Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview

More Information
  • Legumes in Conservation Agriculture (CA) have the potential to increase crop productivity and sustainability of the rice-based system. However, there is limited information available on the importance of legume crops in CA in the rice-based system of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain (EIGP). Rice-based cropping is the mainstay of the people in Bangladesh, on the EIGP. These systems are the major food supplier to the region. In addition, they provide income and employment opportunities to the majority of people in the region. However, the system is facing unprecedented challenges and increased risk due to water, energy, labour and capital scarcity, which are exaggerated due to the effects of climate change. This could be further aggravated by deteriorating soil health, depleting underground water, and reduced land and water productivity which ultimately threaten sustainable food production and food security of the EIGP. Hence, sustainable crop intensification is essential, but increasing cropping intensity has reduced the yield of single crops by degrading soil properties. To address these constraints, Conservation Agriculture (CA), with a minimum tillage system, residue retention and crop diversification with legumes, could be an effective approach for improving crop productivity while sustaining the natural resources in intensive rice-based systems of EIGP. The addition of legumes in crop rotation is a suitable technique for crop diversification due to its multiple benefits related to soil health and natural resources. Diverse legume crops involving rice-based cropping exist at different agro-ecological zones in Bangladesh, and their rotation definitely could act a major role in promoting the CA in rice-based systems. Legume-based rotation offers multiple benefits, such as biological nitrogen fixation, improves soil pores through the deep root system, P-availability, soil fertility and enhanced nutrient cycling, and reducing the use of external input and thereby minimizing greenhouse gas emission and groundwater pollution, improving water productivity, and minimizes diseases and pest incidence. As a result, crop rotation with legumes has a high potential for CA and sustainable rice-based cropping systems in Bangladesh. The gaps between legume and non-legume crops in CA for each parameter suggest a noteworthy possibility for the improvement of rice-based systems in EIGP. This review suggests further sustainability improvements can be achieved through future field research focused on the inclusion of legume crops in the diverse rice-based systems under CA.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Bhatt R, Singh P, Hossain A, Timsina J. 2021. Rice–wheat system in the northwest Indo-Gangetic plains of South Asia: issues and technological interventions for increasing productivity and sustainability. Paddy and Water Environment 19:345−65

    doi: 10.1007/s10333-021-00846-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Timsina J, Wolf J, Guilpart N, van Bussel LGJ, Grassini P, et al. 2018. Can Bangladesh produce enough cereals to meet future demand? Agricultural Systems 163:36−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ladha JK, Pathak H, Tirol-Padre A, Dawe D, Gupta RK. 2003. Productivity trends in intensive rice-wheat cropping systems in Asia. In Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat systems: Issues and impacts, ed.vLadha JK, Hill JE, Duxbury JM, Gupta RK. vol. 65. Madison: the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America. pp. 45–76. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub65.c3

    [4]

    Chakrabarty M. 2016. Climate change and food security in India. Observer Research Foundation, ORF Issue Brief No. 157. New Delhi, India. pp. 1−12. https://orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/ORF_IssueBrief_1571.pdf

    [5]

    Yadav MR, Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar R, et al. 2017. Impact of legume intensified crop rotations and tillage practices on maize productivity vis-à-vis C and N dynamics of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Legume Research 40:1028−37

    doi: 10.18805/lr-3838

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Johansen C, Haque ME, Bell RW, Thierfelder C, Esdaile RJ. 2012. Conservation agriculture for small holder rainfed farming: Opportunities and constraints of new mechanized seeding systems. Field Crops Research 132:18−32

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Singh A, Kaur J. 2012. Impact of conservation tillage on soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system. Agricultural Science Research Journal 2(1):30−41

    Google Scholar

    [8]

    Bhattacharyya R, Kundu S, Pandey SC, Singh KP, Gupta HS. 2008. Tillage and irrigation effects on crop yields and soil properties under the rice–wheat system in the Indian Himalayas. Agricultural Water Management 95:993−1002

    doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.03.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Ringrose-Voase AJ, Kirby JM, Djoyowasito G, Sanidad WB, Serrano C, Lando TM. 2000. Changes to the physical properties of soils puddled for rice during drying. Soil and Tillage Research 56:83−104

    doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00124-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mandal B, Majumder B, Adhya TK, Bandyopadhyay PK, Gangopadhyay A, et al. 2008. Potential of double-cropped rice ecology to conserve organic carbon under subtropical climate. Global Change Biology 14:2139−51

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01627.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Mandal B, Majumder B, Bandyopadhyay PK, Hazra GC, Gangopadhyay A, et al. 2007. The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India. Global Change Biology 13:357−69

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01309.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kirchhof G, Tuong TP, So HB. 2011. Puddling: Effect on Soil Physical Properties and Crops. In Encyclopedia of Agrophysics, ed. J Gliński, J Horabik, J Lipiec: 667-8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Number of 667-8 pp.

    [13]

    Jat RK, Sapkota TB, Singh RG, Jat ML, Kumar M, Gupta RK. 2014. Seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice-wheat rotation of Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: Yield trends and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 164:199−210

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Haque ME, Bell RW, Islam MA, Rahman MA. 2016. Minimum tillage unpuddled transplanting: An alternative crop establishment strategy for rice in conservation agriculture cropping systems. Field Crops Research 185:31−9

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar B, Yadvinder-Singh, et al. 2016. Conservation agriculture in irrigated intensive maize-based systems of north-western India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 193:104−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.03.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Aggarwal GC, Sidhu AS, Sekhon NK, Sandhu KS, Sur HS. 1995. Puddling and N management effects on crop response in a rice-wheat cropping system. Soil and Tillage Research 36:129−39

    doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(95)00504-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hobbs PR. 2001. Tillage and crop establishment in South Asian rice-wheat systems: Present practices and future options. Journal of Crop Production 4:1−22

    doi: 10.1300/J144v04n01_01

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Yadav MR, Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar R, et al. 2017. Long term effect of legume intensified crop rotations and tillage practices on productivity and profitability of maize vis-a-vis soil fertility in North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Legume Research 40:282−90

    doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7583

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Ghosh PK, Venkatesh MS, Hazra KK, Kumar N. 2012. Long-term effect of pulses and nutrient management on soil organic carbon dynamics and sustainability on an inceptisol of indo-gangetic plains of India. Experimental Agriculture 48:473−87

    doi: 10.1017/S0014479712000130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Nayak AK, Gangwar B, Shukla AK, Mazumdar SP, Kumar A, et al. 2012. Long-term effect of different integrated nutrient management on soil organic carbon and its fractions and sustainability of rice-wheat system in Indo Gangetic Plains of India. Field Crops Research 127:129−39

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Jat ML, Gathala MK, Saharawat YS, Tetarwal JP, Gupta R, et al. 2013. Double no-till and permanent raised beds in maize–wheat rotation of north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity, profitability and soil physical properties. Field Crops Research 149:291−99

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gupta R, Seth A. 2007. A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice-wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP). Crop Protection 26:436−47

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.04.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ghosh PK, Hazra KK, Venkatesh MS, Praharaj CS, Kumar N, et al. 2020. Grain legume inclusion in cereal–cereal rotation increased base crop productivity in the long run. Experimental Agriculture 56:142−58

    doi: 10.1017/S0014479719000243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ambast SK, Tyagi NK, Raul SK. 2006. Management of declining groundwater in the Trans Indo-Gangetic Plain (India): Some options. Agricultural Water Management 82:279−96

    doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.06.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Kundu S, Srivastva AK, Gupta HS. 2009. Soil aggregation and organic matter in a sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas under different tillage and crop regimes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 132:126−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.03.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Derpsch R, Friedrich T. Development and current status of no-till adoption in the world, proceedings on CD. Proc. 18th Triennial Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization (ISTRO), 2009, Izmir, Turkey.

    [27]

    Farooq M, Flower KC, Jabran K, Wahid A, Siddique KHM. 2011. Crop yield and weed management in rainfed conservation agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research 117:172−83

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2011.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Saha R, Ghosh PK. 2013. Soil organic carbon stock, moisture availability and crop yield as influenced by residue management and tillage practices in maize-mustard cropping system under hill agro-ecosystem. National Academy Science Letters 36:461−68

    doi: 10.1007/s40009-013-0158-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gupta Choudhury S, Srivastava S, Singh R, Chaudhari SK, Sharma DK, et al. 2014. Tillage and residue management effects on soil aggregation, organic carbon dynamics and yield attribute in rice-wheat cropping system under reclaimed sodic soil. Soil and Tillage Research 136:76−83

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Bhushan L, Ladha JK, Gupta RK, Singh S, Tirol-Padre A, et al. 2007. Saving of water and labor in a rice-wheat system with no-tillage and direct seeding technologies. Agronomy Journal 99:1288−96

    doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0227

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Kaschuk G, Alberton O, Hungria M. 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: Lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42:1−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Unger PW, Stewart BA, Parr JF, Singh RP. 1991. Crop residue management and tillage methods for conserving soil and water in semi-arid regions. Soil and Tillage Research 20:219−40

    doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(91)90041-U

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Bell RW, Haque ME, Jahiruddin M, Rahman MM, Begum M, et al. 2019. Conservation Agriculture for rice-based intensive cropping by smallholders in the Eastern Gangetic plain. Agriculture 9:5

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture9010005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Barman A, Saha P, Patel S, Bera A. 2022. Crop diversification an effective strategy for sustainable agriculture development. In Sustainable Crop Production: Recent Advances, ed. Singh Meena V, Choudhary M, Yadav RP, Kumari Meena S. UK: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102635

    [35]

    Kumar U, Mishra VN, Kumar N, Srivastava LK, Bajpai RK. 2020. Soil physical and chemical quality under long-term rice-based cropping system in hot humid eastern plateau of India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 51:1930−45

    doi: 10.1080/00103624.2020.1812628

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Laik R, Sharma S, Idris M, Singh AK, Singh SS, et al. 2014. Integration of conservation agriculture with best management practices for improving system performance of the rice-wheat rotation in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 195:68−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Kumar V, Ladha JK. 2011. Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. In Advances in Agronomy, ed. Sparks DL. New Delhi, India: Academic Press. 111: 297-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1

    [38]

    Raman A, Ladha JK, Kumar V, Sharma S, Piepho HP. 2011. Stability analysis of farmer participatory trials for conservation agriculture using mixed models. Field Crops Research 121:450−59

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.02.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Gathala MK, Kumar V, Sharma PC, Saharawat YS, Jat HS, et al. 2013. Optimizing intensive cereal-based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 177:85−97

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Mishra JS, Poonia SP, Kumar R, Dubey R, Kumar V, et al. 2021. An impact of agronomic practices of sustainable rice-wheat crop intensification on food security, economic adaptability, and environmental mitigation across eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 267:108164

