-
Soil is considered a hotspot for microbial biodiversity which plays an important role in building a complex link between plants and soil. The microbial components exhibit dynamic nature and, therefore, are characterized as good indicators of soil quality[52]. These components include MBC, MBN, PMN and microbial respiration which not only assist in biological transformations like OM conversion, and biological nitrogen fixation but also increase nutrient availability for crop uptake. Management strategies such as fertilizer inputs and tillage practices may exert beneficial effects on soil biota as discussed below.
Microbial community and biodiversity in the soil
-
Soil is an abode to a considerable portion of global biodiversity. This biodiversity not only plays a pivotal role in regulating soil functions but also provides a fertile ground for advancing global sustainability, especially agricultural ventures. Thus, the maintenance of soil biodiversity is of paramount importance for sustaining ecosystem services. Soil biodiversity is the diverse community of living creatures in the soil that interact not only with one another but also with plants and small animals to regulate various biological activities[53]. Additionally, it increases the fertility of soil by converting organic litter to SOM thereby enhancing SOC content. Thus, the SOM measures the number and activity of soil biota. Furthermore, the quality and amount of SOC, as well as plant diversity have a considerable impact on the soil microbial community structure[54].
Dangi et al.[55] ascertained the impact of integrated nutrient management and biochar on soil microbial characteristics and observed that soil amended with biochar or the addition of organic manures influenced microbial community composition and biomass and crop yield. After two years, the higher rates of biochar significantly enhanced the levels of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA), total arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) than lower rates, unfertilized and non-amended soil. Luan et al.[56] conducted a comparison study in a greenhouse to assess the effects of various rates of N fertilizer and kinds (inorganic and organic) on enzyme activities and soil microbial characteristics. Microbial growth (greater total PLFAs and microbial biomass carbon) and activity were promoted by manure substitution of mineral fertilizer, particularly at a higher replacement rate. On account of lower response in bacterial over fungal growth, manure addition led to a greater fungi/bacteria ratio. Furthermore, manure application significantly enhanced microbial communities, bacterial stress indicators and functional diversity. Lazcano et al.[57] determined the influence of different fertilization strategies on microbial community structure and function, soil biochemical properties and crop yield three months after addition of fertilizer. The integrated fertilizer regimes augmented microbial growth with improved enzyme activity as compared to sole inorganic amendments. Bacterial growth showed variable response with variation in fertilizer regime used whereas fungal growth varied with the amount of fertilizer added. Compared to mineral fertilizers, manure application led to a rapid increase in PLFA biomarkers for gram-negative bacteria. The organic amendments exhibited significant effects even at small concentration of the total quantity of nutrients applied through them; thus, confirming the viability of integrated fertilizer strategies in the short term.
Kamaa et al.[58] assessed the long-term effect of crop manure and INF on the composition of microbial communities. The organic treatments comprised of maize (Zea mays) stover (MS) at 10 t ha−1 and FYM @ 10 t ha−1, INF treatments (120 kg N, 52.8 kg P-N2P2), integrated treatments (N2P2 + MS, N2P2 + FYM), fallow plot and control. The treatment N2P2 exhibited unfavourable effects on bacterial community structure and diversity that were more closely connected to the bacterial structure in control soils than integrated treatments or sole INF. In N2P2, fungal diversity varied differently than bacterial diversity but fungal diversity was similar in the N2P2 + FYM and N2P2 + MS-treated plots. Thus, the total diversity of fungal and bacterial communities was linked to agroecosystem management approaches which could explain some of the yield variations observed between the treatments. Furthermore, a long-term experiment was performed by Liu et al.[59] to study the efficiency of pig manure and compost as a source for N fertilization and found unique prokaryotic communities with variable abundance of Proteobacteria under compost and pig manure treatments.
Recently, Li et al.[60] assessed the influence of different tillage practices (no-tillage, shallow tillage, deep tillage, no-tillage with straw retention, shallow tillage with straw retention and deep tillage with straw retention) on microbial communities and observed that tillage practices improved the bacterial Shannon index to a greater extent over the no-tillage plots in which the least value was recorded. Another research study by He et al.[61] reported the effect of tillage practices on enzyme activities at various growth stages. Across all the growth stages, enzyme activities of cellobiohydrolase (CBH), β-xylosidase (BXYL), alkaline phosphatase (AP), β-glucosidase (BG), β-N-acetylglucosamines (NAG) were 17%−169%, 7%−97%, 0.12%−29%, 3%−66%, 23%−137% greater after NT/ST, NT, ST, ST/PT, and PT/NT treatments as compared to plow tillage. The NT/ST treatment resulted in highest soil enzyme activities and yield, and thus was an effective and sustainable method to enhance soil quality and crop production.
Soil microbial biomass carbon
-
Microbes play a crucial role in controlling different soil functions and soil ecology and microbial community show significant variation across as well as within the landscape. On average, the total biomass of microbes exceeds 500 mg C kg soil−1[62]. Microbial biomass carbon is an active constituent of SOM which constitutes a fundamental soil quality parameter because SOM serves as a source of energy for microbial processes and is a measure of potential microbial activity[48,63]. Soil systems that have higher amounts of OM indicate higher levels of MBC. Microbial biomass carbon is influenced by many parameters like OM content in the soil, land use, and management strategies[64]. The MBC and soil aggregate stability are strongly related because MBC integrates soil physical and chemical properties responds to anthropogenic activities.
