HTML
-
Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) can be considered as the major plant nutrients which occupy a key place in balanced use of fertilizer in plant growth. Phosphorus is important nutrient for growth of legumes and the process of atmospheric nitrogen fixation (Huda et al. 2007). Microorganisms are capable of mineralizing and solubilizing bound nutrients in soil, and make nutrients available in rhizosphere or inhabitant host, thereby enhances the plant growth (Dabas & Kaushik 1998, Sahgal et al. 2004, Tilak et al. 2005, Gupta et al. 2007, Hameeda et al. 2008). It is known that a large number of seedlings of forest species should be used in afforestation in dry deciduous conditions. Microbial application at the nursery stage was also found to be useful in enhancing productivity in some forest trees like Albizzia, Acacia Dalbergia etc. (Varma & Mathur 1989, Sahgal et al. 2004, Dash et al. 2013).
Acacia nilotica is an indigenous multipurpose tree, widely planted under various agroforestry systems. This can be an early successional plant in nutrient poor soils (Purohit et al. 2007). Leaves and pods of Acacia nilotica have been used to feed the goat as traditional food in some parts of the world (Talpur et al. 2008). Faye et al. (2008), studied the symbiotic relationships with specific Rhizobium spp. of two protected forests of Acacia nilotica var. tomentosa in the Senegal river valley. Sarr & Lesueur (2007), studied the influence of soil fertility on the rhizobial competitiveness for nodulation of A. nilotica in nursery conditions and reported that the interactions of inoculated Rhizobium spp. host plant genotype and soil type mainly determine the competitiveness, nodulation, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Sharma et al. (2001) studied the ectomycorrhizal dependency and growth responses of A nilotica and Albizzia lebbeck seedlings with the inoculation of specific densities of spores of Pisolithus tinctorius.
Therefore, knowing the importance of planting Acacia nilotica in the afforestation programme in the nutrient deficient soil, the present study was carried out to develop and appropriate use of bioinoculants for nursery applications. Furthermore, to enhance the quality of planting materials are used in transplantation and field application.
-
Different species of microbial inoculants isolated from
The experiment was carried out in the greenhouse condition (temperature of 35±2℃ and 80±5% relative humidity) within polybags of 2.5 kg capacity filled with sandy loam soil of 6.27. Six phosphate solublizing fungi, Penicillium griseofulvum Diercks (PF1), Penicillium restrictum Gilman & Abott (PF2), Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1 (PF 3), Aspergillus sp.1 (PF4), Aspergillus ornatus (PF5), Aspergillus wentii (PF6), four iron leaching fungi Penicillum expansum (IF1), Paecilomyces variotii (IF2), Cunnighamella elegans (IF3), Penicillium chrysogenum Thom 2 (IF3), five phosphate solublizing bacteria (PB) and 11 Rhizobium isolates were used for the inoculation studies.
Screening of microbial cultures for growth of Acacia nilotica
-
Liquid culture of fungi (7 days old, Czapek dox medium, 4.5 pH) and bacteria (5 days old, Nutrient broth, pH 7.2) were added to each pot (25 ml /pot) prior to seed sowing. The experiment was set in 20 replications. Finally, observations were recorded of 120 days plants (after seed sowing) for shoot height, number of leaves, leaflets, branches developed, fresh and dry biomass of leaves and stems.
Dual inoculation experiment
-
In second phase of experiment, two best microbial strains were selected for tree legume on the basis of their performances in previous experiment. Following experimental sets were taken into consideration; Control: without any inoculation (T1), 50ml broth of Penicillium chrysogenum (T2), 50ml broth of phosphate solubilising bacteria PB 5 (T3), 50ml broth of both fungus and bacteria used in T1 and T2 [T4], 100ml broth of P. chrysogenum + 50ml of PB 5 [T5], 50 ml broth of P. chrysogenum + 100 ml of PB 5 [T6].
Dual Inoculation with Rhizobium isolates
-
In third phase of experiment, two best microbial strains were selected for tree legume on the basis of their performances in previous experiment [1] control uninoculated [2], inoculated with Penicillium chrysogenum [3], inoculated with PB5 [4], individual inoculation of Rhizobium (11 isolates) [5], inoculation with Penicillium chrysogenum, individual Rhizobium [6], inoculation with PB 5 with individual Rhizobium.
