-
Two red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cultivars, 'Prelude' and 'Polana', were used in this research. Tissue cultures of the raspberries were developed in Dr. Dai's lab at North Dakota State University (USA)[16]. Tissue cultures of the two cultivars were maintained by sub-culturing every four weeks in Murashige and Skoog medium (MS)[17] supplemented with 30 g·l−1 sucrose, 5.5 g·l−1 agar (Caisson Labs Inc., Smithfield, UT, 2009), and 3 g·l−1 activated charcoal (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Medium pH was adjusted to 5.7−5.8 before autoclaving at 121 °C and 15 psi for 15 min. All raspberry tissue cultures were maintained in the culture room with a photoperiod of 16/8 h of day/night length, a light intensity of 55 µmol·m−2·s−1 PPF (photosynthetic photon flux), and a day/night temperature of 24/18 °C. Tissue culture conditions in this study were identical unless otherwise noted.
In vitro bud treatment with colchicine and oryzalin for chromosome doubling
-
A total of ten concentrations of colchicine (0, 20, 40, 80, and 160 mM) and oryzalin (0, 80, 160, 320, and 640 µM) solutions were made before the treatment. In brief, 100 ml of liquid MS medium supplemented with 30 g·l−1 sucrose and 1 ml·l−1 PPMTM (Plant Preservative Mixture) (Plant Cell Technology, Inc., Washington, DC, USA) was added to a 300 ml Erlenmeyer flask and autoclaved at 121 °C and 15 psi for 15 min. After cooling, appropriate amounts of 100 mM colchicine (in DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or 100 mM oryzalin came from premixed with a surfactant at 40.4% (Monterey Lawn and Garden, Fresno, CA, USA) were added to the flask to make the final concentration of each solution. Six apical buds (~1 cm) and six nodal buds (~1 cm) were collected from in vitro plants of 'Prelude' or 'Polana' and placed in each of ten flasks. The flasks were covered with aluminum foil, labeled, and placed on an SK-300 Lab Companion shaker (Jeio Tech Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) for a constantly shaking at 110 rpm. After each treatment duration ended (24, 48, and 96 h), two apical buds and two nodal buds were taken from each flask, triple rinsed in autoclaved water and patted dry. Treated buds were then transferred to the 100 ml baby food jar (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 25 ml of MS medium supplemented with 1 ml·l−1 of PPM, 30 g·l−1 sucrose, 5.5 g·l−1 agar, and 10 µM BA for shoot development in the tissue culture room.
In vitro shoots developed from the bud were subjected to ex vitro rooting. Shoots were dipped in a commercial rooting powder Take Root® (United Industries Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 s and inserted into ProMix BX+ (Premier Horticulture Inc., Quakertown, PA, USA) in a 48-hole plug tray covered with a plastic lid. After 4 weeks, plants were being acclimatized by replacing the initial lid (hole-less) with a series of lids with an increasing number of holes on it during a period of four weeks. The rooted and acclimatized plants were subjected to determination of chromosome number.
The experiment of in vitro bud treatment with colchicine and oryzalin was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replicates in a 2 × 5 × 3 factorial arrangement of two cultivars (with nested tissue apical buds and nodal segments), five concentrations of each agent, and three treatment durations. There were 30 treatments and each treatment had four buds and was repeated four times; therefore, a total of 480 buds were used in this experiment.