Microbial biomass is regarded as a determinative criterion to assess the functional state of soil. Soils having high functional diversity of microbes which, by and large, occurs under organic agricultural practices, acquire disease and insect-suppressive characteristics that could assist in inducing resistance in plants[65]. Dou et al.[66] determined that soil microbial biomass C (SMBC) was 5% to 8% under wheat-based cropping systems and zero tillage significantly enhanced SMBC in the 0−30 cm depth, particularly in the upper 0 to 5 cm. According to Liang et al.[67], SMBC and soil microbial biomass N (SMBN) in the 0−10 cm surface layer were greater in the fertilized plots in comparison to the unfertilized plots on all sampling dates whereas microbial biomass C and N were highest at the grain filling stage. Mandal et al.[68] demonstrated that MBC also varied significantly with soil depth. Surface soil possessed a maximum MBC value than lower soil layers due to addition of crop residues and root biomass on the surface soil. The MBC content was highest with combined application of INF along with farmyard manure and GM, whereas untreated plots showed minimum MBC values. The incorporation of CR slows down the rate of mineralization processes; therefore, microbes require more time to decompose the residues and utilize the nutrients released[69]. On the other hand, incorporation of GR having a narrow C:N ratio enhances microbial activity and consequently accelerates mineralization in the soil. Malviya[70] also recorded that the SMBC contents were significantly greater under RT than CT, regardless of soil depth which was also assigned to residue incorporation which increases microbial biomass on account of higher carbon substrate in RT.
Naresh et al.[71] studied the vertical distribution of MBC under no-tillage (NT), shallow (reduced) tillage and normal cultivated fields. A shallow tillage system significantly altered the tillage induced distribution of MBC. In a field experiment, Nakhro & Dkhar[72] examined the microbial populations and MBC in paddy fields under organic and inorganic farming approaches. The organic source used was a combination of rock phosphate, FYM and neem cake, whereas a mixture of urea, muriate of potash and single super phosphate was used as an inorganic source. The organically treated plots exhibited the highest MBC compared to inorganically treated plots and control. Organic carbon exhibited a direct and significant correlation with bacterial and fungal populations. The addition of organic fertilizers enhanced the content of SOC and consequently resulted in higher microbial count and MBC. Ramdas et al.[73] investigated the influence of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients (as minerals or INF) applied over a five-year period on SOC, MBC and other variables. It was observed that the addition of FYM and conjoint application of paddy straw (dry) and water hyacinth (PsWh) (fresh) significantly increased the SOC content than vermicompost, Chromolaena adenophorum (fresh) and Glyricidia aculeate (fresh), and Sesbania rostrata (fresh).
Xu et al.[74] evaluated the influence of long-term fertilization strategies on the SOC content, soil MBN, soil MBC, and soil microbial quotient (SMQ) in a continuous rice system and observed that MBC at the main growth stages of early and late rice under 30% organic matter and 70% mineral fertilizer and 60% organic matter and 40% mineral fertilizer treatments was greater as compared to mineral fertilizer alone (MF), rice straw residues and mineral fertilizer (RF), and no fertilizer (CK) treatments. However, SMBC levels at late growth stages were greater in comparison to early growth stages. A recent study by Xiao et al.[75] demonstrated that increasing tillage frequency (no-tillage, semi-annual tillage, and tillage after every four months, two months, and one month) decreased soil MBC. Microbial biomass carbon content was significantly greater in no-till treatment (597 g kg−1) than in tillage every four months (421 g kg−1), two months (342 g kg−1) and one month (222 g kg−1). The decrease in the content of MBC in association with tillage practices is due to soil perturbations which enhanced soil temperature, diminished soil moisture content, and resulted in the destruction of microbial habitat and fungal hyphae. Therefore, the MBC content eventually affected the N cycle.
Li et al.[76] reported that in comparison to CT, NT and RT resulted in increased MBC content and NT significantly increased MBC by 33.1% over CT. Furthermore, MBC concentration was 34.1% greater in NT than RT. The increase in MBC concentration was correlated with the results of increase in SOC concentration. Site-specific factors including soil depth and mean annual temperature significantly affected the response ratio of MBC under NT as compared to the duration of NT.
Soil microbial biomass nitrogen
-
Microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) is a prominent indicator of soil fertility as it quantifies the biological status of soil. Soil MBN is strongly associated with organic matter of the soil. The nitrogen in MBN has a rapid turnover rate thereby reflecting the changes in management strategies way before the transformations in total N are discernable[77].
In an experiment on continuous silage maize cultivation with crop rotation, Cerny et al.[78] observed that organic fertilizers exerted an affirmative influence on the soil MBN. During the application of organic manure MBN decreased, but there was higher MBN content as compared to control. However, addition of mineral nitrogenous fertilizers exerted an adverse effect on MBN content in experiments with maize. El-Sharkawi[79] recorded that organic matter-treated pots resulted in maximum MBN content than urea-treated pots. The sludge application enhanced total MBN and, therefore, could implicitly benefit crop production particularly in poor soils[18]. Sugihara et al.[80] observed that during the grain-filling stage in maize, residue and/or fertilizer addition exerted a pronounced influence on soil microbial dynamics; however, a clear effect of residue and ⁄or fertilizer addition was not observed. Microbial biomass nitrogen reduced dramatically from 63–71 to 18–33 kg N ha˗1 and C:N ratio at the same time increased more than ten-fold in all plots.
Malik et al.[81] apprised that the organic amendments significantly enhanced MBN concentrations up to 50% more than the unamended soil. Wang et al.[82] evaluated the influence of organic materials on MBN content in an incubation and pot experiment with acidic and calcareous soils. The results revealed that MBN content which was affected by the different forms of organic amendments, increased by 23.37%−150.08% and 35.02%−160.02% in acidic and calcareous soils, respectively. The MBN content of both soils decreased with the increase in the C/N ratio of the organic materials, though a higher C/N ratio was effective for sustaining a greater MBN content for a very long time.
