Search
2025 Volume 1
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Multi-source HM pollution and complex migration processes in reservoirs.

    Intelligent monitoring systems enable real-time HM monitoring and early warning for reservoirs.

    Emerging remediation strategies demonstrate potential for the sustainable removal of HMs from reservoirs.

  • Reservoir ecosystems play a critical role in water resource management and socio-economic development, yet they are increasingly threatened by heavy metal (HM) contamination, highlighting the urgent need for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative solutions. This study identifies point-source discharge, non-point source pollution, and sediment-water interface dynamics as the main sources of HM pollution in reservoir systems, with spatiotemporal variability governed by hydrogeochemical processes and modulated by biogeochemical cycles. While progress has been made in ecological risk assessment through tools like the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) model and its Bayesian refinement, health risk evaluation now integrates the EPA model with Monte Carlo Simulation (MC), enabling more accurate source identification and predictive analysis. In parallel, intelligent monitoring technologies, such as sensor networks, the Internet of Things (IoT), and machine learning, have significantly improved real-time HM detection capabilities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of emerging sustainable remediation strategies, including nanotechnology, agricultural waste-based adsorbents, aquatic plants, biochar, in situ capping, biological floating islands, electrochemical, and electrokinetic methods, with a focus on their feasibility and effectiveness in reservoir environments. Through a synthesis of multidimensional HM pollution analyses, the study identifies key research gaps, such as the need to better understand long-term low-dose biological impacts, develop multifunctional remediation materials, and establish global risk management frameworks. The findings ultimately contribute to systematic and actionable strategies for HM pollution control in reservoir systems.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Tortajada C. 2020. Contributions of recycled wastewater to clean water and sanitation Sustainable Development Goals. NPJ Clean Water 3:22 doi: 10.1038/s41545-020-0069-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Weiss JS, Møller HU, Aldave AJ, Seitz B, Bredrup C, et al. 2015. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies−edition 2. Cornea 34(2):117−159 doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Weiss JS, Rapuano CJ, Seitz B, Busin M, Kivelä TT, et al. 2024. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies−edition 3. Cornea 43(4):466−527 doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003420

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. 2024. China's Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment. pp. 35−70
    [5] Unesco World Water Assessment Programme. 2024. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: water for prosperity and peace. Report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. 174 pp. doi: 10.18356/9789213589113
    [6] Xiong J, Gao Y, Zhou Y, Wu H, Li X, et al. 2023. The development status and research frontier of lake sciences from the perspective of Natural Science Foundation of China. Geographical Research 42(4):1088−1100 doi: 10.11821/dlyj020221301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Mulligan M, van Soesbergen A, Sáenz L. 2020. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Scientific Data 7(1):3 doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0362-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Zhao Z, Wang S, Lu W, Yang W, Li S. 2024. Water quality assessment, possible origins and health risks of toxic metal(loid)s in five cascade reservoirs in the upper Mekong. Journal of Cleaner Production 441:141049 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Yuan X, Xue N, Han Z. 2021. A meta-analysis of heavy metals pollution in farmland and urban soils in China over the past 20 years. Journal of Environmental Sciences 101:217−226 doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Ahmadijokani F, Molavi H, Peyghambari A, Shojaei A, Rezakazemi M, et al. 2022. Efficient removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous media by unmodified and modified nanodiamonds. Journal of Environmental Management 316:115214 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115214

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Zhu H, Bing H, Wu Y, Zhou J, Sun H, et al. 2019. The spatial and vertical distribution of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the three gorges reservoir determined by anti-seasonal flow regulation. Science of The Total Environment 664:79−88 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Liu P, Zheng C, Wen M, Luo X, Wu Z, et al. 2021. Ecological risk assessment and contamination history of heavy metals in the sediments of Chagan Lake, northeast China. Water 13(7):894 doi: 10.3390/w13070894

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Lee PK, Lim J, Jeong YJ, Hwang S, Lee JY, et al. 2021. Recent pollution and source identification of metal(loid)s in a sediment core from Gunsan Reservoir, South Korea. Journal of Hazardous Materials 416:126204 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126204

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Nikolić D, Skorić S, Lenhardt M, Hegediš A, Krpo-Ćetković J. 2020. Risk assessment of using fish from different types of reservoirs as human food – A study on European Perch (Perca fluviatilis). Environmental Pollution 257:113586 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113586

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Akogwu S, Wan Omar WM, Muhammad S, Subehi L, Fielding J. 2023. Past metal(loid) pollution records inferred from the sediments of Bukit Merah Reservoir Perak, Malaysia. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 32(2):1507−1518 doi: 10.15244/pjoes/157053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Gou T, Liang R, Guo Q, Chen S, Zhao X, et al. 2024. Water environmental quality and algal bloom risk in Xiannv Lake after heavy metal pollution incident. Ecological Science 43(5):121 doi: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2024.05.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Guo Q, Li N, Bing Y, Chen S, Zhang Z, et al. 2018. Denitrifier communities impacted by heavy metal contamination in freshwater sediment. Environmental Pollution 242:426−432 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Rocha GM, Salvador B, de Souza Laino P, Santos GHC, Demoner LE, et al. 2022. Responses of marine zooplankton indicators after five years of a dam rupture in the Doce River, Southeastern Brazil. Science of The Total Environment 806:151249 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Nong X, Shao D, Zhong H, Liang J. 2020. Evaluation of water quality in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China using the water quality index (WQI) method. Water Research 178:115781 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115781

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Bing HJ, Liu Y, Huang JC, Tian X, Zhu H, et al. 2022. Dam construction attenuates trace metal contamination in water through increased sedimentation in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Water Research 217:118419 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118419

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Gao L, Gao B, Xu D, Peng W, Lu J. 2019. Multiple assessments of trace metals in sediments and their response to the water level fluctuation in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of The Total Environment 648:197−205 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Huang L, Fang H, Ni K, Yang W, Zhao W, et al. 2018. Distribution and potential risk of heavy metals in sediments of the Three Gorges Reservoir: the relationship to environmental variables. Water 10(12):1840 doi: 10.3390/w10121840

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Liu Z, Wang H, Gao J, Zhu M, Ma H, et al. 2024. Impact of joint dispatch of reservoir group on water pollution incident in drinking water source area. Water Research 266:122312 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Yazdian H, Zahraie B, Jaafarzadeh N. 2024. Multi-objective reservoir operation optimization by considering ecosystem sustainability and ecological targets. Water Resources Management 38(2):881–892 doi: 10.1007/s11269-023-03693-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Zhang J, Li X, Guo L, Deng Z, Wang D, et al. 2021. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and water quality characteristics of the reservoir control reaches in the middle Han River, China. Science of The Total Environment 799:149472 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149472

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Cieśla M, Gruca-Rokosz R. 2024. Fate of heavy metals in ecosystems of dam reservoirs: Transport, distribution and significance of the origin of organic matter. Environmental Pollution 361:124811 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124811

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Willacker JJ, Eagles-Smith CA, Lutz MA, Tate MT, Lepak JM, et al. 2016. Reservoirs and water management influence fish mercury concentrations in the western United States and Canada. Science of The Total Environment 568:739−748 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Lopes MC, Martins ALM, Simedo MBL, Filho MVM, Costa RCA, et al. 2021. A case study of factors controlling water quality in two warm monomictic tropical reservoirs located in contrasting agricultural watersheds. Science of The Total Environment 762:144511 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144511

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Rajendran S, Priya AK, Senthil Kumar P, Hoang TKA, Sekar K, et al. 2022. A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater - A review. Chemosphere 303:135146 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135146

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Fu ZJ, Jiang SK, Chao XY, Zhang CX, Shi Q, et al. 2022. Removing miscellaneous heavy metals by all-in-one ion exchange-nanofiltration membrane. Water Research 222:118888 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118888

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] You S, Lu J, Tang CY, Wang X. 2017. Rejection of heavy metals in acidic wastewater by a novel thin-film inorganic forward osmosis membrane. Chemical Engineering Journal 320:532−538 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Yang L, Hu W, Chang Z, Liu T, Fang D, et al. 2021. Electrochemical recovery and high value-added reutilization of heavy metal ions from wastewater: Recent advances and future trends. Environment International 152:106512 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Yang J, Hou B, Wang J, Tian B, Bi J, et al. 2019. Nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials 9(3):424 doi: 10.3390/nano9030424

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Ghuge SA, Nikalje GC, Kadam US, Suprasanna P, Hong JC. 2023. Comprehensive mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity in plants, detoxification, and remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 450:131039 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Palansooriya KN, Li J, Dissanayake PD, Suvarna M, Li L, et al. 2022. Prediction of soil heavy metal immobilization by biochar using machine learning. Environmental Science & Technology 56(7):4187−4198 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08302

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Bahri M. 2020. Analysis of the water, energy, food and land nexus using the system archetypes: a case study in the Jatiluhur reservoir, West Java, Indonesia. Science of The Total Environment 716:137025 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Liu Q, Xu X, Lin L, Bai L, Yang M, et al. 2024. A retrospective analysis of heavy metals and multi elements in the Yangtze River Basin: distribution characteristics, migration tendencies and ecological risk assessment. Water Research 254:121385 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Feng W, Tao Y, Liu M, Deng Y, Yang F, et al. 2024. Distribution and risk assessment of nutrients and heavy metals from sediments in the world-class water transfer projects. Environmental Sciences Europe 36:140 doi: 10.1186/s12302-024-00970-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Wang Y, Liu RH, Zhang YQ, Cui XQ, Tang AK, et al. 2016. Transport of heavy metals in the Huanghe River estuary, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(4):288 doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4908-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Zamora-Ledezma C, Negrete-Bolagay D, Figueroa F, Zamora-Ledezma E, Ni M, et al. 2021. Heavy metal water pollution: A fresh look about hazards, novel and conventional remediation methods. Environmental Technology & Innovation 22:101504 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Zheng X, Lu Y, Xu J, Geng H, Li Y. 2023. Assessment of heavy metals leachability characteristics and associated risk in typical acid mine drainage (AMD)-contaminated river sediments from North China. Journal of Cleaner Production 413:137338 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137338

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Kuang G, Xue S, Liu Z. 2024. Distribution characteristics and pollution evaluation of heavy metals in surface water of a uranium tailing area based on spatial interpolation. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 332(4):4471−4477 doi: 10.1007/s10967-024-09643-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Zhang T, Zhang C, Du S, Zhang Z, Lu W, et al. 2023. A review: the formation, prevention, and remediation of acid mine drainage. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30(52):111871−111890 doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30220-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Jiao Y, Liu Y, Wang W, Li Y, Chang W, et al. 2023. Heavy metal distribution characteristics, water quality evaluation, and health risk evaluation of surface water in Abandoned Multi-Year Pyrite Mine Area. Water 15(17):3138 doi: 10.3390/w15173138

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Chen MQ, Lu GN, Wu JX, Sun JT, Yang CF, et al. 2020. Acidity and metallic elements release from AMD-affected river sediments: effect of AMD standstill and dilution. Environmental Research 186:109490 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Wang S, Mei G, Xie X, Guo L. 2021. The influence of the instantaneous collapse of tailings pond on downstream facilities. Advances in civil engineering 2021:4253315 doi: 10.1155/2021/4253315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Techane G, Sahilu G, Alakangas L, Mulat W, Kloos H. 2023. Assessment of heavy metal pollution associated with tailing dam in gold mining area, southern Ethiopia. Geosystem Engineering 26:1−11 doi: 10.1080/12269328.2022.2160833

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Wu Q, Qi J, Xia X. 2017. Long-term variations in sediment heavy metals of a reservoir with changing trophic states: implications for the impact of climate change. Science of the Total Environment 609:242−250 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Ullah M, Innocenzi V, Ayedi K, Vegliò F, Ippolito NM. 2024. Automotive wastewater treatment processes and technologies: a review. ACS ES& T Water 4(9):3663−3680 doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c00301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Tytła M, Kostecki M. 2019. Ecological risk assessment of metals and metalloid in bottom sediments of water reservoir located in the key anthropogenic "hot spot" area (Poland). Environmental Earth Sciences 78:179 doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8146-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Chassiot L, Francus P, De Coninck A, Lajeunesse P, Cloutier D, et al. 2019. Spatial and temporal patterns of metallic pollution in Québec City, Canada: Sources and hazard assessment from reservoir sediment records. Science of The Total Environment 673:136−147 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Cao D, Cao W, Fang J, Cai L. 2014. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses from agricultural systems in China: a meta-analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin 85(2):727−732 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.05.041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Panda RK, Behera S. 2003. Non-point source pollution of water resources: Problems and perspectives. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 1(3−4):308−311

    Google Scholar

    [54] Humane SK, Ukey RR, Humane SS, Gajbhiye PB, Aparajit N. 2023. 210Pb geochronology and heavy metal fluxes in Darna and Gangapur Reservoirs, Maharashtra, India. Journal of The Geological Society of India 99:1427−1437 doi: 10.1007/s12594-023-2489-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Zhang XN, Guo QP, Shen XX, Yu SW, Qiu GY. 2015. Water quality, agriculture and food safety in China: Current situation, trends, interdependencies, and management. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14(11):2365−2379 doi: 10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61128-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Cabral JBP, Oliveira SF, dos Santos FF, Becegato VA, Becegato VR, et al. 2021. Potentially toxic metal environmental pollution in sediments of a model hydroelectric plant water reservoir in Brazil. Environmental Earth Sciences 80(16):506 doi: 10.1007/s12665-021-09808-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Mutshekwa T, Mugwedi L, Wasserman RJ, Dondofema F, Cuthbert R, et al. 2024. Aquatic macroinvertebrate community colonisation and succession in macadamia orchard and communal area reservoirs: a case study of Luvuvhu River valley, South Africa. Water SA 50(2):137−147 doi: 10.17159/wsa/2024.v50.i2.4083

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Žáková Z, Kočková E. 1999. Biomonitoring and assessment of heavy metal contamination of streams and reservoirs in the Dyje/Thaya river basin, Czech Republic. Water Science and Technology 39(12):225−232 doi: 10.2166/wst.1999.0550

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Zhao G, Wu Q, Hu W, Huang B, Zu Y, et al. 2024. Input and output balance of heavy metals from an abandoned mining area in farmland soils. Journal of Agro-Environment Science 43(7):1492−1502 doi: 10.11654/jaes.2023-0785

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Amorosi A, Sammartino I, Dinelli E, Campo B, Guercia T, et al. 2022. Provenance and sediment dispersal in the Po-Adriatic source-to-sink system unraveled by bulk-sediment geochemistry and its linkage to catchment geology. Earth-Science Reviews 234:104202 doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Canpolat Ö, Varol M, Okan ÖÖ, Eriş KK, Çağlar M. 2020. A comparison of trace element concentrations in surface and deep water of the Keban Dam Lake (Turkey) and associated health risk assessment. Environmental Research 190:109903 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Aradpour S, Noori R, Naseh MRV, Hosseinzadeh M, Safavi S, et al. 2021. Alarming carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in Sabalan Dam Reservoir, Northwest of Iran. Environmental Pollutants and Bioavailability 33(1):278−291 doi: 10.1080/26395940.2021.1978868

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Zhao Z, Li S, Han Q, Yang W, Chang C, et al. 2025. In situ high-resolution insights into the dynamics of arsenic (As) species and heavy metals across the sediment-water interface in a deep karst reservoir. Journal of Hazardous Materials 490:137775 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137775

