Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview

More Information
  • Anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum) is a popular tropical ornamental plant traded globally as cut-flowers, flowering potted plants, and landscape plants. Despite a cultivation history of less than a century, it boasts over 2,000 documented varieties. However, comprehensive information on anthurium breeding remains fragmented. This article aims to fill this gap by exploring the origins of modern anthurium, systematically organizing anthurium germplasm resources, summarizing molecular breeding resources (including transcriptomics and functional genes), detailing breeding methods, and addressing anticipated challenges and opportunities in anthurium breeding.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Publicly accessible websites for downloading the images shown in Fig. 2.
    Supplementary Table S2 Cultivar names shown in Fig. 3.
  • [1]

    Franz NM. 2007. Pollination of Anthurium (Araceae) by derelomine flower weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Revista De Biologia Tropical 55(1):269−77

    doi: 10.15517/rbt.v55i1.6079

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Croat TB, Sheffer RD. 1983. The sectional groupings of Anthurium (Araceae). Aroideana 6(3):85−123

    Google Scholar

    [3]

    Kamemoto H, Kuehnle AR. 1997. Breeding anthuriums in Hawaii. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. 168 pp

    [4]

    Hamidah M, Debergh P, Ghani A, Karim A. 1995. Cyclic somatic embryogenesis of Anthurium scherzerianum Schott. Acta Horticulturae 447(4):123−24

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.447.15

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Winarto B, Zeng S. 2015. Anthurium in vitro: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 186:266−98

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hua X. 2014. Flower market research report in Chinese New Year in 2013. China Flowers Horticulture 13:24−28

    Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nowbuth P, Khittoo G, Bahorun T, Venkatasamy S. 2005. Assessing genetic diversity of some Anthurium andraeanum Hort. cut-flower cultivars using RAPD markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 4(10):1189−94

    Google Scholar

    [8]

    Alvarez AM, Toves PJ, Vowell TS. 2006. Bacterial blight of anthuriums: Hawaii's experience with a global disease. APSnet Feature 17 pp. www.apsnet.org/edcenter/apsnetfeatures/Documents/2006/BacterialBlightAnthuriums.pdf

    [9]

    Deardoff D, Alvarez A, Deardorff D, Wadswortheds K. 1991. Plant bacterial diseases and their control. Proceedings of the Anthurium Blight Conference, Hawaii, 1990. Hilo: University of Hawaii. pp. 66−69

    [10]

    Van H, Van K, Smeding, Van Der E, Van R, et al. 1998. Cultivation guide Anthurium. Holland: Anthura BV. 140 pp

    [11]

    Feng X. 2020. Eight elements to improve the product rate of Anthurium. China Flowers & Horticulture 3(4):62−63

    Google Scholar

    [12]

    Croat TB, Bunting GS. 1979. Standardization of Anthurium descriptions. Economic Botany 2:15−25

    Google Scholar

    [13]

    Collette V. 2004. Anthurium aristocracy. New Zealand Garden Journal 7(1):3−5

    Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dufour L, Guérin V. 2003. Growth, developmental features and flower production of Anthurium andreanum Lind. in tropical conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 98(1):25−35

    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00196-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Toves PJ. 2022. Anthurium flower color: histology and genetic manipulation. Thesis. University of Hawaii at Manoa, US. pp. 162−64

    [16]

    Kamemoto H. 1981. Anthurium breeding in Hawaii. Aroideana 4:77−86

    Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kamemoto H, Sheffer RD. 1978. A new species hybrid, Anthurium scherzerianum × Anthurium wendlingerii. HortScience 13:177−79

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.13.2.177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ranamukhaarachchi DG, Henny RJ, Guy CL, Li QB. 2001. DNA fingerprinting to identify nine anthurium pot plant cultivars and examine their genetic relationship. HortScience 36(4):758−60

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.4.758

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kuanprasert N, Kuehnle AR, Tang CS. 1998. Floral fragrance compounds of some Anthurium (Araceae) species and hybrids. Phytochemistry 49(2):521−28

    doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00088-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Bliss BJ, Suzuki JY. 2012. Genome size in Anthurium evaluated in the context of karyotypes and phenotypes. AoB Plants 2012:pls006

    doi: 10.1093/aobpla/pls006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Higaki T, Lichty JS, Moniz D. 1995. Anthurium culture in Hawaii. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. pp. 1−2

    [22]

    Elibox W, Umaharan P. 2012. A study of morphophysiological descriptors of cultivated Anthurium andraeanum Hort. HortScience 47(9):1234−40

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.9.1234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Niu J, Leng Q, Lin X, Huang M, Yang G, et al. 2014. Advancement and analysis of the crossing, mutagenesis and ploidy breeding on anthurium. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 34(11):45−50

    Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kamemoto H, Kunisaki J, Aragaki M. 1986. Evaluation of anthurium accessions. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. pp. 1−18

    [25]

    Ehrenberger JA, Kuehnle AR, Amore TD. 2003. Evaluation of University of Hawaii anthurium accessions, 1986–2001. New Plants for Hawaii 10:3−18

    Google Scholar

    [26]

    Henny RJ, Poole RT, Conover CA. 1988. 'Southern Blush' Anthurium. HortScience 23(5):922−23

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.23.5.922

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Henny RJ. 1999. 'Red Hot' anthurium. HortScience 34(1):153−54

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.34.1.153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Henny RJ. Norman DJ. 2001. Anthurium 'Show Biz'. HortScience 36(6):1140−41

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.6.1140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Henny RJ. 2000. Breeding ornamental aroids. Breeding Ornamental Plants 2000:121−32

    Google Scholar

    [30]

    Henny RJ, Norman DJ, Chen J. 2003. 'Orange Hot' Anthurium. HortScience 38(1):133−34

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.38.1.133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chen J, Henny RJ, McConnell DB. 2002. Development of new foliage plant cultivars. In Trends in new crops and new uses, eds Janick J, Whipkey A. VA, Alexandria: ASHS Press. pp. 466−72

    [32]

    Henny JR, Norman DJ, Chen J. 2004. Progress in ornamental aroid breeding research. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 91:464−72

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhang Z, Li Y, Jiang L, Li Y, Wang Z, et al. 2007. In vitro tetraploid induction and its identification in Anthurium andraeanum. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 34(3):729−34

    doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353x.2007.03.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ge Y, Zhang F, Shen X, Yu Y, Pan X, et al. 2012. Genetic variations within a collection of anthuriums unraveled by morphological traits and AFLP markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 45:34−40

    doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2012.07.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yi M, Xie L, Guo H, Zeng R, Li Y, et al. 2015. Advancement on breeding method of Anthurium andraeanum. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 31(4):157−61

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Tian DQ, Pan XY, Yu YM, Wang WY, Zhang F, et al. 2013. De novo characterization of the Anthurium transcriptome and analysis of its digital gene expression under cold stress. BMC Genomics 14(1):827

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-827

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li Z, Wang J, Fu Y, Gao Y, Lu H, et al. 2018. Transcriptome profiling in the spathe of Anthurium andraeanum 'Albama' and its anthocyanin-loss mutant 'Xueyu'. Scientific Data 5(1):180247

    doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.247

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Li Z, Wang J, Zhang X, Xu L. 2015. Comparative transcriptome analysis of anthurium 'Albama' and its anthocyanin-loss mutant. PLoS One 10(3):e0119027

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Sun X, Yuan Z, Wang B, Zheng L, Tan J, et al. 2020. Physiological and transcriptome changes induced by exogenous putrescine in anthurium under chilling stress. Botanical Studies 61(1):28

    doi: 10.1186/s40529-020-00305-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Dou N, Li L, Fang Y, Fan S, Wu C. 2024. Comparative physiological and transcriptome analyses of tolerant and susceptible cultivars reveal the molecular mechanism of cold tolerance in Anthurium andraeanum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25(1):250

    doi: 10.3390/ijms25010250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Li S, Li J, Li X, Guan Y, Chen M, et al. 2021. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals molecular regulators underlying pluripotent cell induction and callus formation in Anthurium andraeanum 'Alabama'. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 57(2):235−47

    doi: 10.1007/s11627-020-10138-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Yang Y, Chen X, Xu B, Li Y, Ma Y, et al. 2015. Phenotype and transcriptome analysis reveals chloroplast development and pigment biosynthesis together influenced the leaf color formation in mutants of Anthurium andraeanum 'Sonate'. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:139

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Li J, Tan Q, Yi M, Yu Z, Xia Q, et al. 2023. Identification of key genes responsible for green and white colored spathes in Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.). Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1208226

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1208226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Osorio-Guarín JA, Gopaulchan D, Quanckenbush C, Lennon AM, Umaharan P, et al. 2021. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals key components controlling spathe color in Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.). PLoS One 16(12):e0261364

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261364

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Suzuki JY, Amore TD, Calla B, Palmer NA, Scully ED, et al. 2017. Organ-specific transcriptome profiling of metabolic and pigment biosynthesis pathways in the floral ornamental progenitor species Anthurium amnicola dressler. Scientific Reports 7:1596

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00808-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Jiang L, Tian X, Fu Y, Liao X, Wang G, et al. 2018. Comparative profiling of microRNAs and their effects on abiotic stress in wild-type and dark green leaf color mutant plants of Anthurium andraeanum 'Sonate'. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 132:258−70

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Iwata RY, Tang CS, Kamemoto H. 1979. Anthocyanins of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science 104:464−66

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.104.4.464

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Iwata RY, Tang CS, Kamemoto H. 1985. Concentration of anthocyanins affecting spathe color in anthuriums. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 110(3):383−85

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.110.3.383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Clark BR, Suzuki JY, Bliss BJ, Borris RP. 2012. Flavone C-glycosides from Anthurium andraeanum. Natural Product Communications 7(6):747−48

    Google Scholar

    [50]

    Yang Z, Liu K, Peng J, Qin Y, Zheng G, et al. 2016. Cloning and expression analysis of chalcone isomerase gene from Anthurium andraeanum. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 43(7):1402−10

    doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0872

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Zheng L, Xia Q, Zeng R, Wei Q, Yi M, et al. 2023. Cloning, expression and phylogenetic analysis of anthocyanidin 5,3-O-glucosyltransferase gene in Anthurium andraeanum. Molecular Plant Breeding 00:1−12

    Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zheng G. 2018. Expression and functional verification of AnCHI and AnC4H related to color in Anthurium andraeanum. Thesis. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, CN. pp. 18−27

    [53]

    Collette VE, Jameson PE, Schwinn KE, Umaharan P, Davies KM. 2004. Temporal and spatial expression of flavonoid biosynthetic genes in flowers of Anthurium andraeanum. Physiologia Plantarum 122:297−304

    doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00402.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Gopaulchan D, Umaharan P, Lennon AM. 2014. A molecular assessment of the genetic model of spathe color inheritance in Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.). Planta 239(3):695−705

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-2007-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Gopaulchan D, Lennon AM, Umaharan P. 2015. Expression analysis of the anthocyanin genes in pink spathes of anthurium with different color intensities. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 140(5):480−89

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.140.5.480

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Li C, Qiu J, Yang G, Huang S, Yin J. 2016. Isolation and characterization of a R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in the spathes of Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.). Plant Cell Reports 35(10):2151−65

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2025-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Li C, Yang G. 2019. The expression pattern of AaMYB1 in anthurium and its overexpression in tobacco. Molecular Plant Breeding 17(6):1898−905

    doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.001898

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Ma G, Shi X, Zhu K, Jin L, Zou Q, et al. 2017. Gene cloning, expression and ectopic transformation analysis of AaMYB1 from anthurium. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences 31(9):1708−16

    doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.09.1708

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Li C, Yang G, Zhang Z, Yin J. 2019. Novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene AaMYB6 involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in Anthurium andraeanum. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 48(10):1859−72

    doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0476

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Li C, Qiu J, Yang G, Huang S, Yin J. 2019. Ectopic expression of the Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.) R2R3-MYB genes AaMYB4 and AaMYB5 enhance the flower color in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 139(1):105−17

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-019-01667-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Li C, Qiu J, Huang S, Yin J, Yang G. 2019. AaMYB3 interacts with AabHLH1 to regulate proanthocyanidin accumulation in Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.)—another strategy to modulate pigmentation. Horticulture Research 6(1):14

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0102-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Lin F, Chen S, Lin K, Chen C, Yao F, et al. 2022. Integrated small RNA profiling and degradome analysis of Anthurium andraeanum cultivars with different-colored spathes. Journal of Plant Research 135:609−26

    doi: 10.1007/s10265-022-01394-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Wei Q, Xia Q, Wang Y, Chen W, Liu C, et al. 2021. Profiling of volatile compounds and associated gene expression in two Anthurium cultivars and their F1 hybrid progenies. Molecules 26(10):2902

    doi: 10.3390/molecules26102902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Xia X. 2014. Screening of floral scent candidate gene and expression analysis of DXR gene in anthurium. Thesis. South China Agricultural University, China. pp. 40−45

    [65]

    Sun X, Yuan Z, Wang B, Zheng L, Tan J. 2021. Exogenous putrescine activates the arginine-polyamine pathway and inhibits the decomposition of endogenous polyamine in Anthurium andraeanum under chilling stress. Scientia Horticulturae 282(1):110047

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Jiang L, Fu Y, Tian X, Ma Y, Chen G, et al. 2022. The Anthurium APRR2-like gene promotes photosynthetic pigment accumulation in response to salt stress. Tropical Plant Biology 15:12−21

    doi: 10.1007/s12042-021-09305-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Jiang L, Tian X, Li S, Fu Y, Xu J, et al. 2019. The AabHLH35 transcription factor identified from Anthurium andraeanum is involved in cold and drought tolerance. Plants 8(7):216

    doi: 10.3390/plants8070216

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Jiang L, Fu Y, Sun P, Tian X, Wang G. 2022. Identification of microRNA158 from Anthurium andraeanum and its function in cold stress tolerance. Plants 11(23):3371

    doi: 10.3390/plants11233371

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Norman DJ, Ali GS. 2018. Anthurium diseases: identification and control in commercial greenhouse operations. PP292. Plant Pathology Department, UF/IFAS Extension, University of Florida. doi: 10.32473/edis-pp292-2012

    [70]

    Hayward AC. 1972. A bacterial disease of anthuriums in Hawaii. Plant Disease Reporter 56:904−08

    Google Scholar

    [71]

    Hong Y. 2015. The global analysis of gene expression in anthurium responsed to blight diseaseand the indification of resistance-related WRKYs. Thesis. Hainan University, CN. pp. 50−71

    [72]

    Fujii TM. 2002. Evaluation of transgenic anthuriums expressing the shiva-1 gene encoding a synthetic antimicrobial peptide. Thesis. University of Hawaii, US. pp. 62−85

    [73]

    Kuehnle AR, Amore TD, Kamemoto H, Kunisaki JT, Lichty JS, et al. 2000. 'White Lady' Anthurium. New Plants for Hawaii Anthurium Cultivar Release 4, NPH-A-4. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (CTAHR), US.

    [74]

    Sheffer RD, Kamemoto H. 1976. Cross compatibility in the genus Anthurium. Journal American Society for Horticultural Science 101(6):709−13

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.101.6.709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Han W, Bao Y, Yu B. 2020. Advances in the research of Anthurium andraeanum cell engineering and its application in breeding. Molecular Plant Breeding 18(10):3311−12

    doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.018.003311

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Li Y, Zenkteler E, Pacak A, Li L, Li H. 2002. Amplification of PCR in identification of hybrids between Anthurium andraeanum and Spathiphyllum wallisii. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University 29(4):403−06

    Google Scholar

    [77]

    Xia Q, Su Q, Yi M, Liu L, Wu X, et al. 2018. A new anthurium cultivar 'Xiaojiao'. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 45(S2):2793−94

    doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0474

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Yi M, Zeng R, Du B, Zhang Z, Liu Z, et al. 2015. A new Anthurium andraeanum cultivar 'Shuangguan'. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 42(9):1859−60

    doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Leng Q, Xian Z, Li G, Li Q, Huang S, et al. 2020. A new Anthurium andraeanum cultivar 'Xiayan'. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 47(S2):3035−36

    Google Scholar

    [80]

    Niu J, Leng Q, Li G, Huang S, Xu S, et al. 2021. 'Victory Flag': a new cut anthurium cultivar. HortScience 56(4):513−14

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI15520-20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Amore TD, Toves PJ, Imamura JL, Uchida JY, Kadooka C. 2021. Anthurium 'Kapoho Welo' and 'Honi-honi'. HortScience 56(8):970−72

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI15901-21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Zhu J. 2005. Studies on the inductive mutation and genetical analysis of Anthurium andraeanum Lind. Thesis. Hunan Agricultural University, China. pp. 24−30

    [83]

    Kobayashi RS, Brewbaker JL, Kamemoto H. 1987. Identification of Anthurium andraeanum cultivars by gel electrophoresis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112(1):164−67

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.112.1.164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Wang JY, Chuang KC. 2013. Development of novel microsatellite markers for effective applications in anthurium cultivar identification. Euphytica 189(3):421−31

    doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0799-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Srisamoot N, Padsri I. 2018. Assessing genetic diversity of some Anthurium andraeanum Hort. cut-flower cultivars using ISSR markers. Genomics and Genetics 11:1−8

    doi: 10.14456/gag.2018.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Khan YJ, Pankajakshan M. 2010. Genetic diversity among commercial varieties of Anthurium andreanum linden using RAPD markers. Plant Genetics & Transgenics 1(1):11−15

    Google Scholar

    [87]

    Wang C, Niu J, Zhang Z, Pan H, Ren Y. 2013. Analysis of genetic relationships of Anthurium andreanum varieties using SRAP markers. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 14(4):759−63

    doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2013.04.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Souza Neto JD, Soares TCB, Motta LB, Cabral PDS, Silva JA. 2014. Molecular characterization of Anthurium genotypes by using DNA fingerprinting and SPAR markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 13(3):4766−75

    doi: 10.4238/2014.July.2.6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Venkat SK, Bommisetty P, Patil MS, Reddy L, Chennareddy A. 2014. The genetic linkage maps of Anthurium species based on RAPD, ISSR and SRAP markers. Scientia Horticulturae 178(23):132−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.08.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Yu C, Jin M, Zhang B, Ming J, Yuan S, et al. 2012. Genetic linkage map of Anthurium andraeanum based on SRAP molecular markers. Acta Horticulturar Sinica 39(6):1151−58

    Google Scholar

    [91]

    Liang G, Xiao S, Gang Y. 2005. A preliminary report on radiated material with 60Co for anthurium tissue culture. Tropical Agricultural Science & Technology 28(3):24−28

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-450X.2005.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Peng W, Tian D, Chen J. 2012. Study of 60Coγ radiation on Anthurium andraeanum under tissue culture conditions. Bulletin of Science and Technology 28(1):95−100

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2012.01.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Puchooa D. 2005. In vitro mutation breeding of anthurium by gamma radiation. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 7(1):11−20

    Google Scholar

    [94]

    Suraninpong P, Wuthisuthimethavee S. 2015. Mutation induction of Anthurium andreanum using gamma radiation. Acta Horticulturae 1083:139−44

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1083.15

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Shang W, Li Q, Zhou H, Chen C, Lin F, et al. 2017. Radiation-induced mutation and mutant screening on calluses of Anthurium andraeanum. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 32(7):710−14

    doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Kamemoto H, Nakasone HY, 1963. Evaluation and improvement of anthurium clones. Thesis. University of Hawaii, US. pp. 10−25

    [97]

    Tian D, Pan X, Ge Y, Liu X, Pan G. 2013. Colchicine in vitro induction of tetraploidy in Anthurium andraeanum. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences 9:1125−27

    Google Scholar

    [98]

    Tian L, Ma Y. 2008. Polyploid induction and ploidy analysis of Anthurium andraenum Linden. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 36(32):13977−13978,13983

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.32.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Chu L, Peng J, Wang Z, Zhao K, Yuan S, et al. 2014. Studies on polyploid induction in Anthurium andraeanum using oryzalin, trifluralin and colchicine. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 41(11):2275−80

    Google Scholar

    [100]

    Teixeira da Silva JA, Winarto B, Dobránszki J, Zeng S. 2015. Anther culture of Anthurium: a review. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37:173

