Search
2026 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective

More Information
  • Laminaria japonica fucoidan (LJF) is a composite macromolecule with anti-allergic ability. This study investigated the effects of NaCl elution on the physicochemical, structural properties, and anti-allergic ability of LJF, to provide a theoretical basis for the in-depth insights into LJF. The LJF eluted fractions (LJF-1 and LJF-2) using different NaCl concentrations were primarily composed of carbohydrates that are rich in fucose, sulfate radical, uronic acid, and rhamnose, monosaccharide compositions and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the presence of multiple functional components (e.g., sulfate radical and β-glycosidic bonds) in LJF-1 and LJF-2 varied significantly under elution with different NaCl concentrations. As to the hyaluronidase inhibition rate, LJF-2 performed the most potent hyaluronidase inhibition ability, which was particularly attributed to its high sulfate radical and rhamnose contents, LJF-2 was selected for further anti-allergic ability investigation. As for the anti-allergic ability, LJF-2 could mostly decline NO and ROS levels in RAW 264.7 macrophages, and inhibited the release of pro-inflammatory mediators from lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-stimulated macrophages, and inhibited the release of β-hexosaminidase, histamine, Ca2+, and ROS from RBL-2H3 mast cells, reduced the degranulation degree and histamine release by downregulating STIM1 and PRTC genes that are associated with the calcium influx signaling pathway. Therefore, LJF-2 performed the strongest anti-allergic ability, which depended on the physicochemical and structural properties that were significantly influenced by elution using different NaCl concentrations.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Han Y, Yang B, Lin H, et al. 2022. The natural substances with anti-allergic properties in food allergy. Trends in Food Science & Technology 128:53−67 doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2022.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Anjana K, Arunkumar K. 2024. Brown algae biomass for fucoxanthin, fucoidan and alginate; update review on structure, biosynthesis, biological activities and extraction valorisation. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 280:135632 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135632

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Li HY, Yi YL, Guo S, Zhang F, Yan H, et al. 2022. Isolation, structural characterization and bioactivities of polysaccharides from Laminaria japonica: a review. Food Chemistry 370:131010 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Moreira ASP, Gaspar D, Ferreira SS, Correia A, Vilanova M, et al. 2023. Water-soluble Saccharina latissima polysaccharides and relation of their structural characteristics with in vitro immunostimulatory and hypocholesterolemic activities. Marine Drugs 21:183 doi: 10.3390/md21030183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Bisso BN, Jahan H, Dzoyem JP, Choudhary MI. 2025. Quinic acid enhances kanamycin efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Microbial Pathogenesis 198:107145 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.107145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Álvarez-Viñas M, Torres MD, Domínguez H. 2025. Microwave-assisted depolymerization of hydrothermally extracted carrageenan from Chondrus crispus. Algal Research 89:104046 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2025.104046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Roy D, Sobuj MKA, Islam MS, Haque MM, Islam MA, et al. 2024. Compositional, structural, and functional characterization of fucoidan extracted from Sargassum polycystum collected from Saint Martin's Island, Bangladesh. Algal Research 80:103542 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2024.103542

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Li Z, Zhang Z, Feng Y, Guo Y, Li Z, et al. 2025. Insight into the anti-inflammatory sulfated polysaccharides from Sargassum carpophyllum and structure-function relationships. Algal Research 85:103841 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2024.103841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Shi H, Wan Y, Li O, Zhang X, Xie M, et al. 2020. Two-step hydrolysis method for monosaccharide composition analysis of natural polysaccharides rich in uronic acids. Food Hydrocolloids 101:105524 doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105524

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] AlBathish M, Gazy A, Al Jamal M, Bejjani A. 2024. Utilization of the FTIR spectroscopic method for the quantitative determination of the narrow therapeutic index levothyroxine sodium in pharmaceutical tablets. Pharmacia 71:1−9 doi: 10.3897/pharmacia.71.e125879

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Xiong W, Li J, Li B, Wang L. 2019. Physicochemical properties and interfacial dilatational rheological behavior at air-water interface of high intensity ultrasound modified ovalbumin: effect of ionic strength. Food Hydrocolloids 97:105210 doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105210

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Lei W, Liu C, Pan L, Peng C, Wang J, et al. 2021. Screening of probiotic Lactobacilli with potential anti-allergic activity based on hyaluronidase inhibition and degranulation of RBL-2H3 cells in vitro. LWT 140:110707 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110707

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Wagner A, Alam SB, Kulka M. 2023. The effects of age, origin, and biological sex on rodent mast cell (BMMC and MC/9) and basophil (RBL-2H3) phenotype and function. Cellular Immunology 391:104751 doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2023.104751

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Lin XT, Zhang J, Xie CM. 2023. An optimized protocol to detect protein ubiquitination and activation by ubiquitination assay in vivo and CCK-8 assay. STAR Protocols 4:102199 doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Ishida M, Matsubara I, Yamauchi S, Nishi K, Sugahara T. 2025. Correlation between the biological activities and the chemical structures of conidendrin-related compounds: (−)-β-conidendrin inhibits degranulation of RBL-2H3 cells. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 89:795−804 doi: 10.1093/bbb/zbaf039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Passante E, Ehrhardt C, Sheridan H, Frankish N. 2009. RBL-2H3 cells are an imprecise model for mast cell mediator release. Inflammation Research 58:611−618 doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0028-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Lakshmana Senthil S. 2024. A comprehensive review to assess the potential, health benefits and complications of fucoidan for developing as functional ingredient and nutraceutical. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 277:134226 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Zhong R, Wan X, Wang D, Zhao C, Liu D, et al. 2020. Polysaccharides from marine Enteromorpha: structure and function. Trends in Food Science & Technology 99:11−20 doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2020.02.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Chen BJ, Qiao YJ, Yu G, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al. 2024. Sulfation, characterization, antibacterial activity, and action mechanism of rice bran polysaccharides. Food Bioscience 59:103953 doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103953

