Search
2023 Volume 2
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening

  • # These authors contributed equally: Jiaojiao Zhang, Xin Shen

More Information
  • Flavor and spice are largely consumed in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. A novel coronavirus, recently named the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in humans in Wuhan, China in 2019. This study is to examine whether flavor components can prevent humans from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given that the drugable antiviral target ACE2 receptor and viral main protease (Mpro) were reported, 169 compounds were screened against these two targets by using autodock vina. According to our docking screening, 10 antiviral components, including glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, agnuside, fenflumizole, angelicide, sageone, oleanic acid, benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate, glycerol ester of rosin, and endere S can directly bind to both host cell target ACE2 receptor and viral target Mpro, indicating their potential for SARS-CoV-2 treatment. In addition, experimental verification found that theaflavin 3,3'-digallate show significant inhibit Mpro/3CLpro activity.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Fig. S1 The docking validation by known inhibitors.
    Supplemental Table S1 Flavor agents docking results.
  • [1]

    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, et al. 2020. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395:497−506

    doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, et al. 2020. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Research 30:269−71

    doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. 2020. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: An analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS. Journal of Virology 94:e00127−20

    doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Du L, He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng B, et al. 2009. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nature Reviews Microbiology 7:226−236

    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Towler P, Staker B, Prasad SG, Menon S, Tang J, et al. 2004. ACE2 X-ray structures reveal a large hinge-bending motion important for inhibitor binding and catalysis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:17996−8007

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311191200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    de Clercq E. 2002. Strategies in the design of antiviral drugs. Nature Reviews Drug discovery 1:13−25

    doi: 10.1038/nrd703

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Agost-Beltrán L, de la Hoz-Rodríguez S, Bou-Iserte L, Rodríguez S, Fernández-de-la-Pradilla A, et al. 2022. Advances in the development of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors. Molecules 27(8):2523

    doi: 10.3390/molecules27082523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chen R, Gao Y, Liu H, Li H, Chen W, et al. 2022. Advances in research on 3C-like protease (3CLpro) inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 since 2020. RSC Medicinal Chemistry 14(1):9−21

    doi: 10.1039/d2md00344a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Huff S, Kummetha IR, Tiwari SK, Huante MB, Clark AE, et al. 2022. Discovery and mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 65(4):2866−79

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00566

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Amporndanai K, Meng X, Shang W, Jin Z, Rogers M, et al. 2021. Inhibition mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 main protease by ebselen and its derivatives. Nature Communications 12(1):3061

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23313-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Sabbah DA, Hajjo R, Bardaweel SK, Zhong HA. 2021. An updated review on SARS-CoV-2 main proteinase (MPro): Protein structure and small-molecule inhibitors. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 21(6):442−60

    doi: 10.2174/1568026620666201207095117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Narayanan A, Narwal M, Majowicz SA, Varricchio C, Toner SA, et al. 2022. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors targeting Mpro and PLpro using in-cell-protease assay. Communications Biology 5:169

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03090-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang L, Zhao H, Liu J, He L, Yu R, et al. 2022. Design of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, PLpro dual-target inhibitors based on deep reinforcement learning and virtual screening. Future Medicinal Chemistry 14(6):393−405

    doi: 10.4155/fmc-2021-0269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Silva RC, Freitas HF, Campos JM, Kimani NM, Silva CHTP, et al. 2021. Natural products-based drug design against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro 3CLpro. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(21):11739

    doi: 10.3390/ijms222111739

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Dou X, Sun Q, Xu G, Liu Y, Zhang C, et al. 2022. Discovery of 2-(furan-2-ylmethylene)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide derivatives as novel inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 238:114508

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wit ED, van Doremalen NV, Falzarano D, Munster VJ. 2016. SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14:523−34

    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, Deng Y, Liu M, et al. 2020. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 582:289−93

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2223-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hu Q, Xiong Y, Zhu G, Zhang Y, Zhang YW, et al. 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro): Structure, function, and emerging therapies for COVID-19. MedComm 3:e151

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Yan Y, Shen X, Cao Y, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. 2020. Discovery of anti-2019-nCoV agents from 38 Chinese patent drugs toward respiratory diseases via docking screening. Preprints 0:2020020254

    doi: 10.20944/preprints202002.0254.v2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Xiong Y, Zhu G, Zhang Y, Hu Q, Wang H, et al. 2021. Flavonoids in Ampelopsis grossedentata as covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro: Inhibition potentials, covalent binding sites and inhibitory mechanisms. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 187:976−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang J, Shen X, Li Y, Yan Y, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:10 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0010
    Zhang J, Shen X, Li Y, Yan Y, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:10 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0010

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(1607) PDF downloads(248)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening

Medicinal Plant Biology  2 Article number: 10  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Flavor and spice are largely consumed in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. A novel coronavirus, recently named the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first identified in humans in Wuhan, China in 2019. This study is to examine whether flavor components can prevent humans from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given that the drugable antiviral target ACE2 receptor and viral main protease (Mpro) were reported, 169 compounds were screened against these two targets by using autodock vina. According to our docking screening, 10 antiviral components, including glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, agnuside, fenflumizole, angelicide, sageone, oleanic acid, benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate, glycerol ester of rosin, and endere S can directly bind to both host cell target ACE2 receptor and viral target Mpro, indicating their potential for SARS-CoV-2 treatment. In addition, experimental verification found that theaflavin 3,3'-digallate show significant inhibit Mpro/3CLpro activity.

