Search
2024 Volume 1
Article Contents
PERSPECTIVE   Open Access    

Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry

More Information
  • Received: 05 September 2024
    Revised: 24 October 2024
    Accepted: 25 November 2024
    Published online: 19 December 2024
    Agrobiodiversity  2024, 1(2): 23−27  |  Cite this article
  • The floriculture industry is experiencing rapid growth with high profitability driven by its irreplaceable symbolic, therapeutic, and emotional value for decorative and aesthetic purposes. However, this prosperity comes with significant environmental costs, as the industry's pursuit of high-quality flower production is largely shaped by profit-driven motives. This thus creates a paradox: while flowers symbolize natural beauty and harmony, their unsustainable production modes undermine these very ideals. In this context, it is emphasized that floral plants can be both economically important and ecologically significant, particularly their functional roles in supporting key components of terrestrial ecosystems. Two potential applications of floral plants in the agroecosystem are proposed: flower strips in agricultural systems and flower meadows comprising halophytes and hyperaccumulators in degraded landscapes. By harnessing the potential functional diversity of floral plants to provide their respective ecological services, it offers an alternative pathway for the floriculture industry to evolve toward a future that balances beauty with sustainability.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Clay GR, Daniel TC. 2000. Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning 49:1−13

    doi: 10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00055-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Adebayo IA, Pam VK, Arsad H, Samian MR. 2020. The global floriculture industry: status and future prospects. In The Global Floriculture Industry. New York, USA: Apple Academic Press. pp. 1−14. doi: 10.1201/9781003000723-1

    [3]

    Jula G, Kim DG, Nigatu S. 2024. Potential of floriculture waste-derived charcoal briquettes as an alternative energy source and means of mitigating indoor air pollution in Ethiopia. Energy for Sustainable Development 79:101390

    doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2024.101390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gebhardt A. 2014. Holland flowering: how the Dutch flower industry conquered the world. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 23 pp. doi: 10.1515/9789048522590

    [5]

    Thörning R, Ahlklo ÅK, Spendrup S. 2022. The Slow Flower Movement - exploring alternative sustainable cut-flower production in a Swedish context. Heliyon 8:e11086

    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Darras AI. 2020. Implementation of sustainable practices to ornamental plant cultivation worldwide: a critical review. Agronomy 10:1570

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Derksen DM, Mithöfer D. 2022. Thinking sustainably? Identifying Stakeholders' positions toward corporate sustainability in floriculture with Q methodology. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 44:1762−87

    doi: 10.1002/aepp.13284

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ferrante A, Ferrini F. 2023. Floriculture and landscapes: perspectives and challenges. Frontiers in Horticulture 2:1123298

    doi: 10.3389/fhort.2023.1123298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lazzerini G, Lucchetti S, Nicese FP. 2016. Green House Gases (GHG) emissions from the ornamental plant nursery industry: a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach in a nursery district in central Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:4022−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Tamiru SM, Leta S. 2017. Assessment of the ecological impacts of floriculture Industries using physico-chemical parameters along Wedecha River, Debrezeit, Ethiopia. Water Utility Journal 15:53−65

    Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yin X, Feng L, Gong Y. 2023. Mitigating ecotoxicity risks of pesticides on ornamental plants based on life cycle assessment. Toxics 11:360

    doi: 10.3390/toxics11040360

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kütt L, Lõhmus K, Rammi IJ, Paal T, Paal J, et al. 2016. The quality of flower-based ecosystem services in field margins and road verges from human and insect pollinator perspectives. Ecological Indicators 70:409−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Genty L, Kazakou E, Metay A, Baude M, Gardarin A, et al. 2023. Flowers of ruderal species are numerous but small, short and low-rewarding. Oikos 2023:e10219

    doi: 10.1111/oik.10219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zytynska SE, Eicher M, Fahle R, Weisser WW. 2021. Effect of flower identity and diversity on reducing aphid populations via natural enemy communities. Ecology and Evolution 11:18434−45

