-
Phytochemical screening of the different extracts for the presence (+) and absence (−) of alkaloids, steroids, glycosides, coumarins, terpenoids, flavonoids, carbohydrates, tannins, and saponins were done. The present study showed that alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, and tannins tests in S. rosmarinus leaves of petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1), and methanol extracts were high whereas glycoside, coumarins, and carbohydrates had a moderate presence. The extract of S. rosmarinus leaves contain commonly bioactive constituents such as alkaloids, steroids, terpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins. These bioactive chemicals have active medicinal properties. Phytochemical compounds found in S. rosmarinus leaves have the potential to treat cancer cells and pathogens. The study also found that these flavonoids are related to natural phenolic compounds with anticancer and antimicrobial properties in the human diet (Table 1).
Table 1. Phytochemical screening tests result of petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1) and methanol extracts of Salvia rosmarinus leaves.
Botanical name Phytochemicals Phytochemical screening tests Different extracts Petroleum ether Chloroform/methanol (1:1) Mehanol Salvia rosmarinus Alkaloids Wagner's test ++ ++ ++ Steroids Libermann Burchard test ++ + ++ Glycoside Keller-Killiani test − + − Coumarins Appirade test − + + Terpenoids Libermann Burchard test ++ ++ ++ Flavonoids Shinoda test ++ ++ ++ Carbohydrate Fehling's test − ++ ++ Tannins Lead acetate test ++ ++ ++ Saponins Foam test + + + + indicates moderate presence, ++ indicates highly present, − indicates absence. Characterization of isolated compounds
-
Two compounds were isolated and characterized using NMR spectroscopic methods (Fig. 1 & Supplementary Fig. S1a−c). Compound 1 (10 mg) was isolated as yellow crystals from the methanol/chloroform (1:1) leaf extract of Salvia rosmarinus. The TLC profile showed a spot at Rf 0.42 with methanol/chloroform (3:2) as a mobile phase. The 1H-NMR spectrum (600 MHz, MeOD, Table 2, Supplementary Fig. S1a) of compound 1 showed the presence of one olefinic proton signal at δ 5.3 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), two deshielded protons at δ 4.7 (m, 1H), and 4.1 (m, 1H) associated with the C-30 exocyclic methylene group, and one O-bearing methine proton at δH 3.2 (m, 1H), and six methyl protons at δ 1.14 (s, 3H), 1.03 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 3H), and 0.80 (s, 3H). A proton signal at δ 2.22 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H) was attributed to methine proton for H-18. Other proton signals integrate for 20 protons were observed in the range δ 2.2 to 1.2. The proton decoupled 13C-NMR and DEPT-135 spectra (151 MHz, MeOD, Supplementary Fig. S1b & c) of compound 1 revealed the presence of 30 well-resolved carbon signals, suggesting a triterpene skeleton. The analysis of the 13C NMR spectrum displayed signals corresponding to six methyl, nine methylene, seven methine, and eight quaternary carbons. Among them, the signal observed at δ 125.5 (C-12) belongs to olefinic carbons. The methylene carbon showed signals at δC 39.9, 28.5, 18.1, 36.7, 23.9, 30.4, 26.5, 32.9, and 38.6. The quaternary carbons showed a signal at δC 39.4, 41.9, 38.4, 138.2, 41.8, and 47.8. The signals of exocyclic methylene carbon signals appeared at δ 153.1 and 103.9. The spectrum also showed sp3 oxygenated methine carbon at δ 78.3 and carboxyl carbon at δ 180.2. The spectrum revealed signals due to methyl groups at δC 27.4, 16.3, 15.0, 20.2, 22.7, and 16.4. The remaining carbon signals for aliphatic methines were shown at δC 55.3, 55.2, 53.0, and 37.1. The NMR spectral data of compound 1 is in good agreement with data reported for micromeric acid, previously reported from the same species by Abdel-Monem et al.[26]. (Fig. 1, Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of the 13C-NMR spectral data of compound 1 and micromeric acid (MeOD, δ in ppm).
