Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants

More Information
  • Received: 09 July 2024
    Revised: 13 August 2024
    Accepted: 03 October 2024
    Published online: 31 October 2024
    Forestry Research  4 Article number: e035 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • UGT catalyzes the transfer of glycosyl molecules from donors to acceptors, and the glycosylation catalyzed by them is a modification reaction essential for plant cell growth, development, and metabolic homeostasis. Members of this class of enzymes are found in all areas of life and are involved in the biosynthesis of an extensive range of glycosides. This review aims to screen and collate relevant properties of the UGT71 family in plants and their functions in plant secondary metabolites. Firstly, we conducted a retrospective analysis of information about plant UGTs, before focusing on UGT71s through glycosylation of secondary metabolites (triterpenoids, flavonoids) and glycosylation of phytohormones (ABA, SA). Consequently, they play a pivotal role in plant defence, hormone regulation, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, thereby enabling plants to adapt to changing environments. Further investigation revealed that UGTs (UGT71s) can enhance the adaptive and resistant potential of plants in the context of today's deteriorating growing conditions due to climate change impacts caused by global warming. Nevertheless, further in-depth studies on the intricate interactions among UGTs in plants are required to fully exploit the potential of UGTs in protecting plants against stress.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 The numbers of total UGTs found in different plants species that have been published in public databases.
    Supplementary Table S2 The counts of candidate UGTs that have been published in public databases.
    Supplementary Figure S1 Modeled 3D structure of UGT71C3.
  • [1]

    Caputi L, Malnoy M, Goremykin V, Nikiforova S, Martens S. 2012. A genome-wide phylogenetic reconstruction of family 1 UDP-glycosyltransferases revealed the expansion of the family during the adaptation of plants to life on land. The Plant Journal 69:1030−42

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04853.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Bowles D, Lim EK, Poppenberger B, Vaistij FE. 2006. Glycosyltransferases of lipophilic small molecules. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57:567−97

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105429

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jones P, Vogt T. 2001. Glycosyltransferases in secondary plant metabolism: tranquilizers and stimulant controllers. Planta 213:164−74

    doi: 10.1007/s004250000492

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Meech R, Hu DG, McKinnon RA, Mubarokah SN, Haines AZ, et al. 2019. The UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT) superfamily: new members, new functions, and novel paradigms. Physiological Reviews 99:1153−222

    doi: 10.1152/physrev.00058.2017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ross J, Li Y, Lim EK, Bowles DJ. 2001. Higher plant glycosyltransferases. Genome Biology 2:reviews3004.1

    doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-2-reviews3004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Hanada K. 2011. An evolutionary view of functional diversity in family 1 glycosyltransferases. The Plant Journal 66:182−93

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04493.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Sun S, Dai T, Wang Z, Chou J, Chao Q, et al. 2021. Projected increases in population exposure of daily climate extremes in Eastern China by 2050. Advances in Climate Change Research

    [8]

    MacKenzie PI, Owens IS, Burchell B, Bock KW, Bairoch A, et al. 1997. The UDP glycosyltransferase gene superfamily: recommended nomenclature update based on evolutionary divergence. Pharmacogenetics 7:255−69

    doi: 10.1097/00008571-199708000-00001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Parra-Rojas JP, Largo-Gosens A, Carrasco T, Celiz-Balboa J, Arenas-Morales V, et al. 2019. New steps in mucilage biosynthesis revealed by analysis of the transcriptome of the UDP-rhamnose/UDP-galactose transporter 2 mutant. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:5071−88

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Fukushima A, Nakabayashi R, Hanada K, Matsuda F, et al. 2012. Two glycosyltransferases involved in anthocyanin modification delineated by transcriptome independent component analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 69:154−67

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04779.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Lin JS, Huang XX, Li Q, Cao Y, Bao Y, et al. 2016. UDP-glycosyltransferase 72B1 catalyzes the glucose conjugation of monolignols and is essential for the normal cell wall lignification in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 88:26−42

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13229

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Rocha J, Sarkis J, Thomas A, Pitou L, Radzimanowski J, et al. 2016. Structural insights and membrane binding properties of MGD1, the major galactolipid synthase in plants. The Plant Journal 85:622−33

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Grubb CD, Zipp BJ, Kopycki J, Schubert M, Quint M, et al. 2014. Comparative analysis of Arabidopsis UGT74 glucosyltransferases reveals a special role of UGT74C1 in glucosinolate biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 79:92−105

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12541

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Sinlapadech T, Stout J, Ruegger MO, Deak M, Chapple C. 2007. The hyper-fluorescent trichome phenotype of the brt1 mutant of Arabidopsis is the result of a defect in a sinapic acid: UDPG glucosyltransferase. The Plant Journal 49:655−68

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02984.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wu B, Cao X, Liu H, Zhu C, Klee H, et al. 2019. UDP-glucosyltransferase PpUGT85A2 controls volatile glycosylation in peach. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:925−36

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery419

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yin Q, Shen G, Di S, Fan C, Chang Z, et al. 2017. Genome-wide identification and functional characterization of UDP-glucosyltransferase genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis in Glycine max. Plant and Cell Physiology 58:1558−72

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Poppenberger B, Fujioka S, Soeno K, George GL, Vaistij FE, et al. 2005. The UGT73C5 of Arabidopsis thaliana glucosylates brassinosteroids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:15253−58

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504279102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang J, Ma XM, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Hou BK. 2011. N-glucosyltransferase UGT76C2 is involved in cytokinin homeostasis and cytokinin response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology 52:2200−13

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr152

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lim EK, Bowles DJ. 2004. A class of plant glycosyltransferases involved in cellular homeostasis. The EMBO Journal 23:2915−22

    doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Gachon CMM, Langlois-Meurinne M, Saindrenan P. 2005. Plant secondary metabolism glycosyltransferases: the emerging functional analysis. Trends in Plant Science 10:542−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ono E, Homma Y, Horikawa M, Kunikane-Doi S, Imai H, et al. 2010. Functional differentiation of the glycosyltransferases that contribute to the chemical diversity of bioactive flavonol glycosides in grapevines (Vitis vinifera). The Plant Cell 22:2856−71

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.074625

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kristensen C, Morant M, Olsen CE, Ekstrøm CT, Galbraith DW, et al. 2005. Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102:1779−84

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409233102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Lim EK, Doucet CJ, Li Y, Elias L, Worrall D, et al. 2002. The activity of Arabidopsis glycosyltransferases toward salicylic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, and other benzoates. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:586−92

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109287200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li D, Chen G, Ma B, Zhong C, He N. 2020. Metabolic profiling and transcriptome analysis of mulberry leaves provide insights into flavonoid biosynthesis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:1494−504

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Nair PC, Meech R, MacKenzie PI, McKinnon RA, Miners JO. 2015. Insights into the UDP-sugar selectivities of human UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGT): a molecular modeling perspective. Drug Metabolism Reviews 47:335−45

    Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen HY, Li X. 2017. Identification of a residue responsible for UDP-sugar donor selectivity of a dihydroxybenzoic acid glycosyltransferase from Arabidopsis natural accessions. The Plant Journal 89:195−203

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Hu Y, Walker S. 2002. Remarkable structural similarities between diverse glycosyltransferases. Chemistry & Biology 9:1287−96

    doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00295-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Louveau T, Orme A, Pfalzgraf H, Stephenson MJ, Melton R, et al. 2018. Analysis of two new Arabinosyltransferases belonging to the carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZY) glycosyl transferase Family1 provides insights into disease resistance and sugar donor specificity. The Plant Cell 30:3038−57

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wilson AE, Tian L. 2019. Phylogenomic analysis of UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases provides insights into the evolutionary landscape of glycosylation in plant metabolism. The Plant Journal 100:1273−88

