Search
2022 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees

More Information
  • Trees convert and store the majority of their photosynthetic products in wood which is an essential renewable resource much in demand by human society. Formation of wood follows a process of consecutive cell developmental stages, from vascular cambium proliferation, cell expansion and differentiation, secondary cell wall deposition to programmed cell death, which is controlled by the functionality of complex molecular networks. What are the molecular networks involved in wood formation? How do the molecular networks act in a way to generate wood tissue during tree growth? What are the regulatory modules that lead to the formation of various wood characteristics? The answers to these questions are fundamental to understanding how trees grow, as well as how we can genetically engineer trees with desired properties of wood for human needs. In recent years, a great deal of interest has been invested in the elucidation of wood formation at the molecular level. This review summarizes the current state of understanding of the molecular process that guides wood formation in trees.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237−40

    doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li L, Lu S, Chiang V. 2006. A genomic and molecular view of wood formation. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25:215−33

    doi: 10.1080/07352680600611519

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Plomion C, Leprovost G, Stokes A. 2001. Wood Formation in Trees. Plant Physiology 127:1513−23

    doi: 10.1104/pp.010816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Smetana O, Mäkilä R, Lyu M, Amiryousefi A, Sánchez Rodríguez F, et al. 2019. High levels of auxin signalling define the stem-cell organizer of the vascular cambium. Nature 565:485−89

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0837-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Tuominen H, Puech L, Fink S, Sundberg B. 1997. A radial concentration gradient of indole-3-acetic acid is related to secondary xylem development in hybrid aspen. Plant Physiology 115:577−85

    doi: 10.1104/pp.115.2.577

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Immanen J, Nieminen K, Smolander OP, Kojima M, Alonso Serra J, et al. 2016. Cytokinin and auxin display distinct but interconnected distribution and signaling profiles to stimulate cambial activity. Current Biology 26:1990−97

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Brackmann K, Qi J, Gebert M, Jouannet V, Schlamp T, et al. 2018. Spatial specificity of auxin responses coordinates wood formation. Nature Communications 9:875

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03256-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zheng S, He J, Lin Z, Zhu Y, Sun J, et al. 2021. Two MADS-box genes regulate vascular cambium activity and secondary growth by modulating auxin homeostasis in Populus. Plant Communications 2:100134

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Moyle R, Schrader J, Stenberg A, Olsson O, Saxena S, et al. 2002. Environmental and auxin regulation of wood formation involves members of the Aux/IAA gene family in hybrid aspen. The Plant Journal 31:675−85

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01386.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Nilsson J, Karlberg A, Antti H, Lopez-Vernaza M, Mellerowicz E, et al. 2008. Dissecting the molecular basis of the regulation of wood formation by auxin in hybrid aspen. The Plant Cell 20:843−55

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055798

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Xu C, Shen Y, He F, Fu X, Yu H, et al. 2019. Auxin-mediated Aux/IAA-ARF-HB signaling cascade regulates secondary xylem development in Populus. New Phytologist 222:752−67

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15658

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kalluri UC, Difazio SP, Brunner AM, Tuskan GA. 2007. Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biology 7:59

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-59

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Nieminen K, Immanen J, Laxell M, Kauppinen L, Tarkowski P, et al. 2008. Cytokinin signaling regulates cambial development in poplar. PNAS 105:20032−37

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805617106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Fu X, Su H, Liu S, Du X, Xu C, Luo K. 2021. Cytokinin signaling localized in phloem noncell-autonomously regulates cambial activity during secondary growth of Populus stems. New Phytologist 230:1476−88

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kim SK, Abe H, Little CHA, Pharis RP. 1990. Identification of 2 Brassinosteroids from the Cambial Region of Scots Pine (Pinus-Silverstris) by Gas-Chromatography Mass-Spectrometry, after Detection Using a Dwarf Rice Lamina Inclination Bioassay. Plant Physiology 94:1709−13

    doi: 10.1104/pp.94.4.1709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Du J, Gerttula S, Li Z, Zhao S, Liu Y, et al. 2020. Brassinosteroid regulation of wood formation in poplar. New Phytologist 225:1516−30

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15936

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Junghans U, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Polle A, Teichmann T. 2004. Effect of auxin transport inhibitors and ethylene on the wood anatomy of poplar. Plant Biology 6:22−29

    doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44712

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Love J, Björklund S, Vahala J, Hertzberg M, Kangasjärvi J, et al. 2009. Ethylene is an endogenous stimulator of cell division in the cambial meristem of Populus. PNAS 106:5984−89

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811660106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Mauriat M, Moritz T. 2009. Analyses of GA20ox- and GID1-over-expressing aspen suggest that gibberellins play two distinct roles in wood formation. The Plant Journal 58:989−1003

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03836.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Arend M, Fromm J. 2013. Concomitant analysis of cambial abscisic acid and cambial growth activity in poplar. Trees 27:1271−76

    doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0875-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Fletcher JC. 2020. Recent Advances in Arabidopsis CLE Peptide Signaling. Trends in Plant Science 25:1005−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.04.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Jun J, Fiume E, Roeder AHK, Meng L, Sharma VK, et al. 2010. Comprehensive analysis of CLE polypeptide signaling gene expression and overexpression activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 154:1721−36

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.163683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Etchells JP, Mishra LS, Kumar M, Campbell L, Turner SR. 2015. Wood formation in trees is increased by manipulating PXY-regulated cell division. Current Biology 25:1050−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hirakawa Y, Shinohara H, Kondo Y, Inoue A, Nakanomyo I, et al. 2008. Non-cell-autonomous control of vascular stem cell fate by a CLE peptide/receptor system. PNAS 105:15208−13

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808444105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kucukoglu M, Nilsson J, Zheng B, Chaabouni S, Nilsson O. 2017. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 (WOX4)-like genes regulate cambial cell division activity and secondary growth in Populus trees. New Phytologist 215:642−57

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14631

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhu Y, Song D, Zhang R, Luo L, Cao S, et al. 2020. A xylem-produced peptide PtrCLE20 inhibits vascular cambium activity in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:195−206

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13187

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kucukoglu M, Chaabouni S, Zheng B, Mähönen AP, Helariutta Y, et al. 2020. Peptide encoding Populus CLV3/ESR-RELATED 47 (PttCLE47) promotes cambial development and secondary xylem formation in hybrid aspen. New Phytologist 226:75−85

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Whitford R, Fernandez A, De Groodt R, Ortega E, Hilson P. 2008. Plant CLE peptides from two distinct functional classes synergistically induce division of vascular cells. PNAS 105:18625−30

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809395105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Etchells JP, Turner SR. 2010. The PXY-CLE41 receptor ligand pair defines a multifunctional pathway that controls the rate and orientation of vascular cell division. Development 137:767−74

    doi: 10.1242/dev.044941

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sundell D, Street NR, Kumar M, Mellerowicz EJ, Kucukoglu M, et al. 2017. AspWood: high-spatial-resolution transcriptome profiles reveal uncharacterized modularity of wood formation in Populus tremula. The Plant Cell 29:1585−604

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Schrader J, Nilsson J, Mellerowicz E, Berglund A, Nilsson P, et al. 2004. A high-resolution transcript profile across the wood-forming meristem of poplar identifies potential regulators of cambial stem cell identity. The Plant Cell 16:2278−92

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.024190

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Prigge MJ, Otsuga D, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Drews GN, Clark SE. 2005. Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family members have overlapping, antagonistic, and distinct roles in Arabidopsis development. The Plant Cell 17:61−76

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026161

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Izhaki A, Bowman JL. 2007. KANADI and class III HD-zip gene families regulate embryo patterning and modulate auxin flow during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:495−508

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    McConnell JR, Emery J, Eshed Y, Bao N, Bowman J, et al. 2001. Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 411:709−13

    doi: 10.1038/35079635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhu Y, Song D, Sun J, Wang X, Li L. 2013. PtrHB7, a class III HD-zip gene, plays a critical role in regulation of vascular cambium differentiation in Populus. Molecular Plant 6:1331−43

    doi: 10.1093/mp/sss164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Robischon M, Du J, Miura E, Groover A. 2011. The Populus class III HD ZIP, popREVOLUTA, influences cambium initiation and patterning of woody stems. Plant Physiology 155:1214−25

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Du J, Miura E, Robischon M, Martinez C, Groover A. 2011. The Populus Class III HD ZIP transcription factor POPCORONA affects cell differentiation during secondary growth of woody stems. PLoS One 6:e17458

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017458

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Zhu Y, Song D, Xu P, Sun J, Li L. 2018. A HD-ZIP III gene, PtrHB4, is required for interfascicular cambium development in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:808−17