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-1909-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Winarto B, Teixeira da Silva JA. 2012. Influence of isolation technique of half-anthers and of initiation culture medium on callus induction and regeneration in Anthurium andreanum. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 110(3):401−11

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0161-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Winarto B, Mattjik NA, Teixeira da Silva JA, Purwito A, Marwoto B. 2010. Ploidy screening of anthurium (Anthurium andreanum Linden ex André) regenerants derived from anther culture. Scientia Horticulturae 127(1):86−90

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Winarto B, Rachmawati F, Pramanik D, Teixeira da Silva JA. 2011. Morphological and cytological diversity of regenerants derived from half-anther cultures of anthurium. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 105:363−74

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9876-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Winarto B, Mattjik NA. 2009. Response of Anthurium andreanum Linden ex André cv. Carnaval anther in medium with various combinations of plant growth regulator concentrations. Journal of Agricultural Sciences in Indonesia 37(2):138−44

    Google Scholar

    [105]

    Winarto B, Mattjik NA. 2009. Studies on anther culture of local accessions of Anthurium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 19(4):386−95

    Google Scholar

    [106]

    Winarto B. 2013. Anther culture study on Anthurium andreanum cv. Casino, Laguna and Safari. Proc. National Floriculture Seminar. Auditorium of Indonesian Ornamental Crop Research Institute, Pacet-Cianjur, West Java-Indonesia, 2013. 29:271−81

    [107]

    Winarto, B. 2009. Androgenesis: a breakthrough effort for preparing haploid or double-haploid plants in Anthurium. Thesis. Bogor Agriculture Institute, Indonesia

    [108]

    Winarto B, Rachmawati F, Teixeira da Silva JA. 2010. New basal media for half-anther culture of Anthurium andreanum Linden ex André cv. Tropical. Plant Growth Regulation 65:513−29

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-011-9622-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Winarto B, Rachmawati F. 2007. Preliminary study of anther culture of anthurium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 17(2):127−37

    Google Scholar

    [110]

    Winarto B. 2010. Improving growth and regeneration of explants derived from anther culture of anthurium via improving culture media. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 20(4):342−51

    Google Scholar

    [111]

    Winarto B. 2011. Effect of glumatine and serine on anther culture of Anthurium andreanum cv. 'Tropical'. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 21(4):295−305

    Google Scholar

    [112]

    Winarto B. 2011. Chromosome staining and its application on determining ploidy level of plantlets derived from anther culture of anthurium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 21(2):113−23

    Google Scholar

    [113]

    Winarto B. 2013. Effect of basic medium and ammonium nitrate on formation and regeneration of calli and shoot multiplication derived from anther culture of anthurium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 23(1):9−20

    Google Scholar

    [114]

    Winarto B, Mattjik NA, Purwito A, Marwoto B. 2009. Effect of sucrose and glucose on successful induction and regeneration of callus derived from anther culture of anthurium. Journal of Biological Research 14(2):165−72

    doi: 10.23869/bphjbr.14.2.20098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Winarto B, Hayati NA, Purwito A, Marwoto B. 2010. Improvement of selected induction media on callus induction in anther culture of anthurium and a histological study on its callus formation. Jurnal Natur Indonesia 12(2):93−101

    Google Scholar

    [116]

    Winarto B, Mattjik NA, Purwito A, Marwoto B. 2010. Application of 2,4-D and TDZ in formation and regeneration of callus derived from anther culture of anthurium. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 20(1):1−9

    Google Scholar

    [117]

    Kuehnle AR, Sugii N. 1991. Induction of tumors in Anthurium andraeanum by Agrobactemium tumefaciens. HortScience 26:1325−28

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.26.10.1325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Kuehnle AR, Chen FC. 1994. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of anthurium. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 29:215−25

    Google Scholar

    [119]

    Chen FC, Kuehnle AR. 1996. Obtaining transgenic Anthurium through agrobacterium-mediated transformation of etiolated internodes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121(1):47−51

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.121.1.47

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Chen FC, Kuehnle AR, Sugii N. 1997. Anthurium roots for micropropagation and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 49:71−74

    doi: 10.1023/A:1005812802655

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Niu J, Leng Q, Lin X, Yang G, Yin J. 2014. Anthurium genetic engineering breeding, advance, problem and solution. Genomics and Applied Biology 33(5):1147−53

    Google Scholar

    [122]

    Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Zeng S, Winarto B, Lennon AM, et al. 2015. Genetic transformation and molecular research in Anthurium: progress and prospects. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 123:205−19

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0832-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Kuehnle AR, Chen FC, Sugii NC. 2001. Transgenic Anthurium. In Transgenic Crops III, ed. Bajaj YPS. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. vol 48. pp. 3−15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-10603-7_1

    [124]

    Kuehnle AR, Fujii T, Chen FC, Alvarez A, Sugii N, et al. 2004. Peptide biocides for engineering bacterial blight tolerance and susceptibility in cut-flower Anthurium. HortScience 39(6):1327−31

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    Khaithong T, Sipes BS, Kuehnle AR. 2007. Transgenic Anthurium andraeanum expressing modified rice cysteine protease inhibitor and resistance to Radopholus similis. Journal of Nematology 39(1):99−100

    Google Scholar

    [126]

    Cao D, Kang L, Lee Y, Duan J, Zhang C, et al. 2015. Optimization of genetic transformation system of Anthurium andraeanum cv. Arizona and Petunia hybrida chalcone synthase gene (PhCHS) transferation. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 23(3):329−36

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2015.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Yao Z. 2003. Genetic transformation of carotenoids biosynthesis enzyme gene (PSY, PDS, LycB, LycE) into anthurium and phalaenopsis. Thesis. Jilin University, China. pp. 35−43

    [128]

    Yang L. 2007. Study on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Anthurium andraeanum. Thesis. Tianjin University, China. pp. 30−45

    [129]

    Feng Y. 2009. Genetic transformation and molecular breeding of Anthurium andraeanum with foreign FT gene. Thesis. Tianjin University, China. pp. 35−45

    [130]

    Kong Z. 2017. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of antibacterial peptide gene for Anthurium andraeanum. Thesis. Lanzhou University, China. pp. 33−47

    [131]

    Zhou J, Zhang X, Ma J, Zhao X, Tai G. 2008. Study on the transformation of Anthurium andreanum by Agribacterium tumefacien-mediated CBF1 gene. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 36(8):3136−37

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.08.045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132]

    Liu B. 2011. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of AtCBF3 and PaFT gene into Anthurium andraeanum. Thesis. Huazhong Agricultural University, China. pp. 30−46

    [133]

    Zhou J. 2006. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of low temperature induced transcription factor CBF1 gene into Anthurium andreanum. Thesis. Jilin University, China. pp. 30−46

    [134]

    Dao T. 2012. Study on establishment of regeneration system and CmDREB gene transformation in Anthurium andraeanum. Thesis. Nanjing Agricultural University, China. pp. 25−45

    [135]

    Albert NW, Arathoon S, Collette VE, Schwinn KE, Jameson PE, et al. 2010. Activation of anthocyanin synthesis in Cymbidium orchids: variability between known regulators. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 100(3):355−60

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9649-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136]

    Zhao Q, Jing J, Wang G, Wang J, Feng Y, et al. 2010. Optimization in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Anthurium andraeanum using GFP as a reporter. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 13(5):9−10

    Google Scholar

    [137]

    Fitch MMM, Leong TCW, He X, McCafferty HRK, Zhu YJ, et al. 2011. Improved transformation of anthurium. HortScience 46(3):358−64

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.3.358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138]

    Hosein FN, Lennon AM, Umaharan P. 2012. Optimization of an Agrobacterium-mediated transient assay for gene expression studies in Anthurium andraeanum. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 137(4):263−72

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.137.4.263

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139]

    Matsumoto TK, Keith LM, Cabos RYM, Suzuki JY, Gonsalves D, et al. 2013. Screening promoters for anthurium transformation using transient expression. Plant Cell Reports 32(3):443−51

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1376-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140]

    Wang G, Xu C, Yan S, Xu B. 2019. An efficient somatic embryo liquid culture system for potential use in large-scale and synchronic production of Anthurium andraeanum seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:29

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141]

    Wang Y, Yang T, Wang D, Gou R, Jiang Y, et al. 2023. Chromosome level genome assembly of colored calla lily (Zantedeschia elliottiana). Scientific Data 10:605

    doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02516-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142]

    Gao Y, Zhang Y, Feng C, Chu H, Feng C, et al. 2022. A chromosome-level genome assembly of Amorphophallus konjac provides insights into konjac glucomannan biosynthesis. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 20:1002−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.02.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143]

    Yin J, Jiang L, Wang L, Han X, Guo W, et al. 2021. A high-quality genome of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott), one of the world's oldest crops. Molecular Ecology Resources 21:68−77

    doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13239

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144]

    Qian Z, Ding J, Li Z, Chen J. 2023. The high-quality Pinellia pedatisecta genome reveals a key role of tandem duplication in the expansion of its agglutinin genes. Horticulture Research 10(3):uhac289

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac289

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Liu Y, Cai T, Su Q, Yi M, Xia Q, et al. 2025. The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e003 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0002
    Liu Y, Cai T, Su Q, Yi M, Xia Q, et al. 2025. The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e003 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0002

Figures(3)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(305) PDF downloads(211)

REVIEW   Open Access    

The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview

Ornamental Plant Research  5 Article number: e003  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum) is a popular tropical ornamental plant traded globally as cut-flowers, flowering potted plants, and landscape plants. Despite a cultivation history of less than a century, it boasts over 2,000 documented varieties. However, comprehensive information on anthurium breeding remains fragmented. This article aims to fill this gap by exploring the origins of modern anthurium, systematically organizing anthurium germplasm resources, summarizing molecular breeding resources (including transcriptomics and functional genes), detailing breeding methods, and addressing anticipated challenges and opportunities in anthurium breeding.

