Search
2022 Volume 2
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis)

More Information
  • Citrus fruits produced in China are often affected by granulation. Granulation is an altered physiological state of citrus fruits occurring usually before harvest but whose underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, cDNA-AFLP technology enabled the identification of 116 granulation-associated genes in pummelo (C. grandis) juice sacs. Differentially expressed transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were shown to be mainly involved in biological regulation and signal transduction, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleic acid, protein metabolism, stress responses, and cell metabolism. Therefore, granulation in pummelo juice sacs seems to involve the following alterations: (1) changes in hormone levels; (2) activation of metabolic pathways related to ATP and sugar synthesis to produce more energy; (3) nucleic acid accumulation and increased protein degradation; (4) activation of stress-responsive metabolic pathways; (5) accelerated juice sac senescence. Our findings provide an overview of differential responses occurring at the transcriptional level in granulated juice sacs, thus revealing new insights into the adaptive mechanisms underlying this altered physiological state in 'Guanximiyou' pummelo (C. grandis) juice sacs.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 AFLP adapter and primer sequences used in this study.
    Supplemental Table S2 Degenerate primers used in this study.
  • [1]

    Ritenour MA, Albrigo LG, Burns JK, Miller WM. 2004. Granulation in Florida citrus. Proceedings Florida State Horticulture Society 117:358−61

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Bartholomew E, Sinclair W, Raby E. 1934. Granulation (crystallization) of Valencia oranges. California Citrogrower 19:88−89

    Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wu J, Pan T, Guo Z, Pan D. 2014. Specific lignin accumulation in granulated juice sacs of Citrus maxima. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62:12082−89

    doi: 10.1021/jf5041349

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Singh R. 2001. 65-year research on citrus granulation. Indian Journal Horticulture 58:112−44

    Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shomer I, Chalutz E, Vasiliver R, Lomaniec E, Berman M. 1989. Scierification of juice sacs in pummelo (Citrus grandis) fruit. Canadian Journal Botany 67:625−32

    doi: 10.1139/b89-084

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Xie Z, Zhuang Y, Wang R, Xu W, Huang Y. 1998. Granulation and dehiscent segments of Guan Honey Pomelo fruits and their correlation to mineral nutrients. Journal of Fujian Agricultural University 27:42−46

    Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zheng Y. 2006. Recent situation and prospect of juice sac granulation for Guanxi honey pomelo fruits. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Science 21:63−65

    doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2006.01.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wang X, Wang P, Qi Y, Zhou C, Yang L, et al. 2014. Effects of granulation on organic acid metabolism and its relation to mineral elements in Citrus grandis juice sacs. Food Chemistry 145:984−90

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Munshi SK, Jawanda JS, Singh R, Vij V. 1980. Studies on mineral composition of fruits in relation to severity of granulation in Dancy tangerine. Indian Journal Horticulture 37:20−25

    Google Scholar

    [10]

    Munshi SK, Singh R, Vij VK, and Jawanda JS. 1978. Mineral composition of leaves in relation to degree of granulation in sweet orange. Scientia Horticulturae 9:357−67

    doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(78)90045-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Sinclair WB, Jolliffe VA. 1961. Chemical changes in the juice vesicles of granulated valencia oranges. Journal Food Science 26:276−82

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1961.tb01654.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ladanyia M. 2008. Citrus Fruit: Biology, Technology and Evaluation. USA: Elsevier publications. pp. 440–46

    [13]

    Sharma RR, Saxena SK. 2004. Rootstocks influence granulation in 'Kinnow' mandarin (Citrus nobilis × C. deliciosa). Scientia Horticulturae 101:235−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu Y. 2014. Cloning and expression of lignin genes in Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. Thesis. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

    [15]

    Awasthi RP, Nauriyal JP. 1972. Studies on granulation in sweet orange. IV. Physical characteristics of granulated and non-granulated fruits. Indian Journal Horticulture 29:40−44

    Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sharma RR, Awasthi OP, Kumar K. 2016. Pattern of phenolic content, antioxidant activity and senescence-related enzymes in granulated vs non-granulated juice-sacs of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin (Citrus nobilis × C. deliciosa). Journal of Food Science and Technology 53:1525−30

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2112-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Galimba KD, Bullock DG, Dardick C, Liu Z, Callahan AM. 2019. Gibberellic acid induced parthenocarpic. 'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus domestica) exhibit reduced ovary width and lower acidity. Horticulture Research 6:41

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0124-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. 2016. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biology 16:86

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Hampton SE, Dore TM, Schmit WK. 2018. Rce1: Mechanism and inhibition. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53:157−74

    doi: 10.1080/10409238.2018.1431606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Gao Z, Wang Y, Chen G, Zhang A, Yang S, et al. 2019. The indica nitrate reductase gene OsNR2 allele enhances rice yield potential and nitrogen use efficiency. Nature Communications 10:5207

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13110-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Hahn A, Vonck J, Mills DJ, Meier T, and Kühlbrandt W. 2018. Structure, Mechanism, and Regulation of the Chloroplast ATP Synthase. Science 360:6389

    doi: 10.1126/science.aat4318

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Chen C, Peng X, Chen J, Gan Z, Wan C. 2021. Mitigating effects of chitosan coating on postharvest senescence and energy depletion of harvested pummelo fruit response to granulation stress. Food Chemistry 348:129113

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li Q, Yao S, Deng L, Zeng K. 2021. Changes in biochemical properties and pectin nanostructures of juice sacs during the granulation process of pomelo fruit (Citrus grandis). Food Chemistry 376:131876

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131876

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Suzuki S, Li L, Sun YH, Chiang VL. 2006. The cellulose synthase gene superfamily and biochemical functions of xylem-specific cellulose synthase-like genes in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Physiology 142:1233−45

    doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang H, Dou W, Jiang CC, Wei Z, Liu J, et al. 2010. Hydrogen sulfide stimulates β-amylase activity during early stages of wheat grain germination. Plant signaling & Behavior 5:1031−33

    doi: 10.4161/psb.5.8.12297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen C, Nie Z, Wan C, Gan Z, Chen J. 2021. Suppression on postharvest juice sac granulation and cell wall modification by chitosan treatment in harvested pummelo (Citrus grandis L. Osbeck) stored at room temperature. Food Chemistry 336:127636

