-
Pretreatment methods of WCO, prior to further processing WCO into various useful products such as alkyd resin, green solvent, soap, plastics, etc., are essential to remove or reduce the FFA content or any impurities present in WCO. Pretreatments are required in refining and upgrading WCOs, which help to further produce suitable WCO-based feedstocks for value-added applications in oleochemical industries. Aforementioned, the physicochemical properties and nature of WCOs vary and thus largely affect the required pretreatment processes. Majorily, the variables affecting the physicochemical properties of WCOs are the origin of cooking oil and the parameters of the frying process such as the temperature, duration and method used. In biodiesel production, the WCOs have to achieve certain quality requirements with respect to the acidity, moisture content and iodine value[20,21]. In the production of solvents and lubricants, the performance and efficiency of catalysts in successive operations are strongly dependent on the composition of WCO feedstock, which must be free from sulfur and metal elements. On top of that, bleaching is necessary as a pretreatment prior to the fabrication of WCO-based monomers and additives for resins and polymers as a light-toned colour is the key aspect. The bleaching process can be done using bleaching earths as adsorbents, oxidizing agents for chemical bleaching or treatment with solvents via liquid-liquid extraction[22]. In the case of WCO-based surfactants production, it is crucial to eliminate toxic or hazardous components during the pretreatment processes[23]. During the process of synthesising plasticizers from WCOs, the content of volatiles must be reduced to avoid generating vapour and bubbles during the entire process. In contrast, the pretreatment process required is less restricted when WCO is employed as drop-in additives for asphalts and concrete manufacture. This is because WCOs as drop-in additives have more flexibility and tolerance to the undesirable characteristics such as odour and appearance compared to other oleochemical production[24]. At present, several pretreatment techniques are either being implemented commercially or under investigation.
Removal of solid impurities
-
Initially, WCOs are treated via physical routes to remove the suspended solid impurities, oligomers and gums which lead to fouling and pipeline hindrance. Generally, WCOs contain roughly 10−20% of solids, depending on the cooking process and waste management methods utilized. The carbohydrate and protein components in WCOs assist the oil emulsification with water by acting as surfactants, while promoting the initiation of aggregates and solid suspension. Since highly saturated oils appear solid at room temperature, they tend to form larger aggregates and capture other solid residues[24]. Hence, it is important to destabilize the water-in-oil emulsions to stimulate oil extraction and solid removal, as well as to melt the solid lipid fraction completely to set free the trapped water and residues[25]. At the first stage of filtration, fabric bags or stainless strainers with sieve diameter of 150−200 µm are used to filter coarse particles. Next, fine filtration is proceeded by utilizing 70−100 µm stainless steel meshes, together with heating at 60−65 °C via the addition of steam. Heating the oil not only helps to melt the solid fats, it is also advantageous to reduce the viscosity and ease the transportation process through pumping. The liquid will be stored in heated tanks at 60 °C after fine filtration as this can help to maintain the viscosity of oil[25,26]. Moreover, centrifugation is a common method to separate water and remove solid particulates from the WCOs. Due to higher capital and operating costs, it is usually utilized in large-scale operations which work continuously[24]. According to Skelton[27], the contamination standard for solid separation of WCOs is 24 mg kg−1, while the water content is limited to 500 ppm, as established in EN 14214 by the European Committee[27].
Reduction of free fatty acid
-
In addition, the acid value in the WCOs is found to be noticeably high as compared to virgin vegetable oils, which is mainly due to the hydrolysis of acyl glycerides into free fatty acids[28,29]. In fact, the maximum acidity content acceptable is at 5 wt%. Thus, FFA reduction is a crucial pretreatment process to ensure the acidity does not cause negative impacts during valorisation processes of WCOs[24]. There are several conventional approaches, including neutralization and esterification as chemical methods, while distillation, extraction with solvent or supercritical fluid, adsorption and membrane separation as physical means. Neutralization is carried out with alkaline solutions to neutralize acids by precipitating FFA as soaps while producing water as by-products. Sodium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide are commonly used alkaline solutions in the treatment and the soap produced will be removed via centrifugation or water washing methods[30]. Moreover, esterification of FFA in WCOs with alcohols to produce esters is a different approach to reduce the FFA content. The common esterification process uses methanol as the alcohol to produce methyl ester and water. By using glycerol, the FFA can be converted into mono-, di- or triglycerides[24,30]. These reactions can be catalyzed by homogeneous acid catalysts, heterogeneous base catalysts and other acid catalysts[24,31]. Al-Sakkari et al.[32] compared the conversion efficiency of FFA into methyl esters by using two type of catalysts, which are sulphuric acid as the homogeneous acid catalyst and cement kiln dust (CKD) as a heterogeneous catalyst. Comparatively, esterification catalyzed by sulphuric acid had achieved a conversion of 96.2%, whereas 98.8% for the economical CKD catalyst[32]. Abidin et al.[31] also found that the high conversion of FFA into methyl ester at 92%, was catalyzed by Purolite D5081 as the ion-exchange resin[31].
