Search
2023 Volume 2
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica

  • # These authors contributed equally: Hanting Yang, Zhaoyu Liu

More Information
  • MicroRNAs are a group of endogenous small non-coding RNAs, they can guide silencing complex to degrade mRNA or hinder its translation by pairing with the target gene mRNA base. In this study, applying high stringent genome-wide computational-based approaches, a total of 31 putative microRNAs were predicted in Stephania japonica. After strict secondary structure screening, seven microRNAs with high reliability were identified and classified into three microRNA families. Using Targetfinder tool, a total of 47 potential target transcription factors of microRNAs were identified, including bHLH, SBP, TCP, ERF transcription factors. The co-expression network of transcription factors and three important cepharanthine-biosynthetic genes shown that microRNAs might be involved in regulating the biosynthesis of cepharanthine and its precursors by regulating potential target transcription factors. Additionally, correlation analysis of microRNAs and transcription factors indicated that the tissue expression patterns of Sja-miR8528, Sja-miR156a and Sja-miR156c showed positive correlation with six transcription factors, while Sja-miR535 showed a negative correlation with five transcription factors. This is the first study explored putative microRNA and analyzed their predictive target transcription factors in S. japonica, providing useful information for future microRNA research in herbal plants.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Fig. S1 Cepharanthine biosynthesis pathway. The red dotted line shows the unidentified enzyme.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 Secondary Structure of MicroRNA.
    Supplemental Fig. S3 Expression patterns of 47 transcription factors in different tissues and CEP biosynthetic pathway genes in S. japonica.
    Supplemental Table S1 List of specific primer sequences in this study.
    Supplemental Table S2 47 potential regulating relationship were predicted between microRNA and transcription factors.
    Supplemental Table S3 Protein sequence that has catalytic activity and participates in CEP biosynthesis in other species.
  • [1]

    Semwal DK, Badoni R, Semwal R, Kothiyal SK, Singh GJP, et al. 2010. The genus Stephania (Menispermaceae): chemical and pharmacological perspectives. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132:369−83

    doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.08.047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Rana MS, Islam MM, Bosunia SN, Mahmud SR, Santa SA, et al. 2014. A survey of medicinal plants used by a village folk medicinal practitioner in sreemangal upazila of maulvibazar district, bangladesh. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8:1−9

    Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yang L, Liu S, Liu J, Zhang Z, Wan X, et al. 2020. COVID-19: immunopathogenesis and immunotherapeutics. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 5:128

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-00243-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Fan HH, Wang LQ, Liu WL, An XP, Liu ZD, et al. 2020. Repurposing of clinically approved drugs for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 in a 2019-novel coronavirus-related coronavirus model. Chinese Medical Journal 133:1051−56

    doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Rogosnitzky M, Okediji P, Koman I. 2020. Cepharanthine: a review of the antiviral potential of a japanese-approved alopecia drug in COVID-19. Pharmacological Reports 72:1509−16

    doi: 10.1007/s43440-020-00132-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Gao S, Li X, Ding X, Qi W, Yang Q. 2017. Cepharanthine induces autophagy, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 41:1633−48

    doi: 10.1159/000471234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Bailly C. 2019. Cepharanthine: an update of its mode of action, pharmacological properties and medical applications. Phytomedicine 62:152956

    doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152956

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Minami H, Dubouzet E, Iwasa K, Sato F. 2007. Functional analysis of norcoclaurine synthase in Coptis japonica. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:6274−82

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608933200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Li Q, Bu J, Ma Y, Yang J, Hu Z, et al. 2020. Characterization of O-methyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of tetrandrine in Stephania tetrandra. Journal of Plant Physiology 250:153181

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153181

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhao W, Shen C, Zhu J, Ou C, Liu M, et al. 2020. Identification and characterization of methyltransferases involved in benzylisoquinoline alkaloids biosynthesis from Stephania intermedia. Biotechnology Letters 42:461−69

    doi: 10.1007/s10529-019-02785-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Godbole RC, Pable AA, Singh S, Barvkar VT. 2022. Interplay of transcription factors orchestrating the biosynthesis of plant alkaloids. 3 Biotech 12:250

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-022-03316-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Boke H, Ozhuner E, Turktas M, Parmaksiz I, Ozcan S, et al. 2015. Regulation of the alkaloid biosynthesis by miRNA in Opium poppy. Plant Biotechnology Journal 13:409−20

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Todd AT, Liu E, Polvi SL, Pammett RT, Page JE. 2010. A functional genomics screen identifies diverse transcription factors that regulate alkaloid biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana. The Plant Journal 62:589−600

