ARTICLE   Open Access    

Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics

  • # Authors contributed equally: Dongfang Zhou, Robert L. Chretien

More Information
  • Hydroponic and vertical farming technologies have grown rapidly in recent years as there are many advantages including year-round production, short growth cycles, greater efficiency of water and nutrient use, prevention of soil-borne diseases and insects, longer shelf life, etc. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a popular leafy green and a good source of vitamins and minerals. Although methods of spinach production in hydroponic systems have been improved including lighting, fertilizer solutions, and others, plant growth could be further promoted to increase profitability and compensate for initial startup costs. One way to increase spinach yields is to use plant growth-promoting bacteria, which can promote plant growth, enhance nutrient uptake, increase stress tolerance as well as inhibit pathogen growth. Two bacteria (Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 and Enterobacter asburiae IALR1379) were tested with two spinach cultivars ('Red Snapper' and 'Seaside') using indoor vertical nutrient film technique systems. Inoculations of IALR632 and IALR1379 significantly increased the shoot fresh weight of 'Red Snapper' by 19.3% and 13.3%, and that of 'Seaside' by 17.8% and 14.1% at harvest, compared with their control treatments, respectively. Both bacterial inoculations enhanced root growth of 'Red Snapper', but not 'Seaside'. Additionally, inoculation of IALR632 significantly increased leaf greenness of both 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside', but IALR1379 did not. Both bacterial endophytes colonized the inside of the roots and translocated to shoots of 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside'. Overall, IALR632 is more effective at increasing spinach yields, root growth, and leaf greenness compared to IALR1379 under indoor vertical hydroponic systems.
  • The competition for consumer preference for fresh apples (Malus domestica) from exotic and tropical fruits is intense. Red-fleshed (RF) apple may not only provide a novel point of differentiation and enhanced visual quality, but also a source of increased concentration of potentially health-benefiting compounds within both the fresh fruit and snack/juice markets[1]. Two different types of RF apples have been characterised: Type 1 RF apple has red colouration not only in the fruit core and cortex, but also in vegetative tissues, including stems and leaves; Type 2 RF apples display red pigment only in the fruit cortex[1, 2]. To facilitate trade and lengthen the supply-window, harvested fruit are usually cold stored, which can induce a series of disorders, including physiological breakdown manifesting as a flesh browning disorder (FBD) in RF apples[3, 4]. FBD in RF apples can be caused by senescence, and there is also some evidence to suggest that a large proportion of RF apples are chilling-sensitive (Jason Johnston, Plant & Food Research Hawke's Bay, personal communication).

    Earlier studies suggested that Type 1 RF colour was determined by a promoter mutation of MdMYB10 that has a tandem replication of a myeloblastosis (MYB) binding cis-element (R6) within the promoter, resulting in autoregulation of MdMYB10[5]. However, van Nocker et al.[6] observed a large variation in the degree and pattern of red pigmentation within the cortex among the accessions carrying MdMYB10, and concluded that the presence of this gene alone was not sufficient to ensure the RF colour. A genome-wide association study (GWAS)[3], reported that, in addition to the MdMYB10 gene, other genetic factors (e.g. MdLAR1, a key enzyme in the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway) were associated with RF colour, too. Wang et al.[7] reported that many of the up-regulated genes in RF apples were associated with flavonoid biosynthesis (e.g., chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanin synthase (ANS), UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) and MYB transcription factors). Recently, MdNAC42 was shown to share similar expression patterns in RF fruit with MdMYB10 and MdTTG1, and it interacts with MdMYB10 to participate in the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in the RF apple Redlove®[8].

    Several transcription factor genes (e.g., MYB, WRKY, bHLH, NAC, ERF, bZIP and HSF) were reported to be differentially expressed during cold-induced morphological and physiological changes in 'Golden Delicious' apples[9]. A study by Zhang et al.[10] showed that ERF1B was capable of interacting with the promotors of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin (PA) MYB transcription factors, and suggested that ethylene regulation and anthocyanin regulation might be linked in either direction. It was reported that ethylene signal transduction pathway genes or response genes, such as ERS (ethylene response sensor), EIN3 (ethylene-insensitive3) and ERFs (ethylene response factors), may play an important role in the regulatory network of PA biosynthesis[11].

    Espley et al.[12] observed no incidence of FBD in cold-stored fruit of 'Royal Gala', but over-expression of MdMYB10 in 'Royal Gala' resulted in a high rate of FBD in RF fruit, which was hypothesised to be caused by elevated fruit ethylene concentrations before harvest and more anthocyanin, chlorogenic acid (CGA) and pro-cyanidins in RF fruit. In addition, the MYB10 transcription factor was shown to elevate the expression levels of MdACS, MdACO, and MdERF106 ethylene-regulating genes[12]. To elucidate the mechanism regulating the FBD of RF apples, Zuo et al.[13] analysed the transcriptome of tree-ripe apples at 0, 0.5 and 4 h after cutting, and reported that the differentially expressed genes at different sampling points were mainly related to plant–pathogen interactions.

    GWAS is a powerful technique for mining novel functional variants. One of the limitations of GWAS, using SNP arrays, is that they require genotyping of large numbers of individuals, which may be expensive for large populations. DNA pooling-based designs (i.e., bulk segregant analysis) test differential allele distributions in pools of individuals that exhibit extreme phenotypes (XP) in bi-parental populations, large germplasm collections or random mating populations[1416]. In addition to reducing the number of samples to be genotyped, the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based XP-GWAS has the potential to identify small-effect loci and rare alleles via extreme phenotypic selection.

    In this WGS-based XP-GWAS, we investigated the genetic basis of RF and FBD by sequencing the pools of individuals that exhibited extreme phenotypes for these two traits, and analysed the differences in allele frequencies between phenotypic classes. This method combines the simplicity of genotyping pools with superior mapping resolution. We also examined the transcriptome from transgenic apple fruit harbouring the R6:MYB10 promoter as a model for red flesh in apple. Differences in gene expression of a highly pigmented line were compared with expression in control fruit and these genes were then used for comparison with the seedling population. Understanding the genetic basis of the link between RF and FBD will help in design of strategies for selection against FBD in high-quality Type 1 RF apple cultivars.

    A snapshot of visual variation in FBD and WCI is presented in Fig. 1. The average WCI and FBD across all ~900 seedlings ranged from 0 to 7, and from 0% to 58%, respectively. Based on the MLM analysis, the estimated narrow-sense heritability (h2) of WCI and FBD was 0.57 (standard error = 0.18) and 0.09 (standard error = 0.05), respectively. The estimated genetic correlation between WCI and FBD was 0.58, and several fruit quality traits displayed unfavourable correlations with WCI (Supplemental Fig. S1). Seedlings with higher WCI scores were generally characterised by poor firmness and crispness, plus higher astringency and sourness. Estimated phenotypic and genetic correlations between all pairs of traits are listed in Supplemental Table S1.

    Figure 1.  Transverse cross-sections of apple slices showing range in (a) flesh colouration, and (b) flesh browning disorder for Type 1 red-fleshed apple. The weighted cortical intensity (WCI) scores (0−9 scale) and the proportion of the cortex area showing symptoms of flesh browning disorder are also displayed.

    A few seedlings had no red pigment in the cortex, but the average WCI score across all seedlings was 2.25. About two-thirds of the seedlings did not display any FBD symptoms, but among the remaining seedlings, FBD ranged between 1% and 58% (Fig. 2). The average WCI score for the 'low' and 'high' WCI pool was 0.45 and 5.2, respectively, while the average FBD was 0% and 20.6% for the 'low' and 'high' FBD pool, respectively (Supplemental Table S2). The average WCI score of the seedlings in the FBD pools was similar (Low: 5.5; High: 4.6), while the average FBD of the high- and low-WCI pools was 4.5% and 0.1%, respectively.

    Figure 2.  The distribution of weighted cortex intensity (WCI) scores (a) and the internal flesh browning disorder IFBD%; (b) in the population of ~900 apple seedlings. The green and red circles highlight the individuals used to form the 'low' and 'high' pools of samples.

    After filtering, about 204,000 SNPs were used and the average sequencing depth of SNP loci was similar for the two pools (42 vs 44). There was a near-perfect correlation between the Z-test statistics and G-statistics, so only the latter are discussed hereafter. A plot of the G' values, smoothed over 2 Mb windows, is shown for all 17 chromosomes (Chrs) in Supplemental Fig. S2. XP-GWAS identified genomic regions significantly associated with FBD on 12 out of the 17 Chrs (Fig. 3), and putative candidate genes within ±1.0 Mb distanceof the significant G' peaks were identified (Table 1). Additional genomic regions, which did not meet the significance threshold but displayed distinguished G' peaks, were also identified across all chromosomes (Supplemental Table S3).

