Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA

More Information
  • Received: 08 November 2023
    Accepted: 05 February 2024
    Published online: 28 February 2024
    Grass Research  4 Article number: e003 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • The Epichloë fungal endophytes of turfgrasses have long been studied for the benefits they provide their plant hosts such as enhancing the host's physiological characteristics and providing disease resistance against fungal pathogens. The mechanisms of fungal disease resistance have been attributed to outcompeting of nutrients or through antifungal secondary metabolites, but these mechanisms have not been validated. The well-established endophyte mediated disease resistance in strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra subsp. rubra) against dollar spot disease caused by Clarireedia jacksonii is due to the presence of the endophyte Epichloë festucae. Studying this tripartite relationship has led to the identification of an antifungal protein designated Efe-AfpA. Expression, purification, and testing of this protein on C. jacksonii in culture and on infected turfgrasses has verified Efe-AfpA's role in the endophyte-mediated disease resistance. Several other antifungal proteins similar to Efe-AfpA have been characterized from other fungal species and could represent an untapped, novel control method for fungal plant diseases.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Schardl CL, Leuchtmann A, Spiering MJ. 2004. Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55:315−40

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Bush LP, Wilkinson HH, Schardl CL. 1997. Bioprotective alkaloids of grass-fungal endophyte symbioses. Plant Physiology 114:1−7

    doi: 10.1104/pp.114.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Card SD, Bastías DA, Caradus JR. 2021. Antagonism to plant pathogens by Epichloë fungal endophytes—a review. Plants 10:1997

    doi: 10.3390/plants10101997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Clarke BB, White JF, Hurley RH, Torres MS, Sun S, et al. 2006. Endophyte-mediated suppression of dollar spot disease in fine fescues. Plant Disease 90:994−98

    doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0994

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Bonos SA, Wilson MM, Meyer WA, Funk RC. 2005. Suppression of red thread in fine fescues through endophyte-mediated resistance. Applied Turfgrass Science 2:1−7

    doi: 10.1094/ATS-2005-0725-01-RS

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tredway LP, Tomaso-Peterson M, Kerns JP, Clarke BB. 2023. Compendium of turfgrass diseases, Fourth Edition. St. Paul, Minnesota: The American Phytopathological Society. pp. 28−32. https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890546888

    [7]

    Ambrose KV, Belanger FC. 2012. SOLiD-SAGE of endophyte-infected red fescue reveals numerous effects on host transcriptome and an abundance of highly expressed fungal secreted proteins. PLoS ONE 7:e53214

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053214

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tian Z, Wang R, Ambrose KV, Clarke BB, Belanger FC. 2017. The Epichloë festucae antifungal protein has activity against the plant pathogen Sclerotinia homoeocarpa, the causal agent of dollar spot disease. Scientific Reports 7:5643

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06068-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Fardella PA, Tian Z, Clarke BB, Belanger FC. 2022. The Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA protects creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) from the plant pathogen Clarireedia jacksonii, the causal agent of dollar spot disease. Journal of Fungi 8:1097

    doi: 10.3390/jof8101097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Rodriguez RJ, White JF, Arnold AE, Redman RS. 2009. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist 182:314−30

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Kuldau G, Bacon C. 2008. Clavicipitaceous endophytes: their ability to enhance resistance of grasses to multiple stresses. Biological Control 46:57−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Leuchtmann A, Bacon CW, Schardl CL, White JF, Tadych M. 2014. Nomenclatural realignment of Neotyphodium species with genus Epichloë. Mycologia 106:202−15

    doi: 10.3852/13-251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Tanaka A, Takemoto D, Chujo T, Scott B. 2012. Fungal endophytes of grasses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15:462−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.03.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Schardl CL, Young CA, Hesse U, Amyotte SG, Andreeva K, et al. 2013. Plant-symbiotic fungi as chemical engineers: multi-genome analysis of the clavicipitaceae reveals dynamics of alkaloid loci. PLoS Genetics 9:e1003323

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003323

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Koshino H, Yoshihara T, Sakamura S, Shimanuki T, Sato T, et al. 1989. A ring B aromatic sterol from stromata of Epichloe typhina. Phytochemistry 28:771−72

    doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(89)80112-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Koshino H, Terada SI, Yoshihara T, Sakamura S, Shimanuki T, et al. 1988. Three phenolic acid derivatives from stromata of Epichloe typhina on Phleum pratense. Phytochemistry 27:1333−38

    doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(88)80188-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Lehtonen PT, Helander M, Siddiqui SA, Lehto K, Saikkonen K. 2006. Endophytic fungus decreases plant virus infections in meadow ryegrass (Lolium pratense). Biology Letters 2:620−23

    doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Salgado-Salazar C, Beirn LA, Ismaiel A, Boehm MJ, Carbone I, et al. 2018. Clarireedia: a new fungal genus comprising four pathogenic species responsible for dollar spot disease of turfgrass. Fungal Biology 122:761−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Goodman DM, Burpee LL. 1991. Biological control of dollar spot disease of creeping bentgrass. Phytopathology 81:1438−46

    doi: 10.1094/Phyto-81-1438

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sapkota S, Catching KE, Raymer PL, Martinez-Espinoza AD, Bahri BA. 2022. New approaches to an old problem: dollar spot of turfgrass. Phytopathology 112:469−80

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-20-0505-RVW

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Bonos SA. 2006. Heritability of dollar spot resistance in creeping bentgrass. Phytopathology 96:808−12

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Walsh B, Ikeda SS, Boland GJ. 1999. Biology and management of dollar spot (Sclerotinia homoeocarpa); an important disease of turfgrass. HortScience 34:13−21

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.34.1.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Fidanza MA, Wetzel HC, Agnew ML, Kaminski JE. 2006. Evaluation of fungicide and plant growth regulator tank-mix programmes on dollar spot severity of creeping bentgrass. Crop Protection 25:1032−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.02.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Schardl CL, Scott B. 2012. Recommendations for gene nomenclature for Epichloë species and related Clavicipitaceae. In International Symposium on Fungal Endophytes of Grasses, eds Young CA, Aiken GE, McCulley RL, Strickland JR, Schardl CL. Ardmore: Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. pp. 84−87.

