Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment

  • # Authors contributed equally: Yaohui Gao, Ruiqing Zhang

More Information
  • Chrysanthemum naktongense (C. naktongense) is widely distributed in northern China, and has high biomass and strong resistance. Lanthanum is a nonessential heavy metal element in plants, and it affects C. naktongense growth and development at high concentrations. Roots are important organs in C. naktongense in terms of plant response to lanthanum treatment. The molecular mechanisms of C. naktongense root response to lanthanum treatment over different durations have not been clarified. The whole roots of C. naktongense were sampled after lanthanum treatment for 0, 24, and 72 h. A total of 5,451 differentially expressed genes (1,954 DEGs upregulated and 1,943 downregulated), were identified via RNA-seq. GO enrichment analysis of the top 20 genes revealed that many upregulated DEGs related to biological processes such as secondary metabolic processes and hormone metabolic processes were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched. The concentration analysis results of the top 20 KEGG pathways revealed that many of the upregulated DEGs that were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched were related to the plant hormone signal transduction pathway. This may be the key to root response to lanthanum treatment. Furthermore, we identified and analyzed 16 CnHsp70s by bioinformatics, the results of qRT-PCR and RNA-seq indicated numerous Hsp70 genes were upregulated under the two durations of treatment, and these genes can serve as good candidates for lanthanum-enriching genes. This study presents a new molecular mechanism by which C. naktongense responds to lanthanum treatment, laying a foundation for the targeted breeding of ornamental flowers in lanthanum-containing soil.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Primers for qPCR.
    Supplementary Tables S2 TR-24vs.CK-0.merge.KEGG enrichment.
    Supplementary Tables S3 TR-72vs.CK-0.merge.KEGG_enrichment.
    Supplementary Table S4 KEGG pathway co-enriched by upregulated DEGs after lanthanum treatment for 24 h and 72 h.
    Supplementary Table S5 The DEGs significantly upregulated in TR-24 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs CK-0 in each pathway (a total of 39 DEGs).
    Supplementary Fig. S1 Expression heat maps of 16 CmHsp70 genes treated with lanthanum for 24 h and 72 h.
  • [1]

    Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS. 2024. Addressing lanthanum toxicity in plants: sources, uptake, accumulation, and mitigation strategies. Science of The Total Environment 2024:172560

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172560

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chen W, Wang Z, Gong X, Sun B, Liu Y, et al. 2017. Substance flow analysis of rare earth lanthanum in China. Materials Science Forum 898:2455−63

    doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.898.2455

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yu X, Wei G, Song Y, Yu K. 2021. Potential role of mycorrhizae combined with Pinus tabuliformis in repairing soil contaminated by lanthanum and cerium. Research Square 00:1−11

    doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-515337/v1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ben Y, Cheng M, Liu Y, Wang L, Yang Q, et al. 2023. The stimulatory effect and mechanism of low-dose lanthanum on soybean leaf cells. Journal of Hazardous Materials 441:129924

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129924

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Liu Y, Zhang J. 2022. Lanthanum promotes bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) roots growth by improving root activity, photosynthesis and respiration. Plants 11(3):382

    doi: 10.3390/plants11030382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Ozturk M, Metin M, Altay V, Prasad MNV, Gul A, et al. 2023. Role of rare earth elements in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 41:345−68

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-023-01369-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jiang D, Gao W, Chen G. 2023. Toxic effects of lanthanum(III) on photosynthetic performance of rice seedlings: combined chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplast structure and thylakoid membrane protein assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 267:115627

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115627

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Song K, Gao J, Li S, Sun Y, Sun H, et al. 2021. Experimental and theoretical study of the effects of rare earth elements on growth and chlorophyll of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedling. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:731838

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.731838

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hadizadeh H, Samiei L, Shakeri A. 2022. Chrysanthemum, an ornamental genus with considerable medicinal value: a comprehensive review. South African Journal of Botany 144:23−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2021.09.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Kotelnikova A, Fastovets I, Rogova O, Volkov DS. 2020. La, Ce and Nd in the soil-plant system in a vegetation experiment with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 206:111193

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111193

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Xue Z, Chen Z, Wang Y, Sun W. 2023. Proteomic analysis reveals the association between the pathways of glutathione and α-Linolenic acid metabolism and Lanthanum accumulation in tea plants. Molecules 28(3):1124

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28031124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jamla M, Khare T, Joshi S, Patil S, Penna S, et al. 2021. Omics approaches for understanding heavy metal responses and tolerance in plants. Current Plant Biology 27:100213

    doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100213

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Rhaman MS, Imran S, Rauf F, Khatun M, Baskin CC, et al. 2021. Seed priming with phytohormones: an effective approach for the mitigation of abiotic stress. Plants 10(1):37

    doi: 10.3390/plants10010037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Krishnamurthy A, Rathinasabapathi B. 2013. Auxin and its transport play a role in plant tolerance to arsenite-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant, Cell & Environment 36(10):1838−49

    doi: 10.1111/pce.12093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Dai H, Wei S, Pogrzeba M, Rusinowski S, Krzyżak J, et al. 2020. Exogenous jasmonic acid decreased Cu accumulation by alfalfa and improved its photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant system. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 190:110176

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kocaman A. 2023. Effects of foliar application of abscisic acid on antioxidant content, phytohormones in strawberry shoots, and translocation of various heavy metals. Scientia Horticulturae 314:111943

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111943

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Berka M, Kopecká R, Berková V, Brzobohatý B, Černý M. 2022. Regulation of heat shock proteins 70 and their role in plant immunity. Journal of Experimental Botany 73(7):1894−909

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab549

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Liu J, Pang X, Cheng Y, Yin Y, Zhang Q, et al. 2018. The Hsp70 gene family in Solanum tuberosum: genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression patterns. Scientific Reports 8(1):16628

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34878-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu M, Bian Z, Shao M, Feng Y, Ma W, et al. 2024. Expression analysis of the apple HSP70 gene family in abiotic stress and phytohormones and expression validation of candidate MdHSP70 genes. Scientific Reports 14(1):23975

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73368-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Cho EK, Hong CB. 2006. Over-expression of tobacco NtHSP70-1 contributes to drought-stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports 25:349−58

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0093-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Imran Q, Falak N, Hussain A, Mun BG, Yun BW. 2021. Abiotic stress in plants; stress perception to molecular response and role of biotechnological tools in stress resistance. Agronomy 11(8):1579