    Figure 3.  G'-statistics across the linkage groups (LG) showing significant association with the flesh browning disorder (FBD) in apple The horizontal red lines indicate the significance threshold. The putative candidate genes (refer to Table 1) underpinning various G' peaks are also shown.
    Table 1.  A list of the genomic regions associated with internal flesh browning disorder (FBD) in apples. Putative candidate genes residing within these regions are also listed using GDDH13v1.1 reference genome assembly.
    ChrGenomic region (Mb)Putative genes functions
    221.9–23.5Ethylene-responsive element binding factor 13 (MdERF13: MD02G1213600);
    33.1–4.9cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) enzyme (MD03G1051100, MD03G1050900 and MD03G1051000); MdWRKY2: MD03G1044400; MdWRKY33 (MD03G1057400)
    38.2–9.6ascorbate peroxidase 1 (MdAPX1: MD03G1108200, MD03G1108300)
    314.7–16.6senescence-related MdNAC90 (MD03G1148500)
    336.5–37.5Ethylene response sensor 1 (MdERS1: MD03G1292200); flavonoid biosynthesis protein MdMYB12 (MD03G1297100); Heat shock protein DnaJ (MD03G1296600, MD03G1297000); pectin methylesterase (MdPME) inhibitor protein (MD03G1290800, MD03G1290900, MD03G1291000).
    411.0–13.0phenylalanine and lignin biosynthesis protein MdMYB85 (MD04G1080600)
    422.1–24.4MYB domain protein 1 (MD04G1142200); HSP20-like protein (MD04G1140600); UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) proteins UGT85A7 (MD04G1140700, MD04G1140900); UGT85A3 (MD04G1140800); UGT (MD04G1141000, MD04G1141300); UGT85A2 (MD04G1141400); UGT85A4 (MD04G1141500); DNAJ heat shock protein (MD04G1153800, MD04G1153900, MD04G1154100)
    427.6–29.6HCT/HQT regulatory genes MD04G1188000 and MD04G1188400
    629.8–31.7Volz et al. (2013) QTL for IFBD; anthocyanin regulatory proteins MdMYB86 (MD06G1167200); triterpene biosynthesis transcription factor MdMYB66 (MD06G1174200); Cytochrome P450 (MD06G1162600; MD06G1162700, MD06G1162800, MD06G1163100, MD06G1163300, MD06G1163400, MD06G1163500, MD06G1163600, MD06G1163800, MD06G1164000, MD06G1164100, MD06G1164300, MD06G1164400, MD06G1164500, MD06G1164700)
    713.9–15.9heat shock protein 70B (MD07G1116300)
    717.4–19.0Drought-stress WRKY DNA-binding proteins (MdWRKY56: MD07G1131000, MD07G1131400)
    723.6–25.2MdPAL2 (MD07G1172700); drought-stress gene NGA1 (MD07G1162400); DNAJ heat shock family protein (MD07G1162300, MD07G1162200), stress-response protein (MdNAC69: MD07G1163700, MD07G1164000)
    97.9–11.8MD09G1110500 involved in ascorbate oxidase (AO); MdUGT proteins (MD09G1141200, MD09G1141300, MD09G1141500, MD09G1141600, MD09G1141700, MD09G1141800, MD09G1142000, MD09G1142500, MD09G1142600, MD09G1142800, MD09G1142900, MD09G1143000, MD09G1143200, MD09G1143400) involved in flavonoids biosynthesis; heat shock proteins 89.1 (MD09G1122200) and HSP70 (MD09G1137300); Ethylene-forming enzyme MD09G1114800; Anthocyanin regulatory protein MdNAC42 (MD09G1147500, MD09G1147600)
    914.9–16.5triterpene biosynthesis transcription factor protein MdMYB66 (MD09G1183800);
    111.7–3.0ethylene response factor proteins (MdEIN-like 3: MD11G1022400)
    1138.6–40.6Senescence-related gene 1 (MD11G1271400, MD11G1272300, MD11G1272000, MD11G1272100, MD11G1272300, MD11G1272400, and MD11G1272500); Chalcone-flavanone isomerase (CHI) protein (MD11G1273600) and MdbHLH3 (MD11G1286900, MDP0000225680); cytochrome P450 enzyme (MD11G1274000, MD11G1274100, MD11G1274200, MD11G1274300, MD11G1274500, and MD11G1274600); heat shock transcription factor A6B (MdHSFA6B: MD11G1278900) – involved in ABA-mediated heat response and flavonoid biosynthesis.
    122.2–3.5heat shock protein 70-1 ((MD12G1025600, MD12G1025700 and MD12G1026300) and heat shock protein 70 (MD12G1025800 and MD12G1025900 and MD12G1026000); ethylene (MD12G1032000) and auxin-responsive (MD12G1027600) proteins.
    127.2–8.4DNAJ heat shock domain-containing protein (MD12G1065200 and MD12G1067400)
    1327.5–30.5MD13G1257800 involved in polyphenol 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL)
    1337.5–39.5pectin methyl esterase inhibitor superfamily protein MdPMEI (MD13G1278600)
    1425.4–27.5Drought-stress response gene MdWRKY45 (MD14G1154500); chalcone synthase (CHS) family proteins (MD14G1160800 and MD14G1160900); triterpene biosynthesis transcription factor MdMYB66 (MD14G1180700, MD14G1181000, MD14G1180900); anthocyanin biosynthesis protein (MdMYB86: MD14G1172900); cytochrome P450 proteins (MD14G1169000, MD14G1169200, MD14G1169600, MD14G1169700)
    150–1.5Ethylene synthesis proteins (MD15G1020100, MD15G1020300 and MD15G1020500); dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR) gene (MD15G1024100)
    154.6–6.8MdMYB73 (MD15G1076600, MD15G1088000) modulates malate transportation/accumulation via interaction with MdMYB1/10; MdNAC52: MD15G1079400) regulates anthocyanin/PA; heat shock transcription factor B4 (MD15G1080700); stress-response protein MdWRKY7 (MD15G1078200)
    1553.5–54.9MdC3H (MD15G1436500) involved in chlorogenic acid biosynthesis; MdEIN3 (MD15G1441000) involved in regulating ethylene synthesis and anthocyanin accumulation
    168.9–10.9SAUR-like auxin-responsive protein (MD16G1124300) and MdNAC83: (MD16G1125800) associated with fruit ripening; MD16G1140800 regulates proanthocyanidin; MdPAE genes (MD16G1132100, MD16G1140500) regulates ethylene production.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The ethylene-responsive factor 13 (MdERF13: MD02G1213600) resided within the significant region (21.9–23.5 Mb) on Chr2, while the ascorbate peroxidase 3 (MdAPX3: MD02G1127800, MD02G1132200) resided in the prominent region between 9.45 and 11.28 Mb) (Fig. 3, Table 1). There were several genomic regions showing association with FBD on Chr3. The first region (8.2–9.5 Mb) flanked MdAPX1 (MD03G1108200, MD03G1108300), while MdERF3 (MD03G1194300) and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70: MD03G1201800, D03G1201700) resided within the prominent peak region (25.5–27.5 Mb). Another significant region (36.5–37.5 Mb) at the bottom on Chr3 harboured ethylene response sensor 1 (MdERS1: MD03G1292200), a flavonoid-biosynthesis related protein MdMYB12 (MD03G1297100), HSP DnaJ and pectin methyl esterase (PME) inhibitor proteins (Fig. 3, Table 1).

    The significant G' region (27.6–29.6 Mb) on Chr4 flanked the genes MD04G1188000 and MD04G1188400 involved in the biosynthesis of hydroxycinnamoyl CoA shikimate/quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT/HQT), while the adjacent region (22.1–24.3 Mb) harboured a cluster of UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) proteins and HSP (Table 1). Another region between 11.0 and 13.0 Mb encompassed phenylalanine and lignin biosynthesis gene MYB85 (MD04G1080600)[17]. The only significant region associated with FBD on Chr6 spanned between 29.8 and 31.7 Mb, which included a SNP earlier reported associated with FBD[4]. This region also harboured several MYB proteins (MdMYB86: MD06G1167200; MdMYB98: MD06G1172900; MdMYB66: MD06G1174200) and a large cluster of cytochrome P450 proteins (Table 1).

    A significant FBD-associated region (13.9–15.9 Mb) on Chr7 encompassed the HSP 70B (MD07G1116300), while another significant region between 23.6 Mb and 25.2 Mb flanked the gene coding for phenylalanine ammonia lyase 2 (MdPAL2: MD07G1172700), a drought stress gene NGA1 (MD07G1162400), DNAJ HSP, and stress-response protein (MdNAC69: MD07G1163700, MD07G1164000) (Fig. 3, Table 1). A large significant region spanning between 7.9 and 11.8 Mb on Chr9 encompassed the gene MD09G1110500 putatively involved in ascorbate oxidase (AO), HSP (HSP70: MD09G1137300; HSP89.1: MD09G1122200), an ethylene-forming enzyme (MD09G1114800), and MdNAC42 (MD09G1147500, MD09G1147600). Another significant genomic region on Chr9 was between 14.9 and 16.5 Mb, which harbours the MYB domain protein MdMYB66 (MD09G1183800) (Table 1).

    A sharp G' peak region (1.7–3.0 Mb) on Chr11 associated with FBD encompassed ethylene insensitive 3 (MdEIN3: MD11G1022400) along with a cluster of UGT proteins, WD-40, and bHLHL proteins (Table 1). A significant region between 38.6 and 40.6 Mb at the bottom of Chr11 was dominated by clusters of senescence-related genes and cytochrome P450 enzymes. This genomic region also flanked a chalcone-flavanone isomerase (CHI) family protein (MD11G1273600) and a bHLH protein (MdbHLH3: MD11G1286900, MDP0000225680), along with the heat shock transcription factor A6B (HSFA6B: MD11G1278900) (Table 1, Supplemental Table S3).

    The region (2.2–3.3 Mb) associated with FBD on Chr12 flanked genes for the HSP 70 and 70-1, NAC proteins, ethylene and auxin-responsive proteins (Table 1). An adjacent significant region (7.2–8.4 Mb) flanked DNAJ HSP, along with bZIP, bHLH and WD-40 repeat-like proteins (Table 1; Supplemental Table S3). There was a large genomic region on Chr13 showing a significant association with FBD. In this region, the first G' peak (27.5–30.5 Mb) harboured MD13G1257800, which regulates polyphenol 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL) synthesis. The second G' peak region (32.6–34.7 Mb) corresponded to an earlier mapped QTL for flesh browning in white-fleshed apples[18].

    The significant region (25.4–27.5 Mb) on Chr14 harboured various genes for proteins with different putative functions, such as AP2 proteins, WD-40 repeat family proteins, bHLH proteins, MdNAC83 (MD14G1150900), MdWRKY45 (MD14G1154500), chalcone synthase (CHS) family proteins (MD14G1160800 and MD14G1160900), cytochrome P450 proteins, and several MYB domain proteins (MdMYB86: MD14G1172900; MdMYB98: MD14G1179000; MdMYB66: MD14G1180700, MD14G1181000, MD14G1180900) (Fig. 3, Table 1, Supplemental Table S3). A sharp G' peak (15.2–17.2 Mb) on Chr14 did not meet the significance threshold corresponding to the FBD QTL in white-fleshed apples[18].

    The upper 1.5 Mb region on Chr15 associated with FBD encompassed several transcription factor families, including WD-40 repeats, bHLH, bZIP, ethylene synthesis proteins, and dihydroflavonol reductase (DFR) protein (MD15G1024100) (Fig. 3, Table 1; Supplemental Table S3). Another significant region on Chr15 (4.6−6.8 Mb) harboured HSF B4, MdMYB73 (which interacts with MdMYB1/10 to modulate malate transportation) and MdNAC52 (MD15G1079400), which regulates anthocyanin and PA synthesis by directly regulating MdLAR[19]. A significantly associated region at the bottom of Chr15 (53.5–54.9 Mb) harboured MdNAC35 (MD15G1444700), MdC3H (MD15G1436500) involved in the production of p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H) enzyme, which plays a role in chlorogenic acid biosynthesis, and MdEIN3 (MD15G1441000).

    The significant region between 8.9 and 10.9 Mb on Chr16 harboured a gene for SAUR-like auxin-responsive protein (MD16G1124300) and MdNAC83 (MD16G1125800), both of which have been reportedly associated with apple fruit ripening[20]. This region also encompassed MD16G1140800, which regulates PA[11], and a gene for the pectin acetyl esterase protein MdPAE10 (MD16G1132100) involved in ethylene production and shelf-life[21]. A sharp G' peak region (20.4–22.4 Mb) in the middle of Chr16 flanked MdERF1B (MD16G1216900) and MdMYB15 (MD16G1218000 and MD16G1218900), involved in altering anthocyanin and PA concentrations[10] (Fig. 3, Table 1, Supplemental Table S3).

