Search
2023 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice

  • # These authors contributed equally: Na Li, Liangliang Chen

More Information
  • Grain size, a main component of grain yield, is regulated by a complex network. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade participates in multiple signaling pathways to regulate various biological processes. Recent studies indicate that MAPK signaling plays key roles in regulating grain size. For instance, OsERECTA1(OsER1)–OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 signaling regulates grain size and grain number per panicle. Grain size is also affected by the OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module, which functions upstream of OsWRKY53. In addition, MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 (OsMKP1), the GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase GSK2, and the Rho-family GTPase OsRac1 controls grain size in rice by modulating MAPK signaling. Here, we discuss recent findings on the importance of MAPK signaling in rice grain-size control and examine mechanisms by which MAPK signaling coordinates grain size, grain number and stress responses.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Li N, Xu R, Li Y. 2019. Molecular networks of seed size control in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:435−63

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095851

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ren D, Ding C, Qian Q. 2023. Molecular bases of rice grain size and quality for optimized productivity. Science Bulletin 68:314−50

    doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.01.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Li N, Xu R, Duan P, Li Y. 2018. Control of grain size in rice. Plant Reproduction 31:237−51

    doi: 10.1007/s00497-018-0333-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Li N, Li Y. 2016. Signaling pathways of seed size control in plants. Current Opinion In Plant Biology 33:23−32

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Xu G, Zhang X. 2023. Mechanisms controlling seed size by early endosperm development. Seed Biology 2:1

    doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2023-0001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Rodriguez MCS, Petersen M, Mundy J. 2010. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:621−49

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    MAPK Group, Ichimura K, Shinozaki K, Tena G, Sheen J, et al . 2002. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. Trends in Plant Science 7:301−8

    doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02302-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Shiu SH, Karlowski WM, Pan R, Tzeng YH, Mayer KFX, et al. 2004. Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice. The Plant Cell 16:1220−34

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.020834

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. 2001. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: Diversity, function, and signaling. Science's STKE 2001:re22

    doi: 10.1126/stke.2001.113.re22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Morris ER, Walker JC. 2003. Receptor-like protein kinases: the keys to response. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6:339−42

    doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00055-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    De Smet I, Voß U, Jürgens G, Beeckman T. 2009. Receptor-like kinases shape the plant. Nature Cell Biology 11:1166−73

    doi: 10.1038/ncb1009-1166

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Couto D, Zipfel C. 2016. Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nature Reviews Immunology 16:537−52

    doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.77

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Tang D, Wang G, Zhou J. 2017. Receptor Kinases in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: More Than Pattern Recognition. The Plant Cell 29:618−37

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00891

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liang X, Zhou J. 2018. Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases: Central players in plant receptor kinase-mediated signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69:267−99

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lin W, Ma X, Shan L, He P. 2013. Big roles of small kinases: the complex functions of receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases in plant immunity and development. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 55:1188−97

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhang M, Zhang S. 2022. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:301−41

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13215

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sun T, Zhang Y. 2022. MAP kinase cascades in plant development and immune signaling. EMBO Reports 23:e53817

    doi: 10.15252/embr.202153817

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hamel LP, Nicole MC, Sritubtim S, Morency MJ, Ellis M, et al. 2006. Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends in Plant Science 11:192−8

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Rao KP, Richa T, Kumar K, Raghuram B, Sinha AK. 2010. In silico analysis reveals 75 members of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in rice. DNA Research 17:139−53

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsq011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xu R, Duan P, Yu H, Zhou Z, Zhang B, et al. 2018. Control of Grain Size and Weight by the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMAPK6 Signaling Pathway in Rice. Molecular Plant 11:860−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Guo T, Chen K, Dong NQ, Shi CL, Ye WW, et al. 2018. GRAIN SIZE AND NUMBER1 negatively regulates the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 cascade to coordinate the trade-off between grain number per panicle and grain size in rice. The Plant Cell 30:871−88

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00959

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Duan P, Rao Y, Zeng D, Yang Y, Xu R, et al. 2014. SMALL GRAIN 1, which encodes a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4, influences grain size in rice. The Plant Journal 77:547−57

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12405

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Liu S, Hua L, Dong S, Chen H, Zhu X, et al. 2015. OsMAPK6, a mitogen-activated protein kinase, influences rice grain size and biomass production. The Plant Journal 84:672−81

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Guo T, Lu ZQ, Shan JX, Ye WW, Dong NQ, et al. 2020. ERECTA1 acts upstream of the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 cascade to control spikelet number by regulating cytokinin metabolism in rice. The Plant Cell 32:2763−79

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Jin J, Hua L, Zhu Z, Tan L, Zhao X, et al. 2016. GAD1 encodes a secreted peptide that regulates grain number, grain length, and awn development in rice domestication. The Plant Cell 28:2453−63

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00379

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Guo T, Lu ZQ, Xiong Y, Shan JX, Ye WW, et al. 2023. Optimization of rice panicle architecture by specifically suppressing ligand–receptor pairs. Nature Communication 14:1640

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37326-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Meng X, Wang H, He Y, Liu Y, Walker JC, et al. 2012. A MAPK cascade downstream of ERECTA receptor-like protein kinase regulates Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture by promoting localized cell proliferation. The Plant Cell 24:4948−60

