Search
2022 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective

More Information
  • Populus is a genus of 25−30 species of deciduous flowering plants in the family Salicaceae, which are primarily planted in short-rotation planations for producing timber, pulpwood, wooden products as well as bioenergy feedstock; they are also widely planted in agricultural fields and along roadsides as shelter forest belts for windbreak, decoration, and reduction of pollutants and noise. Moreover, their fast-growth and good adaptation to marginal lands enable them to provide some critical ecosystem services at various phytoremediation sites for land restoration and reclaimation. Thanks to their important roles, breeding for fast growing poplar trees has been one of the most important objectives for nearly a century. One of the most demonstrated, documented achievements in this aspect is polyploid breeding, especially triploid breeding. This paper critically reviews the various techniques used in inducing triploid plants, including natural 2n formation, artificial induction of 2n male and female gemmates through chemical or physical treatments, trait characterization of the triploid and tetraploid breeding populations, unveiling the molecular mechanisms underpinning the significantly improved traits, and identification and selection of the best triploid progenies. This review also recapitulated the challenges and strategies facing the future of triploid breeding in Populus, including amelioration of 2n gamete induction techniques and efficiency, selection of the best parents and identification of the best progrenies, utilization of the huge amount of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and other omics data for selecting parents for improving target traits.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Levan A. 1945. The present state of plant breeding by induction of polyploidy. Sveriges Utsä des-fö renings Tidskrift 55:109−43

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Levan A. 1948. Nordisk polyploidif oradling has jordbruksvaxter. pp. 468-490. Nord. Jordhrugsforskn

    [3]

    Dewey DR. 1975. Genome relations of diploid Agropyron libanoticum with diploid and autotetraploid Agropyron stipifolium. Botanical Gazette 136:116−21

    doi: 10.1086/336791

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lewis WH. 1979. Polyploidy: Biological Relevance. Basic Life Science. 13:1−544

    [5]

    Nilsson-Ehle H. 1936. Note regarding the gigas form of Populus tremula found in nature. Hereditas 21:372−82

    Google Scholar

    [6]

    Einspahr DW, Wyckoff GW. 1975. Aspen hybrids promise future source of lake states fiber. Pulp and Paper 49:118−19

    Google Scholar

    [7]

    Einspahr DW. 1984. Production and utilization of triploid hybrid aspen. Aspen Bibliography 58:401−9

    Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chen C, Qi L, Zhang S, Han S, Li X, et al. 2004. The karyptype analysis of triploid poplar. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 22:565−67

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0837.2004.06.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kang X, Wang J. 2010. Poplar polyploid induction technology research (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press

    [10]

    Zhang S, Chen B, Han S, Li X, Ren J, et al. 2005. Chromosome numbers of some Populus taxa from China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 43:539−44

    Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhu Z, Lin H, Kang X. 1995. Studies on allotriploid breeding of Populus tomentosa B301 clones. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 31:499−505

    Google Scholar

    [12]

    Seitz FW. 1954. The occurrence of triploids after self-pollination of anomalous androgynous flowers of a grey poplar. Zeitschrift für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung 3:1−6

    Google Scholar

    [13]

    Manzos AM. 1960. Fast-growing form of Populus balsamifera obtained by pollinating female flowers with fractionated pollen of the same species. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 130:433−35

    Google Scholar

    [14]

    Mohrdiek O. 1976. Progeny studies in poplars of the sections Aigeiros, Tacamahaca and Leuce, with recommendations for further breeding work. Thesis. Georg August Universitat Gottingen, German Federal Republic.

    [15]

    Xi X, Li D, Xu W, Guo L, Zhang J, et al. 2012. 2n egg formation in Populus ×euramericana (Dode) Guinier. Tree Genetics & Genomes 8:1237−45

    doi: 10.1007/s11295-012-0510-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Han Z, Geng X, Du K, Xu C, Yao P, et al. 2018. Analysis of genetic composition and transmitted parental heterozygosity of natural 2n gametes in Populus tomentosa based on SSR markers. Planta 247:1407−21

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2871-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kang X. 2002. Mechanism of 2n pollen occurring in Chinese white poplar. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 24:61−7

    Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang J, Kang X. 2009. Distribution of microtubular cytoskeletons and organelle nucleoids during microsporogenesis in a 2n pollen producer of hybrid Populus. Silvae Genetica 58:220−26

    doi: 10.1515/sg-2009-0028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Zhang Z, Kang X. 2010. Cytological characteristics of numerically unreduced pollen production in Populus tomentosa Carr. Euphytica 173:151−59

    doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-0051-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Johnsson H, Eklundh C. 1940. Colchicine treatment as a method in breeding hardwood species. Svensk Papperstidning 43:373−77

    Google Scholar

    [21]

    Mashkina OS, Burdaeva LM, Belozerova MM, V'yunova LN. 1989. Method of obtaining diploid pollen of woody species. Lesovedenie 1:19−25

    Google Scholar

    [22]

    Mashkina OS, Burdaeva LM, V'yunova LN. 1989. Experimental mutagenesis and polyploidy in breeding forest trees. Lesnaya Genetika, Lesnaya genetika, selektsiya i fiziologiyadrevesnykh rasteniĭ, Voronezh, 25–30 sentyabrya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo simpozi-uma. pp. 136–37.