    The average sequencing depth of the SNP loci (~160,000) retained for marker-trait association was similar for the two WCI pools (41 vs 44). The significant regions were located on Chrs 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 15 and 16 (Fig. 4). The genomic intervals within ±1.0 Mb of the significant G' peaks, and the putative candidate genes within those intervals, are listed in Table 2. Additional genomic regions, which did not meet the significance threshold but displayed distinct G' peaks, were also identified across most chromosomes ( Supplemental Fig. S2, Supplemental Table S3). A significant region on Chr4 encompassed chalcone synthase (CHS) genes, along with an ERF (MD04G1009000) involved in regulating PA biosynthesis[11].

    Figure 4.  G’-statistics across the linkage groups (LG) showing significant association with the weighted cortex intensity (WCI) in apple. The horizontal red lines indicate the significance threshold. The putative candidate genes (refer to Table 2) underpinning various G' peaks are also shown.
    Table 2.  A list of the genomic regions significantly associated with the weighted cortex intensity (WCI) in apples. Putative candidate genes residing within these regions are also listed using GDDH13v1.1 reference genome assembly.
    ChrGenomic region (Mb)Putative genes functions
    211.2–13.2UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) proteins (MD02G1153000, MD02G1153100, MD02G1153200, MD02G1153300; MD02G1153400; MD02G1153500; MD02G1153700; MD02G1153800; MD02G1153900);
    40–1.2Chalcone synthase (CHS) genes (MD04G1003000; MD04G1003300 and MD04G1003400); DNAJ heat shock protein (MD04G1003500); MdERF (MD04G1009000) involved in regulating PA biosynthesis.
    69.5–11.0Ubiquitin protein (MD06G1061100); stress-response WRKY protein MdWRKY21 (MD06G1062800);
    612.1–13.6pectin methylesterase inhibitor superfamily protein (MdPME: MD06G1064700); phenylalanine and lignin biosynthesis gene (MdMYB85)
    616.0–17.6MD06G1071600 (MDP0000360447) involved in leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) synthesis
    624.0–26.0UDP-glycosyltransferase proteins (MD06G1103300, MD06G1103400, MD06G1103500 and MD06G1103600); auxin response factor 9 (MdARF9: MD06G1111100) and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp 70; MD06G1113000).
    74.1–5.6Ethylene insensitive 3 protein (MdEIN3: MD07G1053500 and MD07G1053800) involved in proanthocyanidins (PA) biosynthesis; ubiquitin-specific protease (MD07G1051000, MD07G1051100, MD07G1051200, MD07G1051500, MD07G1051300, MD07G1051700 and MD07G1051800).
    1015.9–18.3bHLH proteins (MD10G1098900, MD10G1104300, and MD10G1104600); UGT protein (MD10G1101200); UGT 74D1 (MD10G1110800), UGT 74F1 (MD10G1111100), UGT 74F2 (MD10G1111000).
    1035.6–38.6Stress-response WRKY proteins (MdWRKY28: MD10G1266400; MdWRKY65: MD10G1275800). ethylene responsive factors (MdERF2: MD10G1286300; MdERF4: MD10G1290400, and MdERF12: MD10G1290900) and a NAC domain protein (MdNAC73: MD10G1288300); polyphenol oxidase (PPO) genes ((MD10G1298200; MD10G1298300; MD10G1298400; MD10G1298500; MD10G1298700; MD10G1299100; MD10G1299300; MD10G1299400).
    1524.8–26.8heat shock factor 4 (MD15G1283700), drought-stress response WRKY protein 7 (MdWRKY7: MD15G1287300), MdMYB73 (MD15G1288600) involved in ubiquitination and malate synthesis
    1531.7–34.2MYB domain protein 93 (MdMYB93: MD15G1323500) regulates flavonoids and suberin accumulation (Legay et al. 2016); ubiquitin -specific protease 3 (MD15G1318500),
    161.5–3.4MYB domain proteins (MD16G1029400) regulates anthocyanin; senescence-associated gene 12 (MD16G1031600); ethylene response factor proteins (MdERF118: MD16G1043500, and MD16G1047700 (MdRAV1); MdMYB62 ( MD16G1040800) flavonol regulation; malate transporter MdMa2 (MD16G1045000: MDP0000244249), Ubiquitin-like superfamily protein (MD16G1036000),
    165.4–7.4MdMYB88 (MD16G1076100) regulates phenylpropanoid synthesis and ABA-mediated anthocyanin biosynthesis; MdMYB66 (MD16G1093200) regulates triterpene biosynthesis, MdWRKY72 (MD16G1077700) mediates ultraviolet B-induced anthocyanin synthesis.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There were distinct G' peaks within a large genomic region (spanning between 9.0 and 18.0 Mb) significantly associated with WCI on Chr6 (Fig. 4). The G' peak region 12.1–13.6 Mb encompassed MdMYB85 (MD06G1064300), and a gene for a pectin methyl esterase

    (PME) inhibitor protein (MD06G1064700); while the region between 16.0 and 17.6 Mb flanked the genes involved in leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) synthesis (Table 2). The auxin response factor 9 (MdARF9: MD06G1111100) and the HSP70 (MD06G1113000) resided in the significant region between 24.0 and 26.0 Mb on Chr6 (Table 2).

    The genomic region (4.1–5.6 Mb) with significant association with WCI on Chr7 flanked MdEIN3 (MD07G1053500, MD07G1053800), which plays an important role in the regulatory network of PA biosynthesis[11]. A significant region (35.6–38.7 Mb) on Chr10 encompassed gene clusters for bHLH and WRKY proteins along with an ethylene repressor factor (MdERF2: MD10G1286300) (Fig. 4, Table 2; Supplemental Table S3). This region also harboured MdERF4 (MD10G1290400), MdERF12 (MD10G1290900) and NAC domain genes (MdNAC73: MD10G1288300), which have been reported to be associated with fruit ripening[20]. In addition, there was a cluster of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) genes residing in this region (Table 2).

    On Chr15, the significant WCI-associated region spanning between 31.7 Mb and 34.2 Mb encompassed several TF families, including MdMYB93 (MD15G1323500) (Fig. 4, Table 2, Supplemental Table S3). A distinguished G' peak region (24.9–26.9 Mb) on Chr15 harboured genes for WD-40 repeat-like proteins, bHLH proteins, redox responsive transcription factor 1 (MD15G1283200), cytochrome P450 proteins, HSF4 (MD15G1283700), and MdWRKY7 (MD15G1287300). The MdMYB73 (MD15G1288600) residing in this region has been shown to interact with MdMYB1/10 and regulates several functions, including cold-stress response, ubiquitination and malate synthesis[22, 23].

    The significant 1.5–3.4 Mb region on Chr16 flanked an anthocyanin repressor MYB protein (MD16G1029400), senescence-associated gene 12 (MD16G1031600), malate transporter MdMa2 (MD16G1045000: MDP0000244249), and two ethylene response factor genes (MdERF118: MD16G1043500; MdRAV1: MD16G1047700), which interact in retaining flesh firmness[24]. The MdMYB62 (MD16G1040800) gene residing in this region is phylogenetically linked to MdMYB8 (MD06G1217200), which plays a major role in flavonoid biosynthesis[25]. Another significant region (5.4–7.4 Mb) on Chr16 harboured several bHLH genes, including MdMYB88 (MD16G1076100) involved in phenylpropanoid synthesis resulting in drought resistance[26] and ABA-mediated anthocyanin production[27]. The MdMYB66 (MD16G1093200) gene, which is involved in triterpene biosynthesis, and the MdWRKY72 (MD16G1077700) gene involved in anthocyanin synthesis, were also present in this region (Table 2, Fig. 4).

    The genomic regions tagged by XP-GWAS were enriched for regulatory functions, and several of these have a paralog (Table 3). For example, paralogues for a trio of genes (MdMYB86, MdMYB98 and Cytochrome 450) resided in the FBD-associated genomic regions on Chr6 and Chr14. Several pairs of genes resided together in the FBD-associated paralog regions; for example, MdNAC90 and germin-like protein 10 on Chr3 and Chr11; WRKY55 and WRKY70 on Chr1 and Chr7; and ERF1 and ERF5 on Chr4 and Chr6. The ethylene response factor MdERF1B had a paralog in the FBD-associated region on Chr13 and Chr16. Interestingly, three copies of MdNAC83 (Chrs 14, 16 17) and four copies of MdMYB66 (Chrs 4, 6, 9 and 14) resided in the FBD-associated regions. A pair of genes (RAV1 and MYB62) resided together in the WCI-associated paralog regions on Chrs13 and 16 (Table 3).

