Search
2023 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production

More Information
  • Functional rice has a broad market prospect and represents one of the vital developmental directions for future rice production. This paper summarizes the types, breeding and cultivation technologies of functional rice, as well as prevention and control of pests and diseases. We conclude the following: (1) breeding for functional rice should focus on breeding rice varieties with an endosperm that is enriched with multiple active components and broad-spectrum resistance to pests and diseases; (2) moderate water stress and optimized fertilizer management practices of low nitrogen, low phosphorus, high potassium, high silicon, and moderate micronutrient fertilization, as well as timely and early harvest, are conducive to improving the yield and quality of functional rice. In addition, we stress the need to focus on the development and application of polymerization breeding technologies for the advancement of the functional rice industry, and future research in these areas should be reinforced.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Graham RD, Welch RM, Bouis HE. 2001. Addressing micronutrient malnutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods: Principles, perspectives and knowledge gaps. Advances in Agronomy 70:77−142

    doi: 10.1016/s0065-2113(01)70004-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jin Z, Zhang L, Liu H, Nie L. 2021. Energy assessment of different rice-wheat rotation systems. Food and Energy Security 10:394−405

    doi: 10.1002/fes3.284

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chen H. 2016. Research methods and prospects of functional rice. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences 28:1279−86

    Google Scholar

    [4]

    Singh P, Singh G, Sodhi GPS. 2019. Energy auditing and optimization approach for improving energy efficiency of rice cultivation in south-western Punjab, India. Energy 174:269−79

    doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.169

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hu EA, Pan A, Malik V, Sun Q. 2012. White rice consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis and systematic review. BMJ 344:e1454

    doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhou H, Wang L, Liu G, Meng X, Jing Y, et al. 2016. Critical roles of soluble starch synthase SSIIIa and granule-bound starch synthase Waxy in synthesizing resistant starch in rice. PNAS 113:12844−49

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615104113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H. 2001. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of Amylose—Extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiology 127:459−72

    doi: 10.1104/pp.010127

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wada T, Yamaguchi O, Miyazaki M, Miyahara K, Ishibashi M, et al. 2018. Development and characterization of a new rice cultivar, ‘Chikushi-kona 85’, derived from a starch-branching enzyme IIb-deficient mutant line. Breeding Science 68:278−83

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.17069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Miura S, Koyama N, Crofts N, Hosaka Y, Abe M, et al. 2021. Generation and starch characterization of non-transgenic BEI and BEIIb double mutant rice (Oryza sativa) with ultra-high level of resistant starch. Rice 14:3

    doi: 10.1186/s12284-020-00441-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Wei C, Qin F, Zhu L, Zhou W, Chen Y, et al. 2010. Microstructure and ultrastructure of high-amylose rice resistant starch granules modified by antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:1224−32

    doi: 10.1021/jf9031316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhu L, Gu M, Meng X, Cheung SCK, Yu H, et al. 2012. High-amylose rice improves indices of animal health in normal and diabetic rats. Plant Biotechnology Journal 10:353−62

    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00667.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Tsuiki K, Fujisawa H, Itoh A, Sato M, Fujita N. 2016. Alterations of starch structure lead to increased resistant starch of steamed rice: Identification of high resistant starch rice lines. Journal of Cereal Science 68:88−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Itoh Y, Crofts N, Abe M, Hosaka Y, Fujita N. 2017. Characterization of the endosperm starch and the pleiotropic effects of biosynthetic enzymes on their properties in novel mutant rice lines with high resistant starch and amylose content. Plant Science 258:52−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.02.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xu W, Dubos C, Lepiniec L. 2015. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes. Trends in Plant Science 20:176−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhu Q, Yu S, Zeng D, Liu H, Wang H, et al. 2017. Development of “purple endosperm rice” by engineering anthocyanin biosynthesis in the endosperm with a high-efficiency transgene stacking system. Molecular Plant 10:918−29

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Finocchiaro F, Ferrari B, Gianinetti A. 2010. A study of biodiversity of flavonoid content in the rice caryopsis evidencing simultaneous accumulation of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in a black-grained genotype. Journal of Cereal Science 51:28−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Furukawa T, Maekawa M, Oki T, Suda I, Iida S, et al. 2007. The Rc and Rd genes are involved in proanthocyanidin synthesis in rice pericarp. The Plant Journal 49:91−102

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02958.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Rahman MM, Lee KE, Lee ES, Matin MN, Lee DS, et al. 2013. The genetic constitutions of complementary genes Pp and Pb determine the purple color variation in pericarps with cyanidin-3-O-glucoside depositions in black rice. Journal of Plant Biology 56:24−31

    doi: 10.1007/s12374-012-0043-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Ito VC, Lacerda LG. 2019. Black rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review of its historical aspects, chemical composition, nutritional and functional properties, and applications and processing technologies. Food Chemistry 301:125304

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125304

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhu Q, Zeng D, Yu S, Cui C, Li J, et al. 2018. From golden rice to aSTARice: Bioengineering astaxanthin biosynthesis in rice endosperm. Molecular Plant 11:1440−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen MH, Bergman CJ, Grimm CC, McClung AM. 2020. A rice mutant with a giant embryo has increased levels of lipophilic antioxidants, E vitamers, and γ-oryzanol fraction. Cereal Chemistry 97:270−80

    doi: 10.1002/cche.10242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Satoh H, Omura T. 1981. New endosperm mutations induced by chemical mutagens in rice Oryza sativa L. Japanese Journal of Breeding 31:316−26

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs1951.31.316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zheng Z, Sumi K, Tanaka K, Murai N. 1995. The bean seed storage protein β-phaseolin is synthesized, processed and accumulated in vacuolar Type-II protein bodies of transgenic rice endosperm. Plant Physiology 109:777−86

    doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.777

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Maeda H, Nemoto H, Iida S, Ishii T, Nakagawa N, et al. 2001. A new rice variety with giant embryos, "Haiminori". Breeding Science 51:211−13

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.51.211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Yang WB, Gao MJ, Yin X, Liu J, Xu YH, et al. 2013. Control of rice embryo development, shoot apical meristem maintenance, and grain yield by a novel cytochrome P450. Molecular Plant 6:1945−60

    doi: 10.1093/mp/sst107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Nagasawa N, Hibara KI, Heppard EP, Vander Velden KA, Luck S, et al. 2013. GIANT EMBRYO encodes CYP78A13, required for proper size balance between embryo and endosperm in rice. The Plant Journal 75:592−605

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lee G, Piao R, Lee Y, Kim B, Seo J, et al. 2019. Identification and characterization of LARGE EMBRYO, a new gene controlling embryo size in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice 12:22

    doi: 10.1186/s12284-019-0277-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Katsube T, Kurisaka N, Ogawa M, Maruyama N, Ohtsuka R, et al. 1999. Accumulation of soybean glycinin and its assembly with the glutelins in rice. Plant Physiology 120:1063−74

    doi: 10.1104/pp.120.4.1063

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yang Y, Guo M, Sun S, Zou Y, Yin S, et al. 2019. Natural variation of OsGluA2 is involved in grain protein content regulation in rice. Nature Communications 10:1949