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14514

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Smith J, Yang Y, Levy S, Adelusi OO, Hahn MG, et al. 2016. Functional characterization of UDP-apiose synthases from bryophytes and green algae provides insight into the appearance of apiose-containing glycans during plant evolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry 291:21434−47

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.749069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ramirez-Estrada K, Castillo N, Lara JA, Arró M, Boronat A, et al. 2017. Tomato UDP-glucose sterol glycosyltransferases: a family of developmental and stress regulated genes that encode cytosolic and membrane-associated forms of the enzyme. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:984

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00984

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Rehman HM, Khan UM, Nawaz S, Saleem F, Ahmed N, et al. 2022. Genome wide analysis of Family-1 UDP glycosyltransferases in Populus trichocarpa specifies abiotic stress responsive glycosylation mechanisms. Genes 13:1640

    doi: 10.3390/genes13091640

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Clark JW, Donoghue PCJ. 2018. Whole-genome duplication and plant macroevolution. Trends in Plant Science 23:933−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li Y, Baldauf S, Lim EK, Bowles DJ. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of the UDP-glycosyltransferase multigene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:4338−43

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007447200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Huang S, Li R, Zhang Z, Li L, Gu X, et al. 2009. The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nature Genetics 41:1275−81

    doi: 10.1038/ng.475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Yang M, Fehl C, Lees KV, Lim EK, Offen WA, et al. 2018. Functional and informatics analysis enables glycosyltransferase activity prediction. Nature Chemical Biology 14:1109−17

    doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0154-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Tiwari P, Sangwan RS, Sangwan NS. 2016. Plant secondary metabolism linked glycosyltransferases: an update on expanding knowledge and scopes. Biotechnology Advances 34:714−39

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Lairson LL, Henrissat B, Davies GJ, Withers SG. 2008. Glycosyltransferases: structures, functions, and mechanisms. Annual Review of Biochemistry 77:521−55

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061005.092322

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Osmani SA, Bak S, Møller BL. 2009. Substrate specificity of plant UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases predicted from crystal structures and homology modeling. Phytochemistry 70:325−47

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.12.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Song C, Gu L, Liu J, Zhao S, Hong X, et al. 2015. Functional characterization and substrate promiscuity of UGT71 glycosyltransferases from strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Plant and Cell Physiology 56:2478−93

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Liu Z, Yan JP, Li DK, Luo Q, Yan Q, et al. 2015. UDP-glucosyltransferase71C5, a major glucosyltransferase, mediates abscisic acid homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 167:1659−70

    doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Dong Y, Wang C, Han X, Tang S, Liu S, et al. 2014. A novel bHLH transcription factor PebHLH35 from Populus euphratica confers drought tolerance through regulating stomatal development, photosynthesis and growth in Arabidopsis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 450:453−58

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Su X, Shen G, Di S, Dixon RA, Pang Y. 2017. Characterization of UGT716A1 as a multi-substrate UDP: flavonoid glucosyltransferase gene in Ginkgo biloba. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:2085

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02085

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Xiao J. 2015. Dietary flavonoid aglycones and their glycosides: which show better biological significance? Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 57:1874−905

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1032400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Zhao M, Jin J, Wang J, Gao T, Luo Y, et al. 2022. Eugenol functions as a signal mediating cold and drought tolerance via UGT71A59-mediated glucosylation in tea plants. The Plant Journal 109:1489−506

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15647

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Lim CE, Choi JN, Kim IA, Lee SA, Hwang YS, et al. 2008. Improved resistance to oxidative stress by a loss-of-function mutation in the Arabidopsis UGT71C1 gene. Molecules and Cells 25:368−75

    doi: 10.1016/S1016-8478(23)17594-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Cao Y, Han Z, Zhang Z, He L, Huang C, et al. 2024. UDP-glucosyltransferase 71C4 controls the flux of phenylpropanoid metabolism to shape cotton seed development. Plant Communications 5:100938

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Augustin JM, Kuzina V, Andersen SB, Bak S. 2011. Molecular activities, biosynthesis and evolution of triterpenoid saponins. Phytochemistry 72:435−57

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, et al. 2012. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Research 40:D1178−D1186

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr944

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Mugford ST, Osbourn A. 2012. Saponin synthesis and function. In Isoprenoid Synthesis in Plants and Microorganisms, eds Bach T, Rohmer M. New York: Springer. pp. 405–24. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4063-5_28

    [51]

    Ren C, Xi Z, Xian B, Chen C, Huang X, et al. 2023. Identification and characterization of CtUGT3 as the key player of astragalin biosynthesis in Carthamus tinctorius L. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71:16221−32

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c05117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Wang X. 2009. Structure, mechanism and engineering of plant natural product glycosyltransferases. FEBS Letters 583:3303−9

    doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.09.042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Khorolragchaa A, Kim YJ, Rahimi S, Sukweenadhi J, Jang MG, et al. 2014. Grouping and characterization of putative glycosyltransferase genes from Panax ginseng Meyer. Gene 536:186−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Yan X, Fan Y, Wei W, Wang P, Liu Q, et al. 2014. Production of bioactive ginsenoside compound K in metabolically engineered yeast. Cell Research 24:770−73

    doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.28

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Griesser M, Vitzthum F, Fink B, Bellido ML, Raasch C, et al. 2008. Multi-substrate flavonol O-glucosyltransferases from strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) achene and receptacle. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:2611−25

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Kurze E, Wüst M, Liao J, McGraphery K, Hoffmann T, et al. 2022. Structure-function relationship of terpenoid glycosyltransferases from plants. Natural Product Reports 39:389−409

    doi: 10.1039/d1np00038a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Behr M, Neutelings G, El Jaziri M, Baucher M. 2020. You want it sweeter: how glycosylation affects plant response to oxidative stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:571399

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.571399

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Okazawa A, Kusunose T, Ono E, Kim HJ, Satake H, et al. 2014. Glucosyltransferase activity of Arabidopsis UGT71C1 towards pinoresinol and lariciresinol. Plant Biotechnology 31:561−66

    doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.0910a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Baderschneider B, Winterhalter P. 2001. Isolation and characterization of novel benzoates, cinnamates, flavonoids, and lignans from Riesling wine and screening for antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49:2788−98

    doi: 10.1021/jf010396d

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Guo DD, Liu F, Tu YH, He BX, Gao Y, et al. 2016. Expression patterns of three UGT genes in different chemotype safflower lines and under MeJA stimulus revealed their potential role in flavonoid biosynthesis. PLoS One 11:e0158159

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Piotrowska A, Bajguz A. 2011. Conjugates of abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, ethylene, gibberellins, and jasmonates. Phytochemistry 72:2097−112

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.08.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Islam S, Griffiths CA, Blomstedt CK, Le TN, Gaff DF, et al. 2013. Increased biomass, seed yield and stress tolerance is conferred in Arabidopsis by a novel enzyme from the resurrection grass Sporobolus stapfianus that glycosylates the strigolactone analogue GR24. PLoS One 8:e80035

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Maruri-López I, Aviles-Baltazar NY, Buchala A, Serrano M. 2019. Intra and extracellular journey of the phytohormone salicylic acid. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:423

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00423

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Park SW, Liu PP, Forouhar F, Vlot AC, Tong L, et al. 2009. Use of a synthetic salicylic acid analog to investigate the roles of methyl salicylate and its esterases in plant disease resistance. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284:7307−17

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807968200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Chen L, Wang WS, Wang T, Meng XF, Chen TT, et al. 2019. Methyl salicylate glucosylation regulates plant defense signaling and systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiology 180:2167−81

    doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Gershenzon J, Dudareva N. 2007. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nature Chemical Biology 3:408−14

    doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Bönisch F, Frotscher J, Stanitzek S, Rühl E, Wüst M, et al. 2014. A UDP-glucose: monoterpenol glucosyltransferase adds to the chemical diversity of the grapevine metabolome. Plant Physiology 165:561−81

    doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Karlova R, Busscher J, Schempp FM, Buchhaupt M, van Dijk ADJ, et al. 2022. Detoxification of monoterpenes by a family of plant glycosyltransferases. Phytochemistry 203:113371