    [25]

    Tsai HF, Liu JS, Staben C, Christensen MJ, Latch GC, et al. 1994. Evolutionary diversification of fungal endophytes of tall fescue grass by hybridization with Epichloë species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91:2542−46

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2542

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Moon CD, Craven KD, Leuchtmann A, Clement SL, Schardl CL. 2004. Prevalence of interspecific hybrids amongst asexual fungal endophytes of grasses. Molecular Ecology 13:1455−67

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02138.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Dinkins RD, Nagabhyrn P, Graham MA, Boykin D, Schardl CL. 2017. Transcriptome response of Lolium arundinaceum to its fungal endophyte Epichloë coenophiala. New Phytologist 213:324−37

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Jenssen H, Hamill P, Hancock REW. 2006. Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 19:491−511

    doi: 10.1128/CMR.00056-05

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lacadena J, del Pozo AM, Gasset M, Patiño B, Campos-Olivas R, et al. 1995. Characterization of the antifungal protein secreted by the mould Aspergillus giganteus. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 324:273−81

    doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.0040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Marx F, Haas H, Reindl M, Stöffler G, Lottspeich F, et al. 1995. Cloning, structural organization and regulation of expression of the Penicillium chrysogenum paf gene encoding an abundantly secreted protein with antifungal activity. Gene 167:167−71

    doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00701-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Kaiserer L, Oberparleiter C, Weiler-Görz R, Burgstaller W, Leiter E, et al. 2003. Characterization of the Penicillium chrysogenum antifungal protein PAF. Archives of Microbiology 180:204−10

    doi: 10.1007/s00203-003-0578-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Batta G, Barna T, Gáspári Z, Sándor S, Kövér KE, et al. 2009. Functional aspects of the solution structure and dynamics of PAF – a highly-stable antifungal protein from Penicillium chrysogenum. The FEBS Journal 276:2875−90

    doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07011.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Vila L, Lacadena V, Fontanet P, Martinez del Pozo A, San Segundo B. 2001. A protein from the mold Aspergillus giganteus is a potent inhibitor of fungal plant pathogens. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 14:1327−31

    doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.11.1327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wnendt S, Ulbrich N, Stahl U. 1994. Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and expression of the gene encoding an antifungal-protein from Aspergillus giganteus. Current Genetics 25:519−23

    doi: 10.1007/BF00351672

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Gun Lee D, Shin SY, Maeng CY, Jin Z, Kim KL, et al. 1999. Isolation and characterization of a novel antifungal peptide from Aspergillus niger. Biochemical and Biophysics Research Communications 263:646−51

    doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1428

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Skouri-Gargouri H, Gargouri A. 2008. First isolation of a novel thermostable antifungal peptide secreted by Aspergillus clavatus. Peptides 29:1871−77

    doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Rodríguez-Martín A, Acosta R, Liddell S, Núñez F, Benito MJ, et al. 2010. Characterization of the novel antifungal protein PgAFP and the encoding gene of Penicillium chrysogenum. Peptides 31:541−47

    doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Hajji M, Jellouli K, Hmidet N, Balti R, Sellami-Kamoun A, et al. 2010. A highly thermostable antimicrobial peptide from Aspergillus clavatus ES1: biochemical and molecular characterization. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 37:805−13

    doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0725-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Kovács L, Virágh M, Takó M, Papp T, Vágvölgyi C, et al. 2011. Isolation and characterization of Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein (NFAP). Peptides 32:1724−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Tóth L, Kele Z, Borics A, Nagy LG, Váradi G, et al. 2016. NFAP2, a novel cysteine-rich anti-yeast protein from Neosartorya fischeri NRRL 181: isolation and characterization. AMB Express 6:75

    doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0250-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Garrigues S, Gandía M, Popa C, Borics A, Marx F, et al. 2017. Efficient production and characterization of the novel and highly active antifungal protein AfpB from Penicillium digitatum. Scientific Reports 7:14663

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15277-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Garrigues S, Gandía M, Castillo L, Coca M, Marx F, et al. 2018. Three antifungal proteins from Penicillium expansum: different patterns of production and antifungal activity. Frontiers in Microbiology 9:2370

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Huber A, Hajdu D, Bratschun-Khan D, Gáspári Z, Varbanov M, et al. 2018. New antimicrobial potential and structural properties of PAFB: a cationic, cysteine-rich protein from Penicillium chrysogenum Q176. Scientific Reports 8:1751

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20002-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Marx F. 2004. Small, basic antifungal proteins secreted from filamentous ascomycetes: a comparative study regarding, expression, structure, function and potential application. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 65:133−42

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1600-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Oberparleiter C, Kaiserer L, Haas H, Ladurner P, Andratsch M, et al. 2003. Active internalization of the Penicillium chrysogenum antifungal protein PAF in sensitive Aspergilli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47:3598−601

    doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3598-3601.2003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Huber A, Oemer G, Malanovic N, Lohner K, Kovács L, et al. 2019. Membrane sphingolipids regulate the fitness and antifungal protein susceptibility of Neurospora crassa. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:605

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00605

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Moreno AB, Del Pozo AM, Borja M, Segundo BS. 2003. Activity of the antifungal protein from Aspergillus giganteus against Botrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 93:1344−53

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.11.1344

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Theis T, Wedde M, Meyer V, Stahl U. 2003. The antifungal protein from Aspergillus giganteus causes membrane permeabilization. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47:588−93

    doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.2.588-593.2003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Theis T, Marx F, Salvenmoser W, Stahl U, Meyer V. 2005. New insights into the target site and mode of action of the antifungal protein of Aspergillus giganteus. Research in Microbiology 156:47−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.08.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Yount NY, Yeaman MR. 2006. Structural congruence among membrane-active host defense polypeptides of diverse phylogeny. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1758:1373−86

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Yount NY, Yeaman MR. 2004. Multidimensional signatures in antimicrobial peptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:7363−68

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401567101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Utesch T, de Miguel Catalina A, Schattenberg C, Paege N, Schmieder P, et al. 2018. A computational modeling approach predicts interaction of the antifungal protein AFP from Aspergillus giganteus with fungal membranes via its γ-core motif. mSphere 3:e00377-18

    doi: 10.1128/msphere.00377-18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Paege N, Warnecke D, Zäuner S, Hagen S, Rodrigues A, et al. 2019. Species-specific differences in the susceptibility of fungi to the antifungal protein AFP depend on C-3 saturation of glycosylceramides. mSphere 4:e00741-19

    doi: 10.1128/msphere.00741-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Wang R, Luo S, Clarke BB, Belanger FC. 2021. The Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA is also a possible effector protein required for the interaction of the fungus with its host grass Festuca rubra subsp. rubra. Microorganisms 9:140

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Bernauer L, Radkohl A, Lehmayer LGK, Emmerstorfer-Augustin A. 2020. Komagataella phaffii as emerging model organism in fundamental research. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:607028