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127636

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Nguyen Dinh S, Sai TZT, Nawaz G, Lee K, Kang H. 2016. Abiotic stresses affect differently the intron splicing and expression of chloroplast genes in coffee plants (Coffea arabica) and rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Plant Physiology 201:85−94

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Matsui A, Nakaminami K, Seki M. 2019. Biological function of changes in RNA metabolism in plant adaptation to abiotic stress. Plant and Cell Physiology 60:1897−905

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Raabe K, Honys D, Michailidis C. 2019. The role of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 in plant translation regulation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 145:75−83

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.10.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen Y, Liu L, Shen Y, Liu S, Huang J, et al. 2015. Loss of function of the cytochrome P450 gene CYP78B5 causes giant embryos in rice. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 33:69−83

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0731-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Narusaka Y, Narusaka M, Seki M, Umezawa T, Ishida J, et al. 2004. Crosstalk in the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses in Arabidopsis: Analysis of gene expression in cytochrome P450 gene superfamily by cDNA microarray. Plant Molecular Biology 55:327−42

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-0685-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu H, Li B, Iwakawa HO, Pan Y, Tang X, et al. 2020. Plant 22-nt siRNAs mediate translational repression and stress adaptation. Nature 581:89−93

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2231-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hussain MD, Farooq T, Chen X, Tariqjaveed M, Jiang T, et al. 2021. Viral suppressors from members of the family Closteroviridae combating antiviral RNA silencing: a tale of a sophisticated armsrace in host pathogen interactions. Phytopathology Research 3:27

    doi: 10.1186/s42483-021-00104-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Jacob P, Hirt H, Bendahmane A. 2017. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15:405−14

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Lu Y, Qi Y, Yang L, Lee J, Guo P, et al. 2015. Long-term boron-deficiency-responsive genes revealed by cDNA-AFLP differ between Citrus sinensis roots and leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:585

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00585

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li Z, Wu L, Wang C, Wang Y, He L, et al. 2022. Characterization of pectin methylesterase gene family and its possible role in juice sac granulation in navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck). BMC Genomics 23:185

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08411-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Xiao D, Liu S, Wei Y, Zhou D, Hou X, et al. 2016. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals differential gene expression in incompatible interaction between infected non-heading Chinese cabbage and Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Horticulture Research 3:16034

    doi: 10.1038/hortres.2016.34

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29:e45

    doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wang X, Guo L, Zhou R, Liu Y, Hu H, et al. 2022. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis). Fruit Research 2:16 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0016
    Wang X, Guo L, Zhou R, Liu Y, Hu H, et al. 2022. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis). Fruit Research 2:16 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0016

Figures(5)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(3892) PDF downloads(551)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis)

Fruit Research  2 Article number: 16  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Citrus fruits produced in China are often affected by granulation. Granulation is an altered physiological state of citrus fruits occurring usually before harvest but whose underlying mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, cDNA-AFLP technology enabled the identification of 116 granulation-associated genes in pummelo (C. grandis) juice sacs. Differentially expressed transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) were shown to be mainly involved in biological regulation and signal transduction, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleic acid, protein metabolism, stress responses, and cell metabolism. Therefore, granulation in pummelo juice sacs seems to involve the following alterations: (1) changes in hormone levels; (2) activation of metabolic pathways related to ATP and sugar synthesis to produce more energy; (3) nucleic acid accumulation and increased protein degradation; (4) activation of stress-responsive metabolic pathways; (5) accelerated juice sac senescence. Our findings provide an overview of differential responses occurring at the transcriptional level in granulated juice sacs, thus revealing new insights into the adaptive mechanisms underlying this altered physiological state in 'Guanximiyou' pummelo (C. grandis) juice sacs.

    • Pummelo (C. grandis) is a prevalent plant of the family Rutaceae belonging to evergreen subtropical citrus trees. The 'Guanximiyou' pummelo variety has been widely cultivated in China for more than 400 years, and is known for being rich in carbohydrates, β-carotene, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, phosphorous, and other health-promoting compounds[14]. 'Guanximiyou' pummelo and its bud mutants 'Hongroumiyou' [Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. 'Hongroumiyou'] and 'Sanhongmiyou' [Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr. 'Sanhongmiyou'] varities are highly affected by juice sac granulation[3].

      Citrus fruits are prone to a variety of physiological disorders during the harvest and storage periods. Granulation is an undesirable condition affecting juice sacs of citrus fruits, which become dry, enlarged, grayish, hardened, and less detachable[1]. Granulation was first reported in navel orange in 1934 by Bartholomew et al.[2] in California, being later reported in many fruits, such as pummelo, grapefruit, lemon, and lime[3, 4]. Granulation is often accompanied by enlarged, dried, stiffened, and inflated juice sacs[46]. Granulation eventually leads to decreased nutritional and commodity value, which represents significant economic loss[6, 7].

      In our previous works, granulated juice sacs showed lower contents of citrate and isocitrate, and consequently lower acidity, which could be attributed to increased juice sac degradation. Moreover, granulation was also associated with increased accumulation of mineral elements [i.e., phosphorus (P), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), sulphur (S), and zinc (Zn)] in juice sacs, which might be involved in the occurrence of the granulation phenomenon in pummelo[8]. In fact, previous studies suggested that accumulation of mineral elements in juice sacs may be one of the causes leading to granulation in citrus fruits[9, 10]. For instance, Xie et al. found that high levels of P in juice sacs were associated with higher incidence of granulation in C. grandis[6], an observation that was consistent with alterations described in 'Dancy' tangerine[9] and 'Valencia' orange fruits[10] in other studies. In addition, long-term utilization of phosphatic fertilizer in orchards might induce accumulation of P in fruits. In our previous work, Cu concentration was shown to be higher in granulated juice sacs than in normal ones[8], which is in agreement with previous findings that accumulation of Cu in leaves occurred as granulation progressed in two sweet orange cultivars[11]. Collectively, evidence suggests that granulation is likely associated with increased accumulation of mineral elements (especially P, Cu, Mg, S, and Zn) in pummelo juice sacs.

