Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans

  • # These authors contributed equally: Yuanji Han, Yanxia He

More Information
  • Sweet osmanthus is an androdioecious plant; however, the mechanism underlying pistil sterility in male plants is still unclear. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the structure of pollen grains in the stamens does not differ between the sterile cultivar 'Chenghong Dangui' and the fertile cultivar 'Huangchuan Jingui'. Triphenyltetrazolium chloride and fluorescein diacetate staining as well as in vitro culture experiments revealed that pollen grains were active in both cultivars, indicating that the stamens in both 'Chenghong Dangui' and 'Huangchuan Jingui' could develop normally. When the pistils of the fertile cultivar 'Huangchuan Jingui' differentiated, two protrusions formed on the inner side of the stamen primordium, and these gradually developed and fused together to form the ovary, style, and stigma. The pistil of the sterile cultivar 'Chenghong Dangui' also formed two protrusions on the inner side of the stamen during differentiation; however, instead of fusing, two fronds were formed. These results suggest that male sweet osmanthus are formed due to the abortion of pistils during the development of floral organs. Transcriptome sequencing revealed that the expression levels of carpel development gene CRC, AG, and AGL11 were significantly lower in 'Chenghong Dangui' compared with 'Huangchuan Jingui' at different flowering stages, which provide new insight in the molecular mechanism of pistil abortion in 'Chenghong Dangui'. CRC and AG may regulate each other to promote carpel development.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Primers used in this study.
    Supplemental File 1 Differential expression of genes in the linggeng stage of the 2 cultivars.
    Supplemental File 2 Differential expression of genes in the xiangyan stage of the 2 cultivars.
    Supplemental File 3 Differential expression of genes in the initial flowering stage of the 2 cultivars.
    Supplemental File 4 Differential expression of genes in the full flowering stage of the 2 cultivars.
    Supplemental File 5 Differential expression of genes in the late full flowering stage of the 2 cultivars.
    Supplemental File 6 Enrichment of KEGG pathway in linggeng flowering stage.
    Supplemental File 7 Enrichment of KEGG pathway in xingyan flowering stage.
    Supplemental File 8 Enrichment of KEGG pathway in initial flowering stage.
    Supplemental File 9 Enrichment of KEGG pathway in full flowering stage.
    Supplemental File 10 Enrichment of KEGG pathway in late full flowering stage.
  • [1]

    Dellaporta SL, Calderon-Urrea A. 1993. Sex determination in flowering plants. The Plant Cell 5:1241−51

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1241

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31−37

    doi: 10.1038/353031a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM. 1994. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell 78:203−09

    doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90291-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Causier B, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Davies B. 2010. Floral organ identity: 20 years of ABCs. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 21:73−79

    doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.10.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Cheng Z, Ge W, Li L, Hou D, Ma Y, et al. 2017. Analysis of MADS-box gene family reveals conservation in floral organ ABCDE model of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Frontiers in Plant Science 8:656

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00656

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Liu J, Fu X, Dong Y, Lu J, Ren M, et al. 2018. MIKCC-type MADS-box genes in Rosa chinensis: the remarkable expansion of ABCDE model genes and their roles in floral organogenesis. Horticuture Research 5:25

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0031-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Shore P, Sharrocks AD. 1995. The MADS-box family of transcription factors. European Journal of Biochemistry 229:1−13

    Google Scholar

    [8]

    Mena M, Ambrose BA, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Yanofsky MF, et al. 1996. Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science 274:1537−40

    doi: 10.1126/science.274.5292.1537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yellina AL, Orashakova S, Lange S, Erdmann R, Leebens-Mack J, et al. 2010. Floral homeotic C function genes repress specific B function genes in the carpel whorl of the basal eudicot California poppy (Eschscholzia californica). EvoDevo 1:13

    doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-1-13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Lu HW, Klocko AL, Brunner AM, Ma C, Magnuson AC, et al. 2019. RNA interference suppression of AGAMOUS and SEEDSTICK alters floral organ identity and impairs floral organ determinacy, ovule differentiation, and seed-hair development in Populus. New Phytologist 222:923−37

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15648

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Liu H, Li J, Gong P, He C. 2023. The origin and evolution of carpels and fruits from an evo-devo perspective. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:283−98

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Fourquin C, Vinauger-Douard M, Fogliani B, Dumas C, Scutt CP. 2005. Evidence that CRABS CLAW and TOUSLED have conserved their roles in carpel development since the ancestor of the extant angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:4649−54