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12830

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Tang X, Wang D, Liu Y, Lu M, Zhuang Y, et al. 2020. Dual regulation of xylem formation by an auxin-mediated PaC3H17-PaMYB199 module in Populus. New Phytologist 225:1545−61

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16244

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    McNeil M, Darvill AG, Fry SC, Albersheim P. 1984. Structure and Function of the Primary-Cell Walls of Plants. Annual Review of Biochemistry 53:625−63

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.003205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM. 1993. Structural models of primary-cell walls in flowering plants - consistency of molecular-structure with the physical-properties of the walls during growth. The Plant Journal 3:1−30

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Mellerowicz EJ, Sundberg B. 2008. Wood cell walls: biosynthesis, developmental dynamics and their implications for wood properties. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11:293−300

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Sampedro J, Cosgrove DJ. 2005. The expansin superfamily. Genome Biology 6:242

    doi: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-12-242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    McQueen-Mason S, Durachko DM, Cosgrove DJ. 1992. Two Endogenous Proteins That Induce Cell-Wall Extension in Plants. The Plant Cell 4:1425−33

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.11.1425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Yennawar NH, Li L, Dudzinski DM, Tabuchi A, Cosgrove DJ. 2006. Crystal structure and activities of EXPB1 (Zea m 1), a β-expansin and group-1 pollen allergen from maize. PNAS 103:14664−71

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605979103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Yuan S, Wu Y, Cosgrove DJ. 2001. A fungal endoglucanase with plant cell wall extension activity. Plant Physiology 127:324−33

    doi: 10.1104/pp.127.1.324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Gray-Mitsumune M, Mellerowicz EJ, Abe H, Schrader J, Winzéll A, et al. 2004. Expansins abundant in secondary xylem belong to subgroup A of the α-expansin gene family. Plant Physiology 135:1552−64

    doi: 10.1104/pp.104.039321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Gray-Mitsumune M, Blomquist K, McQueen-Mason S, Teeri TT, Sundberg B, et al. 2008. Ectopic expression of a wood-abundant expansin PttEXPA1 promotes cell expansion in primary and secondary tissues in aspen. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6:62−72

    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00295.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Nishitani K, Tominaga R. 1992. Endo-xyloglucan transferase, a novel class of glycosyltransferase that catalyzes transfer of a segment of xyloglucan molecule to another xyloglucan molecule. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267:21058−64

    doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)36797-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Nishikubo N, Takahashi J, Roos AA, Derba-Maceluch M, Piens K, et al. 2011. Xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase-mediated xyloglucan rearrangements in developing wood of hybrid aspen. Plant Physiology 155:399−413

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.166934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Nishikubo N, Awano T, Banasiak A, Bourquin V, Ibatullin F, et al. 2007. Xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase (XET) functions in gelatinous layers of tension wood fibers in poplar—a glimpse into the mechanism of the balancing act of trees. Plant and Cell Physiology 48:843−55

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Trainotti L, Spolaore S, Pavanello A, Baldan B, Casadoro G. 1999. A novel E-type endo-β-1,4-glucanase with a putative cellulose-binding domain is highly expressed in ripening strawberry fruits. Plant Molecular Biology 40:323−32

    doi: 10.1023/A:1006299821980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ohmiya Y, Nakai T, Park YW, Aoyama T, Oka A, et al. 2003. The role of PopCel1 and PopCel2 in poplar leaf growth and cellulose biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 33:1087−97

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01695.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Yu L, Li Q, Zhu Y, Afzal MS, Li L. 2018. An auxin-induced β-type endo-1,4-β-glucanase in poplar is involved in cell expansion and lateral root formation. Planta 247:1149−61

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2851-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Yu L, Sun J, Li L. 2013. PtrCel9A6, an Endo-1,4-β-glucanase, is required for cell wall formation during xylem differentiation in Populus. Molecular Plant 6:1904−17

    doi: 10.1093/mp/sst104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhao Y, Song D, Sun J, Li L. 2013. Populus endo-β-mannanase PtrMAN6 plays a role in coordinating cell wall remodeling with suppression of secondary wall thickening through generation of oligosaccharide signals. The Plant Journal 74:473−85

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Pelloux J, Rustérucci C, Mellerowicz EJ. 2007. New insights into pectin methylesterase structure and function. Trends in Plant Science 12:267−77

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Gou J, Miller LM, Hou G, Yu X, Chen X, et al. 2012. Acetylesterase-mediated deacetylation of pectin impairs cell elongation, pollen germination, and plant reproduction. Plant Cell 24:50−65

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.092411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Siedlecka A, Wiklund S, Péronne MA, Micheli F, Leśniewska J, et al. 2008. Pectin methyl esterase inhibits intrusive and symplastic cell growth in developing wood cells of Populus. Plant Physiology 146:554−65

    doi: 10.1104/pp.107.111963

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Micheli F, Sundberg B, Goldberg R, Richard L. 2000. Radial distribution pattern of pectin methylesterases across the cambial region of hybrid aspen at activity and dormancy. Plant Physiology 124:191−200

    doi: 10.1104/pp.124.1.191

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Jeon HW, Cho JS, Park EJ, Han KH, Choi YI, et al. 2016. Developing xylem-preferential expression of PdGA20ox1, a gibberellin 20-oxidase 1 from Pinus densiflora, improves woody biomass production in a hybrid poplar. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14:1161−70

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12484

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T. 2000. Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nature Biotechnology 18:784−88

    doi: 10.1038/77355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Wessels B, Seyfferth C, Escamez S, Vain T, Antos K, et al. 2019. An AP2/ERF transcription factor ERF139 coordinates xylem cell expansion and secondary cell wall deposition. New Phytologist 224:1585−99

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15960

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Vahala J, Felten J, Love J, Gorzsás A, Gerber L, et al. 2013. A genome-wide screen for ethylene-induced ethylene response factors (ERFs) in hybrid aspen stem identifies ERF genes that modify stem growth and wood properties. New Phytologist 200:511−22

    doi: 10.1111/nph.12386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Seyfferth C, Wessels B, Jokipii-Lukkari S, Sundberg B, Delhomme N, et al. 2018. Ethylene-related gene expression networks in wood formation. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:272

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00272

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Hager A. 2003. Role of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in auxin-induced elongation growth: historical and new aspects. Journal of Plant Research 116:483−505

    doi: 10.1007/s10265-003-0110-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Meents MJ, Watanabe Y, Samuels AL. 2018. The cell biology of secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Annals of Botany 121:1107−25

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Zhong R, Lee C, Zhou J, McCarthy RL, Ye Z. 2008. A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20:2763−82

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.061325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Zhong R, Ye ZH. 2014. Complexity of the transcriptional network controlling secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant Science 229:193−207

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.09.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Demura T, Fukuda H. 2007. Transcriptional regulation in wood formation. Trends in Plant Science 12:64−70

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Zhu Y, Li L. 2021. Multi-Layered Regulation of Plant Cell Wall Thickening. Plant Cell Physiology 62:1867−73

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Mitsuda N, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Ohme-Takagi M. 2005. The NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST2 of Arabidopsis regulate secondary wall thickenings and are required for anther dehiscence. The Plant Cell 17:2993−3006

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.036004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Tan T, Endo H, Sano R, Kurata T, Yamaguchi M, et al. 2018. Transcription Factors VND1-VND3 Contribute to Cotyledon Xylem Vessel Formation. Plant Physiology 176:773−89

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00461

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Zhou J, Zhong R, Ye Z. 2014. Arabidopsis NAC domain proteins, VND1 to VND5, are transcriptional regulators of secondary wall biosynthesis in vessels. PLoS One 9:e105726

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105726

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhong R, Lee C, Ye Z. 2010. Functional characterization of poplar wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors. Plant Physiology 152:1044−55

    doi: 10.1104/pp.109.148270

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Ye Z, Zhong R. 2015. Molecular control of wood formation in trees. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:4119−31

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Ohtani M, Nishikubo N, Xu B, Yamaguchi M, Mitsuda N, et al. 2011. A NAC domain protein family contributing to the regulation of wood formation in poplar. The Plant Journal 67:499−512

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04614.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Zhao Y, Sun J, Xu P, Zhang R, Li L. 2014. Intron-mediated alternative splicing of WOOD-ASSOCIATED NAC TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR1B regulates cell wall thickening during fiber development in Populus species. Plant Physiology 164:765−76

    doi: 10.1104/pp.113.231134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Li Q, Lin Y, Sun Y, Song J, Chen H, et al. 2012. Splice variant of the SND1 transcription factor is a dominant negative of SND1 members and their regulation in Populus trichocarpa. PNAS 109:14699−704