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081579

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Shang X, Xu W, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Li Z, et al. 2023. Transcriptome analysis revealed the mechanism of Luciobarbus capito (L. capito) adapting high salinity: antioxidant capacity, heat shock proteins, immunity. Marine Pollution Bulletin 192:115017

    doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen L, Li C, Zhang J, Li Z, Zeng Q, et al. 2024. Physiological and transcriptome analyses of Chinese cabbage in response to drought stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23:2255−69

    doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li Q, Cai Y, Gu L, Yu X, Wang Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptome reveals molecular mechanism of cabbage response to low temperature stress and functional study of BoPYL8 gene. Scientia Horticulturae 323:112523

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zu M, Qiu S, Qian Y, Tao J, Zhao D. 2024. Transcriptome sequencing provides insights into high-temperature-induced leaf senescence in herbaceous peony. Agriculture 14(4):574

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture14040574

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen P, Chen T, Li Z, Jia R, Luo D, et al. 2020. Transcriptome analysis revealed key genes and pathways related to cadmium-stress tolerance in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Industrial Crops and Products 158:112970

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wang C, He M, Shi W, Wong J, Cheng T, et al. 2011. Toxicological effects involved in risk assessment of rare earth lanthanum on roots of Vicia faba L. seedlings. Journal of Environmental Sciences 23(10):1721−28

    doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60598-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Grosjean N, Blaudez D, Chalot M, Flayac J, Gross EM, et al. 2024. Rare earth elements perturb root architecture and ion homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Hazardous Materials 468:133701

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology 29:644−52

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sullivan DK, Min KH, Hjörleifsson KE, Luebbert L, Holley G, et al. 2023. kallisto, bustools, and kb-python for quantifying bulk, single-cell, and single-nucleus RNA-seq. BioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2023.11.21.568164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658−59

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15:550

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Yu G, Wang L, Han Y, He Q. 2012. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 16(5):284−87

    doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kang S, Guo C, Xue C, Ma C, Mu H, et al. 2022. Toxic effects of two representative rare earth elements (La and Gd) on Danio rerio based on transcriptome analysis. Toxics 10(9):519

    doi: 10.3390/toxics10090519

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang Y, Nie M, Wang Y, Hu X, Ding W, et al. 2020. Transcriptome analysis of wheat roots in response to heavy metal Pb stress. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences 49(6):8−15

    doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2020.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Kang Y, Yao Y, Liu Y, Shi M, Zhang W, et al. 2023. Exogenous Glutathione enhances tolerance of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to cadmium stress by regulating the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoid and the signal transduction of plant hormones. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 10(1):24

    doi: 10.1186/s40538-023-00400-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhang S, Bao Q, Huang Y, Han N. 2023. Exogenous plant hormones alleviate As stress by regulating antioxidant defense system in Oryza sativa L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:6454−65

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22627-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Rahman S, Li Y, Hussain S, Hussain B, Riaz L, et al. 2023. Role of phytohormones in heavy metal tolerance in plants: a review. Ecological Indicators 146:109844

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109844

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Fattorini L, Ronzan M, Piacentini D, Della Rovere F, De Virgilio C, et al. 2017. Cadmium and arsenic affect quiescent centre formation and maintenance in Arabidopsis thaliana post-embryonic roots disrupting auxin biosynthesis and transport. Environmental and Experimental Botany 144:37−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Wang R, Wang J, Zhao L, Yang S, Song Y. 2015. Impact of heavy metal stresses on the growth and auxin homeostasis of Arabidopsis seedlings. BioMetals 28:123−32

    doi: 10.1007/s10534-014-9808-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhang J, Diao F, Hao B, Xu L, Jia B, et al. 2023. Multiomics reveals Claroideoglomus etunicatum regulates plant hormone signal transduction, photosynthesis and La compartmentalization in maize to promote growth under La stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 262:115128

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Raza A, Charagh S, Zahid Z, Mubarik MS, Javed R, et al. 2021. Jasmonic acid: a key frontier in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports 40(8):1513−41

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02614-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhao S, Ma Q, Xu X, Li G, Hao L. 2016. Tomato jasmonic acid-deficient mutant spr2 seedling response to cadmium stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 35:603−10

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9563-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Lei G, Sun L, Sun Y, Zhu X, Li G, et al. 2020. Jasmonic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis via suppression of cadmium uptake and translocation. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62(2):218−27

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12801

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Müller M, Munné-Bosch S. 2021. Hormonal impact on photosynthesis and photoprotection in plants. Plant Physiology 185:1500−22

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaa119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Liu Y, Tao Q, Li J, Guo X, Luo J, et al. 2021. Ethylene-mediated apoplastic barriers development involved in cadmium accumulation in root of hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. Journal of Hazardous Materials 403:123729

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123729

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Hu B, Deng F, Chen G, Chen X, Gao W, et al. 2020. Evolution of abscisic acid signaling for stress responses to toxic metals and metalloids. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:909

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00909

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang Y, Xing M, Gao X, Wu M, Liu F, et al. 2023. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal that phytohormone pathways and glutathione metabolism are involved in the arsenite toxicity response in tomatoes. Science of The Total Environment 899:165676

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165676

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Huang TL, Nguyen QTT, Fu SF, Lin CY, Chen YC, et al. 2012. Transcriptomic changes and signalling pathways induced by arsenic stress in rice roots. Plant Molecular Biology 80:587−608

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9969-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Yin M, Hu R, Song A, Guan Z, Chen F, et al. 2023. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of HSP70 gene family in Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium under heat stress. Horticulturae 9(2):238

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9020238

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Shaheen S, Majeed Z, Mahmood Q. 2023. The assessment of metal resistance through the expression of Hsp-70 and HO-1 proteins in giant reed. International Journal of Plant Biology 14(3):687−700

    doi: 10.3390/ijpb14030051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Jiang C, Bi Y, Zhang R, Feng S. 2020. Expression of RcHSP70, heat shock protein 70 gene from Chinese rose, enhances host resistance to abiotic stresses. Scientific Reports 10(1):2445

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58745-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Abbas M, Li Y, Elbaiomy RG, Yan K, Ragauskas AJ, et al. 2022. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of SlHsp70 gene family in Solanum lycopersicum revealed higher expression of SlHsp70-11 in roots under Cd2+ stress. Frontiers in Bioscience 27(6):186

    doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2706186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Gao Y, Zhang R, Xu N, Song Y, Chen S, et al. 2025. Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e008 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0004
    Gao Y, Zhang R, Xu N, Song Y, Chen S, et al. 2025. Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e008 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0004

Figures(6)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(178) PDF downloads(54)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment

