Search
2025 Volume 1
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Preparation methods and characteristics of EDBCs are reviewed.

    Passivation mechanisms of heavy metals by EDBCs are systematically analyzed by discussing different roles of functional groups on the surface of EDBCs.

    The applications of EDBCs for farmland soils with heavy metals contamination are introduced.

    Future prospects for the further development of EDBCs are proposed.

  • Biochar exhibits excellent passivation properties, is readily available from abundant sources, and is environmentally friendly, making it a promising option for remediating soils contaminated with heavy metals. However, the limited adsorption efficacy of pristine biochar hinders its application in practical remediation. This work systematically introduces pristine biochar and its adsorption mechanisms for heavy metals, including physical adsorption and electrostatic interaction. For nitrogen-, oxygen-, sulfur-, and phosphorus-doped biochar, the enhanced passivation performance and synthesis methods of these element-doped biochar were presented. Meanwhile, to elucidate the differences in the passivation performance and mechanisms of those biochar doped with different elements, the roles of functional groups were further discussed, and the application strategies of element-doped biochar in actual agricultural soils are presented to offer practical reference. Furthermore, some research prospects on elements-doped biochar were also proposed. This work provides a guideline for the application of biochar in the remediation of polluted agricultural soils.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Fang S, Hua C, Yang J, Liu F, Wang L, et al. 2025. Combined pollution of soil by heavy metals, microplastics, and pesticides: Mechanisms and anthropogenic drivers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 485:136812 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136812

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Yang S, Sun L, Sun Y, Song K, Qin Q, et al. 2023. Towards an integrated health risk assessment framework of soil heavy metals pollution: Theoretical basis, conceptual model, and perspectives. Environmental Pollution 316:120596 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120596

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Renu K, Chakraborty R, Myakala H, Koti R, Famurewa AC, et al. 2021. Molecular mechanism of heavy metals (Lead, Chromium, Arsenic, Mercury, Nickel and Cadmium)-induced hepatotoxicity-A review. Chemosphere 271:129735 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Liang N, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Jiang N, Yang J, et al. 2025. Pollution levels, distribution characteristics and risk assessment of heavy metals (HMs) in road dust in major cities of China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 494:138733 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138733

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Bi ZH, Sun J, Xie YT, Gu YL, Zhang HZ, et al. 2024. Machine learning-driven source identification and ecological risk prediction of heavy metal pollution in cultivated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 476:135109 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Li JL, Yang JX, Liu MM, Ma ZW, Fang W, et al. 2022. Quality matters: Pollution exacerbates water scarcity and sectoral output risks in China. Water Research 224:119059 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Fei XF, Lou ZH, Xiao R, Ren ZQ, Lv XN. 2022. Source analysis and source-oriented risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in agricultural soils of different cultivated land qualities. Journal of Cleaner Production 341:130942 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130942

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Xu DM, Fu RB, Wang JX, Shi YX, Guo XP. 2021. Chemical stabilization remediation for heavy metals in contaminated soils on the latest decade: Available stabilizing materials and associated evaluation methods-A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 321:128730 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128730

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Li JN, Hashimoto Y, Riya S, Terada A, Hou H, et al. 2019. Removal and immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soils by chlorination and thermal treatment on an industrial-scale. Chemical Engineering Journal 359:385−392 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Sun Z, Zhao M, Chen L, Gong Z, Hu J, et al. 2023. Electrokinetic remediation for the removal of heavy metals in soil: Limitations, solutions and prospection. Science of the Total Environment 903:165970 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Zhai MD, Fu BM, Zhai YH, Wang WJ, Maroney A, et al. 2023. Simultaneous removal of pharmaceuticals and heavy metals from aqueous phase via adsorptive strategy: A critical review. Water Research 236:119924 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119924

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Khnifira M, Boumya W, Attarki J, Mahsoune A, Sadiq M, et al. 2022. A combined DFT, Monte Carlo, and MD simulations of adsorption study of heavy metals on the carbon graphite (111) surface. Chemical Physics 5:100121 doi: 10.1016/j.chphi.2022.100121

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Ye L, Gao G, Li F, Sun Y, Yang S, et al. 2025. A comprehensive review on biochar-based materials for the safe utilization and remediation of heavy metal-contaminated agricultural soil and associated mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:116179 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.116179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Ambika S, Kumar M, Pisharody L, Malhotra M, Kumar G, et al. 2022. Modified biochar as a green adsorbent for removal of hexavalent chromium from various environmental matrices: Mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal 439:135716 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135716

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Khairy MG, Hesham AM, Jahin HES, El-Korashy SA, Mahmoud Awad Y, et al. 2022. Green synthesis of a novel eco-friendly hydrochar from Pomegranate peels loaded with iron nanoparticles for the removal of copper ions and methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Journal of Molecular Liquids 368:120722 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120722

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Alarefee HA, Ishak CF, Othman R, Karam DS. 2023. Effectiveness of mixing poultry litter compost with rice husk biochar in mitigating ammonia volatilization and carbon dioxide emission. Journal of Environmental Management 329:117051 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Manyatshe A, Cele ZED, Balogun MO, Nkambule TTI, Msagati TAM, et al. 2022. Chitosan modified sugarcane bagasse biochar for the adsorption of inorganic phosphate ions from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10:108243 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Wang J, Shi L, Liu J, Deng J, Zou J, et al. 2023. Earthworm-mediated nitrification and gut digestive processes facilitate the remobilization of biochar-immobilized heavy metals. Environmental Pollution 322:121219 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Wang H, Gao B, Wang S, Fang J, Xue Y, et al. 2015. Removal of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by biochar derived from KMnO4 treated hickory wood. Bioresource Technology 197:356−362 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Yap MW, Mubarak NM, Sahu JN, Abdullah EC. 2017. Microwave induced synthesis of magnetic biochar from agricultural biomass for removal of lead and cadmium from wastewater. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 45:287−295 doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Fan Y, Wang H, Deng L, Wang Y, Kang D, et al. 2020. Enhanced adsorption of Pb(II) by nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped biochar derived from Camellia oleifera shells. Environmental Research 191:110030 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Xu X, Hu X, Ding Z, Chen Y, Gao B. 2017. Waste-art-paper biochar as an effective sorbent for recovery of aqueous Pb(II) into value-added PbO nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal 308:863−871 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Qu J, Wang Y, Tian X, Jiang Z, Deng F, et al. 2021. KOH-activated porous biochar with high specific surface area for adsorptive removal of chromium(VI) and naphthalene from water: Affecting factors, mechanisms and reusability exploration. Journal of Hazardous Materials 401:123292 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Herath A, Layne CA, Perez F, Hassan EB, Pittman CU, et al. 2021. KOH-activated high surface area Douglas Fir biochar for adsorbing aqueous Cr(VI), Pb(II) and Cd(II). Chemosphere 269:128409 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128409

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Khalil U, Bilal Shakoor M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Nasser Alyemeni M, et al. 2020. Adsorption-reduction performance of tea waste and rice husk biochars for Cr(VI) elimination from wastewater. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 24:799−810 doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2020.07.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Xiao J, Hu R, Chen G. 2020. Micro-nano-engineered nitrogenous bone biochar developed with a ball-milling technique for high-efficiency removal of aquatic Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II). Journal of Hazardous Materials 387:121980 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Liu C, Ye J, Lin Y, Wu J, Price G, et al. 2020. Removal of cadmium(II) using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) biochar alginate beads in aqueous solutions. Environmental Pollution 264:114785 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114785

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Fan Z, Zhang Q, Gao B, Li M, Liu C, et al. 2019. Removal of hexavalent chromium by biochar supported nZVI composite: batch and fixed-bed column evaluations, mechanisms, and secondary contamination prevention. Chemosphere 217:85−94 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Liang J, Li X, Yu Z, Zeng G, Luo Y, et al. 2017. Amorphous MnO2 modified biochar derived from aerobically composted swine manure for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II). ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5:5049−5058 doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] He ZY, Kang B, Feng LY, Yin YG, Yang J, et al. 2025. Evaluation of nutrient spatial distribution and heavy metal pollution improvement in small-scale farmland under the action of biochar and microbial organic fertilizer. Soil and Tillage Research 248:106386 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2024.106386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Liu J, Zeng Q, Chen Y, Dai Z, Jiang W, et al. 2025. Synthesizing ZIF-8 functionalized biochar by in situ reuse of residual Zn from chemical activation for enhanced tetracycline hydrochloride adsorption removal. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:116729 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.116729

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Zhang JW, Mariska S, Pap S, Tran HN, Chao HP. 2023. Enhanced separation capacity of carbonaceous materials (hydrochar, biochar, and activated carbon) toward potential toxic metals through grafting copolymerization. Separation and Purification Technology 320:124229 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124229

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Hou B, Wang L, Yang X, Li Y, Wu Z, et al. 2025. Application of bimetallic cerium-based biochar adsorbent for efficient removal of Cr(VI): effective regulation of Fe doping and straw-based biochar incorporation. Separation and Purification Technology 364:132506 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132506

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Du L, Ahmad S, Liu L, Wang L, Tang J. 2023. A review of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) adsorption by biochar and modified biochar in water. Science of the Total Environment 858:159815 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159815

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Lin H, Xie J, Dong Y, Liu J, Meng K, et al. 2025. A complete review on the surface functional groups in pyrolyzed biochar and its interaction mechanism with heavy metal in water. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:116681 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.116681

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Chen J, Yuan M, Cai W, Wei J, Zhou J, et al. 2021. Constructing the frustrated Lewis pairs within N, S-codoped carbon to reveal the role of adjacent heteroatom sites for highly effective removal of heavy metal ions. Chemical Engineering Journal 422:130153 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Gao W, Lin Z, Chen H, Yan S, Huang Y, et al. 2022. A review on N-doped biochar for enhanced water treatment and emerging applications. Fuel Processing Technology 237:107468 doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107468

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Pan Z, Qi G, Zhang X, You Q, Zheng Y, et al. 2024. Lignin-based hierarchical porous biochar prepared from negative pressure pyrolysis enhanced CO2 and VOCs adsorption. Separation and Purification Technology 345:127398 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127398

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Qu J, Dong M, Bi F, Tao Y, Wang L, et al. 2022. Microwave-assisted one-pot synthesis of β-cyclodextrin modified biochar for stabilization of Cd and Pb in soil. Journal of Cleaner Production 346:131165 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131165

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Li X, Dong H, Xiao S, Deng J, Zhao M, et al. 2025. Rapid reduction of chloramphenicol by sodium bicarbonate-activated biochar loaded with nano zero-valent iron: influence of pyrolysis parameters and the key role of graphitic carbon structure. Separation and Purification Technology 366:132826 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132826

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Kumar Mondal A, Hinkley C, Kondaveeti S, Vo PHN, Kuzhiumparambil U. 2024. Influence of pyrolysis time on removal of heavy metals using biochar derived from macroalgal biomass (Oedogonium sp.). Bioresource Technology 414:131562 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131562

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Zhang J, Cui Y, Zhang T, Hu Q, Tong Y, et al. 2021. Food waste treating by biochar-assisted high-solid anaerobic digestion coupled with steam gasification: enhanced bioenergy generation and porous biochar production. Bioresource Technology 331:125051 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Wang C, Li L, Shi J, Jin H. 2021. Biochar production by coconut shell gasification in supercritical water and evolution of its porous structure. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 156:105151 doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Wang K, Chen J, Wang T, Hong J, Zhao P, et al. 2023. Catalytic calcium-looping gasification of biochar with in situ CO2 utilization with improved energy efficiency. Chemical Engineering Journal 472:144857 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144857

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] You S, Ok YS, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Kwon EE, et al. 2017. A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: Energy and environmental applications. Bioresource Technology 246:242−253 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Ling M, Ma D, Zhong Q, Liao C, Liu Z, et al. 2025. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of polyvinyl chloride and shrimp shells for carbon materials: synergistic conversion and electrochemical properties. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:116481 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.116481