Growth analysis
-
Growth parameters were recorded for the experimental plants such as shoot height (cm), root length (cm), number of leaves, leaflets branches, seedling height (cm), collar diameter (mm), fresh and ry biomass of leaf, stem, root, shoot seedling (g) (Al-Garni 2006, Sah et al. 1998, Tewari et al. 2006). One-way ANOVA was done by following Sokal & Rohlf (1981).
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth in terms of plant height, biomass. In spite of this, significant variations were not observed among all the treatments affect plant growth performances. However, fungal strain PF 3 and bacterial isolate PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compared to other microbial inoculants. Bacterial strains showed good effects in enhancing biomass of leaves as compared to fungal inoculants. Finally, these PF 3 + PB 5 were selected for further experimentations on dual inoculations (Table 1). In primary screening, it was observed that in case of root length best results was given by the treatment PF 3 (33.34 ± 3.54cm) followed by PF6 (29.76 ± 2.99 cm) and PF4 (29.60 ± 2.52 cm). Shoot height was enhanced by PF3 (137.58 ± 8.59 cm) and PF2 (133.56 ± 13.05 cm). Inoculation of PB5 and PF 6 were produced high fresh biomass. In case of dry biomass of leaves highest value was found in PB5 (4.13 ± 0.93g) and PF 3 (3.15 ± 0.36g). Hence, screening experiment exhibited the potential of PF3 + PB5 inoculations and selected for further studies.
Table 1. Growth performance of Acacia nilotica grown under different microbial treatments (p > 0.05 *, p > 0.01 **)
Growth Parameters Treatments 1 2 3 4 5 6 Root length(cm) 31.24±10.27 35.00±3.78 44.74±6.66* 39.80±2.94 44.78±11.93* 42.56±7.42 Shoot height(cm) 84.46±25.00 132.92±8.87** 134.56±6.74** 140.54±5.88** 117.78±12.72* 124.06±21.24** Fresh biomass(g) 4.33±2.57 7.62±1.45 13.21±3.22** 14.69±3.58** 13.70±3.46** 14.57±1.57** Dry biomass(g) 1.82±1.42 5.04±1.17 6.41±1.64** 7.55±1.76** 7.56±1.85** 7.98±0.55** 1- control, 2- Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, 3 - Bacterial isolate 5, 4 -both fungal and bacterial strains equal amount, 5- both fungal and bacterial isolates in 2:1 ratio, 6- both fungal and bacterial isolates in 1:2 ratio, (p > 0.05 *, p > 0.01 **) Effect of dual inoculation on Acacia nilotica
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth. Fungal strain PF3+ PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compared to other treatments in combination (Table 2). In the secondary screening shoot height was enhanced in the treatment of PF3 + PB5 in 1:1 ratio (140.54 ± 5.88 g). This combination had also improved the biomass of plants. The combination of both the microbes in equal proportion was found to be the most effective for the plant.
Table 2. Effect of selected bioinoculant fungal and bacterial strains on growth of Acacia nilotica grown under pot culture conditions
Shoot height (cm) Fresh biomass leaves (g) Dry biomass leaves (g) CONTROL 112.76±29.60 3.54±1.93 2.07±1.77 Penicillium grisefulvum 114.02±14.81 4.23±1.08 2.14±1.02 Penicillium restrictum 133.56±13.05 4.41±1.39 1.90±0.87 Penicillium crysogenum 137.58±8.59* 7.25±2.02 3.15±0.36* Aspergillus species 116.30±22.95 4.13±2.64 0.85±0.55 Aspergillus ornatus 119.42±20.45 11.76±4.94 1.80±0.11 Aspergillus wentii 122.72±17.30 1.42±0.57 4.57±2.87* Penicillum expansum 122.98±8.34 3.26±1.27 1.08±0.41 Paecilomyces variotii 121.70±13.22 9.82±6.02 1.35±0.34 Cunnighamella elegans 97.22±29.73 7.94±1.97 1.94±0.80 Bacterial isolate PB1 115.76±12.70 8.13±2.07 3.04±1.36 Bacterial isolate PB2 104.96±6.92 8.27±4.91 2.88±1.04 Bacterial isolate PB3 108.26±10.07 8.27±4.91 3.02±2.04 Bacterial isolate PB4 119.96±7.41 9.89±1.99 2.96±0.20 Bacterial isolate PB5 95.18±33.11 12.89±2.75* 4.13±0.93* Effect of dual inoculations with Rhizobium
-
The plants of A. nilotica grown under different treatment along with control untreated plants exhibited good growth in terms of plant height and biomass. Microbial strain PF 3 + PB5 showed better effects in enhancing plant growth as compare to other treatments in combination with R4 and R5 respectively (Tables 3-6). In the present study, individual inoculation of R4 exhibited increase of shoot height (118.72 ± 6.58 cm) compared to B5 + R5 (111.36 ± 9.59 cm). Root length was found to be enhanced in case of PF3+ R4 (44.48 ± 2.30 cm), PF3 + B5 + R10 (42.06 ± 1.93cm) followed by treatment of PF3 + PB5 + R11 (40.00 ± 6.64 cm). The plants which were grown under this microbial combination of inoculants had produced good biomass, collar diameter as compared to other treatments. By analyzing all the growth parameters for Acacia nilotica, the best treatments were combination of PF3 (Penicillium chrysogenum Thom 1), PB5 and R11 (Rhizobium sp.). Though the test plants were found to be infected with Rhizobium but a very poor performance was observed as far as root nodule formation is concerned.