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.8432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Jin Z, Nie L. 2023. Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production. Tropical Plants 2:13

    doi: 10.48130/tp-2023-0013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Famulari S, Witz K. 2015. A user-friendly phytoremediation database: creating the searchable database, the users, and the broader implications. International Journal of Phytoremediation 17:737−44

    doi: 10.1080/15226514.2014.987369

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Van Oosten MJ, Maggio A. 2015. Functional biology of halophytes in the phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Environmental and Experimental Botany 111:135−46

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.11.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Li CY, He R, Tian CY, Song J. 2023. Utilization of halophytes in saline agriculture and restoration of contaminated salinized soils from genes to ecosystem: Suaeda salsa as an example. Marine Pollution Bulletin 197:115728

    doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115728

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8:857−74

    doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, et al. 2010. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology 11:97−105

    doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2009.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Bretzel F, Vannucchi F, Romano D, Malorgio F, Benvenuti S, et al. 2016. Wildflowers: from conserving biodiversity to urban greening — a review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20:428−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Venturini EM, Drummond FA, Hoshide AK, Dibble AC, Stack LB. 2017. Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: a review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41:101−42

    doi: 10.1080/21683565.2016.1258377

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Espíndola A, Vanbergen AJ, Settele J, Kremen C, et al. 2017. Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. Ecology Letters 20:673−89

    doi: 10.1111/ele.12762

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Albrecht M, Kleijn D, Williams NM, Tschumi M, Blaauw BR, et al. 2020. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis. Ecology Letters 23:1488−98

    doi: 10.1111/ele.13576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, et al. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:303−13

    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Balzan MV, Bocci G, Moonen AC. 2014. Augmenting flower trait diversity in wildflower strips to optimise the conservation of arthropod functional groups for multiple agroecosystem services. Journal of Insect Conservation 18:713−28

    doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9680-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Grass I, Albrecht J, Jauker F, Diekötter T, Warzecha D, et al. 2016. Much more than bees — Wildflower plantings support highly diverse flower-visitor communities from complex to structurally simple agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 225:45−53

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Pfiffner L, Cahenzli F, Steinemann B, Jamar L, Bjørn MC, et al. 2019. Design, implementation and management of perennial flower strips to promote functional agrobiodiversity in organic apple orchards: a pan-European study. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 278:61−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Hellwig N, Schubert LF, Kirmer A, Tischew S, Dieker P. 2022. Effects of wildflower strips, landscape structure and agricultural practices on wild bee assemblages – A matter of data resolution and spatial scale? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 326:107764

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Gardarin A. 2023. Aphid biological control in arable crops via flower strips: the predominant role of food resources over diversity effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 60:2118−31

    doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.14495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Szitár K, Deák B, Halassy M, Steffen C, Batáry P. 2022. Combination of organic farming and flower strips in agricultural landscapes–A feasible method to maximise functional diversity of plant traits related to pollination. Global Ecology and Conservation 38:e02229

    doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02229

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Russell M. 2015. A meta-analysis of physiological and behavioral responses of parasitoid wasps to flowers of individual plant species. Biological Control 82:96−103

    doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.11.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Nadot S, Carrive L. 2021. The colourful life of flowers. Botany Letters 168:120−30

    doi: 10.1080/23818107.2020.1839789

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Arnold SEJ, Le Comber SC, Chittka L. 2009. Flower color phenology in European grassland and woodland habitats, through the eyes of pollinators. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 57:211−30

    doi: 10.1560/ijps.57.3.211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang H, Chen Z, Feng L, Chen Z, Owens G, et al. 2024. Uptake and transport mechanisms of rare earth hyperaccumulators: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 351:119998

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119998

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Chen J, Wang Y. 2024. Understanding the salinity resilience and productivity of halophytes in saline environments. Plant Science: an International Journal of Experimental Plant Biology 346:112171

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Aziz I, Mujeeb A. 2022. Halophytes for phytoremediation of hazardous metal(loid)s: a terse review on metal tolerance, bio-indication and hyperaccumulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 424:127309

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127309

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Liang Z, Neményi A, Kovács GP, Gyuricza C. 2024. Incorporating functional traits into heavy metals phytoremediation: the future of field-based phytoremediation. Ecological Indicators 166:112262