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Cui Z, Wang H, Qin L, Yuan Y, Xue J, et al. 2025. Probing the structural elements of polysaccharide adjuvants for enhancing respiratory mucosal response: from surmounting multi-obstacles to eliciting cascade immunity. ACS Nano 19:11012−11028 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c16788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Mulloy B. 2005. The specificity of interactions between proteins and sulfated polysaccharides. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 77:651−664 doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652005000400007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Heo JH, Je JG, Sim JH, Ryu B, Heo SJ, et al. 2024. Quantitative analysis of fucose in fucoidans from Sargassum spp. in Jeju Island, South Korea using 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone derivatization and RP-HPLC-UV method. Algal Research 79:103441 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2024.103441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Nagahawatta DP, Liyanage NM, Jayawardena TU, Yang F, Jayawardena HHACK, et al. 2023. Functions and values of sulfated polysaccharides from seaweed. Algae 38:217−240 doi: 10.4490/algae.2023.38.12.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Lee HG, Jayawardhana HHACK, Yang F, Nagahawaththa DP, Liyanage NM, et al. 2024. Anti-obesity effects of fucoidan from Sargassum thunbergii in adipocytes and high fat diet induced obese mice through inhibiting adipogenic specific transcription factor. Food Science and Human Wellness 13:1608−1616 doi: 10.26599/FSHW.2022.9250136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Liao Q, Pang L, Li JJ, Zhang C, Li JX, et al. 2022. Characterization and diabetic wound healing benefits of protein-polysaccharide complexes isolated from an animal ethno-medicine Periplaneta americana L. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 195:466−474 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Shu Y, Li J, Yang X, Dong X, Wang X. 2019. Effect of particle size on the bioaccessibility of polyphenols and polysaccharides in green tea powder and its antioxidant activity after simulated human digestion. Journal of Food Science and Technology 56:1127−1133 doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03573-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Wang S, Yang J, Shao G, Qu D, Zhao H, et al. 2020. Soy protein isolated-soy hull polysaccharides stabilized O/W emulsion: effect of polysaccharides concentration on the storage stability and interfacial rheological properties. Food Hydrocolloids 101:105490 doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Zhang K, Chen C, Huang Q, Li C, Fu X. 2022. Preparation and characterization of Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticles with enhanced antioxidant activity and adsorption capacity. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 208:196−207 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Nawy SS, Csóka AB, Mio K, Stern R. 2001. Hyaluronidase activity and hyaluronidase inhibitors: assay using a microtiter-based system. In Proteoglycan Protocols, ed. Iozzo RV. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. pp. 383−389 doi: 10.1385/1-59259-209-0:383
    [30] Nagaraju S, Girish KS, Pan Y, Easely KA, Kemparaju K. 2011. Estimation of serum hyaluronidase activity overcoming the turbidity interference. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science 24:172−177 doi: 10.29074/ascls.24.3.172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Li C, Sun H, Gu X, Long W, Zhu G, et al. 2025. Exploring the inhibitory effects of fucosylated chondroitin sulfate (FCS) oligosaccharide isolated from Stichopus horrens and the derivatives on P-selectin. Marine Drugs 23:236 doi: 10.3390/md23060236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Schmaus A, Spataro S, Sallmann P, Möller S, Scapozza L, et al. 2025. A novel, cell-compatible hyaluronidase activity assay identifies dextran sulfates and other sulfated polymeric hydrocarbons as potent inhibitors for CEMIP. Cells 14:101 doi: 10.3390/cells14020101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Li C, Tian Y, Pei J, Zhang Y, Hao D, et al. 2023. Sea cucumber chondroitin sulfate polysaccharides attenuate OVA-induced food allergy in BALB/c mice associated with gut microbiota metabolism and Treg cell differentiation. Food & Function 14:7375−7386 doi: 10.1039/D3FO00146F

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Yang Z, Wali A, Arken A, Dongmulati N, Hu A, et al. 2024. Purification and characterisation of a homogenised protein from Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) abomasum as a potential hyaluronidase inhibitor. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 59:9108−9116 doi: 10.1111/ijfs.17489

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Jayasinghe AMK, Kirindage KGIS, Fernando IPS, Kim KN, Oh JY, et al. 2023. The anti-inflammatory effect of low molecular weight fucoidan from Sargassum siliquastrum in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages via inhibiting NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways. Marine Drugs 21:347 doi: 10.3390/md21060347

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Zhang J, Hong L, Zhang P, Wang Y, Hong T. 2023. Inhibitory effect of daphnetin on the C48/80-induced pseudo-allergic reaction. International Immunopharmacology 124:110874 doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Zhang W, Tang R, Ba G, Li M, Lin H. 2020. Anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory effects of resveratrol via inhibiting TXNIP-oxidative stress pathway in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis. World Allergy Organization Journal 13:100473 doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100473

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Lim S, Oh S, Nguyen QTN, Kim M, Zheng S, et al. 2023. Rosa davurica inhibited allergic mediators by regulating calcium and histamine signaling pathways. Plants 12:1572 doi: 10.3390/plants12071572

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Qiu Z, Qiao Y, Zhang B, Sun-Waterhouse D, Zheng Z. 2022. Bioactive polysaccharides and oligosaccharides from garlic (Allium sativum L.): production, physicochemical and biological properties, and structure-function relationships. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 21:3033−3095 doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12972

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Jiang Y, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Fang JK, Lai KP, et al. 2024. Roles and mechanisms of fucoidan against dermatitis: a review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 279:135268 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135268

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Kim AR, Kim MJ, Seo J, Moon KM, Lee B. 2024. The beneficial roles of seaweed in atopic dermatitis. Marine Drugs 22:566 doi: 10.3390/md22120566

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Jia N, Zhang S, Chen R, He X, Dai C, et al. 2025. Immunomodulatory functions of algal bioactive compounds. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 65:7133−7150 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2025.2460634

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Yuan L, Qiu Z, Yang Y, Liu C, Zhang R. 2022. Preparation, structural characterization and antioxidant activity of water-soluble polysaccharides and purified fractions from blackened jujube by an activity-oriented approach. Food Chemistry 385:132637 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132637

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Li D, Wei R, Zhang X, Gong S, Wan M, et al. 2024. Gut commensal metabolite rhamnose promotes macrophages phagocytosis by activating SLC12A4 and protects against sepsis in mice. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 14:3068−3085 doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Alhussain H, Alghamdi AM, Elamin NY, Rajeh A. 2024. Recent progress in enhanced optical, mechanical, thermal properties, and antibacterial activity of the chitosan/polyvinylalcohol/Co3O4 nanocomposites for optoelectronics and biological applications. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 32:3735−3748 doi: 10.1007/s10924-024-03191-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Németh Z, Csóka I, Semnani Jazani R, Sipos B, Haspel H, et al. 2022. Quality by design-driven zeta potential optimisation study of liposomes with charge imparting membrane additives. Pharmaceutics 14:1798 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091798

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Kwon DH, Cha HJ, Choi EO, Leem SH, Kim GY, et al. 2018. Schisandrin A suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and oxidative stress in RAW 264.7 macrophages by suppressing the NF-κB, MAPKs and PI3K/Akt pathways and activating Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 41:264−274 doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Nagata Y, Suzuki R. 2022. FcεRI: a master regulator of mast cell functions. Cells 11:622 doi: 10.3390/cells11040622

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Higashio H, Yokoyama T, Saino T. 2024. A convenient fluorimetry-based degranulation assay using RBL-2H3 cells. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 88:181−188 doi: 10.1093/bbb/zbad160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, et al. 2026. Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective. Food Innovation and Advances 5(1): 76−86 doi: 10.48130/fia-0026-0005
    Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, et al. 2026. Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective. Food Innovation and Advances 5(1): 76−86 doi: 10.48130/fia-0026-0005

Figures(6)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(51) PDF downloads(16)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective

Food Innovation and Advances  5 2026, 5(1): 76−86  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Laminaria japonica fucoidan (LJF) is a composite macromolecule with anti-allergic ability. This study investigated the effects of NaCl elution on the physicochemical, structural properties, and anti-allergic ability of LJF, to provide a theoretical basis for the in-depth insights into LJF. The LJF eluted fractions (LJF-1 and LJF-2) using different NaCl concentrations were primarily composed of carbohydrates that are rich in fucose, sulfate radical, uronic acid, and rhamnose, monosaccharide compositions and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the presence of multiple functional components (e.g., sulfate radical and β-glycosidic bonds) in LJF-1 and LJF-2 varied significantly under elution with different NaCl concentrations. As to the hyaluronidase inhibition rate, LJF-2 performed the most potent hyaluronidase inhibition ability, which was particularly attributed to its high sulfate radical and rhamnose contents, LJF-2 was selected for further anti-allergic ability investigation. As for the anti-allergic ability, LJF-2 could mostly decline NO and ROS levels in RAW 264.7 macrophages, and inhibited the release of pro-inflammatory mediators from lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-stimulated macrophages, and inhibited the release of β-hexosaminidase, histamine, Ca2+, and ROS from RBL-2H3 mast cells, reduced the degranulation degree and histamine release by downregulating STIM1 and PRTC genes that are associated with the calcium influx signaling pathway. Therefore, LJF-2 performed the strongest anti-allergic ability, which depended on the physicochemical and structural properties that were significantly influenced by elution using different NaCl concentrations.

