ARTICLE   Open Access    

Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry

More Information
  • In order to meet people’s demand for strawberry during winter and early spring, strawberry is usually cultivated in solar greenhouses with forcing cultivation in northern China. However, low light intensities and short-days are the major obstacles that restrict strawberry growth. Therefore, it is crucial to solve the problem of insufficient light in strawberry production. In this study, we established LED facilities to supplement the red/blue light (R/B = 4:1) before sunrise and after sunset in the solar greenhouse. We found that the plant height of the strawberry under supplemental R/B light was 13%−17% higher than that of the control, and the crown diameter of the plants was increased by 1.07−1.38 fold compared with the control for two consecutive years. The net photosynthetic rate of strawberry plants was 19% higher than that of the control. In addition, the strawberry primary fruits’ fresh weight during the stage of full ripeness and the total fruit weight/plant was 18%−24% and 27%−33% higher than that of control for two years, respectively. Fruit soluble solid content and firmness were increased by 1.05−1.21 fold and 1.06−1.18 fold compared with those of control during the two years, respectively. Moreover, we found some differentially expressed genes between red/blue light supplementation and control by RNA-seq, including light-responsive genes (PRR95/LHY/CDF3/CO16/bHLH63/BBX21/PAR1/SIGE) and sucrose metabolism-related genes (SWEET9/BAM1). This study provided a foundation for revealing the mechanism of red/blue light supplementation on photosynthesis and fruit quality of strawberries and could help to improve the cultivation techniques for 'Yanli' strawberry.
  • Lotus, Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. (commonly known as Asian lotus), is one of the most commercially significant aquatic plants in the world. It belongs to the Nelumbonaceae family, which contains a single genus Nelumbo, with the American lotus (Nelumbo lutea Pear) as the only other extant species. The Asian lotus is geographically widely distributed in most Asian countries, as well as in Australia and Russia (Fig. 1). The American lotus, also known as yellow lotus, occurs primarily in eastern regions of North American and the Caribbean[1]. Due to geographical isolation by the Pacific Ocean, the two lotus species exhibit distinct morphologies in plant size, leaf, and petal shape, particularly in their petal colors. The Asian lotus displays diverse flower colors, including white, pink, red, pale yellow, as well as a variety of color patterns, while the American lotus only exhibit yellow flowers (Fig. 1). The two species, however, are genetically crossable and share rather similar aquatic habits and life cycles. Both of the two species have eight pairs of chromosomes (2n = 16), with approximately 800 Mb genome sizes, highly conserved gene contents, and little chromosomal rearrangements[2,3].

    Figure 1.  Geographical distribution of lotus accessions collected in the Wuhan National Lotus Germplasm Bank at the Wuhan Botanical Garden of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The different colored dots indicate cultivars belonging to different categories.

    While the American lotus predominantly grows naturally in the wild, the Asian lotus has been domesticated and cultivated over 3,000 years, for its nutritional, ornamental, and medicinal attributes[4]. The total lotus cultivation area in China is estimated to cover over 530,000 ha, and so far at least 4,500 lotus cultivar germplasm resources have been conserved[5]. Most of these cultivars are hybrids developed by traditional crossing, while approximately 300 are local genotypes collected from wild lakes all over the world (Fig. 1)[2]. These lotus cultivars are grouped into four categories based on their agricultural uses, including the flower lotus for ornamental purpose; the rhizome lotus for edible rhizome production; the seed lotus for harvesting fresh or mature seeds; and the medicinal lotus for pharmaceutical uses[6].

    As an ancient traditional herb, all lotus plant tissues have been used in the treatment of various diseases, such as fever, sunstroke, sweating, obesity, ischemia, cancer, diabetes, hepatopathy, and hypertension[710]. Its medicinal properties are largely ascribed to the abundantly accumulated active components in different lotus organs, including alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, polysaccharides, saponins, and minerals. Of these compounds, benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BIAs) are regarded as the most important pharmacological ingredients[11,12]. Here, we summarize the recent advances in the chemical profiles, pharmacological activities, extraction methods, and elucidations of its biosynthesis pathway.

    BIAs are a class of tyrosine-derived nitrogenous secondary metabolites with over 2,500 known structures[13]. The core chemical structure of BIAs consist of a benzene ring, a pyridine ring, and a second aromatic ring (Fig. 2)[14]. Like other plant-derived alkaloids, most BIAs are significantly bioactive[15]. Typical pharmacologically significant BIAs include morphine and codeine with analgesic traits, sanguinarine and berberine with antimicrobial properties, as well as noscapine, papaverine, and tubocurarine with antitussive, vasodilative, and muscle relaxant properties, respectively. The occurrence of BIAs in plants is restricted primarily in the order Ranunculales and eumagnoliids. However, their accumulation has been detected in other families, including Rutaceae, Lauraceae, Cornaceae, and Nelumbonaceae.

    Figure 2.  1-Benzylisoquinoline alkaloids reported in Nelumbo nucifera.

    The lotus plant richly accumulate BIAs in almost all its organs[11]. To date, at least 61 alkaloids (Table 1) have been identified in lotus since the first isolation of nuciferine, roemerine, and O-nornuciferine alkaloids from the plant in the 1960s[16,17]. Notably, all reported lotus alkaloids are BIAs except Oleracein E and Methylcorypalline, which contain only basic isoquinoline structures. Based on their structures, these BIAs can further be divided into three subclasses, including 1-benzylisoquinolines, aporphines, and bisbenzylisoquinolines (Figs 24). 1-Benzylisoquinoline alkaloids are basically intermediates in the biosynthesis of aporphines and bisbenzylisoquinolines, and are mostly accumulated in trace amounts in lotus tissues[18]. In contrast, aporphines and bisbenzylisoquinolines are the end BIA products in lotus, with their accumulation levels accounting for over 95% of the total BIA content[11].

    Table 1.  BIAs detected in the lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) tissues. Alkaloids are assigned with numbers as shown in Figures 25.
    No.AlkaloidFormulaEnantiomerOrganReference
    1-BENZYLISOQUINOLINE
    1LotusineC19H24NO3+E, S, F[25]
    2Methyl lotusineL
    3ArmepavineC19H23NO3(−)-R and (+)-SS, F, L[21]
    4CoclaurineC17H19NO3(+)-RS, L[26]
    5N-norarmepavineC18H21NO3(+)-RL[27]
    6N-methylisococlaurineC18H21NO3L[16,28]
    7N-methylcoclaurineC18H21NO3(−)-RL, S[16]
    8IsococlaurineC19H24NO3+L
    9MethylhigenamineS[17]
    10Norcoclaurine-6-O-glucosideS
    11NorcoclaurineC16H17NO3(+)-R and (+)-SS, L[26,29]
    12ArgemexirineS, L
    136-demethy-4-methyl-N-methylcoclaurineC18H21NO3S[30]
    14Nor-O-methylarmepavineC20H25NO3S[30]
    154’-N-methylcoclaurineC19H23NO3L, S[17]
    164’-methyl coclaurineL, S[17]
    17Bromo methyl armepavineL, S[17]
    18Methoxymethy lisoquinolineL, S[17]
    19HigenamineP[31,32]
    20Higenamine glucosideP[33]
    APORPHINE
    21NuciferineC19H21NO2(−)-RS, F, L[34,35]
    22N-nornuciferineC18H19NO2(−)-RS, L[26]
    23RoemerineC18H17NO2(−)-RS, F, L[16,26,32]
    24O-nornuciferineC18H19NO2(−)-RS, F, L[32,36]
    25AnonaineC17H15NO2(−)-RS, L[16,26]
    26LirinidineC18H19NO2(−)-RS, L[37]
    27Nuciferine-N-MethanolF
    28Nuciferine-N-AcetylF
    29Anonaine-N-AcetylF
    30CaaverineC17H17NO2(−)-RS, L[20,38]
    31Oxidation-nuciferineS, L, F[19,30]
    32AsimilobineC17H17NO2(−)-RS, F, L[17,20]
    33Methyl asimilobineS, L[17]
    34N-methyl asimilobineS, L[16,39]
    35Roemerine-N-oxideS, L[16,40]
    36N-methyl asimilobine-N-oxideS, L, F[16,19]
    37Nuciferine-N-oxideS, L, F[16,19]
    38DehydroanonaineC17H13NO2L[16]
    39DehydronuciferineC19H19NO2L[16]
    40DehydroaporphineC18H15NO2L[41]
    41NelumnucineS, L
    42DehydroroemerineL[16]
    43LiriodenineC17H9NO3L[16,40]
    447-hydroxydehy dronuciferineC19H19NO3L[16]
    45PronuciferineC19H21NO3(+)-R and (−)-SS, F, L[16,26,40]
    46GlaziovineS
    47LysicamineC18H13NO3L[38,42]
    48CepharadioneL[38]
    BISBENZYLISOQUINOLINE
    49NeferineC38H44N2O61R, 1'SS, F, E[17,31]
    50LiensinineC37H42N2O61R, 1'RS, F, E[35]
    51Isoliensinine1R, 1'SS, F, E[25]
    52N-norisoliensinineC36H40N2O6S, F, E[25]
    536-hydroxynorisoliensinineC36H40N2O6S, F, E
    54Methyl neferineS, E[10,17]
    55NelumboferineC36H40N2O6S, E[10,17]
    56NegferineC38H44N2O6L[17,26]
    57NelumborineF[17]
    58DauricineS, F[43]
    TRIBENZYLISOQUINOLINE
    59NeoliensinineC63H70N3O101R, 1'S, 1''RE[44]
    L, Leaf; E, embryo; F, flowers; S, seeds; R, rhizome; LS: leaf sap; NS, not specified.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 3.  Aporphine-type alkaloids isolated from Nelumbo nucifera.
    Figure 4.  Bis- and tri- benzylisoquinoline alkaloids isolated from Nelumbo nucifera.