Position NMR data of compound 1 Abdel-Monem
et al.[26]1H-NMR 13C-NMR 13C-NMR 1 38.60 39.9 2 27.8 28.5 3 3.2 (m, 1H) 78.3 80.3 4 − 39.4 39.9 5 55.3 56.7 6 18.1 18.3 7 36.7 34.2 8 − 41.9 40.7 9 53 48.8 10 − 38.4 38.2 11 23.9 24.6 12 5.3 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H) 125.5 127.7 13 − 138.2 138 14 − 41.8 43.3 15 30.4 29.1 16 26.5 25.6 17 − 47.8 48 18 δ 2.22 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H) 55.2 56.1 19 37.1 38.7 20 − 153.1 152.8 21 32.9 33.5 22 39.0 40.1 23 27.4 29.4 24 16.3 16.9 25 15.0 16.6 26 20.2 18.3 27 22.7 24.6 28 − 180.2 177.8 29 16.4 17.3 30 4.7 (m, 1H), and 4.1 (m, 1H) 103.9 106.5 Compound 2 (18 mg) was obtained as a white amorphous isolated from 40% methanol/chloroform (1:1) in petroleum ether fraction with an Rf value of 0.49. The 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO, Supplementary Fig. S2a) spectral-data showed two doublets at 7.79 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), and 6.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) which are evident for the presence of 1,4-disubstituted aromatic group. The oxygenated methylene and terminal methyl protons were shown at δ 4.25 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H) and 1.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), respectively. The13C-NMR spectrum, with the aid of DEPT-135 (151 MHz, DMSO, Table 3, Supplementary Fig. S2b & c) spectra of compound 2 confirmed the presence of well-resolved seven carbon peaks corresponding to nine carbons including threee quaternary carbons, one oxygenated methylene carbon, one terminal methyl carbon, and two symmetrical aromatic methine carbons. The presence of quaternary carbon signals was shown at δ 120.9 (C-1), 148.2 (C-4), and ester carbonyl at δ 166.0 (C-7). The symmetry aromatic carbons signal was observed at δ 131.4 (C-2, 6), and 116.8 (C-3, 5). The oxygenated methylene and terminal methyl carbons appeared at δC 60.4 (C-8) and 14.7 (C-9), respectively. The spectral results provided above were in good agreement with those for benzocaine in the study by Alotaibi et al.[27]. Accordingly, compound 2 was elucidated to be benzocaine (4-Aminobenzoic acid-ethyl ester) (Table 3, Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S2a−c), this compound has never been reported before from the leaves of Salvia rosmarinus.
Table 3. Comparison of the 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR spectral data of compound 2 and benzocaine (DMSO, δ in ppm).