    [23]

    Kang X, Zhu Z, Lin H. 1999. Study on the effective treating period for pollen chromosome doubling of Populus tomentosa × P.bolleana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 35:21−24

    Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhang Z, Li F. 1992. Studies on chromosome doubling and triploid breeding of white poplar(I): the techniques of the pollen chromosome doubling. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 1992:52−58

    Google Scholar

    [25]

    Li K, Xiao J, Liu G, Li Z. 2006. Optimization of induced 2n pollen grain of Populus ussuriensis Kom by colchicine. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture Sciences 20:282−6

    Google Scholar

    [26]

    Tian M, Li Y, Zhang P, Wan J, Hao J. 2018. Pollen chromosome doubling induced by high temperature exposure to produce hybrid triploids in Populus canescens. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 54:39−47

    Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wang J, Li D, Shang F, Kang X. 2017. High temperature-induced production of unreduced pollen and its cytological effects in Populus. Scientific Reports 7:5281

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05661-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Gulyaeva EM, Sviridova AD. 1979. Method of producing diploid pollen in forest trees. U.S.S.R. Patent #664, 617

    [29]

    Huang Q, Zhang Z, Kang X. 1992. 2n pollen of P. tomentosa × P. bolleana induced by four antimicrotubule agents. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 24:12−15

    Google Scholar

    [30]

    Kang X, Zhu Z, Zhang Z. 2000. Suitable period of high temperature treatment for 2n pollen of Populus tomentosa × P. bolleana. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 22:1−4

    doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2000.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Kang X, Zhu Z. 1997. A study on the 2n pollen vitality and germinant characteristics of white poplar. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 19:402−6

    Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kang X, Zhu Z, Lin H. 2000. Radiosensitivity of different ploidy pollen in poplar and its application. Acta Genetica Sinica 27:78−82

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ewald D, Ulrich K. 2012. In vitro pollination in poplar of section Populus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 111:255−58

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0189-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li Y, Zhu Z, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Kang X. 2000. Obtaining triploids by high and low temperature treating female flower buds of white poplar. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 22:7−12

    doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2000.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Li Y, Zhu Z, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Kang X. 2001. Studies on obtaining triploid by colchicine treatind female flower buds of White poplar. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 37:68−74

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li Y, Ma J, Kang X. 2005. Stages of MMC meiosis and its timely discrimination of white poplars. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 27:70−74

    Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li Y, Kang X, Wang S, Zhang Z, Chen H. 2008. Triploid induction in Populus alba × P. glandulosa by chromosome doubling of female gametes. Silvae Genetica 57:37−40

    doi: 10.1515/sg-2008-0006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wang J, Li D, Kang X. 2012. Induction of unreduced megaspores with high temperature during megasporogenesis inPopulus. Annals of Forest Science 69:59−67

    doi: 10.1007/s13595-011-0152-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Lu M, Zhang P, Kang X. 2013. Induction of 2n female gametes in Populus adenopoda Maxim by high temperature exposure during female gametophyte development. Breeding Science 63:96−103

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.63.96

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Geng X, Ren Y, Han Z, Du K, Kang X. 2018. Production of hybrid triploids via inducing chromosome doubling of megaspore with high temperature treatment in Leuce poplar. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 40:12−18

    doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180215

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kang X, Zhang P, Gao P, Zhao F. 2004. Discovery of a new way of poplar triploids induced with colchicine after pollination. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 26:1−4

    Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wang J, Kang X, Li D. 2012. High temperature-induced triploid production during embryo sac development in Populus. Silvae Genetica 61:85−93

    doi: 10.1515/sg-2012-0011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Wang J, Kang X, Li D, Chen H, Zhang P. 2010. Induction of diploid eggs with colchicine during embryo sac development in Populus. Silvae Genetica 59:40−48

    doi: 10.1515/sg-2010-0005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Kang N, Bai F, Zhang P, Kang X. 2015. Inducing chromosome doubling of embryo sac in Populus tomentosa with high temperature exposure for hybrid triploids. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 37:79−86

    doi: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.02.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Ewald D, Ulrich K, Naujoks G, Schröder MB. 2009. Induction of tetraploid poplar and black locust plants using colchicine: chloroplast number as an early marker for selecting polyploids in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 99:353−57

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9601-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Mattila RE. 1961. On the production of the tetraploid hybrid Aspen by colchicine treatment. Hereditas 47:631−40

    doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1961.tb01792.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Pesina K. 1963. Experimental induction of polyploidy in poplars. Preslia 35:101−9

    Google Scholar

    [48]

    Lu M, Zhang P, Wang J, Kang X, Wu J, et al. 2014. Induction of tetraploidy using high temperature exposure during the first zygote division in Populus adenopoda Maxim. Plant Growth Regulation 72:279−87

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-013-9859-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang J, Shi L, Song S, Tian J, Kang X. 2013. Tetraploid production through zygotic chromosome doubling in Populus. Silva Fennica 47:932

    doi: 10.14214/sf.932

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Einspahr DW. 1965. Colchicine treatment of newly formed embryos of quaking Aspen. Forest Science 11:456−59

    doi: 10.1093/forestscience/11.4.456

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Broertjes C, van Harten AM. 1985. Single cell origin of adventitious buds. Euphytica 34:93−95

    doi: 10.1007/BF00022867

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Cai X, Kang X. 2011. In vitro tetraploid induction from leaf explants of Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag. Plant Cell Reports 30:1771−78

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1085-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Xu C, Huang Z, Liao T, Li Y, Kang X. 2016. In vitro tetraploid plants regeneration from leaf explants of multiple genotypes in Populus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 125:1−9

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0922-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Xu C, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Yao P, Li Y, et al. 2018. Impact of the leaf cut callus development stages of populus on the tetraploid production rate by colchicine treatment. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 37:635−44

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-017-9763-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    De Storme N, Geelen D. 2011. The Arabidopsis mutant jason produces unreduced first division restitution male gametes through a parallel/fused spindle mechanism in meiosis II. Plant Physiology 155:1403−15

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    De Storme N, Geelen D. 2013. Sexual polyploidization in plants-cytological mechanisms and molecular regulation. New Phytologist 198:670−84

    doi: 10.1111/nph.12184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Bastiaanssen HJM, Van Den Berg PMMM, Lindhout P, Jacobsen E, Ramanna MS. 1998. Postmeiotic restitution in 2n-egg formation of diploid potato. Heredity 81:20−27

