Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits

More Information
  • The coconut plant (Cocos nucifera L.), an essential tropical agricultural commodity, encounters a range of obstacles including the proliferation of unwanted weed vegetation, deterioration of soil quality, and depletion of essential nutrients. Conventional methods such as herbicide application and manual labor possess constraints, prompting a growing interest in environmentally sustainable alternatives such as cover cropping to address these challenges. Mucuna, a diverse genus of climbing vines and shrubs in the legume family, has drawn attention for its potential as a beneficial cover crop, offering various agricultural and environmental benefits. Mucuna species are known for their rapid growth, ability to fix nitrogen, and weed-controlling properties, making them well-suited for enhancing soil health and fertility. Moreover, their deep taproot systems contribute to soil aeration and compaction alleviation. The allelopathic potential of Mucuna offers an eco-friendly approach to weed control, reducing reliance on synthetic herbicides. In addition, the inclusion of Mucuna in the soil has the potential to enhance the population of beneficial organisms and support greater biodiversity. Therefore, this can potentially lead to beneficial effects on the implementation of sustainable agricultural methods. Mucuna provides various secondary benefits in addition to its primary agronomic advantages. The seeds and biomass of this plant function as a valuable source of nourishing fodder and feed for a diverse range of livestock, hence enabling the implementation of animal husbandry techniques. Additionally, Mucuna seeds exhibit potential as a nutrient-dense food source for human consumption, boasting demonstrated medicinal properties such as neuroprotective effects and potential in managing diabetes. Incorporating Mucuna cover cropping within coconut plantations can yield several benefits, including improvements in soil hydro-physical properties, enhanced pest and disease control, increased land productivity, and a reduced environmental footprint compared to conventional agricultural methods. The ability of Mucuna to adapt to varied climatic and soil conditions further increases its potential as a long-term and environmentally beneficial option. This review highlights the importance of Mucuna cover cropping and suggests customized recommendations. Furthermore, it proposes future research avenues, such as exploring its role in bolstering climate change resilience and its phytoremediation capabilities, to broaden our comprehension of this versatile cover crop. In conclusion, utilizing the potential of Mucuna inside coconut plantations is a possible path toward sustainable agriculture and environmental protection.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Atapattu AAAJ, Senarathne SHS, Raveendra SAST, Egodawatte WCP, Mensah S. 2017b. Effect of short-term agroforestry systems on soil quality in marginal coconut lands in Sri Lanka. Agricultural Research Journal 54(3):324−28

    doi: 10.5958/2395-146X.2017.00060.6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Nuwarapaksha TD, Udumann SS, Dissanayaka DMNS, Dissanayake DKRPL, Atapattu AJ. 2022. Coconut based multiple cropping systems: An analytical review in Sri Lankan coconut cultivations. Circular Agricultural Systems 2:8

    doi: 10.48130/CAS-2022-0008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Senarathne SHS, Atapattu AJ, Raveendra T, Mensah S. Dassanayake KB. 2018. Biomass allocation and growth performance of Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) a gray in coconut plantations in Sri Lanka. Agroforestry Systems 9:1865−75

    doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0290-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Dissanayaka DMNS, Nuwarapaksha TD, Udumann SS, Dissanayake DKRPL, Atapattu AJ. 2022. A sustainable way of increasing productivity of coconut cultivation using cover crops: A review. Circular Agricultural Systems 2:7

    doi: 10.48130/CAS-2022-0007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Senarathne SHS, Udumann SS. 2022. Effect of selected leguminous cover crop species on the productivity of coconut cultivated in reddish brown latosolic soils in Sri Lanka. CORD 37:33−44

    doi: 10.37833/cord.v37i.435

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wabwoba MS, Mutoro K. 2019. Promoting mucuna beans production for soil rehabilitation, incomes, food and nutrition security in Kenya. Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science 2(4):1−6

    doi: 10.33552/GJNFS.2019.02.000543

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Dongsansuk A, Ayutthaya SIN, Kaewjumpa N, Polthanee A. 2016. Photosynthetic efficiency of PSII and growth of young rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) planted with Mucuna (Mucuna bracteate) cover crop. Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 21(3):12−27

    doi: 10.14456/apst.2016.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Coconut Research Institute of Sri Lanka. 2018. Growing of cover crops in coconut land. Advisory Circular No A 10. Sri Lanka: Coconut Research Institute of Sri Lanka. https://cri.gov.lk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/a10.pdf

    [9]

    Intharuksa A, Denduangboripant J, Chansakaow S, Thongkhao K, Sukrong S. 2023. HPLC and DNA barcoding profiles for identification of the selected twelve Mucuna species and its application for detecting prohibited aphrodisiac Mucuna products. Heliyon 9(3):14130

    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ortiz Ceballos AI, Aguirre Rivera JR, Osorio Arce MM, Pea C. 2012. Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) a cover crop as bioherbicide to preserve the environmental services of soil. In Herbicides - Environmental Impact Studies and Management Approaches, ed. Alvarez-Fernandez R. London, UK: IntechOpen. pp. 167−84. https://doi.org/10.5772/31833

    [11]

    Blomme G, Ntamwira J, Ocimati W. 2022. Mucuna pruriens, Crotalaria juncea, and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) have the potential for improving productivity of banana-based systems in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Legume Science January 4(4):e145

    doi: 10.1002/leg3.145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kavitha C, Thangamani C. 2014. Amazing bean Mucuna pruriens: A comprehensive review. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 8(2):138−43

    doi: 10.5897/JMPR2013.5036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Lepcha P, Sathyanarayana N. 2021. Variability for seed-based economic traits and genetic diversity analysis in Mucuna pruriens population of Northeast India. Agricultural Research 11:1−11

    doi: 10.1007/s40003-021-00568-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Abd Aziz N, Tan BC, Othman RY, Khalid N. 2018. Efficient micropropagation protocol and genome size estimation of an important cover crop, Mucuna bracteata DC. ex Kurz. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 132(2):267−78

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1376-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Correia MV, Pereira LCR, De Almeida L, Williams RL, Freach J, et al. 2014. Maize-mucuna (Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC) relay intercropping in the lowland tropics of Timor-Leste. Field Crops Research 156:272−80