    Unlike BIAs in the Ranunculales, lotus BIAs exhibit several unique features. Firstly, lotus BIAs show strict tissue specific accumulation patterns. Although BIAs are found in all the plant tissues, highest levels of approximately 3,000 μg/g fresh weight (FW) are accumulated in the laminae and plumules, followed by petals and petioles with about 500 and 100–200 μg/g FW, respectively. Conversely, lowest BIAs levels (less than 20 μg/g FW) occur in the rhizomes and stamens. Interestingly, the lotus bleeding sap contains extremely high BIAs level of up to 10,000 μg/g FW[11]. In addition, lotus leaves and petals predominantly accumulate aporphine BIAs, including nuciferine, O-nornuciferine, N-nornuciferine, roemerine, and anonaine, while the plumules mostly contain bis-BIAs of liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine[11]. Secondly, while BIAs prevalently assume the (S)-enantiomer conformation, lotus show enrichment of both (R)- and (S)-conformers. For example, both (R)- and (S)-stereoisomers of armepavine have been isolated from sacred lotus[1921]. To date, most aporphines isolated from lotus belong to the (R)-configurations (Table 1). Thirdly, all aporphine BIAs isolated from lotus lack the hydroxyl and methyl modifications at the C-3' and C-4' positions, suggesting that the (R)-N-methylcoclaurine might be the key precursor for both aporphine and bis-BIA biosynthesis in lotus[22].

    Lotus cultivars exhibit considerably diverse patterns of BIA composition and accumulation. Generally, seed cultivars accumulate the highest concentration of BIAs in leaves, followed by flower cultivars, while lowest levels are observed in the rhizome cultivars[11,23]. Multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) of 92 lotus cultivars showed that the seed cultivars generally accumulate high levels of nuciferine and O-nornuciferine, whereas flower cultivars primarily accumulate high N-nornuciferine, roemerine, and anonaine alkaloids[23]. In contrast, rhizome cultivars contain no dominant BIAs. Cluster analysis of the 92 cultivars also indicated that the American cultivar ‘Meizhouhuanglian’ could group with other Asian lotus cultivars, which suggested the lack of obvious differentiation between the American and the Asian lotus accessions based on BIA content and composition[23]. Developmentally, the lowest BIAs levels are accumulated in the lotus leaves at the bud stages (developmental stage S1). BIAs levels then increase steadily in the leaf growth and expansion stages, peak at S6 stage, then decrease slightly at the S7 senescence stage (Fig. 5a)[11]. Accumulation of BIAs in the lotus plumules is also developmentally regulated[24]. Major BIAs were almost undetectable in the plumules at 12 days post pollination (DAP), which later increased consistently until 21 DAP (Fig. 5b).

    Figure 5.  BIA profiles in the leaf and plumule during development. (a) Lotus leaves showing the seven defined developmental stages. (b) BIA profiles in the seven leaf developmental stages. (c) Lotus plumules showing different developmental stages. (d) BIA content in the plumule at different developmental stages. S, leaf developmental stages; DAP, days post pollination. The figure is modified from previous reports[11,24].

    Extraction of alkaloids from raw materials is the first analytical step in their identification, quantification, and application. Currently, three main alkaloid extraction methods with varied principles are widely used, including solvent extraction, distillation, expeller pressing and sublimation methods. Solvent extraction is presently the most popularly used method. The plant alkaloids occur mostly as salts of organic and inorganic acids[45,46], thus, acidic and basic solvents are initially required to remove the non-alkaloid compounds. Subsequently, appropriate purification methods, primarily acidic extraction is performed by mixing the ground sample materials with weak acid solutions (e.g., acetic acid in water, methanol, or ethanol), to obtain a desired level of purity. The solvent extraction is carried out in four steps: 1) assimilation of solvents into the target solid matrix; 2) alkaloid dissolution in solvents; 3) solvent diffusion out of a solid matrix; 4) collection of extracted solutes[47]. Theoretically, any factors that enhance the above steps can facilitate alkaloid extraction. Key factors that affect the extraction efficiency, include alkaloids-solvent solubility, sample particle size, solvent to solid ratio, extraction temperature, and extraction duration[48,49].

    The lotus BIAs are weak alkalescent compounds, with poor solubility or insolubility in water, but with rapid solubility in organic solvents. Based on the law of similarity and intermiscibility (like dissolves like), crude lotus BIAs extract are usually prepared in alcohol solvents (ethanol or methanol)[10,19]. Other solvents, such as hydrochloric acid, dichloromethane and trichloromethane have also been used for lotus BIA extraction[20]. The solvent extraction efficiency can be enhanced by finely grinding the lotus tissues, solvent refluxing, microwaving, and sonication. A recent comparative study, using three extraction solvent (methanol, 50% methanol, and water) and two different extraction conditions (reflux for 120 min twice or sonication for 30 min twice), suggested that the 'reflux in methanol' method could result in highest BIA recovery from lotus flowers (Table 2)[50]. Moreover, pre-basifying lotus leaves with 10% ammonia water revealed a significant two-fold nuciferine yield relative to that obtained from non-basified leaves[51].

    Table 2.  Extraction efficiency of alkaloids from lotus flower.
    Extraction methodContent (mg/g dry weight)aTotal
    12345678910
    Methanol, reflux1.76 (100)1.75 (100)0.07 (100)0.63 (100)0.69 (100)0.83 (100)1.45 (100)5.73 (100)1.30 (100)0.75 (100)14.96 (100)
    50% Methanol, reflux1.09 (62)1.35 (77)0.05 (71)0.50 (79)0.61 (88)0.78 (94)1.35 (93)3.79 (66)0.94 (73)0.56 (75)11.02 (74)
    H2O, reflux0.24 (14)0.35 (20)nd.b0.21 (33)0.18 (26)0.38 (45)0.78 (54)2.57 (45)0.66 (51)0.29 (38)5.66 (38)
    Methanol, sonication0.88 (50)1.11 (64)0.03 (44)0.39 (62)0.33 (48)0.47 (56)0.97 (67)2.77 (48)0.70 (54)0.42 (56)8.07 (54)
    50% Methanol, sonication0.98 (56)1.27 (73)0.04 (58)0.49 (78)0.47 (69)0.80 (96)1.38 (95)3.93 (69)0.97 (75)0.59 (79)10.92 (73)
    H2O, sonication0.14 (8)0.21 (12)nd.0.12 (20)0.08 (11)0.25 (30)0.53 (37)1.91 (33)0.48 (37)0.19 (26)3.91 (26)
    1. nuciferine; 2. N-nornuciferine; 3. N-methylasimilobine; 4. Asimilobine; 5. Pronuciferine; 6. Armepavine; 7. norarmepavine; 8. N-methylcoclaurine; 9. coclaurine; 10. Norjuziphine. a. relative value (%) against the content obtained by methanol under reflux is given in parentheses. b. less than the quantitation limit.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The conventional solvent extraction method is typically time consuming, requires large volume of organic solvents, and high cost waste solvent treatment. Consequently, modern or greener extraction methods, such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFC), high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC), and microwave assisted extraction (MAE) techniques have been developed and applied in BIAs extraction. SFE utilizes supercritical fluid as the extraction solvent, which has high solubility as liquid and high diffusivity as gas. SFE is almost pollution-free, and can efficiently extract alkaloids with no residual organic solvents[52]. The solvating properties of supercritical fluid can dramatically rise when the pressure and temperature are near their critical points. The supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) is one of the most widely used supercritical fluids due to its low critical temperature (31 °C), low cost, non-toxicity, chemical inertness, and non-flammability properties[46,5354]. However, due to the relatively low polarity of S-CO2, polar agents, such as methanol and water are used as modifiers to raise its polarity and enhance its efficiency for BIAs extraction from lotus tissues. A previous study showed that the highest nuciferine yield of 325.54 μg/g could be achieved with extraction conditions set at 70 °C, 30 MPa, flow rate 0.2 ml/min, 2 h extraction time, and with 10% (v/v) diethylamine and 1% (v/v) water in methanol as the polarity modifier[51].

    The HSCCC is a liquid-liquid partition chromatography technique that uses no solid support matrix. This method permits the introduction of crude samples directly into the hollow column, and eliminates the adsorbing effects on stationary phase material as well as artifact formation, thus offering maximum sample recovery capacity and a wide range of solvent system selection[55]. Ma et al. used a simple two-phase solvent system comprising of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-acetonitrile-water (5:3:3:2.5:5, v/v/v/v/v) to successfully purify four main aporphine alkaloids, including 2-hydroxy-1-methoxyaporphine, pronuciferine, nuciferine, and roemerine from a crude extract of lotus leaves[56].

    In addition to the above-mentioned methods, several other extraction methods, such as maceration, percolation, soxhlet, and pressurized liquid extraction are available for selection. Modern and green methods are preferred mostly due to their energy-efficiency, speed, and less solvent requirement, and high extraction yield. However, traditional techniques are still widely used at the industrial level due to their low investment cost. Overall, the selection of suitable extraction techniques depends not only on the physical, chemical, and stability of the target alkaloids, but also on time and cost of the extraction methods.

    Following extraction, the resulting crude BIA extracts are mixtures of a variety of natural products, such as phenolics, carotenes, glycosides, and terpenes, which require further separation and purification. The separation of BIAs depends largely on their physical and chemical characteristics, such as adsorption properties, partition coefficients, molecular sizes, solubility, and ionic strengths[47]. BIAs are mostly water-insoluble but soluble in organic solvents, while their acid salts are water-soluble or soluble in dilute acids, thus, these compounds can be precipitated by adding solvents (e.g., sodium bicarbonate, ammonia, or tartaric acid) that alter the reaction pH levels. Similar theory has been used to develop pH-zone-refining counter current chromatography techniques for lotus BIAs isolation[35,57].

    Isolation of pure lotus BIAs using conventional methods, such as column chromatography and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is extremely difficult due to their high structural similarity. The structurally similar BIAs can instead be rapidly separated by counter-current chromatography (CCC) according to their different partition coefficients in two immiscible solvents. The CCC is a liquid-liquid partition chromatography technique with no solid support matrixes, and has been widely used for the preparative isolation of lotus BIAs. Accurate selection of the solvent system is highly crucial when using the CCC method. Generally, the two-phase solvent system should have: no decomposition or denaturation effects on the target compounds, sufficient sample solubility and suitable partition coefficient values, and satisfactory retention capacity of the stationary phase[58]. For efficient separation, the partition coefficient (K) value of the target alkaloids and the separation factor between two BIAs (K2/K1) should be close to 1 and greater than 1.5, respectively[55]. Other factors, such as the rotary speed, the mobile phase flow rate, and the column temperature also affect the target alkaloid separation.