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00370.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Mendiburu AO, Peloquin SJ. 1977. Bilateral sexual polyploidization in potatoes. Euphytica 26:573−83

    doi: 10.1007/BF00021683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Barone A, Gebhardt C, Frusciante L. 1995. Heterozygosity in 2n Gametes of Potato Evaluated by Rflp Markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91:98−104

    doi: 10.1007/BF00220864

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Dong C, Suo Y, Wang J, Kang X. 2015. Analysis of transmission of heterozygosity by 2n gametes in Populus (Salicaceae). Tree Genetics & Genomes 11:799

    doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0799-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Liao T, Cheng S, Zhu X, Min Y, Kang X. 2016. Effects of triploid status on growth, photosynthesis, and leaf area in Populus. Trees 30:1137−47

    doi: 10.1007/s00468-016-1352-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Dong C, Mao J, Suo Y, Shi L, Wang J, et al. 2014. A strategy for characterization of persistent heteroduplex DNA in higher plants. The Plant Journal 80:282−91

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12631

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Nilsson-Ehle H. 1936. Über eine in der natur gefundene Gigasform von Populus tremula. Hereditas 21:379−82

    doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1936.tb03205.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Weisgerber H, Rau HM, Gartner EJ, Baumeister G, Kohnert H, et al. 1980. 25 years of forest tree breeding in Hesse. Allgemeing-forstzeitschrift 26:665−712

    Google Scholar

    [65]

    Zhu Z. 2006. Genetic improvement of Populus tomentosa Carr. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House

    [66]

    Xu C, Zhang Y, Han Q, Kang X. 2020. Molecular mechanism of slow vegetative growth in Populus tetraploid. Genes 11:1417

    doi: 10.3390/genes11121417

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Zeng Q, Liu Z, Du K, Kang X. 2019. Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in triploid Populus and its effect on plant morphology and anatomy. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 138:571−81

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-019-01654-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Stupar RM, Bhaskar PB, Yandell BS, Rensink WA, Hart AL, et al. 2007. Phenotypic and transcriptomic changes associated with potato autopolyploidization. Genetics 176:2055−67

    doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.074286

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Chaudhary B, Flagel L, Stupar RM, Udall JA, Verma N, et al. 2009. Reciprocal silencing, transcriptional bias and functional divergence of homeologs in polyploid cotton (gossypium). Genetics 182:503−17

    doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.102608

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Buggs RJA, Chamala S, Wu W, Gao L, May GD, et al. 2010. Characterization of duplicate gene evolution in the recent natural allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus by next-generation sequencing and Sequenom iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping. Molecular Ecology 19:132−46

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04469.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Fujimoto R, Taylor JM, Sasaki T, Kawanabe T, Dennis ES. 2011. Genome wide gene expression in artificially synthesized amphidiploids of Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology 77:419

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9820-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ilut DC, Coate JE, Luciano AK, Owens TG, May GD, et al. 2012. A comparative transcriptomic study of an allotetraploid and its diploid progenitors illustrates the unique advantages and challenges of RNA-seq in plant species. American Journal of Botany 99:383−96

    doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Wang S, Chen W, Yang C, Yao J, Xiao W, et al. 2016. Comparative proteomic analysis reveals alterations in development and photosynthesis-related proteins in diploid and triploid rice. BMC Plant Biology 16:199

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0891-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Ni Z, Kim ED, Ha M, Lackey E, Liu J, et al. 2009. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature 457:327−31

    doi: 10.1038/nature07523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Du K, Han Q, Zhang Y, Kang X. 2019. Differential expression of genes related to the formation of giant leaves in triploid poplar. Forests 10:920

    doi: 10.3390/f10100920

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Cheng S, Huang Z, Li Y, Liao T, Suo Y, et al. 2015. Differential transcriptome analysis between Populus and its synthesized allotriploids driven by second-division restitution. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57:1031−45

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12328

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Cheng S, Yang J, Liao T, Zhu X, Suo Y, et al. 2015. Transcriptomic changes following synthesis of a Populus full-sib diploid and allotriploid population with different heterozygosities driven by three types of 2n female gamete. Plant Molecular Biology 89:493−510

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0384-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Wu W, Li J, Wang Q, Lv K, Du K, et al. 2021. Growth-regulating factor 5 (GRF5)-mediated gene regulatory network promotes leaf growth and expansion in poplar. New Phytologist 230:612−28

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Li J, Wang Y, Wei H, Kang X. 2020. Comparative proteomic analysis of leaves at different ages in allotriploid Populus. Forests 11:1154

    doi: 10.3390/f11111154

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Wei H. 2019. Construction of a hierarchical gene regulatory network centered around a transcription factor. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:1021−31

    doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Lin YC, Li W, Sun YH, Kumari S, Wei H, et al. 2013. SND1 transcription factor-directed quantitative functional hierarchical genetic regulatory network in wood formation in Populus trichocarpa. The Plant Cell 25:4324−41

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.117697

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Du K, Liao T, Ren Y, Geng X, Kang X. 2020. Molecular mechanism of vegetative growth advantage in allotriploid Populus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:441

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21020441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Suo Y, Min Y, Dong C, Wang Y, Cheng S, et al. 2017. MicroRNA expression changes following synthesis of three full-sib Populus triploid populations with different heterozygosities. Plant Molecular Biology 95:215−25

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0627-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Bingham ET, Burnham CR, Gates CE. 1968. Double and single backcross linkage estimates in autotetraploid maize. Genetics 59:399−410

    doi: 10.1093/genetics/59.3.399

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Han Z, Han Q, Xia Y, Geng X, Du K, et al. 2020. Construction of a breeding parent population of Populus tomentosa based on SSR genetic distance analysis. Scientific Reports 10:18573

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74941-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Kang X. 2019. Thinking about clonal breeding strategy of forest trees. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 41:1−9

    doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Dong C, Suo Y, Kang X. 2014. Assessment of the genetic composition of triploid hybrid Populus using SSR markers with low recombination frequencies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44:692−99

    doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0360

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Geng X, Lu T, Du K, Yang J, Kang X. 2021. Variation of homologous recombination in Populus tomentosa with different genotypes. Hereditas 43:182−93

    doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.20-205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Finnegan EJ, Kovac KA. 2000. Plant DNA methyltransferases. Plant Molecular Biology 43:189−201

    doi: 10.1023/A:1006427226972

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Kashkush K, Feldman M, Levy AA. 2003. Transcriptional activation of retrotransposons alters the expression of adjacent genes in wheat. Nature Genetics 33:102−6

    doi: 10.1038/ng1063

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. 2007. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. The Plant Cell 19:3403−17