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.607028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    López-García B, Moreno AB, San Segundo B, De los Ríos V, Manning JM, et al. 2010. Production of the biotechnologically relevant AFP from Aspergillus giganteus in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein Expression and Purification 70:206−10

    doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Cereghino JL, Cregg JM. 2000. Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 24:45−66

    doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00532.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Sonderegger C, Galgóczy L, Garrigues S, Fizil Á, Borics A, et al. 2016. A Penicillium chrysogenum-based expression system for the production of small, cysteine-rich antifungal proteins for structural and functional analyses. Microbial Cell Factories 15:192

    doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0402-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Hegedüs N, Sigl C, Zadra I, Pócsi I, Marx F. 2011. The paf gene product modulates asexual development in Penicillium chrysogenum. Journal of Basic Microbiology 51:253−62

    doi: 10.1002/jobm.201000321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Bugeda A, Garrigues S, Gandía M, Manzanares P, Marcos JF, et al. 2020. The antifungal protein AfpB induces regulated cell death in its parental fungus Penicillium digitatum. mSphere 5:e00595−20

    doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00595-20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Altpeter F, Xu J. 2000. Rapid production of transgenic turfgrass (Festuca rubra L.) plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 157:441−48

    doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80029-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Guo Z, Bonos S, Meyer WA, Day PR, Belanger FC. 2003. Transgenic creeping bentgrass with delayed dollar spot symptoms. Molecular Breeding 11:95−101

    doi: 10.1023/A:1022458101221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Nissinen R, Helander M, Kumar M, Saikkonen K. 2019. Heritable Epichloë symbioses shapes fungal but not bacterial communities of plant leaves. Scientific Reports 9:5253

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41603-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    White JF Jr, Cole GT. 1985. Endophyte-host associations in forage grasses. III. in vitro inhibition of fungi by Acremonium coenophialum. Mycologia 77:487−89

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1985.12025127

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    White JF Jr, Cole GT. 1986. Endophyte-host associations in forage grasses. IV. the endophyte of Festuca versuta. Mycologia 78:102−7

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1986.12025211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Christensen MJ, Latch GCM, Tapper BA. 1991. Variation within isolates of Acremonium endophytes from perennial rye-grasses. Mycological Research 95:918−23

    doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80087-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Siegel MR, Latch GCM. 1991. Expression of antifungal activity in agar culture by isolates of grass endophytes. Mycologia 83:529−37

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1991.12026047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Christensen MJ. 1996. Antifungal activity in grasses infected with Acremonium and Epichloë endophytes. Australasian Plant Pathology 25:186−91

    doi: 10.1071/AP96032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Wäli PR, Helander M, Nissinen O, Saikkonen K. 2006. Susceptibility of endophyte-infected grasses to winter pathogens (snow molds). Canadian Journal of Botany 84:1043−51

    doi: 10.1139/b06-075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Li C, Gao J, Nan Z. 2007. Interactions of Neotyphodium gansuense, Achnatherum inebrians and plant-pathogenic fungi. Mycological Research 111:1220−27

    doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Ren A, Wang Y, Gao T. 2009. Difference in antifungal activity of morphotypes of clavicipitaceous endophytes within and between species. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29:227−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2009.08.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Pańka D, West CP, Guerber CA, Richardson MD. 2013. Susceptibility of tall fescue to Rhizoctonia zeae infection as affected by endophyte symbiosis. Annals of Applied Biology 163:257−68

    doi: 10.1111/aab.12051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Pańka D, Jeske M, Tropczynski M. 2013. Occurrence of Neotyphodium and Epichloë fungi in meadow fescue and red fescue in Poland and screening of endophyte isolates as potential biological control agents. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 12:67−83

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Niones JT, Takemoto D. 2014. An isolate of Epichloë festucae, an endophytic fungus of temperate grasses, has growth inhibitory activity against selected grass pathogens. Journal of General Plant Pathology 80:337−47

    doi: 10.1007/s10327-014-0521-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhou L, Zhang X, Li C, Christensen MJ, Nan Z. 2015. Antifungal activity and phytochemical investigation of the asexual endophyte of Epichloë sp. from Festuca sinensis. Science China Life Sciences 58:821−26

    doi: 10.1007/s11427-015-4845-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Fernando K, Reddy P, Hettiarachchige IK, Spangenberg GC, Rochfort SJ, et al. 2020. Novel antifungal activity of Lolium-associated Epichloë endophytes. Microorganisms 8:955

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060955

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Wheatley WM, Nicol HI, Hunt ER, Nikandrow A, Cother N. 2000. An association between perennial ryegrass endophyte, a leafspot caused by Pyrenophora seminiperda and preferential grazing by sheep. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Harmful and Beneficial Microorganisms in Grassland, Pastures and Turf, Soest, Germany, 2000. pp. 71−75.

    [78]

    Tian P, Nan Z, Li C, Spangenberg G. 2008. Effect of the endophyte Neotyphodium lolii on susceptibility and host physiological response of perennial ryegrass to fungal pathogens. European Journal of Plant Pathology 122:593−602

    doi: 10.1007/s10658-008-9329-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kauppinen M, Helander M, Anttila N, Saloniemi I, Saikkonen K. 2018. Epichloë endophyte effects on leaf blotch pathogen (Rhynchosporium sp. ) of tall fescue (Schedonorus phoenix) vary among grass origin and environmental conditions. Plant Ecology & Diversity 11:625−35

    doi: 10.1080/17550874.2019.1613451

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Guo Y, Gao P, Li F, Duan T. 2019. Effects of AM fungi and grass endophytes on perennial ryegrass Bipolaris sorokiniana leaf spot disease under limited soil nutrients. European Journal of Plant Pathology 154:659−71

    doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01689-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Li F, Duan T, Li Y. 2020. Effects of the fungal endophyte Epichloë festucae var. lolii on growth and physiological responses of perennial ryegrass cv. Fairway to combined drought and pathogen stresses. Microorganisms 8:1917

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121917

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Shi X, Qin T, Liu H, Wu M, Li J, et al. 2020. Endophytic fungi activated similar defense strategies of Achnatherum sibiricum host to different trophic types of pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:1607