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09919-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Rhee CM, Ahmadi SF, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. 2018. Low-protein diet for conservative management of chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 9:235−45

    doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12264

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Iida S, Amano E, Nishio T. 1993. A rice (Oryza sativa L.) mutant having a low content of glutelin and a high content of prolamine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87:374−78

    doi: 10.1007/BF01184926

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Miyahara K. 1999. Analysis of LGC-1, low glutelin mutant of rice. Gamma Field Symposia 38:43−52

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    Nishimura M, Morita R, Kusaba M. 2009. Utilization and molecular characterization of seed protein composition mutants in rice plants. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 43:1−5

    doi: 10.6090/jarq.43.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Mason J, Bailes A, Beda-Andourou M, Copeland N, Curtis T, et al. 2005. Recent trends in malnutrition in developing regions: Vitamin A deficiency, anemia, iodine deficiency, and child underweight. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26:59−108

    doi: 10.1177/156482650502600108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Majumder S, Datta K, Datta SK. 2019. Rice biofortification: High iron, zinc, and vitamin-A to fight against "hidden hunger". Agronomy 9:803

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120803

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Ye X, Al-Babili S, Klöti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, et al. 2000. Engineering the provitamin A (β-Carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-Free) rice endosperm. Science 287:303−5

    doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.303

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, et al. 2005. Improving the nutritional value of golden rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nature Biotechnology 23:482−87

    doi: 10.1038/nbt1082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Trijatmiko KR, Dueñas C, Tsakirpaloglou N, Torrizo L, Arines FM, et al. 2016. Biofortified indica rice attains iron and zinc nutrition dietary targets in the field. Scientific Reports 6:19792

    doi: 10.1038/srep19792

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Masuda H, Usuda K, Kobayashi T, Ishimaru Y, Kakei Y, et al. 2009. Overexpression of the barley nicotianamine synthase gene HvNAS1 increases iron and zinc concentrations in rice grains. Rice 2:155−66

    doi: 10.1007/s12284-009-9031-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Lucca P, Hurrell R, Potrykus I. 2001. Genetic engineering approaches to improve the bioavailability and the level of iron in rice grains. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102:392−97

    doi: 10.1007/s001220051659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Raboy V. 2001. Seeds for a better future: ‘Low phytate’ grains help to overcome malnutrition and reduce pollution. Trends in Plant Science 6:458−62

    doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02104-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Taylor PG, Martínez-Torres C, Romano EL, Layrisse M. 1986. The effect of cysteine-containing peptides released during meat digestion on iron absorption in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 43:68−71

    doi: 10.1093/ajcn/43.1.68

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Pazhamala L, Saxena RK, Singh VK, Sameerkumar CV, Kumar V, et al. 2015. Genomics-assisted breeding for boosting crop improvement in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Frontiers in Plant Science 6:50

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Yi D, Cui L, Wang L, Liu Y, Zhuang M, et al. 2013. Pyramiding of Bt cry1Ia8 and cry1Ba3 genes into cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. Capitata) confers effective control against diamondback moth. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 115:419−28

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-013-0373-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Tanksley SD, Young ND, Paterson AH, Bonierbale MW. 1989. RFLP mapping in plant breeding: New tools for an old science. Nature Biotechnology 7:257−64

    doi: 10.1038/nbt0389-257

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Hatta MAM, Arora S, Ghosh S, Matny O, Smedley MA, et al. 2021. The wheat Sr22, Sr33, Sr35 and Sr45 genes confer resistance against stem rust in barley. Plant Biotechnology Journal 19:273−84

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13460

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Li CX, Zhang JG, Ren ZY, Xie R, Yin CX, et al. 2021. Development of 'multiresistance rice' by an assembly of herbicide, insect and disease resistance genes with a transgene stacking system. Pest Management Science 77:1536−47

    doi: 10.1002/ps.6178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Bollinedi H, Krishnan SG, Prabhu KV, Singh NK, Mishra S, et al. 2017. Molecular and functional characterization of GR2-R1 event based backcross derived lines of golden rice in the genetic background of a mega rice variety swarna. PLoS One 12:e0169600

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Upadhyaya CP, Nookaraju A, Gururani MA, Upadhyaya DC, Kim DH, et al. 2010. An update on the progress towards the development of marker-free transgenic plants. Botanical Studies 51:277−92

    Google Scholar

    [50]

    Miah G, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Puteh AB, Rahim HA, et al. 2013. A review of microsatellite markers and their applications in rice breeding programs to improve blast disease resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14:22499−528

    doi: 10.3390/ijms141122499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Liu WX, Maurer HP, Li GL, Tucker MR, Gowda M, et al. 2014. Genetic architecture of winter hardiness and frost tolerance in triticale. PLoS One 9:e99848

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zhang YP, Kyle M, Anagnostou K, Zitter TA. 1997. Screening melon (Cucumis melo L.) for resistance to gummy stem blight in the greenhouse and field. Hortscience 32:117−21

    doi: 10.21273/hortsci.32.1.117

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Takeda S. 1979. Researches on the protein of rice. Proceedings of the crop science society of Japan 48:517−24

    doi: 10.1626/jcs.48.517

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Liu Q, Li T, Cai J, Zhang J. 2006. Effects of shading at different growth stages on amylose and protein contents in rice grain. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 22(8):234−37

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2006.08.059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zaidi SHR. 2019. Effects of abiotic stress on physiological properties of pigment accumulation in filling grain for color rice (Oryza sativa L.). Thesis. Zhejiang University, China.

    [56]

    Cabuslay GS, Sison CB, Laureles E, Buresh R, Lazaro W, et al. 2003. Grain mineral density: Nitrogen response and seasonal variation. Workshop on Rice Breeding for Better Nutrition 4:7−11

    Google Scholar

    [57]

    Li L, Zhang M, Liu L, Chi J, Wei Z, et al. 2007. Stability comparison of anthocyanin extracts in seed coats of three black crops. Transactions of The Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery 38:91−95

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1298.2007.05.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Nakano H, Ono H, Iwasawa N, Takai T, Arai-Sanoh Y, et al. 2013. Isolation and identification of phenolic compounds accumulated in brown rice grains ripened under high air temperature. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61:11921−28

    doi: 10.1021/jf403416e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Cai ZZ, He FY, Feng X, Liang T, Wang HW, et al. 2020. Transcriptomic analysis reveals important roles of lignin and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in rice thermotolerance during reproductive stage. Frontiers in Genetics 11:562937

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.562937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Cao ZZ, Zhao Q, Pan G, Wei KS, Zhou LJ, et al. 2017. Comprehensive expression of various genes involved in storage protein synthesis in filling rice grain as affected by high temperature. Plant Growth Regulation 81:477−88