Dhaliwal & Bijay-Singh[52] observed higher MBN levels in NT soils (116 kg ha−1) than in cultivated soils (80 kg ha−1). Kumar et al.[83] ascertained that in surface layer, MBN content was 11.8 mg kg−1 in CT which increased to 14.1 and 14.4 mg kg−1 in ZT and RT without residue retention and 20.2, 19.1 and 18.2 mg kg−1 in ZT, RT and CT with residue incorporation, respectively (Table 1). In the subsurface layer, the increased tendency on account of tillage and crop residue retention was identical to those of 0−15 cm layer but the magnitude was comparatively meagre (Table 1). In comparison to control, the persistent retention of crop residues led to significant accrual of MBN in the surface layer.
Table 1. Effect of different treatments on contents of various fractions of soil organic carbon[38].
Treatments PMN (mg kg−1) MBC (mg kg−1) MBN (mg kg−1) DOC (mg kg−1) Depths (cm) 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 Tillage practices ZTR 12.4 11.2 562.5 471.1 20.2 18.9 198.6 183.6 ZTWR 8.5 7.6 350.4 302.1 14.1 12.6 167.1 159.2 RTR 10.6 9.9 490.2 399.3 19.1 17.2 186.4 171.6 RTWR 7.6 6.6 318.1 299.8 14.4 13.7 159.5 148.7 CTR 9.3 8.5 402.9 354.4 18.2 16.6 175.9 168.9 CT 6.7 5.6 307.9 289.5 11.8 9.7 142.5 134.6 Nitrogen management Control 3.6 2.8 218.3 202.9 10.8 10.4 103.7 92.3 80 kg N ha−1 5.3 4.4 241.1 199.4 14.9 12.2 128.3 116.9 120 kg N ha−1 8.9 7.6 282.7 220.9 16.5 16.1 136.8 123.6 160 kg N ha−1 9.8 8.4 343.9 262.9 19.4 18.1 164.8 148.9 200 kg N ha−1 10.4 9.7 346.3 269.6 22.7 21.7 155.7 136.4 ZTR = Zero tillage with residue retention, ZTWR = Zero tillage without residue retention; RTR = Reduced tillage with residue retention, RTWR = Reduced tillage without residue retention, CTR = Conventional tillage with residue incorporation; CT = Conventional tillage without residue incorporation. Xiao et al.[75] determined that the MBN content decreased with tillage treatment having highest value in no tillage treatment, however, the difference among the treatments was negligible. Soil perturbations decreased the aggregate size and thus lower the soil aeration and exposure of fresh organic matter which restricted the growth of microorganisms. The results also concluded that MBN content is highly sensitive to tillage. Ginakes et al.[84] assessed the impact of zone tillage intensity on MBN in a corn-kura clover cropping sequence. Microbial biomass nitrogen was influenced by time and type of tillage treatment. Temporal studies revealed that MBN was higher after tillage treatment than the values possessed before tillage. Under different tillage treatments, higher values were recorded in ST (shank-till) and DT (double-till) over NT and RZT (zone-till) treatments.
Potentially mineralizable nitrogen in the soil
-
Another biological parameter, PMN, is a crucial parameter of soil fertility due to its association with soil N supply for crop growth. Also, PMN indicates the status of soil microbial community associated with PMN, whether it is improving or degrading. Forest soils are characterized by greater levels of PMN than CT receiving conventional chemical fertilizers which could be assignable to improved microbial activity in the former soils than the latter[48,77]. Aulakh et al.[85] assessed the effect of various combinations of fertilizer N, P, FYM and wheat residue (WR) applied to soybean and soybean residues added to wheat under CT and CA. The added fertilizers of N and P, FYM, and crop residue enhanced the mean weight diameter and water-stable aggregates thus favoured the development of macro-aggregates. The treatment INF + FYM + crop residue performed better among all the treatments. The net flux of mineral nitrogen from the mineralizable fraction is used to measure potentially mineralizable N which indicates the balance between mineralization and immobilization by soil microbes[77]. Nitrogen mineralization is widely used to assess the ability of SOM to supply inorganic nitrogen in the form of nitrate which is the most common form of plant-available nitrogen. Kumar et al.[83] observed an increase in PMN which was higher in surface soil than sub-surface soil thereby implying that high OC accumulation on account of crop residue retention was the most probable cause.
Verma & Goyal[86] assessed the effect of INM and organic manuring on PMN and observed that PMN was substantially affected by different organic amendments. Potentially mineralizable nitrogen varied between 19.6−41.5 mg kg−1 soil with greater quantity (2.5%) in vermicompost applied plots than FYM treated plots. The INF treatments resulted in lower PMN content which could be due to nutrient immobilization by microbes. Mahal et al.[87] reported that no-till resulted in higher PMN content than conventional tillage treatments. This trend was due to the maintenance of SOM due to the residue cover and reduction of soil erosion under no-tillage system[88]. On the contrary, tillage practices led to the loss of SOC owing to loosened surface soil and higher mineralization of SOM.