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Xin Y, Du M, Yu X, Paithoonrangsarid K, Mao Y, et al. 2023. Exploring value-added compounds from tropical marine plants. Tropical Plants 2:10

    doi: 10.48130/tp-2023-0010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Zou J, Song F, Lu Y, Zhuge Y, Niu Y, et al. 2021. Phytoremediation potential of wheat intercropped with different densities of Sedum plumbizincicola in soil contaminated with cadmium and zinc. Chemosphere 276:130223

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Tang L, Hamid Y, Zehra A, Sahito ZA, He Z, et al. 2020. Fava bean intercropping with Sedum alfredii inoculated with endophytes enhances phytoremediation of cadmium and lead co-contaminated field. Environmental Pollution 265:114861

    doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114861

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Ventura Y, Eshel A, Pasternak D, Sagi M. 2015. The development of halophyte-based agriculture: past and present. Annals of Botany 115:529−40

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Smith GR. 2015. Phytoremediation-by-design: community-scale landscape systems design for healthy communities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 22:413−19

    doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1079276

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Cassaniti C, Romano D. 2011. The Use of Halophytes for Mediterranean Landscaping. The European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 5:57−63

    Google Scholar

    [45]

    Sağlam C, Önder S. 2018. The use of native halophytes in landscape design in the central Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 6:1718−26

    doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v6i12.1718-1726.1954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Xiao J, Liu H, Tian Y, An P, Liu B, et al. 2023. TropCRD (Tropical Crop Resources Database): the multi-tropical crop variation information system. Tropical Plants 2:9

    doi: 10.48130/tp-2023-0009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Rai KK. 2022. Integrating speed breeding with artificial intelligence for developing climate-smart crops. Molecular Biology Reports 49:11385−402

    doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07769-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Nerkar G, Devarumath S, Purankar M, Kumar A, Valarmathi R, et al. 2022. Advances in crop breeding through precision genome editing. Frontiers in Genetics 13:880195

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.880195

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Van Huylenbroeck J, Bhattarai K. 2022. Ornamental plant breeding: entering a new era? Ornamental Horticulture 28:297−305

    doi: 10.1590/2447-536x.v28i3.2516

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang P, He D, Zhou J, Yang Y, Li F. 2024. Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry. Agrobiodiversity 1(2): 23−27 doi: 10.48130/abd-0024-0005
    Zhang P, He D, Zhou J, Yang Y, Li F. 2024. Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry. Agrobiodiversity 1(2): 23−27 doi: 10.48130/abd-0024-0005

Figures(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(41) PDF downloads(12)

Other Articles By Authors

PERSPECTIVE   Open Access    

Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry

Agrobiodiversity  1 2024, 1(2): 23−27  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The floriculture industry is experiencing rapid growth with high profitability driven by its irreplaceable symbolic, therapeutic, and emotional value for decorative and aesthetic purposes. However, this prosperity comes with significant environmental costs, as the industry's pursuit of high-quality flower production is largely shaped by profit-driven motives. This thus creates a paradox: while flowers symbolize natural beauty and harmony, their unsustainable production modes undermine these very ideals. In this context, it is emphasized that floral plants can be both economically important and ecologically significant, particularly their functional roles in supporting key components of terrestrial ecosystems. Two potential applications of floral plants in the agroecosystem are proposed: flower strips in agricultural systems and flower meadows comprising halophytes and hyperaccumulators in degraded landscapes. By harnessing the potential functional diversity of floral plants to provide their respective ecological services, it offers an alternative pathway for the floriculture industry to evolve toward a future that balances beauty with sustainability.