    Table 3.  A list of homologues genes/genomic regions associated with the internal flesh browning disorder (IFBD) and red flesh (WCI) in apples. Putative candidate genes residing within these regions are also listed using GDDH13v1.1 reference genome assembly.
    TraitChr (genomic region: Mb)Gene namePredicted gene IDPutative function
    IFBDChr6 (29.8–31.7 Mb)MdMYB66MD06G1174200Suberin/triterpene deposition
    IFBDChr14 (25.4–27.5 Mb)MdMYB66MD14G1180700, MD14G1181000, MD14G1180900Suberin/triterpene deposition
    IFBDChr4 (7.0–8.1 Mb)MdMYB66MD04G1060200Suberin/triterpene deposition
    IFBDChr9 (14.9–16.5 Mb)MdMYB66MD09G1183800Suberin/triterpene deposition
    IFBDChr6 (29.8–31.7 Mb)MdMYB86MD06G1167200Anthocyanin regulation
    IFBDChr14 (25.4–27.5 Mb)MdMYB86MD14G1172900Anthocyanin regulation
    IFBDChr6 (29.8–31.7 Mb)MdMYB98MD06G1172900Drought stress response
    IFBDChr14 (25.4–27.5 Mb)MdMYB98MD14G1179000Drought stress response
    IFBDChr6 (29.8–31.7 Mb)Cytochrome P450MD06G1162600, MD06G1162700, MD06G1162800, MD06G1163100, MD06G1163300, MD06G1163400, MD06G1163500, MD06G1163600, MD06G1163800, MD06G1164000, MD06G1164100, MD06G1164300, MD06G1164400, MD06G1164500, MD06G1164700Flavonoid and triterpenic metabolism
    IFBDChr14 (25.4–27.5 Mb)Cytochrome P450MD14G1169000, MD14G1169200, MD14G1169600, MD14G1169700Flavonoid and triterpenic metabolism
    IFBDChr3 (14.7–16.6 Mb)MdNAC90MD03G1148500Senescence-related
    IFBDChr11 (16.5–18.5 Mb)MdNAC90MD11G11679000Senescence-related
    IFBDChr14 (25.4–27.5 Mb)MdNAC83MD14G1150900Senescence/ripening-related
    IFBDChr16 (8.9–10.9 Mb)MdNAC83MD16G1125800Senescence/ripening-related
    IFBDChr17 (0–0. 7 Mb)MdNAC83MD17G1010300Senescence/ripening-related
    IFBDChr3 (14.7–16.6 Mb)Germin-like protein 10MD03G1148000Polyphenol oxidase
    IFBDChr11 (16.5–18.5 Mb)Germin-like protein 10MD11G1167000, MD11G1167100, MD11G1167400, MD11G1169200Polyphenol oxidase
    IFBDChr1 (26.9–28.5 Mb)MdWRKY55MD01G1168500Drought stress response
    IFBDChr7 (30.3–31.9 Mb)MdWRKY55MD07G1234600Drought stress response
    IFBDChr1 (26.9–28.5 Mb)MdWRKY70MD01G1168600Drought stress response
    IFBDChr7 (30.3–31.9 Mb)MdWRKY70MD07G1234700Drought stress response
    IFBDChr4 (7.0–8.1 Mb)MdERF1MD04G1058000Ethylene responsive factor
    IFBDChr6 (5.5–7.3 Mb)MdERF1MD06G1051800Ethylene responsive factor
    IFBDChr4 (7.0–8.1 Mb)MdERF5MD04G1058200Ethylene responsive factor
    IFBDChr6 (5.5–7.3 Mb)MdERF5MD06G1051900Ethylene responsive factor
    IFBDChr13 (18.0–20.0 Mb)MdERF1BMD13G1213100Ethylene response factor 1
    IFBDChr16 (20.4–22.4 Mb)MdERF1BMD16G1216900Ethylene response factor 1
    WCIChr13 (2.6–4.4 Mb)MdRAV1MD13G1046100Ethylene responsive factor
    WCIChr16 (1.5–3.4 Mb)MdRAV1MD16G1047700Ethylene responsive factor
    WCIChr13 (2.6–4.4 Mb)MdMYB62MD13G1039900Flavonol biosynthesis
    WCIChr16 (1.5–3.4 Mb)MdMYB62MD16G1040800Flavonol biosynthesis
    IFBDChr9 (7.9–11.8 Mb)MdNAC42MD09G1147500, MD09G1147600Anthocyanin accumulation
    WCIChr17 (11.4–12.4 Mb)MdNAC42MD17G1134400Anthocyanin accumulation
    IFBDChr9 (7.9–11.8 Mb)HSP 70MD09G1137300Heat stress response
    WCIChr17 (11.4–12.4 Mb)HSP 70MD17G1127600Heat stress response
    IFBDChr4 (11.0–13.0 Mb)MdMYB85MD04G1080600Phenylalanine and lignin biosynthesis
    WCIChr6 (12.1–13.6 Mb)MdMYB85MD06G1064300Phenylalanine and lignin biosynthesis
    IFBDChr15 (13.2–14.2 Mb)MdEBF1MD15G1171800Ethylene inhibition
    WCIChr8 (15.2–17.2 Mb)MdEBF1MD08G1150200Ethylene inhibition
    IFBDChr15 (53.5–54.9 Mb)MdEIN3MD15G1441000Ethylene insensitive 3 protein
    WCIChr8 (30.3–31.6 Mb)MdEIN3MD08G1245800Ethylene insensitive 3 protein
    IFBDChr11 (1.7–3.0 Mb)MdEIN3MD11G1022400Ethylene insensitive 3 protein
    WCIChr7 (4.1–5.6 Mb)MdEIN3MD07G1053500, MD07G1053800Ethylene insensitive 3 protein
    IFBDChr15 (4.6–6.8 Mb)MdMYB73MD15G1076600, MD15G1088000Cold-stress response & malate accumulation
    WCIChr15 (24.8–26.8 Mb)MdMYB73MD15G1288600Cold-stress response & malate accumulation
    IFBDChr15 (4.6–6.8M b)MdWRKY7MD15G1078200Anthocyanin accumulation
    WCIChr15 (24.8–26.8 Mb)MdWRKY7MD15G1287300Anthocyanin accumulation
    IFBDChr15 (43.5–45.5 Mb)MdMYB93MD15G1369700Flavonoid & suberin accumulation
    WCIChr15 (31.7–34.2 Mb)MdMYB93MD15G1323500Flavonoid & suberin accumulation
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Paralogs of several regulatory functions were also found in the regions associated with either FBD or WCI; for example, a significant region (7.9–11.8 Mb) harbouring a gene trio (MdNAC42, HSP70 and HSP89.1) on Chr9 was associated with FBD, but the paralogs of this trio also resided in a distinct G' region associated with WCI on Chr17 (Table 3, Supplemental Table S3). Some other examples included MdMYB85 (Chr4 for FBD, and Chr6 for WCI), MdEBF1 (Chr8 for WCI, and Chr15 for FBD), MdEIN3 (Chr8 for WCI, and Chr15 for FBD), and EIN3 (Chr7 for WCI, and Chr11 for FBD). A pair of genes (MdMYB73 and MdWRKY7) resided together in the separate regions associated with FBD (4.6–6.8 Mb) and WCI (24.8–26.8 Mb) within Chr15 (Table 3).

    The red pigmentation in fruit flesh differed amongst transgenic lines, with fruit from line A10 presenting the most deeply pigmented tissues (Supplemental Fig. S3), while those from lines A2 and A4 were similar in having a lower intensity of pigmentation. No pigmentation was observed in the flesh of control 'Royal Gala' (RG) fruit. RNAseq analysis of a representative transgenic line (A2) compared with RG revealed that a total of 1,379 genes were differentially expressed (log 2-fold), with 658 genes upregulated and 721 genes downregulated. This list was then assessed for commonality with the genomic regions and candidate genes from the XP-GWAS.

    Genes that contained mis-sense SNPs (which would result in a change in predicted protein) and that were also differentially expressed between A2 red-fleshed transgenic line and white-fleshed 'Royal Gala' (control) apples included anthocyanin-related flavanone 3-hydroxylase, chalcone synthase and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (Table 2 & 4). Many more upstream DNA variants (e.g. in potential promoter-controlling elements) were seen in this group of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were also in regions underlying WCI or FBD. Genes encoding enzymes that may be involved in FBD, such as a Rho GTPase activating protein, peroxidase, lipoxygenase 1, and ethylene-forming enzyme (ACO4), were DEGs and showed mis-sense SNPs, including a potential stop codon in the Rho GTPase-activating protein (Table 4). This intersection between DNA change and differential expression warrants further research to evaluate the functions of these genes.

    Table 4.  List of candidate genes associated with WCI or FBD in the XP-GWA and R6:MdMYB10 apple datasets.
    Mutations in GWAS apple populationPredicted gene functionExpression in R6 and ‘Royal Gala’ apples
    GeneMissense
    SNPs
    SNP
    Stop
    Upstream
    variants
    DatasetLocusAnnotation and TAIR IDAverage
    RPKM
    R6 flesh
    Average RPKM
    WT flesh
    log2Fold
    Change
    MD02G11322001FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr02:9450615-11289014flavanone 3-hydroxylase
    (F3H, TT6, F3'H) AT3G51240
    387752.47
    MD02G11336003FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr02:9450615-11289014fatty acid desaturase 5
    (FAD5) AT3G15850
    18109.98
    MD02G11537001WCI Table 2Chr02:11278254-13234556UDP-Glycosyltransferase, lignin related AT2G1856010385341.03
    MD03G10592002FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr03:3177994-4910866Peroxidase AT5G053402514.21
    MD03G1143300422FBD Table 1Chr03:14797661-16611554bZIP transcription factor (DPBF2, AtbZIP67) AT3G44460114852-2.80
    MD03G1147700121FBD Table 1Chr03:14797661-16611554Rho GTPase activating protein AT5G22400205891.29
    MD04G1003400331WCI Table 2Chr04:1-1284894Chalcone synthase (CHS, TT4) AT5G1393014433122.34
    MD04G120410063FBD Table 1Chr04:27629536-29612282lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1, ATLOX1) AT1G550205462681.09
    MD06G1160700129FBD Table 1Chr06:29862341-31737341peptide met sulfoxide reductase AT4G251302121254562.04
    MD06G116140014FBD Table 1Chr06:29862341-31737341Pectin lyase-like protein AT5G63180614129530-2.22
    MD07G1240700126FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr07:30357332-31979025Fe superoxide dismutase 2 AT5G511001051826-3.99
    MD07G13069006FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr07:34607570-36531467UDP-glucosyl transferase 78D2 AT5G170506771112.78
    MD08G12491002WCI Supplemental Table S3Chr08:30486569-31607516HSP20-like chaperone (ATHSP22.0) AT4G102503186456.12
    MD09G111400032FBD Table 1Chr09:7999212-11883202fatty acid desaturase 5 (FAD5) AT3G158507608.68
    MD09G11468001FBD Table 1Chr09:7999212-11883202PHYTOENE SYNTHASE (PSY) AT5G1723038456160901.32
    MD10G132810045FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr10:40235258-41736791ethylene-forming enzyme (ACO4) AT1G050108769033910331.21
    MD15G10236001FBD Table 1Chr15:1-1487288jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase (JMT) AT1G19640472111552.07
    MD15G10241008FBD Table 1Chr15:1-1487288dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR, TT3, M318) AT5G428008723091.63
    MD17G11334004WCI Supplemental Table S3Chr17:11422073-12433463PHYTOENE SYNTHASE (PSY) AT5G172306001721.87
    MD17G12606002FBD Supplemental Table S3Chr17:31098955-32776972dehydroascorbate reductase 1 (DHAR3) AT5G167101867−1.78
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Several gene families (e.g. chalcone synthase, UGT, anthocyanin synthase, HSP, PAL, ERF, WRKY proteins, ABA, and bZIP transcription factors) residing in WCI-associated genomic regions have been reported to be associated with RF in apple[7, 12, 28]. Several of these genes are implicated in stress responses, suggesting that flavonoids and anthocyanin biosynthesis could also be associated with stress (e.g., drought, water loss) tolerance of RF apples[7].

    MdMYB73, which may play a role in the cold-stress response[23, 29], resided in the WCI-associated regions. Ethylene is among the various modulators of environmental stresses induced by factors such as drought and cold temperatures[9, 28]. Several ERF proteins (e.g. MdERF1B, MdERF3) interact with the promoters of MYB domain proteins to regulate anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin (PA) accumulation in apple[10, 11, 30]. The WCI-associated genomic regions in our study flanked several ERFs previously reported to have roles in anthocyanin and PA regulation. MdERF4 (MD10G1290400), one of the three ERFs residing in the WCI-associated region on Chr10, has high phylogenetic similarity with MdERF38, which interacts with MdMYB1 to regulate drought-related anthocyanin biosynthesis[31]. Some ERFs (e.g. MdERF2: MD10G1286300; MdERF4: MD10G1290400, and MdERF12: MD10G1290900) and MdNAC73 residing in the WCI-associated regions have been reported to be associated with fruit maturation[20] – suggesting an interaction between ethylene production and RF colour[12].