    Preparative separation of liensinine and its analogues from lotus plumules using CCC was first reported by Wu et al.[59]. The authors used two-phase solvent systems of light petroleum (b.p. 60–90 °C)–ethyl acetate–tetrachloromethane–chloroform–methanol–water (1:1:4:4:6:2, v/v) and ethyl acetate–tetrachloromethane–methanol–water (1:6:4:1, v/v) (Table 3) to successfully isolate bis-BIAs from lotus plumules in small- and large-scale, respectively. To limit the application of deleterious tetrachloromethane and chloroform solvents, another simplified HSCCC solvent system of n-hexane–ethyl acetate–methanol–water (5:8:4:5, v/v, containing 0.5% NH4OH) was developed and successfully used to separate liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine from crude lotus extract[60]. Later, several pH-zone-refining CCC solvent systems, which generally use 10 mM triethylamine in the upper organic phase and 5 mM HCl in the aqueous phase for adjustment of pH and K values of target compounds were developed[35,57,61,62]. These two phase solvent systems were used to successfully isolate over 98% pure BIA singletons from both plumules and leaves. Other than the CCC technique, a preparative liquid chromatography has also been developed for high purity laboratory-scale isolation of liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine[63].

    Table 3.  Major two-phase solvent systems developed for preparative separation of lotus BIAs through counter-current chromatography (CCC) techniques.
    Solvent systemsMix ratios (v/v)Target BIAsReference
    Light petroleum (60–90 °C)–ethyl acetate–tetrachloromethane–chloroform–methanol–water1:1:4:4:6:2Small scale
    Plumule BIAs
    [59]
    Ethyl acetate–tetrachloromethane–chloroform–methanol–water1:6:4:1Small scale
    Plumule BIAs
    [59]
    n-hexane–ethyl acetate–methanol–water5:8:4:5
    0.5% NH4OH
    Plumule BIAs[60]
    n-hexane–ethyl acetate–methanol–water5:5:2:8
    10 mM triethylamine
    5 mM HCl
    Plumule BIAs[57]
    Diethyl ether – Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4 (pH = 7.2 – 7.5)1:1Plumule BIAs[62]
    Petroleum ether (60–90 °C)–ethyl acetate–methanol–water5:5:2:8
    10 mM triethylamine
    5 mM HCl
    Leaf BIAs[61]
    n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water-[C4mim][PF6]5:2:2:8:0.1
    10 mM triethylamine
    3 mM HCl
    Whole plant BIAs[35]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    After extraction and purification, lotus BIAs are subjected to further identification and quantification processes. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques, particularly the reversed-phase LC methods, were predominantly employed[45]. Identification of known BIA compounds is normally accomplished by HPLC separation and UV detection, followed by electrospray ionization (ESI), and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The reversed-phase C18 columns are most ideal, and the application of aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.1% triethylamine as mobile phase has been shown to effectively separate both lotus leaf and plumule BIAs with strong peak signals and fine peak shapes[23,63,64]. Other optimized HPLC parameters for lotus BIAs characterization include: column temperature 30C; 270–280 nm UV/photodiode array (DAD) detection wavelength; the gradient elution mode, 40%–80% acetonitrile at 0–15 min, 80% acetonitrile at 15–18 min, 80%–40% acetonitrile at 18–19 min, 40% acetonitrile at 19–25 min; and a flow rate 0.8 ml/min. The MS detection of lotus BIAs are preferably conducted in the positive mode, with cone voltage of 20 V and a nebulizer gas temperature/pressure of 150 °C/21 psi. The needle, shield, and capillary voltage parameters are normally used with default settings. Such HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS methods have been used to identify the major leaf BIAs, including nuciferine, N-nornuciferine, O-nornuciferine, anonaine, and roemerine, as well as plumule BIAs, such as liensine, isoliensinine, and neferine (Table 4; Fig. 6; Fig. 7).

    Table 4.  Identification of major lotus leaf and plumule alkaloids and their HPLC-MS/MS ion characteristics.
    PeaksTRa (min)Molecular weightm/z
    [M + H]+
    Major fragment ionsAlkaloids
    1*7.56281282251/219N-nornuciferine
    2*9.03281282265/250O-nornuciferine
    3*10.17265266249/219Anonaine
    4*12.43295296265/250Nuciferine
    5*13.39279280249Roemerine
    66.61610611503/283/206Liensinine
    79.47610611489/297/192Isoliensinine
    817.72624625503/297/206Neferine
    * The retention time (TRa (min) of peaks 1–5 as obtained by Chen et al.[23].
    ∆ The retention time of peaks 6–9 as reported by Chen et al.[63].
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 6.  Analytical mass spectra of lotus leaf BIAs and their fragmentation pathways. The chemical structures and the corresponding peak numbers 1 to 5 represent signals for N-nornuciferine, O-nornuciferine, anonaine, nuciferine, and Roemerine, respectively. Figures are modified from Luo et al. [65] and Chen et al. [23].
    Figure 7.  Analytical mass spectra of lotus leaf BIAs and their fragmentation pathways. The chemical structures and the corresponding peak numbers 6 to 8 represent signals for liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine, respectively. Figures are modified from Chen et al. [64], Deng et al. [11], and Lai et al. [66].

    Currently, lotus BIAs are predominantly identified using the ultra-performance liquid chromatography technique equipped with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTof-MS). In contrast to traditional HPLC-MS methods, the UPLC-Q-Tof-MS technique exhibits higher sensitivity and resolution, and mass measurement accuracy, making it a powerful and reliable analytical technique for plant metabolite identification[65,66]. Under optimized UPLC-Q-Tof-MS conditions, over 20 BIAs were identified from lotus leaves and plumules, based on their chromatographic characteristics, UV spectra, exact mass, and MS fragments[31,65,67]. Moreover, these studies further verified previous observations that liensinine, isoliensinine, neferine, and lotusine are the major BIAs in lotus plumules, while those of aporphines, including nuciferine, roemerine, Anonaine, N- and O-nornuciferine are the major BIAs in lotus leaves.

    In addition to their nutritional roles, lotus is also a key source of herbal traditional Chinese medicine. Lotus was originally used to treat various diseases, such as pharyngitis, chest pain, cough, vomiting blood, fever, and heat stroke[68,69]. To date, extensive studies have identified a wide range of lotus bioactive ingredients, their pharmacological efficiencies, and health benefits. As key bioactive lotus constituents, BIA alkaloids have nowadays received significant attention. In the following sections, we present an overview of pharmacological activities of lotus BIAs from various tissues.

    As introduced above, lotus leaves accumulate primarily aporphine-type BIAs, with Nuciferine, N- and O-nornuciferine as the richest components. Diversified pharmacological activities of lotus leaves therefore attribute predominantly to these three BIAs. The nuciferine, for example, has shown anti-obesity, anti-virus, antioxidant, anti-cardiovascular, antimicrobial, and anti-cancer activities.

    Lipids are maintained through dynamic balances within the cell as Triglyceride (TG) by a series of synthesis and catabolism related transcription factors (TFs) and enzymes. Lotus alkaloids can exert lipid-regulating effects in several ways, including mainly inhibition of lipid synthesis and absorption, inhibition of cell proliferation and differentiation, and interaction with proteins. A study on the effects of nuciferine on blood lipids in male golden hamsters, feeding with normal diet, high-fat diet (HFD), or HFD supplemented with nuciferine (10 and 15 mg/kg·BW/day), revealed a reduction in total cholesterol (TC), TG, low-density lipoprotein and free fatty acids in hamsters treated with different doses of nuciferine after eight weeks[70]. In addition, nuciferine could alleviate dyslipidemia, and liver steatosis by inhibiting the expression of hepatic genes related to lipid metabolism in hamsters fed with a high-fat diet[70,71]. Similarly, a recent study demonstrated that lotus leaf extracts could inhibit adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and suppress obesity in high-fat diet-induced obese rats[72]. Overall, these pharmacological effects demonstrate the potential of lotus leaf BIAs as natural lipid-lowering agents.

    Currently, approximately 90% of global type 2 diabetic patients are characterized by hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Therefore, controlling the blood glucose levels of patients is crucial for diabetes treatment[73]. Huperzine has been reported to lower blood sugar via various mechanism in the body. Conversely, nuciferine can increase the glucose uptake by fat and muscle cells, thereby promoting insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells[56]. Nuciferine is also directly involved in the process of insulin secretion and has been shown to augment insulin secretion in the pancreatic β-cells by shutting down or stimulating the amplification of adenosine triphosphate pathway[74].

    Free radicals or oxidants that break down cells and tissues can affect metabolic function and cause different health challenges. Antioxidants are substances that effectively inhibit oxidation reaction of free radicals at low concentrations[75]. The antioxidant capacity of aporphine alkaloids isolated from the lotus leaves, including (R)-N-methylasimilobine, lysicamine, and (R)-nuciferine have been screened using antiradical scavenging, metal chelating, and ferric reducing power assays[38]. In addition, a previous study demonstrated that lotus leaf-fermented broth could exhibit 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, ferric ion reducing power, superoxide dismutase-like activity, tyrosinase inhibition, and nitrite scavenging activity, which provided scientific basis for the application of sugar-fermented lotus leaves as an antioxidant condiment[76]. A recent study reported that, to enhance, achieve, and maintain higher scavenging activity of DPPH radicals and hydroxyl radicals for lotus leaves, the optimal treatment should include oven drying the leaves at ~55–65 °C to maintain alkaloids and amino acids content[77].

    Bacteria is known to be one of the leading causes of numerous diseases. Over exposure or misuse of antibiotics can result in antibacterial resistance. Chinese herbal medicine has been demonstrated to be an excellent alternative for the treatment of such bacterial infections to avoid antibiotic resistance[78]. The n-butanol compound lotus leaves extracts can effectively inhibit peridontitis-causing bacteria, such as Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Y4, Actinomyces viscosus 19246, Porphyromonas gingivalis 33277, Fusobacterium nucleatum 25586, and Actinomyces naeslundii wvl 45[79]. Moreover, the lotus leaf alkaloids not only have anti-mitogenic effects, but also exhibit a stronger antibacterial effect on Escherichia coli. The lotus leaf alkaloids and flavonoids are considered as key bioactive components responsible for the antibacterial activity.