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-016-0225-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Goufo P, Trindade H. 2014. Rice antioxidants: Phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, tocopherols, tocotrienols, γ-oryzanol, and phytic acid. Food Science & Nutrition 2:75−104

    doi: 10.1002/fsn3.86

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Su D, Lei BT, Li ZW, Cao ZZ, Huang FD, et al. 2014. Influence of high temperature during filling period on grain phytic acid and its relation to spikelet sterility and grain weight in non-lethal low phytic acid mutations in rice. Journal of Cereal Science 60:331−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.04.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Watanabe M, Okubo S, Kanno H, Mochida H. 2014. Antioxidant phenolic compound concentrations and antioxidant activity in colored rice cultivated under different climatic conditions. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 61:528−35

    doi: 10.3136/nskkk.61.528

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Cabrita L, Fossen T, Andersen ØM. 2000. Colour and stability of the six common anthocyanidin 3-glucosides in aqueous solutions. Food Chemistry 68:101−7

    doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00170-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Youn YS, Park JK, Jang HD, Rhee YW. 2011. Sequential hydration with anaerobic and heat treatment increases GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid) content in wheat. Food Chemistry 129:1631−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang H, Hou D, Peng X, Ma B, Shao S, et al. 2019. Optimizing integrative cultivation management improves grain quality while increasing yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18:2716−31

    doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62836-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Zhao G, Xie M, Wang Y, Li J. 2017. Molecular mechanisms underlying γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulation in giant embryo rice seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65:4883−89

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Prathap V, Ali K, Singh A, Vishwakarma C, Krishnan V, et al. 2019. Starch accumulation in rice grains subjected to drought during grain filling stage. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 142:440−51

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.07.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ. 2015. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Molecular Plant 8:68−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Cakmak I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant and Soil 302:1−17

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9466-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Li HF, Lombi E, Stroud JL, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ. 2010. Selenium speciation in soil and rice: Influence of water management and Se fertilization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:11837−43

    doi: 10.1021/jf1026185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Zhou XB, Li YY, Lai F. 2018. Effects of different water management on absorption and accumulation of selenium in rice. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 25:1178−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Deng X, Liu K, Li M, Zhang W, Zhao X, et al. 2017. Difference of selenium uptake and distribution in the plant and selenium form in the grains of rice with foliar spray of selenite or selenate at different stages. Field Crops Research 211:165−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Shin DH, Choi MG, Kang CS, Park CS, Choi SB, et al. 2016. A wheat R2R3-MYB protein PURPLE PLANT1 (TaPL1) functions as a positive regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 469:686−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Teixeira LS, Pimenta TM, Brito FAL, Malheiros RSP, Arruda RS, et al. 2021. Selenium uptake and grain nutritional quality are affected by nitrogen fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports 40:871−80

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02685-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Xue Y, Eagling T, He J, Zou C, McGrath SP, et al. 2014. Effects of nitrogen on the distribution and chemical speciation of iron and zinc in pearling fractions of wheat grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62:4738−46

    doi: 10.1021/jf500273x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Prom-u-thai C, Rerkasem B. 2003. The effect of nitrogen on rice grain iron. International Rice Research Notes 28:37−38

    Google Scholar

    [78]

    Yang S, Han Z, Liu M, Zhang M, Yang B, et al. 2012. Impacts of nitrogen application amounts on grain quality and mineral elements concentrations of Japonica rice in Jianghuai River area. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 28:703−8

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2012.04.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Lucena JJ. 2000. Effects of bicarbonate, nitrate and other environmental factors on iron deficiency chlorosis: A review. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23:1591−606

    doi: 10.1080/01904160009382126

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Su D, Zhou L, Zhao Q, Pan G, Cheng F. 2018. Different phosphorus supplies altered the accumulations and quantitative distributions of phytic acid, zinc, and iron in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:1601−11

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04883

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Nguyen DN, Nguyen TT, Tran QN, Macdonald B, To TP, et al. 2017. Soil and rice responses to phosphate fertilizer in two contrasting seasons on acid sulfate soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48:615−23

    doi: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1253719

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Guo JX, Feng XM, Hu XY, Tian GL, Ling N, et al. 2016. Effects of soil zinc availability, nitrogen fertilizer rate and zinc fertilizer application method on zinc biofortification of rice. Journal of Agricultural Science 154:584−97

    doi: 10.1017/S0021859615000441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Ning H, Qiao J, Liu Z, Lin Z, Li G, et al. 2010. Distribution of proteins and amino acids in milled and brown rice as affected by nitrogen fertilization and genotype. Journal of Cereal Science 52:90−95

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.03.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Ning H, Liu Z, Wang Q, Lin Z, Chen S, et al. 2009. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on grain phytic acid and protein concentrations in japonica rice and its variations with genotypes. Journal of Cereal Science 50:49−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.02.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Li G, Chen Y, Ding Y, Geng C, Li Q, et al. 2016. Charactering protein fraction concentrations as influenced by nitrogen application in low-glutelin rice cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15:537−44

    doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61182-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Leesawatwong M, Jamjod S, Kuo J, Dell B, Rerkasem B. 2005. Nitrogen fertilizer increases seed protein and milling quality of rice. Cereal Chemistry Journal 82:588−93

    doi: 10.1094/CC-82-0588

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Sperotto RA, Ricachenevsky FK, Waldow VdA , Fett JP. 2012. Iron biofortification in rice: It’s a long way to the top. Plant Science 190:24−39

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.03.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Phattarakul N, Rerkasem B, Li L, Wu L, Zou C, et al. 2012. Biofortification of rice grain with zinc through zinc fertilization in different countries. Plant and Soil 361:131−41

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1211-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Jiang W, Struik PC, Lingna J, van Keulen H, Ming Z, et al. 2007. Uptake and distribution of root-applied or foliar-applied 65Zn after flowering in aerobic rice. Annals of Applied Biology 150:383−91

    doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00138.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Yuan L, Wu L, Yang C, Lv Q. 2013. Effects of iron and zinc foliar applications on rice plants and their grain accumulation and grain nutritional quality: Effects of Fe and Zn foliar applications on rice plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93:254−61

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5749

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Liang Y, Su Y, Li L, Huang X, Panhwar FH, et al. 2019. Quick selenium accumulation in the selenium-rich rice and its physiological responses in changing selenium environments. BMC Plant Biology 19:559

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2163-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Huang G, Ding C, Yu X, Yang Z, Zhang T, et al. 2018. Characteristics of time-dependent selenium biofortification of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:12490−97

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04502

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Sors TG, Ellis DR, Salt DE. 2005. Selenium uptake, translocation, assimilation and metabolic fate in plants. Photosynthesis Research 86:373−89

    doi: 10.1007/s11120-005-5222-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Chen X, Zhang Z, Gu M, Li H, Shohag MJI, et al. 2020. Combined use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and selenium fertilizer shapes microbial community structure and enhances organic selenium accumulation in rice grain. Science of The Total Environment 748:141166

