Search
2025 Volume 10
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom)

More Information
  • Received: 07 July 2025
    Revised: 22 August 2025
    Accepted: 09 September 2025
    Published online: 18 November 2025
    Studies in Fungi  10 Article number: e026 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Coprinellus mushrooms, belonging to the family Psathyrellaceae, are saprotrophic fungi that grow on decaying plant material, including wood, leaves, grass, and ruminant dung. These mushrooms are widely distributed and extensively studied worldwide. Given the potential of Coprinellus, this review aims to present their distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivities, highlighting their industrial applications and identifying gaps for future research. Accordingly, this review provides a comprehensive checklist of 67 Coprinellus species, with the USA representing the country with the highest number of recorded species. At the same time, Coprinellus disseminatus is identified as the most widely distributed species. Moreover, 51 bioactive compounds, including sugar alcohols, fatty acids, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives, coumarins, organic acids, sugars, and sesquiterpenes have been identified in eight Coprinellus species. Furthermore, 12 distinct bioactivities have been reported across three species, including antifungal, stimulation of seed germination, biobleaching, antiproliferative activity, antioxidant properties, cytotoxicity, lignocellulolytic activity, biotransformation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, antidiabetic potential, anticholinesterase activity, anti-tyrosinase effects, and anti-inflammatory properties. Overall, Coprinellus mushrooms are rich in bioactive compounds with significant nutritional and medicinal potential. The documented compounds and bioactivities provide a crucial foundation for their effective use in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries. However, despite their rich bioactive potential, only eight species have been studied in detail. Therefore, further research is recommended to investigate novel bioactivities in other Coprinellus species and optimize their industrial applications.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Nagy LG, Vágvölgyi C, Papp, T. 2013. Morphological characterization of clades of the Psathyrellaceae (Agaricales) inferred from a multigene phylogeny. Mycological Progress 12:505−17 doi: 10.1007/s11557-012-0857-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Sharp J. 2022. August Fungi Focus: Pale Brittlestem, Candolleomyces candolleanus/Psathyrella candolleana. www.woodlands.co.uk/blog/flora-and-fauna/august-fungi-focus-pale-brittlestem-candolleomyces-candolleanus-psathyrella-candolleana/
    [3] Amandeep K. 2015. A checklist of coprophilous agarics of India. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 5(4):322−48 doi: 10.5943/cream/5/4/3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Asef MR. 2007. Agaric flora of northwest forests of Iran. Proceedings of the 15th Congress of European Mycologists, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 16−21 September 2007.
    [5] Badalyan SM, Graribyan N, Sakeyan CZ. 2005. Catalogue of the Fungal Culture Collection at the Yerevan State University, Armenia. Yerevan, Armenia: Yerevan State University. www.researchgate.net/publication/236876478
    [6] Badalyan SM, Szafranski K, Hoegger PJ, Navarro-González M, Majcherczyk A, et al. 2011. New Armenian wood-associated coprinoid mushrooms: Coprinopsis strossmayeri and Coprinellus aff. radians. Diversity 3(1):136−54 doi: 10.3390/d3010136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Brazas FP, Taglinao LP, Revilla AGM, Javier RF, Tadiosa ER. 2020. Diversity and taxonomy of basidiomycetous fungi at the northeastern side of Quezon protected landscape, southern Luzon, Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 10:1−11 doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2020.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Doveri F. 2011. Additions to "Fungi Fimicoli Italici": an update on the occurrence of coprophilous Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes in Italy with new records and descriptions. Mycosphere 2(4):331−427

    Google Scholar

    [9] Gierczyk B, Kujawa A, Szczepkowski A. 2014. New to Poland species of the broadly defined genus Coprinus (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycotina). Acta Mycologica 1:159−88 doi: 10.5586/am.2014.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Gomes ARP, Wartchow F. 2018. Notes on two coprinoid fungi (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) from the Brazilian semiarid region. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 75(3):285−95 doi: 10.1017/S0960428618000094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Halama B. 2016. Endangered, rare and little known macrofungi occurring in urban area of Wrocław. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego We Wrocławiu - Rolnictwo 117(619):37−48

    Google Scholar

    [12] Huang M, Bau T. 2018. New findings of Coprinellus species (Psathyrellaceae, Agaricales) in China. Phytotaxa 374(2):119−28 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.374.2.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Hussain S, Usman M, Afshan N, Ahmad H, Khan J, et al. 2018. The genus Coprinellus (Basidiomycota; Agaricales) in Pakistan with the description of four new species. MycoKeys 11(39):41−61 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.39.26743

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Keirle MR, Hemmes DE, Desjardin DE. 2004. Agaricales of the Hawaiian Islands. 8. Agaricaceae: Coprinus and Podaxis; Psathyrellaceae: Coprinopsis, Coprinellus and Parasola. Fungal Diversity 15(3):33−124

    Google Scholar

    [15] Mohammadi Goltapeh E. 2003. Identification of eleven Coprinus species of Iran. Rostaniha 4(1):39−56

    Google Scholar

    [16] Örstadius L, Ryberg M, Larsson E. 2015. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy in Psathyrellaceae (Agaricales) with focus on psathyrelloid species: introduction of three new genera and 18 new species. Mycological Progress 14:1−42 doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1022-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Prydiuk MP. 2014. New and rare for Ukraine species of the family Coprinaceae. 4. Genus Coprinus (section Veliformes). Ukrainian Botanical Journal 71(4):496−501 doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj71.04.496

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Schafer D, Alvarado P, Smith L, Liimatainen K, Loizides M. 2022. Coprinoid Psathyrellaceae species from Cyprus: three new sabulicolous taxa from sand dunes and a four-spored form of the fimicolous species Parasola cuniculorum. Mycological Progress 21:52 doi: 10.1007/s11557-022-01803-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Thiers HD. 1959. The agaric flora of Texas. III. new taxa of brown-and black-spored agarics. Mycologia 51(4):529−40 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1959.12024839

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Tikriti AHAA, Aziz WS, Ali SH, ALSamarraie MQ, Hammadi SY. 2023. Isolation of micro-fungi from some macro-fungi soils. International Journal of Aquatic Science 14(1):567−73

    Google Scholar

    [21] Redhead SA, Vilgalys R, Moncalvo JM, Johnson J, Hopple Jr JS. 2001. Coprinus Pers. and the disposition of Coprinus species sensu lato. Taxon 50:203−41 doi: 10.2307/1224525

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Kamran M, Jabeen S. 2020. Coprinellus ovatus sp. nov. from Pakistan. Mycotaxon 135:321−32 doi: 10.5248/135.321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Nagy LG, Házi J, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T. 2012. Phylogeny and species delimitation in the genus Coprinellus with special emphasis on the haired species. Mycologia 104:254−75 doi: 10.3852/11-149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Uljé CB, Keizer PJ. 2003. Coprinus parvulus, a new Coprinus from the Netherlands. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 18(2):281−83

    Google Scholar

    [25] Seidmohammadi E, Abbasi S, Asef MR. 2018. Morphological and molecular characterization of coprinoid fungi newly recorded for the mycobiota of Iran. Cellular and Molecular Biology 64:78−83 doi: 10.14715/cmb/2017.64.15.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Schafer DJ. 2010. Keys to sections of Parasola, Coprinellus, Coprinopsis and Coprinus in Britain. Field Mycology 11(2):44−51 doi: 10.1016/j.fldmyc.2010.04.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Gomes ARP, Wartchow F. 2014. Coprinellus arenicola, a new species from Paraíba, Brazil. Sydowia 66(2):249−56 doi: 10.12905/0380.sydowia66(2)2014-0249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Doveri F, Sarrocco S, Pecchia S, Forti M, Vannacci G. 2011. Coprinellus mitrinodulisporus, a new species from chamois dung. Mycotaxon 114(1):351−60 doi: 10.5248/114.351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Mkrtchyan JA. 2014. Qualitative analysis of fatty acids composition in different collections of coprinoid mushrooms. Proceedings of the YSU B: Chemical and Biological Sciences 48(1):37−41 doi: 10.46991/PYSUB.2014.48.1.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Badalyan SM. 2015. Chemical composition of mycelia of different collections of coprinoid mushrooms. Biodiversity and ecology of fungi and fungiform organisms of the Northern Eurasia. Proceeding of All-Russian Conference with International Participation, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 20−24 April 2015. pp. 297−99 www.researchgate.net/publication/277075605
    [31] Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, et al. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:6241−46 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Nagy LG, Walther G, Házi J, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T. 2011. Understanding the evolutionary processes of fungal fruiting bodies: correlated evolution and divergence times in the Psathyrellaceae. Systematic Biology 60(3):303−17 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Nagy LG, Kocsubé S, Papp T, Vágvölgyi C. 2009. Phylogeny and character evolution of the coprinoid mushroom genus Parasola as inferred from LSU and ITS nrDNA sequence data. Persoonia 22:28−37 doi: 10.3767/003158509x422434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Nagy LG, Urban A, Örstadius L, Papp T, Larsson E, et al. 2010. The evolution of autodigestion in the mushroom family Psathyrellaceae (Agaricales) inferred from Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian methods. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57(3):1037−48 doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Ujlé CB, Bas C. 1991. Studies in Coprinus—II. Subsection Setulosi of section Pseudocoprinus. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 14(3):275−339

