Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects

More Information
  • The global ornamental plant industry is still booming, and the demand for new combinations of plant quality, resistance, and germplasm resources is increasing. Traditional hybridization, mutagenesis, and mutation breeding strategies have made outstanding contributions to cultivating new varieties. However, due to its long cultivation cycle, there are limitations in adapting to the rapidly changing quality requirements of the market. In the past 20 years of the genome era, especially the emergence and development of transgenic and gene editing technologies, molecular biologists have recognized and verified the intrinsic molecular mechanism of many plant traits, providing an operational blueprint for efficient and directional molecular breeding of ornamental plants. The latest development of CRISPR/Cas technology, knockout, and knock-in technology, provides a powerful tool to meet the simultaneous increase of beneficial traits and knockout of adverse traits. Its faster breeding cycle, lower breeding cost, and higher accuracy show a broader prospect for molecular breeding in the post-genome era. In this paper, the application of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants is reviewed. In addition, we also explore the limitations of its use in ornamental plants. Although CRISPR/Cas technology has many advantages, in some applications, the argument against the use of CRISPR/Cas technology is valid. We think it is important to carefully assess the exact benefits and disadvantages of using this technique in floral crops.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Kisvarga S, Horotán K, Ahmad Wani M, Orlóci L. 2023. Plant responses to global climate change and urbanization: implications for sustainable urban landscapes. Horticulturae 9(9):1051

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9091051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ahmad Wani M, Din A, Nazki IT, Rehman TU, Al-Khayri JM, et al. 2023. Navigating the future: exploring technological advancements and emerging trends in the sustainable ornamental industry. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11:1188643

    doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1188643

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Mekapogu M, Kwon OK, Song HY, Jung JA. 2022. Towards the improvement of ornamental attributes in Chrysanthemum: recent progress in biotechnological advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(20):12284

    doi: 10.3390/ijms232012284

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lamichhane S, Thapa S. 2022. Advances from conventional to modern plant breeding methodologies. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 10:1−14

    doi: 10.9787/pbb.2022.10.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Tang J, Ye J, Liu P, Wang S, Chen F, et al. 2023. Ornamental plant gene editing: past, present and future. Ornamental Plant Research 3:6

    doi: 10.48130/opr-2023-0006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Jin C, Dong L, Wei C, Ahmad Wani M, Yang C, et al. 2023. Creating novel ornamentals via new strategies in the era of genome editing. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1142866

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1142866

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Carroll D. 2011. Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases. Genetics 188:773−82

    doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.131433

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Sun Y, Zhang X, Wu C, He Y, Ma Y, et al. 2016. Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase. Molecular Plant 9:628−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hilscher J, Bürstmayr H, Stoger E. 2017. Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding. Biotechnology Journal 12:1600173

    doi: 10.1002/biot.201600173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhang K, Raboanatahiry N, Zhu B, Li M. 2017. Progress in genome editing technology and its application in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:177

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Ahn CH, Ramya M, An HR, Park PM, Kim YJ, et al. 2020. Progress and challenges in the improvement of ornamental plants by genome editing. Plants 9(6):687

    doi: 10.3390/plants9060687

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Karlson CKS, Mohd-Noor SN, Nolte N, Tan BC. 2021. CRISPR/dCas9-based systems: mechanisms and applications in plant sciences. Plants 10(10):2055

    doi: 10.3390/plants10102055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Li C, Brant E, Budak H, Zhang B. 2021. CRISPR/Cas: a Nobel Prize award-winning precise genome editing technology for gene therapy and crop improvement. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B 22:253−84

    doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2100009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Chen F. 2022. Plant genomes: toward goals of decoding both complex and complete sequences. Ornamental Plant Research 2:24

    doi: 10.48130/opr-2022-0024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zheng T, Li P, Li L, Zhang Q. 2021. Research advances in and prospects of ornamental plant genomics. Horticulture Research 8:65

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00499-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Li M, Wen Z, Meng J, Cheng T, Zhang Q, et al. 2022. The genomics of ornamental plants: current status and opportunities. Ornamental Plant Research 2:6

    doi: 10.48130/opr-2022-0006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Clouse JW, Adhikary D, Page JT, Ramaraj T, Deyholos MK, et al. 2016. The amaranth genome: genome, transcriptome, and physical map assembly. The Plant Genome 9:plantgenome2015.07.0062

    doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.07.0062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Li M, Zhang D, Gao Q, Luo Y, Zhang H, et al. 2019. Genome structure and evolution of Antirrhinum majus L. Nature Plants 5:174−83

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0349-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Hori K, Yamada Y, Purwanto R, Minakuchi Y, Toyoda A, et al. 2018. Mining of the uncharacterized cytochrome P450 genes involved in alkaloid biosynthesis in California poppy using a draft genome sequence. Plant and Cell Physiology 59(2):222−33

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx210

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Li F, Gao Y, Jin C, Wen X, Geng H, et al. 2022. The chromosome-level genome of Gypsophila paniculata reveals the molecular mechanism of floral development and ethylene insensitivity. Horticulture Research 9:uhac176

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Badouin H, Gouzy J, Grassa CJ, Murat F, Evan Staton S, et al. 2017. The sunflower genome provides insights into oil metabolism, flowering and Asterid evolution. Nature 546:148−52

    doi: 10.1038/nature22380

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Hoshino A, Jayakumar V, Nitasaka E, Toyoda A, Noguchi H, et al. 2016. Genome sequence and analysis of the Japanese morning glory Ipomoea nil. Nature Communications 7:13295

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms13295

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hellsten U, Wright KM, Jenkins J, Shu S, Yuan Y, et al. 2013. Fine-scale variation in meiotic recombination in Mimulus inferred from population shotgun sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:19478−82

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319032110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Griesmann M, Chang Y, Liu X, Song Y, Haberer G, et al. 2018. Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis. Science 361:eaat1743

    doi: 10.1126/science.aat1743

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bombarely A, Moser M, Amrad A, Bao M, Bapaume L, et al. 2016. Insight into the evolution of the Solanaceae from the parental genomes of Petunia hybrida. Nature Plants 2:16074

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.74

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Dong AX, Xin HB, Li ZJ, Liu H, Sun YQ, et al. 2018. High-quality assembly of the reference genome for scarlet sage, Salvia splendens, an economically important ornamental plant. GigaScience 7:giy068

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Cheng S, van den Bergh E, Zeng P, Zhong X, Xu J, et al. 2013. The Tarenaya hassleriana genome provides insight into reproductive trait and genome evolution of crucifers. The Plant Cell 25:2813−30

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113480

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang Y, Fan G, Liu Y, Sun F, Shi C, et al. 2013. The sacred Lotus genome provides insights into the evolution of flowering plants. The Plant Journal 76:557−67

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12313

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Zhang L, Chen F, Zhang X, Li Z, Zhao Y, et al. 2020. The water lily genome and the early evolution of flowering plants. Nature 577:79−84

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1852-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hirakawa H, Sumitomo K, Hisamatsu T, Nagano S, Shirasawa K, et al. 2019. De novo whole-genome assembly in Chrysanthemum seticuspe, a model species of Chrysanthemums, and its application to genetic and gene discovery analysis. DNA Research 26:195−203

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsy048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Song C, Liu Y, Song A, Dong G, Zhao H, et al. 2018. The Chrysanthemum nankingense genome provides insights into the evolution and diversification of Chrysanthemum flowers and medicinal traits. Molecular Plant 11:1482−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.10.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wen X, Li J, Wang L, Lu C, Gao Q, et al. 2022. The Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium genome and the molecular mechanism underlying diverse Capitulum types. Horticulture Research 9:uhab022

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhang X, Lin S, Peng D, Wu Q, Liao X, et al. 2022. Integrated multi-omic data and analyses reveal the pathways underlying key ornamental traits in carnation flowers. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20(6):1182−96

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13801

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Liang Y, Li F, Gao Q, Jin C, Dong L, et al. 2022. The genome of Eustoma grandiflorum reveals the whole-genome triplication event contributing to ornamental traits in cultivated Lisianthus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:1856−58

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13899

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Kim J, Kang SH, Park SG, Yang TJ, Lee Y, et al. 2020. Whole-genome, transcriptome, and methylome analyses provide insights into the evolution of platycoside biosynthesis in Platycodon grandiflorus, a medicinal plant. Horticulture Research 7:112

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0329-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Feng C, Wang J, Wu L, Kong H, Yang L, et al. 2020. The genome of a cave plant, Primulina huaijiensis, provides insights into adaptation to limestone Karst habitats. New Phytologist 227(4):1249−63

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16588

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hibrand Saint-Oyant L, Ruttink T, Hamama L, Kirov I, Lakhwani D, et al. 2018. A high-quality genome sequence of Rosa chinensis to elucidate ornamental traits. Nature Plants 4:473−84

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0166-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Nakamura N, Hirakawa H, Sato S, Otagaki S, Matsumoto S, et al. 2018. Genome structure of Rosa multiflora, a wild ancestor of cultivated roses. DNA Research 25:113−21

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsx042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Chen F, Su L, Hu S, Xue JY, Liu H, et al. 2021. A chromosome-level genome assembly of rugged rose (Rosa rugosa) provides insights into its evolution, ecology, and floral characteristics. Horticulture Research 8:141

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00594-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Zhong M, Jiang X, Yang G, Cui W, Suo Z, et al. 2021. Rose without prickle: genomic insights linked to moisture adaptation. National Science Review 8:nwab092

    doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Lu M, An H, Li L. 2016. Genome survey sequencing for the characterization of the genetic background of Rosa roxburghii tratt and leaf ascorbate metabolism genes. PLoS One 11:e0147530

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147530

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Copetti D, Búrquez A, Bustamante E, Charboneau JLM, Childs KL, et al. 2017. Extensive gene tree discordance and hemiplasy shaped the genomes of North American columnar cacti. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(45):12003−08

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706367114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Byrne SL, Nagy I, Pfeifer M, Armstead I, Swain S, et al. 2015. A synteny-based draft genome sequence of the forage grass Lolium perenne. The Plant Journal 84(4):816−26

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    De Vega JJ, Ayling S, Hegarty M, Kudrna D, Goicoechea JL, et al. 2015. Red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) draft genome provides a platform for trait improvement. Scientific Reports 5:17394

    doi: 10.1038/srep17394

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hirakawa H, Kaur P, Shirasawa K, Nichols P, Nagano S, et al. 2016. Draft genome sequence of subterranean clover, a reference for genus Trifolium. Scientific Reports 6:30358

    doi: 10.1038/srep30358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Tanaka H, Hirakawa H, Kosugi S, Nakayama S, Ono A, et al. 2016. Sequencing and comparative analyses of the genomes of zoysiagrasses. DNA Research 23(2):171−80

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    VanBuren R, Wai CM, Ou S, Pardo J, Bryant D, et al. 2018. Extreme haplotype variation in the desiccation-tolerant clubmoss Selaginella lepidophylla. Nature Communications 9:13

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02546-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Li SF, Wang J, Dong R, Zhu HW, Lan LN, et al. 2020. Chromosome-level genome assembly, annotation and evolutionary analysis of the ornamental plant Asparagus setaceus. Horticulture Research 7:48