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141166

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Zhang M, Tang S, Huang X, Zhang F, Pang Y, et al. 2014. Selenium uptake, dynamic changes in selenium content and its influence on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 107:39−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.05.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Zhou X, Shi W, Yang L. 2007. Effect of foliar application of selenite on selenium accumulation and distribution in rice. Acta Pedologica Sinica 44:73−78

    doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2007.01.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Longchamp M, Castrec-Rouelle M, Biron P, Bariac T. 2015. Variations in the accumulation, localization and rate of metabolization of selenium in mature Zea mays plants supplied with selenite or selenate. Food Chemistry 182:128−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Hu Q, Chen L, Xu J, Zhang Y, Pan G. 2002. Determination of selenium concentration in rice and the effect of foliar application of Se-enriched fertiliser or sodium selenite on the selenium content of rice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 82:869−72

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.1115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Chen L, Yang F, Xu J, Hu Y, Hu Q, et al. 2002. Determination of selenium concentration of rice in China and effect of fertilization of selenite and selenate on selenium content of rice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:5128−30

    doi: 10.1021/jf0201374

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Xu J, Hu Q. 2004. Effect of foliar application of selenium on the antioxidant activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of selenium-enriched rice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52(6):1759−63

    doi: 10.1021/jf0349836

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Lin PY, Lai HM. 2011. Bioactive compounds in rice during grain development. Food Chemistry 127:86−93

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Shao Y, Xu F, Sun X, Bao J, Beta T. 2014. Phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains at four stages of development after flowering. Food Chemistry 143:90−96

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Oerke EC, Dehne HW. 2004. Safeguarding production—Losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Protection 23:275−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Oehl F, Sieverding E, Mäder P, Dubois D, Ineichen K, et al. 2004. Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia 138:574−83

    doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1458-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Wang W, He A, Jiang G, Sun H, Jiang M, et al. 2020. Ratoon rice technology: A green and resource-efficient way for rice production. Advances in Agronomy 159:135−67

    doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2019.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Sun D, Rickaille M, Xu Z. 2018. Determinants and impacts of outsourcing pest and disease management: Evidence from China's rice production. China Agricultural Economic Review 10:443−61

    doi: 10.1108/CAER-01-2017-0011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Divya D, Madhavi KR, Dass MA, Maku RV, Mallikarjuna G, et al. 2018. Expression profile of defense genes in rice lines pyramided with resistance genes against bacterial blight, fungal blast and insect gall midge. Rice 11:40

    doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0231-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Hu J, Cheng M, Gao G, Zhang Q, Xiao J, et al. 2013. Pyramiding and evaluation of three dominant brown planthopper resistance genes in the elite indica rice 9311 and its hybrids. Pest Management Science 69:802−8

    doi: 10.1002/ps.3437

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Teng Q, Hu X, Luo F, Cheng C, Ge X, et al. 2016. Influences of introducing frogs in the paddy fields on soil properties and rice growth. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16:51−61

    doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1183-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Magdoff F. 1993. Building soils for better crops: Organic matter management. Soil Science 156:371

    doi: 10.1097/00010694-199311000-00014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA. 2007. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 52:375−400

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Lu J, Chen Y. 1994. Effect of SMV-Infection on metabolisms of carbon and nitrogen compounds in soybean. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University 17:43−47

    Google Scholar

    [113]

    Zas R, Sampedro L, Prada E, Lombardero MJ, Fernández-López J. 2006. Fertilization increases Hylobius abietis L. damage in Pinus pinaster Ait. Seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 222:137−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Ai T, Liu Z, Li C, Luo P, Zhu J, et al. 2011. Impact of fertilization on cotton aphid population in Bt-cotton production system. Ecological Complexity 8:9−14

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Rodrigues FÁ, Jurick WM II, Datnoff LE, Jones JB, Rollins JA. 2005. Silicon influences cytological and molecular events in compatible and incompatible rice—Magnaporthe grisea interactions. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 66:144−59

    doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Guntzer F, Keller C, Meunier JD. 2012. Benefits of plant silicon for crops: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32:201−13

    doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0039-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Kvedaras OL, An M, Choi YS, Gurr GM. 2010. Silicon enhances natural enemy attraction and biological control through induced plant defences. Bulletin of Entomological Research 100:367−71

    doi: 10.1017/S0007485309990265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Ramesh P, Singh M, Rao A. 2005. Organic farming: Its relevance to the Indian context. Current Scientist 88:561−68

    Google Scholar

    [119]

    Ratnadass A, Fernandes P, Avelino J, Habib R. 2012. Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32:273−303

    doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0022-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Jin Z, Nie L. 2023. Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production. Tropical Plants 2:13 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0013
    Jin Z, Nie L. 2023. Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production. Tropical Plants 2:13 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0013

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(3051) PDF downloads(484)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production

Tropical Plants  2 Article number: 13  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Functional rice has a broad market prospect and represents one of the vital developmental directions for future rice production. This paper summarizes the types, breeding and cultivation technologies of functional rice, as well as prevention and control of pests and diseases. We conclude the following: (1) breeding for functional rice should focus on breeding rice varieties with an endosperm that is enriched with multiple active components and broad-spectrum resistance to pests and diseases; (2) moderate water stress and optimized fertilizer management practices of low nitrogen, low phosphorus, high potassium, high silicon, and moderate micronutrient fertilization, as well as timely and early harvest, are conducive to improving the yield and quality of functional rice. In addition, we stress the need to focus on the development and application of polymerization breeding technologies for the advancement of the functional rice industry, and future research in these areas should be reinforced.

    • With the development of the world economy, people's lifestyles have changed dramatically, and long-term high-intensity work has put many people's bodies in a sub-healthy state. The increasing incidence of various chronic diseases has not only put enormous pressure on society's healthcare systems but also caused endless suffering to people[1]. Therefore, people's demands on the functionality and safety of food are increasing, and it has become the consensus of people that 'not just eating enough, but more importantly eating well'.

      Rice is the staple food for more than half of the world's population and the main economic source for a large number of rural people[2]. However, due to the rising cost of rice cultivation, farmers are gaining less and less economic benefits from growing rice, which seriously undermines their incentive to grow rice and poses a serious threat to world food security. Increasing the added value of rice not only helps to increase farmers' income but also helps to ensure world food security. The presence of a large number of functional ingredients in rice makes it possible to increase the added value of rice, and functional rice has therefore been widely noticed.

      Functional rice refers to rice containing certain specific components that play a regulatory and balancing role in human physiological functions in addition to the nutrients necessary for human growth and development in the endosperm, embryo, and rice bran. They can increase human physiological defense mechanisms, prevent certain diseases, help recovery, delay aging, and boost physical strength and energy levels[3]. Rice is a staple food for more than half of the world's population[4], and its functional components have a great potential to be exploited for human welfare. Using functional rice as a carrier to address health problems and realize 'medicine-food homology' is an excellent motivation for promoting functional rice. The current typical functional rice is introduced in this paper. It also summarizes the breeding and cultivation technologies of functional rice.