    • Ornamental plants have irreplaceable symbolic, therapeutic, and emotional values and are typically cultivated varieties produced by the floriculture industry for decorative and aesthetical purposes[1]. The profitability of floriculture products is much higher than other agricultural commodities per unit area[2]. Thus, the global floriculture industry has prospered in recent years and is expected to grow from 49.8 billion US dollars in 2022 to 106.1 billion US dollars in 2033[3]. Nevertheless, the dramatic growth of this industry has led to severe adverse impacts on the environment, including land shortage, soil degradation, climate change, water scarcity, and chemical pollution[4]. This has thus created a debate questioning floriculture's sustainability and raised concerns among researchers and customers. For instance, the emergence of the Slow Flower Movement reflects the customers' demand for sustainable alternatives to conventional floriculture[5]. On the other hand, the sustainability of the floriculture industry has already become a prominent research topic in recent years[6,7], regarding the global environmental concerns due to the indiscriminate usage of peat, fertilizers, and pesticides[811]. In essence, floriculture products such as cut flowers represent both the natural beauty and the industrial unsustainability, causing confusion toward this green but not 'green' industry.

      Perhaps our perception of floral plants as mere aesthetical pleasure to humans while isolating their ecological functions from its economic values contribute to the development of today's dilemma of the floriculture industry. In other words, floral plants can provide service not only to humans but also to other key components in the agroecosystem such as pollinators and pests' natural enemies, which unfortunately is rarely considered in the floriculture industry. Numerous scientific studies have revealed that floral plantings play important roles in recruiting and establishing natural insect communities for pollination and natural pest control, which are essential ecosystem services to agricultural productivity and food security[1215]. In addition, some floral plants equipped with unique characteristics to survive in harsh environments (e.g., heavy metal-contaminated soils or saline soils), known as hyperaccumulators or halophytes, can be implemented in soil rehabilitation and landscape design, where both environmental and aesthetical solutions are needed[1618]. Therefore, harnessing the potential functional diversity of floral plants to provide their respective ecological services in the agroecosystems can be indispensable for the sustainable development of the floriculture industry. In this context, several applicable potentials of floral plants' functional diversity in agroecosystems are proposed that can be incorporated into the future R&D agenda of the floriculture industry.

    • Intensive agricultural production has led to significant biodiversity loss and unfavorable homogenization of the agricultural landscape due to excessive use of agrochemicals and fragmentation and deterioration of natural habitats[19,20]. This net biodiversity loss can severely impair ecosystem functions and services due to the disappearance of cornerstone species such as pollinators, predators, and parasitoids[21]. To mitigate such negative consequences, flower strips established along field edges with flower-rich non-crop species are among the most effective and commonly applied agri-environmental measures (AEMs) in developed countries with substantial governmental support such as the Common Agriculture Policy in the European Union, and the Farm Bill in the United States[22,23]. Flower strips can maintain abundant and functionally diverse insect communities by offering resources such as food, shelter, nesting places, oviposition sites, and overwintering opportunities. Such countermeasures can foster sustainable agricultural production through ecological intensification by harnessing biodiversity-based ecosystem services including pollination and natural pest control. Pollination services are important for maintaining crop productivity of 75% of the leading global food crops and amounting to 35% of the global production volumes[24,25]. Similarly, natural pest control services provided by predator and parasitoid arthropods have important economic implications in the intensive agricultural monocultures which can save between 40 billion and 74 billion Euros replacing human controls in pesticide applications, and host plant resistance[26].

      Burgeoning evidence shows that different flower strip mixtures can conserve multiple functional groups of flower visitors for realizing ecosystem functions in natural enemy enhancement, herbivore suppression, and crop production promotion[14,2731]. For example, the nectar source provided by flower strips can increase a parasitoid wasp's life span by up to 14.7-fold and increase their host searching span from 3 d to up to 2 weeks[32]. A field study observing flower-visitor communities on 14 flower plantings revealed that flower strips can not only attract pollinators such as bees or hoverflies, but also many ecologically and economically important species such as parasitic wasps and non-syrphid Diptera[33] . A quantitative synthesis by Albrecht et al.[24] from 35 studies across 529 sites in North America, Europe, and New Zealand agroecosystems provided general empirical evidence that flower strips enhancing natural pest control service to crops by 16% on average. Their results also demonstrated that increasing species richness of flowering plants can not only promote rare pollinator species and pollinator diversity but also pollination services.