    A key characteristic of cancer is the indefinite cell proliferation, and lotus leaf alkaloids have been shown to exhibit antiproliferative properties against several cancer cells. For example, in the presence of nicotine, nuciferine could significantly inhibit the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells, suppress the activity of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, enhance Axin stability, and induce apoptosis. In addition, nuciferine could also down-regulate the expression levels of β-catenin and its downstream targets, including c-myc, cyclin D, and VEGF-A[80]. Methanolic lotus leaves extract, containing nuciferine, N-methylasimilobine, (-)-lirinidine, 2-hydroxy-1-methoxy-6a, and 7-dehydroaporphine, significantly inhibited melanogenesis in B16 melanoma cells[19]. Furthermore, the inhibitory potential of nuciferine against the growth of human breast cancer cells has been reported[81]. The inhibitory effect of nuciferine is likely due to its ability to block cancer cell division cycle and enhance cancer cell apoptosis.

    A recent study reported that 40 mg/kg nuciferine could not only significantly reduce aortic lesion and vascular plaque in ApoE(-/-) mice fed with a high-fat diet, but also attenuate migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo and in vitro through the Calm4/MMP12/AKT signaling pathway[82]. Nuciferine has also been associated with reduced vascular wall inflammation and significant down-regulation of vascular inflammatory factors, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, MCP-1, and NF-κB, with the latter being a major regulator during all phases of the inflammatory response[83]. Additionally, lotus leaf alkaloids are linked with vascular remodeling by down-regulating MMP-2 and 9 expression and inducing TIMP-2 expression. MMP is an important protease that degrades the extracellular matrix (ECM), while TIMP is a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, both of which contribute to atherosclerosis development[84].

    In contrast to lotus leaves, lotus plumules accumulate mainly bis-BIAs, with liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine the most abundant components. The bioactivities of these bis-BIAs contribute largely to the pharmacokinetic properties of lotus plumules.

    Antioxidant compounds, including alkaloids, phenolics, and saponins could be obtained from lotus plumules using 50% ethanol solvent extraction, and DPPH as well as nitric oxide in-vitro assays to test the hydro alcoholic extract of lotus plumules (HANN) revealed excellent free radical scavenging activity[85]. Neferine not only exhibited scavenging activity against ABTS, DPPH, NO, ONOO and O2 radicals, but also showed significant inhibitory properties against lipid peroxidation and protein nitration in the antioxidant assays (cell-free). In vivo assays also revealed that neferine could significantly reduce NFκB activation and moderately inhibit NO synthesis[86]. Neferine could also inhibit various diseases, such as vascular inflammation, hyperglycemia, and liver disease by reducing NO concentration in different cells and inhibiting the elevation of intracellular molecules, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA)[87]. In addition, total alkaloid from Nelumbinis Plumula (NPA) and its main alkaloids, including liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine showed significant cytoprotective effect on oxidative stress induced by tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP) in the human hepatocellular HepG2 cell line, and the protective effect could be associated with reduced ROS formation, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance production, lactate dehydrogenase release, and elevated GSH levels[88].

    Neferine is a crucial skin anti-inflammatory and anti-aging agent. For example, a previous study demonstrated that neferine could reduce the phosphorylation level of the MAPK/NF-κB pathway, and inhibit mast cell degranulation and cytokine expression by suppressing elevated intracellular calcium in mast RBL-2H3 cells stimulated with A23187/phorbol ester (PMA)[89]. In lipopolysaccharide-induced human endothelial cells, neferine could significantly inhibit the formation of inflammatory mediators, such as NO, tumor necrosis factor-α, cyclooxygenase-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and interleukin 1β due to its ability to regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κβ pathways[90]. In addition, neferine could inhibit lipopolysaccharide and dextran sulfate sodium-induced inflammation both in vitro and in vivo, alter protein expression of iNOS, COX-2, receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1), RIP3, mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL), and increase the protein expression of caspase-8 in colon tissues, all of which affected the incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC)[91]. As the combined effects of oxidative stress and inflammation leads to pathogenesis of numerous diseases, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms of lotus seed alkaloids need to be further explored.

    Liensinine and isoliensinine are two main bis-BIAs found in the lotus seed plumules, and both have been reported to have inhibitory effects against cell proliferation. For example, liensinine could functionally regulate the transforming growth factor β1-induced proliferation, migration, and signaling pathways of human tenon fibroblast cells via the mitogen-activated protein kinase 7 gene to enable rapid patients recovery after glaucoma surgery[92]. Liensinine could also not only significantly inhibit the proliferation of GBC cells in vitro by suppressing their G2/M phase growth in a dose- and time-dependent manner, but also induce apoptosis in gallbladder cancer cells by inhibiting the Zinc finger X-chromosomal protein (ZFX)-induced PI3K/AKT pathway[93]. In addition, previous reports have shown that liensinine could inhibit over-proliferation of gastric cancer cells and osteosarcoma cells[94,95]. Isoliensinine is a liensinine isoform, which has also been shown to exhibit inhibitory effects against angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced proliferation of porcine coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs)[96], as well as HepG2, Huh-7, and H22 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells[97]. Moreover, BIA alkaloids mixtures, including neferine, liensinine, and isoliensinine extracted from lotus plumules could delay or inhibit the abnormal proliferation and migration of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell (PASMCs) by regulating the expression of p-SRC and PIM1[98].

    Extensive anti-cardiovascular activities of Neferine, liensinine, and isoliensinine, such as anti-arrhythmic, anti-thrombic, and anti-hypertensive have been documented. Wicha et al.[99] demonstrated that neferine not only had hypotensive effects on NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester(L-NAME)-induced rats, but also induced vascular relaxation via the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ENOS)/nitric oxide (NO)/soluble guanylate cyclase (SGC) pathway. Neferine has shown potential effectiveness in preventing episodes of reentrant ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death after myocardial ischemic injury, and was effective against ischemic arrhythmias. In addition, neferine was shown to significantly inhibit adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen, arachidonic acid (AA) and platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced platelet aggregation in rabbits. A more recent study showed that, unlike neferine, isoliensinine could effectively scavenge early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) by inhibiting INaL and ICaL in ventricular myocytes, thus, demonstrating its potential anti-arrhythmic effects[100].

    To date, numerous studies have demonstrated the roles of alkaloids from lotus plumules, especially neferine in the treatment of different types of cancer. Neferine is a common chemosensitizer of vincristine that enhances the anti-tumor effect of vincristine by inhibiting gastric cancer cell proliferation (SGC7901) leading to their apoptosis. Neferine has also been shown to inhibit the growth of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells, arrest their cell cycle in G1 phase, and further induce apoptosis through lipid peroxidation, depletion of the mitochondrial membrane potential, MAPKs activation, DNA degredation, and intracellular calcium accumulation[101]. In addition, neferine could cure liver cancer cells (HepG2) and breast cancer cells (MCF-7) by inhibiting their cell proliferation and growth through different mechanisms[102]. Chang et al.[103] reported that in addition to neferine, liensinine could also act as an anti-tumor agent by inhibiting normal mitochondrial energy supply, impairing lysosomal function, and inhibiting the growth of non-small cell lung cancer both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, liensinine could inhibit the growth of gastric cancer cells by increasing ROS levels and inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway[94]. Similarly, isoliensinine could cause apoptosis in HepG2, Huh-7, and H22 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells by decreasing NF-κB activity and constitutively phosphorylating NF-κB p65 subunit at Ser536 in HCC cells[97]. Overall, lotus seeds are now widely used in various cancer treatments due to their broad antagonistic properties.

    In addition to the pharmacological effects mentioned above, lotus BIAs possess substantial functions in protection against photoaging related skin problems[104], reduced clinical manifestation of Alzheimer disorders[105], suppression of CCl4-induced liver damage, and bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis[106,107]. Other minor BIAs isolated from lotus, such as members of the 1-benzylisoquinolins type BIAs have also shown notable anti-HIV, anti-inflammatory, anti-arrhythmic, and anti-thrombotic properties[17]. Thus, lotus BIAs have significant potential for the development of novel drugs in treating various life-threatening human diseases, such as microbial infection, inflammation, atherosclerosis, cancer, obesity, neurological disorders, and diabetes.

    As mentioned above, lotus BIAs are predominantly aporphines and bis-BIAs, which accumulate mainly in lotus leaves and plumules[11,18]. Notable, 1-benzylisoquinolines, which are mostly biosynthetic intermediates and derivatives of the aporphines and bis-BIAs, have also been detected in lotus tissues in trace amounts. The biosynthetic pathways of lotus BIAs have been proposed based on their identified structures[12,22,29,108]. Noteworthily, lotus BIAs primarily occur as R-enantiomers, which is contrary to the predominant S-enantiomers occurrence in the Ranunculales.

    Similar to other plant BIAs, the biosynthesis of lotus BIAs starts also from the L-amino acid tyrosine. Tyrosine is first converted into L-dopamine (L-DOPA) and 4-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (4-HPAA), respectively by the catalyzation of tyrosine decarboxylase (TYDC)[109]. L-DOPA and 4-HPAA are subsequently condensed by norcoclaurine synthase (NCS) into (R)-norcoclaurine, the first BIA scaffold in plants[110] (Fig. 8). Two additional enzymatic steps, catalyzed by norcoclaurine 6-O-methyltransferase (6OMT) and (R)-coclaurine N-methyltransferase (CNMT) respectively, yield the core intermediate (R)-N-methylcoclaurine of almost all BIAs[15]. In other BIA accumulating species, N-methylcoclaurine normally undergoes two further 3'-hydoxylation and 4'-Omethylation reactions, catalyzed by (S)-N-methylcoclaurine 3'-hydroxylase (CYP80B) and 3'-hydroxy-N-methylcoclaurine 4'-O-methyltransferase (4'OMT), respectively, to yield (S)-reticuline, which is another central precursor and a major branch point of numerous BIA structures, including morphine and berberine. Interestingly, neither reticuline nor corytuberine have been isolated from lotus tissues to date. In addition, all identified aporphine-type BIAs in lotus lack the hydroxyl and methyl modifications at the C-4' and C-3' positions, suggesting that the two enzymatic steps catalyzed by CYP80B and 4’OMT are not necessary for aporphine biosynthesis in lotus[22,110]. Consistently, a recent study showed that pronuciferine is the lotus aporphine biosynthesis precursor, and it is synthesized from the core intermediate (R)-N-methylcoclaurine by the enzymatic actions of NnCYP80G and 4-O-methyltransferase (7OMT)[12] (Fig. 8). According to the lotus BIA structures, production of nuciferine from the pronuciferine precursor may arise from an unknown dehydration reaction[18]. Additional modifications, such as N-demethylation, O-demethylation, and methylenedioxy-bridge formation, catalyzed by the N-demethlase (NDM), O-demethlase (NDM), and CYP719A, respectively[22,111], transforms nuciferine into other diverse aporphines (Fig. 8).