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Pugalenthi M, Vadivel V, Siddhuraju P. 2005. Alternative food/feed perspectives of an underutilized legume Mucuna pruriens var. utilis - A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 60(4):201−18

    doi: 10.1007/s11130-005-8620-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Tang K, Angela J. 2019. Phytoremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil with local plant species. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering 495:012054

    doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/495/1/012054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kanatas P, Gazoulis I, Travlos I, Kakabouki I, Kioussi S, et al. 2020. The effects of tillage on weed suppressive ability, leaf area, seed yield and protein content of Mucuna pruriens var. utilis. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 48(2):871−81

    doi: 10.15835/nbha48211887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Fujii Y. 2003. Allelopathy in the natural and agricultural ecosystems and isolation of potent allelochemicals from Velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) and Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Biological Sciences in Space 17(1):6−13

    doi: 10.2187/bss.17.6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Appiah K, Amoatey C, Fujii Y. 2015. Allelopathic activities of selected Mucuna pruriens on the germination and initial growth of lettuce. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4(4):475

    doi: 10.14419/ijbas.v4i4.5148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Gbanguba AU, Daniya E, Kolo MGM, Ibrahim PA, Ismaila U, et al. 2020. Effects of pre-rice cassava/legume intercrops and weed management practices on weed dynamics and yield of low land rice in Badeggi, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 16(6):829−42

    doi: 10.5897/ajar2019.14190

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Herath HMPM, Herath HMIK, Ratnayake WM. 2017. Potential use of Mucuna bracteate as a cover crop for coconut plantations in the low country intermediate zone of Sri Lanka. Journal of Food and Agriculture 10(1−2):26

    doi: 10.4038/jfa.v10i1-2.5210

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Cristiana BR, Ivan CZ, Fabiana R, Jhessica B, Pedro VDM, et al. 2018. The effect of velvet bean (Mucuna cinerea) extract on seedling growth of winter cereals. African Journal of Agricultural Research 13(23):1170−76

    doi: 10.5897/AJAR2018.13046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kaiira MG, Chemining'wa GN, Ayuke F, Baguma Y, Atwijukire E. 2021. Allelopathic potential of compounds in selected crops. Journal of Agricultural Science 13(9):192−201

    doi: 10.5539/jas.v13n9p192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Udensi UE, Akobundu IO, Ayeni AO, Chikoye D. 1999. Management of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) with Velvetbean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) and herbicides. Weed Technology 13(2):201−8

    doi: 10.1017/S0890037X00041610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Bandara MSPM, Dilshara RMP, Gunarathne DKOB, Senevirathne H, Udayanthika SKI, et al. 2017. Impact of invasion of Cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) on the physical and chemical properties of soil. Third Undergraduate Research Symposium on Zoology & Environmental Management, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. pp. 163. http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/16679

    [27]

    Duke JA. 1981. Legume Species. In Handbook of LEGUMES of World Economic Importance, ed. Duke JA. Boston, MA, US: Springer. pp. 5–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8151-8_2

    [28]

    Ennin SA, Dapaah HK, Abaidoo RC. 2009. Nitrogen credits from cowpea, soybean, groundnut and mucuna to maize in rotation. West African Journal of Applied Ecology 6(1):65−74

    doi: 10.4314/wajae.v6i1.45610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Mendham DS, Kumaraswamy S, Balasundaran M, Sankaran KV, Corbeels M, et al. 2004. Legume cover cropping effects on early growth and soil nitrogen supply in eucalypt plantations in south-western India. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39(5):375−82

    doi: 10.1007/s00374-004-0719-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chathurika S, Samarappuli L, Mapa RB. 2010. Litter accumulation from Mucuna bracteata cover crop and its effects on some soil chemical properties in rubber plantations. Journal of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka 90:49−57

    doi: 10.4038/jrrisl.v90i0.1829

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Sakiah Sembiring M, Hasibuan J. 2018. Entisol land characteristics with and without cover crop (Mucuna bracteata) on rubber plantation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 122(1):012043

    doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Muoni T, Koomson E, Öborn I, Marohn C, Watson CA, et al. 2020. Reducing soil erosion in smallholder farming systems in east Africa through the introduction of different crop types. Experimental Agriculture, 56(2):183−95

    doi: 10.1017/S0014479719000280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Silva AdoN, Figueiredo CCde, Carvalho AMde, Soares DdosS, Santos DCRdos, et al. 2016. Effects of cover crops on the physical protection of organic matter and soil aggregation. Australian Journal of Crop Science 10(12):1623−29

    doi: 10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.12.PNE164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wawan Dini IR, Hapsoh. 2019. The effect of legume cover crop Mucuna bracteata on soil physical properties, runoff and erosion in three slopes of immature oil palm plantation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 250(1):012021

    doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/250/1/012021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Atapattu AAAJ, Raveendra SAST, Liyanagedara DS, Piyaratna MGNCK, Herath HMSK. 2017. The role of soil organisms and functions in different coconut based multiple cropping systems. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research 3:67−84

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Osei BY, Agyarko K, Kyere K, Asiedu EK. 2017. Response of hydro-physical properties of a Chromic Luvisol in Ghana to different methods of application of Mucuna pruriens as a soil amendments. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology 2(3):2559−59

    doi: 10.22161/ijeab/2.5.37

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Tarawali G, Manyong VM, Carsky RJ, Vissoh PV, Osei-Bonsu P, et al. 1999. Adoption of improved fallows in West Africa: lessons from mucuna and stylo case studies. Agroforestry Systems 47(1):93−122

    doi: 10.1023/A:1006270122255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Lopes EA, Dallemole-Giaretta R, dos Santos Neves W, Parreira DF, Ferreira PA. 2019. Eco-friendly approaches to the management of plant-parasitic nematodes. In Plant Health Under Biotic Stress, eds. Ansari R, Mahmood I. Singapore: Springer. pp. 167–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6043-5_9

    [39]

    Blanchart E, Villenave C, Viallatoux A, Barthès B, Girardin C, et al. 2006. Long-term effect of a legume cover crop (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) on the communities of soil macrofauna and nematofauna, under maize cultivation, in southern Benin. European Journal of Soil Biology 42(1):S136−S144

