HTML
-
Naturally visible and minuscule attributes assume an extremely significant job in the recognizable proof of separated endophytic fungal isolates. There are a few taxonomical order guides accessible, for example, found in these references (Ainsworth et al. 1973, Ellis 1976, Von Arx 1978, Barnet & Hunter 1998). Culture-subordinate strategies have been frequently utilized in the investigation of the decent variety of endophytic fungi as opposed to coordinate perception techniques. The investigation of endophytic fungi is a technique subordinate process. Some standard procedures like surface sanitization methods, incubation periods and sporulation limit of endophytic fungi apply their immediate effect on confinement of endophytes from the host plant. In this manner, culture seclusion strategy has a few constraints, for example, (1) It rather worksome and tedious and is improper to look at extensive quantities of samples and tests; (2) The expansive number of sterile endophytes represents an extraordinary issue, since they cannot be distinguished to any ordered classification, while different strategies have been utilized to advance sporulation of isolates so as to beat the inadequacies of some endophytes unfit to sporulate in culture (Guo et al. 1998, Taylor et al. 1999, Guo et al. 2000, 2008); (3) Some fungi might be missed because of inability to develop or some develop gradually and are effortlessly outperformed by quickly developing species in counterfeit conditions. So as to defeat the potential specialized predisposition, development autonomous methodologies, e.g., molecular techniques, to analyze endophytic fungal networks of plants are required.
Molecular methodologies have been effectively utilized in the recognition and distinguishing proof of endophytic fungi in leaves, establishes and mycorrhizal growths in roots and soil (Clapp et al. 1995, Chelius & Triplett 1999, Tedersoo et al. 2008). The obstacle in the standard culturing strategies has been overcoming by use of molecular procedures like DNA sequencing and fingerprinting techniques and so forth (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. A schematic flowchart for isolation and identification of endophytic fungi (Sun & Guo 2012).
The newfound, high throughput sequencing (pyro-sequencing) empowers metagenomic and metagenetic investigations and gives a ground-breaking elective apparatus to molecular investigations of the fungal network in common habitats. Pyrosequencing is fast, generally modest, with a free-cloning step and high product yield, which accomplishes an around 100-overlap increment in throughput over Sanger sequencing (Margulies et al. 2005). DNA barcoding methods give a short, compelling and standardized gene region to distinguish endophytic fungi at an explicit dimension. The DNA barcode sequence region utilized ought to be a solitary locus for all gatherings of life forms in kingdom fungi.
The significantly preferred standpoint of sequence-based characterization is that it is most helpful when having plant tissues are contaminated with pathogens since specific primers are utilized for amplifying the target gene in the nearness of high DNA background of the host plant (Table 1). On another side, SSU and LSU sequences frequently don't give adequate resolution to the classification of subgeneric taxa, and genomic areas of higher diversity were scanned for. In the interim, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, and to a lesser degree the IGS (inter-genic spacer) region, these two noncoding components of the nuclear rDNA have turned into the most favored sequences for concentrates on the lower ranking levels (Bachmann 1994, Schurko et al. 2003, Wattier et al. 2003).
Table 1. List of molecular techniques and their potential applications in identification of endophytic fungi
Sr. No. Technique Taxonomic level Field of application 1. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) Species to subspecies Classification 2. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Species to subspecies Classification 3. Inter simple sequence repeats (iSSRs) Species to subspecies Classification 4. Isozyme analysis Subspecies Classification 5. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) Species to subspecies Phylogeny, classification and population studies 6. DNA barcoding Species Classification 7. Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) sequencing Kingdom to species Phylogeny and classification 8. Large subunit (LSU) rDNA sequencing Class to species Phylogeny 9. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing Family to species Phylogeny and classification
-
Cancer is a group of diseases that can harmony organ in the human body and shows uncontrolled growth of malignant cells and invasion into normal tissue. Such malignant cancer cells can travel to other body parts and produce new tumors ultimately leads to death and as such, the discovery for novel anticancer agents remains endless. This hunt has, in these advanced occasions, moved to the endophytic fungi. Novel secondary metabolites are obtained from endophytes which make them suitable therapeutic complex biochemical stage in their host plants (Tan & Zou 2001, Owen & Hundley 2004, Omeje et al. 2017).