    • Rice has a high glycemic index. Its long-term consumption leads to obesity, diabetes, and colon disease in many people[5]. However, the consumption of rice rich in resistant starch (RS) can greatly reduce the risk of these diseases[6]. Therefore, breeding rice varieties with high RS content has attracted considerable attention from breeders in various countries. However, the variability of RS content between different rice varieties is low, and there are few germplasm resources available for selection, thus making it challenging to breed rice varieties with high RS content using traditional breeding methods. Combining traditional and modern molecular breeding techniques can greatly improve the successful production of high RS rice breeds. Nishi et al.[7] selected a high RS rice variety EM10 by treating fertilized egg cells of Kinmaze with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. However, its yield was very low, and it was not suitable for commercial production. Wada et al.[8] crossed 'Fukei 2032' and 'EM129' as parents and selected Chikushi-kona 85, a high RS rice variety with a higher yield than EM10. Miura et al.[9] bred ultra-high RS BeI-BEIIB double mutant rice by crossing the Abe I and Abe IIB mutant strains, and the content of RS in the endosperm reached 35.1%. Wei et al.[10] found that the simultaneous inhibition of starch branching enzyme (SBE) genes SBEIIb and SBEI in Teqing by antisense RNA could increase the RS content in rice to 14.9%. Zhu et al.[11] used RNAi technology to inhibit the expression of SBEI and SBEII genes in rice, which increased the content of RS in rice endosperm from 0 to 14.6 %. Zhou et al.[6] found that rice RS formation is mainly controlled by soluble starch synthase (SSIIA). However, its regulation is dependent on the granule-bound starch synthase Waxy (Wx), and SSIIA deficiency combined with high expression of Wxa facilitates the substantial accumulation of RS in the rice. The results of Tsuiki et al.[12] showed that BEIB deficiency was the main reason for the increased accumulation of RS in rice. Itoh et al.[13] developed new mutant rice lines with significantly higher levels of RS in rice by introducing genes encoding starch synthase and granule-bound starch synthase in the rice into the BEIB-deficient mutant line be2b.

    • The accumulation of anthocyanins/proanthocyanidins in the seed coat of the rice grain gives brown rice a distinct color[14]. Most common rice varieties lack anthocyanins in the seed coat, and so far, no rice variety with colored endosperm in its natural state has been identified. However, Zhu et al.[15] bred rice with purple endosperm using transgenic technology. Red rice contains only proanthocyanidins, while black and purple rice contain anthocyanidins and proanthocyanidins[16]. Red seed coat of rice was found to be controlled by the complementary effects of two central effect genes Rc and Rd. The loss of function of the Rc gene prevented the synthesis of proanthocyanidins, while the Rd gene could enhance the effect of the Rc gene in promoting proanthocyanidins synthesis[17]. Purple seed coat color is controlled by two dominant complementary genes Pb and Pp. Pb determines the presence or absence of seed coat color, and Pp determines the depth of seed coat color[18]. In addition, phycocyanin synthesis is also regulated by transcription factors such as MYB, bHLH, HY5, and WD40[14], but the exact regulatory mechanism is not clear. Colored rice is rich in bioactive components, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, vitamin E (VE), glutelin, phytosterols, and phytic acid (PA). It also contains large amounts of micronutrients such as Ca, Fe, Zn, and Se[19], and has a much higher nutritional and health value than ordinary white rice. In addition, Zhu et al.[20] successfully developed rice with enriched astaxanthin in the endosperm by introducing the genes sZmPSY1, sPaCrtI, sCrBKT, and sHpBHY. This achievement has laid a solid foundation for the further development of functional rice industry.

    • Giant embryo rice refers to rice varieties whose embryo volume is more than twice that of ordinary rice[21]. Rice embryo contains more nutrients than the endosperm; therefore, the nutritional value of giant embryo rice greatly exceeds that of ordinary rice. Studies have found that the levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), essential amino acids, VE, γ-oryzanol, phenols, and trace elements in giant embryo rice are considerably higher than that in ordinary rice[21]. Satoh & Omura[22] used the chemical mutagen N-methyl-N-nitrosourea to treat the fertilized egg cells of the rice variety Kinmaze to obtain a 'giant embryo' mutant. The mutants’ embryo occupied 1/4–1/3 of the rice grain volume and was 3–4 times larger than normal rice embryo[23]. Its GABA content increased dramatically after the rice was soaked in water. Maeda et al.[24] crossed the giant embryo mutant EM40 of Kinmaze with the high-yielding variety Akenohoshi to produce the giant embryo rice variety 'Haiminori'. The embryo size of 'Haiminori' is 3–4 times that of ordinary rice, and the GABA content of its brown rice is 3–4 times higher than that of 'Nipponbare' and 'Koshihikari' after soaking for four hours in water. A few genes that can regulate the size of rice embryos have been identified, and GE is the first identified rice giant embryo gene[25]. Nagasawa et al.[26] found that the loss of GE gene function resulted in enlarged embryos and smaller endosperm in rice. Lee et al.[27] found that the inhibition of LE gene expression by RNAi technology could lead to embryo enlargement in rice, but the regulatory mechanism remains to be investigated.

    • Protein is the second most crucial nutrient in rice, accounting for 7–10% of the grain weight, and glutenin accounts for 60%–80% of the total protein content in rice grains[28]. Compared to other proteins, glutenin is more easily digested and absorbed by the body[29]. Therefore, higher glutenin content in rice can improve its nutritional value. However, people with renal disease (a common complication of diabetes) have impaired protein metabolism, and consumption of rice with lower glutelin content can help reduce their protein intake and metabolic burden[30]. Japanese breeders treated Nihonmasari with the chemical mutagen ethyleneimine and selected the low-glutelin rice mutant NM67[31]. Iida et al.[31] developed a new rice variety LGC-1 (Low glutelin content-1) with a glutelin content of less than 4% by backcrossing the NM67 mutant with the original variety 'Nihonmasari'. According to Miyahara[32], the low glutelin trait in LGC-1 is controlled by a single dominant gene Lgc-1 located on chromosome 2. Subsequently, Nishimura et al.[33] produced two rice varieties, 'LGC Katsu' and 'LGC Jun' with lower glutelin content by crossing LGC1 with a mutant line Koshikari (γ-ray induction) lacking 26 kDa globulin (another easily digestible protein).

    • Vitamin A (VA) is one of the essential nutrients for the human body[34]. However, rice, a staple food, lacks VA, leading to a VA deficiency in many people. β-carotene is a precursor for VA synthesis and can be effectively converted into VA in the human body[35]. Therefore, breeding rice varieties rich in β-carotene has attracted the attention of breeders in various countries. Ye et al.[36] simultaneously transferred phytoene synthase (psy), phytoene desaturase (crt I), and lycopene β-cyclase (lcy) genes into rice using the Agrobacterium-mediated method and produced the first generation of golden rice with a β-carotene content of 1.6 µg·g−1 in the endosperm. However, due to the low content of β-carotene in rice, it is difficult to meet the human body's demand for VA. To increase β-carotene content in rice, Paine et al.[37] introduced the phytoene synthase (psy) gene from maize and the phytoene desaturase (crt I) gene from Erwinia into rice. They obtained the second generation of golden rice with 37 µg g−1 of β-carotene in the endosperm, with nearly 23-fold increase in β-carotene content compared to the first generation of golden rice.