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Zhang B, Zhang J, Xia A, Tang X, Zhu X, et al. 2025. Co-production and upgrading of multiple products from hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae with organic solvent assistance. Bioresource Technology 429:132514 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132514

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Yang P, Yang L. 2025. Top-down hydrothermal carbonization of discarded cigarette butts for optimizing ammonia adsorption performance of carbon microsphere materials. Separation and Purification Technology 369:132997 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Liu H, Xu F, Xie Y, Wang C, Zhang A, et al. 2018. Effect of modified coconut shell biochar on availability of heavy metals and biochemical characteristics of soil in multiple heavy metals contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment 645:702−709 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Gonzaga MIS, Mackowiak C, de Almeida AQ, de Carvalho JIT Jr., Andrade KR. 2018. Positive and negative effects of biochar from coconut husks, orange bagasse and pine wood chips on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and nutrition. Catena 162:414−420 doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Gao L, Li ZH, Yi W, Wang L, Zhang P, et al. 2021. Quantitative contribution of minerals and organics in biochar to Pb(II) adsorption: Considering the increase of oxygen-containing functional groups. Journal of Cleaner Production 325:129328 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129328

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Yang Y, Luo X, Zhang J, Ma X, Sun P, et al. 2022. Sewage sludge-coconut fiber co-pyrolysis biochar: mechanisms underlying synergistic heavy metal stabilization and ciprofloxacin adsorption. Journal of Cleaner Production 375:134149 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Dong X, Ma L, Li Y. 2011. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190:909−915 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Sun L, Gong P, Sun Y, Qin Q, Song K, et al. 2022. Modified chicken manure biochar enhanced the adsorption for Cd2+ in aqueous and immobilization of Cd in contaminated agricultural soil. Science of the Total Environment 851:158252 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Jia X, Zhang Y, He Z, Chang F, Zhang H, et al. 2021. Mesopore-rich badam-shell biochar for efficient adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9:105634 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105634

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Tian J, Li X, Ding W, Shuai K, Zhen Q, et al. 2025. Enhanced removal of cadmium from aqueous environments and soil during electrokinetic remediation using Si-Mg modified sawdust-based biochar as an adsorbent and permeable reactive barrier material. Chemical Engineering Journal 508:161178 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.161178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Ren J, Ren X, Deng Z, Zhang H, Wang J, et al. 2025. Ecological effects of biochar in heavy metal-contaminated soils from multidimensional perspective: Using meta-analysis. Bioresource Technology 432:132695 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132695

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Wei J, Tu C, Yuan G, Liu Y, Bi D, et al. 2019. Assessing the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the molecular properties and copper sorption capacity of a halophyte biochar. Environmental Pollution 251:56−65 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Lu H, Zhang W, Yang Y, Huang X, Wang S, et al. 2012. Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Research 46:854−862 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Chaudhary H, Dinakaran J, Notup T, Vikram K, Rao KS. 2024. Comparison of adsorption performance of biochar derived from urban biowaste materials for removal of heavy metals. Environmental Management 73:408−424 doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01866-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Han R, Gao Y, Jia Y, Wang S. 2024. Heterogeneous precipitation behavior and mechanism during the adsorption of cationic heavy metals by biochar: Roles of inorganic components. Journal of Hazardous Materials 480:136322 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136322

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Li A, Zhang Y, Ge W, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. 2022. Removal of heavy metals from wastewaters with biochar pyrolyzed from MgAl-layered double hydroxide-coated rice husk: Mechanism and application. Bioresource Technology 347:126425 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Liu Y, Chen Y, Li Y, Chen L, Jiang H, et al. 2025. Fabrication, application, and mechanism of metal and heteroatom co-doped biochar composites (MHBCs) for the removal of contaminants in water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 431:128584 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128584

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Wan Z, Sun Y, Tsang DCW, Khan E, Yip ACK, et al. 2020. Customised fabrication of nitrogen-doped biochar for environmental and energy applications. Chemical Engineering Journal 401:126136 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Ahmad S, Gao F, Lyu H, Ma J, Zhao B, et al. 2022. Temperature-dependent carbothermally reduced iron and nitrogen doped biochar composites for removal of hexavalent chromium and nitrobenzene. Chemical Engineering Journal 450:138006 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Chen X, Li H, Liu W, Meng Z, Wu Z, et al. 2020. Low-temperature constructing N-doped graphite-like mesoporous structure biochar from furfural residue with urea for removal of chlortetracycline from wastewater and hydrothermal catalytic degradation mechanism. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 600:124873 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124873

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Ruan G, Yang Y, Peng X, Wang J, Guo Y, et al. 2025. A review of the current status of nitrogen self-doped biochar applications. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13:115291 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.115291

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Zhang Y, Yue X, Xu W, Zhang H, Li F. 2019. Amino modification of rice straw-derived biochar for enhancing its cadmium(II) ions adsorption from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials 379:120783 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Yang G, Jiang H. 2014. Amino modification of biochar for enhanced adsorption of copper ions from synthetic wastewater. Water Research 48:396−405 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Gao Y, Wang Q, Ji G, Li A, Niu J. 2021. Doping strategy, properties and application of heteroatom-doped ordered mesoporous carbon. RSC Advances 11:5361−5383 doi: 10.1039/d0ra08993a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Guo S, Wang Y, Wei X, Gao Y, Xiao B, et al. 2020. Structural analysis and heavy metal adsorption of N-doped biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of Camellia sinensis waste. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:18866−18874 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08455-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Li J, He F, Shen X, Hu D, Huang Q. 2020. Pyrolyzed fabrication of N/P co-doped biochars from (NH4)3PO4-pretreated coffee shells and appraisement for remedying aqueous Cr(VI) contaminants. Bioresource Technology 315:123840 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123840

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Deng J, Li X, Wei X, Liu Y, Liang J, et al. 2020. Different adsorption behaviors and mechanisms of a novel amino-functionalized hydrothermal biochar for hexavalent chromium and pentavalent antimony. Bioresource Technology 310:123438 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123438

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Ling LL, Liu WJ, Zhang S, Jiang H. 2017. Magnesium oxide embedded nitrogen self-doped biochar composites: Fast and high-efficiency adsorption of heavy metals in an aqueous solution. Environmental Science & Technology 51:10081−10089 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Mahmoud ME, Mohamed AK, Salam MA. 2021. Self-decoration of N-doped graphene oxide 3-D hydrogel onto magnetic shrimp shell biochar for enhanced removal of hexavalent chromium. Journal of Hazardous Materials 408:124951 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124951

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Yang X, Wan Y, Zheng Y, He F, Yu Z, et al. 2019. Surface functional groups of carbon-based adsorbents and their roles in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: A critical review. Chemical Engineering Journal 366:608−621 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] de Sá S Costa JF, Vilar VJP, Botelho CMS, da Silva EAB, Boaventura RAR. 2010. Application of the Nernst-Planck approach to lead ion exchange in Ca-loaded Pelvetia canaliculata. Water Research 44:3946−3958 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Li K, Xu W, Song H, Bi F, Li Y, et al. 2024. Superior reduction and immobilization of Cr(VI) in soil utilizing sulfide nanoscale zero-valent iron supported by phosphoric acid-modified biochar: Efficiency and mechanism investigation. Science of the Total Environment 907:168133 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Wang H, Wang X, Teng H, Xu J, Sheng L. 2022. Purification mechanism of city tail water by constructed wetland substrate with NaOH-modified corn straw biochar. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 238:113597 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Yin X, Wang Y, Wei LE, Huang H, Zhou C, et al. 2022. Reduced cadmium(Cd) accumulation in lettuce plants by applying KMnO4 modified water hyacinth biochar. Heliyon 8:e11304 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11304

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Imran M, Khan ZUH, Iqbal MM, Iqbal J, Shah NS, et al. 2020. Effect of biochar modified with magnetite nanoparticles and HNO3 for efficient removal of Cr(VI) from contaminated water: A batch and column scale study. Environmental Pollution 261:114231 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114231

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Fan Q, Sun J, Chu L, Cui L, Quan G, et al. 2018. Effects of chemical oxidation on surface oxygen-containing functional groups and adsorption behavior of biochar. Chemosphere 207:33−40 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Li Y, Wang F, Miao Y, Mai Y, Li H, et al. 2020. A lignin-biochar with high oxygen-containing groups for adsorbing lead ion prepared by simultaneous oxidization and carbonization. Bioresource Technology 307:123165 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123165

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Ding Z, Hu X, Wan Y, Wang S, Gao B. 2016. Removal of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel from aqueous solutions by alkali-modified biochar: Batch and column tests. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 33:239−245 doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Jia L, Yu Y, Li Z, Qin S, Guo J, et al. 2021. Study on the Hg0 removal characteristics and synergistic mechanism of iron-based modified biochar doped with multiple metals. Bioresource Technology 332:125086 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Wang LL, Jiang SF, Huang J, Jiang H. 2022. Oxygen-doped biochar for the activation of ferrate for the highly efficient degradation of sulfadiazine with a distinct pathway. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10:108537 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Zhao N, Yin Z, Liu F, Zhang M, Lv Y, et al. 2018. Environmentally persistent free radicals mediated removal of Cr(VI) from highly saline water by corn straw biochars. Bioresource Technology 260:294−301 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Zhang H, Yue X, Li F, Xiao R, Zhang Y, et al. 2018. Preparation of rice straw-derived biochar for efficient cadmium removal by modification of oxygen-containing functional groups. Science of the Total Environment 631−632:795−802 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Tan G, Wu Y, Liu Y, Xiao D. 2018. Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated rice straw biochar: A low-cost and highly effective sorbent. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 84:85−92 doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Yang F, Zhang S, Li H, Li S, Cheng K, et al. 2018. Corn straw-derived biochar impregnated with α-FeOOH nanorods for highly effective copper removal. Chemical Engineering Journal 348:191−201 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.161

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Wu J, Wang T, Zhang Y, Pan WP. 2019. The distribution of Pb(II)/Cd(II) adsorption mechanisms on biochars from aqueous solution: Considering the increased oxygen functional groups by HCl treatment. Bioresource Technology 291:121859 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121859

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Silos-Llamas AK, Durán-Jiménez G, Hernández-Montoya V, Montes-Morán MA, Rangel-Vázquez NA. 2020. Understanding the adsorption of heavy metals on oxygen-rich biochars by using molecular simulation. Journal of Molecular Liquids 298:112069 doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Leng L, Liu R, Xu S, Mohamed BA, Yang Z, et al. 2022. An overview of sulfur-functional groups in biochar from pyrolysis of biomass. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10:107185 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Ahmed MMM, Liao CH, Venkatesan S, Liu YT, Tzou YM, et al. 2024. Sulfur-functionalized sawdust biochar for enhanced cadmium adsorption and environmental remediation: a multidisciplinary approach and density functional theory insights. Journal of Environmental Management 373:123586 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123586

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Qu J, Yuan Y, Zhang X, Wang L, Tao Y, et al. 2022. Stabilization of lead and cadmium in soil by sulfur-iron functionalized biochar: Performance, mechanisms and microbial community evolution. Journal of Hazardous Materials 425:127876 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127876

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Chen X, Zhang L, Xu W, Ding X, Chen S, et al. 2022. Biochar aerogel decorated with thiophene S manipulated 5-membered rings boosts nitrogen fixation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 313:121425 doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Altaf MM, Ashraf S, Khan MQN, Sun X, Li D, et al. 2025. Effectiveness of sulfur-modified wheat straw biochar in alleviating vanadium stress in rice: impacts on growth, photosynthesis, and redox regulation. Biochar 7:71 doi: 10.1007/s42773-025-00462-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Tan G, Sun W, Xu Y, Wang H, Xu N. 2016. Sorption of mercury(II) and atrazine by biochar, modified biochars and biochar based activated carbon in aqueous solution. Bioresource Technology 211:727−735 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Huang S, Liang Q, Geng J, Luo H, Wei Q. 2019. Sulfurized biochar prepared by simplified technic with superior adsorption property towards aqueous Hg(II) and adsorption mechanisms. Materials Chemistry and Physics 238:121919 doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Khan ZH, Gao M, Qiu W, Song Z. 2020. Properties and adsorption mechanism of magnetic biochar modified with molybdenum disulfide for cadmium in aqueous solution. Chemosphere 255:126995 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126995

