-
The grafted materials Cj + LL and Pt + LL were alternately planted in the same orchard (Fig. 1a). The soil of this orchard is calcareous soil. Therefore, in this orchard, the calcium level (7,075.27 mg/kg) and pH value (7.88) of the soil were higher than in the control orchard, and the levels of mineral elements (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mg and Mn) in the soil were lower than in the control orchard soil (Supplemental Table S3). In particular, the content of Fe was very low at only approximately 1/22 of that in the control orchard. In calcareous soil, there were large differences in phenotype between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. As shown in Fig. 1a & Supplemental Table S4, the tree height and canopy volume of Cj + LL were much larger than those of Pt + LL by approximately 1.5 times and 3.8 times, respectively. In addition, the yield of Cj + LL was 3 times higher than that of Pt + LL. In addition, the fruit performance also differed between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. As shown in Fig. 1b & c, the coloring time, single fruit weight and TSS (total soluble solid) were different between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. The color transition time of the fruits of Cj + LL occurred approximately 20 d later than that of Pt + LL. In addition, the fruit size of Cj + LL was much larger than that of Pt + LL. The single fruit weight of Cj + LL was approximately 1.5 times heavier than that of Pt + LL. However, the fruit of Pt + LL tasted better than that of Cj + LL due to its higher TSS content.
It is known that mineral elements and plant hormones are important for plant growth and fruit development. Therefore, the contents of mineral elements in the root, stem and leaf of Cj + LL and Pt + LL were determined. As shown in Fig. 2a & Supplemental Table S5, we observed that the contents of macroelements (including N, P, K, S and Ca) showed little difference between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. However, the contents of microelements (including Fe, Cu, Zn and B) and Mg showed significant differences in some tissues between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. Overall, the contents of mineral elements in the root, stem and leaf of Cj + LL were higher than those in the root, stem and leaf of Pt + LL (Fig. 2a & Supplemental Table S5). Notably, the Cu content in Cj + LL was higher than that in Pt + LL in all measured tissues. In one-year-old branch and new leaf samples, the content of Fe in Cj + LL was higher than that in Pt + LL.
Figure 2.
The content of several mineral elements in different tissues of (a) Cj + LL and Pt + LL and (b) the content of ABA and IAA in the root, stem and leaf tissues of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. Cj + LL: Ziyang xiangcheng + Lane Late navel orange; Pt + LL: Poncirus trifoliate + Lane Late navel orange. Bars represent the standard error (n = 3). A single asterisk (*) represents statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Analyzed using Student's t test.
Due to the differences in tree size and fruit development between Cj + LL and Pt + LL, the contents of ABA and IAA were measured (Fig. 2b). In the stem tissue, there was no significant difference in the contents of ABA and IAA between Cj + LL and Pt + LL. In the root and leaf tissues, the ABA content was significantly higher in Pt + LL than in Cj + LL. Compared with Pt + LL, the content of IAA in Cj + LL was higher in the root and lower in the leaf. This result indicated that plant hormones may play important roles between the rootstock and scion.
Global analysis of root, stem and leaf transcriptomes
-
To investigate the underlying molecular changes that accompany the morphological and physiological changes described above, we used RNA-seq to generate transcriptome profiles for the root, stem and leaf tissues of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. In the root tissue, 3,431 DEGs (differentially expressed genes) were identified between Cj + LL_root and Pt + LL_root (Fig. 3a & Supplemental Table S6). For the stem and leaf tissues, only 274 and 403 DEGs were identified, respectively (Fig. 3a & Supplemental Table S6). A Venn diagram was used to reveal unique or commonly differentially expressed genes among the root, stem and leaf tissues (Fig. 3b). Only 20 DEGs were common among all three tissues (Fig. 3b). Most of these 20 DEGs were upregulated in the root of Cj + LL and downregulated in the leaf of Cj + LL compared with Pt + LL (Fig. 3c & Supplemental Table S7). This result indicates that the difference between Cj + LL_root and Pt + LL_root is the major differential resource for Cj + LL and Pt + LL.
Figure 3.
Global analysis of gene expression in different tissues of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. (a) The number of differentially expressed genes in the root, stem and leaf tissues. (b) Venn diagram showing the number of commonly and uniquely expressed genes in the root, stem and leaf tissues. (c) Heatmap showing the genes differentially expressed in the root, stem and leaf tissues. DEG: differentially expressed gene.