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.104695

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bergmann DC, Lukowitz W, Somerville CR. 2004. Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science 304:1494−97

    doi: 10.1126/science.1096014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang H, Ngwenyama N, Liu Y, Walker JC, Zhang S. 2007. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:63−73

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Wu X, Cai X, Zhang B, Wu S, Wang R, et al. 2022. ERECTA regulates seed size independently of its intracellular domain via MAPK-DA1-UBP15 signaling. The Plant Cell 34:3773−89

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac194

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Dong H, Dumenil J, Lu FH, Na L, Vanhaeren H, et al. 2017. Ubiquitylation activates a peptidase that promotes cleavage and destabilization of its activating E3 ligases and diverse growth regulatory proteins to limit cell proliferation in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development 31:197−208

    doi: 10.1101/gad.292235.116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Li Y, Zheng L, Corke F, Smith C, Bevan MW. 2008. Control of final seed and organ size by the DA1 gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gens & Development 22:1331−36

    doi: 10.1101/gad.463608

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Du L, Li N, Chen L, Xu Y, Li Y, et al. 2014. The ubiquitin receptor DA1 regulates seed and organ size by modulating the stability of the ubiquitin-specific protease UBP15/SOD2 inArabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26:665−77

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.122663

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Meng X, Chen X, Mang H, Liu C, Yu X, et al. 2015. Differential function of Arabidopsis SERK family receptor-like kinases in stomatal patterning. Current Biology 25:2361−72

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Lee JS, Kuroha T, Hnilova M, Khatayevich D, Kanaoka MM, et al. 2012. Direct interaction of ligand–receptor pairs specifying stomatal patterning. Genes & Development 26:126−36

    doi: 10.1101/gad.179895.111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Jordá L, Sopeña-Torres S, Escudero V, Nuñez-Corcuera B, Delgado-Cerezo M, et al. 2016. ERECTA and BAK1 Receptor Like Kinases Interact to Regulate Immune Responses in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:897

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00897

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Liu Z, Mei E, Tian X, He M, Tang J, et al. 2021. OsMKKK70 regulates grain size and leaf angle in rice through the OsMKK4-OsMAPK6-OsWRKY53 signaling pathway. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:2043−57

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Mei E, Tang J, He M, Liu Z, Tian X, et al. 2022. OsMKKK70 negatively regulates cold tolerance at booting stage in rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:14472

    doi: 10.3390/ijms232214472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Mao X, Zhang J, Liu W, Yan S, Liu Q, et al. 2019. The MKKK62-MKK3-MAPK7/14 module negatively regulates seed dormancy in rice. Rice 12:2

    doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0260-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Tian X, Li X, Zhou W, Ren Y, Wang Z, et al. 2017. Transcription Factor OsWRKY53 Positively Regulates Brassinosteroid Signaling and Plant Architecture. Plant Physiology 175:1337−49

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00946

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Tian X, He M, Mei E, Zhang B, Tang J, et al. 2021. WRKY53 integrates classic brassinosteroid signaling and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway to regulate rice architecture and seed size. The Plant Cell 33:2753−75

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Chujo T, Miyamoto K, Ogawa S, Masuda Y, Shimizu T, et al. 2014. Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice. PLos One 9:e98737

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098737

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Yoo SJ, Kim SH, Kim MJ, Ryu CM, Kim YC, et al. 2014. Involvement of the OsMKK4-OsMPK1 Cascade and its Downstream Transcription Factor OsWRKY53 in the Wounding Response in Rice. The Plant Pathology Journal 30:168−77

    doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.10.2013.0106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hu L, Ye M, Li R, Zhang T, Zhou G, et al. 2015. The rice transcription factor WRKY53 suppresses herbivore-induced defenses by acting as a negative feedback modulator of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Plant Physiology 169:2907−21

    doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hu L, Ye M, Li R, Lou Y. 2016. OsWRKY53, a versatile switch in regulating herbivore-induced defense responses in rice. Plant Signaling & Behavior 11:e1169357

    doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1169357

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Pan Y, Chen L, Zhao Y, Guo H, Li J, et al. 2021. Natural variation in OsMKK3 contributes to grain size and chalkiness in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:784037

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.784037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhou S, Chen M, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Noman A, et al. 2019. OsMKK3, a stress-responsive protein kinase, positively regulates rice resistance to Nilaparvata lugens via phytohormone dynamics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:3023

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20123023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Jalmi SK, Sinha AK. 2016. Functional involvement of a mitogen activated protein kinase module, OsMKK3-OsMPK7-OsWRK30 in mediating resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae in Rice. Scientific Reports 6:37974

    doi: 10.1038/srep37974

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Danquah A, de Zélicourt A, Boudsocq M, Neubauer J, dit Frey NF, et al. 2015. Identification and characterization of an ABA-activated MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 82:232−44

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Matsuoka D, Yasufuku T, Furuya T, Nanmori T. 2015. An abscisic acid inducible Arabidopsis MAPKKK, MAPKKK18 regulates leaf senescence via its kinase activity. Plant Molecular Biology 87:565−75

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0295-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Sözen C, Schenk ST, Boudsocq M, Chardin C, Almeida-Trapp M, et al. 2020. Wounding and Insect Feeding Trigger Two Independent MAPK Pathways with Distinct Regulation and Kinetics. The Plant Cell 32:1988−2003

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Takahashi F, Yoshida R, Ichimura K, Mizoguchi T, Seo S, et al. 2007. The mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade MKK3-MPK6 is an important part of the jasmonate signal transduction pathway in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:805−18