    • Anthurium, a genus within the Araceae family, comprises perennial evergreen herbaceous plants encompassing terrestrial, rupicolous, epiphytic, and hemiepiphytic herbs. It is comprised of 1,326 accepted species and over 1,000 estimated species, naturally distributed from Mexico to tropical America, and later introduced to Florida[1]. The genus is categorized into 18 sections based on plant morphology and flower shape. The section Calomystrium is notable for its distinctive features, including cordate leaves, persistent cataphylls, and glossy spadices with spathes ranging from white to deep red[2]. Other sections with higher ornamental value include Porphyochitonium, Cardiolonchium, Urospadix, and Pachyneurium. Among these, Porphyochitonium and Cardiolonchium species can hybridize with Calomystrium, producing viable offspring. While Pachyneurium can also undergo interspecific hybridization, it does not successfully cross with Calomystrium. Hybridization within Urospadix is rare. Sections such as Belolonchium and Semaephyllium also can successfully hybridize with Calomystrium, though there are fewer records. Other sections, such as Tetraspermium, Gymnopodium, Leptanthurium, and Dactylophyllium, face difficulties with both intraspecific and interspecific hybridization. Some sections, including Polyphyllium, Oxycarpium, Chamaerepium, and Schizoplacium, have few or no hybridization records, while others, such as Belolonchium and Semaephyllium, can not successfully hybridize with Calomystrium. Modern anthurium, commonly known as Anthurium andreanum Hort., is a collective name that are actually interspecific hybrids between A. andraeanum Linden ex. André and other species in the Calomystrium section[3]. Initially, cultivated anthurium originally referred to hybrids between A. andraeanum and species from the Calomystrium and Porphyochitonium sections. Over time, this scope has expanded to include hybrids between A. andraeanum and other sections capable of hybridizing with it.

      Cultivated anthurium is globally renowned for its distinctive and attractive inflorescence, characterized by a spadix and spathe. Nowadays, it is globally traded as cut-flowers, flowering potted plants, and landscape plants. Anthurium ranks as the second largest tropical flower commodity worldwide, just after orchids[46]. The increasing demand for anthurium has prompted many countries to import numerous new cultivars from the Netherlands or Hawaii for commercial cultivation[7]. Presently, Holland, Hawaii, Mauritius, and Jamaica are leading global producers of anthurium, with additional contributions from smaller producers in tropical regions such as the Philippines, Brazil, Malaysia, Martinique, and Thailand[8,9]. Given the rapid turnover of varieties in the flower industry, continuous development of new anthurium cultivars tailored to market demands is crucial for the sustainable progress of the anthurium sector. Despite the relatively short cultivation and breeding history of anthurium, its notable success in interspecific hybridization has resulted in the creation of hundreds of exceptional varieties within a few decades. However, challenges persist in anthurium breeding, including difficulties in accessing native resources, limited understanding of germplasm resources, incomplete breeding information, and so on.

      Published research on anthurium has focused on crucial aspects such as breeding methods, cultivation techniques, and tissue culture. Researchers have actively tackled challenges such as susceptibility to low temperatures, bacterial, and viral diseases, and enhancing anthurium's resilience to these biotic and abiotic stresses. Moreover, genetic engineering has emerged as a promising approach to augment the ornamental qualities of anthurium, attracting considerable attention in the scientific community. The identification of key genes regulating the ornamental traits of anthurium represents a significant advancement, providing valuable insights that could potentially be utilized to address challenges and drive innovation within the anthurium industry.

      This study provides a comprehensive review of recent literature on A. andraeanum, encompassing germplasm resources, molecular breeding resources, and the main breeding methodologies. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying existing gaps in anthurium germplasm and breeding strategies, this research aims to inspire breeders and scientific researchers, offering fresh perspectives and stimulating further exploration in the field.

    • A. andraeanum, a perennial herbaceous plant of the family Araceae, typically grows between 30−100 cm tall. Its optimal growth temperature ranges from 15 °C to 35 °C, with growth being inhibited at temperatures below 14 °C[10]. Prolonged exposure to temperatures above 35 °C, particularly under intense light conditions, can lead to leaf scorching, flower bud abortion, or malformation[11]. A. andraeanum features short stems and alternate, leathery, glossy leaves that are mostly 10−30 cm long and 10−20 cm wide, with blunt to gradually pointed tips, and deeply cordate bases. The terminal flowers are borne on slender peduncles. The commercial 'flower' comprises a spathe, spadix, and peduncle (flower stalk). The spathe, a modified bract, measures typically 5−30 cm long and 2−18 cm wide, showcasing a variety of colors and a bright waxy sheen[12]. The spadix is cylindrical and erect, 3−15 cm long, densely spirally arranged with minute hermaphroditic florets that are protogynous[13]. Each floret contains a pistil and four staminate structures positioned around it (Fig. 1). Approximately six months after fertilization, the ovary enlarges to form a single berry containing one to two seeds, which eventually detach from the spadix upon maturity[14]. Anthurium undergoes a distinct juvenile phase characterized by monopodial growth, where nutrient buds appear in leaf axils without flower production. Upon entering the reproductive phase, it transitions to sympodial growth, with floral buds emerging from leaf axils, resulting in an alternating leaf-flower growth pattern[14].

      Figure 1. 

      The biological morphology and organs of A. andraeanum.

    • Anthurium andraeanum Linden ex. André is widely accepted as the progenitor of modern anthurium cultivars. This vine-like epiphyte features an orange-red, heart-shaped spathe with a blistered texture, reaching up to 14 cm long and 9 cm wide, on a long peduncle where basal lobes slightly overlap or fuse at the base. Native to the wet forests at elevations of approximately 400 to 1,200 m in Northern Ecuador and Southern Colombia, it was first discovered in 1876 in the tropical rainforests of southwestern Colombia. French botanist Eduard André introduced it to Jean Linden's nursery in Belgium, sparking cultivation and breeding efforts. By 1935, various mutant species had been cultivated, leading to the development of several varieties like album (white spathe), garneri (bright red spathe), lawrenciae (large white spathe), rbodocbilum (rose-colored with light green lobes), roseaum (shiny rose-pink), salmoneama (orange-red), and sangauineaun (deep red). Subsequently, breeding programs in Hawaii, the Netherlands, and other locations were launched, driving the advancement and diversification of modern anthurium varieties A. andraeanum Linden ex. André, through hybridization with other species in the Calomystrium section, has led to the development of today's cut-flower varieties of anthurium[15].

      Many other original species of distinct sections (not only Calomystrium and Porphyrochitonium) were also used as parental germplasm resources of modern anthurium cultivars, such as A. scherzerianum Schott, A. antioquence, A. amnicola, A. antioquiense, A. ornatum, A. standleyi, and so on (Fig. 2). A. andraeanum Linden ex André, through hybridization with other species in the Calomystrium section, has led to the development of today's cut-flower varieties of anthurium[2]. A. antisequence and A. amnicola, known for their compact size and prolific flowering, were used as parental plants in breeding programs that resulted in numerous potted anthurium cultivars[1618]. Moreover, these species were crossed with various cut-flower anthurium varieties to create hybrids showcasing a diverse array of colors[18]. Aromatic anthurium germplasm resources like A. armeniense, A. fragrantissimum, A. lindenianum, A. ochrantum, and A. roseospadix were also hybridized with A. andraeanum, resulting in the production of many aromatic anthurium varieties now available in the market[19]. The original A. andraeanum features a heart-shaped spathe, whereas cultivated anthurium varieties exhibit diverse spathe forms. For instance, tulip-shaped varieties may trace their origins to other species within the Calomystrium section or arise from species that are known hybrids between other sections (Cardiolonchium and Porphyrochitonium) and A. andraeanum[20].

      Figure 2. 

      Some parent species used for anthurium breeding. The publicly accessible websites for downloading these images are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

    • After decades of selection and cultivation, over 600 anthurium cultivars are now available globally, categorized primarily as potted plants and cut flowers to cater to distinct market demands. Breeders have focused intensively on enhancing anthuriums' ornamental features, particularly emphasizing the characteristics of the spathe, including shape, color, size, and texture. These cultivars are typically grouped into three main types based on spathe characteristics: standard, obake, and tulip varieties[21,22] (Fig. 3). Standard varieties feature symmetrical heart-shaped spathes with uniform colors such as red, pink, orange, coral, white, green, purple, and brown (Fig. 3ag). Their spadix is gently angled and shorter than the spathe. Obake types display a bicolor appearance with green lobes and a contrasting center color (Fig. 3hn), while tulip varieties resemble upright, cupped spathes reminiscent of tulip petals, with straight, erect spadices (Fig. 3ot). Some cultivars also fall under patterned types, showcasing additional colors and patterns such as stripes or splashes on either heart-shaped or tulip-shaped spathes[22]. Due to their tropical nature, regional influences play a significant role in the development of new anthurium varieties, with the Netherlands leading in cultivar registrations, followed by Hawaii and Florida, highlighting regional strengths in anthurium breeding and cultivation.

      Figure 3. 

      Typical spathe colors and types in anthurium. (a)−(g) Display standard-shaped spathes in various colors. (h)−(n) Present tulip-shaped spathes in different colors. (o)−(t) Feature obake (bio-colored) spathes. The cultivar names corresponding to (a)−(t) can be found in Supplementary Table S2.

      The Netherlands has a rich history of anthurium breeding and is widely recognized as a dominant force in the industry. Many renowned companies, including Anthura, Rijnplant, and AVO, have been actively involved in anthurium research for nearly 80 years. They have developed a series of cut flower and potted flower varieties such as 'Candy', 'Cheers', 'Arena', 'Carisma', 'Grand slam', 'Kaseko', 'Acropolis', 'Tropical', 'Choco', 'Cheers', 'Marysia', 'Fantasia', 'Dakota', 'Alabama', 'Sweet dream', 'Royal pink champion', 'Madural', 'Turenza', and 'Valerie', establishing their dominance in the global anthurium market[23].

      Hawaii also holds prominence cultivating anthurium varieties worldwide, with a history spanning over 80 years. In the late 1930s and 1940s, Hawaii growers made significant advancements by mastering anthurium propagation through seeds. This breakthrough not only expanded cultivation but also enriched the variety of anthurium plants[16]. The University of Hawaii played a pivotal role in advancing anthurium breeding, launching a program in the 1950s that involved collecting wild resources from South America for hybrid breeding. Through their efforts, they developed innovative breeding and evaluation technologies, which enabled them to gradually create multiple cut flower varieties such as 'Nitta', 'Midori', 'Marian Seeforth', 'Paradise Pink', 'Kalapana', 'New Era', and 'Tropical Flame', along with some pot varieties, like 'Southern Blush', 'Hokuloa', 'Manoa mist', 'Sundial', and cut dual-use varieties[2325].