To further elucidate the difference in root, stem and leaf tissues between Cj + LL and Pt + LL at the transcript level, GO-based term classification and KEGG-based pathway enrichment analyses were performed. In the root tissue, 112 biological processes, 23 molecular functions and 17 cellular components were shown to be enriched in the DEGs (Supplemental Table S8). In biological processes, several hubs were significantly enriched, including response to inorganic substance, secondary metabolic process, flavonoid biosynthetic and metabolic processes, and other processes (Fig. 4a & Supplemental Table S8). Notably, several enriched GO terms were related to plant development, nutrient element uptake and stress response, such as response to hormone, ion transport, response to metal ion, lignin biosynthetic process and glutathione metabolic process (Supplemental Table S8). According to the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (Fig. 4d & Supplemental Table S9), our attention was attracted by several enriched pathways, such as flavonoid biosynthesis (15 DEGs), glutathione metabolism (31), phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (45), alpha-linolenic acid metabolism (13), carotenoid biosynthesis (10) and plant hormone signal transduction (54) were in accordance with the results of GO enrichment analysis. In the stem tissue, the DEGs were enriched in 38 biological processes and two molecular functions (Supplemental Table S8). Among the biological processes, several hub processes were identified, including response to chitin, flavonoid biosynthesis and metabolism, and response to stimulus (Fig. 4b). In the leaf tissue, 58 biological processes, three cell components and 12 molecular functions were enriched in the DEGs (Supplemental Table S8). Response to inorganic substance was the most enriched hub biological process, which was in accordance with the results of the root tissue GO enrichment analysis (Fig. 4a & c). The KEGG pathways enriched with the DEGs in the stem and leaf tissues were also identified (Supplemental Table S9). Several common pathways were identified in both stem and leaf tissues, such as alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and diterpenoid biosynthesis (Supplemental Table S9).
Figure 4.
Treemap showing the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and the enriched KEGG pathways of the DEGs in the (a), (d) root tissue, (b) stem tissue and (c) leaf tissue of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. (a)−(c), biological processes; (d) KEGG pathways. Each rectangle is a single cluster representative. The representatives are joined into 'superclusters' of loosely related terms, visualized with different colors. The size of the rectangles may be adjusted to reflect either the p value or the frequency of the GO term in the underlying GO database. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Phytohormone biosynthesis and signal transduction pathway genes underwent great changes
-
In this study, 54 DEGs in the roots of Cj + LL and Pt + LL and seven DEGs in the leaves of Cj + LL and Pt + LL were enriched in plant hormone signal transduction (Fig. 4d & Supplemental Table S9). The DEGs in the JA, auxin and cytokinin signal transduction pathways were also verified in the roots of Cj and Pt, which showed distinct expression between Cj_root and Pt_root (Fig. 5). As shown in Table 1, there were 14, 7, 6 and 5 DEGs distributed in the auxin, ABA, CK and JA signal transduction pathways, respectively. In the JA biosynthesis and signal