    Google Scholar

    [36] Schünemann BLB. 2019. Fungos coprinoides do Rio Grande do Sul. Master Dissertation (in Portuguese). Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/212885
    [37] Zhang Y, Liang J, Tadele LR, Xiang C, Mannweiler S, et al. 2024. Generation of honeysuckle-like flavor from hop (Humulus lupulus L.) fermented with Coprinellus micaceus. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 97:103815 doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103815

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Aranda E, Kinne M, Kluge M, Ullrich R, Hofrichter M. 2009. Conversion of dibenzothiophene by the mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita and Coprinellus radians and their extracellular peroxygenases. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 82:1057−66 doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1778-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Naumann A, Navarro-González M, Sánchez-Hernández O, Hoegger PJ, Kües U. 2007. Correct identification of wood-inhabiting fungi by ITS analysis. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy 1(1):41−61

    Google Scholar

    [40] Wächter D, Melzer A. 2020. Proposal for a subdivision of the family Psathyrellaceae based on a taxon-rich phylogenetic analysis with iterative multigene guide tree. Mycological Progress 19(11):1151−265 doi: 10.1007/s11557-020-01606-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Couttolenc A, Padrón JM, Shnyreva AV, Sergeeva AI, Kurakov AV, et al. 2021. In vitro antiproliferative and antioxidant activity of three fungal strains from the White sea. Polar Science 29:100724 doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2021.100724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Kurakov AV, Bilanenko EN. 2023. Dynamics of mycobiota during composting of cow manure and straw. Eurasian Soil Science 56:453−69 doi: 10.1134/s1064229322602554

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Kuragina N, Samokish V. 2020. Mycobiota in cemeterial areas of Volgograd city. Natural Systems and Resources 3:28−32 doi: 10.15688/nsr.jvolsu.2019.3.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Novaković A, Karaman M, Milovanović I, Torbica A, Tomić J, et al. 2018. Nutritional and phenolic profile of small edible fungal species Coprinellus disseminatus (pers.) J.E. Lange 1938. Food and Feed Research 45(2):119−28 doi: 10.5937/ffr1802119n

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Vukojević J, Hadžić I, Knežević A, Stajić M, Milovanović I, et al. 2016. Diversity of macromycetes in the Botanical Garden "Jevremovac" in Belgrade. Botanica Serbica 40(2):249−59 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.162226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Tešanović K, Pejin B, Šibul F, Matavulj M, Rašeta M, et al. 2017. A comparative overview of antioxidative properties and phenolic profiles of different fungal origins: fruiting bodies and submerged cultures of Coprinus comatus and Coprinellus truncorum. Journal of Food Science and Technology 54:430−38 doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2479-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Moreno G, Picado JA, Rosario P, Alvarado P. 2021. Contribución Al Estudio De Los Hongos Del Campus Externo De La Universidad De Alcalá. Sociedad Micologica de Madrid 45:91−113

    Google Scholar

    [48] Requejo O, Castro ML. 2015. Micobiota nas Gándaras de Budiño (Pontevedra, NO Península Ibérica) II: Agaricales. Micolucus 2:43−59

    Google Scholar

    [49] Schafer D. 2012. Coprinellus heterothrix and C. cinnamomeotinctus. Field Mycology 13(3):99−104 doi: 10.1016/j.fldmyc.2012.06.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Yoo Y, Choi HT. 2013. Biochemical characterization of heterologously expressed chitinase 1 (Chi1) from an inky cap, coprinellus congregatus. Korean Journal of Microbiology 49(4):309−12 doi: 10.7845/kjm.2013.3081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Pejin B, Tešanović K, Jakovljević D, Kaišarević S, Šibul F, et al. 2019. The polysaccharide extracts from the fungi Coprinus comatus and Coprinellus truncorum do exhibit AChE inhibitory activity. Natural Product Research 33(5):750−54 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1405417

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Xiao X, Wang L, Yan F, Zhang J, Lv G, et al. 2024. Effectiveness of symbiotic fungus Coprinellus radians on seeds germination and seedlings development of Cremastra appendiculata (D. Don.) Makino (Orchidaceae). South African Journal of Botany 174:916−26 doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2024.09.056

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Gao Y, Peng S, Hang Y, Xie G, Ji N, et al. 2022. Mycorrhizal fungus Coprinellus disseminatus influences seed germination of the terrestrial orchid Cremastra appendiculata (D. Don) Makino. Scientia Horticulturae 293:110724 doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Voto P. 2021. Novelties in the family Psathyrellaceae. Part V. Micologia e Vegetazione Mediterranea 35(2):149−68

    Google Scholar

    [55] Voto P. 2019. Novità nella famiglia delle Psathyrellaceae. Parte II [Novelties in the Family Psathyrellaceae. Part II]. Rivista Micologica Romana 108:127−33

    Google Scholar

    [56] Sammut C, Karich A. 2021. Coprinellus andreorum: a new species from Malta and South America. Italian Journal of Mycology 50(1):21−29 doi: 10.6092/issn.2531-7342/12445

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Vesterholt J. 2012. Coprinellus P. Karst. In Funga Nordica, eds. Knudsen H, Vesterholt J. Copenhage, Denmark: Nordsvamp. pp. 662−72
    [58] Örstadius L, Nagy LG. 2021. Coprinellus dilectus versus Coprinellus aquatilis (Psathyrellaceae, Agaricales). AGARICA 42:49−54 doi: 10.5617/agarica.11155

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Zhu L, Bau T. 2024. Species clarification of fairy inkcap ("Coprinellus disseminatus") in China. Mycology 15(3):424−70 doi: 10.1080/21501203.2024.2309901

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Nghi DH, Kellner H, Büttner E, Huong LM, Duy LX, et al. 2021. Cellobiose dehydrogenase from the agaricomycete Coprinellus aureogranulatus and its application for the synergistic conversion of rice straw. Applied Biological Chemistry 64:66 doi: 10.1186/s13765-021-00637-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Lopez A, Aquino JDC, Undan JQ, Waing KGD, Jerwin, et al. 2016. Molecular identification and phylogeny of some wild microscopic fungi from selected areas of Jaen, Nueva Ecija, Philippines. Advances in Environmental Biology 10(12):153−58

    Google Scholar

    [62] El Akil M, Ouazzani Touhami A, Benkirane R, Doura A. 2014. Study of some coprinoid fungi in the domanial forest of the Jerada mine site (Northeast of Morocco) whose Coprinellus bipellis and Coprinopsis strossmayeri are new to the fungal flora of Morocco. Journal of Applied Biosciences 82:7389−402 (in French) doi: 10.4314/jab.v82i1.9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Desai WB, Peerally MA. 1990. Coprinus castaneus Berk. & Br.: an indigenous, wild edible mushroom from Mauritius. Discovery and Innovation 2:66−69

    Google Scholar

    [64] Voto P. 2019. Novelties in the family Psathyrellaceae. Part I. Rivista Micologica Romana 107:94−95

    Google Scholar

    [65] Navarro González M. 2008. Growth, fruiting body development and laccase production of selected coprini. Doctoral Dissertation. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany. doi: 10.53846/goediss-3631
    [66] Nakasaki K, Saito M, Suzuki N. 2007. Coprinellus curtus (Hitoyo-take) prevents diseases of vegetables caused by pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiology Letters 275(2):286−91 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00899.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Niveiro N, Albertó E. 2012. Checklist of the argentine Agaricales 2. Coprinace & Strophariacee. Mycotaxon 120:505

    Google Scholar

    [68] Voto P. 2022. Novelties in the family Psathyrellaceae. Part VII and description of Psathyrella longistriata. MycolObs - Mycological Observations 6:77−79