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Ma Y, Yang C, Liu Z, Han C, Qin Y. 2024. Arsenic mobilization across the sediment-water interface of the Three Gorges Reservoir as a function of water depth using DGT and HR-Peepers: a preliminary study. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 276:116276 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116276

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Cui M, Li Y, Xu D, Lu J, Gao B. 2023. Geochemical characteristics and ecotoxicological risk of arsenic in water-level-fluctuation zone soils of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of The Total Environment 881:163495 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Kao JJ, Chen WJ. 2003. A multiobjective model for non-point source pollution control for an off-stream reservoir catchment. Water Science and Technology 48(10):177−183 doi: 10.2166/wst.2003.0569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Shi B, Li X, Hu W, Xi B, Liu S, et al. 2023. Environmental risk of tailings pond leachate pollution: traceable strategy for leakage channel and influence range of leachate. Journal of Environmental Management 331:117341 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117341

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Ali Hussein Ali M, Sun S, Qian W, Abdou Dodo B. 2020. Electrical resistivity imaging for detection of hydrogeological active zones in karst areas to identify the site of mining waste disposal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(18):22486−22498 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08738-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Zhao CS, Pan X, Yang ST, Xiang H, Zhao J, et al. 2021. Effects and prediction of nonpoint source pollution on the structure of aquatic food webs. Ecohydrology 14:e2257 doi: 10.1002/eco.2257

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Wang C, Yang Z, Zhong C, Ji J. 2016. Temporal-spatial variation and source apportionment of soil heavy metals in the representative river-alluviation depositional system. Environmental Pollution 216:18−26 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Kovács E, Dubbin WE, Tamás J. 2006. Influence of hydrology on heavy metal speciation and mobility in a Pb–Zn mine tailing. Environmental Pollution 141(2):310−320 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Sun W, Cheng K, Sun KY, Ma X. 2021. Microbially mediated remediation of contaminated sediments by heavy metals: a critical review. Current Pollution Reports 7(2):201−212 doi: 10.1007/s40726-021-00175-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Chen Y, Xu Y, Ruan A. 2025. Microbial community structure and causal analysis in sediments of shallow eutrophic freshwater lakes under heavy metal compound pollution. Journal of Hazardous Materials 487:137135 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Huang J, Yuan F, Zeng G, Li X, Gu Y, et al. 2016. Influence of pH on heavy metal speciation and removal from wastewater using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Chemosphere 173:199−206 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Rezaei F, Rastegari Mehr M, Shakeri A, Sacchi E, Borna K, et al. 2024. Predicting bioavailability of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in sediment using various machine learning (ML) models: a case study in Mahabad Dam and River-Iran. Journal of Environmental Management 366:121788 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Liu Q, Jia Z, Liu G, Li S, Hu J. 2023. Assessment of heavy metals remobilization and release risks at the sediment-water interface in estuarine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 187:114517 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114517

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Ordóñez Fernandez R, Giráldez Cervera JV, Vanderlinden K, Carbonell Bojollo R, González Fernández P. 2007. Temporal and spatial monitoring of the pH and heavy metals in a soil polluted by mine spill. Post cleaning effects. Water Air and Soil Pollution 178:229−243 doi: 10.1007/s11270-006-9193-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Ying H, Zhao W, Feng X, Gu C, Wang X. 2022. The impacts of aging pH and time of acid mine drainage solutions on Fe mineralogy and chemical fractions of heavy metals in the sediments. Chemosphere 303(Part 2):135077 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Gutiérrez-León J, Cama J, Queralt I, Jiménez JA, Soler JM. 2021. Effect of acid mine drainage (AMD) on the alteration of hydrated Portland cement and calcareous sandstone. Applied Geochemistry 126:104900 doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2021.104900

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Azouzi R, Charef A, Hamzaoui AH. 2015. Assessment of effect of pH, temperature and organic matter on zinc mobility in a hydromorphic soil. Environmental Earth Sciences 74:2967−2980 doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4328-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] He LP, Liu D, Lin JJ, Yu ZG, Yang XX, et al. 2017. Total nitrogen and pH-controlled chemical speciation, bioavailability and ecological risk from Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in the water level-fluctuating zone sediments of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability 29(1):89−96 doi: 10.1080/09542299.2017.1335179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Liu C, Sun C, et al. 2018. pH Effect on heavy metal release from a polluted sediment. Journal of Chemistry 2018:7597640 doi: 10.1155/2018/7597640

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Toller S, Funari V, Zannoni D, Vasumini, I, Dinelli E. 2022. Sediment quality of the Ridracoli fresh water reservoir in Italy: Insights from aqua regia digestion and sequential extractions. Science of The Total Environment 826:154167 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Fu C, Lan Q, Wu Y, Yan B, Ping W, et al. 2020. Influence of sediment characteristics on heavy metal fraction distribution in the Water-Level Fluctuation Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Water Air and Soil Pollution 231:175 doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04525-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Fernández-Martínez R, Corrochano N, Álvarez-Quintana J, Ordónez A, Ordóñez A, Álvarez R, et al. 2024. Assessment of the ecological risk and mobility of arsenic and heavy metals in soils and mine tailings from the Carmina mine site (Asturias, NW Spain). Environmental Geochemistry and Health 46(3):90 doi: 10.1007/s10653-023-01848-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Ding S, Wang Y, Yang M, Shi R, Ma T, et al. 2022. Distribution and speciation of arsenic in seasonally stratified reservoirs: implications for biotransformation mechanisms governing interannual variability. Science of The Total Environment 806(4):150925 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150925

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Madadi R, Karbassi A, Saeedi M. 2021. Release of heavy metals under pre-set redox potentials in Musa estuary sediments, northwestern of Persian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin 168:112390 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112390

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Ma T, Luo H, Huang K, Pan Y, Tang T, et al. 2021. Integrated ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in an oil shale mining area after restoration. Journal of Environmental Management 300:113797 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] de Souza LR, Knöller K, Ladeira ACQ. 2016. Sulfur isotope fractionation and sequential extraction to assess metal contamination on lake and river sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16:1986−1994 doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1410-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Angst G, Mueller KE, Castellano MJ, Vogel C, Wiesmeier M, et al. 2023. Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key. Nature Communications 14:2967 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38700-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Wu Y, Zhang X, Hao R, Zhou Y, Qiu G, et al. 2023. Rethinking terrestrial dissolved organic matter in dam reservoirs before mixing: linking photodegradation and biodegradation and the phenanthrene binding behavior. Science of The Total Environment 904(24):166653 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166653

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Qu L, He C, Wu Z, Dahlgren RA, Ren M, et al. 2022. Hypolimnetic deoxygenation enhanced production and export of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter in a large stratified reservoir. Water Research 219(8):118537 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Nadon MJ, Metcalfe RA, Williams CJ, Somers KM, Xenopoulos MA. 2015. Assessing the effects of dams and waterpower facilities on riverine dissolved organic matter composition. Hydrobiologia 744(1):145−164 doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-2069-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Cui M, Xu D, Liu X, Lai X, Zhang M, et al. 2024. Influence of spectral and molecular composition of dissolved organic matter on labile Cd mobility in riparian soils in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of The Total Environment 955(24):176736 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176736

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Luo L, Yang T, Dzakpasu M, Jiang X, Guo W, et al. 2024. Interplay of humic acid and Cr(VI) on green microalgae: metabolic responses and chromium enrichment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 480(3):135885 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135885

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Lin W, Guo X, Wang Y, Zhao J, Cheng X, et al. 2025. Dissolved organic matter mediates the interactions between bacterial community and heavy metal fractionation in contaminated coal mine soils. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 297:118237 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118237

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Sá F, Longhini CM, Costa ES, Silva CA, Cagnin RC, et al. 2021. Time-sequence development of metal(loid)s following the 2015 dam failure in the Doce river estuary, Brazil. Science of The Total Environment 769(1):144532 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Ji H, Ding H, Tang L, Li C, Gao Y, et al. 2016. Chemical composition and transportation characteristic of trace metals in suspended particulate matter collected upstream of a metropolitan drinking water source, Beijing. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 169:123−136 doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.07.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Hall BD, St Louis VL, Rolfhus KR, Bodaly RA, Beaty KG, et al. 2005. Impacts of reservoir creation on the biogeochemical cycling of methyl mercury and total mercury in boreal upland forests. Ecosystems 8(3):248−266 doi: 10.1007/s10021-003-0094-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Yang N, Li Y, Zhang W, Lin L, Qian B, et al. 2020. Cascade dam impoundments restrain the trophic transfer efficiencies in benthic microbial food web. Water Research 170(6965):115351 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Singh RP, Manchanda G, Maurya IK, Wei Y. (Eds.) 2020. Microbial Versatility in Varied Environments: Microbes in Sensitive Environments. Singapore: Springer-Nature. 292 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3028-9
    [102] Liu X, Sheng Y, Liu Q, Li Z. 2024. Suspended particulate matter affects the distribution and migration of heavy metals in the Yellow River. The Science of The Total Environment 912:169537 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Zou X, Li Y, Wang L, Ahmed MK, Chen K, et al. 2022. Distribution and assessment of heavy metals in suspended particles in the Sundarban mangrove river, Bangladesh. Marine Pollution Bulletin 181(6):113856 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113856

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Qin S, Li X, Huang J, Li W, Wu P, et al. 2024. Inputs and transport of acid mine drainage-derived heavy metals in karst areas of Southwestern China. Environmental Pollution 343(1):123243 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Chen HH, Ma KY, Huang Y, Yang YC, Ma Z, et al. 2021. Salinity drives functional and taxonomic diversities in global water metagenomes. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:719725 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.719725

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Peterson BD, Poulin BA, Krabbenhoft DP, Tate MT, Baldwin AK, et al. 2023. Metabolically diverse microorganisms mediate methylmercury formation under nitrate-reducing conditions in a dynamic hydroelectric reservoir. The ISME Journal 17(10):1705−1718 doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01482-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Zhang K, Li K, Tong M, Xia Y, Cui Y, et al. 2022. Distribution pattern and influencing factors of heavy metal resistance genes in the Yellow River sediments of Henan section. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(17):10724 doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Sharma M, Kant R, Sharma AK, Sharma AK. 2025. Exploring the impact of heavy metals toxicity in the aquatic ecosystem. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources 9(1):267−280 doi: 10.1007/s42108-024-00284-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Khushbu, Gulati R, Sushma, Kour A, Sharma P. 2022. Ecological impact of heavy metals on aquatic environment with reference to fish and human health. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 14(4):1471−1484 doi: 10.31018/jans.v14i4.3900

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Blankson ER, Klerks PL. 2017. The effect of sediment characteristics on bioturbation-mediated transfer of lead, in freshwater laboratory microcosms with Lumbriculus variegatus. Ecotoxicology 26(2):227−237 doi: 10.1007/s10646-016-1757-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] García-Ordiales E, Esbrí JM, Covelli S, López-Berdonces MA, Higueras PL, et al. 2016. Heavy metal contamination in sediments of an artificial reservoir impacted by long-term mining activity in the Almadén mercury district (Spain). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(7):6024−6038 doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4770-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Geng N, Xia Y, Li D, Bai F, Xu C. 2024. Migration and transformation of heavy metal and its fate in intertidal sediments: a review. Processes 12(2):311 doi: 10.3390/pr12020311

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Wilson DC. 2018. Potential urban runoff impacts and contaminant distributions in shoreline and reservoir environments of Lake Havasu, southwestern United States. The Science of The Total Environment 621(621):95−107 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Yolcubal I, Demiray AD, Çiftçi E, Sanğu E. 2016. Environmental impact of mining activities on surface water and sediment qualities around Murgul copper mine, Northeastern Turkey. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(21):1415 doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6224-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Shoaei SM, Arjmandi SA, Ahmad Mirbagheri S. 2022. Enhancing the CE-QUAL-W2 to model dissolved lead transport and transformation in dam reservoirs: a case study of Shahid Rajaei Dam reservoir, north part of Iran. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(1):1−13 doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19889-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Zeng Y, Wang H, Liang D, Yuan W, Yan Y, et al. 2023. 2023. Three Gorges Dam shifts estuarine heavy metal risk through suspended sediment gradation. Journal of Environmental Management 338(2):117784 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117784

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Xu FL, Li YL, Wang Y, He W, Kong XZ, et al. 2015. Key issues for the development and application of the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model for ecological risk assessment. Ecological Indicators 54:227−237 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] He W, Kong X, Qin N, He Q, Liu W, et al. 2019. Combining species sensitivity distribution (SSD) model and thermodynamic index (exergy) for system-level ecological risk assessment of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Environment International 133:105275 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105275

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Schipper AM, Posthuma L, de Zwart D, Huijbregts MAJ. 2014. Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs). Environmental Science & Technology 48(24):14464−14471 doi: 10.1021/es503223k

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Liu J, Liu R, Zhang Z, Cai Y, Zhang L. 2019. A Bayesian network-based risk dynamic simulation model for accidental water pollution discharge of mine tailings ponds at watershed-scale. Journal of Environmental Management 246:821−831 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121] Zeng X, Du J, Zhang S, Ni T. 2023. Spatial-temporal characteristics of ecological risks from heavy metals for aquatic fauna in drinking water sources of China. Water Air and Soil Pollution 234(12):67 doi: 10.1007/s11270-023-06734-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Dueñas-Moreno J, Mora A, Narvaez-Montoya C, Mahlknecht J. 2024. Trace elements and heavy metal(loid)s triggering ecological risks in a heavily polluted river-reservoir system of central Mexico: Probabilistic approaches. Environmental Research 262:119937 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Sheng D, Meng X, Wen X, Wu J, Yu H, et al. 2022. Contamination characteristics, source identification, and source-specific health risks of heavy metal(loid)s in groundwater of an arid oasis region in Northwest China. Science of The Total Environment 841(1-3):156733 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156733

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Guo LC, Zeng EY. 2010. Broadening the global reach of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is vital to combating globalized environmental problems. Environmental Science and Technology 44(18):6911−6913 doi: 10.1021/es102521x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Dai X, Liang J, Shi H, Yan T, He Z, et al. 2024. Health risk assessment of heavy metals based on source analysis and Monte Carlo in the downstream basin of the Zishui. Environmental Research 245(4):117975 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117975

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Wang J, Wang B, Zhao QB, Cao JN, Xiao X, et al. 2025. Sources analysis and risk assessment of heavy metals in soil in a polymetallic mining area in southeastern Hubei based on Monte Carlo simulation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 290(4):117607 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117607

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Zheng X, Xu J, Wang H, Liu X, Yao D, et al. 2017. Health risk assessment of a reservoir-type water source in the northeastern region of China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 23(4):751−766 doi: 10.1080/10807039.2016.1278518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Ali Fallahzadeh R, Ghaneian MT, Miri M, Dashti MM. 2017. Spatial analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metals concentration in drinking water resources. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(32):24790−24802 doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0102-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Wang D, Han G, Wang Y, Hu M, Liu J, et al. 2024. Effects of damming on riverine heavy metals and environmental risks in the world's largest hydropower engineering, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 83(21):604 doi: 10.1007/s12665-024-11903-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Belanović Simić S, Miljković P, Baumgertel A, Lukić S, Ljubičić J, et al. 2023. Environmental and health risk assessment due to potentially toxic elements in soil near former antimony mine in Western Serbia. Land 12(2):421 doi: 10.3390/land12020421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Ali H, Khan E, Ilahi I. 2019. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. Journal of Chemistry 2019:6730305 doi: 10.1155/2019/6730305