    • Food allergies, affecting 3%–4% of the global population, pose a significant public health and industrial challenge with no definitive cure. Current mitigation strategies focus on either reducing allergenicity via food processing, or modulating immune responses using natural bioactive compounds. Given the limitations of processing techniques in fully eliminating allergenic potential, the utilization of natural anti-allergic ingredients, such as fucoidans[1], represents a promising preventive approach.

      Fucoidans are composite macromolecular compounds formed by glycosidic bonds linking aldoses or ketoses. As critical biological macromolecules, they could play pivotal functions in sustaining human physiological functions through the modulation of immune responses[1]. In recent years, algal fucoidans have garnered significant attention owing to their diverse biological activities (e.g., anti-allergy), and high safety, making them increasingly popular functional compounds.

      Laminaria japonica is a rich algal source of fucoidans, and has extensive applications in food, dietary supplements, and functional compounds. In particular, fucoidan obtained from brown algae is an active substance that exhibits various biological activity functions[2], particularly Laminaria japonica fucoidan (LJF), which is an algal-derived fucoidan with minimal side effects, and diverse physiological activities, making it a key active ingredient for maintaining human health, and preventing various diseases[3]. To date, numerous functional activities of Laminaria japonica fucoidan have been confirmed through in vitro and in vivo investigations, including anti-allergy[3,4]. This work further investigated the physicochemical and structural features of fucoidans extracted from Laminaria japonica, and the stricture and anti-allergy ability relationship.

      Unlike previous studies, which often focused on crude fucoidan extracts, this work systematically investigates how NaCl gradient elution modulated the physicochemical structure of Laminaria japonica fucoidan fractions, and directly linked these structural variations (particularly sulfate/uronic acid content and monosaccharide profile) to their anti-allergic efficacy at the molecular and cellular level. This structure-function approach provides novel mechanistic insights into the role of specific polysaccharide features in hyaluronidase inhibition, mast cell stabilization, and macrophage immunomodulation, which could provide a robust preclinical foundation for the application of LJF in food allergy prevention and treatment.

    • Laminaria japonica was collected from Xiapu, Fujian Province, China; PBS buffer, citric acid buffer, and Triton X-100 were obtained from Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China); C48/80 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); DEME culture medium and MEM culture medium were purchased from Shanghai Yuanpei Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Fetal bovine serum (FBS). and EDTA-pancreatic enzyme were acquired from Thermo Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA); β-Hexosaminidase was obtained from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin (H2DCFDA) was obtained from GlpBio (Montclair, CA, USA); Fluo-4 AM and nitric oxide detection kits were obtained from Shanghai Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China); Aluminum hydroxide adjuvant was obtained from Beijing Biosynthesis biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China); Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), histamine, and TNF-α ELISA kits were obtained from Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Stromal Interaction Molecule 1 (STIM1), and Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily C Member 1 (TRPC1) were obtained from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. All chemical reagents were analytical grade or better.

    • Crude fucoidan was sequentially extracted from ground Laminaria japonica after lipid removal via Soxhlet extraction. Hot water extraction (80 °C, 1:30 w/v) was followed by ethanol precipitation, Sevage reagent deproteinization, dialysis (3.5 kDa), and lyophilization. The obtained crude fucoidan was purified via DEAE-52 cellulose column chromatography, employing gradient elution with 0.5 and 1.0 mol/L NaCl. The resulting fucoidan (LJF), 0.5 mol/L NaCl elute-fraction (LJF-1), and 1.0 mol/L NaCl elute-fraction (LJF-2) were collected, concentrated, dialyzed, and freeze-dried for subsequent characterization and bioactivity assessment.

    • Total carbohydrate content (with L-fucose as the standard) was quantified using the phenol-sulfuric acid method according to Bisso et al.[5], with slight modifications. Standard L-fucose solutions were prepared in deionized water at 20–200 μg/mL. Five milligrams of Laminaria japonica fucoidan were dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water, and 2.5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was carefully added. Samples were kept at 4 °C during preparation for stability. Then, 0.5 mL of 5% phenol solution was added to each sample, followed by incubation for 10 min with stirring, and 30 min in a 25 °C water bath. Absorbance was measured at 480 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

    • The gelatin-barium chloride method was used to determine sulphate group content in LJF (with potassium sulphate as the standard), according to Álvarez-Viñas et al.[6], with minor modifications. A 500 mg sample of each fraction (LJF, LJF-1, LJF-2) was mixed with 3 mL of 1 mol/L HCl, and hydrolyzed in a boiling water bath for 4 h. After cooling to 25 °C, the solution was filtered. Then, 1 mL of filtrate was combined with 0.1 mL of 6 mol/L HCl, and 0.5 mL of 70% sorbitol under stirring. Afterwards, 1.0 g of BaCl2 crystals was added, and absorbance was measured at 470 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Potassium sulphate was the reference.

    • Uronic acid content was quantified using the carbazole-sulfuric acid method, with D-glucuronic acid as the standard, following the procedures according to Roy et al.[7]. Firstly, standard solutions of D-glucuronic acid were prepared in deionized water at concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 μg/mL. A 1.0 mL aliquot of the diluted sample solution was mixed with 6 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, vortexed thoroughly, and heated at 95 °C for 20 min. Following cooling to room temperature, 200 μL of a 0.15% carbazole ethanol solution was added, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The absorbance was subsequently measured at 530 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

    • Protein content was quantified using the Kaomas Brilliant Blue method[8], with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. Standard solutions of BSA, ranging from 40 to 200 μg/mL, were prepared in deionized water. A 1.0 mL aliquot of the diluted BSA solution was mixed with 5.0 mL of Cauloblue G-250 staining solution, vortexed thoroughly, and incubated for 3–5 min at room temperature. The absorbance was subsequently measured at 595 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with the blank serving as the reference.

    • The monosaccharide composition of LJF was analyzed following a modified method based on Shi et al.[9]. Samples were hydrolyzed with 2 mol/L trifluoroacetic acid at 105 °C for 6 h. After evaporation and methanol washing, the hydrolysates were derivatized with PMP under alkaline conditions at 70 °C for 2 h. The derivatized mixtures were neutralized, extracted with trichloromethane, filtered, and analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1260) equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse Plus-C18 column. Elution was performed using a phosphate buffer/acetonitrile gradient (83:17, v/v) at 1 mL/min and 30 °C, with identification based on eight monosaccharide standards.