Position NMR data of compound 2 Alotaibi et al.[27] 1H-NMR 13C-NMR 1H-NMR 13C-NMR 1 − 120.9 − 119 2 7.79 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) 131.4 7.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz) 132 3 6.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) 116.8 6.83 (d, J = 7.6 Hz) 114 4 − 148.2 − 151 5 6.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) 116.8 6.83 (d, J = 7.6 Hz) 114 6 7.79 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) 131.4 7.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz) 132 7 − 166.0 − 169 8 4.3 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H) 60.4 4.3 (q, J = 7.0 Hz) 61 9 1.3 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H) 14.7 1.36 (t, J = 7.0 Hz) 15 Antimicrobial activities assay
-
The extracts and isolated compounds from Salvia rosmarinus were evaluated in vitro against microbes from gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and S. epidermidis), gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae) and fungi (C. albicans and A. Niger) (Table 4). The petroleum ether extracts exhibited significant activity against all the present study-tested microbes at 100 μg·mL−1, resulting in an inhibition zone ranging from 7 to 21 mm. Chloroform/methanol (1:1) and methanol extracts demonstrated significant activity against all the present study-tested microbes at 100 μg·mL−1 exhibiting inhibition zones from 6 to 14 mm and 6 to 13 mm, respectively (Table 4). The chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts were significantly active against bacteria of E. coli and K. pneumonia, and A. Niger fungi at 100 μg·mL−1. On the other hand, chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts were significantly inactive against the S. rosmarinus and P. aeruginosa of bacteria and C. albicans of fungi, and again chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts overall significantly active produced an inhibition zone of 12 to 14 mm (Table 4). Methanol extracts exhibited significant activity against S. aureus, E. coli bacteria, and A. Niger fungi at 100 μg·mL−1. The inhibition zone was recorded to be 11 to 13 mm. However, methanol extracts exhibited significant inactivity against K. pneumoniae (Table 4). The overall result of our studies shows that Salvia rosmarinus was extracted and evaluated in vitro, exhibiting significant antibacterial and antifungal activity, with inhibition zones recorded between 6 to 21 mm for bacteria and 5 to 21 mm for fungi. In our study, the positive control for ciprofloxacin exhibited antibacterial activity measured at 21.33 ± 1.15 mm, 15.00 ± 0.00 mm, and 14.20 ± 0.50 mm for petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1), and methanol extracts, respectively. Similarly, the positive control for ketoconazole demonstrated antifungal activity of 22.00 ± 1.00 mm, 13.67 ± 0.58 mm, and 15.00 ± 0.58 mm for petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1), and methanol extracts, respectively. Additionally, our findings indicated that the mean values of flavonoids (mg/g) tested were 92.2%, 90.4%, and 94.0% for petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1), and methanol extracts, respectively. This suggests that the groups of phenolic compounds evaluated play a significant role in antimicrobial activities, particularly against antibiotic-resistant strains.
Table 4. Comparison of mean zone of inhibition (MZI) leaf extracts of Salvia rosmarinus.
Type of specimen, and standard antibiotics for
each sampleConcentration (μg·mL−1) of extract
in 99.8% DMSOAverage values of the zone of inhibition (mm) Gram-positive (+) bacteria Gram-negative (−) bacteria Fungai S. aurous S. epidermidis E. coli P. aeruginosa K. pneumoniae C. albicans A. niger Petroleum ether extracts S. rosmarinus 50 18.50 ± 0.50 15.33 ± 0.58 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 10.00 ± 0.00 15.93 ± 0.12 4.47 ± 0.50 75 19.87 ± 0.06 17.00 ± 0.00 9.33 ± 0.29 10.53 ± 0.50 10.93 ± 0.12 18.87 ± 0.23 5.47 ± 0.50 100 21.37 ± 0.78 17.50 ± 0.50 11.47 ± 0.50 13.17 ± 0.29 12.43 ± 0.51 20.83 ± 0.76 6.70 ± 0.10 Standard antibiotics Cipro. 21.33 ± 1.15 18.33 ± 0.58 9.33 ± 0.58 12.30 ± 0.52 15.00 ± 0.00 Ketocon. 