Search
2022 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting

More Information
  • Soil salinity is a serious threat to horticultural production. Improving salt tolerance of vegetables by breeding is a difficult task as salt tolerance is a quantitative trait, regulated by a large number of genes. As a traditional agronomic method, grafting, which is widely practiced in vegetables, especially among members of Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae, is a useful tool for reducing yield loss caused by salinity. However, the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon remain largely unknown. Numerous studies have been conducted to uncover these mechanisms by which grafting improves salt tolerance in vegetables. This review summarizes the studies that have been conducted on this topic. In this review, the effects of salt stress on vegetable crops were discussed, and the four main mechanisms by which grafting increases the salt resistance of vegetables, namely, restricting the transport of toxic ions, enhancing the antioxidant system, enhancing the stability of the photosynthetic system, and sending root signals, were discussed. This review concludes by identifying several prospects for future research on increasing the adoption of grafting in vegetables under salinity stress.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Giordano M, Petropoulos SA, Rouphael Y. 2021. Response and defence mechanisms of vegetable crops against drought, heat and salinity stress. Agriculture 11:463

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture11050463

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kronzucker HJ, Britto DT. 2011. Sodium transport in plants: a critical review. New Phytologist 189:54−81

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03540.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhu J. 2000. Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 124:941−48

    doi: 10.1104/pp.124.3.941

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Edelstein M, Cohen R, Baumkoler F, Ben-Hur M. 2017. Using grafted vegetables to increase tolerance to salt and toxic elements. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 64:3−20

    doi: 10.1080/07929978.2016.1151285

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Roychoudhury A, Paul S, Basu S. 2013. Cross-talk between abscisic acid-dependent and abscisic acid-independent pathways during abiotic stress. Plant Cell Reports 32:985−1006

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1414-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Arzani A. 2008. Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants: a biotechnological view. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology -Plant 44:373−83

    doi: 10.1007/s11627-008-9157-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Colla G, Rouphael Y, Leonardi C, Bie Z. 2010. Role of grafting in vegetable crops grown under saline conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 127:147−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Huang Y, Bie Z, Liu P, Niu M, Zhen A, et al. 2013. Reciprocal grafting between cucumber and pumpkin demonstrates the roles of the rootstock in the determination of cucumber salt tolerance and sodium accumulation. Scientia Horticulturae 149:47−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.04.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Liu Z, Bie Z, Huang Y, Zhen A, Niu M, et al. 2013. Rootstocks improve cucumber photosynthesis through nitrogen metabolism regulation under salt stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35:2259−67

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1262-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Niu M, Xie J, Chen C, Cao H, Sun J, et al. 2018. An early ABA-induced stomatal closure, Na+ sequestration in leaf vein and K+ retention in mesophyll confer salt tissue tolerance in Cucurbita species. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:4945−60

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Penella C, Nebauer S, López-Galarza S, Quiñones A, Bautista A, et al. 2017. Grafting pepper onto tolerant rootstocks: An environmental-friendly technique overcome water and salt stress. Scientia Horticulturae 226:33−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Parthasarathi T, Ephrath JE, Lazarovitch N. 2021. Grafting of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) onto potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to improve salinity tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae 282:110050

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Semi̇z GD, Suarez DL. 2015. Tomato salt tolerance: impact of grafting and water compositionon yield and ion relations. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39:876−86

    doi: 10.3906/tar-1412-106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kacjan Maršić N, Štolfa P, Vodnik D, Košmelj K, Mikulič-Petkovšek M, et al. 2021. Physiological and biochemical responses of ungrafted and grafted bell pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum (L. ) Sendtn. ) grown under moderate salt stress. Plants-Basel 10:314

    doi: 10.3390/plants10020314

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Huang Y, Kong Q, Chen F, Bie Z. 2015. The history, current status and future prospects of vegetable grafting in China. Acta Horticulturae 1086:31−39

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1086.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Echevarria PH, et al. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae 127:93−105

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Zrenner R, Schwarz D. 2017. Vegetable grafting: The implications of a growing agronomic imperative for vegetable fruit quality and nutritive value. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:741

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kubota C, Meng C, Son Y, Lewis M, Spalholz H, et al. 2017. Horticultural, systems-engineering and economic evaluations of short-term plant storage techniques as a labor management tool for vegetable grafting nurseries. PLoS One 12:e0170614

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170614

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Thies JA. 2021. Grafting for managing vegetable crop pests. Pest Management Science 77:4825−4835

    doi: 10.1002/ps.6512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Oda M. 2002. Grafting of vegetable crops. Scientific Report of the Graduate School of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University 54:49−72

    Google Scholar

    [21]

    Schwarz D, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Venema J. 2010. Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: Thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Scientia Horticulturae 127:162−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Plaut Z, Edelstein M, Ben-Hur M. 2013. Overcoming salinity barriers to crop production using traditional methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 32:250−91

    doi: 10.1080/07352689.2012.752236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Albacete AA, Martínez-Andújar C, Pérez-Alfocea F. 2014. Hormonal and metabolic regulation of source-sink relations under salinity and drought: from plant survival to crop yield stability. Biotechnology Advances 32:12−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Fallik E, Ilic Z. 2014. Grafted vegetables - the influence of rootstock and scion on postharvest quality. Folia Horticulturae 26:79−90

    doi: 10.2478/fhort-2014-0008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Keatinge JDH, Lin LJ, Ebert AW, Chen WY, Hughes JD, et al. 2014. Overcoming biotic and abiotic stresses in the Solanaceae through grafting: current status and future perspectives. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 30:272−87

    doi: 10.1080/01448765.2014.964317

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Nawaz MA, Imtiaz M, Kong Q, Cheng F, Ahmed W, et al. 2016. Grafting: a technique to modify ion accumulation in horticultural crops. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1457

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01457

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Nawaz MA, Shireen F, Huang Y, Bie Z, Ahmed W, et al. 2017. Perspectives of vegetable grafting in Pakistan: current status, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 19:1165−74

    doi: 10.17957/IJAB/15.0404

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Singh H, Kumar P, Chaudhari S, Edelstein M. 2017. Tomato grafting: A global perspective. Hortscience 52:1328−36

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI11996-17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu X, Liu W, Wang T, Zhang J, Li X, et al. 2020. Systemic long-distance signaling and communication between rootstock and scion in grafted vegetables. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:460

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00460

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Singh H, Kumar P, Kumar A, Kyriacou MC, Colla G, et al. 2020. Grafting tomato as a tool to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy 10:263