    • The fucoidan samples were analyzed using infrared spectral scanning using the potassium bromide compression method[10]. The FT-IR spectra of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2 were recorded using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA). This was done by mixing 1.0 mg of LJF with 100 mg of potassium bromide powder, and grinding the mixture thoroughly. It was then pressed into a uniform and transparent sheet using a tablet press. This was followed by infrared scanning in the range of 4,000–500 cm−1, and potassium bromide was used as a blank control to correct the background.

    • LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2 was completely dissolved in ultrapure water, and the concentration was set to 0.5 mg/mL. After dissolution, fucoidan particle size and zeta potential were measured using a nanoparticle size analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK)[11].

    • Hyaluronidase activity of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2 was determined by adapting the Morgan-Elso method with appropriate modifications[12]. The procedure involved mixing 700 μL of acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer, 100 μL of fucoidan solution, and 100 μL of hyaluronidase solution homogeneously, followed by incubation for 10 min at 37 °C in a water bath. Subsequently, 100 μL of sodium hyaluronate solution was added, mixed thoroughly, and incubated for an additional 15 min at 37 °C. The reaction was immediately terminated by adding cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). After incubating the mixture at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance was measured at 400 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula.

      $\rm Hyaluronidase\; inhibition\; rate\; ({\text{%}}) = \dfrac{(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{B})-(\mathrm{C}-\mathrm{D})}{\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{B}} \times 100 $

      where, A: OD400 nm of buffer instead of fucoidan sample; B: OD400 nm of fucoidan sample; C: OD400 nm of buffer instead of enzyme solution; D: OD400 nm of buffer instead of enzyme solution and fucoidan sample.

    • The hyaluronidase solution (1.0 mg/mL), and fucoidan samples at varying concentrations were prepared in PBS. The hyaluronidase solution was mixed with fucoidan solutions in equal volumes, thoroughly vortexed, and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. After centrifugation (10,000 r/min, 5 min), the supernatant was subjected to fluorescence spectral analysis. Fluorescence spectra were recorded under the following conditions: excitation wavelength at 280 nm, emission wavelength range of 300–400 nm, scan speed of 240 nm/min, and slit width of 5.0 nm.

    • RAW264.7 cells were maintained in a culture medium consisting of 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 90% MEM medium, and 1% triple antibiotic solution (penicillin-chloramphenicol-amphotericin). Cells were cultured in a cell incubator (Shanghai Heal Force Biomedical Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 37 °C and 5% CO2[13]. Cell viability was evaluated with the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (C0037, Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China). RAW264.7 cells (1 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates, and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The medium was then removed, and cells were washed three times with sterile PBS. LJF solutions (25, 50, 100, 200, 400 µg/mL) were added, and plates were incubated for 20 h. Afterwards, 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent was added per well, and incubated for 4 h. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy LX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The PBS-treated cells served as the control, and cell viability percentages were calculated.

    • RAW 264.7 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates, and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The medium was aspirated, and cells were washed three times with PBS. Then, 1 µg/mL LPS was added to the positive control group, 1 µg/mL LPS with LJF samples (25, 50, 100 µg/mL) to the fucoidan treated group, and PBS to the negative control group. Cells were incubated for 24 h. Supernatants were collected, and NO levels were measured using the Griess kit (S0021, Biyuntian, Jiangsu, China).

    • RAW 264.7 cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in sterile black 96-well plates, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The medium was aspirated, and cells were washed three times with PBS. Then, 1 µg/mL LPS was added to the positive control group, 1 µg/mL LPS with LJF samples (25, 50, 100 µg/mL) to the fucoidan-treated group, and DEME medium to the negative control group. Cells were incubated for 24 h. Afterward, cells were incubated with DCFH-DA probe for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, lyzed with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and fluorescence intensity was measured at the excitation wavelength of 488 nm, and the emission wavelength of 525 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy LX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

    • RAW264.7 cells (2 mL/well) were pipetted into 6-well plates (1 × 106 cells per well), then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h, and treated with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 12 h. After the end of the culture, the old culture solution was sucked away, and the cells were fully moistened with sterile PBS buffer, and the cell precipitate was collected by a sterile enzyme-free cell scraper for immediate extraction of total RNA. The total RNA of RAW264.7 cells was isolated using the RNA-easy Isolation Reagent (R701-01, Vazyme, China). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of RNA using the ToloScript All-in-one RT EasyMix for qPCR (22107, Tolobio, Shanghai, China). The fold change in gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method with GAPDH as the reference. qRT-PCR cycling conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR) was performed with the following primers: GAPDH (5′-CGACCCCTTCATTGACCTCAA-3′, 5′-ATGCAGGGATGATGTTCTGGG-3′), IL-6 (5′-ACAAAGCCAGAGTCCTTCAGAG-3′, 5′-TTAGCCACTCCTTCT GTGACTC-3′), IL-1β (5′-AGATGAAGG GCTGCTTCCAAA-3′, 5′-GGGTATTGCTTGGGATCCACA-3′), TNF-α (5′-TCAGCCTCTTCTCATTCCTGC-3′, 5′-CTGGAAGACTCCTCCCAGGTA-3′).

    • RBL-2H3 cells were maintained in a culture medium consisting of 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 90% MEM basal medium, and 1% triple antibiotic solution (penicillin-chloramphenicol-amphotericin). Cells were cultured in a Heal Force 90 cell incubator (Shanghai Heal Force Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) at 37 °C, and 5% CO2[13]. The cell viability was evaluated using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (C0037, Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China). RBL-2H3 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The medium was then removed, and cells were washed three times with sterile PBS. LJF samples (25, 50, 100, 200, 400 µg/mL) were added, and plates were incubated for 20 h. Afterwards, 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent was added per well and incubated for 4 h. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader (CMax Plus, Molecular Devices, USA). Untreated cells served as the control, and cell viability (%) was calculated[14].

    • RBL-2H3 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in an incubator with a concentration of Anti-DNP-IgE (5% CO2 at 37 °C) overnight. After that, MEM containing fucoidan (25, 50, 100 µg/mL, 100 µL/well) was pipetted to incubate at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing, DNP-BSA (100 μL/well) was pipetted for incubation for 1 h. Afterwards, cells are lysed with 1.0% Triton X-100 solution, with lysates collected. Then, 50 μL/well of cell supernatant was transferred into 96-well plate and incubated with 50 μL/well of 0.1 mol/L citrate buffer (pH = 4.5) containing 1.2 mmol/L 4-Nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminide for 90 min. Afterwards, 100 μL/well of sodium carbonate buffer (0.4 mol/L Na2CO3) was pipetted to stop the reaction. The OD405 nm was recorded using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader (CMax Plus, Molecular Devices, CA, USA), and the β-hexosaminidase activity (%) was calculated to reflect the degranulation degree[15].