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0271-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Butts CT, Bierma JC, Martin RW. 2016. Novel proteases from the genome of the carnivorous plant Drosera capensis: structural prediction and comparative analysis. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 84:1517−33

    doi: 10.1002/prot.25095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Palfalvi G, Hackl T, Terhoeven N, Shibata TF, Nishiyama T, et al. 2020. Genomes of the Venus flytrap and close relatives unveil the roots of plant carnivory. Current Biology 30(12):2312−2320.e5

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Xiao L, Yang G, Zhang L, Yang X, Zhao S, et al. 2015. The resurrection genome of Boea hygrometrica: a blueprint for survival of dehydration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(18):5833−37

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505811112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Kellner F, Kim J, Clavijo BJ, Hamilton JP, Childs KL, et al. 2015. Genome-guided investigation of plant natural product biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 82(4):680−92

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12827

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Nowak MD, Russo G, Schlapbach R, Huu CN, Lenhard M, et al. 2015. The draft genome of Primula veris yields insights into the molecular basis of heterostyly. Genome Biology 16:12

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0567-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Fu Y, Li L, Hao S, Guan R, Fan G, et al. 2017. Draft genome sequence of the Tibetan medicinal herb Rhodiola crenulata. GigaScience 6:gix033

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Yamashiro T, Shiraishi A, Satake H, Nakayama K. 2019. Draft genome of Tanacetum cinerariifolium, the natural source of mosquito coil. Scientific Reports 9:18249

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54815-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhang GQ, Liu KW, Li Z, Lohaus R, Hsiao YY, et al. 2017. The Apostasia genome and the evolution of orchids. Nature 549:379−83

    doi: 10.1038/nature23897

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Zhang GQ, Xu Q, Bian C, Tsai WC, Yeh CM, et al. 2016. The Dendrobium catenatum Lindl. genome sequence provides insights into polysaccharide synthase, floral development and adaptive evolution. Scientific Reports 6:19029

    doi: 10.1038/srep19029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Yan L, Wang X, Liu H, Tian Y, Lian J, et al. 2015. The genome of Dendrobium officinale illuminates the biology of the important traditional Chinese orchid herb. Molecular Plant 8:922−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Chao YT, Chen WC, Chen CY, Ho HY, Yeh CH, et al. 2018. Chromosome-level assembly, genetic and physical mapping of Phalaenopsis aphrodite genome provides new insights into species adaptation and resources for orchid breeding. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:2027−41

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12936

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Cai J, Liu X, Vanneste K, Proost S, Tsai WC, et al. 2015. The genome sequence of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris. Nature Genetics 47:65−72

    doi: 10.1038/ng.3149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Ai Y, Li Z, Sun WH, Chen J, Zhang D, et al. 2021. The Cymbidium genome reveals the evolution of unique morphological traits. Horticulture Research 8:255

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00683-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Sun Y, Chen GZ, Huang J, Liu DK, Xue F, et al. 2021. The Cymbidium goeringii genome provides insight into organ development and adaptive evolution in orchids. Ornamental Plant Research 1:10

    doi: 10.48130/opr-2021-0010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Yang X, Hu R, Yin H, Jenkins J, Shu S, et al. 2017. The Kalanchoë genome provides insights into convergent evolution and building blocks of crassulacean acid metabolism. Nature Communications 8:1899

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01491-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Cocker JM, Wright J, Li J, Swarbreck D, Dyer S, et al. 2018. Primula vulgaris (primrose) genome assembly, annotation and gene expression, with comparative genomics on the heterostyly supergene. Scientific Reports 8:17942

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36304-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Yang FS, Nie S, Liu H, Shi TL, Tian XC, et al. 2020. Chromosome-level genome assembly of a parent species of widely cultivated azaleas. Nature Communications 11:5269

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18771-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Wai CM, Weise SE, Ozersky P, Mockler TC, Michael TP, et al. 2019. Time of day and network reprogramming during drought induced CAM photosynthesis in Sedum album. PLoS Genetics 15:e1008209

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Shang J, Tian J, Cheng H, Yan Q, Li L, et al. 2020. The chromosome-level wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox) genome provides insights into floral scent biosynthesis and flowering in winter. Genome Biology 21:200

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02088-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Lv Q, Qiu J, Liu J, Li Z, Zhang W, et al. 2020. The Chimonanthus salicifolius genome provides insight into magnoliid evolution and flavonoid biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 103:1910−23

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Li LF, Cushman SA, He YX, Li Y. 2020. Genome sequencing and population genomics modeling provide insights into the local adaptation of weeping Forsythia. Horticulture Research 7:130

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00352-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Xu Z, Pu X, Gao R, Demurtas OC, Fleck SJ, et al. 2020. Tandem gene duplications drive divergent evolution of caffeine and crocin biosynthetic pathways in plants. BMC Biology 18:63

    doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00795-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Kim YM, Kim S, Koo N, Shin AY, Yeom SI, et al. 2017. Genome analysis ofHibiscus syriacus provides insights of polyploidization and indeterminate flowering in woody plants. DNA Research 24:71−80

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Xu M, Gao Q, Jiang M, Wang W, Hu J, et al. 2023. A novel genome sequence ofJasminum sambac helps uncover the molecular mechanism underlying the accumulation of jasmonates. Journal of Experimental Botany 74:1275−90

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac464

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Malli RPN, Adal AM, Sarker LS, Liang P, Mahmoud SS. 2019. De novo sequencing of the Lavandula angustifolia genome reveals highly duplicated and optimized features for essential oil production. Planta 249:251−56

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-3012-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Yang X, Yue Y, Li H, Ding W, Chen G, et al. 2018. The chromosome-level quality genome provides insights into the evolution of the biosynthesis genes for aroma compounds of Osmanthus fragrans. Horticulture Research 5:72

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0108-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Lv S, Cheng S, Wang Z, Li S, Jin X, et al. 2020. Draft genome of the famous ornamental plant Paeonia suffruticosa. Ecology and Evolution 10:4518−30

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.5965

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Zhang L, Xu P, Cai Y, Ma L, Li S, et al. 2017. The draft genome assembly of Rhododendron delavayi Franch. var. delavayi. GigaScience 6(10):gix076

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Soza VL, Lindsley D, Waalkes A, Ramage E, Patwardhan RP, et al. 2019. The Rhododendron genome and chromosomal organization provide insight into shared whole-genome duplications across the heath family (Ericaceae). Genome Biology and Evolution 11:3353−71

    doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz245

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Ma H, Liu Y, Liu D, Sun W, Liu X, et al. 2021. Chromosome-level genome assembly and population genetic analysis of a critically endangered Rhododendron provide insights into its conservation. The Plant Journal 107(5):1533−45

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15399

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Wang X, Gao Y, Wu X, Wen X, Li D, et al. 2021. High-quality evergreen azalea genome reveals tandem duplication-facilitated low-altitude adaptability and floral scent evolution. Plant Biotechnology Journal 19(12):2544−60

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13680

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Gao Y, Wang H, Liu C, Chu H, Dai D, et al. 2018. De novo genome assembly of the red silk cotton tree (Bombax ceiba). GigaScience 7:giy051

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Zhao D, Hamilton JP, Pham GM, Crisovan E, Wiegert-Rininger K, et al. 2017. De novo genome assembly of Camptotheca acuminata, a natural source of the anti-cancer compound camptothecin. GigaScience 6:gix065

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Ye G, Zhang H, Chen B, Nie S, Liu H, et al. 2019. De novo genome assembly of the stress tolerant forest species Casuarina equisetifolia provides insight into secondary growth. The Plant Journal 97:779−94

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Yi XG, Yu XQ, Chen J, Zhang M, Liu SW, et al. 2020. The genome of Chinese flowering cherry (Cerasus serrulata) provides new insights into Cerasus species. Horticulture Research 7:165

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00382-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Shirasawa K, Esumi T, Hirakawa H, Tanaka H, Itai A, et al. 2019. Phased genome sequence of an interspecific hybrid flowering cherry, 'Somei-Yoshino' (Cerasus × yedoensis). DNA Research 26:379−89

    doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsz016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Sollars ESA, Harper AL, Kelly LJ, Sambles CM, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, et al. 2017. Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees. Nature 541:212−16

    doi: 10.1038/nature20786

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Guan R, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Fan G, Liu X, et al. 2016. Draft genome of the living fossil Ginkgo biloba. GigaScience 5:s13742-016-0154-1

    doi: 10.1186/s13742-016-0154-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Silva OB Junior, Grattapaglia D, Novaes E, Collevatti RG. 2018. Genome assembly of the Pink Ipê (Handroanthus impetiginosus, Bignoniaceae), a highly valued, ecologically keystone Neotropical timber forest tree. GigaScience 7:gix125

    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Zhang Q, Zhang H, Sun L, Fan G, Ye M, et al. 2018. The genetic architecture of floral traits in the woody plant Prunus mume. Nature Communications 9:1702

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04093-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Baek S, Choi K, Kim GB, Yu HJ, Cho A, et al. 2018. Draft genome sequence of wild Prunus yedoensis reveals massive inter-specific hybridization between sympatric flowering cherries. Genome Biology 19:127

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1497-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Chen J, Hao Z, Guang X, Zhao C, Wang P, et al. 2019. Liriodendron genome sheds light on angiosperm phylogeny and species–pair differentiation. Nature Plants 5:18−25

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0323-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Wang M, Zhang L, Wang Z. 2021. Chromosomal-level reference genome of the neotropical tree Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don. Genome Biology and Evolution 13:evab094

    doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Liu H, Wang Z, Liu Y, Wei Y, Hu Z, et al. 2024. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in ornamental plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 42:193−200

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-023-01417-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Hwarari D, Radani Y, Ke Y, Chen J, Yang L. 2024. CRISPR/Cas genome editing in plants: mechanisms, applications, and overcoming bottlenecks. Functional & Integrative Genomics 24:50

    doi: 10.1007/s10142-024-01314-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Din A, Qadri ZA, Wani MA, Iqbal S, Malik SA, et al. 2023. Comparative analysis of physical and chemical mutagenesis in Chrysanthemum cv. 'candid': assessing genetic variation and breeding potential. ACS Omega 8:43836−49

    doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05723

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Din A, Qadri ZA, Ahmad Wani M, Banday N, Iqbal S, et al. 2023. Enhancing flower color diversity in Chrysanthemum cv. "candid" through ethyl methane sulfonate mutagenesis: a promising approach for ornamental crop improvement. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 3(11):1004−13

    doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Lloyd AM, Walbot V, Davis RW. 1992. Arabidopsis and Nicotiana anthocyanin production activated by maize regulatorsRandC1. Science 258:1773−75

    doi: 10.1126/science.1465611

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Holton TA, Brugliera F, Lester DR, Tanaka Y, Hyland CD, et al. 1993. Cloning and expression of cytochrome P450 genes controlling flower colour. Nature 366:276−79

    doi: 10.1038/366276a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    de Vetten N, ter Horst J, van Schaik HP, de Boer A, Mol J, et al. 1999. A cytochrome b5 is required for full activity of flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase, a cytochrome P450 involved in the formation of blue flower colors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(2):778−83