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Mishra AK, Aggarwal P, Bhattacharyya R, Das TK, Sharma AR, et al. 2015. Least limiting water range for two conservation agriculture cropping systems in India. Soil and Tillage Research 150:43−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.01.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Ghimire R, Adhikari KR, Chen ZS, Shah SC, Dahal KR. 2012. Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by tillage, crop residue, and nitrogen application in rice–wheat rotation system. Paddy and Water Environment 10:95−102

    doi: 10.1007/s10333-011-0268-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Ghimire R, Lamichhane S, Acharya BS, Bista P, Sainju UM. 2017. Tillage, crop residue, and nutrient management effects on soil organic carbon in rice-based cropping systems: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16:1−15

    doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61337-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Das TK, Bhattacharyya R, Sharma AR, Das S, Saad AA, et al. 2013. Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy 51:34−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Bhattacharyya R, Tuti MD, Bisht JK, Bhatt JC, Gupta HS. 2012. Conservation tillage and fertilization impact on soil aggregation and carbon pools in the Indian himalayas under an irrigated rice–wheat rotation. Soil Science 177:218−28

    doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3182408f1e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Das TK, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Sharma AR, Saharawat YS, et al. 2014. Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton–wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 158:24−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Alam MK, Bell RW, Haque ME, Kader MA. 2018. Minimal soil disturbance and increased residue retention increase soil carbon in rice-based cropping systems on the Eastern Gangetic Plain. Soil and Tillage Research 183:28−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.05.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Islam MA. 2017. Conservation Agriculture: Its effects on crop and soil in rice-based cropping systems in Bangladesh. PhD thesis. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Australia. 365 pp. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/36706/

    [49]

    Salahin N, Jahiruddin M, Islam MR, Alam MK, Haque ME, et al. 2021. Establishment of crops under minimal soil disturbance and crop residue retention in rice-based cropping system: Yield advantage, soil health improvement, and economic benefit. Land 10:581

    doi: 10.3390/land10060581

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Alam MK, Bell RW, Haque ME, Islam MA, Kader MA. 2020. Soil nitrogen storage and availability to crops are increased by conservation agriculture practices in rice–based cropping systems in the Eastern Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 250:107764

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Bhatia A, Pathak H, Jain N, Singh PK, Singh AK. 2005. Global warming potential of manure amended soils under rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Atmospheric Environment 39:6976−84

    doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Ullah A, Nawaz A, Farooq M, Siddique KHM. 2021. Agricultural innovation and sustainable development: A case study of rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia. Sustainability 13:1965

    doi: 10.3390/su13041965

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Alam MK, Biswas WK, Bell RW. 2016. Greenhouse gas implications of novel and conventional rice production technologies in the Eastern-Gangetic plains. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:3977−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Nawaz A, Farooq M, Nadeem F, Siddique KHM, Lal R. 2019. Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: issues, options and opportunities. Crop and Pasture Science 70:395−427

    doi: 10.1071/CP18383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Singh VK, Yadvinder-Singh, Dwivedi BS, Singh SK, Majumdar K, et al. 2016. Soil physical properties, yield trends and economics after five years of conservation agriculture based rice-maize system in north-western India. Soil and Tillage Research 155:133−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    United Nations. 2015. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects, the 2015 Revision. http://esa.un.org/wpp/unpp/panel_population.htm

    [57]

    Gathala MK, Timsina J, Islam MS, Krupnik TJ, Bose TR, et al. 2016. Productivity, profitability, and energetics: A multi-criteria assessment of farmers’ tillage and crop establishment options for maize in intensively cultivated environments of South Asia. Field Crops Research 186:32−46

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Hobbs P, Morris M. 1996. Meeting South Asia's future food requirements from rice-wheat cropping systems; Priority issues facing researchers in the post-green revolution era. Natural Resource Group, Paper 96-01. Mexico, D. F: CIMMYT.

    [59]

    Sharma RSJ, K. K. 1997. Agronomic research in rice–wheat system in Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research 7:139−57

    Google Scholar

    [60]

    Bajpai RK, Tripathi RP. 2000. Evaluation of non-puddling under shallow water tables and alternative tillage methods on soil and crop parameters in a rice–wheat system in Uttar Pradesh. Soil and Tillage Research 55:99−106

    doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00111-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Kumar V, Ladha JK. 2011. Direct seeding of rice: Recent developments and future research needs. In Advances in Agronomy, ed. Sparks DL. 111:421. Pusa, New Delhi, India: Academic Press. pp 297−413 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1

    [62]

    Ladha JK, Dawe D, Pathak H, Padre AT, Yadav RL, et al. 2003. How extensive are yield declines in long-term rice-wheat experiments in Asia? Field Crops Research 81:159−80

    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00219-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Roy KC, Singh G. 2008. Agricultural mechanization in Bangladesh. Agricultural mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 39:83−93

    Google Scholar

    [64]

    Sarkar TK, Islam AKMS, Rahman MA, Kamruzzaman M. 2012. Evaluation of the Versatile Multi-crop Planter (VMP) to establishment chickpea under different tillage practices in drought area of Bangladesh. International Journal of BioResearch 12:31−35

    Google Scholar

    [65]

    Haque ME, Bell RW, Islam AKMS, Sayre K, Hossain MM. 2011. Versatile multi-crop planter for two-wheel tractors: an innovative option for smallholders. World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, 26−29 September. Brisbane, Australia.

    [66]

    Haque ME, Bell RW, Kassam A, Mia MNN. 2016. Versatile strip seed drill: A 2-wheel tractor-based option for smallholders to implement conservation agriculture in Asia and Africa. Environments 3:1−13

    doi: 10.3390/environments3010001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Bell RW, Haque ME, Johansen C, Vance W, Kabir ME, et al. 2017. Mechanised minimum soil disturbance establishment and yield of diverse crops in paddy fields using a two-wheel tractor-mounted planter suitable for smallholder cropping. Experimental Agriculture 54:755−73

    doi: 10.1017/S0014479717000370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Vance WH, Bell RW, Johansen C, Haque ME, Musa AM, et al. 2014. Optimum time of sowing for rainfed winter chickpea with one-pass mechanised row-sowing: an example for small-holder farms in north-west Bangladesh. Crop and Pasture Science 65:602−13

    doi: 10.1071/CP13331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Food and Agriculture Organization. 2022. Conservation Agriculture. Plant Production and Protection Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/conservation-agriculture/en/

    [70]

    Nhamo N, Lungu ON. 2017. Opportunities for Smallholder Farmers to Benefit From Conservation Agricultural Practices. In Smart Technologies for Sustainable Smallholder Agriculture Upscaling in Developing Countries, eds. Nhamo N, Chikoye D, Gondwepp T. Academic Press. pp. 145−63. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810521-4.00007-4

    [71]

    Malik AI, Ali MO, Zaman MS, Flower K, Rahman MM, et al. 2015. Relay sowing of lentil (Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris) to intensify rice-based cropping. The Journal of Agricultural Science 154:850−57

    doi: 10.1017/s0021859614001324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Jat RA, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL. 2012. Conservation agriculture in the semi-arid tropics: Prospects and Problems. In Advances in Agronomy, ed. Sparks DL. 117: 376. USA: Academic Press. pp. 191−273. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00004-0

    [73]

    Dendooven L, Patiño-Zúñiga L, Verhulst N, Luna-Guido M, Marsch R, et al. 2012. Global warming potential of agricultural systems with contrasting tillage and residue management in the central highlands of Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 152:50−58

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.02.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Baker CJ, Saxton KE. 2007. Seed depth, placement and metering. In No-tillage Seeding in Conservation Agriculture, eds. Baker CJ, Saxton KE. 2nd edition. Rome, Italy: CAB International and FAO. pp. 99–117

    [75]

    Jat RA, Jinger D, Kumar K, Singh R, Jat SL, et al. 2021. Scaling-Up of Conservation Agriculture for Climate Change Resilient Agriculture in South Asia. In Scaling-up Solutions for Farmers: Technology, Partnerships and Convergence, eds. Wani SP, Raju KV, Bhattacharyya T. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 351−80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1_11

    [76]

    Nouri A, Yoder DC, Raji M, Ceylan S, Jagadamma S, et al. 2021. Conservation agriculture increases the soil resilience and cotton yield stability in climate extremes of the southeast US. Communications Earth & Environment 2:155

    doi: 10.1038/s43247-021-00223-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Dumanski JR, Peiretti R, Benites J, McGarry D, Pieri C. 2006. The paradigm of conservation agriculture. Proceedings of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation. pp. 58−64.

    [78]

    Friedrich T, Derpsch R, Kassam A. 2012. Overview of the global spread of Conservation Agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports (Online). http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/1941

    [79]

    Food and Agriculture Organization. 2016. www.fao.org/ag/ca/.

    [80]

    Lal R. 1983. No-till farming: Soil and water conservation and management in the humid and sub-humid tropics. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA Monograph No. 2

    [81]

    Soane BD, Ball BC, Arvidsson J, Basch G, Moreno F, et al. 2012. No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: A review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research 118:66−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2011.10.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Naresh RK, Tomar SS, Kumar D, Samsher, Purushottam, et al. 2014. Experiences with rice grown on permanent raised beds: Effect of crop establishment techniques on water use, productivity, profitability and soil physical properties. Rice Science 21:170−80

    doi: 10.1016/s1672-6308(13)60185-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Naresh RK, Gupta RK, Kumar A, Singh B, Prakash S, et al. 2011. Direct-seeding and reduced-tillage options in the rice-wheat system of the Western Indo-Gangetic Plains. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7:197−208

    Google Scholar

    [84]

    Gathala MK, Timsina J, Islam MS, Rahman MM, Hossain MI, et al. 2015. Conservation agriculture based tillage and crop establishment options can maintain farmers' yields and increase profits in South Asia's rice-maize systems: Evidence from Bangladesh. Field Crops Research 172:85−98

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Busari MA, Kukal SS, Kaur A, Bhatt R, Dulazi AA. 2015. Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 3:119−29

    doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Graham RL, Nelson R, Sheehan J, Perlack RD, Wright LL. 2007. Current and potential U.S. corn stover supplies. Agronomy Journal 99:1−11

    doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0222

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Choudhary AK. 2019. Diversifying Crop Rotations with Nitrogen Fixing Legumes. In Conservation Agriculture for Climate Resilient Farming & Doubling Farmers' Income. Patna, India: ICAR RCER. pp. 171−77

    [88]