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Wu W, Wu X, Zhang H, Li R, Guo Z, et al. 2024. Development of polyfunctionalized biochar modified with manganese oxide and sulfur for immobilizing Hg(II) and Pb(II) in water and soil and improving soil health. Science of the Total Environment 955:177005 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Park JH, Wang JJ, Zhou B, Mikhael JER, DeLaune RD. 2019. Removing mercury from aqueous solution using sulfurized biochar and associated mechanisms. Environmental Pollution 244:627−635 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Alves Macedo JC, Sartori Jeunon Gontijo E, Gómez Herrera S, Rangel EC, Komatsu D, et al. 2021. Organosulphur-modified biochar: An effective green adsorbent for removing metal species in aquatic systems. Surfaces and Interfaces 22:100822 doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100822

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Huang Z, Xiong C, Zhao M, Wang S, Zhou Y, et al. 2021. Surface-functionalized pomelo peel-derived biochar with mercapto-1,2,4-triazloe for selective elimination of toxic Pb(II) in aqueous solutions. Advanced Powder Technology 32:1013−1022 doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2021.02.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Cheng Y, Yang J, Shen J, Yan P, Liu S, et al. 2023. Preparation of P-doped biochar and its high-efficient removal of sulfamethoxazole from water: Adsorption mechanism, fixed-bed column and DFT study. Chemical Engineering Journal 468:143748 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143748

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Saka C, Teğin İ, Murtazaoğlu Çetin. 2024. Phosphorus-doped porous carbon particles based on biomass for efficient adsorption performance of Cu2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solutions: thermodynamics, isotherms, kinetics, and mechanism. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 14:30401−30414 doi: 10.1007/s13399-023-04768-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Suo F, You X, Ma Y, Li Y. 2019. Rapid removal of triazine pesticides by P-doped biochar and the adsorption mechanism. Chemosphere 235:918−925 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Gao X, Wu L, Xu Q, Tian W, Li Z, et al. 2018. Adsorption kinetics and mechanisms of copper ions on activated carbons derived from pinewood sawdust by fast H3PO4 activation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25:7907−7915 doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1079-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Yang S, Wen Q, Chen Z. 2021. Effect of KH2PO4-modified biochar on immobilization of Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and As during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresource Technology 339:125570 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W. 2009. Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environmental Science & Technology 43:3285−3291 doi: 10.1021/es803092k

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Chen M, He F, Hu D, Bao C, Huang Q. 2020. Broadened operating pH range for adsorption/reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) using biochar from directly treated jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) fibers by H3PO4. Chemical Engineering Journal 381:122739 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122739

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Turk Sekulić M, Pap S, Stojanović Z, Bošković N, Radonić J, et al. 2018. Efficient removal of priority, hazardous priority and emerging pollutants with Prunus armeniaca functionalized biochar from aqueous wastes: Experimental optimization and modeling. Science of the Total Environment 613-614:736−750 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Jung KW, Lee SY, Choi JW, Lee YJ. 2019. A facile one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxyapatite/biochar nanocomposites: adsorption behavior and mechanisms for the removal of copper(II) from aqueous media. Chemical Engineering Journal 369:529−541 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Ahmad Z, Gao B, Mosa A, Yu H, Yin X, et al. 2018. Removal of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by biochars derived from potassium-rich biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production 180:437−449 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Wang L, Wang J, Wang Z, He C, Lyu W, et al. 2018. Enhanced antimonate (Sb(V)) removal from aqueous solution by La-doped magnetic biochars. Chemical Engineering Journal 354:623−632 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Wang L, Wang J, Wang Z, Feng J, Li S, et al. 2019. Synthesis of Ce-doped magnetic biochar for effective Sb(V) removal: Performance and mechanism. Powder Technology 345:501−508 doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Ji Y. 2025. Adsorption performance of Cr(VI) using Fe-containing sludge biochar co-doped with nitrogen and sulfur. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06712-4
    [118] Yao Y, Liu X, Hu H, Tang Y, Hu H, et al. 2022. Synthesis and characterization of iron-nitrogen-doped biochar catalysts for organic pollutant removal and hexavalent chromium reduction. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 610:334−346 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.187

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Sui L, Tang C, Du Q, Zhao Y, Cheng K, et al. 2021. Preparation and characterization of boron-doped corn straw biochar: Fe(II) removal equilibrium and kinetics. Journal of Environmental Sciences 106:116−123 doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Medha I, Chandra S, Vanapalli KR, Samal B, Bhattacharya J, et al. 2021. (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane and iron rice straw biochar composites for the sorption of Cr(VI) and Zn(II) using the extract of heavy metals contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment 771:144764 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Huang F, Gao LY, Wu RR, Wang H, Xiao RB. 2020. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of adsorption mechanisms for Cd2+ by silicon-rich biochar. Science of the Total Environment 731:139163 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139163

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Yu W, Lian F, Cui G, Liu Z. 2018. N-doping effectively enhances the adsorption capacity of biochar for heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. Chemosphere 193:8−16 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Fan J, Cai C, Chi H, Reid BJ, Coulon F, et al. 2020. Remediation of cadmium and lead polluted soil using thiol-modified biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials 388:122037 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Ahmad S, Liu L, Zhang S, Tang J. 2023. Nitrogen-doped biochar (N-doped BC) and iron/nitrogen Co-doped biochar (Fe/N Co-doped BC) for removal of refractory organic pollutants. Journal of Hazardous Materials 446:130727 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130727

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Wang Y, Li J, Li Q, Xu L, Ai Y, et al. 2024. Effective amendment of cadmium in water and soil before and after aging of nitrogen-doped biochar: preparation optimization, removal efficiency and mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials 477:135356 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135356

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Gai C, Guo Y, Peng N, Liu T, Liu Z. 2016. N-Doped biochar derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk and Chlorella pyrenoidosa for enhancing copper ion adsorption. RSC Advances 6:53713−53722 doi: 10.1039/C6RA09270E

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Gao Q, Xiang H, Ni L, Hou Y, He Y, et al. 2021. Nitrogen self-doped activated carbons with narrow pore size distribution from bamboo shoot shells. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 629:127408 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127408

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Wu D, Chen Q, Wu M, Zhang P, He L, et al. 2022. Heterogeneous compositions of oxygen-containing functional groups on biochars and their different roles in rhodamine B degradation. Chemosphere 292:133518 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Ahmed W, Mehmood S, Núñez-Delgado A, Ali S, Qaswar M, et al. 2021. Enhanced adsorption of aqueous Pb(II) by modified biochar produced through pyrolysis of watermelon seeds. Science of the Total Environment 784:147136 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Zhang X, Zhang L, Li A. 2018. Eucalyptus sawdust derived biochar generated by combining the hydrothermal carbonization and low concentration KOH modification for hexavalent chromium removal. Journal of Environmental Management 206:989−998 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.079

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Yin M, Bai X, Wu D, Li F, Jiang K, et al. 2022. Sulfur-functional group tunning on biochar through sodium thiosulfate modified molten salt process for efficient heavy metal adsorption. Chemical Engineering Journal 433:134441 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Wu B, Ifthikar J, Oyekunle DT, Jawad A, Chen Z, et al. 2021. Interpret the elimination behaviors of lead and vanadium from the water by employing functionalized biochars in diverse environmental conditions. Science of the Total Environment 789:148031 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Ahmed MMM, Liao CH, Liu YT, Venkatesan S, Hsieh YC, et al. 2024. Sulfur-functionalized rice straw biochar for enhanced cadmium sorption: Spectroscopic, kinetic and computational insights. Journal of Cleaner Production 484:144267 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Bi F, Jiang Z, Wang M, Lin Q, Liu X, et al. 2025. Enhanced remediation of cadmium-contaminated farmland by smooth vetch (Vicia villosa var.) coupled with phosphorus/sulfur co-doped biochar: Synergetic performance and mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production 496:144986 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144986

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135] Qu J, Meng X, Jiang X, You H, Wang P, et al. 2018. Enhanced removal of Cd(II) from water using sulfur-functionalized rice husk: characterization, adsorptive performance and mechanism exploration. Journal of Cleaner Production 183:880−886 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Chen F, Zhang M, Ma L, Ren J, Ma P, et al. 2020. Nitrogen and sulfur codoped micro-mesoporous carbon sheets derived from natural biomass for synergistic removal of chromium(VI): adsorption behavior and computing mechanism. Science of the Total Environment 730:138930 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138930

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Jeon C, Solis KL, An HR, Hong Y, Igalavithana AD, et al. 2020. Sustainable removal of Hg(II) by sulfur-modified pine-needle biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials 388:122048 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Zhang L, Ke Z, Wang W, Liu H, Mao Y, et al. 2022. Enhanced removal of multiple metal ions on S-doped graphene-like carbon-supported layered double oxide: Mechanism and DFT study. Separation and Purification Technology 288:120636 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120636

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139] Li H, Jiang Q, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang Y. 2022. Synchronization adsorption of Pb(II) and Ce(III) by biochar-supported phosphate-doped ferrihydrite in aqueous solution: Adsorption efficiency and mechanisms. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 648:129230 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129230

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Pan J, Deng H, Du Z, Tian K, Zhang J. 2022. Design of nitrogen-phosphorus-doped biochar and its lead adsorption performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:28984−28994 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17335-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Qi X, Yin H, Zhu M, Yu X, Shao P, et al. 2022. MgO-loaded nitrogen and phosphorus self-doped biochar: High-efficient adsorption of aquatic Cu2+, Cd2+, and Pb2+ and its remediation efficiency on heavy metal contaminated soil. Chemosphere 294:133733 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133733

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Usama M, Rafique MI, Ahmad J, Ahmad M, Al-Wabel MI, et al. 2023. A Sustainable Approach towards the Restoration of Lead-Contaminated Soils through Nutrient-Doped Olive Waste-Derived Biochar Application. Sustainability 15:2606 doi: 10.3390/su15032606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Wang S, Gao B, Li Y, Mosa A, Zimmerman AR, et al. 2015. Manganese oxide-modified biochars: Preparation, characterization, and sorption of arsenate and lead. Bioresource Technology 181:13−17 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144] Zhang H, Xu F, Xue J, Chen S, Wang J, et al. 2020. Enhanced removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using manganese dioxide-loaded biochar: behavior and mechanism. Scientific Reports 10:6067 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63000-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145] Agrafioti E, Kalderis D, Diamadopoulos E. 2014. Ca and Fe modified biochars as adsorbents of arsenic and chromium in aqueous solutions. Journal of Environmental Management 146:444−450 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146] Li Y, Yin H, Cai Y, Luo H, Yan C, et al. 2023. Regulating the exposed crystal facets of α-Fe2O3 to promote Fe2O3-modified biochar performance in heavy metals adsorption. Chemosphere 311:136976 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136976

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147] Li A, Xie H, Qiu Y, Liu L, Lu T, et al. 2022. Resource utilization of rice husk biomass: Preparation of MgO flake-modified biochar for simultaneous removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution and polluted soil. Environmental Pollution 310:119869 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119869

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] Li H, Jiang Q, Li R, Zhang B, Zhang J, et al. 2022. Passivation of lead and cerium in soil facilitated by biochar-supported phosphate-doped ferrihydrite: Mechanisms and microbial community evolution. Journal of Hazardous Materials 436:129090 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Liu J, He T, Yang Z, Peng S, Zhu Y, et al. 2024. Insight into the mechanism of nano-TiO2-doped biochar in mitigating cadmium mobility in soil-pak choi system. Science of the Total Environment 916:169996 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169996