      A variety of complex factors contribute to the occurrence of granulation, such as higher application rate of nitrogen or phosphatic fertilizers, higher irrigation frequency, delayed fruit harvest, and abundant growth after heavy pruning or fertilization[4, 12, 13]. Wu et al. found that abnormal accumulation of lignin in juice sacs was associated with the occurrence of juice sac granulation in pummelo (C. grandis)[3]. Moreover, key genes involved in main lignin synthetic pathways were found to be expressed exclusively in granulated juice sacs[14]. Furthermore, Awasthi & Nauriyal reported that activity of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase was associated with higher incidence rate of granulation[15]. Sharma et al. also found that the activity of enzymes related to antioxidants, phenyl ammonia-lyase, and total phenolic compounds has a strong negative correlation in granulated juice sacs[16]. In contrast, senescence-related enzymes, such as pectin methyl esterase, lipoxygenase, as well as respiration rates or ethylene production were shown to have a strong positive relationship with the occurrence of granulation in 'Kinnow' mandarin[13, 16]. Collectively, previous studies suggest that granulation is a complex and recurrent phenomenon whose underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Therefore, it is highly important to elucidate the basis of granulation in citrus fruits.

      In this study, cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (cDNA-AFLP) was applied to differentiate normal and granulated C. grandis juice sacs in order to understand differences in gene expression during pummelo juice sac granulation.

    • Using a total of 256 primer combinations, differentially expressed TDFs were identified in normal and granulated C. grandis juice sacs (Fig. 1). Supplemental Table S1 shows cDNA-AFLP profiles using one EcoR I selective primer and eight Mes I selective primers. As shown in Table 1, 4,424 clear and legible TDFs were obtained in pummelo juice sacs. Interestingly, 116 granulation-associated genes showed significant homology to genes encoding known or putative proteins. Among these, 41 TDFs were detected in normal juice sacs, 61 TDFs were detected in granulated juice sacs, and seven TDFs were upregulated and seven TDFs were downregulated in granulated juice sacs. According to functional analysis, these TDFs were assigned to different biological processes, such as hormone and biological regulation (12 TDFs, 10.08%), carbohydrate and energy metabolism (16 TDFs, 13.45%), protein and nucleic acid metabolism (48 TDFs, 40.34%), lipid metabolism (five TDFs, 4.2%), stress response and defense (13 TDFs, 10.92%), cell metabolism (12 TDFs, 10.08%), and unknown biological processes (13 TDFs, 10.92%) (Fig. 2).

      Table 1.  Summary of transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) in normal and granulated juice sacs of C. grandis.

      Found only in normalFound only in granulatedFound in both juice sacsTotal
      Total TDFs detected5368743,0144,424
      Total differentially expressed TDFs detected688926183
      TDFs produced useable sequence data416114116
      TDFs encoding known or putative proteins385711106
      TDFs encoding predicted, uncharacterized89219
      TDFs without matches in the database1126441

      Figure 1. 

      cDNA-AFLP profiles using one EcoR I selective primer and eight Mes I selective primers. One EcoR I selective primer: EcoR I-AC; Eight Mes I selective primers: Mes I-AA, AG, AC, AT, CC, CG, CT, and CA; Lane 1: Normal juice sacs of C. grandis; Lane 2: Granulated juice sacs of C. grandis; Arrows indicate differentially expressed transcript-derived fragments.

      Figure 2. 

      Functional classification of differentially expressed transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) in normal and granulated juice sacs of C. grandis. Functional classification was performed based on information reported for each sequence in the NCBI database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

    • As shown in Fig. 3, 20 TDFs were selected for qRT-PCR analysis in order to confirm cDNA-AFLP expression patterns. These TDFs were selected based on significantly different expression patterns in C. grandis granulated juice sacs and a high degree of homology with genes that play very important roles in various metabolic pathways. Expression levels of selected TDFs corroborated cDNA-AFLP findings, except for TDF #246-4 (Fig. 3). This discrepancy might indicate a gene family with complex regulation, which can be identified exclusively by the cDNA-AFLP technique.

      Figure 3. 

      Relative expression levels of transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) in C. grandis normal and granulated juice sacs. (a) Relative expression levels of genes encoding β-amylase 4 (TDF #64-2); cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase 1 (TDF #94-1); gibberellin 20 oxidase (TDF #13-2); galactose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferases (TDF #200-1); α-galactosidase precursor (TDF #160-1); cytochrome b5 (TDF #123-2); ADP-ribosylation factor 3 (TDF #246-4); 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (TDF #13-1); 1,4-alpha-glucan-maltohydrolase (TDF #20-3); ethylene insensitive 3-like protein (TDF #147-4). (b) Relative expression levels of genes encoding translation initiation factor 4A2 (TDF #14-3); cytochrome P450 (TDF #48-3); auxin down-regulated-like protein (TDF #5-3); cellulose synthase (TDF #249-3); transport protein SEC31 (TDF #34-2); Ca2+-transporting ATPase (TDF #252-3); heat shock protein (TDF #252-1); senescence-associated protein (TDF #5-1); dicer-like protein 4 (TDF #244-6); cell wall-associated hydrolase (TDF #216-3). Results are shown as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

    • Four hormone-related genes were found to be potentially involved in the incidence of granulation in pummelo fruits: TDF #5-3 (auxin down-regulated-like protein); TDF #94-1 (cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase 1); TDF #13-2 (gibberellin 20 oxidase); and TDF #147-4 (ethylene insensitive 3 like protein) (Table 2). Upregulation of hormone-related genes (i.e., TDFs #5-3, 94-1, and 147-4) observed in cDNA-AFLP analysis was further confirmed in qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 3). To confirm discrepancies in hormone levels in normal and granulated juice sacs in pummelo, the contents of five hormones were determined using UPLC-MS. Contents of gibberellin 3 (GA3), gibberellin 20 (GA20), cytokinin (CK), and zeatin (ZT) were higher in normal juice sacs compared to granulated juice sacs, whereas the content of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) was lower in normal juice sacs (Fig. 4).

