REVIEW   Open Access    

Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects

More Information
  • Houseplant propagation has surged in popularity among plant enthusiasts, fueled by growing interests in sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and the therapeutic joy of cultivating new life. Traditional propagation techniques—such as stem cuttings, leaf cuttings, division, and air layering—are widely practiced for their simplicity and high success rates. Social media has significantly influenced this trend, serving as a powerful tool for sharing propagation knowledge and building communities among hobbyists. The rising demand for rare and exotic houseplants has further intensified interest in propagation, as collectors seek affordable ways to expand their collections. Recent advancements in plant science and biotechnology, including tissue culture, genetic engineering, and genome editing, present promising opportunities for enhancing propagation efficiency, particularly for delicate and rare species. This comprehensive review systematically classifies various houseplants and delves into cutting-edge propagation technologies, with a focus on in vitro micropropagation, new cultivar development, and their environmental and economic implications. Additionally, the review explores current marketing strategies and provides a forward-looking perspective on the future of the houseplant industry. By examining the latest innovations, market dynamics, and future prospects, this review aims to provide stakeholders with a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of houseplant propagation, highlighting its potential for growth and innovation.
  • Passiflora plants are lianas with axillar tendrils and nectaries; their sexual organs are merged into a structure named the androginophore[1]. Passiflora is a genus with nearly 600 species; 95% of them are American natives, mainly from South America and Mesoamerica (from Central Mexico to Panama)[2]. More than 60 species of Passiflora produce large edible fruits, and nearly 25 species are cultivated. The economically important edible juice producers are Passiflora edulis, P. edulis f. flavicarpa, P. ligularis, P. quadrangularis, and P. tripartita var. mollissima; moreover, the fruits of P. tripartita, P. tarminiana, P. maliformis, P. alata, P. hannii, P. laurifolia, P. popenovii, and P. setacea are consumed locally elsewhere[3]. Approximately 1.5 million tons of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) are produced worldwide, with Brazil being the main producer and consumer[4].

    Although most Passiflora species are American native, research on those species involved worldwide scientific groups. For example, due to their, actual and potential ecological and economic roles, in several world regions, such as China, projects for cropping and breeding Passiflora are being developed[5]. Medical researchers are determining the potential of Passiflora plant organs to recover physical and psychiatric human health[6,7].

    In Mexico, 91 Passiflora species, native and introduced, have been reported, indicating that, for this genus, this country is the fifth in worldwide diversity ranking[8]. Within Mexico, one of the areas with greater Passiflora diversity are the areas belonging to the southern states of Campeche, Chiapas, Yucatán, and Quintana Roo[9]. In Chiapas state there are, at least, two endemic species, P. pendens and P. tacanensis[8].

    The land area of those southern states is 215,047 km2, representing approximately 10% of the total Mexican territory. Nowadays, its current inhabitants belong to different ethnic groups and mestizo people[10]. Nevertheless, before Spanish irruption in Mexico, this area was inhabited by several groups belonging to ancient Mayan culture, including yucatecos in the states of the Yucatan Peninsula (Campeche, Yucatán, and Quintana Roo), and choles, tsetales, tsotsiles, tojolabanes, and lacandones in Chiapas state[11,12].

    As Mexico is one of the main land reserves for Passiflora plants, scientific efforts to claim further national studies on this plant genus must be performed. This review presents a list of the Passiflora species botanically recorded in four southern Mexican states. Then reports related to previous, actual, and potential uses for those species are briefly summarized. This review aims to point out the importance of the conservation of Passiflora genetic resources in southern Mexico.

    According to the herbaria MEXU[13], HERBANMEX[14], CICY[15], and CHAPA[16], thereafter confirmed in the specialized platform 'Plants of the word on line'[8], in the states under study, there are 55 Passiflora species (Table 1). Chiapas state accounts for 90% of those species, followed by Quintana Roo, Campeche, and Yucatán states[9].

    Table 1.  Passiflora species botanically registered in the states of Chiapas, Campeche, Quintana Roo, and Yucatán, Mexico; and their names in Spanish (S), Yucatec Maya (Y), Lacandón Maya (L), Tseltal Maya (T), and English (E).
    No. Species Location Name
    1 P. adenopoda DC. Chiapas (L): k'um sek; ucumin sek
    2 P. alata Curtis Chiapas (E): winged-stem passion flower
    3 P. ambigua Hemsl. Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): granadilla de monte; ingo; jugito; jugo; (L): ch'um ak'
    4 P. apetala Killip Chiapas No information
    5 P. bicornis Mill. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): ojo de luna; (Y): poch k' aak' ; kasu' uk; (E): wing-leaf passionfruit
    6 P. biflora Lam. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): calzón de niño; bejuco de guaco; hoja de murcielago; (Y): poch aak'; (L): k'um sek (ah); (T): mayil poch;
    (E): twoflower passion-flower
    7 P. bryonioides Kunth Chiapas (S): granada cimarrona; (E): cupped passion flower
    8 P. capsularis L. Quintana Roo No information
    9 P. ciliata Aiton Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): maracuyá; sipolan; (Y): poch k' aak' ; poch kaki; xpoch aki; (E): fringed passion flower
    10 P. clypeophylla Mast. ex Don.Sm. Chiapas No information
    11 P. cobanensis Killip Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo No information
    12 P. conzattiana Killip Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo (S): hoja de vampiro
    13 P. dolichocarpa Killip Chiapas No information
    14 P. edulis Sims Campeche, Chiapas & Yucatán (S): maracuyá; flor de pasión; maracuyá morado;
    (Y): xton kee jil; (E): yellow passion fruit, purple passion fruit
    15 P. exsudans Zucc. Campeche (S): bolsa de gato; té de insomnio
    16 P. filipes Benth Chiapas (S): frijolillo; granadilla(E): slender passion flower
    17 P. foetida L. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): amapola; maracuyá silvestre; granadillo; cinco llagas(Y): poch; túubok; poch' aak' ; poch' iil(E): stinking passion fruit; fetid passion flower; rambusa
    18 P. hahnii (E.Fourn.) Mast. Chiapas (S): granadilla chos
    19 P. helleri Peyr. Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán No information
    20 P. holosericea L. Chiapas No information
    21 P. itzensis (J.M.MacDougal) Port.-Ult. Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (Y): maak xikin soots'
    22 P. jorullensis Kunth Chiapas (S): golondrina; tijerilla
    23 P. lancearia Mast. Chiapas No information
    24 P. ligularis Juss. Chiapas (S): granadilla; granada de moco; (E): sweet granadilla
    25 P. mayarum J.M.MacDougal Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo (S): granadillo; (Y): toon ts' iimim; poch aak'; (E): wild passion flower
    26 P. membranacea Benth. Chiapas (S): granadilla; granada; (T): karanotozak; karanato rak'
    27 P. mexicana Juss. Chiapas No information
    28 P. morifolia Mast. Chiapas (E): woodland passion flower
    29 P. obovata Killip Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán No information
    30 P. oerstedii Mast. Chiapas (S): granadilla chos
    31 P. ornithoura Mast. Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo No information
    32 P. pallida L. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (Y): sak aak' ; soots' aak' ; ts' unyajil
    33 P. pavonis Mast. Chiapas No information
    34 P. pedata L. Campeche, Quintana Roo & Yucatàn (Y): toom ts' iimin; tontotzimin
    35 P. pendens J.M.MacDougal Chiapas No information
    36 P. pilosa Ruiz & Pav. ex DC. Chiapas (S): granadilla; granada de zorro
    37 P. platyloba Killip Chiapas & Quintana Roo (S): granadilla de monte
    38 P. porphyretica Mast. Chiapas (T): schelchikin chinzak
    39 P. prolata Mast. Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo (S): granadilla de monte
    40 P. quetzal J.M.MacDougal Chiapas No information
    41 P. rovirosae Killip Campeche, Chiapas & Quintana Roo No information
    42 P. sanctae-mariae J.M.MacDougal Chiapas No information
    43 P. seemannii Griseb Chiapas No information
    44 P. serratifolia L. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): amapola; jujito amarillo; maracuyá de monte; pasionaria; granada de ratón; (Y): pooch aak' ; ya' ax pooch; (L): poochin; (E): broken ridge granadillo
    45 P. sexflora Juss. Chiapas & Campeche (S): granadilla chos;
    (T): schelchikinchinak; shel chikin chinzak; shel chikin
    46 P. sexocellata Schltdl. Campeche, Chiapas & Yucatàn (S) ala de murciélago; granada de ratón;
    (Y): xikin sots' ; xiik' sots'
    47 P. sicyoides Schltdl. & Cham. Chiapas (S) granadilla
    48 P. standleyi Killip Chiapas No information
    49 P. suberosa L. Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): granadilla roja; granadita de ratón; pata de pollo;
    (Y): kansel-ak; zal-kansel-ak; (I): cork-barked passion-flower, corky passion fruit
    50 P. sublanceolata (Killip) J.M.MacDougal Campeche, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S) jujo; (Y): pooch k' aak'
    51 P. subpeltata Ortega Campeche & Chiapas (S) pasionaria, granadina, aretitos, granada de zorra, jujo
    52 P. tacanensis Port.-Utl. Chiapas No information
    53 P. tarminiana Coppens & V.E.Barney Chiapas No information
    54 P. xiikzodz J.M.MacDougal Campeche, Chiapas, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (Y): maak xikin soots'
    55 P. yucatanensis Killip ex Standl. Campeche, Quintana Roo & Yucatán (S): flor de la pasión de Yucatán; (E): Yucatan passion flower
    References[5,6,8,9,1318].
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Chiapas state presents five biogeographical provinces related to a specific natural area in relation to its endemic biota. Those five provinces are, the 'Gulf of Mexico lowland', 'Chiapas central plateau', 'Chiapas central depression', 'Madre mountain range', and 'coastal lowland'. In contrast, within the Campeche state area, there are two biographical provinces, the 'Gulf of Mexico lowland' and the 'Yucatán lowland'. Whereas Yucatán and Quintana Roo states belong only to the province named 'Yucatán lowland'[19]. Thus, the presence of different biogeographical provinces, implying different climates and ecological conditions, might influence Passiflora diversity. For example, in Mexico, Chiapas state is known to be the second state with a relatively high total plant diversity, with over 10,000 plant species[20].