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04186.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Yamada Y, Sato F. 2013. Transcription factors in alkaloid biosynthesis. In International review of cell and molecular biology, ed. Jeon KW. Vol 305. USA: Academic Press. pp. 339−82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407695-2.00008-1

    [15]

    De Boer K, Tilleman S, Pauwels L, Vanden Bossche R, De Sutter V, et al. 2011. Apetala2/ethylene response factor and basic helix-loop-helix tobacco transcription factors cooperatively mediate jasmonate-elicited nicotine biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 66:1053−65

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04566.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yamada Y, Nishida S, Shitan N, Sato, F. 2021. Genome-wide profiling of WRKY genes involved in benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis in California poppy (Eschscholzia californica). Frontiers in Plant Science 12:699326

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.699326

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jeena GS, Singh N, Shikha RK. 2022. An insight into microRNA biogenesis and its regulatory role in plant secondary metabolism. Plant Cell Reports 41:1651−71

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02877-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Pani A, Mahapatra RK. 2013. Computational identification of microRNAs and their targets in Catharanthus roseus expressed sequence tags. Genomics Data 1:2−6

    doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2013.06.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Fu Y, Guo H, Cheng Z, Wang R, Li G, et al. 2013. NtNAC-R1, a novel nac transcription factor gene in tobacco roots, responds to mechanical damage of shoot meristem. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 69:74−81

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Treiber TN, Treiber G, Meister. 2019. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis and its crosstalk with other cellular pathways. Nature reviews. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 20:5−20

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0059-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Cui C, Wang JJ, Zhao JH, Fang YY, He XF, et al. 2020. A Brassica miRNA regulates plant growth and immunity through distinct modes of action. Molecular Plant 13:231−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.11.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao J, Chen H, Yang H, He Y, Tian Z, et al. 2018. A brassinosteroid responsive miRNA-target module regulates gibberellin biosynthesis and plant development. The New Phytologist 220:488−501

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Liao B, Shen X, Xiang L, Guo S, Chen S, et al. 2022. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly of Artemisia annua reveals the correlation between ADS expansion and artemisinin yield. Molecular Plant 8:1310−28

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.05.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Abla M, Sun H, Li Z, Wei C, Gao F, et al. 2019. Identification of miRNAs and their response to cold stress in Astragalus membranaceus. Biomolecules 9:182

    doi: 10.3390/biom9050182

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Tirumalai V, Swetha C, Nair A, Pandit A, Shivaprasad PV. 2019. MiR828 and miR858 regulate VvMYB114 to promote anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation in grapes. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:4775−92

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz264

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Li H, Lin Q, Yan M, Wang M, Wang P, et al. 2021. Relationship between secondary metabolism and mirna for important flavor compounds in different tissues of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) as revealed by genome-wide miRNA analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 69:2001−12

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Samad AFA, Rahnamaie-Tajadod R, Sajad M, Jani J, Murad AMA, et al. 2019. Regulation of terpenoid biosynthesis by miRNA in Persicaria minor induced by Fusarium oxysporum. BMC Genomics 20:586

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5954-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Chen S, Li Z, Zhang S, Zhou Y, Xiao X, et al. 2022. Emerging biotechnology applications in natural product and synthetic pharmaceutical analyses. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 11:4075−97

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.08.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gabisonia K, Prosdocimo G, Aquaro GD, Carlucci L, Zentilin L, et al. 2019. MicroRNA therapy stimulates uncontrolled cardiac repair after myocardial infarction in pigs. Nature 569:418−22

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1191-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. 2017. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nature reviews. Drug Discovery 16:203−22

    doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Owusu Adjei M, Zhou X, Mao M, Rafique F, Ma J. 2021. MicroRNAs roles in plants secondary metabolism. Plant Signaling & Behavior 16:1915590

    doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1915590

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Chorostecki U, Moro B, Rojas AML, Debernardi JM, Schapire AL, et al. 2017. Evolutionary footprints reveal insights into plant microRNA biogenesis. The Plant Cell 29:1248−61

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00272

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Frazier TP, Xie F, Freistaedter A, Burklew CE, Zhang B. 2010. Identification and characterization of microRNAs and their target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Planta 232:1289−308

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1255-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S. 2019. MiRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic acids research 47:D155−D162

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1141

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Guo Z, Kuang Z, Zhao Y, Deng Y, He H, et al. 2022. PmiREN2.0: from data annotation to functional exploration of plant microRNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 50:D1475−D1482

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab811

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Zhang Z, Yu J, Li D, Zhang Z, Liu F, et al. 2009. PMRD: plant microRNA database. Nucleic Acids Research 38:D806−D813