transduction pathway, several key DEGs were identified, and in the root tissue, most of these DEGs were upregulated in Cj + LL_root (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 5a & Table 1, the key genes for JA biosynthesis were upregulated in Cj + LL_root and Cj_root, such as PKT (Cs9g05210), ACX (Cs6g08630) and LOX2 (orange1.1t04376). Therefore, we measured the content of JA in the root and leaf of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. As shown in Fig. 6a, the content of JA in the root and leaf of Cj + LL was much higher than that in Pt + LL. Moreover, six DEGs were identified in the JA signal transduction pathway. The expression levels of JAZs (Cs1g17210, Cs1g17220 and Cs7g02820), repressors of MYC2, in Cj + LL_root was higher than those in Pt + LL_root, while this three JAZs gene continuously be a low expression level at 6.5 < pH < 8 in Cj_root, then rapidly reached to the similar expression level (Cs1g17210 and Cs7g02820) or significantly higher (Cs1g17220) than Pt_root at pH = 9.5. However, the expression levels of COI1 (Cs7g31600) and MYC2 (orange1.1t01021) in Cj + LL_root and Cj_root were lower than those in Pt + LL_root and Pt_root at pH ≤ 8.0, and quickly rose when pH increased (Fig. 5a & Table 1). This result revealed that COI1-mediated JA signaling in the root of Cj + LL or Cj was weaker than in the root of Pt + LL or Pt under moderately alkaline stress conditions and strengthened while its exacerbated. In the auxin signal transduction pathway, the gene GH3.6 (Cs5g32030) attracted our attention due to its expression pattern in the roots of Cj and Pt. The expression of GH3.6 in the roots of Cj was approximately 150-fold higher than that in the roots of Pt under pH 6.5 and 8.0 conditions (Fig. 5c). At pH 9.5, the expression of GH3.6 was largely increased (approximately 2-fold) in the roots of Cj, but it showed little change in Pt (Fig. 5c). In previous studies[62,63], GH3.6 was shown to play an important role in auxin and JA homeostasis. In the CK signal transduction pathway, the genes were all downregulated in the roots of Cj + LL (Table 1). In the ABA biosynthesis pathway, the expression of ABA 8'-hydroxylase (Cs6g19380) in Cj + LL_root was approximately 9-fold higher than that in Pt + LL_root, and the expression of NCED1 (Cs5g14370), a key gene in ABA biosynthesis, was lower in Cj_root than in Pt_root (Table 1 & Fig. 5b). These differences may explain why the ABA content in the roots of Cj + LL was lower than that in the roots of Pt + LL (Fig. 2b). In addition, the PYR/PYL genes and ABA receptors were also downregulated in the roots of Cj + LL (Table 1).
Table 1. A list of some of the important differentially expressed genes in the root tissue between Cj + LL and Pt + LL.
Gene ID FPKM log2 Ratio
(Cj + LL_root/Pt + LL_root)Probability Gene name Pt + LL_root Cj + LL_root H+-transporting ATPase Cs6g03490 13.80 6.03 −1.20 0.83 ATPase 4 Cs5g04360 32.35 12.96 −1.32 0.86 ATPase 11 Cs5g08370 0.62 7.44 3.60 0.89 ATPase Cs2g13550 320.97 115.17 −1.48 0.89 F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit beta Cs7g14520 0.62 4.64 2.90 0.82 V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit H Cs3g25550 6.75 0.85 −2.99 0.86 V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit a Cs3g25560 12.03 5.59 −1.11 0.81 V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit a Aquaporin Cs7g25610 125.66 52.03 −1.27 0.87 Aquaporin PIP 2-1 Cs7g31410 148.77 22.09 −2.75 0.92 Aquaporin PIP 1-1 Cs6g11670 10.04 1.80 −2.48 0.87 Aquaporin PIP 2-2 Cs6g11700 14.95 5.82 −1.36 