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212977109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Zhong R, Lee C, Ye Z. 2010. Evolutionary conservation of the transcriptional network regulating secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science 15:625−32

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Zhong R, McCarthy RL, Lee C, Ye Z. 2011. Dissection of the transcriptional program regulating secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Plant Physiology 157:1452−68

    doi: 10.1104/pp.111.181354

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Zhong R, Lee C, Ye Z. 2010. Global analysis of direct targets of secondary wall NAC master switches in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 3:1087−103

    doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    McCarthy RL, Zhong RQ, Ye Z. 2009. MYB83 is a direct target of SND1 and acts redundantly with MYB46 in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 50:1950−64

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye ZH. 2007. The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:2776−92

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.053678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    McCarthy RL, Zhong R, Fowler S, Lyskowski D, Piyasena H, et al. 2010. The poplar MYB transcription factors, PtrMYB3 and PtrMYB20, are involved in the regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology 51:1084−90

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Zhong R, McCarthy RL, Haghighat M, Ye Z. 2013. The poplar MYB master switches bind to the SMRE site and activate the secondary wall biosynthetic program during wood formation. PLoS One 8:e69219

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Goicoechea M, Lacombe E, Legay S, Mihaljevic S, Rech P, et al. 2005. EgMYB2, a new transcriptional activator from Eucalyptus xylem, regulates secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 43:553−67

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02480.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Patzlaff A, McInnis S, Courtenay A, Surman C, Newman LJ, et al. 2003. Characterisation of a pine MYB that regulates lignification. The Plant Journal 36:743−54

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01916.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Wang S, Li E, Porth I, Chen J, Mansfield SD, et al. 2014. Regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis by poplar R2R3 MYB transcription factor PtrMYB152 in Arabidopsis. Scientific Reports 4:5054

    doi: 10.1038/srep05054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Zhong R, Ye Z. 2009. Transcriptional regulation of lignin biosynthesis. Plant Signal Behav 4:1028−34

    doi: 10.4161/psb.4.11.9875

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Li C, Ma X, Yu H, Fu Y, Luo K. 2018. Ectopic expression of PtoMYB74 in poplar and arabidopsis promotes secondary cell wall formation. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1262

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Xu C, Fu X, Liu R, Guo L, Ran L, et al. 2017. PtoMYB170 positively regulates lignin deposition during wood formation in poplar and confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Tree Physiology 37:1713−26

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Li C, Wang X, Ran L, Tian Q, Fan D, Luo K. 2015. PtoMYB92 is a transcriptional activator of the lignin biosynthetic pathway during secondary cell wall formation in Populus tomentosa. Plant & Cell Physiology 56:2436−46

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Tian Q, Wang X, Li C, Lu W, Yang L, et al. 2013. Functional characterization of the poplar R2R3-MYB transcription factor PtoMYB216 involved in the regulation of lignin biosynthesis during wood formation. PLoS One 8:e76369

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076369

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Bomal C, Bedon F, Caron S, Mansfield SD, Levasseur C, et al. 2008. Involvement of Pinus taeda MYB1 and MYB8 in phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biogenesis: a comparativein planta analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:3925−39

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Karpinska B, Karlsson M, Srivastava M, Stenberg A, Schrader J, et al. 2004. MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Molecular Biology 56:255−70

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-3354-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Tang X, Zhuang Y, Qi G, Wang D, Liu H, et al. 2015. Poplar PdMYB221 is involved in the direct and indirect regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation. Scientific Reports 5:12240

    doi: 10.1038/srep12240

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Yang L, Zhao X, Ran L, Li C, Fan D, et al. 2017. PtoMYB156 is involved in negative regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Scientific Reports 7:41209

    doi: 10.1038/srep41209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Jiao B, Zhao X, Lu W, Guo L, Luo K. 2019. The R2R3 MYB transcription factor MYB189 negatively regulates secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Populus. Tree Physiology 39:1187−200

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Legay S, Sivadon P, Blervacq AS, Pavy N, Baghdady A, et al. 2010. EgMYB1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor from eucalyptus negatively regulates secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis and poplar. New Phytologist 188:774−86

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03432.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Soler M, Plasencia A, Larbat R, Pouzet C, Jauneau A, et al. 2017. The Eucalyptus linker histone variant EgH1.3 cooperates with the transcription factor EgMYB1 to control lignin biosynthesis during wood formation. New Phytologist 213:287−99

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Gui J, Luo L, Zhong Y, Sun J, Umezawa T, et al. 2019. Phosphorylation of LTF1, an MYB transcription factor in populus, acts as a sensory switch regulating lignin biosynthesis in wood cells. Molecular Plant 12:1325−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Laubscher M, Brown K, Tonfack LB, Myburg AA, Mizrachi E, Hussey SG. 2018. Temporal analysis of Arabidopsis genes activated by Eucalyptus grandis NAC transcription factors associated with xylem fibre and vessel development. Scientific Reports 8:10983

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29278-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Wang H, Tang R, Liu H, Chen H, Liu J, et al. 2013. Chimeric repressor of PtSND2 severely affects wood formation in transgenic Populus. Tree Physiology 33:878−86

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Li E, Bhargava A, Qiang W, Friedmann MC, Forneris N, et al. 2012. The Class II KNOX gene KNAT7 negatively regulates secondary wall formation in Arabidopsis and is functionally conserved in Populus. New Phytologist 194:102−15

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04016.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Yang L, Zhao X, Yang F, Fan D, Jiang Y, et al. 2016. PtrWRKY19, a novel WRKY transcription factor, contributes to the regulation of pith secondary wall formation in Populus trichocarpa. Scientific Reports 6:18643

    doi: 10.1038/srep18643

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Timell TE. 1967. Recent progress in the chemistry of wood hemicelluloses. Wood Science and Technology 1:45−70

    doi: 10.1007/BF00592255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M. 2003. Lignin biosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54:519−46

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Delmer DP. 1999. CELLULOSE BIOSYNTHESIS: Exciting Times for A Difficult Field of Study. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 50:245−76

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.245

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Gardiner JC, Taylor NG, Turner SR. 2003. Control of cellulose synthase complex localization in developing xylem. The Plant Cell 15:1740−8

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.012815

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Suzuki S, Li L, Sun YH, Chiang VL. 2006. The cellulose synthase gene superfamily and biochemical functions of xylem-specific cellulose synthase-like genes in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Physiology 142:1233−45

    doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086678

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Song D, Shen J, Li L. 2010. Characterization of cellulose synthase complexes in Populus xylem differentiation. New Phytologist 187:777−90

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03315.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Xu W, Cheng H, Zhu S, Cheng J, Ji H, et al. 2021. Functional understanding of secondary cell wall cellulose synthases in Populus trichocarpa via the Cas9/gRNA-induced gene knockouts. New Phytologist 231:1478−95

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17338

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Xi W, Song D, Sun J, Shen J, Li L. 2017. Formation of wood secondary cell wall may involve two type cellulose synthase complexes in Populus. Plant Molecular Biology 93:419−29

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0570-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Yu L, Chen H, Sun J, Li L. 2014. PtrKOR1 is required for secondary cell wall cellulose biosynthesis in Populus. Tree Physiology 34:1289−300

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Coleman HD, Yan J, Mansfield SD. 2009. Sucrose synthase affects carbon partitioning to increase cellulose production and altered cell wall ultrastructure. PNAS 106:13118−23

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900188106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Ruan Y, Llewellyn DJ, Furbank RT. 2003. Suppression of sucrose synthase gene expression represses cotton fiber cell initiation, elongation, and seed development. Plant Cell 15:952−64

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.010108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Gerber L, Zhang B, Roach M, Rende U, Gorzsás A, et al. 2014. Deficient sucrose synthase activity in developing wood does not specifically affect cellulose biosynthesis, but causes an overall decrease in cell wall polymers. New Phytologist 203:1220−30

    doi: 10.1111/nph.12888

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Rende U, Wang W, Gandla ML, Jönsson LJ, Niittylä T. 2017. Cytosolic invertase contributes to the supply of substrate for cellulose biosynthesis in developing wood. New Phytologist 214:796−807

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14392

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Simmons TJ, Mortimer JC, Bernardinelli OD, Pöppler AC, Brown SP, et al. 2016. Folding of xylan onto cellulose fibrils in plant cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR. Nature Communications 7:13902

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms13902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. 2010. Hemicelluloses. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:263−89

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Zhong R, Cui D, Ye Z. 2019. Secondary cell wall biosynthesis. New Phytologist 221:1703−23

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Brown DM, Zhang Z, Stephens E, Dupree P, Turner SR. 2009. Characterization of IRX10 and IRX10-like reveals an essential role in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 57:732−46