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.778

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Mol J, Cornish E, Mason J, Koes R. 1999. Novel coloured flowers. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 10:198−201

    doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80035-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Aida R, Yoshida K, Kondo T, Kishimoto S, Shibata M. 2000. Copigmentation gives bluer flowers on transgenic Torenia plants with the antisense dihydroflavonol-4-reductase gene. Plant Science 160:49−56

    doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00364-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Ueyama Y, Suzuki KI, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Fukui Y, Miyazaki K, et al. 2002. Molecular and biochemical characterization of to renia flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase and flavone synthase II and modification of flower color by modulating the expression of these genes. Plant Science 163:253−63

    doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00098-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Noda N, Yoshioka S, Kishimoto S, Nakayama M, Douzono M, et al. 2017. Generation of blue chrysanthemums by anthocyanin B-ring hydroxylation and glucosylation and its coloration mechanism. Science Advances 3:e1602785

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602785

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I. 2013. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytologist 198:16−32

    doi: 10.1111/nph.12145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Ben Zvi MM, Shklarman E, Masci T, Kalev H, Debener T, et al. 2012. PAP1 transcription factor enhances production of phenylpropanoid and terpenoid scent compounds in rose flowers. New Phytologist 195:335−45

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04161.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Knudsen JT, Tollsten L, Bergström LG. 1993. Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253−80

    doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85502-I

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Dudareva N, Pichersky E. 2000. Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents. Plant Physiology 122:627−33

    doi: 10.1104/pp.122.3.627

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Dudareva N, Martin D, Kish CM, Kolosova N, Gorenstein N, et al. 2003. (E)-β-ocimene and myrcene synthase genes of floral scent biosynthesis in snapdragon: function and expression of three terpene synthase genes of a new terpene synthase subfamily. The Plant Cell 15:1227−41

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.011015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Lücker J, Bouwmeester HJ, Schwab W, Blaas J, van der Plas LHW, et al. 2001. Expression of Clarkia S-linalool synthase in transgenic Petunia plants results in the accumulation of S-linalyl-β-D-glucopyranoside. The Plant Journal 27:315−24

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01097.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Aranovich D, Lewinsohn E, Zaccai M. 2007. Post-harvest enhancement of aroma in transgenic lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum) using the Clarkia breweri benzyl alcohol acetyltransferase (BEAT) gene. Postharvest Biology and Technology 43:255−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.09.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Yue Y, Yu R, Fan Y. 2015. Transcriptome profiling provides new insights into the formation of floral scent in Hedychium coronarium. BMC Genomics 16:470

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1653-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Verdonk JC, Haring MA, van Tunen AJ, Schuurink RC. 2005. ODORANT 1 regulates fragrance biosynthesis in Petunia flowers. The Plant Cell 17(5):1612−24

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.028837

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Spitzer-Rimon B, Marhevka E, Barkai O, Marton I, Edelbaum O, et al. 2010. EOBII a gene encoding a flower-specific regulator of phenylpropanoid volatiles' biosynthesis in Petunia. The Plant Cell 22(6):1961−76

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Lozano-Juste J, Cutler SR. 2014. Plant genome engineering in full bloom. Trends in Plant Science 19:284−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C. 2014. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/cas system. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 41:63−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Ma H, Tu LC, Naseri A, Huisman M, Zhang S, et al. 2016. Multiplexed labeling of genomic loci with dCas9 and engineered sgRNAs using CRISPRainbow. Nature Biotechnology 34:528−30

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.3526

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Jia H, Wang N. 2014. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PLoS One 9:e93806

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim JS. 2013. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nature Biotechnology 31:230−32

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.2507

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ann Ran F, Konermann S, et al. 2013. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nature Biotechnology 31:827−32

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Vanyushin BF, Ashapkin VV. 2011. DNA methylation in higher plants: past, present and future. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1809(8):360−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.04.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, et al. 2013. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Research 23(10):1233−36

    doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, et al. 2013. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nature Biotechnology 31(8):688−91

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Khatodia S, Bhatotia K, Passricha N, Khurana SMP, Tuteja N. 2016. The CRISPR/Cas genome-editing tool: application in improvement of crops. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:506

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00506

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Zhang F, Wen Y, Guo X. 2014. CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Human Molecular Genetics 23:R40−R46

    doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Ahmad Wani M, Nazki IT, Din A, Iqbal S, Wani SA, et al. 2018. Floriculture sustainability initiative: the dawn of new era. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 27, ed. Lichtfouse E. Cham: Springer. Volume 27. pp. 91−127. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75190-0_4

    [125]

    Abdul Aziz M, Masmoudi K. 2025. Molecular breakthroughs in modern plant breeding techniques. Horticultural Plant Journal 11:15−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2024.01.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Kishi-Kaboshi M, Aida R, Sasaki K. 2017. Generation of gene-edited Chrysanthemum morifolium using multicopy transgenes as targets and markers. Plant and Cell Physiology 58(2):216−26

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw222

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Kui L, Chen H, Zhang W, He S, Xiong Z, et al. 2017. Building a genetic manipulation tool box for orchid biology: identification of constitutive promoters and application of CRISPR/Cas9 in the orchid, Dendrobium officinale. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:2036

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128]

    Tong CG, Wu FH, Yuan YH, Chen YR, Lin CS. 2020. High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas-based editing of Phalaenopsis orchid MADS genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:889−91

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13264

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129]

    Yan R, Wang Z, Ren Y, Li H, Liu N, et al. 2019. Establishment of efficient genetic transformation systems and application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. and Lilium longiflorum white heaven. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:2920

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20122920

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130]

    Abdulla MF, Mostafa K, Kavas M. 2024. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of FT/TFL1 in petunia improves plant architecture and early flowering. Plant Molecular Biology 114(3):69

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-024-01454-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131]

    Nishihara M, Higuchi A, Watanabe A, Tasaki K. 2018. Application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for modification of flower color in Torenia fournieri. BMC Plant Biology 18:331

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1539-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132]

    Watanabe K, Kobayashi A, Endo M, Sage-Ono K, Toki S, et al. 2017. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the dihydroflavonol-4-reductase-B (DFR-B) locus in the Japanese morning glory Ipomoea (Pharbitis) nil. Scientific Reports 7:10028

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10715-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133]

    Li B, Cui G, Shen G, Zhan Z, Huang L, et al. 2017. Targeted mutagenesis in the medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza. Scientific Reports 7:43320

    doi: 10.1038/srep43320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134]

    Yu J, Tu L, Subburaj S, Bae S, Lee GJ. 2021. Simultaneous targeting of duplicated genes in Petunia protoplasts for flower color modification via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Plant Cell Reports 40:1037−45

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02593-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135]

    Watanabe K, Oda-Yamamizo C, Sage-Ono K, Ohmiya A, Ono M. 2018. Alteration of flower colour in Ipomoea nil through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4. Transgenic Research 27:25−38

    doi: 10.1007/s11248-017-0051-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136]

    Tasaki K, Yoshida M, Nakajima M, Higuchi A, Watanabe A, et al. 2020. Molecular characterization of an anthocyanin-related glutathione S-transferase gene in Japanese gentian with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. BMC Plant Biology 20:370

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02565-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137]

    Xu J, Kang BC, Naing AHN, Bae SJ, Kim JS, et al. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase1 enhances Petunia flower longevity. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:287−97

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138]

    Shibuya K, Watanabe K, Ono M. 2018. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the EPHEMERAL1 locus that regulates petal senescence in Japanese morning glory. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 131:53−57

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139]

    Wang C, Li Y, Wang N, Yu Q, Li Y, et al. 2023. An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 platform for targeted genome editing in rose (Rosa hybrida). Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:895−99

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140]

    Adedeji OS, Naing AH, Kang H, Xu J, Chung MY, et al. 2024. Editing of the ethylene biosynthesis gene in carnation using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex. Plant Methods 20:20

    doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01143-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141]

    Holme IB, Ingvardsen CR, Dionisio G, Podzimska-Sroka D, Kristiansen K, et al. 2024. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation of Eil1 transcription factor genes affects exogenous ethylene tolerance and early flower senescence in Campanula portenschlagiana. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22(2):484−96

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142]

    Wang L, Wang L, Tan Q, Fan Q, Zhu H, et al. 2016. Efficient inactivation of symbiotic nitrogen fixation related genes in Lotus japonicus using CRISPR-Cas9. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1333

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01333

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143]

    Subburaj S, Chung SJ, Lee C, Ryu SM, Kim DH, et al. 2016. Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Plant Cell Reports 35(7):1535−44

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1937-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144]

    Zhang B, Yang X, Yang C, Li M, Guo Y. 2016. Exploiting the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted genome mutagenesis in Petunia. Scientific Reports 6:20315

    doi: 10.1038/srep20315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145]

    Sun L, Kao T. 2018. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of PiSSK1 reveals essential role of S-locus F-box protein-containing SCF complexes in recognition of non-self S-RNases during cross-compatible pollination in self-incompatible Petunia inflata. Plant Reproduction 31:129−43

    doi: 10.1007/s00497-017-0314-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146]

    Chen Q, Zhang X, Jin R, Mao H. 2024. Establishment of a CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system for Chrysanthemum morifolium. Ornamental Plant Research 4:e014

    doi: 10.48130/opr-0024-0012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147]

    Chen K, Liu H, Lou Q, Liu Y. 2017. Ectopic expression of the grape hyacinth (Muscari armeniacum) R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene, MaAN2, induces anthocyanin accumulation in tobacco. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:965

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00965

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148]

    Liu F, Hu L, Cai Y, Lin H, Liu J, et al. 2016. Molecular characterization and functional analysis of two Petunia PhEILs. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1606

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149]

    Wada N, Ueta R, Osakabe Y, Osakabe K. 2020. Precision genome editing in plants: state-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering. BMC Plant Biology 20:234

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02385-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150]

    Kishi-Kaboshi M, Aida R, Sasaki K. 2019. Parsley ubiquitin promoter displays higher activity than the CaMV 35S promoter and the Chrysanthemum actin 2 promoter for productive, constitutive, and durable expression of a transgene in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Breeding Science 69(3):536−44

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151]

    Chib S, Thangaraj A, Kaul S, Dhar MK, Kaul T. 2020. Development of a system for efficient callus production, somatic embryogenesis and gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saffron (Crocus sativus L.).Plant Methods 16:47

    doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00589-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152]

    Nitarska D, Boehm R, Debener T, Lucaciu RC, Halbwirth H. 2021. First genome edited poinsettias: targeted mutagenesis of flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase using CRISPR/Cas9 results in a colour shift. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 147:49−60

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-021-02103-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153]

    Zhu C, Zheng X, Huang Y, Ye J, Chen P, et al. 2019. Genome sequencing and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing of an early flowering Mini-Citrus (Fortunella hindsii). Plant Biotechnology Journal 17:2199−210

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154]

    Tasaki K, Higuchi A, Watanabe A, Sasaki N, Nishihara M. 2019. Effects of knocking out three anthocyanin modification genes on the blue pigmentation of gentian flowers. Scientific Reports 9:15831

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51808-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155]

    Zhang B, Xu X, Huang R, Yang S, Li M, et al. 2021. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutation reveals a role for AN4 rather than DPL in regulating venation formation in the Corolla tube of Petunia hybrida. Horticulture Research 8:116

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00555-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156]

    Semiarti E, Nopitasari S, Setiawati Y, Lawrie MD, Purwantoro A, et al. 2020. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system for molecular breeding of orchids. Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology 25:61

    doi: 10.22146/ijbiotech.39485

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157]

    Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, et al. 2015. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Scientific Reports 5:12217

    doi: 10.1038/srep12217

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158]

    Sarmast MK. 2019. Transient expression-based CRISPR/Cas9 system for manipulation of tall fescue SGR gene. Journal of Plant Production Research 56:35−43

    doi: 10.22069/jopp.2019.13945.2252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159]