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Nogueira MA, de Oliveira JS, Ferraz S. 1996. Nematicidal hydrocarbons from Mucuna aterrima. Phytochemistry 42(4):997−98

    doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(96)86994-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Barros AF, Campos VP, da Silva JCP, Pedroso MP, Medeiros FHV, et al. 2014. Nematicidal activity of volatile organic compounds emitted by Brassica juncea, Azadirachta indica, Canavalia ensiformis, Mucuna pruriens and Cajanus cajan against Meloidogyne incognita. Applied Soil Ecology 80:34−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.02.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zasada IA, Klassen W, Meyer SLF, Codallo M, Abdul-Baki AA. 2006. Velvetbean (Mucuna pruriens) extracts: Impact on Meloidogyne incognita survival and on Lycopersicon esculentum and Lactuca sativa germination and growth. Pest Management Science 62(11):1122−27

    doi: 10.1002/ps.1281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Samiksha Singh D, Kesavan AK, Sohal SK. 2021. Peptidase inhibitor from Mucuna pruriens seeds inhibits the growth and development of Zeugodacus cucurbitae larvae. Phytoparasitica 49(4):645−57

    doi: 10.1007/s12600-021-00901-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Muinga RW, Saha HM, Mureithi JG. 2003. The effect of mucuna (Mucuna pruriens) forage on the performance of lactating cows. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 1:87−91

    Google Scholar

    [45]

    Carew LB, Gernat AG. 2006. Use of velvet beans, Mucuna spp., as a feed ingredient for poultry: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 62(1):131−44

    doi: 10.1079/WPS200590

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Onigemo MA, Anjola OA. 2013. Growth and reproductive performance of pigs fed with raw and differently processed velvet beans (Mucuna Pruriens) as partial replacement for soya bean meal. International Journal of Sustainable Development 6(2):71−76

    doi: 10.13140/2.1.2688.0968

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Hauser S, Henrot J, Korie S. 2020. Maize grain and straw yields over 14 consecutive years in burned and mulched Mucuna pruriens var. utilis and Pueraria phaseoloides relay cropping systems. Experimental Agriculture 56(6):851−65

    doi: 10.1017/S0014479720000368

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    García-Galván A, Belmar-Casso R, Sarmiento-Franco L, Sandoval-Castro CA. 2012. Evaluation of the metabolizable energy value for growing lambs of the Mucuna pruriens seed and the whole pod. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44(4):843−47

    doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9976-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Siddhuraju P, Becker K. 2001. Preliminary nutritional evaluation of Mucuna seed meal (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): an assessment by growth performance and feed utilisation. Aquaculture 196(1-2):105−23

    doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00577-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chakoma I, Manyawu G, Gwiriri L, Moyo S, Dube S. 2016. The agronomy and use of Mucuna pruriens in smallholder farming systems in southern Africa. ILRI Extenstion Brief, December. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute. pp. 1–4. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/78515/extension_brief_mucuna.pdf?sequence=1

    [51]

    Ravindran V, Ravindran G. 1988. Nutritional and anti-nutritional characteristics of mucuna (Mucuna utilis) bean seeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 46(1):71−79

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740460108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Jimoh MA, Idris OA, Jimoh MO. 2020. Cytotoxicity, phytochemical, antiparasitic screening, and antioxidant activities of Mucuna pruriens (Fabaceae). Plants 9(9):1249

    doi: 10.3390/plants9091249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ukachukwu SN, Obioha FC. 2000. Effect of time duration of thermal treatments on the nutritive value of Mucuna chochinchinensis. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 6(1):11−16

    doi: 10.4314/gjpas.v6i1.16096

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Lampariello LR, Cortelazzo A, Guerranti R, Sticozzi C, Valacchi G. 2012. The magic Velvet bean of Mucuna pruriens. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2(4):331−339

    doi: 10.1016/S2225-4110(16)30119-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Rai SN, Chaturvedi VK, Singh P, Singh BK, Singh MP. 2020. Mucuna pruriens in Parkinson’s and in some other diseases: recent advancement and future prospective. 3 Biotech 10(12):522

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02532-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Bhaskar A, Vidhya VG, Ramya M. 2008. Hypoglycemic effect of Mucuna pruriens seed extract on normal and streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Fitoterapia 79(7−8):539−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Shukla KK, Mahdi AA, Ahmad MK, Jaiswar SP, Shankwar SN, et al. 2010. Mucuna pruriens reduces stress and improves the quality of semen in infertile men. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 7:706982

    doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Hussian G, Manyam BV. 1997. Mucuna pruriens proves more effective thanl-DOPA in Parkinson’s disease animal model. Phytotherapy Research 11(6):419−23

    doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1573(199709)11:6<419::aid-ptr120>3.0.co;2-q

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Faisal M, Siddique I, Anis M. 2006. An efficient plant regeneration system for Mucuna pruriens L. (DC.) using cotyledonary node explants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology − Plant 42(1):59−64

    doi: 10.1079/IVP2005717

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Kumar A, Rajput G, Dhatwalia VK, Srivastav G. 2009. Phytocontent screening of Mucuna seeds and exploit in opposition to pathogenic microbes. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences 3(9):71−76

    Google Scholar

    [61]

    Taghizadeh SF, Azizi M, Asili J, Madarshahi FS, Rakhshandeh H, et al. 2021. Therapeutic peptides of Mucuna pruriens L. : Anti-genotoxic molecules against human hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus. Food Science & Nutrition 9(6):2908−14

    doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2248

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Tang KHD, Law YWE. 2019. Phytoremediation of soil contaminated with crude oil using Mucuna bracteata. Research in Ecology 1(1):20−30

    doi: 10.30564/re.v1i1.739

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Mang YD, Njintang YN, Abdou BA, Scher J, Bernard C, Mbofung MC. 2016. Dehulling reduces toxicity and improves in vivo biological value of proteins in vegetal milk derived from two Mucuna (Mucuna pruriens L.) seeds varieties. Journal of Food Science and Technology 53(6):2548−57