    Google Scholar

    [69] Yang Y, Gong X, Zhao D, Qin L. 2023. Identification of a Coprinellus strain and its application in Eucommia ulmoides gum extraction by fermenting leaves. Biotechnology Letters 45:939−53 doi: 10.1007/s10529-023-03396-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Bakys R, Vasiliauskas A, Ihrmark K, Stenlid J, Menkis A, et al. 2010. Root rot, associated fungi and their impact on health condition of declining Fraxinus excelsior stands in Lithuania. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 26(2):128−35 doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.536569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Arhipova N, Gaitnieks T, Donis J, Stenlid J, Vasaitis R. 2011. Decay, yield loss and associated fungi in stands of grey alder (Alnus incana) in Latvia. Forestry an International Journal of Forest Research 84(4):337−48 doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpr018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] James TY, Srivilai P, Kües U, Vilgalys R. 2006. Evolution of the bipolar mating system of the mushroom Coprinellus disseminatus from its tetrapolar ancestors involves loss of mating-type-specific pheromone receptor function. Genetics 172(3):1877−91 doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.051128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Suhara H, Kamei I, Maekawa N, Kondo R. 2011. Biotransformation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin by Coprinellus species. Mycoscience 52:48−52 doi: 10.1007/S10267-010-0062-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Mohammadi Goltapeh E. 2000. A contribution to the identification of Coprinus species of Iran. Proceedings of the 14th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Esfahan, Iran, 5–8 Sept, 2000. 2: 372
    [75] Putra IP, Thamrin JAD. 2021. Coprinellus sect. disseminati: source of gastropod mycophagy in bogor-Indonesia. Biota: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Hayati 6:147−54 doi: 10.24002/biota.v6i3.3316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Singh S, Dutt D, Tyagi CH, Upadhyaya JS. 2011. Bio-conventional bleaching of wheat straw soda-AQ pulp with crude xylanases from SH-1 NTCC-1163 and SH-2 NTCC-1164 strains of Coprinellus disseminatus to mitigate AOX generation. New Biotechnology 28(1):47−57 doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] De Leon A, Pagaduan MA, Panto B, Kalaw S. 2021. Species listing of macrofungi found in paracelis mountain province, Philippines. CLSU International Journal of Science and Technology 5(2):22−40 doi: 10.22137/ijst.2021.v5n2.03

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Oliveira LMN, Caires CS. 2024. Fungos Macroscópicos de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil. Seminário de Iniciaçáo Científica e Tecnológica 3:1−5

    Google Scholar

    [79] Ko KS, Lim YW, Kim YH, Jung HS. 2001. Phylogeographic divergences of nuclear ITS sequences in Coprinus species sensu lato. Mycological Research 105(12):1519−26 doi: 10.1017/s0953756201005184

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Lopez S. 2018. Species abundance of fungi is greater in landslide areas compared to undisturbed areas of the forest in Monteverde, puntarenas, costa rica. UC Merced Undergraduate Research Journal 10(2):1−18 doi: 10.5070/m4102038938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Cáceres O, Kirschner R, Piepenbring M, Schöfer H, Gené J. 2006. Hormographiella Verticillata and an Ozonium stage as anamorphs of Coprinellus domesticus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 89(1):79−90 doi: 10.1007/s10482-005-9011-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Saber M. 1994. Contribution to the knowledge of Agaricaceae (Agaricales) collected in Iran. Fifth International Mycological Congress 14-21
    [83] Pauline NA, Ahmed O, Saifeddine EK, Anas N, Amina OT, Allal D, Koutoua A. 2022. Study of eight species of the genus Coprinus in the forest area of daloa (central west, Côte d'Ivoire). Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 9(11):171−77 doi: 10.36347/sjavs.2022.v09i11.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Yagame T, Funabiki E, Yukawa T, Nagasawa E. 2018. Identification of mycobionts in an achlorophyllous orchid, Cremastra aphylla (Orchidaceae), based on molecular analysis and basidioma morphology. Mycoscience 59(1):18−23 doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2017.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Badalyan SM, Navarro-González M, Kües U. 2011. Taxonomic significance of anamorphic characteristics in the life cycle of coprinoid mushrooms. Proceedings of VII International Conference on Mushroom Biology and Mushroom Products, Arcachon, France, 4−7 October 2011. pp. 140−54 www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanna-Badalyan/publication/229163985
    [86] Thorn RG, Reddy CA, Harris D, Paul EA. 1996. Isolation of saprophytic basidiomycetes from soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(11):4288−92 doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4288-4292.1996

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] De Silva NI, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Bhat DJ, Karunarathna SC, et al. 2021. Morpho-molecular taxonomic studies reveal a high number of endophytic fungi from Magnolia candolli and M. garrettii in China and Thailand. Mycosphere 12(1):163−237 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Oliver JP, Perkins J, Jellison J. 2010. Effect of fungal pretreatment of wood on successional decay by several inky cap mushroom species. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 64(7):646−51 doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Güler P, Türkoğlu A. 2015. Screening of morphological and anatomical features of Coprinellus micaceus Bull. Fr. from Turkey. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry 43(2):115−18 doi: 10.15671/HJBC.20154312551

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Sergentani AG, Gonou-Zagou Z, Kapsanaki-Gotsi E, Hatzinikolaou DG. 2016. Lignocellulose degradation potential of basidiomycota from Thrace (NE Greece). International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 114:268−77 doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Nguyen TK, Lee MW, Yoon KN, Kim HY, Jin G, et al. 2014. In vitro antioxidant, anti-diabetic, anti-cholinesterase, tyrosinase and nitric oxide inhibitory potential of fruiting bodies of Coprinellus micaceus. Journal of Mushrooms 12(4):330−40 doi: 10.14480/jm.2014.12.4.330

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Wright R, Woof K. 2024. The genome sequence of the glistening inkcap, Coprinellus micaceus Coprinellus; Coprinellus micaceus ((Bull.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson, 2001). Wellcome Open Research 9:677 doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23349.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Sandulescu EB, Sfetcu EL, Stavrescu-Bedivan M. 2022. Macromycetes recorded in the campus of the University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest: preliminary data. Scientific Papers-Series A: Agronomy 65(2):419−24

    Google Scholar

    [94] Voto P. 2021. Novelties in the Family Psathyrellaceae. Part VI. Mycological Observations 1:17

    Google Scholar

    [95] Raza M, Cai L, Abbasi MW, Hafeez R, Tariq M, et al. 2022. The first updated checklist of novel fungi in Pakistan (1947–2021). MycoAsia 1(1):1−72 doi: 10.59265/mycoasia.2022-03

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Lee M, Hsiao C, Ju Y, Kuo Y, Lin R, Lee T. 2016. Terpenoids from the Fermented Broths of Coprinellus radians. Natural Product Communications 11(9):1229−30

    Google Scholar

    [97] Zíbarová L, Kolényová M, Tejklová T, Zehnálek P, Antonín V, et al. 2024. Červený seznam makromycetů ČR [Red list of fungi (macromycetes) of the Czech Republic]. Příroda 46:48−192 (in Czech)

    Google Scholar

    [98] Melo RFR, Dos Santos Chikowski R, Miller AN, Maia LC. 2016. Coprophilous Agaricales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from Brazil. Phytotaxa 266(1):1 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.266.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Sharma VP, Kumar S, Kamal S. 2015. Coprinellus and Coprinopsis: aggressive competitors of button mushroom during rainy season cultivation. International Research Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2:155−63

    Google Scholar

    [100] Uljé CB, Verbeken A. 2002. A new species in Coprinus subsection Setulosi. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 18(1):143−45

    Google Scholar

    [101] Lim H, Choi HT. 2009. Enhanced expression of chitinase during the autolysis of mushroom in Coprinellus congregatus. The Journal of Microbiology 47(2):225−28 doi: 10.1007/s12275-008-0247-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Lange M, Smith AH. 1953. The Coprinus ephemerus group. Mycologia 45(5):747−80 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1953.12024313

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Házi J, Nagy LG, Vágvölgyi C, Papp T. 2011. Coprinellus radicellus, a new species with northern distribution. Mycological Progress 10:363−71 doi: 10.1007/s11557-010-0709-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Kour H, Kour D, Kour S, Singh S, Jawad Hashmi SA, et al. 2022. Bioactive compounds from mushrooms: emerging bioresources of food and nutraceuticals. Food Bioscience 50:102124 doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Dulay RMR, Batangan JN, Kalaw SP, De Leon AM, Cabrera EC, et al. 2023. Records of wild mushrooms in the Philippines: a review. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology 11(2):11−32 doi: 10.7324/jabb.2023.110202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Novakovic A, Karaman M, Kaisarevic S, Belovic M, Radusin T, et al. 2016. Coprinellus disseminatus (pers.) J.E. Lange 1938: in vitro antioxidant and antiproliferative effects. Food and Feed research 43(2):93−101 doi: 10.5937/FFR1602093N