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046581

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Sethi V, Raghuram B, Sinha AK, Chattopadhyay S. 2014. A mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade module, MKK3-MPK6 and MYC2, is involved in blue light-mediated seedling development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26:3343−57

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.128702

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Xu R, Yu H, Wang J, Duan P, Zhang B, et al. 2018. A mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase influences grain size and weight in rice. The Plant Journal 95:937−46

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Tamnanloo F, Damen H, Jangra R, Lee JS. 2018. MAP KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 Controls Cell Fate Transition during Stomatal Development. Plant Physiology 178:247−57

    doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Bartels S, Anderson JC, González Besteiro MA, Carreri A, Hirt H, et al. 2009. MAP kinase phosphatase1 and protein tyrosine phosphatase1 are repressors of salicylic acid synthesis and SNC1-mediated responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 21:2884−97

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Anderson JC, Bartels S, González Besteiro MA, Shahollari B, Ulm R, et al. 2011. Arabidopsis MAP Kinase Phosphatase 1 (AtMKP1) negatively regulates MPK6-mediated PAMP responses and resistance against bacteria. The Plant Journal 67:258−68

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04588.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Jiang L, Anderson JC, Gonzalez Besteiro MA, Peck SC. 2017. Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis MAP Kinase Phosphatase 1 (MKP1) Is Required for PAMP Responses and Resistance against Bacteria. Plant Physiology 175:1839−52

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Tong H, Liu L, Jin Y, Du L, Yin Y, et al. 2012. DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING acts as a direct downstream target of a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase to mediate brassinosteroid responses in rice. The Plant Cell 24:2562−77

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097394

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Khan M, Rozhon W, Bigeard J, Pflieger D, Husar S, et al. 2013. Brassinosteroid-regulated GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases phosphorylate mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases, which control stomata development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal Of Biological Chemistry 288:7519−27

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.384453

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Kim TW, Michniewicz M, Bergmann DC, Wang ZY. 2012. Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature 482:419−22

    doi: 10.1038/nature10794

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Sun L, Li X, Fu Y, Zhu Z, Tan L, et al. 2013. GS6, a member of the GRAS gene family, negatively regulates grain size in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 55:938−49

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Duan P, Ni S, Wang J, Zhang B, Xu R, et al. 2016. Regulation of OsGRF4 by OsmiR396 controls grain size and yield in rice. Nature Plants 2:15203

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.203

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Li S, Gao F, Xie K, Zeng X, Cao Y, et al. 2016. The OsmiR396c-OsGRF4-OsGIF1 regulatory module determines grain size and yield in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14:2134−46

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Sun P, Zhang W, Wang Y, He Q, Shu F, et al. 2016. OsGRF4 controls grain shape, panicle length and seed shattering in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 58:836−47

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12473

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Che R, Tong H, Shi B, Liu Y, Fang S, et al. 2016. Control of grain size and rice yield by GL2-mediated brassinosteroid responses. Nature Plants 2:15195

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.195

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Jones MA, Shen JJ, Fu Y, Li H, Yang Z, et al. 2002. The Arabidopsis Rop2 GTPase is a positive regulator of both root hair initiation and tip growth. The Plant Cell 14:763−76

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.010359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Gu Y, Vernoud V, Fu Y, Yang Z. 2003. ROP GTPase regulation of pollen tube growth through the dynamics of tip-localized F-actin. Journal of Experimental Botany 54:93−101

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Poraty-Gavra L, Zimmermann P, Haigis S, Bednarek P, Hazak O, et al. 2013. The Arabidopsis Rho of plants GTPase AtROP6 functions in developmental and pathogen response pathways. Plant Physiology 161:1172−88

    doi: 10.1104/pp.112.213165

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Xu T, Wen M, Nagawa S, Fu Y, Chen JG, et al. 2010. Cell surface- and rho GTPase-based auxin signaling controls cellular interdigitation in Arabidopsis. Cell 143:99−110

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Liu R, Xue HW, Yang Z. 2019. The Rho-family GTPase OsRac1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating cell division. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116:16121−26

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902321116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Kim SH, Oikawa T, Kyozuka J, Wong HL, Umemura K, et al. 2012. The bHLH Rac Immunity1 (RAI1) Is Activated by OsRac1 via OsMAPK3 and OsMAPK6 in Rice Immunity. Plant and Cell Physiology 53:740−54

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Nagano M, Ishikawa T, Fujiwara M, Fukao Y, Kawano Y, et al. 2016. Plasma Membrane Microdomains Are Essential for Rac1-RbohB/H-Mediated Immunity in Rice. The Plant Cell 28:1966−83

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00201

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Wang L, Wang D, Yang Z, Jiang S, Qu J, et al. 2021. Roles of FERONIA-like receptor genes in regulating grain size and quality in rice. Science China Life Sciences 64:294−310

    doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1780-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Duan Q, Kita D, Li C, Cheung AY, Wu HM. 2010. FERONIA receptor-like kinase regulates RHO GTPase signaling of root hair development. PNAS 107:17821−26

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005366107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Mao D, Yu F, Li J, Van de Poel B, Tan D, et al. 2015. FERONIA receptor kinase interacts with S-adenosylmethionine synthetase and suppresses S-adenosylmethionine production and ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell and Environment 38:2566−74

    doi: 10.1111/pce.12570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Yu F, Li J, Huang Y, Liu L, Li D, et al. 2014. FERONIA receptor kinase controls seed size in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant 7:920−22

    doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Guo H, Li L, Ye H, Yu X, Algreen A, et al. 2009. Three related receptor-like kinases are required for optimal cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PNAS 106:7648−53