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03729.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Brown DM, Goubet F, Wong VW, Goodacre R, Stephens E, et al. 2007. Comparison of five xylan synthesis mutants reveals new insight into the mechanisms of xylan synthesis. The Plant Journal 52:1154−68

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03307.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    Keppler BD, Showalter AM. 2010. IRX14 and IRX14-LIKE, two glycosyl transferases involved in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 3:834−41

    doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Lee C, Teng Q, Huang WL, Zhong RQ, Ye ZH. 2010. The arabidopsis family GT43 glycosyltransferases form two functionally nonredundant groups essential for the elongation of glucuronoxylan backbone. Plant Physiology 153:526−41

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.155309

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Wu AM, Hörnblad E, Voxeur A, Gerber L, Rihouey C, et al. 2010. Analysis of the arabidopsis IRX9/IRX9-L and IRX14/IRX14-L pairs of glycosyltransferase genes reveals critical contributions to biosynthesis of the hemicellulose glucuronoxylan. Plant Physiology 153:542−54

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128]

    Lee C, Teng Q, Zhong R, Ye Z. 2011. Molecular dissection of xylan biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Molecular Plant 4:730−47

    doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129]

    Lee C, Teng Q, Huang W, Zhong R, Ye Z. 2009. Down-regulation of PoGT47C expression in poplar results in a reduced glucuronoxylan content and an increased wood digestibility by cellulase. Plant and Cell Physiology 50:1075−89

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130]

    Lee C, Teng Q, Huang W, Zhong R, Ye Z. 2009. The poplar GT8E and GT8F glycosyltransferases are functional orthologs of arabidopsis PARVUS involved in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology 50:1982−7

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp131

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131]

    Lee C, Teng Q, Zhong R, Yuan Y, Haghighat M, Ye ZH. 2012. Three Arabidopsis DUF579 domain-containing GXM proteins are methyltransferases catalyzing 4-O-methylation of glucuronic acid on xylan. Plant and Cell Physiology 53:1934−49

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs138

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132]

    Urbanowicz BR, Peña MJ, Ratnaparkhe S, Avci U, Backe J, et al. 2012. 4-O-methylation of glucuronic acid in Arabidopsis glucuronoxylan is catalyzed by a domain of unknown function family 579 protein. PNAS 109:14253−58

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208097109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133]

    Yuan Y, Teng Q, Zhong R, Ye Z. 2014. Identification and biochemical characterization of four wood-associated glucuronoxylan methyltransferases in Populus. PLoS One 9:e87370

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134]

    Song D, Gui J, Liu C, Sun J, Li L. 2016. Suppression of PtrDUF579-3 expression causes structural changes of the glucuronoxylan in Populus. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:493

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00493

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135]

    Song D, Sun J, Li L. 2014. Diverse roles of PtrDUF579 proteins in Populus and PtrDUF579-1 function in vascular cambium proliferation during secondary growth. Plant Molecular Biology 85:601−12

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0206-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136]

    Zhong R, Cui D, Ye Z. 2018. A group of Populus trichocarpa DUF231 proteins exhibit differential O-acetyltransferase activities toward xylan. Plos One 13:e0194532

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137]

    Pawar PMA, Ratke C, Balasubramanian VK, Chong SL, Gandla ML, et al. 2017. Downregulation of RWA genes in hybrid aspen affects xylan acetylation and wood saccharification. New Phytologist 214:1491−505

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14489

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138]

    Liepman AH, Nairn CJ, Willats WGT, Sørensen I, Roberts AW, et al. 2007. Functional genomic analysis supports conservation of function among cellulose synthase-like a gene family members and suggests diverse roles of mannans in plants. Plant Physiology 143:1881−93

    doi: 10.1104/pp.106.093989

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139]

    Shi R, Sun YH, Li Q, Heber S, Sederoff R, et al. 2010. Towards a systems approach for lignin biosynthesis in Populus trichocarpa: transcript abundance and specificity of the monolignol biosynthetic genes. Plant and Cell Physiology 51:144−63

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp175

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140]

    Wang JP, Matthews ML, Williams CM, Shi R, Yang CM, et al. 2018. Improving wood properties for wood utilization through multi-omics integration in lignin biosynthesis. Nature Communications 9:1579

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03863-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141]

    de Lyra Soriano Saleme M, Cesarino I, Vargas L, Kim H, Vanholme R, et al. 2017. Silencing CAFFEOYL SHIKIMATE ESTERASE affects lignification and improves saccharification in poplar. Plant Physiology 175:1040−57

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00920

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142]

    Bonawitz ND, Chapple C. 2010. The genetics of lignin biosynthesis: connecting genotype to phenotype. Annual Review of Genetics 44:337−63

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143]

    Lu S, Li Q, Wei H, Chang M, Tunlaya-Anukit S, et al. 2013. Ptr-miR397a is a negative regulator of laccase genes affecting lignin content in Populus trichocarpa. PNAS 110:10848−53

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308936110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144]

    Shigeto J, Itoh Y, Hirao S, Ohira K, Fujita K, et al. 2015. Simultaneously disrupting AtPrx2, AtPrx25 and AtPrx71 alters lignin content and structure in Arabidopsis stem. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57:349−56

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12334

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145]

    Li Y, Kajita S, Kawai S, Katayama Y, Morohoshi N. 2003. Down-regulation of an anionic peroxidase in transgenic aspen and its effect on lignin characteristics. Journal of Plant Research 116:175−82

    doi: 10.1007/s10265-003-0087-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146]

    Kumar M, Campbell L, Turner S. 2016. Secondary cell walls: biosynthesis and manipulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:515−31

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv533

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147]

    Pauly M, Keegstra K. 2010. Plant cell wall polymers as precursors for biofuels. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13:304−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148]

    Vanholme R, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W. 2008. Lignin engineering. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11:278−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149]

    Li L, Zhou Y, Cheng X, Sun J, Marita JM, et al. 2003. Combinatorial modification of multiple lignin traits in trees through multigene cotransformation. PNAS 100:4939−44

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0831166100

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150]

    Hu WJ, Harding SA, Lung J, Popko JL, Ralph J, et al. 1999. Repression of lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose accumulation and growth in transgenic trees. Nature Biotechnology 17:808−12

    doi: 10.1038/11758

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151]

    Chanoca A, de Vries L, Boerjan W. 2019. Lignin Engineering in Forest Trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:912

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00912

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152]

    Voelker SL, Lachenbruch B, Meinzer FC, Jourdes M, Ki CY, et al. 2010. Antisense down-regulation of 4CL expression alters lignification, tree growth, and saccharification potential of field-grown poplar. Plant Physiology 154:874−86

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.159269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153]

    Gui JS, Lam PY, Tobimatsu Y, Sun JY, Huang C, et al. 2020. Fibre-specific regulation of lignin biosynthesis improves biomass quality in Populus. New Phytologist 226:1074−87

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154]

    Cao S, Huang C, Luo L, Zheng S, Zhong Y, et al. 2020. Cell-specific suppression of 4-Coumarate-CoA ligase gene reveals differential effect of lignin on cell physiological function inPopulus. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:589729

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.589729

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155]

    De Meester B, Vanholme R, de Vries L, Wouters M, Van Doorsselaere J, Boerjan W. 2021. Vessel- and ray-specific monolignol biosynthesis as an approach to engineer fiber-hypolignification and enhanced saccharification in poplar. The Plant Journal 108:752−65

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15468

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156]

    van Doorn WG. 2011. Classes of programmed cell death in plants, compared to those in animals. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:4749−61

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/err196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157]

    Courtois-Moreau CL, Pesquet E, Sjödin A, Muñiz L, Bollhöner B, et al. 2009. A unique program for cell death in xylem fibers of Populus stem. Plant Journal 58:260−74

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03777.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158]

    Han J, Lin W, Oda Y, Cui K, Fukuda H, et al. 2012. The proteasome is responsible for caspase-3-like activity during xylem development. The Plant Journal 72:129−41

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05070.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159]

    Bollhöner B, Jokipii-Lukkari S, Bygdell J, Stael S, Adriasola M, et al. 2018. The function of two type II metacaspases in woody tissues of Populus trees. New Phytologist 217:1551−65

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14945

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160]

    Chen H, Pang Y, Zeng J, Ding Q, Yin S, et al. 2012. The Ca2+-dependent DNases are involved in secondary xylem development in Eucommia ulmoides. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54:456−70

    doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01134.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161]

    Stewart CM. 1966. Excretion and Heartwood Formation in Living Trees. Science 153:1068−74

    doi: 10.1126/science.153.3740.1068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162]