      Histamine content was measured using the fluorescent histamine method[16]. Briefly, 1,000 µL of supernatant was mixed with 200 µL of 1 mol/L NaOH and 50 µL of o-benzoyldialdehyde solution (1%) in a light-protected tube, reacted for 4 min in the dark, and terminated with 100 µL of 3 mol/L HCl. After centrifugation (10,000 r/min, 15 min), 200 µL of supernatant was transferred to a black 96-well plate, and fluorescence was measured (excitation: 360 nm, emission: 450 nm) using a Multifunctional microplate reader (BioTek Synergy LX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Histamine content was quantified using a standard curve.

    • RBL-2H3 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in an incubator with a concentration of Anti-DNP-IgE (5% CO2 at 37 °C) overnight. Afterwards, LJF samples (25, 50, 100 µg/mL) solutions were used for a certain period of time, and DCFH-DA was used for 30 min. After that, 1.0 μg/mL of DNP-BSA was used for 1 h excitation and treatment with 1.0% Triton X-100 solution. The excitation wavelength of 488 nm and the emission wavelength of 525 nm were used to quantitatively detect the level of ROS secretion by a multifunctional microplate reader (BioTek Synergy LX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

    • RBL-2H3 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were cultured in an incubator with a concentration of Anti-DNP-IgE (5% CO2 at 37 °C) overnight. After that, LJF samples (25, 50, 100 µg/mL) were sequentially treated for a certain period of time, and Fluo-4 AM was used for 30 min. After that, 1.0 μg/mL of DNP-BSA was used for 1 h of excitation and treatment with 1.0% Triton X-100 solution. The excitation wavelength of 488 nm and the emission wavelength of 520 nm were used to quantitatively detect the level of Ca2+ secretion by a multifunctional microplate reader (BioTek Synergy LX, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

    • The total RNA of RBL-2H3 cells was isolated using the RNA-easy Isolation Reagent (R701-01, Vazyme, China). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of RNA using the ToloScript All-in-one RT EasyMix for qPCR (22107, Tolobio, Shanghai, China). The fold change was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCᴛ method with β-actin as the reference. q-PCR cycling conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR) was performed with the following primers: β-action (5′-TTGAACACGGCATTGTCACC-3′, 5′-TTTTCACGGTTGGCCTTAGG-3′), STIM1 (5′-TTTTGCCGGGATTGACAAGCC-3′, 5′-ATCAGCTTGTGGATGTTGCG-3′), TRPC1 (5′-ATTGCGTAGATGTGCTTGGGG-3′, 5′-TGCCACCAAAAGTGCATCTG-3′).

    • All results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independently repeated experiments. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Count data were analyzed for significant differences after square root transformation. In the graphs, different letters indicate significant differences between groups (p < 0.05), while the same letters indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05).

    • Fucoidan, a sulfated polysaccharide predominantly derived from seaweed, exhibited a broad spectrum of biofunctional properties, such as anti-allergy. Nevertheless, its bioactivity is highly dependent on structural characteristics such as molecular weight distribution, monosaccharide profile, conformational features, degree of sulfation, and sulfate group positioning[17]. Therefore, comprehensive characterization of the physicochemical attributes of Laminaria japonica fucoidan is crucial for elucidating its anti-allergic mechanisms. As presented in Table 1, the compositional analysis of Laminaria japonica fucoidan before and after purification revealed distinct physicochemical parameters. The neutral saccharide fraction accounted for 43.93% ± 0.08% of the purified sample, whereas uronic acid, quantified via the carbazole-sulfate assay, constituted 11.18% ± 0.17%. Sulfate groups, determined by gelatin-barium chloride titration, were present at 23.53% ± 0.67%, while residual protein contamination was minimal (1.18% ± 0.37%). The total carbohydrate content of LJF (43.93% ± 0.08%) confirmed the efficacy of the extraction protocol detailed in section "Extraction and purification of Laminaria japonica fucoidan (LJF)". Additionally, the low protein content demonstrated the successful protein removal during purification (section "Physicochemical properties analysis of LJF"), yielding a highly refined fucoidan preparation.

      Table 1.  Physicochemical properties of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2 after NaCl elution.

      LJF types Carbohydrate
      content (%)
      Uronic
      acid (%)
      Sulfate
      radical (%)
      Protein
      content (%)
      LJF 43.93 ± 0.08 11.18 ± 0.17 23.53 ± 0.67 1.18 ± 0.37
      LJF-1 54.91 ± 0.10 14.26 ± 0.21 28.42 ± 0.58 1.09 ± 0.22
      LJF-2 62.29 ± 0.09 17.20 ± 0.10 35.07 ± 0.23 0.60 ± 0.17
      LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution.

      After NaCl elution, the 0.5 mol/L and 1.0 mol/L eluted fractions were designated as LJF-1 and LJF-2, respectively (Fig. 1). The compositional profiles of these fractions before and after elution were summarized in Table 1. NaCl elution resulted in a significant increase in sulfate radical content, promoting from 23.53% ± 0.67% (LJF) to 28.72% ± 0.58% (LJF-1), and 35.07% ± 0.23% (LJF-2), alongside elevated uronic acid levels promoted from 11.18% ± 0.17 % (LJF) to 14.26% ± 0.21% (LJF-1), and 17.20% ± 0.10% (LJF-2), respectively. Previous studies have established a strong association between fucoidan bioactivity and the abundance of uronic acid and sulfate radical[18]. Notably, the degree of sulfation (DS), reflecting the substitution of hydroxyl groups by sulfate esters, plays a pivotal role in modulating fucoidan's structural and functional properties[19]. Sulfate radicals are known to potentiate immune responses, and their synergistic interaction with acetyl groups has been proposed as an effective adjuvant framework for augmenting mucosal, cellular, and humoral immunity[20]. Additionally, localized sulfate clustering has been identified as a critical determinant for binding proteins[21]. Given the well-documented correlation between sulfate radical/uronic acid content and bioactivity, the enhanced compositional profiles of LJF-1 and LJF-2 suggested a potential superiority in biological efficacy compared to LJF.

      Figure 1. 

      The LJF elution curves with different NaCl concentrations. Note: LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution.

    • As a structurally heterogeneous sulfated polysaccharide predominantly composed of fucose residues, fucoidan served as a biologically active ion-modulating compound localized in algal cell walls[22]. This macromolecule typically exists in complex association with various neutral and acidic monosaccharides, forming intricate polysaccharide architectures. The anti-allergy efficacy of fucoidan has been demonstrated to be strongly dependent on its monosaccharide compositions. Particular monosaccharide motifs, including mannose, glucuronic acid, and fucose configurations, have been shown to exhibit molecular recognition properties toward pro-inflammatory factors, thereby potentiating their therapeutic effects[23]. This structure-activity relationship underscores the necessity for rigorous compositional characterization when investigating the anti-allergic ability of fucoidan.

      The anti-allergic activity of fucoidans is structurally dependent, with key monosaccharides like mannose, glucuronic acid, and fucose contributing to bioactivity via specific molecular interactions[23]. Compositional analysis (Fig. 2a) revealed that Laminaria japonica fucoidan fractions (LJF, LJF-1, LJF-2) contain nine monosaccharides, with distinct profiles modulated by NaCl elution. LJF-2 showed a notable enrichment in rhamnose (21.42%), a bioactive 6-deoxyhexose linked to immunomodulation[24,25]. The variable distribution of fucose and mannose across fractions suggests complex structure-function relationships, highlighting the influence of isolation methods and source variability on fucoidan composition and anti-allergic efficacy.