Ornamental Plant Research  5 Article number: e008  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Chrysanthemum naktongense (C. naktongense) is widely distributed in northern China, and has high biomass and strong resistance. Lanthanum is a nonessential heavy metal element in plants, and it affects C. naktongense growth and development at high concentrations. Roots are important organs in C. naktongense in terms of plant response to lanthanum treatment. The molecular mechanisms of C. naktongense root response to lanthanum treatment over different durations have not been clarified. The whole roots of C. naktongense were sampled after lanthanum treatment for 0, 24, and 72 h. A total of 5,451 differentially expressed genes (1,954 DEGs upregulated and 1,943 downregulated), were identified via RNA-seq. GO enrichment analysis of the top 20 genes revealed that many upregulated DEGs related to biological processes such as secondary metabolic processes and hormone metabolic processes were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched. The concentration analysis results of the top 20 KEGG pathways revealed that many of the upregulated DEGs that were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched were related to the plant hormone signal transduction pathway. This may be the key to root response to lanthanum treatment. Furthermore, we identified and analyzed 16 CnHsp70s by bioinformatics, the results of qRT-PCR and RNA-seq indicated numerous Hsp70 genes were upregulated under the two durations of treatment, and these genes can serve as good candidates for lanthanum-enriching genes. This study presents a new molecular mechanism by which C. naktongense responds to lanthanum treatment, laying a foundation for the targeted breeding of ornamental flowers in lanthanum-containing soil.

    • Lanthanum (La) is the second most abundant rare earth element. Owing to improper mining of rare earth minerals and improper disposal of rare earth waste, lanthanum is overused and overenriched in soils[1]. The Inner Mongolia region of China is one of the primary sources of light rare earth elements[2]. In recent years, extensive mining activities have led to a significant enrichment of rare earth elements, including lanthanum[3]. Many studies have shown that lanthanum at low concentrations can promote the growth of plants[4]. A study showed that lanthanum at low concentrations increased the root activity of bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) and improved respiration and photosynthesis in bahia grass, thus promoting root growth[5]. However, when the concentration of lanthanum in the soil is excessively high, growth and development in plants is inhibited[6], and an increase in soil lanthanum concentration decreases the chlorophyll level and photosynthetic capacity of rice[7]. Another study showed that the stem length of Medicago sativa L. plants treated with 20 mM La was significantly shorter than that of control plants[8].

      Wild Chrysanthemum is a perennial herb with both ornamental and medicinal value and strong stress resistance[9]. Chrysanthemum naktongense, a type of wild chrysanthemum with high biomass, is widely distributed in Northeast China and has strong stress resistance. Previous studies have shown that the content of rare earth elements in plant roots is greater than that in the aboveground parts. For example, Hordeum vulgare[10], and tea trees[11] have higher contents of rare earth elements in their roots than in their leaves and stems. In addition, our previous work confirmed that the roots of Chrysanthemum naktongense are strongly enriched with La. However, few studies have investigated the molecular mechanism by which plant roots respond to lanthanum treatment. An in-depth exploration of the differential gene expression patterns and response pathways of Chrysanthemum naktongense roots under lanthanum treatment can help in the cultivation of lanthanum-enriching varieties of this plant. Lanthanum at excessively high concentrations affects the growth and development of Chrysanthemum naktongense. Plant hormones are involved in the intrinsic mechanisms by which plants respond to abiotic stress, and they usually play an important role in regulating plant physiological and biochemical mechanisms by stimulating signal transduction pathways[12,13]. Studies have shown that endogenous auxin can increase the resistance of AUX1 mutant seedlings to arsenic and that auxin translocation and signaling mechanisms play a role in mediating plant resistance to heavy metal stress and in root development[14]. Dai et al. reported that exogenous jasmonic acid decreased Cu accumulation in alfalfa and improved antioxidant system activity[15]. Kocaman reported that the application of exogenous leaf ABA (μmol·L−1 40) limited the transport of Cd, Cr, Hg, and Sn to strawberry leaves[16].

      Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) exhibits a high degree of sequence conservation and is one of the most extensively studied heat shock proteins[17]. It plays a crucial role in plants' resistance to abiotic stresses such as heat, salinity, and drought.[18] Studies have indicated that plant hormones can regulate the expression of Hsp70. The promoter regions of the apple (Malus pumila) Hsp70 gene family members contain a plethora of plant hormone and stress-responsive elements; under treatment with methyl jasmonate (MeJA), gibberellin (GA3), and abscisic acid (ABA), the expression levels of MdHsp70-23, MdHsp70-26, and MdHsp70-45 are the highest[19]. In potato (Solanum tuberosum), StHsp70-7 exhibits increased expression under ABA and gibberellin (GA3) treatment, while StHsp70-17 shows upregulated expression in response to ABA, GA3, and salicylic acid (SA) treatments[18]. In tobacco, ABA treatment induces NtHsp70-1, enhancing the plant's stress tolerance[20]. However, the functions of Hsp70 in many plants, including Chrysanthemum naktongense, remain to be determined.

      In recent years, high-throughput sequencing has been widely used in molecular biological research to identify key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to plant response to abiotic stress[21]. The stressors include salt[22], drought[23], low temperatures[24], high temperatures[25], and heavy metals[26]. Lanthanum is a heavy metal[27], and studies have explored the molecular response mechanisms of plants treated with lanthanum through transcriptome analysis. For example, lanthanum at a low concentration improved the root activities of bahia grass[5]. A combination of transcriptome and ionomic analyses revealed a fundamental pattern in Arabidopsis in response to the uptake and toxicity of the rare earth elements lanthanum and ytterbium[28].

      To study the gene expression of the root system of Chrysanthemum naktongense treated with lanthanum, identify the regulatory genes associated with lanthanum treatment, and propose a response mechanism, we conducted transcriptome sequencing via an Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform. This is the first report on the transcriptome sequencing of Chrysanthemum naktongense, and the results provide insights into the gene expression patterns and pathways of Chrysanthemum naktongense in response to lanthanum treatment.

    • The seeds of Chrysanthemum naktongense used in the test were collected from Chunkun Mountain (110° E, 41° N), Guyang County, Baotou city, Inner Mongolia, China. The seeds were soaked and disinfected with 5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, washed with distilled water 5−6 times until clean, and then placed evenly on two layers of infiltrated filter paper in a glass Petri dish. After germination, the plants were transferred to nutrient-rich soil that was not contaminated with heavy metals for culture. After two months (seedling to the 7 true leaf stage), plants exhibiting consistent and healthy growth were selected for lanthanum treatment. LaCl3, a pure reagent, was employed as the lanthanum source. The samples were divided into three groups according to treatment duration: 0 h (control group CK-0), 24 h (TR-24), and 72 h (TR-72), and three biological replicates were included in both the treatment groups and the control group. The concentration of La3+ was set to 100 mg·L−1; this concentration was selected based on early screening by our research group (under the premise of maintaining normal growth in Chrysanthemum naktongense and yielding the highest antioxidant system index). At the same time, the whole root system was sampled, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for later use.

