-
Soils under minimum tillage were higher in clay content than all the other tillage systems and the control (Table 1). The clay content of the soils decreased in the order of minimum tillage > conventional tillage > Control = No-till. Percent silt was highest in the no-till system though not significantly different from the control. Minimum tillage and conventional tillage reduced the % silt of the soil by 13%; and increased the clay content by 150% and 103%, respectively after three seasons of cultivation. No statistical difference was observed between and within the tillage systems and the control for the sand fractions.
Table 1. Effect of tillage systems on sand fractions, total porosity, root water storage, hydraulic conductivity and soil erodibility.
Tillage system Very fine sand (%) Fine sand (%) Medium sand (%) Coarse sand (%) Very coarse sand (%) Silt
(%)Clay
(%)Total porosity (%) Water storage (mm) Saturated hydraulic conductivity (mm/h) Erodibility
× 10−3 (Mg·h·MJ−1·mm−1)Control 4.0 11.2 27.0 24.0 5.9 22.4 5.3 45 48 634 13 No-till 4.6 11.6 22.8 21.2 5.5 27.7 6.6 46 32.6 585 24 Minimum tillage 3.5 10.9 23.5 22.3 6.5 20.0 13.3 39 44 349 18 Conventional tillage 3.7 10.0 21.8 23.3 10.9 19.8 10.8 42 23.1 127 14 Lsd (0.05) 1.8 2.5 6.2 5.5 6.7 6.9 2.3 5 3 46 7 CV (%) 22.9 11.5 13.0 12.1 46.3 15.3 12.9 6.4 15.2 22 15.4 Total porosity varied from 39 to 46% in the minimum tillage and no-till respectively. The control which was a natural ecosystem has the highest saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) values. Among the tillage systems, no-till has the highest Ks value followed by the minimum tillage and the conventional tillage has the lowest Ks value. The average erodibility was 13 × 10−3 to 24 ×10−3 Mg·ha·h/(ha·MJ·mm). Control tillage, conventional tillage, minimum tillage, and no-till were ranked in terms of erodibility. No-till produced significantly more K (p < 0.05) than the control and conventional tillage.
Impact of soil amendment on soil organic carbon and erodibility
-
Application of soil amendment over five cropping cycles showed some variations in soil organic carbon and soil erodibility (Table 2). The control has the least soil organic carbon and the highest occurred in plots with poultry manure application. Differences in soil organic carbon were significant among the treatments. Soil erodibility has its lowest value under the control (no amendment) and the highest value under the NPK treatment.
Table 2. Effect of soil amendments on soil organic carbon and soil erodibility.
Treatment Soil erodibility values
× 10−3 (Mg·h·MJ−1·mm−1)Organic carbon
(%)Control 17 1.65 ½ PM + ½ NPK 19 2.19 Poultry manure 19 2.67 Mineral NPK 21 1.82 LSDP<0.05 2 0.20 % CV 15.4 8.10 Effect of tillage and soil amendment interactions on erodibility
-
Table 3 shows the mean values of the tillage x soil amendments interactions on soil erodibility. The erodibility of the soil ranged from 1 to 2.6 × 10−2 Mg·h·(MJ−1·mm−1). Conventional tillage was shown to be statistically less erodible than no-till and minimum tillage systems under control (no amendment was applied). No-till erodibility (K) values were comparatively high though not statistically significant from minimum tillage. Soil amendments did not affect erodibility under no-till or conventional tillage systems (p > 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of tillage and soil amendments interactions on soil erosion susceptibility.
Tillage practice Soil erodibility values (Mg·h·MJ−1·mm−1) No-amendment ½ NPK + ½ PM NPK PM No-till 0.021 0.025 0.026 0.024 Minimum tillage 0.019 0.019 0.02 0.015 Conventional tillage 0.01 0.014 0.017 0.016 Lsd (0.05) 0.007 CV (%) 12.1 Correlations of soil erodibility, particle size fractions and hydraulic conductivity
-
Figure 2a depicts the association between K and % sand > 0.10 mm with a coefficient of determination of −0.67 at the 5% probability level. The results showed that as the percentage of sand increased over 0.10 mm, the erodibility values decreased. Figure 2b depicts the association between % silt + extremely fine sand and K values. At a 5% probability level, the connection was statistically significant. With a r2 = 0.61, soil erodibility increases as the percentage of silt + very fine sand increases. Figure 2c indicates that erodibility and clay percentage are inversely related. With a r2 = 0.12, increasing the percentage of clay resulted in a decrease in soil erodibility. At a 5% probability level, the connection was statistically significant.
Figure 2.
Relationship between erodibility and soil particle size fractions and saturated hydraulic conductivity.
The association between erodibility and saturated hydraulic conductivity has a r of −0.52 (Fig. 2d). Soil erodibility decreased significantly (p < 0.05) as saturated hydraulic conductivity increased. Figure 3 indicates that erodibility and soil organic carbon content are inversely associated, with r of −0.31, although this association is not significant at 5% probability due to low range of the values for this study. Soil erodibility decreased as the saturated hydraulic conductivity increased.
-
The author is grateful to his academic supervisor and mentor, Late Prof Charles Quansah of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi, for the tutelage and for supervising this work. May his soul rest in peace.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Mesele SA. 2024. Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e004 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0004
Changes in soil susceptibility to erosion under tillage and soil fertility management practices
- Received: 24 October 2023
- Revised: 13 December 2023
- Accepted: 15 January 2024
- Published online: 29 February 2024
Abstract: The degree to which soil is susceptible to erosion is measured as soil erodibility which can be influenced by different land management options. This study evaluated the dynamics of soil erodibility to tillage and soil amendments in a maize field under five consecutive cropping cycles. Tillage treatments were no-till, minimum, conventional, and grassland fallow (control). The soil amendment treatments used were no amendment (control), NPK, poultry manure (PM), and ½ NPK + ½ PM and these treatments were applied to all the tillage treatments including no-till. The study showed that tillage and soil amendment interactions had significant effects on soil erodibility (p < 0.05). The mean erodibility values ranged from 13 × 10−3 to 24 × 10−3 Mg·h·MJ−1·mm−1 in the following order: control < conventional tillage < minimum tillage < no-till. For the soil amendments, erodibility varied from NPK > poultry manure = ½ NPK + ½ PM > control (undisturbed grassland). Regardless of the type of soil amendment, the soil erodibility under conventional tillage was significantly lower than that under no-till and minimum tillage systems. The relationship between erodibility and easily measured soil parameters, such as % sand greater than 100 µm, % silt plus very fine sand, clay, and saturated hydraulic conductivity, were significant at p < 0.05. The higher contribution (86%) of sand and silt to the variation in erodibility indicates that any other indices of erodibility based on particle size distribution, apart from the nomograph, could satisfactorily predict erodibility values.
-
Key words:
- Conservation agriculture /
- Land degradation /
- Soil erosion /
- Tillage