    • The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), previously named as 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), is a positive-sense, single-strand RNA coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 caused an ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occured in December 2019[1]. Given that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, drug repurposing study was immediately conducted by both virtual screening and cell-based screening, which provided several promising antiviral agents from approved drugs[2]. Flavor and spice have been widely used in China and India since ancient times, some spice such as ginger and pepper were proposed to be beneficial in countering against dampness evil in the human body according to the philosophy of traditional Chinese medicine, however, whether these components do prevent virus infection is still questionable. Herein, contributions were made to identify potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from flavor ingredients by employing molecular docking screening.

      As expected, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor of host cells could be directly bound to spike protein of SARS-CoV-2[3]. Inhibition of ACE2 catalytic pocket by small molecules could change the conformation of ACE2, indicating that ACE2 inhibitor could block SARS-CoV-2 entry[4,5]. Therefore, in this effort, the ACE2 receptor was used as a protein model in accomplishing a quick-identification of the entry inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2.

      Suppression of viral replication is also an appropriate aspect for exploring antiviral drugs besides the blockade of viral entry[6]. Considering that SARS-CoV-2 Mpro is closely related to the processing of two replicase polyproteins which are required in mediating viral replication and transcription, the Mpro inhibitor could be seen as a sally port to discover antiviral drugs[715]. We consequently docked flavor components to SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (PDB: 6LU7) whose structure was clarified by crystal data[1618], to explore more antiviral replication agents.

    • The three-dimensional structure of ligands (aroma oil components) were generated by CORINA online service (https://demos.mn-am.com/corina_interactive.html). The experiment process is the same as we previously described[19]. The docking results were ranked by the binding free energy. The binding results were graphically presented by using PyMOL1.3 (Schrödinger, LLC).

    • For ligands library establishment, the SMILE format of phytochemicals was compiled from Pubchem. The SMILES format of compounds was converted to PDB format by CORINA online service (https://demos.mn-am.com/corina_interactive.html). The PDB format of compounds was then converted to PDBQT format by AutoDock Tools 1.5.6 (The Scripps Research Institute, CA, USA).

    • The crystal structure was obtained from the Protein Data Bank for receptor preparation. Chimera 1.7mac (UCSF Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics, CA, USA) eliminated both ligands and water molecules from target proteins. AutoDock Tools 1.5.6 (The Scripps Research Institute, CA, USA) was then used to add hydrogen and Kollman Charges to the target protein. The target protein's atoms were assigned the AD4 type, and the changed protein was transferred to PDBQT format for docking screening.

    • The docking parameters for AutoDock Vina were left at their defaults. The grid box was 25 Å × 25 Å × 25Å, encompassing the inhibitor binding pocket. The docking results were ordered according to the binding free energy. For parameter validation, we retrieved the inhibitors from the original protein models (Supplemental Fig. S1). Our docking simulation revealed that the predicted conformations of inhibitors are close to the experimental conformations of inhibitors. Furthermore, the inhibitors had a high binding score.

    • The following substances were purchased by Shanghai Bidepharmatech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China): Glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, oleanic acid, and benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate.

    • Mpro/3CLpro activity in vitro was measured by using the Mpro/3CLpro Inhibitor Screening Kit (Beyotime, Cat No. P0312S, China). In brief, 2019-nCoV Mpro/3CLpro was diluted by Assay Buffer, then pre-incubated with compounds for 10 min at 37 °C, then the substrate was added for another 5 min incubation at 37 °C. The optical density (OD) values were then measured using Microplate Reader (BioTek, Synergy 2) with the excitation wavelength at 360 nm and the emission wavelength at 460 nm, respectively. GraphPad Prism5 (GraphPad Software Inc.) was used to analyze the data. Ebselen was positive control. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.

    • The statistical data were obtained from biological triplicates. Statistical analysis was performed by t-Test and ANOVA for multiple groups. p < 0.05 was considered significant difference '*'; p < 0.01 was considered very significant difference '**'.