Microbial respiration in soil
-
Soil respiration is referred as the sum of CO2 evolution from intact soils because of the respiration by soil organisms, mycorrhizae and roots[89]. Various researchers have proposed soil respiration as a potential indicator of soil microbial activity[52,77]. Gilani & Bahmanyar[90] observed that addition of organic amendments enhanced soil respiration more than the control and synthetic fertilizer treatments. Moreover, among organic amendment treatments, highest soil respiration was observed in sewage-sludge treated soils. Under controlled conditions in saline-sodic soil, Celis et al.[91] reported that sewage sludge resulted in a higher soil respiration rate than mined gypsum and synthetic gypsum. The application of gypsum because of minimal organic matter intake had little effect on soil respiration. The addition of organic matter especially during early spring led to higher microbial biomass and soil respiration albeit diminished levels of nitrate-N. Moreover, SOM hinders the leaching of nitrate ions thereby resulting in a better soil chemical environment[71].
Faust et al.[92] observed that microbial respiration was associated with volumetric water content. The respiration declined with less availability of water, thus the lesser the tillage intensity, the more the volumetric water content which consequently resulted in higher microbial respiration. Another study by Bongiorno et al.[93] reflected the influence of soil management intensity on soil respiration. Reduced tillage practices resulted in 51% higher basal respiration than CT. Furthermore, this investigation suggested that microbial catabolic profile could be used as a useful biological soil quality indicator. Recently, Kalkhajeh et al.[94] ascertained the impact of simultaneous addition of N fertilizer and straw-decomposing microbial inoculant (SDMI) on soil respiration. The SDMI application boosted the soil microbial respiration which accelerated the decomposition of straw due to N fertilization. The C/N ratio did not affect the microbial respiration at elongation and heading stages, whereas N fertilization enhanced the microbial respiration to a greater extent than the unfertilized control. Additionally, the interaction between sampling time and basal N application significantly affected microbial respiration.
Gong et al.[95] apprised the effect of conventional rotary tillage and deep ploughing on soil respiration in winter wheat and observed that deep ploughing resulted in a higher soil respiration rate than conventional rotary tillage. Soil moisture content and temperature are the dominating agents influencing soil respiration which is restricted by the soil porosity.
-
Soil organic carbon plays a vital role in regulating various soil functions and ecosystem services. It is influenced by numerous factors like tillage practices and fertilization. Moreover, modified management practices may prove beneficial to avoid SOC loss by increasing its content. An exogenous supply of fertilizers may alter the chemical conditions of soil and thus result in transformation of SOC. Tillage practices lead to frequent soil disturbances which reduce the size of soil aggregates and accelerate the oxidation of SOC thereby reducing its content. The literature on the influence of fertilization and tillage practices on the transformation of SOC is discussed below.
Build-up of soil organic carbon (SOC) in soil
-
Soil organic carbon is a major part of the global carbon cycle which is associated not only with the soil but also takes part in the C cycling through vegetation, oceans and the atmosphere (Figs 1 & 2). Soil acts as a sink of approximately 1,500 Pg of C up to 1 m depth, which is greater than its storage in the atmosphere (approximately 800 Pg C) and terrestrial vegetation (500 Pg C) combined[96]. This dynamic carbon reservoir is continuously cycling in diverse molecular forms between the different carbon pools[97]. Fertilization (both organic and mineral) is one of the crucial factors that impart a notable influence on OC accretion in the soil. Many researchers have studied the soil C dynamics under different fertilizer treatments. Though inorganic fertilizers possess the advantage of easy handling, application and storage, they do not contribute to soil organic carbon. On the contrary, regardless of management method, plant residues are known to increase organic carbon content.
Figure 1.
Impact of different fertilization regimes on abundance of the microbial biomarker groups . Error bars represent the standard error of the means and different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments. Source: Li et al.[60].
Katkar et al.[98] reported a higher soil quality index under conjunctive nutrient management strategies comprising addition of compost and green leaves along with mineral nutrients. Mazumdar et al.[99] investigated the impact of crop residue (CR), FYM, and leguminous green manure (GM) on SOC in continuous rice-wheat cropping sequence over a 25-year period. At the surface layer, the maximum SOC content was recorded under NPK + FYM than NPK + CR and NPK + GM treatments. SOC was significantly lower under sole application of INFs (NPK) than the mixed application of organic and inorganic treatments. A higher range of SOC content was recorded at a depth of 0.6 m in the rice-wheat system (1.8–6.2 g kg−1) in farmyard manure (FYM)-treated plots than 1.7–5.3 g kg−1 under NPK, and 0.9–3.0 g kg−1 in case of unfertilized plots[100]. In a research study Dutta et al.[101] reported that rice residue had a higher decomposition rate (k¼ 0.121 and 0.076 day−1) followed by wheat (0.073 and 0.042 day−1) and maize residues (0.041 day−1) when their respective residues placed on soil surface than incorporated in the soils. Naresh et al.[102] found FYM and dhaincha as GM/ sulphitation press mud (SPM) treatments are potent enough to enhance the SOC. Maximum SOC content was noted in 0–5 cm depth that reduced gradually along the profile. In surface soil, the total organic content (TOC) under different treatments varied with source used to supply a recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) along with conventional fertilizer (CF).