      Table 2.  Homology of differentially expressed cDNA-AFLP fragments with known gene sequences in the database using BLASTX algorithm along with their expression patterns in granulation juice sacs of C. grandis.

      TDF numberSize
      (bp)
      Homologous proteinOrganism of originE-valueDegree of similarity (%)Genbank IDFold change
      Hormone and biological regulation
      48-2292CAAX amino terminal protease familyCucumis melo7E-1890ADN33781.1+
      5-3259Auxin down-regulated-like protein, partialPicea sitchensis5E-0555ADM77850.1+
      6-2158Protein embryo defective 2752Arabidopsis thaliana2E-1261NP_567830.10
      118-3290Expressed proteinOryza sativa5E-2763ABF95726.10
      94-1358Cytokinin-O-glucosyltransferase 1Aegilops tauschii9E-2548EMT28784.1+
      103-1211Nitrate reductaseCucumis sativus1E-3089ADK77877+
      219-5244ARF-GAP domain 2Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. lyrata5E-0943NP_176283.10
      13-2269Gibberellin 20 oxidaseMedicago truncatula4E-4281AES62614.2+
      147-4271EIN3-like (Ethylene insensitive 3) proteinC. melo8E-41100BAB64345+
      195-6197MATE efflux family proteinTheobroma cacao2E-1979EOX90702.10
      115-1355Transmembrane emp24 domain-containing protein p24delta9-likeCrocus sativus3E-6098XP_004143772.1+
      195-1455Multicatalytic endopeptidase complexA. thaliana8E-6984CAA74030.1+
      Carbohydrate and energy metabolism
      134-1192ATP-binding protein-likeA. thaliana2E-1075BAB09414.1+
      249-1311UDP-glucosyltransferase family 1 proteinCamellia sinensis2E-2593ACS87991.1+
      6-1214Fructose-bisphosphate aldolaseLemna minor1E-3394ACD10928.10
      5-4148ATP synthase subunit betaMedicago truncatula2E-1395XP_003627732.1+
      118-2304Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, partialVernicia fordii4E-1194AFJ04516.10
      118-1441Glycosyltransferase, CAZy family GT8Populus trichocarpa5E-7590XP_002312381.1+
      64-2220β-amylase 4Citrus trifoliata2E-2269AFQ33616+
      249-3217Cellulose synthasePopulus tremula × Populus tremuloides5E-1291AAT09895.1+
      141-3499Mitochondrial benzaldehyde dehydrogenaseAntirrhinum majus8E-8980ACM89738.1+
      160-1174α-galactosidase precursorCoffea arabica2E-0462CAJ40777.1+
      13-12692-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenasePopulus trichocarpa8E-4889XP_002330269.17.07 ± 0.52
      200-1389Galactose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferasesT. cacao1E-6583EOY12255.1+
      20-32201,4-alpha-glucan-maltohydrolaseSolanum lycopersicum1E-1460NP_001234052.1+
      246-3192ABC transporter family proteinP. trichocarpa1E-1280XP_002310031.20
      221-3123Diacylglycerol kinase-like proteinA. thaliana6E-1169BAB09587.1+
      246-4172ADP-ribosylation factor 3A. lyrata subsp. lyrata4E-9896XP_002869315.10
      65-1363Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase family protein isoform 3T. cacao7E-4972EOY04345.10
      Protein and nucleic acid metabolism
      228-1243Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase
      subunit M1
      A. thaliana2E-3389AEC07222.10
      251-1188BET1P/SFT1P-like protein 14AA. thaliana6E-0778NP_191376.10
      253-2306Class II aaRS and biotin synthetases
      superfamily protein
      A. thaliana5E-4183NP_186925.4+
      130-3193Ribosomal protein L5Citrullus lanatus1E-3096YP_003587255.10
      119-3254Nuclear transport factor 2 family proteinT. cacao1E-2262EOY06196.1+
      27-3224Glutathione S-transferase family proteinT. cacao1E-0762EOY27562.1+
      195-5268BRCA1-associated proteinM. truncatula8E-3973XP_003609376.20
      54-2169Pre-mRNA splicing factor PRP38 family proteinP.trichocarpa2E-2292ERP53525.10
      151-4347Ribonuclease II family proteinA. thaliana2E-5180NP_565418.1+
      127-1180Mitochondrial substrate carrier family protein isoform 2T. cacao2E-2861EOY07093.1+
      15-2349Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B18M. truncatula1E-0968AFK49668.1+
      15-1392RRNA intron-encoded homing endonucleaseM. truncatula6E-1388XP_003614385.1+
      20-1280Solute carrier family 25 memberM. truncatula6E-2363XP_003615848.20
      221-1256TPA: heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3-like protein 2 isoform 1Zea mays1E-2982DAA58966.10.56 ± 0.06
      217-5194Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like superfamily proteinT. cacao2E-0696EOY06709.11.86 ± 0.34
      215-1363Transcription regulatorA. thaliana1E-0688NP_171710.4+
      195-4333PLP-dependent transferases superfamily proteinA. thaliana2E-3760NP_191772.1+
      21-221060S ribosomal protein L24-1T. cacao1E-3797EOY23121.1+
      155-3187Valyl-tRNA synthetase/valine-tRNA ligaseT. cacao3E-19
      75
      EOY31957.1
      2.23 ± 0.11
      252-2299ACT domain-containing protein ACR8Ricinus communis2E-3086XP_002509632.10.79 ± 0.03
      151-5
      347Exosome complex exonuclease RRP44
      homolog A
      R. communis5E-5382XP_002521738.1+
      217-2369Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit AA. thaliana1E-2277NP_564023.1+
      218-1239Chaperonin 60 alpha subunitArachis diogoi1E-2086ACA23472.10
      31-1293Aspartyl protease family proteinA. thaliana3E-2357XP_002891474.1+
      236-3251Protein kinase domain-containing proteinA. thaliana3E-3080AEE27605.10
      247-1324Importin beta-2 subunit family proteinA. thaliana2E-1676XP_002867489.1+
      253-1263Serine/threonine protein kinase TNNI3KM. truncatula2E-0976XP_003601186.10
      5-2151Amino acid adenylation proteinCalothrix sp. PCC 63039.940YP_007137552.1+
      119-1290Ricin B-like lectin EULS3A. lyrata subsp. lyrata4E-3673XP_002862306.2+
      119-2190Spl1-Related 2 proteinA. thaliana2E-1876CAB56773.1+