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Ouyang W, Huang W, Hao X, Tysklind M, Haglund P, et al. 2017. Watershed soil Cd loss after long-term agricultural practice and biochar amendment under four rainfall levels. Water Research 122:692−700 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.084

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151] Liu Y, Huang J, Xu H, Zhang Y, Hu T, et al. 2020. A magnetic macro-porous biochar sphere as vehicle for the activation and removal of heavy metals from contaminated agricultural soil. Chemical Engineering Journal 390:124638 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124638

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152] Wang Y, Wang X, Bing Z, Zhao Q, Wang K, et al. 2024. Remediation of Cd(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) in contaminated soil by KMnO4 modified biochar: Stabilization efficiency and effects of freeze-thaw ageing. Chemical Engineering Journal 487:150619 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.150619

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Cao Y, Ma C, Yu H, Tan Q, Dhankher OP, et al. 2023. The role of sulfur nutrition in plant response to metal(loid) stress: Facilitating biofortification and phytoremediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 443:130283 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130283

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154] Wu J, Fu X, Zhao L, Lv J, Lv S, et al. 2024. Biochar as a partner of plants and beneficial microorganisms to assist in-situ bioremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment 923:171442 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171442

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155] Ullah S, Liu Q, Wang S, Jan AU, Sharif HMA, et al. 2023. Sources, impacts, factors affecting Cr uptake in plants, and mechanisms behind phytoremediation of Cr-contaminated soils. Science of the Total Environment 899:165726 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165726

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156] Khan Z, Fan X, Khan MN, Khan MA, Zhang K, et al. 2022. The toxicity of heavy metals and plant signaling facilitated by biochar application: implications for stress mitigation and crop production. Chemosphere 308:136466 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136466

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157] Jia X, Zhang B, Han Y, Guan J, Gao H, et al. 2025. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on biochar enhanced chromium phytoremediation in the soil-plant system: exploration on detoxification mechanism. Environmental International 199:109471 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109471

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158] Lin H, Wang Z, Liu C, Dong Y. 2022. Technologies for removing heavy metal from contaminated soils on farmland: a review. Chemosphere 305:135457 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135457

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159] Kang X, Geng N, Hou X, Wang H, Pan H, et al. 2025. Potassium permanganate-hematite-modified biochar enhances cadmium and zinc passivation and nutrient availability and promotes soil microbial activity in heavy metal-contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management 376:124469 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Schommer VA, Vanin AP, Nazari MT, Ferrari V, Dettmer A, et al. 2023. Biochar-immobilized Bacillus spp. for heavy metals bioremediation: A review on immobilization techniques, bioremediation mechanisms and effects on soil. Science of the Total Environment 881:163385 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161] Shang X, Wu S, Liu Y, Zhang K, Guo M, et al. 2024. Rice husk and its derived biochar assist phytoremediation of heavy metals and PAHs co-contaminated soils but differently affect bacterial community. Journal of Hazardous Materials 466:133684 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162] Jiao Z, Ge S, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. 2025. Phosphate-enhanced Cd stabilization in soil by sulfur-doped biochar: Reducing Cd phytoavailability and accumulation in Brassica chinensis L. and shaping the microbial community. Environmental Pollution 364:125375 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125375

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [163] Si S, Ke Y, Xue B, Zhang Z, Zhu X. 2023. Immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) enhanced passivation performance of biochar for Zn. Science of the Total Environment 892:164556 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164556

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164] Tu C, Wei J, Guan F, Liu Y, Sun Y, et al. 2020. Biochar and bacteria inoculated biochar enhanced Cd and Cu immobilization and enzymatic activity in a polluted soil. Environmental International 137:105576 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [165] Wei S, Liu X, Tao Y, Wang X, Lin Z, et al. 2025. Strategy for enhanced soil lead passivation and mitigating lead toxicity to plants by biochar-based microbial agents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 489:137512 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Qu J, Chu H, Wang M, Yu R, Wang S, et al. 2025. Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e002 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0004
    Qu J, Chu H, Wang M, Yu R, Wang S, et al. 2025. Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e002 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0004

Figures(5)  /  Tables(11)

Article Metrics

Article views(1830) PDF downloads(1172)

Review   Open Access    

Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils

Agricultural Ecology and Environment  1 Article number: e002  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Biochar exhibits excellent passivation properties, is readily available from abundant sources, and is environmentally friendly, making it a promising option for remediating soils contaminated with heavy metals. However, the limited adsorption efficacy of pristine biochar hinders its application in practical remediation. This work systematically introduces pristine biochar and its adsorption mechanisms for heavy metals, including physical adsorption and electrostatic interaction. For nitrogen-, oxygen-, sulfur-, and phosphorus-doped biochar, the enhanced passivation performance and synthesis methods of these element-doped biochar were presented. Meanwhile, to elucidate the differences in the passivation performance and mechanisms of those biochar doped with different elements, the roles of functional groups were further discussed, and the application strategies of element-doped biochar in actual agricultural soils are presented to offer practical reference. Furthermore, some research prospects on elements-doped biochar were also proposed. This work provides a guideline for the application of biochar in the remediation of polluted agricultural soils.

    • Heavy metal pollution has escalated into a worldwide crisis, with agricultural soils serving as the frontline[1]. Though some heavy metals are essential elements for the human body under low concentrations, such as Cu and Zn[2]. Most heavy metals, including chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and arsenic (As), can cause irreversible harm to human health via the food chain. For instance, long-term exposure to Pb and As can result in cumulative damage to the brain and kidneys[3]. Moreover, Cd is related to osteoporosis, blood pressure disorders, and cancer[4]. Once released, these heavy metals migrate continuously through multiple pathways, exerting severe negative effects on the hydrosphere, atmosphere, and pedosphere. Agricultural soils contaminated by heavy metals may rapidly lose their ability to sustain safe food production[5].

      Soil provides the fundamental conditions and essential substances, which human beings, plants, and animals depend on for their survival. With the exponential growth of the global economy and population, there is an increasing demand for advanced agricultural production, which encompasses both sufficient crop yield and benign crop quality, to ensure balanced society development[6]. However, heavy metals pollution has emerged in agricultural soils via pathways such as the application of organic manure, irrigation with industrial wastewater containing excessive heavy metals, and other activities, ultimately resulting in a significant degradation of both agricultural product quality, and cultivated soil fertility[7]. Therefore, effective measures for the remediation of soil contaminated by heavy metals are urgently required.

      Various methods for the remediation of heavy metals, such as chemical stabilization[8], thermal treatment[9], electrokinetic remediation[10], and adsorption[11], have been developed by previous studies to address the aforementioned challenges. Among these technologies, adsorption stands out for its operational simplicity, wide practicability, cost-effectiveness, and minimal secondary disturbance to the soil environment, making it a suitable and promising strategy for the remediation of agricultural soils[12]. Over the decades, diverse adsorbents have been employed in the remediation of heavy metal-polluted farmland soils, such as chitosan-based composites, clay minerals, and biochar (BC)[13]. Among them, BC, an adsorbent that has attracted widespread attention due to its high specific surface area (SSA), porous structure, and low expense, is considered a more favorable material for the in-situ passivation process of heavy metals[14]. Meanwhile, systematic investigations have revealed the abundant biomass sources for BC, primarily including agricultural residues such as pomegranate peel[15], rice husk[16], bagasse[17], etc, thereby offering outstanding economic and environmental benefits[18]. The adsorption performance on heavy metals and the corresponding treatment parameters of BC derived from various resources are summarized in Table 1. However, due to the undiscriminating adsorption behaviour and mediocre chemicophysical characteristics of BC, the direct employment of pristine BC in the process of heavy metals passivation exhibits unsatisfactory outcomes, resulting in an insufficient practical value in terms of in-situ heavy metal remediation of cultivated soils[30].

      Table 1.  Summary of removal mechanisms for BC-based adsorbents and various feedstocks

      BC/material Pyrolysis parameters Heavy
      metals
      Maximum adsorption
      capacity (mg/g)
      Kinetic model Isotherm Removal mechanism Ref.
      Hickory wood 600 °C Pb(II) 153.1 Richie Langmuir Surface adsorption [19]
      Cu(II) 34.2 Elovich Langmuir
      Cd(II) 28.1 Richie Langmuir
      Coconut shells 800 W microwave Pb(II) 4.77 Pseudo-second-order (PSO) Langmuir Surface adsorption and Van der Waals forces [20]
      Cd(II) 4.96 PSO Langmuir
      Oleifera shells 550 °C Pb(II) 52.9 PSO Langmuir Chemisorption [21]
      Waste-art-paper 600 °C Pb(II) 1,555 PSO Langmuir Precipitation [22]
      Corn straw 500 + 800 °C Cr(VI) 116.97 Avrami fractional-order (AFO) Langmuir Electrostatic attraction, complexation, ion exchange and reduction action [23]
      Douglas fir 900–1,000 °C Pb(II) 140 PSO Langmuir Chelation, electrostatic-attraction, and ion exchange [24]
      Cr(VI) 127.2 PSO Langmuir
      Cd(II) 29 PSO Langmuir
      Rice husks 450 °C Cr(VI) 195.24 PSO Langmuir Ion exchange [25]
      Tea waste 450 °C Cr(VI) 197.5 PSO Langmuir
      Nitrogenous bone 600 °C Pb(II) 558.88 PSO Langmuir Surface complexation, cation exchange, chemical precipitation, electrostatic interaction and cation-π bonding [26]
      Cu(II) 287.58 PSO Langmuir
      Cd(II) 165.77 PSO Langmuir
      Water hyacinths 700 °C Cd(II) 35.1 Pseudo-first-order (PFO) Langmuir Precipitation [27]
      nZVI-BC 600 °C Cu(II) 31.53 PSO Langmuir Precipitation [28]
      Swine manure, sawdust 400 °C Pb(II) 268 PSO Langmuir Electrostatic attraction and ion exchange [29]

      Therefore, to further enhance the selectivity and efficacy of pristine BC, which refers to BC without modification, various modification approaches have been developed, including chemical activation[31], surface grafting[32], and heteroatom doping[33]. Among these modified BCs, element-doped BC (EDBC) emerges as an exceptional material for heavy metal passivation due to the increase in additional adsorption sites. Heteroatom doping can modulate the electron charge density and enhance the dispersion of EDBCs[34]. Moreover, different functional groups (FGs) are introduced to either directly or indirectly improve the passivation performance of EDBCs on specific heavy metals while maintaining the original surface defect structure of this material[35]. For instance, nitrogen doping introduces nitrogen-containing FGs, such as pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, and graphitic N. These groups can serve as active centers for the adsorption of heavy metals through complexation reactions. The lone pair electrons in the nitrogen atoms can bind with metal ions, increasing the adsorption capacity[36,37]. Thus, wide attention has been drawn to EDBCs. However, to date, few reviews have elucidated EDBCs and the underlying mechanisms for heavy metals remediation in farmland soils.

      Herein, this article is systematically organized into the following sections: (i) Various methods for the preparation of pristine BC; (ii) Adsorption mechanisms of heavy metal ions by pristine BC; (iii) Modification approaches of the doping of different elements (mainly N, O, S, and P) to enhance adsorption properties, along with the corresponding mechanisms for the heavy metals passivation; (iv) Roles and effects of different FGs on the passivation of heavy metal ions on modified BC; (v) Different application strategies of EDBCs for farmland soils, and the future prospects of EDBCs development are also discussed.