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] Ji WB, Yap SHK, Panwar N, Zhang LL, Lin B, et al. 2016. Detection of low-concentration heavy metal ions using optical microfiber sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 237:142−149 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Kamel AH, Hefnawy A, Hazeem LJ, Rashdan SA, Abd-Rabboh HSM. 2024. Abd-Rabboh HSM. Current perspectives, challenges, and future directions in the electrochemical detection of microplastics. RSC Advances 14(3):2134−2158 doi: 10.1039/D3RA06755F

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134] Samal S, Mohanty RP, Mohanty PS, Giri MK, Pati S, et al. 2023. Implications of biosensors and nanobiosensors for the eco-friendly detection of public health and agro-based insecticides: a comprehensive review. Heliyon 9(5):e15848 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135] Adekunle A, Raghavan V, Tartakovsky B. 2019. On-line monitoring of heavy metals-related toxicity with a microbial fuel cell biosensor. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 132:382−390 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Lahari SA, Kumawat N, Amreen K, Ponnalagu RN, Goel S. 2025. IoT integrated and deep learning assisted electrochemical sensor for multiplexed heavy metal sensing in water samples. NPJ Clean Water 8:10 doi: 10.1038/s41545-025-00441-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137] Zhou J, Jia W, Liu M, Xu M. 2021. Elite adaptive simulated annealing algorithm for maximizing the lifespan in LSWSNs. Journal of Sensors 2021(16):9915133 doi: 10.1155/2021/9915133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Pan Y, Liu X, Qian L, Cui Y, Zheng X, et al. 2022. A hand-held optoelectronic tongue for the identification of heavy-metalions. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical 352(5790):130971 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.130971

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139] Muhammad-Aree S, Teepoo S. 2020. On-site detection of heavy metals in wastewater using a single paper strip integrated with a smartphone. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 412:1395−1405 doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-02369-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Eliades DG, Vrachimis SG, Moghaddam A, Tzortzis I, Polycarpou MM. 2023. Contamination event diagnosis in drinking water networks: a review. Annual Reviews in Control 55:420−441 doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Li ZL, Liu HX, Zhang C, Fu G. 2024. Real-time water quality prediction in water distribution networks using graph neural networks with sparse monitoring data. Water Research 250:121018 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.121018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Li Z, Ma W, Zhong D, Ma J, Zhang Q, et al. 2024. Applications of machine learning in drinking water quality management: a critical review on water distribution system. Journal of Cleaner Production 481:144171 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Ahmed M, Mumtaz R, Hassan Zaidi SM. 2021. Analysis of water quality indices and machine learning techniques for rating water pollution: a case study of Rawal Dam, Pakistan. Water Supply 21(6):3225−3250 doi: 10.2166/ws.2021.082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144] Zou Y, Lou S, Zhang Z, Liu S, Zhou X, et al. 2024. Predictions of heavy metal concentrations by physicochemical water quality parameters in coastal areas of Yangtze River estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin 199(1):115951 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115951

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145] Cheng Y, Zhou K, Wang J, Cui S, Yan J, et al. 2022. Regional metal pollution risk assessment based on a long short-term memory model: a case study of the South Altai Mountain mining area, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 379(8):134755 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134755

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146] Sikri N, Behera B, Kumar A, Kumar V, Pandey OP, et al. 2025. Recent advancements on 2D nanomaterials as emerging paradigm for the adsorptive removal of microcontaminants. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 340:103441 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2025.103441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147] Fan YZ, Han L, Yang YZ, Sun Z, Li N, et al. 2020. Multifunctional binding strategy on nonconjugated polymer nanoparticles for ratiometric detection and effective removal of mercury ions. Environmental Science & Technology 54(16):10270−10278 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00702

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] Ahmed MA, Ahmed MA, Mohamed AA. 2022. Facile adsorptive removal of dyes and heavy metals from wastewaters using magnetic nanocomposite of Zinc ferrite@reduced graphene oxide. Inorganic Chemistry Communications 144(3):109912 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109912

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Hosseinkhani O, Hamzehlouy A, Dan S, Sanchouli N, Tavakkoli M, et al. 2023. Graphene oxide/ZnO nanocomposites for efficient removal of heavy metal and organic contaminants from water. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 16(10):105176 doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105176

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Ji W, Li W, Wang Y, Zhang TC, Yuan S. 2024. Fe-MOFs/graphene oxide-derived magnetic nanocomposite for enhanced adsorption of As(V) in aqueous solution. Separation and Purification Technology 334:126003 doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.126003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151] Radulescu DM, Surdu VA, Ficai A, Ficai D, Grumezescu AM, et al. 2023. Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review of the principles and biomedical applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24:15397 doi: 10.3390/ijms242015397

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152] Şahİn M, Atasoy M, Arslan Y, Yildiz D. 2023. Removal of Ni(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) from aqueous phases by silver nanoparticles and magnetic nanoparticles/nanocomposites. ACS Omega 8(38):34834−34843 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Zhang Y, Ni S, Wang X, Zhang W, Lagerquist L, et al. 2019. Ultrafast adsorption of heavy metal ions onto functionalized lignin-based hybrid magnetic nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal 372:82−91 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154] Razavi R, Amiri M, Salavati-Niasari M. 2024. Eco-friendly synthesis by Rosemary extract and characterization of Fe3O4@SiO2 magnetic nanocomposite as a potential adsorbent for enhanced arsenic removal from aqueous solution: isotherm and kinetic studies. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 14:5109−5123 doi: 10.1007/s13399-022-02489-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155] Xu X, Weng X, Li J, Owens G, Chen Z. 2024. Enhanced removal of Pb(II) from acid mine drainage using green reduced graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles. Science of the Total Environment 931:173001 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156] Chen J, Wu J, Liu P, Gan L, Chen Z. 2024. Enhanced removal and recovery of heavy metals from acid mine drainage using nFeS@GS biosynthesized by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12(6):114687 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.114687

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157] Angaru GKR, Choi YL, Lingamdinne LP, Choi JS, Kim DS, et al. 2021. Facile synthesis of economical feasible fly ash-based zeolite-supported nano zerovalent iron and nickel bimetallic composite for the potential removal of heavy metals from industrial effluents. Chemosphere 267:128889 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128889

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158] Khan M, Naseer S, Khan M, Nazir R, Badshah A, et al. 2021. Magnetic solid-phase extraction of Cd(II) from water samples using magnetic nanoparticles impregnated walnut shells powder (MNPS-WSP). Desalination and Water Treatment 228:286−296 doi: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27352

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159] Li B, Xie X, Meng T, Guo X, Li Q, et al. 2024. Recent advance of nanomaterials modified electrochemical sensors in the detection of heavy metal ions in food and water. Food Chemistry 440:138213 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.138213

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Portugal J, Bedia C, Amato F, Juárez-Facio AT, Stamatiou R, et al. 2024. Toxicity of airborne nanoparticles: Facts and challenges. Environment International 190:108889 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108889

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161] Tran, LC, Su X, Nguyen H, La LBT, Adu P, et al. 2025. Advancing polymer nanocomposites through mechanochemical approaches. Advanced Nanocomposites 2:86−107 doi: 10.1016/j.adna.2025.03.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162] Samriti, Rumyantseva M, Sun S, Kuznetsov A, Prakash J. 2023. Emerging nanomaterials in the detection and degradation of air pollutants. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 35:100497 doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100497

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [163] Asghar N, Hussain A, Nguyen DA, Ali S, Hussain I, et al. 2024. Advancement in nanomaterials for environmental pollutants remediation: a systematic review on bibliometrics analysis, material types, synthesis pathways, and related mechanisms. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 22(1):26 doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02151-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164] Gargiulo V, Di Natale F, Alfe M. 2024. From agricultural wastes to advanced materials for environmental applications: Rice husk-derived adsorbents for heavy metals removal from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12(5):113497 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2024.113497

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [165] Sen TK. 2023. Agricultural solid wastes based adsorbent materials in the remediation of heavy metal ions from water and wastewater by adsorption: a review. Molecules 28:5575 doi: 10.3390/molecules28145575

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [166] Liu Y, Biswas B, Hassan M, Naidu R. 2024. Green adsorbents for environmental remediation: synthesis methods, ecotoxicity, and reusability prospects. Processes 12(6):1195 doi: 10.3390/pr12061195

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [167] Bhadoria P, Shrivastava M, Khandelwal A, Das R, Langyan S, et al. 2022. Preparation of modified rice straw-based bio-adsorbents for the improved removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy 29:100742 doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2022.100742

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [168] El-Shafey EI. 2010. Removal of Zn(II) and Hg(II) from aqueous solution on a carbonaceous sorbent chemically prepared from rice husk. Journal of Hazardous Materials 175(1-3):319−327 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [169] Wang F, Yu J, Zhang Z, Xu Y, Chi RA. 2018. An amino-functionalized ramie stalk-based adsorbent for highly effective Cu2+ removal from water: adsorption performance and mechanism. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 117:511−522 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [170] Banerjee M, Basu RK, Das SK. 2018. Cr(VI) adsorption by a green adsorbent walnut shell: Adsorption studies, regeneration studies, scale-up design and economic feasibility. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 116:693−702 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [171] Gupta N, Sen R. 2017. Kinetic and Equilibrium Modelling of Cu (II) Adsorption from aqueous solution by chemically modified groundnut husk (Arachis hypogaea). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 5(5):4274−4281 doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [172] Tan J, Xu Y, Deng Q, Li Y, Yin Y, et al. 2024. Agricultural waste to environmental purifier: application and mechanism of aminated pomelo peel for adsorption of anionic dyes and Cr(VI). Industrial Crops and Products 218:118960 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118960

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [173] Xiao WD, Xiao LP, Xiao WZ, Liu K, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Cellulose-based bio-adsorbent from TEMPO-oxidized natural loofah for effective removal of Pb(II) and methylene blue. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 218:285−294 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [174] Solanki A, Ahamad Z, Gupta V. 2025. Upcycling waste biomass: Alkali-modified watermelon rind as a lignocellulosic bioadsorbent for copper ion removal. Industrial Crops and Products 224:120340 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.120340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [175] Agouborde L, Navia R. 2009. Heavy metals retention capacity of a non-conventional sorbent developed from a mixture of industrial and agricultural wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 167:536−544 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [176] Naga Babu A, Reddy DS, Kumar GS, Ravindhranath K, Krishna Mohan GV. 2018. Removal of lead and fluoride from contaminated water using exhausted coffee grounds based bio-sorbent. Journal of Environmental Management 218:602−612 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [177] Bento JGGS, Senra LF, Maia LS, Almeida LS, Ferreira LM, et al. 2025. Prediction of Cr6+ removal on the biosorbent from pine cone residue with machine learning simulations. Surfaces and Interfaces 65:106460 doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2025.106460

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [178] Šoštarić T, Simić M, Lopičić Z, Zlatanović S, Pastor F, et al. 2023. Food waste (beetroot and apple pomace) as sorbent for lead from aqueous solutions−alternative to landfill disposal. Processes 11:1343 doi: 10.3390/pr11051343

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [179] An HK, Park BY, Kim DS. 2001. Crab shell for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution. Water Research 35(15):3551−3556 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00099-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [180] Wu Y, Ming J, Zhou W, Xiao N, Cai J. 2023. Efficiency and mechanism in preparation and heavy metal cation/anion adsorption of amphoteric adsorbents modified from various plant straws. Science of The Total Environment 884:163887 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [181] Mao J, Xue Y, Zhu H, Xue F, Lei X, et al. 2024. Agricultural residue-based adsorbents with anisotropic cross-linked structures for simultaneous instantaneous capture of heavy metal ions. Chemical Engineering Journal 482:149010 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.149010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [182] Xi R, Zhou J, Jiang B, Zhang Q, Zhu K, et al. 2024. Polydopamine-functionalized natural cellulosic Juncus effusus fiber for efficient and eco-friendly Cr(VI) removal from wastewater. Industrial Crops and Products 208:117877 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117877

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [183] Pandey D, Chhimwal M, Srivastava RK. 2022. A review on the application of macrophytes in phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted water. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment 26(2):1−12 doi: 10.25303/2603rjce116125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [184] Madhav S, Mishra R, Kumari A, Srivastav AL, Ahamad A, et al. 2024. A review on sources identification of heavy metals in soil and remediation measures by phytoremediation-induced methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 21:1099−1020 doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-04950-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [185] Ali S, Abbas Z, Rizwan M, Zaheer IE, Yavaş İ, et al. 2020. Application of floating aquatic plants in phytoremediation of heavy metals polluted water: a review. Sustainability 12(5):1927 doi: 10.3390/su12051927

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [186] Shi D, Zhuang K, Xia Y, Zhu C, Chen C, et al. 2017. Hydrilla verticillata employs two different ways to affect DNA methylation under excess copper stress. Aquatic Toxicology 193:97−104 doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.10.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [187] Anning AK, Akoto R. 2018. Assisted phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil from a mined site with Typha latifolia and Chrysopogon zizanioides. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 148:97−104 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [188] Delplace G, Schreck E, Pokrovsky OS, Zouiten C, Blondet I, et al. 2020. Accumulation of heavy metals in phytoliths from reeds growing on mining environments in Southern Europe. Science of the Total Environment 712:135595 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [189] Vlyssides A, Barampouti EM, Mai S. 2005. Heavy metal removal from water resources using the aquatic plant apium nodiflorum. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis 36(7−8):1075−1081 doi: 10.1081/CSS-200050499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [190] Urrutia C, Yañez-Mansilla E, Jeison D. 2019. Bioremoval of heavy metals from metal mine tailings water using microalgae biomass. Algal Research 43:101659 doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [191] Pang YL, Quek YY, Lim S, Shuit SH. 2023. Review on phytoremediation potential of floating aquatic plants for heavy metals: a promising approach. Sustainability 15(2):1290 doi: 10.3390/su15021290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [192] Dhir B, Srivastava S. 2011. Heavy metal removal from a multi-metal solution and wastewater by Salvinia natans. Ecological Engineering 37(6):893−896 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [193] Prabakaran S, Mohanraj T, Arumugam A, Sudalai S. 2022. A state-of-the-art review on the environmental benefits and prospects of Azolla in biofuel, bioremediation and biofertilizer applications. Industrial Crops and Products 183:114942 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114942

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [194] Bingöl NA, Özmal F, Akın B. 2017. Phytoremediation and biosorption potential of Lythrum salicaria L. for Nickel removal from aqueous solutions. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 26(6):2479−2485 doi: 10.15244/PJOES/70628

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [195] Mahohi A, Raiesi F. 2019. Functionally dissimilar soil organisms improve growth and Pb/Zn uptake by Stachys inflata grown in a calcareous soil highly polluted with mining activities. Journal of Environmental Management 247:780−789 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [196] Xie P, Zahoor F, Iqbal SS, Zahoor, Ullah S, et al. 2022. Elimination of toxic heavy metals from industrial polluted water by using hydrophytes. Journal of Cleaner Production 352:131358 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [197] Schor-Fumbarov T, Keilin Z, Tel-Or E. 2003. Characterization of Cadmium uptake by the water lily Nymphaea aurora. International Journal of Phytoremediation 5(2):169−179 doi: 10.1080/713610178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [198] Cui S, Lv J, Hough R, Fu Q, An L, et al. 2024. Recent advances and prospects of neonicotinoid insecticides removal from aquatic environments using biochar: adsorption and degradation mechanisms. Science of The Total Environment 939:173509 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173509

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [199] Hsu CJ, Cheng YH, Chung A, Huang YP, Ting Y, et al. 2023. Using recoverable sulfurized magnetic biochar for active capping to remediate multiple heavy metal contaminated sediment. Environmental Pollution 316(1):120555 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120555