    Jat RA, Dungrani RA, Arvadia MK, Sahrawat KL. 2012. Diversification of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-based cropping systems for higher productivity, resource-use efficiency and economic returns in south Gujarat, India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58:561−72

    doi: 10.1080/03650340.2010.533172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Manna MC, Ghosh PK, Acharya CL. 2003. Sustainable crop production through management of soil organic carbon in semiarid and tropical India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 21:85−114

    doi: 10.1300/J064v21n03_07

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Sharma PK, Ladha JK, Bhushan L. 2003. Soil physical effects of puddling in rice-wheat cropping system. In Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat systems: Issues and impacts, ed. Ladha JK, Hill JE, Duxbury JM, Gupta RK, Buresh RJ. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. pp. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub65.c5

    [91]

    Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, Sardana V, Timsina J, Jat ML. 2012. Productivity and sustainability of the rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of the Indian subcontinent: Problems, opportunities, and strategies. In Advances in Agronomy, ed. Sparks DL. 117: 376. USA: Academic Press. pp. 315−69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394278-4.00006-4

    [92]

    Mulvaney RL, Khan SA, Ellsworth TR. 2009. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: A global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:2295−314

    doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0527

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Das S, Kabir W. 2016. Pulses production in Bangladesh: status and drivers for enhancement. Conference: Pulses for Sustainable Agriculture and Human Health, Delhi, Pusa, India. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3112.7283

    [94]

    Kumbhar AM, Buriro UA, Oad FC, Chachar QI. 2007. Yield parameters and N-uptake of wheat under different fertility levels in legume rotation. Journal of Agricultural Technology 3:323−33

    Google Scholar

    [95]

    Cutforth HW, Angadi SV, McConkey BG, Miller PR, Ulrich D, et al. 2013. Comparing rooting characteristics and soil water withdrawal patterns of wheat with alternative oilseed and pulse crops grown in the semiarid Canadian prairie. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 93:147−60

    doi: 10.4141/cjss2012-081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Kumar Rao JVDK, Johansen C, Rego TJ. 1998. Residual effects of legumes in rice and wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Proceedings of the Workshop, ICRISAT Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India, 26−28 August 1996.

    [97]

    Lal R. 2015. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7:5875−95

    doi: 10.3390/su7055875

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Garg N, Geetanjali. 2007. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legume nodules: process and signaling. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 27:59−68

    doi: 10.1051/agro:2006030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Reynolds WD, Drury CF, Yang XM, Fox CA, Tan CS, et al. 2007. Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research 96:316−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.still.2007.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Kumar N, Singh SK, Mishra VN, Obi RGP, Bajpai RK. 2017. Soil quality ranking of a small sample size using AHP. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 16:339−46

    doi: 10.5958/2455-7145.2017.00050.9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Hulugalle NR, Lal R. 1986. Root growth of maize in a compacted gravelly tropical alfisol as affected by rotation with a woody perennial. Field Crops Research 13:33−44

    doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(86)90005-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Nadarajan N, Kumar N. 2018. Role of Pulses in Conservation Agriculture. In System Based Conservation Agriculture, ed. Singh VK, Gangwar B. New Delhi: Westville Publishing House. pp. 134−54.

    [103]

    Gogoi N, Baruah KK, Meena RS. 2018. Grain Legumes: Impact on Soil Health and Agroecosystem. In Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management, ed. Meena RS, Das A, Yadav GS, Lal R. Singapore: Springer Singapore. pp. 11−39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_16

    [104]

    Meena VS, Maurya BR, Meena RS, Meena SK, Singh NP, et al. 2014. Microbial dynamics as influenced by concentrate manure and inorganic fertilizer in alluvium soil of Varanasi, India. African Journal of Microbiology Research 8:257−63

    doi: 10.5897/AJMR2013.5448

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Vittal KPR, et al. 2012. Long-term effects of soil fertility management on carbon sequestration in a rice-lentil cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76:168−78

    doi: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Yuvaraj M, Pandiyan M, Gayathri P. 2020. Role of legumes in improving soil fertility status. In Legume Crops - Prospects, Production and Uses, eds. Hasanuzzaman M. UK: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93247

    [107]

    Haynes RJ. 1983. Soil acidification induced by leguminous crops. Grass and Forage Science 38:1−11

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1983.tb01614.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Kumar N, Hazra KK, Nath CP, Praharaj CS, Singh U. 2018. Grain legumes for resource conservation and agricultural sustainability in South Asia. In Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management, ed. RS Meena, Das A, Yadav G, Lal R. Singapore: Springer Nature. pp. 77−107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_3

    [109]

    Singh KK, Ali M, Venkatesh MS. 2009. Pulses in cropping systems. Technical Bulletin, IIPR (Indian Institute of Pulse Research), Kanpur. pp. 47

    [110]

    Klauer SF, Franceschi VR. 1997. Mechanism of transport of vegetative storage proteins to the vacuole of the paraveinal mesophyll of soybean leaf. Protoplasma 200:174−85

    doi: 10.1007/BF01283293

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Sinclair TR, Muchow RC, Bennett JM, Hammond LC. 1987. Relative sensitivity of nitrogen and biomass accumulation to drought in field-grown soybean. Agronomy Journal 79:986−91

    doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900060007x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Shen H, Yan X, Zhao M, Zheng S, Wang X. 2002. Exudation of organic acids in common bean as related to mobilization of aluminum- and iron-bound phosphates. Environmental and Experimental Botany 48:1−9

    doi: 10.1016/s0098-8472(02)00009-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Gilbert GA, Knight JD, Vance CP, Allan DL. 1999. Acid phosphatase activity in phosphorus-deficient white lupin roots. Plant, Cell & Environment 22:801−10

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00441.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Sharma CP, Gupta BR, Bajpai PD. 1986. Residual effect of leguminous crops on some chemical and microbiological properties of soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 34:206−8

    Google Scholar

    [115]

    Yusuf AA, Abaidoo RC, Iwuafor ENO, Olufajo OO, Sanginga N. 2009. Rotation effects of grain legumes and fallow on maize yield, microbial biomass and chemical properties of an Alfisol in the Nigerian savanna. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 129:325−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Alvey S, Yang CH, Buerkert A, Crowley DE. 2003. Cereal/legume rotation effects on rhizosphere bacterial community structure in west african soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 37:73−82

    doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0573-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Liang S, Grossman J, Shi W. 2014. Soil microbial responses to winter legume cover crop management during organic transition. European Journal of Soil Biology 65:15−22

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.08.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Schelud’ko AV, Makrushin KV, Tugarova AV, Krestinenko VA, Panasenko VI, et al. 2009. Changes in motility of the rhizobacterium Azospirillum brasilense in the presence of plant lectins. Microbiological Research 164:149−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Hayman DS. 1986. Mycorrhizae of nitrogen-fixing legumes. MIRCEN journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology 2:121−45

    doi: 10.1007/BF00937189

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Meena RS, Vijayakumar V, Yadav GS, Mitran T. 2018. Response and interaction of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soybean rhizosphere. Plant Growth Regulation 84:207−23

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0334-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Zahran HH. 1999. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63:968−89

    doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.4.968-989.1999

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Franzini VI, Azcón R, Méndes FL, Aroca R. 2013. Different interaction among Glomus and Rhizobium species on Phaseolus vulgaris and Zea mays plant growth, physiology and symbiotic development under moderate drought stress conditions. Plant Growth Regulation 70:265−73

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-013-9798-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Schubert KR, Evans HJ. 1976. Hydrogen Evolution: A major factor affecting the efficiency of nitrogen fixation in nodulated symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 73:1207−11

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.4.1207

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Ruiz-Argüeso T, Maier RJ, Evans HJ. 1979. Hydrogen evolution from alfalfa and clover nodules and hydrogen uptake by free-living Rhizobium meliloti. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37:582−87

    doi: 10.1128/aem.37.3.582-587.1979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    Dong Z, Layzell DB. 2001. H2 oxidation, O2 uptake and CO2 fixation in hydrogen treated soils. Plant and Soil 229:1−12

    doi: 10.1023/A:1004810017490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Stein S, Selesi D, Schilling R, Pattis I, Schmid M, Hartmann A. 2005. Microbial activity and bacterial composition of H2-treated soils with net CO2 fixation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:1938−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Dong Z, Wu L, Kettlewell B, Caldwell CD, Layzell DB. 2003. Hydrogen fertilization of soils — is this a benefit of legumes in rotation? Plant, Cell & Environment 26:1875−79

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01103.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128]

    Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG. 2007. Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121:233−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129]

    Chauhan P, Verma P, Pandey S, Bhattacharya A, Tripathi A, et al. 2021. Endophytic microbial interaction with legume crop for developing resistance against nutrient stress. In Microbes in Land Use Change Management, eds. Singh JS, Tiwari S, Singh C, Singh AK. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 363−87. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824448-7.00020-6

    [130]

    Sharma SR, Singh S, Aggarwal N, Kaur J, Gill RK, et al. 2018. Genetic variation for tolerance to post-emergence herbicide, imazethapyr in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64:1818−30

    doi: 0.1080/03650340.2018.1463519

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131]

    Kumar S, Pandey G. 2020. Biofortification of pulses and legumes to enhance nutrition. Heliyon 6:e03682

    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03682

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132]

    Gathorne-hardy A, Reddy D, Motkuri V, Harriss-White B. 2013. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from SRI and Flooded Rice Production in SE India. Taiwan Water Conservancy 61:111−25

    doi: 10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133]

    Kumar N, Yadav A. 2018. Role of pulses in improving soil quality and enhancing resource use efficiency. In Conservation Agriculture for Advancing Food Security in Changing Climate, eds. Das A, Mohapatra KP, Ngachan SV, Panwar AS, Rajkhowa DJ, et al. New Delhi, India: Today & Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers. pp. 547−61.