    Su S, Xiao W, Guo W, Yao X, Xiao J, et al. 2017. The CYCLOIDEA–RADIALIS module regulates petal shape and pigmentation, leading to bilateral corolla symmetry in Torenia fournieri (Linderniaceae). New Phytologist 215:1582−93

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14673

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160]

    Hilbeck A, McMillan JM, Meier M, Humbel A, Schläpfer-Miller J, et al. 2012. A controversy re-visited: is the coccinellid Adalia bipunctata adversely affected by bt toxins? Environmental Sciences Europe 24:10

    doi: 10.1186/2190-4715-24-10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161]

    Mahfouz MM, Piatek A, Stewart CN Jr. 2014. Genome engineering via TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 systems: challenges and perspectives. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12(8):1006−14

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12256

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162]

    Jones HD. 2015. Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing. Nature Plants 1:14011

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.11

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [163]

    Araki M, Ishii T. 2015. Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends in Plant Science 20(3):145−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164]

    Purnhagen KP, Kok E, Kleter G, Schebesta H, Visser RGF, et al. 2018. The European Union Court's Advocate General's Opinion and new plant breeding techniques. Nature Biotechnology 36:573−75

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.4174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Din A, Wani MA, Jin C, Nazki IT, Ma J, et al. 2025. Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0007
    Din A, Wani MA, Jin C, Nazki IT, Ma J, et al. 2025. Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0007

Figures(1)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(147) PDF downloads(39)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects

Ornamental Plant Research  5 Article number: e010  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The global ornamental plant industry is still booming, and the demand for new combinations of plant quality, resistance, and germplasm resources is increasing. Traditional hybridization, mutagenesis, and mutation breeding strategies have made outstanding contributions to cultivating new varieties. However, due to its long cultivation cycle, there are limitations in adapting to the rapidly changing quality requirements of the market. In the past 20 years of the genome era, especially the emergence and development of transgenic and gene editing technologies, molecular biologists have recognized and verified the intrinsic molecular mechanism of many plant traits, providing an operational blueprint for efficient and directional molecular breeding of ornamental plants. The latest development of CRISPR/Cas technology, knockout, and knock-in technology, provides a powerful tool to meet the simultaneous increase of beneficial traits and knockout of adverse traits. Its faster breeding cycle, lower breeding cost, and higher accuracy show a broader prospect for molecular breeding in the post-genome era. In this paper, the application of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants is reviewed. In addition, we also explore the limitations of its use in ornamental plants. Although CRISPR/Cas technology has many advantages, in some applications, the argument against the use of CRISPR/Cas technology is valid. We think it is important to carefully assess the exact benefits and disadvantages of using this technique in floral crops.

    • Floriculture is one of the major and dynamic branches of horticultural sciences, since antiquity ornamentals crops have always dazzled humans. In accordance with a floriculture industry analysis conducted by Coherent Market Insights (www.coherentmarketinsights.com): The global floriculture market was valued at 34 billion Euros in 2022 according to reports from the International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH). Europe holds the largest market share (40.3%) in global floriculture production, which is 16% of the total floriculture market, while India, China, and the Netherlands are the world's largest producers of cut flowers and potted plants, ornamental plants, and seed balls, respectively. The main flower exporting countries are the Netherlands, Colombia, Italy, Germany, and Ecuador, and the main flower importers are Germany, the Netherlands, the United States, France, and the United Kingdom. The floricultural industry is sustained by novelty, and there has been a quest for the development of new cultivars in floricultural crops. Due to constantly expanding demand, the floricultural farming industry requires new and better varieties with novel characteristics in ornamental plant breeding, such as flower longevity, enhancement of flowering, regulation of flowering time, a novelty in colour range, and perfumes[1,2]. To keep up with demand, the ornamental plant industry wants access to cutting-edge plant varieties with superior characteristics, such as enhanced anatomical qualities, flower colour, pigments, stress tolerance, and disease resistance[3]. This may be with the usage of conventional breeding, like heterosis, hybridization, or by other means like cybridization, somaclonal variations, or with hybridoma techniques. Despite the widespread use of traditional breeding methods, there are clear drawbacks and limitations to these approaches, like low efficiency, time-consuming, and non-directional[4]. Recently, many biotechnological interventions have been carried out to develop new varieties, including the development of transgenics and gene editing. As we have seen in many crops like rice, maize, tomato, etc, there have been huge ethical and religious issues related to the development of transgenics. Many fears were voiced and ideas formed as a result of the increasing population globally and the direct impact these field crops had on human life, such as their use as food. There are no or negligible ethical issues related to the development of transgenic ornamentals, but the researchers were not able to develop the most striking novel traits like colour modification, plant architectural changes, vase period, and flowering time modifications. More than a thousand plant species have been genome sequenced, the post-genomic age necessitated the development of efficient gene function analysis tools by scientists[5,6]. Genetic engineering, genome editing, and similar procedures have gained widespread acceptance over the past decade as practical alternatives to the inherent difficulties that have plagued more traditional approaches[7]. At the beginning of gene editing, to understand gene function, metabolic pathways, and regulatory mechanisms, the scientific community has extensively adopted reverse genetics techniques including gene silencing[8]. However, some of the currently used gene silencing techniques, such as RNA interference, have several inherent flaws, such as instability and insufficient silencing, that can make it difficult to understand the phenotypes that arise. Given that it introduces mutations in the genome that are inherently stable and heritable across many generations, targeted genome editing provides a variety of advantages over other methods[9]. Several methods, including Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription Activator Like Effector Nucleases (TALENs), and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and their associated protein systems (CRISPR/Cas) have been developed. Within these techniques, several different CRISPR/Cas systems have been developed to achieve target-specific genome editing and are more effective and can edit many target genes at once than their predecessors, ZFNs, and TALENs[10]. For CRISPR/Cas systems, the Cas9 protein system is the most widely used in plant research, although other Cas proteins have also been reported like Cas12 and Cas13. Researchers have been able to accelerate their efforts to modify crops by employing CRISPR/Cas9, a genetic editing technique with great promise and easier application. The utilization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing technology which has actively promoted the efficiency of crop breeding helped agricultural and horticulture crops[11]. Numerous new research avenues have been made possible by the advent of CRISPR/Cas systems. Along with CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and CRISPR activator (CRISPRa) gene regulators, this involves the development of a base editor, prime editor, and epigenetic editor. Furthermore, it has imaging applications for targeting chromatin and RNA[12]. Many areas of biology, including medicine and agriculture, have been revolutionized as a direct result of its extensive application. Screening and detection of human and plant diseases were aided by CRISPR during the coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic[13]. Here, we describe the current state of enabling technologies and data on genes underlying features of interest, as well as update our previous evaluation of genome editing applications in ornamental plants (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Applications of genome editing strategies in breeding novel ornamental crops.

    • The use of genome sequencing technology (Table 1) has had a major impact in recent decades on the development of better-blooming crops[14]. While mutation breeding results in a 'subtractive' one-point improvement in floriculture, genetic transformation is vital for the creation and improvement of floricultural crops. Since the first recorded transformation in ornamentals in the eighties[11], genetic engineering technology has been widely regarded as an important strategy for creating new, desirable cultivars. The application of cutting-edge technologies such as CRISPR tools, which require sequence information, has been given a significant boost by the recent completion of the sequencing of the entire genomes and transcriptomes of several important floricultural ornamental crops. It has been clear that knowing the genome sequences of significant ornamental plant species will greatly benefit their breeding and research[15]. So far, the genomes of more than 100 ornamental plants have been sequenced, including 14 annuals, three ornamental aquatics, 19 cut flowers, one cacti, seven ornamental grasses, eight herbaceous perennials, seven orchids, five pot plants, 51 shrubs, and 14 trees[16]. Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas9 will improve our understanding of gene function in these crops, which in turn will allow us to develop more effective genome editing tools. Genome editing also necessitates standard operating procedures for cell transformation and regeneration. This method has been standardised for a wide range of crops, but for many ornamental plants, there are no established guidelines for this methodology. As our understanding of tissue culture expands, we will be able to more quickly implement uniform techniques for plant regeneration across all crops.

      Table 1.  A comprehensive and comparative genomics of ornamental plants, insights into genome size, chromosome number, and sequencing technology.

