-
In total there were 35 seedling vines. Some of these had already been through one round of selection in the previous year (2021). Out of these 35, 11 were kept in 2022 as advanced selections (Table 1). The number of fruits collected per individual ranged from 4 (22R504) to 52 (20R104 and 21R308). The former had P. incarnata IL as a parent and the latter two had P. incarnata OK. Fruits were rated based on feel to gauge, non-destructively, the mass of the fruit. Most average ratings were between 3 and 4 but ranged from 1.59 (22R507) to 4.58 (20R314). After the feel rating, another the visual rating of the pulp was performed, also on a 1-5 scale. The purpose was to see how closely the ratings were aligned. The lowest ranked individuals were 22R502 and 22R504 (1.00) and the highest was 20R314 (4.50). These two ranking were significantly correlated (p < 0.0001) at 0.6586 (Table 2). In 25 out of 35 cases the feel rating was higher than the visual.
Table 1. Fruit related characteristics of interspecific hybrid Passiflora selections among both selections were kept for further evaluation and those that were eliminated from further analysis (not kept).
Selection Parentage Fruit # Keep Feel1 Visual2 Seed # Tot wt (g) Hull wt (g) HT (mm) Width (mm) Density (g/cm2)3 Shape4 Pulp wt (g) Pulp %5 20R104 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 52 No 2.38 1.98 5.67 16.37 12.47 55.40 41.43 0.69 1.34 2.20 11.59 20R114 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 37 Yes 3.78 4.27 21.91 22.61 12.60 56.97 39.10 0.99 1.46 9.57 40.15 20R305 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 22 Yes 4.45 4.36 25.58 32.17 19.11 59.16 44.59 1.18 1.33 10.36 33.21 20R309 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 14 No 3.93 3.14 9.71 24.89 15.17 56.38 42.30 0.98 1.33 3.17 12.19 20R314 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 26 Yes 4.58 4.50 22.74 29.54 17.03 54.49 42.39 1.21 1.29 9.52 33.25 20R426 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 21 No 3.29 3.55 11.27 18.56 14.22 47.57 35.71 1.01 1.35 5.01 20.81 21R203 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 24 Yes 3.29 3.33 14.56 18.94 11.98 55.52 40.65 0.82 1.37 5.26 27.74 21R206 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 51 Yes 3.24 3.22 10.38 17.38 11.18 49.02 33.08 0.99 1.49 5.32 25.90 21R207 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 27 No 2.30 2.00 6.96 12.03 9.11 50.83 34.39 0.66 1.49 2.68 20.13 21R215 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 20 No 3.95 3.85 13.47 21.47 14.40 57.14 38.95 0.94 1.47 5.47 25.75 21R217 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 33 No 2.82 2.82 6.20 15.78 11.74 53.01 38.08 0.77 1.40 2.50 14.36 21R218 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 33 Yes 3.06 3.39 18.33 18.14 9.67 52.91 37.65 0.87 1.41 6.47 32.59 21R221 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 31 No 2.68 3.00 15.56 18.97 13.15 56.73 40.18 0.82 1.41 5.50 28.06 21R301 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 41 No 3.05 3.17 15.50 17.93 12.19 52.28 37.83 0.87 1.39 7.39 34.79 21R303 