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01607

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Yue Q, Miller CJ, White JF, Richardson MD. 2000. Isolation and characterization of fungal inhibitors from Epichloë festucae. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48:4687−92

    doi: 10.1021/jf990685q

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Zhou L, Zhong S, Duo H, Qiao F. 2019. Antimicrobial activity and composition of volatile substance of Epichloë sp. endophyte isolated from Festuca sinensis. Natural Product Research and Development 31:1543−51

    doi: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2019.9.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Purev E, Kondo T, Takemoto D, Niones JT, Ojika M. 2020. Identification of ε-Poly-L-lysine as an antimicrobial product from an Epichloë endophyte and isolation of fungal ε-PL synthetase gene. Molecules 25:1032

    doi: 10.3390/molecules25051032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Fernando K, Reddy P, Guthridge KM, Spangenberg GC, Rochfort SJ. 2022. A metabolomic study of Epichloë endophytes for screening antifungal metabolites. Metabolites 12:37

    doi: 10.3390/metabo12010037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Li F, Mei D, Ren T, Song Q. 2023. Crude extracts and secondary metabolites of Epichloë bromicola against Phytophthroa infestans. Chemistry & Biodiversity 20:e202200841

    doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202200841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Hassing B, Winter D, Becker Y, Mesarich CH, Eaton CJ, et al. 2019. Analysis of Epichloë festucae small secreted proteins in the interaction with Lolium perenne. PLoS One 14:e0209463

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209463

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Fernando K, Reddy P, Spangenberg GC, Rochfort SJ, Guthridge KM. 2022. Metabolic potential of Epichloë endophytes for host grass fungal disease resistance. Microorganisms 10:64

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Paege N, Warnecke D, Zäuner S, Hagen S, Rodrigues A, et al. 2019. Species-specific differences in the susceptibility of fungi to the antifungal protein AFP depend on C-3 saturation of glycosylceramides. mSphere 4:e00741−19

    doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00741-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Fardella PA, Clarke BB, Belanger FC. 2023. The Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA has activity against numerous plant pathogens. Microorganisms 11:828

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040828

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zubrod JP, Bundschuh M, Arts G, Brühl CA, Imfeld G, et al. 2019. Fungicides: an overlooked pesticide class? Environmental Science & Technology 53:3347−65

    doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04392

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Steinberg G, Gurr SJ. 2020. Fungi, fungicide discovery and global food security. Fungal Genetics and Biology 144:103476

    doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2020.103476

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Morton V, Staub T. 2008. A short history of fungicides. APSnet Feature Articles 308:1−12

    Google Scholar

    [95]

    Ons L, Bylemans D, Thevissen K, Cammue BPA. 2020. Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 8:1930

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121930

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Leiter É, Gáll T, Csernoch L, Pócsi I. 2017. Biofungicide Utilizations of antifungal proteins of filamentous ascomycetes: current and foreseeable future developments. BioControl 62:125−38

    doi: 10.1007/s10526-016-9781-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Barna B, Leiter É, Hegedűs N, Bíró T, Pócsi I. 2008. Effect of the Penicillium chrysogenum antifungal protein (PAF) on barley powdery mildew and wheat leaf rust pathogens. Journal of Basic Microbiology 48:516−20

    doi: 10.1002/jobm.200800197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Gandía M, Kakar A, Giner-Llorca M, Holzknecht J, Martínez-Culebras P, et al. 2021. Potential of antifungal proteins (AFPs) to control Penicillium postharvest fruit decay. Journal of Fungi 7:449

    doi: 10.3390/jof7060449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Morris K. 2003. The national turfgrass research initiative. Green Section Record. pp. 26–30.

    [100]

    Váradi G, Tóth GK, Kele Z, Galgóczy L, Fizil Á, et al. 2013. Synthesis of PAF, an antifungal protein from P. chrysogenum, by native chemical ligation: native disulfide pattern and fold obtained upon oxidative refolding. Chemistry – A European Journal 19:12684−92

    doi: 10.1002/chem.201301098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Berkmen M. 2012. Production of disulfide-bonded proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification 82:240−51

    doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.10.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Lucigen Corporation. 2016. Expresso TMT7 SUMO Cloning and Expression System. Lucigen. pp. 1–25.

    [103]

    Lobstein J, Emrich CA, Jeans C, Faulkner M, Riggs P, et al. 2012. SHuffle, a novel Escherichia coli protein expression strain capable of correctly folding disulfide bonded proteins in its cytoplasm. Microbial Cell Factories 11:753

    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-56

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Nozach H, Fruchart-Gaillard C, Fenaille F, Beau F, Ramos OHP, et al. 2013. High throughput screening identifies disulfide isomerase DsbC as a very efficient partner for recombinant expression of small disulfide-rich proteins in E. coli. Microbial Cell Factories 12:37

    doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Fardella P. 2024. Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA. Grass Research 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0001
    Fardella P. 2024. Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA. Grass Research 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0001

Article Metrics

Article views(2401) PDF downloads(288)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA

Grass Research  4 Article number: e003  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The Epichloë fungal endophytes of turfgrasses have long been studied for the benefits they provide their plant hosts such as enhancing the host's physiological characteristics and providing disease resistance against fungal pathogens. The mechanisms of fungal disease resistance have been attributed to outcompeting of nutrients or through antifungal secondary metabolites, but these mechanisms have not been validated. The well-established endophyte mediated disease resistance in strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra subsp. rubra) against dollar spot disease caused by Clarireedia jacksonii is due to the presence of the endophyte Epichloë festucae. Studying this tripartite relationship has led to the identification of an antifungal protein designated Efe-AfpA. Expression, purification, and testing of this protein on C. jacksonii in culture and on infected turfgrasses has verified Efe-AfpA's role in the endophyte-mediated disease resistance. Several other antifungal proteins similar to Efe-AfpA have been characterized from other fungal species and could represent an untapped, novel control method for fungal plant diseases.

    • Microbes and plants are known to form close associations and symbioses with each other. These associations can either be mutualistic or antagonistic depending on the pairing. Many grasses from the family Poaceae will form these relationships with Clavicipitaceous fungi, particularly species from the genus Epichloë[1]. A common benefit of these fungal endophytes is the reduction in herbivory by animals due to the alkaloids produced by the Epichloë species[2]. Epichloë species have also been shown to have antifungal activity against other fungi, mostly through in vitro dual growth cultures[3].

      A unique benefit of the E. festucaeFestuca rubra subsp. rubra symbiosis is the endophyte-mediated disease resistance the grass host attains against dollar spot disease, caused by the fungal pathogen Clarireedia jacksonii, and red thread, caused by Laetisaria fuciformis[4,5]. Dollar spot disease is a highly detrimental foliar disease of turfgrasses requiring the use of both chemical and cultural control methods[6]. The use of chemical controls often leads to the selection of resistant strains, so the discovery of novel control methods that could be utilized in tandem with, or in replacement of fungicides, would be a boon to growers. As such, understanding the underlying mechanism of the endophyte-mediate disease resistance imparted by E. festucae represented an opportunity to discover such a novel control method. Using transcriptome analysis and protein expression systems, an E. festucae antifungal protein, Efe-AfpA, was identified and its activity against C. jacksonii was verified[79].