    Figure 8.  Proposed BIAs biosynthetic pathway in lotus. Steps marked with red, green, and purple background represent the common reactions for the biosynthesis of (R)-N-Methylcoclaurine, the lotus aporphine branch, and the bis-BIA biosynthesis branch, respectively. All biosynthetic enzymes are shown in red. The (R)-N-Methylcoclaurine is the branch point for aporphine and bis-BIA biosynthesis in lotus. Dotted arrows indicate multiple enzymatic or unknown steps.

    The lotus bis-BIAs can also directly be synthesized from the (R)-N-methylcoclaurine precursor (Fig. 8). The 7-O3' coupling reaction, catalyzed by CYP80A enzyme, transfers two molecules of (R)-N-methylcoclaurine into Nelumboferine, which is the first bis-BIAs in the bis-BIA biosynthesis pathway[12,108]. Two further enzymatic steps, catalyzed by the 4'OMT and 7OMT enzymes respectively, yield the three major bis-BIAs, including liensinine, isoliensinine, and neferine. Other enzymatic modifications, including N-demethylation, double 4'-Omethylation, 8-O3' and 3'-3' intermolecular couplings, result in the production of other diverse bis-BIA structures (Fig. 4).

    The currently advanced next generation sequencing techniques have facilitated the availability of at least seven high quality lotus genome versions as references for isolation of BIAs biosynthetic genes[2,112115]. The previously functionally characterized BIAs pathway genes in the Ranunculales[116] have been retrieved and used to query and predict most of their corresponding homologs from the lotus genomic and transcriptomic data based on sequence similarities. As a result, at least 5, 4, and 1 TYDC, NCS, and CNMT candidate gene copies, respectively have been predicted in the early lotus BIA biosynthesis pathway[22]. Similarly, seven OMT genes have been identified, with four and three of which forming clusters with the 6OMT/4’OMT and 7OMT clades, respectively. In addition, downstream lotus BIA biosynthetic gene sequences, including CYP80A, CYP80G, CYP719A, NDM, and ODM have been isolated[22,29].

    The lack of stable lotus transformation system has hindered functional characterization of most its BIA pathway enzymes. Consequently, functional studies have mostly involved correlation analysis between gene expression levels and spatial temporal BIA accumulation patterns in different lotus tissues or developmental stages[22,29,117,118]. In vitro enzymatic assays were recently used to functionally characterize four lotus OMTs, with NnOMT1 exhibiting 6OMT activity and accepting both S- and R-substrates, while NnOMT5 mainly showing 7-O-methyltransferase activity with strong S-enantiomer stereospecific preference[119]. In contrast, Nn6OMT and Nn7OMT have both been shown to display 6-O and 7-O methyltransferase activities[108,120]. Notably, none of these NnOMTs accepted aporphine substrates, indicating that O-methylation reactions proceed primarily from 1-benzylisoquinoline intermediates.

    The core intermediate (R)-N-Methylcoclaurine is the lotus BIA biosynthesis branch point, from which intermolecular C-O phenol coupling reaction catalyzed by NnCYP80A produces diverse bis-BIAs, while the intramolecular C-C phenol coupling reaction catalyzed by NnCYP80G yields aporphines (Fig. 8). Two recent studies[12,108] have functionally characterized the enzymes responsible for the lotus CYP80A and CYP80G members. The expression of NnCYP80G in yeast could efficiently convert the (R)-N-Methylcoclaurine substrate into a pronuciferine glaziovine in lotus, while in the presence of NnOMT5, glaziovine could efficiently be transferred into pronuciferine[12]. Similarly, the expression of NnCYP80A augmented with CPR and CYB5 in yeast could catalyze the production of nelumboferine from (R)-N-Methylcoclaurine substrate[108]. In addition, NnCYP719A, which is the third P450 in lotus could efficiently convert caaverine and lirinidine substrates into anonaine and roemerine, respectively.

    Although the sequences of other lotus BIA biosynthetic genes, such as NnTYDCs, NnNCSs, NnCNMT, NnODMs, and NnNDMs have already been isolated based on similarities with homologs from other BIA producing species, they are still yet to be functionally validated. Since none of the isolated lotus NCSs exhibit NCS activity, a non-enzymatic Pictet-Spengler condensation of dopamine and 4-HPAA might yield norcoclaurine in lotus[108]. However, since both R and S enantiomers of norcoclaurine have been detected in lotus, it is unlikely to entirely rule out the possibility of additional enzyme requirement for the Pictet-Spengler condensation and the formation of (S)-norcoclaurine in lotus, as well as a second enzyme for stereochemical inversion of (S)-norcoclaurine to (R)-norcoclaurine.

    Unlike their characterization, little knowledge is still available on the regulation of lotus BIA genes. A previous comparative transcriptomic analysis of high and low BIA accumulating lotus cultivars showed that the expression levels of most BIA biosynthetic genes were significantly higher in the former than the latter cultivar[22], suggesting transcriptional regulation of lotus BIA biosynthesis. Correlation analysis between gene expression profiles and BIA contents revealed 16 candidate TFs, such as WRKYs, MYBs, ERFs, and bHLHs that potentially regulate lotus BIAs biosynthesis. As an important group of secondary metabolites, lotus BIA biosynthesis is regulated by mechanical wounding and jasmonate (JA) treatment[11,121]. To date, the only two functionally characterized BIA regulator TFs are NnWRKY70a and NnWRKY70b, which both belong to the group III WRKY TFs and are JA responsive. Overexpression of NnWRKY70a and NnWRKY70b in the lotus petals significantly enhanced BIA biosynthesis. Functional validation assays showed that NnWRKY70a and NnWRKY70b could directly bind and activate one or more BIA biosynthetic gene promoters, while NnWRKY70b could physically interact with NnJAZ1 and two other WRKY TFs (NnWRKY53b and NnWRKY70a), thus suggesting its potential interaction with other WRKY TFs to regulate lotus BIA biosynthesis via the JA signaling pathway[122].

    Lotus contains a vast number of BIAs, most of which are R-conformers. Aporphines and bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids are the two major lotus BIAs types, and are predominantly accumulated in the leaves and plumules, respectively. The lotus BIAs are generally weak alkalescent compounds with poor solubility or insoluble properties in water, but soluble in organic solvents. The crude lotus BIAs are commonly extracted with ethanol or methanol solvents, assisted with reflux, sonication, and microwave techniques. Critical fluid extraction and high-speed counter-current chromatography are relatively greener, energy-efficient, time- and solvent-saving, as well as high yielding BIA extraction techniques. The UPLC-Tof-MS is currently the most popular method for BIA isolation, characterization, and quantification. Lotus BIAs harbors significant medicinal properties with potential application in the treatment of various life-threatening diseases, such as obesity, inflammation, cancer, HIV, and aniocardiopathy.

    The availability of high-quality lotus genome sequences have facilitated the isolation of most genes or enzymes involved in lotus BIA biosynthesis and regulation. However, functional characterization specifically through protein expression in engineered yeast strain and downstream enzyme activity assays have only been successfully conducted for NnOMTs, NnCYP80A, and NnCYP80G. Future intensive work on functional characterization of putative genes and enzymes is needed to fully elucidate the lotus BIA biosynthetic pathways. In addition, although the tissue specific accumulation of lotus BIAs has been clarified, the exact cell types involved in lotus biosynthesis and storage remain largely unknown. Combining cutting edge spatial metabolomics with single-cell RNA sequencing would not only give valuable clues on the localization of BIAs and their biosynthetic enzymes, but also facilitate the isolation of BIA biosynthesis regulators as well as possible intermediate transporters. The unique stereochemistry of BIAs in this basal eudicot species is equally worthy of research both at the molecular and biochemical levels.

    The ultimate aim studying lotus BIAs is of course to develop clinical drugs based on these molecules. There is no doubt that BIAs in lotus bear significant pharmacological activities. It should be noticed, however, unmodified lotus BIAs possess suboptimal efficiency in absorption, metabolism, excretion and toxicity properties. Research should be directed on total chemical synthesis, structural modifications, creation of BIA hybrids or new BIA analogs, with an aim to develop lotus BIA-based novel drugs for treatment of degenerative diseases, cancer, and the continuous threat of novel infections like COVID-19.

    The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study design: Li J, Deng X; wrote the manuscript: Wei X, Deng X; revised the manuscript: Zhang M, Ogutu C, Yang M. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    This project was supported by funds received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 32070336 and 32370428) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant no. ZR2021MC163).

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Supplemental Table S1 All DEGs.
    Supplemental Table S2 Top GO.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 Phenotype of strawberry cultivar ‘Yanli’ under supplemental R/B lighting (B) and control (A).
  • [1]

    Afrin S, Gasparrini M, Forbes-Hernandez TY, Reboredo-Rodriguez P, Mezzetti B, et al. 2016. Promising Health Benefits of the Strawberry: A Focus on Clinical Studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64:4435−49

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00857

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Palei S, Das AK, Rout GR. 2015. In vitro studies of strawberry-an important fruit crop: a review. The Journal of Plant Science Research 31:115

    Google Scholar

    [3]

    Hidaka K, Okamoto A, Araki T, Miyoshi Y, Dan K, et al. 2014. Effect of photoperiod of supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes on growth and yield of strawberry. Environmental Control in Biology 52:63−71

    doi: 10.2525/ecb.52.63

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    López-Aranda JM, Soria C, Santos BM, Miranda L, Domínguez P, et al. 2011. Strawberry production in mild climates of the world: a review of current cultivar use. International Journal of Fruit Science 11:232−44

    doi: 10.1080/15538362.2011.608294

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wei H, Liu C, Hu J, Jeong BR. 2020. Quality of Supplementary Morning Lighting (SML) during propagation period affects physiology, stomatal characteristics, and growth of strawberry plants. Plants 9:638

    doi: 10.3390/plants9050638

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zheng L, He H, Song W. 2019. Application of light-emitting diodes and the effect of light quality on horticultural crops: A review. Hortscience 54:1656−61