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2211-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Buckles D. 1995. Velvetbean: A “new” plant with a history. Economic Botany 49(1):13−25

    doi: 10.1007/BF02862271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Macdicken KG, Hairiah K, Otsamo A, Duguma B, Majid NM. 1996. Shade-based control of Imperata cylindrica: tree fallows and cover crops. Agroforestry Systems 36(1-3):131−49

    doi: 10.1007/BF00142871

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Hanum C. 2021. Growth pattern of shoot and root Mucuna bracteata from seeds and cuttings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 782(4):042068

    doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/782/4/042068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Lakshmi KV, Balasubramanian A, Sankaran N. 2009. Seed treatment effects on germination, growth, yield attributes and yield of Mucuna pruriens. Madras Agricultural Journal 96:335−36

    Google Scholar

    [68]

    Hartkamp AD, Hoogenboom G, Gilbert RA, Benson T, Tarawali SA, et al. 2002. Adaptation of the CROPGRO growth model to velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens): II. Cultivar evaluation and model testing. Field Crops Research 78(1):27−40

    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00090-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Houngnandan P, Sanginga N, Woomer P, Vanlauwe B, Van Cleemput O. 2000. Response of Mucuna pruriens to symbiotic nitrogen fixation by rhizobia following inoculation in farmers' fields in the derived savanna of Benin. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30:558−65

    doi: 10.1007/s003740050036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Sitinjak RR, Pratomo B. 2019. Potential of goat urine and soaking time on the growth of Mucuna bracteata DC. cuttings. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 8(1):40−48

    Google Scholar

    [71]

    Douthwaite B, Manyong VM, Keatinge JDH, Chianu J. 2002. The adoption of alley farming and Mucuna: Lessons for research, development and extension. Agroforestry Systems 56(3):193−202

    doi: 10.1023/a:1021319028117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Pereira Soares DO, Pinto KGD, Alves da Gama L, Ferreira CC, Bhowmik PC, et al. 2021. Physical properties of soil and Glyphosate residue as a function of cassava weed management by cover crops in the Amazon ecosystem. HortScience 56(9):1053−58

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI15895-21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Kumar PR, Sundeep S, Sathyanarayana N. 2020. Microsatellite analysis reveals low interpopulation differentiation in velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) of India. The Nucleus 63(1):35−45

    doi: 10.1007/s13237-019-00276-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Dissanayaka DMNS, Udumann SS, Nuwarapaksha TD, Atapattu AJ. 2024. Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0001
    Dissanayaka DMNS, Udumann SS, Nuwarapaksha TD, Atapattu AJ. 2024. Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0001

Figures(5)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(2192) PDF downloads(659)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits

Circular Agricultural Systems  4 Article number: e003  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The coconut plant (Cocos nucifera L.), an essential tropical agricultural commodity, encounters a range of obstacles including the proliferation of unwanted weed vegetation, deterioration of soil quality, and depletion of essential nutrients. Conventional methods such as herbicide application and manual labor possess constraints, prompting a growing interest in environmentally sustainable alternatives such as cover cropping to address these challenges. Mucuna, a diverse genus of climbing vines and shrubs in the legume family, has drawn attention for its potential as a beneficial cover crop, offering various agricultural and environmental benefits. Mucuna species are known for their rapid growth, ability to fix nitrogen, and weed-controlling properties, making them well-suited for enhancing soil health and fertility. Moreover, their deep taproot systems contribute to soil aeration and compaction alleviation. The allelopathic potential of Mucuna offers an eco-friendly approach to weed control, reducing reliance on synthetic herbicides. In addition, the inclusion of Mucuna in the soil has the potential to enhance the population of beneficial organisms and support greater biodiversity. Therefore, this can potentially lead to beneficial effects on the implementation of sustainable agricultural methods. Mucuna provides various secondary benefits in addition to its primary agronomic advantages. The seeds and biomass of this plant function as a valuable source of nourishing fodder and feed for a diverse range of livestock, hence enabling the implementation of animal husbandry techniques. Additionally, Mucuna seeds exhibit potential as a nutrient-dense food source for human consumption, boasting demonstrated medicinal properties such as neuroprotective effects and potential in managing diabetes. Incorporating Mucuna cover cropping within coconut plantations can yield several benefits, including improvements in soil hydro-physical properties, enhanced pest and disease control, increased land productivity, and a reduced environmental footprint compared to conventional agricultural methods. The ability of Mucuna to adapt to varied climatic and soil conditions further increases its potential as a long-term and environmentally beneficial option. This review highlights the importance of Mucuna cover cropping and suggests customized recommendations. Furthermore, it proposes future research avenues, such as exploring its role in bolstering climate change resilience and its phytoremediation capabilities, to broaden our comprehension of this versatile cover crop. In conclusion, utilizing the potential of Mucuna inside coconut plantations is a possible path toward sustainable agriculture and environmental protection.

    • The coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.) is an important crop in tropical regions, serving as a source of food, income, and industrial products. However, coconut cultivation faces several challenges, including low productivity, weed management, soil erosion, and nutrient depletion[13]. Conventional weed control techniques, including herbicides and manual labor, come with inherent drawbacks related to costs, environmental consequences, and long-term viability. Consequently, there is a rising interest in investigating alternative and environmentally responsible approaches, like cover cropping, to confront these issues[4].

      Cover crops are cultivated non-commercial crops that serve multiple purposes, including soil protection and modification, biodiversity enhancement, erosion control, and weed suppression. Intercropping coconut plantations with suitable cover crops can offer numerous agronomically and environmental benefits[5]. The Mucuna genus, consisting of approximately 100 species of climbing vines and shrubs in the legume family, has gained attention as a prominent candidate for cover crops due to its diverse qualities[6], including rapid growth, nitrogen fixation ability, weed-suppressive properties, and potential soil-improving attributes. This genus encompasses numerous species, with Mucuna pruriens var. utilis being the most extensively studied and widely recognized. However, other species, such as Mucuna cochinchinensis and Mucuna bracteata, also exhibit promising traits for cover cropping purposes[7,8]. Variations within the genus have been shown in Fig. 1.

      Figure 1. 