      The purpose of this review is to summarize the identification of the antifungal protein Efe-AfpA and discuss the attempts of using it and other antifungal proteins to suppress plant pathogenic fungal diseases. To do so, a variety of topics need to be discussed: (1) the Epichloë spp. endophytes of grasses, (2) the tripartite relationship between E. festucae, F. rubra subsp. rubra, and C. jacksonii, (3) Efe-AfpA and other antifungal proteins, and (4) how these antifungal proteins could be a new source of control for fungal plant diseases.

    • Endophytic relationships between fungi and plants have been well documented for years. For the most part, these fungi have been described to be from two distinct groups, Clavicipitaceous and Nonclavicipitaceous that are further divided into classes[10]. Relationships between these fungi and grasses can range from antagonistic to symbiotic, such as the case of the Epichloë species of the Clavicipitaceae fungi. These fungi endophytically interact with cool season grasses of the genera Agrostis, Brachypodium, Bromus, Elymus, Festuca, Lolium, and Poa[11]. There is considerable host specificity among the Epichloë spp., which is reviewed in Leuchtmann et al.[12].

      Endophytic production of bioactive molecules provides protection to the hosts from a variety of stresses. Peramines, indole diterpenes, ergot alkaloids, and lolines have all been identified as being synthesized by the Epichloё endophytes[1316]. These compounds protect the plant against animal and insect feeding. This reduced insect feeding can have the beneficial side effect of the reduction of plant diseases vectored by those insects. Endophyte infected meadow ryegrass (Lolium pratense) had a lower incidence of aphids and barley yellow dwarf virus compared to non-endophyte infected grass, which was attributed to the secondary metabolites the endophyte produced[17]. In some cases, endophyte infection also provides tolerance to abiotic stressors through increased drought tolerance, increased root growth and root size[11].

      Class I Clavicipitaceous endophytes, which includes Epichloё festucae, was the first class shown to contribute fungal disease resistance to their hosts. Specifically, E. festucae infecting Festuca rubra is one of the few associations that shows strongly associated in symbio fungal disease resistance, against dollar spot disease caused by Clarireedia jacksonii, and red thread caused by Laetisaria fuciformis[4,5,10]. There have been several studies attempting to identify the antifungal capabilities and compounds of these endophytes, which will be discussed later. While there are many reports of Epichloë-dependent antifungal activity in dual cultures or using extracts, there are few reports of this activity in planta. Of those reports, most use detached leaf assays or whole plant assays in controlled settings[3]. The E. festucae suppression of dollar spot in fine fescues is unique in that it has been observed consistently in the field[4], further solidifying interest in this interaction.

    • In 1989 at the Rutgers Plant Science Research Farm in Adelphia, NJ, USA, strong creeping red fescue infected with the endophyte E. festucae was seen to have resistance to dollar spot disease caused by Clarireedia jacksonii (formerly Sclerotinia homeocarpa)[4,18]. Strong creeping red fescue plants not infected with E. festucae did not exhibit resistance.

      Dollar spot is a destructive disease of turfgrasses whose diagnostic symptoms and signs include bleached white foliar lesions, sunken depressed circles of turf, and cobweb-like mycelium evident early in the morning on dew covered grass[6]. In the United States, more money is spent on controlling dollar spot disease with chemical fungicides than any other turfgrass disease[19,20]. Specifically, over 70% of all fungicides used for controlling turfgrass diseases are targeting dollar spot, brown patch (Rhizoctonia solani), and anthracnose (Colletotrichum sp.)[21]. Several chemical fungicides have been used over the years in the control of this disease such as: benzimidazoles, anilazine, dicarboximides, and DMIs (demethylation inhibitors). Unfortunately, resistance has been found for all of these[22]. Fungicide programs are developed to deter the onset of these resistance strains. Application of tank mixes of fungicides (azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, propiconazole, etc.) with or without the addition of plant growth regulators (paclobutrazol or trinexapaethyl) have shown reduced disease severity, with those including plant growth regulators yielding a higher quality of Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bentgrass)[23].

      Given that E. festucae infecting fine fescues had such a strong association with fungal disease resistance, and it is uniquely conferring disease resistance in symbio, the exact mechanism of how this resistance is achieved was investigated. Understanding this mechanism could represent another tool in mitigating the damage of dollar spot disease, both physically and financially. First, a comparative transcriptomic analysis was done on endophyte infected and endophyte free strong creeping red fescue via SOLiD-SAGE[7]. The resulting sequence data showed that the fungal endophyte genes for secreted proteins were abundant, and the second most abundant fungal transcript (6.3% of mapped fungal tags) was for a predicted secreted, small, cysteine rich protein with similarity to the Penicillium chrysogenum antifungal protein PAF[7]. The E. festucae antifungal protein was designated Efe-AfpA and the gene was designated Efe-afpA, using the Epichloё nomenclature guidelines[24].

      Of the ten available Epichloё genomes at the time, only one other, E. inebrians, had this gene present[7]. Since then, genome sequences of additional Epichloë spp. became available, which also have an antifungal protein gene, E. baconii and E. aotearoae[8]. E. coenophiala, a fungal endophyte of tall fescue turfgrass also has antifungal protein genes[9]. E. coenophiala is a triparental hybrid fungus with two sequences similar to E. festucae's Efe-afpA gene. The first is 100% identical, so it can be assumed this gene comes directly from the E. festucae parent of E. coenophiala. The other sequence is highly similar to Efe-AfpA, so it could also be from E. festucae or possibly the Lolium-associated endophyte component of the triparental hybrid. The third progenitor of E. coenophiala, E. typhina, does not have an afpA gene[7,25,26]. In a search of the NCBI database, only five of the 16 Epichloë spp. for which whole genome sequences are currently available have a gene similar to Efe-AfpA. Although E. coenophiala has genes similar to Efe-AfpA, tall fescue has not been reported to exhibit endophyte-mediated disease resistance likely due to the low expression of the antifungal protein genes[9,27]. There is no information available on disease resistance or gene expression for the other Epichloë spp. that have an antifungal protein gene. The limited existence of an antifungal protein gene among Epichloë species and the unique nature of the endophyte-mediated disease resistance in F. rubra suggested the antifungal protein may be a factor in the disease resistance.