    [134]

    Ahlwat IPS, Srivastava TK. 1994. Fertility management in pulse based cropping system. Proceedings of international symposium on pulses research, 2−6 April, 1994, New Delhi, India. pp. 28

    [135]

    Foyer CH, Lam HM, Nguyen HT, Siddique KHM, Varshney RK, et al. 2016. Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production. Nature Plants 2:16112

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136]

    Gills MS, Prasad K, Ahalawat IPS. 2009. Improving sustainability of rice-wheat cropping system through pulses: weeds and imperatives. In Legumes for Ecological Sustainability, eds. Ali M, Gupta S, Basu PS, Naimuddin. Kanpur, India: Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development. pp. 71-91

    [137]

    Saraf CS, Rupela OP, Hegde D, Yadav RL, Shivakumar BG, et al. 1998. Biological nitrogen fixation and residual effects of winter grain legumes in rice and wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plain. In Residual effects of legumes in rice and wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plain. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing. pp. 14−30

    [138]

    Hossain MS, Hossain A, Sarkar MAR, Jahiruddin M, Teixeira da Silva JA, Hossain MI. 2016. Productivity and soil fertility of the rice–wheat system in the High Ganges River Floodplain of Bangladesh is influenced by the inclusion of legumes and manure. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 218:40−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.11.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139]

    Ghosh PK, Hazra KK, Venkatesh MS, Nath CP, Singh J, et al. 2019. Increasing Soil Organic Carbon Through Crop Diversification in Cereal–Cereal Rotations of Indo-Gangetic Plain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 89:429−40

    doi: 10.1007/s40011-017-0953-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140]

    Nath CP, Hazra KK, Kumar N, Praharaj CS, Singh SS, et al. 2019. Including grain legume in rice-wheat cropping system improves soil organic carbon pools over time. Ecological Engineering 129:144−53

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.02.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141]

    Khadka R, Paudel MN. 2013. Inclusion of grain legumes in rice based systems in the mid-hills of central Nepal. Agronomy Journal of Nepal61−66

    doi: 10.3126/ajn.v1i0.7543

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142]

    Upadhaya B, Kishor K, Kumar V, Kumar N, Kumar S, et al. 2022. Diversification of Rice-Based Cropping System for Improving System Productivity and Soil Health in Eastern Gangetic Plains of India. Agronomy 12:2393

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy12102393

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143]

    Liu X, Tan S, Song X, Wu X, Zhao G, et al. 2022. Response of soil organic carbon content to crop rotation and its controls: A global synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 335:108017

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144]

    Schwenke GD, Herridge DF, Scheer C, Rowlings DW, Haigh BM, McMullen KG. 2015. Soil N2O emissions under N2-fixing legumes and N-fertilised canola: A reappraisal of emissions factor calculations. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 202:232−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145]

    Lal R. 2010. Enhancing eco-efficiency in agro-ecosystems through soil carbon sequestration. Crop Science 50:S120−S131

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2010.01.0012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146]

    Hajduk E, Właśniewski S, Szpunar-Krok E. 2015. Influence of legume crops on content of organic C in sandy soil. Soil Science Annual 66:52−56

    doi: 10.1515/ssa-2015-0019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147]

    Hazra KK, Kumar N, Venkatesh MS, Ghosh PK. 2012. Inclusion of pulses in rice-wheat system can reduce Phalaris minor population. Pulses Newsletter 23:6

    Google Scholar

    [148]

    Ghosh PK, Bandyopadhyay KK, Wanjari RH, Manna MC, Misra AK, et al. 2007. Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use-efficiency in major cropping systems – An Indian perspective: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 30:59−86

    doi: 10.1300/J064v30n01_07

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149]

    Varma D, Meena R, Kumar S. 2017. Response of mungbean to fertility and lime levels under soil acidity in an alley cropping system of Vindhyan Region, India. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5:1558−60

    Google Scholar

    [150]

    Liebman M, Davis AS. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40:27−47

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151]

    Wani SP, Rupela OP, Lee KK. 1995. Sustainable agriculture in the semi-arid tropics through biological nitrogen fixation in grain legumes. Plant and Soil 174:29−49

    doi: 10.1007/BF00032240

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152]

    Prasad K, Singh M, Yadav RL. 1997. Impact of crop sequence on the control of Phalaris minor Retz. In rice-wheat system of Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Proc. Abstracts of paper. Biennial conference of Indian Society of Weed Science, February 1997. PAU, Ludhiana, 1997. pp. 19-21

    [153]

    Shah KK, Modi B, Pandey HP, Subedi A, Aryal G, et al. 2021. Diversified crop rotation: An approach for sustainable agriculture production. Advances in Agriculture 2021:8924087

    doi: 10.1155/2021/8924087

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154]

    Meena RS, Kumawat A, Kumar S, Prasad SK, Pradhan G, et al. 2022. Effect of legumes on nitrogen economy and budgeting in South Asia. In Advances in Legumes for Sustainable Intensification, eds. Meena RS, Kumar S. Academic Press. pp. 619−38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85797-0.00001-X

    [155]

    Tanveer M, Anjum SA, Hussain S, Cerdà A, Ashraf U. 2017. Relay cropping as a sustainable approach: problems and opportunities for sustainable crop production. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 24:6973−88

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8371-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156]

    Aktar-Uz-Zaman M, Ariful Islam M, Shahin Iqbal M, Jahangir Alam M, Sarkar D, et al. 2022. Improvement of early maturing and climate resilient chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars suitable for multiple environments in Bangladesh. Phyton 92:883−899

    doi: 10.32604/phyton.2023.025022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157]

    Schulz S, Keatinge JDH, Wells GJ. 1999. Productivity and residual effects of legumes in rice-based cropping systems in a warm-temperate environment: II. Residual effects on rice. Field Crops Research 61:37−49

    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00147-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158]

    Wang L, Gruber S, Claupein W. 2012. Effect of sowing date and variety on yield and weed populations in a lentil–barley mixture. The Journal of Agricultural Science 151:672−81

    doi: 10.1017/s0021859612000895

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Ariful Islam M, Sarkar D, Robiul Alam M, Jahangir MMR, Ali MO, et al. 2023. Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview. Technology in Agronomy 3:3 doi: 10.48130/TIA-2023-0003
    Ariful Islam M, Sarkar D, Robiul Alam M, Jahangir MMR, Ali MO, et al. 2023. Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview. Technology in Agronomy 3:3 doi: 10.48130/TIA-2023-0003

Figures(8)  /  Tables(6)

Article Metrics

Article views(4031) PDF downloads(599)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview

Technology in Agronomy  3 Article number: 3  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Legumes in Conservation Agriculture (CA) have the potential to increase crop productivity and sustainability of the rice-based system. However, there is limited information available on the importance of legume crops in CA in the rice-based system of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain (EIGP). Rice-based cropping is the mainstay of the people in Bangladesh, on the EIGP. These systems are the major food supplier to the region. In addition, they provide income and employment opportunities to the majority of people in the region. However, the system is facing unprecedented challenges and increased risk due to water, energy, labour and capital scarcity, which are exaggerated due to the effects of climate change. This could be further aggravated by deteriorating soil health, depleting underground water, and reduced land and water productivity which ultimately threaten sustainable food production and food security of the EIGP. Hence, sustainable crop intensification is essential, but increasing cropping intensity has reduced the yield of single crops by degrading soil properties. To address these constraints, Conservation Agriculture (CA), with a minimum tillage system, residue retention and crop diversification with legumes, could be an effective approach for improving crop productivity while sustaining the natural resources in intensive rice-based systems of EIGP. The addition of legumes in crop rotation is a suitable technique for crop diversification due to its multiple benefits related to soil health and natural resources. Diverse legume crops involving rice-based cropping exist at different agro-ecological zones in Bangladesh, and their rotation definitely could act a major role in promoting the CA in rice-based systems. Legume-based rotation offers multiple benefits, such as biological nitrogen fixation, improves soil pores through the deep root system, P-availability, soil fertility and enhanced nutrient cycling, and reducing the use of external input and thereby minimizing greenhouse gas emission and groundwater pollution, improving water productivity, and minimizes diseases and pest incidence. As a result, crop rotation with legumes has a high potential for CA and sustainable rice-based cropping systems in Bangladesh. The gaps between legume and non-legume crops in CA for each parameter suggest a noteworthy possibility for the improvement of rice-based systems in EIGP. This review suggests further sustainability improvements can be achieved through future field research focused on the inclusion of legume crops in the diverse rice-based systems under CA.

    • The current rice-based cropping systems are the backbone for the food security of the burgeoning population of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain (EIGP) in South Asia[1]. The major cropping systems (rice-rice - 6.51 M ha; rice-wheat - 6.22 M ha, rice-maize - 1.0 M ha and rice-lentil - 0.7 M ha) are mostly dominated by rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop in the eastern IGP[2]. In this region, three different rice crops, i.e., aus (pre-monsoon rice), Aman (monsoon rice), and boro (dry season rice) rice are grown in three different seasons throughout the year, hence the cropping systems are generally referred to as rice-based cropping systems. The systems play a vital role in achieving food security and contribute to a major share of the national food basket. The system also provides income and employment opportunities for millions of people in the IGP. The rice-based system involving cereal-cereal rotation (rice-wheat) is highly productive but its high productivity is at the detriment of over-lifting of water and soil nutrients with increasing air pollution[3]. Moreover, the system is facing unprecedented challenges and risks due to climate change. The present challenges and risks are expected to become more widespread in the coming decades and pose a serious threat to sustainable crop production and food security of the IGP[4]. The falling water table, and degradation of natural resources and soil are the major factors responsible for unsustainable crop production in the IGP[5]. Hence, sustainable crop intensification is necessary to produce more food from less land. Increasing cropping intensity may diminish the yield of crops by degrading soil properties[68].

      In rice-based systems, puddling of soil is generally used to grow rice while intensive tillage and limited return of crop residues are being used for the non-rice crop. Although puddling is beneficial for controlling weeds, transplanting seedlings and reducing deep percolation of the standing water[9], and puddle double rice under submerged conditions is a better niche for SOC sequestration[10,11], but it is difficult to establish the next dryland crop due to the degradation in the soils physical health[12]. In addition, it is well documented that the negative impacts of puddling on the soil environment, especially on beneficial microorganisms and soil aggregation[13,14]. Increasing labour scarcity and cost poses a threat to the sustainability of the system. With a falling water table, constant cultivation of high water-demanding rice crops leads to the deterioration of overall system productivity and input-use-efficiency[5,15]. The land preparation for the succeeding upland crop is hindered owing to the drying of the soil and the development of cracking soil blocks[16]. Thus, intensive tillage and irrigation are required to make a good seedbed for the next crop after rice, which causes late planting and eventually results in a lower yield of the dryland crop after rice[17]. In conventional farming systems (CT), intensive tillage along with residue removal are being used for growing the upland crop which also causes physicochemical and biological degradation[18].

      In intensive rice-based systems, the continuous practice of cereal–cereal rotations over many years, to meet the food demand for the burgeoning population, has resulted in a decline in crop productivity and degradation in soil health in the IGP[19]. The reduction of soil organic carbon (SOC) was identified as one of the foremost causes of yield decline in cereal–cereal systems[20]. In addition, the imbalance of nutrient use and depletion of soil fertility[8], poor soil physical condition[21], and lack of micronutrients were the major causes of yield decline in cereal–cereal cropping systems[22]. The detrimental effects of exploitative crop production practices have given momentum to pursue alternative crop management practices and cropping systems, which can improve soil health and sustain productivity in the long run.

      Concerning the challenges raised in continuous cereal-based rotations under conventional cultivation techniques, crop diversification with legumes in conservation agriculture (CA) may be an efficient strategy to increase crop productivity while protecting soil and the environment. The diversification of cereal-based rotations with legume crops improves crop and system productivity in the long run[23]. Further, the diversification of cereal-based rotations with low input demanding legume crops are being promoted to control the overutilization of groundwater, and minimize the cost of production and greenhouse gas emissions in the IGP[24]. Hence, the inclusion of legumes in CA offer potential benefits such as improved soil health and soil aggregation[25], which would lead to their residual effects on the subsequent crops.