22.00 ± 1.00 10.67 ± 0.58 Chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts 50 5.47 ± 0.42 0.00 ± 0.00 10.33 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 9.70 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.12 8.47 ± 0.50 S. rosmarinus 75 5.93 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.00 11.33 ± 0.29 0.00 ± 0.50 12.50 ± 0.12 0.00 ± 0.23 10.67 ± 0.50 100 6.47 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.00 14.17 ± 0.50 7.33 ± 0.29 14.17 ± 0.51 0.00 ± 0.76 12.67 ± 0.10 Standard antibiotics Cipro. 15.00 ± 0.00 11.00 ± 1.00 11.33 ± 0.58 10.00 ± 0.52 12.67 ± 0.00 Ketocon. 7.00 ± 1.00 13.67 ± 0.58 Methanol extracts 50 9.17 ± 0.29 5.50 ± 0.50 0.00 ± 0.00 7.50 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 6.57 ± 0.12 0.00 ± 0.50 S. rosmarinus 75 9.90 ± 0.10 6.93 ± 0.12 9.33 ± 0.29 8.50 ± 0.50 0.00 ± 0.00 8.70 ± 0.23 0.00 ± 0.50 100 11.63 ± 0.55 7.97 ± 0.06 11.47 ± 0.50 9.90 ± 0.10 0.00 ± 0.00 10.83 ± 0.76 13.13 ± 0.10 Standard antibiotics Cipro. 13.00 ± 0.00 11.50 ± 0.50 14.20 ± 0.58 13.33 ± 0.29 10.00 ± 0.00 Ketocon. 12.00 ± 1.00 15.00 ± 0.58 Mean values of flavonoids (mg·g−1) by 570 nm S. rosmarinus Petroleum ether extracts Chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts Methanol extracts 50 0.736 0.797 0.862 75 0.902 0.881 0.890 100 0.922 0.904 0.940 Samples: Antibiotics: Cipro., Ciprofloxacin; Ketocon., ketoconazole (Nizoral); DMSO 99.8%, Dimethyl sulfoxide. Determining the three solvent extracts in S. rosmarinus plants resulted in relatively high comparable with positive (+) control. Especially, the S. rosmarinus petroleum ether leaf extracts against drug resistance human pathogenic bacteria S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae were minimum zone of inhibition (MZI) recorded that 21.37 ± 0.78, 17.50 ± 0.50, 11.47 ± 0.50, 13.17 ± 0.29, and 12.43 ± 0.51 mm, respectively and against human pathogenic fungi C. albicans and A. niger were minimum zone of inhibition (MZI) recorded that 20.83 ± 0.76 and 6.70 ± 0.10 mm, respectively which was used from bacteria against S. aureus MZI recorded that 21.37 ± 0.78 mm higher than the positive control (21.33 ± 1.15 mm). The S. rosmarinus of chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts were found to be against E. coli (14.17 ± 0.50 mm) and K. pneumoniae (14.17 ± 0.51 mm) higher than the positive control 11.33 ± 0.58 and 12.67 ± 0.00 mm, respectively. The methanol extracts of leaves in the present study plants were found to have overall MZI recorded less than the positive control. The Salvia rosmarinus crude extracts showed better antifungal activities than the gram-negative (−) bacteria (Table 4, Fig 2, Supplementary Fig. S3). Therefore, the three extracts, using various solvents of different polarity indexes, have been attributed to specific biological activities. For example, the antimicrobial activities of Salvia rosmarinus extracts may be due to the presence of alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, and saponins in natural products (Table 1).
Figure 2.
Microbes' resistance with drugs relative to standard antibiotics in extracts of Salvia rosmarinus. The figures represent understudy of three extracts derived from Salvia rosmarinus. (a) Petroleum ether, (b) chloroform/methanol (1:1), and (c) methanol extracts tested in Salvia rosmarinus.
Compounds 1 and 2 were isolated from chloroform/methanol (1:1) extract of Salvia rosmarinus (Fig. 1, Tables 2 & 3). The plant extract exhibited highest antibacterial results recorded a mean inhibition with diameters of 21 and 14 mm at a concentration of 100 mg·mL−1 against S. aureus and E. coli/K. pneumoniae, respectively. After testing, overall it was found that the highly active petroleum ether extract of Salvia rosmarinus was able to inhibit the growth of S. aureus and C. albicans, with inhibition zones of 21 and 20 mm, respectively. The petroleum ether extracts showed good efficacy against all tested microbes, particularly gram-positive bacteria and fungi (Table 4). This is noteworthy because gram-negative bacteria generally exhibit greater resistance to antimicrobial agents. Petroleum ether and chloroform/methanol (1:1) extracts of the leaves were used at a concentration of 100 mg·mL−1, resulting in impressive inhibition zone diameters of 11 and 14 mm for E. coli, 13 and 7 mm for P. aeruginosa, and 12 and 14 mm for K. pneumoniae, respectively.