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10020263

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ellouzi H, Hamed KB, Cela J, Munné-Bosch S, Abdelly C. 2011. Early effects of salt stress on the physiological and oxidative status of Cakile maritima (halophyte) and Arabidopsis thaliana (glycophyte). Physiologia Plantarum 142:128−43

    doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01450.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Niu S, Li H, Paré PW, Aziz M, Wang S, et al. 2016. Induced growth promotion and higher salt tolerance in the halophyte grass Puccinellia tenuiflora by beneficial rhizobacteria. Plant Soil 407:217−30

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2767-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Tombesi S, Nardini A, Frioni T, Soccolini M, Zadra C, et al. 2015. Stomatal closure is induced by hydraulic signals and maintained by ABA in drought-stressed grapevine. Scientific Reports 5:12449

    doi: 10.1038/srep12449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Rivelli AR, Lovelli S, Perniola M. 2002. Effects of salinity on gas exchange, water relations and growth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Functional Plant Biology 29:1405−15

    doi: 10.1071/PP01086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Saha P, Chatterjee P, Biswas AK. 2010. NaCl pretreatment alleviates salt stress by enhancement of antioxidant defense system and osmolyte accumulation in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 48:593−600

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2005. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 17:1866−75

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.033589

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhen A, Bie Z, Huang Y, Liu Z, Lei B. 2011. Effects of salt-tolerant rootstock grafting on ultrastructure, photosynthetic capacity, and H2O2-scavenging system in chloroplasts of cucumber seedlings under NaCl stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33:2311

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-011-0771-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Mittler R. 2013. Temporal-spatial interaction between ROS and ABA controls rapid systemic acclimation in plants. The Plant Cell 25:3553−69

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Colla G, Rouphael Y, Jawad R, Kumar P, Rea E, et al. 2013. The effectiveness of grafting to improve NaCl and CaCl2 tolerance in cucumber. Scientia Horticulturae 164:380−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.09.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Sarwar N, Saifullah Malhi SS, Zia MH, Naeem A, et al. 2010. Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90:925−37

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3916

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Yang Y, Lu X, Yan B, Li B, Sun J, et al. 2013. Bottle gourd rootstock-grafting affects nitrogen metabolism in NaCl-stressed watermelon leaves and enhances short-term salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology 170:653−61

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.12.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Devi P, Perkins-Veazie P, Miles C. 2020. Impact of grafting on watermelon fruit maturity and quality. Horticulturae 6:97

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae6040097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Munns R. 2011. Plant adaptations to salt and water stress: differences and commonalities. In Plant Responses To Drought And Salinity Stress: Developments In A Post-genomic Era, ed. Turkan I. vol.57:555. USA: Academic Press, Elsevier. pp. 1−32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387692-8.00001-1

    [44]

    Colla G, Rouphael Y, Rea E, Cardarelli M. 2012. Grafting cucumber plants enhance tolerance to sodium chloride and sulfate salinization. Scientia Horticulturae 135:177−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.11.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Lei B, Huang Y, Sun J, Xie J, Niu M, et al. 2014. Scanning ion-selective electrode technique and X-ray microanalysis provide direct evidence of contrasting Na+ transport ability from root to shoot in salt-sensitive cucumber and salt-tolerant pumpkin under NaCl stress. Physiologia Plantarum 152:738−48

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.12223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Rea E, Colla G. 2012. Improving melon and cucumber photosynthetic activity, mineral composition, and growth performance under salinity stress by grafting onto Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks. Photosynthetica 50:180−88

    doi: 10.1007/s11099-012-0002-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Fu Q, Zhang X, Kong Q, Bie Z, Wang H. 2018. Grafting onto pumpkin rootstock is an efficient alternative to improve melon tolerance to NaCl stress. European Journal of Horticultural Science 83:337−44

    doi: 10.17660/ejhs.2018/83.6.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Di Gioia F, Signore A, Serio F, Santamaria P. 2013. Grafting improves tomato salinity tolerance through sodium partitioning within the shoot. HortScience 48:855−62

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.48.7.855

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Semiz GD, Suarez DL. 2019. Impact of grafting, salinity and irrigation water composition on eggplant fruit yield and ion relations. Scientific Reports 9:19373

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55841-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Coban A, Akhoundnejad Y, Dere S, Dasgan HY. 2020. Impact of salt-tolerant rootstock on the enhancement of sensitive tomato plant responses to salinity. HortScience 55:35−39

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI14476-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    López-Serrano L, Canet-Sanchis G, Selak GV, Penella C, San Bautista A, et al. 2020. Physiological characterization of a pepper hybrid rootstock designed to cope with salinity stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 148:207−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Rus A, Baxter I, Muthukumar B, Gustin J, Lahner B, et al. 2006. Natural variants of AtHKT1 enhance Na+ accumulation in two wild populations of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 2:e210

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020210

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Tounsi S, Ben Amar S, Masmoudi K, Sentenac H, Brini F, et al. 2016. Characterization of two HKT1;4 transporters from Triticum monococcum to elucidate the determinants of the wheat salt tolerance Nax1 QTL. Plant and Cell Physiology 57:2047−57

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Sun J, Cao H, Cheng J, He X, Sohail H, et al. 2018. Pumpkin CmHKT1;1 controls shoot Na+ accumulation via limiting Na+ transport from rootstock to scion in grafted cucumber. International Journal of Molecular Science 19:2648

    doi: 10.3390/ijms19092648

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Asins MJ, Raga V, Roca D, Belver A, Carbonell EA. 2015. Genetic dissection of tomato rootstock effects on scion traits under moderate salinity. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128:667−79

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2462-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Edelstein M, Plaut Z, Ben-Hur M. 2011. Sodium and chloride exclusion and retention by non-grafted and grafted melon and Cucurbita plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:177−84

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Chen TW, Gomez Pineda IM, Brand AM, Stützel H. 2020. Determining ion toxicity in cucumber under salinity stress. Agronomy 10:677

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10050677

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Penella C, Landi M, Guidi L, Nebauer SG, Pellegrini E, et al. 2016. Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength. Journal of Plant Physiology 193:1−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.02.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Orsini F, Sanoubar R, Oztekin GB, Kappel N, Tepecik M, et al. 2013. Improved stomatal regulation and ion partitioning boosts salt tolerance in grafted melon. Functional Plant Biology 40:628−636

    doi: 10.1071/FP12350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Wang X, Lan Z, Tian L, Li J, Yang G, et al. 2021. Change of physiological properties and ion distribution by synergistic effect of Ca2+ and grafting under salt stress on cucumber seedlings. Agronomy 11:848

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy11050848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Penella C, Nebauer SG, Quiñones A, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, et al. 2015. Some rootstocks improve pepper tolerance to mild salinity through ionic regulation. Plant Science 230:12−22

