Search
2024 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie

More Information
  • This paper uses the bibliometric analysis software CiteSpace to examine the current status and evolution of cold-chain logistics vehicle routing problems (CCVRP). 7381 relevant articles published in the Web of Science core collection from 2008 to 2024 were analyzed, an in-depth understanding of the publication trends and category distribution were gained. Subsequently, CiteSpace was used to create a scientific knowledge graph and perform visualization analysis. The analysis includes collaboration among authors, countries, and institutions; co-citation analysis of authors, journals, and references; citation burst detection of keywords; and co-citation cluster analysis of references. Based on a deep understanding of current research hotspots, an in-depth discussion of existing research was conducted from three perspectives: optimization objectives, distribution scenarios, and solution algorithms. The results show that CCVRP involves complex factors such as temperature requirements, time window constraints, and multi-objective optimization. These intricate constraints are causing research to become increasingly interdisciplinary and comprehensive. The evolution of hot topics shows that the research directions span multiple fields, from algorithm design to logistics management. This review helps researchers better understand the history, current status, and future development directions of CCVRP research, and provides valuable references and inspiration for academia and practice.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Desrochers M, Verhoog TW. 1991. A new heuristic for the fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem. Computers & Operations Research 18(3):263−74

    doi: 10.1016/0305-0548(91)90028-p

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Solomon MM, Desrosiers J. 1988. Survey paper—time window constrained routing and scheduling problems. Transportation science 22(1):1−13

    doi: 10.1287/trsc.22.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jabali O, Leus R, Van Woensel T, de Kok T. 2015. Self-imposed time windows in vehicle routing problems. OR Spectrum 37:331−52

    doi: 10.1007/s00291-013-0348-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Moghaddam BF, Ruiz R, Sadjadi SJ. 2012. Vehicle routing problem with uncertain demands: An advanced particle swarm algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering 62(1):306−17

    doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Cattaruzza D, Absi N, Feillet D. 2016. Vehicle routing problems with multiple trips. 4OR 14:223−59

    doi: 10.1007/s10288-016-0306-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Laporte G, Mercure H, Nobert Y. 1986. An exact algorithm for the asymmetrical capacitated vehicle routing problem. Networks 16(1):33−46

    doi: 10.1002/net.3230160104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Righini G, Salani M. 2008. New dynamic programming algorithms for the resource constrained elementary shortest path problem. Networks 51(3):155−70

    doi: 10.1002/net.20212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Kallehauge B. 2008. Formulations and exact algorithms for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. Computers & Operations Research 35(7):2307−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.11.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Pichpibul T, Kawtummachai R. 2012. An improved Clarke and Wright savings algorithm for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. ScienceAsia 38(3):307−18

    doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2012.38.307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yu B, Jin PH, Yang ZZ. 2012. Two-stage heuristic algorithm for multi-depot vehicle routing problem with time windows. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice 32(8):1793−800

    doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2012)8-1793

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Alfredo Tang Montané F, Galvão RD. 2006. A tabu search algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with simultaneous pick-up and delivery service. Computers & Operations Research 33(3):595−619

    doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li H, Zhou J, Xu K. 2023. Evolution of Green Vehicle Routing Problem: A Bibliometric and Visualized Review. Sustainability 15(23):16149

    doi: 10.3390/su152316149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Pillac V, Gendreau M, Guéret C, Medaglia AL. 2013. A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems. European Journal of Operational Research 225(1):1−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.08.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Qin G, Tao F, Li L. 2019. A vehicle routing optimization problem for cold chain logistics considering customer satisfaction and carbon emissions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(4):576

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Ostermeier M, Henke T, Hübner A, Wäscher G. 2021. Multi-compartment vehicle routing problems: State-of-the-art, modeling framework and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research 292(3):799−817

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Koç Ç, Bektaş T, Jabali O, Laporte G. 2016. Thirty years of heterogeneous vehicle routing. European Journal of Operational Research 249(1):1−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Kucukoglu I, Dewil R, Cattrysse D. 2021. The electric vehicle routing problem and its variations: A literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 161:107650

    doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107650

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Sar K, Ghadimi P. 2023. A systematic literature review of the vehicle routing problem in reverse logistics operations. Computers & Industrial Engineering 177:109011

    doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Erdelić T, Carić T. 2019. A survey on the electric vehicle routing problem: variants and solution approaches. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019:5075671

    doi: 10.1155/2019/5075671

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Braekers K, Ramaekers K, Van Nieuwenhuyse I. 2016. The vehicle routing problem: State of the art classification and review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 99:300−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhang J, Van Woensel T. 2023. Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review. International Journal of Production Economics 256:108751

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108751

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Asghari M, Mirzapour Al-e-hashem SMJ. 2021. Green vehicle routing problem: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Production Economics 231:107899

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107899

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li B, Wu G, He Y, Fan M, Pedrycz W. 2022. An overview and experimental study of learning-based optimization algorithms for the vehicle routing problem. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 9(7):1115−38

    doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105677

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ni Q, Tang Y. 2023. A Bibliometric Visualized Analysis and Classification of Vehicle Routing Problem Research. Sustainability 15(9):7394

    doi: 10.3390/su15097394

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Demir E, Bektaş T, Laporte G. 2014. A review of recent research on green road freight transportation. European Journal of Operational Research 237(3):775−93

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Mardešić N, Erdelić T, Carić T, Đurasević M. 2023. Review of Stochastic Dynamic Vehicle Routing in the Evolving Urban Logistics Environment. Mathematics 12(1):28

    doi: 10.3390/math12010028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wang Q. 2018. Distribution features and intellectual structures of digital humanities. Journal of Documentation 74:223−46

    doi: 10.1108/JD-05-2017-0076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Harzing AW, Alakangas S. 2016. A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106:787−804

    doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wang Y, Ma X, Lao Y, et al. 2013. Vehicle routing problem: simultaneous deliveries and pickups with split loads and time windows. Transportation Research Record 2378(1):120−28

    doi: 10.3141/2378-13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Dantzig GB. 1960. On the significance of solving linear programming problems with some integer variables. Econometrica 28(1):30−44

    doi: 10.2307/1905292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Gendreau M, Guertin F, Potvin JY, Taillard É. 1999. Parallel tabu search for real-time vehicle routing and dispatching. Transportation Science 33(4):381−90

    doi: 10.1287/trsc.33.4.381

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Agatz N, Erera A, Savelsbergh M, Wang X. 2012. Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 223(2):295−303

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Berbeglia G, Cordeau JF, Laporte G. 2010. Dynamic pickup and delivery problems. European Journal of Operational Research 202(1):8−15

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.04.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Nagy G, Salhi S. 2005. Heuristic algorithms for single and multiple depot vehicle routing problems with pickups and deliveries. European Journal of Operational Research 162(1):126−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2002.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Laporte G. 1992. The vehicle routing problem: an overview of exact and approximate algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research 59(3):345−58

    doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90192-C

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Ropke S, Pisinger D. 2006. An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transportation Science 40(4):455−72

    doi: 10.1287/trsc.1050.0135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Cordeau JF, Laporte G. 2003. The dial-a-ride problem (DARP): Variants, modeling issues and algorithms. Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies 1:89−101

    doi: 10.1007/s10288-002-0009-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Phiboonbanakit T, Horanont T, Huynh VN, Supnithi T. 2021. A hybrid reinforcement learning-based model for the vehicle routing problem in transportation logistics. IEEE Access 9:163325−47

    doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3131799

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Small H. 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science 24(4):265−69

    doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Marshakova SI. 1973. System of document connections based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI 6(2):3

    Google Scholar

    [41]

    Lin C, Choy KL, Ho GTS, Chung SH, Lam HY. 2014. Survey of green vehicle routing problem: past and future trends. Expert Systems with Applications 41(4):1118−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Toth P, Vigo D. 2014. Vehicle routing: problems, methods, and applications. 2nd Edition. Philadelphia, PA, United States: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, University City Science Center. 481 pp.

    [43]

    Sacramento D, Pisinger D, Ropke S. 2019. An adaptive large neighborhood search metaheuristic for the vehicle routing problem with drones. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 102:289−315

    doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hiermann G, Puchinger J, Ropke S, Hartl RF. 2016. The electric fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. European Journal of Operational Research 252(3):995−1018

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Schneider M, Stenger A, Goeke D. 2014. The electric vehicle-routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Transportation Science 48(4):500−20

    doi: 10.1287/trsc.2013.0490

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Uchoa E, Pecin D, Pessoa A, Poggi M, Vidal T, et al. 2017. New benchmark instances for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research 257(3):845−58

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Wang Z, Sheu JB. 2019. Vehicle routing problem with drones. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 122:350−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.03.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Agatz N, Bouman P, Schmidt M. 2018. Optimization approaches for the traveling salesman problem with drone. Transportation Science 52(4):965−81

    doi: 10.1287/trsc.2017.0791

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Karlin AR, Klein N, Gharan SO. 2021. A (slightly) improved approximation algorithm for metric TSP. STOC 2021: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, Virtual Italy, 2021. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 32−45. doi: 10.1145/3406325.3451009

    [50]

    Pirnay N, Ulitzsch V, Wilde F, Eisert J, Seifert JP. 2024. An in-principle super-polynomial quantum advantage for approximating combinatorial optimization problems via computational learning theory. Science Advances 10(11):eadj5170

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj5170

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Liu S, Zhang C. 2022. Optimization of Cold Chain Distribution Route with Mixed Time Window considering Customer Priority. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022:2953205

    doi: 10.1155/2022/2953205

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Xu B, Sun J, Zhang Z, Gu R. 2023. Research on cold chain logistics transportation scheme under complex conditional constraints. Sustainability 15(10):8431

    doi: 10.3390/su15108431

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Chen W, Zhang D, Van Woensel T, Xu G, Guo J. 2023. Green vehicle routing using mixed fleets for cold chain distribution. Expert Systems with Applications 233:120979

    doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120979

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Zhao Z, Li X, Zhou X. 2020. Distribution route optimization for electric vehicles in urban cold chain logistics for fresh products under time-varying traffic conditions. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020:9864935

    doi: 10.1155/2020/9864935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Hou DK, Fan HM, Lv YC, Ren XX. 2022. Dynamic multicompartment refrigerated vehicle routing problem with multigraph based on real-time traffic information. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2022:5538113

    doi: 10.1155/2022/5538113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Ming XJ, Zhu L. 2022. Research on optimization technology of urban fresh food cold chain logistics distribution path. Packaging and Food Machinery 40:76−81

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1295.2022.02.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Pan YM. 2017. Research on optimization of cold chain logistics distribution route of agricultural products based on cost constraint. Agricultural Economy 357:140−41

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2017.02.055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Zhou Y, Ji YF, Yang LH, Yu K. 2016. Optimization of delivery and pickup vehicle routing in cold chain logistics. Mathematics in Practice and Theory 46(20):18−26

    Google Scholar

    [59]

    Zeng ZX, Zhou CD, Wei JF, Lu HZ, Lü EL, et al. 2019. Optimization of logistics distribution cost model of lychee cold chain based on ant colony algorithm. Packaging Engineering 40:58−65

    doi: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Liang CJ, Huang T, Xu DH, Ding Y. 2016. Improved genetic algorithm for solving cold chain distribution problem with fuzzy time window. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition) 41:826−35

    doi: 10.13624/j.cnki.issn.1001-7445.2016.0826

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Wu D, Cui J, Li D, Fouad Mansour R. 2022. A new route optimization approach of fresh agricultural logistics distribution. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 34:1553−69

    doi: 10.32604/iasc.2022.028780

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Lu JD, Zhang JB. 2018. Cold chain logistics zonal distribution path optimization based on time-space similarity measure. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University 39:32−37

    doi: 10.13340/j.jsmu.2018.04.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Ren T, Luo TY, Li SX, Xiang S, Xiao HL, et al. 2022. Knowledge based ant colony algorithm for cold chain logistics distribution path optimization. Control and Decision 37(3):545−54

    doi: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.0160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Tao DH, Liu R, Lei YJ, Zhang XQ. 2019. Optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path based on green supply chain. Industrial Engineering 22(2):89−95

    Google Scholar

    [65]

    Wang ZY, Lu JY. 2017. Optimization of cold chain logistics vehicle distribution routes considering low carbon. Science and Technology Management Research 37(17):228−32

    Google Scholar

    [66]

    Yang L, Wang YC, Hou HP. 2019. Research on optimization of cold chain low-carbon distribution path. Commercial Economic Research 2019(17):104−7