      No. Species Sequencing technology Genome size Chromosome no., and ploidy level Ref.
      (A) Annuals 1 Amaranthus hypochondriacus Illumina HiSeq 2500 466 Mb 2n = 32 [17]
      2 Antirrhinum majus Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II 520 Mb 2n = 16 [18]
      3 Eschscholzia californica Illumina HiSeq 2500 502 Mb 2n = 12 [19]
      4 Gypsophila paniculata MGISEQ-2000 PE 150 5–10 Mb 2n = 2x = 34 [20]
      5 Helianthus annuus PacBio RS II 3.6 Gb 2n = 34 [21]
      6 Ipomoea nil PacBio, HiSeq 2500 750 Mb 2n = 2x = 30 [22]
      7 Mimulus guttatus Illumina HiSeq 2000 531 Mb 2n = 28 [23]
      8 Mimosa pudica Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 896 Mb 2n = 4x = 48 [24]
      9 Petunia axillaris HiSeq 2500, PacBio 1.4 Gb 2n = 2x = 14 [25]
      10 Petunia inflata HiSeq 2500, PacBio 1.4 Gb 2n = 2x = 14 [25]
      11 Salvia splendens PacBio RS II; Illumina HiSeq X Ten 711 Mb 2n = 2x = 44 [26]
      12 Tarenaya hassleriana Illumina HiSeq 2000 300 Mb 2n = 20 [27]
      (B) Aquatic 1 Nelumbo nucifera Illumina HiSeq 2000 879 Mb 2n = 16 [28]
      2 Nymphaea colorata PacBio RS II, Hi-C 433 Mb 2n = 28 [29]
      (C) Cut flowers 1 Chrysanthemum seticuspe Illumina HiSeq 2000 and MiSeq 3.0 Gb 2n = 2x = 18 [30]
      2 Chrysanthemum nankingense Oxford Nanopore, HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II 3.07 Gb 2n = 18 [31]
      3 Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium PacBio RS II platform, Oxford Nanopore 2.60 Gb 2n = 18 [32]
      4 Dianthus caryophyllus 'Scarlet Queen' contig N50: 14.67 Mb; BUSCO: 97.15% 636 Mb 2n = 2x = 30 [33]
      5 Eustoma grandiflorum PacBio HiF 1.71Gb 2n = 6x = 72 [34]
      6 Platycodon grandiflorus Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform 680 Mb 2n = 2x = 18 [35]
      7 Primulina huaijiensis Illumina HiSeq 2500/HiSeq X Ten platform 478 Mb 2n = 36 [36]
      8 Rosa chinensis Illumina HiSeq 2500, PacBio RS-II 532.7 Mb 2n = 2x = 14 [37]
      9 Rosa multiflora Illumina MiSeq and HiSeq 2000 platforms 711 Mb 2n = 2x = 14 [38]
      10 Rosa rugosa, PacBio HiFi 382.6 Mb 2n = 14 [39]
      11 Rosa wichuraiana 'Basye's Thornless' PacBio HiFi, Oxford Nanopore 530.07 Mb 2n = 14 [40]
      12 Rosa roxburghii Illumina HiSeq 2500 480.97 Mb 2n = 14 [41]
      (D) Cacti 1 Carnegiea gigantea Illumina HiSeq 2000, MiSeq 980.3 Mb–1.3 Gb [42]
      (E) Grasses 1 Lolium perenne Illumina HiSeq 2000 99 Gb 2n = 14 [43]
      2 Trifolium pratense Illumina HiSeq 2000 420 Mb 2n = 14 [44]
      3 Trifolium subterranum Illumina HiSeq 2000 552.4 Mb 2n = 16 [45]
      4 Zoysia japonica Illumina HiSeq 340 Mb 2n = 40 [46]
      5 Zoysia matrella Illumina HiSeq 2000, MiSeq 423 Mb 2n = 40 [46]
      6 Zoysia pacica Illumina HiSeq 2000, MiSeq 302 Mb 2n = 40 [46]
      7 Selaginella lepidophylla PacBio RsII platform, Illumina MiSeq platform 122 Mb 2n = 20 [47]
      (F) Herbaceous perennials 1 Asparagus setaceus HiSeq X Ten, Hi-C 720 Mb 2n = 20 [48]
      2 Drosera capensis Illumina HiSeq 2500 264–293 Mb [49]
      3 Dionaea muscipula PacBio RS II 3.19 Gb [50]
      4 Boea hygrometrica Illumina HiSeq 2000, Roche 454 1.69 Gb [51]
      5 Catharanthus roseus Illumina HiSeq 2000 738 Mbp 2n = 16 [52]
      6 Primula veris Hiseq 2000, Miseq, Ion Proton, PacBio 479.22 Mb 2n = 2x = 22 [53]
      7 Rhodiola crenulata Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 420.2 Mb 2n = 38 [54]
      8 Tanacetum cinerariifolium HiSeq X, HiSeq 4000 7.1 Gb 2n = 18 [55]
      (G) Orchids 1 Apostasia shenzhenica Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio 471 Mb 2n = 68 [56]
      2 Dendrobium catenatum HiSeq 2000 1.1 Gb 2n = 2x = 38 [57]
      3 Dendrobium officinale Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II 1.27 Gb 2n = 2x = 38 [58]
      4 Phalaenopsis aphrodite GAIIX, HiSeq 1.20 Gb 2n = 2x = 38 [59]
      5 Phalaenopsis equestris Illumina HiSeq 2000 1.16 Gb 2n = 2x = 38 [60]
      6 Cymbidium ensifolium PacBio RSII platform 3.62 Gb 2n = 2x = 40 [61]
      7 Cymbidium goeringii PacBio Sequel platform 4.10 Gb 2n = 40 [62]
      (H) Pot plants 1 Begonia fuchsioides Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 935 Mb 2n = 2x = 22 [24]
      2 Kalanchoe fedtschenkoi MiSeq 260 Mb 2n = 34 [63]
      3 Primula vulgaris Illumina HiSeq 2500 474 Mb 2n = 22 [64]
      4 Rhododendron simsii PacBio RS II, Hi-C 525 Mb 2n = 26 [65]
      5 Sedum album PacBio RS II 305 Mb 2n = 48 [66]
      (I) Shrubs 1 Chimonanthus praecox Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II, HiSeq X, Hi-C 778.71 Mb 2n = 22 [67]
      2 Chimonanthus salicifolius Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II, Hi-C 835.5 Mb 2n = 22 [68]
      3 Forsythia suspensa Illumina HiSeq 2500, Oxford Nanopore 701.40 Mb 2n = 28 [69]
      4 Gardenia jasminoides Illumina HiSeq 2000, Oxford Nanopore, Hi-C 547.5 Mb 2n = 22 [70]
      5 Hibiscus syriacus HiSeq 2000 1.9 Gb 2n = 4x = 80 [71]
      6 Jasminum sambac Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform - 537.99 Mb 2n = 2x = 26 [72]
      7 Lavandula angustifolia Illumina HiSeq 2000 870 Mb 2n = 50 [73]
      8 Osmanthus fragrans HiSeq X ten, Hi-C 733.5 Mb 2n = 46 [74]
      9 Paeonia suffruticosa BGISEQ-500, PacBio RS II 13.66–15.76 Gb 2n = 10 [75]
      10 Rhododendron delavayi Illumina HiSeq 2000 697.94 Mb 2n = 26 [76]
      11 Rhododendron williamsianum Illumina HiSeq 2000, Hic 532.5 Mb 2n = 2x =26 [77]
      12 Rhododendron griersonianum Illumina HiSeq X Ten system 677 M 2n = 26 [78]
      13 Rhododendron ovatum PacBio Sequel platform 549 Mb 2n = 26 [79]
      (J) Trees 1 Bombax ceiba Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II 809 Mb [80]
      2 Camptotheca acuminata Illumina HiSeq 2000 516 Mb 2n = 44 [81]
      3 Casuarina equisetifolia Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II 300 Mb [82]
      4 Casuarina glauca Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 314 Mb 2n = 18 [24]
      5 Cerasus serrulata Illumina X ten, Nanopore, Hic-C 256.65 Mb 2n = 16 [83]
      6 Cerasus yedoensis Illumina HiSeq 2000, MiSeq, HiSeq X 690.1 Mb 2n = 16 [84]
      7 Cercis canadensis Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 301 Mb 2n = 2x = 14 [24]
      8 Fraxinus excelsior Illumina HiSeq 2000, MiSeq, Roche 454 877.24 Mb 2n = 22 [85]
      9 Ginkgo biloba Illumina HiSeq 2000/4000 10 Gb 2n = 24 [86]
      10 Handroanthus impetiginosus Illumina HiSeq 2000 557 Mb 2n = 40 [87]
      11 Prunus mume Illumina GA II 280 Mb 2n = 16 [88]
      12 Prunus yedoensis HiSeq X Ten, PacBio RS II 257 Mb 2n = 16 [89]
      13 Liriodendron chinense Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS II, Bionano 1.8 Gb 2n = 38 [90]
      14 Jacaranda mimosifolia PacBio Sequel II Platform, Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform 707.32 Mb 2n = 36 [91]
    • Agrobacterium-mediated transformation uses Agrobacterium tumefaciens to transfer CRISPR components into plant cells, leveraging its efficiency and ability to integrate foreign DNA into the plant genome. This method has seen significant improvements in transformation efficiency, extending its use to a broader range of ornamental plants[92]. Meanwhile, the biolistic or particle bombardment method propels microscopic particles coated with CRISPR components into plant cells. This technique is particularly useful for plants that are not easily transformed by Agrobacterium, with recent optimizations enhancing delivery efficiency and reducing cellular damage[93]. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated protoplast transformation facilitates the uptake of CRISPR components by plant protoplasts, although it is technically challenging. Recent research has focused on improving PEG-mediated transformation protocols to increase the efficiency and viability of transformed protoplasts. Among the potential solutions to improve CRISPR delivery, viral vectors such as adenoviral vectors (AdVs), adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), and lentivirus vectors (LVs) are being explored for their high delivery efficiency. These vectors can deliver CRISPR components directly into plant cells, potentially overcoming some of the limitations of traditional methods. Recent advancements have optimized viral vector systems for specific plant species, improving their safety and stability. Additionally, nanoparticle-mediated delivery, which encapsulates CRISPR components in nanoparticles, shows promise despite being experimental. This method targets specific cells and tissues, with recent studies developing novel nanoparticle formulations that enhance delivery efficiency and reduce off-target effects[93]. Another innovative approach is magnetofection, which uses magnetic fields to concentrate CRISPR-loaded magnetic nanoparticles into plant cells, enhancing delivery efficiency and showing potential for targeted delivery in various plant species.

    • In the past, new traits were introduced into ornamental plants through classical breeding methods such as selection, crossing, mutation breeding, polyploidization, heterosis breeding, and chromosome doubling. However, these techniques faced challenges such as high chromosome and ploidy numbers, as well as issues of incompatibility. To overcome these hurdles and improve the gene pool, techniques like tissue culture, embryo rescuing, hybridization, and intra/interspecific crossing were employed. However, to meet the increasing demands for quality and quantity, biotechnological interventions were adopted in ornamental plants[94,95]. In recent decades, biotechnological interventions have gained further momentum with the utilization of genetic engineering to modify specific traits. Genetic engineering has overcome the barriers of cross-breeding and enabled the introduction of genes from distant gene pools. This technology has enhanced the quality and novelty of ornamental plants, including the modification of flower colours (e.g., production of blue chrysanthemum), variegation patterns in petals and leaves, alternatives to growth retardants for compactness, improved tolerance towards ethylene, disease resistance, and flower fragrance (Fig. 1).

    • Flower colour modification has always fascinated humans, and it primarily involves three types of bio-pigments: betalains, carotenoids, and flavonoids. There is a constant quest to develop novel colours in ornamental plants, particularly blue flowers. In genetic engineering, the focus has mainly been on modifying the flavonoid pathways in flowers. For example, the expression of the Lc gene (bHLH) under a constitutive promoter (CaMV35S) has been used to enhance anthocyanin production[96]. This approach has also been applied to improve anthocyanin levels in transgenic petunias, which have the potential to become valuable ornamental plants. Researchers have made numerous attempts to engineer blue flowers in popular cut flowers such as roses, carnations, and chrysanthemums, which collectively cover approximately 60% of the global market. However, these flowers only possess pelargonidin and cyanidin derivatives that lack aromatic acyl groups, making them prime targets for engineering the synthesis of delphinidins, which are responsible for blue hues[97]. Expression of the petunia flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase (F3'5'H) gene in a carnation line that accumulates cyanidin-based pigments resulted in low levels of delphinidin production and no significant impact on flower colour[98]. However, Florigene Ltd and Suntory Ltd managed to develop transgenic violet carnations (Florigene mauve Moondust™ and Florigene Moonshadow™) by inserting the F3'5'H gene and a petunia DFR gene into a white carnation lacking DFR[99]. These transgenic carnations exhibited higher levels of delphinidin, but they were not completely blue. On the other hand, Torenia flowers with an antisense DFR gene were bluer than those with an antisense CHS gene, as incomplete down-regulation of DFR led to flavone accumulation, resulting in co-pigmentation effects that shifted the flower's colour towards blue[100]. However, down-regulating FNSII genes in blue Torenia resulted in reduced flavone levels and increased precursor flavanones, leading to unexpectedly pale blue flowers[101]. This highlights a major drawback of the transgenic production of blue flowers, as the resulting colours may not be stable or novel over time. An alternative strategy for developing blue-coloured chrysanthemums was developed by Noda et al.[102] called metabolic engineering. They successfully generated the world's first true-blue chrysanthemums by incorporating the butterfly pea UDP-glucose: anthocyanin 3',5'-O-glucosyltransferase gene, and the Canterbury bells F3'5'H gene. This two-step modification of the anthocyanin structure proved to be a simple and effective method to achieve blue flowers in chrysanthemums. In addition to overexpressing specific genes involved in critical enzyme production, selecting an appropriate host with the right genetic makeup is crucial for redirecting pigment biosynthesis and achieving the desired colour change. This approach can help mitigate native route antagonism or allow the downregulation of other antagonistic pathways, ultimately leading to successful flower colour modification.