Ex vitro root-dipping in colchicine for chromosome doubling
-
Colchicine solutions for root dipping were prepared by adding 100 ml of distilled water into (300 ml) Erlenmeyer flask, then adding appropriate amount of the colchicine stock solution. Plants with roots of 'Prelude' and 'Polana' were pulled out from the ex vitro rooting medium. The lower leaves of the plant were removed and kept only the top 2−3 leaves. The plant roots were trimmed to 5 cm long, gently rinsed with running water for 1 min, and blotted dry. Ten ml of each of four colchicine solutions (0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mM) was added to a 50 ml disposable plastic tube (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). Two plants were inserted into a tube placed in a test tube rack with the root submerged in colchicine solution for a 4 or 8 h colchicine treatment. The tube rack was covered with aluminum foil. There were 16 treatments (2 cultivars × 4 concentrations × 2 durations) and three tubes per treatment (treated as replication). After treatment, plant roots were rinsed three times with distilled water in three 300 ml magenta boxes with 10-min intervals. Rinsed plants were then planted in a seedling tray filled with ProMix BX+ mycorrhizae (Premier Horticulture Inc., Quakertown, PA, USA). The trays were placed in the tissue culture room for plant re-growth.
The ex vitro root dipping experiment was conducted as a RCBD with three replications in a 2 × 4 × 2 factorial arrangement with two cultivars ('Polana' or 'Prelude'), four colchicine concentrations (0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 mM), and two durations (4 and 8 h). There were 16 treatments and each treatment had one plant with three replications; therefore, a total of 48 plants were used in this experiment.
Determination of chromosome number
-
New emerging shoot tips from the plants recovered from the chemical treatment of either in vitro buds or ex vitro root dipping were collected. The meristem of the shoot tip was squashed on a microscope viewing plate covered with a slide (VWR international, Randnor, PA, USA). Acetocarmine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution was used to stain the chromosomes. Chromosome detection was carried out on OLYMPUS CX41 microscope (Leeds Precision Instruments Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 40× view. After, plants confirmed to be polyploidy were prepared for DAPI (Vectashield®, Burlingame, CA, USA) image capture following the seven-step process. Step 1, slides with a good image of chromosome profile were dipped in liquid nitrogen for 10 s till the nitrogen stopped boiling around the slide. Step 2, put the slide down on a flat surface and pop off the cover slide using a blade on the corner. Step 3, put the frozen slide into 70% ethanol first for 5 min and air dry using clean blotting paper (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and repeated the previous step with 95% and 100% ethanol solutions (Decon Labratories Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA). Step 4, after slide dried, load 13 µl of the DAPI antifade mounting solution to where the original center of the slide was, placed fresh cover slide flat on the DAPI droplet, and covered with a blotting paper. Step 5, one min after the DAPI antifade mounting solution spread, pressed gently on the corner of the cover slide to remove excess solution. Step 6, placed the finished slide into a shadow box to protect the DAPI dye from light, and then stored in the fridge until the image capture, and Step 7, took the shadow box with prepared slides into a dark room and captured the image with OLYMPUS BX51 (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA).
Data collection and analysis
-
Data were collected after new bud growth was detected. The percent of initial buds developing new shoots were recorded as the survival rate. The number of plants with double the chromosome number of all survived plants was recorded as the polyploidy induction rate. Data in the in vitro bud treatment were tested for normality assumptions using PROC UNIVARIATE and homogeneity of variances among main factors (cultivar, chemicals, concentration, tissue type) were tested using PROC GLM for Hovtest (i.e. Levene). All data were analyzed by PROC GLIMMIX (SAS version 9.0401M6, SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA) for survival and polyploidy rates that were separated by the LSMEANS for factors and their interactions with Options lines (α = 0.05) for simple effects differences. Since PROC GLIMMIX was used to specify for specific distribution for correct analysis, only Type III tests of fixed effects for each response variables of ANOVA were calculated rather than the sum of squares and their means square.
Results
Effects of cultivar, concentration, and treatment duration on the survival and polyploidy induction of in vitro buds
-
Results of the in vitro bud treatment showed that the effect of cultivar on the survival rate was significant, whereas no significance was found in either concentration or treatment duration of both colchicine and oryzalin. There were no significant interactions between the cultivar and the concentration and treatment duration of colchicine or oryzalin on explant survival rate (Table 1) and polyploidy induction (Table 2).
Table 1. Type III tests of fixed effects of cultivar, concentration, and duration on the explant survival of red raspberry cultivars.