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Chi MJ, Dong XY, Wei WK, Li XM, Li XJ. 2023. Bisabolane and drimane sesquiterpenes from the fungus Coprinellus sp. Phytochemistry Letters 55:30−33 doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2023.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Atlagić K, Živić M, Jakovljević D, Filipović JM, Šibul F, et al. 2023. Cytotoxic activity of the crude polysaccharides/exopolysaccharides of Coprinus comatus and Coprinellus truncorum. Natural Product Research 37(11):1838−43 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2022.2118743

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Eguchi F, Dulay RMR, Kalaw SP, Yoshimoto H, Miyazawa N, et al. 2014. Antihypertensive activities of a Philippine wild edible white rot fungus (Lentinus sajor-caju) in spontaneously hypertensive rats as models. Advances in Environmental Biology 8(24):74−81

    Google Scholar

    [110] Chen HP, Liu JK. 2017. Secondary metabolites from higher fungi. In Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, eds. Kinghorn A, Falk H, Gibbons S, Kobayashi J. vol. 106. Cham: Springer. pp. 1−201 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59542-9_1
    [111] Ghora M, Bhowmik A, Ghosh S. 2025. Medicinal value of basidiomycota fungi. In Medicinal plants and their uses: basic to field, eds. Das D, Ghosh P. India: Shashwat Publication.
    [112] Spremo NR, Tesanović KD, Rakić MS, Janjušević LN, Ignjatov MV, et al. 2017. Antifungal activity of macrofungi extracts on phytopathogenic fungal strains of genera Fusarium sp. and Alternaria sp. Zbornik Matice srpske za prirodne nauke 2017(133):231−40 doi: 10.2298/ZMSPN1733231S

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Fabros JA, Dulay RMR. 2025. Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom). Studies in Fungi 10: e026 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0024
    Fabros JA, Dulay RMR. 2025. Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom). Studies in Fungi 10: e026 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0024

Figures(4)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(523) PDF downloads(258)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom)

Studies in Fungi  10 Article number: e026  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Coprinellus mushrooms, belonging to the family Psathyrellaceae, are saprotrophic fungi that grow on decaying plant material, including wood, leaves, grass, and ruminant dung. These mushrooms are widely distributed and extensively studied worldwide. Given the potential of Coprinellus, this review aims to present their distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivities, highlighting their industrial applications and identifying gaps for future research. Accordingly, this review provides a comprehensive checklist of 67 Coprinellus species, with the USA representing the country with the highest number of recorded species. At the same time, Coprinellus disseminatus is identified as the most widely distributed species. Moreover, 51 bioactive compounds, including sugar alcohols, fatty acids, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, hydroxycinnamic acids and derivatives, coumarins, organic acids, sugars, and sesquiterpenes have been identified in eight Coprinellus species. Furthermore, 12 distinct bioactivities have been reported across three species, including antifungal, stimulation of seed germination, biobleaching, antiproliferative activity, antioxidant properties, cytotoxicity, lignocellulolytic activity, biotransformation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, antidiabetic potential, anticholinesterase activity, anti-tyrosinase effects, and anti-inflammatory properties. Overall, Coprinellus mushrooms are rich in bioactive compounds with significant nutritional and medicinal potential. The documented compounds and bioactivities provide a crucial foundation for their effective use in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries. However, despite their rich bioactive potential, only eight species have been studied in detail. Therefore, further research is recommended to investigate novel bioactivities in other Coprinellus species and optimize their industrial applications.

    • Psathyrellaceae Vilgalys, Montecalvo & Redhead mushrooms are characterized by having a deliquescent fruiting body that has a special autodigestive phase of ontogeny on which the maturing fruiting body undergoes extensive cell autolysis that involves all the tissues of the cap and becomes a blackish inky fluid when mixed with a blackish mass of spores[1]. According to Sharp[2] and Nagy et al.[1], Psathyrellaceae mushrooms are morphologically characterized by their small to medium-sized, dark-spored, delicate fruiting bodies, which frequently have soft, delicate stems and caps. In an earlier classification, Psathyrellaceae, formerly known as Coprinaceae, are divided into two large genera: the autodigesting species of Coprinus Pers. and the non-autodigesting species of Psathyrella, respectively[1]. These mushrooms are widely distributed in both tropical and temperate countries, which thrive in different types of substrates such as soils, leaf litter, dead branches, and ruminant dung, among others[320].

      The Coprinellus mushrooms, one of the genera belonging to Psathyrellaceae, were derived from Coprinus (Pseudocoprinus Kühner), and were introduced to accommodate partially deliquescent species (such as Coprinellus disseminatus) and are now recognized as one of the established genera of Psathyrellaceae with over 71 species recorded based on the mycological data of the Species Fungorum[21]. In terms of its morphology, Coprinellus species are divided into three large clades, the Setulusi, Micacei, and Domestici clades, based on the existence of cap pileocystidia and the morphology of its veil[13,22]. Although these groupings tend to reflect morphological characteristics, molecular studies have demonstrated some phylogenetic inconsistencies, particularly in the distribution of setulose within clades[23]. In addition, Coprinellus is one of the coprinoid or inky caps fungi that exhibit distinctive features, including the dark pigmented basidiospores, occurrence of pseudoparaphyses in the hymenium, deliquescent lamellae, and sequential basidial development[24]. Similar to all other coprinoid genera, Coprinellus species can be distinguished from typical agarics by their gills, which liquefy as the mushroom matures[22]. Moreover, Coprinellus immature gills are not pinkish, with either present or absent veil, deliquescent or non-deliquescent cap during sporulation, and the pileipellis consists of hymeniderm or cystoderm of globose to piriform cells[25]. Ecologically, Coprinellus is characterized as a saprophytic fungus that grows in nutrient-rich substrates, including dead trees, branches, leaf litter, grassy debris, bare soil, and ruminant dung[26].

      Furthermore, various studies have already classified taxonomically the different species of Coprinellus, particularly the newly recorded species from diverse countries. In the study of Gomes & Wartchow[27], they reported the taxonomy of the new species Coprinellus arenicola isolated from Paraíba, Brazil, based on its holotype, basidiomata, pileus, lamellae, stipe, basal mycelium, basidiospores, basidia, cheilocystidia, pileipellis, stipitipellis, elements of veil on pileus, etymology, habitat, and distribution. Accordingly, C. arenicola is a newly described species of small, subgregarious basidiomycete fungi characterized by a buff to pale beige, plicate-pectinate pileus, adnexed grayish to black lamellae, a smooth, white, hollow stipe, an absent annulus, heart-shaped to triangular basidiospores, and habitat specificity to sandy soils in Paraíba, Brazil. Similarly, Coprinellus ovatus from Pakistan is characterized as a small, caespitose fungus with an orange-yellow, fibrillose, plicate pileus, free brownish-black lamellae, a yellowish-brown radicating stipe, mitriform to amygdaliform basidiospores, utriform cheilocystidia, and grows among broadleaf trees[22]. Overall, different species of Coprinellus share similar features such as deliquescent lamellae, small basidiomata, and saprophytic nutrition since they all belong to the same family, Psathyrellaceae, but can be morphologically distinguished from one another based on the differences in color of the lamella, stipe, structure of basidiospore, presence or absence of cheilocystidia, color, and structure of pileus, among others.

      Furthermore, Coprinellus mushrooms are widely documented and studied, with Europe being among the top continents with the most Coprinellus mushrooms recorded[6,8,13,16,18,23,24,2849]. Aside from species identification, the different bioactivities of the genus Coprinellus have also been elucidated, including antifungal[50], anticholinesterase[51], and antioxidant[46] activities. Moreover, the co-culturing of C. radians and C. disseminatus stimulates seed germination in Cremastra appendiculata[52,53].

      In addition to their bioactivities, novel bioactive compounds were also screened in Coprinellus mushrooms. For instance, Tešanović et al.[46] extracted different phenolic compounds such as flavones, flavonols, flavanones, flavanols, bioflavonoids, isoflavonoids, hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, coumarins, cyclohexanecarboxylic acids, and chlorogenic acids in the hot water extract of C. truncorum. Meanwhile, in the qualitative analysis of the fatty acid composition of Coprinellus curtus, C. disseminatus, C. domesticus, Coprinellus ellissi, C. micaceus, and C. radians mycelia, both unsaturated (linoleic and oleic) and saturated (palmitic, stearic, and myristic) fatty acids were present[29].