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113371

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Saha SK, Swaminathan P, Raghavan C, Uma L, Subramanian G. 2010. Ligninolytic and antioxidative enzymes of a marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria willei BDU 130511 during Poly R-478 decolourization. Bioresource Technology 101:3076−84

    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Kim YJ, Zhang D, Yang DC. 2015. Biosynthesis and biotechnological production of ginsenosides. Biotechnology Advances 33:717−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Liu C, Dai L, Liu Y, Dou D, Sun Y, et al. 2018. Pharmacological activities of mogrosides. Future Medicinal Chemistry 10:845−50

    doi: 10.4155/fmc-2017-0255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Achnine L, Huhman DV, Farag MA, Sumner LW, Blount JW, et al. 2005. Genomics-based selection and functional characterization of triterpene glycosyltransferases from the model legume Medicago truncatula. The Plant Journal 41:875−87

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02344.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Bönisch F, Frotscher J, Stanitzek S, Rühl E, Wüst M, et al. 2014. Activity-based profiling of a physiologic aglycone library reveals sugar acceptor promiscuity of Family 1 UDP-glucosyltransferases from grape. Plant Physiology 166:23−39

    doi: 10.1104/pp.114.242578

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Gómez R, Vicino P, Carrillo N, Lodeyro AF. 2019. Manipulation of oxidative stress responses as a strategy to generate stress-tolerant crops. From damage to signaling to tolerance. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 39:693−708

    doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1597829

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Montoro P, Braca A, Pizza C, De Tommasi N. 2005. Structure–antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids isolated from different plant species. Food Chemistry 92:349−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.07.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Agati G, Azzarello E, Pollastri S, Tattini M. 2012. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: location and functional significance. Plant Science 196:67−76

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Chapman JM, Muhlemann JK, Gayomba SR, Muday GK. 2019. RBOH-dependent ROS synthesis and ROS scavenging by plant specialized metabolites to modulate plant development and stress responses. Chemical Research in Toxicology 32:370−96

    doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Pourcel L, Routaboul JM, Cheynier V, Lepiniec L, Debeaujon I. 2007. Flavonoid oxidation in plants: from biochemical properties to physiological functions. Trends in Plant Science 12:29−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.11.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Yamasaki H, Sakihama Y, Ikehara N. 1997. Flavonoid-peroxidase reaction as a detoxification mechanism of plant cells against H2O2. Plant Physiology 115:1405−12

    doi: 10.1104/pp.115.4.1405

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Naoumkina M, Dixon RA. 2008. Subcellular localization of flavonoid natural products: a signaling function? Plant Signaling & Behavior 3:573−75

    doi: 10.4161/psb.3.8.5731

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Brunetti C, Sebastiani F, Tattini M. 2019. Review: ABA, flavonols, and the evolvability of land plants. Plant Science 280:448−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.12.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ. 2002. Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 13:572−84

    doi: 10.1016/s0955-2863(02)00208-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Song C, Hong X, Zhao S, Liu J, Schulenburg K, et al. 2016. Glucosylation of 4-hydroxy-2, 5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone, the key strawberry flavor compound in strawberry fruit. Plant Physiology 171:139−51

    doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Hõrak H. 2021. How to achieve immune balance and harmony: glycosyltransferase UGT76B1 inactivates N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid to suppress defense responses. The Plant Cell 33:453−54

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma KK. 2007. Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Reports 27:411−24

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-007-0474-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J. 2016. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:571

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00571

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Xu ZY, Lee KH, Dong T, Jeong JC, Jin JB, et al. 2012. A vacuolar β-glucosidase homolog that possesses glucose-conjugated abscisic acid hydrolyzing activity plays an important role in osmotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24:2184−99

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.095935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Dietz K, Sauter A, Wichert K, Messdaghi D, Hartung W. 2000. Extracellular β-glucosidase activity in barley involved in the hydrolysis of ABA glucose conjugate in leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 51:937−44

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/51.346.937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Lee KH, Piao HL, Kim HY, Choi SM, Jiang F, et al. 2006. Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increases active pools of abscisic acid. Cell 126:1109−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Upadhyaya H, Panda SK. 2013. Abiotic stress responses in TEA [Camellia sinensis L (O) Kuntze]: an overview. Reviews in Agricultural Science 1:1−10

    doi: 10.7831/ras.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Priest DM, Jackson RG, Ashford DA, Abrams SR, Bowles DJ. 2005. The use of abscisic acid analogues to analyse the substrate selectivity of UGT71B6, a UDP-glycosyltransferase of Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Letters 579:4454−58

    doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.06.084

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD. 1996. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. The Plant Cell 8:1773−91

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1773

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Iqbal Z, Iqbal MS, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF, Ansari MI. 2021. Plant defense responses to biotic stress and its interplay with fluctuating dark/light conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:631810

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.631810

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Bennett RS, Hutmacher RB, Davis RM. 2008. Seed transmission of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum race 4 in California. The Journal of Cotton Science 12:160−64

    Google Scholar

    [95]

    Bartholomew DM, Van Dyk DE, Lau SM C, O’Keefe DP, Rea PA, et al. 2002. Alternate energy-dependent pathways for the vacuolar uptake of glucose and glutathione conjugates. Plant Physiology 130:1562−72

    doi: 10.1104/pp.008334

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Gharabli H, Della Gala V, Welner DH. 2023. The function of UDP-glycosyltransferases in plants and their possible use in crop protection. Biotechnology Advances 67:108182

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108182

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Shi Q, Du J, Zhu D, Li X, Li X. 2020. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of anthocyanin biosynthesis mechanisms in the color mutant Ziziphus jujuba cv. Tailihong. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:15186−98

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05334

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Gosch C, Halbwirth H, Schneider B, Hölscher D, Stich K. 2010. Cloning and heterologous expression of glycosyltransferases from Malus x domestica and Pyrus communis, which convert phloretin to phloretin 2'-O-glucoside (phloridzin). Plant Science 178:299−306

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.12.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yang Y, Wang J, Han F, Zhang J, Gao M, et al. 2024. Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants. Forestry Research 4: e035 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0032
    Yang Y, Wang J, Han F, Zhang J, Gao M, et al. 2024. Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants. Forestry Research 4: e035 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0032

Figures(5)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(199) PDF downloads(84)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants

Forestry Research  4 Article number: e035  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: UGT catalyzes the transfer of glycosyl molecules from donors to acceptors, and the glycosylation catalyzed by them is a modification reaction essential for plant cell growth, development, and metabolic homeostasis. Members of this class of enzymes are found in all areas of life and are involved in the biosynthesis of an extensive range of glycosides. This review aims to screen and collate relevant properties of the UGT71 family in plants and their functions in plant secondary metabolites. Firstly, we conducted a retrospective analysis of information about plant UGTs, before focusing on UGT71s through glycosylation of secondary metabolites (triterpenoids, flavonoids) and glycosylation of phytohormones (ABA, SA). Consequently, they play a pivotal role in plant defence, hormone regulation, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, thereby enabling plants to adapt to changing environments. Further investigation revealed that UGTs (UGT71s) can enhance the adaptive and resistant potential of plants in the context of today's deteriorating growing conditions due to climate change impacts caused by global warming. Nevertheless, further in-depth studies on the intricate interactions among UGTs in plants are required to fully exploit the potential of UGTs in protecting plants against stress.