The present study found that at a concentration of 50 μg·mL−1, petroleum ether, chloroform/methanol (1:1), and MeOH extracts did not display any significant inhibition zone effects against the tested microbes. This implies that the samples have a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the pathogens. The leaves of Salvia rosmarinus have been found to possess remarkable antimicrobial properties against gram-negative bacteria in different extracts such as E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae with 14.17 ± 0.50 in chloroform/methanol (1:1), 13.17 ± 0.29 in petroleum ether and 14.17 ± 0.51 in chloroform/methanol (1:1), respectively. However, in the present study, Salvia rosmarinus was found to possess remarkable high zones of inhibition with diameters of 21.37 ± 0.78 and 17.50 ± 0.50 mm antimicrobial properties against S. aureus, and S. epidermidis of gram-positive bacteria, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S3). The results are summarized in Fig. 2a−c.
Binding mode of isolated compounds docked against DNMT1 enzyme
-
The crystal structure of human DNMT1 (351-1600), classification transferase, resolution: 2.62 Å, PDB ID: 4WXX. Active site dimensions were set as grid size of center X = −12.800500 Å, center Y = 34.654981 Å, center Z = −24.870231 Å (XYZ axis) and radius 59.081291. A study was conducted to investigate the binding interaction of the isolated compounds 1 and 2 of the leaves of Salvia rosmarinus with the binding sites of the DNMT1 enzyme in human cervical cancer (PDB ID: 4WXX), using molecular docking analysis.
The study also compared the results with those of standard anti-cancer agents Jaceosidin (Table 5 & Fig. 3). The compounds isolated had a final fixing energy extending from −5.3 to −8.4 kcal·mol−1, as shown in Table 4. It was compared to jaceosidin (–7.8 kcal·mol−1). The results of the molecular docking analysis showed that, compound 1 (−8.4 kcal·mol−1) showed the highest binding energy values compared with the standard drugs jaceosidin (–7.8 kcal·mol−1). Compound 2 has shown lower docking affinity (–5.3 kcal·mol−1) but good matching amino acid residue interactions compared to jaceosidin. After analyzing the results, it was found that the isolated compounds had similar residual interactions and docking scores with jaceosidin.
Table 5. Molecular docking results of ligand compounds 1 and 2 against DNMT1 enzyme (PDB ID: 4WXX).
Ligands Binding affinity
( kcal·mol−1)H-bond Residual interactions Hydrophobic/electrostatic Van der Waals 1 −8.4 ARG778 (2.85249), ARG778 (2.97417), VAL894 (2.42832) − Lys-889, Pro-879, Tyr-865, His-795, Cys-893, Gly-760, Val-759, Phe-892, Phe-890, Pro-884, Lys-749 2 −5.3 ARG596 (2.73996), ALA597 (1.84126), ILE422 (2.99493), THR424 (2.1965), ILE422 (2.93653) Electrostatic Pi-Cation-ARG595 (3.56619), Hydrophobic Alkyl-ARG595 (4.15839), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-ARG595 (5.14967) Asp-423, Glu-428, Gly-425, Ile-427, Trp-464, Phe-556, Gln-560, Gln-594, Glu-559, Gln-598, Ser-563 Jaceosidin −7.8 ASP571 (2.93566), GLN573 (2.02126), GLU562 (2.42376), GLN573 (3.49555), GLU562 (3.46629) Hydrophobic Alkyl-PRO574 (4.59409), Hydrophobic Alkyl-ARG690 (5.09748), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-PHE576 (5.1314), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-PRO574 (4.97072), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-ARG690 (5.07356) Glu-698, Cys-691, Ala-695, Pro-692, Val-658, Glu-566, Asp-565 Figure 3.