    • A total of about 1 g of Chrysanthemum naktongense root was preserved in liquid nitrogen and ground into a powder. Total RNA was extracted with a TRIzol reagent. The concentration and purity of total RNA were determined with a NanoDrop2000 instrument. The integrity of total RNA was determined via agarose gel electrophoresis. RIN values were obtained via an Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit. The total RNA that met standards was used to construct a library of nine samples. High-throughput sequencing was conducted at Beijing Kaitai Ming Mirror Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).

    • First, the original reads sequenced via Illumina (Illumina Novaseq 6000) were treated to remove reads with contamination, high unknown base N content (> 5%), and low quality. High-quality clean reads were subsequently obtained. Trinity[29] was then used for de novo assembly, Kallisto[30] software was used to estimate the expression levels of the assembled transcripts, and an expression level FPKM below 1 was selected as the threshold. Low-expression transcripts were filtered out, and only transcripts with the highest expression levels of a gene were retained, representing the genetic signature. This reduced false positive results due to assembly. Then, CD-hit-est[31] was used for cluster analysis of the above results, and only one gene with high similarity was retained. The main parameters for CD-hit-est were -c0.98-p1-d0-b3-T10. The GC content and the Q20 and Q30 data were also evaluated.

    • The transcriptome data of the root system of plants treated with lanthanum for 24 h (TR-24), and 72 h (TR-72) were compared with those of the control group (CK-0). DESeq2 software was used for differential expression gene analysis, and |logFC| (FC: fold change) > 1 and p < 0.05 were selected as the thresholds for differential gene screening[32]. The R cluster Profiler package[33] was used for functional annotation of Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were carried out for differentially expressed unigenes. The real-time fluorescence-based quantitative differential gene primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The annotation results were visualized on the online cloud platform of Beijing Kaitai Spiegel Biological Co., Ltd. (https://kaitai.cloud/all).

    • Identification and bioinformatics analysis of Hsp70 family members in Chrysanthemum naktongense were conducted using the online software InterPro (www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro) to search for and download the conserved Hsp70 protein domain (accession number: PF00012). Local software HMMER 3.0 was employed to search for potential Hsp70 protein sequences within the Chrysanthemum naktongense transcriptome protein sequences. Additionally, online tools SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de), Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org), and NCBI-CDD (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd) were utilized to identify conserved domains in the Chrysanthemum naktongense Hsp70 protein sequences and to eliminate redundant sequences. The physicochemical properties of the aforementioned protein sequences were predicted using the online software Expasy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam). Subcellular localization of the proteins was predicted using the online software WoLF PSORT (https://psort.hgc.jp). Hsp70 gene sequences from Arabidopsis and rice were downloaded from the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (www.arabidopsis.org), and the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu), respectively. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0 with the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method, and a bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replicates using pairwise gap deletion mode. The phylogenetic tree results were visualized using the online software iTOL (https://itol.embl.de). Finally, the conserved motifs of the Hsp70 family members were analyzed using the online software MEME (http://meme-suite.org), and the results were visualized using the TBtools software (version: 2.1.19).

    • The E.Z.N.A Plant RNA Kit (OMEGA, USA) was employed to extract total root RNA from whole roots subjected to treatments for 0, 24, and 72 h. The extracted RNA was subsequently reverse transcribed into cDNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (TOYOBO, Japan). SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Japan) was analyzed, using 7 μL ddH2O, 1 μL cDNA, 2 μL of upstream and downstream primers, and 10 μL of SYBR enzyme as the reaction system. The relative gene expression was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method. Gene-specific primers were designed utilizing the online NCBI Primer-BLAST tool (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast, Supplementary Table S1).

    • Microsoft Excel (2019) software was used to conduct a one-way analysis of variance and produce line charts. Duncan's multiple intervals were used to analyse significant differences, and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

    • As shown in Table 1, a total of 56.48 Gb of clean bases were obtained from nine libraries of roots exposed to lanthanum for different durations. The data availability rates ranged from 97.86% to 98.52%, the percentage of Q20 bases was 98.6% or greater, the percentage of Q30 bases was 95.65% or greater, and the GC content was 43.20% or greater, which suggested that the sequencing data were reliable and could be used for subsequent analysis. A total of 62,125 unigenes were obtained after sequence assembly. By comparing the sequences with those in the COG, GO, and KEGG databases, functional annotation of unigenes was carried out, and 43,841 annotated unigenes were ultimately obtained.

      Table 1.  Quality of sample sequences.

      Sample
      name
      Clean
      reads (Mb)
      Clean
      bases (Gb)
      Data use
      rate (%)
      Q20
      (%)
      Q30
      (%)
      GC
      (%)
      TR-24 (1) 43.90 6.54 98.25 98.73 95.85 43.44
      TR-24 (2) 42.33 6.31 98.32 98.60 95.69 44.05
      TR-24 (3) 40.70 6.06 98.47 98.66 95.73 43.79
      TR-72 (1) 41.68 6.20 98.52 98.81 96.07 43.47
      TR-72 (2) 39.38 5.87 98.27 98.78 96.02 43.73
      TR-72 (3) 41.94 6.25 98.12 98.70 95.85 43.70
      CK-0 (1) 46.22 6.89 98.41 98.67 95.65 43.20
      CK-0 (2) 39.77 5.91 97.86 98.69 95.75 44.04
      CK-0 (3) 43.33 6.45 98.49 98.79 96.02 43.94
      The data use rate (%) was calculated as clean_base/raw_base × 100.
    • To preliminarily explore the response mechanism of the Chrysanthemum naktongense root system to lanthanum treatment, we performed COG annotation of the sequencing results. As shown in Fig. 1a, a total of 44,284 unigenes were annotated in the COG database, but most of them had unknown functions although they ranked first in the COG prediction, indicating that many sequences in the root system of Chrysanthemum naktongense unigenes have not been effectively verified and studied. Among the unigenes, signal transduction mechanisms (T), posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperone posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperone (O), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J), and transcription (K) were found at positions 2-5, suggesting that the intrinsic mechanism of root response to lanthanum treatment may involve the basic processes of growth and development and signal transduction.