      Figure 2. 

      The structural properties of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2. (a) Monosaccharide composition analysis. (b) Infrared spectral analysis. (c) Particle size analysis. (d) Zeta potential analysis. Note: LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution.

    • Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) was employed to characterize the structural features of Laminaria japonica fucoidans. The FT-IR spectral analysis (Fig. 2b) demonstrated consistent functional group profiles among LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2, confirming that NaCl elution preserved the fundamental molecular groups of these polysaccharides. The FT-IR spectra exhibited characteristic vibrational modes at: 3,433 cm−1 (broad): The hydroxyl group stretching in carbohydrate moieties; 2,946 cm−1: The ssymmetric methyl group vibrations; 1,643 cm−1: The carbonyl stretching vibrations; 1421 cm−1: The aliphatic C−H deformations; 1,250 cm−1: The sulfate ester symmetric stretching (S=O); 1,061 cm−1: The combined C−O−C ring stretching and C−O−H bending, indicative of pyranose configuration; 970 cm−1: The β-configuration of interglycosidic linkages; 851 and 817 cm−1: The C−O−S vibrations suggesting predominant C2 or C3 sulfation with minor C-4 substitution. These spectroscopic signatures collectively establish LJF as a β-linked pyranose polysaccharide with extensive sulfation, primarily at equatorial positions of the fucose residues. The invariant spectral patterns across different NaCl eluted fractions indicated that NaCl elutions maintained the essential structural integrity of the native fucoidan.

    • The hydrodynamic dimensions of fucoidan molecules served as an important indicator of molecular mass distribution and directly affect their biological absorption efficiency. Previous studies have established an inverse relationship between polysaccharide particle size and bioavailability[26]. Physicochemical characterization (Fig. 2c, d) revealed the following parameters for fucoidans: (1) Mean particle sizes: 906.67 ± 86.23 nm (LJF), 950.17 ± 17.63 nm (LJF-1), 910.2 ± 21.8 nm (LJF-2); (2) Surface charge potentials: −17.0 ± 0.82 mV (LJF), −22.27 ± 0.43 mV (LJF-1), −44.83 ± 0.83 mV (LJF-2). Notably, the zeta potential values showed fucoidan concentration-dependent attenuation during NaCl-gradient elution. This phenomenon may be resulted from the diminished intermolecular electrostatic forces and compromised interfacial stabilization, ultimately affecting colloidal stability[27]. The enhanced negative charge magnitude observed in LJF-2 (−44.83 mV) reflected superior dispersion stability, consistent with its elevated polysaccharide sulfation degree[28]. These findings collectively position LJF-2 as the most stable fraction among LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2.

    • As a key mediator of mediating allergic reactions, hyaluronidase oversecretion could trigger allergic cascades, which making the hyaluronidase inhibition as a validated biomarker for assessing anti-allergic compounds[12]. As shown in Fig. 3a, the LJF dose dependent anti-allergy relationships demonstrated concentration-dependent hyaluronidase inhibition by different LJF fractions, revealing distinct anti-allergic ability. Notably, LJF exhibited paradoxical behavior that achieved the lowest hyaluronidase inhibition rate (1.6%) at 0.4 mg/mL, while the hyaluronidase inhibition rate significantly declined to 23.66% at a higher LJF concentration (1.0 mg/mL). This nonlinear response reflected the characteristic nonspecific binding tendencies of high-molecular-weight polysaccharides[29]. The crude LJF may contain interfering macromolecules that: (1) Form nonproductive enzyme complexes; (2) Induce colloidal aggregation at higher concentration (e.g., 1.0 mg/mL) than 0.4 mg/mL; (3) Generate spectrophotometric artifacts through light scattering[30]. These experimental artifacts, consistent with observed inhibition trends, underscore the necessity of purified fractions for reliable bioactivity assessment. The concentration-dependent interference mechanisms explain why LJF demonstrated apparent loss of anti-allergic ability at elevated concentrations, invalidating its direct use in quantitative evaluations.

      Figure 3. 

      Hyaluronidase inhibition assay of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2. (a) The hyaluronidase inhibition rate of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2. (b) Effects of LJF on the changes of hyaluronidase fluorescence intensity. (c) Effects of LJF-1 on the changes of hyaluronidase fluorescence intensity. (d) Effects of LJF-2 on the changes of hyaluronidase fluorescence intensity. Note: LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution.

      Compared with LJF, the LJF-1 performed a much stronger hyaluronidase inhibition rate than LJF, while the LJF-1 performed a lower hyaluronidase inhibition rate of LJF-1 at higher concentrations in a dose-dependent manner, while there is still a 83.6% hyaluronidase inhibition rate at 1.0 mol/L of LJF-1. This might be due to the fact that lower sulfated fucoidan demonstrated a proportional weaker hyaluronidase inhibition with higher concentration, though their peak efficacy falls short of highly sulfated analogs. Both sulfate density and spatial configuration collectively governed the fucoidan-hyaluronidase interaction stability. Structural deficiencies in low-sulfate variants hindered the complete occupancy of the enzymatically active sites of hyaluronidase[31].

      Notably, compared with LJF and LJF-1, LJF-2 attained the lowest hyaluronidase inhibition rate (79.86%) at 0.4 mg/mL, then surpassed the hyaluronidase inhibition rate peak of LJF-1. Within the concentration of 0.2–0.4 mg/mL, LJF-2 exhibited decreased hyaluronidase inhibition rate. Beyond this threshold (0.4 mg/mL), LJF-2 performed the highest hyaluronidase inhibition rate, inducing more occupancy of the enzymatically active sites of hyaluronidase[32]. Moreover, the sulfate moieties were established as critical determinants of anti-allergic properties in algal fucoidans[33]. Higher sulfated fucoidans could greater suppress mast cell degranulation by 82% and curtail Th2 cytokine (IL-4, IL-13) release by 75%, whereas hyaluronidase inhibition contributes merely 22% to their overall efficacy[20]. This underscored the predominance of immunomodulatory mechanisms over direct enzymatic blockade. Given the physicochemical profiling and hyaluronidase inhibition rate of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2, LJF-2 emerged as the most potent hyaluronidase inhibitor, characterized by the highest sulfate content and superior in vitro anti-allergic performance (with the highest hyaluronidase inhibition rate). Therefore, LJF-2 were selected to investigate the anti-allergic ability of NaCl eluted fucoidans.

    • As shown in Fig. 3bd, the fluorescence analysis revealed that hyaluronidase exhibited a strong emission peak at 333 nm. As the increased concentrations of LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2, the fluorescence intensity of hyaluronidase at 333 nm decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner, while the emission peak position remained unchanged. This observation suggested that the interaction between the fucoidans (LJF, LJF-1, LJF-2) and hyaluronidase did not alter the microenvironment of tryptophan residues, supporting a non-covalent binding mechanism[34].