    • Plants have evolved to synthesize a vast array of secondary metabolites that are not essential for their primary growth and development but play a crucial role in their interaction with the environment, reproductive strategy, and defense mechanisms[1]. These metabolites can undergo various chemical modifications, such as hydroxylation, methylation, and glycosylation. Enzymes have evolved to introduce new functional groups to molecules, enabling this capability. Glycosylation reactions can occur on different functional groups including -OH, -COOH, -NH2, -SH, and C-C in a wide range of molecules such as proteins, carbohydrates, primary and specialized metabolites, and xenobiotics[2]. Plant secondary metabolites frequently possess carbon skeletons connected to one or more sugar moieties. The glycosylation of these metabolites plays a crucial role in influencing their solubility, biochemical characteristics, subcellular distribution, and biological function. This is because glycosylation alters the structure of the metabolites, making them more soluble and affecting their ability to interact with other molecules in the cell. Overall, glycosylation is an important process that plays a key role in the function of plant secondary metabolites[3].

      Glycosylation represents the last step in the biosynthesis of numerous natural compounds, and is a process that can occur during the final stages of synthesizing various molecules, including glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and hormones[4]. Cellular homeostasis is crucially maintained through the regulation of levels, activity, and localization of important cellular metabolites. This process is facilitated by glycosyltransferase enzymes (GTs), which play a key role in glycosylation. The products of glycosylation modifications encompass a range of compounds such as glycoproteins, glycolipids, and various small-molecule glycoside, or glycoester compounds, including anthocyanosides, flavonoid glycosides, glycosides or glycoesters of hormones, and similar compounds. Modifications by these enzymes, which occur in all living organisms, modulate the solubility, stability, bioavailability, and bioactivity of various small molecules[5]. Therefore, it is believed that glycosylation modification affects many aspects of plant growth and development and is an important mechanism for regulating cellular metabolic homeostasis[2].

      The enzyme that catalyzes plant glycosylation is uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferase (UDP-glycosyltransferase, UGT), which is a glycosyltransferase that utilizes uridine diphosphate (UDP)-activated sugar molecules as glycosyl donors. It is the largest glycosyltransferase superfamily in plants, with many glycosyltransferases related to the glycosylation of secondary metabolites and phytohormone glycosylation belonging to this superfamily[6]. It is widely accepted that global warming is responsible for an increase in the frequency, intensity and duration of climate extremes. Furthermore, socioeconomic exposure is considered to be a dominant factor in climate impacts[7]. Glycosylation is a crucial chemical process that regulates the production and role of various specialized metabolites essential for combating pathogens and environmental stresses. This indicates that UGTs have the potential to enhance plant resilience and survival under challenging growing conditions that may arise from climate change. In this study, the functional properties of subfamily UGT71 and the distribution characteristics of each family in different plant families are further summarized, based on a review of the structural properties and family classification of plant UGTs. This is to provide guidance for the discovery and identification of plant UGT71s genes, as well as for the study of sequence structure and catalytic function, and to promote the molecular breeding of plant UGT71s. Furthermore, members of the UGT71 family play a role in the homeostasis of triterpenoids, flavonoids (and their derivatives), and hormones. This contributes to the study of glycoside synthesis, which in turn protects the growth and development of plants.

    • Glycosyltransferases (GTs, EC 2.4.x.y) are a diverse family of genes found in various living organisms[4]. Glycosyltransferases (GTs) are enzymes that transfer sugar molecules from activated donors to specific receptors. The classification of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) genes into 106 families (GT1~GT106) is based on substrate specificity, amino acid sequence similarity, and catalytic specificity. In Fig. 1, the nomenclature of UGT genes follows a pattern where the root symbol UGT is followed by an Arabic numeral representing the family, a letter indicating the subfamily, and another Arabic numeral for the individual gene. The numbering system assigns families 1−50 to animals, 51−70 to yeast, 71−100 to plants, and 101−200 to bacteria[8]. The amino acid sequence identity of UGTs within a family are usually 40% or higher, and within a subfamily is typically 60% or higher[5,8]. Additionally, the establishment of the UGT Nomenclature Committee (https://labs.wsu.edu/ugt) is a significant development.

      Figure 1. 

      The nomenclature system for UGT genes.

      Family-1 GTs also referred to as UDP glycosyltransferases (GTs), are the predominant GTs found in plants and play a crucial role in influencing plant development and growth[8]. Within these UGT proteins, there exists a conserved consensus sequence near the C-terminal, which spans 44 amino acids and is commonly known as the plant secondary product glycosyltransferase (PSPG) box or signature motif[6]. This family displays an inverting mechanism of catalysis and is characterized by a GT-B structural fold. UDP-glucose is the main sugar donor in family 1, followed by UDP-galactose, UDP-rhamnose, UDP-xylose, and UDP-glucuronic acid (Fig. 2)[2,9]. UGTs are enzymes that transfer uridine-diphosphate-activated monosaccharides to various compounds. These include anthocyanins, cell wall components, fatty acids, flavonoids, glucosinolates, and phenylpropanoids[1014].

      Figure 2. 

      Sugar donors for glycosyltransferase.

      A significant number of UGTs have been identified across various plant species. Specifically, 107, 168, and 220 UGTs were discovered within the complete genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, peach, and soybean, respectively[1,15,16]. Notably, Quercus suber possesses 312 UGT family members, representing the largest known UGT family to date. In recent times, extensive research efforts have concentrated on the identification of UGTs in diverse plants. The findings indicated significant variations in the quantities of UGTs among various plant species[1,1517]. Moreover, UGTs play a crucial role in diverse biological processes, regulating the levels of multiple hormones, detoxifying xenobiotics, and stabilizing secondary metabolites chemically[1820].

      It is crucial to comprehend the glycosyltransferase reaction mechanism and glycosides' physiological functions. This understanding is essential for the synthesis of valuable glycosides in vitro and the genetic modification of vital crop traits[2,21]. The proliferation of UGTs in various species and their independent evolution of functionality sometimes result in inaccurate connections between the structure and function of UGTs. This discrepancy could account for the sluggish advancements in the functional elucidation of UGTs. Despite extensive research on the UGT family over numerous years, only a limited number of UGTs have been thoroughly examined in plant species thus far[20,22]. The UGT71 family, for example, belongs to group E, one of the largest UGT groups in plants. UGT71 family members in Arabidopsis thaliana have demonstrated the ability to detect various compounds, such as triterpenoids[1], flavonoids[19], and benzoates[23], as well as plant hormones[24].

      Predicting substrate specificity is a complicated task because divergent families may recognize the same substrates, and even closely related UGTs can exhibit different affinities for substrates. More and more plant UGTs have been the subject of X-ray crystallography[25], with three-dimensional (3D) structures reported in www.rcsb.org. Protein structural information is essential for the study and understanding of the evolution and catalytic mechanism of glycosyltransferase proteins. The 3D structure of Arabidopsis thaliana UGT71C3, as modelled, is depicted in Supplementary Fig. S1. These studies have demonstrated that the secondary and tertiary structures of these proteins are conserved[26,27]. An examination of plant UGTs' structure reveals that these enzymes feature two Rossmann folds. The highly conserved C-terminal motif plays a crucial role in binding with activated sugar donors, whereas the variable N-terminal region suggests involvement in sugar receptor binding. Research on the UGT71 family's structure using molecular modeling unveils a region-specific conserved motif at the N-terminus designed for sugar acceptor binding[28]. This crucial motif likely hosts several essential residues that might have undergone evolutionary pressure to ensure precise substrate binding.

    • Following the rapid progress in plant molecular biology, the molecular-based strategies are being used to isolate genes of interest. The UGT family has been reported to have expanded in land plants, particularly in tracheophytes[1]. Numerous genes encoding UGTs with known or potential functions have been discovered in various plant species. Furthermore, recent genome sequencing initiatives have unveiled a multitude of additional UGT genes[2,10,20].