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409577102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Morel P, Heijmans K, Ament K, Chopy M, Trehin C, et al. 2018. The floral C-lineage genes trigger nectary development in Petunia and Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 30:2020−37

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Gong P, Song C, Liu H, Li P, Zhang M, et al. 2021. Physalis floridana CRABS CLAW mediates neofunctionalization of GLOBOSA genes in carpel development. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:6882−903

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab309

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM. 1989. Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 1:37−52

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.37

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, et al. 1990. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346:35−39

    doi: 10.1038/346035a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Davies B, Motte P, Keck E, Saedler H, Sommer H, et al. 1999. PLENA and FARINELLI: redundancy and regulatory interactions between two Antirrhinum MADS-box factors controlling flower development. The EMBO Journal 18:4023−34

    doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.14.4023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kapoor M, Tsuda S, Tanaka Y, Mayama T, Okuyama Y, et al. 2002. Role of petunia pMADS3 in determination of floral organ and meristem identity, as revealed by its loss of function. The Plant Journal 32:115−27

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01402.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Hands P, Vosnakis N, Betts D, Irish VF, Drea S. 2011. Alternate transcripts of a floral developmental regulator have both distinct and redundant functions in opium poppy. Annals of Botany 107:1557−66

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Nakatsuka T, Saito M, Yamada E, Fujita K, Yamagishi N, et al. 2015. Isolation and characterization of the C-class MADS-box gene involved in the formation of double flowers in Japanese gentian. BMC Plant Biology 15:e182

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0569-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Klocko AL, Borejsza-Wysocka E, Brunner AM, Shevchenko O, Aldwinckle H, et al. 2016. Transgenic suppression of AGAMOUS genes in apple reduces fertility and increases floral attractiveness. PLoS ONE 11:e0159421

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Eshed Y, Baum SF, Bowman JL. 1999. Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell 99:199−209

    doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81651-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yamaguchi T, Nagasawa N, Kawasaki S, Matsuoka M, Nagato Y, et al. 2004. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. The Plant Cell 16:500−09

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.018044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Sugiyama SH, Yasui Y, Ohmori S, Tanaka W, Hirano HY. 2019. Rice flower development revisited: regulation of carpel specification and flower meristem determinacy. Plant and Cell Physiology 60:1284−95

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bowman JL, Smyth DR. 1999. CRABS CLAW, a gene that regulates carpel and nectary development in Arabidopsis, encodes a novel protein with zinc finger and helix-loop-helix domains. Development 126:2387−96

    doi: 10.1242/dev.126.11.2387

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Lee JY, Baum SF, Alvarez J, Patel A, Chitwood DH, et al. 2005. Activation of CRABS CLAW in the nectaries and carpels of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 17:25−36

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026666

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Orashakova S, Lange M, Lange S, Wege S, Becker A. 2009. The CRABS CLAW ortholog from California poppy (Eschscholzia californica, Papaveraceae), EcCRC, is involved in floral meristem termination, gynoecium differentiation and ovule initiation. The Plant Journal 58:682−93

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03807.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Alvarez J, Smyth DR. 1999. CRABS CLAW and SPATULA, two Arabidopsis genes that control carpel development in parallel with AGAMOUS. Development 126:2377−86

    doi: 10.1242/dev.126.11.2377

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gómez-Mena C, de Folter S, Costa MMR, Angenent GC, Sablowski R. 2005. Transcriptional program controlled by the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS during early organogenesis. Development 132:429−38

    doi: 10.1242/dev.01600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Li X, Yang Y, Zheng W, Hou J. 2002. On Flower-bud Induction in Fruit Trees. Chinese Bulletin of Botany 19:385−95

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2002.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ma Y, Dai S. 2004. Flower bud differentiation mechanism of anthophyta. Molecular Plant Breeding 1:539−45

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2003.04.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Li J, Dong M, Shang F. 2007. Study on the Flower Bud Differentiation of Osmanthus fragrans 'Dangui' and O. fragrans 'Ziyingui'. Chinese Bulletin of Botany 24:620−23

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2007.05.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Wodehouse RP. 1935. Pollen grains. pp. xv + 574. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 323−40 pp.

    [34]

    Walker JW. 1976. Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. In The Evolutionary Significance of Exine, eds. Ferguson IK, Muller J. London: Academic Press. 251−308 pp.