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [200] Ting Y, Ch'Ng BL, Chen C, Ou MY, Cheng YH, et al. 2020. A simulation study of mercury immobilization in estuary sediment microcosm by activated carbon/clay-based thin-layer capping under artificial flow and turbation. The Science of the Total Environment 708:135068 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [201] Wang L, Wang Y, Ma F, Tankpa V, Bai S, et al. 2019. Mechanisms and reutilization of modified biochar used for removal of heavy metals from wastewater: a review. Science of the Total Environment 668:1298−1309 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [202] Xiang L, Liu S, Ye S, Yang H, Song B, et al. 2021. Potential hazards of biochar: the negative environmental impacts of biochar applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials 420:126611 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126611

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [203] Ruzickova J, Koval S, Raclavska H, Kucbel M, Svedova B, et al. 2021. A comprehensive assessment of potential hazard caused by organic compounds in biochar for agricultural use. Journal of Hazardous Materials 403:123644 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123644

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [204] Acosta Hernández I, Muñoz Morales M, Fernández Morales FJ, Rodríguez Romero L, Villaseñor Camacho J. 2023. Removal of heavy metals from mine tailings by in-situ bioleaching coupled to electrokinetics. Environmental Research 238(2):117183 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [205] Yao Y, Feng Y, Li H, Cui Y, Liu M, et al. 2024. New insights into sustainable in-situ fixation of heavy metals in disturbed seafloor sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials 480:136411 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [206] Chang X, Duan T, Feng J, Li YX. 2024. Contrasting fate and binding behavior of Mn and Cu with dissolved organic matter during in situ remediation using multicomponent capping in malodorous black water. Water Research 253:121288 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [207] Sarkar DJ, Das Sarkar S, V SK, Chanu TN, Banerjee T, et al. 2023. Ameliorative effect of natural floating island as fish aggregating devices on heavy metals distribution in a freshwater wetland. Environmental Pollution 336:122428 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122428

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [208] Shahid MJ, Ali S, Shabir G, Siddique M, Rizwan M, et al. 2020. Comparing the performance of four macrophytes in bacterial assisted floating treatment wetlands for the removal of trace metals (Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Cr) from polluted river water. Chemosphere 243:125353 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125353

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [209] Acosta-Núñez LF, Mussali-Galante P, Castrejón-Godínez ML, Rodríguez-Solís A, Castañeda-Espinoza JD, et al. 2025. In situ phytoremediation of mine tailings with high concentrations of Cadmium and Lead using Dodonaea viscosa (Sapindaceae). Plants 14(1):69 doi: 10.3390/plants14010069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [210] Chang Y, Cui H, Huang M, He Y. 2017. Artificial floating islands for water quality improvement. Environmental Reviews 25(3):350−357 doi: 10.1139/er-2016-0038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [211] Zhao F, Xi S, Yang X, Yang W, Li J, et al. 2012. Purifying eutrophic river waters with integrated floating island systems. Ecological Engineering 40(3):53−60 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.12.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [212] Liu X, Huang L, Qian K. 2021. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors: mechanism, preparation, and application in biomedicine. Advanced NanoBiomed Research 1:2000104 doi: 10.1002/anbr.202000104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [213] Liu C, Wu T, Hsu PC, Xie J, Zhao J, et al. 2019. Direct/alternating current electrochemical method for removing and recovering heavy metal from water using graphene oxide electrode. ACS Nano 13(6):6431 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [214] Dube A, Malode SJ, Ali Alshehri M, Shetti NP. 2025. Electrochemical water treatment: Review of different approaches. Journal of Environmental Management 373:123911 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [215] Guo Z, Zhang Y, Jia H, Guo J, Meng X, et al. 2022. Electrochemical methods for landfill leachate treatment: a review on electrocoagulation and electrooxidation. Science of The Total Environment 806:150529 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150529

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [216] Xu Y, Zhang C, Zhao M, Rong H, Zhang K, et al. 2017. Comparison of bioleaching and electrokinetic remediation processes for removal of heavy metals from wastewater treatment sludge. Chemosphere 168:1152−1157 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.086

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [217] Putra RS, Wicaksono WP, Fatimah I, Tanaka S. 2022. Electro-enhanced phytoremediation system on the removal of trace metal concentration from contaminated water. Heliyon 8(11):e11451 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11451

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [218] Sadasivan Pillai H, Tharayil M. 2017. Treatment of heavy metals from water by electro-phytoremediation technique. Journal of Ecological Engineering 18(5):18−26 doi: 10.12911/22998993/76208

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [219] Xu J, Liu C, Hsu PC, Zhao J, Wu T, et al. 2019. Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil by asymmetrical alternating current electrochemistry. Nature Communications 10:2440 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10472-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, et al. 2025. Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e003 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0003
    Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, et al. 2025. Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e003 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0003

Figures(5)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(2228) PDF downloads(1123)

Review   Open Access    

Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects

Agricultural Ecology and Environment  1 Article number: e003  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Reservoir ecosystems play a critical role in water resource management and socio-economic development, yet they are increasingly threatened by heavy metal (HM) contamination, highlighting the urgent need for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative solutions. This study identifies point-source discharge, non-point source pollution, and sediment-water interface dynamics as the main sources of HM pollution in reservoir systems, with spatiotemporal variability governed by hydrogeochemical processes and modulated by biogeochemical cycles. While progress has been made in ecological risk assessment through tools like the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) model and its Bayesian refinement, health risk evaluation now integrates the EPA model with Monte Carlo Simulation (MC), enabling more accurate source identification and predictive analysis. In parallel, intelligent monitoring technologies, such as sensor networks, the Internet of Things (IoT), and machine learning, have significantly improved real-time HM detection capabilities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of emerging sustainable remediation strategies, including nanotechnology, agricultural waste-based adsorbents, aquatic plants, biochar, in situ capping, biological floating islands, electrochemical, and electrokinetic methods, with a focus on their feasibility and effectiveness in reservoir environments. Through a synthesis of multidimensional HM pollution analyses, the study identifies key research gaps, such as the need to better understand long-term low-dose biological impacts, develop multifunctional remediation materials, and establish global risk management frameworks. The findings ultimately contribute to systematic and actionable strategies for HM pollution control in reservoir systems.

    • Water security has become paramount for global sustainable development. The United Nations 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda (SDG 6) highlights the critical status of global water resources, with Target 6 specifically addressing 'clean water and sanitation'[1]. Recent monitoring data reveal alarming trends: 40% of water bodies across 89 surveyed countries exhibit severe pollution, directly compromising drinking water safety for nearly three billion people[2]. Projections suggest this crisis may intensify, with the global water supply-demand gap potentially reaching 40% by 2030 without effective intervention[3]. China's decade-long efforts in water environment governance have yielded measurable improvements in surface water quality, as documented in the 'China Ecological Environment Status Bulletin' (2012–2022)[4]. However, persistent challenges remain, including deteriorating groundwater and coastal marine ecosystems, alongside an increase in the frequency of detecting emerging contaminants in drinking water supplies. The 2024 UN World Water Development Report underscores the geopolitical dimensions of water scarcity, identifying it as an emerging catalyst for international conflicts and advocating for enhanced transboundary cooperation in water resource management[5].

      Reservoirs represent critical yet vulnerable components of water infrastructures, serving dual functions as engineered water storage systems and complex ecosystems[6]. Of the more than 58,000 large dams operating globally[7], many face mounting pressures from HM contamination—a priority concern due to metals' toxicity, bioaccumulation potential, and environmental persistence[810]. Climate change and anthropogenic activities have created complex pollution dynamics, where reservoir-specific hydrology mediates sediment-water interface processes that control metal speciation and bioavailability[11,12]. Ecological consequences are increasingly evident: HM concentrations in reservoir fish populations frequently exceed World Health Organization (WHO) safety thresholds, posing dietary exposure risks through trophic magnification[1315]. Notably, structural similarities between reservoirs and tailings ponds have led to classification ambiguities in research contexts, despite their differing operational purposes. Both systems share a capacity for acute ecological damage, as demonstrated by the Xiannv Lake Reservoir incident, where HM release reduced sediment denitrifying bacteria abundance by 72%, severely disrupting microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling functions[16,17]. Similarly, the Rio Doce Dam failure revealed persistent ecosystem impacts, with dissolved HMs during high-flow periods correlating significantly with zooplankton community shifts toward metal-tolerant taxa five years post-collapse[18].

      Contemporary research identifies secondary pollution from water infrastructure operations as an escalating concern[19]. While reservoirs may temporarily sequester pollutants[20,21], long-term risks persist, particularly in inter-basin transfer systems. Current understanding remains fragmented, with most studies examining individual projects rather than systemic interactions between water transfer networks and reservoir management[2224]. This limitation stems partly from the conventional classification of reservoirs as lacustrine systems, despite fundamental differences in their formation, ecosystem dynamics, and vulnerability to anthropogenic impacts[25,26]. Comparative analyses highlight these distinctions: examination of more than 64,000 fish samples from 883 reservoirs and 1,387 lakes in western North America revealed that reservoir fish mercury (Hg) concentrations averaged 44% higher than those in lakes, with reservoir age showing phased influences—peaking at three years post-impoundment before declining, yet maintaining a 27% elevation long-term[27]. These mechanistic drivers explain this pattern: (1) enhanced methylmercury (MeHg) production during initial organic matter decomposition; (2) sediment exposure-submergence cycles from water-level management stimulating microbial activity; and (3) semi-enclosed hydrodynamics amplifying trophic transfer. These effects were particularly pronounced in arid regions and mining-impacted areas[28].

      Current remediation technologies encounter considerable limitations. Although chemical methods, such as adsorption[29], ion exchange[30], and membrane separation[31], show partial effectiveness in removing HMs[32], they are often associated with high operational costs, secondary pollution, or limited efficiency. Emerging approaches based on nanomaterials and bioremediation offer promising potential but face substantial challenges in scalability for real-world applications[3335]. This technological challenge is especially evident in complex water-energy-food-land (WEFL) coupled systems, as illustrated by the system archetype analysis of Indonesia's Jatiluhur Reservoir, where agricultural expansion, industrial development, and residential water demands together form a 'limits to growth' archetype[36]. Importantly, amid the rapid global expansion of hydropower projects, changes in watershed geochemical behavior due to dam construction and their associated ecological risks are becoming increasingly prominent scientific concerns[37]. Furthermore, existing risk assessment frameworks lack sufficient capacity to evaluate complex exposure scenarios, such as combined pollution and chronic low-dose exposure, further highlighting the pressing need for integrated and systematic solutions.

      This interdisciplinary review integrates multi-source environmental data to systematically examine HM pollution in reservoirs through four analytical perspectives. To visually synthesize the interdisciplinary exploration of HM pollution in reservoirs, Fig. 1 illustrates a comprehensive conceptual framework that corresponds to the four analytical perspectives of this review: (1) source identification and attribution; (2) interfacial processes and transformation mechanisms; (3) ecological impacts and risk assessment; and (4) emerging technologies and green materials development. By synthesizing emerging monitoring technologies with innovative remediation strategies, this work provides a scientific basis and strategic reference for future in-depth research on HM pollution mechanisms, promotion of intelligent monitoring and green remediation technologies, and establishment of a unified and standardized technical standard system. This study aims to contribute to the development of sustainable management frameworks for reservoir ecosystems.

      Figure 1. 

      Framework diagram of the entire process of heavy metal pollution research and control in reservoirs.

    • Reservoirs serve as essential infrastructure for freshwater storage, with water quality being a critical factor influencing both watershed ecological integrity and public health safety. Current research highlights that HMs in reservoir ecosystems display complex multi-media interfacial behaviors and significant ecological accumulation effects[38]. Three primary source pathways of HM in reservoir water bodies have been systematically identified: (1) point-source discharges originating from discrete emission sites; (2) non-point-source transport via diffuse surface runoff in agricultural regions; and (3) endogenous remobilization through redox cycling at the sediment-water interface. These distinct pollution sources exhibit regional variability while collectively shaping the spatial distribution and speciation of HMs by dynamically interacting with hydrodynamic conditions and biogeochemical processes[39].

      HM contamination in aquatic systems compromises water quality, accumulates in sediments, and propagates through trophic levels via biomagnification, ultimately posing significant risks to human health[40]. Therefore, understanding the source contributions of diverse pollutants is critical for providing a scientific foundation to effectively manage reservoir water security.

    • Mining activities and industrial wastewater discharge represent two primary pathways of point-source pollution, characterized by notable spatial variability and long-term persistence[41,42]. Acid mine drainage (AMD), which originates from mine tailings ponds, is defined by its low pH levels and the presence of various dissolved HMs, making it a focal point of extensive research due to its distinct physicochemical properties[43]. Globally, approximately 18,000 tailings ponds have been constructed for storing metal and non-metal mining waste, with major mining nations confronting substantial AMD-related environmental challenges. The impacts of AMD on aquatic ecosystems can persist long after mining operations have ceased[44,45]. In recent decades, numerous countries have reported incidents of tailings ponds leakage, leading to severe ecological or environmental damage and, in some cases, loss of life[46]. A study by Techane et al. on the Legadembi gold mine tailings dam revealed that sulfide oxidation promotes the acidic dissolution of HMs, while downstream soils facilitate the migration of arsenic and tungsten via anion exchange processes[47]. Similarly, Wu et al., through the analysis of sediment cores from the Miyun Reservoir, identified a significant correlation between the enrichment levels of nickel and other HMs over the past two decades and the intensity of upstream mining activities[48].

      Despite the widespread implementation of stringent environmental regulations (e.g., the EU IED Directive and China's GB8978-1996) and the active promotion of clean production technologies, legacy pollution in early industrial zones and the continuous emergence of novel pollutants have emerged as significant new environmental challenges[49]. For instance, Tytła et al. reported that sediments from the Dzierżno Duże Reservoir exhibited high to extremely high concentrations of multiple HMs, with industrial activities contributing up to 70% of the contamination[50]. Likewise, Chassiot et al. reconstructed a 50-year pollution history in the Saint-Charles River Reservoir, demonstrating that industrial discharges led to persistent HM accumulation in downstream sediments, thereby triggering ecological degradation[51].

    • Non-point source (NPS) pollution exhibits significant spatial heterogeneity and complex transport mechanisms, characterized by dispersed emission sources and interconnected migration pathways[52]. Among various pollution sources, agricultural activities are the dominant contributor to NPS pollution, accounting for the largest proportion[53]. For example, sediment core analyses from India's Darna and Gangapur reservoirs in Nashik revealed distinct vertical HM distribution patterns that correspond chronologically to phases of agricultural development[54]. The Igboho Dam Reservoir provides direct evidence, where abnormally high concentrations of metallic elements in sediments were primarily linked to the long-term overuse of agrochemicals and organic fertilizers in adjacent farmlands[55]. Monitoring data from reservoirs in southeastern Brazil further indicate that HM pollution in areas affected by agricultural practices typically reaches moderate to severe contamination levels[56]. This pollution pressure propagates through the food chain, inducing cascading effects that significantly influence aquatic community structures. Australian studies demonstrated a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) between changes in benthic community composition in reservoirs and sediment HM concentrations, indicating that environmental stress caused by agricultural activities substantially alters the community succession patterns of reservoir ecosystems[57]. In addition to agricultural activities, atmospheric deposition represents another critical pathway for HM input into reservoirs. Elevated concentrations of HMs in sediments and algae from Fryanov Reservoir and Nové Mlýny Reservoir have been predominantly attributed to atmospheric deposition[58]. In addition, an analysis of a typical legacy pyrite mining area in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River found that heavy metals input from atmospheric deposition can enter reservoirs through pathways such as surface runoff. On one hand, they may accumulate in slow-flow areas like reservoir inlets alongside heavy metals from other sources, altering the spatial distribution of heavy metals in and around the reservoir. On the other hand, although their input flux is lower than that of active mining areas due to factors like the suspension of mining operations, they remain a significant source of heavy metals for the reservoir and the surrounding farmland soil[59].