At present endophytic fungi are considered the most promising sources of natural antitumor drugs owing to their wide distribution and diversity among all organisms (Omeje et al. 2017). Additionally, microorganisms that can survive in unusual environments synthesize bioactive compounds of potential therapeutic applications (Mushtaq et al. 2018). The greater interest has been developed from the past few decades to exploit the rich biochemical diversity possessed by the endophytes (Table 2). Since the revelation of taxol from a fungal endophyte, endeavors have relied upon the control and enhancement of the way of culture conditions and this methodology has created a few bioactive and novel drugs (Strobel et al. 2004).
Table 2. List of anticancer compounds isolated from fungal endophytes
Sr. No. Fungal Endophyte Host Plant Anticancer Compound References 1. Acremonium spp. Knema laurina Brefeldin A Chinworrungsee et al. (2008) Taxus baccata Leucinostatin Strobel & Hess (1997) 2. Alternaria spp. Polygonum senegalense Alternariol Aly et al. (2008) Alternariol 5-O-sulfate Alternariol 5-O-methyl ether Altenusin Desmethylaltenusin Clerodendrum phlomidis Squalene Kumaradevan et al. (2015) 3. Arthirnium arundinis violacea Polysiphonia Epiepoxydon Klemke et al. (2004) 4. Aspergillus clavatus Taxus mairei Brefeldin Wang et al. (2002) 5. Aspergillus fumigatus Cynodon dactylon 9-Deacetoxyfumigaclavine Ge et al. (2009) 6. Aspergillus brasiliensis Cynodon dactylon Rubrofusarin Song et al. (2004) Tabebuia argentea Lapachol Channabasava & Govindappa (2014) 7. Aspergillus Sequoia Sequoiatones Stierle et al. (1999) parasiticus sempervirens Sequoiamonascin Stierle et al. (2003) 8. Aspergillus terreus aspera Achyranthus Terrein Goutam et al. (2017) 9. Bartalinia robillardoides Aegle marmelos Paclitaxel Gangadevi & Muthumary (2009) 10. Cercospora spp. Fallopia japonica Cercosporene F Feng et al. (2014) 11. Chaetomium globosum Polysiphonia urceolata Chaetopyranin Wang et al. (2006) Imperata cylindrica Chaetoglobosin Ding et al. (2006) Ulva pertusa Cytoglobosin Cui et al. (2010) Ephedra fasciculata Globosumone Bashyal et al. (2005) Curcuma wenyujin Chaetoglobosin X Wang et al. (2012) 12. Floropilus chiversii Ephedra fasciculata Radicicol Turbyville et al. (2006) 13. Entrophospora infrequens Nothapodytes foetida Camptothecin Puri et al. (2005) 14. Eupenicillium spp. Xanthium sibiricum Eupenicillinol C, Eupenicillinol D Li & Kusari (2017) 15. Eutypella spp. Etlingera littoralis Eutypellin Isaka et al. (2009) 16. Fusarium nematophilum Camptotheca acuminata Camptothecin Su et al. (2014) 17. Fusarium oxysporum Catharanthus roseus Vincristine Yang et al. (2004) Ephedra fasciculata Beauvericin Zhan et al. (2007) Cylindropuntia echinocarpus Bikaverin 18. Fusarium solani Camptotheca acuminata Camptothecin, 9-Methoxycamptothecin Kusari et al. (2009b), Ran et al. (2017) Podophyllum hexandrum Podophyllotoxin Nadeem et al. (2012) 19. Annulohypoxylon truncatum Artemisia annua Daldinone Gu et al. (2007) 20. Lasiodiplodia theobromae Morinda citrifolia Taxol Pandi et al. (2011) 21. Neurospora crassa Camptotheca acuminata Camptothecin Rehman et al. (2008) 22. Pestalotiopsis fici Camellia sinensis Pestaloficiol Ling et al. (2009) 23. Penicillium dodgei Pinellia ternata Dehydropaxilline Gao et al. (2017) 24. Penicillium spp. Aegiceras corniculatum Leptosphaerone Penicillenone Lin et al. (2008) Annona squamosa Meleargine, Chrysogine Yunianto et al. (2014) Tabebuia argentea Lapachol Channabasava & Govindappa (2014) 25. Pestalotiopsis microspora Torreya taxifolia Torreyanic acid Lee et al. (1996) Taxus wallichiana Paclitaxel Stierle et al. (1993) Artocarpus heterophyllus Hydroxypestalotin Riga et al. (2019) 26. Pestalotia photiniae Roystonea regia Photinides Ding et al. (2009) 27. Pestalotiopsis spp. Rhizophora mucronata Pestalotiopsone Xu et al. (2009) 28. Pestalotiopsis terminaliae Terminalia arjuna Paclitaxel Gangadevi & Muthumary (2008) 29. Phialocephala fortinii Podophyllum peltatum Podophyllotoxin Eyberger et al. (2006) 30. Phomopsis longicolla