    The WCI-associated region on Chr15 included a gene MdMYB73 (MD15G1288600) involved in malate acid synthesis. Previous studies have reported that MdMYB1 regulates both anthocyanin and malate accumulation, and perhaps MdBT2 regulates MdMYB73-mediated anthocyanin accumulation[22, 23]. The malate transporter gene MdMa2 and the MdMYB7 gene, involved in the regulation of anthocyanin and flavanols in RF apple[32], resided together in the WCI-associated upper region of LG16. Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that there is interplay between anthocyanin and malate accumulation in the RF apple. There was a cluster of ubiquitin-specific proteases underpinning the WCI-associated regions on Chrs 7 and 15, which is supported by earlier reports suggesting that ubiquitin-specific proteases respond to auxin and might suppress anthocyanin biosynthesis proteins[33]. The auxin response factor 9 (MdARF9: MD06G1111100), which has also been shown to suppress anthocyanin biosynthesis in RF callus samples[33], also resided in the WCI-associated genomic region on LG7.

    Seedlings in both the low- and high-FBD pools carried the MdMYB10 gene, which suggests that MdMYB10 itself is not the causal factor of FBD in RF apples. Long-term cold storage generally results in senescence-related flesh breakdown, and several transcription factor genes (e.g. MYB, WRKY, NAC, ERF, cytochrome P450, and HSP) have been shown to express differentially during long-term cold storage[9]. The FBD-associated genomic regions in our study harboured several ERFs, suggesting that ethylene synthesis proteins may be contributing to cell wall disassembly, allowing PPO enzymes to come into contact with phenolic compounds and potentially leading to FBD symptoms[18].

    Pectin methyl esterase (PME) genes resided in the FBD-associated significant regions on Chrs 3, 13 and 17. Volatile generation and senescence degradation have been suggested to be bio-markers of FBD, and the expression levels of methyl esters were found to be associated with FBD and senescence in 'Fuji' apples after cold storage[34]. The MdPME2 gene has also been reported to be associated with apple flesh firmness and mealiness[21, 35]. The co-location of genes encoding cell wall-degrading enzymes (MdPME) and QTLs for FBD has been reported in apple[18, 36].

    The clusters of cytochrome P450 enzymes and senescence-related genes resided in some of the FBD-associated regions in this study. There are no earlier reports of the involvement of P450 enzymes in apple FBD expression, but some genes related to cytochrome P450 were found to be upregulated during litchi fruit senescence[37]. Pericarp browning in litchi is mainly attributable to the degradation of anthocyanin, and the ABA-initiated oxidation of phenolic compounds by PPO[37]. Flavonoids are among the major polyphenols in RF apples[5], and cytochrome P450 is part of the regulatory mechanism for flavonoid metabolism[38]. Association of FBD with the genomic region harbouring P450 would suggest its role in enhanced polyphenol synthesis causing FBD. The co-occurrence of a senescence-related gene MdNAC90 (MD03G1148500; MD11G11679000) and the PPO regulator germin-like proteins (in the FBD-associated paralog regions on Chrs 3 and 11) lends support to an interplay between senescence and oxidation of phenolics and anthocyanins.

    A significant region on Chr9 encompassed a cluster of UGT proteins, which play a role in the regulation of flavonoids and phenolic compounds, as well as converting phloretin to phloridzin[39]. Cytochrome P450, which resided within several FBD-associated regions, is reportedly involved in flavonoid metabolism, such as chlorogenic acid (CGA) acid and phloridzin, which have also been positively associated with suberin production and cell wall disassembly[40, 41].

    Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in regulating physiological processes in plants, such as senescence[37]. Legay et al.[42] suggested that MdMYB93 (MD15G1369700), found residing in the FBD-associated regions in this study, plays a critical role in remobilisation of flavonoid/phenolic compounds, which can be utilised for detoxification of ROS in the case of oxidative stress. However, flavonoid biosynthesis has also been linked with suberin production causing cuticle cracks in apples[42, 43], and the development of cuticular cracks could accelerate flesh browning as a result of an enhanced oxidative process[44].

    Several HSP (e.g. HSP70, HSP70-1, HSP60, HSP89.1, and HSP DNAJ) and HSF (e.g. HSF4, HSFB4, HSFA6B) resided in the FBD-associated genomic regions. Ferguson et al.[45] showed that, during summer, apple flesh temperature could reach as high as 43 °C, and that an increase in the expression of HSP in apples was associated with high daily flesh temperatures, suggesting a role of HSP to counter heat stress. HSPs have been reported to interact with AP2/ERFs and to play a role in flavonoid biosynthesis and drought tolerance in apple[46]. Heat stress affects lignin accumulation and its substrate, O-phenols, and has been reported to play role in enzymatic browning[47]. Additionally, HSF that regulate HSP expression have also been reported to be regulated by cold stress to generate heat-induced cold tolerance in banana[48]. HSF1 was shown to transcriptionally regulate the promoters of HSP to enhance chilling tolerance in loquat fruit[49]. Activity of the enzymes (PAL, C4H, 4CL) of the phenylpropanoid pathway was positively correlated with loquat fruit lignification, whilst suppression of their expression by heat shock treatment and low-temperature conditioning significantly reduced fruit lignification[50].

    Wang et al.[7] showed that ascorbate peroxidase (APX) was among the genes that were upregulated in RF apple compared with in white-fleshed apples. Several genes (e.g. MdAPX1, MdAPX3, MdAPX4, and MdDHAR1) involved in ascorbate synthesis resided in the genomic regions associated with FBD. Co-localisation of MdDHAR and ascorbic acid (AsA) synthesis genes in the FBD-linked genomic regions have been reported[51], suggesting that the low AsA content increases fruit susceptibility to FBD[52]. It has been shown that the expression of MdMYB1 and MdDHAR genes was strongly correlated in RF apples, and that AO and APX were upregulated by anthocyanin regulatory genes[31].

    There were several genes associated with CGA biosynthesis residing in the FBD-associated regions on various linkage groups, including the genes MYB19 (MD07G1268000) and MdC3H (MD15G1436500). Higher concentrations of CGA were reported in transgenic apple lines carrying MdMYB10[12], suggesting a role of CGA metabolism in the expression of FBD[53]. Interestingly, some of the FBD-associated regions (e.g. Chrs 9, 11, 13, 14 and 17) reported here in RF apples coincide with those reported earlier for FBD in white-fleshed apples[18, 36, 53], suggesting some common underlying genetic mechanisms.

    As discussed above, ERFs have been reported to be involved in the accumulation of anthocyanin and PA biosynthesis, while ethylene synthesis proteins also contribute to cell membrane breakdown, allowing the PPO enzyme to come into contact with phenolic compounds, potentially leading to FBD symptoms[12, 18]. We observed clusters of anthocyanin biosynthesis proteins (bHLH), ERFs (MdERF2, MdERF4, MdERF12) and PPO genes together in the genomic region associated with WCI on Chr10. The co-occurrence of these gene families perhaps facilitates potential interactions that contribute to the genetic correlation between WCI and FBD. We noted that genes involved in flavonoid regulation and ethylene synthesis occurred together in the FBD-associated regions on several chromosomes (e.g. MD16G1140800 and MdPAE10: MD16G1132100; MdERF1B: MD16G1216900 and MdMYB15: MD16G1218000, MD16G1218900) – suggesting these genes could be in linkage disequilibrium and this would contribute to the expression of WCI and FBD.

    MYB7 (MD16G1029400) resided in the WCI-associated upper region of Chr16, and the expression level of MYB7 was shown to be correlated with that of LAR1 in peach fruit[54]. The MdLAR1 protein (MDP0000376284), which is located about 1.2 Mb upstream of MYB7 (MD16G1029400), was reported to be associated with WCI and FBD in apple[3]. Mellidou et al.[36] reported that 4CL (MD13G1257800 in the FBD-linked region on Chr13), which catalyses the last step of the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading either to lignin or to flavonoids, was upregulated in browning-affected flesh tissues. The gene MdMYB85, involved in the regulation of flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis, resided in the WCI-associated region on Chr6 and FBD-associated paralogous region on Chr4. Metabolic interactions between anthocyanin and lignin biosynthesis have been reported for apple[55] and strawberry[56], while flesh lignification and internal browning during low-temperature storage in a red-fleshed loquat cultivar was shown to be modulated by the interplay between ERF39 and MYB8[57].

    The co-localisation of MdMYB66 and cytochrome P450 proteins, along with the anthocyanin regulatory protein MdMYB86, in paralogous FBD-associated genomic regions on Chr6 and Chr14 suggests that these genes interact as a 'hub' contributing to the WCI-FBD genetic link. The paralogs of some other genes were found to be residing in the regions associated with either WCI or FBD. For example, MdNAC42 and HSP70 co-localised in the FBD-associated region on Chr9, but this same pair of genes also resided in the most prominent region associated with WCI on Chr17. Similarly, paralogs of MdEIN3 resided in the WCI-associated region on Chr7 (MD07G1053500, MD07G1053800) and FBD-associated region on Chr11 (MD11G1022400). Interestingly, the paralogs of MdMYB73 and MdWRKY7 co-localised in the WCI- (24.6–26.8 Mb) and FBD-associated (4.6–6.8 Mb) regions on Chr15. The WCI-associated region at the bottom of Chr11 hosted a cluster of senescence-related genes, along with the anthocyanin biosynthesis gene MdbHLH3 (MD11G1286900), suggesting they might interact in the genetic nexus between FBD and WCI.

    FBD in RF apples can be caused by senescence, injury via extreme temperature exposure (chilling or heat), or enzymatic (cut fruit) reaction. Genes reported to be connected to all three factors were located in various FBD-associated genomic regions in this study. Postharvest strategies that both delay senescence and limit exposure to low temperatures may be needed to manage FBD. We also hypothesise that high ascorbic acid content could help to minimise expression of FBD in Type-1 RF cultivars. The adverse genetic correlation between WCI and FBD appears to arise from dual and/or interactive roles of several transcription factors, which would pose challenges for designing a conventional marker-assisted selection strategy. The use of bivariate genomic BLUP to estimate breeding values to simultaneously improve adversely correlated polygenic traits (e.g. WCI and FBD), could be an alternative approach[58, 59].

    A population of 900 apple seedlings composed of 24 full-sib families was generated in 2011 by selected crossings between six red-leaved pollen parents and six white-fleshed female parents. All six pollen parents inherited their red-leaf phenotype from the same great-grandparent 'Redfield'[1]. Each pollen parent was involved in four crosses, and the female parents were involved in three to six crosses each. Foliage colour of young seedlings is a phenotypic marker for Type 1 RF apple. The main purpose of this trial was to understand the flesh colour variation and FBD in the Type 1 RF seedlings, so only the seedlings with red foliage (i.e. carrying MdMYB10) were kept for this trial. The number of seedlings per family varied from 10 to 95. The seedlings were grafted onto 'M9' rootstock and were planted in duplicate at the Plant & Food Research orchard in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand (39°39′ S, 176°53′ E) in 2015.