      128-1286Chloroplast elongation factor TuB (EF-TuB)Nicotiana sylvestris7E-1290BAA01975.1+
      94-2242Clone 6F8 eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-14 geneNicotiana benthamiana2E-4789JN688263.1+
      34-2343Transport protein SEC31T. cacao2E-0681EOY23302.1+
      91-1199Phosphatase 2C family protein isoform 2T. cacao2E-8387EOY06499.1+
      160-6271Kinase superfamily protein isoform 1T. cacao3E-3478EOY06443.10
      209-3337Ser/Thr phosphatase-containing Kelch repeat domain protein, partialN. benthamiana1E-5090AFN44702.10
      220-3208Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily protein isoform 2T. cacao5E -0851EOY04957.12.25 ± 0.22
      197-1398Ubiquitin-specific protease family C19-related proteinA. thaliana9E-6879NP_564009.1+
      87-2220Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like superfamily protein isoform 1T. cacao3E-2786EOY33236.12.55 ± 0.06
      209-5319Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase, partialGenlisea aurea3E-5288EPS64063.10
      194-1474Proteasome subunit beta type-4Solanum nigrum6E-7391ADW66147.10
      150-9199Serine/threonine-protein kinase AtPK2/AtPK19R. communis2.851XP_002528702.1+
      123-4246IFA binding proteinLilium longiflorum2E-3774ABM68547.10
      123-3302Dual specificity kinase 1Arabidopsis thaliana3E-2793AEE276350
      26-2324Dephospho-CoA kinaseA. thaliana1E-4369NP_180318.10
      14-3222Translation initiation factor 4A2Z. mays7E-3797AAD20980.10.65 ± 0.01
      244-1302Translation elongation factor, partialAmmopiptanthus mongolicus1E-0588AFC01200.1+
      246-2165Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5
      isoform 2
      T. cacao3E-0552EOX90767.10
      Lipid metabolism
      123-1278Patellin-5A. lyrata subsp. lyrata3E-1367XP_002872438.10
      141-4209Patellin-5Triticum urartu8E-2771EMS62735
      XP_003623
      0.27 ± 0.02
      195-3347Non-specific lipid-transfer proteinM. truncatula1E-0592596.3+
      197-3327Pleckstrin (PH) and lipid-binding START domains-containing protein isoform 2T. cacao1E-4778EOY34386.1+
      125-2278Glyoxylate/hydroxypyruvate reductase
      A HPR2
      A. lyrata subsp. lyrata1E-2970XP_002889322.1+
      Stress response and defense
      48-1263Trehalose 6-phosphate synthaseNicotiana tabacum3E-1891BAI99252.1+
      220-2208Transcription factor bHLH130M. truncatula4E-2275XP_003590427.11.41 ± 0.06
      123-2189Cytochrome b5N. tabacum9E-2680CAA50575 +
      48-3268Cytochrome P450Citrus sinensis2E-2895AAL24049.1+
      64-1297Cytochrome P450A. thaliana1E-2381NP_176086.1+
      221-2451Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1Curcuma longa1E-1056ABY83898.1+
      218-2341DNA damage-binding protein, partialM. truncatula3E-6467XP003638090.10
      252-1353Heat shock proteinM. truncatula6E-0745XP_003621962.10.36 ± 0.04
      115-2290Stress responsive proteinZ. mays5E-3264NP_001149550.1+
      5-1230Senescence-associated protein
      Picea abies2E-4596ACA04850.1+
      154-5184Dehydration-induced 19-like proteinGossypium hirsutum8E-0556ADP30960.1+
      27-1271B-box zinc finger proteinBambusa oldhamii7E-0957ACF35275.10
      244-6248Dicer-like protein 4A. thaliana9E-0963NP_197532.3+
      Cell metabolism
      252-3355Ca2+-transporting ATPaseA. thaliana2E-0472NP_195479+
      130-1240Plasma membrane isoform 4T. cacao3E-2983EOY10146.10
      244-2287Cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenaseA. thaliana3E-0591AAA99511.1+
      40-1163Clathrin adaptor complexes medium subunit family proteinA. lyrata subsp. lyrata3E-2293XP_002886592.10
      154-3429RAB GTPase homolog A5AA. thaliana1E-1790NP_199563.10.67 ± 0.01
      217-6323Receptor-like kinase binding proteinP. trichocarpa4E-2858XP_002325092.10.87 ± 0.05
      147-3168Calreticulin-like protein
      Solanum melongena6E-2288BAA85118.13.35 ± 0.12
      16-3238Ycf2 (chloroplast)Gossypium raimondii3E-3796YP_005087735.1+
      143-4350Tetraspanin8T. cacao9E-2469EOY31574.1+
      216-3443Cell wall-associated hydrolaseVibrio cholerae5E-3976ACX81677.10
      200-2283Nucleic acid binding proteinZ. mays5E-4389NP_001152488.1+
      Unknown biological processes
      217-3323Hypothetical protein AT5G07270A. thaliana4E-0959NP_1963440
      236-1256Choline/ethanolamine kinase, putativeRicinus communis4E-3583XP_002525542.1+
      236-2322Uncharacterized protein LOC8268581R. communis3E-3182XP_002530954.10
      249-2196Amino acid transporter, putativeR. communis3E-0339XP_002531860.1+
      8-2168Predicted: monoacylglycerol lipase abhd6-B-likeFragaria vesca subsp. vesca1E-1880XP_004303453.10
      119-4310Domain of uncharacterized protein function 724 6, putative isoform 1T. cacao2E-2268EOX95351.10
      57-1205Predicted: Vitis vinifera peroxidase 3-like mRNAVitis vinifera2E-2191XM_002280238.4+
      100-1318Hypothetical protein CICLE_v10006049mgCitrus clementina6E-14100ESR32793.10
      17-3206Hypothetical protein MTR_2g077840M. truncatula2E-376XP_003596462.10
      197-2335Mitochondrial protein, putativeM. truncatula3E-0488XP_003588355.10
      217-4261Putative ATP synthetase alpha chainOryza sativa subsp. japonica3E-1363AAO72570.10
      154-1202Hypothetical protein CICLE_v10022616mgCitrus clementina7E-2295ESR54213.10
      89-3215Hypothetical protein CICLE_v10033239mgC. clementina3E-19100ESR51519.1+
      TDFs: Transcript-derived fragments. Results are shown as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Fold change: 0 indicates TDFs only detected in normal juice sacs; + indicates TDFs only detected in granulated juice sacs. Relative expression ratio was obtained by analyzing gel images using PDQuest version 8.0.1 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