    • Pyrolysis refers to the decomposition process of biomass by heating under oxygen-limited conditions, thereby converting raw materials into bio-oil, gases, and BC. As the predominant preparation method of BC, there are many pyrolysis-derived technologies are developed in recent applications, including catalytic co-pyrolysis, negative pressure pyrolysis, etc.[38]. For example, microwave-assisted pyrolysis is a rather convenient and high-yielding method compared with sole pyrolysis, which greatly decreases the energy expense[39]. Meanwhile, biomass composition has an effect on BC yield. For example, a higher concentration of cellulose, lignin, and ash content in feedstock is positively correlated with enhanced BC yield. Moreover, existing evidence suggests that through controlled pyrolysis temperature, BC with tailored surface area, total pore volume, and high mass fraction of carbon could be achieved[40]. The properties of BC are also distinctly influenced by the duration of pyrolysis. It has been reported that prolonged pyrolysis duration could produce BC with reduced detrimental substances[41].

    • Gasification refers to a thermochemical process in which biomass is oxidized to produce BC, syngas, and biomass extracts under oxygen-deficient conditions at elevated temperatures (higher than 500 °C)[42]. Same as the pyrolysis technique, its products are prone to being affected by reaction conditions. For example, the SSA and porosity of BC prepared by gasification under high temperature and pressure are more superior to those of conventional synthesis[43]. Previously, BC was considered a byproduct with intentionally limited yield to ensure the high conversion rate of carbon monoxide[44]. Recently, the advantage of gasification, its high BC production efficiency, has garnered significant research attention. Moreover, gasification could achieve a continuous feedstock treatment, providing higher throughput than other techniques[45].

    • Hydrothermal carbonization is a moderate method that realizes the conversion and carbonization of feedstock at a relatively low temperature (150–300 °C), and ordinary pressure[46]. Hydrothermal carbonization is carried out at relatively low temperatures (180–260 °C) under autogenous pressure in an aqueous environment. This allows direct use of high-moisture organic residues—green algae, kitchen waste, and other water-rich solid wastes—thereby eliminating the energy otherwise required for predrying[47]. Moreover, the hydrochar could be customized by a simple adjustment in synthesis parameters, including solution medium, reacting temperature, heating time, etc., hence minimizing the economic expense of negative emission treatment of waste[48].

    • Physical adsorption refers to the weak reaction in which contaminants diffuse into the surface holes of the adsorbent and deposit on its surface to remove heavy metals without forming chemical bonds. The increase in the number of micropores on BC can significantly enlarge SSA, thus facilitating the physical adsorption process[49]. Moreover, the pore structure of BC is significantly influenced by the sources of materials and synthetic parameters. For example, under the same pyrolysis temperature, the SSA and pore size of orange bagasse-derived BC (SSA = 99.1 m2/g, PS = 6.75 nm) were significantly higher than those of BC derived from coconut husks (SSA = 77.2 m2/g, PS = 3.91 nm), and pine woodchips (SSA = 72.2 m2/g, PS = 4.15 nm). The adsorption capacity of hydrochar is twice that of BC prepared by ordinary pyrolysis[50].

    • Electrostatic attraction is the mutual interactive force caused by the difference in charge distribution between adsorbents and heavy metals, acting as a secondary driving force for the adsorption of heavy metals[51]. The zero charge point of BC and the solution pH are the main factors determining the electrostatic interaction performance. BC carries negative charges when the solution pH exceeds BC zero charge point, positively charged when the pH is below that point[52]. On the other hand, when H+ concentration is high, protonation reaction occurs on the surface of BC, specifically through the ionization of hydroxyl (-OH) and carboxyl (-COOH) groups, resulting in a positive charge on its surface. For example, when the environment pH was 2, BC's adsorption capacity for negatively charged Cr ions through electrostatic attraction soared to 123 mg/g[53].

    • Another common mechanism is the adsorption of heavy metals by the ion exchange between protons/cations, and metal ions on BC[54]. The alkali metal ions and FGs on BC are essential components in ion exchange[55]. Through ion exchange, BC effectively adsorbs and immobilizes heavy metal ions in soil. Many analyses have been conducted to quantify the contribution of ion exchange. For instance, employing BC as the remediation agent, the predominant mechanism for Cd passivation in soil was identified to be ion exchange (44.65%) under a pH range of 3–7[56].

    • Various complexes could be formed via interactions between electron donors and electron accepters. In terms of heavy metals, their interactions with ligands leads to the appearance of an organic complex structure, resulting in heterogeneous adsorption[57]. The -COOH and -OH groups on BC surface can effectively bind heavy metals. For instance, these groups serve as complexing agents for Cu ions, affecting the passivation performance of BC[58]. Similarly, Lu et al.[59] demonstrated that Pb ions, which were passivated by -COOH and -OH groups, accounted for 38.2%–42.3% of the total Pb amount, showing their negligible role. In addition to -COOH and -OH, other functional groups such as -NH2, -PO3H2, -SO3H, and quinone-like structures (-O-O-C=O) can also participate in surface complexation. -NH2 groups can form coordination bonds with heavy metals through their lone pair electrons. -PO3H2 and -SO3H groups contribute to adsorption via electrostatic attraction and ligand exchange mechanisms. Quinone-like structures can undergo redox reactions with certain heavy metals, further enhancing the adsorption capacity of BC[60]. These diverse functional groups collectively contribute to the efficient immobilization of heavy metals by EDBC.

    • Precipitation refers to the formation of solid products (either within the solid matrix or liquid phase) during pollutant adsorption, a process that often operates synergistically with other removal mechanisms. The content of ash elements in feedstocks positively relates to the passivation performance of BC. Meanwhile, it was observed that with a minor diameter of BC particles, there would be an interference of the precipitation compared with a larger counterpart, due to its higher heterogeneous formation energy (21.90 mJ/m2)[61]. Besides, the FGs on the BC surface can influence other adsorption mechanisms to accelerate the precipitation. For example, in BC adsorption of Cu ions and Cd ions, two new peaks were found by analyzing the differences between the XRD results of fore-reaction and after-reaction BC. The newly formed peaks confirmed the complexation of heavy metals with FGs on BC surface, which ultimately facilitates the precipitation process[62].

    • The passivation performance of pristine BC on heavy metals is insufficient, so element doping of it is required. A variety of methods have been frequently applied, introducing different surface FGs on BC to increase the passivation capacity toward different heavy metals, mainly involving nitrogen-, oxygen-, sulfur-, and phosphorus-doping[63]. However, few studies have conclusively identified an effective doping element for BC in agricultural soil remediation. Herein, a systematic summary of how element-doped BC synthesize and the reactivity of various elements toward contaminants in farmland soils is conducted.

    • Nitrogen (N) doping serves as an efficacious approach to enhance the performance of BC. One of the advantages of N-doping is that additional active sites on the BC surface could be created with N atom addition, enhancing the hydrophilicity to facilitate complexation reaction. Simultaneously, elevated basicity of BC surfaces enhances electrostatic interactions[64], thereby boosting the passivation of heavy metals in farmland soils.

      The preparation of N-doped BC typically involves the doping with an external N-precursor, which is utilized to form N-containing FGs onto the surface of BC. Thermal treatment processes often involve the addition of exogenous reagents to introduce N at varying temperatures[65], as the preparation of BC typically relies on N-containing precursors. For example, the N-doped graphite-like BC showed that the BC surface was uniformly distributed with N atoms and abundant nitrogenous species (e.g., pyrrolic N and graphitic N). In particular, the total N content, which was measured at 17.7%, was nearly ten times as much as that of the pristine BC[66]. By substituting carbon atoms within the graphitic lattice, nitrogen creates lattice defects and curvature that open up additional slit pores, raising the specific surface area by up to 35% while generating a hierarchical micro-/meso-pore network beneficial for rapid heavy-metal diffusion[67].

      The FGs adhered to the surface of BC are common exogenous N, such as aminated groups[64]. Aminated groups serve as preferential adsorption sites in contact with BC due to their electron-rich feature, facilitating the removal of pollutants through the protonation process and complexation reactivity. For example, the amidogen (-NH2) on the surface of BC greatly improves the adsorption effect through complexation with heavy metals (e.g., Cd2+)[68]. Besides, oxynitride introduced on BC can generate aminated groups through a series of acquired electron processes, which is conclusive to improve heavy metal adsorption capacity[69].

      In addition to aminated groups and oxynitrides which possess fundamental FG characteristics of doped N, the substitution of carbon atoms from the edges of ordered carbon units by doped N atoms are energetically preferable in the atomic scale[70], including pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, and graphitic N. Remarkably, N atoms were of great significance in promoting the redox process of heavy metals to diminish toxicity through complexation reactions between FGs and contaminants[71]. Moreover, the lone pair electrons in the graphite N atom were able to supply extra adsorption sites for the complexation between pollutants and BC, enhancing the hydrophilicity of BC to promote the contact between the adsorbent and heavy metals.

      In summary, numerous studies suggested that N-doping BC with external modification showed high passivation efficiency to heavy metals through introducing N-containing groups or providing and activating new reaction sites. The N introduction of BC for heavy metal passivation was summarized into three points: (1) The incorporation of typical base sites can readily supply lone pair electrons, enabling the adsorption of a greater number of metal cations on BC via electrostatic attraction; (2) N-doping enhances surface hydrophilicity, promoting the coordination of graphite N with heavy metals; (3) The surface possesses higher electron population, exhibiting favorable affinity towards heavy metals. To better exhibit the significance of N-doping for heavy metals passivation, frontier studies from recent years were collected, and the passivation classifications of heavy metals as well as the adsorption properties of different N-doped BC are listed in Table 2. Meanwhile, preparation of biomass, synthesis technology, and performance regulation toward nitrogen doped-BC are also summarized in Fig. 1.

      Table 2.  BC adsorbents doped with N for heavy metal removal

      BC Preparation technology Contaminant Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)—Langmuir Adsorption mechanism Ref.
      Oleifera shells Ammonium polyphosphate pretreatment, high temperature carbonization Pb(II) 723.6 Chemisorption [21]
      Coffee shells (NH4)3PO4 pretreatment, in-situ doping Cr(VI) 235.5 Adsorption/reduction [72]
      Rice straw Nitrification and nitro reduction method Cd(II) 84.266 Complexation [68]
      Lignocellulosic biomass Nitrification and nitro reduction method Cu(II) 17.12 Complexation, onexchange, chelation, and microprecipitation [69]
      Wood dust HNO3 pretreatment, autoclave heating Cr(VI) 107.2939 Ion exchange, electrostatic effect [73]
      Sb(V) 167.2042
      N-enriching hydrophyte biomass Biomass of N-rich aquatic plants loaded with MgCl2 by rapid pyrolysis, endogenous doping Pb(II) 893 Ion-exchange, surface adsorption [74]
      Shrimp shells Microwave-assisted self-modification of nitrogen doped oxygen graphene hydrogels Cr(VI) 360.05 Electrostatic adsorption (ion-pair), pore filling, reduction and coordination. [75]

      Figure 1. 

      Preparation of BC, synthesis technology, and performance regulation toward nitrogen-doped BC.

    • The main purpose of oxygen (O) doping for BC is to introduce various O-containing FGs, which have substantial impacts on surface reaction, hydrophilicity, and electricity of BC[76]. Specifically, O doping can affect the electron transfer and significantly increase active sites through deprotonation, thus effectively enhancing the passivation performance for heavy metals. The carboxyl and hydroxyl groups are commonly considered to be the main groups promoting the surface coordination between heavy metals and adsorbents[77]. Therefore, O doping serves as an effective method to alleviate the remediation performance of BC in farmland.

      Surface oxidation and plasma treatment are the main methods of O doping[39]. In general, surface oxidation represents the most prevalent and straightforward method for creating abundant O-containing FGs. This involves the utilization of oxidants to augment the quantity of O-containing FGs present on the BC surface. Common oxidants include acid (e.g., HNO3 and H3PO4)[78], alkali (e.g., NaOH and KOH)[79], or some oxidant reagents (e.g., H2O2 and KMnO4)[80].