      Given the potential of Coprinellus, this review highlights the global distribution, various bioactive compounds, and biological activities of Coprinellus mushrooms, emphasizing their importance in different industries and underscoring the gaps for future studies.

    • Nutritional and physical factors, including substrates, microclimates, temperature, pH, humidity, and elevation, significantly influence the distribution of mushrooms. Given this environmental sensitivity, the ability of Psathyrellaceae mushrooms to thrive across a wide range of climatic conditions is particularly notable, as evident in their global distribution records[320]. Moreover, Coprinellus mushrooms, belonging to the family Psathyrellaceae, also display broad thermal tolerance, as recorded in both tropical and temperate countries (Fig. 1). In the present review, a total of 67 Coprinellus mushrooms were recorded based on available reports from various studies, including species listing, diversity assessment, biological compound profiling, and bioactivity assessments (Table 1). The Coprinellus mushrooms demonstrated a wide geographical distribution, with the USA, Hungary, Argentina, China, Brazil, and Armenia representing the countries with the most recorded instances of Coprinellus mushrooms (Fig. 2). Notably, particular species of Coprinellus exhibit broad distributions, including Coprinellus disseminatus, Coprinellus micaceus, Coprinellus radians, Coprinellus domesticus, and Coprinellus flocculosus, which are among the top species of Coprinellus that are widely distributed (Fig. 3).

      Figure 1. 

      Global occurrence patterns of Coprinellus mushrooms, visualized using filled map tools in Microsoft Excel 2019.

      Table 1.  Global distribution of Corpinellus species.

      Coprinellus species Country of origin Ref.
      1. Coprinellus alkalinus (Anastasiou) Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      2. Coprinellus alvesii Voto (2019) Brazil [55]
      3. Coprinellus andreorum Sammut & Karich (2021) Malta [56]
      4. Coprinellus apleurocystidiosus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      5. Coprinellus aquatilis (Peck) Voto (2019) Finland [57]
      Norway [57]
      USA (New York) [58]
      6. Coprinellus arenicola Wartchow & A.R.P. Gomes (2014) Brazil [27]
      7. Coprinellus aureodisseminatus T. Bau & L.Y. Zhu (2024) China [59]
      Ecuador [40]
      8. Coprinellus aureogranulatus (Uljé & Aptroot) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) Netherlands [32]
      China [12]
      Vietnam [60]
      Philippines [61]
      9. Coprinellus austrodisseminatus T. Bau & L.Y. Zhu (2024) China [59]
      10. Coprinellus bipellis (Romagn.) P. Roux, Guy García & Borgar. (2006) Morocco [62]
      11. Coprinellus campanulatus S. Hussain & H. Ahmad (2018) Pakistan [13]
      12. Coprinellus carbonicola (Singer) Voto (2020) Argentina [27]
      13. Coprinellus castaneus (Berk. & Broome) Voto (2020) Mauritius [63]
      14. Coprinellus chaignonii (Pat.) Voto (2019) n.r. [64]
      15. Coprinellus crassitunicatus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      16. Coprinellus criniticaulis Voto (2021) n.r. [36]
      17. Coprinellus curtoides Voto (2021) USA (Hawaii) [14]
      18. Coprinellus curtus (Kalchbr.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) Hungary [32]
      USA (North Carolina) [65]
      Japan [66]
      Armenia [29]
      Italy [8]
      Argentina [67]
      Sweden [13]
      19. Coprinellus deliquescens (Bull.) P. Karst. (1879) India [3]
      Argentina [67]
      20. Coprinellus deminutus (Enderle) Valade (2014) Hungary [32]
      21. Coprinellus dendrocystotus (Voto) Voto (2023) n.r. [68]
      22. Coprinellus dilectus (Fr.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) Poland [9]
      Netherlands [35]
      Germany [35]
      23. Coprinellus disseminatisimilis S. Hussain (2018) Pakistan [13]
      24. Coprinellus disseminatus (Pers.) J.E. Lange (1938) China [69]
      Russia [40]
      Hungary [32]
      Lithuania [70]
      Latvia [71]
      Sweden [40]
      USA (North Carolina) [72]
      Armenia [5]
      Japan [73]
      Serbia [44]
      Iran [74]
      Indonesia [75]
      Iraq [20]
      India [76]
      Philippines [77]
      Brazil [78]
      Russia (Karelia) [41]
      USA (Hawaii) [79]
      Korea [79]
      Costa Rica [80]
      Argentina [67]
      25. Coprinellus domesticus (Bolton) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) Hungary [32]
      Panama [81]
      USA (North Carolina) [65]
      Iran [82]
      Armenia [29]
      West Africa (Côte d'Ivoire) [83]
      Spain [47]
      Japan [84]
      Serbia [45]
      Argentina [67]
      Netherlands [13]
      26. Coprinellus duricystidiosus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      27. Coprinellus ellisii (P.D. Orton) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) USA
      (North Carolina)
      [85]
      Japan [73]
      Armenia [29]
      28. Coprinellus ephemerus (Bull.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) India [3]
      Italy [8]
      Argentina [67]
      29. Coprinellus fimbriatus (Berk. & Broome) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) India [3]
      30. Coprinellus flocculosus (DC.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) Hungary [32]
      USA (North Carolina) [39]
      Iran [74]
      Iraq [20]
      Poland [11]
      Armenia [29]
      Italy [8]
      Spain [47]
      Norway [13]
      31. Coprinellus furfurellus (Berk. & Broome) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) n.r. [21]
      32. Coprinellus heptemerus (M. Lange & A.H. Sm.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) USA [86]
      Hungary [33]
      Italy [8]
      33. Coprinellus limicola (Uljé) Doveri & Sarrocco (2011) n.r. [28]
      34. Coprinellus magnoliae N.I. de Silva, Lumyong & K.D. Hyde (2021) Thailand [87]
      China [59]
      35. Coprinellus maysoidisporus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      36. Coprinellus micaceus (Bull.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) Hungary [32]
      China [59]
      Armenia [85]
      Japan [73]
      Iran [20]
      USA (Virginia) [88]
      Russia (Volograd) [43]
      Turkey [89]
      India [3]
      Greece [90]
      Japan [79]
      Korea [91]
      UK (Wales) [92]
      Germany [37]
      Romania [93]
      Serbia [45]
      Brazil [36]
      Argentina [67]
      Philippines [7]
      37. Coprinellus neodilectus Voto (2019) Brazil [55]
      38. Coprinellus occultivolvatus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      39. Coprinellus ovatus M. Kamran & Jabeen (2020) Pakistan [22]
      40. Coprinellus pallidissimus (Romagn.) P. Roux, Guy García & S. Roux (2006) Spain [48]
      41. Coprinellus papillatus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      42. Coprinellus parapellucidus Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      43. Coprinellus parcus T. Bau, L.Y. Zhu & M. Huang (2024) China [59]
      44. Coprinellus parvulus (P.-J. Keizer & Uljé) Házi, L. Nagy, Papp & Vágvölgyi (2011) Netherlands [24]
      45. Coprinellus phaeoxanthus A.R.P. Gomes & Wartchow (2016) Brazil [10]
      46. Coprinellus plicatiloides (Buller) Voto (2020) n.r. [94]
      47. Coprinellus pseudomicaceus (Dennis) Voto (2019) Brazil [36]
      48. Coprinellus punjabensis Usman & Khalid (2021) Pakistan [95]
      49. Coprinellus pusillulus (Svrček) Házi, L. Nagy, Papp & Vágvölgyi (2011) Hungary [33]
      50. Coprinellus pyrrhanthes (Romagn.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) n.r. [21]
      51. Coprinellus radians (Desm.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) Armenia [6]
      Hungary [32]
      China [52]
      USA (North Carolina) [65]
      Germany [38]
      USA (Virginia) [88]
      Taiwan [96]
      Germany [39]
      Serbia [45]
      Brazil [36]
      Argentina [67]
      Sweden [13]
      52. Coprinellus rufopruinatus (Romagn.) N. Schwab (2019) n.r. [65]
      53. Coprinellus saccharinus (Romagn.) P. Roux, Guy García & Dumas (2006) Ukraine [17]
      Argentina [67]
      54. Coprinellus sclerobasidium (Singer) Voto (2020) Argentina [67]
      55. Coprinellus silvaticus (Peck) Gminder (2010) Hungary [32]
      Sweden [16]
      Iran [82]
      Serbia [45]
      Czech Republic [97]
      56. Coprinellus subangularis (Thiers) Voto (2020) USA (Texas) [19]
      57. Coprinellus subcurtus Voto (2019) USA (Hawaii) [55]
      58. Coprinellus subradians Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      59. Coprinellus subrenispermus (Singer) Voto (2020) Argentina [67]
      60. Coprinellus tenuis S. Hussain (2018) Pakistan [13]
      61. Coprinellus tibiiformis Voto (2021) n.r. [54]
      62. Coprinellus truncorum (Scop.) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) Serbia [46]
      Hungary [34]
      Iran [4]
      India [3]
      Argentina [67]
      Sweden [13]
      63. Coprinellus valdivianus (Singer) Voto, Dibán & Maraia (2023) n.r. [68]
      64. Coprinellus velutipes T. Bau & L.Y. Zhu (2024) China [59]
      65. Coprinellus verrucispermus (Joss. & Enderle) Redhead, Vilgalys & Moncalvo (2001) Hungary [32]
      66. Coprinellus xanthothrix (Romagn.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson (2001) USA (North Carolina) [39]
      Japan [73]
      Iran [82]
      Armenia [29]
      Germany [39]
      Serbia [45]
      Hungary [31]
      Netherlands [13]
      67. Coprinellus xylophilus Voto (2021) Hungary [13]
      n.r., not reported.