Cai et al.[103] ascertained that long-term manure application significantly improved SOC content in different size fractions which followed the sequence: 2,000–250 μm > 250–53 μm > 53 μm fraction. Naresh et al.[22] determined that mean SOC content increased from 0.54% in control to 0.65% in RDF and 0.82% in RDF + FYM treatment and improved enzyme activity; thus, ultimately influenced nutrient dynamics under field conditions. The treatments RDF + FYM and NPK resulted in 0.28 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 and 0.13 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively and thus higher sequestration than control. Zhao et al.[104] determined that in the surface layer, significant increase in SOC content in each soil aggregate was noticed under straw incorporation treatments over no straw incorporated treatments (Fig. 3). Moreover, the aggregate associated OC was significantly higher in the surface layer than the sub-surface layer. The highest increment in aggregate-associated OC was noted in both maize and wheat straw (MR-WR) added plots followed by MR and least in WR. Besides, all of the three straw-incorporated treatments exhibited notable increase in SOC stock in each aggregate fraction in the surface layer of the soil. In the subsurface (20−40 cm) layer under MR-WR, significant rise in SOC stock of small macro-aggregates was observed, whereas there was a reduction in SOC stock in the silt + clay fraction than other treatments. The straw-incorporated treatments increased the quantity of mineral-associated organic matter (mSOM) and intra-aggregate particulate organic matter, (iPOM) within small macro-aggregates and micro-aggregates especially in the topmost layer of the soil.
Figure 3.
Distribution of OC in coarse iPOM (intra-aggregate particulate organic matter) fine iPOM, mSOM (mineral-associated matter), and free LF (free light fraction) of small macro-aggregates and micro-aggregates in the 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm soil layers under MR-WR (return of both maize and wheat straw), MR (maize straw return), WR (wheat straw return). Different lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments and depths respectively[104].
Srinivasarao et al.[105] reported that SOC content was reduced with the addition of INFs (100% RDN) alone as compared to the conjunctive application of inorganic and organic or sole FYM treatments. Earlier, Srinivasarao et al.[106] reported that FYM treated plots exhibited greater per cent increase in SOC stock than mineral fertilized plots and control. Tong et al.[107] ascertained that the application of NP and NPK significantly improved SOC stocks. On the contrary, fertilized soils could also exhibit decrease in carbon content than control. Naresh et al.[108] determined that higher biomass C input significantly resulted in greater particulate organic carbon (POC) content. Zhang et al.[109] ascertained that long-term addition of NPK and animal manures significantly improved SOC stocks by a magnitude of 32%−87% whereas NPK and wheat/ and or maize straw incorporation enhanced the C stocks by 26%−38% than control. Kamp et al.[110] determined that continuous cultivation without fertilization decreased SOC content by 14% than uncultivated soil. However, super optimum dose of NPK, balanced NPK fertilization and integration of NPK with FYM not only improved SOC content but also SOC stocks over the first year. In conventionally tilled cotton-growing soils of southern USA, Franzluebbers et al.[111] estimated that carbon sequestration averaged 0.31 ± 0.19 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. Mandal et al.[112] reported maximum SOC stock in the surface layer of the soil (0–15 cm) which progressively diminished with depth in each land use system. A significant decrease in SOC stock along the profile depth was also observed by Dhaliwal et al.[47] in both croplands and agroforestry. In the topmost soil layer, highest SOC stock was recorded in rice–fallow system while the lowest was in the guava orchard[112].
Nath et al.[113] determined that there was accrual of higher TOC in surface layers as compared to lower layers of soil under paddy cultivation. This accrual could be adduced to left-over crop residues and remnant root biomass which exhibited a decreasing trend with soil depth. Das et al.[114] determined that integrated use of fertilizers and organic sources resulted in greater TOC as compared to control or sole fertilizer application. Fang et al.[115] observed that the cumulative carbon mineralization differed with aggregate size in top soils of broad-leaved forests (BF) and coniferous forests (CF). However, in deep soil it was greater in macro-aggregates as compared to micro-aggregates in BF but not in CF (Fig. 4). By and large, the percent SOC mineralized was greater in macro-aggregates as compared to micro-aggregates. Dhaliwal et al.[100] ascertained that SOC accrual was considerably influenced by residue levels and tillage in surface soil (0−20 cm); albeit no variation was observed at lower depth (20−40 cm). The SOC content was greater in zero-tilled and permanently raised beds incorporated with residues as compared to puddled transplanted rice and conventionally planted wheat. Pandey et al.[116] reported that no-tillage prior to sowing of rice and wheat increased soil organic carbon by 0.6 Mg C ha–1 yr–1. The carbon sequestration rate on account of no-tillage or reduced tillage ranged between 0−2,114 kg ha–1 yr–1 in the predominant cropping system of South Asia, Xue et al.[117] observed that the long-term conventional tillage, by and large, exhibited a significant decline in SOC owing to degradation of soil structure, exposing protected soil organic matter (intra-soil aggregates) to microbes. Therefore, the adoption of no-tillage could hamper the loss of SOC thereby resulting in a greater or equivalent quantity of carbon in comparison to CT (Fig. 5).
Figure 4.
(a) Soil aggregate fractions of two depths in two restored plantations of subtropical China, (b) organic carbon and (c) its mineralization from various soil aggregates within 71 d at various soil depths in two restored plantations of subtropical China. Error bars show the standard error of the mean. The different letters represent significant differences among the different soil aggregate fractions within a depth at p < 0.05[115].
Figure 5.
The concentrations of (a) SOC, (b) total nitrogen (TN), and (c) soil C:N ratio for 0–50 cm profile under different tillage treatments in 2012 and 2013. NT = no-till with residue retention; RT = rotary tillage with residue incorporation; PT = plow tillage with residue incorporation; and PT0 = plow tillage with residue removed. The lowercase letters indicate statistical difference among treatments at p < 0.05[117].