The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compounds against DNMT1 enzyme (PDB ID: 4WXX). The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compound 1 and 2 represent against DNMT1 enzyme, and jaceosidin (standard) against DNMT1 enzyme.
Hence, compound 1 might have potential anti-cancer agents. However, anti-cancer in vitro analysis has not yet been performed. Promising in silico results indicate that further research could be beneficial. The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compounds 1 and 2 against human cervical cancer of DNMT1 enzyme (PDB ID: 4WXX) are presented in Fig. 3. The binding interactions between the DNMT1 enzyme (PDB ID: 4WXX), and compound 1 (Fig. 3) and compound 2 (Fig. 3) were displayed in 3D. Compounds and amino acids are connected by hydrogen bonds (green dash lines) and hydrophobic interactions (non-green lines).
Binding mode of isolated compounds docked against HPV type 16 E6
-
Crystal structure of the HPV16 E6/E6AP/p53 ternary complex at 2.25 Å resolution, classification viral protein, PDB ID: 4XR8. Active site dimensions were set as grid size of center X = −43.202782 Å, center Y = −39.085513 Å, center Z = −29.194115 Å (XYZ axis), R-value observed 0.196, and Radius 65.584122. A study was conducted to investigate the binding interaction of the isolated compounds 1 and 2 of the leaves of Salvia rosmarinus with the binding sites of the enzyme of human papilloma virus (HPV) type 16 E6 (PDB ID: 4XR8), using molecular docking analysis software. The study also compared the results with those of standard anti-cancer agents jaceosidin (Table 6 & Fig. 4). The compounds isolated had a bottom most fixing energy extending from −6.3 to −10.1 kcal·mol−1, as shown in Table 6. It was compared to jaceosidin (–8.8 kcal·mol−1). The results of the molecular docking analysis showed that, compound 1 (−10.1 kcal·mol−1) showed the highest binding energy values compared with the standard drugs jaceosidin (–8.8 kcal·mol−1). Compound 2 has shown lower docking affinity (–6.3 kcal·mol−1) but good matching amino acid residue interactions compared to jaceosidin. After analyzing the results, it was found that the isolated compounds had similar residual interactions and docking scores with jaceosidin.
Table 6. Molecular docking results of ligand compounds 1 and 2 against HPV type 16 E6 (PDB ID: 4XR8).
Ligands Binding affinity
(kcal·mol−1)H-bond Residual interactions Hydrophobic/electrostatic Van der Waals 1 −10.1 ASN101 (2.25622), ASP228 (2.88341) − Asp-148, Lys-176, Lys-180, Asp-178, Ile-179, Tyr-177, Ile-334, Glu-382, Gln-336, Pro-335, Gln-73, Arg-383, Tyr-100 2 −6.5 TRP63 (1.90011), ARG67 (2.16075), ARG67 (2.8181) Hydrophobic Pi-Sigma-TRP341 (3.76182), Hydrophobic Pi-Pi Stacked-TYR156 (4.36581), Hydrophobic Pi-Pi T-shaped-TRP63 (5.16561), Hydrophobic Pi-Pi T-shaped-TRP63 (5.44632), Hydrophobic Alkyl-PRO155 (4.34691), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-TRP341 (4.11391), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-ALA64 (4.61525) Glu-154, Arg-345, Asp-66, Met-331, Glu-112, Lys-16, Trp-231 Jaceosidin −8.8 ARG146 (2.06941), GLY70 (3.49991), GLN73 (3.38801) Electrostatic Pi-Cation-ARG67 (3.93442), Hydrophobic Pi-Alkyl-PRO49 (5.40012) Tyr-342, Tyr-79, Ser-338, Arg-129, Pro-335, Leu-76, Tyr-81, Ser-74, Tyr-71, Ser-80, Glu-46 Figure 4.
The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compounds against HPV type 16 E6 (PDB ID: 4XR8). The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compound 1 and 2 represent against HPV type 16 E6 enzyme, and jaceosidin (standard) against HPV type 16 E6 enzyme.