    Google Scholar

    [67]

    Ning T, An L, Duan X. 2021. Optimization of cold chain distribution path of fresh agricultural products under carbon tax mechanism: a case study in china. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40:10549−58

    doi: 10.3233/JIFS-201241

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Jia X. 2022. Research on the optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path of agricultural products e-commerce in urban ecosystem from the perspective of carbon neutrality. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10:966111

    doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.966111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Shen L, Li CY, Gan Y, Zhao G. 2021. Optimization of fresh product distribution path considering cargo damage and carbon emissions. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University 42:44−49+70

    doi: 10.13340/j.jsmu.2021.01.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Bao CL, Zhang SB. 2021. Optimization of cold chain logistics joint distribution path considering carbon emissions. Industrial Engineering and Management 23(5):95−100+107

    doi: 10.19495/j.cnki.1007-5429.2018.05.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Pan QQ, G HC. 2016. Research on cold chain logistics distribution path optimization considering carbon emissions. Mathematics in Practice and Theory 46(2):62−68

    Google Scholar

    [72]

    Liu YB, Wang K, Wang ZY, Wang SJ. 2019. Optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path considering carbon emissions and freshness. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 43:188−95

    doi: 10.16357/j.cnki.issn1000-5862.2019.02.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Kang K, Han J, Wei P, Ma YF. 2018. Research on low-carbon distribution path optimization of cold chain logistics of fresh agricultural products. Computer Engineering and Applications 55(2):259−65

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Chen YZ. 2021. Location and path optimization of green cold chain logistics based on improved genetic algorithm from the perspective of low carbon and environmental protection. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 30(6):5961−73

    Google Scholar

    [75]

    Ding Y. 2021. Multi temperature co distribution cold chain logistics vehicle distribution path optimization simulation. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology 43(3):311−16

    doi: 10.7688/j.issn.1000-1646.2021.03.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Liang CJ, Zhou QQ. 2017. Research on vehicle routing optimization of cold chain logistics with temperature decision. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition) 42:1802−9

    doi: 10.13624/j.cnki.issn.1001-7445.2017.1802

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Zhu X, Wang Y. 2021. Optimization of pharmaceutical cold chain logistics distribution path based on road conditions. Science Technology and Engineering 21:1548−54

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.04.043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Lan H, He QF, Bian Z, Jin ZH. 2015. Optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path considering road traffic conditions. Journal of Dalian Maritime University 41(4):67−74

    doi: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2015.04.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Bai QY, Yin XQ, Lin Y. 2021. Optimization of cold chain logistics path considering real-time traffic in the road network. Industrial Engineering and Management 26:56−65

    Google Scholar

    [80]

    Zhang JF, Yang ZH. 2020. Research on multi-temperature cold chain distribution route optimization under time-varying road network environment. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 37(1):119−26

    doi: 10.11721/cqnuj20200104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Yao YG, He SY. 2019. Research on optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path of agricultural products based on transportation big data. Management Review 31(4):240−53

    Google Scholar

    [82]

    Chen YH. 2020. Intelligent algorithms for cold chain logistics distribution optimization based on big data cloud computing analysis. Journal of Cloud Computing 9:37

    doi: 10.1186/s13677-020-00174-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Zhao B, Gui H, Li H, Xue J. 2020. Cold chain logistics path optimization via improved multi-objective ant colony algorithm. IEEE Access 8:142977−95

    doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013951

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Miao XH, Zhou XN, L S, Fang WC, Wang XM, et al. 2011. Research on the optimization of the third party cold chain logistics distribution path. Operations Research and Management 20:32−38

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2011.04.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Sun MM, Zhang CY, Lin GL, D Y. 2017. Cold chain logistics distribution problems and path optimization of fresh agricultural products. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences 45(11):282−85

    Google Scholar

    [86]

    Li Q, Jiang L, Liang CY. 2021. Multi-objective cold chain distribution optimization based on fuzzy time window. Computer Engineering and Applications 57(23):255−62

    Google Scholar

    [87]

    Lü JJ, Sun SS. 2013. Research on vehicle routing optimization based on cold chain logistics distribution of fresh agricultural products. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences 40(9):178−81

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2013.09.050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Huang XX, Hu JK, Huang YF. 2018. Optimization of cold chain distribution route of fresh agricultural products under carbon tax and carbon limit rules. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University 39:74−79+110

    doi: 10.13340/j.jsmu.2018.01.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Liu Z, Guo H, Zhao Y, Hu B, Shi L, et al. 2021. Research on the optimized route of cold chain logistics transportation of fresh products in context of energy-saving and emission reduction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 18:1926−40

    doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021100

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Ren XY, Chen CF, Xiao YL, Su SC. 2019. Path optimization of cold chain distribution with multiple distribution centers considering carbon emissions. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17:9437−53

    doi: 10.15666/aeer/1704_94379453

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Liu, G, Hu J, Yang Y, Xia S, Lim MK. 2020. Vehicle routing problem in cold Chain logistics: a joint distribution model with carbon trading mechanisms. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 156:104715

    doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104715

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Yao Z, Zhang Y. 2020. Research on the optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path based on the dual perspectives of the Internet of Things and low carbon. Ecological Economy 36:61−66

    Google Scholar

    [93]

    Fang WT, Ai SZ, Wang Q, Fan JB. 2019. Research on cold chain logistics distribution path optimization based on hybrid ant colony algorithm. China Management Science 27(11):107−15

    doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.11.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Moncer H, Rami A, Abdulrahim S. 2017. Integrated economic and environmental models for a multi stage cold supply chain under carbon tax regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production 166:1357−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Xiao Y, Zhao Q, Kaku I, Xu Y. 2017. Development of a fuel consumption optimization model for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Computers & Operations Research 39:1419−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.08.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Wu SA. 2017. Optimization of cold-chain logistics distribution path based on dijkstra algorithm. Boletín Técnico 55(7):439−44

    Google Scholar

    [97]

    Cai HY, Pan Y. 2017. Optimization of cold chain logistics distribution path for fresh agricultural products based on artificial bee colony algorithm. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences 45(15):318−21

    Google Scholar

    [98]

    Ma J, Yang Y, Guan W, Wang F, Liu T, et al. 2017. Large-scale demand driven design of a customized bus network: a methodological framework and beijing case study. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2017:3865701

    doi: 10.1155/2017/3865701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    An JY, Song R, Bi MK, Xue SQ. 2019. Research on the optimization design of flexible bus routes connecting high-speed rail stations. Transportation System Engineering and Information 19(5):150−155+176

    doi: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2019.05.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Huang D, Gu Y, Wang S, Liu Z, Zhao W. 2020. A two-phase optimization model for the demand responsive customized bus network design. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 111:1−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Han Z, Chen Y, Li H, Zhang K, Sun J. 2019. Customized bus network design based on individual reservation demands. Sustainability 11:5535

    doi: 10.3390/su11195535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Ou W, Jiao LP. 2011. Dynamic programming algorithm for vehicle routing problem under emergencies. Computer Simulation 28(8):354−58

    Google Scholar

    [103]

    Li Z, Song R, He S, Bi M. 2018. Methodology of mixed load customized bus lines and adjustment based on time windows. PLoS One 13:e0189763

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189763

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Guo R, Guan W, Zhang W, Meng F, Zhang Z. 2019. Customized bus routing problem with time window restrictions: model and case study. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 15:1804−24

    doi: 10.1080/23249935.2019.1644566

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Wang Z, Li G, Ren J. 2021. Dynamic path planning for unmanned surface vehicle in complex offshore areas based on hybrid algorithm. Computer Communications 166:49−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.11.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Xie YL. 2022. Multi temperature zone cold chain logistics distribution path optimization algorithm based on hybrid ant colony. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology 44(5):552−57

    doi: 10.7688/j.issn.1000-1646.2022.05.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Xiong H. 2021. Research on cold chain logistics distribution route based on ant colony optimization algorithm. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2021:6623563

    doi: 10.1155/2021/6623563

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Ren T, Chen Y, Xiang YC, Xing LY, Li SD. 2020. Low carbon cold chain vehicle routing optimization considering customer satisfaction. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 26:1108−17

    doi: 10.13196/j.cims.2020.04.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Fu Q, Li J, Chen H. 2022. Resource scheduling method for optimizing the distribution path of fresh agricultural products under low-carbon environmental constraints. Scientific Programming 2022:7692135

    doi: 10.1155/2022/7692135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Chen LF, Shen ZF. 2022. Logistics path decision optimization method of fresh product export cold chain considering transportation risk. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2022:8924938

    doi: 10.1155/2022/8924938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Yang Y, Ma C, Zhou J, Dong S, Ling G, et al. 2022. A multi-dimensional robust optimization approach for cold-chain emergency medical materials dispatch under COVID-19, A case study of Hubei Province. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 9:1−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2022.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Fan SQ, Lou D, Sun Y. 2017. Research on the optimization of vehicle distribution routes for cold chain logistics of fresh agricultural products. Preservation and Processing 17(6):106−11

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2017.06.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Qi B, Li G. 2024. The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie. Digital Transportation and Safety 3(3): 92−114 doi: 10.48130/dts-0024-0010
    Qi B, Li G. 2024. The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie. Digital Transportation and Safety 3(3): 92−114 doi: 10.48130/dts-0024-0010

Figures(12)  /  Tables(14)

Article Metrics

Article views(573) PDF downloads(228)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie

Digital Transportation and Safety  3 2024, 3(3): 92−114  |  Cite this article

Abstract: This paper uses the bibliometric analysis software CiteSpace to examine the current status and evolution of cold-chain logistics vehicle routing problems (CCVRP). 7381 relevant articles published in the Web of Science core collection from 2008 to 2024 were analyzed, an in-depth understanding of the publication trends and category distribution were gained. Subsequently, CiteSpace was used to create a scientific knowledge graph and perform visualization analysis. The analysis includes collaboration among authors, countries, and institutions; co-citation analysis of authors, journals, and references; citation burst detection of keywords; and co-citation cluster analysis of references. Based on a deep understanding of current research hotspots, an in-depth discussion of existing research was conducted from three perspectives: optimization objectives, distribution scenarios, and solution algorithms. The results show that CCVRP involves complex factors such as temperature requirements, time window constraints, and multi-objective optimization. These intricate constraints are causing research to become increasingly interdisciplinary and comprehensive. The evolution of hot topics shows that the research directions span multiple fields, from algorithm design to logistics management. This review helps researchers better understand the history, current status, and future development directions of CCVRP research, and provides valuable references and inspiration for academia and practice.

    • In today's growing logistics industry, cold chain logistics has become an important link in ensuring the quality and safety of perishable goods such as food and medicine. However, the efficiency and cost management of cold chain logistics are often challenged by logistics vehicle route planning. The cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem has thus emerged, and its evolution and research history demonstrate the continuous attention and exploration of logistics efficiency and resource utilization. As a key supply chain management field, cold chain logistics aims to keep the goods at a low temperature throughout the distribution process to ensure the freshness and quality of the products. In this field, the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem has always been the focus of attention because it is directly related to transportation efficiency, cost control, and the safety of goods. With the development of the logistics industry and the continuous advancement of technology, the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem has also been evolving and escalating. To better understand this evolution process, this paper conducts a comprehensive bibliometric and visualization review to trace the development trajectory of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem research.

      The research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems has a long history. The initial focus was mainly on optimizing static route planning, with the goal of reducing transportation costs and time. As shown in Fig. 1, cold chain logistics has expanded to many aspects of social production and transportation. With the continuous expansion of logistics networks and the diversification of customer needs, the research focus has gradually shifted to dynamic route planning, considering real-time traffic conditions, climate change and other factors to ensure the safety and timely delivery of goods. However, the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem also faces many challenges and evolutions. Traditional route planning methods often fail to effectively cope with complex environmental changes and uncertainties, resulting in inefficiency and waste of resources. In addition, with the acceleration of urbanization and the improvement of environmental protection awareness, the demand for reducing traffic congestion and reducing carbon emissions is becoming increasingly urgent, which poses new challenges to the research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems.

      Figure 1. 

      Cold chain logistics production and transportation route map.