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812346106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Haruta M, Sabat G, Stecker K, Minkoff BB, Sussman MR. 2014. A peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase regulate plant cell expansion. Science 343:408−11

    doi: 10.1126/science.1244454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Xiao Y, Stegmann M, Han Z, DeFalco TA, Parys K, et al. 2019. Mechanisms of RALF peptide perception by a heterotypic receptor complex. Nature 572:270−74

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1409-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Xie Y, Sun P, Li Z, Zhang F, You C, et al. 2022. FERONIA Receptor Kinase Integrates with Hormone Signaling to Regulate Plant Growth, Development, and Responses to Environmental Stimuli. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:3730

    doi: 10.3390/ijms23073730

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Song L, Xu G, Li T, Zhou H, Lin Q, et al. 2022. The RALF1-FERONIA complex interacts with and activates TOR signaling in response to low nutrients. Molecular Plant 15:1120−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Zhang Y, Wang P, Shao W, Zhu JK, Dong J. 2015. The BASL polarity protein controls a MAPK signaling feedback loop in asymmetric cell division. Developmental Cell 33:136−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Bücherl CA, Jarsch IK, Schudoma C, Segonzac C, Mbengue M, et al. 2017. Plant immune and growth receptors share common signalling components but localise to distinct plasma membrane nanodomains. eLife 6:e25114

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.25114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Sun T, Nitta Y, Zhang Q, Wu D, Tian H, et al. 2018. Antagonistic interactions between two MAP kinase cascades in plant development and immune signaling. EMBO Reports 19:e45324

    doi: 10.15252/embr.201745324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Li N, Chen L, Li Y. 2023. Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice. Seed Biology 2:15 doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2023-0015
    Li N, Chen L, Li Y. 2023. Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice. Seed Biology 2:15 doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2023-0015

Figures(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(3409) PDF downloads(492)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice

Seed Biology  2 Article number: 15  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Grain size, a main component of grain yield, is regulated by a complex network. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade participates in multiple signaling pathways to regulate various biological processes. Recent studies indicate that MAPK signaling plays key roles in regulating grain size. For instance, OsERECTA1(OsER1)–OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 signaling regulates grain size and grain number per panicle. Grain size is also affected by the OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module, which functions upstream of OsWRKY53. In addition, MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 (OsMKP1), the GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase GSK2, and the Rho-family GTPase OsRac1 controls grain size in rice by modulating MAPK signaling. Here, we discuss recent findings on the importance of MAPK signaling in rice grain-size control and examine mechanisms by which MAPK signaling coordinates grain size, grain number and stress responses.

    • As the main component of grain yield, grain size is one of the most critical agronomic characteristics of rice. Although grain size may be affected by the growth environment, it is predominantly controlled by intrinsic signals determined by the interplay of genetic regulators. Therefore, grain size is a goal of genetic improvement in rice breeding, and studies are focusing on the identification and characterization of rice grain-size regulators[13]. With the development and application of breeding technologies, it is of great value to understand the mechanisms of grain-size control in breeding high-quality, high-yield rice varieties to ensure food security.

      A rice grain is comprised of the embryo and the endosperm, which are covered by an aleurone layer and a thin seed coat. In a mature rice grain, the endosperm occupies most of the volume and determines grain size. The grain is enclosed by the spikelet hull, which consists of a palea and a lemma. The size and shape of the spikelet hull limits the growth and development of the embryo and endosperm, and therefore influences final grain size and shape. Recent studies have revealed that several signaling pathways participate in rice grain-size control[15].

      The mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is comprised of three types of serine-threonine protein kinases, namely MAPK kinase kinase (MAP kinase kinase kinase, MKKK), MAPK kinase (MAP kinase kinase, MKK), and MAPK. They are activated by different upstream receptors on the plasma membrane upon external stimuli, leading to the sequential phosphorylation of MKK and MAPK and the activation of MAPK, which phosphorylate specific downstream substrates to regulate diverse biological processes[6,7]. In plants, receptor‐like kinases (RLKs) and receptor‐like proteins function as upstream receptors of the MAPK cascade to recognize and transmit external and internal signals[8]. RLKs are characterized by an extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic kinase domain. They compose a superfamily in plants and have evolved to mediate the communication needed to regulate growth, immunity, and development, as well as final seed/grain size[913]. Signaling from RLK to MAPK also requires intermediate components such as receptor‐like cytoplasmic kinase (RLCK)[14,15]. The identified phosphorylation substrates of the plant MAPKs include kinases, enzymes, transcription factors, and other proteins. Phosphorylation may alter their activity, subcellular localization, and/or protein stability to mediate different downstream events[16,17].

      The rice genome encodes approximately 75 MAPKKKs, 8 MAPKKs, and 15 MAPKs[18,19], which have been reported to function in plant development, phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling, immune response, and abiotic stress[16,17]. Studies indicate that MAPK signaling controls grain size in rice. Here, we discuss the recent findings on the role of MAPK signaling in this process.