    For Chiapas state, there are botanical reports of Passiflora in 65 of the 126 municipalities, with a greater presence in Ocosingo (19 species), Unión Juárez (nine species), and Palenque (eight species). Including the four states under study, the municipality of Othón P. Blanco, Quintana Roo state (11 species), follows Ococingo, and then, the list continues with Calakmul, Campeche State (11 species). For Yucatán state, a greater Passiflora presence has been reported in Progreso (five species) (Fig. 1).

    Figure 1.  Municipalities within Peninsula de Yucatán and Chiapas, Mexico, with greater botanical reports of Passiflora species. Chiapas (yellow) [Ococingo (19), Unión Juárez (9), and Palenque (8)], Campeche (red) [Calakmul (11), Holpechén (6), Campeche (5), and Champotón (5)], Yucatán (black) [Progreso (5)], and Quintana Roo (purple) [Othón P. Blanco (11), Felipe Carrillo Puerto (8), and José María Morelos (5)]. Four Passiflora species illustrate this genus diversity. Data of present work were marked on a map sourced from Google Earth.

    The number of Passiflora species recorded in Ocosingo is greater than the number of Passiflora species reported in each of the other 18 states in Mexico[9]. Additionally, Unión Juárez must be valorized for its Passiflora richness, as the municipality area is only 62 km2[10].

    Passiflora species grow mainly in family orchards and jungle systems[12,21]; the latter system is very sensitive to overexploitation of natural resources, pollution, and climatic change. Moreover, it is very responsive to demographic changes, public policies, and local technological projects[22].

    To our knowledge, there are no reports of the use of Passiflora plants by ancient Mayan culture. However, ethnobotanical reports, written in the last three decades, indicate that in the Lacandón forest, native people eat the fruits of 'ch'um ak'' (P. ambigua), 'ch'ink ak'il' (Passiflora sp.) 'poochin' (P. serratifolia) and P. hahnii[12,13]. A recent review confirmed the consumption of P. ambigua, P. bicornis, P. ciliata, P. foetida, P. hahnii, P. ligularis, P. mayarum, P. serratifolia, and P. yucatensis fruits in communities of Chiapas and the Yucatan Peninsula[23].

    In Yucatán state, the P. ciliata plant is used to treat hysteria, sleeplessness, and child convulsion; local people assign this species narcotic and sedative properties[24]. In the Chiapas High Valleys, P. membranacea liana is used as a rope to tie tools or help build rudimentary houses[21].

    In the municipality of Solidaridad, Quintana Roo State, the staff of the butterfly pavilion of a theme park, crop at least two Passiflora species, one allegedly to be P. lobata ('pata de gallo' in Spanish), to raise butterfly larvae. The information within the park, mentions that they raise the butterflies Agraulis vanillae, Dryas iulias, Heliconius erato, and H. charithonia. Scientific literature supports the preference of butterfly larvae for P. lobata[25].

    For centuries, some effects on the human body have been assigned to Passiflora plants. Moreover, in the Spanish language, the name of passion fruit was misunderstood, and many people have given aphrodisiac properties to Passiflora species, instead of relating its name to the passion of Christ[1]. Moreover, in plants of this genus, several molecules with spasmolytic, sedative, anxiolytic, and blood pressure modulation properties have been identified. One of those molecules is passicol, which has antibacterial properties. P. foetida leaf extracts reduce the growth of Pseudomonas putida, Vidrio cholerae, Shigella flexneri, and Streptococcus pyogenes, supporting the use of this plant in ethnopharmacology to treat fiber, diarrhea, stomach and throat pains, and ear and skin infections[26].

    It has been suggested that the anthocyanin present in the peel of P. biflora might be used as an additive to increase color and antioxidant capacity in some human foods[27]. Additionally, pectin can be extracted from the Passiflora peel for human consumption[28], and it has been proposed to transform peel into biofuels[29]. As Brazil is a high yellow passion fruit producer, it has been proposed to produce passion fruit seed oil there. The oil might be used in human foods or transformed into creams, shampoos, and pharmacology products[30]. In addition, among the seed components, there are stilbenes, which are excellent antioxidants, enhance human skin conditions, and present hypoglycemic properties[31].

    In the Yucatan Peninsula, Passiflora is among the top five plant genera with relatively high diversity[17]. This richness might be used to breed, aiming for genotypes producing high-quality fruits and suitable for cropping in new areas[5,32]. Nevertheless, land use change represents one of the greatest risks to conserving actual biodiversity; this factor also contributes to increasing the rate of climatic change and affects ecosystem sustainability[33].

    Quintana Roo state is one of the main tourist region's in Mexico, Cancun resort area is located there, and further luxury resorts are still planned. Mexican environmental law protects approximately 30% of the land of the municipality of Othón P. Blanco, Quintana Roo state[34]; and this municipality started policy programs for sustainable bay management, keeping its vegetation, including several medicinal plants[35]. In this sense, recently, the Mexican government involved some institutes in flora conservation. In the municipality of Solidaridad, Quintana Roo state, the Botanical Garden 'Dr. Alfredo Barrera Marín' belonging to the 'Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo' is the repository of the flora native of the section North 5 of the project Maya Railway.

    In general, in the four states under study herein, there are important archeological and touristic venues; thus, Passiflora conservation in southern Mexico might involve ethno-tourism, ecotourism, and other local developmental projects. Moreover, in the Yucatan Peninsula and Chiapas there are almost 17 areas named Nature Reserves. They are: 'Pantanos de Centla', 'Río Celestum', 'Río Lagartos', 'Sian Ka'an' 'Chinchorro', 'Caribe Mexicano', 'Tiburón ballena', 'El triunfo', 'La Encrucijada', 'La Sepultura', 'Lacan tún', 'Montes azules', 'Selva El Ocote', 'Volcán Tacaná', 'Calakmul', 'Balam ku', and 'Los Peténes'. Therefore, according to UNESCO, in nature reserves, effective fauna and flora protection policies might be observed[36].

    The role of Passiflora plant species in conserving local fauna, and, by a consequence, help to keep the ecosystem balance, must be carefully understood. Several Passiflora species included in Table 1 have been reported to be good feed sources for animals. For example, P. biflora may play a role in conserving bats in the Lacandón forest[9]. For Passiflora species being bat-pollinated, it has been observed that their flowers are well adapted to bat behavior, as their flowers secrete nectar at night[37]. Moreover, it has been reported that some years after introducing Passiflora plants, the population of butterflies and bees was increased[9]. Some studies have revealed that P. suberosa is a good feed source for A. vanillae maculosa larvae, although less preferred by D. iulia caterpillar, who prefers leaves of P. misera[38,39].

    Although tropical forest regeneration is possible, the predicted growth of urban areas is a risk factor[33] in reducing Passiflora diversity. On the other hand, some researchers have suggested that rural families contribute strongly to maintaining plant species[40]. Thus, reducing the poverty factor might be included in national, state, and municipality politics to recognize the importance of native and original communities in conserving plant genetic resources. For example, within the three municipalities with the greatest presence of Passiflora species, only Othón P. Blanco has less than 45% of its population living in poverty, whereas over 80% of the populations of Ocosingo and Calakmul live in poverty. In five of the six municipalities with a greater presence of Passiflora, the human population living in poverty is greater than 70%[41].

    Although some countries offer payments to conserve plant genetic resources, they are limited to plant species presenting economic importance[42]. Thus, to involve local people in plant genetic conservation, projects aimed at sustainability, environment conservation, prosperity, and human welfare must be offered. The municipality, state, and national governments must establish laws and regulations to save jungles and mangroves. Further efforts to keep flora and fauna, in this case Passiflora species, in the areas with a higher presence of this genus, are expected to keep its holistic value and diversity.

    The high diversity of Passiflora plants in Chiapas state seems to be related to the presence of five biographical provinces: 'Gulf of Mexico lowland', 'Chiapas central plateau', 'Chiapas central depression', 'Madre mountain range', and 'coastal lowland'. Within Chiapas state, Ococingo is the municipality with the highest Passiflora diversity.

    Although there are no reports of the use of Passiflora in ancient Maya culture living in Chiapas, Campeche, Yucatán, or Quintana Roo states, the actual use of Passiflora suggests inherited knowledge. On the other hand, the agro-industrial and pharmacological potential of this plant genus might help promote sustainable regional development. The rescue of traditional fruit species and their ancient knowledge might enhance the local economy and maintain ecological balance.

  • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Franco-Mora O; data collection: Franco-Mora O, Moreno-Jiménez A; analysis and interpretation of results: Franco-Mora O, Sánchez-Pale JR; draft manuscript preparation: Franco-Mora O, Castañeda-Vildózola Á. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • The herbarium MEXU, HERBANMEX, and CICY offers free access to their on line database; they are cited in the References section[1315]. Data from herbaria CHAPA (16) is available at the Institute.

  • The herbaria exemplars, consulted herein, represent the work of several botanists. The picture of Passiflora ciliata was kindly donated by Prof. Elia Ballesteros-Rodríguez (CICY, Yucatán, Mexico).