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI14109-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nadalini S, Zucchi P, Andreotti C. 2017. Effects of blue and red LED lights on soilless cultivated strawberry growth performances and fruit quality. European Journal of Horticultural Science 82:12−20

    doi: 10.17660/eJHS.2017/82.1.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zahedi SM, Sarikhani H. 2017. The effect of end of day far-red light on regulating flowering of short-day strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Nv. Paros) in a long-day situation. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 64:83−90

    doi: 10.1134/S1021443717010198

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Miao L, Zhang Y, Yang X, Xiao J, Zhang H, et al. 2016. Colored light-quality selective plastic films affect anthocyanin content, enzyme activities, and the expression of flavonoid genes in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit. Food Chemistry 207:93−100

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hogewoning SW, Wientjes E, Douwstra P, Trouwborst G, van Ieperen W, et al. 2012. Photosynthetic quantum yield dynamics: From photosystems to leaves. The Plant Cell 24:1921−35

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097972

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Paradiso R, Meinen E, Snel JFH, De Visser P, Van Ieperen W, et al. 2011. Spectral dependence of photosynthesis and light absorptance in single leaves and canopy in rose. Scientia Horticulturae 127:548−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.11.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Hogewoning SW, Trouwborst G, Maljaars H, Poorter H, van Ieperen W, et al. 2010. Blue light dose - responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. Journal of Experimental Botany 61:3107−17

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Trouwborst G, Hogewoning SW, van Kooten O, Harbinson J, van Ieperen W. 2016. Plasticity of photosynthesis after the 'red light syndrome' in cucumber. Environmental and Experimental Botany 121:75−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Ouzounis T, Heuvelink E, Ji Y, Schouten HJ, Visser RGF, et al. 2016. Blue and red LED lighting effects on plant biomass, stomatal conductance, and metabolite content in nine tomato genotypes. Acta Horticulturae 1134:251−58

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2016.1134.34

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Choi HG, Moon BY, Kang NJ. 2015. Effects of LED light on the production of strawberry during cultivation in a plastic greenhouse and in a growth chamber. Scientia Horticulturae 189:22−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Díaz-Galián MV, Torres M, Sanchez-Pagán JD, Navarro PJ, Weiss J, et al. 2021. Enhancement of strawberry production and fruit quality by blue and red LED lights in research and commercial greenhouses. South African Journal of Botany 140:269−75

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Li H, Dai H, Liu Y, Ma Y, Wu D, et al. 2015. A new strawberry cultivar 'Yanli'. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 42:799

    doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0485

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chang L, Zhang Z, Yang H, Li H, Dai H. 2007. Detection of strawberry RNA and DNA viruses by RT-PCR using total nucleic acid as a template. Journal of Phytopathology 155:431−36

    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01254.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Strader L, Weijers D, Wagner D. 2022. Plant transcription factors - being in the right place with the right company. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 65:102136

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen C, Tian X, Li J, Bai S, Zhang Z, et al. 2022. Two central circadian oscillators OsPRR59 and OsPRR95 modulate magnesium homeostasis and carbon fixation in rice. Molecular Plant 15:1602−14

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.09.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Liu Y, Ma M, Li G, Yuan L, Xie Y, et al. 2020. Transcription factors FHY3 and FAR1 regulate light-induced CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 gene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 32:1464−78

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00981

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Lv X, Zeng X, Hu H, Chen L, Zhang F, et al. 2021. Structural insights into the multivalent binding of the Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter by the CO-NF-Y master transcription factor complex. The Plant Cell 33:1182−95

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yang J, Yang M, Wang D, Chen F, Shen S. 2010. JcDof1, a Dof transcription factor gene, is associated with the light-mediated circadian clock in Jatropha curcas. Physiologia Plantarum 139:324−34

    doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01363.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Hao Y, Zhang X, Liu Y, Ma M, Huang X, et al. 2022. Cryo-EM structure of the CRY2 and CIB1 fragment complex provides insights into CIB1-mediated photosignaling. Plant Communications 11:100475

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bursch K, Toledo-Ortiz G, Pireyre M, Lohr M, Braatz C, et al. 2020. Identification of BBX proteins as rate-limiting cofactors of HY5. Nature Plants 6:921−28

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0725-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Roig-Villanova I, Bou J, Sorin C, Devlin PF, Martínez-García JF. 2006. Identification of primary target genes of phytochrome signaling. Early transcriptional control during shade avoidance responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 141:85−96

    doi: 10.1104/pp.105.076331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Gruda N. 2005. Impact of environmental factors on product quality of greenhouse vegetables for fresh consumption. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24:227−47

    doi: 10.1080/07352680591008628

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Peet MM. 1997. Greenhouse crop stress management. International symposium on growing media and hydroponics 481:643−54

    Google Scholar

    [29]

    Weston LA, Barth MM. 1997. Preharvest factors affecting postharvest quality of vegetables. HortScience 32:812−16

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.32.5.812

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Wang T, Wu G, Chen J, Cui P, Chen Z, et al. 2017. Integration of solar technology to modern greenhouse in China: Current status, challenges and prospect. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70:1178−88

    doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ottosen CO, Rosenqvist E, Sorensen L. 2003. Effect of a dynamic climate control on energy saving, yield and shelf life of spring production of bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). European Journal of Horticultural Science 68:26−31

    Google Scholar

    [32]

    Hernández R, Kubota C. 2016. Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs. Environmental and Experimental Botany 121:66−74

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Li Y, Liu C, Shi Q, Yang F, Wei M. 2021. Mixed red and blue light promotes ripening and improves quality of tomato fruit by influencing melatonin content. Environmental and Experimental Botany 185:104407

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wang J, Lu W, Tong Y, Yang Q. 2016. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:250

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Warner R, Wu B, MacPherson S, Lefsrud M. 2021. A review of strawberry photobiology and fruit flavonoids in controlled environments. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:611893

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.611893

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Tang Z, Yu J, Xie J, Lyu J, Feng Z, et al. 2019. Physiological and growth response of pepper (Capsicum annum L.) seedlings to supplementary red/blue light revealed through transcriptomic analysis. Agronomy 9:139

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy9030139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Liang Y, Kang C, Kaiser E, Kuang Y, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Red/blue light ratios induce morphology and physiology alterations differently in cucumber and tomato. Scientia Horticulturae 281:109995

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.109995

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Chen F, Zheng G, Qu M, Wang Y, Lyu MJA, et al. 2021. Knocking out NEGATIVE REGULATOR OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS 1 increases rice leaf photosynthesis and biomass production in the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:1836−49

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa566

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Dodd AN, Belbin FE, Frank A, Webb AAR. 2015. Interactions between circadian clocks and photosynthesis for the temporal and spatial coordination of metabolism. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:245

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00245

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Yanagisawa S. 2004. Dof domain proteins: Plant-specific transcription factors associated with diverse phenomena unique to plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 45:386−91

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Meng Y, Li H, Wang Q, Liu B, Lin C. 2013. Blue light–dependent interaction between cryptochrome2 and CIB1 regulates transcription and leaf senescence in soybean. The Plant Cell 25:4405−20

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116590

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhao X, Heng Y, Wang X, Deng XW, Xu D. 2020. A positive feedback loop of BBX11-BBX21-HY5 promotes photomorphogenic development in Arabidopsis. Plant Communications 1:100045

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Xu D. 2020. COP1 and BBXs-HY5-mediated light signal transduction in plants. New Phytologist 228:1748−53

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16296

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Song Z, Bian Y, Liu J, Sun Y, Xu D. 2020. B-box proteins: pivotal players in light-mediated development in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62:1293−309

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Liu Y, Wei H, Ma M, Li Q, Kong D, et al. 2019. Arabidopsis FHY3 and FAR1 regulate the balance between growth and defense responses under shade conditions. The Plant Cell 31:2089−106

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00991

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Lysenko EA. 2007. Plant sigma factors and their role in plastid transcription. Plant Cell Reports 26:845−59

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0318-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Mellenthin M, Ellersiek U, Börger A, Baier M. 2014. Expression of the Arabidopsis sigma factor SIG5 is photoreceptor and photosynthesis controlled. Plants 3:359−91

    doi: 10.3390/plants3030359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Chi W, He B, Mao J, Jiang J, Zhang L. 2015. Plastid sigma factors: their individual functions and regulation in transcription. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics 1847:770−78

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kanazawa T, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, Hanaoka M, Tanaka K. 2013. Characterization of four nuclear-encoded plastid RNA polymerase sigma factor genes in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha: blue-light-and multiple stress-responsive SIG5 was acquired early in the emergence of terrestrial plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 54:1736−48

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Paponov M, Kechasov D, Lacek J, Verheul MJ, Paponov IA. 2020. Supplemental light-emitting diode inter-lighting increases tomato fruit growth through enhanced photosynthetic light use efficiency and modulated root activity. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1656

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01656

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Wang S, Jin N, Jin L, Xiao X, Hu L, et al. 2022. Response of tomato fruit quality depends on period of LED supplementary light. Frontiers in Nutrition 9:833723

    doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.833723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Naznin MT, Lefsrud M, Gravel V, Hao X. 2016. Using different ratios of red and blue LEDs to improve the growth of strawberry plants. Acta Horticulturae 1134:125−30

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2016.1134.17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Nhut DT, Takamura T, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Tanaka M. 2003. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under superbright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 73:43−52

    doi: 10.1023/A:1022638508007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Campbell SM, Sims CA, Bartoshuk LM, Colquhoun TA, Schwieterman ML, et al. 2020. Manipulation of sensory characteristics and volatile compounds in strawberry fruit through the use of isolated wavelengths of light. Journal of Food Science 85:771−80

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Wang L, Luo Z, Yang M, Liang Z, Qi M, et al. 2022. The action of RED light: Specific elevation of pelargonidin-based anthocyanin through ABA-related pathway in strawberry. Postharvest Biology and Technology 186:111835

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111835

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wang Y, Tang X, Wang B, Dai H, Zhang Z. 2023. Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry. Fruit Research 3:4 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2023-0004
    Wang Y, Tang X, Wang B, Dai H, Zhang Z. 2023. Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry. Fruit Research 3:4 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2023-0004

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(5726) PDF downloads(909)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry

Fruit Research  3 Article number: 4  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: In order to meet people’s demand for strawberry during winter and early spring, strawberry is usually cultivated in solar greenhouses with forcing cultivation in northern China. However, low light intensities and short-days are the major obstacles that restrict strawberry growth. Therefore, it is crucial to solve the problem of insufficient light in strawberry production. In this study, we established LED facilities to supplement the red/blue light (R/B = 4:1) before sunrise and after sunset in the solar greenhouse. We found that the plant height of the strawberry under supplemental R/B light was 13%−17% higher than that of the control, and the crown diameter of the plants was increased by 1.07−1.38 fold compared with the control for two consecutive years. The net photosynthetic rate of strawberry plants was 19% higher than that of the control. In addition, the strawberry primary fruits’ fresh weight during the stage of full ripeness and the total fruit weight/plant was 18%−24% and 27%−33% higher than that of control for two years, respectively. Fruit soluble solid content and firmness were increased by 1.05−1.21 fold and 1.06−1.18 fold compared with those of control during the two years, respectively. Moreover, we found some differentially expressed genes between red/blue light supplementation and control by RNA-seq, including light-responsive genes (PRR95/LHY/CDF3/CO16/bHLH63/BBX21/PAR1/SIGE) and sucrose metabolism-related genes (SWEET9/BAM1). This study provided a foundation for revealing the mechanism of red/blue light supplementation on photosynthesis and fruit quality of strawberries and could help to improve the cultivation techniques for 'Yanli' strawberry.