    • Fe and Zn are essential trace elements for human beings. The contents of Fe and Zn in common rice are about 2 μg·g−1 and 16 μg·g−1, respectively[38], which are far from meeting human needs. In 2004, to alleviate micronutrient deficiencies among underprivileged people in developing countries, the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research launched the HarvestPlus international collaborative program for improving Fe, Zn, and β-carotene levels in staple crops, with breeding targets of 13 μg·g−1 and 28 μg·g−1 for Fe and Zn in rice, respectively. Masuda et al.[39] found that expression of the nicotianamine synthase (NAS) gene HvNAS in rice resulted in a 3-fold increase in Fe and a 2-fold increase in Zn content in polished rice. Trijatmiko et al.[38] overexpressed rice OsNAS2 gene and soybean ferritin gene SferH-1 in rice, and the Fe and Zn content in polished rice of rice variety NASFer-274 reached 15 μg·g−1 and 45.7 μg·g−1, respectively. In addition, it has been found that increasing Fe intake alone does not eliminate Fe deficiency but also decreases the amount of Fe absorption inhibitors in the diet or increases the amount of Fe absorption enhancers[40]. The negatively charged phosphate in PA strongly binds metal cations, thus reducing the bioavailability of Fe and Zn in rice[41], while the sulfhydryl group in cysteine binds Fe, thereby increasing the absorption of non-heme Fe by the body[42]. To improve the bioavailability of Fe and Zn, Lucca et al.[40] introduced a heat-tolerant phytase (phyA) gene from Aspergillus fumigatus into rice and overexpressed the cysteine-rich protein gene (rgMT), which increased the content of phytase and cysteine residues in rice by 130-fold and 7-fold, respectively[40].

    • The functional quality of rice is highly dependent on germplasm resources. Current functional rice breeding mainly adopts transgenic and mutagenic technologies, and the cultivated rice varieties are mainly enriched with only one functional substance and cannot meet the urgent demand by consumers for rice enriched with multiple active components. The diversity of rice active components determines the complexity of multifunctional rice breeding. In order to cultivate multifunctional rice, it is necessary to strengthen the application of different breeding technologies. Gene polymerization breeding is a crop breeding technology that can polymerize multiple superior traits that have emerged in recent years, mainly including traditional polymerization breeding, transgenic polymerization breeding, and molecular marker-assisted selection polymerization breeding.

    • The transfer of beneficial genes in different species during traditional polymeric breeding is largely limited by interspecific reproductive isolation, and it is challenging to utilize beneficial genes between different species effectively. Gene transfer through sexual crosses does not allow accurate manipulation and selection of a gene and is susceptible to undesirable gene linkage, and in the process of breed selection, multiple backcrosses are required[43]. Thus, the period of selecting target plants is long, the breeding cost is high, and the human resources and material resources are costly[44]. Besides, it is often difficult to continue the breakthrough after a few generations of backcrossing due to linkage drag. Thus, there are significant limitations in aggregating genes by traditional breeding methods[45].

    • Transgenic technology is an effective means of gene polymerization breeding. Multi-gene transformation makes it possible to assemble multiple beneficial genes in transgenic rice breeding rapidly and can greatly reduce the time and workload of breeding[46]. The traditional multi-gene transformation uses a single gene transformation and hybridization polymerization method[47], in which the vector construction and transformation process is relatively simple. However, it is time-consuming, laborious, and requires extensive hybridization and screening efforts. Multi-gene-based vector transformation methods can be divided into two major categories: multi-vector co-transformation and multi-gene single vector transformation[47]. Multi-vector co-transformation is the simultaneous transfer of multiple target genes into the same recipient plant through different vectors. The efficiency of multi-vector co-transformation is uncertain, and the increase in the number of transforming vectors will increase the difficulty of genetic screening, resulting in a reduced probability of obtaining multi-gene co-transformed plants. Multi-gene single vector transformation constructs multiple genes into the T-DNA region of a vector and then transfers them into the same recipient plant as a single event. This method eliminates the tedious hybridization and backcrossing process and solves the challenges of low co-transformation frequency and complex integration patterns. It can also avoid gene loss caused by multi-gene separation and recombination in future generations[47]. The transgenic method can break through the limitations of conventional breeding, disrupt reproductive isolation, transfer beneficial genes from entirely unrelated crops to rice, and shorten the cycle of polymerizing target genes significantly. However, there are concerns that when genes are manipulated, unforeseen side effects may occur, and, therefore, there are ongoing concerns about the safety of transgenic crops[48]. Marker-free transgenic technology through which selective marker genes in transgenic plants can be removed has been developed. This improves the safety of transgenic crops, is beneficial to multiple operations of the same transgenic crop, and improves the acceptance by people[49].

    • Molecular marker-assisted selection is one of the most widely used rice breeding techniques at present. It uses the close linkage between molecular markers and target genes to select multiple genes directly and aggregates genes from different sources into one variety. This has multiple advantages, including a focused purpose, high accuracy, short breeding cycle, no interference from environmental conditions, and applicability to complex traits[50]. However, few genes have been targeted for the main effect of important agronomic traits in rice, and they are mainly focused on the regulation of rice plant type and the prevention and control of pests and diseases, and very few genes related to the synthesis of active components, which can be used for molecular marker-assisted selection are very limited. Furthermore, the current technical requirements and costs for analyzing and identifying DNA molecular markers are high, and the identification efficiency is low. This greatly limits the popularization and application of functional rice polymerization breeding. Therefore, to better apply molecular marker-assisted selection technology to breed rice varieties rich in multiple active components, it is necessary to construct a richer molecular marker linkage map to enhance the localization of genes related to functional substance synthesis in rice[51]. Additionally, it is important to explore new molecular marker technologies to improve efficiency while reducing cost.

      It is worth noting that the effects of gene aggregation are not simply additive. There are cumulative additive effects, greater than cumulative epistatic effects, and less than cumulative epistatic effects among the polymerization genes, and the effects are often smaller than the individual effect. Only with a clearer understanding of the interaction between different QTLs or genes can functional rice pyramiding breeding be carried out reasonably and efficiently. Except for RS and Se, other active components of rice mainly exist in the rice bran layer, and the content of active components in the endosperm, the main edible part, is extremely low. Therefore, cultivating rice varieties with endosperm-enriched active components have broad development prospects. In addition, because crops with high quality are more susceptible to pests and diseases[52], the improvement of rice resistance to pests and diseases should be considered during the polymerization breeding of functional rice.

    • The biosynthesis of active components in rice is influenced by rice varieties but also depends on cultivation management practices and their growth environment.