    Phenotyping for RF and FBD was conducted over two consecutive fruiting seasons (2017 and 2018). Fruit were harvested once, when judged mature, based on a change in skin background colour from green to yellow, and when the starch pattern index (SPI) was between 1.0 and 2.0 (on a scale of 0 to 7). In each season, six fruit were harvested from each plant and stored for 70 d at 0.5 °C, followed by 7 d at 20 °C before fruit evaluation. Fruit were cut in half across the equator and the proportion of the cortex area (PRA) that was red in colour, and the intensity of the red colour (RI) (= 1 (low) to 9 (high)) was scored. A weighted cortical intensity (WCI) was then calculated (PRA × RI) as an estimation of the amount of red pigment in the fruit. The proportion of the cortex area showing symptoms of FBD was also recorded. WCI and FBD were averaged over all fruit for a particular seedling. Fruit were also assessed for the following eating quality traits on a 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) scale: firmness, crispness, juiciness, sweetness, sourness and astringency, to understand the genetic correlations of eating-quality traits with WCI and FBD.

    The binary vector pSA277-R6:MYB10 was transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LAB4404 by electroporation. Transgenic 'Royal Gala' plants were generated by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of leaf pieces, using a method previously reported[5]. Wild-type 'Royal Gala' and three independent transgenic lines (A2, A4 and A10) of R6:MdMYB10 were grown under glasshouse conditions in full potting mix with natural light. The resulting fruit were assessed for flesh colour phenotypes at harvest (around 135 d after full bloom). Fruit peel and cortex from three biological replicates were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen, with each replicate compiled from five pooled mature fruit for each transgenic line or wild-type control.

    Total RNA of 36 samples (3 R6:MYB10 lines and 1 wild type control, 3 time points, 3 biological replicates) was extracted, using Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (SIGMA). Removal of genomic DNA contamination and first-strand cDNA synthesis were carried out using the mixture of oligo (dT) and random primers according to the manufacturer's instructions (QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit, Qiagen). Real-time qPCR DNA amplification and analysis was carried out using the LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche), with LightCycler 480 software version 1.5. The LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche) was used following the manufacturer's method. The qPCR conditions were 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 5 s at 95 °C, 5 s at 60°C, and 10 s at 72 °C, followed by 65 °C to 95 °C melting curve detection. The qPCR efficiency of each gene was obtained by analyzing the standard curve of a cDNA serial dilution of that gene. The expression was normalized to Malus × domestica elongation factor 1-alpha MdEF1α (XM_008367439) due to its consistent transcript levels throughout samples, with crossing threshold values changing by less than 2.

    Individual fruit measurements were first averaged for each seedling. As the phenotyping was repeated over two years, we used a mixed linear model (MLM) accounting for this 'permanent environmental effect', as previously described[58]. Pedigree-based additive genetic relationships among seedlings were taken into account for estimation of genetic parameters using ASReml software[60]. Product-moment correlations between best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) of breeding values of all seedlings for different traits were used as estimates of genetic correlation among traits.

    A selective DNA pooling procedure was adopted to construct DNA pools. A high-pool and a low-pool were constructed separately for the two traits (WCI and FBD). Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of selected seedlings, and quantified by fluorimetry using the picogreen reagent (Cat#P11496, Thermo). The low and high pools consisted of 35 seedlings each, and normalised amounts (~300 ng) of DNA from individuals were pooled. The pools were dried down with DNA Stable reagent (Cat#93021001, Biomatrica) in a centrifugal evaporator and shipped for sequencing. Each DNA pool was sequenced using paired-end 125 bp reads on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The quality of raw sequence reads was checked with FastQC/0.11.2 and MultiQC/1.2. Based on the quality control reports, the reads were aligned to the published apple reference genome GDDH13 v1.1[61] using the program bowtie2/2.3.4.3[62] with trimming from both ends before alignments and aligning in full read length ("-5 6 -3 5 –end-to-end"). The mapping results were marked for duplicate alignments, sorted, compressed and indexed with samtools/1.12[63]. Based on the alignment of binary alignment map (BAM) files of the high and low pools, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identification was performed using samtools/1.12 ('samtools mpileup') and bcftools/1.12 ('bcftools call –mv')[63, 64]. Variant sites with missing genotype in any of the pools, or having the same genotype between the pools, were discarded. To minimise the influence of sequencing quality on association analysis, the identified SNPs were further filtered according to the following criteria: 1) a Phred-scaled quality score > 20; and 2) the read depth in each pool was neither < 35, nor > 500.

    The allele frequencies between each pair of bulk DNAs (low versus high WCI; low versus high FBD) were compared at each SNP locus. Differences in the allele frequencies between the low and high pool were expected to be negligible for unlinked SNP markers, but allele frequency differences would be larger for SNPs closely linked to the underlying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) contributing to the extreme phenotypes. A nonparametric test (G-statistic = 2 × Σni ln(ni/nexp), where ni (i = 1 to 4) represented counts of reference and alternate alleles at a particular SNP generated from sequencing of the low and high pool, and nexp was the expected allele count assuming no allele frequency divergence between the two DNA pools[65].

    We then calculated a modified statistic (G'), which took into account read count variation caused by sampling of segregants as well as variability inherent in short-read sequencing of pooled samples[65]. Using R package QTLseqr[66], firstly a G-statistic was calculated for each SNP marker, and then a weighted average using Nadaraya-Watson kernel was obtained to yield a G' statistic for a sliding genomic window of 2 Mb size. The Nadaraya-Watson method weights neighbouring markers' G-values by their distance from the focal SNP so that closer SNPs receive higher weights. The 95th percentile value of G' was used as a threshold to identify significant hotspots and to identify the putative candidate genes residing within the ±1 Mb region around the G' peak. For comparison purposes, a standard two-sided Z-test[14] was also performed to determine the significance of allele frequency differences at SNP loci between the pools for each trait.

    The GDDH gene models intersecting with the XP-GWA hotspots were pulled out with bedtools/2.30.0 ("bedtools intersect -wo -nonamecheck"). The selected genes were further blasted to TAIR10 ("-evalue 1e-5") and the annotated functions from Arabidopsis genes with the best blast score, the highest % identity, and the longest aligned length, were used. Then the expressions of genes located in the GWA hotspots were extracted from the RNAseq analysis of the R6:MdMYB10 representative transgenic line, and the log 2-fold change between the R6:MdMYB10 and 'Royal Gala' apples were calculated.

    This research was funded in 2017/18 by the Strategic Science Investment Fund of the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and from 2019 by the Plant & Food Research Technology Development – Pipfruit programme. We thank our colleague Jason Johnston for providing some pictures of the flesh browning disorder in red-fleshed apples. Richard Volz and Jason Johnston provided constructive comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • [1]

    Vyas M. 2017. Nutritional profile of spinach and its antioxidant & antidiabetic evaluation. International Journal of Green Pharmacy 11:1125

    doi: 10.22377/ijgp.v11i03.1125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    USDA. 2023. United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Crop Production 2022 Summary. https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/k3569432s/9306v916d/wm119139b/cropan23.pdf

    [3]

    Maneejantra N, Tsukagoshi S, Lu N, Supaibulwatana K, Takagaki M, et al. 2016. A quantitative analysis of nutrient requirements for hydroponic spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) production under artificial light in a plant factory. Journal of Fertilizers & Pesticides 7:1000170

    doi: 10.4172/2471-2728.1000170

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gao W, He D, Ji F, Zhang S, Zheng J. 2020. Effects of daily light integral and LED spectrum on growth and nutritional quality of hydroponic spinach. Agronomy 10:1082

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Mei C, Flinn BS. 2010. The use of beneficial microbial endophytes for plant biomass and stress tolerance improvement. Recent Patents on Biotechnology 4:81−95

    doi: 10.2174/187220810790069523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Glick BR. 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:963401

    Google Scholar

    [7]

    del Orozco-Mosqueda MD, Santoyo G, Glick BR. 2023. Recent advances in the bacterial phytohormone modulation of plant growth. Plants 12:606

    doi: 10.3390/plants12030606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Mei C, Chretien RL, Amaradasa BS, He Y, Turner A, et al. 2021. Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterial endophytes and plant growth promotion in vitro and in greenhouse. Microorganisms 9:1935

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hossain MA, Hossain MS, Akter M. 2023. Challenges faced by plant growth-promoting bacteria in field-level applications and suggestions to overcome the barriers. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 126:102029

    doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson AC. 2017. Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:49

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Massa F, Defez R, Bianco C. 2022. Exploitation of plant growth promoting bacteria for sustainable agriculture: hierarchical approach to link laboratory and field experiments. Microorganisms 10:865

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050865

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Stegelmeier AA, Rose DM, Joris BR, Glick BR. 2022. The use of PGPB to promote plant hydroponic growth. Plants 11:2783

    doi: 10.3390/plants11202783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Lee S, Lee J. 2015. Beneficial bacteria and fungi in hydroponic systems: types and characteristics of hydroponic food production methods. Scientia Horticulturae 195:206−15

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Lee S, An R, Grewal P, Yu Z, Borherova Z, et al. 2016. High-performing windowfarm hydroponic system: Transcriptomes of fresh produce and microbial communities in response to beneficial bacterial treatment. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 29:965−76

    doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-16-0162-R

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Dhawi F. 2023. The role of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) and their feasibility in hydroponics and vertical farming. Metabolites 13:247

    doi: 10.3390/metabo13020247

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Aini N, Yamika WSD, Ulum B. 2018. Effect of nutrient concentration, PGPR and AMF on plant growth, yield and nutrient uptake of hydroponic lettuce. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 21:175−83

    Google Scholar

    [17]

    Moncada A, Vetrano F, Miceli A. 2020. Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth-promoting bacteria in hydroponic leaf lettuce. Agronomy 10:1523

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mei C, Zhou D, Chretien RL, Turner A, Hou G, et al. 2023. A potential application of Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 for lettuce growth promotion in hydroponics. Microorganisms 11:376

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020376

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Purnima, Singh P. 2023. Growth effects of Pseudomonas, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) - a review. Current Agriculture Research Journal 11:63−68

    doi: 10.12944/carj.11.1.05

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Hsu CK, Micallef SA. 2017. Plant-mediated restriction of Salmonella enterica on tomato and spinach leaves colonized with Pseudomonas plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology 259:1−6

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.07.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Urashima Y, Hori K. 2003. Selection of PGPR which promotes the growth of spinach. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 74:157−62

    doi: 10.20710/dojo.74.2_157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Dasgan HY, Kacmaz S, Arpaci BB, İkiz B, Gruda NS. 2023. Biofertilizers improve the leaf quality of hydroponically grown baby spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Agronomy 13:575

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020575

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Dasgan HY, Aldiyab A, Elgudayem F, Ikiz B, Gruda NS. 2022. Effect of biofertilizers on leaf yield, nitrate amount, mineral content and antioxidants of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in a floating culture. Scientific Reports 12:20917

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24799-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Putra AM, Anastasya NA, Rachmawati SW, Yusnawan E, Syib'li MA, et al. 2024. Growth performance and metabolic changes in lettuce inoculated with plant growth promoting bacteria in a hydroponic system. Scientia Horticulturae 327:112868