    • The internal release represents a significant contributor to HM pollution in reservoir water systems, driven by dynamic migration processes occurring at the sediment-water interface (SWI). Sediments act not only as a 'sink' but also as a potential 'source' of HMs and other pollutants under fluctuating environmental conditions[60]. These processes are primarily governed by three key mechanisms: (1) physical disturbance mechanisms, largely induced by human activities; (2) chemical transformation mechanisms, involving variations in parameters such as pH reduction and redox potential (Eh); and (3) biological mechanisms, including microbial metabolic activities and benthic bioturbation. The following sections will provide a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of HM pollution and the ecological risks associated with environmental changes at the SWI. Specifically, this section focuses on the pollution resulting from such changes. For example, studies conducted in the Keban Dam Reservoir demonstrated that the resuspension of surface sediments, along with the subsequent sedimentation of metal ions, resulted in concentrations of Cu, Zn, and barium (Ba) in deep water layers being two to three times higher than those in the epilimnetic waters[61]. Investigations into Sabalan Reservoir in Iran further revealed that sediments, acting as long-term accumulators of arsenic (As), continuously influence overlying water via interfacial diffusion, thereby posing significant environmental hazards[62]. This phenomenon is closely associated with reductive release processes at the SWI, particularly the critical role of iron-manganese reduction (IMR) in facilitating HM ion exchange. Taking the eutrophic area of Hongfeng Reservoir as a case study, the biogeochemical processes at the SWI exhibit typical characteristics of HM migration and transformation. Research data demonstrate that the reducing environment mediated by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) generates S2−, which competes with PO43− for adsorption sites, thereby inducing the desorption of arsenate (HAsO42−/H2AsO4). Simultaneously, the formation of FeS and ZnS precipitates results in negative fluxes of Cd and Zn[63]. Additionally, studies reveal that environmental resistance exerts minimal influence on this process. Regardless of seasonal variations such as dry-wet alternation or off-season regulation, the IMR cycle persistently drives arsenic release, establishing a continuous pollution pathway that is challenging to interrupt[64,65].

      As depicted in Fig. 2, the multidimensional coupling mechanism of HM pollution in reservoirs demonstrates that real-world pollution processes are characterized by complex, networked interactions. The diagram identifies five major sources of HM pollution, which stem from both anthropogenic activities and natural processes contributing to reservoir contamination. Agricultural activities involving the use of fertilizers and pesticides, as well as soil erosion, facilitate the input of HM into reservoirs through surface runoff. Mining tailings, when subjected to rainwater erosion, can leach HMs into adjacent water bodies, which ultimately flow into reservoirs. Industrial emissions, such as exhaust gases and dust, lead to deposition—a phenomenon known as cross-media pollution. In addition, factories introduce HMs into reservoir watersheds either directly or indirectly via wastewater discharge, gaseous emissions, and solid waste disposal. Similarly, domestic and industrial sewage, whether discharged directly or insufficiently treated, also serves as a significant source of HM input into reservoir systems. Reservoir sediments serve as both a sink and a source of HMs. Under fluctuating environmental conditions, previously adsorbed HMs can re-release into the water column, contributing to what is known as 'internal pollution'. Microbially and plant-mediated processes further facilitate transformations of HMs (e.g., oxidation/reduction, complexation), thereby affecting their toxicity and mobility—an intricate process often referred to as the 'hidden cycle'. The biogeochemical cycling of HMs will be discussed in detail in the following section. Rivers function as conveyor belts, transporting HMs from diverse pollution sources within the watershed into reservoirs, acting as a key mechanism for pollution dispersion. Importantly, HM pollution does not simply result from linear accumulation originating from a single source; rather, it forms a three-dimensional network shaped by the interaction of multiple interfacial processes[66]. Given the complexity of geological environments and spatial structures, contamination originating from tailings ponds often remains concealed. Conventional investigation methods are labor-intensive, costly, and inadequate for providing detailed spatial distribution data[67,68]. Moreover, NPS pollution frequently induces delayed impacts on the environmental quality of receiving water bodies. For instance, when pollution levels exceed environmental capacity, eutrophication-induced hypoxia fundamentally alters the dynamics of the SWI: depletion of dissolved oxygen triggers IMR-mediated reductive dissolution, releasing previously immobilized HMs and converting them into bioavailable forms. This process, facilitated by benthic uptake and food chain transfer, perpetuates a vicious cycle[69]. The situation becomes even more complex under concurrent eutrophication and HM pollution, as the coupling of sulfur and carbon cycles modifies metal migration and transformation pathways. These multiple feedback mechanisms render traditional single-pollution control strategies largely ineffective, thus highlighting the urgent need to develop an integrated reservoir pollution management system based on the theory of multiprocess coupling.

      Figure 2. 

      Schematic diagram of multi-source input of HM pollution in reservoirs.

    • The behavior of HMs in reservoir ecosystems involves a dynamic, multi-phase coupled process primarily driven by hydrogeochemical mechanisms that govern their migration and transformation. This process exhibits three-dimensional complexity: vertical stratification creates a pollution gradient layer transitioning from oxidized conditions in surface sediments to reduced states in deeper layers, while horizontal heterogeneity leads to pollution hotspots whose spatial distribution is shaped by hydrodynamic conditions, watershed characteristics, and biogeochemical cycles. The inherent complexity of this process results in considerable spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability[7073]. A thorough understanding of these multi-phase coupling mechanisms is crucial for accurately predicting the environmental fate of HMs, assessing ecological risks, and developing targeted remediation technologies. Moreover, such insights form the theoretical foundation for the sustainable management of reservoir ecosystems.

    • pH serves as a critical regulatory parameter in aquatic environmental chemistry, exerting substantial influence over the geochemical behavior of HMs through multiple mechanistic pathways[74]. As a master variable governing HM mobility within soil-sediment-water systems, pH regulates migration and transformation processes via complex chemical equilibria and interfacial reactions. Under acidic conditions (pH < 7), HM mobility is markedly enhanced through three primary mechanisms: (1) mobilization of exchangeable and carbonate-bound fractions (e.g., Cd, Zn, Cu, Pb) due to weakened sediment binding; (2) dissolution of IMR, releasing adsorbed Cr3+ and Ni2+; and (3) reduction of As5+ to the more toxic As3+ species[7577]. Conversely, alkaline conditions (pH > 7) induce fundamentally different behaviors: (1) precipitation of Cd, Zn, Cu, and Pb as hydroxides, promoting speciation shifts toward oxidized and residual forms with reduced bioavailability; (2) stabilization of IMR, thereby immobilizing Cr3+ and Ni2+; and (3) oxidation of As3+ to the less toxic As5+, which subsequently adsorbs onto IMR or forms stable complexes[7883]. Extensive reservoir studies consistently confirm the essential role of pH in regulating HM bioavailability, chemical speciation, and associated ecological risks. This pH-dependent dichotomy fundamentally governs HM fate in aquatic ecosystems, carrying significant implications for the development of effective pollution control strategies and risk assessment frameworks.

    • As a master variable governing the environmental behavior of variable-valence HMs, Eh plays a pivotal role in species transformation and migration dynamics by regulating electron transfer processes. This redox-dependent behavior exhibits distinct stratification: (1) under oxidizing conditions (Eh > 300 mV), IMR effectively immobilizes HM ions through surface complexation and coprecipitation mechanisms; whereas (2) in reducing conditions (Eh < 100 mV), microbial-mediated reductive dissolution becomes the dominant process controlling HM release and transformation. The water-level fluctuation zones of reservoir banks represent a critical aquatic-terrestrial interface exhibiting pronounced spatiotemporal Eh heterogeneity due to periodic variations in water levels[84]. The Eh-dependent behavior of arsenic speciation exemplifies this pattern: As5+ dominates in highly oxidizing conditions (Eh > 450 mV), while at intermediate redox states (Eh = –100 to +100 mV), the microbial reductive dissolution of iron oxides releases adsorbed As5+ and promotes its conversion into the more toxic and mobile As3+ species[85,86]. Seasonally anoxic reservoir sediments typically develop strongly reducing microenvironments (Eh < 0 mV), where SRB play a dominant role in controlling the fate of HM[87]. Through dissimilatory sulfate reduction, SRB produce S2− that reacts with HM ions to form insoluble sulfide precipitates. Field observations from the Águas Claras Reservoir demonstrate that the coupling of low Eh and high SRB activity significantly reduces dissolved HM concentrations[88]. However, this Eh-HM relationship can exhibit nonlinear behavior in specific environments such as AMD systems, where sulfide oxidation rapidly consumes dissolved oxygen, leading to abrupt declines in Eh that unexpectedly promote HM mobilization[89]. These findings highlight the complex redox-driven mechanisms governing HM biogeochemical cycling in reservoir sediments.

    • Organic matter (OM) also plays a critical role in modulating the environmental behavior of HMs through complexation processes. The OM pool in reservoirs consists of both macromolecular humic substances derived from terrestrial sources and low-molecular-weight compounds originating from autochthonous production, forming a dynamic system whose transformation pathways are further influenced by hydraulic retention[9093]. Three principal mechanisms govern OM-HM interactions: (1) molecular complexation—dissolved organic matter (DOM), particularly humic acids (HA), forms stable complexes with HMs via oxygen-containing functional groups. While this process can enhance HM bioavailability, it may also reduce their mobility through the formation of macromolecular complexes, as evidenced by multiple reservoir studies[9496]; (2) colloidal transport—organic-inorganic composite colloids possess a high specific surface area and surface reactivity, enabling effective adsorption of HMs and altering their migration patterns. Tracking after the Fundão Dam incident revealed that tailings-derived colloids decreased HM distribution coefficients by 40%–60% through solubilization[97]. Similarly, colloidal Cd accounted for 35%–40% of total Cd transport flux in Miyun Reservoir[98]; and (3) microbial mediation—OM indirectly influences HM biogeochemical cycling by shaping metal-resistant microbial communities, which constitutes a key mechanism in the self-remediation of a contaminated ecosystem[99]. In early studies, OM had not yet emerged as a central research focus in relation to its influence on HM behavior in reservoir bottom sediments. Research investigating the correlation mechanisms between the varying sources and compositions of OM and HM migration and transformation remains limited. Future studies should aim to elucidate the quantitative relationships between the molecular characteristics of OM and HM speciation transformation, as well as assess the relative contributions of OM from different sources in the HM multi-media migration processes. Such efforts would contribute to a more robust scientific theoretical foundation for the risk management of reservoir ecosystems.

      As core geochemical parameters in reservoir environments, pH and Eh govern the speciation transformation and environmental fate of HMs through complex synergistic mechanisms. OM, acting as a critical ecological medium, further influences HM bioavailability via processes such as complexation, reduction, and competitive adsorption. Under oxidizing conditions, DOM such as fulvic acid forms stable complexes with HMs, thereby enhancing their mobility. Conversely, under reducing conditions, anaerobic OM degradation consumes electron acceptors (e.g., Fe3+, SO42−), which promotes HM release while simultaneously facilitating sulfide production (e.g., by SRB metabolism) or the formation of organo-metal precipitates that influence immobilization efficiency. The dynamic interactions among these key factors—pH, Eh, and OM—collectively form a comprehensive framework for assessing HM pollution risks in reservoir systems.

    • The biogeochemical cycle provides a fundamental framework for understanding the dynamic processes of HM pollution in reservoir ecosystems, where microbial communities and suspended particulate matter (SPM) play pivotal roles. Microbial metabolic activities drive changes in HM speciation through redox reactions, OM decomposition, and biomineralization processes. At the same time, SPM functions as a critical intermediary in aquatic environments, facilitating horizontal HM transport via hydrodynamic processes, vertical flux through sedimentation and resuspension cycles, and trophic transfer via bioaccumulation. The complex interactions between microbial communities and SPM underscore their importance not only for advancing scientific research but also for informing effective management strategies in reservoir systems[100104].

    • In water reservoirs, microbial adaptive mechanisms are essential for maintaining ecosystem stability and functionality. The increasing application of metagenomic technologies has provided powerful tools to investigate these mechanisms. Aquatic microbial community diversity strongly influences the expression of potential metagenomic functions, thereby regulating microbial responses to environmental changes[105]. For instance, studies have demonstrated that denitrifying bacteria contribute to MeHg production via the expression of the mercury methyltransferase A gene (hgcA) in surface waters of Brownlee Reservoir under nitrate-reducing conditions[106]. Additionally, Zhang et al. utilized metagenomics to identify Cu resistance genes and As resistance genes as dominant metal resistance genes (MRGs) in sediments from ten reservoirs in Central China, where MRGs dynamics are directly shaped by HM concentrations[107].

      Metagenomic studies have revealed the molecular strategies employed by microorganisms to withstand HM stress, including the regulated expression of metal resistance genes and the reorganization of microbial community structures. In parallel, bioturbation and bioaccumulation processes in aquatic ecosystems contribute to the secondary release of HMs from sediments into organisms, playing critical roles in the biogeochemical cycling of HMs[108,109]. Field investigations at Toledo Bend Reservoir have demonstrated that benthic bioturbation can significantly alter the interfacial migration flux of Pb, with the extent of this influence being modulated by sediment properties, such as pH and OM content[110]. Similarly, studies on Castilseras Reservoir have confirmed the environmental risk associated with Hg transfer from bottom sediments to aquatic food webs, leading to elevated Hg concentrations in organisms at higher trophic levels[111]. MRGs primarily enable bacterial tolerance to HM toxicity through mechanisms such as efflux pumps, enzyme-mediated transport, and intracellular chelation of HMs. The environmental migration and transformation of MRGs have increasingly become focal points in environmental and ecological research in recent years. Collectively, these findings offer valuable insights into the assessment of environmental risks posed by HM pollution within reservoir ecosystems.

    • SPM in aquatic systems serves as a key medium for the transport of HM, due to its large specific surface area and abundant reactive sites, which significantly influence contaminant dynamics via interfacial adsorption[112]. However, the HM retention capacity of SPM varies considerably across different reservoirs. For example, in Parker Dam, although SPM exhibits high HM concentrations, the dominance of quartz (accounting for more than 70% of its composition) limits surface reactivity, thereby reducing the overall pollution risk[113]. Conversely, in the Borçka Dam Reservoir affected by AMD, iron- and manganese-rich suspended particles contribute to over 85% of the adsorption flux of Cu and Zn, markedly increasing the risk of secondary pollution during sediment resuspension[114]. The adsorption of HMs onto SPM generally follows kinetic models that describe the equilibrium between HM species bound to particles and those in the dissolved phase, while also capturing concentration-dependent adsorption capacities and mechanistic insights into HM transport. Recent advances in modeling have uncovered system-specific behaviors; for instance, the enhanced CE-QUAL-W2 model combined with a two-dimensional laterally averaged model was applied to simulate Pb transport in the Shahid Rajaei Dam Reservoir, revealing temperature-dependent transformation processes of Pb[115]. Studies on the Three Gorges Dam illustrate that its operation has gradually diminished both SPM and the fraction of fine particles in the Yangtze Estuary, consequently lowering the resuspension potential of Pb and Cr[116].