      Figure 2. 

      Countries with the highest reported species diversity of Coprinellus.

      Figure 3. 

      Coprinellus species with the broadest global occurrence.

      The distribution and diversity of Coprinellus species are influenced by the climate of their native regions and the abundant vegetation that provides the necessary nutrients for fungal growth. According to Schafer[26], Coprinellus mushrooms are saprotrophic fungi that grow on decaying plant material, such as wood, leaves, grass, and animal dung, primarily from ruminants. This ecological versatility enables the widespread distribution of Coprinellus mushrooms, as both temperate and tropical regions offer the requisite substrates, such as decaying organic matter and ruminant dung, ensuring the mushrooms' survival across diverse climates. In addition, efforts in extensive macrofungal identification and domestication play an important role in the abundant records of Coprinellus species, particularly in Europe. Accordingly, approximately 43.87% of the Coprinellus reports are from Europe, with only 29.68%, 24.52%, and 1.94% from Asia, the Americas (encompassing both North America and South America), and Africa, respectively (Fig. 4).

      Figure 4. 

      Percentage of Coprinellus species recorded across continents.

      In comparison with the data from the present review, other studies have also reported different species of Coprinellus. For instance, the study of Doveri[8] on the occurrence of coprophilous Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes in Italy recorded a total of 12 species of Coprinellus mushrooms. Meanwhile, the evolutionary and divergence study of Psathyrellaceae of Nagy et al.[32] utilizes 18 Coprinellus species in Hungary; however, seven of these species, particularly Coprinellus bisporus, Coprinellus callinus, Coprinellus congregatus, Coprinellus hiascens, Coprinellus pellucidus, Coprinellus sassii, and Coprinellus subpurpureus have been reclassified under the genus Ephemerocybe (Ephemerocybe bispora, Ephemerocybe callina, Ephemerocybe congregata, Ephemerocybe hiascens, Ephemerocybe pellucida, Ephemerocybe sassii, and Ephemerocybe subpurpurea, respectively) within the same family, Psathyrellaceae. In addition, 37 Coprinellus species utilize in different studies, specifically Coprinellus allovelus[9,28], Coprinellus amphithalus[18], Coprinellus angulatus[13,15,18,67,98], Coprinellus bisporiger[9,13], Coprinellus bisporus[8,13,29,99], Coprinellus brevisetulosus[8,13,67], Coprinellus callinus[13,18], Coprinellus canistrii[100], Coprinellus christianopolitanus[16], Coprinellus cineropallidus[13], Coprinellus cinnamomeotinctus[49], Coprinellus congregatus[8,34,101], Coprinellus doverii[8], Coprinellus eurysporus[13,102], Coprinellus fallax[21], Coprinellus furocystidiatus[23], Coprinellus hetersetulosus[8], Coprinellus heterothrix[9,34,49], Coprinellus hiascens[8,13,36,67], Coprinellus marculentus[8,42,98], Coprinellus minutisporus[28], Coprinellus mitrinodulisporus[28], Coprinellus pallidus[18], Coprinellus pellucidus[8,13,36,67], Coprinellus plagiosporus[13], Coprinellus pseudoamphitalus[28], Coprinellus pseudodisseminatus[12], Coprinellus radicellus[9,13,103], Coprinellus sublicola[18], Coprinellus sassii[8,13], Coprinellus sclerocystidiosus[13,18], Coprinellus singularis[21], Coprinellus subdisseminatus[42], Coprinellus subimpatiens[11,15,18,45,67], Coprinellus subpurpureus[34], Coprinellus uljei[13], and Coprinellus velatopruinatus[36] have also been reclassified under genus Ephemerocybe. Moreover, individual records of Coprinellus species, such as Coprinellus arenicola[27], Coprinellus ovatus[22], Coprinellus parvulus[24], and Coprinellus aureogranulatus[12] have also been reported in different countries. Notably, Hussain et al.[13] described three new species of Coprinellus in Pakistan (Coprinellus campanulatus, Coprinellus disseminatus-similis, and Coprinellus tenuis) and utilized a total of 25 species of Coprinellus from 97 sequences from the ITS datasets at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website to differentiate these three new species.

      Despite these extensive records, taxonomic inconsistencies and outdated classifications persist in the literature. According to Voto[55], while working on a worldwide key to genera and species of the family Psathyrellaceae, several taxa were noted to have improper status, emphasizing the need to correct invalid species names in publications. Therefore, this present review, in line with the listing from Species Fungorum, provides an updated and corrected distribution of Coprinellus worldwide based on available reports.

      Therefore, it is evident that the present review provides the most extensive accounts of Coprinellus species distribution to date. Notably, to the author's knowledge, this is the first comprehensive report on the global distribution of Coprinellus, offering valuable baseline data for future studies on their ecology, cultivation, and potential utilization. Given the widespread occurrence of these mushrooms across diverse climates and substrates, as highlighted in this review, such data are crucial for guiding conservation efforts, bioprospecting, and effective utilization in different industries.

    • Mushrooms are widely utilized as a source of food and traditional medicine worldwide, as they are known to contain essential nutrients, vitamins, minerals, mycochemicals, and mycocompounds have been shown to be beneficial to human health[30]. However, the edibility and nutritional benefits of most of the mushrooms were limited due to a lack of research. Therefore, continuous efforts to discover the nutritional composition of mushrooms and their biological compounds enable researchers to harness their beneficial nutrients. Accordingly, mushrooms are known to contain various bioactive compounds that are responsible for their distinct bioactivities. These compounds make mushrooms essential for many industries, including pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and food industries, among others. According to Kour et al.[104], a variety of bioactive compounds, such as peptides, polysaccharides, proteins, polysaccharide-protein complexes, phenolic compounds, and terpenoids, have been identified in different types of mushrooms. Meanwhile, in the Philippines, approximately 15.53% of the macrofungal studies focused on elucidating the chemical composition of different mushroom species, particularly their proximate compositions, including protein, fats, moisture, fiber, and carbohydrates, as well as amino acid and fatty acid composition, and various mychochemicals[105].

      Coprinellus, belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota and family Psathyrellaceae, was also explored for its various bioactive compounds, including its nutritional profile, polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, macroelements, microelements, fatty acids, and proteins, among others. According to Badalyan[30], many coprinoid mushrooms produce bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides, phenolics, and terpenoids, which have various beneficial effects, such as antimicrobial activity, immune modulation, antioxidant properties, cell growth stimulation, nematocidal activity, and antidiabetic activity. In the present review, 51 bioactive compounds, including sugar alcohol (one), fatty acids (four), phenolic compounds (six), flavonoids (22), hydroxycinnamic acid and derivatives (six), coumarins (three), organic acids (two), sugars (two), and sesquiterpenes (five) were recorded in eight species of Coprinellus, specifically C. curtus, C. disseminatus, C. domesticus, C. ellisii, C. micaceus, C. radians, C. truncorum, and C. xanthorix (Table 2). Additionally, in the study of Novaković et al.[44], the determination of amino acid composition, fatty acid profile, and mineral composition of C. dessiminatus was also recorded. Based on their findings, 17 amino acids (essential and non-essential), seven fatty acids (polyunsaturated, saturated, monounsaturated), three macroelements (K, Mg, and Ca), and four microelements (Cu, Zn, Mn, and Fe) were present in the methanolic extract of C. disseminatus. The total essential amino acids were 29.57 mg/g DW, with leucine being the most abundant, while non-essential amino acids totaled 96.69 mg/g DW. In addition, fatty acids consisted of 59.1% polyunsaturated, 23.1% saturated, and 17.9% monounsaturated, primarily linoleic (56.6%), palmitic (13.9%), and oleic acids (12.0%). Potassium was the most abundant macroelement, followed by calcium and magnesium, while iron dominated microelements[44].

