-
The production of solar power is increasing in popularity because of its ubiquitous accessibility, minimal upkeep needs, etc[22−29]. There was much discussion about the mathematical simulation of the solar photovoltaic (PV) system in previous research[30−32]. Power-switching equipment enables the photovoltaic (PV) solar power system to operate at MPP in an array of conditions of the atmosphere[33]. A method of producing energy that operates by the warmth of the sun, a never-ending supply of pure, unlimited energy, is known as Concentrated Solar Electricity (CSP). This type of solar energy production often serves as a massive, concentrated supply of power for utilities[34] as well as requiring a lot of direct sunshine. The plurality of MPPT algorithms utilized to manage these power-switching components in the photovoltaic (PV) system includes P&O, Increment Conductivity (IC), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC), as well as others[35]. The P&O method takes into consideration the slope of the curve known as P-V to select a new functioning point[36]. A DC-DC booster converter is one of the inner stages described by the investigation. It immediately changes by monitoring the quantity of solar output electricity as well as the duty period of the drive-switching pulse[37]. Besides providing access to a revised unipolar in nature Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation inverter (PWM), the method offers an improved SPWM converter with an adjusted, more powerful reference waveform compared to the regular SPWM as well as a converter with Zero crossing Detection circuits[38]. Compared to a source of AC electricity like a three separate phases grid, which is indefinitely competent, the DC voltage generated by a PV array is far less valuable. As a consequence, various attempts at DC to AC conversion have previously been made[39]. Single-stage and two-stage converting procedures are both accessible[40]. Regardless of all the presently available techniques, the P&O MPPT approach is the one that is most frequently used[41]. Even though the gradual permeability technique is faster than P&O, it is still quite slow for devices that are connected to the grid since it needs to do computations to keep track of its heading toward the center (maximum power point)[42]. Particle swarm optimizing, fuzzy theory, and genetic algorithm development are some of the instruments for subsequent generation approaches. Contrarily, rigorous methods are implemented for conventional approaches, including linear programming (LP). The study authors proposed that an inverter uses a suitable voltage-regulated oscillation (VCO) to provide variable frequency carriers controlled by standard voltage from the grid produced by a full rectification wave[43]. Following thorough adjusting, fuzzy logic-based techniques offer quick responses, but they have problems with implementation as well as need previous information to establish the fuzziness parameters for the technique. An overview of P&O techniques can be found in Attia et al.[42]. This method claims that energy is lost as a result of the point of operation oscillating around the point of greatest power. While decreasing the fixed disturbance size of steps might lessen these fluctuations, it will take longer to reach MPP. To deal with this troublesome situation, an improved P&O algorithm for MPPT featuring adjustable step size is presented. Since a PV module's production is a DC and the electrical grid's interface requires AC electricity, a DC-AC converter is required[44]. The MultiStart optimization (MS) algorithm-based PI (MS-PI) used in this study to manage the index of modulation under various load scenarios results in a superior voltage regulator for freestanding solar power inverters[45].
Various methods have been used in literature to regulate Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) systems. The most commonly used methods are Incremental Conductance (IC) and Perturb and Observe (P&O), which are categorized based on the electrical power or current characteristics used for control loops[46,47]. The indirect control approach of active and reactive power was developed based on the field orientation control (FOC) for induction motors. Voltage-oriented control (VOC) involves orienting voltage vectors with respect to current vectors[48]. In PWM converters, measurements of input voltage and current are utilized by additional controllers to determine active and reactive power. Direct Power Control (DPC) is a method of instantaneous power control that uses switching tables and hysteresis comparisons[49]. Despite offering superior dynamic behavior, DPC has a few shortcomings. It cannot achieve a constant switching frequency and requires a high sampling frequency[50]. Virtual Flow-based DPC (VFDPC) and Virtual Flux-based VOC (VFOC) techniques are utilized as the foundation for further controls that use virtual flux to estimate voltage[51,52]. In their paper, Ouchen et al.[52] propose a direct power control method (DPC-SVM) based on vector modulation. The method involves the use of a PI/PID controller to keep track of the loop reference. By adjusting the controller settings, the system's behavior can be made dynamic and steady[53]. The controller's high performance ensures improved quality and robustness of the control. A new type of control called Fractional Order PID (FOPID) was developed by modifying the integration sequence of the conventional PID control system to a fractional one[54]. The FOPID configuration controller is known for its improved specified responsiveness and ability to adapt to changes in the controlled device. Tuning the FOPID variables enhances the responsiveness and strengthens the resilience of the controlled device when compared to a standard PID-controlled system[55]. In their publication, Jain & Saravanakumar conducted a thorough analysis of FOPID and traditional PID control systems[56,57]. The FOPID was used by Kakkar et al. to manage the flux-oriented virtual control of a PWM converter linked to the electrical grid[58]. The simulation results showed that the FOPID algorithm significantly increased the injected electrical performance compared to a traditional PID control system. Additionally, the FOPID algorithm proved to be less susceptible to loads and variable fluctuations. To improve the responsiveness of the automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system, a fractional filter was suggested and applied to the FOPID control system. This approach, known as SCA-FOPIDFF control, resulted in a significant enhancement of the AVR system efficiency[59]. Regardless of the type of controller used, whether PID or FOPID, tuning the settings is essential for the converter to respond satisfactorily.