      In Florida, anthurium research started later than in other regions. In the 1980s, researchers from the University of Florida's Horticulture Department and the Oglesby Plant Laboratory initiated efforts to hybridize A. andraeanum with compact wild anthurium species. This breeding program led to the cultivation of numerous potted flower varieties, including popular series such as 'Red Hot', 'Tropical Fire', 'Orange Hot', 'Salsa', 'Purple Plum', 'Favorita', 'SmallTalk', and 'Lady'[2632].

      Chinese researchers have also made strides in recent years in cultivating new anthurium varieties[3335]. Some of these varieties have received new variety rights and are commercially available, such as potted flower varieties 'Xiaojiao', 'Baixue Gongzhu', 'Fu Rui', 'Caixia', 'Xu Ri', 'Chao Tianjiao' 'Shuang Guan', 'Xia Yan', 'Zi Yun', 'Cai Xia', 'Rising Sun', 'Sunshine', 'Crystal Love', and 'Spring Dawn'.

    • Researchers have estimated the genome size of A. andraeanum to be 4.7 Gb using flow cell cytometry[20]. Despite the absence of a published genome sequence for A. andraeanum, de novo transcriptome analysis has emerged as a crucial method for acquiring genetic insights[36]. This approach proves particularly valuable in elucidating the genetic composition and regulatory mechanisms of anthurium species. Currently, many transcriptomes of anthurium have been reported (Table 1), predominantly focusing on pivotal signaling pathways and genes associated with traits such as spathe color, flower development, and stress resilience.

      Table 1.  List of the reported transcriptomes of anthurium.

      Source Tissue Number of unigenes/miRNAs Mean length (bp) Accession number (NCBI) Ref.
      'Albama'/'Xueyu' Spathe 111,674 987 SAMN08322140−SAMN08322145 [37]
      'Albama'/anthocyanin-loss mutant Spathe 47,563 652 Not released [38]
      'Albama' Leaf 37,396 1,356 Not released [39]
      E (cold-tolerant)/MH (cold-sensitive) Leaf 132,108 648 PR-JNA973051 [40]
      'Albama' Callus 225,752 1,299 SRP152774 [41]
      'Sonate' Leaf 41,017 768 GBKP00000000 [42]
      Eight anthurium cultivars Spathe 62,013 200 SAMN34164547−SAMN34164553
      SAMN35719425
      [43]
      'Sasha'/'Honduras'/'Rapido' Spathe 151,652 91 Not released [44]
      'Alabama' Stem, leaf 44,382 60 E-MTAB-1955 [36]
      A. amnicola Root, spathe, leaf, spadix 19,458 No data SAMN03839010−SAMN03839021 [45]

      Comparative analyses of transcriptomes from different anthurium cultivars have been conducted to investigate the mechanisms governing anthocyanin biosynthesis. For instance, studies have compared transcriptomes of A. andraeanum 'Alabama', alongside its anthocyanin-deficient mutants to understand the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis[37,38]. Similarly, researchers have explored the genetic basis of color variations among different-colored spathes of anthurium varieties[43,44]. Analogous investigations have been conducted on leaf color. Transcriptome and small RNA sequencing of A. andraeanum 'Sonate' and its leaf color mutant revealed a range of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and miRNAs[42,46]. Moreover, a study related to the organ-specific transcriptome profiling of metabolic and pigment biosynthesis pathways in Anthurium amnicola Dressler, the progenitor species of anthurium, provided a comprehensive evaluation of the mechanisms involved in pigment synthesis in anthurium plants[45].

      By analyzing the transcriptomes, researchers gained insights into the signaling pathways and key genes associated with the cold stress resistance of anthurium. In A. andraeanum 'Alabama', researchers identified 4,363 DEGs under cold treatment and examined changes in metabolic pathways during prolonged stress treatment[36]. Another study compared the transcriptomes of cold-tolerant cultivar A. andraeanum 'Elegang' and cold-susceptible cultivar A. andraeanum 'Menghuang', pinpointing 9,132 DEGs involved in cold response mechanisms enriched in pathways like plant hormone signaling, trehalose metabolism, and ribosomal proteins[40]. Additionally, RNA-Seq analysis following the treatment of anthurium seedlings with Putrescine (Put), a polyamine, identified 1,840 DEGs associated with defense, abscisic acid response, cold response, and oxidative stress response[39].

      The findings contribute to our understanding of these traits and provide valuable information for the development of breeding strategies aimed at cultivating anthurium varieties with improved characteristics.

    • The pigmentation of anthurium spathes primarily comprises anthocyanins, flavonoids, and chlorophyll[4749]. These pigments, present in varying types and proportions, determine the different color variations in anthurium spathes, ranging from red, pink, orange, coral, white, and green to obakes. Red, orange, pink, and coral spathes contain mainly cyanidin-3-rutinoside (red) and geranium-3-rutinoside (orange), with their ratios varying among different cultivars. White spathes lack anthocyanins but contain a substantial amount of flavone 6-C-glycoside derivatives. Green spathes predominantly feature chlorophyll. Notably, delphinidin (blue) has not been detected in A. andraeanum[4749].

      The biosynthesis pathway responsible for anthocyanin production is well-established and conserved across plant species. In anthurium, key structural genes involved in anthocyanin synthesis have been identified, such as AaCHS, AaDFR, AaF3H, AaANS, AaF3'H, Aa5, 3GT, AaCHI, and AaC4H[5055]. Transcription factors (TFs) play crucial roles in regulating spathe coloration by controlling the structural genes. Initially, the putative genetic factors M, O, and R have been identified as regulators of spathe color. The dominant R gene is the putative regulator of CHS, F3H, and ANS, dominate O gene is the putative regulator of DFR, and M gene is the regulator of F3'H[56]. Subsequently, both MYB and bHLH type TFs are proven to be involved in spathe color regulation. Researches indicate that AaMYBs, such as AaMYB1, 2, 4, 5, and 6, positively regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis by influencing the expression of anthocyanin synthesis genes[5660]. For instance, overexpression of AaMYB6 in tobacco promotes the accumulation of anthocyanin pigments in filaments through activating the expression of NtF3'H, NtDFR, NtANS, and NtUFGT, potentially interacting with AabHLH1[56]. Conversely, AaMYB3 negatively regulates proanthocyanin accumulation in tobacco by downregulating the expression of NtDFR and NtANS, possibly through interaction with AabHLH1[61]. Additionally, overexpression of AabHLH1 in an Arabidopsis tt8 mutant restores the proanthocyanin-deficient seed coat phenotype[61]. Several genes related to chlorophyll synthesis in anthurium have also been reported. Li et al. suggested that reduced AaMYB2 expression leads to white-colored spathes by increasing AaLAR and AaANR expression, while enhanced AaMYB124 expression contributes to green spathes by upregulating AaHemB and AaPor[43].

      Furthermore, correlation analyses of miRNA and mRNA expression patterns have identified several miRNA-mRNA interaction pairs that potentially act as negative regulators in anthocyanin accumulation, including miR156b/miR529-SPL17, miR408-blue copper protein-like gene, miR858-MYB3-like, and miR164-NAC100 pairs[62].

    • Research has shown that the fragrance in anthurium germplasm resources comes from species like A. armeniense, A. fragrantissimum, A. lindenianum, A. ochranthum, and A. roseospadix[19]. The primary aroma substances in anthurium include oxygenated monoterpenes and monoterpene hydrocarbons such as α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, and linalool[19]. Studies on anthurium aroma are limited, focusing on the relationship between aroma compounds and genes involved in terpene metabolism pathways. Wei et al. investigated aroma components in A. andraeanum 'Alabama' and 'Mystry', and observed the higher expression levels of aroma synthesis genes in aromatic varieties 'Alabama' compared to the non-aromatic 'Mystery', including AaDXS, AaDXR, AaMDS, AaHDS, AaTPS, AaDAHPS, AaADT2, AaPAL1, and AaPAL2[63]. Transcriptome sequencing has also been used to identify candidate genes associated with aroma compound synthesis. Xia utilized Illumina Hiseq 2005 technology to analyze the transcriptome of A. andraeanum 'Mystery' and 'Alabama' across various tissues, and identified several genes involved in terpene metabolism including AaDXR, AaMCT, AaHDS, AaLIS, AaGPPS, and AaPAL[64]. It is worth noting that while certain genes related to floral fragrance synthesis have been cloned in specific varieties, such as AaDXS and AaDXR, the sequences of other genes are still based on transcriptome data.

    • Both abiotic and biotic stresses negatively impact the growth and development of anthurium plants, sometimes leading to plant death. These stress conditions affect overall growth rates, yields, and increase cultivation costs.

      Anthurium, being a tropical flower, is particularly sensitive to low temperatures. Researchers have extensively studied its cold resistance through exogenous treatments, transcriptome analysis, and gene function identification. For instance, exogenous putrescine (put) activated the arginine-polyamine pathway under chilling stress, enhancing arginine decarboxylase activity and gene expression, while inhibiting polyamine decomposition[65]. Transcriptome analysis identified 39 cold-inducible transcription factors (TFs) in A. andraeanum 'Alabama', including members of the AP2/ERF, NAC, MYB, and bZIP families[36]. Proteins involved in protein synthesis, energy metabolism, and hormone signaling were found to play crucial roles in cold resistance, such as ribosomal proteins, HSPs, and HsfA[40]. Some genes in anthurium have been proved to play roles in cold tolerance. For instance, heterologous overexpression of AaAPRR2 in Arabidopsis were shown to increase photosynthetic pigment accumulation and enhance salt stress tolerance[66]. Heterologous expression of AabHLH35 were proven to improve cold and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis[67]. A cold-induced factor, AnAPX, enhanced cold tolerance in tobacco against cell membrane damage. Furthermore, the heterologous overexpression of Aa-miR158 in Arabidopsis enhanced cold stress tolerance by increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and elevating reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels[68].