      Figure 1. 

      COG annotation results of DEGs and DEGs in the roots of Chrysanthemum naktongense under lanthanum stress for different durations. (a) COG annotation results of differentially expressed genes. All the predicted genes were consistent with the COG database and were functionally grouped into 24 molecular families. The X-axis represents the number of differentially expressed genes assigned to the corresponding COG class, and the Y-axis represents the COG class to which the differentially expressed genes are annotated. (b)−(d) shows the volcano map of differentially expressed genes in TR-24 vs CK-0, TR-72 vs CK-0, and TR-72 vs TR-24. (e), (f) show Venn diagrams of upregulated and downregulated DEGs in TR-24 vs CK-0, TR-72 vs CK-0, and TR-72 vs TR-24, respectively. The threshold for differentially expressed gene screening was as follows: (|logFC| > 1, p < 0.05).

    • After 24 h of lanthanum treatment (TR-24), we identified 3,266 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the root system of prickly lettuce compared to the control group without lanthanum treatment (CK-0). Among these, 1,551 genes were upregulated and 1,715 were downregulated (Fig. 1b). Following 72 h of lanthanum treatment (TR-72), we observed 5,993 DEGs, with 3,146 upregulated and 2,847 downregulated genes (Fig. 1c). A comparison between TR-72 and TR-24 revealed a total of 1,456 DEGs; among them, 866 were upregulated and 590 were downregulated (Fig. 1d). Utilizing Venn diagrams for further analysis (Fig. 1e & f), we found that there were: 977 genes upregulated in both TR-24 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs CK-0, 1,261 genes downregulated in both comparisons, the comparisons between TR-72 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs TR-24 revealed a total of 596 co-upregulated genes and 358 co-downregulated genes. These results indicated an increase in specific differentially expressed genes as well as co-expressed ones following lanthanum treatment over time.

    • To further understand the functional pathways related to the above DEGs, GO enrichment analysis of the top 20 upregulated DEGs in each treatment group was performed (Fig. 2ac). Compared with those in the 0 h treatment group (CK-0), 125 DEGs related to BPs were upregulated in the 24 h treatment group (TR-24 vs CK-0, Fig. 2a). The most significantly enriched terms (p < 0.05) were related to secondary metabolic processes (GO:0019748, 19 DEGs), response to jasmonic acid (GO:0009753, 16 DEGs), secondary metabolite biosynthetic processes (GO:0044550, 14 DEGs), and hormone metabolic processes (GO:0042445, 13 DEGs). Twenty-five upregulated DEGs related to molecular function (MF), including O-methyltransferase activity (GO:0008171, seven DEGs), palmitoyl-(protein) hydrolase activity (GO:0008474, three DEGs), were enriched. Compared with CK-0, 272 upregulated DEGs related to the biological process (BP) were enriched under 72 h lanthanum treatment (TR-72 vs CK-0, Fig. 2b). The most abundant terms were related to hormone metabolic processes (GO:0042445, 31 DEGs), response to nitrate (GO:0010167, 26 DEGs), response to chitin (GO:0010200, 25 DEGs), etc. There were 123 annotations related to molecular function (MF), molecular transducer activity (GO:0060089, 41 DEGs), signaling receptor activity (GO:0038023, 38 DEGs), anion transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0008509, 33 DEGs), etc. In addition, 33 upregulated DEGs related to cellular components (CC) and apoplasts (GO:0048046) were significantly enriched. In addition, in TR-72 vs TR-24 (Fig. 2c), 123 upregulated DEGs were annotated to the biological process (BP) category. The most prominent enrichment was found in external encapsulating structure organization (GO:0045229, 22 DEGs). In addition, 71 DEGs were annotated to the cellular component (CC) category, and the most significant enrichment was found in cell wall organization (GO:0071555, 21 DEGs), etc. Twenty upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in molecular functions (MF) and were related to the plastid thylakoid lumen (GO:0031978, four DEGs), transferase activity, and transfer of hexosyl groups (GO:0016758, 16 DEGs).

      Figure 2. 

      Column diagram of the top 20 enriched GO terms and bubble diagram of the enriched KEGG pathways of the upregulated DEGs in each treatment group. (a)−(c) Show the top 20 GO enrichment terms in the sequences of TR-24 vs CK-0, TR-72 vs CK-0, and TR-72 vs TR-24. BP refers to biological process, CC refers to cellular component, and MF refers to molecular function. The vertical axis shows the name of the GO enrichment term, and the horizontal axis displays the number of genes enriched in each GO term. The length of the rectangle represents the number of DEGs associated with each enrichment term, and the colour depth represents the significance of each enrichment term. (d)−(f) Shows the bubbles of the TR-24 vs CK-0, TR-72 vs CK-0, and TR-72 vs TR-24 upregulated DEGs in the top 20 enriched KEGG terms. The vertical axis represents the name of the enriched KEGG pathway, and the horizontal axis represents the GeneRatio of each enriched pathway. The size of the points represents the number of DEGs in each enriched pathway, and the depth of the colour of the points represents the significance of each enriched term.

      Through GO enrichment analysis, it was found that the GO enrichment terms of the top 20 DEGs in each treatment group that were upregulated (Fig. 2ac) were mainly related to biological processes, in which the secondary metabolite generation pathway, hormone metabolism, and plant cell wall-related biological processes played crucial roles in the response of the C. naktongense root system to lanthanum treatment.

      To further explore which biological pathways played important roles in the response to lanthanum treatment, we performed Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of the DEGs under the two treatment durations. The results revealed that (Supplementary Tables S2, S3) in TR-24 vs CK-0, 1,243 DEGs were annotated to 282 pathways. In TR-72 vs CK-0, 2,880 DEGs were annotated to 332 pathways. TR-24 vs CK-0 showed significant enrichment in 37 KEGG pathways (p < 0.05), TR-72 vs CK-0 exhibited significant enrichment in 58 KEGG pathways (p < 0.05), and all of them were dominated by upregulated DEGs.