      In the past few decades, scholars have conducted extensive and in-depth research on the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem. This research explores the challenges of multi-objective optimization, time window constraints, temperature control, etc., and solves these problems by introducing intelligent algorithms and optimization models. At present, the research on the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem shows a trend of diversification and integration. Traditional methods are mainly based on mathematical optimization models, such as vehicle routing problem (VRP) and dynamic path planning (DVRP), and the optimal route is obtained through algorithmic solution. Desrochers & Verhoog[1] discovered a hybrid vehicle routing model; Solomon & Desrosiers introduced the concept of service time window in VRP research[2] ; Jabali et al.[3] considered the penalty cost based on the restriction of service time window, and proposed a soft time window VRP model; Moghaddam et al.[4] considered the demand uncertainty factor in the VRP model; Cattaruzza et al.[5] discussed the vehicle routing problem of multiple trips. There are also many research results on VRP model algorithms: for example, precise algorithms include the branch and bound method proposed by Laporte et al.[6] the dynamic programming algorithm studied by Righini & Salani[7], and the cutting plane method proposed by Kallehauge[8] and others. Heuristic algorithms include the saving algorithm[9], the two-stage algorithm[10] , and the taboo search algorithm[11]. However, these methods often ignore the impact of real-time information and environmental changes on route planning, resulting in unsatisfactory results in actual applications.

      In contrast to traditional methods, modern methods have emerged, including intelligent route planning systems based on artificial intelligence (AI) and big data technologies. These systems can monitor factors such as traffic conditions and climate change in real-time, and combine historical data for prediction and optimization, thereby improving the accuracy and flexibility of route planning. Traditional methods focus on the precise solution of mathematical models and algorithms, and their advantages lie in their solid theoretical foundation and strong interpretability. However, when faced with complex actual situations, it is often difficult to fully consider various uncertainties, resulting in unstable results and difficulty in real-time adjustment. In contrast, modern methods are based on big data and AI technology and are more adaptable and real-time. They can adapt to environmental changes and changes in demand through continuous learning and optimization, improving the flexibility and adaptability of route planning.

      Considering these broad objectives leads to more complex optimization problems and inspires more variants applicable to various real-world application scenarios. To fully understand the current state of research in this particular area and to determine the significance of the present work, a summary of previous review papers on the vehicle routing problem in cold chain logistics was compiled and ranked by their relevance as retrieved by WOS. This summary is listed in Table 1, which provides the publication year, information on the research, WOS category, research method, time-span, and the number of articles it reviewed.

      Table 1.  Summary of review articles on cold chain logistics vehicle routing issues.

      Publication Year Scope (WOS) Methodology Time span Count
      Li et al.[12] 2023 GVRP Bibliometric analysis 2000−2021 166
      Pillac et al.[13] 2013 DVRP Content analysis 1995−2013 154
      Qin et al.[14] 2019 VRP-CSC Systematic analysis 1983−2018 53
      Ostermeier et al.[15] 2020 MCVRP Content analysis 1981−2020 89
      Koç et al.[16] 2016 HVRP Content analysis 1981−2015 137
      Kucukoglu et al.[17] 2021 EVRP Systematic analysis 2001−2021 165
      Sar & Ghadimi[18] 2023 RLVRP Bibliometric analysis 1959−2022 109
      Erdelic & Carić[19] 2019 EVRP Content analysis 1959−2018 175
      Braekers et al.[20] 2016 VRP Systematic analysis 2009−2015 309
      Zhang & Van Woensel[21] 2022 DVRPRR Systematic analysis 1980−2022 185
      Asghari & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem[22] 2021 GVRP Systematic analysis 2000−2020 313
      Li et al.[23] 2022 VRP-LBO Content analysis 1959−2020 212
      Ni & Tang[24] 2023 VRP Bibliometric analysis 1955−2022 209
      Demir et al.[25] 2014 GVRP Content analysis 1996−2013 118
      Mardešić et al.[26] 2023 SDVRP Content analysis 1957−2022 180

      Through the review of the above review papers, it can be found that most of the existing research adopts content analysis and system analysis methods. Therefore, this paper systematically combs the research literature in related fields through bibliometric methods to reveal the main trends and hotspots of the research. The visual review section will show the key nodes, development paths, and academic cooperation relationships in the research field through charts and graphics. In this way, we will be able to see the overall pattern of research on cold chain logistics vehicle route issues more clearly and provide guidance for future research.

      The contributions of this paper are: first, compared with other studies that only focus on certain aspects of the cost problem, the scope of the study of cold chain logistics routes is broader. Second, the article uses bibliometric methods and visualization software to conduct in-depth analysis, including exploring the development stage of the field, analyzing the countries, authors, and journals that have made significant contributions, analyzing the evolution of topics based on keywords, and exploring research hotspots based on the co-citation network of literature. Finally, the article discusses future trends in a quantitative way, which is a valuable supplement to the subjective conclusions limited by the author's knowledge.

      The following sections of this paper will introduce the data source collection and processing process in turn, and present the results of the bibliometric analysis. Next, the differences in cost quantification methods and constraint settings in cold chain logistics vehicle routing optimization will be analyzed from the perspectives of objectives, problem scenarios, and solution algorithms. In addition, the solution algorithms of different models will be classified, and the applicability of various algorithms under different optimization objectives and problem scenarios will be compared. Finally, the full article will be summarized and future research directions will be prospected.

    • To systematically and comprehensively review and analyze the literature related to the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem, the original literature database of this paper comes from the Web of Science Core Collection. The reasons for choosing the Web of Science Core Collection for bibliometric analysis are as follows: (1) The Web of Science Core Collection has covered 18,000 high-quality leading journals in different fields since 1900, with a total citation count of 1.3 billion[27] . (2) The present research focuses on visual analysis of authors, journals, countries, institutions, keywords, references, etc. The Web of Science Core Collection not only covers a series of metadata related to this information, but also outputs it in a recognizable format for direct reading through CiteSpace. (3) Due to duplication of literature, using other databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus would also produce fairly similar results[28] . Therefore, it may not be necessary to consider various databases at the same time in this paper. The data was first generated by performing a basic search in the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection, setting the time span from January 2000 to January 2024 and obtaining 55,298 articles containing the keywords 'vehicle routing problem', 'cold chain logistics', 'vehicle routing optimization', 'electric vehicle routing', 'transportation cost', 'carbon emission', and 'models and algorithms'. Thus, a preliminary database was formed for subsequent analysis based on these 55,298 records.

    • The existence of duplicate documents in the database is inevitable. To improve the credibility of the analysis results, the 55,298 documents were imported into the software CiteSpace 6.3.R1 (64-bit) and duplicate documents removed. At the same time, the time interval in CiteSpace was set to 2008 to 2024 (this is because the publication year of the documents included in the WOS core started in 2008), the year of each slice was set to 1, and the top 10 high-frequency nodes were selected from each slice. That is, Top N = 10. In order to reduce waiting time and simplify the network structure, the Pathfinder pruning method in CiteSpace was used when generating different visualization graphs. According to the above data processing procedures, a total of 7,381 unique documents were obtained, including 4,606 articles, 137 reviews, 2,528 conference papers, and 110 online publications. Figure 2 shows the detailed information of each type. From the results of Fig. 2, it can be seen that 4,606 articles account for 62% of the entire sample size and other types of documents account for 38% of the total. Of course, these filtered 7381 documents published between 2008 and 2024 were considered for the subsequent bibliometric analysis.

      Figure 2. 

      Literature types in CCVRP research.

    • An article and other studies that cite it can provide information about the influence and importance of the article in the academic community. Information such as the author, affiliation, and research field reflects the author's background and professional field. Through this information, we can understand the topic of the article, the author's identity, the research region, the reputation and academic level of the publishing journal, etc. In addition, through keyword and citation analysis, we can also understand the research hotspots and trends in the field, as well as the connection and impact of related research results.

      The time series distribution of research papers and their citations can reflect the research status and trends of a certain research topic in a specific period. Figure 3 shows the number of publications related to cold chain logistics vehicle routing issues and their citations between 2008 and 2024. In the past 16 years, the number of publications and citations have increased significantly, indicating that research on this issue is receiving increasing attention. It can be observed from Fig. 3 that from 2008 to 2014, the number of publications was in a slow growth stage, always staying below 400, and even showed a downward trend in 2010, which indicates that the research attention at this stage was relatively limited. From 2015 to 2022, the number of publications gradually increased, reaching a peak of 836 articles in 2022, ranking second in history in terms of citation frequency. From 2008 to 2023, the number of citations has been on an upward trend. Although the number of publications has declined in 2023, the number of citations has reached a historical high of 25,606 times. Therefore, a decrease in the number of publications does not necessarily lead to a decrease in citation frequency. Comparing the data in 2017 and 2024, although the number of publications in 2017 was about three times that in 2024, the number of citations was almost the same at about 6,600 times, which shows that people still maintain interest in this field.

      Figure 3. 

      Distribution of publications and citation records from 2008 to 2024.

    • Table 2 lists the top 10 subject categories in the PDP field from 2008 to 2024. It should be stated in advance that in the records exported by Web of Science, a publication may belong to multiple different subject categories, which results in the number of papers in Table 2 exceeding the sample size and the sum of the percentages exceeding 100%.

      Table 2.  Distribution of the top 10 categories in CCVRP research.

      No. Web of Science category Count
      1 Operations Research Management Science 2749
      2 Computer Science Artificial Intelligence 1487
      3 Engineering Electrical Electronic 1214
      4 Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications 1123
      5 Engineering Industrial 1084
      6 Computer Science Theory Methods 956
      7 Transportation Science Technology 918
      8 Computer Science Information Systems 707
      9 Management 637
      10 Transportation 531

      As shown in Table 2, the first and second most relevant categories are 'Operations Research and Management Science' and 'Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence'. Among them, 'Operations Research and Management Science' ranked first with 2749 papers, accounting for 37.07% of the total number of publications; 'Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence' ranked second with 1487 papers, accounting for 20.05% of the sample size. The third place is 'Engineering Electrical and Electronics', which shows that the main purpose of this research is to solve complex management and engineering problems in the real world. Moreover, in recent years, with the advent of the big data era and the development of artificial intelligence, the scope of this research has expanded to 'Transportation Science and Technology' and 'Interdisciplinary Applications of Computer Science', which also indicates that the research analysis framework is highly adaptable and widely applicable. Based on the remaining five categories shown in Table 2, we can further conclude that this research has gradually become interdisciplinary and highly comprehensive.

    • In this section, bibliometric and visual analysis of authors and cited authors was conducated by setting the node types to 'author' and 'cited author' in CiteSpace respectively. The purpose of author analysis is to find the scholars who publish the most papers and show the collaborative relationship between different scholars in research. Generally speaking, the more papers he or she publishes, the stronger the ability to accelerate the development of this research. The results of the cited author analysis can not only help us identify scholars with the highest academic level and academic influence, but also sort out the complex co-citation relationships between authors. After running the software, the main results obtained are the author's collaboration network diagram and co-citation network diagram, as shown in Figs 4 & 5, respectively. Table 3 lists and compares the distribution of the top 10 highly published authors and highly cited authors.

      Figure 4. 

      Collaboration network diagram of CCVRP research authors.

      Figure 5. 

      Co-citation network of CCVRP research authors.

      Table 3.  Top 10 most published and most cited authors in the study.

      No. Highly published authors Highly cited authors
      Author Count 7,416 percentile Author Count Half-life
      1 Juan AA 83 1.119 Dantzig GB 1443 10.5
      2 Wang Y 69 0.93 Solomon MM 1282 10.5
      3 Laporte G 63 0.85 Door G 1457 9.5
      4 Gendreau M 50 0.674 T oth P 1628 9.5
      5 Lim A 45 0.607 C oreau JF 1097 8.5
      6 Zhang J 42 0.566 Gendreau M 1197 8.5
      7 Li J 39 0.526 Clarke G 564 7.5
      8 Zhang ZZ 39 0.526 B aldacca R 848 6.5
      9 Van Woensel T 38 0.512 C hristofides N 261 4.5
      10 Yu VF 38 0.512 Prins C 156 4.5

      Figure 4 consists of 239 nodes and 203 links, where each node represents an author and each link represents a collaboration between two authors. The density value of the entire network is 0.0069, which indicates that the research directions of these authors are relatively scattered and there are few connections and collaborations between them. Combined with the results in Table 3, it is obvious that Juan is the most prolific author, having published 83 papers, mainly focusing on the application of business analytics, optimization, simulation, and artificial intelligence in computational transportation and logistics, production and manufacturing, computational finance and insurance, and smart cities. Wang is the second most prolific author, and is also the only Chinese author who has published more than 60 papers. His research areas are mainly focused on logistics and transportation, vehicle routing problems, and intelligent transportation systems. His outstanding work[29] formulated the PDP with split loads and time windows as a mixed integer programming problem (MILP) and proposed a mixed integer programming problem (MILP). Laporte[6] is the first author and is a famous Canadian operations researcher and logistics expert. He is well-known for his research in combinatorial optimization, vehicle routing problems (VRP), and logistics and transportation problems. He first proposed the concept of DARP and designed a taboo search heuristic algorithm to solve it. An interesting phenomenon is that among the top 10 prolific authors, Chinese authors account for as much as 50%, and the top 10 prolific authors have published more than 30 papers.