Based on a thorough analysis of numerous studies and publications, Table 1 provides a summarized view of scientific articles. The table discusses different characteristics such as the type of DC-link and current controller used in various reference structures to regulate energy current or voltage in 1-phase or 3-phase inverters. It also highlights the number of modulation approaches, filter types, and feedback loop counts used in different grid-connected implementations. From the aforementioned articles and the research papers presented in Table 1, it can be inferred that each of these controls has certain limitations and challenges.
Table 1. Key features of various controllers suggested in scholarly works.
Ref. NOP, CRF CC DLC FL CP F MT A [60] 3-PH DP, PI DB M-L C, V LCL DPWM G [61] 3-PH Active recative control PI, PR M-L V, P L PWM G [62] 3-PH MPC − S-L V, C L PWM PV [63] 3-PH MPC − S-L C LCL PWM G [64] 3-PH Fuzzy PI M-L V, C L SVPWM PV [65] 1-PH Fractional order PR − M-L C, P L SPWM PV [66] 3-PH Fractional order PI Fractional order PR M-L V, C LCL PWM PV [67] 3-PH PI PI M-L V, C LCL PWM PV [68] 3-PH PR PI M-L V, C LCL PWM PV [69] 1-PH FuzzySMC − S-L V L PWM PV [70] 3-PH PI PI M-L V, C L SVPWM PV [71] 1-PH PI, MPC PI, MPC M-L V, C L PWM PV [72] 3-PH PI, Vector control PI M-L V, C L PWM PV [73] 3-PH Fractional order SMC − S-L C L PWM PV [74] 3-PH MPC − S-L C LCL PWM G [75] 1-PH Fractional order RC − S-L C LCL PWM G NOP: Number of Phases, CRF: Control Reference Frames, CC: Current Controller, DLC: DC-Link Controller, FL: Feedback Loop, CP: Control Parameters, F: Filter, MT: Modulation Technique, A: Application, M-L: Multiple loop, S-L: Single loop, V: Voltage, C: Current, P: Power, and G: General. The study mentioned earlier makes it evident that it is impossible to forecast which of these dispatching methods would far exceed the other in terms of system efficiency. The feasibility of supplying an Iraqi home's power demands with a grid-connected PV system is investigated in this study. Utilizing HOMER's MATLAB Linking software and taking into account forecasts of both demand for electricity and potential solar production of cells, an enhanced dispatch approach is developed. Depending on the anticipated information, the apparatus operates at its most effective and efficient levels. In order to contrast the developed plan with the standard techniques of loading follow (LF) and cycling charge (CC) for the HES, a techno-economic and environmental assessment is conducted[76].
-
The primary diagram of a solar energy system that connects to the grid is shown in Fig. 2. There are two different configurations for grid-dependent solar power plants; the three-stage configuration is the most popular. In the dual-stage installation process, PV as well as the network are intertwined with both power converter phases (DC-DC, DC-AC). PV panels, a DC-DC conversion, a DC-AC inverter, and an electrical system are the components of a network-connected PV construction. In the recommended system the DC-to-DC conversion is performed by a converter known as a boost, and the incorporated MPPT controller maximizes the output of each PV module. Using DC-to-AC conversion devices, the solar energy (PV) system is connected to the electrical grid. A three-level inverters and converters are used for converting DC to AC.
Figure 2.
Overall system design[76].
Design of the inverter controller
-
In order to connect a photovoltaic array to the AC bus, a power inverter is necessary. A three-phase inverter, when connected to the system, receives a steady DC power supply from the booster converter. These types of inverters are used only in systems that require them. They generate a three-phase voltage (va, vb, and vc) and are capable of producing a significant amount of power.
The primary function of voltage source inverters (VSI) is to convert a steady voltage of DC producing a three-phase alternate current voltage with adjustable frequency and magnitude. A triple-level conversion with three bridging legs that are neutral-point restrained is used in the current work. According to Fig. 3, every bridge leg—A, B, and C—can be in any three different voltage indicates, which are referred to as having 'three' in this setting. A converter's architecture is shown in Fig. 3.