Singh et al.[118] determined that carbon stock in the 0-40 cm layer increased by 39, 35 and 19% in zero-tilled clay loam, loam, and sandy loam soils, respectively as compared to conventional tilled soils over a period of 15 years. Kuhn et al.[119] also apprised about the advantages of NT over CT vis-a-vis SOC stocks across soil depths. In the surface layer (0−20 cm) NT, by and large, resulted in higher SOC stocks as compared to CT; however, SOC stocks exhibited a declining trend with soil depth, in fact, became negative at depths lower than 20 cm. Sapkota et al.[120] observed that over a period of seven years, direct dry-seeded rice proceeded by wheat cultivation with residue retention enhanced SOC at 0-60 cm depth by a magnitude of 4.7 and 3.0 t C ha−1 in zero-tillage (ZTDSR-ZTW + R) and without tillage (PBDSR-PBW + R), respectively. On the contrary, the conventional tillage rice-wheat cropping system (CTR-CTW) decreased the SOC up to 0.9 t C ha−1 (Table 2).
Table 2. Influence of tillage and crop establishment methods on SOC stock and its temporal variation under rice–wheat system[120].
Tillage and crop establishment methods Depths (m) 0–0.05 0.05–0.15 0.15–0.3 0.3–0.6 0–0.6 Total SOC (t/ha) CTR-CTW 3.5e 7.1c 8.7 7.0 26.2c CTR-ZTW 3.9d 7.6bc 8.8 6.5 26.7c ZTDSR-CTW 4.2d 7.5bc 9.2 6.3 27.3c ZTDSR-ZTW 4.9c 8.9ab 8.2 6.2 28.2bc ZTDSR-ZTW+R 6.1a 9.0ab 9.8 6.8 31.8a PBDSR-PBW+R 5.5b 9.3a 9.3 6.0 30.1ab MSD 0.4 1.7 2.0 1.4 2.49 Treatment effect
(p value)< 0.001 0.04 0.158 0.267 < 0.001 Initial SOC content 3.6 ±
0.158.1 ±
1.398.78 ±
1.076.7 ±
0.7327.1 ±
1.21Change in SOC over seven years (t/ha) CTR-CTW −0.16 −0.99 −0.04 0.28 −0.90 CTR-ZTW 0.28 −0.50 0.01 −0.20 −0.41 ZTDSR-CTW 0.62 −0.57 0.45 −0.34 0.16 ZTDSR-ZTW 1.34 0.84 −0.62 −0.46 1.09 ZTDSR-ZTW+R 2.49 0.96 1.04 0.16 4.66 PBDSR-PBW+R 1.89 1.22 0.51 −0.64 2.98 CTR-CTW = Conventionally tilled puddled transplanted rice followed by conventionally tilled wheat, CTR-ZTW = Conventionally tilled puddled transplanted rice followed by zero-tilled wheat, ZTDSR-CTW = Zero-tilled direct dry-seeded rice followed by conventionally tilled wheat, ZTDSR-ZTW = Zero-tilled direct dry-seeded rice followed by zero-tilled wheat, ZTDSR-ZTW+R = Zero-tilled direct dry-seeded rice followed by zero-tilled wheat with residue retention, PBDSR-PBW+R = Direct dry-seeded rice followed by direct drilling of wheat both on permanent beds with residue retention, MSD, minimum significant difference. Significant different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Labile carbon (LC) fractions in soil
-
Labile organic carbon (LC) is that fraction of SOC that is rapidly degraded by soil microbes, therefore, having the highest turnover rate. This fraction can turn over quickly on account of the change in land use and management strategies. From the crop production perspective, this fraction is crucial as it sustains the soil food cycle and, hence, considerably impacts nutrient cycling thereby altering soil quality and productivity. Short-term management could influence the labile fraction of carbon[121]. However, some site-specific problems and regional factors may influence their distribution in soil layers[102].
Banger et al.[122] observed significant alteration in labile pools of C, for instance, particulate organic matter (POM), water-soluble C (WSC) and light fraction of C (LFC) because of the addition of fertilizers and/or FYM over a 16-year period. Particulate organic matter, LFC and WSC contributed 24%–35%, 12%–14% and 0.6%–0.8%, respectively, towards SOC. The increase in concentration of SOC including its pools like POC and the sequestration rate due to integrated nutrient management was also reported by Nayak et al.[123]. Gu et al.[124] observed that mulch-treated soils (straw and grass mulch) had significantly greater levels of LOC, POC, DOC and EOC as compared to no mulch-treated soils which could be adduced to the addition of straw, root and its sections into the soil. The content of labile C fractions across all treatments exhibited a decreasing trend with soil depth[23, 102, 125].