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp818

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Su X, Yang L, Wang D, Shu Z, Yang Y, et al. 2022. 1 K Medicinal Plant Genome Database: an integrated database combining genomes and metabolites of medicinal plants. Horticulture Research 9:uhac075

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Sun W, Xu Z, Song C, Chen S. 2022. Herbgenomics: decipher molecular genetics of medicinal plants. The Innovation 3(6):100322

    doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100322

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Miao C, Wang Z, Zhang L, Yao J, Hua K, et al. 2019. The grain yield modulator miR156 regulates seed dormancy through the gibberellin pathway in rice. Nature Communications 10:3822

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11830-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods 9:357−59

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zuker M. 2003. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research 31:3406−15

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Markham NR, Zuker M. 2008. UNAFold: software for nucleic acid folding and hybridization. In Bioinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology™, ed. Keith JM. Vol 453. Humana Press. pp. 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-429-6_1

    [43]

    Paul S, de la Fuente-Jiménez JL, Manriquez CG, Sharma A. 2020. Identification, characterization and expression analysis of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) microRNAs. 3 Biotech 10:25

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-2000-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jin J, Tian F, Yang DC, Meng YQ, Kong L, et al. 2017. PlantTFDB 4.0: toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Research 45:D1040−D1045

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Fahlgren N, Carrington JC. 2010. miRNA target prediction in plants. In Plant MicroRNAs. Methods in Molecular Biology, ed. Meyers B, Green P. Vol 592. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. pp. 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-005-2_4

    [46]

    Abel Y, Rederstorff M. 2021, Stem-loop qRT-PCR-based quantification of miRNAs. In Small Non-Coding RNAs. Methods in Molecular Biology, ed. Rederstorff M. Vol 2300. New York: Humana. pp. 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1386-3_6

    [47]

    Patra B, Pattanaik S, Schluttenhofer C, Yuan L. 2018. A network of jasmonate-responsive bHLH factors modulate monoterpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. The New Phytologist 217:1566−81

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14910

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Chen C, Li J, Feng J, Liu B, Feng L, et al. 2021. sRNAanno-a database repository of uniformly annotated small RNAs in plants. Horticulture Research 8:45

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00480-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Willmann MR, Poethig RS. 2007. Conservation and evolution of miRNA regulatory programs in plant development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10:503−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Huang D, Koh C, Feurtado JA, Tsang EWT, Cutler AJ. 2013. MicroRNAs and their putative targets in Brassica napus seed maturation. BMC Genomics 14:140

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Pan F, Wang Y, Liu H, Wu M, Chu W, et al. 2017. Genome-wide Identification and expression analysis of SBP-like transcription factor genes in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). BMC Genomics 18:486

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3882-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zhu H, Zhang Y, Tang R, Qu H, Duan X, et al. 2019. Banana SRNAome and degradome identify microRNAs functioning in differential responses to temperature stress. BMC genomics 20:33

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5395-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Dröge-Laser W, Snoek BL, Snel B, Weiste C. 2018. The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor family-an update. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 45:36−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    He Q, Cai H, Bai M, Zhang M, Chen F, et al. 2020. A soybean bZIP transcription factor GmbZIP19 confers multiple biotic and abiotic stress responses in plant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:4701

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21134701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Chang C, Liu Z, Wang Y, Tang Z, Yu F. 2019. A bZIP transcription factor, CaLMF, mediated light-regulated camptothecin biosynthesis in Camptotheca acuminata. Tree Physiology 39:372−80

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhang Y, Wang L. 2005. The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology 5:1

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Sun W, Ma Z, Chen H, Liu M. 2020. Genome-wide Investigation of WRKY transcription factors in Tartary Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) and their potential roles in regulating growth and development. Peer J 8:e8727

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.8727

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Jiang W, Fu X, Pan Q, Tang Y, Shen Q, et al. 2016. Overexpression of AaWRKY1 leads to an enhanced content of Artemisinin in Artemisia annua. Biomed Research International 2016:7314971

    doi: 10.1155/2016/7314971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Chen WH, Li PF, Chen MK, Lee YI, Yang CH. 2015. Forever young flower negatively regulates ethylene response DNA-binding factors by activating an ethylene-responsive factor to control Arabidopsis floral organ senescence and abscission. Plant Physiology 168:1666−83

    doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00433

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yang H, Liu Z, Yu C, Song C, Wang C. 2023. Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:7 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0007
    Yang H, Liu Z, Yu C, Song C, Wang C. 2023. Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:7 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0007

Figures(6)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(2855) PDF downloads(482)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica

Medicinal Plant Biology  2 Article number: 7  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: MicroRNAs are a group of endogenous small non-coding RNAs, they can guide silencing complex to degrade mRNA or hinder its translation by pairing with the target gene mRNA base. In this study, applying high stringent genome-wide computational-based approaches, a total of 31 putative microRNAs were predicted in Stephania japonica. After strict secondary structure screening, seven microRNAs with high reliability were identified and classified into three microRNA families. Using Targetfinder tool, a total of 47 potential target transcription factors of microRNAs were identified, including bHLH, SBP, TCP, ERF transcription factors. The co-expression network of transcription factors and three important cepharanthine-biosynthetic genes shown that microRNAs might be involved in regulating the biosynthesis of cepharanthine and its precursors by regulating potential target transcription factors. Additionally, correlation analysis of microRNAs and transcription factors indicated that the tissue expression patterns of Sja-miR8528, Sja-miR156a and Sja-miR156c showed positive correlation with six transcription factors, while Sja-miR535 showed a negative correlation with five transcription factors. This is the first study explored putative microRNA and analyzed their predictive target transcription factors in S. japonica, providing useful information for future microRNA research in herbal plants.

    • Stephania japonica is a vine plant of the family Menispermaceae[1]. Which is widely used in traditional medicine and ornamental gardening[1,2]. The COVID-19 outbreak in 2019 led to a global disaster, and scientists are working together to find effective drugs[3]. This brings S. japonica back into the view of scientists. Among study results of effective drugs, cepharanthine (CEP) stands out because of its high coronavirus suppression effect in vitro according to the cell experiment of Fan et al.[4] and and Rogosnitzky et al.[5]. CEP is a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid that has been shown to have effects like antiviral, anti-inflammatory and antitumor[6]. It is a secondary metabolite of S. japonica, and extraction from plants is still one of the main ways of its production[7]. CEP supply remains depends on the extraction from the root of S. japonica, however, the current production mode unable sustain the demand of high-quality CEP required by the market.

      CEP biosynthesis mainly begins with dopamine and 4-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde via norclaurane synthesis (NCS) to yield norclaurane[8], norclaurane under the catalysis of 6-O-methyltransferase (6OMT) to produce coclaurine[9], coclaurine under the catalysis of coclaurine N-methyltransferase (CNMT) to produce methycoclaurine[10], and methycoclaurine is the precursor of the synthesis of CEP, it was catalyzed by O-methyltransferase (OMT) and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) (Supplemental Fig. S1). With the increased clinical demand for cepharanthine, it is important to study the biosynthesis of cepharanthine and how transcription factors (TFs) and microRNA regulate its biosynthesis. Previous studies indicated that microRNAs and TF play an important role in the biosynthesis of alkaloids[11,12]. For example, CrERF5 positively regulate the biosynthesis of indole alkaloids and their precursors in Catharanthus roseus[13,14]. The overexpression of NtORC1/ERF221 significantly increased the accumulation of nicotine alkaloid in tobacco plants[15]. Overexpression of CjWRKY1 could increase benzylisoquinoline alkaloid in California poppy cells[16]. MicroRNA is a common regulatory factor that can affect alkaloids biosynthesis by regulating transcription factors[17]. An Arabidopsis miR5021 homologue have a regulatory effect on the key enzymes involved in alkaloid biosynthesis in C. roseus[18]. Three microRNAs in Opium poppy are related to the biosynthesis of alkaloids[11]. miR164 targets the NTNAC-R1 gene to increase nicotine content in tobacco[19]. Study on the regulation of microRNA on transcription factors can play a guiding role in the production of plant secondary metabolites.

      MicroRNA is a class of non-coding RNA with a length of 18 - 24 nt, which is ubiquitous in living organisms and play a role in regulating gene expression[20]. MicroRNA has emerged as important regulators in plants, partcipating in plant biological and metabolic process, such as plant development[2122], and various environmental response[2324]. Interestingly, increasing evidence has shown that the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites in plants were meditated by microRNAs. microRNA-mediated silencing targeted the repressor class of MYBs to promote anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape lines with high anthocyanins[25]. microRNAs may regulate the biosynthesis of flavor compounds in different tissues of tea plant, for instance, the content of gallate catechins was related with the expression of miR156, miR166 and miR172, and the increased content of non-gallated catechins was shown to be positively correlated with the expression of miR169a, miR169l and miR319h[26]. In addition, the biosynthesis of terpenoid and alkaloid has also been meditated by microRNAs. The research suggested that the microRNAs including pmi-miR6173, pmi-miR6300, pmi-Nov_13, miR396a, miR398f/g and pmi-Nov12 post-transcriptionally regulate terpenoid biosynthesis in Persicaria minor (kesum)[27]. The investigation uncovered unknown microRNA families including miR396, miR319, miR399, miR858, miR5083, miR6111 in the Artemisia annua and these microRNAs may influence artemisinin (ART) accumulation[28]. As the depth study of microRNA increases, microRNAs are already being regarded as future gene therapy drugs to be developed[29,30]. MicroRNAs and binding sites of their target genes are evolutionarily conserved in different species[31,32]. Based on their conservation, microRNAs in other species can be predicted by computational methods[33]. The public database such as miRbase[34], PmiREN[35], PMRD[36] makes it easier to carry out research on more species.