On the other hand, glycerolysis that uses glycerol to break the chemical bonds between FFA into glycerides as stated, is advantageous in reducing FFA content. Previously, glycerolysis was found to be relatively inefficient due to the requirement of high temperature, long reaction time and high energy consumption. As a solution, Gopinathan et al.[33] investigated an alternative that uses continuous flow microwave irradiation for glycerolysis reaction. This technique, with lower energy intensity, was able to reduce FFA from 3.95% to 0.34% under the operating conditions of 1:1 oil to glycerol molar ratio, 10 min reaction time and pump speed of 70 rpm[33]. Additionally, FFA removal using biological methods is currently under investigation. It was discovered that Pseudomonas sp. has the capability to utilize FFA as a carbon source to promote their growth. However, the inability to utilize the short chain fatty acids has been the major drawback[30]. Recently, Bacillus thermoamylovorans was discovered to have the potential to reduce FFA content through the conversion into polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) where WCOs act as the substrate. At the laboratory scale, the pretreated WCOs had a FFA content of 0.99%, which was largely reduced from 3.5% initially. Meanwhile, 3.47 g/L of PHA was produced under optimal conditions of 45 °C, agitation speed of 200 rpm and 50 g/L WCOs[34]. This biological pretreatment technique is promising for industrialization as the FFA content is found to be lower than 1% after pretreatment, and value-added products like PHA can be produced.
Furthermore, distillation as a physical method is a common approach which is used to reduce FFA content, mainly vacuum and stripping distillations. Vacuum distillation is simple, with high applicability as it is able to produce desired glycerides by separating them from FFA and water. Compared to glycerides, acidic compounds and water have higher volatility. Hence, able to be removed from crude WCOs in a simpler way. Moreover, other volatile components can be removed simultaneously through distillation, including hydrocarbons, aldehydes, ketones etc[24,35]. As a result, FFA content can be reduced from 6.2% to 4.3% via distillation[25]. In addition, FFA removal can be done through solvent extraction by using solvent as the separation agent to extract FFA selectively, which is the solute of interest in this case. The mechanism behind is the solubility difference of FFA between WCOs and solvent which acts as a driving force for this selective separation. It can be performed in single or multiple stages to improve the contact. The effectiveness of the extraction process is strongly influenced by the type of solvent used. In this regard, Hansen solubility parameter functions as an elementary parameter to estimate the affinity of FFA, by evaluating the similarity of solvent as well as the loading required[24,36]. Ethanol has been a conventional solvent used for the extraction process and able to reduce the acid content below 0.1% with multistage liquid film contactor as the contact device and solvent to oil ratio of 2:1[24]. Likewise, extraction using supercritical fluid such as carbon dioxide at low temperature and high pressure is advantageous as well. This is because the characteristics of carbon dioxide such as high availability, low toxicity and low cost, have made it a superior solvent which is simple to utilize and safe. In fact, the extraction performance is enhanced using ethanol as co-solvent[24,37].
As mentioned, FFA content can be reduced conventionally via an adsorption process where covalent bonds are formed between the active materials and the carboxylic constituents of acid compounds. Not only being used for acidity adsorption, it can also get rid of the coloured compounds to enhance the colour of refined WCOs[24,38]. It was conducted by heating the WCOs at a reduced pressure before undergoing a dual-stage adsorption with activated carbon and adsorbent with hydrophilic properties such as activated alumina or silica gel[35]. By using column chromatography with magnesium silicate and aluminium oxide, Lee et al.[39] were able to reduce FFA content from 10.6 wt% to 0.23 wt%[39]. Alternatively, agro-waste like rice husk can be an adsorbent that achieves a reduction capacity of 63%, which is similar to the conventional activated carbon. Notwithstanding the similar capacity of FFA reduction in WCOs, the utilization of rice husk is more favourable comparatively. For example, rice husk as an adsorbent is able to achieve its maximum capacity in a shorter time without catalysts, which leads to higher energy and cost efficiencies[40]. On top of that, using membrane technology to separate FFA from WCOs is promising due to the relatively low energy consumption and its ability to retain nutrients after separation. Membrane separation is basically driven by the pressure gradient established, as well as the differences of components in terms of molecular weight, size, shape and physicochemical interactions with the membrane. As compared to triglycerides with molecular weight greater than 800 g/mol, FFA only has a molecular weight of less than 300 g/mol. Owing to the difference, undesired components in WCOs such as FFA and low molecular weight hydrocarbons are able to be separated selectively[24,41]. In general, there are two major categories of materials used to fabricate membranes, which are polymers including polyamide, cellulose acetate and polysulfone; as well as metals and ceramic materials such as stainless steel and alumina. As reported by Mannu et al.[41], polyethersulfone membrane modified with hexamethyldisiloxane is able to retain 35.3%−40% of FFA after operation[41].