      Variations of Inflorescences and fruits in Mucuna species. (a) M. pruriens var. pruriens (L.) DC.; (b) M. pruriens var. utilis (Wall. ex Wight) Baker ex Burck; (c) M. bracteata DC. ex Kurz; (d) M. gigantea (Willd.) DC.; (e) M. gracilipes Craib; (f) M. hainanensis Hayata; (g) M. revoluta Wilmot-Dear; (h) M. thailandica Niyomdham & Wilmot-Dear; (i) M. warburgii Lauterb. & K. Schum. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from Mucuna species[9]

      The Mucuna genus displays a wide array of morphological traits that may differ among species[9]. Nevertheless, several common characteristics are shared by numerous species of Mucuna. An individual plant that is in a state of good health and optimal growth has the capacity to attain a length ranging from 3 to 18 m. Furthermore, this plant possesses a life cycle that is determined by both hereditary factors and environmental conditions, spanning a duration of 120 to 330 d[10]. Mucuna plants are typically climbing vines or shrubs with robust and sturdy stems. The stems may be herbaceous or woody, depending on the species. They tend to twine or rise, often utilizing nearby structures or plants for support. The branches of some species can reach considerable lengths, allowing them to ascend high into the canopy. Plants of this genus have a deep taproot system, and depending on the variety of soil conditions, some roots can grow up to 7−10 m in length[11]. Root hairs increase the surface area available for nutrient and water absorption while serving as a nodulation site[10]. Rhizobia bacteria live symbiotic with the legume root system for atmospheric nitrogen fixation[11].

      The leaves of Mucuna spp. are typically characterized by their large size, alternate arrangement, and pinnately compound structure. Each leaf comprises three leaflets arranged along a central rachis, creating a trifoliate pattern. While the leaflets can exhibit variations in size, shape, and texture, they are generally ovate or elliptical with pointed tips. The leaf surfaces may range from smooth to covered with fine hairs, displaying shades of deep green to lighter green. These leaves are trifoliate in nature and may exhibit pubescence[12]. A mature leaf typically measures approximately 5−20 cm long and 3−15 cm wide.

      Mucuna species are known for their striking and colorful bisexual flowers that form in clusters or racemes[10]. These flowers typically exhibit a papilionaceous structure, resembling the characteristic butterfly-like shape commonly found in legume family plants. These flowers are composed of five petals, which include a larger banner petal, two lateral wings, and two joined lower petals that create a keel. Depending on the specific species, the flower colors can vary significantly, encompassing shades of purple, blue, white, pink, or yellow. Following self-pollination, Mucuna flowers transform into elongated and fleshy seed pods[13]. These pods often have a distinctive curved or coiled appearance, contributing to their unique visual appeal. The size, shape, and coloration of the pods may exhibit variation across different species of Mucuna. The pods of Mucuna plants are known to yield seeds that are generally big and spherical, characterized by a compact covering of short hairs or bristles[12]. Depending on the specific species, these seeds can be highly abundant and vary in color, with options ranging from black and brown to mottled. Mucuna reproduction occurs through sexual means via seeds and vegetatively through stem cuttings with a high success rate. Innovative micro-propagation techniques have been developed to address challenges associated with low germination rates and poor seedling viability typically observed in Mucuna seeds[14].

      According to Correia et al., Mucuna spp. can achieve optimal growth and development in environments with an annual rainfall ranging from 400 to 3,000 mm and temperatures between 19 and 27 °C[15]. It tends to enter the flowering stage earlier when the night-time temperature drops below 21 °C. Furthermore, Mucuna spp. is well-known for its ability to tolerate a wide range of pH levels (4.5−7.7), soil types, drought conditions, and high soil acidity levels[6,16]. Adaptability to diverse climates and soil conditions has influenced its preference as a cover crop[14,17]. However, as indicated by Blomme et al., it is essential to note that the growth and nodulation of Mucuna can be influenced by shading[11].

      While Mucuna shows potential as a cover crop in coconut cultivation, there is a noticeable scarcity of comprehensive reviews that investigate its complete potential. Therefore, the objective of this review article is to undertake a thorough assessment of the existing scientific literature. With this review, we seek to derive valuable insights from both research findings and practical field experiences. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Mucuna as a cover crop in coconut plantations. By conducting a comprehensive examination of the agronomic, environmental, and economic ramifications, our objective is to acquire a comprehensive comprehension of the potential benefits and obstacles associated with the integration of Mucuna into coconut-based agroecosystems.

    • Climbing nature and quick growth characteristics contribute significantly to their exceptional competitive abilities against weed populations in agricultural fields[4]. The allelopathic potential of the Mucuna genus is particularly noteworthy when compared to that of typical cover crops[18]. The primary allelochemical present in Mucuna species is L-DOPA, with leaves containing notably higher concentrations, accounting for approximately 1% of their dry weight. The presence of these allelopathic chemicals results in the manifestation of inhibitory effects on the growth of adjacent plants, as reported by Fujii[19]. The root exudates of Mucuna primarily affect nearby plants, thereby contributing to its localized weed suppression effect. Therefore, the efficacy of weed management under field conditions is influenced by both Mucuna biomass production rate and planting distances[20]. Research conducted to evaluate weed density in different pre-rice cassava cropping systems over three consecutive years has proved that Mucuna was the most effective cover crop for suppressing weeds, followed by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), soybean (Glycine max), and lablab (Lablab purpureus) (Table 1)[21]. Furthermore, Fig. 2 provides evidence that coconut planted with Mucuna bracteata in a three-row intercropped system optimizes ground cover, making it the most suitable planting technique out of those analyzed for achieving extensive ground cover[22].

      Table 1.  Comparison of weed density in different pre-rice cassava/legume cover cropping practices in rice at 9 weeks after transplanting.

      Cassava/cover
      cropping systems
      Weed density (No. of weeds/m2)
      201120122013
      Cassava/Mucuna71f139d129f
      Cassava/Cowpea102.5e171c156e
      Cassava/Soybean123.3d188c169cd
      Cassava/Lablab137.4c200b178c
      Cassava mono-cropping165b224b218b
      Natural fallow199.8a325a377a
      Means followed by the same letter(s) within the same column are not significantly different at a 5% significance level. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from intercrops and weed management practices[21].