      Figure 4. 

      Granulation led to alterations in hormone content in C. grandis juice sacs. The content of five hormones were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass-spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Normal juice sacs were considered as negative control. GA3: gibberellin 3; GA20: gibberellin 20, CK: cytokinins; ZT: zeatin; and IAA: indole-3-acetic acid. Error bars represent standard deviations calculated from three biological replicates. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

    • Plant hormones are involved in the growth, development, ripening, and senescence of fruits. As an important regulator, hormones play a very critical role in the regulation of physiological disorders, defense, and stress responses, among other processes[17, 18]. Herein, using cDNA-AFLP technology, four hormone-related genes were found to be involved in the incidence of granulation in pummelo. qRT-PCR (Fig. 3) and UPLC-MS (Fig. 4) analyses further confirmed that the occurrence of granulation might induce changes in the hormone level in pummelo. Higher levels of GA3, GA20, CK, and ZT found in C. grandis normal juice sacs might induce increased cell division rate, and lead to granulation, whereas IAA might alter physiology of juice sacs. Taken together, these results indicated that alterations in hormone contents in C. grandis juice sacs might determine the occurrence of granulation. Our findings provide useful information about the mechanisms underlying the granulation phenomenon in C. grandis juice sacs.

      As shown in Table 2, four TDFs (i.e., TDFs #48-2, 103-1, 115-1, and 195-1) in normal juice sacs and four TDFs (i.e., TDFs #6-2, 118-3, 219-5, and 195-6) in granulated juice sacs related to nutrients transformation and were identified by cDNA-AFLP. CAAX (Carboxyl-terminal three amino acids) protein is involved in the regulation of Rce1 (Ras converting enzyme) activity in cell signaling processes[19]. Nitrate reductase plays a central role in plant nitrogen acquisition by controlling nitric oxide levels[20]. Changes in the expression of genes coding for CAAX amino terminal protease (TDF #48-2) and nitrate reductase (TDF #103-1) in granulated juice sacs might be related to disrupted nitrogen absorption and utilization.

    • In total, 17 differentially expressed TDFs related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism were found in pummelo juice sacs, among which five TDFs (TDFs #6-1, 65-1, 246-3, 246-4, and 118-2) were found exclusively in normal juice sacs and 12 TDFs (TDFs #221-3, 249-1, 249-3, 5-4, 118-1, 64-2, 244-2, 141-3, 160-1, 200-1, 20-3, and 134-1) were identified exclusively in granulated juice sacs (Table 2, Fig. 3). ATP synthase plays a key role in the cell by providing energy for ATP synthesis[21, 22]. In granulated juice sacs, the gene coding for ATP synthase subunit beta was upregulated, therefore energy levels are likely to be increased in granulated juice sacs. Deposition of both lignin and cellulose accompanied by juice sac granulation is widespread in harvested citrus fruit[23]. This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that ATP-binding protein-like (TDF #134-1), cellulose synthase (TDF #249-3), UDP-glucosyltransferase protein (TDF #249-1), glycosyltransferase, CAZy protein (TDF #118-1), 1, 4-alpha-glucan-maltohydrolase (TDF #20-3), β-amylase 4 (TDF #64-2), and galactose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferases (TDF #200-1) were upregulated in granulated juice sacs (Table 2, Fig. 3). Cellulose synthase belongs to the glycosyl hydrolase family which comprise enzymes that degrade complex sugars into mono- and disaccharides (glucose and cellobiose)[24]. Amylases hydrolyze starch and glycogen, and β-amylase specifically degrades amylose into maltose[25]. Researchers recently found that complex networks of pectin might be promoted by the granulation process[26]. Taken together, it is likely that major metabolic pathways related to ATP synthesis are activated in granulated juice sacs to produce more energy to meet the high demand of stressed juice sacs.

      However, the observed higher mRNA levels of fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (TDF #6-1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (TDF #118-2), ADP-ribosylation factor 3 (TDF #246-4), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase protein gene (TDF #65-1) might enable higher tolerance to stressful conditions in granulation of juice sacs.