      Figure 5 shows the co-citation relationship between two authors, which means that their articles are cited together by another article written by a third author. Figure 5 contains a total of 32 nodes and 87 links. Table 3 lists the top 10 highly cited authors according to their citation half-life. Authors who publish a large number of articles are not necessarily the authors with a large number of citations. Highly cited authors are usually regarded as the most advanced and influential scholars in a certain field, and their papers and works are necessary references and studies for beginners interested in this research. The first one is Dantzig[30] , who was one of the pioneers in the field of linear programming and operations research. His most famous contribution is the invention of the simplex method, which has led to a wide range of scientific and technological applications in important problems such as logistics, scheduling, and network optimization, as well as the effective use of mathematical theories using computers. Solomon[2] was the second most cited author, he was a well-known scholar in the field of optimization, scheduling, and supply chain management, famous for his research on vehicle routing problems and logistics management. Solomon designed a set of famous benchmark problems (Solomon's benchmark problems) for evaluating and comparing different VRP algorithms. These benchmark problems have become the standard reference in the VRP research field.

      Another noteworthy phenomenon is that Laporte is the only scholar who is both a high-publishing and highly cited author, which also means that his academic contributions have been widely recognized by his peers in PDP research. Gendreau's[31] paper publication ranks fourth, but his citation half-life ranks sixth. Specifically, from 1996 to 2024, Gendreau's papers in this field were cited 1,197 times, and many scholars from different institutions have worked closely with him, such as Coreau, Taillard, and Christofides, Coreau, and Christofides ranked 5th and 9th respectively.

    • To have a clearer understanding of the research directions involved, CiteSpace was used to draw a co-citation network diagram of the journals in the CCVRP research, as shown in Fig. 6, which consists of 21 nodes and 49 links. Table 4 lists the top 10 highly cited journals and their basic information. Among them, the European Journal of Operations Research ranks first among the highly cited journals, with 5,787 citations, a centrality of 0.86, and an impact factor of 6.4. That is, the European Journal of Operations Research is an important journal that must be paid attention to in the field of cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems. 'Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: 'A review'[32], 'Dynamic pickup and delivery problems'[33], and 'Heuristic algorithms for single and multiple depot vehicle routing problems with pickups and deliveries'[34] are the most cited papers published in the European Journal of Operations Research. The second is Computers & Operations Research, with 5,338 citations and an impact factor of 4.7. The journal has published 1,204 articles in the past four years, with an average citation rate of 8.355 (OOIR) per article. One of the most cited papers is 'Vehicle Routing Problem: An Overview of Exact and Approximate Algorithms' by Laporte[35], published in 1992. This paper has a high citation rate in the field, reflecting its importance in the study of vehicle routing problems. The third is Transportation Science, with 4,157 citations and an impact factor of 5.1. It is mainly based on theory, supplemented by observation and experimental research on traffic phenomena. The article entitled 'An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Heuristic for Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows'[36] has the highest citation rate among the papers published in Transportation Science.

      Figure 6. 

      Network diagram of co-citations of CCVRP research journals.

      Table 4.  Top 10 CCVRP research journals with the highest citations.

      No. Citation Centrality SSCI/SCIE Journal title Count 7,416 percentile Five-Year Impact Factor
      1 5787 0.86 SCIE, Q1 European Journal of Operational Research 330 4.45% 6.4
      2 5338 1.51 SCIE, Q1 Computers & Operations Research 321 4.33% 4.7
      3 4154 1.14 SCIE, Q1 Transportation Science 149 2.01% 5.1
      4 3947 0.39 SCIE, Q1 Operations Research 27 0.36% 4.6
      5 2892 0.38 SCIE, Q1 Computers & Industrial Engineering 220 2.97% 4.3
      6 2387 0.2 SCIE, Q1 Expert Systems with Applications 195 2.63% 6.9
      7 2273 0.38 SCIE, Q2 Journal of the Operational Research Society 52 0.70% 2.6
      8 2184 0.2 SCIE, Q2 Networks 85 1.15% 2.8
      9 2053 0.2 SCIE, Q1 Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 160 2.16% 4.0
      10 1424 0 SCIE, Q1 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 74 1.00% 5.6

      Considering the distribution of highly cited journals, CCVRP research results mainly focus on using optimization theory and combining methodologies from other professional fields to analyze managers' path selection behavior in real logistics situations. Moreover, the main scope of these journals coincides with the above categories, further proving that it is the intersection and combination of knowledge in diversified fields that has promoted the progress of research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing issues.

    • To confirm the contribution and influence of each country/institution and better examine the mutual cooperation relationship between different countries/institutions, CiteSpace was used to perform country and institution analysis, setting the node type to 'country' and 'institution' respectively. First, the country collaboration network diagram is shown in Fig. 7, where each circle represents a country and each link represents the cooperation relationship between countries. Next, the institution collaboration network diagram is shown in Fig. 8, where each node represents a research institution and each link represents the cooperation relationship between two institutions. Tables 5 & 6 show the top 10 countries and the top 10 institutions in terms of publication volume from 2008 to 2024, respectively.

      Figure 7. 

      CCVRP research cooperation network of various countries.

      Figure 8. 

      CCVRP research institution cooperation network.

      Table 5.  The top 10 countries with the highest publication rates between 2008 and 2024.

      No. Count Centrality Year Country
      1 2280 0.36 2008 China
      2 796 0.65 2008 USA
      3 504 0.74 2008 France
      4 428 0.93 2011 Canada
      5 401 0.83 2008 Italy
      6 344 0.13 2008 Germany
      7 265 0 2009 Iran
      8 262 0.81 2008 Spain
      9 246 0.88 2009 England
      10 215 0.13 2011 Turkey

      Table 6.  Top 10 institutions in terms of publication volume from 2008 to 2024.

      No. Count Centrality Year Country Institution
      1 252 0.31 2008 Canada Montreal University
      2 153 0.19 2008 France National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
      3 94 0.02 2008 China Beijing Jiaotong University
      4 83 0.35 2011 Canada HEC Montreal
      5 74 0.25 2011 Canada Polytechnique Montreal
      6 64 0.04 2009 China Huazhong University of Science & Technology
      7 53 0.04 2009 Spain UOC Open University of Catalonia
      8 49 0.13 2008 France University of Technology of Troyes
      9 48 0.04 2008 China Tsinghua University
      10 47 0.08 2019 Singapore National University of Singapore

      According to Fig. 7 & Table 5, China is the most productive country in the world, publishing 2,280 papers from 2008 to 2024, accounting for about 30.80% of the total number of published documents. Although China's CCVRP-related research work started later than in other countries, it has achieved rich results so far. Among them, Singapore and France have close academic cooperation with China. The United States is one of the countries that analyzed CCVRP earlier, ranking second with 796 publications. From the country composition in Table 5, except for China, Turkey, and Iran, other output countries are from Europe and North America, and the academic cooperation between countries is still weak and loose.

      As shown in Table 6, three Chinese institutions (Beijing Jiaotong University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and Tsinghua University) are among the top 10 institutions with the highest number of publications, which is consistent with the conclusion that China ranks first among all countries . In terms of the number of publications, the University of Montreal in Canada ranks first in the world, with 252 publications, which is roughly equivalent to the total of 246 publications from the United Kingdom. However, the most influential institution is HEC Montreal in Canada. According to the analysis of authors and cited authors above, we know that Cordeau's[37] research team is from the Montreal Institute of Technology and Laporte's[35] research team is from HEC Montreal. These two institutions are ranked 4th and 5th in terms of the number of publications, respectively. In fact, each top institution maintains cooperative relationships with other institutions. For example, in China, Huazhong University of Science and Technology's close partners include City University of Hong Kong, Shanghai Jiaotong University, and Henan University of Science and Technology. In addition, the University of Montreal has established extensive cooperative relations with more than 30 academic institutions, including Polytechnic University of Milan, Universidad de la Laguna, Laval University, Technical University of Munich, Mines Saint-Etienne, and University of Vienna. In addition, given that the overall density of the institutional cooperation network is only 0.0127, the breadth and depth of international cooperation in the academic community needs to be further strengthened.

      From the perspective of collaborative networks, centrality is a crucial indicator that represents the central position of a node in the entire network. The larger the value of a node's centrality, the more nodes other nodes in the network must pass through when they connect. Specifically, the outermost color of the nodes in Figs 7 & 8 is used to measure their centrality. The closer to purple, the higher the centrality of the node, and the more critical the position of the country or institution in this study. As shown in Tables 5 & 6, countries or institutions with many publications do not necessarily have strong centrality. For example, although the United States is lower than China in the number of publications, its centrality is about 1.8 times that of China. Moreover, the sum of the centralities of all three Chinese universities in Table 6 (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, and City University of Hong Kong) is still smaller than the centrality value of the 8th-ranked Polytechnic Institute of Troyes, France. These all indicate to some extent that China and its institutions play a limited mediating role in the CCVRP study.

      Another noteworthy example is Canada. Among the top 10 countries in Table 5, Canada ranks 4th in quantity but first in centrality. Among the top 10 institutions in Table 6, three are from Canada and all are in the top 5. The University of Montreal dominates in the number of publications, and the HEC Montreal dominates in global centrality. In other words, Canada and its institutions not only make great contributions to the number of publications, but also play an important 'hub' role in the cooperation network, connecting two different nodes, which is particularly worthy of attention.

      Table 7 lists and compares the top 10 most productive countries and institutions over the past decade, which can better identify the emerging forces of CCVRP research. Obviously, even if we shorten the time interval to nearly ten years, China and the United States are still the top two countries in terms of the number of publications, and the HEC Montreal has maintained its central position in the network of institutional collaborations. Among the top 10 institutions in Table 7, universities from China (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Chongqing University, and Tsinghua University) have published a total of 221 documents since 2011, which exceeds the number of publications published by the United Kingdom, Brazil, and Turkey. Combining the visualization results of Figs 7 & 8 with Tables 5 & 6, we can see that China, Canada, and the United States not only have a deep accumulation of professional knowledge, but also have strong academic innovation capabilities necessary to promote scientific and technological progress.

      Table 7.  The top 10 most productive countries and institutions in the past decade.

      No. High-published countries High-published institutions
      Count Centrality Country Count Centrality Institution
      1 1847 0.55 China 209 0.64 University of Montreal
      2 683 1.3 USA 126 0.42 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
      3 424 0.97 France 77 0.05 Beijing Jiaotong University
      4 374 0.85 Canada 64 0.51 Polytechnique Montreal
      5 341 0.2 Italy 64 0.77 HEC Montreal
      6 299 0 Germany 57 0 Huazhong University of Science & Technology
      7 257 0 Iran 49 0.11 UOC Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
      8 217 0.2 United Kingdom (UK, England) 47 0.2 National University of Singapore
      9 196 0.37 Spain 44 0.05 Chongqing University
      10 181 0 Turkey 43 0.11 Tsinghua University
    • Keywords are considered as a high-level summary and refinement of the document content. In keyword analysis, the frequency of occurrence is an indicator of the core strength of keywords, and burst detection can be used to review the explosive research hotspots in various periods. In this section, keywords were collected from two streams: keywords given by authors and keywords plus. In particular, keyword analysis uses co-occurrence analysis and citation burst detection.

    • Co-occurrence analysis attempts to explore the relationship between research topics by calculating the frequency of two keywords appearing in the same document. Figure 9 shows the keyword co-occurrence network related to CCVRP research, where a total of 268 keywords were selected from 7,381 publications. In Fig. 9, each node represents a keyword, and each link between nodes represents their co-occurrence relationship. The larger the size of the node, the higher the frequency of the word.

      Figure 9. 

      Keyword co-occurrence network diagram in CCVRP research.