Hence, compounds 1 and 2 might have potential anti-cancer agents of HPV as good inhibitors. However, anti-cancer in vitro analysis has not been performed yet on HPV that causes cervical cancer agents. Promising in silico results indicate that further research could be beneficial. The 2D and 3D binding interactions of compounds 1 and 2 against human papilloma virus (HPV) type 16 E6 enzyme (PDB ID: 4XR8) are presented in Fig. 4. The binding interactions between the HPV type 16 E6 enzyme (PDB ID: 4XR8) and compound 1 (Fig. 4) and compound 2 (Fig. 4) were displayed in 3D. Compounds and amino acids are connected by hydrogen bonds (magenta lines) and hydrophobic interactions (non-green lines).
ADMET profiling in grug-likeness and toxicity analysis
-
In silico bioactivities of a drug, including drug-likeness and toxicity, predict its oral activity based on the document of Lipinski's Rule[25] was stated and the results of the current study showed that the compounds displayed conform to Lipinski's rule of five (Table 7). Therefore, both compounds 1 and 2 should undergo further investigation as potential anti-cancer agents. Table 8 shows the acute toxicity predictions, such as LD50 values and toxicity class classification (ranging from 1 for toxic, to 6 for non-toxic), for each ligand, revealing that none of them were acutely toxic. Furthermore, they were found to be similar to standard drugs. Isolated compound 1 has shown toxicity class classification 4 (harmful if swallowed), while 2 showed even better toxicity prediction giving results of endpoints such as hepatotoxicity, mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, and irritant (Table 8). All the isolated compounds were predicted to be non-hepatotoxic, non-irritant, and non-cytotoxic. However, compound 1 has shown carcinogenicity and immunotoxicity (Table 9). Hence, based on ADMET prediction analysis, none of the compounds have shown acute toxicity, so they might be proven as good drug candidates.
Table 7. Drug-likeness predictions of compounds computed by Swiss ADME.
Ligands Formula Mol. Wt. (g·mol−1) NRB NHA NHD TPSA (A°2) Log P (iLOGP) Log S (ESOL) Lipinski's rule of five 1 C30H46O3 454.68 1 3 2 57.53 3.56 −6.21 1 2 C 9H11NO2 165.19 3 2 1 52.32 1.89 −2.21 0 Jaceosidin C17H14O7 330.3 3 7 3 105 1.7 1 0 NHD, number of hydrogen donors; NHA, number of hydrogen acceptors; NRB, number of rotatable bonds; TPSA, total polar surface area; and log P, octanol-water partition coefficients; Log S, turbid metric of solubility. Table 8. Pre ADMET predictions of compounds, computed by Swiss ADME.
Ligands Formula Skin permeation value
(logKp - cm·s−1)GI
absorptionInhibitor interaction BBB permeability Pgp substrate CYP1A2 inhibitor CYP2C19 inhibitor CYP2C9 inhibitor CYP2D6 inhibitor 1 C30H46O3 −4.44 Low No No No No No No 2 C 9H11NO2 −5.99 High Yes No No No No No Jaceosidin C17H14O7 −6.13 High No No Yes No Yes Yes GI, gastrointestinal; BBB, blood brain barrier; Pgp, P-glycoprotein; and CYP, cytochrome-P. Table 9. Toxicity prediction of compounds, computed by ProTox-II and OSIRIS property explorer.