      Conservation agriculture relies on the three key principles — minimal soil disturbance, crop residue retention and crop diversification, preferably with legume crops, and has been shown to successfully reverse the process of soil degradation in large-scale commercial agriculture[6]. Further, CA is applicable in diverse agro-ecological zones and has been advocated for ensuring food security for millions of smallholders in the developing world[26]. In recent decades, many advantages are claimed for CA such as increased crop yield[2730], improved soil organic matter and fertility, improved nutrient cycling and plant uptake[31], improved soil moisture[28,32], reduced production cost while maintaining, or increasing, crop yields[33]. Compared to the conventional farming system, CA practices generally resulted in improved SOC[34], controlled erosion, increased water-stable aggregates and infiltration, and microbial biomass carbon. Thus, legumes in CA are a vital approach to reverse the detrimental effect of conventional rice-based systems and contribute to achieving the twin goals of enhancing crop productivity and sustainability of rice-based systems in Bangladesh and the IGP in general. Therefore, the present paper deals with the role of legumes in CA in improving crop productivity while sustaining the existing rice-based cropping systems in EIGP.

    • Several constraints hinder crop production of rice-based systems in the IGP. Mismanagement of natural resources is one of the major constraints causing stagnating or decreasing crop yield of rice-based systems in IGP[3]. Some of the key constraints, causes, consequences and possible solutions are summarized in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Production constraints of conventional rice-based systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains.

      ConstraintCropping systemCauseConsequenceSolutionReferences
      Stagnation or decline in crop yieldRice-wheatContinuous cereal–cereal rotationsThe decline in soil physical and chemical qualityInclusion of legumes in rice-based system[35]
      Unsustainable production systemRice-wheat; maize-wheatContinuous cereal–cereal rotationsCrop productivity declineInclusion of legumes in rice-based system[23]
      The decline in soil organic carbon, total productivityRice-wheatContinuous cultivation of
      rice-wheat cropping system
      Decline in sustainabilityInclusion of pulses and organic nutrient management practices[19]
      Unsustainable production systemRice-wheatLow yield and farm income; environmental constraints and weather variabilityDeclined crop yield, profitability and resource
      use efficiency, and increased global warming potential
      Adaptation of CA-based systems[13, 3640]
      Decreasing crop productivityRice-wheat;Cotton-wheatDegradation of soil physical propertiesThe decline in crop productivityApplication of CA-based management system - minimum or no tillage along with crop residue retention[41]
      Soil organic carbon depletionRice-wheatIntensive tillage and removal of crop residueReducesproductivity and causes environmentaldegradationResidue retention and ZT system[42, 43]
      ZT and residue retention[4446]
      Rice-wheat/lentil-mungbean; rice-mustard-JuteIntensive tillage and removal of crop residueDepletion of SOC and soil N, and causes environmentaldegradationStrip planting system and residue retention[4750]
      Stagnation of crop yield, greenhouse gas emissionsRice-wheatExcess use of agricultural inputsIncreased the emission of greenhouse gasesChanges transplanted rice to direct-seeded/non-puddled rice, reduce the use of organic sources[5154]
      Yield reductionRice-wheatHeavy weed infestationDeclined yield as a result of heavy weed infestationIncorporation of legumes in the rotation and cultivation of allelopathic crops[52]
      Input intensive deteriorates soil health and is less profitableRice-maizePuddling in rice and
      complete residue removal
      Negative impact on soil physical status for maizeZTDSR followed by ZTM (zero tillage maize)[55]
    • The current population of Bangladesh is about 161 million and is likely to be 186 million in 2030 and 202 million in 2050[56], with arable land being lost by 1 % every year. Hence, there is no alternative except crop intensification to meet the food demand for a growing population. Although the intensive rice-based systems are the major food supplier, the sustainability of the system is being hampered by degrading soil health, polluting environments, high input requirements[39], high production cost and low farm profits[57], stagnating or declining yield and productivity[5860], degrading soil and water resources[61], declining soil carbon and total nitrogen, and delays in sowing[62]. Nevertheless, the CA production system is one of the effective approaches for increasing crop productivity, and profitability and ensuring food security while sustaining the natural resources in IGP[13,33]. There are several opportunities available for CA in rice-based systems, which are shown in Fig. 1.

      Figure 1. 

      Opportunities of Conservation Agriculture (CA) in intensive rice-based system.

    • Conservation agriculture-based on 4-wheel tractors (4-WT) has been practised for many years in developed countries. However, 4-WT is generally not compatible with mechanization in Bangladesh due to small and scattered fields[63,64]. A two-wheel tractor (2-WT) based machine, Versatile Multi-crop Planter (VMP) has been manufactured for crop production under the CA system in small holder farms with several planting modes of diverse crops[65]. To date, the available 2-WT and power tiller numbers are 700,000 in Bangladesh, 9,123 in Nepal and 117,200 in India, and the numbers are gradually increasing for cultivating small holder land[66]. Added to that, there are now many experienced operators of 2WTs who can provide training to new local service providers[33].

    • In intensive rice-based cropping, limited optimum sowing time is available between the harvesting of the present and planting of the following crop. In a conventional rice-based system, rice is grown on puddled soil and ponding of water; and repeated dry tillage is followed by the broadcasting of seeds used for growing subsequent cool dry season crops. All these practices for growing diverse crops in a rice-based system lead to delays in seeding by more than a week. The short growing period and late planting, grain filling or podding stage coincide with high temperature which results in a plentiful yield of cool dry season crops. However, mechanized CA planting opens up options for reducing the turnaround time and offering sowing in time; thus, enabling crop intensification and increasing crop productivity[6,67,68].

    • Conservation Agriculture promotes crop diversification through practicing different crop rotations and associations involving diverse crop species in a year[69]. The adoption of CA systems has several opportunities for growing different crops under crop diversification. Several crops like rice, jute, mustard, chickpea, lentil, wheat, maize, mungbean etc. could be well adapted to the new mechanized CA planting systems[67]. In CA systems, a suitable crop rotation is one of the three key principles. Crop diversification through an appropriate crop rotation reduces the soil degradation, soil salinity, infestation of insects-pests and weeds, increases crop productivity and farm profit, improves soil health, carbon sequestration and mitigate the climate change effects[34,70].

    • Reducing the cost of production is one of the major driving factors for shifting mechanized CA planting options from conventional farming practices[71]. In CA-based planting, a mechanized single pass is applied for the sowing of seed and fertilizer simultaneously into rows that minimize production costs as compared to the conventional farming system[49,67]. Adoption of CA implies less labour, irrigation water, and other expenditures; thus improved farm profitability under CA in rice-based systems[6,33,72].

    • The mechanized CA planting technique increased the crop yield and productivity of different crops in the rice-based system. The findings of several types of research conducted in eastern IGP demonstrated that CA techniques maintained equal or higher crop yields in intensive rice-based systems[14,33,48].

    • Conservation agriculture involving minimum tillage, surface residue cover and diversified crop rotations with legume crops offers multiple ways to minimize greenhouse gases. First, recycling crop residue by eliminating the burning of crop residues and excessive tillage reduces a huge amount of greenhouse gases emission and thereby, global warming potential[53,73].

    • The surface seeding as a result of shallow tillage under conventional cultivation techniques makes rainfed crops more vulnerable to drought[74]. However, the average seeding depth in a mechanized CA planting system is about 3−5 cm[67]. The deeper seed placement in the mechanized CA planting system makes rainfed crops more drought tolerant. The decreased soil disturbance for a longer-term period improves soil structure and infiltration rate, hence, soil water remains at the deeper soil profile; and enables plant roots to source available water from the deeper soil profile. Thus, the plant becomes more drought tolerant, increases the resilence and adapted to climate change under the CA system[75,76].

    • Conservation agriculture (CA) is a complete concept designed to adjust crop yields and incomes while conserving a balance of farming, economic and ecological benefits[77]. According to the FAO guideline, 'CA' is an approach to managing agroecosystems for improved and sustained productivity, increased profits and food security while preserving and enhancing the resource base and the environment[78]. Conservation agriculture has been planned on the principles of combined management of soil, water and other agricultural capitals in achieving sustainable agricultural production. The CA as a production system is underpinned by a set of three interlinked principles - minimum or no mechanical soil disturbance, permanent soil cover with residue retention, and legume-based crop rotations. Although CA can apply to all sizes of farms, its adoption is important in the areas of degrading soil, high labour and energy scarcity[79]. The details of CA-related technologies are described in Fig. 2.

      Figure 2. 

      Three interlinked key components of CA.

    • A few common terms used to describe conservation tillage, are explained as follows.

    • The minimum tillage is one of the key principles of CA (Fig. 3). Minimum tillage (MT) involves the minimum soil disturbance required for seed and fertilizer sowing in the soil. Minimizing multiple passes of tillage and thus the reduction in soil compaction may improve soil structure and stability, soil organic matter (SOM) and soil water content, microbes and buffer soil temperature as well as avert some weeds[6]. Various methods of minimum tillage are described as follows:

      Figure 3. 

      Soybean in zero-till system.

    • The no-tillage system eliminates all pre-planting soil disturbance to prepare the seedbed without the opening of a 2–3 cm wide strip or small strip in the ground for seed placement to ensure adequate seed/soil contact[80]. Another term for no-tillage is direct drilling or zero tillage in which seeds are sown without any prior soil tillage allowing only less soil disturbance (< 5 cm) by the soil tillage[81]. In no-tillage, 85 –100 % of the surface area leftovers are covered with crop residues (Fig. 3).

    • A strip-planting system is a mode of conservation tillage. In the strip planting system, the seedbed is separated into a seeding area and an untilled tillage area (Fig. 4). The seeding area (strip width is about 4–5 cm and seeding depth is 5–7 cm) is tilled to adjust the soil and micro-climate environment for crop establishment. The inter-row zone (~20 cm, which is equivalent to 80%–85% area of the seedbed) is leftover undisturbed and protected by at least 30% retention of previous crop residue[48]. Hence, there is a potential benefit of combining conventional tillage and no-tillage by disturbing the seeding zone while leaving the inter-row undisturbed with residue cover.

      Figure 4. 

      Lentil in Conservation Agriculture practices (strip planting system and high residue retention).

    • The permanent raised bed (PRB) system of planting is agronomic management where crops are sown on top of the raised beds. Although it can be considered as reduced tillage, there is considerable soil disturbance while forming new beds. Raised beds are developed by moving soil from the furrows[82]. There are two parts in a PRB system e.g. bed top and bed furrow (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      Lentil sowing using a raised bed planting system.