    • Plants have evolved various sophisticated mechanisms for adapting to hostile environments during growth and development. Abiotic stresses demonstrably affect protein and nucleic acid metabolism in plants[27]. Studies with mutants in genes related nucleic acid metabolism revealed that nucleic acid processing, decay, and stability play a significant role in regulating gene expression at a post-transcriptional level in response to abiotic stresses in plants[28]. In plants, transcription and translation are the key steps for fine-tuning gene expression. In particular, during protein metabolism, modulation of global transcription and translation rates allows control over the production of specific proteins[29]. Differentially expressed TDFs found exclusively in granulated juice sacs included nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B18 (TDFs #15-2), transcription regulator (TDFs #215-1), transcription initiation factors TFIID (TDFs #217-2), 4A-14 (TDFs #94-2), chloroplast elongation factor TuB (TDFs #128-1), and translation elongation factor (TDFs #244-1) (Table 2), which might be related to nucleic acid accumulation. Moreover, differentially expressed mitochondrial substrate carrier family protein (TDFs #127-1), importin beta-2 subunit protein (TDFs #247-1), and transport protein SEC31 (TDFs #34-2) in granulated juice sacs suggest that protein transport might be impaired (Table 2, Fig. 3), which strengthens the hypothesis of nucleic acid accumulation in granulated juice sacs. Interestingly, all differentially expressed TDFs found exclusively in granulated juice sacs [i.e., ribonuclease II family protein (TDFs #154-4), 60S ribosomal protein L24-1 (TDFs #21-2), eukaryotic initiation factor (TDFs #94-2), translation elongation factor (TDFs #244-1), eukaryotic translation initiation factor (TDFs #246-2), and chloroplast elongation factor (TDFs #128-1)] (Table 2) could be associated with protein translation, which further indicates that protein translation might be impaired in granulated juice sacs.

      Similarly, differentially expressed TDFs [i.e., phosphatase 2C family protein (TDFs #91-1), ubiquitin-specific protease family C19-related protein (TDFs #197-1), serine/threonine-protein kinase AtPK2/AtPK19 (TDFs #150-9)] related to protein phosphorylation and ubiquitination were upregulated in granulated juice sacs (Table 2), indicating that protein degradation might be increased in granulated juice sacs. Therefore, nucleic acid accumulation and protein degradation might have accelerated granulation in C. grandis juice sacs. Collectively, these findings indicate that impaired nucleic acid and protein metabolism in C. grandis juice sacs can be associated with the granulation phenotype.

    • Cytochromes P450s and b5 play a key role in the response to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Chen et al.[30] found that loss of function of the cytochrome P450 gene CYP78B5 causes giant embryos in rice. Herein, expression levels of genes encoding cytochrome P450 (TDF #48-3, 64-1), b5 (TDF #123-2), and cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (TDF #221-2) were increased in C. grandis granulated juice sacs (Table 2, Fig. 3), which is in agreement with findings of previous studies reporting that certain cytochrome P450 genes in Arabidopsis were upregulated during biotic stresses, i.e., drought, hormone, high salinity, mechanical wounding, low temperature, herbicide (paraquat), and heavy metal (CuSO4) stress[31]. Thus, differential expression of genes coding for cytochrome P450s, b5, and cytochrome oxidase in C. grandis juice sacs might indicate an adaptation to physiological disorders.

      In plants, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is recognized and cleaved by dsRNA-specific RNases named DCL (Dicer-like) enzymes, primarily by DCL4 and then by DCL2, producing 21- to 24-nucleotide double-stranded siRNA duplexes. Then, the antiviral silencing pathway is triggered by the presence of siRNAs, and 21-, 22-, or 24-nucleotide siRNA species mediate cleavage of mRNAs and DNA methylation in plants[32]. Expression of Dicer-like protein-coding genes might indicate that the plant's immune system was activated by biotic or abiotic stress response[33]. Herein, the gene encoding Dicer-like protein 4 was differentially and exclusively expressed in granulated juice sacs (TDF #244-6) (Table 2, Fig. 3), thus suggesting activating the immune defense system of C. grandis likely against granulation in juice sacs.

      Plants under field conditions often encounter a variety of stresses, at times occurring simultaneously. Therefore, stress-responsive proteins are important effectors in plants during response to biotic or abiotic stresses[34, 35]. Under adverse conditions, many proteins have been previously found as differentially expressed in plants in response to bacterial, fungal, or viral infection, as well as to physiological disorders. Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) or the chaperone network are a major component of multiple stress-responses, and are controlled by diverse heat-shock factors which are recruited under stress conditions[34]. In the present study, differential expression of stress-responsive (TDF #115-2) and HSP (TDF #252-1) genes in granulated juice sacs may be related to a response against physiological disorders (Table 2, Fig. 3). Senescence is the final developmental stage of every plant organ, which eventually culminates in cell death. In granulated juice sacs, expression of the senescence-associated protein gene (TDF #5-1) might indicate that this altered physiological state is accompanied by accelerated senescence, dryness, hardness, and degeneration. Taken together, granulation activates stress-responsive metabolic pathways in C. grandis juice sacs, consequently increasing the expression of related genes.

    • In recent research, pectin methylesterase catalyzes the de-methylesterification of homogalacturonans and plays crucial roles in cell wall modification during plant development and fruit ripening[36]. The genes Ca2+-transporting ATPase (TDF #252-3), Ycf2 (chloroplast) (TDF #16-3), and tetraspanin 8 (TDF #143-4) (Table 2) involved in cell wall metabolism were specifically expressed in granulated juice sacs (Table 2, Fig. 3). In addition, mRNA levels of genes encoding plasma membrane isoform 4 protein (TDF #130-1), clathrin adaptor complexes medium subunit family protein (TDF #40-1), receptor-like kinase binding protein (TDF #217-6), and cell wall-associated hydrolase protein (TDF #216-3) were downregulated in granulated juice sacs. Therefore, cell wall formation or biosynthesis might be impaired in granulated juice sacs.

