HTML
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth in terms of plant height, biomass. In spite of this, significant variations were not observed among all the treatments affect plant growth performances. However, fungal strain PF 3 and bacterial isolate PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compared to other microbial inoculants. Bacterial strains showed good effects in enhancing biomass of leaves as compared to fungal inoculants. Finally, these PF 3 + PB 5 were selected for further experimentations on dual inoculations (Table 1). In primary screening, it was observed that in case of root length best results was given by the treatment PF 3 (33.34 ± 3.54cm) followed by PF6 (29.76 ± 2.99 cm) and PF4 (29.60 ± 2.52 cm). Shoot height was enhanced by PF3 (137.58 ± 8.59 cm) and PF2 (133.56 ± 13.05 cm). Inoculation of PB5 and PF 6 were produced high fresh biomass. In case of dry biomass of leaves highest value was found in PB5 (4.13 ± 0.93g) and PF 3 (3.15 ± 0.36g). Hence, screening experiment exhibited the potential of PF3 + PB5 inoculations and selected for further studies.
Table 1. Growth performance of Acacia nilotica grown under different microbial treatments (p > 0.05 *, p > 0.01 **)
Growth Parameters Treatments 1 2 3 4 5 6 Root length(cm) 31.24±10.27 35.00±3.78 44.74±6.66* 39.80±2.94 44.78±11.93* 42.56±7.42 Shoot height(cm) 84.46±25.00 132.92±8.87** 134.56±6.74** 140.54±5.88** 117.78±12.72* 124.06±21.24** Fresh biomass(g) 4.33±2.57 7.62±1.45 13.21±3.22** 14.69±3.58** 13.70±3.46** 14.57±1.57** Dry biomass(g) 1.82±1.42 5.04±1.17 6.41±1.64** 7.55±1.76** 7.56±1.85** 7.98±0.55** 1- control, 2- Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, 3 - Bacterial isolate 5, 4 -both fungal and bacterial strains equal amount, 5- both fungal and bacterial isolates in 2:1 ratio, 6- both fungal and bacterial isolates in 1:2 ratio, (p > 0.05 *, p > 0.01 **) Effect of dual inoculation on Acacia nilotica
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth. Fungal strain PF3+ PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compared to other treatments in combination (Table 2). In the secondary screening shoot height was enhanced in the treatment of PF3 + PB5 in 1:1 ratio (140.54 ± 5.88 g). This combination had also improved the biomass of plants. The combination of both the microbes in equal proportion was found to be the most effective for the plant.
Table 2. Effect of selected bioinoculant fungal and bacterial strains on growth of Acacia nilotica grown under pot culture conditions
Shoot height (cm) Fresh biomass leaves (g) Dry biomass leaves (g) CONTROL 112.76±29.60 3.54±1.93 2.07±1.77 Penicillium grisefulvum 114.02±14.81 4.23±1.08 2.14±1.02 Penicillium restrictum 133.56±13.05 4.41±1.39 1.90±0.87 Penicillium crysogenum 137.58±8.59* 7.25±2.02 3.15±0.36* Aspergillus species 116.30±22.95 4.13±2.64 0.85±0.55 Aspergillus ornatus 119.42±20.45 11.76±4.94 1.80±0.11 Aspergillus wentii 122.72±17.30 1.42±0.57 4.57±2.87* Penicillum expansum 122.98±8.34 3.26±1.27 1.08±0.41 Paecilomyces variotii 121.70±13.22 9.82±6.02 1.35±0.34 Cunnighamella elegans 97.22±29.73 7.94±1.97 1.94±0.80 Bacterial isolate PB1 115.76±12.70 8.13±2.07 3.04±1.36 Bacterial isolate PB2 104.96±6.92 8.27±4.91 2.88±1.04 Bacterial isolate PB3 108.26±10.07 8.27±4.91 3.02±2.04 Bacterial isolate PB4 119.96±7.41 9.89±1.99 2.96±0.20 Bacterial isolate PB5 95.18±33.11 12.89±2.75* 4.13±0.93* Effect of dual inoculations with Rhizobium
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth in terms of plant height and biomass. Microbial strain PF 3 + PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compare to other treatments in combination with R4 and R5 respectively (Tables 3-6). In the present study, individual inoculation of R4 exhibited increase of shoot height (118.72 ± 6.58 cm) compared to B5 + R5 (111.36 ± 9.59 cm). Root length was found to be enhanced in case of PF3+ R4 (44.48 ± 2.30 cm), PF3 + B5 + R10 (42.06 ± 1.93cm) followed by treatment of PF3 + PB5 + R11 (40.00 ± 6.64 cm). The plants which were grown under this microbial combination of inoculants had produced good biomass, collar diameter as compared to other treatments. By analyzing all the growth parameters for Acacia nilotica, the best treatments were combination of PF3 (Penicillium chrysogenum Thom 1), PB5 and R11 (Rhizobium sp.). Though the test plants were found to be infected with Rhizobium but a very poor performance was observed as far as root nodule formation is concerned.