In a long-term experiment, Anantha et al.[126] observed that the total organic carbon apportioned into labile carbon, non-labile, less labile, and very labile carbon constituted around 18.7%, 19.3%, 20.6% and 41.4% of the TOC, respectively (Table 3). Zhu et al.[20] determined that straw incorporation had a substantial impact on TOC and labile C fractions of the soil which were greater in straw incorporated treatments as compared to non-straw treatments across all the depths. Wang et al.[127] reported that the light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) and DOC were significantly greater in the straw-applied treatments than the control by a magnitude of 7%–129% for both the early and late season rice. The treatments NPK + FYM or NPK + GR + FYM resulted in greater content of very labile and labile C fractions whereas non-labile and less labile fractions were greater in control and NPK + CR treatment. There was 40.5% and 16.2% higher C build-up in sole FYM treated plots and 100% NPK + FYM, respectively over control. On the other hand, a net depletion of 1.2 and 1.8 Mg ha−1 in carbon stock was recorded under 50% NPK and control treatments, respectively. Out of the total C added through FYM, only 28.9% was stabilized as SOC, though an external supply of OM is a significant source of soil organic carbon[69]. Hence, to sustain the optimum SOC level at least an input of 2.3 Mg C ha−1 y−1 is required. A comparatively greater quantity of soil C in passive pools was observed in 100% NPK + FYM treatment. The increase in allocation of C into the passive pool was about 33%, 35%, 41% and 39% of TOC in control, suboptimal dose, optimal dose and super optimal dose of NPK which indicates that the concentration of passive pools increased with an increase in fertilization doses. Water-soluble carbon (WSC) was 5.48% greater in the upper soil layer as compared to lower layer of soil. In surface soil (0−15 cm), the values of light fraction carbon (LFC) were 81.3, 107.8, 155.2, 95.7, 128.8, 177.8 and 52.7 mg kg−1 in ZT without residue retention, ZT with 4 t ha−1 residue retention, ZT with 6 t ha−1 residue retention, FIRB without residue addition and FIRB with 4 and 6 t ha−1 residue addition and CT, respectively (Table 4). Tiwari et al.[128] determined that the decrease in POC was due to reduction in fine particulate organic matter in topsoil whereas decrement in dissolved organic carbon was observed largely in subsoil. Therefore, in surface soils fine POC and LFOC might be regarded as preliminary evidence of organic C alteration more precisely, while DOC could be considered as a useful indicator for subsoil. Reduction in allocations of fine POC, LFOC and DOC to SOC caused by tillage and straw management strategies indicated the decline in quality of SOC. A higher SOC concentration was recorded in the conjoint application of INF + FYM (0.82%) and sole application of INF (0.65%) than control (0.54%). Kumar et al.[83] reported that the CT without residue retention had significantly lower labile carbon fractions (27%–48%) than zero-tillage with 6-ton residue retention. Moreover, residue-retained fertilized treatments had significantly greater labile fractions of C than sole fertilized treatments[125]. Kumar et al.[83] reported highest change in DOC in zero-till with residue retention (28.2%) in comparison to conventional tillage practices. In ZT, absence of soil perturbations resulted in sustained supply of organic substrata for soil microbes which increases their activity. On the contrary, CT practices resulted in higher losses of C as CO2 due to frequent disturbances.
Table 3. Oxidisable organic carbon fractions in soils (g kg−1) at different layers[126].
Treatment Depths (cm) 0−15 15−30 30−45 Total Very Labile C Control 3.6 ± 0.5c 1.4 ± 0.3b 1.3 ± 0.2a 6.3 ± 0.4b 50% NPK 4.6 ± 0.3bc 2.1 ± 0.7ab 1.5 ± 0.1a 8.1 ± 0.9a 100% NPK 4.4 ± 0.3bc 2.3 ± 0.2a 1.4 ± 0.5a 8.0 ± 0.7a 150% NPK 5.0 ± 0.2ab 2.6 ± 0.2a 1.5 ± 0.1a 9.0 ± 0.3a 100% NPK + FYM 4.8 ± 0.2ab 2.0 ± 0.2ab 1.3 ± 0.3a 8.1 ± 0.2a FYM 5.9 ± 1.3a 2.2 ± 0.2a 1.4 ± 0.3a 9.5 ± 1.6a Fallow 4.2 ± 0.7bc 1.5 ± 0.5b 0.7 ± 0.3b 6.3 ± 0.8b Lbile C Control 2.4 ± 0.3a 1.0 ± 0.2a 0.8 ± 0.4a 4.2 ± 0.6a 50% NPK 1.7 ± 0.4ab 0.9 ± 0.5a 0.7 ± 0.2a 3.3 ± 0.7a 100% NPK 1.8 ± 0.4ab 0.8 ± 0.5a 0.6 ± 0.3a 3.2 ± 0.8a 150% NPK 1.2 ± 0.3b 0.7 ± 0.2a 0.9 ± 0.2a 2.8 ± 0.4a 100% NPK + FYM 1.9 ± 0.3ab 0.7 ± 0.2a 0.7 ± 0.3a 3.4 ± 0.2a FYM 2.5 ± 0.9a 0.7 ± 0.3a 0.7 ± 0.2a 3.9 ± 0.9a Fallow 2.2 ± 1.0ab 1.0 ± 0.3a 1.0 ± 0.4a 4.1 ± 1.1a Less labile C Control 1.5 ± 0.3c 0.6 ± 0.4c 0.4 ± 0.0c 2.6 ± 0.7d 50% NPK 1.8 ± 0.1c 0.4 ± 0.1c 0.5 ± 0.2c 2.7 ± 0.1cd 100% NPK 2.5 ± 0.3ab 0.8 ± 0.1bc 1.1 ± 0.2ab 4.4 ± 0.1b 150% NPK 2.6 ± 0.2a 0.9 ± 0.1bc 0.4 ± 0.2c 3.9 ± 0.1b 100% NPK + FYM 2.7 ± 0.6a 1.5 ± 0.2a 1.4 ± 0.1a 5.6 ± 0.7a FYM 1.9 ± 0.7bc 1.7 ± 0.2a 1.0 ± 0.2b 4.5 ± 0.7ab Fallow 1.5 ± 0.3c 1.3 ± 0.7ab 0.9 ± 0.4b 3.8 ± 1.2bc Non labile C Control 1.2 ± 0.5b 1.2 ± 0.3a 0.2 ± 0.2b 2.6 ± 0.5b 50% NPK 1.2 ± 0.9b 1.7 ± 0.8a 0.7 ± 0.4ab 3.5 ± 1.8ab 100% NPK 1.3 ± 0.6b 1.5 ± 0.6a 0.5 ± 0.2ab 3.3 ± 1.0ab 150% NPK 1.4 ± 0.3b 1.5 ± 0.2a 0.8 ± 0.1a 3.7 ± 0.3ab 100% NPK + FYM 2.0 ± 0.8b 1.3 ± 0.1a 0.3 ± 0.3ab 3.5 ± 0.7ab FYM 3.7 ± 1.3a 1.0 ± 0.2a 0.5 ± 0.5ab 5.1 ± 1.9a Fallow 2.1 ± 0.2b 1.4 ± 0.7a 0.4 ± 0.2ab 3.9 ± 0.9ab Values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.001, ± indicates the standard deviation values of the means. Table 4. Influence of tillage and nitrogen management on distribution of carbon fractions in soil[83].