      It was found that the number of UGTs increased gradually during evolution. As shown in Fig. 3 (shown in Supplementary Tables S1 & S2), findings increased from 1, 2, and 15 putative UGTs in the three ancient organisms. These include the following components the single-celled green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the moss Physcomltrium patens and the Chara braunii, to more than 100 in the arborvitae such as Selaginella moellendorffii (gymnosperm), and Populus trichocarpa (angiosperm)[2932]. Hypothesizing a swift expansion of the UGT family post differentiation from P. patens, it is suggested that this rapid growth persists at varying rates in vascular plants. Notably, the UGT count in vascular plants is 2.7 to 11.5 times greater than in P. patens. This observation indicates that the UGT family likely experienced rapid expansion following its divergence from P. patens and continues to grow at different velocities in vascular plants[10]. Moreover, the phylogenetic group of UGTs seems to remain constant in higher plants. This divergence suggests that the UGT family has been expanding early on in plants, which may demonstrate expansion and contraction of plant UGT groups may have implications for the metabolic activities of specific lines[33]. During the evolutionary process of embryophytes, particularly in gymnosperms and shrubby plants, numerous genome-wide, and tandem duplication events have taken place. These events have diversified UGTs, resulting in both sub-functionalization and neo-functionalization[10].

      Figure 3. 

      The numbers of total UGTs found in different plants species that have been published in public databases. For each group (i.e. column), the color scale is drawn according to the following ratio (shown in Supplementary Table S1 & S2), the percentage of UGTs group compared with the total UGTs within a given taxon/the percentage of UGTs group compared with the total UGTs within the taxon where the group is first identified.

      The UGT of Arabidopsis thaliana was initially utilized to examine evolution, resulting in the categorization of its UGT evolutionary tree into 14 distinct groups, labeled A through N[5,34]. Subsequent research has identified two additional groups, O and P, in plants like rice and cucumber[35]. Across different species, the number of UGTs in these 14 groups varies significantly. In the course of evolution among higher plants, groups A, D, E, G, and L have experienced rapid expansion, with group E showing the most rapid expansion. Genes within group E make up a notable portion of the UGT superfamily in various species, ranging from 20% to 25%[1]. Over time, group E has emerged as the largest subgroup within the GT classification, encompassing UGT71s, UGT72s, and UGT88s. Genes within a group may have evolved convergently in function, while genes with similar functions may have evolved convergently among different groups. To further investigate the evolution of UGT71s, a phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana UGTs was conducted to further explore the evolution of UGT71s (Fig. 4). Figure 4 illustrates the phylogenetic tree of UGT enzymes responsible for the biochemical identification of glycosyltransferases, specifically tailored for the metabolites under study. Sequences from various plant species were retrieved from the GenBank protein database. The UGT gene from Arabidopsis thaliana served as the reference point for the UGT family. The present research suggests that the glycosylation of flavonoids might be an ancient and conserved function within plant UGTs.

      Figure 4. 

      The constructed phylogenetic tree of UGT71s includes glycosyltransferases participating in metabolites such as glycosides. Sequences from different plant species were gathered from the GenBank protein database. UGT genes from Arabidopsis were utilized as a reference for UGT families. A tree was built utilizing the maximum-likelihood method with 1,000 bootstrap replications.

    • The biochemical characterization of UGTs' catalytic activity is crucial in the field of glycobiology due to advancements in high-throughput technologies and the identification of new UGTs in plant genomes. With the development of faster and more efficient testing methods, researchers can study the functions and properties of UGT enzymes more comprehensively[36]. The discovery of novel UGTs in plant genomes has broadened the scope of glycobiology, shedding light on the diverse roles these enzymes play in biological processes. The study of UGTs' catalytic activity is essential for understanding their role in various biochemical pathways and metabolic processes. By characterizing the enzymatic functions of UGTs, researchers can elucidate their substrate specificity, reaction mechanisms, and potential physiological significance. This information is valuable for developing strategies to modulate UGT activity for applications in agriculture, medicine, and biotechnology. In conclusion, the biochemical characterization of UGTs has contributed significantly to the field of glycobiology, providing insights into the functions and properties of these enzymes in plant genomes. With the use of high-throughput technologies and the discovery of new UGTs, researchers have been able to expand their knowledge of UGT catalytic activity and its implications for biological systems. This research lays the foundation for further exploration of UGT enzymes and their potential applications in various fields.

      Advances in bioinformatics have also made significant contributions to the identification of plant UGTs. Numerous conserved motifs have been identified using different motif discovery tools, revealing the PSPG box as a common consensus sequence among UGTs. Additionally, in silico strategies have been employed to utilize the increasing amount of analytical and biochemical data on UGTs to predict substrate specificity and biological function[3638]. The 3D structure of an enzyme can be used to predict substrate specificity[39]. Future advancements in prediction tools are expected through the utilization of identified 3D structures of UGTs. Despite the isolation of various UGTs from different sources in recent years using these structures, challenges remain in their production, purification, and crystallization[39]. Studies have shown that UGT71s are tolerant to substrates in vitro, especially to acceptor substrates, whereas they have high specificity for donor substrates[40]. UGT71 members utilize triterpenoids, flavonoids, and ABA for substrates. Table 1 summarizes the different known in vitro substrates for recombinant UGT71s protein.

      Table 1.  The impact on the expression/activity of UGT71s in plants with known substrate(s).

      UGT isoform Plant species Substrate(s) Action Physiological effects Ref.
      UGT71C5 Arabidopsis thaliana ABA Knockdown Drought tolerance and delayed seed germination [41]
      UGT71B6 Arabidopsis thaliana ABA Overexpression Higher tolerance to salt, freezing and drought stresses [42]
      UGT71B7 Arabidopsis thaliana ABA Knockdown Drought tolerance during germination [42]
      UGT71B8 Arabidopsis thaliana ABA Knockdown Drought tolerance during germination [42]
      UGT71C3 Arabidopsis thaliana MeSA Knockout Pseudomonas syringae infection resistance and increase in MeSA and SA levels [39]
      FaGT6 Fragaria × ananassa Quercetin and kaempferol In vitro catalytic
      activities
      Taking over an additional role in the detoxification of xenobiotics [43]
      UGT71W2 Fragaria × ananassa 1-naphthol Silenced Increasing stability and water solubility of natural products [40]
      UGT71K3 Fragaria × ananassa Acylphloroglucinol Silenced Improving fruit quality [44]
      UGT71A33/34 Fragaria × ananassa 3-hydroxycoumarin In vitro catalytic
      activities
      Contributing to the glycosylation of flavonols, xenobiotics [40]
      UGT71A59 Camellia sinensis Eugenol In vitro and in vivo catalytic activities Enhancing cold and drought tolerance of tea plants [45]
      UGT71C1 Arabidopsis thaliana Lignan Knockout Increased resistance to oxidative stress [46]
      UGT71C4 Cotton Naringenin Overexpression Controls the flux of phenylpropanoid metabolism [47]
      UGT71B1 Arabidopsis thaliana Flavonoids In vitro catalytic
      activities
      Enhancement of metabolite content Increase in their stable storage in plants [46]
      MtUGT71G1 Medicago truncatula Hederagenin Mutation Beneficial to plant defence [48]
      UGT71K1 Malus × domestica Phloretin In vitro catalytic activities Enhance plant disease resistance [49]
      PgUGT1/2 Panax ginseng Ginsenosides In vitro catalytic activities Enhancement of metabolite content [48]
      UGT71A27 Panax ginseng Dammarane In vitro catalytic activities Increased stable storage in plants [48]
      MpMUGT3 Mentha × piperita Menthol In vitro catalytic activities Protects cells from terpenoid toxicity [50]
      CtUGT3 Carthamus
      tinctorius L.
      Kaempferol Overexpression Enhancing the content of medicinal kaempferol glycosides [51]
    • The water solubility and biological activity of triterpenoids are altered by glycosylation. The UGT71 family has a very large active site that interacts efficiently with hydrophobic terpenoid structures and it also catalyzes the glycotransferase of triterpenoids. Concerning hydrophobic terpenoid, the MtUGT71G1 has glycosylation activity towards triterpenoids. The binding pocket in MtUGT71G1 is primarily made up of amino acids at the N-terminal, along with some residues toward the end of the C-terminus close to where the sugar donor binds[52]. In MtUGT71G1, the loop is situated at a different location structurally, creating a larger, open pocket that enhances the ability to bind and recognize bulky triterpenoids. By replacing or mutating residues in the binding pocket and creating UGT chimeras through exchanging structural domains, it is possible to enhance its catalytic properties and adjust its specificity towards different substrates. Altering the enzyme structure can effectively influence UGTs and their glycosylation patterns[52]. In Panax ginseng, both PgUGT1 and PgUGT2, which are part of the UGT71 family, exhibit biochemical activity on ginsenosides[53]. UGTs involved in the biosynthesis of dammarane saponins have been found in ginseng. Notably, UGT71A27 catalyzes the addition of a glucose molecule to the hydroxyl group at the C-20 position in dammarane diol-II, resulting in the formation of compound K[54].