      MicroRNAs are important pilots of secondary metabolites, and research on regulatory effects of microRNA in S. japonica are more and more necessary. None of the microRNA-related studies have been performed so far in S. japonica, and none are listed in the miRBase. This research used genomic data to explore potential microRNA in S. japonica and analyzed their regulatory effects to related TFs. Then generated the microRNA and respective target profile of S. japonica and performed a comparative microRNA expression study between vegetative and reproductive tissues (leaves, roots, stems, and buds), which may help to understand the microRNA-mediated regulation of transcription factors and further regulate the biosynthesis of CEP in S. japonica.

    • The S. japonica genome data was obtained by our research group (unpublished data)[37,38]. Known microRNAs downloaded from the miRBase database (www.mirbase.org) used as a reference microRNA set for predicting the conserved microRNAs[39]. To identify the potential microRNA genes in the S. japonica genome, mature microRNAs were filtered out and aligned with S. japonica genome sequences by the bowtie method (params: -f -m 20 -v 1 -a)[40]. In order to obtain the relatively conservative and maximum possible microRNA, the bowtie process allows only one mismatch, and microRNAs identified within other plants were retained and kept for analysis.

    • To check the reliability of 31 putative microRNAs, the 200 bp upstream and downstream of putative microRNAs were predicted secondary structures using MFOLD (http://unafold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold)[41] and the UNAFold website (www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/rna-folding-form.php)[42]. To further improve credibility of candidate microRNA, the filtering standards described by Paul et al.[43] were used to screen for microRNAs with stem-loop structure.

    • All gene models in S. japonica genome were assigned to TFs families based on PlantTFDB classification. The TF database was obtained from PlantTFDB (http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/)[44]. In this study, Targetfinder (https://github.com/carringtonlab/TargetFinder)[45] was used with default parameters to identify the potential microRNA targets. Potential target genes, including transcription factors were subsequently analyzed.

    • The physical location distribution of 47 transcription factors was obtained from the genome data of S. japonica. The TBtools was used to visualize the relationship between 47 transcription factors and four microRNA in S. japonica. RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) data of various S. japonica tissues were obtained by our research group (unpublished data), including leaf, root, stem, and bud. In our study, the expression patterns of 47 transcription factors were analyzed using TBtools software based on the FPKM values.

    • S. japonica plants were obtained from Hubei province, China. Stem, leaf, root, and bud were collected respectively. The samples from six individual plants were pooled as one biological replicate used for RNA-seq analysis and qRT-PCR analysis. The qualified RNAs were used for cDNA library preparation. Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer was used to detect the quality of the library and DNBSEQ was used for RNA sequencing. The raw data of low-quality, irrelevant sequences were filtered out using fastq1 (v.0.21.0. option: default). Clean sequences were aligned to the reference genome using Star3. StringTie4 was used to assemble the transcripts, and use the merge function of the software to merge the transcript of each sample. The combined transcripts were compared with the known transcripts in gffcompare5 (v. 0.12.1. option: -R-C-K) to obtain new transcripts and new genes. The gene expression statistics were generated using RSEM6 to obtain the number of reads in the transcript of the sample and convert to Fragments Per Kilobase per Million bases (FPKM). The co-expression network was visualized using Cytoscape.

      Total RNA of leaves, roots, stems, and buds in S. japonica was extracted according to plant total RNA Extraction Kit (Foregene Biotech, Chendu, China, CodeNo. RE-05011) and reverse-transcribed according to the reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Foregene Biotech, Chengdu, China, CodeNo. RT-01032). Specific reverse transcription primers were design for the microRNA using the Stem-loop qRT-PCR method[46]. During reverse transcription, microRNAs were reverse transcribed with individual tubes to get cDNA for qPCR. The cDNA was used as a template to measure gene expression. The specific primers and the GAPDH gene (internal control) are listed in Supplemental Table S1. A quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was conducted by a realtime PCR system (QuantStudio5) using TB Green® Premix ExT aq™ II (Vazyme Biotech, Beijing, China, CodeNo. Q711-02). The comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCᴛ method) was used to quantify relative gene expression. Correlation analysis is completed using the online analysis website of Cloudtutu (www.cloudtutu.com).