    • OsMKKK10/SMALL GRAIN 2 (SMG2), OsMKK4/SMG1, and OsMPK6 /DARWF AND SMALL GRAIN 1 (DSG1) are part of a cascade regulating grain size and panicle architecture in rice by promoting cell proliferation[2023]. Sequential phosphorylation of OsMKK4 and OsMPK6 by OsMKKK10 activates OsMPK6, and OsMPK6 activity positively associates with grain size[20,23]. Loss-of-function of OsMKKK10, OsMKK4, or OsMPK6 decreases cell proliferation, resulting in dwarfism, dense panicles, and small grains but increased spikelet number per panicle[2023]. On the contrary, constitutive activation of OsMKKK10 (CA-OsMKKK10) or OsMKK4 (OsMKK4-DD) increases grain size and plant height[2023]. In addition, the osmkk4 mutant (large11-1D), in which OsMKK4 activity is enhanced due to the replacement of alanine227 by threonine, produces larger grains and shows increased grain weight[20]. Genetic analysis has shown that OsMKKK10, OsMKK4, and OsMPK6 function in a same pathway to regulate grain growth[20].

      OsERECTA1 (OsER1), a leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RLK, positively regulates grain size and negatively regulates spikelet number per panicle[24]. Genetic and biochemical analyses have suggested that the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module acts downstream of OsER1 to regulate spikelet formation. Furthermore, OsMPK6 interacts with and phosphorylates the zinc finger transcription factor DROUGHT AND SALT TOLERANCE (DST), and it can enhance the transcriptional activity of DST, leading to increased CYTOKININ OXIDASE2 (OsCKX2) expression. This study demonstrates that the OsER1–OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module negatively regulates the number of spikelets per panicle by affecting cytokinin metabolism[24]. Attention has also been given to identify the ligands recognized by the OsER1 receptor. REGULATOR OF AWN ELONGATION2 (RAE2) or GRAIN NUMBER, GRAIN LENGTH AND AWN DEVELOPMENT1 (GAD1), an EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR (EPF)/EPF-LIKE (EPFL) peptide family member, has been shown to regulate rice grain number and size[25]. A similar panicle morphology in the GAD1 loss-of-function mutant and oser1 suggests that GAD1 may be one of the peptides activating the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 cascade to control grain size. More recently, the EPF/EPFL small secretory peptides (SSPs), including OsEPFL6, OsEPFL7, OsEPFL8, and OsEPFL9, were reported to be the ligands of the OsER1 receptor and to activate the MAPK cascade during panicle morphogenesis[26]. Notably, OsEPFL8, but not other SSPs of OsER1, is involved in spikelet fertility, and suppression of ligand (OsEPFL6/7/9)-receptor (OsER1) pairs optimizes panicle architecture and enhances rice yield[26]. However, the molecular mechanism between OsER1 and OsMKKK10 is still unclear.

      In Arabidopsis, the MKK4/MKK5–MPK3/MPK6 cascade functions downstream of the receptor-like protein kinase ERECTA (ER) to control inflorescence architecture and stomatal development[2729]. This regulatory pathway of inflorescence architecture appears to be conserved between monocots and dicots. In addition, it has been reported that ER regulates cell proliferation in the outer integument, thereby controlling seed size by the MKK4/5–MPK3/6–DA1–UBIQUITIN-SPECIFIC PROTEASE15 (UBP15) module in Arabidopsis[30]. The ubiquitin-activated protease DA1 cleaves and inactivates the positive seed-size regulator UBP15 to negatively regulate seed size[3133]. MPK3/6 can phosphorylate DA1, which inactivates and destabilizes DA1 and increases UBP15 accumulation, thereby promoting seed growth[30]. Interestingly, ER regulates seed size independently of its intracellular domain, which is essential for the function of ER in inflorescence morphogenesis and stomatal development[27,30,34]. ER may interact with other membrane-located receptor(s) to recognize the ligands for seed-size regulation. In stomatal development and plant immune responses, ER binds to the co-receptor TOO MANY MOUTHS (TMM) and/or main co-receptors, BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1/SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE (BAK1/SERK) family LRR-RLKs[3436]. Future studies should identify and characterize the ligands of ER, as well as the potential ER-interacting receptor(s) in seed-size control.

    • A recent study has shown that OsMKKK70 function is redundant with that of its homologs OsMKKK62 and OsMKKK55, which control grain size and leaf angle by OsMKK4–OsMPK6–OsWRKY53 signaling[37]. OsMKKK70 overexpression increases grain length and leaf angle. The osmkkk70 mutant shows no significant differences in grain size and leaf angle compared with wild type; however, the osmkkk62/70 and osmkkk55/62/70 mutants show smaller grains, erect leaves, and reduced brassinosteroid (BR) sensitivity, suggesting that OsMKKK70, OsMKKK62, and OsMKKK55 functions are redundant in the control of grain size and leaf angle. OsMKKK70-overexpressing plants showed an increase in lemma cell number, indicating that OsMKKK70 enhances cell proliferation in spikelets and promotes grain growth. Although OsMKK4 phosphorylation by OsMKKK70 was not observed, OsMKKK70 can interact with OsMKK4, and OsMKKK70 can promote OsMPK6 phosphorylation in vivo. In addition, overexpression or constitutive activation of OsMKK4 or OsMPK6 partially rescues the grain size, leaf angle, and BR hyposensitivity phenotypes of the osmkkk62/70 double mutant, suggesting that OsMKKK70, OsMKK4, and OsMPK6 function through a common pathway to regulate grain size and leaf angle.