    [35]

    Vernet P, Lepercq P, Billiard S, Bourceaux A, Lepart J, et al. 2016. Evidence for the long-term maintenance of a rare self-incompatibility system in Oleaceae. New Phytologist 210:1408−17

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13872

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Charlesworth D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22:333−48

    doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01683.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Wallander E. 2008. Systematics of Fraxinus (Oleaceae) and evolution of dioecy. Plant Systematics and Evolution 273:25−49

    doi: 10.1007/s00606-008-0005-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Ross MD, Weir BS. 1976. Maintenences of males and females in hermaphrodite populations and the evolution of dioecy. Evolution 30:425−41

    doi: 10.2307/2407568

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Lloyd DG. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325−39

    doi: 10.1007/BF01508307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Ross MD. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. The American Naturalist 119:297−318

    doi: 10.1086/283911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Xu L, Wang J, Song L, Wang L. 2009. Preliminary study on the functions of AGAMOUS homologous genes in Pisum sativum (in Chinese). Chinese Science Bulletin 54:3207−12

    doi: 10.1360/972009-724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Liljegren SJ, Ditta GS, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman JL, et al. 2000. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:766−70

    doi: 10.1038/35008089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Pinyopich A, Ditta GS, Savidge B, Liljegren SJ, Baumann E, et al. 2003. Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature 424:85−88

    doi: 10.1038/nature01741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Favaro R, Pinyopich A, Battaglia R, Kooiker M, Borghi L, et al. 2003. MADS-box protein complexes control carpel and ovule development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 15:2603−11

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.015123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Mejía N, Soto B, Guerrero M, Casanueva X, Houel C, et al. 2011. Molecular, genetic and transcriptional evidence for a role of VvAGL11 in stenospermocarpic seedlessness in grapevine. BMC Plant Biology 11:57

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-57

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Ocarez N, Mejía N. 2016. Suppression of the D-class MADS-box AGL 11 gene triggers seedlessness in fleshy fruits. Plant Cell Reports 35:239−54

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1882-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhang S, Tan FQ, Chung CH, Slavkovic F, Devani RS, et al. 2022. The control of carpel determinacy pathway leads to sex determinationin cucurbits. Science 378:543−49

    doi: 10.1126/science.add4250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Lenhard M, Bohnert A, Jürgens G, Laux T. 2001. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 105:805−14

    doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00390-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Lohmann JU, Hong RL, Hobe M, Busch MA, Parcy F, et al. 2001. A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 105:793−803

    doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00384-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Prunet N, Yang W, Das P, Meyerowitz EM, Jack TP. 2017. SUPERMAN prevents class B gene expression and promotes stem cell termination in the fourth whorl of Arabidopsis thaliana flowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114:7166−71

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705977114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Xu Y, Prunet N, Gan ES, Wang Y, Stewart D, et al. 2018. SUPERMAN regulates floral whorl boundaries through control of auxin biosynthesis. The EMBO Journal 37:e97499

    doi: 10.15252/embj.201797499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Yamaguchi N, Huang JB, Xu YF, Tanoi K, Ito T. 2017. Fine-tuning of auxin homeostasis governs the transition from floral stem cell maintenance to gynoecium formation. Nature Communications 8:1125

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01252-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Castañeda L, Giménez E, Pineda B, García-Sogo B, Ortiz-Atienza A, et al. 2022. Tomato CRABS CLAW paralogues interact with chromatin remodeling factors to mediate carpel development and floral determinacy. New Phytologist 234:1059−74

    doi: 10.1111/nph.18034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Li Z. 1996. Sectioning of plant tissue. pp. 183. Beijng: Peking University Press. 130−45 pp.

    [55]

    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15:550

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Han Y, Lu M, Yue S, Li K, Dong M, et al. 2022. Comparative methylomics and chromatin accessibility analysis in Osmanthus fragrans uncovers regulation of genic transcription and mechanisms of key floral scent production. Horticulture Research 9:uhac096

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Han Y, He Y, Yue S, Guo B, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans. Ornamental Plant Research 3:11 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2023-0011
    Han Y, He Y, Yue S, Guo B, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans. Ornamental Plant Research 3:11 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2023-0011

Figures(5)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(4096) PDF downloads(695)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans

Ornamental Plant Research  3 Article number: 11  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Sweet osmanthus is an androdioecious plant; however, the mechanism underlying pistil sterility in male plants is still unclear. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the structure of pollen grains in the stamens does not differ between the sterile cultivar 'Chenghong Dangui' and the fertile cultivar 'Huangchuan Jingui'. Triphenyltetrazolium chloride and fluorescein diacetate staining as well as in vitro culture experiments revealed that pollen grains were active in both cultivars, indicating that the stamens in both 'Chenghong Dangui' and 'Huangchuan Jingui' could develop normally. When the pistils of the fertile cultivar 'Huangchuan Jingui' differentiated, two protrusions formed on the inner side of the stamen primordium, and these gradually developed and fused together to form the ovary, style, and stigma. The pistil of the sterile cultivar 'Chenghong Dangui' also formed two protrusions on the inner side of the stamen during differentiation; however, instead of fusing, two fronds were formed. These results suggest that male sweet osmanthus are formed due to the abortion of pistils during the development of floral organs. Transcriptome sequencing revealed that the expression levels of carpel development gene CRC, AG, and AGL11 were significantly lower in 'Chenghong Dangui' compared with 'Huangchuan Jingui' at different flowering stages, which provide new insight in the molecular mechanism of pistil abortion in 'Chenghong Dangui'. CRC and AG may regulate each other to promote carpel development.

    • In flowering plants, cross-pollination is a common mode of reproduction and promotes genetic variation, gene exchange, and species adaptation. Plants have evolved a variety of reproductive systems involving cross-pollination at the individual and population levels, such as monoecy, dioecy, andromonoecy, gynomonoecy, and androdioecy[1].

      Based on studies of Arabidopsis thaliana and snapdragon mutants, Coen & Meyerowitz and Causiera & Meyerowitz proposed the well-known ABC model, which suggests that the formation of the four whorls of floral organs is a result of the combined action of class A, B, and C genes[2,3]. Subsequent studies identified class D and E genes, and the flower organ development model gradually developed into an ABCDE model[46], with MADS-box genes accounting for the majority of genes in the model[7]. In core dicotyledons, A and E functional genes determine the development of the calyx; A, B, and E functional genes determine the development of petals; B, C, and E functional genes determine the development of stamens; and C and E functional genes determine the development of carpels[7].

      Studies have shown that the class C MADS-box gene AGAMOUS (AG)[811] and the non-MADS-box gene CRABS CLAW (CRC)[1214] play important roles in carpel development. AG regulates the differentiation of carpels and interacts with other genes to control floral determinacy. In Arabidopsis, the loss of AG function usually results in the absence of carpels, and the carpels are replaced by indeterminate perianth whorls[15,16]. The loss-of-function of AG and class C homeotic genes shows similar phenotypes in other plants, such as Antirrhinum[17], petunia[18], opium poppy (Papaver somniferum)[19], Nicotiana benthamiana[20], and apple (Malus domestica)[21].

      CRC regulates the development of tissues derived from the abaxial side of the carpel primordium[22]. In plants with mutations in CRC and CRC orthologs, the carpel is replaced with petals, stamens, or a flower[23,24]. CRC genes influence carpel development in various plants, such as A. thaliana[25,26], Eschscholzia californica[27], Pisum sativum[12], Petunia hybrid[13], and Physalis floridan[14]. CRC is a master regulator in the gene regulatory network determining floral morphology, particularly carpel formation[11]. Both CRC and AG are core transcription factors that can regulate each other to promote carpel development[28,29].

      Sweet osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans Lour.) is a well-known ornamental and aromatic plant in China. Preliminary studies have found that sweet osmanthus is an androdioecious breeding system; however, the molecular mechanism underlying the formation of the androdiecious reproductive system in the species has not been determined. In this study, morphology and molecular analyses were combined to investigate the mechanism underlying pistil sterility in androdiecious sweet osmanthus plants. The results of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the conservation of germplasm resources and the cultivation of new cultivars of sweet osmanthus.