    • This work reports the first comparative investigation of normal and granulated juice sacs in pummelo (C. grandis) using the cDNA-AFLP technology. In total, 116 granulation-associated cDNA-AFLP products were identified in pummelo juice sacs. Differentially expressed TDFs were shown to be mainly involved in biological regulation and signal transduction, carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleic acid, protein metabolism, stress responses, and cell metabolism. Collectively, granulation in pummelo juice sacs seems to be associated with the following alterations: (1) changes in hormone levels; (2) activation of metabolic pathways related to ATP and sugar synthesis; (3) nucleic acid accumulation and increased protein degradation; (4) activation of stress-responsive metabolic pathways; (5) accelerated juice sac senescence (Fig. 5). Therefore, granulation is a complex process. The present study provides a comprehensive view into the differential responses occurring in granulated juice sacs, thus offering new insights into the adaptive mechanisms of 'Guanximiyou' pummelo (C. grandis) juice sacs at the transcriptional level during physiological distress.

      Figure 5. 

      Proposed regulatory network for the granulation phenomenon in C. grandis juice sacs. Red arrows indicate upregulated genes. HSP: heat-shock protein.

    • Pummelo (C. grandis) 'Guanximiyou' cultivar was used in this study. Fruits were collected from 25-year-old sour orange rootstocks in a pummelo orchard at grown at Yanban village pummelo orchard, Xiaoxi town, Pinghe county, Fujian province, China (E 24°35', N 117°31'), on single-tree replicates for all measurements on 1 October 2020. Fully mature pummelo fruits were harvested until granulation was visible. The degree of granulation was assessed according to the method of previous studies[3, 8, 14]. Normal and granulated juice sacs were collected from the same pummelo tree, a total of nine trees were sampled in the pummelo orchard. Five to ten fruit per tree were chosen from the outer of the mid-upper canopy. All the samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation.

    • Normal and granulated juice sacs were ground in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was independently isolated from samples using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equal amounts of normal or granulated frozen juice sacs obtained from three pummelo units were mixed as one biological replicate, respectively. Each assay was repeated as three independent experiments, each with three biological replicates. Double-stranded cDNA synthesis was performed following the method proposed by Lu et al.[35].

    • cDNA-AFLP analysis was performed according to the methods proposed by Xiao et al.[37]. Double-stranded cDNA was purified using an equal volume of phenol : chloroform : isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1, v/v/v). Subsequently, 500 ng of the resulting double-stranded cDNA was digested using the restriction enzymes EcoR I (10U; TaKaRa Biotechnology, China) at 37 °C for 3 h, and following Mse I (10U; TaKaRa) at 65 °C for 3 h. The resulting restricted products were ligated to AFLP adaptors (EcoR I: 5'-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3', 5'-CATCTGACGCATGGTTAAP-3' and Mse I: 5'-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3', 5'-TACTCAGGACTCATP-3') with T4-DNA ligase (TaKaRa) and incubated overnight at 16 °C. Obtained products were pre-amplified with the corresponding pre-amplification primers: EcoR I: 5'- GACTGCGATCCAATTC-3' and Mse I: 5'-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA-3'. A 100-fold dilution of pre-amplified products was used for the selective amplification using 256 combinations of the primers EcoR I 5'-GACTGCGATCCAATTC+MM-3' and Mse I 5'-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA+NN-3', where MM and NN represent the following combination of nucleotides: AA, AT, AC, AG, GA, GC, GT, GG, CA, CT, CG, CC, TA, TC, TT, and TG. Final products were mixed with bromophenol blue and separated on 6% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 60 W for 3 h. Gels were silver stained to enable visualization of cDNA products. All samples in cDNA-AFLP analysis were submitted to electrophoresis at least three times independently.

      Differential cDNA bands were excised, incubated in 100 µL of double-distilled H2O (ddH2O) for 10 min in a boiling water bath, then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant used as template was re-amplified by PCR using the 256 combinations of the selective amplification primers. All positive amplicons were sequenced or ligated into the vector pMD18-T (TaKaRa) and further sequenced to confirm the identity of transcript-derived fragments (TDFs). Finally, differential cDNA sequences were analyzed using BLASTX and BLASTN searching engines (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

    • qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA synthesis was performed with a mix of random primers and oligo(dT) primers provided in the kit using 500 ng of total RNA. β-actin gene served as an internal control. All qRT-PCR primers used are given in Supplemental Table S2. qPCR analysis was conducted in an ABI 7500 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). qPCR mixture consisted of 10 μL of 2× SYBR Premix Ex Taq DNA polymerase, 0.2 μL (200 nM) each of specific primer pairs, 2 μL of diluted reverse-transcribed cDNA, and 0.4 μL of ROX Dye II, in a 20 μL total reaction volume as per manufacturer's instructions. Quantification was conducted according to a previously described method[38]. Experiments were repeated at least three times independently using biological replicates.

    • Hormone content in normal or granulated C. grandis juice sacs was analyzed using UPLC-MS. Approximately 100 mg of juice sac powder was weighed and transferred to a 1.5-mL centrifuge tube. Then, 500 μL of extracting solution (isopropyl alcohol : ddH2O : hydrochloric acid at a ratio of 2:1:0.002, v/v/v) and 50 μL of four standard samples were added, and tubes were slowly inverted to allow sufficient mixing at 4 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, 1,000 μL of trichloromethane was added to the mixture, and tubes were incubated at 4 °C for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. Supernatants were transferred to new tubes and blow-dried with nitrogen. Dried samples were redissolved in 100 μL of MeOH : H2O (1:1, v/v), filtered through a 0.1-μm membrane, and transferred to sample vials for LC-MS analysis. UPLC separation was performed using a BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters Corporation, USA) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1. The experiments were performed three times independently with biological replicates.

    • All experiments were performed with at least three replicates. Statistical analysis of data were carried out by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, US) with storage time and coating as factors. Comparison of means was performed using Duncan's multiple range test. The value of P < 0.05 or P < 0.01 represented statistical significance.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 32002022) and Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (CARS-26).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (2) References (38)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wang X, Guo L, Zhou R, Liu Y, Hu H, et al. 2022. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis). Fruit Research 2:16 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0016
    Wang X, Guo L, Zhou R, Liu Y, Hu H, et al. 2022. cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals altered gene expression profiles involved in juice sac granulation in pummelo (Citrus grandis). Fruit Research 2:16 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0016

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return