The integrated circuit is turned ON and OFF to supply the necessary outputs and thus produce the AC voltage result of the inverters. Pulse width modulation (PWM) techniques are frequently used to carry out this function. It should be taken into account that to prevent the short circuit of the DC supply, the switches on each leg should be actuated alternately. Integrated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) and power MOSFET components can be used for the implementation of switching. The power ratings and switching speeds of each device vary. As seen in Fig. 4, IGBTs are ideally suited for applications requiring medium power as well as switching frequencies. Every piece of equipment has a different switching speed as well as power rating. IGBTs have the greatest potential for uses needing moderate power consumption as well as switching frequency, as can be shown in Fig. 4.
Maximum power point tracking
-
Temperature variations, variations in the sun's direction, and variations in the amount of sunlight all affect the solar PV module's power generation. There is also a single maximum power point in this specific working situation of the PV features. The photovoltaic panel should ideally function near this point, meaning that its output should be getting closer to the MPPT. Maximum power point tracking is the procedure of running a photovoltaic module under certain circumstances (MPPT). Optimizing photovoltaic power enhances the sunlight's PV module's use[75].
There have already been several algorithms for MPPT put out in previous years. The works featured here contain two comparisons among them. These days, the P&O and the incremental permeability approach are the most often used techniques[76]. There is also a description of the Hill climbing method in[77]. The suggested model makes use of the gradual conductance approach as it has the primary benefit of offering high effectiveness in quickly changing environmental circumstances. However, if it was necessary for the modeling, we might employ an alternative MPPT method. The output current of the PV array serves as the technique's foundation and is continuously adjusted to attain the voltage at the maximum power point (MPP).
Design of DC-to-DC converter
-
An unregulated direct current (DC) supply voltage is converted to the regulated direct current voltage that outputs at a specified voltage level using a switched-mode DC-to-DC converter. Switching sources of power offers substantially improved effectiveness as well as energy density as opposed to a linear power supply. Typical parts of fundamental conversion that step upward or lower the source voltage include transistors, diodes, capacitors, as well as inductive devices. Buck (step-down), boost (step-up), and buck-boost (step-up or step-down) have been the three main converter configurations. In our recommended design, the boost topologies are utilized due to its free-wheeling diode's potential to be employed to avoid the reverse current and effectively increase PV array voltage generation to a higher level.
It is feasible to control converters utilizing a pulse width modulation (PWM) rate of duty while the resultant voltage of a conversion is dependent on the current state of the transistor switch. The optimal load resistance of the photovoltaic panel is therefore achieved by varying duty cycles. The boost DC converter increases its input voltage by momentarily storing the energy within an inductive element and utilizing the stored energy to increase the supply voltage to a greater amount. The layout of the circuit for a converter that produces a boost is shown in Fig. 5.
To create separation among the converter's internal components, an inductor is charged up while switch G is closed. Diode D has reverse bias at both the point of input and the final result. When a switch is turned, electricity is stored in the inductor before being transferred to the demand. The grid and inverter characteristics taken into account while developing the filter are shown in the following Table 2. L's value is calculated using the current ripples. Reduced ripple results in reduced switching as well as conducting losses.
Table 2. Design parameters.
Details Value Grid line voltage (V L-L) 415 V Grid phase voltage (Vph) 240 V DC source voltage (Vdc) 250 V Output power fed to grid (Pn) 1,000 W Grid Frequency (f) 50 Hz Switching frequency (fs) 20 KHz -
All data used in the implementation of this work is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Al Mashhadany Y, Al Smadi T, Abbas AK, Algburi S, Taha BA. 2024. Optimal controller design for high performance of solar energy for grid-connected systems. Wireless Power Transfer 11: e007 doi: 10.48130/wpt-0024-0005
Optimal controller design for high performance of solar energy for grid-connected systems
- Received: 10 April 2024
- Revised: 23 July 2024
- Accepted: 21 August 2024
- Published online: 22 October 2024
Abstract: Engineers are searching for alternatives to conventional sources of electricity to solve the energy crisis as a result of the sharp increase in energy usage. The design, simulations, and investigation of a three-phase, 10.44 kW solar energy system are presented in this study. PV analysis is also done. The photovoltaic system consists of six concurrent strings, each consisting of four photovoltaic cells connected in series, and an inverter that provides a two-way flow of energy. The output of a Phase Lock Loop (PLL) comments linearization system is utilized for generating a signal, and the power converting voltage is synchronized with the signal using this reference voltage. Two stages that are most appropriate for the battery's rechargeable charging process are chosen to replenish a battery bank in either quantity or float arrangement for eight sequences of 12.5 V and 200 Ah rechargeable battery packs. The designed photovoltaic (PV) system falls under the category of hybrid systems. Not to mention, a MATLAB computer model has been developed for a grid-dependent solar PV system that makes use of a sinusoidal pulse width modulator and a voltage source inverter.
-
Key words:
- High performance /
- Photovoltaic (PV) systems /
- DC-DC converter /
- Phase lock loop /
- Grid synchronization