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 41 Yes 3.95 3.66 17.13 23.12 14.62 54.90 40.66 0.99 1.35 6.86 28.74 21R304 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 43 Yes 3.09 3.30 14.67 18.21 11.72 54.10 37.50 0.86 1.45 6.06 28.37 21R308 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 52 No 2.27 2.44 7.59 15.03 10.06 53.58 38.94 0.69 1.38 3.14 19.50 21R317 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 6 No 2.33 1.33 2.00 20.48 20.00 54.17 44.91 0.83 1.20 0.85 2.35 21R319 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata OK 41 Yes 3.41 4.07 26.71 22.28 10.27 56.57 38.96 0.98 1.45 10.99 46.97 22R306 Frederick × P. incarnata IL 30 No 2.43 2.37 9.07 14.40 10.28 48.43 39.87 0.74 1.22 3.90 26.25 22R307 Frederick × P. incarnata IL 25 Yes 3.36 3.88 19.57 18.62 11.78 52.80 39.13 0.89 1.35 6.87 36.87 22R401 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 16 No 3.13 2.19 6.92 25.03 15.35 52.80 46.63 0.94 1.14 3.38 17.33 22R402 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 35 No 3.26 2.31 7.42 20.66 13.90 53.15 41.97 0.90 1.27 3.72 19.77 22R403 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 5 No 3.00 1.40 0.00 18.51 13.00 47.19 36.52 1.04 1.31 0.00 0.00 22R404 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 12 No 3.75 3.50 12.00 21.39 13.09 50.33 37.40 1.10 1.35 6.14 26.96 22R405 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 20 Yes 3.85 3.35 14.64 25.77 17.31 55.36 43.77 1.04 1.27 7.55 29.30 22R406 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 20 No 3.45 2.40 10.75 21.57 15.12 49.35 41.22 1.05 1.20 5.93 24.84 22R407 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata MS 16 No 3.75 3.25 11.20 23.00 15.22 48.57 40.47 1.14 1.20 5.58 27.77 22R501 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 23 No 1.61 1.13 1.05 11.73 11.10 39.04 34.34 0.86 1.13 0.49 2.39 22R502 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 9 No 2.11 1.00 2.00 13.71 8.80 45.48 36.30 0.81 1.27 0.85 8.71 22R503 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 25 No 1.80 1.08 0.41 11.86 11.43 39.27 33.05 0.92 1.19 0.04 0.38 22R504 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 4 No 1.75 1.00 0.00 13.11 7.72 44.10 32.53 0.81 1.36 0.00 0.00 22R505 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 12 No 2.92 1.67 5.20 19.60 14.31 50.32 41.75 0.96 1.21 2.45 12.94 22R506 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 25 No 1.92 1.04 0.21 15.39 13.74 48.25 39.22 0.78 1.24 0.08 0.97 22R507 P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata IL 37 No 1.59 1.19 0.63 10.77 10.12 41.98 34.12 0.74 1.23 0.22 2.11 1 Feel: (feel scale of 1−5, with 1 = light, empty fruit and 5 = heavy, full fruit). 2 Visual: (visual rating of pulp of 1−5, with 1 = light, empty fruit and 5 = heavy, full fruit). 3 Density: Fd = W/(H×D), where W = fruit weight (g), H = fruit height (cm), and D = fruit width (cm). 4 Shape: H/D, where H = fruit height (mm), and D = fruit width (mm). 5 Pulp percentage [(pulp weight/total weight) × 100]. Table 2. Correlations of fruit characteristics among all interspecific Passiflora hybrids selections in 2022.