    • Floral fragrances play a crucial role in plant reproduction and are also of economic importance due to their enhancement of ornamental plant appearance. Modifying floral perfumes can significantly increase the value of ornamental plants, but a better understanding of the underlying processes is necessary. Flowers produce a wide range of specialized metabolites, including volatiles that attract pollinators, hormones that promote or suppress signalling cascades, and volatiles that protect against herbivores and pathogens[103]. However, flower-specific metabolites are often produced in small quantities, making their identification and characterization challenging[104]. Classical breeding of ornamental plants has led to a reduction in floral fragrance, but a more in-depth understanding of fragrance chemical biosynthetic pathways could help overcome this issue. While few scent genes have been identified, recent research has discovered numerous genes involved in floral aroma biochemistry. However, only a few of these fragrance genes directly encode enzymes that produce volatile chemicals[105]. Genetic engineering has shown promise in enhancing flower fragrance potential. For example, the linalool synthase (LIS) gene, as well as other genes like IEMT, BEAT, and SAMT, have been cloned from Clarkia breweri, a plant species known for its fragrance[106]. Similarly, genes such as (E)-ß-ocimene and myrcene synthases, and BAMT, involved in the synthesis of methyl-benzoate, have been extracted from snapdragon flowers[107]. However, the successful modification of floral scent through genetic engineering has been variable, with some transgenic plants not exhibiting the desired fragrance[108]. Another approach to enhancing floral fragrance is through the transfection of specific genes. For example, lisianthus plants were transfected with the C. breweri BEAT gene, which led to the induction of petal scent through the synthesis of benzyl acetate[109]. Transcriptomic profiling has also provided valuable insights into the development of floral fragrances in plants such as Hedychium coronarium[110]. The regulation of fragrance production pathways involves the action of transcription factors (TFs). While the transcriptional regulation of phenyl propanoid/benzenoid pathway TFs has been extensively studied, the regulation of terpenoid pathway TFs remains unknown. For example, the exclusively expressed ODORNT1 (ODO1) TF regulates the shikimate pathway in petunia petals[111]. R2-R3 type flower-specific TFs, such as Petunia EOBI, have also been identified and found to influence scent gene expression[112]. Despite significant advancements in understanding fragrance production, there is still much to learn. Master regulators that control volatile chemical synthesis and metabolic pathways have yet to be identified. However, the identification of fragrance production genes and enzymes has opened up possibilities for metabolic engineering, leading to improved plant defence and fragrance value. In conclusion, while there is promise in modifying floral fragrances through genetic engineering, our limited knowledge of smell metabolic mechanisms and regulation highlights the need for further research in this field.

    • With the development of biotechnology, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has become a more advanced and useful gene editing technology. Firstly, the CRISPR/Cas9 technique is more efficient than that of Zinc-Finger Nucleases (ZFNs, the first generation, 1993) and Transcription Activator-like Effector Nucleases TALENs (TALENs, the second generation, 2009). Lozano-Juste & Cutler[113] observed higher mutation rates in plants with CRISPR/Cas9 in comparison to ZFNs and TALENs. This is further supported by the facts of Liang et al.[114] who observed that CRISPR was 13.1% more efficient than TALENs (9.1%) while targeting the same sites in Zea mays. Secondly, CRISPR/Cas9 systems are simpler to build than programmable sequence-specific nucleases like ZFNs and TALENs because the target specificity of the nuclease is directly determined by a short sequence in the sgRNA. The specificity of the DNA sequence to which Cas9 will bind is determined by a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) that directs Cas9 to a 20-nucleotide (nt) sequence on the DNA sequence (the so-called protospacer). For Cas9 to bind and cleave the target sequence, an additional 3-nucleotide element (protospacer-adjacent motif; PAM) with the NGG sequence downstream of the target sequence is necessary. Specifically, 3 base pairs (bp) upstream of PAM is where DNA is cleaved. Insertional/deletion mutations of varying sizes can be caused by the repair of Cas9-induced DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) within the protospacer. Therefore, CRISPR/Cas9 systems are simpler to build than programmable sequence-specific nucleases like zinc-finger nuclease or transcription activator-like effector nuclease because the target specificity of the nuclease is directly determined by a short sequence in the sgRNA (TALEN). As a result, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been rapidly adopted for gene editing across a wide range of species[115], such as rice, wheat, potato, rose, orchid, petunia, chrysanthemum, and other ornamentals. All of these genome-edited plants also have genome data from at least one related plant species.

    • ZFNs or TALENs can theoretically be used to accomplish anything that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can. The fact that so many publications using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology have appeared in such a short period of time, including the first reports of genome editing in some horticultural species[116], nevertheless, emphasizes the technology's undeniable benefits in terms of ease of use, affordability, and adaptability. The CRISPR/Cas9 technology makes it much easier to test various gRNAs for each target gene because it does not involve any protein engineering procedures, in contrast to its predecessors. Additionally, cloning is not necessary because only 20 nucleotides in the gRNA sequence need to be altered to bestow a different target specificity. By employing two complementary annealed oligonucleotides, any number of gRNAs can be generated in vitro[117]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system can now be employed for high-throughput functional genomics applications, making genome editing affordable for any molecular biology laboratory. This enables the quick and low-cost assembly of huge gRNA libraries. Secondly, the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables genomic changes that are not possible with the other nucleases, such as While ZFNs and TALENs cannot cleave methylated DNA in human cells, the CRISPR/Cas9 system enables genomic changes that are not possible with the other nucleases[118]. Although this feature hasn't been extensively studied in plants, it is plausible to believe that the CRISPR/Cas9 system's capacity to cleave methylated DNA is inherent to the system and independent of the target genome. Plants have methylated CpG/CpNpG sites at a rate of about 70%, especially the CpG islands in promoters and proximal exons[119]. Consequently, the CRISPR/Cas9 method is more adaptable for genome editing in plants in general but is especially suitable for monocots with high genomic GC content, such as rice[120]. In contrast, conventional TALENs cannot break DNA containing 5-methylcytosine, since methylated cytosine is identical to thymidine in the main groove. To create TALENs that can cleave methylated DNA, the repeat that identifies cytosine can be swapped out for a repeat that recognises thymidine. Thirdly, the simplicity of multiplexing is CRISPR/primary Cas9's practical advantage over ZFNs and TALENs. It is possible to edit many genes simultaneously by introducing DSBs at various locations[121]. This technique is very effective for eliminating redundant genes or parallel pathways. By focusing on two widely separated cleavage sites on the same chromosome, the same method can also be used to create massive genomic deletions or inversions[121]. The monomeric Cas9 protein and any quantity of distinct sequence-specific gRNAs are all that is needed for multiplex editing with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. For each target site, distinct dimeric proteins are needed when using multiplex editing using ZFNs or TALENs. Finally, the CRISPR research community's open access policy has encouraged the general adoption and application of this technology, as opposed, for instance, to the ZFN platform's exclusive character. The community offers access to plasmids (for example, through the non-profit repository Add gene), web-based tools for choosing gRNA sequences and determining specificity (for example, for plant genomes: http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/cgi-bin/CRISPR; www.genome.arizona.edu/crispr; www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder etc. These facilities have influenced newcomers to adopt the technology and helped our understanding of the system and its practical applications advance quickly. This technique has the huge potential of avoiding marketing gluts/glitches with reduced supply-demand timing. One of the remarkable aspects of this technology is that it is the most user-friendly among all the genome editing technologies available to date[122].

    • Ornamental plants are remarkably beautiful and eye-catching flowers. Besides their ornamental value, they have pharmaceutical, culinary, confectionery, aromatherapeutic, and essential oil utilisation. For instance, essential oils and secondary metabolites in rose and other crops like jasmine have their utilization in the production of cosmetics, drugs, organic teas, perfumes, hormones, insect pest repellents, etc. Consumers demand distinctive and useful traits within the developed novel cultivars. For instance, people need more colourful flowers and flower sharps, the more novel and exaggerated looks are welcome. What's more, it's even better if add a little scent to some cut flowers that are not floral. However, from the technical means of breeding, it is difficult to achieve the above novel traits, not to mention the specific breeding technical problems such as cross incompatibility. As we know majority of the ornamental plants are not cross-compatible, besides incompatibility issues also arise within and among the many species. Therefore, we agree that conventional plant breeding methods and even conventional biotechnological methods are not sufficient and efficient enough to develop novel and newer traits within ornamental plants. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new versatile techniques or tools to overcome the obstacles faced by researchers in developing the novelty within ornamentals. During the last few decades, efforts and achievements have been made in developing the tools for the efficient targeting of plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9 technology. This is a versatile tool for targeted genome editing in many plants including ornamentals, which brought a new era for the improvement of ornamental plants. However, the technique had not been used in ornamentals to the extent it could be. Because of its high target specificity, the construction of the CRISPR/Cas9 system is easier to construct than other programmable sequence-specific nucleases, like transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) or zinc-finger nuclease. Consequently, there has been rapid adoption of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for gene editing in any species or a variety of horticultural plants[115]. With the help of another natural, simple, and convenient method, Agrobacterium bacterium the plasmid containing CRISPR/Cas9 can be transferred into most of the plant's cells/organisms to achieve genome editing[123].

    • It's no secret that the global market for ornamental crops like roses, chrysanthemums, orchids, and tulips is worth well over a billion dollars[124]. There is a significant need for novel features linked with acceptable plant architecture, scent, and colour in the ornamental plant industry because these plants are primarily grown for their aesthetic value. Breeding through hybridization and breeding through mutation have long been utilised to create such features[125]. However, the time and effort involved in breeding, the difficulty in achieving homozygous mutation in polyploids, the lack of precision, and the low frequency in producing the desired outcomes call for the implementation of additional technologies, such as transgenic and genome editing technologies. Transgenic plants like the petunia (created by inserting a maize gene expressing dihydro flavanol reductase) and the early flowering chrysanthemum and orchid (created by inserting genes from the MADS-box gene family) have been developed in recent years. The advent of genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9 has provided a fresh opportunity for their rapid evolution. Recently sequenced and assembled genomes can benefit from these methods as well, as their annotations can be parsed for insights into their metabolic activity. The first specific genome editing in floricultural crops is been reported in Chrysanthemum, one of the top ten cut flowers on a global level. There have been many hurdles in the breeding of novel flower traits because of the complex ploidy of the genome. The quest for the development of novel varieties in chrysanthemum has surged in the last decade. Conventional biotechnology along with transgenic one has altogether failed to develop novel and sustainable traits in chrysanthemum. An attempt to perform the world's first genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 system in chrysanthemum was undertaken[126]. First of all, they developed transgenic lines of chrysanthemum expressing a yellowish-green fluorescent protein gene from Chiridius poppei (CpYGFP) and then targeted CpYGFP for gene editing followed by comparing the activity of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and parsley ubiquitin calli and derived Cas9 with parsley ubiquitin promoter. In the next step, they choose two sgRNAs for targeting different positions in the CpYGFP gene thus obtaining transgenic calli having mutated CpYGFP genes (CRISPR_CpYGFP-chrysanthemum). After going through DNA sequencing and florescence observations, they finally obtained CRISPR_CpYGFP-chrysanthemum shoot containing a mutation in the CpYGFP sequence. This was the hallmark for exploiting the genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 system in the floricultural research field (Table 2). The study paved the way for utilising CRISPR/Cas9 system for developing the never-possible varieties or traits in floricultural crops.

      Table 2.  Comprehensive list of genome-edited ornamentals plants, targets, tools, and phenotypic outcomes.