      Figure 2. 

      Comparison of weed growth in different Mucuna planting systems. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from potential use of Mucuna bracteate as a cover crop[22].

      The smothering effect exerted by Mucuna leads to reduced germination percentages, slower germination speed indices, and the development of weak, unhealthy seedlings in other plant species[23]. Additionally, Mucuna has emerged as a promising bio-herbicide[24], providing an environmentally friendly alternative to herbicide usage in organic farming systems. Notably, the cultivation of Mucuna pruriens var. utilis has demonstrated effective control of cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), an invasive weed in many regions of Sri Lanka[25,26]. Mucuna has also displayed efficient weed management capabilities against Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) and nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus)[27]. These findings highlight the potential of Mucuna as an effective tool for weed control in agricultural systems, especially for managing problematic and invasive weed species.

    • Mucuna exhibits distinct characteristics in nodule formation, nitrogen release, litter production, and soil improvement compared to other legumes. While Mucuna produces relatively larger nodules, the number of nodules per plant and unit area is generally lower than other legume species[28]. However, regarding nitrogen cycling, Mucuna has shown a higher potential for releasing net nitrogen from its plant biomass during decomposition than other species like Pueraria phaseoloides and Stylosanthes hamata[29]. Moreover, Mucuna species have been observed to yield significantly higher quantities of organic matter in comparison to P. phaseoloides and other ground cover plants, rendering them a suitable choice for mulch cover and a valuable contributor to soil carbon and plant nutrients[30]. According to Sakiah & Hasibaun, lands with Mucuna bracteata cover on flat and sloping terrain contained 2.58% and 2.22% organic matter content, respectively[31]. In contrast, if these lands lacked this plant cover, they would register only 1.98% and 1.44% of organic matter respectively. Additionally, one year after establishment well-grown Mucuna cultivation can generate approximately 8−10 t ha−1, whereas other cover crops typically produce about 4.4 t ha−1. The actual yield of Mucuna is influenced by factors such as the duration of the growing season and the overall health of the soil[12]. The aforementioned characteristics definitively identify the Mucuna species as a highly efficient provider of green manure.

      The deep-rooted characteristic of Mucuna confers a significant advantage by effectively minimizing soil compaction. This is accomplished by establishing channels for water entry and promoting root penetration. Consequently, this unique characteristic helps prevent nutrient leaching and improves soil structure[31,32]. Studies have shown that soil integrated with Mucuna exhibits a greater capacity for forming larger and more stable soil aggregates than other cover crops[33]. The persistent generation of binding chemicals, such as organic acids and humic substances, by the flourishing soil microorganisms facilitated by the biomass of Mucuna can be ascribed to this phenomenon[34]. These diverse soil organisms are one of the key indicators of healthy soil[35]. In addition, the root system of Mucuna has been seen to significantly improve certain hydro-physical characteristics of the soil. These improvements include a reduction in bulk density, an increase in total porosity, and the promotion of aeration porosity. This, in turn, creates an optimal soil environment for enhanced plant growth[36]. It is imperative to consider that the impact of cover crop intensity may vary depending on certain management strategies, as illustrated in Fig. 3. It illustrates the suitability of Mucuna cover cropping and its proper management for flat lands as well as slopy lands in terms of soil physical properties like bulk density, total pore spaces, infiltration capacity, and permeability. This reduces risks of waterlogging, runoff, and erosion while promoting factors beneficial to plant production like water availability, drainage, and root development.

      Figure 3. 

      Variation of soil physical properties in two Mucuna cover crop management systems in different topography levels. (a) changes in bulk density with land slope; (b) changes in total pore space with land slope; (c) changes in permeability with land slope; (d) changes in infiltration with land slope. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from effect of Mucuna bracteata on soil physical properties, runoff and erosion[34]. Note: Letters followed by the same lowercase letter in the same parameter show not significantly difference on a significant level at 5%.

      Mucuna pruriens var. utilis has gained significant recognition as a preferred ground cover in West Africa for mitigating soil degradation caused by traditional agricultural methods[37]. It can be employed as a monoculture short fallow cover crop for severely degraded soils, while a maize-mucuna relay cropping system proves suitable for moderately degraded soils[37]. These approaches underscore the versatility and efficacy of Mucuna in combatting soil degradation and advancing sustainable agricultural practices in the region.

    • The Mucuna genus is well-known for its remarkable ability to combat pests and diseases, rendering it a valuable crop for safeguarding other plants[38]. Mucuna species employ a variety of mechanisms to regulate the intrusion of plant-parasitic organisms. The decomposition of deceased Mucuna plant material enriches soil health, fostering a conducive environment for both micro and macro-organisms and serving as a carbon and energy source for all soil inhabitants[34]. Studies have demonstrated that cultivating Mucuna promotes the proliferation and growth of beneficial organisms, including nematodes, earthworms, millipedes, centipedes, coleoptera, diptera, and isopoda, while simultaneously suppressing populations of phytophagous nematodes and ants[39].

      Mucuna aterrima, as an example, emits both non-volatile and volatile organic compounds from its above-ground portions, which hold promise in combating root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)[40,41]. The levels of these allelochemicals differ across various plant components, with the vine, leaves, petioles, fine roots, and primary roots displaying distinct lethal concentration (LC50) values (Fig. 4)[42]. Furthermore, the seeds of Mucuna pruriens contain a peptidase inhibitor that impedes the population growth of the Melon fruit fly (Zeugodacus cucurbitae) by increasing larval mortality, reducing pupal weight, and inhibiting adult emergence[43]. These discoveries underscore the potential of Mucuna species to offer natural resistance against pests and diseases. The emission of allelochemicals and the facilitation of symbiotic organisms collectively augment the pest control and plant defense capabilities of Mucuna crops. The inclusion of Mucuna within integrated pest management (IPM) techniques has the potential to diminish dependence on synthetic pesticides and foster the adoption of agricultural practices that are more sustainable and ecologically conscious.

      Figure 4. 

      Impact of Mucuna pruriens extractions for 50% reduction Meloidogyne incognita. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from germination and growth study[42]. Note: Values followed by the same lowercase letters and same uppercase letters are not different (p < 0.05) separately. Values are taken by Bon p-value adjustments.