    • According to the observations of paraffin sections, flower bud differentiation in sweet osmanthus can be divided into five stages: involucre differentiation, primordium differentiation, terminal flower perianth differentiation, stamen differentiation, and pistil differentiation. Involucre differentiation was completed at the end of June, when the growth cone gradually flattened and widened, producing two protrusions on its surface, the involucre primordium (Fig. 1af). As the cells grew, the involucre and primordia became larger and bent upward until the two primordia were close together (Fig. 1g). At the beginning of July, the growth points inside the involucre gradually expanded into a hemispherical shape, and the central tip and both sides of the lower part showed darker staining. The growth points gradually expanded and separated to form multiple raised semicircles. At this time, the rudimentary structure of cymose inflorescence (Fig. 1h) was already visible. The protrusions on both sides of the base of the involucre formed the lateral flower primordium (Fig. 1i), while the central protrusion formed the terminal flower primordium. During the perianth differentiation stage, the terminal flower primordium gradually flattened, and two small protrusions were formed on both sides, corresponding to the calyx primordia (Fig. 1jl). Since the calyx of sweet osmanthus is very short, the calyx primordium stopped growing after a short period, and two protrusions formed at the center. These protrusions were the petal primordia and continued to grow and bend into a curved petal shape (Fig. 1m, n). This period proceeded rapidly, and the differentiation of the perianth primordia was completed in less than a month. At the time of the formation of petal primordia, the stamen primordia began to appear, and two small protrusions (Fig. 1o) appeared on the inner side of petals at the end of July; these developed gradually, enlarged, and finally formed the stamen primordia (Fig. 1p). At this time, the filaments and anthers also began to differentiate. At the beginning of August, after the stamen primordia of the fertile 'Huangchuan Jingui' matured, two small protrusions were formed on its inner side. With continuous growth, the protrusions moved towards each other and gradually fused to form a carpel, forming a slit in the center (Fig. 1q). The carpel primordia continued to develop, expanded into an ovary, and formed a style and a stigma (Fig. 1r & s). Two small protrusions (Fig. 1t) were also formed on the inner side of the stamens of sterile 'Chenghong Dangui'; however, the protrusions gradually elongated and did not fuse (Fig. 1u). Instead, two fronds were formed, and ovary development was not seen (Fig. 1v). The pistil of 'Huangchuan Jingui' was able to develop normally to form fruits after fertilization (Fig. 2a & b), while pistil abortion was observed in 'Chenghong Dangui', with no fruit formation (Fig. 2c & d).

      Figure 1. 

      Floral bud differentiation of sweet osmanthus. (a) − (g) Involucre differentiation. (h), (i) flower primordium differentiation. (j) − (n) Terminal flower perianth differentiation. (o), (p) Stamen differentiation. (q) − (s) Pistil differentiation. (t) − (v) Pistil differentiation (sterile). in: Involucre primordium, sf: Side flower primordium, se: Sepal primordium, pe: Petal primordium, an: Stamen primordium, pi: Pistil primordium.

      Figure 2. 

      Development of the pistil of the two cultivars. (a) The full flowering stage of 'Huangchun Jingui' cultivar. (b) Fruit formation of 'Huangchun Jingui' cultivar. (c) The full flowering stage of 'Chenghong Dangui' cultivar. (d) Pistil abortion and no fruit formation in 'Chenghong Dangui' cultivar.

    • Scanning electron microscopy results showed that the pollen grains of both cultivars ('Huangchuan Jingui' and 'Chenghong Dangui') were oblong and round with three lobes in polar view (Fig. 3a & b); they were classified as N3P4C5 according to the NPC classification system. The outer wall of the pollen had a reticulate pattern, with fine and small reticulation. The germination pore was a 3-pore groove, and the poles of the pore groove were narrow and became wide in the middle (Fig. 3ch). The mean polar axis length of 'Huangchuan Jingui' was 18.0 μm, while that of 'Chenghong Dangui' was 18.6 μm. Both cultivars had small pollen with significant differences in polar axis length (Table 1). In addition, the P/E, pore groove length (L), and L/P values differed significantly between the two cultivars (Table 1). After triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and observing under a microscope, the pollen grains of both 'Huangchuan Jinghui' and 'Chenghong Dangui' were stained red or light red (Fig. 3i,j). After fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining and observing under fluorescence microscope, the pollen grains of both 'Huangchuan Jingui' and 'Chenghong Dangui' exhibited green fluorescence (Fig. 3k,l), indicating that the pollen grains of both cultivars were active. The results of aniline blue staining showed that regardless of whether the pollen of 'Huangchuan Jingui' or 'Chenghong Dangui' was used to pollinate the stigma of 'Huangchuan Jingui', the germinated pollen tubes could be seen on the stigma of the pistil style of the 'Huangchuan Jingui' (Fig. 3m,n). These results indicated that pollen grains of both male and bisexual flowers were active on the stigma of the pistil.

      Figure 3. 