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • [1]

    Chen J, Henny RJ, Chao CT. 2003. Somaclonal variation as a source for cultivar development of ornamental aroids. Research Development in Plant Science 1:31−43

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Manaker GH. 1996. Interior plantscapes: installation, maintenance, and management, 3rd edition. (Cited July 15 2024). https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/123819/records/647361432c1d629bc97e8769

    [3]

    Deng L, Deng Q. 2018. The basic roles of indoor plants in human health and comfort. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25:36087−101

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3554-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Cabahug RAM, Nam SY, Lim KB, Jeon JK, Hwang YJ. 2018. Propagation techniques for ornamental succulents. Flower Research Journal 26(3):90−101

    doi: 10.11623/frj.2018.26.3.02

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Murray Ev, Rao Krp. 2006. Export opportunities for Indian floriculture. Proc of the International Exposure Programme to Europe on Agribusiness Enterprises held from June 30 to July 9, India, 2005. CAB, India. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30202.82883

    [6]

    Schiva T. 2000. Strategies for development of commercial floriculture in Asia and the Pacific. Report, SYP-41-99. APO, New Delhi. pp. 27−38

    [7]

    Subburaj S, Chung SJ, Lee C, Ryu SM, Kim DH, et al. 2016. Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Plant Cell Reports 35:1535−44

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1937-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Seneviratne KACN, Kuruppu Arachchi KAJM, Seneviratne G, Premarathna M. 2020. Zamioculcas zamiifolia novel plants with dwarf features and variegated leaves induced by colchicine. Ceylon Journal of Science 49(2):203−07

    doi: 10.4038/cjs.v49i2.7741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Mehbub H, Akter A, Akter MA, Mandal MSH, Hoque MA, et al. 2022. Tissue culture in ornamentals: cultivation factors, propagation techniques, and its application. Plants 11(23):3208

    doi: 10.3390/plants11233208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Pierik RLM. 1991. Micropropagation of ornamental plants. Acta Horticulturae 289:45−54

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1991.289.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Demirarslan D, Gündoğdu Ş. 2021. Indoor plants: their use and importance. In Housing Architecture and Design from the Past to the Future, eds Demirarslan D, Tunalı SK. Lyon: Livre de Lyon. pp. 405–31

    [12]

    Rather DAMUD, Hajam DMA, Bhat MSA, Malik MI. 2023. Horticulture: principles and practices. India: Academic Guru Publishing House

    [13]

    Rehman M, Ullah S, Bao Y, Wang B, Peng D, et al. 2017. Light-emitting diodes: whether an efficient source of light for indoor plants? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(32):24743−52

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0333-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Corth R, Jividen GM, Downs RJ. 1973. New fluorescent lamp for plant growth applications. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 2:139−42

    doi: 10.1080/00994480.1973.10747705

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Haynes C, Hoyer J, Steil A. 2005. Indoor Plants. University Extension, Iowa State University

    [16]

    Mihalte L, Sestras RE, Feszt G. 2011. Methods to improve seed germination of Cactaceae species. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 17:288−95

    Google Scholar

    [17]

    Monterusso MA, Rowe DB, Rugh CL. 2005. Establishment and persistence of Sedum spp. and native taxa for green roof applications. HortScience 40(2):391−96

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.40.2.391

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen J, Stamps RH. 2006. Cutting propagation of foliage plants. In Cutting Propagation: A Guide to Propagating and Producing Floriculture Crops. US: Ball Publishing. pp. 203–28

    [19]

    Baldwin DL. 2013. Succulents simplified: growing, designing, and crafting with 100 easy-care varieties. US: Timber Press. 272 pp

    [20]

    Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davis FT Jr. 2010. Hartmann & Kester's plant propagation: principles and practices, 8th edition. Boston: Pearson

    [21]

    Rathour A, Kumar R. 2023. Plant Propagation Techniques in Horticulture. In Recent Trend in Agriculture. India: Integrated Publications New Delhi. pp. 125−40

    [22]

    Dole JM, Wilkins HF. 2005. Floriculture: principles and species. US: Prentice Hall. 613 pp

    [23]

    Tawfik AA. 2001. Fast and efficient mass-propagation of some ornamental plants using simple water air-flow medium. Acta Horticulturae 548:611−18

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.548.75

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Gunathilake CC, Abeywickrama K. 2011. Growth promotion and preservation of bare rooted plants of Dracaena sanderiana for commercialization. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension. 14:1−4

    Google Scholar

    [25]

    Tootoonchi M, Gettys LA, Ferrell JA, Erickson JE, Bhadha JH. 2023. Salt tolerance assessment of aquatic and wetland plants: increased salinity can reshape aquatic vegetation communities. Hydrobiologia 850:4575−87

    doi: 10.1007/s10750-022-04934-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Bryant G. 1995. Propagation Handbook: basic techniques for gardeners. US: Stackpole Books. 124 pp

    [27]

    Yam TW, Arditti J. 2018. Orchid micropropagation: an overview of approaches and methodologies. In Orchid Propagation: From Laboratories to Greenhouses—Methods and Protocols, eds. Lee YI, Yeung ECT. New York, NY: Humana Press. pp. 151–78. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7771-0_7

    [28]

    Pierik RLM, Steegmans HHM, Van Der Meys JAJ. 1974. Plantlet formation in callus tissues of Anthurium andraeanum Lind. Scientia Horticulturae 2(2):193−98

    doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(74)90009-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Aslam J, Mujib A, Sharma MP. 2013. In vitro micropropagation of Dracaena sanderiana Sander ex Mast: an important indoor ornamental plant. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 20:63−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ng CY, Saleh NM. 2011. In vitro propagation of Paphiopedilum orchid through formation of protocorm-like bodies. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 105(2):193−202

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9851-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Alawaadh AA, Dewir YH, Alwihibi MS, Aldubai AA, El-Hendawy S, et al. 2020. Micropropagation of lacy tree Philodendron (Philodendron bipinnatifidum schott ex Endl.). HortScience 55(3):294−99

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci14612-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Casanova Palomeque NM, Bertolini V, Iracheta Donjuan L. 2021. In vitro establishment: Monstera acuminata Koch and Monstera deliciosa Liebm. Trends in Horticulture 4:13

    doi: 10.24294/th.v4i1.1795

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Klanrit P, Kitwetcharoen H, Thanonkeo P, Thanonkeo S. 2023. In vitro propagation of Philodendron erubescens 'Pink Princess' and ex vitro acclimatization of the plantlets. Horticulturae 9(6):688

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9060688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Mokshin E, Lukatkin A, Teixeira da Silva J. 2008. Aseptic culture and simple, clonal micropropagation of Ficus elastica Roxb. Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology 2:52−54

    Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ibrahim SMM, Hashish KI, Taha LS, Mazher AAM, Kandil MM. 2016. In vitro culture protocol, micropropagation, acclimatization and chemical constituents of Spathiphyllum cannifolium plant under copper concentration effect. International Journal of PharmTech Research 9:33−41

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Pourhassan A, Kaviani B, Kulus D, Miler N, Negahdar N. 2023. A complete micropropagation protocol for black-leaved Zamioculcas zamiifolia (lodd.) Engl. 'Dowon'. Horticulturae 9(4):422

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9040422

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Jing Y, Beleski D, Vendrame W. 2024. Micropropagation and acclimatization of Monstera deliciosa Liebm. 'Thai Constellation'. Horticulturae 10:1

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10010001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Zhang JH, Zeng JC, Wang XM, Chen SF, Albach DC, et al. 2020. A revised classification of leaf variegation types. Flora 272:151703

    doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2020.151703

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Campitelli BE, Stehlik I, Stinchcombe JR. 2008. Leaf variegation is associated with reduced herbivore damage in Hydrophyllum virginianum. Botany 86:306−13

    doi: 10.1139/B07-139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Chen J, Wang Q, Henny RJ, McConnell DB. 2005. Response of tropical foliage plants to interior low light conditions. Acta Horticulturae 669:51−56

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.669.5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Marcotrigiano M. 1991. Understanding foliar variegation as it relates to propagation. Combined proceedings - International Plant Propagators' Society. Vol 41. pp. 410–15. https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6476538

    [42]

    Wang ZX, Yu YF, Chen L, Qin HY, Liu YX, et al. 2016. Advances in leaf pigment composition, structure and photosynthetic characteristics of colored-leaf plants. Plant Physionlogy Journal 52:1−7

    doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.0490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Campitelli BE, Stehlik I, Stinchcombe JR. 2008. Leaf variegation is associated with reduced herbivore damage in Hydrophyllum virginianum. Botany 86(3):306−13

    doi: 10.1139/b07-139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    van Harten AM. 1998. Mutation breeding: theory and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 353 pp. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/mutation-breeding-theory-and-practical-applications

    [45]

    Goodhead DT. 1995. Molecular and cell models of biological effects of heavy ion radiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 34:67−72

    doi: 10.1007/BF01275208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Yamaguchi H, Shimizu A, Hase Y, Tanaka A, Shikazono N, et al. 2010. Effects of ion beam irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in Chrysanthemum. Breeding Science 60(4):398−404

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.60.398

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Chen J, McConnell DB, Henny RJ, Norman DJ. 2010. The foliage plant industry. In Horticultural Reviews, ed. Janick J. US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Volume 31. pp. 45−110. doi: 10.1002/9780470650882

    [48]

    Taguchi M. 1988. Method of producing variegated plant. European Patent Office. EP0257845A3

    [49]

    Awan MA, Konzak CF, Rutger JN, Nilan RA. 1980. Mutagenic effects of sodium azide in rice. Crop Science 20(5):663−68

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000050030x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Sakuraba Y, Schelbert S, Park SY, Han SH, Lee BD, et al. 2012. STAY-GREEN and chlorophyll catabolic enzymes interact at light-harvesting complex II for chlorophyll detoxification during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24(2):507−18

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089474

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Cho JS, Nguyen VP, Jeon HW, Kim MH, Eom SH, et al. 2016. Overexpression of PtrMYB119, a R2R3-MYB transcription factor from Populus trichocarpa, promotes anthocyanin production in hybrid poplar. Tree Physiology 36(9):1162−76

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Borevitz JO, Xia Y, Blount J, Dixon RA, Lamb C. 2000. Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. The Plant Cell 12(12):2383−94