      Species Delivery method Material Cas9 promotor sgRNA promotor Target gene Final produce Phenotype Ref.
      Campanula portenschlagiana Agrobacterium In vitro grown petioles CaMV 35S AtU6-26 CpEil1a, CpEil1b Plants Increased ethylene tolerance [141]
      Chrysanthemum morifolium 'Sei-Marin' Agrobacterium Young leaves PcUbi AtU6 CpYGFP Plant Decreased fluorescence [150]
      Chrysanthemum morifolium Agrobacterium leaf discs CaMV 35S AtU6-26 CmPDS, CmTGA1 Plant Display an albino phenotype [146]
      Crocus sativus Agrobacterium Corms CaMV 35S Plant [151]
      Dendrobium officinale Agrobacterium Protocorms CaMV 35S OsU3 C3HC4H, 4CL, CCR, IRX Plant [127]
      Dianthus caryophyllus CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex Leaf segments CaMV 35S AtU6-26 ACS1, ACO1 Plant Reduced ethylene production, delayed flower senescence, improved longevity [140]
      Euphorbia pulcherrima (Poinsettia) Agrobacterium mediated Internode stem F3′H Flower colour changed from vivid red to vivid reddish-orange [152]
      Fortunella hindsii Agrobacterium Seedlings CaMV 35S AtU6 FhPDS Plant Albino leaves [153]
      Ipomoea nil 'AK77' Agrobacterium Embryos PcUbi AtU6g InCCD4 Plant Altered flower color [135]
      Ipomoea nil 'AK77' Agrobacterium Embryos PcUbi AtU6g InEPH1 Plant Extended flower longevity [138]
      Ipomoea nil 'Violet' Agrobacterium Embryos PcUbi AtU6g InDFR Plant Altered flower color [132]
      Ipomoea nil 'Violet' Agrobacterium mediated Immature embryo EPH1 Delay in petal senescence [138]
      Japanese Gentian (Albireo) Agrobacterium mediated Leaf Gt5GT, Gt3'GT, Gt5/3'AT Pale red violet, dull pink, and pale mauve flowers [154]
      Japanese Gentian (Albireo) Agrobacterium mediated Leaf GST1 Reduced anthocyanin in petals, white and pale blue flower [136]
      Lilium longiflorum 'White Heaven' Agrobacterium Seedling scales Ubi OsU3 LlPDS Plant Albino leaves [129]
      Lilium pumilum Agrobacterium Embryos Ubi OsU3 LpPDS Plant Albino leaves [129]
      Lotus japonicus Agrobacterium mediated LjLb1, LjLb2, LjLb3 Nodule formation in the presence of rhizobia and establishing low free oxygen concentration in nodule [142]
      Petunia hybrida 'Madness Midnight' PEG Protoplasts PhNR Protoplasts [143]
      Petunia hybrida 'Madness Midnight' PEG Protoplasts PhF3H Protoplasts Flower color [134]
      Petunia hybrida 'Mirage Rose' Agrobacterium Young leaves CaMV 35S AtU6 PhACO1 Plant Extended flower longevity [137]
      Petunia hybrid 'Mitchell Diploid' Agrobacterium mediated Leaf DPL Absence of the Vein associated anthocyanin pattern [155]
      Petunia hybrida 'Mitchell' Agrobacterium Young leaves CaMV 35S AtU6 PhPDS Plant Albino leaves [144]
      Petunia × hybrida 'Mitchell Diploid' Agrobacterium Young leaves CaMV 35S 6 (AtU6) PhFT1, PhTFL1a, etc. Plant Early Flowering, Increased Branching [130]
      Petunia inflata Agrobacterium Young leaves CaMV 35S AtU6 PiSSK1 Plant Altered compatibility of pollens [145]
      Phalaenopsis amabilis Agrobacterium mediated PDS3 Protocorms Albino leaf [156]
      Phalaenopsis equestris Agrobacterium mediated MADS44, MADS36 and MADS8 Long juvenile period [128]
      Populus tomentosa Carr. (clone 741) Agrobacterium mediated Leaf PtoPDS Albino phenotype was observed [157]
      Festuca arundinacea. Transient Agrobacterium mediated transformation Leaf SGR Chlorophyll degradation [158]
      Salvia miltiorrhiza (SmCPS1) Tanshinone biosynthesis [133]
      Torenia fournieri 'Crown Violet' Agrobacterium Young leaves CaMV 35S AtU6 TfF3H Plant Altered flower color [131]
      Torenia fournieri TfRAD1 Leaf sections Flowers with abnormal shape & pigmentation [159]
    • Recent work has shown CRISPR/Cas9 as a viable gene-editing tool in chrysanthemum by targeting transgenic plants with a multicopy GFP gene utilising a variety of promoters. Compared to CaMV35s, the ubiquitin promoter from Petriselinum crispum was found to be more successful at inducing mutations in chrysanthemum and, consequently, producing more severe decreases in fluorescence[126]. Dendrobium officinale, a type of orchid, had its genome edited using CRISPR/Cas9 in a separate study. Because of its high lignocellulose content, D. officinale is rarely used in natural medicine. Mutation rates of 10%−100% were achieved in different loci of five genes involved in lignocellulose biosynthesis when multiple gRNAs were used to target these genes[127]. These genes are coumarate 3-hydroxylase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, coumarate-coenzyme A ligase, cinnamoyl coenzyme A reductase, and irregular xylem 5. CRISPR/Cas9 has been used to successfully create numerous MADS gene mutants (MADS8, MADS36, and MADS44) in the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris. Successful generation of triple mutants (at a rate of 97.9%) was accomplished, and single and double mutants were also created for the study of the role of individual genes in flowering plant growth[128]. Using Agrobacterium-mediated gene editing and protoplast transfection, the CiPDS (chicory phytoene desaturase) gene was modified under the U6 promotor.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 was used to initiate flowering and advance flower growth by targeting MADS genes (MADS, MADS44, MADS36, and MADS8) from the orchid species Phalaenopsis[128]. There are over a hundred different species of the genus Lilium, all of which bloom after emerging from their underground bulbs. In three species of Lilium, PDS has been used as an editing target to show that CRISPR/Cas9 can be used to modify the genome. Fisch and White Heaven cultivars showed mutation rates of 69.57% and 63.64%, respectively[129]. Abdulla et al.[130] successfully utilized CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis to target FT and TFL1 genes in petunia, resulting in early flowering and compact growth. The edited plants exhibited significant phenotypic changes, including shorter internodes and increased branching. This study demonstrates the potential of genome editing to enhance ornamental traits in petunia, paving the way for advancements in ornamental plant breeding.

    • The colour of flowers is an important trait in ornamental crops. Recent studies have focused on gene targeting to modify flower colour in various plant species. In Torenia fournieri, the gene for flavanone-3-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the flavonoid production pathway, was edited. This resulted in a light purple to nearly white bloom colour in 80% of regenerated transgenic lines[131]. Knocking out the InCCD4 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 in an undisclosed plant species led to the development of yellow midribs in the flower petals. In this case, the disruption of the dihydroflavonol-4-reductase-B (DFR-B) gene, which affects anthocyanin production, resulted in flowers with various colours such as white, violet, and pale-violet, as well as stems and leaves devoid of anthocyanins[132]. In Salvia miltiorrhiza, a Chinese medicinal plant, the diterpene synthase gene (SmCPS1) involved in tanshinone production was knocked out using CRISPR/Cas9 to create tanshinone-free plants while leaving other phenolic compounds unaffected[133]. A gRNA was designed to simultaneously target two F3H genes (F3HA, F3HB) in the petunia cultivar 'Madness Midnight'. After transformation into protoplasts, the gRNA induced indel mutations ranging from 9.99% to 26.27%. Among the 67 protoplast-regenerated plants, only one double-knockout mutant exhibited a noticeable flower color change, transitioning from purple to pale purplish pink[134]. In Ipomoea nil cultivar AK77, the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) gene associated with carotenoid degradation was knocked down using CRISPR/Cas9. The resulting knockout mutant plants displayed pale yellow petals and a 20-fold increase in carotenoid content compared to the wild type[135]. In Japanese gentian flowers, the glutathione S-transferase 1 (GST1) gene was targeted for gene editing by Tasaki et al.[136]. Only 7.5% of the plants underwent editing at the target site, and two mutants with different phenotypes were generated: severe (almost white) and mild (pale blue). Another study focused on the DFR-B gene, which encodes an anthocyanin biosynthetic enzyme. Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in the secondary embryos of Ipomoea nil, a mutation rate of 75% was achieved. Biallelic mutants exhibited green stems and white flowers, while a few monoallelic mutants displayed green stems with violet flowers or violet stems with pale flowers[132]. These studies demonstrate the successful use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to modify flower colour in various plant species, offering potential applications in crop improvement and ornamental plant breeding.

    • Reduced activity of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase 1 (ACO) in petunias has been found to result in longer-lasting blooms[137]. ACO is the terminal enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis, and partial knock-out of this gene led to a significant decrease in ethylene production in flower organs. As a result, the mutant flowers exhibited an extended vase life of four additional days, totalling ten days. In another study focused on Ipomoea nil (Japanese morning glory), the primary targets of CRISPR/Cas9 technology were flower longevity and colour[138]. The NAC transcription factor family, which plays a vital role in hormone signalling in plants, was found to influence disease resistance. Specifically, the deletion of the Ephemeral 1 (EPH1) transcription factor using CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in an approximately 84% increase in flower longevity compared to the wild type. This increase was attributed to mutations occurring at single or multiple target sites, involving insertions and/or deletions of one or more bases, ultimately leading to an extension of senescence by up to 10.8 h[132]. Additionally, the cleavage of carotenoids in mature Ipomoea nil petals is mediated by a dioxygenase called indole-3-carboxylate dioxygenase 4 (InCCD4)[135]. Furthermore, the knockout of the RhEIN2 gene (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE2) in roses was found to significantly impact the response of the flowers to ethylene, resulting in almost complete inhibition of flower opening in the mutant[139]. Lastly, the CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the ACO1 gene in petunias led to reduced ethylene production and increased flower vase life in the T0 mutant[137]. Adedeji et al.[140] successfully edited ethylene biosynthesis genes (ACS1 and ACO1) in carnation using the CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex system, achieving mutation frequencies ranging from 8.8% to 58.5%. The edited plants exhibited reduced ethylene production, leading to delayed flower senescence and extended vase life. This study demonstrates the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for improving ornamental plant longevity and reducing reliance on chemical inhibitors. Holme et al.[141] utilized CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout CpEil1a and CpEil1b genes in Campanula portenschlagiana, enhancing ethylene tolerance without affecting flower longevity. The study demonstrated an allele dosage effect, where increased mutations led to higher ethylene tolerance.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been employed to develop desired features in ornamental crops. Symbiosis receptor-like kinase and three haemoglobin genes in Lotus japonicas were targeted to promote nodule formation and decrease free oxygen content in nodules while in the presence of rhizobia, hence improving symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The mutation rate for symbiosis receptor-like kinase-targeting gRNA was 35%, while that for leghaemoglobin-targeting gRNA was 28.5%[142]. To alter the endogenous nitrate reductase gene in petunia, a model ornamental crop, protoplasts were used[143]. Loss-of-function mutants of the nitrate reductase enzyme are unable to absorb nitrate effectively because they are not able to take in and use the nutrients. As with nitrate reductase, petunia has shown to be capable of a knock-out of PDS with efficiencies ranging from 55.6% to 87.5%[144].