      Table 8 lists the top 20 keywords with the highest co-occurrence frequency. Among them, 'VRP' is the most important keyword, appearing 3,617 times with other related terms. Keywords related to 'VRP' include 'traveling salesman problem', 'system', 'time window', 'transportation', 'tabu search', 'vehicle routing', 'distribution' and 'cold chain logistics'. The second is 'algorithm', with a co-occurrence frequency of 1,573 times , which is closely related to 'model', 'optimization', 'meta-heuristic', 'scheduling', 'tabu search', 'genetic algorithm', and 'particle swarm optimization'. In addition, based on the distribution of keywords in Table 8, we can further draw the following conclusions: (1) Scholars attach great importance to establishing mathematical models under realistic backgrounds and assumptions to study the relationship between routing selection and optimization. (2) Most of the research results of CCVRP involves designing algorithms and methods with high computational efficiency to ensure the computability of the formulated models and further obtain the optimal strategy for reference by logistics managers. (3) The most commonly used algorithms include genetic algorithms, taboo search, ant colony algorithms and other heuristic algorithms, which are also an important basis for proposing more innovative and better-performing methodologies.

      Table 8.  Top 20 keywords with the highest co -occurrence frequency.

      No. Freq. Centrality Year Keyword
      1 3617 0.16 2008 Vehicle routing problem
      2 1573 0 2008 Algorithm
      3 1178 0.09 2008 Optimization
      4 1137 0.12 2008 Time windows
      5 815 0.04 2008 Vehicle routing
      6 698 0.19 2008 Genetic algorithm
      7 653 0.1 2008 Tabu search
      8 594 0.08 2009 Model
      9 562 0.13 2008 Search
      10 506 0.03 2008 Delivery
      11 485 0.46 2008 Traveling salesman problem
      12 460 0.15 2009 Pickup
      13 440 0.04 2008 Algorithms
      14 365 0.23 2010 Variable neighborhood search
      15 345 0.09 2009 Local search
      16 305 0.19 2008 System
      17 276 0.1 2013 Large neighborhood search
      18 258 0.05 2008 Ant colony optimization
      19 250 0.12 2011 Models
      20 244 0.62 2008 Particle swarm optimization
    • To reflect the historical development of research hotspots and highlight current research hotspots to inspire scholars to conduct follow-up research, we list the top 28 keywords with the strongest citation bursts in Table 9. Generally speaking, for a specific keyword, the longer the burst duration and the higher the burst intensity, the more people will pay attention to it within a certain period of time.

      Table 9.  Top 28 keywords with a surge in citations between 2008 and 2024.

      No. Keywords Year Burst BurstBegin BurstEnd
      1 Tabu search 2008 33.9 2008 2015
      2 Vehicle routing 2008 23.95 2009 2013
      3 Constraints 2008 22.83 2012 2018
      4 Scheduling problems 2008 20.22 2008 2017
      5 Genetic algorithm 2008 19.7 2008 2010
      6 Reinforcement learning 2021 13.37 2021 2024
      7 Last-mile delivery 2020 12 2021 2024
      8 Vehicle routing problem 2008 11.58 2008 2010
      9 Deep reinforcement learning 2022 11.39 2022 2024
      10 Stochastic demands 2011 11.24 2016 2019
      11 Bee colony algorithm 2019 10.33 2019 2021
      12 Mathematical model 2019 10.29 2020 2021
      13 Electric vehicle routing problem 2022 10.21 2022 2024
      14 Shortest path problem 2011 10.16 2013 2015
      15 Vehicle routing problems 2011 10.07 2011 2015
      16 Multi-depot vehicle routing problem 2011 9.87 2011 2018
      17 Approximation algorithms 2011 9.84 2011 2016
      18 Resource constraints 2013 9.62 2013 2015
      19 Hybrid 2019 9.53 2021 2024
      20 Search problems 2020 9.49 2020 2022
      21 Carbon emission 2022 9.44 2022 2024
      22 Machine learning 2021 9.3 2021 2024
      23 Energy consumption 2019 9.27 2022 2024
      24 Column generation 2009 9.23 2013 2014
      25 Fleet 2019 9.16 2021 2024
      26 Task analysis 2022 9.01 2022 2024
      27 Optimization model 2020 8.82 2020 2022
      28 Tabu search algorithm 2011 8.72 2013 2016

      As shown in Table 9, 'tabu search' ranks first with a citation burst intensity of 33.9, starting in 2008 and ending in 2015. The second is the keyword 'vehicle routing', with a citation burst intensity of 23.95, starting in 2009 and ending in 2013. It is worth noting that reinforcement learning, deep reinforcement learning, and machine learning appeared in the keywords with a surge in citation bursts, starting in 2021 and ending in 2024. This also shows that new directions may have emerged in the research of CCVRP in recent years.

      Emerging keywords such as 'last mile delivery', 'electric vehicle routing problem', 'reinforcement learning', 'deep reinforcement learning', 'carbon emissions', and 'machine learning' have become hot topics in recent years. Judging from the distribution of emerging keywords, the current hot topics are focused on solving more complex business needs involved in CCVRP. For example, Phiboonbanakit et al.[38] proposed a novel approach to a new vehicle route optimization model, using reinforcement learning interconnected with a tree-based regression model to create a reinforcement learning traffic environment. The reinforcement learning agent uses the previous environment state as experience to select appropriate actions to determine the current vehicle route by selecting the optimal strategy.

    • Reference co-citation is measured by the frequency with which two documents are cited together by other documents[39,40] . Generally speaking, the more times two documents are cited together by a third document, the more likely they are to be related in content and the more likely they are to be classified into the same cluster, which is also the principle of the co-citation cluster analysis below. Understanding the co-citation relationship between references helps us to master the knowledge base and review previous research frontiers in our research. References with high co-citation frequencies usually represent the most influential and prominent literature resources. Therefore, in the CCVRP research, the node type was set to 'reference' and CiteSpace was used to visualize the co-citation relationship between references to grasp the composition and historical development of the knowledge base.

    • As shown in Fig. 10, each node in the reference co-citation network represents a reference, and each line connecting two nodes represents the co-citation relationship between the two references. The larger the radius of the circle, the more frequently the reference is cited. In addition, considering that the overall density of the co-citation network is only 0.0084, since the references contained in some academic papers may be from different disciplines, there may be few opportunities for co-citation between core references.

      Figure 10. 

      Co-citation network of references in CCVRP research.

      Table 10 lists the top 10 most cited papers in CCVRP research, sorted by citation frequency. For example, the top-ranked paper, 'The vehicle routing problem: State of the art classification and review'[20], provides a taxonomic review of VRP literature published between 2009 and June 2015. Based on an adapted version of an existing comprehensive taxonomy, 277 papers were classified and trends in VRP literature were analyzed. This classification is the first to classify papers to such a detailed level. Lin et al.[41] conducted an extensive literature review on the Green Vehicle Routing Problem (GVRP). They provided a taxonomy of GVRP, dividing GVRP into Green-VRP, polluted routing problem, and VRP in reverse logistics, and proposed research gaps between its state and richer models that describe the complexity of real-world cases.

      Table 10.  The top 10 most cited references in CCVRP research.

      No. Article title Author Freq. Journal title
      1 The vehicle routing problem: State of the art classification and review Braekers K (2016)[20] 181 Computers & Industrial Engineering
      2 Vehicle Routing: Problems, Methods, and Applications Toth P (2014)[42] 168 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
      3 Survey of green vehicle routing problem: past and future trends Lin CH (2014)[41] 141 Expert Systems with Applications
      4 An adaptive large neighborhood search metaheuristic for the vehicle routing problem with drones Sacramento D (2019)[43] 124 Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
      5 A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems Pillac V (2013)[13] 122 European Journal of Operational Research
      6 The electric fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stations Hiermann G (2016)[44] 116 European Journal of Operational Research
      7 The electric vehicle-routing problem with time windows and recharging stations Schneider M (2014)[45] 112 Transportation Science
      8 New benchmark instances for the capacitated vehicle routing problem Uchoa E (2017)[46] 112 European Journal of Operational Research
      9 Vehicle routing problem with drones Wang Z (2019)[47] 112 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
      10 Optimization approaches for the traveling salesman problem
      with drone
      Agatz N (2018)[48] 107 Transportation Science

      The goal is to review the state of the art in GVRP, discuss how traditional VRP variants interact with GVRP, and provide insights into the next wave of GVRP research. Another study that extended the VRP was conducted by Sacramento et al.[43] . Although they were not the pioneers in studying the truck-drone problem, they proposed a new mathematical formulation for the problem, which is an extension of FSTP for multiple trucks, including capacity and time completion constraints, while minimizing cost as the objective function. They proposed an adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS) metaheuristic method to solve the multiple truck problem. This algorithm represents a new method for two vehicles to cooperate in planning routes.

      Although the optimal solution is difficult to obtain, some researchers have reformulated CCVRP as a special optimization model and adopted an exact algorithm that matches the model structure to cope with the computational difficulties. In contrast, Hiermann et al.[44] combined exact algorithms with heuristic algorithms and introduced the electric fleet size and mixed vehicle routing problem with time windows and charging stations (E-FSMFTW) to model the decisions on fleet composition and actual vehicle routes (including the choice of charging time and location). To accurately define the problem, they provided a mathematical formulation of a MIP model and used a state-of-the-art branch and price algorithm designed specifically for VRPTW to solve a set of smaller instances to provide a benchmark for heuristic methods. Based on this, they proposed a metaheuristic method based on adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS) with embedded local search and labeling procedures. There is an interesting phenomenon that Table 10 lists two highly cited papers related to the topic of 'electric vehicles'[44,45] and three highly cited papers related to the topic of 'unmanned aerial vehicles'[41,47,48] . 'Electric vehicles' and 'drone vehicles' are both hot topics in the current VRP field. It can be seen that in the co-cited literature, the research on vehicle routing problems related to cold chain logistics does not occupy an advantage.

    • Co-citation cluster analysis is an indispensable component of bibliometric research. First, the distribution of co-citation clusters usually represents the composition of a domain knowledge base, and the top terms contained in each cluster can be regarded as the research frontier of each knowledge field. In addition, analyzing the co-citation cluster results over the entire time range can help us correctly conduct time series analysis of the historical development of the knowledge system.

      Based on the above reference co-citation network, the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) weighted algorithm was used in CiteSpace to generate and label co-citation clusters, and the characteristics of the top 15 largest clusters are listed in Table 11. As shown in Table 11, cluster labels are selected from keywords by running the LLR algorithm to ensure that the labels of each cluster have high uniqueness and coverage. Size refers to the number of documents grouped into the same cluster. Silhouette is used as a measure of the homogeneity or consistency level of clustering. When the silhouette score is higher than 0.7, the clustering results are reliable and convincing. The average value indicates the average citation year of the references included in a cluster. In Table 11, the silhouette scores of the top 15 largest clusters are all higher than 0.7, which indicates that the relevant results of the clustering analysis are of high quality and reasonable.

      Table 11.  The top 15 largest reference co-citation clusters in CCVRP studies.

      Cluster ID Size Silhouette Label (LLR) Average year
      0 28 0.986 Traveling salesman problem 2019
      1 25 0.98 Delivery request 2007
      2 25 0.923 Split delivery vehicle 2007
      3 22 1 Green vehicle 2013
      4 21 0.948 Electric vehicle 2017
      5 20 0.982 Path flexibility 2014
      6 20 1 Electric vehicle 2016
      7 20 0.9 Multi-depot vehicle 2005
      8 19 0.965 Electric vehicle 2010
      9 16 0.878 Electric vehicle 2013
      10 15 1 Multiple stack 2008
      11 13 1 Grain logistics vehicle 2005
      12 13 0.892 Periodic location-routing problem 2004
      13 11 0.879 Different traffic condition 2006
      14 5 1 Neighborhood-based search heuristic 2010

      Different from the descriptive co-citation analysis in traditional bibliometric research, the timeline/time zone visualization of reference co-citation clusters in CiteSpace can more intuitively show the temporal distribution and historical evolution of knowledge fields. As shown in Fig. 11, the top of the timeline visualization shows the time when the reference was first cited, from 2008 to 2024. The right side of the timeline visualization shows the top 15 largest co-citation clusters. The references contained in a cluster are represented by nodes, which are distributed on the horizontal timeline according to the year of the first citation. The curve connecting two nodes represents the citation evolution path of the reference.

      Figure 11. 

      Timeline view of the top 15 largest reference co-citation clusters.