Fruit feel Visual Seed # Hull wt (g) Pulp wt (g) Pulp % Density (g/cm2) Total wt (g) Fruit Feel1 1.00 0.6586 0.6524 0.5129 0.6592 0.6584 0.7677 0.7084 Visual2 0.6586 1.00 0.6807 0.0442 0.7215 0.6586 0.5145 0.3972 Seed # 0.6524 0.6807 1.00 0.3441 0.9652 0.9069 0.5681 0.8095 Hull wt (g) 0.5129 0.0442 0.3441 1.00 0.3073 0.2260 0.6114 0.8024 Pulp wt (g) 0.6592 0.7215 0.9652 0.3073 1.00 0.8916 0.6604 0.7853 Pulp %3 0.6584 0.6586 0.9069 0.2260 0.8916 1.00 0.6306 0.7314 Density4 0.7677 0.5145 0.6581 0.6114 0.6604 0.6306 1.00 0.7818 Total wt (g) 0.7084 0.3972 0.8095 0.8024 0.7853 0.7314 0.7818 1.00 1 Feel: (feel scale of 1−5, with 1 = light, empty fruit and 5 = heavy, full fruit). 2 Visual: (visual rating of pulp of 1−5, with 1 = light, empty fruit and 5 = heavy, full fruit). 3 Pulp percentage [(pulp weight/total weight) × 100]. 4 Density: Fd = W/(H×D), where W = fruit weight (g), H = fruit height (cm), and D = fruit width (cm). Seed number was counted for each fruit and then averaged over all collected fruits for each individual vine. Some fruits produced no seeds (22R403 and 22R504) whereas others had more than 25 seeds per fruit (20R305 and 21R319) (Table 1). The presence of many seeds was an indicator of significant pulp presence. As would be expected with any segregating population only one generation from wild material, average total weight of the fruit varied greatly among the individual vines. Some were small, close to 10 g (22R507) and some were much larger, over 30 g (20R305). Of course, there are different components encompassing the total weight, namely hull weight and pulp weight (including seeds). Hulls of P. incarnata are thinner than those of P. edulis and that difference in thickness can affect postharvest shelf life. In general, hull weights ranged between 10 to 20 g, with a few less than 10 g and only one at 20 g (Table 1). Pulp weight ranged from 0 to 10 g, with two individuals above 10 g (20R305 and 21R319), both of which have P. incarnata OK as a parent. Pulp % [(pulp weight/total weight) × 100] was a strong indicator for advancing a selection. Many vines had poor pulp percentage (< 25%). A few were over 30% and two individuals were over 40% (20R114 and 21R319). Fruit density is a non-destructive measure of how full a fruit is of pulp while accounting for fruit size (g/cm2). Fruit densities were mostly < 1.00 but some were higher.
In terms of harvested fruit, shapes were almost exclusively longer than wide. Most were greater than 40 mm and many over 50 mm and only two were less than 40 mm (22R501 and 22R503). The average width of fruit ranged between 32 and 46 mm. The overall shape (height/width) were similar among all fruits with all being over 1.00 (round) and they were categorized as oblong spheroid[16].
All correlations of measured traits were significant at p < 0.05 except for hull weight and visual assessment (Table 2). Fruit density was positively correlated with feel and total fruit weight (r = 0.7677 and 0.7818, respectively). This would indicate that any of these three non-destructive measures could potentially be used equally. Total weight was highly correlated with seed number (r = 0.8095), pulp weight (r = 0.7853), and pulp percentage (r = 0.7314). Feel was also correlated with those same variables but lower (r = 0.6524, r = 0.6592, and r = 0.6584). Fruit density was similar to feel (r = 0.6581, r = 0.6604, and r = 0.6306). Therefore, total fruit weight, as a non-destructive measure, was the best indicator of seed number, pulp weight, and pulp percentage in this study (Table 2).
When it came to influence of male parent on traits, IL was clearly behind both MS and OK (Table 3). Vines with IL as a parent produced fewer seeds, lower total fruit weight, shorter height, smaller width, lower fruit density, lighter pulp weight and pulp percentage. Those vines with OK as a parent made more seeds, longer height, and a more elongated shape than the other two pollen parents. MS-based vines had the greatest average total fruit weight, hull weight, fruit width, and fruit density. MS and OK were not different in pulp weight and pulp percentage.
Table 3. Fruit measurements by Passiflora incarnata male parent among all interspecific hybrid selections in 2022.