    • Antimicrobial peptides are common among all organisms ranging from single celled to multicellular organisms, and share a variety of characteristics: small, cationic, and amphiphilic[28]. Of the several known fungal antifungal proteins, AFP and PAF, produced by Aspergillus giganteus and Penicillium chrysogenum respectively, have been studied most thoroughly.

      AFP is a 51 amino acid protein with four disulfide bonds whose NMR structure was determined in 1995. The data showed five beta barrel structures stabilized by four disulfide bonds, but also a level of cysteine pair isomerization[29]. PAF, the other highly researched antifungal protein, is produced by P. chrysogenum. It has about 43.6% amino acid sequence identity and 71.3% sequence similarity to AFP and shares the characteristics of being small and cationic, but has three disulfide bonds[3032]. Both were shown to have high activity against a variety of fungi at low MIC (minimal inhibitory concentrations), another characteristic of these types of antifungal proteins[31,33]. Recently many more of these proteins have been isolated and characterized[8,30,3443].

      PAF, as with many antifungal proteins, has a broad range of antifungal activity from the fungi it affects and the effective concentrations[44]. Some fungi are extremely sensitive to PAF, and to the other P. chrysogenum antifungal protein PAFB, such as Aspergillus fumigatus and A. niger, having MICs of 1 μM or less. There are more resistant fungi, as is the case with P. chrysogenum which is extremely sensitive to PAFB but not to PAF[43]. Sensitive fungi have been shown to internalize PAF, where it localizes to the cytoplasm as seen by using immunofluorescence in several Aspergillus species. Internalization of PAF has multiple effects on the target fungus, such as membrane permeabilization and changes in morphology such as hyperbranching[31,45]. More recently it was shown that the membrane sphingolipid glucosylceramide was required for PAF to have full antifungal activity on Neurospora crassa, while PAFB did not have the same requirement[46].

      AFP from A. giganteus is also active against a wide variety of ascomycete fungi such as multiple Fusarium and Aspergillus species and Botrytis cinerea[29,47,48]. This antifungal protein's mode of action has been explored using the Sytox green viability stain, where sensitive fungi treated with the protein would take up the stain. Using both immunofluorescence and an AFP-antibody, it was shown that the protein interacted with the plasma membrane leading to the conclusion that it must permeabilize the membrane allowing for the dye to enter the cells[48]. Transmission electron microscopy of AFP treated A. niger (sensitive) and P. chrysogenum (resistant) showed major differences in the cellular ultrastructure. Treated A. niger showed a collapsing cytoplasm and aberrant vacuoles, with AFP localizing to the cell wall visualized through immunogold staining. P. chrysogenum did not show AFP localization to any particular cellular compartment but was internalized, and the ultrastructure remained similar to the untreated control[49].

      Analysis of antimicrobial peptides revealed a conserved structure termed the γ-core motif. Variations of this motif are found in antimicrobial proteins, defense polypeptides, and toxins suggesting that the γ-core is an essential component of the membrane interactions of these compounds[50]. Modern molecular and computational modelling work suggests that the AFP protein's γ-core motif is responsible for its interaction with fungal membranes. Furthermore, the modeling showed a likely scenario where AFP proteins would assemble as a blanket over the fungal membrane[51,52]. Similarly to how PAF requires the lipid glucosylceramide for full activity, AFP depends on the C-3 unsaturation of membrane glycosylceramides. Those fungi with Δ3 unsaturation are sensitive to AFP while fungi with Δ3 saturation are insensitive. When the gene responsible for Δ3 unsaturation, dtdA, was knocked out in A. niger and Fusarium graminearum their sensitivity to AFP decreased[53].

    • Epichloё festucae's Efe-AfpA was first identified through SOLiD-SAGE analysis of RNA from E. festucae infected strong creeping red fescue as the second most abundant fungal tag. It was predicted to be secreted and antifungal by sequence analysis[7]. Protein sequencing of Efe-AfpA isolated from the apoplast confirmed its abundance in infected plants. Its predicted amino acid sequence showed high sequence similarity to the well characterized PAF antifungal protein from P. chrysogenum. This apoplastic isolated Efe-AfpA was tested against C. jacksonii in vitro to determine activity and resulted in a zone of inhibition of growth[8].

      While other antifungal proteins can be isolated from fermented pure cultures, Efe-AfpA is not found in culture. The Efe-afpA gene was expressed 700-fold greater in the leaf sheath of E. festucae infected strong creeping red fescue than in culture[54]. Efe-AfpA is found in the apoplast of endophyte infected strong creeping red fescue, but not in a high enough abundance that would suggest purification from the apoplast as being viable[8]. Therefore, this required utilizing another expression system for large scale purification of Efe-AfpA. The yeast Pichia pastoris (currently referred to as Komagataella phaffi[55]) is commonly used for heterologous protein expression. Pichia pastoris was utilized to produce Efe-AfpA as it had also been used to produce A. giganteus's AFP[8,56,57].

      Larger quantities of the protein were able to be purified from transformed P. pastoris, although the protein was not completely pure. Several tests were performed, all concluding that Efe-AfpA had antifungal activity against C. jacksonii by permeabilizing the membrane[8]. While active protein was obtainable, induction of expression was cumbersome requiring two different media, a daily addition of methanol, and yielded impure protein. These factors lead to the search for an optimal expression system.

      Efe-AfpA was expressed in and purified from E. coli, P. chrysogenum, and P. pastoris and the antifungal activities were compared to PAF produced by a P. chrysogenum overexpressor strain[9,58]. The heterologous system used to express Efe-AfpA had an effect on its antifungal activity against Neurospora crassa in vitro, with the P. chrysogenum derived Efe-AfpA having the highest antifungal activity at relatively low concentrations. Its activity was also the most similar to that of PAF. This Efe-AfpA's activity against C. jacksonii was confirmed in culture and was assayed to determine if it could control dollar spot disease on both creeping bentgrass and endophyte-free strong creeping red fescue in a greenhouse setting. Dollar spot disease symptoms were reduced on both turfgrasses[9].

      Several pieces of evidence therefore indicate that Efe-AfpA is a major component in the endophyte-mediated disease resistance seen in strong creeping red fescue infected by Epichloë festucae: (1) Uniqueness of the Efe-afpA gene amongst Epichloë spp.; (2) high levels of expression in symbio, but not in pure culture; (3) its antifungal activity against C. jacksonii in culture, and; (4) its reduction in dollar spot disease severity in greenhouse trials when applied to non-endophyte infected strong creeping red fescue inoculated with dollar spot. The next piece of evidence required to fully validate this protein's involvement in disease resistance would be a strong creeping red fescue isolate infected with an Efe-AfpA E. festucae knockout.