      In the bed planting system, irrigation channels drain and traffic lanes are used through furrows of the bed. Usually, on the top of the bed, two to six rows are planted[83]. For a permanent bed, once developed, the bed is not demolished or displaced but is only revamped in cropping of each season[84]. With soil conditions, field slope, available machinery, crop type and irrigation technique the dimension of raised beds may vary. The bed planting system is beneficial for growing legumes and other crops in both water-logged and drought-prone regions.

    • Crop residue retention is one of the key components of CA, which can protect the soil from sunlight and direct raindrop impact[85]. It also guards the soil surface against erosion, while retaining C at the topsoil. According to Graham et al.[86], the threshold levels of crop residue removal must be established based on the amount of residue needed to (i) preserve soil and water, (ii) equal or increase crop production, (iii) improve SOM pools, (iv) decrease net GHG emissions, and (v) reduce non-point source pollution. With the emergence of a range of planters for 2-WT, there is a need to estimate the ideal residue retention for CA in rice-based cropping systems.

    • Crop rotation involves growing diverse crops in a given period on the same field and it is one of the major principles of CA (Fig. 2). However, the choice of suitable crops and cropping systems is an important factor for maintaining soil health, crop productivity and profitability. Appropriate crop and variety selection in the system is vital for a CA system to be successful[87]. The choice of a short-duration legume crop could be a viable option to fill the gap between the cool dry season and monsoon season rice in Bangladesh.

    • Continuous cultivation of rice and cereal crops for longer periods has created several problems, notably a decline of soil fertility[88,89], deterioration of soil physical properties[90], decrease in the water table, and disease and pest outbursts etc, resulting in a threat to the sustainability of the system in IGP[88]. Further, cereal crops are heavy feeders of nutrients[91] and constant cereal cultivation is the cause of the depletion of soil organic matter and nutrients, and degradation of soil physical properties, which are also key reasons for yield decline in intensive rice-based cropping systems of EIGP[62,92]. Hence, effective crop diversification is needed to sustain the agricultural production system. Some major crop rotations involving legume crops are shown in Table 2.

      Table 2.  Major crop rotations involving legume crops in Bangladesh. Source: Rahman[93].

      Cropping pattern Region (land type)
      T. Aman rice – Chickpea – FallowHigh Barind Tract (drought-prone)
      Sesbania (green manure) – Chickpea
      T. Aman rice – Wheat – Mung beanHigh-land (plain)
      Fallow – Legumes – Jute
      T. Aman rice – Maize – Mung beanMedium land (plain)
      T. Aman rice – Mung bean – T. Aus riceSaline and non-saline areas
      T. Aman rice – Soybean – Fallow

      The addition of leguminous crops in a crop rotation could be a strong case for crop diversification as it reverses the degradation process, improves the yield of component crops, and soil fertility through atmospheric nitrogen (N) fixation and supplies residual N to the following crop[19,94]. In addition, the system can lessen different input requirements as compared to cereal-based systems. Further, legume crops adsorbed less soil water and leave unused soil water in the deeper depth of the soil profile which might be beneficial for deep rooting crops after legume crops[95]. Legume-dominated cropping pattern can sequester soil organic carbon (SOC), increase soil N content, and improve soil aggregate stability as a result of symbiotic N fixation, return of leaf litter and N-rich roots to the soil[19,25], which principals to residual benefits for the succeeding crops. Also, legume crops can add 20 to 60 kg N per hectare to the following crop[96]. In addition, the nitrate losses can be reduced by cultivating pulse crops after monsoon rice. Further, the addition of pulse crops in the cropping pattern increased rice equivalent yield and profits[39], improved soil C sequestration and plays a critical role to alleviate climate change[97]. However, all of these benefits of legumes are reported for conventional rice-based farming. But the impact of legumes in conservation agriculture is yet to be fully evaluated in rice-based systems of IGP. Further, the legumes inclusion in rice-based cropping sequence under CA are needed to be examined at contrasting soil environments of IGP. It is anticipated that legume inclusion in the rotation under CA might be vital for ensuring the sustainability of rice-based cropping systems in Bangladesh of IGP.

    • Growing crops in the rice-based system of IGP is largely dependent on monsoon rain and the productivity is, therefore, inconsistant every year. However, economic sustainability is crucial to ensure farmers’ sustainable income. Hence, constant efforts need to be made to research different aspects of crop production to increase the productivity of various crops in the rice-based system. The inclusion of legumes in the rice-based system has enabled an increase in overall productivity without deteriorating natural resources. There is every possibility of saving resources following the rice-legume system in crop production. Hence, the rice-legume is a relatively profitable system as the legume crop requires less fertilizer and other inputs. Being of short-duration, legume crops can easily fit into the window between two main crops in a year. It minimizes the use of fertilizer input for itself as well as for the succeeding crop by 25%–30%[98]. Moreover, less input, less crop management practices, less labour and less time are required to grow legume crops. As a result, the cost of cultivation of leguminous crops is lower when compared to cereal crops.

    • Legume crops improved soil health in the rice-based system by improving the soils physical, chemical and biological properties. A detailed description is given below:

    • Preserving soil physical health at a desirable level is challenging in the rice-based cropping system[35]. Soil with better physical health improves crop performance as well as minimizes environmental degradation[99]. The inclusion of legumes improved the soil physical environment by virtue of increasing concentrations of microbial biomass, carbon sequestration, BNF and phosphorus solubilization and mycorrhizal association in the intensive rice-based system[35,100]. The soil bulk density was significantly reduced through the retention of legume residues in the soil in cereal–legume cropping systems[101]. Legumes have deep and taproot systems and exposed pathways deep into the soil profile which improve the soil physical condition. Some legume crops having a deep root system break the hard pan that opens pathways deep into the soil and improves soil physical properties[102]. The legume-based crop rotations are favourable to soil physical properties especially improved soil aggregate and soil structure. A glycoprotein released from the roots of legumes called 'glomalin', is a gluey substance that entangles soil minerals, organic matter, and debris and forms stable soil aggregates. Therefore, the microbial activity of the rhizosphere improved soil structure in legume-based rotations (Fig. 6).

      Figure 6. 

      Impact of legumes on soil health. Modified from Gogoi et al.[103].

      In a long-term rotational experiment, Meena et al.[104] recorded a higher portion of soil aggregates above 250 µm where the previous crop was legumes. The glomalin of legumes works as 'glue' that binds soil together into stable aggregates. This aggregate stability increases pore space and tilth, reducing both soil erodibility and crusting. These aggregate formations due to legume crops improved the infiltration of soil water[105]. Further, the leguminous crop also protects the soil from nutrient loss and erosion. Further, N-rich legume residues stimulate earthworms to make burrows. The root channels of deep-rooted legume and earthworm holes improve the soil porosity, aeration and water percolation at the deeper soil profile.

    • The legume crops influence soil chemical properties like soil pH, nutrient availability, cation exchange capacity, etc, (Fig. 6). Legumes could acidify their rhizosphere by absorbing more cations than anions from the soil solution and increase the relationship between plants, soil and microbes on soils for optimum crop growth and development[106,107]. The legume crop meets a significant portion of their N demand from the atmosphere as diatomic N instead of NO3 from the soil. As a result, their net effect lowers the soil pH of the alkaline soil[106,108]. Legume crops are rich in both nitrogen and carbon. Besides, a substantial portion of nutrient-rich residues is added through legume crops to the soil as root biomass and leaf litter[109]. The root biomass and leaf litter being rich in N facilitate the rapid decomposition of crop biomass in soil and increase microbial activity. The microorganisms in the soil need both carbon and nitrogen. The nitrogen of the legumes crops allows the decomposition of crop residues and their conversion to soil building the organic matter[106]. Further, the legume crop residues may change unavailable P to the available form of P for the succeeding crops. Natural P in the tissues of legume crops residue provides a labile sort of P on decay to the following crops. Soil microorganisms play a significant role in nutrient recycling through decomposition of organic carbon and nutrients. Inclusion of legume in the rotation helps in minimizing N requirement as well as efficient utilization of native P due to secretion of certain acids that help in solubilization of several forms of P. The increased availability of P a result of P acquisition from insoluble phosphates through root exudates. Further, long-term growing of mungbean in rice-wheat system improved SOC more than other systems (Table 3).

      Table 3.  Effect of cropping pattern and nutrient management on soil fertility.

      TreatmentsSoil organic C (%)Avail. N (kg/ha)Avail. P2O5 (kg/ha)Avail. K2O (kg/ha)
      Rice-wheat0.35c258.9c18.1c222.9c
      Rice-chickpea0.38b272.5b20.7ab237.9b
      Rice-wheat-rice- chickpea0.37bc266.6b19.2b238.0b
      Rice-wheat-mungbean0.42a286.3a21.1a262.2a
      Adapted from Nadarajan & Kumar[102].
    • The nodule of legumes captures the atmospheric N as diatomic N with the help of the enzyme nitrogenase rather than nitrate from the soil and their effect is to decrease the soil pH. Both soil microbial activities, as well as plant growth significantly, increase at favourable pH (Fig. 6). In addition to the nitrogen stored in proteins, it has a further coating for storing glycoprotein in the leaf cells[110]. Besides, phosphorus (P) is the second most important component after N for growing crops. However, these essential nutrients become unavailable to plants as a result of bounding complexes with different nutrients even though the soil may contain a huge amount of P[111]. However, growing legume crops can improve the P uptake. For example, there are several organic acids secreted by the roots of legume crops ( malate, citrate, oxalate, tartrate, and acetate) that reduce the soil pH in the rhizosphere and help in the conversion of inaccessible P to available forms[103,112]. In addition, legume crops secret enzyme phosphatase from their roots which helps in breaking down P-containing organic complex[113].

      Legume crops increase microbial density and diversity of soil microbes that leads to better stability in the total life of the soil as compared to cereals or fallow[114]. It also provides increased biomass in the soil by adding extra N from their root and shoot, and BNF. Soil microbes use the additional N to decompose carbon-rich residues of cereal crops. The soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) is regarded as one of the major soil biological properties of soil. Legume-based crop rotation increased the SMBC over cereal-based rotation[115]. The bacterial growth serves to increase the legume rhizosphere because of the hydrogen gas during BNF[103]. The microbial activities are enhanced by the nodule-rhizosphere interaction of the leguminous crops. Also, growing leguminous crops in rotation significantly influences soil biological agents and increased the diversity of microbes[116]. The leguminous rhizospheric microorganism captures atmospheric N and thereafter improved root exudation and increased C:N ratio[117]. The exudation of the lectins of legumes influences the movement of rhizobacteria and improves root colonization and phyto-beneficial activity[118]. Legume crops form a tripartite symbiotic association (mycorrhiza-legume-Rhizobium)[119] and are accountable for the colonization of specific arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi because of their distinctive nutritional necessities linked with their nodule activity[120]. The hyphae of the mycorrhizae absorb and transport a huge amount of low-diffusing P to their host plant and help in nodule development[121]. The compatibility of different interactions of AM fungal strains is important to fix N and uptake nutrients and water by the pulse crops[122]. The AM colonization is promoted by legume crops under the low-input situation.