      OsMKKK55/62/70 are involved in diverse developmental processes and stress responses. OsMKKK70 overexpression increases grain size but reduces pollen fertility and seed setting percentage, indicating its role in reproductive development[37]. OsMKKK55/62/70 also modulate the gibberellin (GA) content in anthers to regulate cold tolerance at the booting stage[38]. In normal temperatures, the seed setting rate of osmkkk62/70 and osmkkk55/62/70 is similar to that of wild type, whereas in cold conditions the mutants show an increased seed setting rate compared to wild type. In addition, OsMKKK62 functions upstream of the OsMKK3–OsMAPK7/14 module to control seed dormancy[39], and OsMKKK55/70 may also be involved in this process[38].

      OsWRKY53 positively regulates grain size and BR signaling[40]. OsWRKY53 overexpression increases grain size, leaf angle, and exogenous BR sensitivity, whereas the oswrky53 mutant produces small grains and shows BR-deficient phenotypes such as decreased leaf inclination, dwarfism, and low sensitivity to exogenous BR. OsWRKY53 can be phosphorylated by OsMPK6 in an OsMKK4-dependent manner, which is critical for the positive regulation of BR signaling by OsWRKY53[40]. Phosphor-mimicking OsWRKY53 can partially rescue the grain size and BR hyposensitivity phenotypes of the osmkkk62/70 mutant[37], indicating that both OsWRKY53 and OsMKKK70/62 control grain size and BR signaling. OsWRKY53 overexpression can also suppress the small-grain phenotype of osmpk6 and osmkkk10, suggesting that OsWRKY53 functions downstream of the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module to control grain growth[41]. Notably, WRKY53 mainly affects cell size and slightly affects cell number in the spikelet hull[41], whereas OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 and OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 modules regulate grain size mainly through cell proliferation, indicating that there are unknown components downstream of the MAPK cascade that enhance cell division to promote grain growth. In addition, OsWRKY53-overexpressing and OsMKKK70-overexpressing plants display dwarfism, whereas OsMKKK10 overexpression increases plant height, indicating that OsMKKK10 and OsMKKK70 function through different downstream signaling pathways to regulate plant height[37].

      Similar to OsMKKK70 and its homologs, OsWRKY53 negatively regulates cold tolerance at the booting stage by modulating the GA content in anthers. The oswrky53 mutant shows a higher fertile pollen ratio and a higher seed setting rate compared to the wild type in cold conditions. By contrast, OsWRKY53 overexpression leads to a decreased fertile pollen ratio and seed setting rate, consistent with the findings of osmkkk62/70. These findings suggest that the OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMPK6–OsWRKY53 cascade may mediate a trade-off between grain size and seed setting under cold stress[38]. In addition, OsWRKY53 functions downstream of OsMKK4–OsMPK6 in defense responses to wounding, pathogens, and herbivores[4244]. Interestingly, it acts as a positive regulator in pathogen defense[42] but as a negative regulator in herbivore-induced defense[44,45].

    • OsMKK3 affects cell proliferation in spikelet hulls to regulate grain size[46]. Loss-of-function of OsMKK3 reduces grain length, grain width, and chalkiness, whereas overexpression of OsMKK3 increases grain size. Interestingly, natural variation in OsMKK3 influences grain size and chalkiness in rice. Four OsMKK3 haplotypes have been identified in wild rice accessions, and it is believed that the OsMKK3 haplotype present in cultivated rice originated from different wild rice accessions. Furthermore, OsMKK3 underwent strong selection during the domestication of indica and japonica, and polymerization of OsMKK3-Hap1 with other beneficial alleles increased grain length and quality.

      OsMKK3 overexpression in rice has been reported to contribute to increased resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) and leaf blight disease (Xanthomonas oryzae)[47,48]. OsMKK3 phosphorylates OsMPK7 and activates OsWRKY30 to enhance the defense response against X. oryzae, which causes leaf blight disease[48]. In Arabidopsis, MKK3 is involved in several hormone signaling pathways and stress responses[16]. It functions in the MAPKKK14–MKK3–MPK1/MPK2/MPK7 cascade, which is activated by wound-induced jasmonic acid (JA) production, and in the MAPKKK17/18–MKK3–MPK1/2/7/14 cascade, which is triggered by ABA signaling[4951]. It can also act upstream of MPK6 to regulate JA signaling[52] and blue light-induced seedling development[53]. However, the components acting upstream and downstream of OsMKK3 in grain-size control are still unclear.

    • MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PHOSPHATASE1 (OsMKP1)/GRAIN SIZE AND NUMBER1 (GSN1) negatively regulates grain size and weight, but positively regulates grain number per panicle[21,54]. Loss-of-function of OsMKP1/GSN1 results in large grains and sparse panicles; however, OsMKP1 expression is positively correlated with the grain number per panicle. OsMKP1 directly interacts with OsMPK6 and inactivates it via dephosphorylation. Furthermore, the large-grain, sparse-panicle phenotype of the gsn1 mutant is rescued by suppression of OsMKKK10, OsMKK4, or OsMPK6, suggesting that OsMKP1/GSN1 and the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module employ a common pathway to regulate panicle morphogenesis and grain size[21]. Therefore, OsMKP1 coordinates the trade-off between grain size and grain number per panicle by regulating the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module.