      As shown in Table 11 & Fig. 11, the largest Cluster #0 (column generation) has 28 members and a silhouette score of 0.986. It mainly focuses on processing TSP. Traditionally, the Christofides algorithm plays an important role in TSP approximate solutions, ensuring that the solution is within 50% of the optimal solution. Recent research attempts to make breakthroughs on this basis. For example, the algorithm proposed by Karlin et al.[49] improves the solution for specific types of TSP instances (such as graph TSP) by using a random tree selection method. Quantum computing has shown great potential in solving TSP. Pirnay's[50] research team explored the application of quantum algorithms (especially Shor's algorithm) in solving TSP and found that quantum computing can reduce the computational complexity from exponential time to polynomial time.

      Cluster #1 (delivery request) ranks second with 25 members. In the Cold Chain Logistics Vehicle Routing Problem (CCVRP), it is crucial to analyze the role and principle of delivery requests. This problem not only involves the complexity of the traditional vehicle routing problem but also needs to consider the special temperature requirements and time sensitivity in cold chain logistics. Based on the data of delivery requests, optimization algorithms (such as genetic algorithms, ant colony algorithms, etc.) are used to plan the optimal path. These algorithms consider factors such as time windows, temperature requirements, delivery locations, and cargo priorities to generate efficient distribution plans. For example, Liu & Zhang[51] proposed a time window constraint for trapezoidal fuzzy membership functions based on the analysis of the characteristics of urban cold chain transportation. Based on whether the distribution center is out of stock and customer priority, the cold chain distribution path optimization was analyzed. A cold chain distribution path optimization model considering customer priority was constructed, and the improved genetic algorithm was used to solve the two scenarios of no out-of-stock and out-of-stock. Xu et al.[52] proposed a two-stage segmentation strategy based on multiple distribution centers and demand splitting based on the consideration of the impact of manufacturers joining the overall logistics distribution. This strategy comprehensively considers vehicle load capacity, mixed cargo restrictions and service time window constraints, provides services in multiple rounds, and fully considers factors such as vehicle driving distance, waiting time, and vehicle occupancy rate.

      Cluster #4 (electric vehicles) plays an increasingly important role in CCVRP. They not only help reduce transportation costs and environmental impact but also improve operational efficiency and service quality. Electric vehicles reduce costs in the cold chain logistics process. Modern electric cold chain vehicles are also equipped with efficient electric refrigeration systems that can continuously supply power while the vehicle is in motion to maintain the temperature conditions required for cold chain goods. Electric vehicle batteries can also continue to power refrigeration equipment when parked, avoiding temperature fluctuations caused by engine shutdown. However, the current range of electric vehicles is limited, and vehicle routing planning in cold chain logistics needs to take into account the location and charging time of charging stations. Combined with advanced routing optimization algorithms, it is possible to optimize charging arrangements while meeting cold chain transportation needs and maximize distribution efficiency. For example, Chen et al.[53] studied the cold chain green multi-station vehicle routing problem with time windows and mixed fleets (CC-GMD-VRPTW-MF) in urban logistics distribution, using electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline and diesel vehicles (GDVs). To accurately evaluate energy consumption, a realistic energy consumption model was used. An improved Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS0) algorithm is proposed, which introduces a new equilibrium perturbation mechanism and a new memory-based local search mechanism to enhance the computational performance. Numerical studies are conducted on the newly designed CC-GMD-VRPTW-MF instance to investigate the effects of incorporating electric vehicles into joint delivery, considering different carbon prices, and adjusting the time window.

      Cluster #13 (different traffic conditions) focuses on evaluating the negative impact of traffic congestion, road closures, accidents, and other uncertainties on the cold chain logistics cargo delivery process, such as time delays, increased fuel consumption and costs, increased routing complexity, and decreased service levels. The latest research is mainly reflected in two aspects: dynamic routing planning and the use of hybrid and electric vehicles. For example, the transportation route is adjusted based on real-time traffic conditions, and artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are used to predict traffic congestion and adjust the distribution plan. Zhao et al.[54] designed an electric vehicle routing problem (EVRP) model under time-varying traffic conditions to plan the itinerary of fresh products in the urban cold chain. The goal of the EVRP model is to minimize the total cost of logistics distribution, including economic costs and fresh value loss costs. To reflect the real situation, the EVRP model considers multiple influencing factors, including time-varying road network traffic, road type, customer time window requirements, freshness of fresh products, and queuing during charging. To solve the EVRP problem, an improved adaptive ant colony algorithm is designed. The algorithm also takes into account the charging station layout strategy based on the principle of minimum power consumption to solve the key problem of when and where to charge quickly during the layout process.

      As the research content deepens, mathematical models with complex structures and multiple constraints put forward higher requirements for solution algorithms, and the scenarios in which precise algorithms can be applied are subject to certain restrictions. Therefore, scholars often use more powerful and efficient heuristic algorithms and meta-heuristic algorithms in CCVRP research. As can be seen from Fig. 12, Cluster #14 (neighborhood-based search heuristics) has undergone roughly 4 years of development, and references related to heuristics have been frequently cited in recent years. Neighborhood-based search heuristics are widely used in CCVRP, mainly used to optimize paths to meet the special needs of cold chain logistics. Neighborhood-based search methods find the optimal solution by continuously searching for adjacent solutions in the solution space. Specific methods include local search, simulated annealing, taboo search, and particle swarm optimization. These methods can effectively reduce transportation time and cost in CCVRP and ensure that goods are delivered within the specified time window. For example, considering multiple paths between two nodes and real-time traffic information on different paths, as well as cargo damage costs and refrigeration costs during the distribution process, Hou et al.[55] established a two-stage mixed integer programming model based on the idea of pre-optimization to minimize the total cost through real-time adjustment. A hybrid variable neighborhood chaotic genetic algorithm was designed to solve the model. The pseudo-randomness of the chaotic system was introduced into the algorithm to ensure the diversity of the initial solution and an adaptive neighborhood search number strategy was introduced to take into account the breadth and depth required for population evolution.

      Figure 12. 

      Application of traffic big data in cold chain logistics distribution.

      Through the visualization analysis previous, we have a full understanding of the development and evolution of CCVRP research, the strength of different countries and institutions, the collaborative relationship between authors, the transformation of research hotspots, and future development trends. Next, the progress of CCVRP research from three aspects: CCVRP optimization objectives, problem scenarios, and solution algorithms will be elaborated on.

    • Like the traditional vehicle routing problem, the vehicle routing of cold chain logistics also needs to solve a specific objective function to achieve the routing layout. From the perspective of cost priority, the goal of cold chain logistics vehicle routing is to minimize the distribution cost. Ming & Zhou[56] constructed a cold chain vehicle routing model with the goal of minimizing the total cost. The total distribution cost is mainly composed of fixed costs, transportation costs, refrigeration costs, cargo damage costs, and overload penalty costs. From the cost perspective, agricultural product cold chain logistics has problems such as a high turnover rate, insufficient hardware facilities, insufficient number of cold chain logistics centers, and imperfect construction of agricultural product logistics information platforms[57] . When analyzing to minimize cost, the constraint of picking up and delivering goods at the same time can also be added to improve the distribution efficiency[58]. Zeng et al.[59] added a time window penalty factor to the model of various cost factors affecting the cold chain logistics vehicle routing. A mixed time window mode is adopted, and a multi-segment function is used to represent the penalty cost of violating the time window.

      From the perspective of customer priority, the goal of cold chain logistics vehicle routes is to maximize customer satisfaction. Cold chain logistics has strict time requirements, but due to the influence of subjective and objective conditions such as scheduling strategies and transportation, there may be situations where delivery cannot be made within the specified time range. Most studies on traditional vehicle routing problems use single-objective models and consider traditional time windows, ignoring the diversity of objectives and the effectiveness of algorithm calculation time. Due to the particularity of cold chain transportation goods, the setting of time windows often needs to be more flexible, and the connection with customers must also be closer. Not only costs need to be considered, but also time and customer satisfaction. Considering that the goods carried by cold chain logistics have certain particularities and have high-temperature requirements, Liang et al.[60] proposed setting a fuzzy time window in cold chain logistics distribution to reflect customer satisfaction, and added the goal of maximizing customer satisfaction by quantifying the fuzzy time window in the target optimization. The freshness of fresh products directly determines customer satisfaction. Based on the cost-effectiveness idea, Wu et al.[61] proposed a comprehensive cold chain vehicle routing optimization model to minimize the unit cost of product freshness. The establishment of a fuzzy time window means that the vehicle should try its best to provide services within the time window required by the customer. However, unlike the rigid requirements of fixed time windows, it mostly faces non-rigid requirements. When necessary, services can be provided outside the service hours, but part of the fee will be charged as a penalty. Improving the timeliness of delivery will also improve customer satisfaction. Lu & Zhang[62] considered the proximity of customer geographical locations and the similarity of delivery time windows, and proposed a cold chain logistics partition vehicle routing model based on spatiotemporal similarity measurement to solve the problem of cold chain logistics. The problem of low timeliness of chain logistics distribution, customer time window, and product quality are important factors affecting customer satisfaction. Ren et al.[63] added the weights of the time window and product quality, and used a VRP model with soft time window constraints and penalty functions to describe customer satisfaction. The satisfaction level of cold chain logistics distribution quality transforms the maximum goal of customer satisfaction into the minimum goal of penalty cost. In addition, based on the cost-benefit idea, a comprehensive cold chain vehicle routing optimization model with minimization of unit customer satisfaction cost as the objective function can also be established[14] . For customer satisfaction, on-time delivery is used as the evaluation criterion.

      From the perspective of energy conservation and emission reduction, the goal of cold chain logistics vehicle routes is to minimize carbon emissions. Cold chain logistics vehicles consume fuel and generate carbon emissions during transportation and refrigeration. Since cold chain logistics uses cooling equipment such as air conditioners during transportation, cold chain logistics has the disadvantages of high energy consumption, and high emissions. Tao et al.[64] analyzed the carbon tax cost caused by the fuel consumption of vehicle transportation and its refrigeration equipment in the establishment of a target model for minimizing total cost. Low-carbon routing will increase the total distance of distribution, but can significantly reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption. Unlike other models with cost as the optimization goal, Wang & Lu[65] established a vehicle routing model to minimize carbon emissions while considering factors such as vehicle speed, distance, and load capacity. Yang et al.[66] also aimed to minimize carbon emissions, but subdivided the carbon emissions of refrigerated truck transportation and emptying. Cold chain logistics can also be linked to joint distribution and carbon trading mechanisms. Ning et al.[67] established a joint distribution-green vehicle routing problem (JD-GVRP) model for cold chain logistics companies to coordinate the distribution of cold chain goods under the premise of considering carbon tax policies. Under the influence of carbon neutrality, green logistics concepts, and economic background, cold chain logistics of agricultural products is a relatively energy-consuming project in the logistics industry. On this basis, the optimization objective of the cold chain distribution model of fresh agricultural products established by Jia[68] takes into account the pollution cost, including the cost of atmospheric pollutant emissions, the cost of solid and liquid pollutant emissions, and the cost of noise pollution. In the cold chain logistics vehicle routing model, the optimization objective of most models is to minimize the total distribution cost. To consider carbon emissions, the method of converting carbon emissions into economic benefits in the target optimization and introducing carbon emission costs[6974] is widely used.

      Generally speaking, the focus of cold chain logistics vehicle route objectives can be summarized as distribution costs, customer satisfaction, carbon emissions, etc. When setting goals, the above points can also be considered at the same time. For example, through multi-temperature collaborative configuration, customer satisfaction can be improved and distribution costs can be reduced. For traditional cold chain logistics distribution, multi-temperature co-configuration can achieve complex temperature requirements during the distribution process and meet the different storage temperatures required by various products. Ding[75] constructed a multi-temperature co-location cold chain logistics vehicle route model based on the total cost, time, and risk of multi-temperature co-location cold chain logistics distribution. When optimizing the target, temperature is taken as an important influencing factor, and the deterioration rate that changes exponentially with temperature is applied to the model[76] . The temperature is adjusted in real-time to find a route that can meet the customer's freshness requirements and reduce the supplier's costs. In addition, the actual road conditions during the delivery process should also be considered when optimizing the target. The actual road conditions of cold chain logistics during the distribution process indirectly affect the delivery timeliness. Therefore, optimizing the distribution model target based on real-time road traffic conditions[7780] can greatly reduce distribution costs, improve customer satisfaction, and better meet the actual situation of cold chain logistics distribution of fresh products. Yao & He[81] obtained urban road congestion information from big data based on cost optimization and used it to optimize the vehicle routes for cold chain distribution of agricultural products. To reduce the number of times cold chain distribution vehicles travel to and from the distribution center, reasonable docking points are set in cold chain distribution, and a mathematical model of the route of agricultural product cold chain logistics vehicles based on real-time road conditions are established. Chen[82] uses cloud computing technology as the basis for the constituent elements of the cold chain distribution problem, obtains real-time traffic information in the transportation system through a unified access interface, and analyzes the delivery time and cost of refrigerated trucks to establish a cold chain distribution vehicle route optimization model. Compared with the single-objective model that only provides a single distribution route to minimize costs, multi-objective optimization can provide logistics companies with a variety of distribution route options in practice[83] . The focus types of optimization objectives and corresponding literature are shown in Table 12.