      Anthurium plants are susceptible to various bacterial and fungal diseases during cultivation, including bacterial blight, bacterial wilt, rhizoctonia root rot, phytophthora, and black nose disease[69]. Among these, bacterial blight, primarily caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae (Xad), is the most severe bacterial disease affecting anthurium and was first reported in Brazil in 1960[70]. In the disease-resistant A. andraeanum 'Acropolis', transcriptome sequencing was used to investigate the signaling pathways involved in disease resistance and the roles of hormone signaling pathways in enhancing disease resistance. Furthermore, ten WKRY genes potentially associated with Xad resistance were identified[71]. To enhance the resistance of the susceptible A. andraeanum 'Tian Tang Fen' to Xad, the cephalosporin-based cutting peptide Shiva-1 was introduced into 'Tian Tang Fen'. The obtained transgenic plants exhibited improved resistance to bacterial leaf blight[72]. These findings highlight the potential for genetic modification and targeted interventions to enhance stress resistance in anthurium plants, offering a promising approach to mitigate the impact of adverse stresses in cultivation.

    • Anthurium is a widely cultivated ornamental plant of significant commercial value, with its market competitiveness sustained through the development of new cultivars exhibiting enhanced traits, including improved spathes (shape, color, and size), leaves (shape, color, and size), plant stature, fragrance, stress tolerance, and prolonged flowering duration. Currently, hybrid breeding remains the dominant method in the cultivation of new varieties of Anthurium andraeanum, with approximately 90% of mainstream varieties on the market being the result of hybridization.

    • Anthurium is a cross-pollinated plant with hermaphroditic and protogynous characteristics during floral development[13]. Due to its highly heterozygous genetic background, significant segregation occurs in the F1 generation, providing numerous opportunities for selection. Based on these characteristics, various potted and cut flower series have been developed through crossbreeding, featuring differences in spathe size (4−6 cm, 7−11 cm, 11−13 cm, 13−15 cm, 15−17 cm, 17−19 cm), spathe color (black, brown, green, orange, pink, purple, red, white, yellow), spathe shape (cupped, heart-shaped, mini, obake, standard), plant height (7−24 cm), and low-temperature tolerance (average, below average, excellent, good), among others. The commercialized anthurium varieties undergo a lot of steps, including target identification, parent selection, hybridization, F1 generation evaluation, tissue culture asexual reproduction, field evaluation, final selection, registration, and release. This process typically takes eight to 10 years. Some varieties are the result of multiple crosses or backcrosses, which can take up to 15 years to achieve, like A. 'White Lady', which is achieved through multiple interspecies hybridization [(A. andraeanum 'Uniwai' × A. lindenianum) × A. amnicola] × (A. andraeanum × A. antioquiense)[35,73].

      Hybrid breeding methods include intraspecific, interspecific, and intergeneric hybridization. Most commercial varieties are produced through intraspecific crosses, such as 'Xiao Jiao', 'Xia Yan', and 'Cherry Red', have gained market prominence due to the stability and efficiency of intraspecific hybridization (Table 2). Interspecific hybridization also plays a crucial role in cultivating new anthurium varieties. For example, Sheffer & Kamemoto used 57 anthurium species as materials for distant hybridization and formulated 1,529 combinations, ultimately obtaining 344 distant hybrids with a success rate of 22.5%[35,74]. Many anthurium cultivars are original from two or more native species, such as 'Pink Champion', 'White Lady', 'Centennial', and 'New Era', are the result of interspecific hybridization, highlighting its importance in expanding Anthurium diversity[75] (Table 3). While intergeneric hybridization has been explored, it often results in problems like infertility and abnormal growth, limiting its widespread application. However, some success has been achieved through techniques like embryo rescue technology, which has facilitated the creation of hybrids between different genera[76].

      Table 2.  Information of some reported intraspecific hybrids of A. andraeanum.

      Species/cultivars Parent materials Origin Ref.
      'Bai xue Gongzhu' 'Pink Champion' × 'Colorado' Guangzhou Flower Research Center, China MARA
      'Zhao Xia' 'Toscane' × 'Colorado' Guangzhou Flower Research Center, China MARA
      'Xu Ri' 'Pink Champion' × 'Fiesta' Guangzhou Flower Research Center, China MARA
      'Xiao Jiao' 'Texana' × 'Sierra' Guangzhou Flower Research Center, China [77]
      'Shuang Guan' 'Pink champion' × 'Orange champion' Guangzhou Flower Research Center, China [78]
      'Xia Yan' 'Arizona' × 'Dakota' Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, China [79]
      'Victory Flag' 'Tropical' × 'Choco' Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, China [80]
      'Ming nong Yue hua' 'Sempre' × 'Big Beauty' Sanming Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China [75]
      'Royal champion'a 'Dakota' × 'Sierra' the Netherlands MARA
      'Cherry Red'a 'Red hot' × 'Kozohara' Hawaii, USA MARA
      'Kapoho Welo' 'Acropolis' × 'Tropic Fire' Hawaii, USA [81]
      'Red hot' 'Southern Blush' × 'Lady Jane' Hawaii, USA [27]
      'Tropic', 'Sunrise' 'Anuenue' × 'Soga Orange' Obake' Hawaii, USA [23]
      'Apapane' UH931 × 'Tropic Fire' Hawaii, USA [23]
      'I'iwi' UH931 × 'Tropic Fire' Hawaii, USA [23]
      'Lē'ahi' UH931 × 'Blushing Bride' Hawaii, USA [23]
      a Indicates that the information about this variety comes from The International Gardening Association. MARA: The Science and Technology Development Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China (www.nybkjfzzx.cn/p_pzbh/sub_gg.aspx?n=21).

      Table 3.  Information of reported interspecific hybrids of A. andraeanum.

      A. Andraeanum cultivars Parent materials Origin Ref.
      'Southern Blush' A. andraeanum × A. amnicola × A. andraeanum 'Lady Jane' Hawaii [2426]
      'Hokuloa' A. antioquiense × A. andraeanum 'Tatsuta' Hawaii [23]
      'Manoa mist' A. antioquiense × A. andraeanum 'Marian Seefurth' Hawaii [23]
      'Sundial' (A. amnicola × A. andraeanum) × ((A. antioquense × (A. antioquense × A. andraeanum)) ×
      A. andraeanum 'Lady Jane')
      Hawaii [23]
      'Pink Champagne' A. andraeanum 'Anuenue' × A. amnicola the Netherlands [23]
      'New Era' A494 × A. andraeanum × A. antioquiense × pink UH507 Hawaii [23]
      'Blushing Bride' (A. andraeanum (pink) × A. antioquiense) × A. andraeanum Hawaii [23]
      'Maggie Inouye' ((Uniwai × A.kamemotoanum) × A.formosum) × A. amnicola Hawaii [23]
      'Princess Aiko' A. antioquiense × A. Andraeanum 'Tatsuta' Hawaii [23]
      'Electron' Unnamed seedling × seedling 94-4:(7-2:(3-1:(A. amnicola × A. andraeanum) ×
      4-1:(A. antioquense × 1-1:(A. antioquense × A. andraeanum)))) × A. andraeanum 'Lady Jane')
      Hawaii [23]
      'Mini Gem' 'ARCS' × A. amnicola Hawaii, [23]
      'Kalapana' 'Diamond Jubilee' × 'Paradise Pink' Hawaii, [23]
      'White Lady' (('Uniwai' × A. lindenianum) × A. amnicola)) × (A. andraeanum × A. antioquiense) Hawaii, [23]
      'Hilo Moon' 'Tropic Mist' × (A. antioquiense × 'Marian Seefurth') Hawaii [23]
      'Waimea' 'Paradise Pink' × (A. antioquiense × 'Marian Seefurth') Hawaii [23]

      The reproduction of newly acquired germplasm mainly relies on asexual reproduction, which preserves the desirable traits of the germplasm, ensuring its continuity and further utilization.

    • Molecular markers play a key role in A. Anthurium breeding, particularly in areas such as assisting with the selection of target traits, evaluating germplasm resources, and determining parental relationships. Effective molecular markers have been reported in flower color and fragrance breeding for the early screening of these traits in hybrid progeny. For example, Jiang constructed 10 flower color pools using 60 A. Anthurium resources and identified six molecular markers linked to flower color. Zhu used markers SSR10 and SSR126 for marker-assisted selection of red spathes in 96 progeny from the cross of A. 'Mystral' × A. 'Alabama', achieving accuracy rates of 75.9% and 71.9%, respectively[82]. Zhu also identified the fragrance-associated marker SSR27 and applied it to hybrid progeny populations from two different crosses, with accuracy rates of 87% and 69%, respectively[82].

      Molecular markers are increasingly used to assess the genetic diversity of Anthurium germplasm and to explore genetic relationships and variations among different varieties or wild species. This aids in identifying valuable gene resources and provides insights for selecting optimal hybrid parents. Bliss & Suzuki[20] attempted to distinguish various anthurium varieties using genome size as a differentiator. The findings suggested that genome sizes could reflect the species contributing to the pedigree of the cultivars but were inadequate for distinguishing genetic relationships between varieties[20].

      Molecular markers offer a more effective means of investigating genetic relationships. Isoenzymes, the earliest protein markers used in anthurium genotyping, exhibited limited variability and low polymorphism[83]. DNA markers such as microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSR) and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) have proven more effective. Wang & Chuang[84] used four SSR loci to classify 27 diverse genotypes into three main clusters. Srisamoot & Padsri[85] used 10 ISSR markers to assess genetic diversity among 26 cultivars, identifying significant genetic variation and high diversity. Their analysis, which revealed 122 bands with 113 polymorphic ones, resulted in an average polymorphism percentage of 91.64%, and clustered the cultivars into two main groups with a Cophenetic Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.92[85]. Khan & Pankajaksan[86] used RAPD markers to analyze the genetic similarity among 12 cultivars, finding that intra-clustering within the two major clusters reflected their genetic backgrounds. Wang et al.[87] utilized SRAP markers to analyze the genetic relationship among 33 cultivars and identified a considerable genetic diversity. The clustering patterns were closely linked to the color and morphology of the spathe. In contrast, other studies have reported inconsistencies between molecular markers and genetic diversity. For example, Souza Neto et al.[88] used seven RAPD and 17 ISSR markers to evaluate the genetic diversity of 20 anthurium cultivars revealing wide genetic divergence, but genotype clustering did not match the morphological data. Nowbuth et al.[7] evaluated the genetic variation among 24 cut-flower anthurium cultivars using RAPD markers and found low genetic variation, with clustering analysis showing no correlation with morphological traits.