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Suo Y, Dong C, Kang X. 2015. Inheritance and variation of cytosine methylation in three Populus allotriploid populations with different heterozygosity. Plos One 10:e0126491

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126491

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004
    Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004

Figures(8)

Article Metrics

Article views(7618) PDF downloads(2050)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective

Forestry Research  2 Article number: 4  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Populus is a genus of 25−30 species of deciduous flowering plants in the family Salicaceae, which are primarily planted in short-rotation planations for producing timber, pulpwood, wooden products as well as bioenergy feedstock; they are also widely planted in agricultural fields and along roadsides as shelter forest belts for windbreak, decoration, and reduction of pollutants and noise. Moreover, their fast-growth and good adaptation to marginal lands enable them to provide some critical ecosystem services at various phytoremediation sites for land restoration and reclaimation. Thanks to their important roles, breeding for fast growing poplar trees has been one of the most important objectives for nearly a century. One of the most demonstrated, documented achievements in this aspect is polyploid breeding, especially triploid breeding. This paper critically reviews the various techniques used in inducing triploid plants, including natural 2n formation, artificial induction of 2n male and female gemmates through chemical or physical treatments, trait characterization of the triploid and tetraploid breeding populations, unveiling the molecular mechanisms underpinning the significantly improved traits, and identification and selection of the best triploid progenies. This review also recapitulated the challenges and strategies facing the future of triploid breeding in Populus, including amelioration of 2n gamete induction techniques and efficiency, selection of the best parents and identification of the best progrenies, utilization of the huge amount of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and other omics data for selecting parents for improving target traits.

    • Tree polyploid breeding can involve the selection of naturally occurring polyploids and the artificial induction of polyploids. Natural polyploid plants have typically undergone long-term natural selection and adaptation, hence they exhibit strong genetic stability and adaptability. However, the number of naturally occurring polyploid plants is limited due to low fertility or infertility. As a result, identification of polyploid plants from a natural population is a great challenge for breeding and utilization. Moreover, although natural polyploids exhibit strong adaptability, their important economic traits may not meet human needs. As the technologies advance, and the advantages of polyploid plants, as well as the underlying mechanisms are unveiled, we will enter an era of artificial induction of polyploidy in plants.

      According to Levan[1,2], the plants that are particularly suitable for improvement via chromosome doubling are those that have relatively small numbers of chromosomes, large vegetative bodies as target traits, and are capable of cross-pollination. Later, Dewey added two more characteristics: perennial habit and vegetative reproduction[3]. Lewis[4] maintained that reducing the dependence on seed production was important for the success of polyploid breeding as poplyploids, especially triploid plants, lack the ability to produce seeds. Compared with annual herbaceous plants, many forest trees can propagate vegetatively, and thus do not rely on reproduction of seeds for commercial utilization of polyploids. Furthermore, their perennial habits guarantee that new genotypes in which genetic gains are fixed can be utilized continuously for a long period after being successfully bred. Consequently, polyploid breeding of forest trees shows great potential for the development of new varieties especially fast-growing clones with short-rotation and high productivity.

      Among forest trees, Populus, including 25−30 species, collectively called poplar and aspen, has been the subject of the most intensive research through polyploid breeding. The developmental stages for induction of chromosome doubling in microspores, megaspores, embryo sacs, zygotes, and somatic cells have been ascertained, and some real-time discrimination techniques for most appropriate time have been developed. A number of highly efficient systems for the induction of chromosome doubling in aforementioned tissues to cells have been established for generating triploids and tetraploids efficiently. Significant progress has also been made in understanding the trait variations in triploid and tetraploid poplar trees and their underlying formation mechanisms, resulting in theoretical and technical advances in the polyploid breeding of forest trees. In this review article, we will review these advances and discuss the challenges, strategies and perspective of polyploid breeding of poplars.

    • Nilsson-Ehle[5] first found a giant triploid P. tremula in Sweden that had very large leaves and grew rapidly. This discovery brought widespread attention to using polyploid breeding and marked the beginning of poplar polyploid breeding. In the following seven decades, a series of new varieties of polyploids have been selected or bred and widely utilized in forestry[611], which laid the foundation for the induction and utilization of polyploidy Populus.

    • Hybridization with natural 2n gametes is the most economical way to obtain triploids. Seitz first discovered that bisexual flowers of P. canescens (with partial anthers on the female inflorescences) could produce unreduced pollens; and self-pollination between the female portions of the bisexual flowers and the unreduced pollens yielded about 1% triploids[12]. Since then, 2n pollens have been found in P. balsamifera[13], P. canescens[14], and P. tomentosa (Fig. 1[9,11]). Triploids produced by crossing unreduced pollens with haploid female gametes showed much faster growth. However, to produce triploids by crossing haploid pollens with unreduced female 2n gametes encountered some challenges as the 2n female gametes could not be detected visually by morphological observation. The occurrence of 2n female gametes is generally indirectly determined by the appearance of triploid offsprings. Unquestionably, the other way to detect the 2n female gametes is to hybridize the 2n pollens with a female parent that may potentially produce gametes. For example, crossing of 2n pollens of P. nigra var. italica (Moench.) with P. × euramericana resulted in a tetraploid plant[15]. Natural 2n female gametes have later been found in the same way in P. tomentosa[16].

      Figure 1. 

      Natural occurrence of unreduced 2n pollens in Populus tomentosa. (a) Enlarged pollen grains produced by male clone B105 of P. tomentosa; (b) Enlarged pollen grains produced by male clone B111 P. tomentosa; (c) Chromosome number (n = 2x = 38) of an enlarged pollen; (d) Chromosome number (n = x = 19) of a normal pollen; (e) Germinated 2n pollens on medium; (f) Germinated 2n pollens on the stigma. (Figure source: References [9], [11])

      In contrast to wide occurance of 2n pollen formation, natural 2n female gametogenesis in Populus appears to occur at lower frequencies, presumably because of the much smaller quantity compared to that of pollen. Unlike 2n pollen, natural 2n female gametes do not experience a competitive process for fertilization with haploid female gametes. Therefore, 2n female gametes are hard to acquire for triploid breeding despite their low occurrence rate.