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Mohsenian Y, Roosta HR. 2015. Effects of grafting on alkali stress in tomato plants: Datura rootstock improve alkalinity tolerance of tomato plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 38:51−72

    doi: 10.1080/01904167.2014.920370

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Feng X, Guo K, Yang C, Li J, Chen H, et al. 2019. Growth and fruit production of tomato grafted onto wolfberry (Lycium chinense) rootstock in saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae 255:298−305

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Yang Y, Wang L, Tian J, Li J, Sun J, et al. 2012. Proteomic study participating the enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of bottle gourd rootstock-grafted watermelon seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58:54−65

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Shu S, Gao P, Li L, Yuan Y, Sun J, et al. 2016. Abscisic acid-induced H2O2 accumulation enhances antioxidant capacity in pumpkin-grafted cucumber leaves under Ca(NO3)2 stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1489

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01489

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Wei G, Yang L, Zhu Y, Chen G. 2009. Changes in oxidative damage, antioxidant enzyme activities and polyamine contents in leaves of grafted and non-grafted eggplant seedlings under stress by excess of calcium nitrate. Scientia Horticulturae 120:443−51

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Talhouni M, Sönmez K, Kiran S, Beyaz R, Yildiz M, et al. 2019. Comparison of salinity effects on grafted and non-grafted eggplants in terms of ion accumulation, MDA content and antioxidative enzyme activities. Advances in Horticultural Science 33:87−95

    doi: 10.13128/ahs-23794

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Wei G, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Yang L, Zhang G. 2007. Growth and ionic distribution of grafted eggplant seedlings with NaCl stress. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 27:1172−78

    Google Scholar

    [69]

    Ben Rejeb K, Benzarti M, Debez A, Bailly C, Savouré A, et al. 2015. NADPH oxidase-dependent H2O2 production is required for salt-induced antioxidant defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology 174:5−15

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Li L, Shu S, Xu Q, An Y, Sun J, et al. 2017. NO accumulation alleviates H2O2 -dependent oxidative damage induced by Ca(NO3)2 stress in the leaves of pumpkin-grafted cucumber seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 160:33−45

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.12535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Elsheery NI, Helaly MN, Omar SA, John SVS, Zabochnicka-Swiątek M, et al. 2020. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in grafted cucumber. South African Journal of Botany 130:90−102

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.12.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Abdeldym EA, El-Mogy MM, Abdellateaf HRL, Atia MAM. 2020. Genetic characterization, agro-morphological and physiological evaluation of grafted tomato under salinity stress conditions. Agronomy 10:1948

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10121948

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Yan Y, Wang S, Wei M, Gong B, Shi Q. 2018. Effect of different rootstocks on the salt stress tolerance in watermelon seedlings. Horticultural Plant Journal 4:239−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2018.08.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Niu M, Sun S, Nawaz MA, Sun J, Cao H, et al. 2019. Grafting cucumber onto pumpkin induced early stomatal closure by increasing ABA sensitivity under salinity conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1290

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    James RA, Munns R, von Caemmerer S, Trejo C, Miller C, et al. 2006. Photosynthetic capacity is related to the cellular and subcellular partitioning of Na+, K+ and Cl- in salt-affected barley and durum wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment 29:2185−97

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01592.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Xu HL, Gauthier L, Gosselin A. 1994. Photosynthetic responses of greenhouse tomato plants to high solution electrical conductivity and low soil water content. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 69:821−32

    doi: 10.1080/14620316.1994.11516518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Liu S, Li H, Lv X, Ahammed GJ, Xia X, et al. 2016. Grafting cucumber onto luffa improves drought tolerance by increasing ABA biosynthesis and sensitivity. Scientific Reports 6:20212

    doi: 10.1038/srep20212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Liu Z, Bie Z, Huang Y, Zhen A, Lei B, et al. 2012. Grafting onto Cucurbita moschata rootstock alleviates salt stress in cucumber plants by delaying photoinhibition. Photosynthetica 50:152−160

    doi: 10.1007/s11099-012-0007-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Yang Y, Yu L, Wang L, Guo S. 2015. Bottle gourd rootstock-grafting promotes photosynthesis by regulating the stomata and non-stomata performances in leaves of watermelon seedlings under NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 186−187:50−58

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.07.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Shabala S, Wu H, Bose J. 2015. Salt stress sensing and early signalling events in plant roots: Current knowledge and hypothesis. Plant Science 241:109−119

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.10.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Albacete A, Martínez-Andújar C, Martínez-Pérez A, Thompson AJ, Dodd IC, et al. 2015. Unravelling rootstock×scion interactions to improve food security. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:2211−26

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Gálvez A, Albacete A, Martínez-Andújar C, del Amor FM, López-Marín J. 2021. Contrasting rootstock-mediated growth and yield responses in salinized pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L. ) are associated with changes in the hormonal balance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:3297

    doi: 10.3390/ijms22073297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Hossain MS, Dietz KJ. 2016. Tuning of redox regulatory mechanisms, reactive oxygen species and redox homeostasis under salinity stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:548

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00548

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Niu M, Huang Y, Sun S, Sun J, Cao H, et al. 2018. Root respiratory burst oxidase homologue-dependent H2O2 production confers salt tolerance on a grafted cucumber by controlling Na+ exclusion and stomatal closure. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:3465−76

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Liu H, Tian X, Li Y, Wu C, Zheng C. 2008. Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA 14:836−43

    doi: 10.1261/rna.895308

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Ding D, Zhang L, Wang H, Liu Z, Zhang Z, et al. 2009. Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Annals of Botany 103:29−38

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Li B, Duan H, Li J, Deng X, Yin W, et al. 2013. Global identification of miRNAs and targets in Populus euphratica under salt stress. Plant Molecular Biology 81:525−39

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0010-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Li C, Li Y, Bai L, Zhang T, He C, et al. 2013. Grafting-responsive miRNAs in cucumber and pumpkin seedlings identified by high-throughput sequencing at whole genome level. Physiologia Plantarum 151:406−22

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.12122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Liu N, Yang J, Guo S, Xu Y, Zhang M. 2013. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of conserved and novel microRNAs in grafted watermelon by high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8:e57359

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Li Y, Li C, Bai L, He C, Yu X. 2016. MicroRNA and target gene responses to salt stress in grafted cucumber seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:12

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2070-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Xie J, Lei B, Niu M, Huang Y, Kong Q, et al. 2015. High throughput sequencing of small RNAs in the two Cucurbita germplasm with different sodium accumulation patterns identifies novel microRNAs involved in salt stress response. PLoS One 10:e0127412

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127412

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Tolstyko E, Lezzhov A, Solovyev A. 2019. Identification of miRNA precursors in the phloem of Cucurbita maxima. PeerJ 7:e8269