      Morphological characteristics and activity of pollen grains of the two cultivars. (a) − (h) Morphological characteristics of pollen grains. (i) − (n) Activity of pollen grains of the two cultivars.

      Table 1.  Measurement results of pollen.

      CultivarsPolar axis (P) (μm)Equator axis (E) (μm)P/EPore groove length (L) (μm)L/P
      'Huangchuan Jingui'18.0 ± 1.0110.8 ± 1.051.63 ± 0.1112.4 ± 1.520.70 ± 0.08
      'Chenghong Dangui'18.6 ± 0.66*10.9 ± 0.541.70 ± 0.12*13.9 ± 1.21*0.77 ± 0.05*
      * P < 0.05
    • To investigate the differential expression of genes related to floral organ development in 'Huangchuan Jingui' and 'Chenghong Dangui' and their effects on the development of carpels and pistils, a transcriptome sequencing analysis of the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' and 'Chenghong Dangui' at the linggeng stage, xingyan stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage, and late full flowering stage was performed. Compared with 'Chenghong Dangui', the numbers of upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were 4,937, 4,644, 3,981, 4,165, 4,910 during the linggeng stage, xingyan stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage and late full flowering stage, while the downregulated DGEs were 3,842, 3,341, 3,003, 3,462, 4,090 respectively in 'Huangchuan Jingui' (Supplemental Files 15). From the KEGG enrichment analysis results, we found that the most enriched DEGs exists in the plant-pathogen interaction pathway of the five flowering stages, with 209, 204, 178, 222, and 252 DEGs, respectively. The secondly DEGs enrichment pathway is plant hormone signal transduction, which contains 162, 163, 140, 190, and 226 DEGs in the five flowering stages (Supplemental Files 610). Thus, we presumed that the development of sweet osmanthus flower organs may be greatly influenced by hormones.

      MADS-box genes are key genes for the development of floral organs, and the transcriptome sequencing results showed that, compared with levels in 'Chenghong Dangui', 7, 8, 6, 8, and 10 MADS-box genes were up-regulated in 'Huangchuan Jingui' during the linggeng stage, xingyan stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage, and late full flowering stage, respectively (Fig. 4). Among these, class A genes included AP1 and FUL, which were up-regulated in the linggeng stage and the xingyan stages of the flowering organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui'. Class B genes included GLOBOSA and PISTILLATA, which were up-regulated in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' at both the full flowering and the late full flowering stages. The class C gene AGAMOUS (AG) was up-regulated in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' at both the initial and full flowering stages. In addition, several AGAMOUS-like (AGL) genes, such as AGL11, AGL12, AGL81, AGL17, and AGL81, were up-regulated in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' in different flowering stages (Fig. 4). These genes may also be involved in the development of floral organs and carpel formation. In particular, the expression of AGL11 was significantly up-regulated in all five periods of flowering organ development of 'Huangchuan Jingui'. In addition, the CRC gene, a non-MADS-box gene involved in carpel development, was significantly up-regulated in all five periods in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui'.

      Figure 4. 

      Differential expression of genes related to flower organ development in the two cultivars. (a) Differential expression genes related to flower organ development in the linggeng stage. (b) Differential expression genes related to flower organ development in the xingyan stage. (c) Differential expression genes related to flower organ development in the initial flowering stage. (d) Differential expression genes related to flower organ development in the full flowering stage. (e) Differential expression genes related to flower organ development in the late full flowering stage. Y: 'Huangchuan Jingui', D: 'Chenghong Dangui'. Y1 and D1: Linggeng stage, Y2 and D2: Xingyan stage, Y3 and D3: Initial flowering stage, Y4 and D4: Full flowering stage, Y5 and D5: Late full flowering stage. Three replicates for each analysis.

    • A transcriptome sequencing analysis showed that the CRC gene was significantly up-regulated in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' across all five periods, compared with levels in 'Chenghong Dangui', while the AG gene was up-regulated in the floral organs of 'Huangchuan Jingui' at the initial and full flowering stages. Previous studies have shown that CRC and AG are two key genes that determine carpel formation[10,11,13,14]. A dual luciferase assay showed that the activity of the AG gene promoter was 1.43-fold higher in tobacco leaves co-transformed with 35S::CRC and AGpro::LUC plasmids as compared to that in control tobacco leaves transformed with only AGpro::LUC plasmids (Fig. 5a). Compared with activity in control tobacco leaves transformed with only CRCpro::LUC plasmids, the activity of the CRC gene promoter was up-regulated by 1.45-fold in tobacco leaves co-transformed with 35S::AG and CRCpro::LUC plasmids (Fig. 5b).