    Spicer R. 2005. Senescence in Secondary Xylem: Heartwood Formation as an Active Developmental Program. In Vascular Transport in Plants, eds. Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA. UK: Academic Press. pp. 457−75 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088457-5/50024-1

    [163]

    Li H, Dai X, Huang X, Xu M, Wang Q, et al. 2021. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a high-resolution cell atlas of xylem in Populus. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:1906−21

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Luo L, Li L. 2022. Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees. Forestry Research 2:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0005
    Luo L, Li L. 2022. Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees. Forestry Research 2:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0005

Figures(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(6808) PDF downloads(1656)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees

Forestry Research  2 Article number: 5  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Trees convert and store the majority of their photosynthetic products in wood which is an essential renewable resource much in demand by human society. Formation of wood follows a process of consecutive cell developmental stages, from vascular cambium proliferation, cell expansion and differentiation, secondary cell wall deposition to programmed cell death, which is controlled by the functionality of complex molecular networks. What are the molecular networks involved in wood formation? How do the molecular networks act in a way to generate wood tissue during tree growth? What are the regulatory modules that lead to the formation of various wood characteristics? The answers to these questions are fundamental to understanding how trees grow, as well as how we can genetically engineer trees with desired properties of wood for human needs. In recent years, a great deal of interest has been invested in the elucidation of wood formation at the molecular level. This review summarizes the current state of understanding of the molecular process that guides wood formation in trees.

    • Trees are major constituents of terrestrial ecosystems and every year more than half of the carbon fixed by terrestrial plants can be attributed to trees[1]. Most of the carbon fixed in trees is stored in wood, therefore, wood is an important carbon reservoir and plays an important role in the balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In addition, as a natural renewable resource, wood is widely used in human society, such as in pulping, construction, lignocellulosic biofuels, and other wood-based chemicals. Understanding how wood is produced through complex molecular processes has tremendous significance in maximizing carbon storage in trees and is also essential for the genetic improvement of trees for wood production.

      Formation of wood (secondary xylem) is a sequential developmental process that starts from the vascular cambium, via cell division/differentiation, cell expansion, secondary cell wall (SCW) deposition and programmed cell death (PCD) (Fig. 1) to form wood tissue. The different developmental stages involve a distinct battery of genes to carry out various molecular and cellular activities in directing wood cell development[2]. Here we try to summarize the current understanding of the molecular processes that occur in wood formation of trees.

      Figure 1. 

      The cross-section of tree trunk shows the wood formation process. CPD, cell proliferation/differentiation; CE, cell expansion; SCW thickening, secondary cell wall thickening; PCD, programmed cell death; v, vessel; xf, xylem fiber; rp, ray parenchyma cell, pf, phloem fiber.

    • Vascular cambium, derived from procambium in the vascular bundle, is a ring of meristem tissue which grows the stem girth. Vascular cambium cell proliferation produces daughter cells that differentiate into various cell types through different pathways. Generally, the daughter cells differentiate outward into secondary phloem and inward into secondary xylem (wood tissue). Wood tissue is mainly composed of tracheids and parenchyma cells in gymnosperms, but vessels, fibers and parenchyma cells in angiosperms, which provide mechanical support and long distance transportation of water and minerals for upright growth[3]. The vascular cambium proliferation and differentiation are programmatically carried out and precisely regulated through complex signals and molecular networks.

      Phytohormones play an essential role in controlling vascular cambium activities. Of them, auxin, cytokinin and brassinosteroids are known to be the main phytohormones involved in regulating cambium proliferation activity. Auxin regulates cell fate to promote xylem identity[4]. In trees, auxin is distributed in a bell curve of concentration across the phloem-cambium-developing xylem area, peaking in the cambium district[5,6]. It is postulated that the gradient of auxin concentration affects cambium proliferation and differentiation[7]. Regulation of the auxin concentration modifies cambium activity and wood formation. In Populus, two vascular cambium-related MADS-box genes, VCM1 and VCM2, are found to modulate the soluble auxin concentration in cambium cells by regulating expression of PIN5, thereby regulating vascular cambium activity[8]. VCM1 and VCM2 bind to the PIN5 promoter to enhance PIN5 expression, while PIN5, localized in the ER membrane, transports active IAA from the cytosol to the ER lumen, in which the active IAA is deactivated. Thus, the VCM1/VCM2-PIN5 functions as a molecular module to tune the auxin homeostasis in the vascular cambium district and hence to modify the vascular cambium activity. Auxin levels can trigger molecular cascades through auxin early response genes, such as the Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid (Aux/IAA) family and Auxin Response Factor (ARF) family. PttIAA3 is a Populus IAA member predominantly expressed in the cambial meristem and developing secondary xylem cells[9]. By upsetting the auxin signaling through expression of a dominant mutant version of PttIAA3, the cambium cell division activity is reduced, affecting the secondary xylem development with little effect on phloem development[10]. PtoIAA9, another IAA gene in Populus, is also preferentially expressed in cambium and its neighboring cells[11]. PtoIAA9 can interact with PtoARF5 to regulate cambium division and xylem development via orchestrating the expression of the HD-ZIP III transcription factor genes PtoHB7/8 which correlate with cambium proliferation and xylem cell differentiation in poplar[11]. There are a total of 35 Aux/IAA and 39 ARF genes in the Populus trichocarpa genome[12]. It is unclear how many Aux/IAAs and ARFs are specifically involved in auxin signaling in the regulation of wood formation. Nevertheless, the experimental evidence shows that auxin and its signaling play a key role in the regulation of cambium activity and secondary xylem development. However, the knowledge regarding how auxin signaling is conducted in cambium cells to direct cell proliferation and differentiation is far from complete. Many questions remain to be studied, such as how auxin determines wood cell type differentiation? What are the molecular pathways, by which the auxin signaling is transduced downstream of the ARFs to cell proliferation, differentiation and SCW formation?

      Cytokinin (CK) is another phytohormone known to play a role in wood formation. CK is distributed across the vascular cambium area with its peak concentration in the cells of the developing phloem side next to the cambium[6]. CKs can stimulate cambium cell division and thus affect wood formation[13]. Reducing the CK level by overexpression of a cytokinin catabolic gene, the Arabidopsis CYTOKININ OXIDASE 2 (CKX2) gene in poplar, results in inhibition of the radial growth, likely due to the decrease of cell division in vascular cambium[13]. The spatial distribution of CK and auxin in the cambium zone is partially overlapped[6]. Increase of CK biosynthesis in the cambial zone and developing xylem cells result in an increase in auxin concentration in the cambial zone[6], suggesting that the two hormone signals are interconnected in regulating cambium proliferation and differentiation. However, the molecular pathways underlying the crosstalk of the two hormones as it relates to control of wood formation are yet to be studied. A recent study showed that reduction of the CK level in phloem cells by phloem-specific expression of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase 2 (CKX2, a gene encoding a cytokinin degrading enzyme), restricts the cambial proliferation activity[14]. This suggests that CK is transported from phloem to cambium cell for directing cell division.

      Brassinosteroids (BRs) are shown to be related to cambial activity and it may coordinate with IAA to promote cambium cell division[15]. In Populus, exogenous application of 24-epi-brassinolide (BL, an active form of BRs) results in enhancement of cambial cell division while application of propiconazole (PCZ, an inhibitor of BR biosynthesis) leads to inhibition of cell division[16]. Additionally, other phytohormones such as ethylene[17,18], gibberellins[19] and abscisic acid[20], are also reported to be involved in modulating cambium proliferation and cell differentiation in trunk growth of trees. However, it is unclear how signal transduction of these hormones is carried out in cambium and developing xylem cells. A more challenging question yet to be answered is how the multiple phytohormone signals are mutually connected in regulating vascular cambium proliferation and differentiation during tree growth.