      Relative to the description of 2n gamete formation, fewer studies have focused on the cellular mechanism of 2n gamete formation in Populus. Previous studies have shown that 2n pollen formation in P. tomentosa may arise from the fusion of spindle poles in some cells, the disappearance of the phragmoplasts, or premature cytokinesis in meiosis II[1719].

    • To improve the efficiency of 2n gamete formation and triploid breeding, artificial induction of chromosome doubling in microspores has been widely used to create polyploid plants. Johnsson and Ecklundh first applied colchicine to P. tremula and P. tremuloides male flower branches to obtain 2n pollen[20]; they then pollinated female inflorescences with the 2n pollen and successfully obtained triploid plants[20]. Since then, 2n pollen hs been induced in other species including P. deltoides[20], Pinus sylvestris[21], P. balsamifera[21], P. alba[22], P. tomentosa × P. bolleana[23], P. alba × P. glandulosa[24], P. ussuriensis[25], Populus canescens[26], P. alba × P. tremula[21] and P. pseudo-simonii[27] by chemical or physical treatments (Fig. 2[9,23]) for generating triploids. The most efficient chemical is colchicine with an optimal concentration of 0.2%−0.5%, whereas the most appropriate physical treatment is a high temperature in the range of 38−40 °C[9,21,2326,28,29]. Compared with chemical induction, physical induction is a simple and inexpensive approach and thus enables batch treatment of more plant materials at one time. However, it is difficult to ensure the production of high quality 2n pollen when male flower branches are cultured in tap water, and more efficient techniques that can yield higher quality of 2n pollens remain to be optimized due to unsynchronized developmental stages of flowers in the branches.

      Figure 2. 

      Pollen chromosome doubling of P. tomentosa × P. bolleana induced by colchicine. (a) 2n pollens induced by colchicine. The arrow indicates a normal pollen. (b) Chromosome number (n = 2x = 38) of an induced 2n pollen. (c) Chromosome number (n = x = 19) of a normal pollen. (d) Germination of induced 2n pollen on medium. (e) Germination of induced 2n pollens on the pistil stigma. (f) Chromosomes are aggregated into clusters after colchicine treatment. (Figure source: References [9], [23])

      Understanding the cytokinetic processes and mechanisms can help to increase the induction efficiency of 2n pollen formation. First, it is critical to identify the sensitive stage for induction of 2n pollen. The meiotic pachytene of pollen mother cells (PMCs) was found to be the most sensitive stage to induce pollen chromosome doubling with colchicine. Likewise, the most effective phase to induce pollen chromosome doubling with high temperature is from the diakinesis to metaphase I phases of PMCs (Fig. 3[9,23]). More than 80% 2n pollen could be produced by these methods[23,30]. However, it is impossible to obtain 100% artificially induced 2n pollen owing to the asynchronous meiosis of PMCs. As a result, the induced 2n pollen are always mixed with regular haploid pollens. Compared with normal pollens, unreduced pollens show poorer fertilization competitiveness due to their stunted development, resulting in a low percentage of triploid plants after pollination with 2n pollen[31].

      Figure 3. 

      Meiotic stages of microspore mother cells in P. tomentosa × P. bolleana. (a) Leptotene; (b) Pachytene; (c) Diplotene; (d) Diakinesis. (Figure source: References [9], [23])

      Since haploid and diploid pollens have different sensitivities to 60C o-γ-ray radiation, a specific dose of 60C o-γ-ray can be applied to inhibit the development of haploid pollen. This kind of treatment results in an increase in the competitiveness of 2n pollen and results in as much as 3.8% of triploid plants[32]. Ewald and Ulrich also produced 0.27%−2.38% triploid poplars through microscopic selection of 2n pollens via in vitro pollination[33]. However, the generation rate of triploids through crossings with artificially inducted 2n pollen remains low because of the high competitiveness of haploid pollen, limiting the utility of this approach for triploid poplar breeding.

    • Compared to induced 2n pollen, induced 2n female gametes can be pollinated with normal pollen more easily to obtain triploid plants due to a lack of competitive process among 2n female gametes during pollination. Li et al. demonstrated this in P. tomentosa × P. bolleana[34,35]. After the female flower buds were treated with either colchicine or high temperature, 100% 2n female gametes, upon being pollinated with normal pollen, developed into triploids. Therefore, the induction of 2n female gametes rather than the pollination/crossing process is the most critical step for success. Mounting evidence indicates that the meiotic phase of megaspore mother cells is the most important factor that affects chromosome doubling. However, it is difficult to determine the exact meiotic phase of megaspore mother cells. In higher plants, the development of female buds is highly synchronized with male buds for the best pollination. Hence the most appropriate meiotic phase for inducing chromosome doubling of female gametes can be estimated by the developmental phase of male gametes[36,37] or the developmental morphology of the female flower buds (Fig. 4[38]). The optimal treatment periods for chromosome doubling in megaspores are the pachytene to diplotene phases for colchicine treatment and the diplotene to metaphase I phases for high temperature treatment. As demonstrated in several previous studies, 16.7%−66.7% triploids can be obtained[3640].

      Figure 4. 

      Meiosis of megaspore mother cells in 'Zheyin #3' and its relationship to female flower bud development. (a) In the pachytene stage, the flower buds swell, and the bud scales crack but are not yet open. (b) In the diplotene stage, the bud scales are slightly open, but the inflorescence is not exposed. (c) In metaphase I, the bud scales are open, and the inflorescence is slightly exposed. (d) In metaphase II, the bud scales are fully open one third of the inflorescence has emerged from the bud scales. Scale = 10 μm. (Figure source: Reference [38])

      Poplar embryo sac development follows the typical polygonum-type development process. Three rounds of mitosis are required for a megaspore to develop into the mature embryo sac. Based on this fact, 2n female gametes can be induced by physical or chemical treatment during the embryo sac development. Kang et al. used P. alba as the female parent and P. tomentosa as the male parent, and treated the female inflorescence for 24−36 h after pollination with 0.2% colchicine solution and obtained 57.1% triploid plants[41]. The optimal treatment stage for chromosome doubling of the embryo sac in 'Zheyin #3' was at the four-nucleate stage[42,43]. The highest triploid generation rate of 66.7% was achieved when colchicine treatment was conducted for 54−66 h after pollination[43]. When high temperature treatment was applied for 66−72 h after pollination, the highest triploid generation rate was 83.3%[38,39,44].