      Compared with CK-0, TR-24 had 208 significantly upregulated DEGs (p < 0.05) enriched in 29 KEGG pathways. The top 20 enriched pathways of the upregulated DEGs (Fig. 2d) included the oestrogen signaling pathway (ko04915, 19 DEGs). The multiple DEGs were related to the longevity-regulating pathways (ko04213, 14 DEGs), phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (ko00940, 13 DEGs), and plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075, 13 DEGs). In TR-72 vs CK-0, 556 upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched (p < 0.05) in 42 KEGG pathways, and the top 20 (Fig. 2e) included. Plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075, 38 DEGs), longevity regulating pathway - multiple species (ko04213, 24 DEGs), phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (ko00940, 19 DEGs), etc. TR-72 vs TR-24 had 134 upregulated enriched DEG pathways related to 21 KEGG pathways, the top 20 (Fig. 2f) of which included phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (ko00940, nine DEGs), plant hormone signal transduction (ko04075, nine DEGs). These results indicated that, under lanthanum treatment, the main pathways that significantly changed in the root system were the oestrogen signaling pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, and other pathways. Importantly, the GO and KEGG enrichment results revealed that upregulated DEGs were involved in multiple pathways related to the response to lanthanum stress, among which plant hormone-related pathways were the most significant and highly enriched pathways.

    • After lanthanum treatment for 24 and 72 h, the number of upregulated DEGs enriched in the plant hormone signal transduction pathway was greater than that enriched in the other KEGG pathways, and the difference was significant. To investigate the effects of lanthanum treatment on the hormone signaling pathway in the root system of Chrysanthemum naktongense, we analyzed the expression patterns of genes involved in this pathway. The results (Supplementary Tables S2, S3) revealed that in this pathway, 13 and 38 samples from TR-24 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs CK-0, respectively, presented upregulated DEGs and 19 samples from TR-72 vs CK-0 presented downregulated DEGs and were enriched in this pathway. With increasing treatment duration, the number of DEGs enriched in this biological pathway also increased. Among them, a total of 19 auxin signal transduction-related DEGs were predicted (Fig. 3b: 13 upregulated, six downregulated): five encoded transport inhibitor response proteins (TIR1: one downregulated, four upregulated), seven encoded AUX/IAA proteins (one downregulated, six upregulated), one encoded auxin response factor (ARF: acetic acid-amido synthetase), three encoded acetic acid-3-amido synthetase proteins (GH3: acetic acid-induced protein) and arg7-like protein (ARG7:1 acetic acid-induced protein, two acetic acid-induced proteins), which were downregulated, and one acetic acid-induced protein was upregulated. In the jasmonic acid signaling pathway (Fig. 3a), seven DEGs (Fig. 3b) were predicted, including two that encoded coronatine-insensitive protein (COI: one upregulated, one downregulated) and five that encoded the jasmonate-zim domain protein (JAZ: all upregulated). In the abscisic acid signal transduction pathway (Fig. 3a), a total of eight DEGs were predicted (Fig. 3b), among which three encoded abscisic acid receptor (PYR/PYL: one downregulated, two upregulated) and three encoded phosphatase 2C protein (PP2C: PP2C). Both genes encoded ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 5-like protein (ABF: both downregulated); three DEGs were related to gibberellin signal transduction (Fig. 3b), two encoded transcription factors (TFs: upregulated), one encoded gibberellin receptor (GID1: downregulated); three were ethylene signal transduction DEGs (Fig. 3b: these were upregulated, but their expression decreased with increasing treatment duration); and one encoded the ethylene-responsive transcription factor (ERF). ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3-like 3 (EIL3) and the DNA-binding domain in plant proteins such as APETALA2 and EREBPs (AP2/ERF); a salicylic acid signal transduction DEG (Fig. 3b) encodes the basic form of pathogenesis-related protein 1-like (PR-1: downregulated). Taken together, these results suggest that lanthanum treatment affects plant hormone signal transduction pathways, thereby altering plant growth and development. In addition, the auxin signal transduction pathway and jasmonic acid signal transduction pathway are significantly enriched in response to lanthanum treatment.

      Figure 3. 

      Plant hormone signal transduction pathway and category of DEGs in this pathway. (a) Expression heatmap of genes associated with the auxin, jasmonic acid, and abscisic acid signal transduction pathways and related enriched DEGs. (b) Number of DEGs annotated to different plant hormones.

    • To further explore the gene expression patterns in the roots of Chrysanthemum naktongense in response to lanthanum treatment, we analyzed the KEGG pathways enriched with upregulated DEGs under the two treatment durations and the DEGs in each pathway. The results revealed that there were seven KEGG pathways in which both TR-24 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs CK-0 showed enrichment of upregulated DEGs (Supplementary Table S4). These pathways included stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis (a total of 13 DEGs); longevity-regulating pathways, including multiple species (a total of 26 DEGs); phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (a total of 27 DEGs); flavonoid biosynthesis (a total of 14 DEGs); plant hormone signal transduction (a total of 41 DEGs); plant‒pathogen interactions (a total of 30 DEGs); and sulphur metabolism (a total of 11 DEGs). Among them, the DEGs significantly upregulated in TR-24 vs CK-0 and TR-72 vs CK-0 in each pathway were as follows (a total of 39 DEGs, Supplementary Table S5): stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis, three DEGs; longevity-regulating pathway, 12 DEGs in multiple species; phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, two DEGs in flavonoid biosynthesis; and 10 DEGs in plant hormone signal transduction. There were seven DEGs related to plant‒pathogen interactions and four DEGs related to sulphur metabolism. A total of 21 metal transport-related genes were predicted among the 39 upregulated DEGs mentioned above. These genes included those for heat-activated protein 70 (Hsp70), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), JAZ, F-box, WRKY, ERF, and GH3. Among them, the largest number of genes were predicted for Hsp70, at 12. These findings suggest that the Hsp70 gene may play a crucial role in the intrinsic mechanism by which Chrysanthemum roots respond to lanthanum treatment.

    • To deeper understand the Hsp70s in Chrysanthemum naktongense after Pfam, SMART, and NCBI CDD-search analysis, a total of 16 Hsp70 members were identified from the transcriptome data in this study, and they were named CnHsp70-1 to 16 according to the order of their appearance in the transcriptome data. The physicochemical characteristics of the 16 CnHsp70 family members were comprehensively analyzed, revealing that the protein sequence lengths varied from 265 amino acids in CnHsp70-7 to 864 amino acids in CnHsp70-12 (Table 2). The isoelectric points (pI) spanned a range from 5.11 for CnHsp70-8 to 8.71 for CnHsp70-9, classifying CnHsp70-9, CnHsp70-7, and CnHsp70-15 as basic proteins, while the remaining 13 members, with pI values below 7, were characterized as acidic proteins. Molecular weights ranged from 29.47 kDa for CnHsp70-7 to 96.54 kDa for CnHsp70-12. Instability indices varied from 30.19 for CnHsp70-5 to 50.64 for CnHsp70-9, with CnHsp70-9, CnHsp70-13, CnHsp70-16, and CnHsp70-7 identified as unstable proteins due to their instability indices exceeding 40, while the others were considered stable. The Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) values, which were all negative, ranged from −0.461 for CnHsp70-13 to −0.061 for CnHsp70-6, indicating that all 16 CnHsp70 proteins are hydrophilic in nature. Subcellular localization prediction results showed that nine CnHsp70 members were localized in cytoplasm, four in chloroplast, and one member in extracellular space, mitochondrial, and plasma membrane.