      In Arabidopsis, MKP1 participates in stomatal development and plant immunity by modulating the MAPK cascade[5558]. MKP1 inhibits the activity of MAPKs in early stomatal lineage cells, thereby positively regulating stomatal development[55]. MKP1 also negatively regulates plant immunity. For instance, the mkp1 mutant displays enhanced activation of MPK3 and MPK6 as well as defense responses[5658]. These findings reveal that the phosphatase MKP1 is essential for modulating MAPK signaling in various developmental processes, as well as plant immunity.

    • The GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase GSK2 is part of the BR signaling pathway. GSK2 interacts with and phosphorylates OsMKK4 to inhibit OsMKK4-mediated phosphorylation of its substrate OsMPK6, thereby negatively regulating OsMPK6 activity[41]. GSK2 overexpression leads to short grains and typical BR-deficient phenotypes, whereas knockdown of GSK2 by RNA interference increases grain size and enhances BR sensitivity[59]. In Arabidopsis, the GSK2 ortholog BIN2 phosphorylates YDA and MKK4/5 and reduces YODA(YDA)–MKK4/5–MPK3/6 activity to regulate BR-mediated stomatal development[60,61], which is suggestive of crosstalk between BR signaling and MAPK signaling.

      Notably, GSK2 modulates the activity of several transcription activators involved in grain-size control, including DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING (DLT/OsGRAS-32/D62/GS6) that positively regulates the BR response and negatively regulates cell division in grain growth[59,62], GS2/GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (OsGRF4) that increases grain size by enhancing cell elongation[6365], and GRAIN SHAPE GENE ON CHROMOSOME 9 (GS9) that regulates grain shape by influencing cell division[66]. GSK2 can also phosphorylate OsWRKY53, the downstream target of OsMPK6, to reduce its stability[41]. Knockout of OsWRKY53 rescues the large grain size and leaf angle phenotypes caused by the knockdown of GSK2, indicating that OsWRKY53 acts downstream of OsGSK2 to control grain size and BR signaling. In terms of grain growth, OsWRKY53 and GSK2 mainly affect cell elongation and slightly affect cell number, whereas OsMKKK70, OsMKK4, and OsMPK6 mainly affect cell number[41]. Given that BR promotes grain growth by regulating cell expansion in spikelet hulls[1], it is likely that OsWRKY53 plays a significant role in BR-mediated seed-size control and an insignificant role in MAPK-regulated seed-size control[41].

    • OsRac1 is a member of the highly conserved ROP/Rac small GTPase family. ROP GTPases function as molecular switches in plant development processes and stress responses[6770]. OsRac1 positively regulates grain size and yield by promoting cell proliferation[71]. OsRac1 overexpression increases the grain filling rate, as well as grain width, grain weight, and grain yield. OsRac1 interacts with OsMPK6 and influences its phosphorylation. Both OsMPK6 and OsRac1 affect cell division to control grain size, and OsMPK6 functions downstream of OsRac1 in grain-size control. OsRac1 also positively regulates disease resistance through OsMPK6[72,73]. Therefore, OsRac1 is a promising target for rice breeding.

    • The Catharanthus roseus RLK (CrRLK1L) family FERONIA-like receptor 1 (FLR1) negatively regulates grain size in rice[74]. FLR1 interacts with OsRac1 via its kinase domain, indicating that FLR1 may function through the OsRac1–OsMPK6 module to control grain growth. However, the interaction of FLR1 with the OsRac1–OsMPK6 module in grain-size control is unclear. FLR1 influences both cell expansion and cell division in spikelets, suggesting that FLR1 regulates cell division through OsRac1–OsMPK6 but regulates cell elongation through other downstream components. Interestingly, FLR1 tends to bind to activated OsRac1 over inactivated OsRac1, and it has been proposed that inactive OsRac1 is liberated from the cell membrane to trigger downstream effectors. In addition, the flr1 mutant produces large and wide grains but displays an increased chalkiness percentage, indicating that FLR1 negatively regulates grain size but positively regulates grain quality[74].

      Among the rice FLRs, FLR1 and FLR2 are most homologous to Arabidopsis FERONIA (FER). The Arabidopsis fer mutant shows large seeds caused by increased cell elongation in the integuments, but small leaves, short root hairs, and few epidermal hairs caused by decreased cell elongation, indicating that FER inhibits cell elongation during seed growth but enhances cell elongation in certain vegetative tissues[7578]. FER establishes a signaling complex with RopGEF (Rop guanine nucleotide exchange factor) and Rop/Rac GTPase to mediate auxin-induced root hair growth[75]. GEF1 overexpression in Arabidopsis limits seed growth[77], suggesting that FER may function through Rac1–MPK6 to regulate seed growth. Moreover, FER can recognize different RAPID ALKALINIZATION FACTOR (RALF) peptides to regulate growth, immunity, and development[7981]. Therefore, it is possible that FLR1 regulates grain growth by recognizing specific RALF peptides. In addition, FER-RALF1 activates TOR signaling in response to low nutrient levels[82]. It would be interesting to investigate whether FLRs can increase grain size under nitrogen-deficient conditions.