Treatments WSOC
(g kg−1)SOC
(g kg−1)OC
(g kg−1)BC
(g kg−1)POC
(mg kg−)PON
(mg kg−1)LFOC
(mg kg−1)LFON
(mg kg−1)Depths (cm) 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 0−15 15−30 Tillage practices ZTR 28.8 26.2 23.1 19.3 9.61 9.13 4.69 4.28 1342.8 967.9 119.5 108.1 194.7 154.8 14.8 12.3 ZTWR 25.3 24.6 18.4 14.8 7.87 7.21 3.76 3.19 981.1 667.4 94.6 86.5 120.5 104.7 11.8 10.3 RTR 27.0 25.9 22.4 18.2 8.68 8.17 4.13 3.87 1230.2 836.9 109.7 97.8 170.9 144.9 13.7 11.6 RTWR 23.7 21.8 18.1 14.2 7.66 7.07 3.12 2.96 869.4 604.4 82.6 76.6 107.1 97.3 9.7 8.6 CTR 26.1 24.4 21.8 17.4 8.49 7.96 3.82 3.48 1099.1 779.4 98.4 89.3 143.8 115.9 12.8 10.9 CT 21.8 20.9 16.1 13.1 6.21 5.64 2.89 2.63 617.5 481.8 69.2 57.6 90.8 73.6 9.6 7.9 Nitrogen management Control 21.1 14.9 16.1 13.1 6.13 5.48 1.58 1.07 709.7 658.6 31.7 26.3 123.9 104.3 6.4 5.8 80 kg N ha−1 28.3 21.2 17.8 14.7 6.46 6.16 2.46 1.75 860.7 785.6 68.4 56.2 132.8 116.1 7.6 6.9 120 kg N ha−1 29.5 22.1 19.1 16.1 7.25 6.71 3.26 2.18 952.2 808.9 89.5 78.5 150.6 127.6 9.7 8.6 160 kg N ha−1 30.2 23.1 20.8 18.2 7.75 7.28 3.82 2.66 1099.5 823.8 96.8 83.4 168.5 145.7 10.2 9.8 200 kg N ha−1 31.1 25.4 21.3 18.7 7.93 7.48 4.15 3.42 1153.1 898.4 103.9 97.3 176.2 152.9 11.7 10.6 WSOC = Water soluble organic carbon, SOC = Total soil organic carbon, OC = Oxidizable organic carbon, BC =Black carbon, POC = particulate organic carbon, PON = particulate organic nitrogen, LFOC = labile fraction organic carbon, and LFON = labile fraction organic nitrogen. ZTR = Zero tillage with residue retention, ZTWR = Zero tillage without residue retention; RTR = Reduced tillage with residue retention, RTWR = Reduced tillage without residue retention, CTR = Conventional tillage with residue incorporation; CT = Conventional tillage without residue incorporation. -
The support rendered by the Departemnt of Soil Science, PAU, Ludhiana, RVSKVV, Gwailor, CSSRI, Karnal, IISS, Bhopal, School of Organic Farming, PAU Ludhiana and Washington State University, USA is fully acknowledged .
-
About this article
Cite this article
Dhaliwal SS, Shukla AK, Behera SK, Dubey SK, Sharma S, et al. 2024. Impact of fertilization and tillage practices on transformations of carbon, essential plant nutrients and microbial biota composition in soils: a review. Technology in Agronomy 4: e003 doi: 10.48130/tia-0023-0020
Impact of fertilization and tillage practices on transformations of carbon, essential plant nutrients and microbial biota composition in soils: a review
- Received: 25 July 2023
- Accepted: 30 November 2023
- Published online: 05 February 2024
Abstract: Soil management approaches have been advocated to modify the soil fertility parameters for higher agricultural production through different land systems. The present review examines the influence of organic/inorganic fertilizers and tillage practices through transformations in regulating the nutrient status, microbial components, and soil organic carbon. Fertilization along with different tillage practices have been found to affect the available plant nutrient content including macronutrients, secondary nutrients, and micronutrients. The review investigation also showed that, compared to inorganic fertilizers (INF), application of compost enhanced plant available macronutrients (N, P, K), micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn) and soil organic carbon (SOC) with different tillage practices. Through different land systems, transformation of the plant available macronutrients, micronutrients and microbial compositions showed their enhancement. Microbial parameters viz. microbial biodiversity, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and microbial respiration reported increase. Soil organic carbon and aggregate distribution in the soil and the aggregate-associated organic carbon and physical fractions of SOC have also been reviewed. Among different tillage systems, the reduced tillage with residue incorporation and no-tillage (zero tillage) with residue mulching, significantly enhanced carbon sequestration in soil aggregates in comparison to conventional tillage with residue removal treatments. The practice of zero tillage improved dissolved organic carbon and MBC in light and heavy fractions of carbon in the upper layers of soil.