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Bai H, Song Z, Zhang Y, Li Z, Wang Y, et al. 2020. The bHLH transcription factor PPLS1 regulates the color of Pulvinus and leaf sheath in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 133(6):1911−26

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03566-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Brugliera F, Tao GQ, Tems U, Kalc G, Mouradova E, et al. 2013. Violet/blue chrysanthemums—metabolic engineering of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway results in novel petal colors. Plant and Cell Physiology 54(10):1696−710

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Liu Y, Feng X, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Zhu P. 2021. Simultaneous changes in anthocyanin, chlorophyll, and carotenoid contents produce green variegation in pink-leaved ornamental kale. BMC Genomics 22:455

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07785-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhao J, Zhang Q, Xie J, Hung CY, Cui J, et al. 2012. Plant regeneration via direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf and petiole explants of Epipremnum aureum 'Marble Queen' and characterization of selected variants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 34(4):1461−69

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-012-0944-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR. 1981. Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60(4):197−214

    doi: 10.1007/BF02342540

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Grandbastien MA. 1998. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends in Plant Science 3(5):181−87

    doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01232-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Olhoft P. 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91(12):5222−26

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5222

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Kaeppler SM, Kaeppler HF, Rhee Y. 2000. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Molecular Biology 43:179−88

    doi: 10.1023/a:1006423110134

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Mohan Jain S. 2001. Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118(2):153−66

    doi: 10.1023/A:1004124519479

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Henny RJ, Chen J, Norman DJ. 2003. 'Diamond bay' and 'Emerald bay'Aglaonema. HortScience 38(7):1446−47

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.38.7.1446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Chen J, McConnell DB, Henny RJ, Everitt KC. 2003. Cultural Guidelines for Commercial Production of Interiorscape Aglaonema. EDIS 2003:ENH957

    doi: 10.32473/edis-ep160-2003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Chao CT, Devanand PS, Chen J. 2005. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among Calathea species and cultivars. Plant Science 168(6):1459−69

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.01.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Henny RJ, Chen J, Norman DJ. 2006. 'Sterling' Dieffenbachia. HortScience 41(5):1356

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.41.5.1356

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Kristiansen K. 1992. Micropropagation of Ficus benjamina clones. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 28:53−58

    doi: 10.1007/BF00039915

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Vuylsteke DR, Ortiz R. 1996. Field performance of conventional vs. in vitro propagules of plantain (Musa spp., AAB group). HortScience 31(5):862−65

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.31.5.862

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Chen J, Henny RJ, Devanand PS, Chao CT. 2006. AFLP analysis of Nephthytis (Syngonium podophyllum Schott) selected from somaclonal variants. Plant Cell Reports 24(12):743−49

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0032-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Brand AJ, Bridgen MP. 1989. 'UConn white': a white-flowered Torenia fournieri. HortScience 24(4):714−15

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.24.4.714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Henny RJ, Chen J. 2008. Tropical foliage plant development: origin of new cultivars. EDIS 2008(2):ENH1092

    doi: 10.32473/edis-ep356-2008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Bringslimark T, Hartig T, Patil GG. 2009. The psychological benefits of indoor plants: a critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(4):422−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Bringslimark T, Hartig T, Patil GG. 2007. Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: putting experimental results into context. HortScience 42(3):581−87

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.42.3.581

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Dravigne A, Waliczek TM, Lineberger RD, Zajicek JM. 2008. The effect of live plants and window views of green spaces on employee perceptions of job satisfaction. HortScience 43:183−87

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.1.183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Seiji S, Naoto S. 2002. Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22:265−72

    doi: 10.1006/jevp.2002.0232

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Lohr VI, Pearson-mims CH. 1996. Particulate matter accumulation on horizontal surfaces in interiors: influence of foliage plants. Atmospheric Environment 30(14):2565−68

    doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00465-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Fjeld T. 2000. The effect of interior planting on health and discomfort among workers and school children. HortTechnology 10:46−52

    doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.10.1.46

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Park SH, Mattson RH, Kim E. 2004. Pain tolerance effects of ornamental plants in a simulated hospital patient room. Acta Horticulturae 639:241−47

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.639.31

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Park SH, Mattson RH. 2009. Therapeutic influences of plants in hospital rooms on surgical recovery. HortScience 44:102−05

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.1.102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Mosaddegh MH, Jafarian A, Ghasemi A, Mosaddegh A. 2014. Phytoremediation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene contaminated air by D. deremensis and O. microdasys plants. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 12:39

    doi: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-39

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Yang DS, Son KC, Kays SJ. 2009. Volatile organic compounds emanating from indoor ornamental plants. HortScience 44(2):396−400

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.396

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Aydogan A, Montoya LD. 2011. Formaldehyde removal by common indoor plant species and various growing media. Atmospheric Environment 45(16):2675−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Cornejo JJ, Muñoz FG, Ma CY, Stewart AJ. 1999. Studies on the decontamination of air by plants. Ecotoxicology 8(4):311−20

    doi: 10.1023/A:1008937417598

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    De Kempeneer L, Sercu B, Vanbrabant W, Van Langenhove H, Verstraete W. 2004. Bioaugmentation of the phyllosphere for the removal of toluene from indoor air. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64(2):284−88

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1415-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Papinchak HL, Holcomb EJ, Best TO, Decoteau DR. 2009. Effectiveness of houseplants in reducing the indoor air pollutant ozone. HortTechnology 19(2):286−90

    doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.19.2.286

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Cummings BE, Waring MS. 2020. Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: a review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 30(2):253−61

    doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Din A, Qadri ZA, Ahmad Wani M, Iqbal S, Ali Malik S, et al. 2022. Developing an efficient in vitro callusing and regeneration protocol in Dendranthema × grandiflorum Kitam. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 25(4):393−405

    doi: 10.1007/s12892-022-00140-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Hayden AL. 2006. Aeroponic and hydroponic systems for medicinal herb, rhizome, and root crops. HortScience 41(3):536−38

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.41.3.536

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Dhanaraju M, Chenniappan P, Ramalingam K, Pazhanivelan S, Kaliaperumal R. 2022. Smart farming: Internet of Things (IoT)-based sustainable agriculture. Agriculture 12(10):1745

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture12101745

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Oliveira LFP, Moreira AP, Silva MF. 2021. Advances in agriculture robotics: a state-of-the-art review and challenges ahead. Robotics 10:52

    doi: 10.3390/robotics10020052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Jain SK, Lettis WR, Murty CVR, Bardet JP. 2002. Introduction. Earthquake Spectra 18:1−4

    doi: 10.1193/1.2803902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Data Bridge Market Research. 2024. Global indoor plants market – industry trends and forecast to 2031. www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-indoor-plants-market

    [92]

    Acumen Research and Consulting. 2023. Indoor plants market size - global industry, share, analysis, trends and forecast 2023−2032. www.acumenresearchandconsulting.com/indoor-plants-market

    [93]

    Rout GR, Mohapatra A, Jain SM. 2006. Tissue culture of ornamental pot plant: a critical review on present scenario and future prospects. Biotechnology Advances 24(6):531−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Zuzarte M, Salgueiro L, Canhoto J. 2024. Plant tissue culture: industrial relevance and future directions. In Plants as Factories for Bioproduction, ed. Steingroewer J. Cham: Springer. Vol 188. pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/10_2024_254

    [95]

    Ricroch AE, Hénard-Damave MC. 2016. Next biotech plants: new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36(4):675−90

    doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004521

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Naderi Boldaji H, Dianati Daylami S, Vahdati K. 2023. Use of light spectra for efficient production of PLBs in temperate terrestrial orchids. Horticulturae 9(9):1007

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9091007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Hesami M, Jones AMP. 2020. Application of artificial intelligence models and optimization algorithms in plant cell and tissue culture. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 104(22):9449−85

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10888-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Koukounaras A. 2021. Advanced greenhouse horticulture: new technologies and cultivation practices. Horticulturae 7(1):1

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7010001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Zhou Y, Ye Y, Zhu G, Xu Y, Tan J, et al. 2023. Diversity, classification, and EST-SSR-based association analysis of Caladium ornamental traits. Physiologia Plantarum 175:e13841

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.13841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Mihailović BM, Radosavljević K, Popović V. 2023. The role of indoor smart gardens in the development of smart agriculture in urban areas. Ekonomika Poljoprivrede 70(2):453−68

    doi: 10.59267/ekopolj2302453m

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Oboni KA, Hossain MA. 2025. Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects. Technology in Horticulture 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0025-0005
    Oboni KA, Hossain MA. 2025. Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects. Technology in Horticulture 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0025-0005

Figures(6)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(395) PDF downloads(135)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects

Technology in Horticulture  5 Article number: e010  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Houseplant propagation has surged in popularity among plant enthusiasts, fueled by growing interests in sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and the therapeutic joy of cultivating new life. Traditional propagation techniques—such as stem cuttings, leaf cuttings, division, and air layering—are widely practiced for their simplicity and high success rates. Social media has significantly influenced this trend, serving as a powerful tool for sharing propagation knowledge and building communities among hobbyists. The rising demand for rare and exotic houseplants has further intensified interest in propagation, as collectors seek affordable ways to expand their collections. Recent advancements in plant science and biotechnology, including tissue culture, genetic engineering, and genome editing, present promising opportunities for enhancing propagation efficiency, particularly for delicate and rare species. This comprehensive review systematically classifies various houseplants and delves into cutting-edge propagation technologies, with a focus on in vitro micropropagation, new cultivar development, and their environmental and economic implications. Additionally, the review explores current marketing strategies and provides a forward-looking perspective on the future of the houseplant industry. By examining the latest innovations, market dynamics, and future prospects, this review aims to provide stakeholders with a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of houseplant propagation, highlighting its potential for growth and innovation.