      Table 12.  Objective function types and characteristics of cold chain logistics vehicle routes.

      Objective function type Priorities of optimization objectives Ref.
      Multiple targets Based on minimizing the total cost of distribution [56, 57]
      Based on maximizing customer satisfaction and minimizing total distribution cost [14, 5863]
      Based on carbon emission minimization, total distribution cost minimization [14, 64], etc.
      Based on the minimization of total distribution cost and multi temperature co distribution [75, 76]
      Based on real-time road conditions and minimize total distribution cost [7782]
      Based on minimizing total distribution cost, minimizing carbon emissions, and maximizing customer satisfaction [14]
      Single target Based on minimizing carbon emissions [65]
    • According to the different objective function settings and constraints of the cold chain logistics vehicle route model, the problem scenarios of cold chain logistics vehicle routes can be roughly divided into three categories: distribution cost scenarios, time window penalty cost and customer satisfaction scenarios, and real-time traffic conditions scenarios.

    • The total cost of cold chain logistics distribution is mainly composed of fixed costs, transportation costs, refrigeration costs, cargo damage costs, and carbon emission costs. It is generally believed that fixed costs will not change with transportation conditions and are fixed values[57]. But there is overlap in scenario building for fixed costs and transportation costs. Fixed costs include vehicle repairs, maintenance, depreciation, and personnel wages[56]. There are also views that transportation costs should be composed of fixed costs and variable costs[84]. The variable costs are vehicle fuel costs, and maintenance costs. Some models are relatively rough in quantifying transportation costs, directly giving the transportation cost per unit mile during calculation[62]; the quantification of transportation costs can be subdivided into fuel consumption and fuel costs are calculated based on volume[64], Wu et al.[61] quantified through fixed costs, vehicle maintenance costs during transportation and loading and unloading stages; taking into account the freight price per unit weight, the distance between customers, and customer demand, Zhao et al.[83] used customer demand to calculate refrigerated truck transportation costs. The construction of refrigeration cost and cargo damage cost scenarios is more complex than fixed costs and transportation costs. The quantification of refrigeration costs is related to the consumption of refrigerant during vehicle transportation and loading and unloading[57], and the fuel consumed by refrigeration equipment[85]. When measuring refrigerant consumption, it is necessary to consider the heat load caused by the temperature difference between the inside and outside of the refrigerated truck during transportation and the heat load caused by air convection during loading and unloading at the customer point[76] . The heat load is related to the volume of the carriage, the area inside and outside the carriage, and the degree of depreciation. Among them, Li et al.[86] considered the transportation and loading and unloading process when calculating the refrigeration cost, and considered factors such as heat load, compartment damage, and compartment heat transfer area. Although Lü & Sun[87] also considered the heat load, the unit cooling cost was used in the calculation. Refrigeration equipment is powered by generators powered by fuel consumed by delivery vehicles, which increases fuel consumption in the process[64]. Given the differences in energy consumption parameters during cooling of different vehicles, the energy consumption assessment adjustment coefficient can be introduced into the energy cost calculation[59]. The most direct manifestation of refrigeration cost is fuel consumption. Shen et al.[69] quantified the amount of fuel consumed to reduce unit heat load during transportation and loading, and then calculated the fuel cost.

      Part of the cargo damage cost is the damage caused by the increase in delivery time and temperature fluctuations during the delivery process; the other part is caused by the temperature inside the refrigerated box rising due to the hot air from the outside entering the car body due to opening and closing the door when serving customers. In fact, the deterioration rate will change with the transportation distance and temperature. Liang & Zhou[76] added the temperature constraints during transportation and the temperature-related deterioration rate into the cargo damage cost, where the deterioration rate is determined by the AllenNieus equation, the cost of cargo damage can be measured more effectively through temperature. Warm co-balancing is a new way to reduce the cost of cargo damage. Given the risk of cargo damage during transportation and reloading, the probability of product damage and transportation accidents is introduced during the transportation process, and the value is [0,1]. During the transfer process, the probability of cost and accident probability are introduced. Each type of product has a corresponding vulnerability value, and risk offset factors can also be added during the calculation process[75], including traffic risk offset factors corresponding to driver skills, traffic vehicle performance, road conditions, replacement technicians, tool performance, and replacement factors. Risk offsetting factors generated by installation management. The longer the delivery time, the greater the chance that the goods will be lost. Accordingly, Huang et al.[88] constructed a cargo damage coefficient formula based on the sensitivity of cargo to time to express the exponential change pattern of the cargo damage coefficient with time. Kang et al.[73] established a variable function for the quality of refrigerated goods, and based on this, calculated the cost of cargo damage during the transportation and loading and unloading stages. With the improvement of scientific and technological levels, the logistics industry is paying more and more attention to sustainable development. Optimizing the carbon emission structure of the cold chain logistics industry is the top priority to ensure the sustainable development of the logistics industry[89] .

      Carbon emission cost is the cost for enterprises to purchase corresponding carbon emission indicators through carbon exchanges. In the quantification of carbon emission costs, CCD releases more carbon dioxide than ordinary commodities. The load estimation method can be used for calculation and the fuel consumption is calculated based on the fuel consumption rate and distance under different loads[61,90,91]. There is a certain linear relationship between carbon emissions and fuel consumption[92], so that the carbon specific values for emissions. Given the double calculation of fuel consumption costs in transportation and refrigeration and the fact that most scholars only consider the fuel consumption in transportation and ignore the impact of refrigeration fuel consumption on carbon emissions, Fang et al.[93] unified the measurement of fuel consumption and carbon emissions, and unified the measurement of fuel consumption and carbon emissions. The cost of fuel consumption during distribution and the environmental cost of carbon pollution are considered as green costs and entered into the model. Moncer et al. proposed an activity-based cost minimization model and a carbon footprint minimization model[94]. The introduction of a carbon tax mechanism[64] can also quickly obtain the cost of carbon emissions, provided that the carbon emissions are calculated based on fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emission coefficients[71,88]. Some scholars collected relevant statistical data for regression analysis and found that fuel consumption per unit distance can be expressed as a linear function that depends on the truck's cargo capacity[95]. The total vehicle weight is divided into vehicle weight and cargo weight, then the fuel consumption per unit distance can be expressed linearly by the two[73] .

    • In cold chain logistics vehicle routes, the establishment of time window penalty costs has become increasingly important. Cold chain goods are shipped from distribution centers to various customer points. The temperature in the container needs to be constantly adjusted to ensure the quality of cold chain goods. At the same time, the shorter the delivery time and service time, the more conducive it is to maintaining the quality of the goods. Customer satisfaction is converted from the vehicle service time and is determined by the specific time when the vehicle arrives at the customer point. Specifically, given a time period, it is determined by the lower or upper limit of the fuzzy time window and the lower or upper limit of the optimal service time. According to the actual arrival time, it is determined which time period it is, and the difference between the upper or lower limit of the optimal service time and the arrival time and the difference between the time segments are calculated. The ratio of the difference is used to measure customer satisfaction[60]. Similar to the traditional VRPTW problem, cold chain distribution logistics also has corresponding early and late arrival penalty costs. Ren et al.[63] studied the maximum customer satisfaction by converting it into penalty cost minimization.

    • Big data can be used to easily obtain real-time traffic information in the traffic system. Therefore, using big data and cloud computing analysis to build a cold chain logistics distribution model based on real-time road conditions is one of the current hot topics. Traffic big data plays an important role in cold chain logistics. Its application in distribution is shown in Fig. 12.

      Chen[82] obtained real-time traffic information during the model construction process. Through the unified interface of the established service architecture, real-time traffic information of urban road sections where vehicles are distributed is obtained in the traffic information cloud. Using the real-time road conditions of the vehicles, the driving speed of the distribution vehicles on the relevant sections is obtained, and the driving time of the distribution vehicles is calculated, so that the vehicles can choose the shortest route during driving. Obtaining urban road congestion information from big data can also be used for vehicle route optimization in cold chain distribution of agricultural products. To reduce the number of cold chain distribution vehicles traveling to and from the distribution center, it is recommended to introduce docking points and equipment connections in the cold chain distribution of fresh agricultural products. The shuttle solution[81] (cold chain distribution shuttles are mainly small and micro electric vans with low investment and operating costs. They generally use phase change cold storage materials for refrigeration or foam boxes for insulation to ensure the temperature and freshness of agricultural products) further studied the docking point selection and cold chain logistics vehicle routes based on the docking point situation, and established an agricultural product cold chain vehicle route model based on traffic big data including docking points.

      Regarding the construction of real-time traffic scenarios, Zhu & Wang[77] directly considered the time window penalty cost caused by the failure of medicines to be delivered within the specified time due to weather and other reasons in their model. In addition, by introducing the corruption function of fresh products, under the premise of time-varying road network theory, the time variable in the corruption function that is closely related to food quality can be solved[80], and the cargo damage cost of multi-temperature distribution under the time-varying road network traffic environment can also be solved. Lan et al.[78] divided the actual road conditions into five categories based on the theory of road accessibility and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method of road accessibility. The real-time traffic scenario constructed by Bai et al.[79] is divided into two stages. The first stage is to obtain the travel time based on the real-time traffic conditions of each connected path of the initial customer point, and the second stage is the dynamic allocation process. After each refrigerated truck delivers to a customer point, it is eliminated, and then the delivery order is planned based on the real-time traffic conditions between the remaining customer points, the demand conditions of each customer point, and the time window. Wu[96] plan logistics vehicle routes based on real-time traffic information, and consider the impact of road congestion, intersection congestion, and one-way road restrictions on the path planning.

      In general, the distribution cost scenario, time window penalty cost, and customer satisfaction scenario are both different and related to the real-time traffic scenario. The difference is that the constraints and variables are set differently when constructing the three scenarios. When constructing the distribution cost scenario, if the variables involved in each type of cost are different or the quantification method of the same variable is different, the corresponding constraint settings will also be different. In the process of setting such scenarios, it is necessary to pay attention to the repeated accounting of cost variables. Repeated accounting does not mean that they appear repeatedly in the target, but when setting the cost variables, different quantification methods are used to repeatedly quantify the same variables. In the time window penalty cost and customer satisfaction scenarios, it is necessary to consider adding time window constraints and customer satisfaction functions and quantify customer satisfaction by setting delivery time variables and cargo damage cost variables. When constructing the real-time traffic scenario, it is necessary to consider the quantification of variables such as traffic flow, customer demand, road congestion, road infrastructure, and weather. By introducing the traffic congestion coefficient, constraints such as delivery speed, delivery volume, and delivery priority can be set to measure the impact of road traffic conditions on the route selection of cold chain logistics vehicles. Different distribution scenario types and corresponding literature are shown in Table 13.

      Table 13.  Cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem scenario types and characteristics.