      Acid modification can effectively introduce FGs into BC, such as carboxyl and hydroxyl groups. Moreover, the concentration of modifying agent and temperature of BC preparation have a profound impact on the modification effect[81,82]. Besides, H2SO4 treatment could oxidize aromatic ring side chains in BC, thus introducing a substantial quantity of acidic FGs (mainly -COOH group). Instead, different H2SO4 treatments showed distinct oxidation effects, and the oxidation effect reached its maximum when the H2SO4 concentration was 97%[83]. Moreover, BC modified with HNO3 exhibited excellent adsorption performance toward Cr(VI), which is 9.72% higher than those without modification[81]. This acid modification method could effectively improve the surface FGs of BC. However, it should be noted that BC is relatively difficult to oxidize by acid at higher temperatures. In addition to the above acidic oxidation, alkaline oxidation is also a conventional method for O doping to remove heavy metals. BC modified with NaOH and H2O2 resulted in the SSA of the BC increased by 126% compared with the pristine BC, and O-containing FGs played an important role in removing Cd(II) through complexation[82]. Moreover, alkali-modified BC can enhance the adsorption capacity of BC for removing heavy metals with its activated surface, which rose the SSA from 256 to 873 m2/g[84].

      Equally, O plasma treatment is another excellent method to introduce O-containing FGs, by which O-containing FGs are appended to the BC surface with the internal structure remaining intact. Moreover, the O-containing FGs (e.g. carbonyl, hydroxyl, and carboxyl) increased greatly with the process of plasma treatment, which oxidized Hg0 to HgO and improved the removal rate of Hg[85]. Surface-bonded oxygen, mainly as ether and carbonyl groups, thermally cleaves at 400–600 °C and releases CO/CO2, leaving behind a high density of ultra-micropores (< 1 nm) that enlarge the SSA and sharpen the pore-size distribution without collapsing the carbon skeleton[86].

      Overall, O-doping technology can introduce a large quantity of O-containing FGs onto BC, while simultaneously enhancing both the SSA and pore structures of BC to adsorb heavy metals effectively. Importantly, -COOH and -OH groups have a vital effect on passivating heavy metals, which generate negative charges through deprotonation and adsorb heavy metals through electrostatic attraction. To better explain the significance of O-doped BC for passivating heavy metals, frontier studies in the past few years had been collected and were listed to illustrate the passivation properties of different O-doped BC toward heavy metals in Table 3. Meanwhile, a graphic summary outlining the preparation process is shown in Fig. 2.

      Table 3.  BC adsorbents doped with O for heavy metal removal

      BC Preparation technology Contaminant Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)—Langmuir Adsorption mechanism Ref.
      Dried hickory chips Heating with NaOH solution, alkali modification Pb(II) 19.1 Chemisorption [84]
      Cu(II) 17.9
      Cd(II) 0.98
      Corn straw Soaking in water and HNO3 activation, wet chemical oxidation Cr(VI) 36.365 Adsorption/reduction [87]
      Rice straw Modification of biochar with equal volume mixture of H2O2 and HNO3, wet chemical oxidation Cd(II) 117.975 Electrostatic attraction, chemisorption [88]
      Rice straw KMnO4 reacts with pyrolytic biochar to form MnO coating, wet chemical oxidation Pb(II) 305.25 Chemical adsorption, complexation, precipitation, ion interaction [89]
      Corn straw In-situ doping, acid ammonium persulfate oxidation method Cu(II) 151.67 Surface complexation, chemical reduction [90]
      Camellia seed husks Soaking in HCl, wet chemical oxidation, endogenous doping Pb(II) 141.86 Electrostatic attraction, sedimentation, coordination [91]
      Cd(II) 54.3
      Pecan nut shells (Caryaillinoinensis) Irradiation heating in H2O steam atmosphere Pb(II) 129.86 Complexation, strong interaction, ion interaction [92]
      Cu(II) 57.83
      Cd(II) 21.69

      Figure 2. 

      The preparation methods of oxygen-doped BC and its according enhancement mechanism.

    • Sulfur (S) doping is also meaningful for the improvement of BC, in terms of the passivation performance for heavy metals. Firstly, the S-containing FGs can form stable metal-sulfur coordination bonds with heavy metals, with bond energies higher than those of conventional O/N functional groups. Meanwhile, the thiophene sulfur (C-S-C) and sulfoxide/sulfonic acid (-SO3H) generated during the preparation process donate electrons to the π-conjugated system, increasing the surface negative charge density and enhancing electrostatic adsorption and ion exchange capacity[93]. Aforementioned mechanisms facilitate the remediation of agricultural soils contaminated with heavy metals. Sulfur radicals generated at moderate temperatures insert into aromatic rings, forming thiophenic bridges that kink the carbon layers and generate abundant wedge-shaped macropores (> 50 nm) interconnected with mesopores, thereby enlarging the overall surface area and improving mass-transfer kinetics for soil contaminants[94].

      During the co-pyrolysis process, the sublimated S was converted to S radicals at the appropriate temperature, which could easily react with the biomass lignin component and form S FGs after pyrolysis[95]. S FGs, as a positive factor for improving the adsorption performance of BC, can be divided into organic S (e.g., C-S, -C-S-C-, and thiophene), and inorganic S (e.g., sulfate, sulfite, and sulfide)[96]. Methods for introducing S sources are elemental S, CS2, SO2, and H2SO4. Notably, SO2 is added to the pyrolysis atmosphere, which is easier to fix in BC than adding a liquid or solid reagent[97]. Besides, different sources for introducing S result in significant changes. For instance, the BC derived from impregnation exhibited a high abundance of FGs (-SO3H), which was nearly twice that obtained through treatment with concentrated S-containing reagents.

      Simultaneously, S-containing BC had a greater adsorption efficiency for Hg0 and Hg2+ than S-free BC. Specifically, Na2S-modified BC showed a high adsorption efficiency for Hg(II), which was 1.77 times higher than that of the pristine BC. BC impregnation with Na2S and KOH enhanced its adsorption performance for pollutants due to the development of precipitate substance and FGs on the surface, and more active sites also contributed to its adsorption[98]. Similarly, CS2 and corn straw were co-heated at low temperature to prepare sulfurized BC passivator, and the findings indicated that the contents of bioavailable-Pb and -Cd in soil decreased by 59.22% and 70.28% by S modified BC[99]. This process introduced more S-containing groups with greater affinity to metal due to complexation, such as -OH, C=S groups that can form Hg-S and Hg-O bond.

      Furthermore, S-containing FGs can enhance passivation capabilities of Cd ions by BC. For example, a novel Na2S-modified BC was prepared by one-step pyrolysis method to passivate Cd ions in soil, showing a passivation performance (37.27%), nearly three times that of raw BC[98]. The presence of S-containing FGs on BC surface facilitated removal efficiency by creating an electrostatic attraction to Cd ions and forming strong complexes with Cd-S. In addition, S FGs on the BC surface facilitated the adsorption of nickel ions. BC introduced C-S, and S-H using S(α) as a doping reagent, reducing the bioavailability of Hg by 56.8 % and Pb by 34.1 % in soil[100]. This might be due to weak acid (heavy metal) and weak base (S) interaction, which increased the affinity of S to heavy metals[101]. Figure 3 describes the preparation and formation mechanisms of S doping in detail.

      Figure 3. 

      The preparation methods of sulfur-doped BC and its according enhancement mechanism.

      In conclusion, S-doped BC presents strong attraction to heavy metals (particularly Hg ions and Cd ions), and many advanced studies have verified that BCs with S modification are potential green adsorbents. In addition, various treatment methods and reagents can affect the adsorption properties and physical structures of BC. Based on the above points, relevant studies are summarized in Table 4.

      Table 4.  BC adsorbents doped with S for heavy metal removal

      BC Preparation technology Contaminant Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)—Langmuir Adsorption mechanism Ref.
      Corn straw Acid ammonium persulfate oxidation process, hydrophilic treatment Pb(II) 184.5 Surface complexation, precipitation and reduction reactions [90]
      Corn straw Mixing and stirring modification of biochar with Na2S solution Hg(II) 5.71 Precipitation, chemisorption, electrostatic interaction, chemical interaction mechanism, ion exchange [98]
      Corn straw Adding ammonium tetrathiomolybdate solution to calcined biochar, heating in autoclave Cd(II) 139 Surface complexation, electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, chelation [100]
      Wood chips S element impregnation pyrolysis, sulfurization Hg(II) 107.5 Surface adsorption, functional groups and chemical bonds [102]
      Sugarcane bagasse Single step reaction with isothiocyanates during pyrolysis Cd(II) 87.5 Surface complexation, coprecipitation, ion exchange, electrostatic attraction [103]
      Cr(III) 25.5
      Ni(II) 41.0
      Pb(II) 41.2
      Pomelo peel H2SO4 treated biochar and chloroacetyl chloride mixed with N, N- two methylformamide and reflux 24 h at 100 °C Pb(II) 420 Coordination, ion exchange, chelation [104]
    • Compared with pristine BC, phosphorus—whether surface-loaded or internally doped—generates additional adsorption sites for heavy-metal removal via ligand complexation or precipitation, and concurrently increases the specific surface area by refining the internal pore structure. Moreover, P-rich BC not only contributes to environmental restoration and plant growth but also alleviates the potential negative impacts of excess phosphorus in the environment[105]. Phosphate precursors decompose into P–O–C linkages that act as rigid spacers during pyrolysis, preventing layer restacking and creating interlayer voids; this results in a 2–3-fold increase in mesopore volume and a concomitant enhancement in SSA, while maintaining structural integrity under wetting–drying cycles[106].

      Metaphosphates and polyphosphates, as P-rich reagents, can provide abundant FGs for BC. Metaphosphate doping introduces phosphorus-containing functional groups—such as P–OH and P=O onto the BC surface. The incorporation of metaphosphate markedly increases the specific surface area and simultaneously elevates the densities of –COOH and –PO3 moieties. These combined modifications create abundant active sites that effectively passivate heavy metals from environmental media[107]. For instance, BC modified with metaphosphates could efficiently enhance the passivation capacity for heavy metals by the linkage[108]. Furthermore, precipitation formed by polyphosphate (mainly PO43–, HPO42–, and H2PO4) and heavy metal ions (such as Cd, Cu, and Cr(VI) ions) was one of the primary processes for heavy metals passivation[109]. Simultaneously, P-doped BC could release various phosphate ions to combine with heavy metals that also take part in the establishment of Cd(H2PO4)2, Cu3(PO4)2H2O, and CrPO4(H2O)6 through complexation reaction.

      The preparation methodology is categorized into endogenous and exogenous approaches based on the elemental composition of the biomass feedstock. Biomass materials rich in P, such as manure and sludge, can be directly prepared into P-containing BC, which is termed as endogenous doping. For instance, the dried manure containing rich P element was utilized to synthesize PBC to passivate Pb ions in soil. The result indicated that Pb ions passivation was primarily caused by the creation of phosphate precipitation (Pb9[PO4]6)[110]. Additionally, the exogenous approach, as an important means of P doping, has achieved element introduction through a variety of P-containing reagents, including H3PO4, pyrophosphoric acid (H4P2O7), and monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4). H3PO4 activation not only can create -C-P-C- linkage to enhance the peculiarity of structure, but also improve the performance of BC passivation for heavy metals. Significantly, P-loaded BC derived from fiber that possessed rich P FGs was synthesized, which was utilized for the elimination of Cr(VI) through the redox reaction between Cr(VI) with electron-rich C-O, P-O, and C-P bonds[111].