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.8269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estañ MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Moyano E, et al. 2010. The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 125:211−17

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.03.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Huang Y, Zhao L, Kong Q, Cheng F, Niu M, et al. 2016. Comprehensive Mineral Nutrition Analysis of Watermelon Grafted onto Two Different Rootstocks. Horticultural Plant Journal 2:105−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2016.06.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Niu M, Xie J, Sun J, Huang Y, Kong Q, et al. 2017. A shoot based Na+ tolerance mechanism observed in pumpkin − An important consideration for screening salt tolerant rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae 218:38−47

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Gregory PJ, Atkinson CJ, Bengough AG, Else MA, Fernández-Fernández F, et al. 2013. Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:1209−22

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Niu M, Wei L, Peng Y, Huang Y, Bie Z. 2022. Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting. Vegetable Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/VR-2022-0008
    Niu M, Wei L, Peng Y, Huang Y, Bie Z. 2022. Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting. Vegetable Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/VR-2022-0008

Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(4769) PDF downloads(1055)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting

Vegetable Research  2 Article number: 8  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Soil salinity is a serious threat to horticultural production. Improving salt tolerance of vegetables by breeding is a difficult task as salt tolerance is a quantitative trait, regulated by a large number of genes. As a traditional agronomic method, grafting, which is widely practiced in vegetables, especially among members of Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae, is a useful tool for reducing yield loss caused by salinity. However, the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon remain largely unknown. Numerous studies have been conducted to uncover these mechanisms by which grafting improves salt tolerance in vegetables. This review summarizes the studies that have been conducted on this topic. In this review, the effects of salt stress on vegetable crops were discussed, and the four main mechanisms by which grafting increases the salt resistance of vegetables, namely, restricting the transport of toxic ions, enhancing the antioxidant system, enhancing the stability of the photosynthetic system, and sending root signals, were discussed. This review concludes by identifying several prospects for future research on increasing the adoption of grafting in vegetables under salinity stress.

    • Salinity is one of the major factors that limit crop production. Over 1,500 million hectares of land suffer from increased salinity[1]. Soil salinity has two distinct types: primary salinity and secondary salinity[2]. The former is the result of natural processes, such as rock disintegration. During these processes, soluble salts, such as sodium, calcium, magnesium and sulfates, permeate into the water environment where they are accumulated in the soil by rain and wind[3]. Sodium chloride is one of the most easily transported salts in these processes[1]. By contrast, secondary salinity is the result of human activities, such as overfertilization under a protected horticultural condition, replacement of perennial crops with annual crops, overuse of chemical fertilizers, all of which increases soil salinity, especially in vegetable production[4]. It is predicted that by 2050 the high salinity of arable land will make half of it unusable for agriculture[5]. High salinity negatively impacts the yield and quality of horticultural crops[6]. Most vegetable crops are glycophytes; thus, they are susceptible to soil salinity even at mild or moderate salt levels[7]. About 50−70 mM of NaCl concentration in nutrient solution could lead to irreversible injury to cucumber[810] and tomato[1113]. In contrast, the salinity threshold level of pepper is 20 mM of NaCl [14].

      To deal with the adverse effects of salinity on vegetable production, researchers have attempted to enhance the salt tolerance of vegetables by breeding strategies. However, owing to the complexity of salt tolerance, which is a quantitative trait, few salt-tolerant species have been developed for commercial use. Recently, vegetable grafting has become widely adapted as a commercial measure[1519]. Vegetable grafting is an ancient practice. Grafting of Cucurbitaceae was mentioned in the ancient book, 'Si-Sheng-Zhi-Shu', which was published in China in the first century[16]. The first commercial use of grafting of vegetables was in Asia in the 20th century. Grafting of eggplants (Solanum melongena) started in the 1950s, followed by grafting of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in the 1960s and 1970s, respectively[4]. Grafting was initially used to overcome soil diseases[20]. However, grafting has been gradually recognized to significantly improve plant resistance to abiotic stress, including salinity, drought, and high temperature and chilling[21]. The spread of grafting in recent years and its impact on horticultural production have been the main driving force for hundreds of studies and comprehensive reviews on vegetable grafting and salinity[1,4,2230]. However, the mechanisms by which grafting enhances the salt tolerance of vegetables remain unclear, and some novel findings on this topic have been neglected.

      This review aims to present the latest knowledge of the effects of salinity on vegetable crops and the role grafting plays in increasing salt tolerance. In this review, two main families of vegetables, namely, Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae, were selected as case studies to present the current scientific consensus on the mechanisms by which grafting reduces the effects of stress on these important vegetables.

    • Stress imposed by saline conditions includes two components: (1) osmotic effect, which is caused by the increase in osmotic potential of water that decreases the ability of water uptake; and (2) toxicity of salt ions, especially Na+ and Cl, which is harmful to the physiological processes of various plants. In the first stage, saline conditions do not substantially alter plant growth because most toxic ions are collected in the vacuoles. This process is the reason why halophytes are more tolerant to stress than glycophytes[3132]. In this phase, both leaves and roots are inhibited, but leaves do not present salt injury symptoms. Another remarkable change is stomatal conductance. The stomata close very quickly when they detect changes in osmotic pressure (within 3 h) and rebound during a prolonged stress period (after 6–12 h)[10,33]. In the second stage, the cells are unable to store the toxic ions in vacuoles. As a result, their concentration in the cytoplasm increases and the activity of many enzymes is severely inhibited[1].

    • Vegetables subjected to excessive salt stress are usually associated with reduced photosynthetic capacity[34]. In particular, Na+ and Cl interfere with chlorophyll production[9]. Salinity can also reduce the content of carotenoids and xanthophylls and the fluorescence intensity of chlorophyll[35]. Stomatal closure limits the fixed rate of carbon dioxide. Therefore, the rate of light energy absorption by photosynthetic pigments exceeds the rate of its consumption in chloroplasts[36]. This condition can lead to photosynthetic damage of PSII through the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus inducing oxidative stress and damage of the photosystem[37,38].

    • Salt has an antagonistic effect on the absorption and transport of nutrients in plants, which may damage the nutritional balance of vegetables[39]. In fact, salinity can reduce the solubility of micronutrients by altering the pH of the soil solution[40]. However, this effect on micronutrients depends on the species and salinity levels[41]. Salinity also reduce nitrogen absorption via the interactions between Na+ and ${\text{NH}}_4^+ $ or Cl and ${\text{NO}_3^{-}} $[9]. High Na+ levels reduce Ca2+ levels but stabilizes K+ levels in roots and reduces K+ levels in leaves[41]. Moreover, high Na+ levels reduce Mg2+ levels in leaves but not in roots. Furthermore, the presence of soluble salts (Na+, Cl, and ${\text{SO}}_4^{2-} $) in soil reduces phosphate absorption[7,42]. In addition, high concentrations of Na+ and Cl in soil or water may depress nutrient-ion activities and produce extreme ratios of Na+/Ca2+, Na+/K+, Ca2+/Mg2+, and Cl/${\text{NO}_3^{-}} $ in leaves[39]. Therefore, the plant becomes susceptible to nutritional disorders as well as osmotic stress induced by Na+ or Cl.