Ligands Formula LD50
(mg·kg−1)Toxicity
classOrgan toxicity Hepatotoxicity Carcinogenicity Immunotoxicity Mutagenicity Cytotoxicity Irritant 1 C30H46O3 2,000 4 Inactive Active Active Inactive Inactive Inactive 2 C 9H11NO2 NA NA Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Jaceosidin C17H14O7 69 3 Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive NA, not available. -
The main aim of the study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of different extracts of Salvia rosmarinus in vitro, and its compounds related to in silico targeting of enzymes involved in cervical cancer. The phytochemical screening tests indicated the presence of phytochemicals such as alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, and tannins in its extracts. The plant also exhibited high antimicrobial activity, with varying efficacy in inhibiting pathogens in a dose-dependent manner (50−100 μg·mL−1). However, this extract exhibited a comparatively high inhibition zone in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria had lower inhibition zones against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae, respectively, and stronger antifungal activity 20.83 ± 0.76 mm inhibition zone against C. albicans fungi. Molecular docking is a promising approach to developing effective drugs through a structure-based drug design process. Based on the docking results, the in silico study predicts the best interaction between the ligand molecule and the protein target DNMT1 and HPV type 16 E6. Compound 1 (–8.3 kcal·mol−1) and 2 (–5.3 kcal·mol−1) interacted with DNMT1 (PDB ID: 4WXX) and the same compound 1 (–10.1 kcal·mol−1) and 2 (–6.5 kcal·mol−1) interacted with HPV type 16 E6 (PDB ID: 4XR8). Compounds 1 and 2 may have potential as a medicine for treating agents of cancer by inhibiting enzymes DNMT1 and HPV type 16 E6 sites, as well as for antimicrobial activities. None of the compounds exhibited acute toxicity in ADMET prediction analysis, indicating their potential as drug candidates. Further studies are required using the in silico approach to generate a potential drug through a structure-based drug-designing approach.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Dejene M, Jemal K, Tegegn G, Aliye M, Tufa LT, et al. 2024. Antimicrobial activity, docking and ADMET profiling of Salvia rosmarinus compounds on a targeting enzymes in cervical cancer. Ornamental Plant Research 4: e030 doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0026
Antimicrobial activity, docking and ADMET profiling of Salvia rosmarinus compounds on a targeting enzymes in cervical cancer
- Received: 02 April 2024
- Revised: 27 June 2024
- Accepted: 19 August 2024
- Published online: 29 November 2024
Abstract: Salvia rosmarinus is an ornamental garden plant with leaves that have fragrance and medicinal uses. The aim of the present study is to investigate the chemical composition, antimicrobial effects of Salvia rosmarinus leaf extracts, and evaluate the anticancer effects of its compounds against targeting enzymes called DNMT1 and HPV type 16 E6 in human cervical cancer through docking and ADMET profiling. In-vitro and in-silico methods were used to assess antimicrobial activity and drug-likeness, utilizing agar-discs and Biovia-2021 software for testing, and docking and ADMET profiling for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Windows with GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1 (244). The plant leaves extract had indicated vastly present phytochemicals and high antimicrobial activity, with varying efficacy in inhibiting pathogens in a dose-dependent-manner (50−100 μg·mL−1). Petroleum ether extracts showed high antibacterial properties against S. aureus and S. epidermidis with inhibition zones of 21.37 ± 0.78 and 17.50 ± 0.50 mm at 100 μg·mL−1, respectively. However, this extract exhibited a comparatively lower inhibition zone against gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae, respectively, and stronger antifungal activity 20.83 ± 0.76 mm inhibition-zone against C. albicans fungi. The methanol/chloroform (1:1) extract of the plant leaves yielded micromeric (1) and benzocaine (2) and both compounds showed good binding-affinity with DNMT1 (PDB ID: 4WXX) with minimum binding energy of −8.4 kcal·mol−1 and −5.3 kcal·mol−1 respectively similar to those of standard. HPV type 16 E6 (PDB ID: 4XR8) interacts similarly with compound 1 (–10.1 kcal·mol−1) and 2 (–6.5 kcal·mol−1) as Jaceosidin (–8.8 kcal·mol−1). The plant studied shows antimicrobial activities, with the potential for treating cervical cancer but required further study.
-
Key words:
- Anti-microbial /
- Anti-cancer /
- Enzyme /
- Docking /
- Salvia rosmarinus