    • Mucuna species have been extensively studied as potential fodder or supplementary feed for various livestock in animal husbandry. Different researchers have documented their potential in the diets of dairy cows, pigs, goats, guinea pigs, cane rats, and poultry[4447]. However, certain monogastric animals may exhibit sensitivity to the anti-nutritional compounds found in Mucuna, rendering it toxic for them, as highlighted by Carew & Gernat[45]. On the other hand, for sheep, both M. pruriens seeds and pods have demonstrated potential as raw materials in diet formulation, contingent upon their metabolizable energy content, as indicated by Garcia-Galvan et al.[48].

      Moreover, the seeds of M. pruriens have been subject to investigation as a dietary supplement in preparing fish meal for common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), thus aiding in the fulfillment of the protein needs of fish[49]. To ensure safe use, the seeds should be harvested at the boosting stage and dried properly to 75%−80% dry matter basis within 3−5 d[50]. Moreover, it has been observed that mature Mucuna seeds are consumed as a cereal in human diets, particularly in South Asian countries like Sri Lanka, due to their nutritional value[51]. The seeds have been found to possess various biological activities, such as cytotoxicity, phytochemical, anti-parasitic, and antioxidant properties[52]. However, Mucuna seeds contain anti-nutritional compounds, including tannins, cyanides, hemagglutinins, anticoagulants, and trypsin inhibitors[53]. Seed yield varies with the environmental conditions, management practices, and soil conditions.

      Fortunately, these anti-nutrients can be removed during household preparations using simple steps[6]. The process involves isolating and cleaning mature, high-quality seeds and soaking them in water for 24 h, with water changes at intervals. The soaked seeds are then boiled for 4−5 h, with water changes, before de-husking and drying. Autoclaving can be employed for industrial use to eliminate heat-labile anti-nutritional factors[49]. Ultimately, Mucuna seeds can be incorporated into the human diet in various forms, including whole seeds, flour, or as part of beverages when combined with other foods[6].

    • Mucuna pruriens, in addition to serving as a beneficial ground cover, possesses remarkable medicinal, pharmaceutical, and nutritional properties, as highlighted in the study by Lampariello et al.[54]. The plant exhibits a diverse range of therapeutic activities, making it a subject of interest in various fields of medicine. Research has revealed that Mucuna pruriens exhibits a wide range of beneficial properties, including anti-venom, anti-ischemic, aphrodisiac, anti-microbial, anti-neoplastic, anti-inflammatory, anti-epileptic, anti-protozoal, and anti-diabetic effects, along with neuroprotective properties[55]. In Ayurvedic medicine, M. pruriens is highly valued for its medicinal attributes. The seeds, in particular, have been found to enhance antioxidant defenses, improve the quality of semen in infertile men, and reduce lipid peroxide levels[56,57]. Additionally, the seeds contain a significant amount of 'Levodopa,' making them a potential treatment for Parkinson's disease[55,58]. Furthermore, various parts of the M. pruriens plant have therapeutic applications. The roots of Mucuna are recognized for their potential to alleviate constipation, address ulcers, and reduce fever. In contrast, the leaves are traditionally considered beneficial for addressing debility, relieving headaches, and reducing inflammation[59]. The bioactive compounds present in Mucuna pruriens seeds have shown anti-microbial effects against pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Salmonella typhi[60]. Furthermore, Mucuna also contains therapeutic peptides, such as proteinase and glycosidase inhibitors, which have been identified for their potential in treating liver cancers and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Additionally, they can influence the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs[61].

    • Certain Mucuna species exhibit phytoremediation properties, enabling them to thrive in soils contaminated with crude oil[17,62]. This capability holds significant promise as a solution to combat pollution-related land degradation. Additionally, the edible seeds of Mucuna species stand out as a cost-effective and nutrient-rich source of carbohydrates, protein, lipids, amino acids, fibre, and minerals when compared to other widely consumed legumes like Glycine max, as highlighted by Mang et al.[63].

    • Introducing the Mucuna genus into agricultural fields offers an environmentally friendly approach that can substantially reduce labor demands and dependence on external synthetic chemicals, including herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and particularly synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, as Buckles emphasized[64]. Through the use of this approach, agricultural practitioners have the potential to reduce production costs, preserve energy resources, and concurrently advance the sustainability of both the land and the environment. As a result, this methodology possesses the capacity to augment the financial gains of farmers.

    • When cultivating Mucuna as a cash crop, it is recommended to use a seed rate of 50 kg ha–1, with planting spacings set at 0.6 m × 0.6 m[12]. For use as a cover crop, Mucuna can be grown either as a sole cover crop or in a mixed cover cropping system, with a spacing of 0.8 m × 0.4 m and two seeds per hole at a seed rate of 30 kg ha–1[4,37].

      Mucuna can be directly seeded in non-prepared fields or fields prepared using herbicides or ploughing, slashing, burning, or cleaning[65]. In order to enhance the rates of germination, it is recommended to administer seed treatments (see Table 2). Additionally, slashing can be practiced for more efficient seeding to stimulate germination[37]. In cases where seeds are limited and costly, stem cuttings can be utilized as a planting material. Hanum found that seedlings established from stem cuttings exhibited a higher growth rate than seed-sown seedlings (Fig. 5)[66].

      Table 2.  The impact of various seed treatments on Mucuna pruriens seed germination. Source: Authors' compilation based on information from study on seed treatment effects[67].

      TreatmentsGermination (%)
      Control (no seed treatment was practised)53
      Cold water soaking for 24 h58
      Hot water soaking at 80 °C for 5 min79
      Acid treatment (commercial H2SO4) for 3 min83
      Scarification (seeds were rubbed against the hard surface for 5 min)93
      Cow-dung pelleting63
      Panchakavya soaking (3% concentration for 6 h)
      (a mixture of 2.5 kg of cow dung, 1.5 L of cow urine,
      1 L of cow milk, 1 L of cow curd, 500 g of cow
      ghee and 1.5 L of sugar cane juice)
      67

      Figure 5. 

      Comparison of growth of Mucuna from seeds and cuttings. Source: Authors‘ compilation based on information from growth pattern study[66].