      Two independent Efe-afpA knockouts were generated using CRISPR-Cas9, and neither could infect strong creeping red fescue whereas the wild type and the complemented isolates could. This suggested that the Efe-AfpA protein could be an effector with an additional role in the symbiotic relationship between strong creeping red fescue and E. festucae beyond disease resistance[54]. Other antifungal proteins have also been described to have more than one function[59,60].

      Other methods could be used in lieu of a knockout such as transgenic turfgrass expressing Efe-AfpA. Grasses normally susceptible to dollar spot disease, such as non-endophyte infected strong creeping red fescue and creeping bentgrass, could heterologously express the antifungal protein and then be inoculated with C. jacksonii. Reduction in disease severity compared to an untransformed control would support Efe-AfpA's role in disease resistance. Both red fescue and creeping bentgrass have been shown to be amenable to transformation[61,62].

      Epichloë endophytes are known to affect their hosts and produce many secondary metabolites, so other mechanisms may be involved with this disease resistance. From the transcriptomic work by Ambrose & Belanger[7] no candidate plant genes for disease resistance or defense response were identified with the highest percentage of upregulated plant tags being in the gene ontology category 'photosynthesis'. So while E. festucae has an impact on the host gene expression, no obvious plant genes stood out that explained the endophyte-mediated disease resistance. Epichloë spp. also have an effect on the host plant's microbial community. Festuca arundinaceum (tall fescue) infected with E. coenophiala had a different fungal community than its endophyte-free counterpart, particularly in the amount of Puccinia coronata, a common fungal pathogen[63]. This different population may also play a role in disease resistance, but more work needs to be done to further elucidate if this is the case with strong creeping red fescue and dollar spot disease.

      Recently Card, Bastìas, and Caradus excellently reviewed publications detailing the antagonism of Epichloë species against plant pathogens[3]. Many of these studies utilized dual culture assays where the Epichloë spp. were cultured with another fungus and growth inhibition was observed[6476] while others did show antifungal activity in planta described as antibiosis[70,7375,7782]. Of the 29 studies cited spanning decades of work where in vitro or in planta bioactivity was reported to be due to antibiosis, only 5 identified the compounds responsible for the antifungal effect[75,76,8385]. More recently, antifungal compounds were identified from E. bromicola and Epichloë strains NEA12 and NEA23[86,87].

      Besides the highly abundant Efe-afpA tag, the Epichloë transcriptomic data identified many more small, secreted, Epichloë specific proteins. E. festucae is known to produce small secreted proteins, some of which have been predicted to be effectors from a study done on its symbiosis with Lolium perenne. Of the three effectors investigated, no functions were determined beyond localization in the host plant[88]. It is possible that these proteins also play a role in disease resistance or the induction of a defense response in the host. Further knockouts, overexpressors, or purifications of the other abundant E. festucae proteins should be conducted to further validate their functions. While many publications have reported antifungal activity by Epichloë spp. only a few have specifically identified the compounds involved and confirmed that the compounds are found in symbio as opposed to pure culture, which may not represent the compounds produced by the endophyte in the host plant. Bioprospecting these metabolites using advanced analytical methods and software should help streamline and expedite this process[89]. So, despite the other players that could be involved, the evidence gathered about Efe-AfpA solidifies its place as a major component of the endophyte-mediated disease resistance seen in strong creeping red fescue.

      Efe-AfpA's potential mode of action was investigated, much like that of the antifungal proteins AFP and PAF. AFP from A. giganteus appears to rely heavily on both the presence of glycosylceramides (GlcCer) on the membrane and the unsaturation of the C-3 carbon in the glycosylceramides in the target organism. In experiments where the glucosylceramide synthase protein was inhibited, the sensitive fungus A. niger had decreased susceptibility. When the Δ(3) desaturase gene was knocked out in the AFP-sensitive A. niger it also had decreased susceptibility[90]. PAF's, from P. chrysogenum, mode of action was also investigated in relation to glucosylceramides with the GlcCer N. crassa mutants. All mutants generated in the glucosylceramide pathway, including gcs, lead to decreased susceptibility to PAF but not PAFB, also from P. chrysogenum, indicating that not only are glucosylceramides important for PAF's activity but that PAFB may have other membrane constituents with which it interacts[46]. The antifungal activities of Efe-AfpA and PAF were assayed against a selection of these glucosylceramide mutants. It was found that while PAF required the presence of glucosylceramide for full activity, Efe-AfpA was highly antifungal against all the mutants[9]. This indicated that while these two proteins share sequence and predicted structural similarities, their modes of action are different.

      AFP and PAF, among other antifungal proteins, have been tested against a variety of fungi to determine their activities. This is important as these proteins could potentially represent a new type of disease control method and understanding of which can be used against which plant pathogenic fungus will be a necessity. Efe-AfpA was assayed against a variety of plant pathogenic fungi in addition to C. jacksonii. In culture Efe-AfpA had antifungal activity against fungi that cause economically important diseases, such as Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium graminearum, and Pyricularia oryzae[91].

    • Management of fungal plant pathogens is a problem for many crops. Current management strategies rely heavily on the use of fungicides, which are considered critical for global food security[92,93]. Fungicides are also used heavily on amenity crops such as turfgrasses[94]. Although deemed critical for disease management, there are several problems associated with fungicide use, including toxicity to non-target organisms and development of resistance in the target fungus[92]. Another strategy for disease control is the development of alternatives or complements to synthetic fungicides with reduced toxicities. This approach can involve application of biological control organisms or products derived from living organisms to crops to reduce disease severity[95]. In particular, antifungal proteins produced by fungi are being researched for their utilization as biofungicides[96].

      The efficacies of other antifungal proteins have been studied, with purified antifungal protein being applied to the plant to reduce or prevent disease. The MIC for AFP from A. giganteus against the rice blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae (formerly Magnaporthe oryzae) was determined to be 4 μM in vitro. In both detached leaf assays and whole plant experiments, treatments with AFP protected the plants from rice blast as compared to the untreated control[33]. Tomato roots that were pre-treated with AFP of different concentrations were challenged against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. When pre-treated with a concentration of 100 μg·mL−1 of AFP, the tomato plants were protected from the pathogen while lower concentrations were not effective[49]. Reduction of barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) and wheat leaf rust (Puccinia recondite f. sp. tritici) was shown by either applying PAF from P. chrysogenum to leaves or floating detached leaves in a PAF solution[97]. PAFB was shown to be effective in reducing disease on oranges and apples caused by P. digitatum, P. italicum, and P. expansum, all of which are post-harvest problems on fruits[98].