      As schematically illustrated in Fig. 3, the multi-scale interactions between hydrogeochemical parameters (pH, Eh), biogeochemical components (OM, SPM), and microbial processes are systematically integrated to depict the dynamic behavior of HMs in reservoir ecosystems. These processes are primarily regulated by three key mechanisms: (1) pH-dependent dissolution-precipitation equilibria that influence HM bioavailability; (2) redox transformations driven by Eh, which affect elements like As, Fe, and Hg; and (3) OM-mediated speciation through complexation, colloid-assisted transport, and microbial interactions. Importantly, SRB-driven Hg methylation and SPM-mediated adsorption-desorption cycles contribute significantly to the dynamic flux network of HMs across the sediment-water-biota continuum. While these individual mechanisms are increasingly understood, critical knowledge gaps persist regarding the nonlinear synergistic interactions within pH-Eh-OM ternary systems, the quantitative relationships between microbial functional genes (e.g., hgcA) and HM speciation, and the impacts of climate change on SPM resuspension thresholds. To tackle these challenges, strategic research priorities involve developing advanced risk modeling frameworks that integrate multi-media (water-sediment-biota) HM speciation data with bioavailability algorithms to enable real-time warning systems. Additionally, engineering functional materials, such as sulfur-modified biochar and nanocomposites, are being designed to target key processes, including methylation inhibition and sulfide stabilization. The following sections provide a comprehensive evaluation of ecological risk quantification methodologies and emerging remediation technologies, offering both theoretical support and practical technical pathways for the sustainable management of HM pollution in reservoirs.

      Figure 3. 

      Sources, migration processes, and biogeochemical cycles of HM in the reservoir environment.

    • In recent years, substantial advancements have been made in the development of ecological risk assessment methods for HM pollution in reservoirs. Internationally, models based on multi-species toxicity data have become the predominant approach. These models quantify the relationship between pollutant concentrations and ecological effects by incorporating the varying sensitivities of organisms across different trophic levels. Among them, the Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) model is the most widely used. It assumes that species sensitivity follows certain statistical distributions (e.g., log-normal or logistic distributions) to determine threshold concentrations that safeguard a specified proportion of species. The construction of SSD models typically involves selecting ecologically representative test species from multiple trophic levels (producers, consumers, and decomposers), acquiring reliable toxicity data via standardized testing procedures, estimating model parameters using appropriate statistical techniques (e.g., maximum likelihood estimation), and assessing prediction reliability through uncertainty analysis[117]. Despite their widespread use, SSD models face limitations, such as insufficient taxonomic representativeness of test species and uncertainties in extrapolating laboratory-derived thresholds to field conditions[118,119]. To address these challenges, researchers have increasingly adopted Bayesian correlation models to enhance the accuracy of risk assessment and support evidence-based decision-making[120]. Critical indicators in ecological risk assessment include key thresholds such as the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of species (HC5) and the Hazardous Concentration for 50% of species (HC50), which reflect the sensitivity of organisms to pollutants. For instance, a study employing a modified SSD model across eight reservoirs in the lower Yellow River found significant differences in sensitivity between vertebrates and invertebrates under varying HM concentrations. Ni and Cd exhibited the lowest chronic risk thresholds, while Antimony (Sb) showed the highest; Cu already reached relatively high levels of chronic ecological risk[121]. Another study utilized SSD-based risk quotient (RQSSD) and joint probability curve (JPC) methods to evaluate ecological risks from 13 metal elements in reservoirs along Mexico's Atoyac River. The results from both the JPC and RQSSD methods confirmed that biological communities in the watershed are subjected to multiple metal-induced stressors[122]. SSD models and their improved methodologies have been extensively applied in surface water environmental monitoring, water quality assessment, and pollution identification, offering efficient and accurate detection capabilities that provide strong technical support for surface water research. However, the application of SSD models in reservoir environmental monitoring remains at an early stage. Future integration of SSD models with complementary approaches, as well as further development of their use in identifying reservoir pollution and assessing health risks, presents considerable potential for advancement. Table 1 summarizes the commonly used risk assessment models and health evaluation methods in current research, highlighting how these technological innovations provide more accurate tools for managing health risks associated with HMs in reservoir environments.

      Table 1.  Common risk assessment models and applications in reservoir-HMs research N

      Model name Formula Parameter annotation Application scenario
      Potential ecological risk index (PERI) Eri = Tri × Ci/$ C_b^{i} $ Tri: Toxicity coefficient; Ci /$ C_b^{i} $: pollutant concentration/background value Sediment ecological risk assessment
      Comprehensive potential ecological risk index (RI) RI = ∑$ E_r^{i} $ $ E_r^{i} $: Ecological risk index for single pollutant Ecological risk assessment of multi-pollutant synergy
      Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) BAF = Cbiota / Cwater Cbiota: HM concentration in fish/shellfish Cwater: Aqueous concentration Assessment of enrichment effects in aquatic organisms
      Cwater Fish/shellfish Cwater: Aqueous concentration enrichment effects in aquatic organisms
      Target hazard quotient (THQ) $ THQ=\dfrac{EF\,\times \,ED\, \times \,FIR\,\times\, C}{RfD\,\times \,BW\,\times\, AT} $ EF: Exposure frequency (d/year); FIR: Ingestion rate (g/day); RfD: Reference dose (mg/kg·d); ED: Exposure duration (years); BW: Body weight (kg); AT: Averaging time (d) Health risk assessment of drinking water/aquatic products
      Lifetime cancer risk (LCR) LCR = SF × ADD SF: Slope factor (mg/kg·d) ADD: Average daily intake (based on water concentration and ingestion), (mg/kg·d) Long-term risk assessment of carcinogenic HMs
    • Health risk assessment is essential for managing HM pollution in reservoirs, aiming to quantify potential health hazards from pollutants via multiple exposure pathways. The current mainstream approach relies on evaluation models recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) to assess both carcinogens and non-carcinogen risks[123,124]. Recent methodological advancements have improved the reliability of these assessments by incorporating Monte Carlo (MC) simulation techniques. MC simulations enhance uncertainty quantification by constructing probabilistic analysis models that convert key parameters, such as HM concentrations and exposure frequency, into probability distributions[125,126]. For example, MC-based analysis of a reservoir water source revealed that arsenic concentration (contributing 73.5%) and drinking water intake rate (19.1%) are the primary contributors to carcinogenic risks[127]. A Monte Carlo assessment of five urban reservoirs in Iran identified Pb contamination in the Ardakan Reservoir and Ni contamination in the Meibod and Bahabad Reservoirs[128]. A notable advancement involves combining positive matrix factorization (PMF) with MC techniques. Studies in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area have demonstrated the effectiveness of this integrated approach in identifying pollution sources and predicting spatial risk patterns[129]. Importantly, this methodology has also demonstrated significant utility in evaluating sudden environmental incidents, as illustrated by studies following a tailings dam failure in Serbia. PMF source apportionment analysis confirmed that tailings materials were the dominant pollution source, contributing over 70%, with the highest contamination levels detected within a few kilometers downstream[130].

    • Assessing and monitoring potentially toxic HMs and metalloids across various ecological compartments and resident biological communities is critical for environmental protection[131]. Intelligent monitoring and early warning systems have become indispensable for preventing and controlling HM pollution in aquatic ecosystems. These advanced systems integrate high-precision sensor networks, Internet of Things (IoT)-based data transmission infrastructure, cloud computing analytics, and AI-powered predictive modeling to establish a comprehensive technological framework that covers the entire process from pollution detection to risk mitigation. By enabling real-time dynamic tracking of HM contamination, these systems promote a paradigm shift in pollution management strategies, transitioning from reactive remediation to proactive prevention through predictive modeling of contamination trends and data-driven decision support. The implementation of such integrated systems has significantly enhanced the scientific rigor and intelligent management capabilities of water environment governance, achieving minute-level response times to pollution events. Finally, a smart water environment management system that integrates monitoring, analysis, management, and application has been established, as shown in Fig. 4. This technological advancement marks a significant step toward safeguarding aquatic ecosystems and public health against HM contamination.

      Figure 4. 

      Schematic diagram of the full-chain technical architecture for smart water environment management.

    • The dynamic and complex nature of water environmental pollution necessitates the ongoing development and refinement of innovative sensing technologies to ensure accurate monitoring and effective risk assessment of HM pollution. Currently, mainstream sensing technologies can be broadly categorized into four types: optical sensors, electrochemical sensors, biosensors, and nanosensors. While optical sensors offer high sensitivity, their application in water monitoring remains limited due to factors such as high cost and susceptibility to environmental conditions[132]. Traditional electrochemical sensors, which have long served as primary tools for water environment monitoring, are being enhanced through the integration of sustainable materials and low-pollution manufacturing processes to improve their environmental compatibility[133]. Meanwhile, biosensors and nanosensors, known for their environmental friendliness and high specificity, have emerged as research hotspots in HM pollution monitoring[134]. In the field of biosensing technology, Ademola Adekunle's team innovatively employed microbial fuel cells to construct biosensors, enabling real-time monitoring of toxicity in mine drainage. Their research revealed a strong correlation between changes in microbial community composition within the sensors and HM exposure levels, with detection results showing high consistency (R2 = 0.92) when compared to traditional Microtox toxicity tests, thus confirming the reliability of this technology in addressing HM pollution[135]. Advances in nanosensing technology have created new possibilities for water quality monitoring. Researchers have developed a smart sensor capable of detecting multiple HMs by modifying carbon wire electrodes with gold nanoparticles. This innovation presents three key advantages: (1) the use of cost-effective carbon-based electrode materials combined with recycled plastic substrates, which supports resource sustainability; (2) strong pH adaptability and resistance to ion interference; and (3) the ability to simultaneously detect multiple HMs, including Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Hg2+, with real-time data visualization achieved via an IoT platform[136]. The sensor has been effectively tested across various real-world water samples in India, showcasing its potential for practical applications. However, existing sensing technologies still encounter significant challenges in reservoir HM monitoring, such as limited field application, material performance constraints, and inadequate adaptability to complex aquatic environments. Therefore, future research should focus on developing low-cost, environmentally friendly, and functionally integrated sensing systems. By enhancing monitoring efficiency through multi-technology integration, these systems can provide critical technical support for early warning of HM pollution risks in reservoirs.

      As the core architecture of IoT technology, sensor networks enable the real-time collection and transmission of environmental parameters through distributed intelligent sensing nodes, offering notable advantages in water environment monitoring[137]. With the deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, innovative sensing systems have made groundbreaking advancements in monitoring HM ions in water bodies. For example, Pan et al. developed a smartphone-based edge computing platform that integrates portable sensing devices with IoT cloud services. This platform successfully enabled multi-parameter detection of HMs and intelligent identification of pollution sources across four typical industrial wastewater models, including electroplating, battery manufacturing, metallurgy, and pesticide wastewater. System tests demonstrated that the platform's detection results for real water samples were highly consistent with those obtained using traditional laboratory analysis methods, thereby providing an efficient technical solution for pollution traceability, environmental regulation, and water quality assessment[138]. Similarly, Muhammad-Aree & Teepoo developed a cost-effective and field-deployable paper-based HM detection strip integrated with a smartphone application. This system enables the rapid detection of HMs such as Zn, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Manganese (Mn) in wastewater samples within 1 min, with results closely aligning with those obtained through laboratory analysis[139]. While these technological innovations offer promising solutions for monitoring HMs in reservoirs, large-scale engineering applications remain challenging and require further advancements in material performance, device stability, and system reliability. Therefore, future research should prioritize the development of intelligent and eco-friendly monitoring technologies to strengthen technical capabilities in safeguarding reservoir water quality.

    • Machine learning technologies are revolutionizing research methodologies and practical applications in the prevention and control of HM pollution in aquatic environments. Through multi-source heterogeneous data fusion and innovative intelligent algorithms, a comprehensive technical framework has been established, spanning from pollution source tracing to risk early warning[140,141]. Current mainstream algorithm systems, including neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, and Bayesian networks, exhibit exceptional performance in identifying pollution sources and assessing environmental risks[142]. For example, decision tree algorithms achieved a 99.6% accuracy rate in a study conducted at Rawal Dam[143]. In another study on HM pollution in the Yangtze River Estuary, the random forest model demonstrated strong predictive performance for Pb, with the average R value of the test set reaching 0.90 and root mean square error (RMSE) as low as 0.16 for predicting Pb concentrations in water samples[144]. Recent advancements have introduced a spatiotemporal correlation prediction model that integrates spatial clustering features with stacked Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Based on data from 31 copper mine sites, the stacked LSTM model correctly classified 83.87% of the sites into medium- to high-risk categories. Moreover, its predicted spatial distribution of pollution risk was highly consistent with the actual distribution of mine sites, significantly improving the reliability of HM pollution risk assessment[145]. Deep learning technology has further overcome the limitations of traditional analytical methods, enabling precise identification of latent patterns within complex sensor data. Moreover, it facilitates intelligent interpretation and visualization of monitoring results through integration with IoT platforms. Nevertheless, the speciation variability of HMs in reservoirs presents significant challenges to the widespread adoption of this technology, including issues related to algorithm adaptability, limitations in data quantity and quality, and complexities in system integration, particularly the need for enhanced generalization across reservoirs with varying functions. By focusing on multimodal data fusing, hybrid model optimization, and the development of intelligent decision-support systems, scholars can construct an integrated 'monitoring-early warning-governance' prevention and control framework. This strategy would effectively complement remediation technologies such as microbial remediation, offering more innovative and efficient solutions for managing HM pollution in reservoirs. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration between environmental science and computer science is essential for advancing technological innovation in reservoir pollution prevention. Additionally, because the effective implementation of machine learning technologies fundamentally relies on high-quality monitoring data, continuous improvements in sensor network deployment and data quality assurance mechanisms are critically important.

    • The evolution of nanotechnology has markedly enhanced the efficiency of HM removal, achieving critical advancements in selectivity, renewability, and environmental compatibility[146]. For instance, thiol-functionalized nanomaterials exhibit exceptional dual functionality for HM detection and removal. A notable case is mercaptosuccinic acid-thiosemicarbazide-based non-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles, which achieve an ultralow detection limit of 95 nM (19.0 μg/L) for Hg2+ with a linear range spanning four orders of magnitude (0.1–1,471 μM), and demonstrate a removal efficiency of 90.42% within 50 min. Furthermore, Na2S treatment allows this material to be regenerated for five reuse cycles while sustaining less than 5% performance loss per cycle[147]. In complex pollution systems, composite nanomaterials show particularly outstanding performance. Ahmed et al. synthesized a Zn ferrite/reduced graphene oxide (GO) composite using a modified Hummers method, achieving adsorption capacities of 89.8 mg/g for Pb2+ and 119.0 mg/g for organic dyes while maintaining over 90% removal efficiency after five cycles[148]. The GO-Zn oxide (GO-ZnO) nanocomposite integrates excellent adsorption performance with antibacterial functionality, demonstrating adsorption capacities of 121.95 mg/g for Cd2+ and 277.78 mg/g for Pb2+, along with reducing the size and number of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, demonstrating remarkable antibacterial activity[149]. Ji et al. synthesized a magnetic Fe3O4/GO nanocomposite by integrating solvothermal synthesis with pyrolysis techniques. This novel material preserves the original Metal-Organic Framework (MOF) morphology and crystalline structure while exhibiting strong anti-interference properties, thereby facilitating efficient As5+ adsorption over a broad pH range (2–9)[150]. Green synthesis approaches enhance the practical applicability of nanomaterials by mitigating environmental hazards and reducing economic costs[151]. Additionally, the 'waste-treats-waste' concept has gained recognition as an additional environmentally sustainable strategy, with representative examples summarized in Table 2.