      In addition to traditional phytohormones, small peptides play a critical role in modulating cambial activity. The CLAVATA3 (CLV3)/EMBRYO SURROUNDING REGIONRELATED (CLE) peptide is recognized by its receptor to regulate the molecular networks involved in the maintenance of meristem identity and activity in Arabidopsis[21,22]. Activity of the vascular cambium in trees is also regulated by CLE peptides. The Populus homologs of CLE41 and PHLOEM INTERCALATED WITH XYLEM (PXY) play a role in directing cambium division[23]. Overexpression of PttCLE41 that encodes a peptide ligand known as TRACHEARY ELEMENT DIFFERENTIATION INHIBITORY FACTOR (TDIF)[24] and its receptor kinase gene PttPXY in hybrid aspen results in increased cambial cell division[23]. Meanwhile, the PttWOX4 (WUSCHEL HOMEOBOX RELATED 4) gene, a transcription factor downstream of the CLE-PXY signaling, is specifically expressed in the cambium region. Suppression of PttWOX4 leads to reduction of secondary growth in trees[25]. The studies suggest that CLE-PXY-WOX4 forms a molecular module in promoting vascular cambium activity. Meanwhile, other CLE genes, such as PtrCLE20 and PttCLE47 are also found to play a role in the regulation of the vascular cambium activity in Populus[26,27]. PtrCLE20 is transcribed in developing xylem and its derived peptide displays inhibition on cambium cell dividing activity. Likely the peptide is moved from developing xylem to cambium cells where it inhibits vascular cambium proliferation[26]. It is proposed that the cambium activity may be coordinately regulated by a pair of peptide signals respectively from the phloem and xylem[26]. The CLE41 peptide, which is originated from phloem cells[24,28,29] to deliver a positive signal and the CLE20, which is originated from xylem cells to convey a negative signal[26], meet in the cells of the vascular cambium to regulate cambium proliferation in a synchronized manner. This proposition projects a molecular view of how wood formation is tuned by the signals from two opposite locations. Nevertheless, more analysis would provide multi-faceted evidence for further corroboration.

      In an analysis of transcriptional activity in wood formation, high-spatial-resolution RNA sequencing identified a group of transcription factor genes actively expressed in the cambium-xylem area[30,31]. Although many of the transcription factor genes expressed in the wood-forming tissue are yet to be studied for their function in cambium activity and xylem differentiation, several have been characterized for their roles in regulating wood formation in trees. The HD-ZIP III gene family has been shown to regulate vascular patterning, differentiation of cambium daughter cell, polar auxin transport, organ polarity in Arabidopsis, such as ATHB-8, PHV/ATHB-9, CORONA/ATHB-15, PHABULOSA (PHB)/ATHB-14, and INTERFASCICULAR FIBERLESS1 (IFL1)/REVOLUTA (REV)[3234]. The P. trichocarpa genome contains seven members of the HD-ZIP III gene family but five in Arabidopsis. HD-ZIP III genes are highly expressed in relation to vascular cambium development and xylem differentiation[3538]. Among them, alteration of PopREVOLUTA (PRE, an orthologue of Arabidopsis IFL1/REV.) expression in Populus leads to defects in vascular tissue patterning[36]. Mis-expression of PopCORONA (PCN), a homologous gene of the Arabidopsis Corona/ATHB-15, results in defects of xylem cell differentiation[37]. PtrHB7, the homologous gene of ATHB-8, is highly expressed in cambium and functions in balancing the differentiation between secondary xylem and phloem tissues[35]. Suppression of PtrHB7 results in enhanced differentiation of cambium cells to phloem but has an inhibitory effect to xylem, while PtrHB7-overexpressed plants display the opposite phenotype[35]. Furthermore, PtrHB4 is required for development of the interfascicular cambium to form the vascular cambium in trees[38]. These studies indicate that the HD-ZIP III members act in different stage of wood formation, from vascular patterning, vascular cambium formation and xylem differentiation. In response to auxin signaling, HB7/8 are regulated by the IAA9-ARF5 module in cambium proliferation in Populus[11]. It appears that the HD-ZIP III regulators play a key role in cambium proliferation and differentiation. Full characterization of the HD-ZIP III mediated pathways would provide more insights into understanding wood formation.

      The transcriptional regulatory networks during wood formation may be initially orchestrated by phytohormones as fundamental signaling. In Populus, PaC3H17 and PaMYB199 expression is regulated by auxin, and PaC3H17 and PaMYB199 display opposite roles in cambium cell proliferation[39]. PaMYB199 plays a repressive role in cambium proliferation while its expression is inhibited by PaC3H17. Conceivably, PaC3H17 and PaMYB199 may act as intermediate players in the auxin signaling pathway to regulate cambium proliferation[39].

      Vascular cambium development, proliferation and subsequent cell differentiation are primary processes in cellular development of wood formation in trees. To date, studies have shown that phytohormones, peptides and molecular modules play various roles in regulating cambium proliferation and differentiation (Fig. 2). This knowledge represents a foundation toward a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying wood formation in trees.

      Figure 2. 

      Signal molecules and molecular networks identified in cambial cell proliferation and differentiation of trees.

    • After the secondary xylem mother cells are produced from cambium cells, they undergo cell expansion, followed by deposition of the SCW, lignification and cell death to form wood cells (Fig. 1). The cell expansion process determines the final cell shape and size in wood. This process mainly occurs during primary cell wall formation and modification. The primary cell wall is composed of 20%−30% cellulose, 30%−50% pectin, 20%−25% hemicelluloses and about 10% glycoproteins[40]. Cellulose and hemicellulose form a network structure embedded in pectin[41]. Both disrupting the connection between cellulose and hemicellulose or breaking the hemicellulose can disperse the cellulose microfibrils to promote the loosening of the cell wall. Multiple enzymes are identified as primary players in this process.

      A series of genes encoding enzymes related to cell wall modification in Populus stem have been identified, such as EXPANSINs, XTHs, PMEs, PL1s[4244]. EXPA (α-expansin) and EXPB (β-expansin) can bind to xyloglucan and xylose, respectively. It is speculated that they may untie the non-covalent bonds between xyloglucan/xylose and other cell wall components to promote cell wall loosening[45]. Exogenous applications of expansins to cell walls can quickly induce cell wall extension without affecting its plasticity and flexibility[46]. A number of expansin genes are expressed in the radial expansion zone of Populus stem, such as EXPA1, EXPA5, and EXPA7[42,47]. Overexpression of PttEXPA1 in hybrid aspen resulted in increase of stem internode length and fiber diameter growth[48]. Furthermore, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase (XET)/hydrolase (XTH) are involved in cell wall loosening and remodeling, possibly by catalyzing the hydrolysis and reconnection of xyloglucan[49]. In Populus, multiple XTHs are highly expressed in wood-forming tissues[42,50]. Developing gelatinous (G) layer in xylem fiber cells in Populus is related to the XET activity[51]. Overexpression of PtxtXET16-34 showed an increase of the vessel diameter and change of xyloglucan content[50].

      In addition to expansins and XTH, glycosyl hydrolases also participate in cell wall loosening, such as endo-1,4-β-glucanases and endo-1,4-β-mannanase. Endo-1,4-β-glucanases (EGases) is thought to function in cell wall loosening through its hydrolyzing xyloglucans activity[52]. PopCel1 and PopCel2 encode two EGases. Overexpression of these two genes promotes plant growth by enhancing cell expansion[53]. When PtrCel9A6 and PtrGH9A7 from Populus are expressed in Arabidopsis, the transgenics showed an increase in plant growth and fiber cell length, suggesting that EGases are applicable to the modification of plant growth and cell length[54,55]. Another hydrolase, endo-1,4-β-mannanase hydrolyzes mannan-type polysaccharides to generate oligosaccharides. Overexpression of PtrMAN6, an endo-1,4-β-mannanase gene in Populus, leads to enhanced cell wall loosening but inhibits cell wall thickening, while knockdown of its expression has the opposite effect[56]. The PtrMAN6 function in coordinating cell wall remodeling and thickening may be mediated through oligosaccharide signals[56].

      Pectin is a major component of the primary cell wall, critical to remodeling and expansion of cell walls. Pectin methyl esterases (PMEs) and pectin acetylesterases (PAEs) are two enzymes of pectin modification to control cell wall loosening[57,58]. Modification of PME1 in Populus affects expansion of the wood cells and results in changes in fiber cell length and width[59]. High PME activity is detected in the cambium and developing xylem region in Populus stem, suggesting that PME is important for the regulation of dynamic cell expansion during wood formation[60]. Overexpression of the Populus trichocarpa PAE1 gene in tobacco reduces the degree of pectin acetylation and alters cell wall characteristics[58].

      Hormone signals may play roles in cell elongation and expansion. Overexpression of GA biosynthesis-related genes such as GIBBERELLIN 20-OXIDASE 1 (GA20ox1) in transgenic Populus increases the endogenous GA content and promotes elongation of xylem fibers and growth[61,62]. Moreover, studies have shown that overexpression of the ethylene response factor gene ERF139 in Populus reduced the diameter of vessels while the ERF139 dominant negative mutant displayed an increase in vessel diameter[63]. Ethylene can induce the expression of ERF139 and ERF118[64]. ERF118 in Populus is reported to be associated with cell expansion[65]. These results suggest that ethylene signaling may be involved in the cell expansion of wood. Auxin signaling is involved in promoting cell expansion[66], however, the specific mechanism regulating the role of auxin in wood cell expansion is not fully understood.

      As discussed above, xylem cell expansion in the process of wood formation is regulated by many factors, including plant hormones, expansins, hydrolases, and other molecular networks. The molecular knowledge underlying xylem cell expansion would have implications in tree improvement.