      Table 2.  The physicochemical characteristics of the 16 CnHsp70 family members.

      Gene name Gene ID Length (aa) Isoelectric point (pI) Molecular weight (kDa) Instability index Sub-cellular localization
      Hsp70-1 TRINITY_DN10529_c1_g2_i3 483 6.47 53.17 32.20 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-2 TRINITY_DN10613_c1_g1_i2 493 6.84 55.68 39.82 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-3 TRINITY_DN10917_c0_g1_i7 675 6.02 72.15 36.56 Mitochondrial
      Hsp70-4 TRINITY_DN152347_c0_g1_i2 614 5.24 66.81 35.86 Chloroplast
      Hsp70-5 TRINITY_DN152347_c0_g2_i1 352 6.42 39.02 30.19 Chloroplast
      Hsp70-6 TRINITY_DN16204_c0_g1_i1 335 5.13 36.57 31.48 Extracellular space
      Hsp70-7 TRINITY_DN1712_c11_g1_i2 265 8.44 29.47 41.39 Chloroplast
      Hsp70-8 TRINITY_DN1712_c1_g1_i6 585 5.11 64.35 33.28 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-9 TRINITY_DN190619_c0_g1_i1 631 8.71 70.59 50.64 Chloroplast
      Hsp70-10 TRINITY_DN3151_c0_g1_i18 443 6.63 48.35 37.93 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-11 TRINITY_DN46341_c0_g1_i3 654 5.44 71.27 37.13 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-12 TRINITY_DN5040_c0_g1_i23 864 5.41 96.54 39.62 Plasma membrane
      Hsp70-13 TRINITY_DN548_c0_g1_i14 832 5.20 92.09 42.99 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-14 TRINITY_DN56386_c0_g1_i1 645 5.13 70.51 37.19 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-15 TRINITY_DN57700_c0_g2_i1 314 8.09 35.75 33.13 Cytoplasmic
      Hsp70-16 TRINITY_DN756_c0_g1_i18 714 6.31 81.08 42.41 Cytoplasmic

      Furthermore, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of 18 Hsp70 gene family members from Arabidopsis thaliana, 32 from rice (Oryza sativa), and 16 from Chrysanthemum naktongense using an evolutionary tree (Fig. 4a). The resulting 66 Hsp70 genes were categorized into seven distinct clusters, designated as Group I to Group VIII. Specifically, the 16 CnHsp70 members were found distributed across Groups II, IV, V, VI, and VII. Additionally, we utilized the online MEME software to analyze the 16 CnHsp70 protein sequences, and the results (Fig. 4b) revealed the presence of 10 distinct motifs, designated as Motif 1 through Motif 10. Each member contained between 5 to 10 motifs, with Motif 1, Motif 2, and Motif 8 being notably conserved across all CnHsp70 member sequences.

      Figure 4. 

      Phylogenetic tree of Hsp70 family members of Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Oryza sativa (Os), and Chrysanthemum naktongense (Cn) and structure of 16 Hsp70 motifs of Chrysanthemum naktongense. (a) Phylogenetic tree of Hsp70 family members of AtHsp70-1 to 18, OsHsp70-1 to 32, and CnHsp70-1 to 16. Different colors are used to distinguish different groups. The asterisk indicates CnHsp70-1 to 16. (b) Phylogenetic tree of CnHsp70-1 to 16 and their motifs, diverse colors symbolize distinct motifs.

    • To verify the accuracy of the transcriptome results, in this study, such as those related to the Longevity regulating pathway - multiple species, photosynthesis, and minerals, were selected, and real-time fluorescence quantitative verification was carried out on genes related to heavy metal transport and absorption pathways (Fig. 5). Linear regression analysis revealed that the correlation coefficients were similar, R2 = 0.89, indicating that the results of qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq were consistent in terms of gene expression trends. Therefore, the transcriptome data is reliable.

      Figure 5. 

      Six genes were verified via real-time quantitative PCR.

      In addition, to further understand lanthanum expression in CnHsp70s in response to treatment at different times, we analyzed lanthanum expression in 16 Hsp70 members identified above for 24 h and 72 h (Fig. 6). The analysis revealed that the majority of the 16 CnHsp70 family members exhibited upregulation in response to lanthanum treatment at both 24-h and 72-h intervals, with expression patterns that were largely congruent with the transcriptomic data. This concordance validates the authenticity of the transcriptomic data. Furthermore, a subset of 10 CnHsp70 members, including CnHsp70-2, -3, -5, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, -15, and -16, displayed upregulation at both time points, with their expression levels escalating in tandem with the duration of lanthanum exposure (Supplementary Fig. S1).

      Figure 6. 

      Expression levels of 10 Hsp70 members of Chrysanthemum naktongense in RNA-seq and qRT-PCR. The blue line represents the results of RNA-seq and the yellow represents qRT-PCR.

    • REEs are nonessential heavy metals for plants, and long-term plant exposure to REEs negatively affects plant growth and development[34]. Plant hormones play important roles in the response of plants to abiotic stress. In addition, many studies[3537] have suggested that plant hormones, as signal transduction molecules, can reduce the toxicity of heavy metals in plants, thus promoting plant growth and development[38]. Compared with those in the control group, a total of 41 plant hormone signal transduction pathways related to upregulated DEGs were identified after lanthanum treatment for 24 h and 72 h (Fig. 3).

      Auxin plays an important role in plant resistance to abiotic stress. Some studies have shown that the upregulation of auxin-regulatory genes under heavy metal treatment drives auxin biosynthesis and signaling[39,40]. Previous studies have shown that genes encoding AUX/IAA proteins involved in plant hormone signaling in maize are significantly upregulated under lanthanum treatment[41]. Our results are essentially consistent with these findings. In this study, we predicted a total of 19 DEGs related to auxin signal transduction (Fig 3ac), among which 13 DEGs were upregulated, and seven genes encoding AUX/IAA proteins were upregulated, accounting for 85.71% of the above 13 DEGs.