Male Total wt (g) Hull wt (g) Height (mm) Width (mm) Density (g/cm2)2 Shape3 Pulp Wt (g) Pulp %4 Seed # IL 14.8 c 11.5 b 45.9 c 37.6 c 0.83 c 1.23 c 2.00 b 11.9 b 5.0 c MS 22.1 a 14.8 a 51.6 b 41.2 a 1.02 a 1.26 b 5.24 a 23.8 a 10.3 b OK 19.5 b 12.3 b 54.1 a 38.8 b 0.89 b 1.40 a 5.90 a 27.2 a 14.3 a P value1 < 0.0001 < 0..0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 1 Means within a column followed by the same letter are similar according to Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) at p ≤ 0.05. Means followed with different letters within a column are significantly different. 2 Density: Fd = W/(H×D), where W = fruit weight (g), H = fruit height (cm), and D = fruit width (cm). 3 Shape: H/D, where H = fruit height (mm), and D = fruit width (mm). 4 Pulp percentage: [(pulp weight/total weight) × 100]. After selections were made, the individual selections kept were significantly higher/better in all traits categories except for fruit width (p = 0.3698) and hull weight (p = 0.2415) (Table 4). Eleven out of 35 vines were chosen as advanced selections. Those chosen to advance had much higher seed numbers and pulp weights, which are highly correlated (r = 0.9652). Fruit that was full of pulp had the highest priority in the selection process and that was borne out in the results (Table 4).
Table 4. Resulting traits of interspecific Passiflora vine selections that were kept and those discarded during the 2022 season.
Seed # Total wt (g) Height (mm) Width (mm) Density (g/cm2)2 Shape3 Pulp wt (g) Hull wt (g) Kept 18.2 21.7 54.3 39.0 0.97 1.40 7.5 12.6 Discarded 7.0 16.9 50.4 38.7 0.84 1.31 3.0 12.2 P value1 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.3698 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.2415 1 Means within a column are different according to Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) at p ≤ 0.05. 2 Density: Fd = W/(H×D), where W = fruit weight (g), H = fruit height (cm), and D = fruit width (cm). 3 Shape: H/D, where H = fruit height (mm), and D = fruit width (mm). -
There is reason to be cautiously optimistic about interspecific hybrid Passiflora involving P. incarnata. However, as seen in previous studies, the challenges are significant toward the production of a commercially viable fruit. In the case of this study, the fruit obtained was smaller than desired with lesser fruit quality than that of P. edulis. Therefore, creating more generations with backcrossing to P. edulis is the next logical step in the process with the expectation of incremental losses of cold hardiness. Additional proxy experiments of cold hardiness, such as differential thermal analysis and electrolyte leakage[24] will be performed as it becomes necessary to determine more precise estimates of tolerances to cold temperatures.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Stafne ET. 2023. Challenges in breeding and selecting Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata hybrids. Technology in Horticulture 3:16 doi: 10.48130/TIH-2023-0016
Challenges in breeding and selecting Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata hybrids
- Received: 06 May 2023
- Accepted: 12 June 2023
- Published online: 04 September 2023
Abstract: Passiflora is comprised of many species, with P. edulis being the prominent commercial species. Another species that grows in more temperate regions is P. incarnata. Breeding to create interspecific hybrids with these two species has been done before but without longstanding success. Controlled crosses of P. edulis f. flavicarpa × P. incarnata were made to generate baseline data on interspecific passionfruit hybrids that can survive subtropical and temperate winters. The number of fruits collected per individual hybrid selection ranged from 4 to 52. Some fruits produced no seeds whereas others averaged more than 25 seeds per fruit. Pulp weight ranged from 0 to 10 g, with two individuals above 10 g. Many vines had poor pulp percentage (< 25%). A few were over 30% and two individuals were over 40%. The average width of fruit ranged between 32 and 46 mm. The overall shapes were similar among fruits. Vines with P. incarnata from Illinois (USA) as a parent produced fewer seeds, lower total fruit weight, shorter height, smaller width, lower fruit density, lighter pulp weight and pulp percentage. The vines with P. incarnata from Oklahoma (USA) as a parent made more seeds, longer height, and a more elongated shape than the other two pollen parents. Mississippi-based P. incarnata vines had the greatest average total fruit weight, hull weight, fruit width, and fruit density. Based on the results of this study, there is reason to be cautiously optimistic about interspecific hybrid Passiflora involving P. incarnata. Creating more generations with backcrossing to P. edulis is the next logical step in the process.
-
Key words:
- Breedings /
- Hybrids /
- Challenges /
- Selecting /
- Passiflora edulis /
- Flavicarpa