    • After cell expansion, SCW deposition is initiated. SCW is the main biomass produced by land plants and stores most of the carbon fixed by photosynthesis. In trees, SCW is primarily deposited in xylem tissue, i.e. wood. SCW are mainly composed of three kinds of polymers, including 60% cellulose, 10%−40% hemicellulose and 30% lignin[67]. Biosynthesis and assembly of SCW during wood formation is regulated by a battery of elaborate transcriptional networks.

      Biosynthesis of SCW involves multiple metabolic pathways to convert photosynthetic products into three major biopolymers. Coordination of the biosynthesis and assembly of the biopolymers to deposit in SCW during wood formation is strictly regulated through hierarchical transcriptional networks (Fig. 3). The regulatory networks are constructed in multiple layers composed of NAC and MYB transcription factors[6871]. In Arabidopsis, a number of NAC transcription factors such as Vascular-related NAC-domain1 (VND1) to VND7, NAC secondary wall thickening promoting factor 1 (NST1), and secondary wall-associated NAC domain protein 1 (SND1/NST3) and NST2 constitute the top-level master regulators to regulate the expression of other downstream TFs and genes related to wall synthesis[7274]. In tree species, the compeer master regulators in the hierarchical networks are named WNDs (wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors)[75,76]. Compared to Arabidopsis, the Populus genome contain more homologous genes of the master regulators. For example, there are three NST homologs (NST1, NST2 and NST3/SND1) in Arabidopsis, and four homologous genes (WND1A, WND1B, WND2A and WND2B) in Populus trichocarpa which function differently[75,77,78]. PtrWND1B, an ortholog of Arabidopsis SND1, functions in fiber cell wall thickening. Suppression of PtrWND1B expression specifically inhibited fiber cell wall thickening[78]. PtrWND1B alternative splicing produces two isoforms which play antagonistic roles in regulating fiber cell wall thickening, which does not occur in Arabidopsis and may act as a particular mechanism to regulate xylem fiber cell wall thickening in trees[78,79]. Overexpression of the normal short-transcript PtrWND1B-s enhanced fiber cell wall thickening, while overexpression of the alternative long-transcript PtrWND1B-l repressed fiber cell wall thickening[78]. Meanwhile, EgWND1, an SND1 homolog in Eucalyptus, also shows its relation to SCW deposition. Its overexpression in Arabidopsis causes ectopic deposition of SCW[80]. Modification of PtrWND2B and PtrWND6B expression in Populus results in changes to SCW thickening and biosynthesis of lignin and cellulose[77,81]. WNDs act as main transcriptional regulators to control wood SCW formation through a set of hierarchical networks in trees.

      Figure 3. 

      Transcription factor genes in regulation of wood secondary cell wall biosynthesis.

      WNDs activate downstream genes through its binding to the secondary wall NAC-binding element (SNBE) in the promoter of target genes[81,82]. In Populus, the PtrMYB3 and PtrMYB20 promoters contain multiple SNBE elements that are targeted by PtrWNDs[81]. A number of the MYB transcription factors constitute a complex of regulatory networks downstream of the NAC transcription factors to hierarchically regulate SCW formation in response to internal developmental signals and environmental stimuli[68,69,81]. In Arabidopsis, MYB46 and MYB83 are the second layer master switches in the regulatory network, which can be directly targeted by NAC to activate the secondary wall biosynthetic program[83,84]. PtrMYB2/21 and PtrMYB3/20, the homologous genes of AtMYB46 and AtMYB83 in Populus, respectively, which are activated by WNDs to regulate the biosynthesis pathways of cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose[85,86]. Studies also show that PtrMYB18/74/75/128 are also able to activate the expression of SCW biosynthesis genes[81]. In addition, several regulators have been identified for specific regulation of lignin biosynthesis. PtMYB4 and EgMYB2 are homologous genes of AtMYB46/83 in pine and Eucalyptus, respectively, and constitutive overexpression of these genes induces ectopic SCW formation, particularly lignin biosynthesis[87,88]. Similarly, PtrMYB26/28/90/152 in P. trichocarpa[81,89,90], PtoMYB92/170/216 in P. tomentosa[9194], and PtMYB1/8 in pine[95] are reported to specifically regulate lignin biosynthesis. On the other hand, SCW biosynthesis can be regulated through repression mechanisms. PdMYB199, a homologous gene of AtMYB42/85, plays a negative role in SCW thickening by inhibiting expression of SCW biosynthesis genes[39]. In Populus, PttMYB21a[96], PdMYB221[97], PtoMYB156[98], PtrMYB189[99] and Eucalyptus EgMYB1[100,101] are transcriptional repressors inhibiting lignin biosynthesis. LTF1, one of the AtMYB4 homologous genes in Populus acts as a sensory switch to specifically repress lignin biosynthesis[102].

      Furthermore, expression of EgrNAC61, a SND1 homolog in Eucalyptus, is positively related to wood SCW formation and displays activity in Arabidopsis protoplast to induce expression of the SCW biosynthesis genes[103]. PtrNAC154[104], PtrNAC150/156/157, PtrZF1 and PtrGATA1 (two zinc-finger transcription factors)[81] are identified in Populus as activators for SCW thickening, while PtrWRKY19 and PtrKNAT7[105,106] exert repression on expression of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin biosynthesis genes.

      Studies have revealed a complex of regulatory genes that control formation of SCW in tree wood (Fig. 3). Generally, the identified genes display regulatory roles similar to their homologs in herbaceous model species. However, many of them perform distinct functions specific to tree species. For example, alternative splicing of PtrWND1B illustrates a mechanism to sustain homeostatic fiber cell wall thickening during wood formation in Populus, while its orthologs in Arabidopsis do not undergo alternative splicing[78]. In terms of cell wall structure and chemical composition, wood SCWs show diverse characteristics in various tree species and are also very different from those in herbaceous species[107,108]. Thus, formation of the characteristic of wood SCWs may be attributed to specific regulations unique to tree species, which are largely unknown. Understanding of the regulations underlying wood SCW formation has huge implications for tree improvement for biomaterial production.

    • SCW is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin, which are also the main components of wood[3] . To date, most of the genes that encode the enzymes catalyzing SCW biosynthesis during wood formation have been characterized.

      Cellulose, a biopolymer of unbranched β-(1,4)-linked glucan chains, is the most abundant component in wood SCW and its content has a substantial effect on its properties. Cellulose biosynthesis is catalyzed by cellulose synthases (CESAs)[109], which form a cellulose synthesis complex (CSC) localized on the plasma membrane (PM). On the PM, CSCs are co-localized with cortical microtubules (MTs) and moves along the MT bands to catalyze glucan chain elongation to form cellulose microfibrils extending into cell walls[67,110]. The P. trichocaropa genome contains 18 CESA genes to form two types of CSCs to synthesize cellulose wood cell walls[111,112]. Knockout or suppression of CESA in Populus results in the disruption of the SCW layered structure as well as alteration of the cellulose content and structure[113,114]. The CESA in different types of CSC showed distinct effects on the cellulose microfibril structure[114]. This suggests a possibility that CESA composition in CSC affects formation of the cellulose microfibril structure. In addition, wood cellulose biosynthesis involves other proteins. Ptrcel9A6 and PtrKOR1 (KORRIGAN 1) are EGase genes which are required for SCW cellulose formation[55,115]. They are expressed in developing xylem undergoing secondary wall thickening. Suppression of their expression results in thinner SCW with reduced cellulose content[55,115]. Studies have shown that sucrose synthase (SUS) is involved in cell wall thickening and cellulose biosynthesis[116,117]. While in tree species, reduction of the SUS activity does not specifically affect cellulose content but causes an overall decrease of biopolymers in wood[118], indicating that SUS may not be particularly involved in cellulose biosynthesis. The CYTOSOLIC INVERTASEs (CINs) convert sucrose to UDP- glucose. Suppression of CIN activity in Populus leads to a decrease in UDP- glucose and cellulose[119].

      Cellulose is a main component of wood and there has been a great deal of investigation to understand cellulose biosynthesis and its regulation. While the general molecular mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis has been elucidated, much more of its regulation is yet to be studied. Full understanding of how cellulose biosynthesis can be manipulated in relation to wood properties would help to engineer trees with desired cellulose and wood characters.

      Hemicellulose is a heteropolysaccharide and can form linkages with cellulose and lignin to make cell wall polymers connect together[120]. There are different types of hemicelluloses, such as xyloglucan, xylan, mannan, and β-(1→3)(1→4)-glucan. Xylan and mannan are the main hemicelluloses in SCW[121].