    • A public data of mature plant miRNAs was downloaded from miRBase database (http://www.mirbase.org/), and possible microRNA sites was found use genome-wide matching by bowtie (removes non-plant microRNAs and repeats). In total, 31 potential microRNAs were predicted from S. japonica using a rigorous filtration method. Most of the identified S. japonica microRNAs were match to Picea abies (20%), Arabidopsis thaliana (13%), Oryza sativa (10%), and Camelina sativa (10%) (Fig. 1a). Thirty one potential microRNAs belong to ten microRNA families (miR1134, miR11418, miR11592, miR1168, miR156, miR415, miR5021, miR529, miR535, and miR6196) (Supplemental Table S1 & Fig. 1b).

      Figure 1. 

      (a) Potential microRNAs found by bowtie software come from known microRNAs of different species. (b) Potential microRNAs found by bowtie software from known microRNAs families.

    • To further improve credibility of candidate microRNA, secondary structures of 31 potential pre-microRNA were predicted using RNAfold and mfold. The possible precursor (pre-miRNA) sequences of approximately 400 nucleotides (nt) (200 nt upstream and 200 nt downstream to the BLAST hit region) were mined. Seven out of 31 potential pre-microRNA have been screened out with stem-loop structure, which belonging to three microRNA families (miR156, miR535, miR8528) (Supplemental Fig. S2, Table 1). In the current study, the maximum number of microRNA members was found to be present in the miR156 family. The GC content of S. japonica microRNAs had an average of 52.14%. The MFE values ranged from −36.3 to −48.6 with an average of −45.06, while the MFEI values oscillated between 0.86 and 1.25 with an average of 1.16, excluding the possibility of being other microRNAs.

      Table 1.  Summary of the identified microRNAs from S. japonica.

      NameLM
      (nt)
      Query
      microRNA
      Chromosome
      position
      microRNA
      sequences
      AccessionLocLP
      (nt)
      GC
      (%)
      MFEs
      (ΔG)
      MFEI
      Sja-miR156a20ath-miR156hchr10_4372847_4373267UGACAGAAGAAAGAGAGCACMIMAT00010135'8544−451.2
      Sja-miR156b20ath-miR156hchr11_610113_610533UGACAGAAGAAAGAGAGCACMIMAT00010135'8439−42.21.3
      Sja-miR156c19cas-miR156gchr4_50504862_50505281GACAGAAGAGAGUGAGCACMIMAT00452765'8148−48.61.3
      Sa-jmiR156d19cas-miR156gchr5_16609851_16610270GACAGAAGAGAGUGAGCACMIMAT00452765'8148−48.61.3
      Sja-miR156e19cas-miR156gchr8_1964637_1965056GACAGAAGAGAGUGAGCACMIMAT00452765'8450−36.30.9
      Sja-miR53520ppt-miR535achr3_56476014_56476435GGCGGCGGCGAGGCGGGGGMIMAT00031395'8156−46.51.0
      Sja-miR852818pxy-miR-8528achr3_55723033_55723451GGGCGGCGGCGAGCGGGAMIMAT00337485'4980−48.21.2
    • A total of 1125 transcription factors has been predicted and assigned to 56 transcription factor families based on PlantTFDB classification. The transcription factor families with a large number in S. japonica are NAC, bHLH, MYB, ERF, C2H2, and MYB-related transcription factors (Fig. 2a). Fourty seven target sites of microRNA were obtained using Targetfinder. We found that bHLH (7), SBP (5), TCP (4), TALE (3), and ERF (3) account for a large proportion of 47 transcription factors and may be regulated by microRNAs (Fig. 2b & Supplemental Table S2).

      Figure 2. 

      (a) Number of transcription factor families in S. japonica. (b) Statistical analysis of 47 transcription factors with regulatory relationship with microRNA.