      Additionally, molecular markers help identify the genetic relationships between parent plants, preventing issues like progeny decline caused by inbreeding. By analyzing genetic distance and gene complementarity between parents, molecular markers can also be used to predict heterosis. Molecular markers have been developed as a DNA fingerprinting technique (DFP) to confirm the phylogenetic relationships among morphologically similar potted cultivars. Ranamukhaarachchi et al.[18] used RAPD as a DFP tool to determine the phylogenetic relationships among nine morphologically similar anthurium potted cultivars. They successfully identified close genetic correlations and shared specific DNA bands between these varieties and three potential parent species. However, the DFP tool is primarily useful for confirming relationships among known cultivars and their potential parent species.

      Furthermore, researchers have constructed a genetic linkage map for Anthurium using molecular markers, facilitating more effective marker-assisted selection (MAS) and improving the process of hybrid parent selection. Venkat et al.[89] used a double-pseudo test cross-mapping strategy with RAPD, ISSR, and SRAP markers to create genetic linkage maps for two species, A. ornatum, and A. andreanum. The map for A. ornatum consisted of 10 linkage groups and a doublet spanning 1,233.5 cm length, incorporating a total of 85 markers. The map for A. andreanum consisted of 12 linkage groups covering 1,023.5 cm length with 78 markers. Another map for A.andraeanum based on SRAP markers and 94 F1 individuals from a 'Pink Champion' × 'Dakota' cross, consisted of 19 linkage groups covering 1,689.5 cm length with 254 markers[90].

      Currently, the limited genome information and insufficient research on genetic maps for crucial traits in anthurium hinder the rapid progress of the anthurium breeding industry. Hybrid breeding is still the primary method used, but integrating molecular marker-assisted selection could enable more efficient and accurate screening of target traits, thereby shortening the breeding period. Therefore, developing effective molecular markers and constructing detailed genetic maps offer significant potential to advance anthurium breeding.

    • In recent years, significant advancements have been made in biotechnology and related fields, leading to important progress in mutation breeding, ploidy breeding, and molecular breeding. Although these breeding methods are still in the research phase, each offers unique advantages and holds great potential. In the future, they are expected to play a pivotal role in the development of new varieties of A. andraeanum, warranting considerable attention and anticipation. Mutation breeding leverages physical, chemical, and other factors to induce heritable variations in A. andraeanum, creating opportunities to develop new varieties with distinct traits. Ploidy breeding, which alters the ploidy level of the plant's chromosomes, aims to produce varieties with superior growth characteristics and enhanced ornamental value. Meanwhile, molecular breeding employs advanced transgenic technologies to selectively improve specific traits of A. andraeanum.

    • Mutation breeding is a technique that induces genetic variation in plants by applying physical or chemical factors. This process typically involves selecting individuals with desirable traits from the mutated population to cultivate new varieties. In the case of anthurium, gamma ray radiation is commonly used as a physical mutagenesis method to generate new germplasm exhibiting novel traits such as dwarfism, distinctive spotted leaves, or enhanced stress resistance. Studies have indicated that different tissues of anthurium exhibit varying sensitivities to irradiation, with higher irradiation doses leading to more significant inhibition of the experimental material. Liang et al.[91] reported that the half-lethal dose of radiation for adventitious buds of anthurium ranged from 30 to 40 Gy, while for callus tissue, it was between 10 and 20 Gy. Similarly, Peng et al.[92] observed that the half-lethal dose of radiation for callus tissue was approximately 20−30 Gy, whereas for tissue culture seedlings, it ranged from 30−40 Gy. Researchers also noted that the regenerated plants following radiation exhibited stunted growth and slower development, with the degree of growth inhibition increasing with the radiation dose. Other radiation treatments have also been applied in anthurium mutation breeding. A137Cs (Caesium) source was utilized to apply γ radiation to different tissues of A. andreanum 'Nitta', including seeds, callus, and leaf explants[93]. Morphological changes were observed in the materials treated with 137Cs at a dose of 5 Gy, while 15 Gy was found to be lethal. Subsequently, comprehensive researches were conducted building upon the acquisition of mutants through mutagenesis. A. andreanum 'Angel' plants exposed to 10 Gy gamma radiation displayed the highest percentage of mosaic leaves when[94]. Furthermore, an effective amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker was then developed for differentiating irradiated clones in A. andreanum 'Angel'[94]. Additionally, mutants were successfully generated from petiole callus tissue of A. andreanum 'Sweet Heart' using a 1.5 Gy dose of 60Co treatment[82]. Cytological analysis of these mutants revealed various chromosomal variations, including bridges, micronuclei, fragments, and chromosomal hysteresis. Exposure of A. andreanum 'Alabama' callus to 30 Gy of 60Co radiation resulted in mutants with stable inheritance and notable changes in leaf color, leaf shape, and spathe color[95]. Researchers also developed random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) molecular markers to effectively distinguish between the mutants and their parent plants.

      These findings indicate that a preliminary physical mutation breeding technology system for anthurium has been established, with radiation proving effective in increasing the frequency of genetic variation compared to natural conditions. However, there have been no reports of anthurium varieties selected through this method being successfully integrated into commercial production.

    • Polyploid breeding involves using artificial or natural mutations to double the chromosome number in cells, aiming to create superior varieties with desired traits. In nature, Anthurium andreanum and related species are typically diploid (2n = 30). Cultivating polyploid anthuriums can enhance their ornamental value and environmental resistance. Current methods for inducing polyploidy in anthuriums include chemical induction and sexual hybridization, primarily aimed at developing new germplasm with extended flowering periods, larger flowers, and improved stress resistance.

      Colchicine is commonly used in chemical methods, targeting young explants, callus tissues, protocorms, clustered buds, and somatic embryo cells. In the 1950s and 1960s, Hawaiian researchers pioneered ploidy breeding for anthuriums, successfully using colchicine to double chromosomes[96]. Zhang et al. achieved up to a 45.5% tetraploid induction rate in leaf-induced callus tissue with 0.2 g·L−1 colchicine for 14 d[33]. Similarly, Tian et al. achieved the highest tetraploid induction rate of 17.5% by treating A. andreanum 'Alabama' leaf callus tissue with 0.2 g·L−1 colchicine for 15 d[97]. Aerial root regeneration clumps also exhibited the capability to produce polyploid plants, with a 63.3% induction rate achieved by subjecting them to 0.3% colchicine treatment for 7 h[98]. Additionally, other chemical inducers are also showed effective in inducing anthurium polyploidy. Chu et al. found that sulfamethoxazole, fluralin, and colchicine can induce polyploidy in tissue-cultured A. andreanum 'Dakota' seedlings. They achieved induction rates of 48.72% with 15 mg·L−1 sulfamethoxazole for 7 d, 71.79% with 100 mg·L−1 fluralin for 5 d, and 62.96% with 0.5% colchicine for 5 d[99].

      Sexual hybridization, which crosses different species or chromosomal groups, also produces polyploid offspring with desirable traits. Triploid varieties such as potted anthurium varieties 'Guifei' and 'Feizixiao', developed from tetraploid A. andreanum 'Pink Champion' and diploid 'Tropical', exhibit enhanced stress resistance and superior characteristics compared to their parent varieties.

      Haploid breeding is also an important technique in ploidy breeding, allowing for the production of homozygous plants with specific desired traits. This process involves several steps: haploid induction, chromosome doubling, and the selection of superior homozygous plants. In the case of A. andraeanum, a specialized technical system utilizing plant tissue culture has been developed to induce haploid plants from anthers[100]. Winarto & Teixeira da Silva[101] developed an efficient anther or half-anther culture system for A. andraeanum 'Tropical', by optimizing various steps such as anther separation timing, sterilization methods, and callus induction. They also studied the ploidy levels of the anther cultures and explored the relationship between haploid production and genotype[101116]. Their study revealed morphological and cytological variations in in vitro plantlets and acclimatized ex-vitro plants from anthurium half-anther culture[102,103]. These variations included differences in plant size, peduncle length, spathe position, bud type and number, spathe and spadix color, and spadix length. Cytological variations showed different ploidy levels: 23%−29% haploids, 5%−10% aneuploids, 56%−69% diploids, and 3%−4% triploids[103]. The obtained haploid plants were then treated with colchicine to develop doubled haploid (DH) plants, with a 65% success rate using 0.05% colchicine for 10 d, and an 80% success rate using 0.25% colchicine for 7 d[106]. The successful establishment of haploid cultures from A. andraeanum 'Tropical' enabled the development of similar techniques for other cultivars, such as 'Carnaval', 'Casino', 'Laguna', and 'Safari'[101,104107].

      Despite these advancements, the random nature of haploid breeding still presents challenges in targeted trait improvement and no new A. andraeanum varieties have been reported through haploid breeding so far.

    • Transgenic breeding involves introducing exogenous genes or modifying the expression of endogenous genes to achieve specific traits, offering advantages over traditional breeding methods by enabling rapid, stable, and targeted development of new varieties or species. However, in A. anthurium, genetic modification is still in the stage of system establishment and optimization. As early as 1991, Kuehnle et al. began exploring Agrobacterium-mediated transformation systems for anthurium using various explants, including internodes, leaves, petioles, and roots[117,118]. Their efforts led to the successful introduction of neo and att genes into A. andraeanum 'Anuenue' using internodes and roots[119,120]. Subsequently, other reporter and functional genes were transferred into different anthurium cultivars such as 'Arizona', 'Pink Champion', 'Marian Seefurth', and others (Table 4). To date, there have been more than 20 reports on the genetic transformation and transgenic breeding of anthurium, attempting to improve traits like color, flowering period, abiotic resistance, and biotic resistance[121,122] (Table 4). The explants used included etiolated internodes, leaves, petiole, roots, etiolated shoots, callus, and somatic embryos. The key transformation techniques included Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, pollen tube pathway, and gene guns.

      Table 4.  Transgenic research on anthurium.