      Scene type Content of scenario construction Ref.
      Distribution
      cost scenario
      Transportation cost [60, 62, 97]
      Fixed cost, transportation cost [56]
      Cargo damage cost [75]
      Carbon emission cost [66, 70], etc.
      Fixed cost, refrigeration cost [57]
      Refrigeration cost [69, 85]
      Refrigeration cost, transportation cost [59, 64], etc.
      Cargo damage cost, transportation cost [76]
      Transportation cost, carbon emission cost [61, 64], etc.
      Refrigeration cost, cargo damage cost [76]
      Refrigeration cost, carbon emission cost [64]
      Cost of cargo damage, carbon emission [73, 88]
      Transportation cost, refrigeration cost, cargo damage cost [76]
      Transportation cost, refrigeration cost, carbon emission cost [64]
      Time window penalty cost
      and customer satisfaction scenario
      Time window penalty cost [60]
      Maximize customer satisfaction [63]
      Real time
      traffic scene
      Get real-time road conditions based on big data [81, 82]
      Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on road smoothness [78]
      Real time traffic scene construction [77, 79]
      Based on time-varying road network theory [80]
    • Generally, algorithms for solving vehicle path optimization problems can be roughly divided into two categories, one is the exact algorithm and the other is the heuristic algorithm. The exact algorithms mainly include the branch and bound method[98101], the dynamic programming algorithm[102] , the branch and cut method[103,104] , etc. When conducting case analysis on a few cases at the customer site, the exact solution algorithm is often used. For example, Wang et al.[105] focused on dynamic path planning for unmanned environment monitoring vehicles under complex road conditions. Based on the idea of two-level planning, they proposed a hybrid algorithm that combines global and local path planning. It can effectively solve the local optimization problem of the path, but the optimization of path cost and carbon emission problems still needs to be further studied. In practical applications, since most problems do not have a benign structure, it is impossible to establish a strict mathematical expression; some problems do not have a strict optimal solution, or some problems are large in scale and it takes too much cost to obtain the optimal solution. Therefore, heuristic algorithms are generally used to solve them. Among them, the ant colony algorithm[71] is the most common. Other intelligent algorithms mainly include genetic algorithm[82], simulated annealing algorithm[80,91], particle swarm algorithm[56,106], A* algorithm[93], artificial fish swarm algorithm[66], hybrid algorithm[72], etc.

      Ming & Zhu[56] improved the particle swarm algorithm by using Levy flight and reverse learning optimization. The step size of reverse learning was obtained through Levy flight. When the search was stuck in the local optimal state, the particle individual was learned from the worst position. The optimization was performed through reverse learning, which prevented the particle swarm algorithm from falling into the local optimal state and causing the algorithm search to stagnate. At the same time, the algorithm's search ability was also improved. When using genetic algorithms to solve problems, Liang & Zhou[76] used the double-point cut crossover method, took the objective function value as the individual fitness value, and used natural number coding to encode the data, while considering the vehicle configuration and vehicle temperature. Ding[75] first used the linear weighted method to transform and simplify the multi-objective optimization problem into a single-objective optimization problem to solve, thereby improving the efficiency of path optimization. Secondly, they used quantum bits to describe the relevant information of the path and gave the individual probability radiation of the quantum bits in the corresponding two-state system. The corresponding quantum individuals can be represented as the pheromones contained in each cold chain logistics distribution path. Finally, the ant colony algorithm was combined to obtain the pheromone coding of ants on each cold chain logistics transportation path. Based on the solution idea of a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm, the adaptive adjustment of crossover rate and mutation rate can be improved to improve the convergence speed. After the improvement, the potential optimal solution population is formed through optimization between different generations to avoid local optimality and search for Pareto optimal solution. Compared with the traditional algorithm, Liang et al.[60] selected the genes after crossover for repair, which effectively prevented the situation that the chromosome did not meet the constraint conditions. The non-dominated sorting and crowding calculation after merging the new population improved the accuracy of selecting the optimal solution. Xie[106] combined the advantages of the particle swarm algorithm in multidimensional search space with the improved ant colony algorithm, used the insertion-based heuristic method to construct weak feasible solutions, and used crossover and inversion to optimize individual ant colonies. After operations such as crossover and inversion, the optimal path planning is found under constraints such as time window, avoiding the ant colony algorithm from being unable to obtain the local optimal solution due to the fast convergence speed. Fang et al.[93] used the global convergence and rapidity of the A* algorithm to perform initial pheromone distribution on the path corresponding to the optimal solution, and then made full use of the positive feedback and high solution efficiency of the ant colony algorithm to find the optimal solution. Ding[75] proposed an optimization method for the delivery routes of multi-temperature and low-temperature cold chain logistics vehicles. Considering the interference factors at each stage, controlling the delivery time, delivery cost, and delivery risk of multi-temperature cold chain logistics, optimizing the vehicle routes of multi-temperature cold chain logistics, and realizing the route optimization by using the ant colony algorithm. This method can effectively plan the route, but since the ant colony algorithm requires a large number of iterations to obtain the optimal value, the data results are redundant, which can easily extend the route optimization time. By improving the traditional pheromone update mode, limiting the maximum and minimum concentrations of pheromones on the road, and changing the path selection transfer probability, a cold logistics vehicle route plan based on the improved ant colony optimization algorithm (IACO) is formed. Xiong[107] conducted simulation experiments and results and showed that the IACO algorithm is lower than the hybrid simulated annealing ant colony algorithm (CSAACO) and the traditional ACO algorithm in terms of convergence speed, logistics transportation distance and logistics delivery time. Ren et al.[108] integrated the taboo search operator and the knowledge model of dynamic probability selection under the knowledge-based elite strategy into the ant colony algorithm and designed a new knowledge-based ant colony algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed model and knowledge-based ant colony algorithm was verified by comparing the traditional ant colony algorithm, the improved ant colony algorithm based on taboo search, and the proposed knowledge-based ant colony algorithm. Liu et al.[72] combined the genetic algorithm with strong global search ability and the taboo search algorithm with good local optimization ability. They used the genetic algorithm for the entire vehicle route in the global space and the taboo search algorithm for a single vehicle route in the local space, thereby improving the efficiency of the algorithm. Considering that the traditional genetic algorithm is prone to premature convergence, local convergence, difficulty in obtaining the optimal solution, and insufficient global search characteristics of the simulated annealing algorithm when solving the VRP problem, Bai et al.[79] combined the two to solve the cold chain logistics distribution path optimization problem.

      To avoid the premature convergence and local optimality of the genetic algorithm, Fu et al.[109] introduced the Tent chaos perturbation method to optimize the genetic algorithm. This method uses a perturbation mechanism to initialize the population perturbs it again after the selection operation to increase the diversity of the population, and designs the rules of selection, crossover, and mutation operators to speed up the solution. Chen & Shen[110] proposed a cold chain logistics path decision optimization method for fresh products considering transportation risk factors and constructed a cold chain transportation risk factor index system using risk quantification methods. At the same time, the K nearest neighbor algorithm was used to predict traffic congestion risks and extract cold chain logistics transportation risk factors, thereby shortening transportation time. To reduce the error of path planning, the hierarchical analysis method was used to establish a calculation model, and the risk factor matrix was used to calculate the indicator weights of risk factors. To maximize the robustness of the solution, Yang et al.[111] proposed a multidimensional robust optimization model and solved the problem through a hybrid algorithm combining the Pareto genetic algorithm and the improved grey relational analysis (IGRA). The research results show that this method can slightly reduce costs and improve robustness, and can effectively avoid the blindness of allocation while considering the urgency of demand.

      Generally speaking, the path optimization problem is an NP-Hard problem. When choosing a solution algorithm, we should first determine whether to choose an exact algorithm or a heuristic algorithm based on the size of the solution case. Secondly, we should choose the algorithm that best suits the model based on the differences in the objective function and the scenario. Through the application of actual cases, we can compare the differences in the optimal solution, solution speed, and solution process under different algorithms to determine whether the algorithm needs to be improved, other algorithms should be used, or a hybrid algorithm should be used to solve the problem. Finally, when designing an algorithm, we should fully combine the characteristics of the model, fully embed the elements in the model into the algorithm, and establish an effective connection between the algorithm and the model. In response to the existing literature, a series of summaries on the improvements of the algorithms used have been made, where the null value means that the algorithm has not been improved. The types, characteristics, and effects of the improved algorithms are shown in Table 14.

      Table 14.  Solving algorithm types and characteristics.

      Type Refs Improved advantage
      Ant colony algorithm [61, 63, 73, 75, 83]
      [62, 86, 107, 108, 112]
      [63] Good optimization effect, high solution stability, and stronger search ability, suitable for medium and large-scale data sets;
      [73, 85]: Overall cost reduction;
      [75]: High timeliness and low cost greatly improve the distribution and transfer efficiency of multi-temperature co-distribution cold chain logistics;
      [107, 112]: fast convergence speed and high solving efficiency;
      [108]: Reduction in convergence time, total distance and total cost of carbon emissions satisfaction.
      Genetic algorithm [60, 70, 72, 74]
      [76, 84, 86, 109]
      [60]: Double optimization that effectively takes into account cost and customer satisfaction, the total distribution cost is better than the standard genetic algorithm;
      [70]: Significant cost reduction;
      [72]: Has better convergence efficiency and optimization capabilities;
      [74, 76, 109]: Total cost reduction, closer to reality;
      [86]: More suitable for solving distribution problems with narrow time windows and random geographical locations of customers or partial clustering and partial randomization.
      Simulated annealing algorithm
      Particle swarm optimization [56] [56]: Lower total cost and 100% on-time rate.
      A* algorithm
      Artificial fish
      swarm algorithm
      [66] [66]: Fast convergence speed, strong global search capability, and can further balance costs such as fuel consumption, refrigeration, and carbon emissions during the distribution process.
      Hybrid algorithm [62, 111] [62]: The time penalty cost is significantly reduced, and the total distribution cost is lower;
      [111]: Reduce costs, improve robustness, and effectively avoid blindness in distribution.
    • Through bibliometrics and visualization techniques, this paper systematically traces the research evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing issues. The early focus on basic route optimization has gradually shifted to research on the optimization of complex cold chain logistics networks, reflecting the increasing emphasis by academia and industry on the efficiency and sustainable development of cold chain logistics. Bibliometric analysis shows that the current research hot spots on cold chain logistics vehicle routing issues mainly focus on dynamic route optimization, multi-modal transportation, electric vehicles, and intelligent algorithms. These research hotspots reflect the urgent need to improve cold chain logistics transportation efficiency, reduce costs, and cope with complex environmental challenges. With the continuous development of fields such as computer science, operations research, and logistics management, research methods and technologies for cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems have been significantly improved and expanded. The application of traditional mathematical programming methods to heuristic algorithms, meta-heuristic algorithms, and hybrid optimization algorithms provides more options and possibilities for solving complex problems in actual cold chain logistics transportation. The study also found that the research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing is not only limited to a single field but also involves the intersection of multiple disciplines and fields, such as operations research, computer science, logistics management, etc., which provides more information for the further development of this field.

      Based on the research conclusions of this study, the following prospects for future research directions are proposed.

      (1) Interdisciplinary integration: Future research can further cross disciplinary boundaries and combine knowledge from computer science, logistics management, operations research, etc. to conduct more in-depth research. For example, cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data analysis can be introduced into the solution of cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems to improve the intelligence and real-time nature of the solution.

      (2) Customization of application scenarios: As the application of cold chain logistics in various industries continues to deepen, future research will focus more on personalized solutions for different industries and specific scenarios. For example, in the pharmaceutical field, special transportation requirements for drugs may need to be considered, while in the food field, logistics path optimization under different temperature requirements may need to be considered.

      (3) Sustainable development considerations: As the world pays more attention to sustainable development, future research will pay more attention to the potential contribution of cold chain logistics vehicle route optimization in energy conservation, emission reduction, resource utilization, etc. Therefore, future research may incorporate more sustainable development concepts such as environmental protection and carbon neutrality to achieve the sustainable development goals of the cold chain logistics industry.

      In summary, with the continuous development and innovation of the cold chain logistics industry, the research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems will continue to face new challenges and opportunities. Through interdisciplinary integration, customized solutions, and sustainable development considerations, the research on cold chain logistics vehicle routing problems will provide more effective support and guidance for the development of the cold chain logistics industry.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: research concept and manuscript draft preparation: Qi B; data collection and chart analysis: Li G. Both authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Web of Science (WoS) repository.

      • This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52062027), the 'Double-First Class' Major Research Programs, the Educational Department of Gansu Province (GSSYLXM-04), Soft Science Special Project of Gansu Basic Research PIan under Grant No. 22JR4ZA035, Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Major Special Project - Enterprise Innovation Consortium Project (No. 22ZD6GA010), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR5RA343), Foundation of A Hundred Youth Talents Training Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University, China, and Open Fund of National Engineering Research Center of Highway Maintenance Technology, Changsha University of Science & Technology (No. kfj220108), Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (No. 22YF7GA142) and Industry Support Plan Project from the Department of Education of Gansu Province (No. 2024CYZC-28).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (12)  Table (14) References (112)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Qi B, Li G. 2024. The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie. Digital Transportation and Safety 3(3): 92−114 doi: 10.48130/dts-0024-0010
    Qi B, Li G. 2024. The evolution of the cold chain logistics vehicle routing problem: a bibliometric and visualization revie. Digital Transportation and Safety 3(3): 92−114 doi: 10.48130/dts-0024-0010

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return