    • Seven microRNAs and 47 transcription factors were disproportionately distributed on 11 S. japonica chromosomes (Fig. 3). The Sja-miR156b, Sja-miR156c, Sja-miR156d, Sa-jmiR156e, and Sja-miR156f were located in the Chr 4, Chr 5, Chr 8, Chr 10, Chr 11, respectively. The Sja-miR535 and Sja-miR8528 were located in Chr 3. Nine TFs genes on Chr1, four TFs genes on Chr2, two TFs on Chr3, six TFs on Chr4, five TFs on Chr5, two on Chr6, five on Chr7, five on Chr8, four on Chr9, three on Chr 10, and two on Chr11. In addition, a total of 27 potential target proteins of Sja-miR535 were identified, including bHLH (4), TCP (3), ERF (2) and WRKY (2). Sja-miR8528 has target relationship with 11 transcription factors in eight families such as SPB (3). Sja-miR156b has target relationship with five transcription factors, Sja-miR156c has target relationship with four transcription factors, and five target proteins of Sja-miR156d were identified.

      Figure 3. 

      The chromosome mapping of microRNA and transcription factors.

    • The expression profiles of 47 transcription factors in different tissues (leaf, root, stem, and bud) of S. japonica were carried out. The heatmap analysis showed that most transcription factors preferentially expressed in roots, and buds. A total of 26 TFs with high expressions were observed in root tissues of S. japonica (Supplemental Fig. S3). Eight TFs with high expressions were observed in bud tissue. Five TFs with high expressions in stem tissue, and six TFs with high expressions in leaf tissue.

      The key enzymes involved in CEP biosynthesis pathway have been isolated and identified in other plants (Supplemental Table S3). We identified five NCS, five 6-OMT, and five CNMT genes in S. japonica genome using BLASTP method, which are highly similar with known functional genes at protein level. Heatmap analysis showed that the majority of 47 transcription factors had higher expression level in root, which was consistent with candidate CEP-biosynthetic genes. Co-expression analysis of transcription factors and CEP-biosynthetic genes was constructed using Cytoscape (R > 0.8, P-value < 0.05). The result shown that 32 TFs were strongly correlated with CEP-biosynthetic genes in S. japonica. They may participate in regulating the biosynthesis of CEP or its precursors (Fig. 4).

      Figure 4. 

      Regulatory network of transcription factors genes with CEP biosynthetic genes in S. japonica. Red: transcription factors genes. Purple: CEP biosynthetic genes.

    • To further investigate the correlation between microRNA and transcription factors based on expression levels, we examined the expression levels of four microRNA and six transcription factors (which were confirmed to play an important role in alkaloid biosynthesis in the previous studies) using quantitative reverse-transcription (qRT-PCR). qRT-PCR results indicated that four microRNA had higher expression levels in S. japonica root. Six transcription factors had higher expression levels in leaf and had lower expression levels in root and bud. The qRT-PCR results of six transcription factors were consistent with those obtained with RNA-seq, with high expressions in leaf (Fig. 5).

      Figure 5. 

      Expression analysis of microRNA and transcription factors in different tissues by qRT-PCR. (a) - (d) Four microRNA expression levels. (e) - (j) Six transcription factors expression levels. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (P < 0.05).

    • In order to explore the correlation between microRNAs and transcription factors, we performed a correlation analysis on the expression levels of four microRNAs and six transcription factors. The correlation analysis showed that the expression pattern of Sja-miR8528 and six TFs present positive correlation. Additionally, the positive correlation trend has also been verified between the microRNA Sja-miR156a, Sja-miR156c. On the contrary, the Sja-miR535 expression was in negative correlation trend associated with the five TFs expect the SjERF3. Hence, the microRNA Sja-miR8528, Sja-miR156a and Sja-miR156c might played a certain role in participated regulate the program of the cepharanthine by regulating the expression of the transcription factors such as basic (region) leucine zippers (bZIP), WRKY, and ERF (Fig. 6).

      Figure 6. 

      Correlation analysis of microRNAs and transcription factors.

    • MicroRNAs have been widely found to play regulatory roles in plants, which play an important role in many aspects such as plant development, reproduction and genome reprogramming[47]. In addition to regulation of gene expression, microRNA have also been found to be involved in key steps such as post transcriptional modification, processing and export steps, other regulatory mechanisms may also be involved[48]. MicroRNA was once ignored and thought to function only in non-mammalian species[20]. With the discovery of that microRNA plays an important role in many steps, the research on microRNA will be possible to solve more unsolved mysteries of biology.