      Legumes release hydrogen (H2) gas into soil during nitrogen fixation (N2 + 8H+ + 8e– + 16 Mg-ATP → 2NH3 + H2 + 16Mg-ADP + 16 P)[123]. The H2 released from nodules is oxidized by the soil in the rhizosphere. However, several legume nodules release a large amount of H2 due to the absence of a hydrogenase uptake enzyme system (HUP-) or low activity of the HUP system within the strain of rhizobia[124]. For example, N-fixing HUP-legume crop can produce approximately 5,000 L of H2 per day per hectare during peak growth, which is an energy equivalent of 5%–6%[125]. The soil microorganisms oxidized H2 and used it as an energy source to multiply rapidly around HUP-root nodules[126]. The growth plant increased in legume-based cropping systems due to increased bacterial populations adjacent to H2-releasing nodules[127].

      Legumes can provide high soil biological biodiversity, which is helpful to improve resistance and resilience against various stresses[128]. Legumes also increase the total root biomass in the soil by supplying extra N of their root and shoot biomass. Soil microorganisms break down carbon-rich residues of crops using the extra N[106]. Soil biodiversity, soil C and N are important for improving soil health and ensuring food and nutrition security.

      Various nutrients and microbes are important factors for plant growth and development, and microbial association with legume crops. Several constraints affect crop production such as parent material, particle size, humus, soil water content, soil pH, temperature, aeration, root zone, the rhizo-flora, and advances in mycorrhiza. In addition, nutrient stress is another major limitation in crop production as an imbalance in nutrient concentration impedes the metabolism process of plants[129]. Generally, nutrient stress means either the presence of lower concentrations or excessive concentrations of the element. A deficit of nutrients improves the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, reduces nodulation, nitrogen fixation, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll content and results in hormonal imbalance[130]. In this case, endophytes are beneficial microbes, which could be an alternative eco-friendly approach to chemical fertilizers for crop production and reduce nutrient stress for plants[131]. Legume crops in association with microbes enable them to survive under hostile conditions and help to tackle the adverse effects of environmental stresses[132]. Legume crops and microbes are involved by a mechanism to cope up with the hostile environment and microbes in leguminous crops solubilize the nutrients and make them absorbable to crops. Microbes integrated with crops provide biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in crops without causing any detrimental effects (Fig. 7). Hence, nutrient use efficiency as well as stress tolerance in crops can be improved by using microbes, which is an eco-friendly approach.

      Figure 7. 

      Abiotic and nutrient stress tolerance in plants through endophytic microbes. Adapted from Kirchof et al.[12].

    • Legume crops can be successfully cultivated through conservation agriculture, which is known as water-saving technology. In addition, the water requirement of legume crops is much less than cereal crops. Due to distinctive features, legume crops are more proficient in uptake water-efficient than other crops. Legume crops can uptake soil water from deeper soil profiles due to their deep root system, thereby having the ability to thrive well under drought situations. The legume crops need only 150–250 mm whereas rice needs 1,000–2,200 mm, wheat 300–400 mm and sugarcane 1,500–2,500 mm of water (Table 4). In general, winter legumes need no irrigation or one irrigation after rice crop whereas wheat crop needs 5–6 irrigations (3–4 cm of each irrigation) in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Consequently, the problem of groundwater depletion is commonly found in rice-wheat regions of EIGP. This situation can be reversed by substituting one of the cereal crops with legume crops.

      Table 4.  Water requirement of potential legume crops of the rice-based system in IGP. Adapted from Kumar & Yadav[133].

      Sl No.Legume cropsWater requirement (cm)
      Winter legumes
      1Chickpea12­–21
      2Lentil10–12
      3Field pea12–14
      4Rajmash20–25
      5Lathyrus10–12
      Kharif/summer legumes
      1Black gram (summer)22–30
      2Mungbean (summer)20–35
      3Black gram (Kharif)6–12
      4Mungbean (Kharif)12–15
      5Pigeonpea16–22.5
    • In the last decades, groundwater pollution in the rice-based system through nitrate leaching is a rising concern in IGP. Hence, suitable cropping systems involving crops that require a low rate of nitrogenous fertilizer and better agronomic practices are required to minimize nitrate leaching and improve N-use efficiency. The addition of pulse crops in the rice-based system is one of the best agronomic practice that can minimize nitrate leaching as well as improves N-use efficiency. Legumes can capture atmospheric N in symbiosis with certain types of bacteria present in the root nodules of the leguminous crops (Table 5). By fixing atmospheric nitrogen legumes can supplement 20 to 60 kg N to the following crop[134]. The efficiency of nitrogenous fertilizer to succeeding crop was reported up to 40–80 kg/ha[135].

      Table 5.  Nitrogen fixation and release into the soil of different legume crops.

      CropN-fixation
      (kg/ha)
      N release into
      the soil (kg/ha)
      References
      Lentil35-10032.8[136]
      Mungbean50–5534.5[136]
      Chickpea26–63[136]
      Cowpea53–8550.3[136]
      Pigeonpea68–200[136]
      Field pea4659.4[136]
      Black gram (Urdbean)50–6038.3[136]
      Lathyrus85%–91% Ndfa36–48[137]
    • Including legumes in crop rotations have multiple benefits such as improved soil health, increased crop productivity and farm profitability. In addition, it helps to develop sustainable production systems by fixing atmospheric nitrogen. The fixed nitrogen is used by the legume crop and the subsequent crops[135]. Furthermore, the inclusion of legumes in the rotation improves soil aggregation, and soil carbon content, reduce greenhouse gas emission and thereby protects the environment. Therefore, there are plenty of success stories across the globe. Some of them are summarized in Table 6.

      Table 6.  Success stories of legume inclusion in rice-based cropping system under the CA system.

      Cropping patternFindingsLocationsReferences
      Legume-based cropping patternsNon-legume-based cropping patterns
      Wheat-mungbean-rice, wheat-blackgram-rice, wheat-sesbania-ricewheat-fallow-riceThe adoption of legumes in the wheat–rice cropping sequence increased the productivity and improved soil SOM, total N, available P and available ZnRajshahi, Bangladesh[138]
      Monsoonal rice-lentil/Lathyrus-rain-fed ricemonsoonal rice-fallow-rain-fed riceThe inclusion of relay-sown legume for fallow in the existing cropping pattern can intensify and diversify the rice-based croppingEIGP and Bangladesh[71]
      Rice-wheat-mung bean, maize-wheat-mung bean, rice-chickpeaRice-wheat, maize-wheatLegume-based rotation increased soil organic carbon and available nitrogen and phosphorus, and system productivity and net returnKanpur, India[23]
      Maize-chickpea, rice-chickpeaMaize-wheat, rice-wheatInclusion of chickpea in the cereal-cereal rotations improved SOC pools over timeKanpur, India[139]
      Rice-chickpea, rice-wheat-mung bean, rice-wheat-rice-chickpeaRice-wheat, maize-wheatInclusion of legume in rice-based rotation improved soil aggregation, carbon concentration in aggregates, and soil carbon poolsKanpur, India[140]
      Rice-wheat-mung bean, rice-wheat-cowpea, rice-maize-mung bean, rice-wheat-mung bean, rice-maize/cowpea, rice-maize/mung bean, rice-lentil-maizeRice-maize-fallow, rice-fallow-maize, rice-wheat-fallowInclusion of legumes in the fallow between two cereal crops could improve soil health and farmers’ incomeNepal[141]
      Rice-wheat-green gram, rice-mustard-green gram, Rice-red gram+turmeric-green gram, maize-wheat-blackgram, maize+blackgram-chickpea-sesbania, blackgram-maize+vegetable pea-sesbaniaRice-wheat, maize-cole crops-sesame,Including legume crops is a viable option for enhancing productivity, profitability and soil health in the rice-based system of EIGP.Bihar, India[142]
      Legume based rotationNon-legume based rotationThe inclusion of legumes enhanced the soil's organic carbon contentGlobal-scale meta-analysis (513 pairwise data from 167 studies)[143]
    • Conservation agriculture is promoted, and the fixed nitrogen of legume crops meets the requirement of nitrogen for their own as well as for the succeeding crops. Hence, the demand for total fertilizer requirement is less with the co-benefits of increasing yields in the legume-based system over the cereal-cereal system. In addition, legumes significantly reduced GHGs emissions as BNF is a less-emissive form of N input to the soil than fertilizer N[144]. As a result, reduced fertilizer demand and less-emissive N contributes to the global nitrogen cycle, reduces GHG emission, and minimizes global warming, and water contamination. In addition, intercropping of legumes in cereals grown with wider rows also minimizes nitrate leaching.

      The use of suitable crop rotations can be enhanced and increase the SOC[145]. Fine tilth for growing legumes in the rice-based system is not essential. Even legumes perform better or equally well both under conservation tillage and farmers’ practices though conservation tillage sequesters more C than conventional tillage methods. In addition, roots, litter falls and plant biomass of legumes improves soil organic matter. The legume-based rotation also increased the availability of N and enhanced biomass C. Further, it promotes the release of C through root exudation into the rhizospheric zone[146]. The fixed N by legume crops also accelerates the C sequestration in the rotation due to an increase in microbial activities and biomass production. The legume-based rotation also enhances the nutrient use efficiency and thus resulted in higher belowground biomass and C inputs in soil. Also, short-duration legumes can easily be fitted in fallow in between two main crops and reduce C-loss and enhance C-sequestration in the rice-based system. Growing legumes under minimum tillage in the rice-based rotation also reduced the consumption of fossil fuels. Consequently, the legume-based system reduced CO2 emission which is a major driver of climate change. Thus, legume crops are grown mitigate global warming and climate change effects through increasing soil C-sequestration and minimizing CO2 emission. The legume-based system also reduces the emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) as compared to other systems that are greatly dependent on nitrogenous fertilizer.

    • Weeds are one of the main constraints of the CA system in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. The choice of a suitable crop is important for crop diversification to reduce weed invasion. Growing legumes in crop rotation could be an important consideration for minimizing weed populations below the threshold level. Multispecies crop rotation with crops having different growing behaviours may decrease chances for weed germination and growth, and renaissance through resource competition and niche interference. Switching one cereal crop in the rice-based system with a legume crop may help in diminishing the weed seed bank in the soil. For example, Hazra et al.[147] found from a long-term experiment in India that legume crops can diminish the pervasion of Phalaris minor in winter crops. In addition, some legume crops with a fast-growing habit such as mungbean and black gram can compete with the weeds and can suppress weed growth. In addition, a legume with a better canopy cover was more effective than other non-legume crops with a narrow canopy cover in weed control. Mung bean or cowpea inhibited the weed development and showed as effective as two-hand weeding, and mungbean was shown to be effective at the initial stage, while cowpea at later growth stages[148]. The intercropping of legumes with other crops is also a viable option to suppress rising weeds. Intercropping of short duration, fast and early developing legume crop with longer growth habits cover and suppress rising weeds satisfactorily.