Table 3. Effects of selected microbial inoculants and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Shootheight (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) C 1 70.94±6.62 19.58±1.44 90.52±7.44 8.14±1.31 3.79±0.67 18.60±2.70 2.75±0.18 1.47±0.13 C2 95.90±23.30** 30.96±3.31** 126.84±24.30** 10.27±1.50 5.29±0.67 21.20±1.92 2.62±0.41 1.37±0.29 C3 84.66±10.49 28.10±6.20* 112.76±14.56* 10.33±0.58 6.37±0.25* 20.22±2.12 2.49±0.25 1.37±0.21 R1 83.94±5.33 22.48±1.34 106.42±6.57 9.46±3.40 5.37±2.46 21.40±1.52 2.49±0.43 1.37±0.25 R2 108.02±9.29** 24.26±6.78 132.28±12.90** 10.32±1.39 6.59±0.48* 21.60±1.95 2.76±0.26 1.47±0.17 R3 99.04±9.43** 30.10±10.27** 129.14±17.55** 10.60±1.18 5.24±0.98 20.60±0.89 2.80±0.49 1.60±0.33 R4 118.72±6.58** 20.28±1.51 139.00±6.90** 9.84±1.60 6.00±1.41 20.60±0.89 3.11±0.38 1.69±0.18 R5 79.14±11.16 25.24±4.02 104.38±7.44 10.73±1.24 6.22±1.07 22.00±2.35 2.67±0.36 1.79±0.47 R6 71.90±7.74 31.12±5.84** 103.02±4.24 11.45±1.80** 6.14±1.05 19.00±2.55 3.15±0.33 1.74±0.45 R7 67.82±9.69 24.94±7.27 92.76±12.03 11.28±1.65** 7.10±1.04** 21.20±3.56 1.93±0.30 1.01±0.29 R8 65.46±9.69 28.24±3.32 93.70±10.35 9.14±1.45 4.61±1.41 21.80±3.70 2.68±0.54 1.49±0.42 R9 83.10±4.63 19.10±3.40 102.20±5.89 9.49±2.43 6.09±1.71 22.20±1.64* 2.78±0.35 1.41±0.22 R10 93.28±9.13* 35.56±5.82** 128.84±14.02** 10.65±1.43 5.50±0.94 20.80±2.39 3.37±0.55 1.62±0.29 R11 86.16±6.24 26.14±1.89 112.30±7.02* 12.06±2.20** 6.98±0.02** 21.00±1.41 2.50±0.87 1.38±0.36 C1– control uninoculated, C2– Penicillium chrysogenum Thom., C3– Bacterial isolate PB 5, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 4. Effects of dual inoculation of PC and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root(g) PC+R1 51.04±7.59 20.22±1.12 71.26±8.46 11.96±2.29** 7.32±1.24** 21.60±1.67 2.97±0.40 1.55±0.15 PC+R2 89.48±12.31 33.82±8.67** 123.30±8.14** 11.38±3.04** 7.76±1.20** 20.80±1.92 2.61±0.25 1.46±0.20 PC+R3 80.42±12.41 33.98±6.84** 114.40±15.73** 11.18±1.31* 6.37±0.67* 22.00±2.35 2.69±0.26 1.59±0.25 PC+R4 60.04±7.58 44.48±2.30** 104.52±6.94 9.30±1.39 5.05±0.54 23.00±2.24** 3.32±0.31 1.71±0.22 PC+R5 79.40±7.60 18.38±1.21 97.78±6.53 7.91±2.71 3.28±1.22 22.20±2.59* 2.63±0.68 1.46±0.35 PC+R6 82.98±5.42 19.04±0.87 102.02±5.34 10.94±1.32* 5.39±0.79 21.60±3.78 2.47±0.59 1.34±0.47 PC+R7 59.90±10.03 20.26±1.00 80.14±9.31 9.91±0.78 4.97±0.70 21.20±1.79 2.69±0.61 1.64±0.23 PC+R8 80.04±11.14 23.72±2.18 103.72±9.62 10.91±1.03 5.89±0.55 20.80±2.17 2.62±0.60 1.31±0.41 PC+R9 56.26±6.78 32.28±2.53** 88.54±4.41 7.13±1.08 3.39±10 21.20±3.03 2.50±0.43 1.35±0.27 PC+R10 92.14±9.92* 32.64±2.02** 124.78±11.08** 9.72±1.89 6.08±0.98 21.60±1.34 3.84±1.38 2.16±0.95 PC+R11 99.10±6.57** 31.96±3.80** 131.06±6.41** 12.40±1.57** 6.30±0.12* 21.00±1.00 2.68±1.73 1.41±0.40 PC–Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 5. Effects of dual inoculation of PB5 and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) PB5+R1 87.56±11.14 37.60±7.63** 