    • Flavonoids usually exist as α or β glycosides, and glycosylation is one of the main factors that bring about the structural diversification of flavonoids[44]. UGT71s can be classified into flavonoid 3-O-glycosyltransferases, 7-O-glycosyltransferases, etc., depending on the modification sites in the modification of flavonoid compounds. Concerning flavonoids, in the UGT71s family, FaGT6 of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) catalyzes the formation of 3-O-glucosides and small amounts of 7-O-, 3'-O-monoglucosides, and diglucosides from quercetin, a flavonol represented by quercetin, and also accepts a variety of flavonoids, hydroxycoumarins, and naphthol as substrates[55]. In strawberry (F. × ananassa), the UGT71W2 enzyme exhibited the highest level of activity towards 1-naphthol, whereas UGT71A33, UGT71A34a/b, and UGT71A35 enzymes had a preference for 3-hydroxycoumarin. Additionally, these enzymes were found to produce 3- and 7-O-glucosides, as well as diglucosides, from flavonols. Furthermore, radiochemical analysis indicated that UGT71A33, UGT71A34, and UGT71A35 enzymes acted on the hydroxyl groups at positions 3 and 7 of the flavonols. In contrast, UGT71W2 was unable to catalyze the formation of the glucoside at position 7[3,34,56]. The Arabidopsis thaliana UGT71C1 rapidly converts quercetin diglucosides glycosides to 3'-O- and 7-O-monoglucosides. These compounds then act as substrates to produce 7, 3'-di-O-glucosides. The ugt71c1 mutants show significantly decreased levels of quercetin 3,7-O glucoside and kaempferol 3,7-O glucoside in comparison to the wild type, with reductions of 25% and 70% respectively[57]. Additionally, there is a notable decrease in the content of lariciresinol and pinoresinol-glucosides in these mutants[58]. In addition to quercetin and lignoceroside, recombinant UGT71C1 also glycosylates lignans and turpentines[48]. Isomeric larch alcohol is an isomer of larch alcohol and its 4'-β-D-glucosideform has lower antioxidant properties than its glycosidic form[59]. In safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), CtUGT3 may be involved in regulating the biosynthesis of flavonol-3-O-glucoside in both lines[60].

    • The glycosylation modification of phytohormones refers to the process by which a hormone forms a complex with a sugar molecule, thereby regulating plant growth and development through synergistic interactions with the glycosylated product[35]. Phytohormones are known to engage in several different types of conjugation reactions, including glycosylation. This process has been observed in substances derived from various phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellins, strigolactones, cytokinins, auxins, brassinosteroids, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid. This process contributes to the functional diversity and regulatory capacity of phytohormones in plants, playing a vital role in plant physiology and development. Glycosylation of phytohormones is a complex and dynamic process that helps to modulate the effects of these signaling molecules on plant growth and responses to environmental stimuli[6163]. Among the hormones, plant UGT71s are primarily responsible for glycosylation of ABA. The role of UGT71s in abscisic acid (ABA) metabolism has been thoroughly investigated in the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana. Specifically, UGT71B6, UGT71B7, and UGT71B8 enzymes catalyze the production of ABA-glucosyl ester (ABA-GE). The genes encoding these enzymes are upregulated by ABA, as well as by abiotic stresses such as high salinity and osmotic stress[19,24]. Furthermore, experimental interference with the expression of UGT71C5 in Arabidopsis thaliana has been shown to increase the concentration of free ABA. This increase in free ABA leads to enhanced drought tolerance and delays in seed germination. Biochemical analyses have demonstrated that UGT71C5 can glucosylate ABA both in vitro and in vivo, highlighting its involvement in the plant's resistance to drought stress[41].

      On the other hand, UGT71s indirectly affect SA levels. In addition to directly controlling SA levels in plants, UGT can glycosylate other compounds that in turn affect SA levels[64]. These compounds encompass salicylic acid (SA) metabolites like UGT71C3, which methylates and glycosylates salicylate (MeSA) in Arabidopsis thaliana. This process is predominantly triggered in leaf tissues by pathogens, such as Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 with the avrRpt2 gene (Pst DC3000/avrRpt2)[65].

    • Plant secondary metabolites are diversified through the cooperation of UGTs with acyltransferases, methyltransferases, and cytochromes P450s, among others, thereby altering their physicochemical properties[20,36,65]. The activity of UGT could be significant for the maintenance of homeostasis in different metabolic pathways. The essential regulation helps in maintaining redox stability, particularly when dealing with the equilibrium between the aglycone and glycosylated forms of molecules[38]. The wide variety of enzyme functions in secondary metabolites offers plants the adaptability needed for survival in a dynamic environment[35]. From an evolutionary perspective, the substrates for each glycosyltransferase have become increasingly specialized, and each enzyme has retained its irreplaceability through natural selection, resulting in an evolutionary diversity of secondary metabolites[65]. The UGT71s that glycosylate plants triterpenoids, flavonoids, hormones and as such they may have a critical role in regulating these processes (Table 1). Playing a role in improving the water solubility, inactivation or detoxification of natural products[10], and may contribute to redox homeostasis through various biochemical mechanisms. In this section, the process of glycosylation in plant secondary metabolites is analyzed, specifically focusing on the role of UGT71 enzymes. These enzymes play a crucial role in modifying secondary metabolites through the addition of sugar molecules, which can impact a plant's response to environmental stressors. Glycosylation catalyzed by UGT71s has been shown to regulate the accumulation and distribution of secondary metabolites within plants, leading to changes in their defense mechanisms against external threats (Fig. 5). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that glycosylation mediated by UGT71s enzymes can enhance the stability and solubility of secondary metabolites, making them more available for defense responses. This process also influences the production of volatile compounds that play a role in plant interactions with other organisms in their environment. By understanding the mechanisms of glycosylation involving UGT71s, researchers can gain insights into how plants adapt and respond to different stress conditions, ultimately contributing to the development of strategies for improving crop resilience and productivity.

      Figure 5. 

      Roles of UGT71s in plant response to stresses. Among the biological processes in which UGT71s are involved are glycosylation of secondary metabolites (mainly triterpenoids and flavonoids) and glycosylation of phytohormones. In addition, this chemical modification plays a role in the response to plant fitness, thus helping plants to adapt to changing environments.