      Figure 5. 

      Transcriptional regulation of CRC and AG genes. (a) The effector and reporter plasmids used in dual-LUC assays. REN: Renilla luciferase, LUC: Firefly luciferase. (b) The AG promoter activity (LUC/REN ratio) of tobacco leaves coinfiltration with Agrobacteria carrying effector and reporter. (c) The CRC promoter activity (LUC/REN ratio) of tobacco leaves coinfiltration with Agrobacteria carrying effector and reporter. The data represent the means ± SD of three replicates from three independent experiments. * P < 0.05.

    • Flower bud differentiation is an important process in the transition of plants from the vegetative to the reproductive stage[30]. Understanding the mechanism underlying flower bud differentiation in plants is important for formulating reasonable cultivation measures for flowering regulation, implementing them to improve annual production of ornamental plants, and clarifying the genetic regulation of plant traits[31]. In this study, the leaf-like structure surrounded by each inflorescence of sweet osmanthus was considered as the involucre; accordingly, the bract differentiation period could be more appropriately termed as the involucre differentiation period. The period from the emergence of the inflorescence primordium to the differentiation of the calyx primordium involves the emergence of the embryonic cyme of sweet osmanthus, and the terminal flowers and lateral flowers differentiate later. Therefore, the inflorescence primordium and flower primordium emerge simultaneously at this stage, which is more appropriately referred to as the flower primordium differentiation period. The emergence of the flower primordium and the formation of the perianth primordium are short and continuous processes; accordingly, the sepal and petal differentiation stages should be combined into the perianth differentiation stage. Therefore, in this study, flower bud differentiation in sweet osmanthus was divided into five periods: involucre differentiation, floral primordium differentiation, terminal perianth differentiation, stamen differentiation, and pistil differentiation.

      Previous studies have shown that when the pistil of fertile varieties differentiate, the carpel primordium first appears as a protrusion and develops gradually, forming a small hole in the center, which extends and fuses to form the carpel primordium. In sterile varieties, two protrusions form on the inner side of the stamen, and these do not fuse at the end but form two fronds[32]. In this study, regardless of whether the variety was fertile or sterile, two protrusions formed initially on the inner side of the stamen primordia. However, in the later growth period of the fertile 'Huangchuan Jingui', the two protrusions fused together and gradually developed into the ovary, style, and stigma. The 'small hole' would be the slit between the two protrusions when they fuse.

      The shape and size of plant pollen, the type of germination pore, and surface characteristics of plant pollen are important features for evolutionary analyses and plant classification. Previous studies have shown that a longer pollen is related to a smaller surface-to-volume ratio and more derived taxa, while the most derived pollen shows reticulate, striped reticulate, or fine reticulate outer wall characteristics[33,34]. The results of this study revealed that the surface of the pollen grains of the two varieties of sweet osmanthus had reticulate patterns, indicating that their pollen was highly evolved. Among the two varieties, the P/E value of 'Huangchuan Jingui' was smaller than that of 'Chenghong Dangui', indicating that the pollen grains of 'Huangchuan Jingui' were rounder while those of 'Chenghong Dangui' were longer. Hence, 'Chenghong Dangui' may be more evolved than 'Huangchuan Jingui'.

      Androdioecy is an extremely rare plant reproductive system where in both male and hermaphroditic plants are present. It has been reported in only a few plants (<0.005%) and is usually found in Oleaceae[1,35]. Androdioecy is considered an intermediate state between monoecious and dioecious plants[36,37], probably resulting from the sterility of pistils in monoecious plants[36, 3840]. In the ABCDE model of floral organ development, class C functional genes (e.g., AG) determine the development of pistils and carpels. Class C genes have been found in Zeamays[6], E. californica[9], P. sativum[41], Populus alba[10], A. thaliana[16,42,43] and other plants. In this study, the class C functional gene AG was up-regulated in both the initial and full flowering stages of 'Huangchuan Jingui', suggesting that these stages are critical periods for carpel development. The ectopic expression of the STK (AGL11) gene in ag-deficient mutants can promote carpel development[44]. Hence, AGL11 is an important gene for the development of carpels, ovules, and fruits[4346]. In this study, the expression levels of AGL11 in 'Huangchuan Jingui' across five periods, including the ling geng stage, xingyan stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage, and late full flowering stage, were significantly higher than those of 'Chenghong Dangui', indicating that this gene is an important determinant of the development of carpels and ovules in sweet osmanthus. Previous studies have shown that the CRC gene contributes to carpel and fruit development. Arabidopsis CRC is primarily required for the elaboration of carpel morphology[25,28], and mutations in the CRC gene contribute to the female-to-male transition in melons[47]. In this study, the expression level of the CRC gene in all five stages was significantly higher in 'Huangchuan Jingui' than that in 'Chenghong Dangui', suggesting that this gene is involved in the development of carpels in sweet osmanthus.