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2024.112868

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhou D, Chretien RL, South K, Evans M, Lowman S, et al. 2024. Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics. Technology in Horticulture 4: e015 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0012
    Zhou D, Chretien RL, South K, Evans M, Lowman S, et al. 2024. Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics. Technology in Horticulture 4: e015 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0012

Figures(5)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(3186) PDF downloads(437)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics

Technology in Horticulture  4 Article number: e015  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Hydroponic and vertical farming technologies have grown rapidly in recent years as there are many advantages including year-round production, short growth cycles, greater efficiency of water and nutrient use, prevention of soil-borne diseases and insects, longer shelf life, etc. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a popular leafy green and a good source of vitamins and minerals. Although methods of spinach production in hydroponic systems have been improved including lighting, fertilizer solutions, and others, plant growth could be further promoted to increase profitability and compensate for initial startup costs. One way to increase spinach yields is to use plant growth-promoting bacteria, which can promote plant growth, enhance nutrient uptake, increase stress tolerance as well as inhibit pathogen growth. Two bacteria (Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 and Enterobacter asburiae IALR1379) were tested with two spinach cultivars ('Red Snapper' and 'Seaside') using indoor vertical nutrient film technique systems. Inoculations of IALR632 and IALR1379 significantly increased the shoot fresh weight of 'Red Snapper' by 19.3% and 13.3%, and that of 'Seaside' by 17.8% and 14.1% at harvest, compared with their control treatments, respectively. Both bacterial inoculations enhanced root growth of 'Red Snapper', but not 'Seaside'. Additionally, inoculation of IALR632 significantly increased leaf greenness of both 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside', but IALR1379 did not. Both bacterial endophytes colonized the inside of the roots and translocated to shoots of 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside'. Overall, IALR632 is more effective at increasing spinach yields, root growth, and leaf greenness compared to IALR1379 under indoor vertical hydroponic systems.

    • Crop production in controlled environment agriculture (CEA) plays an important role in feeding an increasing world population as urbanization is expanding, and arable land is decreasing. Crops can be grown year-round with reduced water and pesticide usage. Spinach (Spinacia oleracea) is a leafy green vegetable and one of the most consumed salad crops. It is a nutrient-rich vegetable with high amounts of carotenoids, vitamin C, vitamin K, folic acid, iron, and calcium. It has numerous health benefits, including antioxidant activity and antidiabetic effects[1], reduction of macular degeneration, and blood pressure (www.healthline.com/nutrition/foods/spinach). Spinach production was valued at over US$560 million in the United States in 2022[2] and is one of the most predominant crops grown hydroponically under artificial lights[3,4].

      For CEA hydroponic production, crop yield is an important factor in selecting a crop since CEA has a large upfront investment, and higher yields expedite the return on investment. An alternative way to increase crop yield is to use plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). In general, PGPB, including rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria, promote plant growth, increase nutrient uptake, enhance stress tolerance, and inhibit pathogen growth[57]. Mechanisms of plant growth promotion are diverse, and complex, and often depend on specific bacterial strains and their interactions with the host plant. Direct growth promotive functions include nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, hormone production, and enhanced nutrient uptake[6,7]. Indirect mechanisms include induction of systemic resistance and inhibition of plant pathogens. Many studies across various systems and crops have reported plant growth promotion due to PGPB application. Commercial products are also available to producers that contain PGPB for both greenhouse and field crop production. However, consistent results are not always achieved due to environmental factors, interactions with existing microorganisms, application methods, and a lack of understanding of the PGPB mechanisms. Many PGPB have been shown to promote plant growth under in vitro conditions, likely because competitive microbes are eliminated, and the environmental factors are highly regulated. Bacterial endophytes from the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research (IALR) Plant Endophyte Research Center's collection were found to increase the growth of tall fescue KY31 up to 300%[8]. It has been observed that when PGPB identified in vitro are applied in the field, the percentage yield increase is greatly reduced or completely disappears[911]. When compared to field production, CEA crop production in hydroponic systems is more similar to in vitro conditions, and consistently higher yields may be expected.

      PGPB applications in hydroponic production systems under CEA conditions have been found to improve plant growth and crop quality and reduce disease severity in various crops grown in hydroponic systems through a range of mechanisms[1215]. Aini et al. evaluated the effects of nutrient concentration, PGPB, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and nutrient uptake of hydroponically produced romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. longifolia) and found the application of PGPB and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a consortium reduced the nutrient concentration level needed by the plant[16]. A commercial biostimulant product TNC BactorrS13 containing several Bacillus spp. added to nutrient solutions enhanced salt tolerance of hydroponically grown lettuce[17]. Single PGPB strains applied in hydroponic production systems have also resulted in improved plant growth. Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 significantly increased the fresh weight of five lettuce cultivars in different CEA conditions and hydroponic systems including greenhouse deep water cultivation, greenhouse nutrient film technique (NFT) and indoor vertical NFT[18]. PGPB have been utilized to improve spinach growth in field production, with Pseudomonas species in particular found to increase the productivity of spinach (Spinacia oleracea)[19]. Inoculation of spinach cv. 'Tyee' with Pseudomonas strains S2 and S4 resulted in shoot dry weight increases of 69% and 63% compared to non-inoculated controls, respectively[20]. For hydroponically grown spinach, there are a few reports on PGPB applications. One example is a study conducted by Urashima & Hori where spinach grown in small-scale sterilized hydroponic culture was inoculated with Pseudomonas spp. The spinach plants that received the bacterial inoculation had increased root and shoot growth by 50%[21]. In another study, spinach grown in a floating hydroponic system at 50% normal nutrient concentration and inoculated with PGPB did not have improved yield measurements but did have improved quality measures such as nutrient leaf content and reduced nitrate concentrations[22]. However, other studies have shown that PGPB not only increased total harvest yields but also improved the food quality of basil (Ocimum basilicum) grown in a floating culture. Biofertilizers, including a mix of beneficial bacteria, improved leaf quality, and the leaves had lower nitrate content, increased vitamin C, phenols, flavonoids, and increased mineral elements (Ca, Mg, P, N, K, Fe, and Zn)[23].

      While past studies have identified optimal nutrient requirements for spinach in hydroponic production, spinach production in CEA faces several challenges, including nutrient imbalances, insect pests and plant pathogens, water quality, and environmental factors (e.g. high temperatures can cause bolting while low temperatures can stunt growth). Further research is needed to improve the profitability of spinach production. The current hypothesis is that the application of PGPB to spinach grown hydroponically in an indoor vertical farm will result in higher yields. To evaluate this, bacterial endophytes Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 and Enterobacter asburiae IALR1379 were applied individually to two spinach cultivars ('Red Snapper' and 'Seaside') grown under indoor vertical farm conditions in NFT hydroponic systems. Growth parameters were evaluated to determine yield improvements, and presence of the target bacteria were confirmed with GFP-tagged bacterial endophytes.

    • Two cultivars of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) were used in this study: 'Seaside' F1, a slow bolting smooth-leaf variety with dark green leaves and 'Red Snapper' F1, a red-veined, baby-leaf spinach with a novel leaf shape purchased from Johnny's Selected Seeds (Fairfield, ME, USA).

    • Spinach seeds were sowed in wetted Oasis Grower Solutions Horticubes XL Foam Media (276 cells) (Kent, OH, USA). Three seeds were sowed per cell and covered with vermiculite to keep the seeds moist and germinate in the dark and then placed in propagation systems from AmHydro (Arcata, CA, USA). One seedling was kept in each cell for bacterial inoculation. The seed flats were irrigated with tap water until germination under natural lights in a greenhouse. After germination, the seedling flats were irrigated for 1 min, four times daily with Virginia Tech fertilizer solution[18]. The EC of the fertilizer was maintained at 1.0 ± 0.1 mS/cm and pH 5.9 ± 0.1. The EC and pH were monitored with Economy pH/EC Meter (Spectrum Technologies, Inc., Aurora, IL, USA) and adjusted as needed.

    • Two bacterial endophytes IALR632 and IALR1379 from the IALR Plant Endophyte Research Center's collection were chosen for spinach experiments in CEA indoor vertical conditions based on previous growth promotion results in other crops[8,18]. IALR632 was isolated from the leaves of a wild Sorghum halepense plant in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains in Central Virginia, USA (geographic location: 37.125372, −79.298415). It was identified as Pseudomonas psychrotolerans (GenBank accession MZ519967). Endophyte IALR1379 was isolated from the roots of a wild Tragopogon dubius plant in Yanceyville, NC, USA (geographic location: 36.407037, −79.341545). It was identified as Enterobacter asburiae (GenBank accession OQ414238). Plant parts were surface-sterilized, and bacteria were isolated according to the method in a previous publication[8]. All endophytes were preserved in glycerol stocks at −80 °C for later use.

      Treatments were applied to seedlings at the first true leaf stage. Bacterial endophyte inoculants were prepared by taking a loop of bacterial glycerol stock and culturing it in 25 mL of half-strength Luria-Bertani (LB) broth in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm at 30 °C overnight. The overnight culture was transferred to a flask with 500 mL of fresh half-strength LB medium and grown at 30 °C at 200 rpm for about 5 h until the OD600 was approximately 1.0 (the number of colony-forming units per mL for IALR632 and IALR1379 were 1.85 × 109 and 4.12 × 108, respectively). One mL of the bacterial culture was pipetted at the base of each seedling. The control treatment was 1 mL sterile half-strength LB broth.

    • Seedlings with 3−4 true leaves were transplanted into vertical racks with 3 levels outfitted with NFT hydroponic systems (HydroCycle Vertical NFT Lettuce and Herb Systems, FarmTek, Dyersville, IA, USA). Each level contained 48 plants and the slope of all NFT channels were set to 2.5%–3%. Light was supplied with high output reproductive pink batten LED grow lights with a 6:1 red-to-blue ratio (GE First Generation ArizeTM Lynk and Life 1.5 HO Horticulture Batten LED Luminaire, Hort Americas, Bedford, TX, USA). The lights were fixed 30 cm above the NFT channel surface. The reservoir tank was 265 L (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Spinach plants were grown in the indoor vertical NFT units with three levels and a reservoir tank. The plants at both ends of the channels were not counted due to low light intensity.

    • The vegetative hydroponic fertilizer solution developed at Virginia Tech (Blacksburg, VA, USA) was used for spinach growth[18]. The fertilizer solution does not account for mineral elements present in the city water source. Concentrated (100×) stock solutions were maintained in two parts (Stocks A and B). Equal amounts of Stocks A and B were used to create a final dilute solution (1:90) with EC 1.7 ± 0.1 mS/cm and adjusted to pH 5.9 ± 0.1 in reservoirs under each vertical tower. The EC was adjusted by adding nutrient solution or water. The pH was adjusted by adding 1 N H2SO4 or 1 N KOH as needed. The indoor vertical NFT system was set up as follows: temperatures at 21/19 °C (day/night), light length at 16 or 14 h, relative humidity at 58%, and the CO2 level at 350–500 ppm. The two bacterial endophytes were evaluated in three separate experiments. The real-time growth conditions (humidity and temperature) of each experiment were recorded with a WatchDog 2,475 Plant Growth Stations (Spectrum Technologies, Inc, Aurora, IL, USA), and data analysis was performed with SpecWare software version 9 (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Vertical NFT environmental conditions.