      Species/cultivars Explants Transformation methods Transgene Promoter Transformation results Ref.
      A. andraeanum Etiolated internodes, leaf, petiole Agrobacterium No data No data Tumors formed on etiolated internodes (32%), green leaves (2%), petiole explants (3%) [17]
      A. andraeanum, A. lindenianum, A. kamemotoanum Roots Agrobacterium nptII, att, uidA CaMV35S; NOS No data [118]
      A. andraeanum, 'Rudolph', 'UH1060' Etiolated internodes Agrobacterium nptII, att, uidA CaMV35S; NOS Western analysis confirmed the expression of attacin protein in callus induced from laminae of regenerated kanamycin resistant 'Rudolph' plantlets [119]
      A. andraeanum 'Anuenue' Roots Agrobacterium att, neo CaMV35S; NOS 1.3% [120]
      A. andraeanum, A. lindenianum, A. kamemotoanum Etiolated internodes Agrobacterium nptII, uidA CaMV35S; NO No data [123]
      A. andraeanum 'Paradise Pink', Hybrid 'Tropic Flame' Etiolated internodes Agrobacterium Shiva-1 (with PR1 secretion signal) Double CaMV35S Stable (several-year-long) insertion and expression of Shiva-1 gene in the transgenic lines by PCR, RT-PCR and ELISA [124]
      A. andraeanum 'Marian Seefurth', A. andraeanum 'Paradise Pink' Etiolated shoots or leaf Agrobacterium Gene of Modified rice cysteine protease (D86) No data No data [125]
      A. Andraeanum 'Arizona' Leaf Agrobacterium PhCHS CaMV35S; NOS No data [126]
      A. andraeanum 'Arizona'; A. andraeanum 'Atlantic' Petiole, etiolated internodes Agrobacterium Gene gun LycB CaMV35S; NOS No data [127]
      A. andraeanum 'T × P'; A. andraeanum 'Arizona' Callus Agrobacterium LycB CaMV35S; NOS 3.4% [128]
      A. Andraeanum 'Arizona' Petiole Agrobacterium AtFT, PttFT1 Double CaMV35S Eight cell lines of AtFT transformed plants and one cell line of PttFT1 transformed plantsin the transgenic lines by PCR and GFP [129]
      A. Andraeanum Red varieties Leaf, callus Agrobacterium AaAMP CaMV35S; NOS Insertion by PCR, PCR sequencing. [130]
      A. andraeanum Callus Agrobacterium CBF1 CaMV35S; NOS No data (resistant healing tissues showed the highest survival and differentiation rates of 48.65% and 11.46%) [131]
      A. andraeanum 'Pink Champion';
      A. andraeanum 'Robino Champion'
      Leaf Agrobacterium AtCBF3;
      PaFT
      CaMV35S; NOS AtCBF3: one transgenic plants were obtained; PaFT: 1 transgenic plants were obtained [132]
      A. andraeanum 'Pink Champion' Leaf, root, callus Agrobacterium CBF3 CaMV35S; NOS No data [133]
      A. andraeanum 'Sonate' Leaf, callus Agrobacterium DREB No data 11 transgenic plants were obtained [134]
      A. andraeanum 'Pink Champagne' Leaf Agrobacterium gfp, nptII CaMV35S; NOS Seven transgenic plants were obtained [135]
      A. andraeanum 'Arizona' Callus Agrobacterium API-A, API-B, gfp, nptII CaMV35S; NO 1.71% [136]
      A. andraeanum 'Marian Seefurth' A. andraeanum 'Midori' Emobryogenic callus Agrobacterium NPR1, nptII, NPRI, att, T4 lysozyme, Cowpeat rypsin Inhibitor genes CaMV35S; NOS Up to nine selected lines/100 mg fresh weight of callus (for T4 lysozyme) [137]
      A. Andraeanum 'Local Pink',
      A. andraeanum 'Pierrot',
      A. andraeanum 'Lydia', Sonata',
      A. andraeanum 'KAIRI2010',
      A. andraeanum 'Honduras',
      A. andraeanum 'Mirjam',
      A. andraeanum 'Tropical'
      Leaf discs to test; cultivar effects; leaf, spathe and
      spadixto test explant and developmental stage effects
      Agrobacterium Gus plus with rice glycine-Rich protein signal peptide sequence No data Transient transformation Efficiency varied with anthurium cultivars from 0% ('Tropical') up to 83 ± 1.05% ('Local Pink') before protocol's optimization.
      After optimization, it reached 100%. both in 'Local Pink' and 'KAIRI2010' (before optimatization it was
      below 5%)
      [138]
      A. andraeanum 'Marian Seefurth' Lamina somatic embryos and roots Bombardment uidA Ubiquitin 2, Actin 1, Cytochrome C1 from rice
      Ubiquitin 1 from
      maize; CaMV35S
      No data [139]

      However, research on transgenic anthurium has primarily resulted in plants capable of detecting exogenously inserted genes through molecular biology methods, with no significant observable phenotypic changes reported so far. This lack of phenotypic change may be due to the minor effects of individual genes or unforeseen issues arising from the long growth cycles of the plants.

    • A. andraeanum is a tropical ornamental plant of great economic importance. This article provides a review of the research progress on the origin, germplasm resources, genetic resources, and breeding methods of anthurium. Currently, there is limited research on anthurium, revealing many areas that require further exploration.

    • Currently, cross-breeding is the primary method for developing commercial A. andraeanum varieties. However, commercial breeding efforts are often driven by consumer preferences and commercial interests, leading to overly concentrated breeding objectives and a narrow range of parental selection. As a result, many new varieties exhibit homogeneity, particularly in traits such as flower color (especially red), petal structure, and flower size. This focus on a few desired characteristics has led to a lack of diversity in recently launched varieties. Moreover, breeding institutions often keep their parent selection and breeding technologies confidential, hindering rapid advancements in new variety development.

      The Anthurium genus, with over 1,000 species across 18 sections, offers a rich gene pool for breeding. Species of A. andraeanum from different regions have developed unique genetic resources, such as stress-resistance genes and ornamental traits, through long-term adaptation to their environments. Integrating these genes into cultivated varieties could yield new characteristics and help prevent further homogenization.

      Marker-assisted breeding can play a crucial role in improving genetic diversity. By analyzing genetic markers, breeders can select parents with distinct genetic profiles, thereby increasing genetic variation in offspring and reducing homogeneity. To address this, breeding efforts should focus on broadening parental selection, expanding breeding populations, and introducing new traits through distant hybridization. The use of effective marker-assisted selection can help shorten the breeding cycle and support the development of A. andraeanum varieties with greater diversity and new application values.

    • In the field of A. andraeanum breeding, various techniques have been explored, but methods such as mutation and ploidy breeding show limited efficiency and high randomness in producing ideal varieties. In mutation breeding, when targeting specific traits (e.g., flower color) using similar mutagenic conditions (e.g., fixed doses of chemical mutagens), the resulting mutants often exhibit similar changes. To broaden the variation spectrum and uncover more valuable traits, new mutagenesis techniques, such as space mutagenesis and ion beam implantation, should be further explored. Combining these methods with modern biotechnologies like genome-wide selection can enable early and efficient screening of mutagenized populations, accelerating the development of superior varieties.

      Transgenic breeding holds great potential to advance A. andraeanum breeding. However, most current transgenic experiments have not led to significant phenotypic changes, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate target genes. Genome sequencing and QTL analysis will enhance the efficiency of identifying suitable genes for transgenic breeding. Additionally, challenges such as complex genetic backgrounds, long transformation cycles, and low transformation efficiencies remain. The choice of suitable receptor materials is crucial and requires further exploration. A promising solution to these challenges is the efficient somatic embryogenesis liquid culture system recently developed by Wang et al.[140], which addresses issues of slow proliferation and low transformation rates. When combined with CRISPR gene editing, this system offers the potential for precise gene modification, leading to the creation of novel germplasms and even new varieties.

    • The lack of comprehensive genomic information has hindered the analysis of breeding and trait regulation mechanisms in A. andraeanum. Although the predicted genome size is 4.7 Gb, its complex genetic background presents significant challenges. To address this, sequencing local species and re-sequencing cultivated varieties will be more effective. Detailed genomic information is crucial for gene mapping, developing molecular markers, and understanding the genetic basis of key traits, which will aid in breeding new varieties.

      Additionally, genomic data from other species in the Araceae family, such as Zantedeschia elliottiana[141], Amorphophallus konjac[142], Colocasia esculenta[143], and Pinellia ternata[144], can provide valuable insights for solving biological problems in anthurium.

      The integration of multi-omics technologies, including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, can offer a more comprehensive analysis of genetic information. This combined approach can systematically uncover the molecular regulatory networks behind key biological processes like growth, flower color formation, and stress resistance. With this vast molecular data, breeders can identify key genes and regulatory elements linked to target traits, enabling efficient molecular breeding.

      A. andraeanum exhibits unique traits such as its colorful and varied spathes, inflorescence colors, reproductive isolation, prolonged juvenile period, and extended ornamental period. Studying the mechanisms behind these features using interdisciplinary methods from horticulture, biology, genetics, and molecular biology can provide valuable insights for enhancing these traits.

    • Strengthening international cooperation and exchanges in anthurium breeding, facilitating the exchange of resources, technologies, and expertise, and improving the international variety registration and protection system are crucial for advancing the development of anthurium breeding.

      • This research was funded by Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2022B0202080004), Project of Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (202206010136), Project of Rural Revitalization Strategy of Guangdong Province (2024-NPY-01-005), Project of Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (23106336) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515010401).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conception and supervision: Wei Q, Zhou X; data collection: Liu Y, Cai T, Guo H; image collection and processing: Xia Q, Yuan Y, Xie L; manuscript suggestions: Yi M, Su Q, Zhang Z, Zeng R; draft manuscript preparation: Liu Y, Wei Q, Cai T; manuscript reviewing and editing: Wei Q, Zhou X. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (4) References (144)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Liu Y, Cai T, Su Q, Yi M, Xia Q, et al. 2025. The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e003 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0002
    Liu Y, Cai T, Su Q, Yi M, Xia Q, et al. 2025. The origin, germplasm resources, and breeding of Anthurium andraeanum: an overview. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e003 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0002

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return