Source of variation Numerator
degrees of
freedomDenominator
degrees
of freedomF Value P > F Colchicine Cultivar 1 201 4.15 0.0430* Concentration 4 201 0.77 0.5443 Duration 2 6 0.71 0.4700 Cultivar × Concentration 4 201 0.47 0.5867 Cultivar × Duration 2 201 0.28 0.2800 Concentration × Duration 8 201 0.68 0.6800 Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 8 201 0.80 0.8000 Oryzalin Cultivar 1 202 7.58 0.0064* Concentration 4 202 0.71 0.5860 Duration 2 6 1.28 0.2807 Cultivar × Concentration 4 202 1.41 0.3146 Cultivar × Duration 2 202 0.46 0.6292 Concentration × Duration 8 202 0.39 0.9267 Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 8 202 0.49 0.8631 * Significant at α < 0.05. Table 2. Type III tests of fixed effects of cultivar, concentration and duration on polyploidy induction of red raspberry cultivars.
Source of variation Numerator
degrees
of freedomDenominator
degrees
of freedomF Value P > F Colchicine Cultivar 1 67 0.32 0.3209 Concentration 4 67 0.41 0.4139 Duration 2 NA NA NA Cultivar × Concentration 4 67 0.41 0.4139 Cultivar × Duration 2 NA NA NA Concentration × Duration 8 NA NA NA Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 8 NA NA NA Oryzalin Cultivar 1 NA NA NA Concentration 4 NA NA NA Duration 2 NA NA NA Cultivar × Concentration 4 NA NA NA Cultivar × Duration 2 NA NA NA Concentration × Duration 8 NA NA NA Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 8 NA NA NA NA: SAS could not compute data analysis due to no polyploidy values being present at different treatment levels. The effect of cultivar on the survival rate in colchicine treatments was significantly different (Table 1). 'Prelude' had a better survival rate (12.95%) than 'Polana' (7.08%) across all colchicine treatments (Table 3). In the oryzalin treatment, the effect of cultivar on the explant survival rate was also significant (Table 1). Unlike the cultivar response to colchicine, 'Polana' (14.17%) has a higher survival rate than 'Prelude' (6.15%) across all oryzalin treatments (Table 3). There were no significant interactions among oryzalin concentration, cultivar, and treatment duration on explant survival rate (Table 1). Due to no polyploidy plants being produced with oryzalin, no probability rate was calculated in SAS ANOVA (Table 2).
Table 3. Effect of cultivar on the explant survival rate in the colchicine and oryzalin treatment.
Cultivar Survival rate (%) Colchicine treatment Oryzalin treatment 'Prelude' 12.95a* 6.15b 'Polana' 7.08b 14.17a * The same letter followed behind indicates no significance at α < 0.05. A tetraploid plant of 'Prelude' was identified from the treatment of 160 mM colchicine for 96 h with a sample size of 16 plants. Chromosome counting indicated that the plant contains 28 chromosomes in the meristem cell (2n = 4x = 28) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
DAPI comparison of (a) diploid 'Prelude' (2n = 2x =14) and (b) tetraploid 'Prelude' (2n = 4x = 28). Bar = 10 µm.
Effects of cultivar, colchicine concentration, and treatment duration on plant survival and polyploidy induction in root dipping treatment
-
Results showed that there were no significant differences in plant survival rate among cultivar, colchicine concentration, and treatment duration. No interactions between these factors were detected (Table 4). There was a trend of decreasing survival rate as an increase of colchicine concentration (Table 5). However, significant effects of cultivar (α = 0.1) and colchicine concentration (α = 0.5) on polyploidy induction were detected and an interaction between cultivar and concentration was also significant at α = 0.05 (Table 6).
Table 4. Type III tests of fixed effects of cultivar, concentration, and treatment duration on the plant survival in the root dipping treatment of raspberry cultivars.