      Following the second year of establishment, Mucuna forms a dense vegetation cover, covering the entire ground at a rate of 2−3 square meters per month[31]. Unlike some other cover crops, plants in the Genus Mucuna display rapid vegetative growth right from emergence, as noted by Hartkamp et al.[68]. Incorporating rhizobial inocula at the planting stage is beneficial to enhance plant establishment and development[69].

      Mucuna responds better to natural fertilizers than synthetic fertilizers, especially goat urine, which increases the number of leaves, tendril length, and dry weight of the plants. The best result for tendril lengths (69.95 cm) was observed when 300 ml of goat urine and 60 min of soaking time were applied[70]. Despite being known for its pest and disease resistance, Mucuna shows susceptibility to various fungi such as Cercospora stizolohii, Mycosphaerella cruenta, Phyllosticta mucunae, Phymatotrichum omnivorum, Phytophthora drechsleri, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, Uromyces mucunae, bacteria including Bacterial leaf-spot, Xanthomonas stizolobiicola, Pseudomonas stizolobii, and Pseudomonas syringae, and parasitic plants such as Striga gesnerioides[27]. This vulnerability may add to the costs for farmers. Proper maintenance and pruning are also essential due to its significant and aggressive vegetative growth, producing larger leaves, thick stems, and climbing habits[29]. This growth habit can also make it a competitor for young seedlings of the main crop, necessitating careful management.

      When Mucuna has completed approximately 50% to 70% of its growth cycle, which typically occurs at or after the pod-filling stage, it is appropriate to incorporate it into the soil. During this stage, the maximum amount of plant dry weight and nitrogen can be effectively assimilated into the soil. Integration can be achieved by cutting and burying the plant material in the ground, cutting and spreading it on the field, utilizing ex-situ plant biomass, or creating secondary products like compost from plant waste[10]. Several studies have proposed that Mucuna could be a suitable alternative for cover cropping in lieu of alley cropping, owing to its numerous advantages[71]. However, recommendations for these types of cover crops may differ based on practicability, the nature of the main crop, the composition of weeds, environmental factors, and local realities[72].

    • To comprehend the economic significance of Mucuna species, it is imperative to comprehensively characterize the bioactive compounds found in different plant parts and elucidate their mechanisms of action in disease suppression[55]. Proper pre-breeding procedures should be conducted to boost crop diversification and identify and evaluate pivotal genes with advantageous agronomic traits[13,73]. Given the global concern regarding zinc deficiency in tropical agricultural soils, assessing the impact of Mucuna cover cropping on soil zinc levels offers valuable prospects for future research[72].

      Furthermore, it is essential to explore the effects of Mucuna cover crops on biodiversity, encompassing beneficial insects, pollinators, and soil organisms. A growing amount of attention is being paid to assessing how the crop contributes to the provision of ecosystem services like habitat and pollination support, as well as how it might strengthen agroecosystems' resilience to climate change by reducing soil erosion, improving water and nutrient management, and increasing carbon sequestration.

      Examining the allelopathic effects of Mucuna cover crops on primary crops and other plant species is crucial to interpreting their potential for beneficial and detrimental interactions. These avenues of research will play a significant role in shaping our understanding of the multifaceted contributions of Mucuna species in sustainable agriculture and ecosystem management.

    • While the genus Mucuna has proven successful in Sri Lankan rubber plantations, its utilization in coconut plantations remains relatively uncommon. Nonetheless, Mucuna exhibits the potential to emerge as an ideal cover crop within the Sri Lankan agricultural sector due to its adaptability and multifaceted advantages. In the role of a cover crop, Mucuna stands poised to significantly contribute to sustainable agriculture by mitigating soil degradation and enhancing hydro-physical properties. It demonstrates the capacity to effectively suppress weeds, pests, and diseases in agricultural fields, thus reducing the reliance on chemical inputs. Additionally, the capacity of Mucuna to augment the soil's carbon content and supply vital nutrients has the potential to improve both crop yield and land productivity. Beyond these primary benefits, Mucuna offers a spectrum of secondary advantages. It serves as a nutritious food source for humans and livestock, providing valuable animal husbandry feeding materials. Additionally, the plant is a valuable source of raw materials for medicinal and pharmaceutical production, further amplifying its economic significance. The efficacy of Mucuna cover cropping is contingent upon meticulous site selection, which necessitates careful consideration of various elements including the inherent qualities of the primary crop, prevailing weed populations, environmental conditions, and local circumstances. Tailored recommendations for implementing Mucuna cover cropping can be formulated based on these variables to ensure its effective adoption. For widespread acceptance and adoption, it is imperative to conduct thorough research into the agronomic practices of Mucuna cover cropping, particularly in the context of coconut cultivation across diverse agroecological zones within the country. Maximizing the secondary benefits derived from Mucuna plants can serve as a compelling incentive for farmers to embrace this sustainable agricultural practice more readily. In conclusion, the implementation of Mucuna cover cropping in Sri Lanka's agriculture sector has the capacity to yield a wide range of environmental and economic benefits, hence promoting sustainability and enhancing prosperity.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Atapattu AJ, Dissanayaka DMNS; data collection: Udumann SS, Dissanayaka DMNS; data analysis: Atapattu AJ, Dissanayaka DMNS, Udumann SS; draft manuscript preparation: Atapattu AJ, Dissanayaka DMNS, Nuwarapaksha TD; tables, and figures preparation: Dissanayaka DMNS, Nuwarapaksha TD. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

    • We want to express our appreciation to the technical staff of the Agronomy Division of the Coconut Research Institute. Mrs. Asanki Jayamali, Mrs. Madhuwanka P. Gayadari, and Mr. Namal K. Gunarathna deserve special recognition for their enormous contribution. We would like to express our deep gratitude to the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and critical evaluation.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (2) References (73)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Dissanayaka DMNS, Udumann SS, Nuwarapaksha TD, Atapattu AJ. 2024. Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0001
    Dissanayaka DMNS, Udumann SS, Nuwarapaksha TD, Atapattu AJ. 2024. Harnessing the potential of Mucuna cover cropping: a comprehensive review of its agronomic and environmental benefits. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return