    • Sodium is the most commonly encountered salt ion that is toxic to crops[43]. Regulation of Na+ influx, efflux, and compartmentation are important for plants to cope with Na+ accumulation in shoots. Grafted cucumber has a higher crop performance with Na2SO4 than with NaCl because of the inability of rootstock to restrict transfer of Cl from roots to shoots[44]. Thus, restriction of Na+ is the key mechanism to improve the salt tolerance of vegetables via grafting.

      Given that only a small proportion of Na+ can be retrieved from shoots and returned to roots via the phloem in plants[45], the key factor that determines Na+ accumulation in scions is the restrictive ability of rootstock to load Na+, both in Cucurbitaceae[8,46,47] and Solanaceae[12,4851]. Sodium restriction by rootstocks is based on two main functions concerning Na+ regulation. The first one is Na+ exclusion in the root maturation zone, and the other one is Na+ loading in vascular bundle sheath cells. Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumbers show a higher rate in effluxing Na+ from roots than self-grafted cucumber plants. This observation is consistent with the findings from non-grafted cucumber and pumpkin that indicated higher Na+ exclusion capacity in pumpkin roots than in other plant parts[45]. Sodium extrusion is mediated by the Na+/H+ antiporter located on the plasma membrane (PM). Under NaCl stress, an increase in Na+ extrusion is concurrent with a higher H+ influx in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) than in cucumber. The strong Na+ exclusion in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumber is due to the active Na+/H+ antiporter across the PM that is powered by PM H+−ATPase. High-affinity K+ transporter-1 (HKT1) encodes a Na+ preferential transporter that controls Na+ delivery from root to shoot via Na+ withdrawal from xylem sap[52,53]. Limiting Na+ radial transport to the stele is the key way to reduce the content of Na+ in the scion in pumpkin grafted cucumber[54]. Rootstock HKT1 genotype affected fruit Na+ and non-commercial tomato fruit yield[55]. These findings may play a key role in salt tolerance breeding of vegetables.

      Numerous studies (Table 1) have suggested that salt tolerance can be improved by rootstocks, which limits the uptake of Na+ but not of Cl. However, some studies still focused on the function of rootstocks in the regulation of Cl distribution[56]. Grafting the cucumber variety 'Aramon' onto pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) rootstocks reduces Na+ uptake, enhances K+ transport toward young leaves, and induces Cl recirculation to old leaves. Thus, cucumber can avoid overaccumulation of Cl, and the pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) rootstocks regulate the recirculation of K+ and Cl[57]. Similar results were obtained in Solanaceae. Various pepper species grafted onto salt-tolerant rootstocks (e.g., Capsicum chinense or Capsicum baccatum) can achieve high plant productivity by limiting Cl transport to leaves, thereby allowing the uptake of other cations (i.e., K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) for low osmotic potential at low energy cost[58]. Moreover, the increase in root length density and root surface area of the salt-tolerant rootstock may be an adaptation to salinity. Salinity may also reduce nitrogen absorption via the interactions between Na+ and ${\text{NH}}_4^+ $.

      Table 1.  Studies on the mechanism by which grafting limits salt ion transport.

      IDScion speciesRootstock speciesSalt treatmentsGrowth conditionsTested traitsReference
      1'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)90 mM NaClHoagland's solutionCa2+, K+, and Na+ content; plasma membrane (PM) H+−ATPase activity; expression levels of SOS1 and PMA[45]
      2'Brennus' and 'London' (Cucumis melo)'RS841 improved' (Cucurbita maxima Duch. × Cucurbita moschata)40 and 80 mM NaClHoagland's solutionWUE; Cl, ${\text{NO}_3^{-}} $, ${\text{SO}_4^{2-}} $, ${\text{PO}_4^{-}} $, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and ${\text{NH}_4^{+}} $[59]
      3'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)90 mM NaClHoagland's solutionFW and DW; Na+, K+, and Cl concentrations; Na+ concentration in xylem; gas exchange parameters[8]
      4'Ekron' (Cucumis sativus)'P360' (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata)20 mM CaCl2, 30 mM NaCl or 10 mM CaCl2 + 15 mM NaClQuartziferous sandFruit dry matter; total soluble solid content; Fv/Fm; GPX activity; K+, Ca2+, Na+, Mg2+, and Zn2+ contents[44]
      5'Cyrano' and 'Akito' (Cucumis sativus)'P360' and 'PS1313' (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata)40 mM NaClQuartziferous sandYield; shoot and root biomass; net photosynthetic rate; K+, Na+, and Cl concentrations[46]
      6'Deer No. 99' (Cucumis sativus)Cucurbita ficifolia100 mM NaCl50% Yamazaki solutionEnzyme activities; salt damage score; Na+, Ca2+, and K+ distributions[60]
      7'Aramon' (Cucumis sativus)'Becada' (Cucurbita moschata)50 mM NaClNutrient solutionGas exchange, plant growth, and ion concentrations in xylem sap[57]
      8'Baimi' (Cucumis melo)'Jingxin 3' (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata)150 mM NaClHoagland's solutionGrowth parameters; photosynthetic measurement; antioxidant system; enzymes for sugar metabolism; Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ concentrations[47]
      9'Xintaimici' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)75 mM NaClHoagland's solutionCmHKT1;1 expression; cation uptake experiments in yeast cells; cucumber transformation with CmHKT1;1[54]
      10'Ikram' (Solanum lycopersicum)'Charlotte' (Solanum tuberosum)5.0 dS m−1 NaClSandy loam soilStomatal conductance; fluorescence parameters; Na+, K+, and Ca2+ concentrations in roots, stems, leaves, and fruits[12]
      11'Tom 121' and 'Tom 174' (Solanum lycopersicum)'Tom 121' and 'Tom 174' (Solanum lycopersicum)50 mM NaClGreenhouse soilless culture conditionsStomatal conductance (gS); osmotic potential; Na+ and Cl concentrations[50]
      12'Adige' (Capsicum annuum)'ECU-973' (Capsicum chinense) and 'BOL-58' (Capsicum baccatum)32 mM Na+ and 41 mM Cl (sandy soil); 40 mM NaCl (hydroponic)Sandy soil and hydroponicsK+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and Cl concentrations; proline determination; photosynthetic activity; chlorophyll fluorescence[61]
      13'Red stone' (Solanum lycopersicum)'Long purple' (Solanum melongena), 'datura' (Datura patula), and 'orange nightshade' (Solanum luteum)5 and 10 mM NaHCO31/4 concentration of Hoagland's solutionBiomass; Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ concentrations; proline content[62]
      14'Cuore di Bue' (Solanum lycopersicum)'Maxifort' and 'Arnold' (Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum habrochaites)20 and 40 mM NaClPerlite–peat substrateYield, fruit number, fruit weight, TSS, and Na+ content[48]
      15'Chaoyan 298' (Solanum lycopersicum)'Yanqi' (Lycium chinense)7.42 g kg−1 (total salt include Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl,
      ${\text{SO}_4^{2-}} $, ${\text{HCO}_3^{-}} $)
      Coastal saline soilSPAD, fruit production, shoot biomass, leaf ion[63]
      16'Angela' (Solanum melongena)'Maxifort' (Solanum lycopersicum)55.5 mM Na+ and 148 mM ClSand tanksYield and ion uptake in leaves and fruits[49]