    • Many studies have investigated chromosome doubling in somatic or zygote cells in poplar, mainly by applying physical or chemical treatments to terminal buds[45], seeds[46], developing embryo sac[37], calli[47], and zygotes[48,49] to induce tetraploid plants[22,4550]. Adventitious buds cultured in vitro originated from single cells[51]. Therefore, when adventitious bud primordial cells are formed, physical or chemical treatments can effectively induce chromosome doubling while avoiding the production of chimeras, making it an ideal means for the induction of chromosome doubling in in vitro somatic cells[52]. The optimal treatment conditions for chromosome doubling in somatic cells differed among genotypes of P. cathayana hybrid seedlings[53]. Factors such as the pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time have significant effects on tetraploid induction rate in in vitro culture[52,53]. When a thin layer of callus cells begins to form on the incision of explants such as in vitro cultured leaves, 7.9%−13.2% tetraploids can be produced by colchicine treatment[54].

      Chromosome doubling can also be induced after pollination in zygote cells. Because a zygote is a fertilized egg cell, all tetraploid plants formed are non-chimeras. Mashkina et al. obtained tetraploid plants in P. alba by treating zygotes with colchicine at the first mitosis stage[22]. However, the optimal treatment stages for the chromosome doubling in zygote cells remains unknown. By treating large amounts of plant materials, most studies resulted in poor repeatability and low induction efficiency. A correlation has been reported between the development of flocculent fibers (seed hairs) in the poplar ovary and the development of the zygote[48,49]. When the flocculent fibers in the ovary begin to wrap the middle and lower parts of the ovule but have not yet completely covered it (Fig. 5[49]), physical or chemical treatments effectively induced zygote chromosome doubling in P. adenopoda and a (P. pseudo-simonii × P. nigra 'Zheyin #3') × (P. × beijingensis) hybrid, and obtained as high as 14.1%[48] and 7.41%[49] tetraploid plants, respectively.

      Figure 5. 

      Developmental stages of zygote and flocculent fibers in the ovary of 'Zheyin #3' × P. beijingensis. (a) During double fertilization, flocculent fibers occur around the funicle in the ovary, but they are not visible to the naked eye. (b) The dormant zygote forms after fertilization, and the flocculent fibers cover the surface of the funicle and are visible to the naked eye. (c) In the two-celled embryo stage, the flocculent fibers begin to wrap the ovule but do not fill the ovary. (d) In the globular embryo stage, flocculent fibers completely wrap the ovule and fill the ovary. Scale = 10 μm. (Figure source: Referencecs [49])

    • There are three main methods of breeding triploids based on 2n gamete induction: 1) first division restitution (FDR)[55], the FDR gametes comprise the non-sister chromatids of each homologous chromosome (FDR); 2) second division restitution[56], FDR gametes comprise of the sister chromatids of each homologous chromosome (SDR); and 3) post-meiotic restitution gamete (PMR), meiotically formed haploid spores undergo an extra round of genome duplication, and consequently yield fully homozygous 2n gametes[57]. Theoretically, FDR-type and SDR-type 2n gametes contain 70%–80% and 30%–40% of the heterozygosity of their parents, respectively[58,59]. For example, the heterozygosity of FDR-, SDR-, and PMR-type 2n gametes from the same P. cathayana parent combination were 74.8%, 39.6%, and 35.9%, respectively[60]. Three triploid populations produced by these three methods also differ in growth, photosynthetic, and physiological traits. The highest average values of growth traits were observed in the FDR-type triploid population. Although the highest average values of growth traits for the SDR-type and the PMR-type triploid population, there were also some excellent genotypes[61]. This is because regions with high transcript abundance have higher frequencies of homologous recombination[62].

    • Height and diameter are the two most prominent traits that significantly increase in triploid poplars. Nilsson-Ehle found tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and overall volume of natural triploid P. tremula were 11%, 10%, and 36% higher than those of diploids, respectively[63]. The growth in height and DBH of triploid P. tremuloides x P. tremula hybrids were at least 20% higher than those of same-aged diploids[6,7,64]. The stem volume of the triploid clone B301 of P. tomentosa was 3.5 times that of its diploid parent[11] (Fig. 6).

      Figure 6. 

      Eight-year-old triploid P. tomentosa trees show significant advantages in growth over diploid clones (not the same parents). Triploids are on the left, and diploids are on the right.

      All elite varieties of poplars widely cultivated in China, such as P. × canadensis 'I-214', P. × euramericana 'Zhonglin-46', P. × langfangensis-3, and P. alba × P. berolinensis, are triploids that were bred by selection from thousands of hybrid offspring[8,10]. They all exhibited remarkable advantage in vegetative growth.

      Larger sizes of cells and organs are clearly shown in triploid poplars. Larger tree stems and leaves were first indicators of natural polyploid poplars[63]. The widths of leaves of one-year-old seedlings in triploid P. tomentosa reached 53 cm[9]. Leaf areas of most individuals of the triploid population obtained by sexual polyploidization exhibit much greater than those of the diploid individuals derived from the same parents[9], but some exceptions of triploid plants with leaf areas smaller than diploid plants are also observed. Greater leaf sizes increase the photosynthetic areas and promote the vegetative growth of triploids. Triploids also have longer fibers. For example, the average fiber length of a triploid hybrid of P. tremula × P. deltoides is 18% longer than that of the diploid control[6]. The average fiber length of 5-year-old triploid P. tomentosa is 1.28 mm, 52% longer than that of diploid P. tomentosa with the same age[65]; these triploid poplars also contain 17.9% lower lignin content and 5.8% more α-cellulose content[65] as compared to diploids. The low lignin and high cellulose content of triploid poplars are due to the reduced number of fiber cells per unit volume, which reduces the cell surface area. Their rapid growth, long fibers, and low lignin content make triploid poplars excellent raw material for fiber industries such as pulping and papermaking.