    • Triterpenoids are a class of secondary metabolites associated with general defense and stress responses[66]. Triterpenoids are a significant class of plant secondary metabolites featuring a 30-carbon atom basic nucleus. They are widely distributed in nature as either free or sugar-bound glycosides or esters. Glycosylation plays a significant role in modifying the physicochemical properties and biological activities of triterpenes in plants, enhancing water solubility and influencing the biological activity of triterpenoids[67]. Additionally, it has been identified as a key element in plant defense mechanisms[50]. Glycosylation of hydroxyl and/or carboxyl groups in triterpenoids results in the formation of various triterpenoid derivatives. Despite the identification of a few UGT enzymes capable of glycosylating triterpene aglycones, many UGTs have not been thoroughly studied in terms of their biochemical functions and substrate specificities. UGT71s exhibit significant structural diversity in these important molecules by attaching monosaccharides to triterpene aglycones and triterpenoid glycosides, enabling the modification of their water solubility and biological properties.

      Constitutive terpenoid saponins were found to possess insecticidal and antifungal activities, and glycosylation of triterpenoids was found to be a key component of plant defense mechanisms[50]. Recently, MpMUGT3a and MpMUGT3b from peppermint × pepper and lycopene have recently been reported to have detoxifying effects on the menthol and geranic acid, suggesting that glycosyltransferases can protect cells from terpenoid toxicity[68]. And the antifungal effects of triterpenoid saponins are during plant growth associated with the glycoside molecule, where esterification of the hydroxyl group results in altered activity[69]. During plant growth, the accumulation of triterpenoids biosynthetic varies depending on the environment, which depends on the conservation needs of plant organs and tissues. For instance, the removal or modification of sugar residues can lead to a decrease in biological activity, while resistance to fungal pathogens can be attributed to glycosylation at specific carbon sites. Hydrolytic enzymes known as avenacinase, produced by root-infected rhizobacteria (Gaeumannomyces graminis), exhibit β-glucosidase activity targeting the C-3 chain to detoxify vinculin saponins[41]. Specific saponins tend to accumulate during root and fruit development in saponin-producing plants like ginseng and red ginseng[70,71]. This phenomenon has been associated with the catalytic function of specific UGTs during these biological processes, with saponin trans-activation observed in Dioscorea pseudojaponica (yam) tubers and oat root epidermis when exposed to soil-borne fungi[48]. Therefore, it can be inferred that the biosynthetic activity of UGT71s plays a crucial role in physiological processes and defense responses, resulting in the accumulation of specific terpenoid biosynthesis.

    • The wide substrate specificity demonstrated by most UGT71s in vitro complicates the identification of their authentic substrates in vivo[72]. Physiological glycoside libraries containing a variety of natural glycosides offer a valuable approach to uncovering potential natural substrates of UGTs[73]. Accumulation of flavonoids significantly increases the tolerance of various plants to oxidative stress caused by intense irradiation or drought[74], and producing a large number of glycosides found in plants.

      Plant flavonoid glycosides serve as the primary active components in several key traditional Chinese medicines. Glycosylation typically occurs as the final stage in the synthesis of flavonoid glycosides. This process not only alters the polarity of flavonoid compounds but also impacts the pharmacodynamic activity and pharmacokinetics of flavonoids. Flavonoid glycosides are considered to be more potent antioxidants compared to flavonoids[75]. Studies have shown that UGT71C1 can glycosylate the 3-OH of flavonoids in vitro. The ugt71c1 mutant shows decreased levels of quercetin 3,7-O-glucoside compared to the wild-type. Quercetin in the vacuole, chloroplast, and nuclear compartments act to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) through various mechanisms[76,77]. Specifically, in the vacuole, quercetin reduces H2O2 to H2O in a peroxidase-dependent manner[78]. These radicals are then recycled to their reduced form via ascorbate, enabling the reduction of further H2O2 molecules[79]. Flavonoids exhibit efficient singlet oxygen scavenging activity when located in chloroplasts, and protect DNA against oxidative damage when present in the nucleus[80,81]. The primary structural characteristic responsible for the free radical scavenging capacity of flavonoids is the highly reactive nature of their hydroxyl substituents[82].

      $ \rm {Flavonoids} \;{\text ——}\; {OH+R{\text'} \to Flavonoids} \;{\text ——}\; {O{\text'}+RH} $

      The results indicate that UGT71C1 is involved in glycosylation pathways related to flavonoids under oxidative stress conditions, and modifies the plant cellular redox scavenging potential by showing increased resistance to oxidative stress. This demonstrates the role of UGT71s in redox homeostasis.

      Strawberry glycoside extracts were used as physiological libraries by enzymatic hydrolysis to search for in vivo substrates of LC-MS analyses determined that 3-hydroxycoumarin was the natural substrate for UGT71A33, UGT71A34a, and UGT71A35, and quercetin was a natural substrate for UGT71A34a[40]. It was found that the function of UGT71W2 in plants was analyzed by agroinfiltration in fruiting discs of F. × ananassa cv. It was down-regulated UGT71W2 transcripts using RNAi as a medium. This experiment successfully down-regulated the level of UGT71W2 transcripts in strawberry fruiting discs by injecting Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying the p9U10-UGT71W2 vector. UGT71W2 was found to have no impact on the color of strawberry fruits, however, it did lead to a significant decrease in the levels of kaempferol glucoside and kaempferol-3-(60-coumaroyl) glucoside, to some extent. In contrast, it is hypothesized that possibly excess 4-coumaroyl molecules are diverted to hydroxycinnamoyl glucoside biosynthesis, with higher levels of 4-coumaroylglucoside accumulation[40,44]. Combined with the results of library analyses as well as targeted and untargeted metabolite analyses performed on agroinfiltrated fruits demonstrates that UGT71W2 may contribute to the glucosylation of 1-naphthol, estrogens in plants. These findings further illuminate the specificity of plant UGT71s substrates, showcasing both their limited and extensive plasticity to metabolites of similar structures. This phenomenon ultimately enables the relatively small yet diverse group of UGTs to effectively produce the wide array of glycosides present in plants.

    • Phytohormones play a crucial role in mediating plant stress responses by regulating the balance between inactive glycosides and their active forms, enabling plants to efficiently adapt to environmental fluctuations[83,84]. The main phytohormone for glycosylation regulation mediated by UGT71s is abscisic acid (ABA)[20]. UGT71s play a role in glycosylating phytohormones in response to abiotic stress. As sessile organisms, plants must adapt to changing environments, which may include exposure to common abiotic stresses such as drought, soil salinity, and extreme temperatures[85]. Maintaining homeostasis and glycosylation of ABA is crucial for enhancing tolerance to water or salt stress and reducing oxidative damage.

      ABA performs a critical role in dealing with abiotic stresses[86]. UGTs control the quantity of unconjugated ABA in two ways: First, they create an inactive storage form called ABA glucosyl ester (ABE-GE), which swiftly breaks down to produce active, unconjugated ABA[87]. ABA-GE is sequestered in plant vesicles and the apoplastic space[88]. The pathway for ABA synthesis involves the straightforward one-step hydrolysis of glucose-conjugated ABA (ABA-GE) to ABA by β-glucosidases, specifically AtBG1 which are localized in the endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole. The AtBG1 is localized to the ER, suggesting that ABA-GE may require input to the ER. Dehydration stress can trigger the transportation of ABA-GE across the ER membrane to the ER[89]. This process is likely to be highly regulated to meet the plant's demand for ABA, as AtBG1 and its substrate ABA-GE are usually stored in different compartments within the cell. They are only brought together when elevated levels of ABA are needed in response to abiotic stress[87].