      Yang et al.[41] evaluated the multiple effects of salt and rootstock on nitrogen metabolism of grafted watermelon. The increase in activity of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) may have participated in ammonium assimilation in gourd (Lagenaria siceraria)-grafted seedlings when the glutamine synthetase (GS) or glutamate synthase (GOGAT) pathway was inhibited by salinity stress (NaCl), and thus increased the salt tolerance of watermelon[41]. Grafting also increases the uptake of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in grafted plants by decreasing Na+ uptake, suggesting that the mechanism by which grafting reduces Na+ uptake is also related to Ca2+/Na+ or Mg2+/Na+ selectivity[49].

    • The relationship between an antioxidant system and salt tolerance has been found in many plant species. It has been reported that grafting with salt-tolerant rootstocks can improve the antioxidant capacity of scions under salt stress (Table 2). To protect the plants themselves from reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced oxidative damage, plants up-regulate antioxidant system to maintain the dynamic balance of ROS production and extinction. Plants have evolved nonenzymatic and enzymatic antioxidation mechanisms. Enzymatic antioxidants include catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and glutathione reductase (GR). The most common nonenzymatic antioxidants are glutathione (GSH in its reduced form), ascorbate (AsA in its reduced form), carotenoids, and tocopherols[7].

      Table 2.  Studies on the mechanisms by which grafting enhances the antioxidant system.

      IDScion speciesRootstock speciesSalt treatmentsGrowth conditionsTested traitsReference
      1'Jinyou No. 3' (Cucumis sativus)Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata80 mM Ca(NO3)21/2 Hoagland's solutionH2O2, Fv/Fm, and antioxidant enzymes[70]
      2'Xiuli' (Citrullus lanatus)'Chaofeng Kangshengwang' (Lagenaria siceraria)100 mM NaCl1/2 Hoagland's solutionNR, NiR, GS, GOGAT, and NADH-GDH activities[41]
      3'Hybrid 1010' (Cucumis sativus)Cucurbita moschata, Lagenaria siceraria, Citrullus lanatus, and Cucurbita maxima50 and 100 mMVermiculite and compostChlorophyll contents, net assimilation rate, stomatal conductance (gs), electrolyte leakage (EL), antioxidant enzyme activities, and endogenous phytohormones[71]
      4'Naomi' and 'Artvin' (Solanum melongena)'AGr703' (Solanum aethiopicum), 'Yula', and 'Vista' (Solanum incanum × Solanum melongena)6−7 dSm−1 NaCl3:1 perlite: vermiculiteLeaf ion concentrations, antioxidant enzymes, and lipid peroxide[67]
      5'Bark' (Solanum lycopersicum)'LA1995', 'LA2711', 'LA2485', and 'LA3845' (Solanum lycopersicum)100 and 200 mM NaClPeat moss, vermiculite, and perlitePlant growth and yield, antioxidant enzymes, and UPGMA-based phylogenetic tree[72]
      6'Jingxin No.2' (Citrullus lanatus)'Quanneng Tiejia' and 'Kaijia No.1' (Cucurbita moschata)200 mM NaClHoagland's solutionPhotosynthetic analysis, chlorophyll a fluorescence, K+ and Na+ contents, antioxidative enzyme activities, H2O2 generation, and lipid peroxidation[73]

      Grafting can improve the activities of antioxidant enzymes. This phenomenon has been confirmed in different vegetable grafting complexes. In Cucurbitaceae, cucumber grown under Ca(NO3)2 stress has higher activities of antioxidant enzymes if they are grafted with selected bottle gourd rootstocks and suffers less oxidative damage. Using two genotypes as the scions, Yang et al. & Shu et al. reported that the enhancement of salt tolerance in rootstock-grafted watermelons is related to the activation of antioxidant systems activated by using rootstock grafting, including the SOD, POD, and APX[64, 65]. The AsA-GSH cycle is the key mechanism for scavenging ROS in plant chloroplasts. Rootstock-grafted watermelons have higher APX, GR, and DHAR activities in their chloroplasts under 100 mM NaCl and higher MDHAR activity under 50 mM NaCl than self-grafted plants[41]. Zhen et al. suggested that the alleviation of growth inhibition of grafted rootstocks under salt stress may be related to the improvement of photosynthesis and the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activity[37]. In Solanaceae, eggplant seedlings, using salinity tolerant eggplant cultivar as rootstock, were more tolerant to stress by excess of Ca(NO3)2 than non-grafted seedlings, owing to the effectively scavenging system of free radicals and the protective mechanisms of antioxidant enzymes and polyamines[66].

      Leaf MDA and antioxidant enzyme activity are used as indicators of the level of salt tolerance of grafted eggplants. Rootstock-grafted eggplants have higher SOD, CAT, and APX activity levels than self- and nongrafted plants, and thus they have a better salt tolerance and growth rate[67]. Wei et al. observed that grafted eggplants maintain lower H2O2 content and higher antioxidant enzyme activity under Ca(NO3)2 stress than nongrafted plants[68]. Penella et al. reported that the antioxidant system of ungrafted pepper did not function as an ROS scavenger under salt stress although the ungrafted plant also showed an increased activity of the primary antioxidant enzymes, indicating that the rootstock may promote the antioxidant system to play a role in response to salinity[58].

      Polyphenols are phytochemicals with antioxidant activity. Kacjan Maršić et al. reported that grafting of pepper leads to a substantial increase in total phenolic content under 40 mM NaCl conditions compared with nongrafted plants[14]. Similarly, López-Serrano et al. observed that salinity treatment considerably increases the total phenolic content of grafted pepper, which indicated that phenolic compounds are thought to help prevent the formation of reactive oxygen species and protect photosynthetic organs[51].