Fig. 1 outlines current FFA reduction techniques, while Table 1 summarizes the pros and cons of the techniques discussed along with the proposed acidity removal efficiency from past research. Neutralization and esterification are the most commonly used methods in removing FFA contents of vegetable oils due to their high effectiveness in reducing the acid value and are applicable for a wide range of WCOs properties. Additionally, esterification can also be associated simultaneously with transesterification of WCO in biodiesel production. However, major disadvantages also present in these methods which complicate the operations in scaling up for commercialization.
Table 1. Pros and cons between the existing techniques for FFA removal from WCO.
Techniques Process Pros Cons Acid removal References Chemical methods Neutralization Lesser energy usage Suitable for WCOs with different origins Higher removal selectivity Produce soaps and wastewater Reduce triglyceride content Large amount of water needed during washing process Up to < 1 wt% Pinzi[42],
Rodrigues and Meirelles[43], Shahidi[44], Tanzer et al.[45]Esterification Higher efficiency Suitable for WCOs from different origins Flexible working principle (simultaneous esterification-transesterification in biodiesel production) Higher processing costs Produce wastewater Cause corrosion if homogeneous acidic catalysts are used Able to achieve 100% acid conversion Mendecka et al.[21], Vaisali et al.[30], Divakar and Manohar[46], Elias et al.[47], Saravanan et al.[48] Physical methods Distillation Simple and universal applicability Simultaneous removal of other volatile components Less amount of waste generated Good quality of FFA High capital and operating costs Large energy consumption Vacuum system operates with steam jets and can generate higher wastewater Up to < 1 wt% Cárdenas et al.[24], Maddikeri et al.[35], Rodrigues and Meirelles[43], Shahidi[44], Yuan et al.[49] Extraction with solvent or supercritical fluid No generation of by-products Low energy consumption Low loss of WCO during extraction High capital and equipment costs Selection of solvent with low reactivity and high thermal stability is critical From 2−4 wt% to < 0.1 wt% Cárdenas et al.[24], Rodrigues and Meirelles[43], Bhosle and Subramanian[50], Meirelles[51] Adsorption Enhance the color of WCO by removing α and β unsaturated carbonyl compounds Applicable even under the presence of different impurities in WCO Large amount of absorbents are required Solid waste generation High separation effectiveness is required prior to industrial implementation Roughly 65%–80% efficiency Cárdenas et al.[24], Rahayu et al.[38], Rincón et al.[52], Sumnu and Sahin[53] Membrane separation Able to achieve selective FFA separation Lower energy consumption Improved FFA quality Higher yield of WCO Cost of membranes is very high High generation of solid waste Solvent is required to achieve separation Usually associated with solvent extraction with similar removal efficiency Cárdenas et al.[24],
Vaisali et al.[30], Bhosle and Subramanian[50],
Ladhe and Kumar[54]Removal of moisture, sulfur, phosphorus, and nitrogen containing compounds
-
Moisture removal is crucial to prevent adverse impact in subsequent oleochemical processes and the occurrence of microbial or enzymatic degradation during operation and storage. The presence of water will cause hydrolysis of glycerides into FFA, which is undesirable. In general, water is being removed together with acid compounds when undergoing the various pretreatment methods stated. For instance, steam stripping, adsorption, membrane separation and solvent extraction are able to eliminate water content during operations. Other than that, heating WCOs at 60 °C for 10 min by microwave is found to be efficient in removing water content at low energy intensity[24]. The polar compounds in WCOs can also affect the quality through degradation when the amount is greater than 25% by mass[55]. During pretreatment with distillation, polar compounds with high volatility will be removed along with FFA while polar compounds with larger size can be eliminated during the adsorption process. Presently, the combination of distillation and adsorption is implemented industrially to eliminate polar compounds. Solvent extraction with water or aqueous acid solutions are capable of removing these compounds also. They also can be removed through polar membrane separation although low effectiveness in commercialization was observed. Even so, it was found to have potential in achieving 40% reduction of polar compounds after being processed[24].