    • Houseplants, often cultivated for their visual appeal, are typically placed indoors, on terraces, or on lawns. While their sizes can vary, they usually do not exceed 5.5 feet in height. These plants can range from cacti and succulents to small flowering plants such as orchids and African violets. However, the most significant group among them is foliage plants, which, despite not always producing flowers, are cherished for their unique and attractive leaves[1]. Foliage plants form the backbone of the houseplant industry. As urbanization progresses and living spaces evolve, houseplants have become indispensable for creating environments that provide peace, coziness, and mental comfort. Moreover, the economic impact of the houseplant industry cannot be overlooked. The global market for houseplants has seen substantial growth, driven by increasing consumer awareness of their benefits and the rise of urban living. As people move to cities and living spaces become more compact, the need for greenery and natural elements within homes has intensified[2]. Houseplants offer a solution to this need, providing a touch of nature that can transform urban living spaces into green sanctuaries. This trend is further amplified by social media and digital platforms, where the aesthetic appeal of houseplants is prominently showcased, inspiring more people to adopt indoor gardening as a hobby or lifestyle choice. Beyond their aesthetic value, houseplants offer numerous benefits, including improving air quality, regulating room temperature and humidity, and fostering a positive environment. Research conducted in Japan, Norway, and the USA has demonstrated that indoor plants can alleviate stress, enhance productivity, and promote overall well-being[3]. Due to these benefits and the increasing trend towards modernization, the demand for houseplants and their market is continuously expanding.

      Marketing strategies in the houseplant industry have also evolved to keep pace with the growing demand. Retailers and nurseries are increasingly utilizing online platforms to reach a broader audience, offering a wide variety of plants along with detailed care instructions and tips. Subscription services for houseplants have emerged, providing consumers with regular deliveries of new plants and related accessories. These innovative approaches not only make it easier for people to acquire and care for houseplants but also foster a sense of community among plant enthusiasts. The global indoor plants market size is expected to reach USD$14.753 billion by 2030 (market-reports).

      Conventional propagation techniques with comparatively higher propagation rates like division, cutting, and water propagation are being used rather than slow propagation techniques like seed propagation[4]. In response to this growing demand, many developed countries have focused on the micropropagation of houseplants, enabling mass production and exportation[5,6]. This surge in demand has also spurred the development of new plant varieties. Advanced technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9, alongside conventional mutation procedures, are now being employed to create new ornamental varieties of houseplants[7,8]. Micropropagation, a form of plant tissue culture, involves the propagation of plants from small tissue sections in sterile conditions. This method allows for the rapid production of a large number of genetically identical plants, ensuring uniformity and high quality. Micropropagation techniques have advanced significantly, allowing for the efficient and cost-effective production of houseplants. This has not only met the rising demand but also facilitated the development of new and improved plant varieties. Through selective breeding and genetic modification, plants with enhanced aesthetic and functional attributes are being cultivated, catering to the evolving preferences of consumers[9].

      The prospects for the houseplant industry are promising. Continued advancements in micropropagation and genetic engineering are expected to yield even more diverse and resilient plant varieties. Efforts to improve sustainability in plant production, such as reducing the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, are gaining traction. Additionally, the integration of smart technology in plant care, including automated watering systems and sensors for monitoring plant health, is set to revolutionize the way houseplants are maintained. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the status of houseplant production, with a particular emphasis on in vitro micropropagation. It examines recent advancements and developments in the field, explores marketing strategies, and considers future prospects. By delving into the challenges and opportunities in this sector, we aim to contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance the availability and diversity of indoor plants. This review will help stakeholders to understand the dynamic landscape of the houseplant industry and the potential it holds for future growth and innovation.

    • The commercial production of ornamental plants is expanding globally, with its monetary value significantly increasing over the past two decades. This industry shows great potential for continued growth in international markets. In developed countries, major potted plants such as Begonia, Ficus, Anthurium, Chrysanthemum, Rosa, Saintpaulia, Spathiphyllum, Philodendron, and many others (Table 1) are commonly kept as houseplants. With the extended variety in size, color, and leaf type, houseplants have some similar properties like aesthetic appeal and a vibrant look (Fig. 1). Driven by elevated value and demand, the rate of houseplant production has surged significantly. As reported by Pierik[10], in 1991, approximately 212.5 million plants were produced, with 157 million of these classified as ornamental plants. This represents a substantial 78% of the total production, underscoring the prominence of ornamental varieties in the market[10]. The variable of houseplant classification is versatile. However, houseplants can broadly be categorized into two types based on their light requirements: indoor and outdoor. Outdoor plants, which need both bright light and shade, include foliage plants, cacti, succulents, and ornamental plants. Popular ornamental houseplants include moth orchids, bougainvillea, and peace lilies. There is also a wide variety of vibrant and unique cacti and succulents favored as houseplants. Cacti are hardy with impressive growth rates, while succulents can be challenging to sustain in warm, humid climates.

      Table 1.  Some popular houseplants and their scientific names.

      Scientific nameCommon nameScientific nameCommon name
      Aglaonema commutatumChinese evergreenChlorphytum comosumSpider plant
      Alocasia azlaniiJewel alocasiaCissus rhombifoliaGrape ivy
      Aloe barbadensisAloeCodiaeum variegatumCroton
      Anthurium andraeanumLace leafCordyline terminalisTi plant
      Aphelandra squarrosaZebra plantCrassula argenteaJade plant
      Araucaria heterophyllaNorfolk island pineCycas revoluteSago palm
      Araucaria heterophyllaHouse pineCyclamen persicumFlorist's cyclamen
      Asparagus densifloraAsparagus fernDieffenbachia seguineDumb cane
      Aspidistra elatiorCast iron plantDizygotheca elegantissimaFalse aralia
      Asplenium nidusBird's nest fernDracaena marginataDragon tree
      Beaucarnea recurvataPonytail palmDracaena sanderianaLucky bamboo
      Brassaia actinophyllaUmbrella plantDracaena trifasciataSnake plant
      Chamaedorea elegansParlor plantEpipremnum aureumPathos
      Euphorbia milliCrown of thornsPhilodendron erubescensPink princess
      Ficus benjaminaWeeping figPhilodendron scandensHeart leaf philodendron
      Ficus elasticRubber plantPittosporum tobiraPittosporum
      Ficus lyrataFiddle-leaf figPlatycerium bifurcatumStaghorn fern
      Fiscus lyrataFiddle leafPleomele reflexaPleomele
      Gardenia augustaGardeniaPodocarpus macrophyllusPodocarpus
      Gynura aurantiacaPurple passion plantSaintpaulia ionanthaAfrican violet
      Hedera helixEnglish ivySchefflera actinophyllaUmbrella plant
      Helxine soleiroliiBaby tearsSchefflera arboricolaHawaiian schefflera
      Hoya carnosaWax plantSchlumbergera bridgesiiCuistmas cactus
      Maranta leuconeuraPrayer plantSemperflorens CultorumBegonia
      Monstera deliciosa (Albo borsigiana)Variegated monsteraSoleirolia soleiroliiCorsican creeper
      Monstera obliquaBroken heart plantSpathiphyllum wallisiiPeace lily (white flag)
      Nephrolepsis exaltataBoston fernSyngonium podophyllumNephthytis
      Peperomia obtusifoliaPeperomiaTolmiea menziesiiPiggyback plant
      Phalaenopsis amabilisMoon orchidVariegated Philodendron MinimaMini monstera

      Figure 1. 

      Pictures of common houseplants. 1. Bougainvillea glabra, 2. Nephrolepis cordifolia, 3. Monstera deliciosa, 4. Philodendron angela, 5. Philodendron Florida, 6. Philodendron Birkin, 7. Dracaena trifasciata, 8. Aglaonema commutatum, 9. Caladium bicolor, 10. Echeveria gibbiflora, 11. Epipremnum aureum, 12a. Syngonium podophyllum (pink), 12b. Syngonium podophyllum (white), 13. Philodendron melanochrysum, 14. Ficus elastic, 15. Philodendron Majesty, 16. Philodendron domesticum, 17. Monstera adansonii, 18. Anthurium crystallinum, 19. Zamioculcas zamiifolia, 20. Gymnocalycium damsii variegata, 21. Syngonium podophyllum, 22. Gymnocalycium mihanovichii, 23. Philodendron wendlandii, 24. Chlorophytum comosum, 25. Caladium lindenii, 26. Fittonia albivenis, 27. Philodendron erubescens, 28. Cyperus alternifolius, 29. Aglaonema Schott, 30. Carina, 31, Rebecca, 32. Sarah. Images 1−29 were collected from local nurseries located in 24°22'26" N, 88°36'04" E and images 30−32 were adopted from Chen et al.[1].

      Foliage plants are a significant part of the industry due to their lower maintenance needs and their ability to effectively brighten up spaces. Foliage plants can be classified from various perspectives, such as water requirements, leaf size, plant toxicity, growth habits, and care levels needed (beginner-friendly, intermediate, or advanced). Additionally, foliage plants can be either variegated or non-variegated, with variegated ones typically receiving more attention and higher market value[11]. The classification is based on the biological and ecological properties of houseplants, emphasizing their practical care requirements and suitability for specific indoor environments (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Classification of houseplants. 1. Based on variegation, 2. based on leaf size, 3. based on growing structure, 4. based on water requirement, 5. based on care requirements, 6. based on toxicity.

    • Foliage plants are commonly kept indoors due to their low maintenance needs. However, optimal water, temperature, and fertilization are crucial for the growth and health of indoor plants. Most houseplants can tolerate temperatures below 10 °C and up to 30 °C, although growth typically stalls at 15 °C, with the ideal temperature for indoor foliage being around 21 °C. Temperature fluctuations, particularly a difference of 20 °C between day and night, can cause significant stress to indoor plants[12].