      In the present study, we predicted seven microRNAs which belong to three microRNA families (miR156, miR535, miR8528). The miRNA156 was found in A. thaliana firstly, with highly conserved regions[49] which are involved in the growth and development process of plants by regulating the SQUAMOSA promoter binding proteins/ SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein-like (SBP/SPL) gene[38]. It’s reported that there is highest expression of miR156 family in seeds and mature embryos, most of which are expressed during embryonic development, and the expression volume shows a steady upward trend with seed maturity[50]. In the study, 47 TFs have been verified which were regulated by the seven microRNAs, and the six target genes including one SBP gene and two bHLH gene has been predicted of the five members of miR156 family, as well as bHLH (7), SBP (5), TCP (4), TALE (3), and ERF (3) account for a large proportion. The SBP (Squamosa promoter binding protein) is the unique transcription factors in the plant which play a vital role in the regulating plant-type, flowering, yield, hormone signal transduction and stress response[51]. However, in the analysis of chromosome location distribution of seven microRNAs and 47 transcription factors, we found that microRNA and the regulated genes were distributed on all chromosomes, without centralized distribution, and there were intra-chromosome regulation and inter-chromosome regulation. Most of the microRNA sites are located at the edge of chromosome (Fig. 3). Therefore, in this work, the five microRNAs of miR156 family may participate in the growth and development of the S. japonica by regulating the SBP. There are few related research of the miR535 family and the miR8528 family, the research showed that the miR535 family may play a considerable role in fine tuning SPL gene expression in banana[52]. In the study, although 47 target genes of miR535 and the miR8528 were predicted, the function of the two transcription factors need to further verified.

      The bZIP transcription factors are characterized by a basic DNA-binding region and an adjacent so-called leucine zipper, enabling bZIP to dimerize[53]. They play an important role in plant signal transduction, response to biological and abiotic stress[54], regulation of growth and development, and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites[55]. The WRKY family is a unique TF family of higher plants and algae, which play important roles in many life processes, particularly in response against biotic and abiotic stress, which was first found in Impoea batatas[56]. It is reported that FtWRKY42 is highly expressed in the root and may perform a similar function with its homologous gene AtWRKY75, which play a role in the formation of lateral and hairy roots. FtWRKY9, FtWRKY42 and FtWRKY60 are highly expressed in fruit and may play an important role in fruit development[57]. The recent research showed that the WRKY was involved in the biosynthesis of Artemisinin[58]. ERF transcription factors regulate fruit ripening by effecting the changes of pigment and softening, and control the longevity of flowers and leaves by regulating the process of senescence and abscission[59]. In the present study, we analyzed the relationship between four microRNA and six transcription factors (bZIP, WRKY, ERF), the correlation analysis showed the Sja-miR8528, Sja-miR156a and Sja-miR156c expression was in positive association with the six TFs, which may mean these microRNAs participate in the process of the growth and development of S. japonica by regulating the expression of transcription factors. On the contrary, the Sja-miR535 expression was in negative associated with the five TFs expect the ERF-2. Thus, the microRNA might play a certain role in regulation of plant secondary metabolism through TFs.

    • In the present study, seven conserved microRNAs were identified in the S. japonica genome, belonging to three microRNA families (miR156, miR535, miR8528), and 47 predictive target transcription factors were obtained. Co-expression network of transcription factors and CEP-biosynthetic genes indicated that microRNAs may involve in regulating the biosynthesis of CEP and its precursors by regulating potential target transcription factors. The tissue expression level of four selected microRNAs (Sja-miR156a, Sja-miR156c, Sja-miR535, Sja-miR8528) and six transcription factors (bZIP, WRKY and ERF) were determined using the qRT-PCR method. Through correlation analysis, it was found that the expression pattern of Sja-miR8528 was positively correlated with the six TFs. Our study is the first to identify microRNAs and their targets in S. japonica and will be helpful for strengthening the research on microRNA-mediated regulation in herbal plants.

      • This work was supported by introduces the talented person scientific research start funds subsidization project of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (030040017) and Hubei science and technology planning project (2020BCB038).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Chi Song is the Editorial Board member of Medicinal Plant Biology who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Hanting Yang, Zhaoyu Liu

      • Supplemental Fig. S1 Cepharanthine biosynthesis pathway. The red dotted line shows the unidentified enzyme.
      • Supplemental Fig. S2 Secondary Structure of MicroRNA.
      • Supplemental Fig. S3 Expression patterns of 47 transcription factors in different tissues and CEP biosynthetic pathway genes in S. japonica.
      • Supplemental Table S1 List of specific primer sequences in this study.
      • Supplemental Table S2 47 potential regulating relationship were predicted between microRNA and transcription factors.
      • Supplemental Table S3 Protein sequence that has catalytic activity and participates in CEP biosynthesis in other species.
      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (1) References (59)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yang H, Liu Z, Yu C, Song C, Wang C. 2023. Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:7 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0007
    Yang H, Liu Z, Yu C, Song C, Wang C. 2023. Expression relationship between microRNA and transcription factors in Stephania japonica. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:7 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0007

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return