The quality of WCOs as oleochemical feedstocks is also dependent on the sulfur, phosphorus and nitrogen containing compounds. According to the requirement established by EN 14214, the maximum acceptable content for sulfur is 10 ppm, while for phosphorus is 4 ppm[56]. Sulfur and phosphorus have the ability to deactivate the active sites of catalysts in subsequent operations and corrode the operating equipment. As a solution, adsorption, solvent extraction, precipitation and oxidation reaction are the most common methods used to get rid of sulfur compounds in WCOs. Besides, hydration of phosphatides using saline solutions or dilute acids is used to remove phosphorus compounds in WCOs, along with the removal of waxes, gums and other impurities through degumming process[24]. Some compounds in WCOs such as aldehydes, ketones, FFA, sulfur and phosphorus with unpleasant odour might be transferred to oleochemical derivatives during subsequent processes. Fortunately, these unpleasant odours are being removed predominantly during the pretreatment with steam distillation[30]. Further deodorization and flavour enhancement processes can be performed at the final stage. This is done by evaporation and distillation of refined WCOs using superheated steam entrainment that operates under vacuum conditions at elevated temperatures around 150−160 °C[24]. Eventually, the final end product after a series of pretreatment processes will be high quality refined WCOs which are odourless and light in colour[30]. As a result, the enhancement of the sensory properties of WCOs after removal of problematic impurities has enlarged the possible applications of WCOs.
-
Briefly, the accelerating consumption of cooking oil without proper management and regulations prompts environmental problems such as contamination of sea water and groundwater due to the direct disposal of WCO into water drainage. Hence, regulations related to the utilization of WCO-based products or fuels in certain sectors should be promulgated in each country in order to eventually actualize the ideal model of the current business world, which is a circular economy. Preliminarily, the collection procedures or system enforced by the local government must be relatively matured in order to resolve the current issue on low recovery rate of WCO which hardens the commercialization of WCO-based products. Indeed, the heterogenous characteristics of WCO is mainly due to the different oil origins as well as the extent of cooking process. Therefore, characterization of WCO prior to its valorisation is significant to thoroughly examine the suitability of WCO in a certain application. Generally, high FFA content in WCO which leads to higher viscosity can be pre-treated via neutralization (chemical approach) or distillation (physical approach) by transforming FFA into soaps or desired glycerides respectively. Removal of solid impurities and unwanted compounds such as sulphur and nitrogen-containing compounds are required prior to the valorisation of WCO. In essence, oleochemicals such as alkyd resin, green solvent and plastics as well as plasticizers are indeed possible to be produced using WCO as explained in this article. Each of the investigations have successfully proven that WCO is not only improving the current-existed products, but also reducing the dependency of the present-day industrial activities on petroleum sources. Last but not least, although the use of WCO in the production of biodiesel seems permissible nowadays, the exploration of other potential of WCO is still promising in the future so as to broadly utilize the overwhelm of WCO in different sectors.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Foo WH, Koay SSN, Tang DYY, Chia WY, Chew KW, et al. 2022. Safety control of waste cooking oil: transforming hazard into multifarious products with available pre-treatment processes. Food Materials Research 2:1 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2022-0001
Safety control of waste cooking oil: transforming hazard into multifarious products with available pre-treatment processes
- Received: 18 November 2021
- Accepted: 23 December 2021
- Published online: 06 January 2022
Abstract: The increase in worldwide vegetable oil consumption has produced a large increase in hazardous waste cooking oil (WCO) production. The improper disposal of WCO has been a significant problem from both an environmental and economic perspective. Therefore, it is advantageous to transform WCOs into valuable products efficiently and effectively in order to contribute towards the establishment of a circular economy. In this review, the current state of WCO is discussed in relation to WCO production and valorisation. The valorisation rate of each country can be categorised into three groups related to the consumption of vegetable oil, production and valorisation of WCO, as well as the production, conversion and valorisation factors. Before any valorisation and processing of WCO can be carried out, pretreatments are crucially needed in refining and upgrading WCOs, specifically to reduce their free fatty acid (FFA) contents. This could help to produce refined WCOs with appropriate feedstock properties suitable for value-added applications in oleochemical industries. Hence, several pretreatment methods (e.g., solid impurities removal, FFA reduction, moisture removal) have been summarized and evaluated in depth. The transformation of WCO into valuable products including alkyd resin, green solvent, soap, plastics and plasticizer are also reviewed. Recent technological advances have made WCO feasible as sustainable feedstocks for oleochemical production, but not limited to biofuel production which in turn maximizes the value of this hazardous waste and turns WCO into a sustainable source.
-
Key words:
- Esterification /
- Free fatty acids /
- Valorisation /
- Alkyd resin /
- Green solvent /
- Soap