      Xylan is composed of a β-(1,4)-xylan backbone decorated with glycosyl substitutions and modifications with methyl and acetyl groups[122]. Genetic and biochemical analyses revealed that β-1,4-xylan backbone biosynthesis is mediated mainly by a xylan synthase complex composed of IRX10/IRX10L, IRX9/IRX9L and IRX14/IRX14L. Mutations in these genes show defects in xylan synthesis[122127]. In Populus, five GT43 glycosyltransferases are encoded by PtrGT43A/B/C/D/E genes, which are highly expressed in developing xylem[128]. Modification of their expression disrupts xylan synthesis[128]. In addition, more glycosyltransferase genes are reported to play a role in xylan synthesis. PoGT47C, PoGT8D and PoGT8E/F are suggested to act in synthesis of the xylan reducing end[128130]. In wood xylan, glucuronic acid (GlcA) is often methylated at the O-4 position by glucuronoxylan methyltransferases (GXMs)[131,132]. PtrGXM1, PtrGXM2, PtrGXM3, and PtrGXM4 in Populus have been reported to mediate the methylation of GlcA in xylan during wood formation[133]. DUF579 proteins show diverse function and PtrUF579-3 is able to catalyze the GlcA methylation of xylan in Populus[134,135]. Suppression of PtrDUF579-3 leads to a reduction in both the number of GlcA side chains and the degree of methylation on the GlcA side chain[134]. In addition to methylation, acetylation is another form of xylan modification. PtrXOATs (XYLAN O-ACETYLTRANSFERASE), DUF231 proteins in Populus, shows a catalyzing activity of acetylation on xylan[136]. The REDUCED WALL ACETYLATION (RWA) genes may play a role in the regulation of xylan acetylation. Four RWA genes in Populus, including RWA-A/-B/-C/-D, are expressed in developing wood and downregulation of these genes result in a reduction of xylan and xyloglucan acetylation in wood[137].

      Glucomannan and galactoglucomannan are two types of mannan SCWs. Glucomannan is mainly formed in angiosperms while galactoglucomannan is a major hemicellulose in gymnosperms[107]. Biosynthesis of the β-1,4-glucomannan backbone is catalyzed by cellulose synthase-like family A (CslA)[138]. Populus PtrCslA1 is highly expressed in wood-tissue, exhibiting glucomannan synthase activity for the biosynthesis of glucomannan during wood formation[111].

      Lignin, the second most abundant component after cellulose in wood, is a cross-linked phenolic polymer. Generally, lignin, which contains three subunits, H-, G- and S-monolignols, are polymerized by oxidative coupling of p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol and sinapyl alcohol[2,108]. Monolignol biosynthesis is achieved through a general phenylpropanoid pathway in cytosol and monolignols needed to be transported across the plasma membrane into the cell wall for polymerization. In the phenylpropanoid pathway, monolignol synthesis starts with deamination of phenylalanine catalyzed by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and is then catalyzed by a series of enzymes including cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), Hydroxycinnamoyl-Coa Shikimate/Quinate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferase (HCT), Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR), Ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H), Caffeate O-Methyltransferase (COMT) and Cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), to form three monolignols[108]. Analysis of genes associated with the phenylpropanoid pathway in Populus show a set of 23 genes that encode for the monolignol biosynthesis enzymes. Eighteen of the genes are preferentially expressed in developing xylem and may play a core role in the biosynthesis of monolignols during wood formation[139]. During wood formation, changing the expression of these genes results in significant changes in the content of monolignols[140]. Meanwhile, alternative routes are reported in monolignols biosynthesis. For instance, caffeoyl shikimate esterase (CSE) can catalyze the conversion of caffeoyl shikimate to caffeic acid[122]. Modification of CSE expression in Populus leads to defective lignin biosynthesis[141].

      Monolignol polymerization is believed to be catalyzed by laccases (LACs) and peroxidases[142]. Populus genome contains 49 LAC genes and 17 of them are highly expressed in developing xylem, likely participating in lignin polymerization in a redundant manner[143]. LAC expression is regulated by Ptr-miR397a. Overexpression of Ptr-MIR397a in Populus results in reduction of the LAC transcript abundance and lignin content[143]. Studies show that peroxidase plays a role in cell wall lignification in Arabidopsis[144] and down-regulation of anionic peroxidase alters both lignin content and composition in hybrid aspen[145].

      Lignin, a major component of SCW, is recalcitrant for the utilization of cell wall biomass in the production of biofuels and biochemicals[146,147]. Thus, modification of lignin is considered as an expectant strategy to circumvent the barrier for efficient processing of cell wall biomass[148]. Lignin modification in trees can change the lignin content and monolignol composition[149151]. However, modification of lignin is often concomitant with defects in growth and development. For example, down-regulating the expression of 4CL in Populus results in a decrease in lignin content and is accompanied by stunting in the growth of transgenic Populus[152]. To overcome the growth penalty caused by lignin modification, recent studies have developed a new approach to engineer lignin through cell-type specific modifications. Cell-specific downregulation of LTF1 or 4CL1 in the fibers and vessels of Populus xylem, respectively, result in the reduction of lignin content in fibers or vessels, while the fiber-specific lignin reduction does not affect plant growth but achieves improvements in wood biomass quality and saccharification efficiency[153,154]. In another study, vessel-specific reintroduction of lignin biosynthesis in the lignin biosynthesis-deficient Populus results in restoration of lignification in vessels and ray cells with hypolignification in fibers, and this modification yields increase of the wood biomass saccharification[155]. These studies indicate that lignin biosynthesis can be specifically regulated in different cell types in wood tissue. Cell-specific modification of lignin promises a new strategy to engineer lignin for improvement of wood cell wall biomass without growth penalty in trees.

    • In the process of wood formation, a series of irreversible autolysis, induced by the collapse of the vacuole, promotes PCD which is the last step in the formation of mature xylem cells[156,157]. Analyzing the maturation of secondary xylem of Populus revealed that many genes encoding proteases, nucleases, and autophage-related proteins are up-regulated before the PCD process of Populus xylem cells, indicating that they may be related to PCD during wood formation[157]. During the development of secondary xylem of Populus, 20S proteasome (20SP), a protein complex, was identified as having caspase-3-like activity related to PCD[158]. Treatments with Ac-DEVD-CHO (caspase-3 inhibitor) and clasto-lactacystin b-lactone (a proteasome inhibitor) inhibited the xylem differentiation of veins in Arabidopsis cotyledons and PCD of vessels in a VND6-induced Arabidopsis xylogenic culture, respectively, indicating the 20S proteasome is involved in xylem development and PCD[158]. PttMC13 (METACASPASES 13) and PttMC14 encoding cysteine proteases in Populus had been reported to play an important role in the process of proteolytic and xylem elements cell death[159]. Moreover, during PCD, endonucleases can catalyze the degradation of DNA, and two Ca2+-dependent DNase genes (EuCaN1 and EuCaN2) encoding endonuclease were identified in secondary xylem of Eucommia ulmoides[160]. Disrupting their expression resulted in abnormal xylem development, which may be related to their role in PCD[160].

      Formation of characteristic heartwood in trees is an interesting physiological process. The longitudinal and radial parenchyma cells in some tree species remain alive over the course of several years to contribute to heartwood formation[3,161,162]. Clearly, those cells may not be normally programed to go to full PCD process but keep active in synthesis of the compounds needed for heartwood maturation[3,161,162]. The molecular mechanisms that control the process of heartwood formation need further investigation and research.

      PCD is a crucial step in wood formation, accompanied by a series of irreversible hydrolysis processes and ultimate degradation of all cellular content, except the cell wall. While current understanding of PCD in relation to wood formation is insufficient, further research will help provide new insights into understanding of the development of distinct wood characteristics.

    • With the continuous advancement of research in tree molecular biology, we are on the way to extending our knowledge of the molecular regulation of wood formation. Recently, the release of the cell atlas of Populus xylem obtained by single-cell sequencing[163] provides a possibility to dissect the cellular developing lineage of wood formation at a single-cell resolution, which would open a new avenue to further our understanding of wood formation. Meanwhile, more and more tree genomes have being sequenced. Availability of the high-quality genome sequences which include tree species with a variety of wood properties will aid in mapping the genomic bases for regulation of the characteristics of wood formation. By combination of the genomic, genetic, molecular and cellular approaches, understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning wood formation will be advanced more quickly with more comprehensive elaborations, which will provide strong knowledge for improvement of wood with desired properties.

      • This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (32130072, 31630014) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB27020104).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  References (163)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Luo L, Li L. 2022. Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees. Forestry Research 2:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0005
    Luo L, Li L. 2022. Molecular understanding of wood formation in trees. Forestry Research 2:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return