      Watering houseplants is an essential and sensitive step. Active growing plants, kept in comparatively hot weather with thin or large leaves require much water. When the plant media is hard on the surface or feels lighter, the plants require watering. Water can be sprayed over plants, simply poured into soil, or following the bottom watering process depending on the plant species. Hard water, containing high mineral levels can damage pH-sensitive plants[12].

      Light source is another vital factor for indoor plant growth. Decades ago, incandescent bulbs were commonly used, but these emit red and orange light, which is not ideal for photosynthesis. Today, LED lights are more prevalent; while they do not replace sunlight, they support sufficient photosynthesis for plant survival[13]. Fluorescent lights are considered the best option for indoor plants, as they provide suitable wavelengths for photosynthesis without risking leaf burn. This type of light can also enhance the development of variegated plants, significantly increasing their value[14].

      Fertigation is essential for potted plants, as there are no alternative nutrient sources available. During the growing phase, applying fertilizers every 14 to 28 d is recommended, using lower doses more frequently rather than high concentrations infrequently[15]. Indoor plants require both macronutrients—such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium—and micronutrients for optimal growth[12].

    • Propagation can be broadly classified into two categories, sexual propagation, and asexual propagation. Under asexual propagation they are propagated by leaf cuttings, stem cuttings, and division of suckers[4]. Propagation of houseplants can be by different processes like propagation by seed, cutting, division, layering, water propagation, and micropropagation (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Propagation techniques of houseplants. (a) Cutting propagation, (b) layering, (c) water propagation, (d) micropropagation.

    • Seed propagation is common for cactus and some flowering plants. The foliage and succulent produce hardly any seeds to propagate[16]. The succulents that can propagate through seeds are S. acrem, S. album, S. kamtschatticum, and S. reflexum including many others[17]. Though many of foliage plants produce seeds but this is not as popular a propagation method. Hypoestes, Agrave, Cordyline, Dracaena, Nolina, Aocasia, Anthurium, Monstera, Philaodendron, Staphylium, Zamioculcas, and many others are reported as seed-producing foliage plants[18].

    • Cutting propagation is one of the most convenient methods for foliage plants, often more cost-effective than tissue culture. A portion of the stem with a node can develop into a new plant under suitable conditions. The new plant is genetically identical to the mother plant. Cuttings can be categorized as cane, eye, leaf buds, or tip cuttings (Fig. 3a). This method is highly effective for succulents[19] and is used for many houseplants, such as Pothos and Philodendron[20].

      Types of cuttings:

      (1) Stem cuttings: common for many houseplants like Pothos and Philodendron[20].

      (2) Leaf cuttings: used for plants like African violets and begonias[21].

      (3) Root cuttings: less common but used for plants like snake plants[22].

      Advantages: faster growth compared to seeds, and clones of the parent plant[20].

      Disadvantages: some plants are difficult to propagate this way[22].

    • Layering involves bending a stem to the ground or a pot of soil, covering part of it with soil, and waiting for roots to develop before severing it from the parent plant (Fig. 3b).

      Types of layering:

      (1) Air layering: common for larger houseplants like rubber plants and monstera[21].

      (2) Ground layering: less common indoors but used for vining plants[20].

      Advantages: high success rate, less stress on the parent plant[22].

      Disadvantages: slower process can be cumbersome for indoor settings[20].

    • Water propagation is similar to cutting propagation where clean water is involved instead of soil or coco peat (Fig. 3c). This process is mainly a method of root formation but many foliage like lucky bamboo, philodendron, and pathos can easily propagate and grow in clear water. Water propagation is easy, cheap, and convenient for a commercial approach. The popular houseplant Ficus benjamina is difficult to propagate in soil but can be easily propagated in water[23]. Dracaena sanderiana (common name lucky bamboo), may not only propagate in water but also can be grown on clear water due to it's aesthetic appeal[24].

      Advantages: high propagation success rate, genetic makeup is similar to the ex-plant[20].

      Disadvantages: in water propagation nutrients are limited so growth can stall and roots may rot with time[25].

    • Propagation by division involves dividing a plant containing plant roots or bulbs. It is the easiest method for plants that have bulbs or crowns[26]. Houseplants like Zamioculcas zamiifolia, Aloe vera, Chlorophytum comosum, and Spathiphyllum can be propagated in this manner.

    • In vitro propagation is the most effective method to grow large-scale healthy plants in a short period. This technique, also known as micropropagation, can be carried out in various ways, such as meristem culture, somatic embryogenesis, and micropropagation via thin cell layers. Although micropropagation is not as convenient as traditional propagation techniques due to high production costs and the need for specialized laboratory facilities, it is particularly useful for producing new or variegated indoor plants (Fig. 3d). Industrial orchid cultivation, for instance, has successfully employed micropropagation as the primary propagation technique, proving to be both successful and economically beneficial[27].

      Despite the challenges, micropropagation remains the most widely practiced method in the plant industry due to the high demand and price range of plants. However, successful micropropagation procedures used in industries are rarely documented as scientific discoveries due to business strategies and other issues.

      The first successful micropropagation of Anthurium was reported in 1974[28]. Subsequent reports have documented the micropropagation of several Anthurium varieties. Several indoor plants, such as Dracaena sanderiana[29], and Paphiopedilum orchid[30] have been successfully micropropagated. Micropropagation of Lacy Tree Philodendron was reported in 2020[31]. Monstera acuminata Koch and Monstera deliciosa Liebm have been propagated in vitro recently[32]. Very recently in vitro propagation of Philodendron erubescens 'Pink princess' has been successful and claimed to be suitable for large scale production[33].

      The practice of indoor plant micropropagation is increasing dramatically due to high market demand and its acceptability for maintaining variegation. However, maintaining aseptic conditions and selecting appropriate media components are crucial for successful micropropagation. Recent studies on developing micropropagation protocols for popular indoor plants are included here. Table 2 includes sterilization techniques, and Table 3 presents the culture media for several successful foliage plant tissue cultures with suitable media.

      Table 2.  Step-by-step protocols for surface sterilization.

      Plant Sterilization steps Ref.
      Ficus elastica, Ruby 1. Young upper leaves were washed with soapy
      water and washed again by tap water;
      2. Washed with 1% KMnO4 for 25 min;
      3. Washed with 70% C2H5OH for 1 min;
      4. Washed with 2%−6% chloramine B containing 25%−29% active chlorine for 5, 10, 15 min or with Domestos for 25 min;
      5. Washed three times with distilled water.
      [34]
      Spathiphyllum, Peace lily 1. Explants were washed under running tap water
      for 1 h;
      2. Washed with 70% ethanol for 30 min;
      3. Washed with 15% sodium hypochlorite NaOH (Clorox + 0.01% Tween 20) for 7 min;
      4. Rinsed with sterile water three times;
      5. Dipped in 0.1% HgCl2 solution for 5 min;
      6. Rinsed five times with sterile water.
      [35]
      Zamioculcas zamiifolia,
      Black ZZ
      1. Leaves were washed with dishwashing liquid for
      20 min;
      2. Explants placed under running tap water for
      30 min;
      3. Treated with 10% sodium hypochlorite (active chloride) for 10 min;
      4. Disinfected with 0.1 mg/L HgCl2 solution for 10 min;
      5. Washed with ethanol 70% for 1 min;
      6. Washed three times with sterile distilled water for
      5 min.
      [36]
      Dracaena sanderiana,
      Lucky bamboo
      1. Explants were rinsed 3–4 times with sterilized double distilled water.
      2. Surfaces disinfected for 10 min in H2O2 (1%) solution.
      [29]
      Monstera deliciosa
      Liebm, Thai constellation
      1. Washed in the sink with soap and water;
      2. Surface sterilized using 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) for 20 min;
      3. Rinsed in dH2O;
      4. Washed with 2% sodium hypochlorite for another 20 min;
      5. Lastly rinsed three times with water.
      [37]
      Monstera deliciosa,
      Liebm
      1. Immersed in fungicidal antioxidant solution for
      3 min with vacuum pump agitation;
      2. Double immersion in 1.25% NaClO + three drops
      of Tween-20 for 15 min;
      3. Immersion in 0.83% NaClO + three drops of
      Tween-20 for 10 min;
      4. Two washes between each NaClO immersion, three final washes with sterilized distilled water;
      5. Final immersion in antioxidant solution.
      [32]
      Monstera acuminata, Koch 1. Immersed in fungicidal antioxidant solution for
      3 min with vacuum pump agitation;
      2. Double immersion in 1.25% NaClO + three drops
      of Tween-20 for 15 min;
      3. Immersion in 0.83% NaClO + three drops of
      Tween-20 for 10 min;
      4. Two washes between each NaClO immersion, three final washes with sterilized distilled water;
      5. Final immersion in antioxidant solution.
      [32]

      Table 3.  Tissue culture media.