      In conclusion, there are three main points of the influences of P doping on BC and the applications of heavy metal adsorption: (1) The introduction of P enhances the cross-linking structure of C, promotes the formation of developed pore, and improves SSA; (2) The immersion treatment of P-containing chemical reagents is the main method of exogenous doping and introduces various P-containing FGs; (3) Fundamental processes of P contribution involved in the adsorption of heavy metals are complexation, precipitation with metal ions, and ion exchange. The co-precipitation of phosphate released from BC and complexation of chemical bonds with metal ions greatly enhance the adsorption performance. The application of P-doped BC for heavy metal passivation is shown clearly in the Table 5. A basic introduction and description of the P-doped BC is given in Fig. 4.

      Table 5.  BC adsorbents doped with P for heavy metal removal

      BC Preparation technology Contaminant Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)—Langmuir Adsorption mechanism Ref.
      Oleifera shells Ammonium polyphosphate pretreatment, high temperature carbonization Pb(II) 723.6 Chemisorption [21]
      Coffee shells (NH4)3PO4 pretreatment, in situ pyrolysis Cr(VI) 235.5 Adsorption, reduction [72]
      Apricot stones H3PO4 thermochemical activation Pb(II) 179.48 Surface adsorption, chemisorption, ion exchange, ion capture [112]
      Cd(II) 105.84
      Ni(II) 78.8
      Undaria pinnatifida roots Ca (NO3)2·4H2O and (NH4) 2·HPO4 mixed, one pot hydrothermal Cu(II) 99.01 Surface complexation and cation exchange [113]

      Figure 4. 

      The preparation methods of phosphorus-doped BC and its according enhancement mechanism.

    • Apart from N, O, P, and S doping, other element doping and multi-element co-doping BC can demonstrate effective removal of heavy metals by enhancing its pore structure and introducing various FGs on its surface[114,115]. For example, it could be inferred that the ion exchange of K+ in K-rich BC made a significant addition to the passivation process of heavy metal ions by comparing the changes of peak values before and after adsorption[114].

      Nevertheless, most element-doped BC is prepared through external doping. For instance, magnetic BC doped with Ce by the chemical coprecipitation method was rich in magnetite structures and had more surface hydroxyl groups (-OH), enhancing the adsorption of Sb(V)[116]. Similarly, magnetic BC doped with La by the chemical co-precipitation method, in which surface -OH increased significantly, exhibited 7.52 times adsorption capacity for Sb(V) compared to the pristine BC[115].

      In recent years, many multi-elements co-doped BCs have shown excellent removal effects for heavy metals compared to single atom doping due to multi-atom synergy. Unlike single-element doping, the simultaneous introduction of two or more heteroatoms creates a heterogeneous yet complementary array of functional groups on the BC surface. Previous researchers used coffee and (NH4)3PO4 to obtain N/P co-doped BC through one-step pyrolysis, and the SSA was significantly increased to 1,130 m2/g. Meanwhile, the peak values of quaternary nitrogen (N-Q) and C-P bonds decreased significantly before and after the reaction, indicating that both of them served as electron donors to reduce Cr(VI)[72]. Similarly, N/S/Fe tri-doped BC achieved high Cr(VI) removal through the combined reduction by pyridinic-N and Fe2+, coupled with strong electrostatic attraction between surface functional groups and the contaminants[117]. In addition, Fe/N co-doped BC was prepared with pomelo peel and FePc (C32H16FeN8). The successful doping of Fe and N provided a substantial amount of active sites and significantly enhanced the electron transfer efficiency. Compared with the sole introduction of N, the additional doping of Fe brought more reduction ability, thereby exhibiting superior performance[118]. Consequently, multi-element doping represents a readily accessible route for fabricating high-performance EDBC.

      In summary, most of the doping is realized through external doping with relatively complicated steps, while for some protoplasm or raw materials that meet specific requirements, self-doping can be carried out through simple one-step pyrolysis. Element doping has many positive effects on BC. In addition, various groups can be introduced into BC during element doping, thus affecting the number of active sites and electron transfer, finally showing excellent removal performance toward heavy metals. Table 6 clarifies the preparation methods, the maximum uptake amount, and corresponding mechanisms of heteroatom-doped BC over the past 5 years.

      Table 6.  BC adsorbents doped with other elementals for heavy metal removal

      BC Preparation technology Contaminant Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g)—Langmuir Adsorption mechanism Ref.
      Phragmites australis Synthesis of Ce doped magnetic battery by chemical co-precipitation and dissolution thermal method Sb(V) 25 Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction and ligand exchange, intrasphere complexation [116]
      Corn straw Biomass and boric acid were mixed, pyrolyzed, in-situ doping Fe(II) 132.78 Chemical complexation, ions exchange, and co-precipitation [119]
      Rice straw Iron and (3- amino propyl) triethoxy silane (APTES) complex, doped with Fe and NH2 radicals. Cr(VI) 100.59 Precipitation, surface complexation [120]
      Zn(II) 83.92 Electrostatic attraction, reduction, complexation
      Rice husks Pyrolysis, endogenous doping Cd(II) 154.22 Complexation, electrostatic attraction, sedimentation, cation exchange [121]
    • N-containing FGs mainly refer to the amino FGs attached to the periphery of materials, which can improve the basic properties of BC[122]. Because of the rich electronic properties of unpaired electrons, amine groups can be used as a preferred adsorption center for BC/substrate contact, which promotes the adsorption of heavy metals[123]. In general, N FGs do not significantly enhance BC structural properties, but they can effectively passivate heavy metals through multiple mechanisms, including complexation, electrostatic attraction, and ion exchange[122]. Earlier research has indicated that amino groups are powerful complex FGs that could effectively interact with heavy metal complexes because of their high stability constants. For example, the number of pyridine N groups decreased significantly after the adsorption reaction, suggesting that it played a role in surface complexation with Cu ions[124]. In addition, for N-doped BC obtained from in-situ pyrolysis of pretreated coffee shells with (NH4)3PO4, the N-containing FGs on its surface could not only serve as electron donors to reduce Cr(VI), but also participate in passivating Cr(VI) as active sites[72]. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 5a, Wang et al. investigated the outstanding passivation property of Cd ions by N-doped BC, which was mainly due to the low hydrophilicity and high alkalinity caused by N-containing FGs on the BC surface[125]. Table 7 provides a summary of the maximum adsorption capacity of N-containing FGs for the passivation of heavy metals using carbon passivators.

      Figure 5. 

      (a) Percentage distribution of Cd speciation on NBC and aged NBC[125]. (b) Regeneration and reusability of biochars[129]. (c) Influence of various materials on percentage variation of Cr fractions in the contaminated soil[112]. (d) Effects of different passivators on the morphology distribution of Cd[134]. (e) As(V), (f) Pb(II) adsorption kinetics data[143].

      Table 7.  Effects of nitrogen-functional carbon adsorbents on heavy metal removal

      Material Heavy metal Qmax (mg/g) Kinetic model Isotherm Functional groups (FGs) Ref.
      Coffee shells Cr(VI) 95% Pseudo-second-order (PSO) Slips -N–Q [72]
      Agarpowder 1,5-Diphenylcarbazide, FeCl3 Cr(VI) 144.86 PSO Langmuir -NH2, -NH3+ [64]
      Rice straw Cd(II) 69.3 PSO Langmuir -NH2 [68]
      Rice husks, chlorella pyrenoidosa Cu(VI) 29.11 PSO Langmuir -NH2 [126]
      Plant waste and aquatic animal waste Ni(II) 44.78 PSO Freundlich -NH2, -NH3+ [127]
    • O-containing FGs are important factors affecting the surface reaction, hydrophilicity, electrical properties, and catalytic properties of carbon[127]. -OH, -COOH, epoxy (-COC-), and carbonyl (-C=O) groups are the most common FGs, which can act as functional active sites to create composites that include metals, organic molecules, or other different atoms[128]. Additionally, the O-containing compounds such as -OH and -COOH groups from adsorbents can easily interact with heavy metal ions, thereby enhancing the passivation performance[98]. For example, -OH and -COOH groups served as the primary influencing factors for Pb ions passivation, and they could combine with Pb ions to form complex compounds[107]. As shown in Fig. 5b, BC doped with oxygen-containing FGs also demonstrates long-term stability in heavy metal passivation[129]. Moreover, the quantity of O-containing FGs of BC was greatly increased after acid modification, and many -OH and -COOH groups were involved in the complexation with Pb and Cd ions[91]. Table 8 provides a summary of the excellent passivation property of oxygen-containing FGs for the passivation of heavy metals using carbon passivators.

      Table 8.  Effects of oxygen-containing carbon adsorbents on heavy metal removal

      Material Heavy metal Qmax (mg/g) Kinetic model Isotherm Functional groups (FG) Ref.
      Pines Pb(II) 55 Pseudo second-order (PSO) Freundlich -OH, -COOH [83]
      Rice straw Cd(II) 117 PSO Freundlich -C=O, -OH, -C-O [88]
      Sawdust Cr(VI) 45.88 PSO Freundlich -OH, -C=O, -C-O [130]
      Grape pomace Pb(II) 137 PSO Sips -OH [131]
    • S-containing FGs are of great significance for heavy metals adsorption by BC. Compared with C atoms, S atoms have increased electron attraction, which increases the surface polarity and makes the surface more negative electrically, thereby attracting positively charged heavy metal ions[132]. Earlier studies have shown that the polarization of lone pair electrons of S could enhance the chemical reactivity of S-doped carbon materials, significantly enhancing the attraction toward heavy metals[133]. Based on Pearson's theory, S functional groups can act as a soft base and interact with heavy metal ions (which are soft acids) to improve the removal effect[123]. As shown in Fig. 5d, Bi et al. explored the use of NaS in the molten salt medium to introduce an S-containing motif on BC to promote the process of passivation of Cd ions within the soil system[134]. Besides, through the analysis of XPS before and after the adsorption of NaS-modified BC, it was found that the peak became larger after adsorption. Qu et al. introduced high concentrations of S-containing groups on BC surface by grafting magnesium xanthate, which greatly improved the ability to passivate Cd ions[135]. The abundant pore structures of S-modified BC provided sites that facilitate passivation, and the processes with ion exchange and π-π interaction increased, providing additional chances for binding of heavy metal ions with S-containing FGs, thus resulting in excellent passivation properties (Table 9).

      Table 9.  Effects of sulfur-containing carbon adsorbents on heavy metal removal

      Material Heavy metal Qmax (mg/g) Kinetic model Isotherm Functional groups (FG) Ref.
      Corn straw Cd(II) 139 Pseudo-second-order (PSO) Langmuir Mo-S [100]
      Wood Hg(II) 107.5 PSO Langmuir C-SOx- [102]
      Rice husks Cd(II) 137.16 PSO Langmuir C=S [135]
      Luffa sponge Cr(VI) 312.50 PSO Langmuir C-SH [136]
      Sugarcane bagasse Pb(II) 95.7 PSO Langmuir -N=C=S [103]
      Cr(III) 90.7
      Cd(II) 87.5
      Pine-tree needle Hg(II) 48.2 PSO Freundlich C-S [137]
      Wheat straw Hg(II) 95.5% PSO Langmuir C-S [138]
    • Research shows that introducing P heteroatoms can create extra adsorption sites for BC and promote significant electron delocalization, which improves the reduction of Cr(VI) ions by offering Lewis base sites and enhancing the hydrophilicity of the surfaces[109]. P can be introduced into BC by H3PO4 impregnation, which maintains the porous composition of original materials and enhances the SSA of the BC by creating micropores[111]. Modified BC can precipitate with metal ions and improve the adsorption ability. Simultaneously, H3PO4 can promote the dehydration, aromatization, crosslinking, and porous action of biomass during carbonization. As shown in Fig. 5c, H3PO4-modified BC demonstrated strong Cr(VI) reduction capability toward KOH-modified BC. Moreover, phosphate and polyphosphate salt bridges formed on BC through the thermochemical treatment of H3PO4 significantly enhanced carbon crosslinking, resulting in an improved adsorption structure[112]. Table 10 summarizes the maximum adsorption capacity of P-containing FGs used in carbon adsorbents for removing heavy metals, including the most suitable kinetic and isothermal models, as well as the impact of particular FGs on the adsorption process of heavy metals.