      Moreover, with increasing treatment duration, the expression of DEGs related to the auxin signal transduction pathway increased. Six DEGs were downregulated, and their expression levels decreased with increasing treatment duration. These results indicated that low concentrations of lanthanum promoted the expression of DEGs involved in the auxin signal transduction pathway in the roots of Chrysanthemum naktongense. Moreover, the response of the auxin signal transduction pathway to treatment with low concentrations of lanthanum increased with increasing treatment duration. Therefore, lanthanum at a low concentration may promote the auxin signal transduction pathway in the root system of Chrysanthemum naktongense. In addition, jasmonic acid can effectively mitigate the effects of heavy metals on plants and help plants adapt to their environment under adverse conditions[42]. Zhao et al. reported that endogenous jasmonic acid could effectively limit the absorption and upward transport of Cd by tomato roots[43]. Jasmonic acid alleviates Cd-induced toxicity in Arabidopsis through signal transduction pathways[44]. In this study, we predicted a total of seven DEGs related to jasmonic acid signaling pathways (Fig. 3a, b & d), six of which were upregulated, including five genes encoding JAZ proteins and one gene encoding a COI. These results suggest that lanthanum treatment may promote jasmonic acid signal transduction pathways in the roots of Chrysanthemum naktongense. Abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid are generally considered stress hormones and play highly important roles in plant response to Cd stress[45,46]. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a key plant hormone involved in regulating plant response to various abiotic stresses, such as drought, heat, cold, and heavy metals[47]. Wang et al. demonstrated that arsenic toxicity upregulated the expression of genes involved in ABA signal transduction pathways in tomato roots[48]. Other studies have shown that arsenic toxicity upregulates the expression of the ABA signal transduction regulatory genes OsPP2C4, OsPP2C5, OsbZIP10, and OsbZIP12 in rice seedlings[49]. Similar to the above results, in this study, in the abscisic acid signal transduction pathway (Fig. 3a, b & e), low-concentration lanthanum treatment downregulated one gene encoding the PYR/PYL protein and two genes encoding ABF. These results suggest that lanthanum at low concentrations may inhibit the expression of genes involved in the ABA signal transduction pathway. However, the underlying mechanism by which plant hormone pathways respond to lanthanum treatment needs to be further investigated.

    • Heavy metal treatment induced differential expression in genes encoding stress-responsive proteins. In this study, we found that 21 genes encoding stress response proteins, including Hsp70, MAPK4, JAZ, F-box, WRKY, ERF, and GH3, were consistently and significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated at both treatment durations. Twelve of the genes encoded the Hsp70 protein. Moreover, the expression heatmap (Fig. 4a) revealed that the expression of the genes encoding these 12 protein members of Hsp70 essentially increased with increasing lanthanum treatment duration. Under abiotic stress such as high temperature, drought, high salt, and heavy metals, Hsp70 can be rapidly synthesized to improve plant stress resistance[50]. Some studies have shown that Hsp70 is related to the internal mechanism of plant response to heavy metals. Shaheen et al. reported that the expression level of the Hsp70 protein in giant reeds increased with increasing metal concentration and concluded that the Hsp70 protein may significantly improve plant tolerance to metal stress[51]. The overexpressing transgenic strain of RcHsp70 in Chinese rose increased the resistance of the plant to heavy metal stress[52]. Genome-wide analysis and expression profile analysis of the SlHsp70 gene family in Nightshade by Abbas et al. revealed that the expression level of SlHsp70-11 in roots was greater under Cd2+ stress[53]. These findings are essentially consistent with our findings. To gain a deeper comprehension of the Hsp70s expression profile in Chrysanthemum naktongense treated with lanthanum, in this study, we identified 16 CnHsp70 members in the transcriptome data by bioinformatics. The expression analysis found that a subset of 10 CnHsp70 members, including CnHsp70-2, -3, -5, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, -15, and -16, after treatment with 100 mg·L−1 lanthanum for 24 h and 72 h, the expression level was on the rise (Supplementary Fig. S1). These findings indicated that Hsp70s may enhance the ability of plants to withstand heavy metal stress. Furthermore, previous research has demonstrated that plant hormones can influence the expression levels of Hsp70[18]. In this study, genes involved in plant hormone signal transduction pathways and Hsp70s were found to be up-regulated following lanthanum treatment (Figs 3, 5 & 6). Consequently, both plant hormones and Hsp70s may play a beneficial role in C. naktongense's response to lanthanum exposure. Nevertheless, the potential mechanism remains to be further explored.

    • In this study, we preliminary revealed the molecular mechanism by which the root system of Chrysanthemum naktongense responds to lanthanum treatment. Based on TR-24 vs CK-0 (3,266) and TR-72 vs CK-0 (5,933) analysis, it was found that, with increasing lanthanum treatment duration, the number of DEGs increased. In addition, we found that DEGs were significantly (p < 0.05) enriched in multiple KEGG pathways under the two treatment durations, among which DEGs in the plant hormone signaling pathway were most enriched. In this pathway, low-concentration lanthanum treatment promoted the signal transduction pathways of auxin and jasmonic acid and inhibited the signal transduction pathways of abscisic acid, thus effectively enhancing the resistance of the root system to lanthanum treatment. In addition, 16 members of CnHsp70s were identified, and a subset of 10 CnHsp70 members, including CnHsp70-2, -3, -5, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, -15, and -16, after treatment with 100 mg·L−1 lanthanum for 24 and 72 h, the expression level was on the rise. In future studies, researchers should further elucidate the plant hormone-mediated root response to lanthanum treatment, investigate the role of the key genes screened herein, and identify genes that have the potential to improve the accumulation of the rare earth element lanthanum in Chrysanthemum naktongense.

      • This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. LH2021C018), Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2024MS03086), and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Double First-Class Construction and Characteristic Development Guide Foundation (YLXKZX-NKD-026).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Gao Y, Zhang R; data collection: Gao Y, Zhang R, Chen S; analysis and interpretation of results: Gao Y, Zhang R, Xu N; draft manuscript preparation: Gao Y, Zhang R, Song Y. Dr. He Miao, the corresponding author of this article, supervised the research team, including the mentoring of junior researchers and students, and secured partial funding for the research project. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as the research group intends to publish additional findings in the future but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Yaohui Gao, Ruiqing Zhang

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (2) References (53)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Gao Y, Zhang R, Xu N, Song Y, Chen S, et al. 2025. Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e008 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0004
    Gao Y, Zhang R, Xu N, Song Y, Chen S, et al. 2025. Transcriptome analysis revealed the molecular mechanism by which Chrysanthemum naktongense roots respond to low-concentration lanthanum treatment. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e008 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0004

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return