      Ornamental plants in floriculture include a wide range of species from annual to perennial accommodating seasonal annual flowers with differential traits in color, scents, and sizes[33]. This diversity, consisting of both native and exotic species in the form of modern cultivars and other wild relatives provide a resource pool to select the best combination for flower strip establishment adapted to different crops, soil, and climate conditions (see Fig. 1). Hence, developing floriculture products with more diverse floral traits capable of conserving multiple functional groups of flower visitors to realize ecosystem services may promote the floriculture industry toward applicability and sustainability in agroecosystems with more ecological significance. Nevertheless, efficient provision of such trait-based service should consider its functional diversity (i.e., color richness), functional stability (i.e., species diversity), and functional intensity (i.e., flower sizes and abundances)[12]. For example, flower color is one functional trait perceived differently by humans and insect pollinators[34]. Therefore, more efforts with in-depth investigations and field observations are still required with adoption of rational, science-based, and pragmatic approaches to realize such goals.

      Figure 1. 

      A graphic illustration of functional diversity applying ornamental plants in flower strips in agroecosystems.

    • Halophytes and hyperaccumulators are equipped with unique traits in adapting to harsh conditions such as high salinity and heavy metals (HMs) or rare earth element (REEs) rich soil. Halophytes are plants that can complete the life cycle in high salt environments with over 200 mM NaCl (equals to 20 dS/m). Halophytes can be divided into euhalophytes, recretohalophytes, and pseudohalophytes based on their salt uptake and distribution mechanisms. For instance, euhalophytes, generally have succulent leaves or stems, can regulate their osmotic balance and adjust ionic balance to avoid ionic toxicity by high salinity. Recretohalophytes can secrete salts through salt glands or bladders. Pseudohalophytes would not absorb salts but exclude salt from roots by enhancing apoplastic barriers. Salt-accumulating halophytes continuously accumulate salt from the external saline environment by promoting water infiltration and salt leaching, thus reducing the concentration of salt ions in the soil[35,36]. Hyperaccumulators are those plants that can actively take up exceedingly large amounts of heavy metals/rare earth elements (100−1,000 fold higher than non-hyperaccumulators) without showing phytotoxicity symptoms[35]. Both halophytes and hyperaccumulators are of great value in the restoration of salinized and contaminated soil and many efforts have been made to exploit their potential to reduce damage by salinity and heavy metal/rare earth elements pollution and preserving soil functions in the agroecosystem[35,3739]. For example, the genus Spartina and Halimione can not only tolerate high salinity but also accumulate heavy metals, showing their pronounced capacity for phytoremediation and phytostabilization of As, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn[17,37]. Many hyperaccumulators have been extensively investigated for their practical applications in the phytoremediation of contaminated agricultural soils such as Sedum alfredii or Sedum plumbizincicola[40,41].

      According to the online Global Hyperaccumulator Database (http://hyperaccumulators.smi.uq.edu.au/collection/) and HALOPH database (https://ehaloph.uc.pt), there are a total of 1202 halophytes and around 1000 hyperaccumulators recorded worldwide. Besides their practical implementations in saline or contaminated soil, many halophytes and hyperaccumulators can produce attractive flowers which also have high potential for landscaping in degraded soils[42,43]. For instance, Cassaniti & Romano[44] investigated native halophytes in the Mediterranean region and listed 42 species with ornamental potentials. Similar works have been investigated in Turkey with more than 80 species utilized in landscape design for soil conservation and erosion prevention[45]. Some candidate halophyte and hyperaccumulator species with attractive flowers are presented in Fig. 2. Pictures are cited from the Plants of the World Online (https://powo.science.kew.org), Flora of Victoria (https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au), and Plant Plus of China (https://ppbc.iplant.cn). Flower meadows comprising these halophytes and hyperaccumulators with attractive traits can increase the aesthetic appeal of abandoned degraded landscapes and may help to support sustainable floriculture marketing strategies[21]. This provides an attractive solution for economic utilization and ecological remediation of these degraded and often abandoned land such as mining areas or polluted agricultural fields.

      Figure 2. 

      Some halophytes and hyperaccumulators with attractive floral traits. (a)−(c) halophytes; (d)−(h) hyperaccumulators.