    • In a study conducted by Kui et al.[127], five genes involved in the lignin synthesis pathway were edited using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. These genes included coumarin acid 3-hydroxylase (C3H), cassia bark acid 4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarin acid: coenzyme A ligase (4CL), cassia bark acyl-coenzyme A reductase (CCR), and IRREGULAR XYLEM5 (IRX). After transforming the edited genes into the original stem, the researchers detected base insertions, deletions, and substitutions, which had an impact on the lignin biosynthesis of Dendrobium officinale. In another study by Sun & Kao[145], the piSSK1 gene of the Skp1 subunit in the Petunia SCF-SLF complex was edited using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The edited gene was then transformed into leaves to investigate the effect of piSSK1 on self-incompatibility. The researchers found that the loss of piSSK1 in transgenic pollen grains inhibited the growth of pollen tubes. Self-incompatibility in Petunia is regulated by a polymorphic S-locus, which includes several genes (SLF) expressed only in the late stages of pollen development, and a single gene expressed only in the pistil during fruit set. For these SLF proteins to function, they must form an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex with another protein containing an F-box sequence (Skp1, Cullin1, and F-box; SCF). In SCFSLF complexes, the Cullin1 (PiCUL1-P) and Skp1 (PiSSK1) subunits are restricted to pollen. While the role of PiSSK1 in self-incompatibility is known, its specific function is still unclear. Crosses between wild-type plants and knock-out mutant lines resulted in no fruit set, demonstrating the essential role of the Skp1 component PiSSK1 in proper SCFSLF complex assembly[145]. Chen et al.[146] established a CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system for Chrysanthemum morifolium, targeting the CmPDS and CmTGA1 genes to enhance disease resistance and improve breeding efficiency. The study demonstrated high editing efficiency and successful gene knockout, resulting in albino phenotypes and reduced resistance to Chrysanthemum White Rust.

    • In the floriculture market, one of the most differentiating aspects is the availability of appealing colour combinations. Grape hyacinth was used by Chen et al.[147] to identify MaAN2, an R2R3 transcription factor. In tobacco, transformation, and overexpression of MaAN2 led to the upregulation of genes involved in anthocyanin production, resulting in transgenic tobacco with a noticeable dark hue. Consumers are also drawn to vases because of their long shelf lives. Ethylene is a hormone in plants that has a role in growth and development. When both exogenous and endogenous ethylene levels are high, they trigger ethylene responses that hasten the ageing process. By using virus-induced gene silencing, Liu et al.[148] were able to knock out EIL1 and EIL2 in petunia, two probable downstream components of the ethylene signalling pathway. By keeping an eye on things, they discovered that down-regulating the two EIL genes affects the lifetime of petunia blooms. To test this, we propose that by using CRISPR knock-in to replace one of the EIL genes[148] with MaAN2[147], and then increasing pigmentation through CRISPRa-facilitated upregulation of the transgene, we can improve two types of aesthetic quality in mutant lines at once (beauty and consistency of the beauty per se). The resulting plants would have flowers with intense colour and lengthy vase life, and the consequences would be minimal. The inability of plants to detect ethylene typically results in profound malformation. However, the functional redundancy of EIL genes prevented the observable phenotypic alterations seen in transfected plants after EIL gene silencing, save for the increased bloom lifetime[148]. Colour changes in plants are a typical occurrence, and this is true regardless of customer taste or the ease of identification. High mutation rates are found in enzymes involved in complex biosynthesis, such as anthocyanin and carotenoid synthesis because these pathways involve a wide variety of metabolites catalysed by a large number of enzymes. Point mutations, which occur when there is only one change in a base sequence, are a common cause of albinism and other colourless phenotypes in flowers. Base editing, prime editing, and CRISPR knock-in via HDR are promising CRISPR/Cas9-derived approaches that can be used to alter the altered gene's function[149]. The CRISPR/Cas system has superseded several older methods of genetic engineering. Validation of the safety, stability, and practicability of these newly proposed uses of the CRISPR system is underway, but they are being actively and immediately used. It will be up to society to judge the system's superior performance among other genome-editing techniques, and new findings are expected to speed up plant breeding.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 is poised to revolutionize plant biology research by enabling routine targeted mutagenesis in plants. Unlike traditional random mutagenesis methods, which introduce genes at random locations, CRISPR-Cas9 offers precise editing, allowing researchers to target specific genes for inactivation. This technology holds significant promise for developing mutants of genes that were previously difficult to access, enabling the mutation of multiple loci and the creation of widespread deletions. As a result, plant breeding can progress without the need to introduce transgenes. Genetically modified (GM) plants, if not for concerns about potential environmental and health risks, could have significantly advanced agricultural practices[160]. In traditional genetic engineering, a DNA construct can be introduced into multiple chromosomes, resulting in random genome alterations. However, these random insertions can have unintended effects and are unsuitable for large-scale modifications, such as the incorporation of an entire metabolic pathway into a plant. By contrast, plant breeding has traditionally relied on natural genetic diversity and random mutagenesis to generate novel traits. CRISPR/Cas9 technology, however, enables precise and stable genetic changes in plants that can be inherited across generations. Furthermore, it can be easily erased after gene editing, resulting in plants free from CRISPR modification by the time they are cultivated[161]. Alongside other gene-editing techniques such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), the Cas9/sgRNA system has emerged as a cornerstone of new plant breeding technologies (NPBTs). These techniques can rapidly produce null segregant lines that lack transgenic inserts, a process much faster than conventional breeding methods. Importantly, NPBT plants resemble conventionally bred plants and should be evaluated based on their final characteristics, not the method by which they were produced. As a result, CRISPR-edited plants may fall outside the scope of current GMO regulations, raising new challenges for the regulation and acceptance of genetically engineered (GE) crops[162]. Currently, advisory and regulatory bodies are exploring how to classify genome-edited crops under existing GMO legislation, with some advocating for the classification of GE crops created by genome editing as non-GM, to promote social acceptance[162]. Araki & Ishii[163] propose regulatory concepts for GE crops, suggesting that plants modified using CRISPR-Cas9 technology should not be classified as GMOs under product-based GMO regulations. This is because the end product, despite having been genome-edited, does not consist of a genetically modified organism in the traditional sense. However, more research is needed to refine CRISPR/Cas9 systems for plant genome editing, as this powerful tool has the potential to generate valuable agronomic traits in plant species. This approach could complement classical breeding techniques in the study of complex quantitative traits determined through traditional breeding methods. GE plants with regulatory frameworks in place may be more acceptable than those carrying foreign DNA, as they could bypass the common concerns associated with transgenics[113]. In the US, the Department of Agriculture has proposed that GE plants not containing foreign DNA should not be considered GMOs, whereas the European Commission is expected to address the regulatory uncertainties surrounding genome editing in the near future[163]. The success and public perception of CRISPR technology in agriculture will depend on its ability to deliver results in terms of food security and crop improvements[163]. In the European Union (EU), the acceptance of transgenic and NPBTs is shaped by a strict regulatory framework, as evidenced by the 2018 ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). This ruling classified organisms derived from new mutagenesis techniques as GMOs, subjecting them to the EU's GMO directive while exempting organisms produced through traditional mutagenesis methods with a long safety record (European Union, 2018b, paragraph 54). This regulatory approach reflects the EU's cautious stance toward transgenic crops and NPBTs, resulting in limited acceptance compared to other global regions[164]. The ruling has significant economic implications for the EU's agricultural and food sectors, particularly concerning the importation of goods created using NPBTs. Moreover, it highlights a disconnect between scientific progress in plant breeding and existing regulatory frameworks. Many argue that newer, more targeted techniques like CRISPR may be safer than older methods that remain exempt from regulation. These authors suggest that the CJEU ruling underscores the need for regulatory reform to better align with scientific developments and global agricultural practices[164]. One challenge stemming from the CJEU ruling is that many mutagenic NPBTs are not detectable in the final product and cannot be distinguished from plants altered through traditional breeding methods. While this ruling primarily addresses the EU's regulatory approach, it highlights the more restrictive stance taken in Europe compared to other regions, likely reflecting public concerns about GMOs and new breeding technologies. The tension between scientific progress, regulatory frameworks, public perception, and international trade continues to complicate the widespread acceptance of transgenics and NPBTs in the EU.

    • CRISPR/Cas9 has rapidly gained prominence in molecular biology due to its transformative technological capabilities and unique attributes, including ease of manipulation, high efficiency, and broad applicability. With the complete sequencing of several ornamental plant genomes, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 to modify target genes in these plants is now a tangible reality. This enables researchers to investigate the molecular mechanisms regulating important ornamental traits and to enhance either the aesthetic value or stress resistance of these plants. The integration of advanced technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 is becoming a cornerstone of modern ornamental plant breeding, particularly for the study and modification of traits such as flower colour, type, fragrance, and resistance. These efforts aim to accelerate the development of novel and exotic ornamental plant varieties. Currently, CRISPR/Cas9 is primarily applied for genome editing and gene expression regulation. In addition, its potential extends to DNA labelling and epigenome editing, as demonstrated in studies[115]. While these applications have not yet been explored extensively in plants, CRISPR/Cas9 shows great promise for epigenome editing through modifications such as DNA methylation and histone changes. Similarly, it offers exciting possibilities for DNA tagging using fluorescent-labelled Cas9 proteins and custom guide RNAs (gRNAs). Despite its potential, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 in ornamental plants is not without challenges. Key obstacles include minimizing off-target effects and enhancing the efficiency of Cas9-mediated edits. Tailoring CRISPR vector promoters to suit the unique genomes of different ornamental species is another significant hurdle. Each species' genetic makeup requires customized promoter designs, making the development of universal promoters impractical. This necessitates extensive research to optimize promoter efficiency and precision for each species. Additionally, improving homology-directed repair (HDR)-a critical pathway for precise gene editing—remains a priority in overcoming technical limitations. The floriculture industry stands to benefit immensely from the advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 technology. For instance, it can be leveraged to enhance ornamental traits such as flower colour, shape, and fragrance, creating unique varieties that appeal to consumers. CRISPR also has the potential to develop disease-resistant plants, reducing dependency on chemical treatments and promoting sustainable cultivation practices. Moreover, extending the vase life of cut flowers is a major industry goal, and CRISPR can be employed to modify genes that regulate flower senescence, ensuring prolonged freshness. Additionally, CRISPR can improve the tolerance of ornamental plants to abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and salinity, enhancing their resilience and ease of cultivation. Looking ahead, further research is essential to refine CRISPR/Cas9 applications and expand its utility in ornamental horticulture. Advancements in these areas will not only address the current challenges but also unlock new opportunities for innovation, transforming the ornamental plant industry.

      • This work was supported by Yunnan Xingdian Talents—Special Selection Project for High-level Scientific and Technological Talents and Innovation Teams-Team Specific Project, Xingdian Talent Support Project (CYRC2020004), and Yunnan Xingdian Talents—Youth Special Project (XDYC-QNRC-2022-0731).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: writing – original draft, reviewing, and editing: Din A, Wani MA, Nazki IT; supervision and funding acquisition: Jin C, Ma J, Li F. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (2) References (164)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Din A, Wani MA, Jin C, Nazki IT, Ma J, et al. 2025. Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0007
    Din A, Wani MA, Jin C, Nazki IT, Ma J, et al. 2025. Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects. Ornamental Plant Research 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/opr-0025-0007

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return