      H2O2 induced by NADPH oxidase may act as a cascade reaction to trigger the antioxidant system in plants, thereby alleviating the oxidative damage induced by salt stress[69]. This finding confirms that ROS plays an important role in the salt tolerance of grafting complexes as an early signal (See Section 'Root signals play an important role in improving the salt tolerance of grafted vegetables').

    • Grafting alleviates the inhibition of photosynthesis induced by salt stress (Table 3). Stomatal closure is the primary reason that limits photosynthesis under salt stress. Stomatal closure under salt stress results in rapid reduction of carbon dioxide involved in photosynthesis. Rapid stomatal closure might be an alternative strategy to cope with salt stress. A recent study found that cucumbers grafted onto pumpkins (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata) showed a more rapid stomatal closure than self-grafted cucumber. This reason was believed to be the enhanced adaptability of plants to early osmotic stress under saline conditions[65, 74]. Photosynthesis is initially reduced by stomatal limitations, and then non-stomatal effects were not observed for hours or days after salt treatment until Na+ or Cl accumulated at higher levels in the leaves[75]. An early response of vegetables to salt stress is a reduction of leaf growth, which is caused by a drop in stomatal conductance in tomatoes[76].

      Table 3.  Studies on the mechanism by which grafting enhances the stability of the photosynthetic system.

      IDScion speciesRootstock speciesSalt treatmentsGrowth conditionsTested traitsReference
      1'Xiuli' (Citrullus lanatus)'Chaofeng Kangshengwang' (Lagenaria siceraria)100 mM NaCl1/2 Hoagland's solutionChlorophyll content, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and Rubisco activity[79]
      2'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata) and 'Bouche' (Cucurbita ficifolia)90 mM NaCl1/2 Hoagland's solutionBiomass, gas-exchange parameters (Pn), and synthetase (GS)[9]
      3'Xiuli' (Citrullus lanatus)'Chaofeng Kangshengwang' (Lagenaria siceraria)100 mM NaCl1/2 Hoagland's solutionBiomass, net photosynthetic rate, and proteomic analysis[64]
      4'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)90 mM NaCl1/2 Hoagland's solutionGrowth parameters, gas-exchange parameter measurements, chlorophyll fluorescence, xanthophyll pigment analysis, and ultrastructure of chloroplasts[78]
      5'Adige' (Capsicum annuum)Capsicum chinense, Capsicum baccatum, and Capsicum annuum7.5 dS m−1 with 57.5 mM of Na+ and 71.2 mM of ClSandy loam soilBiomass and ion determination, leaf water potential, and gas-exchange parameters[11]
      6'Adige' (Capsicum annuum)A25 (Capsicum annuum)7.5 dS m−1 with 57.5 mM of Na+ and 71.2 mM of ClHydroponic greenhouseBiomass and ion determination, gas exchange and PSII, and antioxidant enzymes[58]
      7'Vedrana' (Capsicum annuum)'Rocal F1' (Capsicum annuum)20 and 40 mM NaClPerlite and rock wool flocksGrowth conditions, proline, photosynthetic measurements, sugars, and organic acids[14]

      After the 'early osmotic stress', plants reopen their stomata and stomatal conductance recovers to a relatively normal level but still substantially lower than that under non-saline conditions[74,77]. In this stage, stomatal conductance is less affected in salt-tolerant rootstock-grafted combinations because the accumulation of large amounts of Na+ in the leaves of scions forces the plant to close its stomata to reduce the amount of Na+ delivered from roots to shoots via transpiration flow. Moreover, salt-tolerant rootstocks usually have a considerably higher ability to restrict Na+ transport from roots to shoots[10]. A similar situation has been observed in Solanaceae. The stomatal conductance of tomato and grafted plants responds to saline water irrigation through stomatal closure[12].

      In plants under long-term salt stress, the decrease in photosynthesis is not only caused by stomatal closure, but also by non-stomatal factors. Grafting with salt-tolerant rootstocks can enhance photosynthetic rate by protecting chloroplast structure. For example, the reduction in PSII efficiency caused by salt stress is associated with the PSII complex, and pigment–protein complexes of the thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts. By investigating PSII efficiency, xanthophyll cycle, and chloroplast ultrastructure of nongrafted and pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumber plants, Liu found that chloroplasts are remarkably affected in the leaves of NaCl-treated cucumbers[78]. The starch grains of non-grafted plants and self-grafted plants were larger than those of rootstock grafted plants, reflecting that the salt stress affected cells to mobilize starch. A similar result has also been obtained in watermelon seedlings. In self-grafted watermelon, NaCl stress markedly reduces its chlorophyll content, inhibits its photochemical activity and CO2 assimilation, and damages the structure of its photosynthetic apparatus. By contrast, grafting watermelon with bottle gourd rootstock increases its chlorophyll content, especially chlorophyll b, and minimizes the harmful effects of NaCl stress on PSII reaction center and thylakoid structures[79].

      Kacjan Maršić et al. analyzed the photosynthetic pigments in pepper leaves in both grafted and nongrafted plants. They reported that using the salt-tolerant rootstock 'Rocal F1' remarkably increases the level of photosynthetic pigments compared with 'Vedrana' nongrafted bell pepper[14].

    • The root is the first organ to be exposed to salinity. Early root signaling is crucial for plant adaptation to abiotic stress[80]. The early signals provided by rootstocks under salt stress play a decisive role in activating the salt tolerance of scions (Table 4). Most rootstock-borne signals are hormones and some are chemicals. Among these signals, ABA and ROS are the most widely studied root-borne signals for improving salt tolerance.

      Table 4.  Studies on the mechanism by which root signals improve the salt tolerance of grafted vegetables.