    • We are meeting at a time of immense challenges to sustainable development with natural resource depletion and adverse impacts of environmental degradation including biodiversity loss and land degradation ('Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development', United Nations). Among the 17 SDGs (sustainable development goals), goal 15 specifically depicts a vision of protecting, restoring, and promoting sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably managing forests, combating desertification, and halting and reversing land degradation, and halting biodiversity loss. Although the current floriculture industry is still under debate regarding its sustainability, it has great potential in realizing its ecological importance in restoring degraded land, conserving biodiversity, and promoting sustainable agricultural production. Much more work needs to be done, however, to fully realize this potential and advocate its ecological significance. In this context, a three-step roadmap is proposed that the R&D of the floriculture industry can undertake to transform service provision and accelerate sustainable development (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Roadmap to realize the functional diversity of floral plants in agroecosystems.

      Firstly, implementing ornamental plants in both flower strips and degraded soil remediation requires screening for flower species with high potential. For the implementation in flower strips, a database should be established based on the known important traits in attracting pollinators and natural enemy communities given that there are hundreds of ornamental species, each comprising many cultivars with different colors, fragrances, sizes, and nectar quality[46]. This also includes laboratory and field experiments assessing the effective interactions between flowers and focal insect communities (e.g., relationship between nectar quality and attracted insects abundance and diversity) to quantify the attractiveness and screen for the potential flower species. Regarding the database for the utilization of floral halophytes and hyperaccumulators in degraded soil remediation and landscaping, less work may be required as there are limited choices when considering both the aesthetical traits and their respective elemental hyperaccumulating and tolerance abilities. The second step is to assess their practicability by quantifying their actual performances in the field. For the implementation in flower strips, a systematic investigation of the ecological effects of flower compositions and land management on the abundance and diversity of attracted focal insects, pest control efficiency, and crop yield to scrutinize the most suitable formula for each crop. As for the utilization in degraded soil remediation, the focus is on soil quality improvement, land recovery, biodiversity gain, and human aesthetical enjoyment. Based on the knowledge acquired from the first two steps, the species can then be target-designed with precise traits implemented in flower strips or phytoremediation fields to improve the performance by modern breeding biotechnology such as CRISPR/Cas9 and smart breeding driven by big data technology and artificial intelligence (AI)[4749]. With the improvement in the focal functional traits, the application of novel functional floral plants can then be applied in more delicate scenarios with better performance.

    • The ecological service provided by today's floriculture industry is mainly to human beings based on their aesthetical needs. As a consequence, the market for ornamental plants is subjected to periodic trend-driven changes based on consumer preference which ultimately determines its economic value. In the meantime, the quality production of flower products is at the cost of huge environmental impact to meet the increasingly restricted standards of the market. In the present situation of global change, the paradoxical situation between quality production and environmental protection induces a dilemma for the sustainable development of floriculture. In this context, the ecological importance of floral plants in their functional services to other key components in the terrestrial ecosystem is advocated, and two potential applications proposed (i.e., flower strips and phytoremediation) of floral plants in the agricultural systems and degraded landscapes. This may provide alternatives to relieve the floriculture industry from the current dilemma towards a future with sustainability and applicability. Nevertheless, substantial work is urgently required regarding the database of the candidate species, field performances, and interactive functional traits to fully realize these ecological functions.

      • This work was supported by the Talent cultivation funding supported by Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2023RCYP-06), the Scientific and Technological Talents and Platform Program of Yunnan Province (Academician Expert Workstation) (202305AF150165), and the Xingdian Talent Support Project (CYRC2020004).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Zhang P, Li F; draft manuscript preparation: Zhang P; data collection and organization: Zhou J, He D, Yang Y; manuscript revision and editing: Li F. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Yunnan Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  References (49)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang P, He D, Zhou J, Yang Y, Li F. 2024. Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry. Agrobiodiversity 1(2): 23−27 doi: 10.48130/abd-0024-0005
    Zhang P, He D, Zhou J, Yang Y, Li F. 2024. Much more than a pretty thing: harnessing floral plants' functional diversity to achieve the sustainability of the floriculture industry. Agrobiodiversity 1(2): 23−27 doi: 10.48130/abd-0024-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return