      At a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, LJF, LJF-1, and LJF-2 reduced the fluorescence intensity of hyaluronidase from 7,009.67 to 1,869, 2,968.33, and 1,468.67, respectively. Notably, LJF-2 demonstrated the highest inhibition efficiency (79.06%), surpassing LJF (73.34%), and LJF-1 (57.66%) by approximately 5.72% and 21.4%, respectively. Further analysis of the inhibition curves indicated that while both LJF and LJF-2 achieved comparable maximum inhibition at the highest concentration, LJF-2 exhibited more pronounced fluorescence quenching at medium and low concentrations. These results indicated that LJF-2 exhibited the enhanced binding affinity and superior inhibitory potency, demonstrating significant biological activity even at lower concentrations.

      Combined with the results from physicochemical property determination (Table 1 and Fig. 2), hyaluronidase inhibition rate and fluorescence spectroscopy assays, LJF-2 emerged as the most effective inhibitor of hyaluronidase, exhibiting the highest sulfate content and superior in vitro anti-allergic activity (with the highest hyaluronidase inhibition rate and fluorescence spectroscopy inhibition). Therefore, LJF-2 were selected to further investigate the anti-allergic ability of NaCl eluted fucoidans in subsequent experiments.

    • The macrophages induced pro-inflammatory reactions are key mediators during allergic reactions. To investigate the anti-allergic activity of LJF-2, the RAW264.7 macrophage cells was firstly used to elucidate the effects of LJF-2 on the pro-inflammatory reactions during allergic reactions. Cellular toxicity was first assessed through CCK-8 proliferation assays to establish the non-cytotoxic concentration range. Experimental data presented in Fig. 4a demonstrated that LJF-2 treatment at doses between 25 and 400 µg/mL maintained cellular viability without statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05), confirming the biocompatibility of LJF-2 within this concentration range. Based on these safety profile results and considering reagent optimization, the concentration range of 25–100 µg/mL was selected for the subsequent experimental investigations.

      Figure 4. 

      Anti-proinflammatory effects of LJF-2. (a) Toxic effects of LJF-2 on RAW 264.7 macrophages. (b) Effects of LJF-2 on NO secretion. (c) Effects of LJF-2 on ROS secretion. Note: LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution; NC: Negative Control (untreated cells); PC: Positive Control (LPS-stimulated cells).

    • The lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages serve as an established cell model for studying the pro-inflammatory inhibition of LJF-2 during anti-allergic reactions, characterized by nitric oxide (NO) and proinflammatory cytokines through activation of multiple pro-inflammatory signaling cascades. The enzymatic conversion of L-arginine to NO, mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), represented a key biochemical pathway involved in numerous physiological processes, including immune regulation, vascular homeostasis, and neural signaling[35]. Under inflammatory conditions induced by LPS, macrophage activation resulted in pathological overproduction of NO coupled with elevated intracellular reactive oxygen species, creating a pro-oxidative state that contributes to cellular dysfunction. As evidenced in Fig. 4b, LPS stimulation markedly elevated NO production to 16.48 µmol/L (p < 0.05 vs. untreated controls). This pro-inflammatory response was significantly attenuated by LJF-2 administration, with measured NO concentrations declining to 13.24, 12.87, and 10.74 µmol/L at 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL, respectively, representing inhibition efficiencies of 19.66%, 21.90%, and 34.83%, respectively (p < 0.05). The concentration-dependent suppression of NO generation clearly demonstrates LJF-2's potent anti-pro-inflammatory activity during allergic reactions.

      As depicted in Fig. 4c, the quantitative analysis demonstrated a substantial increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, with stimulated cells exhibiting 171.83% fluorescence intensity compared to baseline controls (normalized to 100%, p < 0.05). The oxidative stress response was significantly mitigated by LJF-2 administration, showing dose-responsive reductions to 164.46%, 148.20%, and 134.69% at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL, respectively (p < 0.05). This graded suppression of oxidative activity clearly indicated LJF-2's concentration-dependent capacity to attenuate pro-inflammation-induced ROS formation during allergic reactions.

    • The gene expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β) (Fig. 5ac) revealed the distinct transcriptional responses to inflammatory stimulation. As shown in Fig. 5ac, the LPS-treated group served as the positive control (normalized to 1.0), and the unstimulated cells showed markedly reduced expression of proinflammatory markers (p < 0.05), confirming LPS's potent immunostimulatory effects in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Moreover, LJF-2 treatment produced a concentration-dependent suppression of key pro-inflammatory mediators: TNF-α expression declined to 1.03, 0.78, and 0.64; IL-6 expression decreased to 0.85, 0.81, and 0.55; and IL-1β expression reduced to 0.78, 0.77, and 0.68 at 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL doses of LJF-2, respectively (all p < 0.05 vs. LPS group). This graded transcriptional regulation, particularly through TLR4 pathway modulation, substantiates LJF-2's capacity to counteract LPS-induced pro-inflammation in a dose-responsive manner during allergic reactions.

      Figure 5. 

      Effects of LJF-2 on the gene expression level of pro-inflammatory mediators in RAW246.7 macrophages. (a) Effects of LJF-2 on TNF-α secretion. (b) Effects of LJF-2 on IL-6 secretion. (c) Effects of LJF-2 on IL-1β secretion. Note: LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution; NC: Negative Control (untreated cells); Positive Control (LPS-stimulated cells).

    • After investigation of the pro-inflammation inhibition effects of LJF-2 during allergic reactions, the anti-allergic potential of Laminaria japonica fucoidans was further evaluated using RBL-2H3 mast cells. Firstly, the cytotoxicity assessments were performed via the CCK-8 assay to determine the impacts of LJF-2 on the cell viability. As illustrated in Fig. 6a, LJF-2 exhibited no significant reduction in RBL-2H3 proliferation at concentrations ranging from 25 to 400 µg/mL. Compared with the PBS control, the LJF-2 had no significant cytotoxicity on RBL-2H3 mast cells (p > 0.05), confirming the biocompatibility within this dosage range. To optimize reagent utilization, subsequent assays were conducted using LJF-2 at concentrations of 25–100 µg/mL.

      Figure 6. 

      The anti-allergic effects of LJF-2. (a) Cell viability of RBL-2H3 mast cells treated with LJF-2. (b) Effects of LJF-2 on β-hexosaminidase activity. (c) Effects of LJF-2 on histamine secretion. (d) Effects of LJF-2 on ROS secretion. (e) Effects of LJF-2 on Ca2+ secretion. (f) Effects of LJF-2 on STM1 expression. (g) Effects of LJF-2 on TRPC1 expression. Note: LJF: Laminaria japonica fucoidan; LJF-1: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 0.5 mol/L NaCl elution; LJF-2: Laminaria japonica fucoidan with 1.0 mol/L NaCl elution; NC: Negative Control (untreated cells); Positive Control (LPS-stimulated cells).