      Table 2.  Bioactive compounds present in Coprinellus mushrooms.

      Coprinellus species Sample type Bioactive compounds Ref. Coprinellus species Sample type Bioactive compounds Ref.
      C. curtus HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] C. truncorum Hot water extracts of fruiting body, submerged mycelia, and fermentation broth Apigenin [46]
      Stearic acid Baicalein
      Myristic acid Chrysoeriol
      C. disseminatus Crude ethanol (CdEtOH) and water extract (CdAq) Phenol [106] Vitexin
      Flavonoids Apigenin-7-O-glucoside
      Methanol extract Chrysoeriol [44] Luteolin-7-O-glucoside
      Luteolin7-O-glucoside Apiin
      Apigenin7-O-glucoside Baicalin
      Amentoflavone Quercetin
      p-Hydroxybenzoic acid Isorhamnetin
      p-Coumaric acid Quercitrin
      Protocatechuic acid Kaempferol-3-O-glucoside
      Chlorogenic acid Hyperoside
      HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] Quercetin-3-O-glucoside
      Fructose Naringenin
      Saccharose Catechin
      Oleic acid Epicatechin
      Stearic acid Amentoflavone
      C. domesticus HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] Daidzein
      Oleic acid Genistein
      C. ellisii HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
      Stearic acid Protocatechuic acid
      C. micaceus HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] Vanillic acid
      Fructose Gallic acid
      Stearic acid Gentisic acid
      Myristic acid p-Coumaric acid
      HPLC (hot water extract) Protocatechuic acid [91] o-Coumaric acid
      Chlorogenic acid Caffeic acid
      (−)−Epicatechin Esculetin
      Naringin Scopoletin
      C. radians HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] Umbelliferon
      Fructose Quinic acid
      Oleic acid 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid
      Stearic acid Ethanol extracts of the fruiting body and mycelia Apigenin [108]
      C. xanthorix HPLC (water extract) Mannitol [30] Baicalein
      Saccharose Chrysoeriol
      Oleic acid Amentoflavone
      Stearic acid Aqueous extract Crysoeriol [51]
      Myristic acid Apigenin-7-O-glucoside
      Coprinellus sp. Crude extract Coprinsesquiterpin A (1) [107] Luteolin-7-O-glucoside
      Coprinsesquiterpin B (2) Hyperoside
      Coprinsesquiterpin C (3) p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
      Coprinsesquiterpin D (4) Protocatechuic acid
      Coprinsesquiterpin E (5) Gallic acid
      p-Coumaric acid
      o-Coumaric acid
      Quinic acid
      5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid

      Furthermore, an in vitro study by Novaković et al.[106] on the antiproliferative effects of C. disseminatus against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line indicated a strong correlation between the total phenolic and flavonoid content and the cytotoxic activity. Therefore, C. disseminatus could be considered a potential alternative source of nutraceuticals and biologically active compounds. Likewise, Coprinsesquiterpenes, a new bisabolene-type sesquiterpene extracted from Coprinellus mushrooms, demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects, with IC50 values ranging from 12.8 μM to 34.7 μM in the Nitric Oxide (NO) inhibition assay[107]. Likewise, both the polysaccharides (PSH) and exopolysaccharides (ePSH) of C. truncorum demonstrated notable cytotoxic effects on human-derived HepG2 cancer cells[108].

      Furthermore, aside from characterization, these bioactive compounds were also evaluated for diverse biological activities. According to Eguchi et al.[109], mushrooms contain various bioactive compounds with diverse health benefits, including antiviral, antidiabetic, antiparasitic, antibacterial, anti-hypercholesterolemic, and anticancer properties. Additionally, these compounds exhibit hepatoprotective, cardiovascular, energy-boosting, immune-modulating, and antioxidant effects. These advantageous properties are primarily attributed to the cellular components and secondary metabolites present in mushrooms, particularly those belonging to Basidiomycota[110]. Moreover, as noted by Ghora et al.[111], these medicinal properties are primarily derived from the fruiting body, culture mycelium, and culture broth of mushroom species.

      Accordingly, the bioactivities of Coprinellus mushrooms, including C. disseminatus, C. micaceus, and C. truncorum, were assessed using different extracts and isolated bioactive compounds (Table 3). Notably, Coprinellus mushrooms exhibited 12 different bioactivities, including antifungal, promoting seed germination, biobleaching, antiproliferative, antioxidant, cytotoxic, lignocellulolytic, biotransformation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, antidiabetic, anticholinesterase, anti-tyrosinase, and anti-inflammatory properties. For instance, the study by Nguyen et al.[91] evaluated four different bioactivities, specifically antidiabetic, antioxidant, tyrosinase, and NO inhibitory activities, as well as anticholinesterase activity, of the methanol and hot water extracts of the fruiting body of C. micacues. Accordingly, studies have revealed that the fruiting body of C. micaceus contains bioactive compounds exhibiting anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, α-glucosidase inhibitory, anti-tyrosinase, and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities, indicating their potential use in the pharmaceutical industry[91].

      Table 3.  Biological activity of Coprinellus mushrooms.