      Plant Basic media Plant hormones and other nutrients Culture process Explant type Ref.
      Ficus elastica, Ruby MS media
      pH 5.8−5.9
      1.5 mg/L IAA and 0.5−4.0 mg/L BAP, 0.7% agar,
      1 mg/L pyridine, 1 mg/L thiamine, 15 mg/L
      ascorbic acid, 40 g/L sucrose
      In vitro regeneration of the plantlets 2−3 months old upper young leaves [34]
      Spathiphyllum, Peace lily MS media,
      pH 5.7−5.8
      BA 1.0−2.0 ppm, NAA 0.1−0.2 ppm, 0.8% agar, sucrose 25 g/L, Cu ion 2.5 ppm
      Embryogenic suspension culture and regeneration About 1.0 cm leaf blade from meristem [35]
      Zamioculcas zamiifolia, Black ZZ MS media,
      pH 5.6−5.8
      30g/L sucrose, 0.7% agar, 0.5 mg/L,
      NAA and 2 mg/L BA
      In vitro regeneration of the plantlets 15 mm ×15 mm leaf [36]
      Philodendron erubescens,
      Pink princess
      MS media
      BAP 1.0 mg/L, 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) 0.5 mg/L, indole-3-butyric acid 3.0 mg/L (IBA), and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), Peat moss Ex vitro acclimatization of the plantlets
      1.0–1.5 cm, 4–5 leaves,
      and at least three roots
      [33]
      Dracaena sanderiana,
      Lucky bamboo
      MS media,
      pH 5.6-5.8
      6.78 μM 2,4-D, 46.5 μM CPA, 0.0–10.20
      2,4-5-triacetic acids, 0.0–9.86 μM IBA,
      0.0−10.73 μM NAA, 0.0−11.41 μM IAA
      In vitro regeneration from nodal explants Node 1 cm, internodal stem 1 cm, leaf 1 cm, axillary buds 1 cm and roots 1 cm [29]
      Monstera deliciosa Liebm, Thai constellation MS media,
      pH 5.6−5.8
      B5 vitamins supplemented with vitamin B5,
      30 g/L sucrose, 2.5 g/L gellan gum, 7.5 mg/L
      BAP (6-benzylaminopurine), and 0.5 mg/L
      NAA, Bio stimulant IQ forte 3ml/L
      In vitro clonal propagation Axillary buds [37]
      Monstera deliciosa Liebm MS media,
      pH 5.6−5.8
      BAP 1 mg/L, 2,4-D 0.2 mg/L, PPM 1 mL/L In vitro propagation and organogenesis Mature leaves [32]
      Monstera acuminata, Koch MS media,
      pH 5.6−5.8
      benomyl solution, cysteine, BAP 1 mg/L,
      IAA 0.5 mg/L, NAA 0.1 mg/L
      In vitro propagation and organogenesis Mature leaves [32]
    • Variegated plants are characterized as plants possessing leaves with regular or irregular spots or patches. Patches are generated naturally or chemically, though plants with pathological infection, chlorophyll deficient lesions, or variegated areas outside of leaf blades are excluded from this group[38]. Several research articles[39] identify five anatomical categories of variegated plants: (1) Presence of non-green leaf areas due to chlorophyll deficiency. (2) Presence of intercellular air spaces just below the epidermis. (3) Specific morphology of adaxial epidermal cells. (4) Accumulation of non-photosynthetic pigments that conceal the green hue of leaves. (5) Presence of more epidermal cells and thicker outer tangential cell walls.

      Additionally, variegation can be classified macroscopically; fishbone-shaped, blotched-shaped, V-shaped, spotted, striped, reticulate, and pinnate.

      The main area of interest at present is understanding how plants can be rendered variegated. Variegation can occur naturally or be induced artificially. While natural variegation often stems from genetic factors and environmental conditions, artificial methods—including chemical treatments and light manipulation—can also create these patterns. This discussion examines both natural and induced variegation, highlighting recent horticultural techniques used to achieve and control these decorative effects (Fig. 4). Natural variegation occurs due to transposons, beneficial viruses, chimeras, gene expression manipulation, and controlled light exposure[40,41]. Variegation can also serve as a defensive mechanism or help plants resist environmental stress. For instance, the variegated leaves of Arum italicum accommodate photosystem-II, which increases photosynthesis under low light conditions[42]. Similarly, variegated leaves of Hydrophyllum virginianum protect against herbivory[43].

      Figure 4. 

      Natural and chemical inducers of variegated houseplants.

      In modern horticulture, plants are intentionally variegated through light adjustments, chemical mutagens, or physical mutations to enhance their aesthetic appeal and market values. Popular methods include gamma rays, ion beams, colchicine, and metabolic route alterations. Ionizing radiation, such as X-rays and gamma rays, can cause chromosome rearrangement, while ion beam radiation produces single or double-strand breaks[44,45]. This mutation can cause shifting flower color in chrysanthemum and promote changes in chlorophyll production by carbon ion buildup[46]. The natural and chemical inducers of variegation are shown in Fig. 4.

      Currently, few strategies for inducing variegation in indoor plants have been explored. Selective breeding and targeted propagation have established key foliage plants like Aglaonema, Dieffenbachia, Dracaena, Epipremnum, Ficus, Hedera, Philodendron, and Syngonium[47]. The latest trend focuses on developing propagated plants with induced variegation. Research by Taguchi shows that treatment with 4-methoxy-3,3'-dimethylbenzophenone can induce tiger stripe or partial leaf whitening variegation in plants such as Philodendron oxycardium, Spathiphyllum patinii, Musa spp, Anthurium, Cymbidium, and Dracaena surculosa. Additionally, 2,3,5-trichloro-4-hydroxypyridine induces tiger stripe variegation in Dracaena fragrans, while α-(2-naphthoxy) propionanilide induces similar variegation in Epiphyllum pumilum[48].

    • Developing new plant cultivars can be approached through several innovative techniques (Fig. 5) beyond the random use of physical and chemical mutagens. These include isolating unique mutants, somaclonal variation, controlling gene expression, genetic rearrangement using transgenes, and editing metabolic pathways. For example, physical and chemical mutagens can induce leaf color changes, which can be maintained through tissue culture. These changes can result in albino, greenish-white, white emerald, light green, greenish-yellow, etiolation, yellow-green, and striped varieties, affecting chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and other pigment production[49]. Treating Zamioculcas zamiifolia with colchicine can produce a dwarf variety with unusual black leaves, known as the black ZZ plant[7]. Chlorophyll synthesis involves 15 steps, and mutations in early enzyme production genes can cause albino or yellow leaves. Mutations in genes encoding aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, porphobilinogen deaminase, and uroporphyrinogen III cosynthase, involved in photosynthesis can lead to albino or yellow leaf phenotypes. This type of mutation in genes is responsible for patches or stripes on leaves[50]. In Populus canadensis, overexpression of the PtrMYB119 gene increases anthocyanin accumulation, leading to strong red pigmentation[51]. Similarly, overexpression of Arabidopsis PAP1 induces high anthocyanin accumulation, resulting in dark purple leaves[52]. In Setaria italica, the bHLH transcription factor PPLS1 controls purple pigmentation in the pulvinus and leaf sheath. The V shaped variegation of Trifolium repens is regulated by Rm, Rid, and Rl genes[53]. Manipulating metabolic pathways by feeding selective precursors can induce desired traits. A study by Brugliera et al. showed that feeding delphindin precursor to Chrysanthemums can induce the desired violet color[54]. Genes like Bo9g058630 coding dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR) and Bo3g019080 coding shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT) are studied in differentially expressed gene (DEG) approach and they affect anthocyanin, chlorophyll production in shades pink leaves, green-pink combined colored leaf. While transcription factors TT8, MYBL2, GATA21, GLK2, and RR1 are potential regulators of leaf color change in Brassica oleracea var. acephala[55]. RT-PCR analysis of leaf variegation of E. aureum 'Golden Pothos' showed little expression differences of a marker gene, EaZIP between green and whitish plants or between green and whitish sectors of a variegated leaf[56].

      Figure 5. 

      Proposed approach for developing new cultivars of houseplants.

      Somaclonal variation is an important source for the cultivar development of houseplants. Somaclonal variation can be defined as the phenotypic variation found among the houseplants regenerated through the passage of tissue culture[57]. It may occur during the plant's regeneration process through either organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. In vitro culture houseplants generate somaclonal variants that can be novel and can be fixed through vegetative propagation. The variation includes morphological traits, response to biotic or abiotic factors, and production of specific compounds. The extent of somaclonal variation can be determined as the percentage of plants showing alternation of one or more defined characteristics. Such plants are called 'somaclones'[57]. Plant tissue culture causes the wounding of explants, and it causes transposon activation[58]. In vitro explant culture can result in cell dedifferentiation, induction, and differentiation. During this process, cells may reset the genome expression due to exogenous stress and not follow the same orderly sequence that is usually followed under natural conditions[59]. Instead, the genome may be abnormally reprogrammed or decidedly restructured. This restructuring can give rise to wide ranges of altered phenotypes in the regenerated plants[60,61]. As a result, a longer regeneration process will produce more somaclones. Table 4 represents the number of somaclonal variants released so far based on the information available from open access resources.

      Table 4.  Number of houseplants released from the selection of somaclonal variants.

      Genera No. of cultivars Common cultivars derived
      from somaclonal variants
      Ref.
      Aglaonema 13 Diamod Bay, Emerald Bay, Moonlight Bay [62,63]
      Alocasia 2 Polly, Purpley [63]
      Anthurium 5 Lady Carmen, Orange Hot, SmallTalk Red, SmallTalk purple. [63]
      Calathea 7 Angela, Cora, Dottie, Eclipse, Rosey Roseo Picta, Satum [64]
      Dieffenbachia 20 Camouflage, carina, Rebecca, Sarah [65]
      Ficus 1 Cleo [66]
      Musa 1 French Reversion [67]
      Philodendron 4 Baby Hope, Hope Compact, Hope2, Gold Queen [63]
      Spathiphyllum 5 Cristina, Domino, Gayle's Green, Hi Ho Silver, White lightening [63]
      Syngonium 23 Banana Allusion, Berry Allusion, Bob Allusion, Bold Allusion, Cream allusion, Pink allusion [63,68]
      Torenia 1 Uconn white [69,70]

      CRISPR-Cas is another promising tool for developing new ornamental plant varieties. This technology allows for the silencing, over-expression, or point mutation of specific genes responsible for desired traits. Although its use in ornamental plants is still limited, it has shown revolutionary changes in fruit, vegetables, and medicinal plants. Petunia hybrida is the first ornamental plant edited with CRISPR-Cas9, with many others in development[7].

    • Houseplants have a significant impact on various aspects of life. They improve air quality by absorbing toxins and releasing oxygen, enhancing overall well-being. Houseplants also reduce stress and boost mood by creating a calming environment. Additionally, they can increase productivity and concentration, making them beneficial for both homes and workplaces. The presence of houseplants stimulates economic growth through increased sales in the gardening and home decor industries. In workplaces, they can reduce absenteeism and indirectly benefit businesses financially. Furthermore, houseplants may enhance property values by improving the aesthetic appeal of homes and offices.