    • Recent studies have identified two MAPK signaling pathways and several regulatory components that play key roles in grain-size control (Fig. 1). However, there are still many gaps to be filled. For instance, OsMPK6 regulates grain growth mainly through cell proliferation, whereas OsWRKY53 plays a minor role in cell proliferation and a major role in cell elongation[41]. However, the main downstream regulators of OsMPK6 in grain-size control remain elusive. Genetic screening of the modifiers of the osmpk6 mutant or phosphor-proteomic searches may be key in identifying the OsMPK6 substrates that mediate grain-size control. Considering that DA1 functions downstream of the MKK4/5–MPK3/6 module to control seed size in Arabidopsis[30], the rice ortholog of DA1 is also likely to be a target of the OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module in grain-growth control.

      Figure 1. 

      Control of grain size and number by the MAPK signaling in rice and a comparison to that in Arabidopsis. (a) OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 and OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMAPK6 ascades play key roles in grain-size control in rice. OsWRKY53 acts downstream of OsMAPK6 to regulate grain size by mainly promoting cell expansion and slightly promoting cell proliferation in the spikelet, whereas the major downstream targets of OsMAPK6 that facilitate cell proliferation in the spikelet hull remain elusive. OsER1 functions upstream of the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module and regulates the morphology of panicles and the number of spikelets per panicle by influencing the metabolism of cytokinin. EPFL peptides act as ligands of OsER1 in this signaling pathway. GSK2, OsMKP1, and OsRac1 influence grain size by modulating the MAPK cascade, whereas FLR1 regulates grain size probably through the OsRac1-OsMAPK6 module. OsMKK3 is not included in the illustration as the upstream and downstream components are unknown. (b) In Arabidopsis, ER functions upstream of the MKK4/5–MPK3/6 cascade to control seed size by regulating DA1-UBP15 activity.

      Although the plant genome encodes multiple MKKKs, MKKs, and MAPKs that can form countless MAPK-cascade combinations, different signaling pathways sometimes use a common MAPK module to regulate diverse cell processes[6,7,16,17]. For instance, the OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 cascade regulates both grain size and grain number per panicle, whereas the OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module controls many other developmental processes and immune responses[16,17]. How different signaling pathways are activated during panicle and grain development to balance grain number, grain size, and other traits remains to be investigated. To achieve signaling specificity, a MAPK cascade can be activated by different upstream signals, or it can target different substrates to participate in different signaling pathways. Signal specificity may lie in the spatiotemporal expression of upstream and downstream components of a certain MAPK cascade[16,17]. Thus far, the expression patterns of different receptors and downstream targets of MAPK signaling that are involved in grain-size control remain elusive. Notably, Arabidopsis ER is expressed in different tissues where it participates in different developmental processes. It is likely that the activation of OsER1–OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6–cytokinin signaling relies on the cellular or temporal-specific expression of EPFLs during panicle morphogenesis. For instance, OsER1 recognizes specifically expressed EPFLs and activates downstream OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 signaling. DST phosphorylation by OsMPK6 upregulates its activity, resulting in increased OsCKX2 transcription and decreased cytokinin levels, which limits grain number[24,26]. Meanwhile, OsMPK6 activates OsWRKY53 and other unknown targets to enhance cell proliferation and cell expansion in the spikelet hull, thereby increasing grain size. Antagonistic to this signaling cascade, OsMKP1 balances grain number and grain size by affecting OsMPK6 activity[24]. Activation of the OsMKKK70–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module by unknown ligands and receptors can also trigger downstream signaling to promote grain growth. However, it is unclear whether this occurs at the same time and in the same space as OsMKKK10–OsMKK4–OsMPK6 module activation. Identification of the ligands and substrates, as well as an investigation of the spatiotemporally expressed components, would help answer these questions.

      The scaffold proteins mediating interactions between MAPK components also contribute to signaling specificity[16,17]. By assembling the required components, they can increase the efficiency of the interaction or control the spatiotemporal specificity of the cascade. For instance, BREAKING OF ASYMMETRY IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE (BASL) functions as a scaffold for YDA and MPK3/6 to regulate the asymmetric division of stomatal lineage cells[83]. Phosphorylation of BASL by MPK3/6 leads to its polar localization and the recruitment of MPK3/6 and YDA, which enhances spatial YDA–MPK3/6 signaling and specifies cell fate. However, it is unclear whether the scaffold proteins recruit specific MAPK signaling components to regulate grain development and other downstream events.

      The mechanisms by which MAPK cascades coordinately regulate grain development processes and stress/immune responses are unclear. A study has shown that membrane receptors for development- and immune-related signaling pathways can be spatially separated within nanodomains of their associated signaling components, thereby forming specific pools of signaling components within a cell[84]. Alternatively, MKKKs of different pathways can compete with common downstream MKKs and MAPKs to antagonize the interactions between a development-related MAPK pathway and an immune-related MAPK pathway[85]. At this point, we wonder whether different MAPK signaling pathways are compartmentalized for signal specificity or antagonistic with each other in the regulation of grain growth and other traits. Future studies are expected to answer these questions.

      • We sincerely apologize to our colleagues whose work could not be discussed due to space limitations. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871219), the Starting Grant from Hebei Agricultural University, China (YJ201920), the State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation (NCCIR2021KF-7), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA24010101, XDB27010102), and AgroST Project (NK2022050103).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Yunhai Li is the Editorial Board member of Seed Biology who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Na Li, Liangliang Chen

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  References (85)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Li N, Chen L, Li Y. 2023. Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice. Seed Biology 2:15 doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2023-0015
    Li N, Chen L, Li Y. 2023. Control of grain size and number by MAPK signaling in rice. Seed Biology 2:15 doi: 10.48130/SeedBio-2023-0015

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return