      Coprinellus species Bioactivity Extract/compounds Findings Ref.
      C. disseminatus Promote seed germination n.r. Promote seed germination of Cremasta appendiculata up to 71.61% ± 0.92%. [53]
      Biobleaching C. disseminatus SH-1 NTCC-1163 (enzyme-A) and SH-2 NTCC-1164 (enzyme-B) Under solid-state fermentation, two newly developed low-cellulose xylanases (enzymes A and B) reduced the kappa number of wheat straw soda-AQ pulps by 24.38% and 27.94%, respectively, following XE treatment. [76]
      Antiproliferative Biomass ethyl acetate (BEA) extract The BEA extract exhibited antiproliferative activity (GI50 < 50 μg/mL) against all tested solid tumor cell lines (A549, HBL-100, HeLa, T-47D, WiDr), except for SW1573, which showed a slightly higher GI50 value of 52 μg/mL. [41]
      Antioxidant Biomass ethyl acetate (BEA) extract, and
      Culture-broth Ethyl
      acetate (CEA) extract
      In the galvinoxyl radical assay, C. disseminatus (CEA) exhibited an antioxidant capacity of 10.281 ± 0.237 μM Trolox equivalents (TEAC). Meanwhile, in the ABTS assay, the BEA extract of C. disseminatus demonstrated the strongest activity, with a TEAC value of 126.67 ± 7.69 μM. [41]
      Antioxidant Crude ethanol (CdEtOH) The extract demonstrated strong superoxide anion scavenging activity (IC50 = 1.40 ± 0.66 μg/mL), followed by hydroxyl radical (7.37 ± 1.46 μg/mL) and FRAP (9.74 ± 0.79 μg/mL) scavenging. In contrast, it showed moderate nitric oxide (273.30 ± 21.53 μg/mL) and weaker DPPH (397.28 ± 64.17 μg/mL) scavenging effects. [106]
      Antioxidant Water extracts (CdAq). The extract demonstrated antioxidant activity, with the strongest activity against hydroxyl radicals (OH, IC50 = 4.02 ± 0.29 μg/mL) and FRAP reduction (4.02 ± 0.60 μg/mL). Moderate activity was observed for superoxide anion (SOA, 24.84 ± 2.38 μg/mL) and nitric oxide (NO, 21.28 ± 6.08 μg/mL), while DPPH scavenging was least potent (250.37 ± 15.74 μg/mL). [106]
      Cytotoxicity Crude ethanol (CdEtOH) The extract exhibited time and assay-dependent cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells. In MTT assays, potency improved with prolonged exposure (24 h: IC50 > 249.47 ± 11.52 μg/mL; 72 h: 217.90 ± 24.79 μg/mL). Meanwhile, the effect of exposure time was observed in SRB assays, where the IC50 decreased from 511.37 ± 6.46 μg/mL (24 h) to 205.90 ± 35.98 μg/mL (72 h). Notably, the 72-hour results converged across both assays, indicating sustained exposure enhances cytotoxic efficacy regardless of the detection method. [106]
      Cytotoxicity Water extracts (CdAq) The cytotoxic effects on MCF-7 breast cancer cells were evaluated using MTT and SRB assays at different time points. In the MTT assay, the compound showed minimal cytotoxicity at 24 h (IC50 > 900 μg/mL) but exhibited moderate activity after 72 h of exposure (IC50 = 718.07 ± 37.36 μg/mL). The SRB assay demonstrated stronger concentration-dependent cytotoxicity, with IC50 values decreasing from 625.26 ± 26.80 μg/mL at 24 h to 211.01 ± 25.07 μg/mL at 72 h. These results indicate that the compound's anti-proliferative effects are both time-dependent and assay-dependent, with the SRB method showing greater sensitivity in detecting cytotoxic activity compared to the MTT assay. [106]
      Lignocellulolytic activity Xylanase and cellulase When cultured in a glucose-containing medium, the mycelium exhibited XLE and CLE activities of 815.074 ± 7.102 U/mL and 9.704 ± 0.030 U/mL, respectively. [69]
      C. disseminatus and
      C. micaceus
      Biotransformation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin n.r. C. disseminatus achieved nearly complete degradation of dibenzo-p-dioxin (DD) within two weeks. Additionally, both C. disseminatus and C. micaceus converted 2,7-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,7-DCDD) into a monohydroxylated derivative, suggesting the activity of the cytochrome P450 system in this process. [73]
      C. micaceus Lignocellulolytic activity n.r. Exhibited high production of cellulolytic enzymes, including endo-β-1,4-glucanase (0.69 ± 0.04 U/mL after 10 d with optimal pH 5.0) and endo-β-1,4-xylanase (1.17 ± 0.21 U/mL after 10 d with optimal pH 6.0), along with the lignolytic enzyme laccase (0.81 ± 0.20 U/mL after 28 d with optimal pH 3.0). This robust enzymatic activity indicates a strong potential for lignocellulose degradation. [90]
      Antioxidant Methanol and hot water extract Both methanol and hot water extracts exhibited lower DPPH scavenging activity than BHT but showed superior metal chelating effects at all concentrations. Their reducing power was also weaker than BHT at 0.125–0.2 mg/mL. [91]
      Antidiabetic Methanol and hot water (fruiting body) extract At a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL, the methanol and hot water extracts of C. micaceus reduced α-glucosidase activity by 62.26% and 67.59%, respectively. In comparison, acarbose, the positive control, showed an 81.81% inhibition at the same concentration. [91]
      Anticholinesterase Methanol and hot water extract In the AChE inhibitory assay, the methanol and hot water extracts of C. micaceus demonstrated 94.64% and 74.19% inhibition, respectively, at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. In comparison, galanthamine, the control drug, showed 97.80% inhibition at the same concentration. [91]
      Anti-tyrosinase Methanol and hot water extract At a concentration of 2.0 mg/mL, the methanol and hot water extracts exhibited strong tyrosinase inhibition, with rates of 91.33% and 91.99%, respectively. In comparison, kojic acid (the positive control) showed a higher inhibition rate of 99.61% at the same concentration. [91]
      Antioxidant (Nitric oxide inhibition) Methanol and hot water extract The methanol and hot water extracts dose-dependently suppressed nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)- stimulated RAW264.7 cells. [91]
      C. truncorum Cytotoxicity Polysaccharide and exopolysaccharide Both PSH and ePSH demonstrated notable cytotoxic effects on human-derived HepG2 cancer cells (three-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The C. truncorum PSH and ePSH were particularly effective, achieving a maximal reduction in cell viability of approximately 50% at 450 μg/mL after 24 h of treatment. [108]
      Anticholinesterase Polysaccharide extracts The polysaccharide extracts (PSH) from C. truncorum exhibited significant acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 0.61 mg/mL in liquid assays. [51]
      Antifungal MeOH (Fruiting body) The MIC and MFC values of CtMeOH extracts against Fusarium proliferatum BL1, Fusarium verticillioides BL4, Fusarium proliferatum BL5, and Fusarium graminearum were both found to be 198.00 mg/mL. In contrast, lower values of 99.00 mg/mL for both MIC and MFC were recorded for Alternaria padwickii (ALT). [112]
      Antifungal EtOH (Fruiting bodies) The CtEtOH exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 99.00 mg/mL against Alternaria padwickii (ALT) [112]
      Antioxidant Hot water extract The antioxidant activity of different fungal extracts was evaluated using DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. The fruiting body extract exhibited moderate antioxidant activity, with a DPPH IC50 value of 65.90 ± 2.13 µg/mL and a FRAP value of 26.72 ± 0.47 mg AAE/g. In contrast, the submerged mycelium demonstrated significantly stronger antioxidant effects, showing a much lower DPPH IC50 (7.52 ± 2.46 µg/mL) and a higher FRAP value (30.63 ± 0.88 mg AAE/g), indicating greater free radical scavenging and reducing power. Meanwhile, the fermentation broth exhibited intermediate DPPH scavenging activity (IC50 42.39 ± 1.75 µg/mL) but the lowest FRAP value (6.03 ± 0.18 mg AAE/g), indicating a comparatively weaker reducing capacity. [46]
      Coprinellus sp. Anti-inflammatory Coprinsesquiterpin Coprinsesquiterpins 1–5 were tested for their ability to reduce inflammation in vitro by suppressing NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Among them, Coprinsesquiterpins 1, 3, and 5 showed significant anti-inflammatory effects, with IC50 values of 34.7, 27.1, and 12.8 μM, respectively. In contrast, Coprinsesquiterpins 2 and 4 were less effective, displaying IC50 values above 40 μM. [107]
      n.r., not reported.

      In summary, mushrooms, including species from the genus Coprinellus, are valuable sources of bioactive compounds with significant nutritional and medicinal potential. However, despite their promising applications in the pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and food industries, research on Coprinellus remains limited, with only a few species being studied for their biochemical composition and bioactivities. The existing studies reveal that Coprinellus species contains essential amino acids, fatty acids, polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and minerals, while also exhibiting diverse bioactivities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory effects. Nevertheless, the full scope of their medicinal and nutritional benefits remains underexplored due to the lack of comprehensive research on most species within this genus. Thus, to fully utilize the potential of Coprinellus mushrooms, further biochemical and bioactivity studies are recommended on a broader range of species within this genus. Expanding research efforts will not only enhance the understanding of the medicinal and nutritional properties but also uncover novel bioactive compounds that could be utilized in various industries.

    • This review highlighted the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus species worldwide. It presents a comprehensive checklist of 67 Coprinellus species, 51 different bioactive compounds, and 12 different bioactivities. The documented compounds and bioactivities establish an important foundation for the effective use of Coprinellus mushrooms in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries. However, despite their rich bioactive potential, only eight species have been studied in detail.

      Therefore, based on the compiled data, the following areas should be prioritized in future research:

      (1) Conduct thorough studies on Coprinellus species, ensuring accurate characterization and classification using both morphological and molecular approaches.

      (2) Additional species listing and optimization studies, especially for those countries with an ideal growing environment, favoring the growth of Coprinellus utilizing agro-industrial wastes and other cost-effective, locally available substrates.

      (3) Isolate, characterize, and identify novel biological compounds in understudied and newly discovered Coprinellus species.

      (4) Investigate additional biological activities across different models and elucidate their mechanism of action,

      (5) Assess the edibility of various species of Coprinellus mushrooms through comprehensive chemical and toxicological analysis.

      (6) Develop Coprinellus-based products, including functional foods, dietary supplements, and pharmaceutical drugs.

      • The authors are very grateful to the DOST-SEI Accelerated Science and Technology Human Resource Development Program-National Science Consortium (ASTHRDP-NSC) for the scholarship support that made this graduate study possible.

      • The authors confirmed their contributions to the paper as follows: Fabros JA and Dulay RMR conceptualized the paper; Fabros JA drafted the manuscript; Dulay RMR reviewed and edited the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version after reviewing the data.

      • Since no new data were generated or examined for this study, data sharing is not relevant to this article.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (3) References (112)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Fabros JA, Dulay RMR. 2025. Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom). Studies in Fungi 10: e026 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0024
    Fabros JA, Dulay RMR. 2025. Status review of the distribution, biological compounds, and bioactivity of Coprinellus (inky cap mushroom). Studies in Fungi 10: e026 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0024

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return