Table 3. Effects of selected microbial inoculants and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Shootheight (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) C 1 70.94±6.62 19.58±1.44 90.52±7.44 8.14±1.31 3.79±0.67 18.60±2.70 2.75±0.18 1.47±0.13 C2 95.90±23.30** 30.96±3.31** 126.84±24.30** 10.27±1.50 5.29±0.67 21.20±1.92 2.62±0.41 1.37±0.29 C3 84.66±10.49 28.10±6.20* 112.76±14.56* 10.33±0.58 6.37±0.25* 20.22±2.12 2.49±0.25 1.37±0.21 R1 83.94±5.33 22.48±1.34 106.42±6.57 9.46±3.40 5.37±2.46 21.40±1.52 2.49±0.43 1.37±0.25 R2 108.02±9.29** 24.26±6.78 132.28±12.90** 10.32±1.39 6.59±0.48* 21.60±1.95 2.76±0.26 1.47±0.17 R3 99.04±9.43** 30.10±10.27** 129.14±17.55** 10.60±1.18 5.24±0.98 20.60±0.89 2.80±0.49 1.60±0.33 R4 118.72±6.58** 20.28±1.51 139.00±6.90** 9.84±1.60 6.00±1.41 20.60±0.89 3.11±0.38 1.69±0.18 R5 79.14±11.16 25.24±4.02 104.38±7.44 10.73±1.24 6.22±1.07 22.00±2.35 2.67±0.36 1.79±0.47 R6 71.90±7.74 31.12±5.84** 103.02±4.24 11.45±1.80** 6.14±1.05 19.00±2.55 3.15±0.33 1.74±0.45 R7 67.82±9.69 24.94±7.27 92.76±12.03 11.28±1.65** 7.10±1.04** 21.20±3.56 1.93±0.30 1.01±0.29 R8 65.46±9.69 28.24±3.32 93.70±10.35 9.14±1.45 4.61±1.41 21.80±3.70 2.68±0.54 1.49±0.42 R9 83.10±4.63 19.10±3.40 102.20±5.89 9.49±2.43 6.09±1.71 22.20±1.64* 2.78±0.35 1.41±0.22 R10 93.28±9.13* 35.56±5.82** 128.84±14.02** 10.65±1.43 5.50±0.94 20.80±2.39 3.37±0.55 1.62±0.29 R11 86.16±6.24 26.14±1.89 112.30±7.02* 12.06±2.20** 6.98±0.02** 21.00±1.41 2.50±0.87 1.38±0.36 C1– control uninoculated, C2– Penicillium chrysogenum Thom., C3– Bacterial isolate PB 5, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 4. Effects of dual inoculation of PC and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root(g) PC+R1 51.04±7.59 20.22±1.12 71.26±8.46 11.96±2.29** 7.32±1.24** 21.60±1.67 2.97±0.40 1.55±0.15 PC+R2 89.48±12.31 33.82±8.67** 123.30±8.14** 11.38±3.04** 7.76±1.20** 20.80±1.92 2.61±0.25 1.46±0.20 PC+R3 80.42±12.41 33.98±6.84** 114.40±15.73** 11.18±1.31* 6.37±0.67* 22.00±2.35 2.69±0.26 1.59±0.25 PC+R4 60.04±7.58 44.48±2.30** 104.52±6.94 9.30±1.39 5.05±0.54 23.00±2.24** 3.32±0.31 1.71±0.22 PC+R5 79.40±7.60 18.38±1.21 97.78±6.53 7.91±2.71 3.28±1.22 22.20±2.59* 2.63±0.68 1.46±0.35 PC+R6 82.98±5.42 19.04±0.87 102.02±5.34 10.94±1.32* 5.39±0.79 21.60±3.78 2.47±0.59 1.34±0.47 PC+R7 59.90±10.03 20.26±1.00 80.14±9.31 9.91±0.78 4.97±0.70 21.20±1.79 2.69±0.61 1.64±0.23 PC+R8 80.04±11.14 23.72±2.18 103.72±9.62 10.91±1.03 5.89±0.55 20.80±2.17 2.62±0.60 1.31±0.41 PC+R9 56.26±6.78 32.28±2.53** 88.54±4.41 7.13±1.08 3.39±10 21.20±3.03 2.50±0.43 1.35±0.27 PC+R10 92.14±9.92* 32.64±2.02** 124.78±11.08** 9.72±1.89 6.08±0.98 21.60±1.34 3.84±1.38 2.16±0.95 PC+R11 99.10±6.57** 31.96±3.80** 131.06±6.41** 12.40±1.57** 6.30±0.12* 21.00±1.00 2.68±1.73 1.41±0.40 PC–Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 5. Effects of dual inoculation of PB5 and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) PB5+R1 87.56±11.14 37.60±7.63** 125.16±16.69** 11.84±1.78** 6.31±0.21* 21.60±1.14 2.78±0.30 1.63±0.20 PB5+R2 91.18±26.56* 29.26±5.42** 120.44±30.17** 13.02±1.37** 6.90±1.51** 20.60±1.52 2.32±0.52 1.07±0.46 PB5+R3 5.66±12.72 19.74±1.13 75.40±12.66 11.08±1.19* 5.87±1.28 21.20±0.84 2.40±0.46 1.41±0.46 PB5+R4 