      Table 2.  Examples of nanotechnology in remediating HM-contaminated water bodies

      Material Preparation process HMs Performance indicators Features/applications Ref.
      Fe3O4-CS Plant extract Pb2+ Pb2+: 98.39% Cyclic stability: after three cycles, the adsorption capacity retention rates were 95.81%, 70.65%, 50.50%, and 42.75%, respectively [152]
      Cu2+ Cu2+: 75.52%
      Cd2+ Cd2+: 51.54%
      Ni2+ Ni2+: 45.34
      Lignin hybrid NPs Chemical cross-linking method Pb2+ Pb2+: 150.33 mg/g Reaches equilibrium within 30 s, suitable for actual reservoir water treatment [153]
      Cu2+ Cu2+: 70.69 mg/g
      Fe3O4/SiO2 Rosemary extract As3+ As3+: 49 mg/g Biological-nano synergistic system achieves simultaneous oxidation and removal of As3+ [154]
      rGO/Ag NPs Green tea reduction Pb2+ Pb2+: 84.2% In actual AMD treatment, the Pb2+ removal rate increased from 46.4% to 63.2% after five cycles (due to the in situ formation of iron oxide) [155]
      nFeS@GS Geobacter biohybrid Cu2+ Cu2+: 87.9% The recovery rate of heavy metals after sodium citrate desorption is > 90.7%, which is suitable for acidic mine wastewater [156]
      Pb2+ Pb2+: 96.2%
      Cd2+ Cd2+: 95.1%
      Fly ash-nZVI/Ni Waste-derived Cr6+ Cr6+: 48.31 mg/g The removal rate of Cr6+, Cu2+, etc. in actual industrial wastewater is > 87% [157]
      Cu2+ Cu2+: 147.06 mg/g
      MNPs-WSP Walnut shell coprecipitation Cd2+ Cd2+: 1.43 mg/g Recovery rates of 85%–98%, suitable for various water sources such as tap water and groundwater [158]

      Despite recent advancements, the large-scale application of nanomaterial-based remediation technologies for HM pollution faces three major challenges: (1) technical limitations persist, such as material instability in complex water matrices (e.g., magnetic nanoparticle aggregation, reduced conductivity of GO, and solubility issues in MOF), as well as inefficient regeneration processes[159]; (2) there remains insufficient understanding of environmental risks, particularly regarding the bioeffects, bioaccumulation, distribution patterns, metabolic pathways, and organ-specific toxicity mechanisms of green nanomaterials (GNMs), due to a lack of comprehensive data[160,161]; and (3) engineering barriers hinder the transition of laboratory-scale achievements to practical, real-world applications. To address these issues, future research should adopt a hierarchically structured methodology that integrates multi-scale strategies. At the molecular level, advanced in situ spectroscopic techniques should be utilized to elucidate interfacial interactions between pollutants and functional materials, while real-time monitoring technologies must be developed to characterize the dynamic process. In green material design, priority should be given to plant- and microbe-derived GNMs with dual functionality: high HM affinity (e.g., sulfur-modified biochar), and climate mitigation potential via carbon-negative production from agricultural waste. At the system scale, optimization requires the implementation of comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks to evaluate energy costs associated with GNM synthesis, long-term ecological impacts, and circular economy potential. Technologically, synergistic processes should be engineered by integrating nano-adsorption for primary capture, membrane separation for concentration, and electrochemical recovery for resource recycling, thereby establishing an integrated remediation system[162,163].

    • In HM remediation, agricultural waste adsorbents have emerged as an innovative and increasingly promising technology[164]. The widespread availability of agricultural biomass provides significant potential for waste recycling and value-added utilization. Various agricultural biosorbents have been effectively applied to remove trace metals from wastewater, as summarized in Table 3, which presents commonly used agricultural waste adsorbents for HM contamination, highlighting their high-efficiency, broad-spectrum removal of multiple HMs. Cost-effective modification techniques can further enhance their performance without significantly increasing costs, while maintaining efficacy across a wide pH range to accommodate diverse environmental conditions. Additionally, these adsorbents are derived from sustainable sources, including crop straws, fruit shells, and plant residues, offering an environmentally friendly and economical alternative to conventional materials.

      Table 3.  Comparative performance of agricultural waste-derived adsorbents for HM removal: methods, materials, and efficiency

      Method Agricultural waste adsorbent Adsorption capacity/removal efficiency Ref.
      NaOH treatment Rice straw Cd2+ removal: 61.5% [167]
      Zn2+ removal: 52.9%
      H2SO4 Rice husk Zn2+ maximum adsorption capacities: 19.38 mg/g [168]
      Hg2+ maximum adsorption capacities: 384.62 mg/g
      Tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) Ramie fiber Cu²+ maximum adsorption capacities: 0.587 mmol/g [169]
      Grinding & drying Walnut shell Cr6+ maximum adsorption capacities: 16.73~40.99 mg/g [170]
      NaOH + citric acid Peanut shell Cu²+ removal: 31% [171]
      NaOH + epichlorohydrin + N, N-dimethylformamide + TETA Pomelo peel Cr6+ maximum adsorption capacities: 193.17 mg/g [172]
      NaOH + TEMPO + NaBr + NaClO Luffa sponge Pb²+ maximum adsorption capacities: 96.6 mg/g [173]
      NaOH treatment Watermelon rind Cu2+ removal: 99.53% [174]
      Brine sediment Sawdust Zn: 5.59 mg/g [175]
      Cu 4.33 mg/g
      Boiling in HCl Coffee grounds Pb: 61.6 mg/g [176]
      Grinding & drying Pine cone Cr6+ removal: 90.84% [177]
      Grinding & drying Apple pomace (AP) & beetroot
      residue (BR)
      Max Pb adsorption: 31.7 mg/g (AP), 79.8 mg/g (BR) [178]
      Grinding & drying Crab shell Pb removal > 97% [179]
      Cd removal > 90%
      TEPA + BCTTC Modification Metasequoia sawdust (MS) Pb2+ removal: 24.0% [180]
      Cd2+ removal: 93.2%
      Cyclopropylene chloride cross-linked polyethylene imine (PEI) and coconut shell carbon (CSC) Sugarcane bagasse, corn cob, peanut shell, coconut shell carbon (CSC) Complete removal (100%) of Cr6+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Cd2+ in
      10 min
      [181]
      Polydopamine (PDA) functionalization Juncus effusus (JE) fiber Cr6+ maximum adsorption capacities: 145.8 mg/g [182]

      The commercial viability of adsorption-based treatment plants is influenced by several key factors. Among these, fixed and operational costs—such as installation expenses, adsorbent preparation and pretreatment expenditures, and regeneration costs—are particularly significant. Despite the enforcement of increasingly stringent environmental regulations, certain industrial sectors continue to exceed permissible limits for discharging harmful chemicals. Although some industries have adopted adsorption technology due to its relatively low cost, the assessment of its effectiveness largely depends on laboratory-scale batch adsorption experiments, while data from continuous-flow studies remain notably scarce[165].

      Furthermore, large-scale process design necessitates accurate estimation methods for kinetic parameters, isotherm models, and thermodynamic parameters in multicomponent systems, thereby imposing higher requirements on the accuracy of adsorption modeling. In the context of sustainable development, spent adsorbent regeneration critically enables waste stream reduction, secondary pollution prevention, and operating cost optimization. Simultaneously, recovering adsorbed substances not only enables the production of valuable byproducts but also helps mitigate environmental risks. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop environmentally benign and cost-effective regeneration techniques that enhance the reusability of adsorbents over multiple cycles[166].

    • Large aquatic macrophytes have demonstrated remarkable potential for accumulating HMs, with accumulation levels reaching up to 100,000 times the HM concentrations in surrounding water[183]. The mechanisms by which plants remediate HM-contaminated soil or water include phytoextraction, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, and rhizofiltration[184]. Table 4 provides an overview of common aquatic plants that have been studied and validated for their ability to mitigate HM pollution in water. Based on current research data, aquatic plants demonstrate significant advantages and certain limitations in HM pollution remediation. In terms of treatment efficiency, representative species such as Lemna gibba achieve removal rates of 82%–95% for multiple metals, including Cd, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Cr[196], while Azolla exhibits even higher removal rates exceeding 92% for trivalent metals such as Pb2+, Al3+, and Fe3+[193], highlighting their exceptional broad-spectrum treatment capability and synergistic multi-pollutant removal characteristics. Regarding HM accumulation mechanisms, different species display distinct features: the root BAF of Vetiver for Cu reaches 2,313.89 under Al2(SO4)3 conditioning[187]. Notably, certain species, such as Chlorella vulgaris, can reduce molybdenum (Mo) concentrations from 0.540 mg/L to below the detection limit (< 0.0005 mg/L) within 72 h, achieving a removal efficiency of up to 99.9%[190]. This rapid removal capability highlights its potential for use in emergency remediation scenarios. However, these examples also highlight several existing challenges. For instance, different plant species have relatively specific environmental requirements. Lythrum salicaria L., for example, achieves optimal remediation efficiency only under a pH of 7 and an initial Ni2+ concentration of 10 mg/L[194]. Moreover, most plants require prolonged remediation periods, and due to limitations in current experimental settings, it is still uncertain whether large-scale application might result in these species becoming invasive within local ecosystems.

      Table 4.  Phytoremediation performance of various plant and algal species for HM removal from contaminated aquatic systems

      Species Remediation site Remediation effect Target part Ref.
      Eichhornia crassipes Textile wastewater, mining wastewater Textile wastewater: Cr: 94.78%, Zn: 96.88%,
      Mining wastewater: Fe: 70.5%, Cr: 69.1%
      Roots [185]
      Black algae Nutrient solution Cu2+: 61.4% Leaves [186]
      Cattail and vetiver Mensin gold bibiani Limited mining soil Hg: > 80%, As: > 80%, Cu: > 80%, Zn: > 80% Roots [187]
      Arundo donax and Phragmites australis Cartagena-La Unión mining area, Spain Phragmites australis: Pb: 480 mg/kg Stems and leaves [188]
      Arundo donax: Zn: 406 mg/kg
      Apium nodiflorum Nestos river, Greece The maximum daily removal capacity:
      Cd: 0.208 kg, Cr: 0.45 kg, Cu: 0.368 kg, Pb: 0.113 kg,
      Mn: 0.425 kg, As: 0.312 kg, Ni: 0.398 kg, Hg: 0.116 kg,
      Zn: 0.357 kg, Sn: 0.197 kg
      Whole plant [189]
      Chlorella vulgaris Copper mine tailings water, northern Chile Cu: 64.7%, Mo: 99.9% Cell surface (adsorption) and intracellular (absorption) [190]
      Pistia stratiotes Steel mill wastewater Cd: 82.8%, Cu: 78.6%, Pb: 73% Roots [191]
      Salvinia natans Electroplating plant wastewater Zn: 84.8%, Cu: 73.8%, Ni: 56.8%, Cr: 41.4% Leaves [192]
      Azolla Polluted water bodies Al3+: 96%, Fe3+: 92%, Au3+: 100% Whole plant [193]
      Lythrum salicaria L Aquatic systems pH: 7 and Ni2+: 10 mg/L, Roots: 3,737.8 mg/kg,
      Stems: 697 mg/kg, Leaves: 418.4 mg/kg
      Roots, stems and leaves [194]
      Stachys inflata Bama Pb-zinc mining area AMF + PGPR + earthworms: Pb availability increased:
      25 mg/kg, Zn availability increased: 102 mg/kg
      Whole plant [195]
      Lemna gibba Hayatabad Industrial Estate (HIE) wastewater Cd: 95%, Cu: 93%, Pb: 82%, Ni: 88%, Cr: 92% Roots and shoots [196]
      Nymphaea aurora Hydroponic experiment pH: 5.5, Cd: 140 mg/g, Cd: 140 mg/g Shoots and leaves [197]

      Despite its notable advantages, including cost-effectiveness and environmental sustainability, phytoremediation still faces several technical challenges that limit its widespread application. First, most existing studies are based on controlled laboratory experiments or localized field trials conducted in specific contaminated areas, resulting in a lack of large-scale empirical validation. Second, the majority of research has concentrated on shallow water environments, leaving a significant knowledge gap regarding remediation effectiveness in deep-water systems. Third, successful implementation requires precise matching between plant species and pollutant—a requirement illustrated by Lythrum salicaria, which exhibits maximum Ni accumulation at pH 7[194]. However, natural fluctuations in water pH can significantly compromise its performance. Collectively, these limitations impede the engineering scalability and practical deployment of phytoremediation technologies. Therefore, future research should emphasize improving environmental adaptability assessments and optimizing critical process parameters to enhance reliability under variable conditions.

    • Biochar (BC) has emerged as a highly effective cross-medium remediation material, offering dual benefits for soil improvement and water purification. Due to its cost-effectiveness and environmental friendliness, BC remains a preferred option for metal ion removal in aquatic environments[198]. As shown in Fig. 5a, BC can be modified through various standard methods, which are broadly classified into physicochemical approaches. Modification strategies for biochar can significantly enhance its targeted removal capacity for specific pollutants, thereby improving its adaptability to the pollution characteristics of diverse aquatic environments. For instance, sulfurized magnetic biochar (SMBC) effectively reduces Cu/Ni/Zn concentrations in overlying water by 78%–92% and suppresses MeHg formation by 95%[199]. In another study focusing on Mn pollution in lake-reservoir systems, Zhao et al. developed a fixed-bed system utilizing rice straw biochars prepared at varying pyrolysis temperatures (300, 500, and 700 °C) and subjected to different modification methods (unmodified, pre-alkali treatment, and post-alkali treatment) to evaluate their dynamic adsorption behavior toward Mn2+. The findings revealed that pre-alkali-treated biochars exhibited significantly enhanced adsorption performance, with Pre-BC400 demonstrating a maximum static adsorption capacity of 41.06 mg/g. The Thomas model effectively described the dynamic adsorption process (R2 > 0.9). Both the initial Mn2+ concentration and influent flow rate were found to influence breakthrough and saturation times, indicating that operational parameters should be adjusted according to the severity of pollution in real-world applications. This research provides valuable technical insights for managing seasonal Mn contamination in lake reservoirs[200].

      Figure 5. 

      The four HMs remediation methods introduced in this section are as follows: (a) Illustrates biochar modification approaches, including chemical modification and physical modification; (b) represents in situ capping technology; (c) stands for the Floating Phytoremediation System, also known as the Biological Floating Island; (d) denotes the electrochemical remediation method.

      However, the practical applications of BC still faces several challenges: (1) difficulties in separation and recovery, as the small particle size of powdered BC complicates its effective separation from aqueous phases, potentially leading to secondary pollution; (2) limited regeneration capacity, as HM-laden BC is difficult to desorb, and improper disposal may transform it into hazardous waste; and (3) scalability bottlenecks, including regionally constrained raw material supply and low production yield due to high moisture content[201203]. Therefore, future research should prioritize the development of more cost-effective, efficient, and environmentally sustainable methodologies.