    • Strawberry is an important economic crop with delicious and nutritious fruit[1,2]. In north China, strawberry is usually cultivated in solar greenhouses with forcing cultivation during the winter and early spring season. Forcing cultivation has the advantages of breaking dormancy and prolonging the harvest time in strawberry. However, under this condition, low light intensities and short-days are the major obstacles that restrict strawberry growth and development. There are many reasons for this problem, including short sunshine time and frequent hazy weather in winter, covering for heat preservation, and reducing light transmittance after the surface of the shed film absorbs dust, etc. These conditions may lead to reduced photosynthesis and thus affect plant growth and development of strawberry. Therefore, it is crucial to solve the problem of insufficient light in strawberry production.

      The artificial supplemental light source is an important cultivation technology for strawberry plants grown in greenhouses[3,4]. LED (Light Emitting Diode) was widely used in horticultural production in controlled environments due to the advantages of small size, relatively low heat release, great wavelength controllability, long lifetime, and low power consumption[5,6]. Different light wavelengths have different effects on strawberry plants' development and fruit quality[7,8]. To improve light-use efficiency in a greenhouse, more and more researchers pay attention to which corresponding light wavelengths are required for different growth and development processes of plants[9].

      Red light is one of the most efficient light qualities for powering plants' photosynthesis[10,11], but monochromatic red light may cause abnormal phenotypes because of a lower photosynthetic rate in several crop plants, such as leaf curling and leaf thickness, etc[12,13]. Adding blue light can suppress these symptoms[1214]. Other studies showed that red and blue light mixed wavelength is beneficial to enhance strawberry production and fruit quality[15,16]. However, the effective model of R/B light supplementation in strawberry cultivar 'Yanli' is poorly understood.

      Strawberry cultivar 'Yanli' was released from Shenyang Agricultural University, China. The fruit has excellent flavor and aroma and the exterior is a regular conic shape and bright red. It is grown in different provinces of China, especially cultivated by forcing cultivation in solar greenhouses in northern China[17]. Therefore, it is necessary to study its effective cultivation practices. We established LED facilities to supplement the red/blue light (R/B = 4:1) for 'Yanli' before sunrise and after sunset in the solar greenhouse. The results showed that the photosynthetic efficiency, soluble solid content and yield were increased. In addition, we initially screened the candidate genes for improving photosynthesis and fruit quality in 'Yanli' strawberry under the condition of red/blue light supplementation by RNA-seq. These results will help to perfect the cultivation techniques for strawberry cultivar 'Yanli'.

    • 'Yanli' (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants were grown in the greenhouse at Shenyang Agricultural University (Liaoning province, China). Runner plants of 'Yanli' were planted in the greenhouse in early September every year. After 30 d, 20 of them were subjected to the condition of a mixture of red (R) and blue (B) light at 06:30−08:00 AM (before sunrise) and 15:50−19:00 PM (after sunset) daily. Supplemental light treatments were provided using LED lamps (North Brilliancy Technology Co., LTD, Shenzhen, China). These LED lamps were installed at 1.5 m above the strawberry plants. The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was measured by a quantum sensor (LI-250A, LI-COR, USA), and the PPFD ratio of red (3.9261 μmol·m–2·s–1) to blue (0.9716 μmol·m–2·s–1) to supplemental light (R/B) was 4:1. Plants without any supplemental light were used as control.

    • The height and crown diameter of strawberry plants were measured before reproductive growth. Plant height was measured from the ground to the highest blade. The crown diameter was the diameter of the leaf clusters. Primary fresh fruits were weighed. During the ripening stages of strawberry, the soluble solid content (SSC) of the strawberry juice was measured by a digital pocket refractometer ATAGO PAL-α (Atago Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the firmness of fresh fruit was measured using a texture analyzer (GY-4, Handpi). Two opposite sites on the fruit shoulder were measured for each fruit, and the average firmness value of each fruit was recorded. Photosynthetic indexes, including net photosynthetic rate(Pn), stomata conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr), were measured with a portable photosynthesis system (CIRAS-2, PP Systems, Massachusetts, USA) within the hours of 8:30−11:30 AM under sunny conditions. Third fully opened and new leaves from each plant were used for the photosynthetic indexes data. Twenty plants were measured for treatment and control, and three fruits were measured per plant.

    • After 50 d of irradiation, the fully opened and new leaves of treated strawberry plants and controls in three biological replicates were selected for sampling and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted by a modified CTAB method[18]. RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). cDNA library and high-throughput sequencing were conducted by Biomarker Technologies Co, LTD (Beijing, China). The Illumina HiSeq™ platform was performed. Reads from each library were de novo assembled separately. Gene expression levels were measured in the RNA-Seq analysis as fragments per kilobase per million mapped fragments (FPKM).

    • The data for the physiological parameters were analyzed using DPS 7.05 software. Significant differences between treatment and control were evaluated with Student's t-test, and the significance level was set at * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01, respectively.

    • Aiming to elucidate whether red/blue (R/B) light supplementation affects the growth and development of 'Yanli' strawberry, we compared the plants growing under R/B light supplementation and control conditions. We found that R/B light supplementation significantly increased the growth of strawberry plants in two years (Supplemental Fig. S1). During 2019−2020 and 2020−2021, the plant height of the strawberry under supplemental R/B lighting was 17% and 13% higher than that of the control, respectively (Table 1). Meanwhile, the crown diameter of the plants under light treatment was increased by 1.38-fold and 1.07-fold compared with that in the control during the two years, respectively (Table 1). To further explore the effect of supplemental R/B light on the photosynthesis of 'Yanli' strawberry, we measured the photosynthetic parameters of 'Yanli' strawberry plants during the flowering and fruit setting stage. The results showed that the Pn, Gs and Tr of strawberry plants under R/B light supplementation were 19%, 55% and 27% higher than those in the control, respectively (Fig. 1).

      Table 1.  Comparison of strawberry plant height and crown diameter between red/blue light supplementation and control.

      YearLight treatmentPlant height (cm)Crown diameter (cm)
      2019−2020Control17.1122.42
      RB19.96**30.86**
      2020−2021Control17.2224.23
      RB19.44*26.04**

      Figure 1. 

      Effect of R/B light supplementation on photosynthetic parameters of strawberry cultivar 'Yanli' cultured in solar greenhouse. (a)−(d) net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomata conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr). Vertical bars represent the SD. Statistical significance was measured using Student's t-test. (n = 20, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

    • To investigate whether supplemental R/B light affected strawberry yield and fruit quality, we analyzed strawberry primary fruit fresh weight, total fruit weight/plant, SSC, and the fruit firmness under supplemental R/B light and control. As shown in Fig. 2a, the R/B light supplementation led to a remarkable improvement (18% and 24%) in the strawberry primary fruit fresh weight during the stage of full ripeness compared with that in control conditions during the years 2019−2020 and 2020−2021. And total fruit weight/plant under supplemental R/B light was 27% and 33% higher than that of the control during two consecutive years, respectively (Fig. 2b). Under R/B light supplementation, strawberry fruit SSC was increased by 1.21-fold and 1.05-fold compared with that in the control during the two years, respectively (Fig. 2c). Similarly, fruit firmness was also increased by 1.18-fold and 1.06-fold compared with that in the control for two years, respectively (Fig. 2d). These results suggested that supplemental R/B light could improve 'Yanli' strawberry yield and fruit quality.

      Figure 2. 

      Effect of R/B light supplementation on production and fruit quality of strawberry cultivar 'Yanli' cultured in solar greenhouse. (a) Primary fruit fresh weight, (b) total fruit weight/plant, (c) soluble solid content and (d) firmness of the 'Yanli' fruit under R/B light supplementation and control. Vertical bars represent SD. Statistical significance was measured using Student's t-test. (n = 20, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

    • To study the effect of supplemental R/B light on 'Yanli' strawberry plants, total RNA from six samples (CK-1, CK-2, CK-3 and RB-1, RB-2, RB-3) were used for RNA-seq. The treatment and control group respectively contain three biological repeat samples. After filtering dirty tags from the raw data, a total of 38.36 Gb of clean data were obtained, with an average of 6.21 Gb of clean reads per sample. Of the clean reads, the average GC content is approximately 46.96%, and the Q30 percentage was over 93.05%. The percentage of clean reads mapped to the unigene database ranged from 79.07% to 80.42% (Table 2).

      Table 2.  Summary of transcriptome data.

      SampleClean read numberClean base numberGC contenta% ≥ Q30bMapped readsMapped ratio
      CK-121,222,1926,353,022,70046.98%93.13%16,779,94979.07%
      CK-223,479,2917,032,924,42447.23%93.04%18,653,55179.45%
      CK-320,727,3676,210,109,12647.07%93.09%16,668,43980.42%
      RB-120,756,1396,218,258,99846.63%93.07%16,594,03479.95%
      RB-220,842,5206,243,435,53846.83%92.85%16,552,37779.42%
      RB-321,022,7526,297,302,71246.99%93.09%16,753,65479.69%
      a GC Content: the percentage of G and C bases in the total bases in clean reads.
      b % ≥ Q30: the percentages of clean reads with Phred qualities scores over 30.