Dicerandra frutescens Dicerandrol Wagenaar & Clardy (2001) 31. Phomopsis spp. Musa acuminata Oblongolide Taridaporn et al. (2010) Tectona grandis Phomoxanthone Isaka et al. (2001) 32. Phyllosticta spinarum Platycladus orientalis Tauranin Wijeratne et al. (2008) 33. Rhinocladiella spp. Tripterygium wilfordii Cytochalasin Lee (1995) 34. Rosellinia sancta-cruciana Albizia Jammosporin A lebbeck Sharma et al. (2018) 35. Stemphylium globuliferum Mentha pulegium Alterporriol Debbab et al. (2009) 36. Teratosphaeria spp. Pinus clausa Teratosphaerone A, Monosporascone Padumadasa et al. (2018) 37. Canariomyces subthermophilus Hypericum perforatum Hypericin, Emodin Kusari et al. (2009a) 38. Trametes hirsuta Podophyllum hexandrum Podophyllotoxin Puri et al. (2006) The in vitro anticancer activity of compound terrein (4, 5 dihydroxy 3 (1 propenyl) 2 cyclopenten 1 one) was evaluated against human lung cancer cell line (A 549) with the IC50 value of 121.9 ± 4.821 μgml-1 (Goutam et al. 2017). The in vitro cytotoxicity assay of chaetoglobosin X was effective against MFC (gastric cancer cells in mice) and H-22 (hepatic cancer cells in mice) cell lines. It displayed the strongest cytotoxicity against H 22 cells with IC50 value 3.125 μgml-1 and exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against MFC cells with IC50 value of 6.25 μgml-1 (Wang et al. 2012).
Camptothecin from endophytic fungi Fusarium solani was assayed in vitro for cytotoxicity against vero cell and human prostate cell line PC3. It displayed remarkable inhibitory effects at inhibiting cell growth and inducing apoptosis on vero and PC3 cell lines in a dose dependent manner (Ran et al. 2017).
In this review, we limit our dialog to a couple of selected imperative bioactive metabolites produced by fungal endophytes from some restorative plants. In the last, some decade's different analysts have detailed work on endophytic fungi as a potential wellspring of novel bioactive hotspots for anticancer, antiparasitic, antitubercular, cancer prevention agent, insecticidal agents and immunoregulatory agents (Omeje et al. 2017).
In the present review, we are displaying a report on endophytic fungi as a potential wellspring of extraordinary anticancer compounds. Following the disclosure of the first anticancer compound, taxol from the endophytic fungus Taxomyces andreanae, a few different scientists have been considered as authentic vaults of anticancer compounds. The strong anticancer compound paclitaxel (Taxol) has a place with the diterpenoid class of plant-inferred bioactive agents (Stierle et al. 1993, Omeje et al. 2017).
Taxol was isolated and purified for the first time, from the bark of yew plant Taxus brevifolia from South America, before, being isolated from the endophytic fungus Taxomyces andreanae. The medication was afterword endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA, for the treatment of chose malignancies (Cremasco et al. 2009, Omeje et al. 2017). The diverse sources of novel anticancer agents from endophytic fungi are enlisted in Table 2.
The extensive variety of chemical compounds have been disengaged from an assortment of endophytic fungi has a place with different hosts and synthetic groups, for example, aldehydes, alkaloid, chromones, cyclohexanones, depsidones, depsipeptides, ergochromes, esters, lactones, lignans, peptides, polyketides, quinones, diterpenes, sesquiterpenes, xanthones and so forth.
Today the greater part of the bioactive agents enrolled in Table 2 are at various dimensions of phase Ⅰ, phase Ⅱ clinical trials (Perfect 2017) and there are apparent expectations that the vast majority of them will be affirmed for helpful use sooner rather than later. Besides, the bioactive compounds obtained from the variety of endophytes isolated from host plants will be proven as big armor against the disease of cancer.
-
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
SD Palwe, MY Borde, HB Sonawane. 2021. Endophytic fungi: a source of potential anticancer compounds. Studies in Fungi 6(1):188−203 doi: 10.5943/sif/6/1/12 |