125.16±16.69** 11.84±1.78** 6.31±0.21* 21.60±1.14 2.78±0.30 1.63±0.20 PB5+R2 91.18±26.56* 29.26±5.42** 120.44±30.17** 13.02±1.37** 6.90±1.51** 20.60±1.52 2.32±0.52 1.07±0.46 PB5+R3 5.66±12.72 19.74±1.13 75.40±12.66 11.08±1.19* 5.87±1.28 21.20±0.84 2.40±0.46 1.41±0.46 PB5+R4 60.68±6.91 25.40±3.45 86.08±3.51 11.51±1.02** 6.3±0.88* 20.80±0.84 2.11±0.36 1.2±0.22 PB5+R5 111.36±9.59** 30.30±7.07** 141.66±13.03* 12.99±1.73** 6.80±0.31* 21.00±1.22 2.74±0.27 1.46±0.17 PB5+R6 60.24±15.49 20.46±1.62 80.70±15.44 12.50±1.73** 5.78±1.28 21.20±0.84 3.38±0.72 1.78±0.40 PB5+R7 65.28±6.54 23.80±2.87 89.08±8.09 11.73±2.45** 7.47±0.36** 22.20±1.48* 2.74±0.20 1.51±0.14 PB5+R8 64.74±13.13 25.06±3.06 89.82±13.55 11.97±1.87** 6.11±0.73 21.80±2.17 2.85±0.23 1.63±0.08 PB5+R9 89.34±8.40 30.64±4.27** 119.98±11.00** 10.68±2.68 6.61±2.19* 22.60±1.67* 2.57±0.13 1.42±0.08 PB5+R10 85.86±8.51 31.54±2.16** 117.40±9.64** 11.32±2.37 5.72±1.52 22.60±1.67* 2.72±0.38 1.61±0.29 PB5+R11 101.70±12.19** 35.92±6.31** 137.62±13.87** 11.08±2.14 6.58±1.34* 21.20±1.64 3.29±0.42 1.82±0.41 PB5 Bacterial isolate, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **) Table 6. Effects of Triple inoculation of Pencillium chrysogenum, PB 5 and Rhizobium on growth of Acacia nilotica
Treatment Shoot height (cm) Root length (cm) Seedling height (cm) FBM leaf (g) DBM leaf (g) Collar dia (cm) FBM root (g) DBM root (g) CONTROL 70.94±6.62 19.58±1.44 90.52±7.44 8.14±1.31 3.79±0.67 18.60±2.70 2.75±0.18 1.47±0.13 PC+PB5+R1 100.80±11.17** 31.64±5.48** 132.44±14.34** 10.80±1.21 6.06±0.72 21.20±1.64 3.09±0.35 1.68±0.18 PC+PB5+R2 68.04±7.98 25.36±4.23 93.40±9.14 11.33±1.82 5.65±1.40 21.60±0.89 2.56±0.60 1.55±0.43 PC+PB5+R3 81.40±23.42 27.12±5.73 108.52±23.97 11.34±1.20 6.79±0.68* 20.40±0.55 3.02±0.18 1.79±0.20 PC+PB5+R4 89.96±10.45 21.96±1.73 111.92±9.48* 11.01±1.60 6.37±0.27* 21.20±2039 2.78±0.29 1.44±0.12 PC+PB5+R5 98.64±10.25** 36.94±3.75 135.58±11.99** 11.97±2.38 6.21±1.07 21.00±2.55 3.81±0.57 2.05±0.39 PC+PB5+R6 75.66±5.62 32.04±2.05** 107.70±6.73 10.92±1.82 6.26±0.64* 21.60±2.41 3.02±0.78 1.81±0.37 PC+PB5+R7 90.64±12.61** 32.22±3.64** 122.86±12.45** 11.27±2.33 7.20±1.12** 23.60±0.55** 2.96±0.37 1.63±0.15 PC+PB5+R8 78.60±13.66 31.40±2.76** 110.00±11.23 11.88±1.35 6.70±0.38* 22.20±1.79* 2.64±0.48 1.39±0.26 PC+PB5+R9 75.56±10.08 37.08±3.42** 112.64±8.00* 11.59±2.16 6.78±1.31* 20.80±1.92 2.74±0.58 1.46±0.33 PC+PB5+R10 83.80±5.77 42.06±1.93** 125.86±4.31** 13.44±2.45 6.96±1.96** 21.60±2.88 2.96±0.50 1.61±0.18 PC+PB5+R11 73.40±6.02 40.00±6.64** 123.40±3.81** 13.85±1.11 7.69±0.76** 23.60±1.52** 3.28±0.48 1.72±0.28 C– control un- inoculated, PC- Penicillium chrysogenum Thom. 1, PB5– Bacterial isolate, R1-R11 –Rhizobial isolates (p>0.05 *, p>0.01 **)
Effect of microbial inoculation on Acacia nilotica
-