    • One hundred and sixty nine flavor components in total were docked to two drug targets. The top 10 hits including glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, agnuside, fenflumizole, angelicide, sageone, oleanic acid, benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate, glycerol ester of rosin, and endere S, are summarized in Tables 1 & 2. Interestingly, these components were also characterized in traditional Chinese medicine with the exception of fenflumizole and benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate. As for the ACE2 receptor, 11 out of 169 compounds exhibited good binding affinities (<−9 kcal/mol) are glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, agnuside, fenflumizole, angelicide, sageone, oleanic acid, benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate, glycerol ester of rosin, endere S, and testosterone. Of which, glycyrrhizic acid and oleanic acid are triterpenoidal acids. Moreover, three out of 169 compounds, glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, and agnuside, inhibit Mpro with strong binding affinities (<−9 kcal/mol). Of note, the properties of glycyrrhizic acid against SARS-CoV-2 have been pointed out in our previous investigation[19]. It is also interesting that theaflavin 3,3'-digallate which is a phenolic compound generated from ginger, was found to be interactive with both ACE2 receptor and Mpro with considerable biding affinities. It is worth mentioning that the current mainstream view about SARS-CoV-2 is the observation of inflammation storms leading to death. However, we believe that there should be typical 'free radical storm' or severe oxidative stress during SARS-CoV-2 in view of biomedical or chemical defense. Normally, inflammation and free radical including reactive oxygen species are powerful weapons for human body against evils. Our present finding of theaflavin 3,3'-digallate and previous results regarding to phenolics as hits[19] prompted us to consider their effects against SARS-CoV-2 might be also associated with their antioxidant potency. With this rationale, we tentatively suggest that marketed antioxidants such as edaravone and intake of ginger with high content of phenolics might be beneficial for SARS-CoV-2 patients. Unfortunately, this hypothesis and therapeutic approach has been largely ignored during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Last but not the least, it is not surprising that the other flavor agents are not hits with super good binding energy (<−10 kcal/mol) (Supplemental Table S1) due to the difficulty of their relatively simple chemical structures in occupying the whole catalytic pocket and provide high binding affinities.

      Table 1.  Top 10 flavor agents docking results.

      LigandBinding energy
      1R4L6LU7Sum
      Glycyrrhizic acid−9.6−9.3−18.9
      Theaflavin 3,3'-digallate−8.3−10−18.3
      Agnuside−9.6−8−17.6
      Fenflumizole−9.5−7.7−17.2
      Angelicide−9.7−7.1−16.8
      Sageone−9−7.8−16.8
      Oleanic acid−9.4−7.3−16.7
      Benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl)
      carbamate
      −9.4−7.1−16.5
      Glycerol ester of rosin−9.4−6.9−16.3
      Endere S−9.4−6.8−16.2

      Table 2.  Key residues for the inhibitor binding.

      LigandKey residues
      1R4L6LU7
      Glycyrrhizic acidArg273, His345, Ala348, Thr365, Arg518Phe140, Gly143, His163, Gln189
      Theaflavin 3,3'-digallateAsn149, Asn154, Arg273, Asn277, His345, Lys363, Thr365, Arg518Ser46, Tyr54, Phe140, Ser144, Cys145, Gly143, His163, Glu166, Gln189, Thr190
      AgnusideHis345, Thr371, Glu406, Arg518Thr24, Thr45, Leu141, Gly143, Ser144, Cys145, Glu166
      FenflumizoleHis345None
      AngelicideNoneGly143, Ser144, Cys145
      SageoneArg273, His345Gly143, Ser144, Cys145
      Oleanic acidGlu406none
      Benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamateArg273, His345, Thr445, Tyr515Gly143, Ser144, Cys145, His163
      Glycerol ester of rosinArg273, His374, Arg518Gly143, His163
      Endere SArg273, Arg518Gly143, His163

      In addition, glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, oleanic acid, and benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate were tested in vitro Mpro/3CLpro activity by using Mpro/3CLpro Inhibitor Screening Kit (Fig. 1)[20]. The results showed that all four compounds exhibited inhibitory activity, with theaflavin 3,3'-digallate being the strongest, and further, we tested theaflavin 3,3'-digallate and ebselen with IC50 values of 16.56, 0.33 μM (Fig. 2), respectively. The current study verifies the consistency of molecular docking and experimental results, but further studies need to be performed.

      Figure 1. 

      Inhibitory effects of compounds from AGE against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. (1 = glycyrrhizic acid, 2 = theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, 7 = oleanic acid, and 8 = benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate).

      Figure 2. 

      IC50 of theaflavin 3,3'-digallate and ebselen for AGE against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.

    • Drug repurposing is a common strategy to fight novel coronavirus. However, most of drug repurposing studies are about FDA approved drugs. Flavor ingredients were widely used to prevent plague in ancient China and India, and are commercially available in abundance. We were curious whether flavor ingredients can also prevent SARS-CoV-2 at this time. According to docking screening, we found that flavor ingredients including glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, and agnuside are most likely to directly bind to both viral Mpro and ACE2 receptor, lending a hand for countering against SARS-CoV-2. In addition, experimental verification found that glycyrrhizic acid, theaflavin 3,3'-digallate, oleanic acid, and benzyl (3-fluoro-4-morpholine-4-yl phenyl) carbamate show inhibit Mpro/3CLpro activity and are worth further study.

      • This study was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81525026) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81903875).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Yong-Xian Cheng is the Editorial Board member of Medicinal Plant Biology. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Jiaojiao Zhang, Xin Shen

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (20)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang J, Shen X, Li Y, Yan Y, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:10 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0010
    Zhang J, Shen X, Li Y, Yan Y, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents from commercially available flavor via docking screening. Medicinal Plant Biology 2:10 doi: 10.48130/MPB-2023-0010

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return