      Dates
      (transplant to harvest)
      No. of
      plants/treatment
      Temperature
      (°C)
      Light
      (h)
      PPFD
      (μmol/m2/s)
      DLI
      (mol/m2/d)
      Relative humidity
      (%)
      29 Apr. – 19 May 2022 18 20.5 16 250 14.4 58.5
      4 Oct. – 27 Oct. 2022 36 21.0 16 250 14.4 55.5
      13 Sept. – 5 Oct. 2023 36 20.9 14 250 12.6 53.9
    • Approximately 3 weeks after transplant, plants were harvested, and growth measurements were conducted. Shoot and root fresh weights (FW) were measured separately. Dry weight (DW) was determined after shoots and roots were dried at 60 °C for 2 d. Leaf greenness was also measured at harvest by averaging three representative leaves per plant using SPAD 502 Plus Chlorophyll Meter (Spectrum Technologies, Inc., Aurora, IL, USA).

    • To monitor bacterial colonization of spinach seedlings, IALR1379 was transformed with p519ngfp following a previous report[18]. Both IALR1379- and IALR632-tagged p519ngfp[18] were used to inoculate spinach seedlings of 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside' one week after seeds were sowed using the same method described above. Samples were taken at 4, 11, and 18 d after bacterial inoculation with three biological replicates. Seedlings were separated into roots and shoots, and ground with sterile water. Ground samples were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 3 min. Supernatant was diluted into 10×, 100×, and 1,000×, and 0.1 mL was plated on LB + kanamycin (30 mg/L). The colonies with GFP were counted under a fluorescent microscope Olympus SZX12 (Tokyo, Japan).

    • Three different experiments were carried out for spinach grown in indoor vertical NFT systems with bacterial inoculations. Due to limited vertical NFT units, one unit was used to grow spinach seedlings treated with one bacterial inoculation to avoid cross-contamination. Data collected from different experiments were placed together for statistical analysis with different experiments as blocks. Data for growth measurements and leaf greenness by bacterial treatments were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and the least significant difference (LSD) was used for multiple treatment comparisons using SAS® Studio from SAS OnDemand for Academics. All significant levels were set at p < 0.05.

    • Two bacterial endophytes (IALR632 and IALR1379) were selected from the IALR's collection based on their plant growth-promoting traits and in vitro growth promotion. Both bacterial endophytes have multiple plant growth promoting traits (Table 2). Both have a relatively high ability to solubilize insoluble phosphate compounds as well as N-fixing ability. IALR1379 produces high levels of the plant growth promotive hormone auxin, and IALR632 has high siderophores and ACC deaminase activity.

      Table 2.  Plant growth promoting traits of bacterial endophytes.

      Plant growth
      promoting traitsa
      Pseudomonas
      psychrotolerans
      IALR632
      Enterobacter
      asburiae
      IALR1379
      Auxins (μg/mL)10.0 ± 2.9b56.8 ± 1.2
      N fixation++
      P solubilization (μg/mL)263.6 ± 12.4238.1 ± 18.2
      ACC deaminase++-
      Siderophore (%)97 ± 0.526 ± 5.3
      a Plant growth promoting traits were measured following previous publication[8]. b Data showed mean ± standard error.
    • For 'Red Snapper', the shoot FW and DW, total FW and DW were increased by 19.3%, 19.4%, 28.5%, and 17.3% with IALR632 inoculation, and 13.3%, 12.1%, 23.5%, and 11.1% with IALR1379 inoculation at harvest three weeks after transplant, compared with the control treatment, respectively (Fig. 2). Although they both increased root FW and DW, the two bacteria showed different effects on root growth. IALR1379 significantly increased root FW but not root DW. IALR632 significantly increased root DW but not root FW.

      Figure 2. 

      Effects of bacterial endophytes on the growth of spinach cultivar 'Red Snapper' under indoor vertical farm conditions in NFT hydroponic systems. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05). FW: fresh weight and DW: dry weight.

      For 'Seaside', both IALR632 and IALR1379 bacterial inoculations significantly enhanced shoot FW by 17.8% and 14.1%, compared with the control treatment, respectively (Fig. 3). Only IALR632 significantly increased shoot DW and total DW by 12.7% and 10.6%, compared with the control treatment, respectively. However, bacterial inoculations did not affect the root growth of 'Seaside'.

      Figure 3. 

      Effects of bacterial endophytes on the growth of spinach cultivar 'Seaside' under indoor vertical farm conditions in NFT hydroponic systems. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05). FW: fresh weight and DW: dry weight.

    • Leaf greenness was measured with a SPAD meter at harvest. The results showed that IALR632 inoculation significantly increased leaf greenness in both 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside' cultivars, compared to the controls (Fig. 4). However, there were no differences between the control plants and IALR1379 treated plants in leaf greenness of both cultivars.

      Figure 4. 

      Effects of bacterial inoculation on leaf greenness of spinach plants. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).

    • Bacteria IALR632 and IALR1379 were confirmed to be endophytic with GFP-tagged IALR632 and IALR1379. Figure 5 showed that bacterial endophytes were re-isolated from leaves of 'Seaside' 18 d after bacterial inoculation. The colonies of IALR632-GFP were smaller and less bright while those of IALR1379-GFP were bigger and much brighter. Table 3 shows colony-forming units per mg FW of roots and shoots of both 'Red Snapper' and 'Seaside' at 4, 11, and 18 d after bacterial inoculation. Overall, IALR632 had more colonies in shoots than those in the roots of both spinach cultivars, particularly at 18 d. IALR1379 was predominantly colonized in the roots.

      Figure 5. 

      Colonies of bacterial endophytes re-isolated from leaves of 'Seaside' at 18 d after inoculation of GFP-tagged bacteria. The images were taken under fluorescence microscope Olympus SZX12 with 5 s exposure and 11.2× magnification.

      Table 3.  Bacterial colonization of spinach seedlings using GFP-tagged bacterial endophytes.

      Bacteria Cultivars Tissues Days after inoculation
      4 11 18
      IALR632 Red snapper Shoot 24.7 ± 8.5 209.4 ± 191.7 10.6 ± 9.1
      Root 2.7 ± 0.4 200.2 ± 197.7 0.6 ± 0.4
      Seaside Shoot 4.7 ± 3.4 2.3 ± 1.3 15.1 ± 8.1
      Root 17.1 ± 16.7 4.3 ± 1.5 1.7 ± 0.6
      IALR1379 Red snapper Shoot 4.9 ± 4.7 12.0 ± 6.0 5.0 ± 4.2
      Root 26.6 ± 26.4 841.7 ± 836.6 27.4 ± 8.7
      Seaside Shoot 7.8 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.5 6.9 ± 4.0
      Root 38.3 ± 3.1 6.8 ± 1.9 19.6 ± 5.2
      The values present averages of colonization form units (CFU) per mg fresh tissues from three biological replicates ± standard errors.
    • There has been an increasing trend to use PGPB in agriculture production because PGPB not only can promote plant growth, increase nutrient uptake and enhance stress tolerance[5,6], but also is more environmentally friendly. Under in vitro conditions, PGPB greatly increases tall fescue KY31 growth, up to 300%[8]. Often the efficacy of PGPB in field applications is dramatically reduced and inconsistent, probably due to changing environmental factors and competition with other microorganisms. In CEA facilities, the growing conditions are controlled, and microorganism growth is restricted. Indoor vertical facilities control temperature, humidity, light duration and intensity, as well as CO2 concentrations. These controlled environmental conditions could provide stable conditions needed to increase PGPB efficacy in promoting plant growth. We tested two bacteria (Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 and Enterobacter asburiae IALR1379) with two spinach cultivars ('Red Snapper' and 'Seaside') under indoor vertical conditions in NFT hydroponic systems. IALR632 and IALR1379 inoculations achieved significantly higher yields, increasing shoot FW by 19.3% and 13.3% for 'Red Snapper' (Fig. 2), by 17.8% and 14.1% for 'Seaside' (Fig. 3), compared with their control treatments, respectively. Overall, IALR632 is more effective at increasing yield in spinach compared to IALR1379 under indoor vertical hydroponic systems. Moreover, both bacterial endophytes exhibited colonization in both spinach cultivars. Colonization within the plant corresponded with the original plant tissue they were isolated from (Table 3).

      Mechanisms for bacterial endophytes for plant growth promotion have been elucidated in general. Both IALR632 and IALR1379 have a high ability to solubilize phosphate compounds, which could enhance phosphate uptake. IALR632 belongs to the Pseudomonas genus, which is widely used to promote plant growth[22] and has robust functional growth-promoting traits, which can result in increased plant biomass yields from photosynthesis of higher leaf greenness (Fig. 4). It also has ACC deaminase activity and higher siderophore production. ACC deaminase activity lowers ethylene levels in plants and may increase plant stress tolerance to changes in environmental conditions. Higher levels of siderophore compounds increase iron absorbance. Recently, Putra et al. found that two Pseudomonas strains promoted lettuce growth in hydroponic NFTs by enhancing IAA production and affecting 12 metabolic pathways, particularly in myo-inositol and acetic acid metabolic pathways[24]. IALR1379 is identified as Enterobacter asburiae and produces higher levels of plant growth promotive hormone auxin, which could promote plant growth.

      PGPB application in hydroponically produced spinach has the potential to improve yield in vertical farming facilities. There are still many challenges for consistent efficacy for PGPB application in hydroponically grown spinach in CEA, including different fertilizer use, the dosage of bacterial cultures, effective colonization, variations of colonization in plants (Table 3), and application methods. In addition, more cultivars need to be tested for possible plant-microbe interactions.

    • In summary, plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes Pseudomonas psychrotolerans IALR632 and Enterobacter asburiae IALR1379 have potential applications for improving yields of spinach grown in indoor vertical farming systems.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Mei C, Lowman S, Evens M; data collection: Chretien RL, Zhou D, Mei C; analysis and interpretation of results: Zhou D, Chretien RL, South K, Mei C; draft manuscript preparation and edit: Chretien RL, Zhou D, South K, Mei C, Lowman S, Evens M. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This research was funded by USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant, Agreement Number: 2021B-570 for Utilizing Endophytes to Promote Hydroponic Vegetable Growth and Increase Profitability and Tobacco Commission for Promoting Controlled Environment Agriculture in Southern Virginia.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Dongfang Zhou, Robert L. Chretien

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (3) References (24)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhou D, Chretien RL, South K, Evans M, Lowman S, et al. 2024. Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics. Technology in Horticulture 4: e015 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0012
    Zhou D, Chretien RL, South K, Evans M, Lowman S, et al. 2024. Beneficial bacterial endophytes promote spinach plant growth under indoor vertical hydroponics. Technology in Horticulture 4: e015 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0012

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return