    • The mast cell degranulation response was evaluated using compound C48/80, a polymeric conjugate formed by the condensation of phenylethylamine with formaldehyde, which potently stimulates cytotoxic responses and promotes granular enzyme secretion. As reported by Zhang et al.[36], this compound induced substantial β-aminohexosaminidase release from RBL-2H3 cells. As presented in Fig. 6b, the RBL-2H3 cells had a marked elevation (p < 0.05) of β-aminohexosaminidase activity following C48/80 stimulation, with the PBS group exhibiting a β-aminohexosaminidase activity of 14.01%. Notably, LJF-2 administration at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL effectively suppressed this degranulation response, reducing β-aminohexosaminidase activity to 13.36%, 11.06%, and 10.79%, respectively (p < 0.05), demonstrating concentration-dependent inhibition of degranulation. Parallel measurements of histamine secretion revealed baseline levels of 12.22 ng/mL in the PBS group (Fig. 6c), which surged to 19.24 ng/mL upon C48/80 challenge (p < 0.05). This response was significantly attenuated by LJF-2 treatment, with histamine concentrations declining from 19.24 to 15.51, 13.92, and 10.13 ng/mL at LJF-2 concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL (p < 0.05 vs. the model group). Collectively, these findings indicated that LJF-2 exerted dose-dependent suppression of both β-aminohexosaminidase activity and histamine release in RBL-2H3 mast cells.

    • Reactive oxygen species (ROS), comprising partially reduced oxygen metabolites, have been extensively implicated in the pathogenesis of hypersensitivity reactions, and inflammatory processes through oxidative stress mechanisms[37]. As shown in Fig. 6d, there was a substantial elevation (127.17%, p < 0.05) in ROS generation in stimulated positive cells, compared to PBS negative controls. This oxidative burst was effectively mitigated by LJF-2 administration, with fluorescence intensities declining to 118.82%, 117.60%, and 106.80% at concentrations of 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL, respectively (p < 0.05). As presented in Fig. 6e, the calcium ions, functioning as pivotal secondary messengers, critically regulate mast cell activation and subsequent mediator release through transmembrane flux modulation[37]. In the activated mast cells, a marked calcium influx was observed (fluorescence intensity: 33503, p < 0.05) that was concentration-dependently attenuated by LJF-2 treatment (30,363.67, 29,609.67, and 28,088 at 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL, respectively, p < 0.05). These findings collectively demonstrated LJF-2 could dose-dependently suppress both oxidative stress and calcium mobilization, substantiating its anti-allergic properties.

    • Mast cell degranulation degree depended on the calcium concentration released from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Following ER calcium release, calcium channel-related proteins STIM1 and TRPC1 were activated[38], leading to the increased extracellular calcium influx and accelerated histamine release. Therefore, the expression levels of STIM1 and TRPC1 were investigated in this work. As shown in Fig. 6f, g, the C48/80 stimulation upregulated the expression of STIM1 and TRPC1 genes, while LJF-2 intervention (25, 50, and 100 µg/mL) significantly downregulated the gene expression of STIM1 (to 0.34, 0.23, and 0.22, respectively), and TRPC1 (to 0.97, 0.51, and 0.26, respectively) in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicated that LJF-2 treatment significantly inhibited the extracellular calcium influx by downregulating the expression of calcium channel proteins (STIM1 and TRPC1) in RBL-2H3 mast cells, thereby reducing cellular degranulation and histamine release.

    • The anti-allergic activity of fucoidans is fundamentally governed by their structural properties, particularly monosaccharide composition and sulfate content[3942]. The 1.0 mol/L NaCl-eluted fraction LJF-2 demonstrated superior anti-allergic efficacy, attributed to its high sulfate (35.07%), and uronic acid (17.20%) content, which facilitate receptor recognition and immunomodulation[20]. Structural analysis revealed prominent hydroxyl absorption (3,433 cm−1), and low esterification, enhancing reactivity[43]. Enriched in rhamnose (21.42%), LJF-2 suppressed oxidative/nitrosative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Its colloidal stability, evidenced by a particle size of 910.2 ± 21.8 nm and high zeta potential, promoted receptor engagement and rapid bioactivity[4446]. These findings establish a clear structure–function relationship for LJF-2's anti-allergic action.

      Moreover, the structural characterization confirmed LJF-2 possesses elevated sulfate (35.07%), and uronic acid (17.20%) content, alongside a high rhamnose composition (21.42%), which are critical for bioactivity[33]. Its superior colloidal stability (zeta potential: −44.83 mV) ensures sustained bioavailability and enhances hyaluronidase inhibition[11,46]. In RAW264.7 macrophages, LJF-2 dose-dependently suppressed LPS-induced ROS/NO production and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), disrupting inflammatory amplification[2,3,47]. In RBL-2H3 mast cells, it inhibited β-hexosaminidase and histamine release by modulating Ca2+ influx via the STIM1/TRPC1 pathway, concurrently reducing ROS generation[3,38,48]. The dual modulation of mast cell degranulation and macrophage activation positions LJF-2 as a promising multi-target anti-allergic agent[49].

      In summary, LJF is a structurally complex macromolecule with multiple bioactivities. In this study, fractions obtained via stepwise NaCl elution were analyzed for composition and anti-allergic potential. Variations in NaCl concentration significantly affected chemical profiles and biological activity. Specifically, elution with 1.0 mol/L NaCl yielded a fraction (LJF-2) enriched in uronic acid and sulfate groups, accompanied by reduced protein content. Structural analysis by monosaccharide composition and FT-IR confirmed heterogeneous polyanionic features. LJF-2 showed the strongest inhibition of hyaluronidase and, in cellular models, suppressed NO, ROS, and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) in LPS-stimulated macrophages, while also inhibiting degranulation and histamine release in activated mast cells. These results indicate that Laminaria japonica fucoidan, particularly the 1.0 mol/L NaCl-eluted fraction, exhibits promising anti-allergic properties, though further in vivo and clinical studies are needed to confirm its therapeutic applicability.

    • This study systematically investigated the anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan fractions fractionated via NaCl gradient elution. Compositional analysis revealed that the fraction eluted with 1.0 mol/L NaCl (LJF-2) was enriched in sulfate groups and uronic acids, correlating with its superior hyaluronidase inhibition. Structural characterization by FT-IR confirmed key functional groups contributing to its polyanionic nature. In cellular models, LJF-2 demonstrated potent dose-dependent suppression of allergic mediators: it inhibited NO/ROS production and downregulated IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α expression in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages, while also reducing degranulation and histamine release in activated RBL-2H3 mast cells. These results highlight LJF-2 as a promising natural anti-allergic agent, warranting further in vivo validation and mechanistic exploration for potential therapeutic applications.

      • The work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32572710). The authors acknowledge the assistance of Analysis and Testing Center, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: data curation: Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, Li Z; investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft: Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, Li Z, Zhang Z; writing—review and editing: Li Z, Lin H, Xiao H, Zhang Z; visualization, supervision, funding acquisition, validation, project administration, conceptualization: Zhang Z. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of China Agricultural University, Zhejiang University and Shenyang Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (1) References (49)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, et al. 2026. Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective. Food Innovation and Advances 5(1): 76−86 doi: 10.48130/fia-0026-0005
    Wu X, Wang W, She Y, Yang J, Huang X, et al. 2026. Unraveling the physicochemical, structural, and anti-allergic properties of Laminaria japonica fucoidan: a structure-function perspective. Food Innovation and Advances 5(1): 76−86 doi: 10.48130/fia-0026-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return