      IDScion speciesRootstock speciesSalt treatmentsGrowth conditionsTested traitsReference
      1'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)75 mM NaClHoagland's solutionPhotosynthetic rate, ABA, and ABA biosynthesis-related genes[74]
      2'Jinchun No. 2' (Cucumis sativus)'Chaojiquanwang' (Cucurbita moschata)75 mM NaClHoagland's solutionBiomass; MDA; Na+, H2O2, Na+, and H+ fluxes along the stem; NADPH oxidase activity[84]
      3'Adige' (Capsicum annuum)'NIBER®' (Capsicum annuum x Capsicum. annuum)70 mM NaClStandard nutrient solution for pepperNa+ and K+ concentrations; gas exchange; ABA, NR, and proline content; H2O2[51]
      4'Gacela' (Capsicum annuum)'Creonte', 'Atlante', and 'Terrano' (commercial rootstocks)35 mM NaCl50% sand, 30% peat, and 20% vermiculitePlant growth and fruit yield, gas exchange, and hormones (IAA, ZA, GA, SA, JA, ABA, ACC)[82]

      ABA is usually associated with stress response under abiotic stress. ABA can improve the salt tolerance of grafted vegetables by triggering rapid stomatal closure at the early stage of salt stress to avoid water loss. This process may be related to the ability of grafting to improve the sensitivity of scions to ABA. ABA sensitivity has been demonstrated to improve the water status of grafted tomato[81], pepper[51], and cucumber[74] under salinity. A study reported that grafting with pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) rootstocks evidently improves the osmotic stress tolerance of cucumber scions under saline conditions[37]. During this process, ABA in the root acts as a signaling substance to mediate stomatal closure of aboveground cucumber scions, thereby preventing wilting due to excessive water loss under salt stress. The ABA signaling in roots may be part of the reason for the better performance of the pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumber than that of self-grafted plants under Ca(NO3)2 stress[65].

      However, with the extension of salt stress, ABA concentration in shoots is negatively correlated with the salt tolerance of the grafted plants. Galvez et al. evaluated three pepper rootstocks with different growth and yield characteristics. They associated the invigorating effects of the rootstocks with the improvement in photosynthesis and K+ homeostasis coordinately controlled by ABA[82]. Similarly, López-Serrano et al. reported that the reduction in leaf ABA content in plants grafted onto 'Niber' (a commercial pepper rootstock) under salinity keeps the stomata open, striking an appropriate photosynthesis balance and leading to NR activation[51]. Their results have provided clues for screening salt-tolerant rootstocks.

      ROS signaling is critical to the acclimation of plants to salt stress conditions[83]. It is well known that hydrogen peroxide is one of the most common ROS signaling molecules with the ability to travel long distances. Root RBOH-dependent H2O2 operates as a primordial signal to regulate the salt tolerance in grafted cucumber by Na+ exclusion[84] and stomatal closure[74]. However, NADPH oxidase-sourced H2O2 is essential to maintain the transport capacity of H+/Na+. Diphenylene iodonium (an NADPH oxidase inhibitor) blocks salinity-induced H2O2 production and reduces the salinity tolerance of grafted cucumber[84]. The mechanism by which NADPH oxidase-mediated H2O2 signaling positively affects the SOS pathway has remained elusive until now. Previous studies have suggested that NADPH oxidase may operate as a sensor in plants. The NADPH works in tandem with Ca2+-permeable channels[80, 83].

      The increase of H2O2 in pepper-grafted plants has also been associated with high total antioxidant capacity and low lipid peroxidation. These results suggested that H2O2 can be positively used to activate the antioxidant capacity of grafted plants and help them endure salt stress by acting as a signal substance rather than a damage to plant[51].

    • In addition to regulating plant growth, miRNAs also respond to various abiotic stresses by negatively regulating the expression of target genes at the post-transcriptional level[26]. Many miRNAs, such as miR169, miR395, miR398, and miR399, have been identified in networks that respond to high salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana[85], Glycine max[86], and Populus euphratica[87]. A previous study found that grafting can alter the expression of miRNAs and their target genes; over 40 miRNAs were observed to change in the leaves of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) after it was grafted onto bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) or pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata)[88, 89]. Under saline conditions, the post-transcriptional effects of the miRNA target network may be important in graft-dependent responses to salt stress. A study reported that the expression levels of most miRNAs in the leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumber seedlings increase after 6 and 24 h of salt stress compared with self-grafted cucumbers[90]. Moreover, the expression levels of most miRNAs in the roots of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)-grafted cucumber seedlings increase under normal and salt stress conditions[91]. The different responses to salinity of miRNAs might be decided by the genotype of rootstock. Xie et al. subjected two Cucurbita rootstocks, ('N12' (Cucurbita maxima) and 'N15' (Cucurbita moschata)), with significant differences in Na+ accumulation, to determine small RNA populations in root tissues after 4 h of salt treatment and controls[91]. Results indicated that the miRNAs between the two Cucurbita germplasms have differential expression under salt stress conditions. Owing to their vigorous vascular system, Cucurbita plants have been used as a model for understanding long-distance signal elements, including miRNAs transport. Tolstyko et al. demonstrated that the phloem transcriptome contains a subset of Cucurbita maxima pri-miRNAs that differs from a subset of pri-miRNA sequences abundant in a leaf transcriptome[92]. They validated this conclusion via interspecies grafting experiments, which showed that Cucurbita maxima pri-miR319a can be transported across the graft union, verifying the presence of pri-miR319a in sieve elements and indicating that phloem miRNA precursors may play a role in long-distance signaling in plants.

    • Grafting has been successfully practiced in many countries. This old technology can reduce the negative effects of salinity on vegetables and provide an alternative way to cope with salt stress and maintain yield and quality.

      The physiological mechanism of grafting to improve salt tolerance of vegetable crops has been discussed in detail in this review. It can be found that most studies focus on the effects of grafting on plant biomass accumulation, photosynthesis, salt ion accumulation and other aspects. However, there are few studies on the effect of grafting on improving the commodity quality of vegetables under salt stress. Recently, vegetable yield is no longer the only factor for production. How to improve the quality of vegetable crops under abiotic stress is the key question for future consideration[93]. Some rootstocks can improve the survival rate of vegetables under serious salt stress but cause deterioration of vegetable quality[94]. On the other hand, different genetic backgrounds and cultivation modes (hydroponics or substrate culture) significantly affect the salt tolerance of vegetables, and there was previously no standard for the evaluation of salt-tolerant rootstocks[95].

      There are few studies on the molecular mechanism of grafting to improve salt tolerance of vegetable crops. Considering that the key of grafting to improve salt tolerance lies in limiting salt ion transport, it is very important to reveal the function of related ion transporters located in the plasma membrane and vacuole membrane. Related genes and regulatory mechanisms need to be elucidated through a large number of studies. More importantly, hormone signaling plays an important role in rootstock − scion communication. Long distance transfer of genome − level mRNA is also widespread during grafting[96]. Mechanism of sensing salt signals in rootstock root, and long-distance signals between rootstock and scion under salinity need to be elucidated further in the future.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772357, 32072653, 32002112), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2019CFA017).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Table (4) References (96)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Niu M, Wei L, Peng Y, Huang Y, Bie Z. 2022. Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting. Vegetable Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/VR-2022-0008
    Niu M, Wei L, Peng Y, Huang Y, Bie Z. 2022. Mechanisms of increasing salt resistance of vegetables by grafting. Vegetable Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/VR-2022-0008

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return