The morphological studies done on the Acacia nilotica grown under bio-inoculations elucidated the positive impact of microbial cultures on plant growth, provided suitability of some inoculants for producing better growth, dry biomass in test plants when compared with the uninoculated control. Specifically, the fungal sp. appeared better in providing benefits to these plants in general. It is evident that after inoculation, the increment of seedling height of inoculated seedling is very high as compared to control. The superiority of P. chrysogenum is clearly evident indicated the differential response of microbial inoculations towards the growth and development of the host species
Test plants of Acacia nilotica, was inoculated by the most effective mineral solubilisers showed double symbiotic benefits in terms of nitrogen and phosphorus under periodic experimental conditions. Microbial inoculation of tree legume species with mineral solubilisers, nitrogen fixing bacteria not only enhanced the above ground biomass but also provided a well-developed root system which indirectly helpful in balanced nutrient supply. Hence application of such inoculants at nursery stage may produce quality planting material and useful for reforestation programme. In the present study, nodulation pattern in A. nilotica was very poor. Since, study was carried out for only four months; role of inoculated Rhizobium, their effects on performance of host plants is difficult to be interpreted. However, during screening experiments for evaluation of bioinoculants of mineral solubilisers, especially phosphate solubilising microbes, and Rhizobium isolates, the seedlings was found to be manifested with root nodule though it was very poor, could not be recorded for its number, size, and the structure. Hence, the role of Rhizobium inoculants in the performance of test plants cannot be interpreted well.
-
Many of the tropical leguminous trees are reported to fix atmospheric nitrogen through nodule development, endowed with arbuscular mycorrrhizal and other microbial associations. Plantation of such species enrich poor quality soils. Therefore, the seedlings fortified with microbial inoculations may lead to successful in establishment of plants in poor quality sites (Sah et al. 1998, Sahgal et al. 2004). Our study on bioinoculation, selection of PF3, B5, R 11 either individually or in combination may be good proposition for the development of bioinoculant for the development of quality planting material of this forest tree species.
- We are thankful to Ministry of environment, forest, climate change, Govt. of India for financial support through project no 23/22/2006-RE Authors are also thankful to the Chief Executive, Regional Plant Resource Centre, Bhubaneswar Odisha, for providing necessary laboratory and field facilities.
- Copyright: © 2021 by the author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
S Dash, N Gupta. 2021. Growth promoting effect of microbial inoculants on Acacia nilotica grown under nursery conditions. Studies in Fungi 6(1):401−407 doi: 10.5943/sif/6/1/30 |