      The FPKM values were used to analyze the gene expression levels in the RNA-seq analysis. R (Pearson correlation coefficient) was used as the evaluation index of correlation between each sample, the results of Fig. 3a showed that there was a strong correlation between the three biological replicates from each group. 1.5 fold change and P value less than 0.05 were used to define differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A total of 165 DEGs were identified, among which 76 were up-regulated and 89 were down-regulated by supplementing R/B light, respectively (Supplemental Table S1, Fig. 3b).

      Figure 3. 

      Overview of the transcriptome sequencing under supplemental R/B lighting in strawberry leaves. (a) Pearson correlation between samples analysis. (b) Number of up- and down-regulated expressed genes. CK-1, CK-2, CK-3 are controls, RB-1, RB-2, and RB-3 are the experimental groups treated with supplemental R/B lighting.

    • GO (Gene ontology) functional classes showed that the putative function of DEGs. The enriched genes were classified into three major categories, including Biological Processes (BP), Cellular Components (CC), and Molecular Functions (MF). Metabolic process, cellular process and single-organism process were enriched mainly in biological processes. Among CC, cell, cell part, membrane, membrane part and organelle were the main terms. Molecular functions such as binding, catalytic activity and transporter activity were mainly enriched (Fig. 4). And TopGO was used to analyze the function enrichment of DEGs, including in the oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114, KS = 9.5e-10), photosynthesis (GO:0015979, 6.7e-05), chloroplast thylakoid membrane (GO:0009535, 0.00014; Supplemental Table S2). The annotated unigenes were classified into 14 COG (Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins) categories (Fig. 5). And the largest group is 'carbohydrate transport and metabolism'.

      Figure 4. 

      Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in strawberry leaves by supplementing R/B light.

      Figure 5. 

      Histogram of COG (cluster of orthologous groups) classification.

      In addition, KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) annotation was used to analyze the functional enrichment of DEGs. There were 18 significantly enriched KEGG pathways (Fig. 6). In the comparison of the control and R/B light supplementation groups, the identified DEGs were mainly enriched in plant hormone signaling transduction, base excision repair, circadian rhythm-plant, and alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism.

      Figure 6. 

      KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs regulated by supplementing R/B light in strawberry leaves.

    • Transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in plant response to changing environments[19]. In 'Yanli' leaves, the expressions of a total of 13 TF genes were significantly affected by supplementing R/B light. These TF genes belong to different families (NAC, PRR, MYB, bZIP, ZAT, CDF, CO, bHLH, BBX and PAR) (Table 3). The gene families including PRR, MYB, CDF and CO play an important role in the regulation of the circadian clock[2023]. bHLH, BBX and PAR participate in the light signal transduction[2426]. We found that PRR95 (PRR family), LHY (MYB family) and CDF3 (CDF family) were up-regulated, while CO16 (CO family), bHLH63 (Arabidopsis thaliana CIB1 homologous gene, bHLH family), BBX21 (BBX family) and PAR1 (PAR family) were down-regulated in 'Yanli' leaves during supplementing R/B light. In addition, we found that the SIGE regulating the expression of the chloroplast genes in the light-signaling pathway was upregulated (Supplemental Table S1). The results indicated that these TFs and SIGE maybe participate in the photosynthesis process of 'Yanli' during R/B light supplementation.

      Table 3.  List of differentially expressed TF genes.

      Gene familyTF nameAnnotation functionlogFCRegulation
      NACNAC72NAC domain-containing protein 72-like0.931857Up
      PRRPRR95Two-component response regulator-like PRR950.893515Up
      MYBLHYProtein LHY-like0.657352Up
      bZIPTRAB1bZIP transcription factor TRAB10.651141Up
      ZATZAT8Zinc finger protein ZAT8-like0.628283Up
      CDFCDF3Cyclic dof factor 30.641524Up
      COCO16Zinc finger protein CONSTANS-LIKE 16−0.66291Down
      bZIPbZIP34Basic leucine zipper 34−1.07449Down
      bZIPbZIP61Basic leucine zipper 61-like−0.9109Down
      bHLHbHLH63Transcription factor bHLH63−0.66341Down
      BBXBBX21B-box zinc finger protein 21−0.67538Down
      PARPAR1Transcription factor PAR1−0.61181Down
      MYBRADTranscription factor RADIALIS-like−0.61324Down
    • Light is one of the most vital environmental factors for plant growth and development. Too much or too little light can have adverse effects on some horticultural crops[2729]. In winter, the cultivation of horticultural crops in solar greenhouses is widely used to meet people's nutritional needs, in northern China[30]. In addition to insufficient light time in northern winter, low PPFD under greenhouse conditions is also one of the important factors restricting the yields and quality of horticultural crops[28,31]. More and more studies found that combined red and blue light supplementation have a widely positive effect on the process of growth and development, and fruit quality for horticultural plants[3234]. There are also individual differences between different red and blue ratios, different horticultural plants and different varieties[15,32,35]. The supplementation of red/blue (4:1) light for 3 h every day improved the growth of pepper seedlings in solar greenhouse[36]. Tomatoes grown under red/blue light (ratio = 3:1) have optimum growth[37]. In order to explore suitable cultivation measures for the 'Yanli' strawberry, and LED red and blue light (ratio = 4:1) was supplemented without changing other conditions in the solar greenhouse. Combined with transcriptome analysis and phenotypic identification, we found that supplementation of red and blue light could improve photosynthesis, yield and soluble solid content in strawberry cultivar 'Yanli'.

      For plant morphology and physiological indicators, we observed that the plant height, crown diameter and photosynthesis were significantly increased in 'Yanli' strawberry under R/B light supplementation before sunrise and after sunset every day. Previous studies have also shown that red and blue light can improve plant growth and photosynthesis. Strawberry quality and production were improved by promoting the stomatal opening and accumulation of the photosynthetic products under the condition of supplementary morning lighting with blue light[5]. In addition, we compared the transcriptomes of the leaves of 'Yanli' strawberry plants under supplemental red and blue light and control.

      Many TFs regulate photosynthesis gene expression and response to changing environmental conditions[30,38]. We found several different expression TF genes in 'Yanli' leaves between supplementing R/B light and control. PRR95, LHY and CDF3 were up-regulated, bHLH63, BBX21 and PAR1 were down-regulated. Among them, PRR and LHY are the downstream photoreceptors and the key component of the circadian clock[39]. Photosynthesis is regulated by the circadian rhythm, and it is very important that the circadian clock coordinates photosynthesis to improve the efficiency of light-energy capture and carbon fixation[20]. In Jatropha curcas, CDFs (cycling dof factors) responded to the photoperiod[23]. CDFs also play an important role in improving photosynthetic efficiency, coordinating carbon/nitrogen balance and promoting plant growth[40]. For CIB1 (CRYPTOCHROME-INTERACTING BHLH 1), FvebHLH63 homologous gene, previous studies show that CIB1 negatively regulates the photosynthetic rate in soybean[41]. BBXs play an important role in photomorphosis. BBXs and HY5 are components that control a variety of light-regulated genes expression[4244]. PAR regulated hypocotyl length under simulated shade in Arabidopsis[45]. The function of PAR1 in strawberry needs to be further studied. Besides, RNA polymerase sigma factor gene SIGE (a homolog of SIG5 in Arabidopsis) was upregulated by supplementing R/B light. SIG5 is mainly induced by red light and blue light to participate in photosynthesis[46,47]. SIG5 regulates the chloroplast genes psbD and psbA (PSII core proteins) in chloroplasts at the post-transcriptional level[48,49]. In the present study, transcriptome analysis indicated PRR95, LHY, CDF3, CO16, bHLH63, BBX21, PAR1 and SIGE exhibited different expressions between supplemental R/B light and control in 'Yanli'. We speculate that these eight differentially expressed genes maybe participate in the photosynthesis process of 'Yanli' during R/B light supplementation.

      For fruit quality and yield, previous studies have shown that tomato fruit quality was improved by increased photosynthetic efficiency under red and blue LED (red : blue = 8:2) supplementation in the greenhouse[50]. In the condition of an artificial climate chamber, supplementing R/B light in the morning promoted the accumulation of health-promoting substances in the tomato fruits, such as vitamin C, organic acids, carotenoids, etc. While the content of sugars, flavonoids, and aromatic substances in tomato fruits were significantly increased by supplementing R/B light at night[51]. In addition, the photosynthetic activity, and fruit productivity were increased in strawberry plants under different ratios of red and blue LED light[52,53]. In this study, we found that the SSC content, primary fruit weight, and fruit weight per plant were increased by R/B light supplementation in 'Yanli' strawberry. At the same time, transcriptome analysis found that the expression of genes related to sucrose transport (sugar transporter: SWEET9-like, c50514.graph_c0) and amylolysis (beta-amylase: BAM1, c61305.graph_c0) were up-regulated (Supplemental Table S1). This may be related to strawberry fruit quality. Some studies showed that there were no effects on the strawberry fruit firmness after monochromatic red or blue light treatment[54,55]. However, our studies found that the strawberry fruit firmness was increased by supplementing R/B light. This is probably a consequence of different strawberry varieties or different cultivation environments. Next, we will further explore the differentially expressed genes in 'Yanli' between R/B light supplementation and control.

      For the most suitable ratio of supplementary R/B light and the photoperiod for strawberry cultivars 'Yanli', we are investigating the growth and development of 'Yanli' strawberry plants in the artificial climate culture chamber under different R/B light ratio and photoperiod, so as to be applied to 'Yanli' cultivation and production more accurately. Different red and blue ratios have different effects on different species or different traits of the same species[35,37]. In this study, we found that the growth, photosynthesis, yield and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberries were improved under R/B light (red : blue = 4:1) supplementary in solar greenhouses of northern China. The cost for LED lights is about $600 per thousand square meters, and the LED lights could be used for 3−5 years. The economic benefits far outweigh the costs of LED lights. Therefore, these studies provide evidence for establishing the effective cultivation measures of 'Yanli' strawberry. The internal molecular mechanism still needs to be further studied.

      • This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32130092, 32102350, 31872072) and LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1902069).

      • Zhihong Zhang is the Editorial Board member of the journal Fruit Research. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research group.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (3) References (55)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wang Y, Tang X, Wang B, Dai H, Zhang Z. 2023. Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry. Fruit Research 3:4 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2023-0004
    Wang Y, Tang X, Wang B, Dai H, Zhang Z. 2023. Positive effect of red/blue light supplementation on the photosynthetic capacity and fruit quality of 'Yanli' strawberry. Fruit Research 3:4 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2023-0004

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return