      Several experiments have demonstrated that altering the expression of specific UGTs, responsible for ABA glycosylation, notably affects plant fitness under unfavorable abiotic conditions. Disrupting the expression of UGT71C5 in Arabidopsis thaliana led to an increase in drought tolerance, delayed seed germination, and raised free ABA concentration. On the other hand, overexpression negatively affected all three factors[41]. Manipulating the expression of ABA-glycosylating UGTs can lead to varying phenotypic outcomes based on the plant's maturity. Silencing UGT71B6, UGT71B7, and UGT71B8 in Arabidopsis thaliana resulted in growth defects and decreased salt tolerance in adult plants. Conversely, it improved tolerance to osmotic stress induced by drought, salinity, or cold stress[90], as well as enhanced drought tolerance during germination[42]. Furthermore, these proteins exhibited the ability to glucosylate different structural analogs of ABA to different extents[91]. The products were identified as glucoseesters[91]. Overexpression of UGT71B6 during osmotic stress conditions suppressed the expression of genes related to drought tolerance and osmotic stress. UGT71B6, along with its homologs UGT71B7 and UGT71B8, modulate ABA levels in living organisms and are crucial for plant cellular responses to dehydration and osmotic stress, as well as for plant germination and growth. Thus, it may be assumed that the UGT71s have a biological function of regulating ABA levels to maintain optimal growth conditions.

    • In addition to coping with abiotic stresses, plants are also capable of resisting and adapting to biotic stresses[92]. Pests and pathogens frequently attack plants by either feeding on plant parts or injecting toxins into the plant[93]. Toxins released by pathogens like bacteria and fungi can cause or worsen plant diseases[94]. Plant UGTs catalyze the glycosylation of toxins, providing protection to the plant and potentially enhancing the affinity of these compounds for membrane-bound transporters, facilitating toxin export[95]. Additionally, UGT71s can indirectly regulate biotic stress responses by glycosylating plant hormones, playing a significant role in plant defense mechanisms.

      In Arabidopsis thaliana, UGT71C3 was identified as an enzyme that transfers glucose to MeSA, making it a MeSA glucosyltransferase. According to biochemical analyses, UGT71C3 has a high enzymatic activity towards MeSA, and can produce MeSA glucosides both in vitro and in vivo. After Pst DC3000/avr Rpt2 primary pathogen infection, the ugt71c3 knockout mutant displayed greater systemic resistance to secondary infection by pathogens, while the UGT71C3 overexpressing lines showed compromised systemic resistance compared to wild-type plants[96]. Similarly, localized primary infection of leaves led to significantly higher levels of systemic MeSA and SA accumulation in the ugt71c3 knockout mutant than in wild-type plants, while the UGT71C3 overexpressing strain accumulated lower levels of MeSA and SA. Furthermore, the UGT71C3 overexpressing lines presented much higher levels of Me SAG than wild-type plants[97]. Induction of pathogens and MeSA up-regulates the expression of UGT71C3, leading to accelerated glucosylation of MeSA, which results in less MeSA being translocated to uninoculated systemic tissues. In systemic tissues, UGT71C3 further glucosylates MeSA, resulting in reduced MeSA levels and consequently, reduced levels of SA translocated from MeSA. This ultimately leads to a reduction in the expression level of pathogen-associated proteins, weakening the defense response[56,98].

    • Glycosylation, catalyzed by UGTs, is a modification reaction that is necessary for plant cell growth, development, and metabolic homeostasis[47]. It plays an important role in defense, hormone regulation, xenobiotic modification and detoxification of pollutants, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and plant-microbe interactions. Therefore, UGTs are closely related to life processes such as plant seed germination, growth, flowering, and fruiting[6]. In recent years, the completion and improvement of genome sequencing and the assembly of plant species, the revelation of molecular functions by forward and reverse genetics, and the determination of enzyme substrates and products by biochemical reactions have led to the discovery, identification, and clarification of an increasing number of UGT genes. This has established a robust theoretical foundation for the further elucidation of the biological functions of the UGT family[11]. Nevertheless, as a superfamily, the specific working model and mechanism of action of the majority of UGT family members remain unclear. This paper presents a summary of the main properties of the UGT71family in plants, shown in Fig. 5. The substrates of UGT71s enzymes are mainly UDP-glucose as a sugar donor, and they play an important role by glycosylating secondary metabolites and glycosylating phytohormones (Fig. 5). Firstly, with regard to secondary metabolites, in particular, some members of the UGT71 family have been demonstrated to modify triterpenoids and flavonoids, thereby facilitating the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and improving plant stress tolerance, among other effects. With respect to hormones, UGT71s mainly modify ABA and SA, which play regulatory roles in biotic and abiotic stresses.

      UGTs have the potential to play a pivotal role in a range of bioremediation strategies and agriculture on marginal lands[16]. However, further studies are required to elucidate the intricate interplay of stress pathways in plants and the underlying molecular mechanisms. This will facilitate the development of safe and efficient biotechnological solutions[6,16]. The identification of additional UGT71s in plants will further promote research on the structure and function of UGTs, which have important functional roles in hormonal pathways and in enhancing stress tolerance in plants. Furthermore, they have been found to have the potential to safeguard and improve crop yields. Their involvement in regulating secondary metabolites in plants has also given them the potential to enhance the quality of crops. On the other hand, it has been reported that the majority of chemical synthesis of flavonoids necessitates the use of toxic chemicals and extreme reaction conditions. However, the utilization of plant UGT71s to catalyze in vitro the conversion of UGT71s into flavonoid glycoside derivatives through glycosylation represents a promising avenue for the synthesis of flavonoids. This is expected to resolve the issue of synthesizing active flavonoids artificially and to pave the way for the utilization of analogous derivatives as synthetic drug ingredients. UGT71s regulate the accumulation of plant metabolites by participating in the glycosylation pathway of various compounds, thus protecting plants from a multitude of biotic and abiotic stresses, which is of great significance for crop genetic improvement and provides a novel direction for the cultivation of new varieties with high resistance to diseases.

      The functional study of UGT71 family genes provides a robust theoretical foundation for future crop improvement. Firstly, UGT71 genes that confer resistance to abiotic stress can be cloned and subsequently overexpressed in plants, resulting in crops that exhibit enhanced resilience to such stresses and improved yields. This approach lays the groundwork for genetic breeding and CRISPR/Cas9 applications in agricultural and forestry crops, while also offering essential genetic resources for developing plants with increased resistance to adversity. Secondly, genetic engineering of the UGT71 family can enhance the yield of metabolites with nutritional and health benefits, such as flavonoids, thereby improving the nutritional and health qualities of food products to better meet consumer demands. Additionally, the UGT71 gene family can be utilized to reduce pesticide residues and contaminants in crops, thereby improving food safety. This represents a critical reference point for the implementation of design breeding strategies in the agricultural and forestry sectors. Furthermore, in the context of global warming and the associated deterioration of growing conditions due to climate change, it has the potential to enhance the adaptability and resilience of plants.

      Nevertheless, a significant amount of work remains to be done, including in vivo studies involving metabolite profiling of plants overexpressing UGTs and knockout plants lacking individual UGTs. These studies should also examine tissue and subcellular specificity, along with regulatory promoter elements for metabolite accumulation. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the biological roles of recombinant UGTs, it will be necessary to combine these studies with in vitro catalytic analyses of recombinant UGTs.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, writing-original draft: Yang Y, Han F, Wang J, Zhang J; methodology: Yang Y, Han F, Wang J, Zhang J, Gao M, Zhao Y; software, investigation: Yang Y, Gao M, Zhao Y; validation, formal analysis, data curation, visualization: Yang Y; writing-review & editing: Gao M, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Wang Y; project administration: Han F, Wang J, Zhang J; supervision, funding acquisition: Chen Y, Wang Y. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971685) and the Ten Thousand People Plan of Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent of Zhejiang, China (Grant No. 2022R52028) awarded to Yicun Chen.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (1) References (98)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yang Y, Wang J, Han F, Zhang J, Gao M, et al. 2024. Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants. Forestry Research 4: e035 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0032
    Yang Y, Wang J, Han F, Zhang J, Gao M, et al. 2024. Characterization of UGT71, a major glycosyltransferase family for triterpenoids, flavonoids and phytohormones-biosynthetic in plants. Forestry Research 4: e035 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0032

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return