      The turfgrass industry in the United States is extremely lucrative. Turfgrass is the fourth largest crop in the United States with 50 million acres and an annual value of ${\$} $40 – 60 billion[99]. Given how economically important it is, and how costly fungicide applications can be to control diseases such as dollar spot, any alternatives or additives to current management programs would be very useful not only to the US but internationally as well. Since applications of purified antifungal proteins can reduce plant disease symptoms, and Efe-AfpA was previously shown to inhibit growth of C. jacksonii, the E. festucae antifungal protein could be a potential alternative or additive to current control measures for dollar spot disease as well as other fungal pathogens. This would require scaled up culture conditions allowing for the purification of large amounts of the protein needed for field efficacy trials. An important facet of this scale up would be the selection of an appropriate expression system as E. festucae does not produce Efe-AfpA in culture[54]. When it comes to fungicides on the market today, expression systems are not used as the fungicidal compounds are produced through chemical means. This method could be used for small antimicrobial proteins, as the production of PAF through chemical ligation was successful in producing a protein with the same structure and antifungal activity as the native PAF[100]. However, between the complicated methodologies, some of which failed, described by Varadi et al. and the ease of which many of these antifungal proteins are produced using fungal expression systems, heterologous expression is still the most efficient method[100].

      When it comes to expression systems, one would want to select those that produce high levels of active protein with the least amount of economic and physical input. In other words, an expression system that is cheap and easy to use. Three expression systems were tested for the production of Efe-AfpA: P. pastoris, E. coli, and P. chrysogenum.

      The Pichia system, while capable of producing AFP easily, yielded impure Efe-AfpA and was cumbersome due to multiple media types and the necessity of methanol for induction of expression[8,56]. Bacteria present an attractive alternative expression system with several marketed kits for easy transformation, growth, and heterologous protein purification. However, correct disulfide bond pairing can be difficult to achieve in heterologous systems, which can lead to mispairing, mis-folding, and protein aggregation[101]. This is even more important as it has been shown that incorrect pairing can lead to impaired function of the PAF protein. When the six cysteine residues in PAF were reduced by dithiothreitol, causing a loss of the disulfide bonds, the modified PAF no longer had any inhibitory activity against Aspergillus niger[32].

      SHuffle cells and the Expresso® T7 SUMO Cloning and Expression System[102] were used to ensure proper folding of Efe-AfpA. SHuffle cells are the E. coli strain trxB gor suppressor strain, which has had its reductive pathways in the cytoplasm diminished yielding an environment primed for the oxidation of the sulfhydryl groups leading to the formation of disulfide bonds. It also overexpresses DsbC, a disulfide bond isomerase that acts as a chaperonin to further ensure correct bond formation and pairing[103,104]. However, the resulting Efe-AfpA had very different levels of activity compared to its Pichia and Penicillium produced counterparts and the highly similar PAF protein which may be due to structural differences involving these disulfide bonds. This system becomes even less useful because of its low yield[9].

      Small cationic proteins have also been produced in a P. chrysogenum system developed from the ΔPAF mutant[59]. Multiple PAF and PAF-like proteins (NFAP from Neosartorya fischeri) have been transformed and expressed in the P. chrysogenum ΔPAF system yielding high quantities and biologically active proteins[43,58]. This provides an alternative to a bacterial system which may not be able to accommodate the correct pairing of disulfide bonds. The PAF expression system resulted in the highest yield of very active Efe-AfpA[9]. It also utilizes very common reagents for the media, does not require an additive to induce expression, and allows for a one step purification of the protein using a cation exchange resin[58]. As such, it is the most straightforward and easiest of the systems tested to use for expression and purification of active protein.

      A variety of other experimentation and testing is required to further determine these antifungal proteins' efficacy in disease control. Field testing is the ultimate test, but stability studies are required to first see if these proteins can persist on plants long enough to provide protection. Heat, ion concentrations, and protease sensitivity have been investigated for some of these antimicrobial proteins[29,32,48,49], but another obvious stress to test would be light stability particularly UV sensitivity. Stability of these proteins in different formulations would also need to be examined as many chemical fungicide products are sold in a variety of forms: liquid, solids, wettable powder, etc. Should stability be a problem, adjuvants could also be added to these formulations to provide increased stability and persistence of the protein in the field. To answer these questions however, one first needs to produce large quantities of active protein, which is why expression system selection is paramount.

    • Fungal endophytes of plants have long been known to impart benefits to their host, but the exact mechanisms of which have been an ongoing area of research. Many of these benefits come from the secondary metabolites the fungal endophyte produces such as the antiherbivory alkaloids. While antagonism against a variety of fungi has been reported, very few studies verify the compounds involved and confirm their presence in symbio. The endophyte-mediated disease resistance imparted by E. festucae in strong creeping red fescue, which protects the grass host from dollar spot disease, is a more unique benefit among clavicipitaceous endophytic fungi. While this field phenomenon was observed decades ago, the molecular mechanism is only now being understood. Several lines of research have now revealed the endophyte-mediated disease resistance is likely due to an endophyte produced antifungal protein, Efe-AfpA, which has activity against C. jacksonii. Efe-AfpA, and other antifungal proteins like it such as AFP and PAF, has activity against many fungi and could represent a new mechanism for disease control. Further studies are required to fully understand Efe-AfpA's efficacy against dollar spot disease, specifically scale up, UV stability, and field trials. In tandem, research into its mode of action should be continued. Once fully characterized, Efe-AfpA and other proteins like it could represent a new product for plant disease control alleviating the use of chemical fungicides resulting in less environmental impacts and a reduction in the selection for resistant fungal pathogens.

    • The author confirms sole responsibility for manuscript preparation.

    • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • I thank Dr. Faith C. Belanger for her insight and support in writing this manuscript. I would also like to thank the United States Golf Association Davis Program, the Rutgers Center for Turfgrass Science, and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project accession number 1024790 through the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch project NJ12108 for financially supporting previous work that made this review possible.

      • The funders of the previous research mentioned above had no role in the writing of this manuscript. The author declares he has no conflict of interest. Rutgers University has filed a provisional patent concerning the purification and use of Efe-AfpA for fungal pathogen disease control.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    References (104)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Fardella P. 2024. Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA. Grass Research 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0001
    Fardella P. 2024. Harnessing antifungal proteins from fungi to protect plants: a review of the Epichloë festucae antifungal protein Efe-AfpA. Grass Research 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return