      There are significant differences in seedling growth and photosynthetic parameters among triploid hybrids produced using different chromosome doubling techniques and parental combinations. Triploid seedlings are significantly higher in average height, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, and net photosynthetic rate of leaves at different positions, and larger in leaf area, diameter growth as compared with the diploid seedlings produced from the same parental lines. Moreover, there are greater variations in seedling growth, photosynthetic rate, leaf area, and chlorophyll fluorescence among different triploid individuals within than between populations[9,61]. This is likely because these growth-related traits are typically controlled by multiple genes and display a normal distribution in the population. This suggests that growth-related traits in triploid plants depend not only on the dose effect of chromosome doubling but also on the heterozygous effect conferred by the two distinct parents.

      Although tetraploid poplars also have large cells, they generally grow slower compared with diploid and triploid poplars. Tetraploid P. cathayana has significantly larger guard cells but significantly slower height growth than the diploid counterparts[9,54]. It was found that the leaf area and photosynthetic rate at the tenth leaf position in tetraploid poplars are 0.17%−150.98% and 9.50%−57.53% higher than those of the diploid counterparts, respectively. However, after the formation of the tenth leaf, as the age increases, the area and net photosynthetic rate in the tetraploid plants beyond the tenth leaves are 16.07%−49.32% and 12.75%−48.66% lower than those of the diploid counterparts[66]. Overall, tetraploids grow slower than diploids because the total number of leaves is 75% less and the gross photosynthetic rate is 34.48% lower in tetraploid plants as compared to those in diploid plants[66]. In a few cases of hexaploid poplars produce by somatic chromosome doubling of triploids, they exhibit enlarged stomata, slower height growth, but shorter, thicker, and fewer roots[67].

    • A considerable amount of research has been conducted to understand the genetic mechanisms that regulate the growth and development of polyploid plants. Microarray analysis and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) have revealed a large number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in polyploids. Among the total DEGs, 5%−10% DEGs have expression levels significantly higher than those of the mid-parents value[6872]; similar phenotypes were found in triploid rice[73] and Arabidopsis tetraploids[74]. The circadian clock regulators, CCA1 and LHY, induce expression of TOC1, GI and downstream genes in Arabidopsis tetraploids during the daytime, augmenting the transcription of genes involved in photosynthesis, and starch metabolism. Although a great number of DEGs in the leaves of poplar triploids with fast growth or tetraploids with slower vegetative growth are identified, the number of circadian clock regulator-driven genes is not observed in DEGs of these polyploids[66,75], indicating that the interactions among the more than three or four sets of chromosomes may obstruct normal gene expression.

      Transcriptomic and proteomic studies in triploid poplars have revealed that the number of DEGs in terminal buds and young leaves are about 30 times greater than that of diploids[76,77]. These DEGs are mainly involved in metabolic processes, cell proliferation, DNA methylation, cell division, and meristem growth and development. In triploid poplar leaves, transcription factors (e.g., WRKY and MYB) and genes related to hormones (e.g., auxin and brassinosteroids) and growth (e.g., growth-regulting factor 5 (GRF5)) are significantly upregulated, leading to faster cell division and leaf growth associated with high photosynthetic capacity and photoassimilate accumulation in leaves[75,78]. Comparative proteomics studies on poplar triploids revealed that differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in developing leaves are significantly enriched in the pathways related to photoreaction, photorespiration, the Calvin cycle, starch and sucrose metabolisms, the oxidative pentose phosphate (OPP) pathway, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, nitrogen metabolism, and other major metabolic pathways and processes[79]. Wu et al.[78] used a top-down graphical Gaussian model (GGM) algorithm[80,81] to reconstruct the regulatory network-mediated by growth-regulating factor, GRF5-1[78]. This network operates in the leaf primordia and young leaves, and directly regulates leaf size and vegetative growth. Yeast one-hybrid screens (Y1H), electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), and dual luciferase analyses confirmed that GRF5-1 directly binds to the promoter of the cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase 1 gene, CKX1, and represses its expression[78]. Overexpression of GRF5-1 in diploid poplar 84k produces larger leaves comparable to those of triploid poplar. Moreover, the zeatin and isopentenyl adenosine (IPA) content significantly escalate in the apical buds and the third-position leaves, implying the increase of leaf cytokinin content which in turn results in larger leaves, higher photosynthetic rates, and faster growth[78]. Since GRF5-1 is a gene that is selectively boosted in poplar triploids, the above results suggest that selective activation of some growth-regulators is one mechanism underlying the advantage of vegetative growth in triploid poplars[78].

      Transcript abundances are not always consistent with the abundance of their corresponding proteins in triploid poplar leaves, indicating that the traits changed may, to some degree, be regulated by post-transcriptional regulation[79]. RNA-seq studies of DEGs in triploid P. cathayana leaves showed that, compared with diploids, allotriploid P. cathayana showed significant changes of genes involved in vegetative growth[82]. However, miRNAs related to vegetative growth traits in allotriploids are expressed at similar levels to those in diploids during leaf development[83] and no obvious dose effect is observed in vegetative growth-related miRNA expression in triploid leaves. These results imply that transcription and post-transcriptionally may be syncronized to empower greater vegetative growth in allotriploid P. cathayana (Fig. 7[82]).

      Figure 7. 