    • In situ capping technology has emerged as an effective strategy for remediating HM-contaminated water bodies through innovative material design and process optimization. Figure 5b provides schematic illustrations of its working principles. This integrated approach combines physical containment, adsorption, and redox transformation to achieve sustainable remediation with minimal ecological impact. The system establishes a multifunctional barrier on the surface of contaminated sediments, which not only physically isolates and blocks HM diffusion pathways but also chemically immobilizes HMs via interactions with the capping material, thereby significantly reducing exposure risks to benthic organisms. Recent advances in remediation technologies have successfully overcome key limitations of traditional materials, such as poor selectivity and low stability. The electrokinetic-bioleaching coupled system (EK-bioleaching) demonstrates superior performance by reducing energy consumption by 40% and chemical costs by 45%, while effectively treating multiple metal contaminants to meet regulatory standards[204]. The multi-source mineral composite calcined material (MMCCM) reduces the diffusion flux of Cu/Co/Ni by 75%–82% through optimized particle size distribution[205]. A particularly noteworthy innovation is the ternary composite system composed of hydrothermal carbonized sediment (HCS), hydrated magnesium carbonate (HMC), and sodium percarbonate (SPC) at an optimal ratio of 25:60:15. This system simultaneously provides mechanical protection, chemical isolation, and oxygenation functions. It promotes the carbonation of Mn/Cu and regulates the specific binding of DOM fractions with metal ions: microbial byproducts and fulvic-like acids preferentially complex with Cu2+, while phenolic groups and HA tend to bind Mn2+. This significantly enhances remediation efficiency and environmental compatibility[206].

      Bio-floating island technology, an environmentally friendly water remediation method introduced to China in the late 1980s, has become a critical tool for pollution control in lakes, reservoirs, and other water bodies. Figure 5c provides schematic illustrations of the working principles of bio-floating islands. By leveraging multiple mechanisms, including plant uptake, microbial metabolism, and substrate adsorption, this technology demonstrates exceptional pollutant removal efficiency while also providing ecological landscape benefits. Studies indicate that bio-floating islands are particularly effective in addressing HM pollution. Research shows that these islands exhibit significant remediation effects on HM contamination. For instance, a case study conducted in Loktak Lake, India, revealed that natural floating islands used as fish aggregation devices (FADs) could reduce Cd and Pb concentrations in water by 73.91% and 65.22%, respectively, while decreasing other HMs (Co, Cr, Cu, etc.) by 40.57%–49.16%. Simultaneously, HM accumulation in fish decreased by 24.07%–25.07%, significantly reducing ecological risks[207]. The research by Shahid et al. on four emergent plants (Brachia mutica, Typha domingensis, Phragmites australis, and Leptochloa fusca) in bacterial-assisted floating treatment wetlands (FTWs) revealed that bacterial inoculation significantly enhanced phytoremediation. The Phragmites australis plus bacteria group performed best, reducing Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Cr concentrations to 0.53, 0.20, 0.09, 1.04, and 0.07 mg/L, respectively, after five weeks, with metals primarily accumulating in roots. Bacteria inoculation promoted metal uptake by enhancing plant biomass and root development, offering an eco-friendly solution for HM pollution[208].

      These innovations address challenges such as secondary release and short remediation cycles, offering a reliable solution for the long-term treatment of HM-contaminated water[209]. As novel environmental functional materials and process intelligence continue to advance, in situ capping technology is rapidly progressing toward greater precision, sustainability, and eco-friendliness, demonstrating significant potential for widespread application. Additionally, research indicates that bio-floating islands effectively reduce HM pollution. Critical factors influencing the efficiency of HM removal include the selection of macrophyte species, the construction of microbial communities, and the integration of plant-microbe remediation strategies. Nevertheless, practical implementation necessitates careful attention to invasive species management and the prevention of material pollution[210,211]. Bio-floating island technology leverages its distinctive ecological purification mechanisms to provide sustainable solutions for addressing waterborne HM contamination, highlighting its significant potential for future environmental applications.

    • Standard electrochemical methods employed in aquatic environments include electrochemical oxidation and reduction, electro-Fenton (EF) processes, electro-deionization, electrodialysis (ED), electroflotation, electrocoagulation, and capacitive deionization (CDI). These technologies offer functionalities that traditional approaches cannot achieve. In recent years, driven by innovations in nanomaterial-modified electrodes and process optimization, electrochemical techniques have seen significant advancements in the control of HM pollution, leading to a comprehensive technological transformation from monitoring to treatment[212]. Advanced sensing systems, such as GO-modified carbon felt electrodes, utilize their high-density surface functional groups to enhance electrodeposition capacity up to a hundredfold compared to conventional methods. A single gram of this material can effectively process over 29 g of HMs while maintaining detection sensitivity at the parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Regarding treatment processes, alternating current electrodeposition technology enables the selective recovery of HMs such as Cu, Cd, and Pb with removal efficiencies exceeding 99.9%, achieved through precise regulation of electrical parameters (0.1–10 kHz, 1–5 V). Meanwhile, the combined electrocoagulation-electroflotation process achieves a 98.7% Cr removal efficiency at a current density of 20 mA/cm2 while simultaneously reducing sludge production by 60%[213]. These innovative technologies surpass conventional methods by enabling on-site detection, reducing operational costs, and effectively utilizing existing infrastructure[214]. Although further research is needed to enhance electrode durability and develop advanced intelligent control systems, integrating nano- and micro-materials into newly developed electrochemical sensors offers groundbreaking solutions for establishing environmentally sustainable HM treatment systems[215]. As modular systems continue to evolve and processes become more refined, this technology is expected to become the preferred solution for addressing HM contamination in aquatic environments. Figure 5d illustrates a typical electrochemical method used for treating HMs in polluted water bodies.

      Electrokinetic remediation has emerged as a novel and promising approach for HM pollution control. By utilizing low-intensity electric fields, this method drives multiple mass transfer processes such as electroosmosis, electromigration, and electrophoresis, enabling efficient removal of HMs from contaminated media[216]. Putra et al. explored the efficiency of an electrokinetic-enhanced phytoremediation (EP) system using Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) for Pb2+ removal in contaminated water. The study demonstrated that a 2D electrode configuration promoted a V-shaped distribution and facilitated the migration of Pb ions toward the plant root zone in an agar medium. The EP system, when supplemented with 0.01% urea, significantly enhanced the bioconcentration factor (BC, up to 24.01) and translocation factor (TF, up to 0.61) for Pb. Additionally, the plants exhibited tolerance to Pb stress by maintaining chlorophyll content and biomass, offering an effective ecological solution for HM-contaminated water remediation[217]. Another study assessed the removal efficiency of electro-stimulated phytoremediation for Pb, Cr, and Cu in water using three experimental setups: phytoremediation alone, electrokinetic remediation alone, and combined electrokinetic-phytoremediation. Results demonstrated that the aluminum electrode-based electro-phytoremediation system, operating at 4V with a daily runtime of 2 h, achieved significantly higher removal efficiencies for Cd, Pb, and Cu compared to individual remediation methods. Complete removal (100%) of Cd and Pb was achieved within 15 d, while Cu was fully removed within 10 d. Electrical stimulation markedly enhanced the BCF of water hyacinth, demonstrating hyperaccumulation capacities for Cd and Cu. Additionally, electrostimulation promoted chlorophyll synthesis, improved plant growth, and enhanced stress resistance, highlighting the technology's potential for treating HM-contaminated wastewater[218]. Currently, this method presents several limitations, including uneven electric field distribution in large water bodies, susceptibility of electrode materials to corrosion and rapid degradation, and the potential for the installation to alter the pH and other physicochemical properties of the water body, which may subsequently impact the ecosystem. Despite significant advancements in electrokinetic remediation for soil applications, challenges remain for its implementation in large water bodies such as reservoirs, particularly in terms of optimal electrode configuration, energy consumption optimization, and ecological safety considerations[219]. Further research is required to address critical issues, including the selection of suitable electrode materials, optimization of operational parameters, and long-term ecological impact assessments, to facilitate the transition from laboratory-scale studies to practical engineering applications.

    • Research on HMs in reservoirs carries substantial ecological and public health significance. Its primary strength lies in enabling early identification of pollution risks from toxic HMs through scientific monitoring and assessment, thereby providing essential data that also allows for tracing pollution origins, supporting the formulation of source control strategies. In addition, advances in novel removal technologies and eco-friendly materials have enhanced progress in water pollution treatment, reducing remediation costs and contributing to long-term drinking water safety and aquatic ecosystem stability. However, traditional risk assessment methods face notable limitations in addressing complex scenarios such as combined pollution and chronic low-dose exposure, often failing to accurately evaluate potential risks. Meanwhile, intelligent monitoring technologies require further improvements in environmental adaptability and predictive accuracy to fulfill demands for real-time and precise monitoring. Furthermore, while promising, current research remains largely experimental, necessitating additional studies before these approaches can be broadly applied in pollution remediation efforts. Although emerging technologies such as nanomaterials and bioremediation demonstrate efficient HM removal capabilities, their engineering applications face limitations due to multiple challenges, including material stability, ecological safety, and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the absence of unified production standards and long-term efficacy evaluations complicates the harmonization of significant variations in preparation methods, action mechanisms, and practical implementations across different materials.

      It should be particularly emphasized that the governance of HM pollution in reservoirs requires a comprehensive approach that integrates both the hydrogeological characteristics of the watershed and socio-economic factors. Key considerations include, for example, the impact of seasonal water level fluctuations on HM migration at the sediment-water interface; the coordinated control of agricultural non-point source pollution and industrial point source pollution; and the design of effective stakeholder participation mechanisms. Moreover, reservoir ecosystems are influenced by multiple supply and demand pressures, which can sometimes conflict, resulting in complex interrelationships among the structure, function, and processes of reservoirs, river basins, and human interventions. Therefore, achieving sustainable management of reservoirs necessitates the establishment of a full-chain technical system encompassing 'monitoring - assessment - remediation - control'. By integrating interdisciplinary collaboration, multi-scale model coupling, and intelligent management platforms, it can provide systematic solutions for global water environment governance. By advancing research on pollution mechanisms, innovating monitoring and early warning technologies, overcoming bottlenecks in green remediation technologies, establishing a comprehensive management system, and enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration and policy support, the challenges posed by HM pollution in reservoirs can be effectively addressed, achieving their sustainable management, and providing valuable references and assurance for global water environment risk management.

    • The pollution sources, migration pathways, and monitoring and treatment technologies of HMs in reservoirs have increasingly drawn the attention of researchers and the public. This paper reviews the challenges posed by multi-source composite pollution and complex migration mechanisms in managing HM pollution in reservoirs, emphasizing that governance strategies must comprehensively consider the synergistic effects of pollution sources, multi-media interface processes, and the dynamic evolution of ecological risks. Recent advancements in risk assessment technologies, such as SSD models for ecological risk evaluation and the integrated US EPA-MC framework for human health risk assessment, have significantly enhanced pollution management capabilities. Complementing these tools, emerging monitoring systems now utilize IoT networks and machine learning algorithms to enable real-time tracking and early warning, collectively forming an intelligent 'monitoring-warning-governance' framework. In the realm of remediation, innovative technologies demonstrate considerable promise: nanomaterials offer selective HM removal with reusability; agricultural waste adsorbents and biochar provide eco-friendly, cost-effective solutions; phytoremediation utilizing aquatic plants demonstrates efficient HM bioaccumulation, while bio-floating islands provide ecological benefits through integrated plant-microbe-substrate interactions; and in situ capping techniques effectively control pollutant migration with minimal environmental disturbance. However, this review indicates that research on HM pollution control in reservoirs is primarily confined to laboratory settings, revealing a significant gap in practical applications. Current strategies are one-sided, traditional risk assessment methods are limited, and intelligent monitoring systems require further development. Multiple bottlenecks hinder the engineering application of emerging technologies, and due to the lack of unified standards and long-term certification studies, coordinating differences among materials remains challenging. Therefore, this work aims to provide a foundation for future mechanism analyses, intelligent system development, and green technology innovation, thereby ensuring long-term reservoir ecosystem safety to address HM pollution challenges.

    • The pollution of HMs in water bodies, such as reservoirs, has become increasingly severe. Farmland soil serves as a significant source of HM input, and soil properties play a crucial role in determining the behavior of these metals. Nanotechnology holds considerable promise for treating HM pollution; however, its application requires careful attention to stability and potential ecological health risks. Given the current coexistence of multiple pollutants, future research should prioritize understanding the mechanisms of combined pollution and developing efficient treatment technologies, while addressing the limitations of traditional approaches and the scalability challenges of emerging solutions to better support pollution control and sustainable agricultural practices.

      (1) Given the complex and interconnected nature of HM pollution, future efforts should integrate interdisciplinary research, policy, and community engagement. This integration will enable a shift from reactive to proactive management—grounded in multiprocess coupling theory—to ensure sustainable reservoir ecosystems.

      (2) A deep understanding of geochemical, microbiological, and data science mechanisms is essential to unravel their complex interaction processes and translate these insights into scalable technologies. Prioritizing real-time monitoring, mechanistic modeling, and nature-based solutions will help mitigate ecological risks and ensure water security in the context of climate change.

      (3) Establishing and improving the utilization of adsorbents derived from agricultural and forestry solid waste is crucial for advancing sustainable agriculture and supporting carbon emission reduction efforts. Addressing challenges such as resource utilization, cost reduction, and enhancing economic feasibility is essential for enabling large-scale practical applications. Intelligent and adaptive phytoremediation systems offer promising solutions to water pollution by transforming remediation strategies.

      (4) Scaling up biochar into globally applicable water remediation technologies is vital; more comprehensive approaches are needed to overcome current limitations in separation, regeneration, and scalability. In situ remediation and bio-floating island technologies represent a shift from passive containment to active and intelligent pollution control systems that not only manage contamination but also restore aquatic ecosystems. The future of water quality management lies in synergistic, multifunctional approaches that integrate advanced materials science with ecological engineering principles.

      (5) Future advancements in nanomaterials should place greater emphasis on human health implications. Understanding the behavior, fate, and long-term ecological impacts of nanoparticles in aquatic environments is critical. Additionally, electrochemical remediation should evolve from standalone treatment processes into smart, self-optimizing water purification networks. Integrating materials science, artificial intelligence, and ecological engineering holds promise for delivering sustainable solutions to global HM pollution challenges.

      (6) In real-world environments, HMs often coexist with organic pollutants and contaminants. Therefore, future research should prioritize the investigation of synergistic mechanisms within HM-organic compound pollution systems and the development of efficient technologies for their simultaneous removal.

      • The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, study design: Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, Zhang D, Jia H, Wang J, Zhang Z, Hough R; supervision, resources, funding acquisition: Cui S; methodology: Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Jia H, Wang J, Zhang Z, Hough R; formal analysis: Ma C, Zhang F; data curation: Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F; investigation: Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, Zhang D, Jia H, Wang J, Zhang Z; writing – original draft preparation: Ma C; writing – review & editing: Cui S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the Distinguished Youth Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China (Grant No. JQ2023E001), and Young Leading Talents of Northeast Agricultural University, China (Grant Nos NEAU2023QNLJ-013 and NEAU2024QNLJ-01).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Multi-source HM pollution and complex migration processes in reservoirs.

        Intelligent monitoring systems enable real-time HM monitoring and early warning for reservoirs.

        Emerging remediation strategies demonstrate potential for the sustainable removal of HMs from reservoirs.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (4) References (219)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, et al. 2025. Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e003 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0003
    Cui S, Ma C, Zhang F, Jia Z, Pan F, et al. 2025. Heavy metals in reservoirs: pollution characteristics, remediation technologies, and future prospects. Agricultural Ecology and Environment 1: e003 doi: 10.48130/aee-0025-0003

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return