    • Environmental conditions have a greater effect on protein content than genetic forces[53]. Both light intensity and light duration affect the synthesis and accumulation of active components in rice. Low light intensity in the early stage of rice growth is not conducive to the accumulation of glutelin in rice grains but favors the accumulation of amylose, while the opposite is true in the late stage of rice growth[54]. Low light intensity during the grain-filling period reduces the accumulation of total flavonoids in rice[55] and decreases Fe ions' movement in the transpiration stream and thereby the transport of Fe ions to rice grains[56]. An appropriate increase in light intensity is beneficial to the accumulation of flavonoids, anthocyanins, and Fe in rice, but the photostability of anthocyanins is poor, and too much light will cause oxidative degradation of anthocyanins[57]. Therefore, functional rice is best cultivated as mid-late rice, which would be conducive to accumulating active components in rice.

    • The temperature has a great influence on the synthesis of active components in rice. An appropriate increase in the temperature is beneficial to the accumulation of γ-oryzanol[58] and flavonoids[59] in rice. A high temperature during the grain-filling period leads to an increase in glutelin content in rice[60], but an increase in temperature decreases the total phenolic content[61]. The results regarding the effect of temperature on the content of PA in rice were inconsistent. Su et al.[62] showed that high temperatures during the filling period would increase the PA content, while Goufo & Trindade[61] reported that the increase in temperature would reduce the PA content. This may be due to the different growth periods and durations of temperature stress on rice in the two studies. The synthesis of anthocyanins/proanthocyanidins in colored rice requires a suitable temperature. Within a certain range, lower temperatures favor the accumulation of anthocyanins/proanthocyanidins in rice[63]. Higher temperatures will lead to degradation, and the thermal stability of proanthocyanidins being higher than that of anthocyanins[64]. In addition, cold or heat stress facilitates GABA accumulation in rice grains[65]. Therefore, in actual production, colored rice and low-glutelin rice are best planted as late rice, and the planting time of other functional rice should be determined according to the response of its enriched active components to temperature changes.

    • Moderate water stress can significantly increase the content of glutelin[66] and GABA[67] in rice grains and promote the rapid transfer of assimilation into the grains, shorten the grain filling period, and reduce the RS content[68]. Drought stress can also induce the expression of the phytoene synthase (psy) gene and increase the carotenoid content in rice[69]. Soil moisture is an important medium in Zn diffusion to plant roots. In soil with low moisture content, rice roots have low available Zn, which is not conducive to enriching rice grains with Zn[70]. Results from studies on the effect of soil water content on Se accumulation in rice grains have been inconsistent. Li et al.[71] concluded that flooded cultivation could significantly increase the Se content in rice grains compared to dry cultivation. However, the results of Zhou et al.[72] showed that the selenium content in rice grains under aerobic and dry-wet alternative irrigation was 2.44 and 1.84 times higher than that under flood irrigation, respectively. This may be due to the forms of selenium contained in the soil and the degree of drought stress to the rice that differed between experiments[73]. In addition, it has been found that too much or too little water impacts the expression of genes related to anthocyanin synthesis in rice, which affects the accumulation of anthocyanins in rice[74]. Therefore, it is recommended to establish different irrigation systems for different functional rice during cultivation.

    • Both the amount and method of nitrogen application affect the accumulation of glutelin. Numerous studies have shown that both increased and delayed application of nitrogen fertilizer can increase the accumulation of lysine-rich glutelin to improve the nutritional quality of rice (Table 1). However, this improvement is not beneficial for kidney disease patients who cannot consume high glutelin rice. Nitrogen stress can down-regulate the expression of ANDs genes related to the anthocyanins biosynthesis pathway in grains, resulting in a decrease in anthocyanins synthesis[55]. Increased nitrogen fertilizer application can also increase the Fe, Zn, and Se content in rice[75,76]. However, some studies have found that increased nitrogen fertilizer application has no significant effect on the Fe content of rice[77], while other studies have shown that increased nitrogen fertilizer application will reduce the Fe content of rice[78]. This may be influenced by soil pH and the form of the applied nitrogen fertilizer. The lower the soil pH, the more favorable the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+, thus promoting the uptake of Fe by rice. Otherwise, the application of ammonium fertilizer can improve the availability of soil Fe and promote the absorption and utilization of Fe by rice. In contrast, nitrate fertilizer can inhibit the reduction of Fe3+ and reduce the absorption of Fe by rice[79].

      Table 1.  Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on glutelin content of rice.

      SampleN level
      (kg ha−1)
      Application timeGlutelin content
      (g 100 g−1)
      References
      Rough rice05.67[66]
      270Pre-transplanting : mid tillering : panicle initiation : spikelet differentiation = 2:1:1:16.92
      300Pre-transplanting : mid tillering : panicle initiation : spikelet differentiation = 5:2:2:16.88
      Brown rice05.35[83]
      90Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 4:16.01
      Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 1:16.60
      180Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 4:16.53
      Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 1:17.29
      270Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 4:17.00
      Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 1:17.66
      Rough rice05.59[84]
      187.5Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 4:16.47
      Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 1:16.64
      300Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 4:17.02
      Pre-transplanting : after transplanting = 1:17.14
      Polished rice03.88[85]
      90Pre-transplanting : tillering : booting = 2:2:14.21
      180Pre-transplanting : tillering : booting = 2:2:14.43
      270Pre-transplanting : tillering : booting = 2:2:16.42
      360Pre-transplanting : tillering : booting = 2:2:14.87
      Brown rice09.05[86]
      120Flowering22.14

      Appropriate application of phosphorus fertilizer is beneficial in promoting the translocation of Fe and Zn from leaves to rice grains, thus increasing the content in rice grains[80]. However, the excessive application of phosphate fertilizer will reduce the availability of Fe and Zn in soil, resulting in less uptake by the roots and a lower content in the rice grains[81]. The content of PA in rice increased with a higher phosphorus fertilizer application rate[80]. Increasing the phosphorus fertilizer application rate would increase the values of [PA]/[Fe] and [PA]/[Zn] and reduce the effectiveness of Fe and Zn in rice[80]. Currently, there are few studies on the effect of potassium fertilization on the synthesis of active components in rice. Available studies report that increased application of nitrogen fertilizer can increase the Zn content in rice[82]. Therefore, the research in this area needs to be strengthened.

      Because the iron in soil mainly exists in the insoluble form Fe3+, the application of iron fertilizer has little effect on rice biofortification[87]. There are different opinions about the effect of Zn fertilizer application methods. Phattarakul et al.[88] believed that foliar spraying of Zn fertilizer could significantly improve the Zn content in rice grains. Jiang et al.[89] concluded that most of the Zn accumulated in rice grains were absorbed by the roots rather than from the reactivation of Zn in leaves. In contrast, Yuan et al.[90] suggested that soil application of Zn fertilizer had no significant effect on Zn content in rice grains. The different results may be affected by the form of zinc fertilizer applied and the soil conditions in the experimental sites. Studies have found that compared with the application of ZnEDTA and ZnO, zinc fertilizer in the form of ZnSO4 is most effective for increasing rice's Zn[70]. In addition, the application of zinc fertilizer reduces the concentration of PA in rice grains[70].