      Genetic regulation model of allotriploid P. cathayana with enhanced vegetative growth. Arrows indicate promotion, and short lines indicate inhibition. The three solid lines next to 'mRNAs' indicate the dose effect in the triploid, and the dotted lines next to 'miRNAs' indicate the lack of a dose effect. (Figure source: Reference [82])

      To understand the slower-growing tetraploid poplars, RNA-seq and miRNA-seq were performed and the results revealed a dosage effect of miRNA expression on leaf growth in tetraploid poplar[53,66]. The differentially expressed miRNAs whose target genes are positively, and negatively correlated with vegetative growth manifest a gradually increased and decreased expression, respectively. These changes resulted in the suppression of vegetative growth-related gene expression, ultimately causing slower vegetative growth in the tetraploids (Fig. 8[66]). These results are consistent with the genetic regulatory model of allotriploid P. cathayana with enhanced vegetative growth[75].

      Figure 8. 

      Molecular regulatory model of tetraploid poplars with slower vegetative growth than triploid poplars. Arrows indicate promotion, and short lines indicate inhibition. The red curves represent the expression of differentially expressed miRNAs positively associated with tetraploid vegetative growth or DEGs positively associated with vegetative growth. The blue curves represent the expression of differentially expressed miRNAs or DEGs negatively associated with tetraploid vegetative growth. ET, ethylene; EP: expressed protein; NRG, negative related growth; ABA: Abscisic acid; JA: asmonic acid; GA: gibberellic acid; FC: fold change. (Figure source: Reference [66])

    • Polyploid breeding in poplars has proven that triploids consistently show vegetative growth advantages over either diploid counterparts (e.g., with same parents) or unrelated artificially selected diploid trees (e.g., elite clones). As a result, triploid breeding has become the the major focus of poplar research and and an effective approach to increase vegetative growth and wood productivity. Multiple trait improvements has been achieved through a single round of breeding, resulting in new poplar varieties with fast growth, long fibers, low lignin but high fiber content that are suitable for short-rotation fiber industries. In the past two decades, empherical protocols in chromosome doubling techniques for megaspores, embryo sacs, zygotes, and somatic cells have been developed, enabling the rapid and efficient production of triploid poplars. Nevertheless, some problems and challenges still exist, and the underlying mechanisms of polyploid breeding remain fragmented, and more technical details need to be developed. To achieve the goals of genetic improvement, future research plans and strategies may need to be refocused on the following aspects:

      Firstly, despite the fact that polyploid induction through chromosome doubling can be achieved, the efficiency remains low and less predictable. Although the gamete chromosome doubling induced via physical condition or chemical regeants has shown to yield significantly improved growth traits of triploids[9,40,44], the more efficient and predictable protocols with different chromosome doubling techniques must be developed to obtain a large number of polyploid varieties with significant heterosis in various target traits of interest.

      Secondly, the construction of breeding populations and the selection of hybrid parents for polyploid poplar breeding are critically important for further improvement of the breeding efficiency. Present studies have shown that polyploid plants seem to rely on heterozygosity to generate the heterosis[84]. In the polyploids that were acquired by physical or chemical treatments of parents to induce 2n gametes, the traits such as growth of the triploid offspring show great differences[9,40,44]. In full-sib populations derived from different combinations of P. tomentosa parents that were crossed without any physical or chemical treatment, some hybridization offspring were triploids. The triploids of the best parental combinations exhibited distinct growth advantage in diameter and height[16,85]. To fully realize the benefits of triploid poplar breeding, we should emphasize the construction of the breeding population and the selection of elite parents for polyploid breeding. For example, we can take the advantage of SSR genetic distance information, and elite paternal parent selection and genetic assessment to construct more effective breeding populations, and then produce new triploid poplar varieties with superior growth traits through gamete chromosome doubling. The ploidy advantages derived from chromosome doubling and the heterosis generated by the combination of distinct parents can thus be used more effectively[85,86]. Furthermore, genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metablomic information can be integrated to assess and accelerate construction of breeding populations and selection of hybrid parent pairs that can generate high heterosis.

      Thirdly, besides parental selection, the influence of different gamete induction methods on the efficiency of polyploid breeding should be taken into account as the three 2n gamete induction methods, FDR, SDR and PMR, can generate gametes with distinct heterozygosity[62,87,88]. More attention should be paid to FDR 2n gametes in practical work as they possess a relatively higher heterozygosity and can thus more efficiently transfer parental heterozygosity and epistasis to the progeny. Nevertheless, SDR- or PMR-type 2n gametes may be more suitable for triploid breeding if tree species exhibit poor synchrony in meiosis I during gametogenesis.

      Finally, unveiling the genetic regulatory mechanisms of vegetative growth traits in polyploid poplars is also critically important for designing effective breeding plans and strategies and achieving the highest genetic gains on various traits. Previous studies have revealed that gene expression of polyploid poplars involves post-transcriptional regulation. For instance, miRNA expression levels determine the expression levels of their target genes and associated traits[66,75]. However, it remains unclear why the miRNA expression in tetraploids shows an obvious dosage effect during leaf development, whereas the miRNA expression in triploids does not. Studies also show that polyploidization can lead to changes in DNA methylation, thereby impacting gene expression[8991]. The DNA methylation level of terminal buds in triploid poplars was found to be lower than that of diploid poplars based on methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) markers[92]. Several questions then arise: Is the differential expression of miRNAs associated with these changes in DNA methylation after chromosome doubling in polyploid poplars? If so, how does DNA methylation regulate the expression of miRNAs and their target genes after polyploidization? Further investigation of variation in DNA methylation patterns and their correlation with gene expression and post-transcriptional regulation may help us to better understand the genetic control of vegetative growth in plants with different somatic ploidy levels and may enable us to design more effective research plans for poplar polyploid breeding.

      Due to their large body sizes, long juvenile periods, and long lifespans of forest trees, it is inappropriate to use crop breeding strategies to achieve high levels of heterosis in trees. Strategies that are specifically suitable for poplar breeding must be developed. The superior performance of polyploid poplars produced by sexual polyploidization provides a new approach for the rapid development of poplar breeding. In light of global climate change and increasing lumber shortages, polyploid breeding of poplars is likely to become more practical as the awareness of its high value and development of new technologies and methods continues. Polyploid breeding will play an important role in breeding new poplar varieties with high-quality, fast-growth and stress tolerance.

      • This work was funded by the National 14th Five-Year Key R&D Program Project (2021YFD2200105).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  References (92)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004
    Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return