      Previous studies have shown that both CRC and AG are important genes for carpel development, and AG can promote the expression of CRC genes[13,4853]. The results of this study showed that AG in sweet osmanthus can bind to the promoter and thereby regulate the expression of CRC, and CRC can bind to the promoter and regulate the expression of AG. The results of this study suggest that both genes, CRC and AG, may regulate each other and promote the expression of downstream genes, thereby determining carpel development in sweet osmanthus. Genes that function downstream of CRC and AG and their mechanisms of action needs further investigation.

    • The flower buds and flower organs at the linggeng stage, xingyan stage, initial flowering stage, full flowering stage, and late full flowering stage of both the 'Huangchuan Jingui' and the 'Chenghong Dangui' cultivars were harvested from the campus of Henan University (China).

    • The experimental materials were washed with water and fixed with formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) solution. Flower buds of different growth parts and sizes were collected and cut into slices according to the conventional paraffin sectioning method[54], with a thickness of 8 μm. Sections were stained with alum-hematoxylin, sealed with neutral gum, and observed and photographed under an OLYMPUS BX60 microscope.

    • The anthers were peeled off and placed in a dry place to allow the pollen to disperse naturally. The pollen was spread on double-sided conductive adhesive, vacuum-dried, sprayed with gold coating, and observed and photographed under a JSM5600LV scanning electron microscope. The polar axis length (P), equatorial axis length (E), and germination groove length (L) were measured using a screen measurement tool, and the P/E and L/P values were calculated. In total, 30 pollen grains of each variety were measured and average values were obtained for each parameter. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used to analyze the measurement data. Difference is considered significant at P < 0.05. There were three independent repeated experiments for the analysis.

    • The pollen grains at the initial flowering stage were taken and stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining solution and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining solution, and images were obtained under a light microscope and a fluorescence microscope, respectively. The viability of pollen was examined by in vitro culture, using aniline blue staining and fluorescence microscopy for observation and photography.

    • RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed by Frasergen (Wuhan, China). Transcriptome datasets were generated using the Illumina HiSeq 2,500 sequencing platform (San Diego, CA, USA). Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2R package[55]. Expression levels of differentially expressed genes were computed using the following formula: FPKM = cDNA fragments / [mapped fragments (millions) × transcript length (kb)]. Fold Change ≥ 2 and FDR (False Discovery Rate) < 0.01 were used as differential expression genes screening criteria.

    • The cDNA sequences of AG and CRC were amplified and inserted into the pHBT vector (effectors). The promoter regions of AG (2.07 kb) and CRC (2.00 kb) were amplified and ligated into the pGreenII 0800-Luc vector (reporters). The primers for amplification are listed in Supplemental Table S1. EHA105 strains containing effectors and reporters were cotransformed into 5-week-old N. benthamiana leaves. Agroinfiltration was carried out following the method described by Han et al.[56]. The infiltrated plants were cultured at 23 °C under continuous lighting for 72 h. The LUC and REN activities were detected using a dual-luciferase assay kit (Solarbio, China). There were three independent repeated experiments for the analysis. Difference is considered significant at P < 0.05.

      • This research were supported by the Henan Province Major Research Fund of Public Welfare (No. 201300110900), National Natural Science Fund in China (No. U1604114), Basic Research Project of Key Scientific Research Program of higher education institutions in Henan Province (No. 20zx015).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Yuanji Han, Yanxia He

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (1) References (56)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Han Y, He Y, Yue S, Guo B, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans. Ornamental Plant Research 3:11 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2023-0011
    Han Y, He Y, Yue S, Guo B, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Floral bud differentiation and mechanism underlying androdioecy of Osmanthus fragrans. Ornamental Plant Research 3:11 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2023-0011

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return