Source of variation Numerator
degrees of
freedomDenominator
degrees of
freedomF Value P > F Cultivar 1 32 0 1.0000 Concentration 3 32 1.89 0.1513 Duration 1 32 0.33 0.5677 Cultivar × Concentration 3 32 0.22 0.8802 Cultivar × Duration 1 32 1.33 0.2568 Concentration × Duration 3 32 1.00 0.4055 Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 3 32 0.67 0.5787 Table 5. The effect of colchicine concentration on plant survival rate in root dipping treatment of raspberry.
Colchicine (mM) Plant survival rate (%) 0 100a* 0.1 100a 1.0 97.92a 10 89.58a * The same letter followed behind indicates no significance at α < 0.05. Table 6. Type III tests of fixed effects of cultivar, concentration, and treatment duration on the polyploidy induction in the root dipping treatment of raspberry cultivars.
Source of variation Numerator
degrees of
freedomDenominator
degrees of
freedomF value P > F Cultivar 1 32 4.00 0.0540** Concentration 3 32 4.00 0.0159* Duration 1 32 0 1.0000 Cultivar × Concentration 3 32 4.00 0.0159* Cultivar × Duration 1 32 0 1.0000 Concentration × Duration 3 32 0 1.0000 Cultivar × Concentration × Duration 3 32 0 1.0000 * Significant at α < 0.05. ** Significant at α < 0.1. In the root dipping study, a polyploidy induction rate of 16.67% was achieved in the treatment of 10 mM colchicine for 'Prelude' (Table 7), indicating the different response of cultivars to colchicine. The result also indicates that an increase of colchicine concentration is needed for future polyploidy induction in red raspberry cultivars when ex vitro root dipping method is used.
Table 7. The effect of cultivar × colchicine concentration on the polyploidy rate in root dipping treatment of raspberry cultivars.
Colchicine (mM) Polyploidy induction rate (%) Cultivar ‘Prelude’ Cultivar ‘Polana’ 0 0b* 0b 0.1 0b 0b 1.0 0b 0b 10 16.67a 0b * The same lowercase letter indicates no significance at α < 0.05. -
The authors would like to thank Dr. Jawahar Jyoti for his help with statistical analyses.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Hermanson AL, Dai W. 2023. Polyploidy induction of raspberry species (Rubus) using colchicine and oryzalin. Technology in Horticulture 3:22 doi: 10.48130/TIH-2023-0022
Polyploidy induction of raspberry species (Rubus) using colchicine and oryzalin
- Received: 11 June 2023
- Accepted: 04 September 2023
- Published online: 02 November 2023
Abstract: Raspberry (Rubus spp.) is a fruit crop used in many products across the United States. Commercial production of raspberry in North Dakota is challenging due to lack of cultivars with winter hardiness. In this study, two diploid red raspberry cultivars 'Prelude' and 'Polana' that are reported hardy in USDA hardiness zone 5 were used to induce polyploid raspberries that may have benefits of greater growth vigor, enhanced stress tolerance, larger fruit size, and higher yield. The effects of cultivar, anti-mitotic agent and its concentration, and the treatment duration on in vitro and ex vitro polyploidy induction were determined. 'Prelude' succeeded in polyploidy induction through the colchicine treatment of in vitro explants (apical and nodal buds) and ex vitro root dipping. There were three verified tetraploid 'Prelude' plants. One tetraploid plant of 'Prelude' was developed when in vitro explants were treated with 160 mM colchicine for 96 h and the other two were developed when the root system was dipped in the 10 mM colchicine for 8 h. No polyploid plants of 'Polana' were developed. Oryzalin, another anti-mitotic agent, did not succeed in polyploidy induction in this study. This study provides useful information on polyploidy induction in raspberry species, which could benefit future germplasm enhancement of raspberry and other Rubus species.
-
Key words:
- Raspberry /
- In vitro and ex vitro chromosome doubling /
- Tetraploid