      The application of legume residue in CA can influence seed germination of weeds due to changes in soil properties in the seed zone of the soil layer. The applied legume residue on the soil surface is the barrier of sunlight interception and protection to the soil surface. The soil surface protection by residue cover influences soil temperature and soil water at the surface soil[149]. In addition, the surface residue cover can control weeds by delaying the germination of weed seed and thereby, decreasing the population and growth of weeds. Thus, residue retention of legume crops minimizes yield loss due to weeds[108]. Moreover, weed are more vulnerable to the phytotoxic effects of crop residues, and the allelopathic effect of crop residue influences the soil chemical properties at the weed seed zone and may cause germination failure of weeds[150]. There are several legume crops like lentils and cowpea that suppress and decrease numerous weeds due to the allelopathic effect of weeds[108]. Hence, the use of legume residue can be used to control weeds and minimize the dependency on herbicides.

      Legume crops require less fertilizer and irrigation compared to cereal crops for their growth and development. The use of less fertilizer and irrigation enhances weed germination as compared to cereal crops. Thus, legume crop minimizes weed invasion.

    • Legume crops are an excellent chance in a continuous cereal-based crop rotation and decrease the weed, insects, and diseases problems. In this case, a three year interval between the same type of crops is sufficient to reduce the weed, insect, and disease infestation. The addition of legume crops in the rotation improves soil structure as well as reduces insect and disease incidence while promoting mycorrhizal colonization[151]. The increased level of N-fertilization and irrigation considerably improved the incidence of diseases, insect pests and weeds, and resulted in severe yield loss in the rice-wheat cropping system[152]. The addition of legume crops in the rice-wheat cropping system greatly reduced Phalaris minor population and the incidence of diseases and pests in a long-term experiment at Kanpur[108].

    • Crop diversification with legume crops adapted and gained popularity in many countries in recent decades due to its sustainable outcomes[153]. Diversification and intensification of rice-based systems under CA in IGP through short-duration legume varieties will be the key to sustainability. However, the following research strategies are needed to attain sustainable crop production in rice-based systems:

    • Generally, manual hand weeding is performed to control weeds for legume crops in all seasons, which is costly and time-consuming. Hence, research efforts should be taken to identify post-emergence herbicides of legume crops for weed control. In addition, it is needed to develop genotypes tolerant to post-emergence herbicides in Bangladesh. Already post-harvest herbicide-tolerant varieties have been developed using genetic diversity or mutagenesis in many crops in developed countries. For example, Sharma et al.[130] developed imazethapyr tolerance five lentil genotypes (LL699, LL1397, IPL406, EC78452 and LL1203) and suggested that there are genotypic variations for herbicide tolerance in legumes that can be used for identifying herbicide-tolerant varieties. These herbicide-tolerant varieties are necessary options for controlling weed with post-emergence herbicides which can control weeds properly and increase crop yield.

      Imbalance application of nitrogenous fertilizer in the cropping system incurred more capital investment, energy budgeting and carbon footprint, which causes environmentally and economically unacceptable crop production systems. However, the inclusion of legumes in the cropping system reduces nitrogen losses, reduces pollution, increases N budgeting, and improves soil health, crop productivity and overall sustainability[148,154].

      Concerted research efforts are required to evaluate proper pest and nutrient especially micronutrients management strategies of legume crops in CA in different agroecological zones in the rice-based system. Also, agronomic fortification strategies of legume crops are desirable to be assessed[131].

      Legumes improve agroecosystems, crop productivity, soil SOC and N stocks, soil chemical and biological properties, BNF, reduced greenhouse gas emission and nitrate leaching[103]. However, these benefits of legumes are needed to be quantified in the rice-based system of Bangladesh, and their mechanisms are understood.

      A life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from legumes involving rice-based systems in CA is also essential to find alternative options to minimize greenhouse gas emissions over existing cropping and cultivation technique[132].

    • Research should be initiated to develop varieties appropriate for crop diversification in CA.

      Legume varieties that have resistance to biotic stresses such as ascochyta blight, botrytis, fusarium wilt, viruses, pod borer, aphid, bruchids, cutworms and leaf miners need to be developed in Bangladesh.

      Legume crop varieties that have high yield and are bold seeded suitable for machine sowing are desirable to promote CA in the rice-based system in Bangladesh.

      Legume varieties that have the potential to increase SOC restoration are needed to be developed in Bangladesh.

      Varieties with profuse root systems and early vigour/ground coverage need to be developed to cultivate under CA-technologies.

      Super-early (< 95 d) lentil, pea, chickpea and grasspea varieties can be successfully grown in the fallow window in between monsoon-rice and boro-rice crops.

    • Bangladesh has the potential to increase crop production areas by growing short-duration legume varieties in a large area of rice fallows. A large part of rice-fallow land can be targeted for growing legumes during the cool dry season after the monsoon rice crop. Pulses Research Centre of Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institue recently developed an extra early lentil variety, BARI Masur-9 (< 95 d) and BARI Chola-11 (100–106 d) that would be well substitute for 8 million ha of fallow areas between two rice crops in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain[155,156]. Growing short-duration varieties (e.g. BARI Mung-6, BARI Mung-7, BARI Mung-8 and Binamoog-8, BARI Mash-3) during the Kharif season (between early monsoon and cool dry season), by relay cropping, and intercropping, ensures further utilization of existing agricultural land which remains fallow in between two seasons. Replacement of upland rice crops with high yield and resistance to different disease and insect legume cultivars (e.g. BARI Masur-8, BARI Kesari-5, BARI Kesari-6, BARI Motor-3, BARI Chola-9, BARI Chola-10 and BARI Chola-11) is another worthwhile strategy that has the potential to offer higher farm profits.

    • One of the major methods of multiple cropping is relay cropping in which one crop is sown on a standing second crop before the second crop is harvested[155]. In relay cropping legume with rice, the legume crop is sown on the mature standing rice crop 10–15 d before the monsoon rice is harvested (Fig. 8). Relay cropping is considered as a totally non-tillage practice, a component of CA which can improve soil health and crop productivity[33]. Growing legume as relay cropping as a replacement for fallow in the rice-fallow-pre-monsoon rice cropping pattern could be an opportunity to intensify and diversify cropping. This was confirmed in practice in some of the northern districts of Bangladesh, Nepal and eastern India, following the on-farm trial of relay sowing[71]. Also, the addition of legumes as relay crops (Fig. 8) in crop rotation can intensify rice-based cropping and improve soil health and crop yield[71,157]. Often long duration rice cultivation leads to delayed sowing of legume crop after monsoon rice to reach optimal moisture conditions of the seed bed and results in yield depletion due to late sowing[158]. On the contrary, available soil moisture losses quickly at the time of harvesting of monsoonal rice crop are hard to establish the cool dry season legume crops after rice[109]. However, the yield reduction due to delay sowing can be addressed while the yield of cool season legume crops can be increased through extending life cycle by relay cropping legume into monsoonal rice[71]. In relay cropping, legume crops get more time for vegetative growth between two rice crops and increases yield. Among the legume crops, grass pea and lentil is generally sown as relay into monsoonal rice in EIGP (Fig. 8). Interestingly, this system can be considered as resource conservation technology as it does not need any cost related activities and resources such as tillage, weeding, nutrient application and irrigation[109].

      Figure 8. 

      Relay sowing lentil into standing monsoonal rice.

    • Abiotic stress (waterlogging, cold, heat, drought and salinity) tolerant legume varieties are needed to be developed and deployed to minimize the negative effects of climatic change.

    • Further study is essential to increase N2 fixation by developing effective rhizobium strains and inoculation methods. Since N fixation is influenced by fertilizer N, more tolerant cultures of rhizobium are needed. Moreover, a matching nutrient supply system is needed as N fixation by legumes alone may not fulfil the requirement of nutrients. Thus, the combination between mineral fertilizers and rhizobium needs further research as a way of achieving a better combination of nutrition systems. The magnitude to which legumes can fix atmospheric N and their contribution to the soil N economy needs to be measured. Besides, an improved supply system, as well as application procedure for rhizobium, are required to develop.

    • The present crop production technique under the conventional method in Bangladesh is poorly mechanized, which is costly, labour-intensive, time-consuming and unsustainable. Therefore, it is necessary to warrant affordable and manageable mechanization at all stages of crop production (sowing, intercultural operations and harvesting) to ensure timely farm operations, reduce the cost of production, improve the utilization efficiency of expensive inputs increase farm profit, reduce greenhouse gas emission and finally achieve sustainable crop production. The 2-WT machine can be used for sowing seed in line with minimum soil disturbance can minimize the production cost. Further, developing new legume varieties suitable for machine harvesting varieties can also attract farmers to the large-scale commercial cultivation of legumes instead of subsistence farming. In the case of variety choice, plants having a higher podding height from above the ground, erect and non-lodging growth habit, uniform maturity and top-bearing characteristics of legumes should be an obvious choice for mechanical harvesting without harvest loss.

    • Legumes are suitable crops for crop diversification in CA for sustainable crop production in rice-based cropping systems in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. Legumes can provide multiple benefits to human, animal and soil health improvement and maintain natural resources. As efficient protein producers and climate-hardy crops, legumes mitigate and adapt to climate change effects, improve health by supplying nutrition, and help to promote economic stability. Introducing different legume crops to fit into various rice-based cropping systems can be crucial to increase resilience to climate change and improving soil health, crop productivity and sustainability. Hence, the addition of legume crops in CA for the rice-based system may give the way for sustainable agriculture to combat hunger and ensure food and nutritional security.

    • This is a collaborative article. No funding existed for the article. Authors are thankful to Dr Chris Johansen for his thoughtful critique and valuable comments on our manuscript.

      • Akbar Hossain is the Editorial Board member of journal Technology in Agronomy. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research group.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  Table (6) References (158)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Ariful Islam M, Sarkar D, Robiul Alam M, Jahangir MMR, Ali MO, et al. 2023. Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview. Technology in Agronomy 3:3 doi: 10.48130/TIA-2023-0003
    Ariful Islam M, Sarkar D, Robiul Alam M, Jahangir MMR, Ali MO, et al. 2023. Legumes in conservation agriculture: A sustainable approach in rice-based ecology of the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain of South Asia − an overview. Technology in Agronomy 3:3 doi: 10.48130/TIA-2023-0003

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return