60.68±6.91 25.40±3.45 86.08±3.51 11.51±1.02** 6.3±0.88* 20.80±0.84 2.11±0.36 1.2±0.22 PB5+R5 111.36±9.59** 30.30±7.07** 141.66±13.03* 12.99±1.73** 6.80±0.31* 21.00±1.22 2.74±0.27 1.46±0.17 PB5+R6 60.24±15.49 20.46±1.62 80.70±15.44 12.50±1.73** 5.78±1.28 21.20±0.84 3.38±0.72 1.78±0.40 PB5+R7 65.28±6.54 23.80±2.87 89.08±8.09 11.73±2.45** 7.47±0.36** 22.20±1.48* 2.74±0.20 1.51±0.14 PB5+R8 64.74±13.13 25.06±3.06 89.82±13.55 11.97±1.87** 6.11±0.73 21.80±2.17 2.85±0.23 1.63±0.08 PB5+R9 89.34±8.40 30.64±4.27** 119.98±11.00** 10.68±2.68 6.61±2.19* 22.60±1.67* 2.57±0.13 1.42±0.08 PB5+R10 85.86±8.51 31.54±2.16** 117.40±9.64** 11.32±2.37 5.72±1.52 22.60±1.67* 2.72±0.38 1.61±0.29 PB5+R11 101.70±12.19** 35.92±6.31** 137.62±13.87** 11.08±2.14 6.58±1.34* 21.20±1.64 3.29±0.42 1.82±0.41 PB5 Bacterial isolate, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 6. Effects of Triple inoculation of Pencillium chrysogenum, PB 5 and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) CONTROL 70.94±6.62 19.58±1.44 90.52±7.44 8.14±1.31 3.79±0.67 18.60±2.70 2.75±0.18 1.47±0.13 PC+PB5+R1 100.80±11.17** 31.64±5.48** 132.44±14.34** 10.80±1.21 6.06±0.72 21.20±1.64 3.09±0.35 1.68±0.18 PC+PB5+R2 68.04±7.98 25.36±4.23 93.40±9.14 11.33±1.82 5.65±1.40 21.60±0.89 2.56±0.60 1.55±0.43 PC+PB5+R3 81.40±23.42 27.12±5.73 108.52±23.97 11.34±1.20 6.79±0.68* 20.40±0.55 3.02±0.18 1.79±0.20 PC+PB5+R4 89.96±10.45 21.96±1.73 111.92±9.48* 11.01±1.60 6.37±0.27* 21.20±2039 2.78±0.29 1.44±0.12 PC+PB5+R5 98.64±10.25** 36.94±3.75 135.58±11.99** 11.97±2.38 6.21±1.07 21.00±2.55 3.81±0.57 2.05±0.39 PC+PB5+R6 75.66±5.62 32.04±2.05** 107.70±6.73 10.92±1.82 6.26±0.64* 21.60±2.41 3.02±0.78 1.81±0.37 PC+PB5+R7 90.64±12.61** 32.22±3.64** 122.86±12.45** 11.27±2.33 7.20±1.12** 23.60±0.55** 2.96±0.37 1.63±0.15 PC+PB5+R8 78.60±13.66 31.40±2.76** 110.00±11.23 11.88±1.35 6.70±0.38* 22.20±1.79* 2.64±0.48 1.39±0.26 PC+PB5+R9 75.56±10.08 37.08±3.42** 112.64±8.00* 11.59±2.16 6.78±1.31* 20.80±1.92 2.74±0.58 1.46±0.33 PC+PB5+R10 83.80±5.77 42.06±1.93** 125.86±4.31** 13.44±2.45 6.96±1.96** 21.60±2.88 2.96±0.50 1.61±0.18 PC+PB5+R11 73.40±6.02 40.00±6.64** 123.40±3.81** 13.85±1.11 7.69±0.76** 23.60±1.52** 3.28±0.48 1.72±0.28 C– control un- inoculated, PC- Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, PB5– Bacterial isolate, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **)
Effect of microbial inoculation on Acacia nilotica
-
Many of the tropical leguminous trees are reported to fix atmospheric nitrogen through nodule development, endowed with arbuscular mycorrrhizal and other microbial associations. Plantation of such species enrich poor quality soils. Therefore, the seedlings fortified with microbial inoculations may lead to successful in establishment of plants in poor quality sites (Sah et al. 1998, Sahgal et al. 2004). Our study on bioinoculation, selection of PF3, B5, R 11 either individually or in combination may be good proposition for the development of bioinoculant for the development of quality planting material of this forest tree species.
S Dash, N Gupta. 2021. Growth promoting effect of microbial inoculants on Acacia nilotica grown under nursery conditions. Studies in Fungi 6(1):401−407 doi: 10.5943/sif/6/1/30 |