      Table 10.  Effects of phosphorus-containing carbon adsorbents on heavy metal removal

      Material Heavy metal Qmax (mg/g) Kinetic model Isotherm Functional groups (FGs) Ref.
      Camellia oleifera shells Pb(II) 723.6 Pseudo-second-order (PSO) Langmuir O-P-O, P=O, P-N-C, P-O-C [21]
      Corn stalk Ce(III) 177.26 PSO Langmuir P-O [139]
      Lotus leaves Pb(II) 321.52 PSO Freundlich P=O, P-O-C, HO-P=O [140]
      Fish scales Cu(II) 505.8 PSO Langmuir P-O, P=O [141]
      Cd(II) 327.2
      Pb(II) 661.2
      Olive oil mill press waste Pb(II) 57.78 PSO PO43−, ester sulphate [142]
    • FGs involving the above elements significantly contribute to the absorption of heavy metals, while some other heteroatom-doped FGs also have a remarkable impact on promoting the removal of heavy metals by BC. As shown in Fig. 5e, f, Wang et al. prepared birnessite-modified BC, in which sodium-manganese hydroxide particles had an intense influence on As(V) and Pb(II), and the adsorption efficiency was notably enhanced[143]. Similarly, Zhang et al. confirmed that the surface of BC with loaded MnO2 was rich in Mn-OH groups, which had a high ability to adsorb heavy metal ions and could be used as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of heavy metal ions from the water system[144]. Besides, MgO nanoparticle- embedded, N-self-doped BC showed excellent Pb(II) removal efficiency. The remarkable adsorption capability was strongly linked to the plentiful surface FGs present in the materials[74]. Furthermore, the addition of iron can also introduce related groups to facilitate the removal efficiency of BC. Agrafioti et al. showed that the Fe(OH)3 group in Fe-impregnated BC could promote the adsorption of As by co-precipitation[145]. Table 11 summarizes the highest removal capacity of heteroatom FGs for the removal of heavy metals by carbon adsorbents, including the most suitable kinetic and isothermal models, as well as the impact of particular FGs on the adsorption process of heavy metals.

      Table 11.  Effects of heteroatom-containing carbon adsorbents on heavy metal removal

      Material Heavy metal Qmax (mg/g) Kinetic model Isotherm Functional groups (FG) Ref.
      Rice husks Cd(II) 154.22 Pseudo-second-order (PSO) Freundlich -OH, -COOH, C=N, -NH2 [121]
      Chicken manure Cu(II) 258.22 PSO Langmuir Fe-O, Fe-OH, C-OH [146]
      Pb(II) 390.60
      As(V) 5.78
      Rice husks Cd(II) 104.68 PSO Langmuir Mg-O, -OH [147]
      Cu(II) 173.22
      Zn(II) 104.38
      Cr(VI) 47.02
    • Resorting to the aforementioned mechanisms, the application of EDBC is a method to achieve the conspicuous passivation efficacy of the heavy metal in soil through materials-soil interactions. Furthermore, it is also feasible to utilize EDBC to improve the physical and chemical properties of soil, thereby resulting in a reduced activity of heavy metals indirectly. For instance, with P-doped BC, Li et al. conducted a 90-d soil incubation experiment to elucidate the changes in the migration tendency of Pb and Ce in soil. The addition of P-doped BC brought an obvious enhancement of the passivation content of Pb and Ce (161.4% and 43.9% respectively), which demonstrated a favorable inhibition of Cd leaching under different conditions[148]. Liu et al. fabricated nano-TiO2-doped BC and employed it in a Cd-contaminated plant system. The results showed that by facilitating the formation of humid substance and the increase of soil cation exchange capacity, the Cd passivation performance was double[149]. Meanwhile, added into agricultural soils, EDBC presented further growth promotion capacity for agricultural plants by alleviating environmental stress. For example, restraining Cd and Zn activity (which declined by 57.79% and 35.64% respectively), Mn/Fe co-doped BC effectively decreased their bio-toxicity and thereby boosted the vigorousness in photosynthesis and other life activities of foxtail millet[150].

      EDBC also possesses superior applicability in heavy metal-contaminated farmland soils. In the in-situ experiments, alginate and FeCl3 were pyrolyzed to prepare magnetic Fe-doped BC, and the product exhibited a macroporous structure, guaranteeing the adsorption ability for total Cd and As (dropped to 49.46% and 45.39%, respectively) in soil. Meanwhile, by adding water, the magnetic BC sphere could float above the mixture of soil and water, thus realizing an effective separation from the polluted soil body (with an 87.67% recovery rate)[151]. Wang et al. conducted an incubation experiment followed by freeze-thaw-cycle experiment to illustrate the stability and ageing resistance ability of Mn-doped BC. The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) concentrations of Cd, Zn, and Pb decreased significantly by 66.80%, 25.39%, and 99.68%, respectively, demonstrating effective attenuation in the bio-toxicity of heavy metals attributed to the repressed mobility[152].

    • Phytoremediation refers to a plant-centered technique, utilizing the absorption characteristics and the transport process of plants to realize the transfer process of heavy metals from the soil environment to stems, leaf, and other aboveground parts of the plant body. Subsequently, through unified harvest and management, the content and toxicity of heavy metals can be diminished[153]. Compared with using EDBC alone, the combined application of BC remediation and phytoremediation is an advanced strategy that leverages synergistic effects: it enhances key soil physicochemical properties—particularly aeration and aggregate structure—thereby creating more favorable conditions for subsequent plant growth[154]. Concurrently, the organic substances secreted by plant roots can augment the immobilization of heavy metals in the soil, facilitated by BCs. This dual facilitation constitutes the mutual reinforcement between phytoremediation and BC amendment in diminishing heavy metal bio-availability[155]. In pot experiments, P/S co-doped BC was fabricated through one-pot pyrolysis technology. During the contaminated farmland simulation experiments, P/S co-doped BC was applied in conjunction with crushed smooth vetch, a green manure crop. After treatment, soil organic matter (SOM) and available P (AP) contents surged (increased by 34.52% for SOM and 86.17% for AP) compared with untreated soil, while returned smooth vetch could further boost the increase in AP content. Therefore, the tolerance of smooth vetch to Cd stress was significantly enhanced[134].

      With the characteristic of multi-valence, Cr exhibits a more complicated behavior in agricultural soils, and more detrimental intermediate products tend to be generated during the remediation process, which impedes the application of the phytoremediation technique[156]. To overcome such a dilemma, Jia et al. selected O-doped BC synthesized by calcining corn stalk, and explored the underlying mechanism of BC and reactive oxygen species (ROSs) generated by plants through analyzing the concentration of different Cr species and the detoxification led by pennisetum and ROSs it produced[157]. The result implied that decreased concentration of ROSs activated the uptake of Cr ions (80.60%, increased by 14.46% compared to sole phytoremediation). On the other hand, the antioxidase system of pennisetum was provoked to facilitate the cell wall fixation of Cr ions (Cr content proportion of the cell walls and vacuoles was increased by 18.12%), thus suppressing the intracellular damage inflicted. Therefore, a collaborative resistance mechanism of BC and plants was presented.

    • For farmland soil, in-situ immobilization of heavy metal pollutants, without interrupting normal cultivation and agricultural production routine, is crucial for the sustainability and cost-effectiveness[158]. Microbial remediation, referring to a heavy metal immobilization strategy that takes a specific microbial community as the core executor, is further explored in contaminated agricultural soils[101]. The common techniques of cooperative immobilization by BC and microorganisms are mainly classified into two methods: one is to bio-immobilize heavy metals by regulating the indigenous functional microbial communities in soil[159]; the other is to concurrently apply BC along with microbial agents, namely introducing exogenous microbial communities to intensify the suppression of soil heavy metal contaminants[160].

      The increase in indigenous functional microbes count primarily ascribes to the restriction of heavy metals activity and a more appropriate living environment for them. These enhanced microbial communities cooperate with EDBC in the immobilization of heavy metals. For instance, Shang et al. prepared rice husk-derived BC, which could be regarded as Si-doped BC due to the high content of Si-based compound. A simulation experiment was conducted, and the variation that occurred in the bacterial community was also observed. The outcome showed that as the incubation proceeded, the diversity and abundance of microbes related to the immobilization of Zn ions and Cr ions were significantly boosted (up to 69.01%–76.76%)[161]. In another study, S-doped BC was prepared for Cd passivation in agricultural soils. Pot experiment results showed a significant decrease in soil bio-available Cd (by 91.4%), which was attributed to the S-doped BC, and the corresponding changes occurred in the soil bacteria community. An activated mutual benefit among microorganism species was induced, collectively reducing the plant-available fraction of Cd ions[162].

      For remediation involving exogenous bacterial species, EDBC with its characteristically large specific surface area (SSA) serves as an effective microbial carrier, facilitating microbial-mediated remediation[163]. Moreover, EDBC provides both essential nutrients and protective habitats for the colonization of microorganisms from environmental stress, therefore enhancing the abundance and activity of the introduced microbial agents[164]. Wei et al. prepared Fe/S-doped BC and consequently coupled it with the microbe agent to explore its performance on soil Pb immobilization and plant growth promotion. The results revealed that with the addition of Fe/S-doped BC, the fraction of unstable Pb was diminished (by 55.43%). Moreover, the application of BC-bacteria composite could improve soil fertility (AK and AP elevated to 26.79 and 52.25 mg/kg, respectively). In this way, EDBC, combined with microbe, presented a superior immobilization capacity for heavy metals and an outstanding amelioration of agricultural soil fertility[165].

    • EDBC exhibited superior remediation performance and overcame the disadvantages of the pristine BC in the remediation of heavy metals in agricultural soils. Herein, various synthesis methods of EDBC were summarized, along with its adsorption mechanisms for heavy metals, including physical adsorption, electrostatic interaction, ion exchange, and others. The work systematically discussed how introducing different functional groups further regulates the physicochemical properties of EDBC, thereby influencing the passivation mechanisms and the performance of different EDBC. Meanwhile, several application strategies of EDBC for agricultural soils were comprehensively reviewed. Overall, EDBC has shown wide applicability and enormous potential in environmental and agricultural fields. However, there are still some limitations and deficiencies in the utilization of EDBC to resolve the contamination of agricultural soils. Therefore, to further propel its application, future work should focus on: (i) Introducing target functional groups. More doping strategies should be developed to accurately prepare functional BC as required, fitting various contamination backgrounds; (ii) Addressing the potential of metal release. The risk of secondary heavy metals leaching needs to be addressed to ensure the sustainability and safety of this strategy; (iii) Expanding passivation studies. Current adsorption research is significantly insufficient in terms of anionic metal groups (such as SbO3 and FeO42– groups), thus corresponding analyses should be conducted to clarify the remediation performance of EDBC on them.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: conceptualization, methodology: Qu J, Chu H; investigation, formal analysis: Yu R; visualization, writing − review and editing: Wang S, Liu T, Tao Y, Han S, Zhang Y; writing − original draft preparation: Qu J, Chu H, Wang M; supervision and funding acquisition: Zhang Y. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the Hainan Province Key Research and Development Program (ZDYF2024SHFZ144), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD1501005), and Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Protection and Remediation.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Preparation methods and characteristics of EDBCs are reviewed.

        Passivation mechanisms of heavy metals by EDBCs are systematically analyzed by discussing different roles of functional groups on the surface of EDBCs.

        The applications of EDBCs for farmland soils with heavy metals contamination are introduced.

        Future prospects for the further development of EDBCs are proposed.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (11) References (165)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Qu J, Chu H, Wang M, Yu R, Wang S, et al. 2025. Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e002 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0004
    Qu J, Chu H, Wang M, Yu R, Wang S, et al. 2025. Synthesis, mechanism, and application of element-doped biochar for heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e002 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0004

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return