    • Humans have a long-standing connection with plants, and the practice of keeping indoor plants is ancient due to their mental and physiological health benefits. Over the past three decades, numerous studies have confirmed these benefits[71]. Indoor plants create a soothing environment, improve air quality, and help alleviate respiratory and anxiety-related conditions. A Norwegian study of 385 office workers found that indoor plants positively impact stress management and productivity[72]. In the USA, employees reported an improved quality of life, with men showing a better response to indoor plants[73].

      NASA's Clean Air Study highlighted the air-purifying abilities of plants like the spider plant (Chlorophytum comosum) and peace lily (Spathiphyllum). Research in Japan and the USA indicates that indoor plants enhance productivity, reduce anxiety, improve mood, and increase energy and concentration[74,75]. Indoor plants are effective in managing anxiety and respiratory conditions, with foliage plants significantly helping symptoms related to mucous membrane neurophysiology[76]. A study showed that hospital patients exposed to plants for just 10 min experienced higher pain tolerance, lower self-rated pain intensity, and reduced electrodermal activity[77]. Patients recovering from surgeries with plants in their rooms had faster recovery, lower blood pressure, reduced fatigue, and less need for analgesics[78].

      While the benefits of indoor plants are evident, further homogeneous research is needed for definitive conclusions. Existing studies, however, indicate that indoor plants positively affect human physical and mental health.

    • Improving indoor air quality is essential, especially in spaces where volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from paints and furnishings can cause respiratory issues, irritation, and allergies, particularly in children[3]. Research has shown that indoor plants can reduce organic pollutants like benzene, toluene, ethylene, formaldehyde, xylene, and harmful compounds such as carbon monoxide, ozone, aldehydes, and ketones. Key species like Sansevieria trifasciata, Chlorophytum comosum, and Epipremnum aureum are effective in this process[79].

      Indoor plants can decrease VOC concentrations by around 35%, though some ornamental plants may emit VOCs themselves[76,80]. Species such as Hedera helix, Chrysanthemum morifolium, Dieffenbachia compacta, and Epipremnum aureum can remove up to 96% of formaldehyde within 24 h[81]. Similarly, Pelargonium domesticum, Ficus elastica, Chlorophytum comosum, and Kalanchoe blossfeldiana can eliminate 85%−95% of benzene within the same period[82]. Azalea indica can remove 95% of toluene within 72 h[83], while D. deremensis and O. microdasys can eliminate 95% of toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene within 48 h[79]. Furthermore, they have shown the capability to clear 95% of ozone within 2 h[84]. However, recent studies suggest that achieving substantial purification may require 10 to 1,000 plants per square meter[85].

    • As environmental awareness grows, sustainability is becoming central to houseplant propagation. The industry faces scrutiny over its environmental footprint, especially regarding non-renewable resources like peat moss and carbon emissions from plant transport[86]. Future trends emphasize sustainability, with techniques like aeroponics showing success in cultivating varieties such as Ficus, Philodendron, and Dracaena[87]. Innovations like vertical farming, green walls, and green roofs enhance urban aesthetics and promote a healthy atmosphere. These solutions are increasingly integrated with advanced technologies, including IoT and robotics, to streamline maintenance and irrigation, furthering their environmental benefits[88,89].

    • Houseplants offer significant social and economic benefits. Aesthetically, they enhance the appeal of homes and workplaces, fostering inviting environments that encourage social interaction and community building. Economically, the houseplant industry has seen substantial growth, fueled by rising interest in home gardening and indoor plants. In recent years, rare varieties have driven this market to new heights. For example, Philodendron Minima (mini Monstera) sold for USD$8,150 in 2020, and a variegated Monstera deliciosa fetched USD$5,000 on Trade Me. In 2022, a variegated Monstera adansonii was sold for USD$38,000 on eBay due to limited supply and high demand (www.gardenista.com).

      Prices for houseplants vary based on size, demand, and availability. Popular species like the Monstera Thai Constellation are priced between USD$99 and USD$140 due to their unique variegation. The Monstera deliciosa ranges from USD$48 to USD$228, influenced by size and variegation. Zamioculcas zamiifolia is priced from USD$48 to USD$198, while the Philodendron White Wizard and Pink Princess are around USD$98. More affordable options include the Bird's Nest Fern (USD$48−USD$78), Apoballis lavallaei (USD$78), and Aglaonema pictum Tricolor (USD$98−USD$128). The Stromanthe Triostar, with a price range of USD$58−USD$78, offers vibrant foliage at moderate cost. Budget-friendly choices like Devil's Ivy (USD$41−USD$51) and red Anthurium (USD$64) are popular among beginners and those seeking cost-effective greenery.

    • The worldwide market for houseplants is witnessing significant growth due to their appeal for decorative purposes, the wide variety of available species, aesthetic value, ability to create refreshing and soothing environments, and the belief in their air-purifying properties. Additionally, houseplants add a new dimension to interior decor and enhance the visual appeal of living spaces. The monetary value of indoor plants has experienced a substantial increase since the 1980s, with considerable potential for further growth in both domestic and international markets[90]. Leading the forefront of indoor plant production are companies such as DÜMMEN ORANGE (USA), Syngenta (Switzerland), Beekenkamp Group (Netherlands), Hofland Flowering Plants (Netherlands), SAKATA (USA), DUTCH FLOWER GROUP (Netherlands), MARGINPAR BV (Netherlands), Walter Bloom Plants BV (Netherlands), Selecta Klemm, Double H Nurseries Ltd (Germany), ARCANGELI GIOVANNI (Italy), KP Holland (Netherlands), and Ball Horticultural Company (USA) (Indoor Plants Market By 2031)[91].

      The indoor plant industry amounted to a business of USD$16.2 billion by 2022 solely in developed countries, a significant leap from the mere USD$13 million in 1949 and USD$574 previously (Indoor Plants Market Size, Share, Trends | Forecast, 2032)[92]. In the early 20th century, successful micropropagation of 156 species was achieved, with the Netherlands contributing 33%, Japan 24%, Italy 11%, and Thailand 10%, indicating a global effort to commercially produce ornamental plants[93]. Now the Netherlands is the leading exporter of micro-propagated plants, contributing 59% of global exports. Following the Netherlands are Italy with 16%, Colombia with 10%, Israel with 4%, Spain with 2%, Kenya with 1%, and other countries collectively making up 18% (Fig. 6). According to OEC world report 2022 the houseplant market has been taken over by Netherlands, Canada, USA, China and some others country (oec.world).

      Figure 6. 

      Major houseplant exporter countries worldwide.

    • Houseplants have surged in popularity over the past decade, becoming a staple in homes, offices, and public spaces. This trend has not only transformed interior design but also spurred a growing interest in plant care and propagation. The future of houseplant propagation holds exciting potential, driven by advancements in technology, shifts in consumer preferences, and increasing awareness of the benefits of indoor greenery. The future prospects of houseplant propagation are explored by considering factors such as technological innovations, sustainability, and market trends.

      The future of houseplant propagation is likely to see significant advancements in biotechnology. Tissue culture, also known as micropropagation, involves growing plants from small tissue samples in sterile, controlled environments. This method allows for the rapid production of large numbers of identical plants, ensuring uniformity and quality[9]. Advances in gene editing and nanotechnology are significantly influencing the ornamental plant industry, enhancing the efficiency and outcomes of micropropagation[94]. Current trends in micropropagation focus on optimizing tissue culture media by incorporating various plant growth stimulators, biostimulants, and light spectra[37,95,96]. The use of light spectra, a novel approach introduced in 2023, has shown promise in embryo production for terrestrial orchids[96]. AI models are increasingly applied to improve various stages of tissue culture, including in vitro sterilization, callus induction, shoot multiplication, and acclimatization. By analyzing a wide range of data—such as binary inputs (e.g., embryogenic vs non-embryogenic callus), discrete variables (e.g., number of roots and shoots), continuous variables (e.g., shoot length), time-series data, fuzzy inputs (e.g., callus color), and categorical variables (e.g., types of phytohormones)—AI facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the interactions among these variables[97]. Looking ahead, smart greenhouse technology promises to further enhance production efficiency by optimizing water supply, temperature, humidity, and lighting conditions for plants[98].

      Genetic engineering tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 hold revolutionary potential by enabling precise gene editing to express desired traits. Manipulating genes responsible for color pigments can produce plants with uniquely vibrant hues, as seen experimentally in colorful Caladium varieties[99]. Furthermore, tissue culture technology offers substantial production scalability in short periods, essential for meeting increasing market demands globally.

      Automation and artificial intelligence could revolutionize houseplant propagation by optimizing growing conditions and automating routine tasks. This could lead to higher success rates and lower labor costs[100].

    • The future of houseplant propagation is bright, driven by technological advancements, a focus on sustainability, and evolving consumer preferences. As the industry evolves, we can expect more accessible and innovative propagation methods, environmentally friendly practices, and a diverse market catering to a wide range of tastes and needs. Houseplants will continue to play a vital role in our lives, offering beauty, health benefits, and a connection to nature. The propagation of these plants, whether for personal enjoyment or commercial purposes, will be a dynamic and thriving field, reflecting broader trends in technology, sustainability, and lifestyle.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception, project design, execution, data analyses, manuscript writing, revision and overall supervision: Hossain MA; data collection, analysis and manuscript drafting: Oboni KA. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (4) References (100)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Oboni KA, Hossain MA. 2025. Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects. Technology in Horticulture 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0025-0005
    Oboni KA, Hossain MA. 2025. Exploring the diversity, propagation, impacts, and market dynamics of houseplants: current trends and future prospects. Technology in Horticulture 5: e010 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0025-0005

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return