      The form of selenium fertilizer and the method and time of application will affect the accumulation of Se in rice grains. Regarding selenium, rice is a non-hyperaccumulative plant. A moderate application of selenium fertilizer can improve rice yield. However, the excessive application can be toxic to rice, and the difference between beneficial and harmful supply levels is slight[91]. Selenite is readily adsorbed by iron oxide or hydroxide in soil, and its effectiveness in the soil is much lower than selenite[92]. In addition, selenate can migrate to the roots and transfer to rice shoots through high-affinity sulfate transporters. In contrast, selenite is mainly assimilated into organic selenium in the roots and transferred to the shoots in smaller amounts[93]. Therefore, the biological effectiveness of Se is higher in selenate-applied soil than in selenite application[94] (Table 2). Zhang et al.[95] found that the concentration of Se in rice with soil application of 100 g Se ha-1 was only 76.8 μg·kg-1, while the concentration of Se in rice with foliar spray of 75 g Se ha-1 was as high as 410 μg·kg-1[73]. However, the level of organic selenium was lower in rough rice with foliar application of selenium fertilizer compared to soil application[96], while the bioavailability of organic selenium in humans was higher than inorganic selenium[97]. Deng et al.[73] found that the concentrations of total selenium and organic selenium in brown rice with selenium fertilizer applied at the full heading stage were 2-fold higher than those in brown rice with selenium fertilizer applied at the late tillering stage (Table 2). Although the application of exogenous selenium fertilizer can rapidly and effectively increase the Se content of rice (Table 2), it can easily lead to excessive Se content in rice and soil, which can have adverse effects on humans and the environment. Therefore, breeding Se-rich rice varieties is a safer and more reliable way to produce Se-rich rice. In summary, functional rice production should include the moderate application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer and higher levels of potassium fertilizer, with consideration to the use of trace element fertilizers.

      Table 2.  Effect of selenium fertilizer application on the selenium content of rice.

      SampleSe level (g Se ha−1)Selenium fertilizer formsApplication methodSe content (μg·g−1)References
      Rough rice00.002[98]
      18SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading0.411
      Polished rice00.071[99]
      20SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading0.471
      20SelenateFoliar spray at full heading0.640
      Rough rice75SeleniteFoliar spray at late tillering0.440[73]
      75SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading1.290
      75SelenateFoliar spray at late tillering0.780
      75SelenateFoliar spray at full heading2.710
      Polished rice00.027[100]
      15SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading0.435
      45SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading0.890
      60SeleniteFoliar spray at full heading1.275
    • The content of many active components in rough rice is constantly changing during the development of rice. It was found that the content of total flavonoids in brown rice increased continuously from flowering stage to dough stage and then decreased gradually[101]. The γ-oryzanol content in rice decreased by 13% from milk stage to dough stage, and then gradually increased to 60% higher than milk stage at full maturity[101]. The results of Shao et al.[102] showed that the anthocyanin content in rice reached its highest level at two weeks after flowering and then gradually decreased. At full ripeness, and the anthocyanins content in brown rice was only about 50% of the maximum level. The content of total phenolics in rice decreased with maturity from one week after flowering to the fully ripe stage, and the loss of total phenolics reached more than 47% by the fully ripe stage. In contrast, the content of total phenolics in black rice increased with maturity[102]. Moreover, RS content in rough rice decreases during rice maturation[68]. Therefore, the production process of functional rice should be timely and early harvested to obtain higher economic value.

    • Pests and diseases seriously impact the yield and quality of rice[103]. At present, the two most effective methods to control pests and diseases are the use of chemical pesticides and the planting of pest and disease-resistant rice varieties. The use of chemical pesticides has greatly reduced the yield loss of rice. However, excessive use of chemical pesticides decreases soil quality, pollutes the environment, reduces soil biodiversity[104], increases pest resistance, and aggravates the adverse effects of pests and diseases on rice production[105]. It also increases residual pesticide levels in rice, reduces rice quality, and poses a severe threat to human health[106].

      Breeding pest and disease-resistant rice varieties are among the safest and effective ways to control rice pests and diseases[107]. In recent years, many pest and disease resistance genes from rice and microorganisms have been cloned[47]. Researchers have used these genes to breed rice varieties resistant to multiple pests and diseases through gene polymerization breeding techniques. Application in production practices delivered good ecological and economic benefits[108].

      Green pest and disease control technologies must consider the synergies between rice and water, fertilizer, and pest and disease management. In this regard, the rice-frog, rice-duck, and other comprehensive rice production models that have been widely used in recent years are the most representative. These rice production models significantly reduced chemical pesticide usage and effectively controlled rice pests and diseases[109]. The nutritional imbalance will reduce the resistance of rice to pests and diseases[110]. Excessive application of nitrogen fertilizer stimulates rice overgrowth, protein synthesis, and the release of hormones, increasing its attractiveness to pests[111]. Increased soluble protein content in rice leaves is more conducive to virus replication and increases the risk of viral infection[112]. Increasing the available phosphorus content in the soil will increase crop damage by pests[113], while insufficient potassium supply will reduce crop resistance to pests and diseases[114]. The application of silica fertilizer can boost the defense against pests and diseases by increasing silicon deposition in rice tissue, inducing the expression of genes associated with rice defense mechanisms[115] and the accumulation of antifungal compounds in rice tissue[116]. The application of silica fertilizer increases the release of rice volatiles, thereby attracting natural enemies of pests and reducing pest damage[117]. Organic farming increases the resistance of rice to pests and diseases[118]. In addition, rice intercropping with different genotypes can reduce pests and diseases through dilution and allelopathy and changing field microclimate[119].

      In conclusion, the prevention and control of rice pests and diseases should be based on chemical and biological control and supplemented by fertilizer management methods such as low nitrogen, less phosphorus, high potassium and more silicon, as well as agronomic measures such as rice-aquaculture integrated cultivation, organic cultivation and intercropping of different rice varieties, etc. The combined use of multiple prevention and control measures can improve the yield and quality of functional rice.

    • Functional rice contains many active components which are beneficial to maintaining human health and have high economic and social value with broad market prospects. However, the current development level of the functional rice industry is low. The development of the functional rice requires extensive use of traditional and modern polymerization breeding techniques to cultivate new functional rice varieties with endosperm that can be enriched with multiple active components and have broad-spectrum resistance to pests and diseases. It is also important to select suitable planting locations and times according to the response characteristics of different functional rice active components to environmental conditions.

      • This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 32060430 and 31971840), and Research Initiation Fund of Hainan University (Project No. KYQD(ZR)19104).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Received 6 February 2023; Accepted 19 July 2023; Published online 21 August 2023

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Table (2) References (119)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Jin Z, Nie L. 2023. Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production. Tropical Plants 2:13 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0013
    Jin Z, Nie L. 2023. Functional rice: a new direction for sustainable development of rice production. Tropical Plants 2:13 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0013

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return