0.84 Aquaporin PIP2-1 Cs5g08710 15.09 2.82 −2.42 0.89 Aquaporin TIP2-2 Cs7g28650 447.95 51.70 −3.12 0.93 Aquaporin TIP1-1 Cs8g17900 11.52 2.95 −1.97 0.86 Aquaporin TIP1-3 Cs2g04370 4.28 20.43 2.25 0.89 Aquaporin NIP1-2 JA biosynthesis and signal transduction Cs9g05210 15.71 133.92 3.09 0.93 PKT Cs5g17880 24.23 52.72 1.12 0.86 OPR2 Cs5g17920 38.68 125.16 1.69 0.90 OPR2 Cs6g08630 13.04 48.65 1.90 0.90 ACX Cs1g17380 43.12 90.51 1.07 0.86 LOX3 orange1.1t03773 37.65 113.44 1.59 0.89 LOX2 orange1.1t04376 21.70 114.64 2.40 0.92 LOX2 orange1.1t00464 22.53 46.72 1.05 0.85 JAR1 Cs1g17210 153.01 442.86 1.53 0.89 JAZ Cs1g17220 70.18 182.71 1.38 0.88 JAZ Cs7g02820 232.46 521.60 1.17 0.87 JAZ10 Cs7g31600 31.27 17.16 −0.87 0.81 COI1 ABA biosynthesis and signal transduction Cs1g22620 6.40 32.66 2.35 0.91 ABA1 Cs6g14030 7.37 20.57 1.48 0.86 ABA2 Cs6g19380 55.00 495.16 3.17 0.94 ABA 8'-hydroxylase Cs8g19140 13.73 5.495 −1.32 0.84 HAI2 Cs9g18020 5.29 12.54 1.25 0.824 PP2C orange1.1t00478 136.22 36.88 −1.89 0.904 PYL9 orange1.1t01026 62.78 21.28 −1.56 0.894 PYR1 Cs1g19380 37.87 14.395 −1.40 0.87 SnRK2.5 Cs4g05990 0.01 2.12 7.73 0.807 SnRK2 Cs1g19910 11.745 32.3 1.46 0.87 SnRK2 Auxin signal transduction Cs4g04520 12.71 29.77 1.23 0.86 ARF7 Cs4g07020 33.15 14.08 −1.24 0.86 ARF19 Cs3g25860 27.15 11.37 −1.26 0.86 ARF5 Cs2g05440 5.55 1.43 −1.964 0.80 ARF3 Cs1g13960 18.25 67.95 1.90 0.90 IAA15 Cs9g08100 18.66 58.73 1.65 0.89 IAA22B Cs4g18240 8.77 51.10 2.54 0.91 IAA29 Cs6g07990 47.99 19.56 −1.29 0.87 AUX1 Cs1g22140 1.24 6.17 2.32 0.84 GH3.1 Cs5g32030 9.90 27.82 1.49 0.87 GH3.6 Cs4g12720 43.54 17.55 −1.31 0.87 SAUR72 Cs7g03030 29.78 13.75 −1.11 0.85 SAUR orange1.1t02550 20.21 52.50 1.38 0.87 SAUR Cs5g32500 14.39 6.51 −1.14 0.82 TIR1 Cytokinin signal transduction Cs5g32140 39.75 16.12 −1.30 0.87 AHP orange1.1t01850 60.92 15.39 −1.98 0.90 ARR-A Cs7g07940 56.70 13.82 −2.04 0.91 ARR-A Cs9g02760 16.87 6.64 −1.35 0.85 ARR-B Cs7g06180 20.05 9.22 −1.12 0.84 ARR-B Cs2g19760 10.39 3.45 −1.59 0.84 CRE1 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (lignin biosynthesis) orange1.1t02755 199.89 75.86 −1.40 0.88 CCR1 Cs7g24940 32.08 81.54 1.35 0.88 PAL4 Cs6g11940 263.56 143.15 −0.88 0.83 PAL1 Cs8g15880 16.64 5.42 −1.62 0.87 4CL orange1.1t02041 308.63 637.33 1.05 0.86 Peroxidase 15 Cs2g28110 42.09 14.10 −1.58 0.89 Peroxidase 4 orange1.1t02947 4.355 74.87 4.10 0.96 OMT1 orange1.1t03686 70.36 7.03 −3.32 0.94 OMT1 Cs1g12660 19.94 94.94 2.25 0.91 CCOAMT Cs1g22450 74.54 34.48 −1.11 0.86 CCOAMT Vitamin E biosynthesis Cs7g17560 7.80 16.06 1.04 0.82 PDS1 Cs7g15250 36.25 9.42 −1.94 0.89 G-TMT Cs9g17840 1.89 9.44 2.32 0.87 HPT1 Cs3g03920 10.38 2.98 −1.80 0.85 HPT1 Cs9g19520 1.67 18.18 3.45 0.92 HPT1 orange1.1t05352 0.71 12.25 4.11 0.93 HPT1 Glutathione metabolism Cs5g32800 416.34 1032.87 1.31 0.88 GST Cs1g02370 22.36 7.25 −1.62 0.88 GGT Cs5g03830 169.05 659.59 1.96 0.90 GPX Cs6g19310 94.55 217.63 1.20 0.87 G6PD orange1.1t02665 34.83 13.39 −1.38 0.87 GR Figure 6.
The contents of (a) JA, (b) lignin, (c) GSH, (d) MDA and (e) H2O2 in Cj + LL and Pt + LL. JA: jasmonate; GSH: glutathione; ABA: abscisic acid; IAA: indole-3-acetic acid. A single asterisk (*) represents statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), and double asterisks (**) represent highly statistically significant differences (p < 0.01). Analyzed using Student's t test.
Lignin biosynthesis may play an important role in the response to alkalinity stress
-
Many DEGs related to lignin biosynthesis were identified in the root, stem and leaf tissues of Cj + LL and Pt + LL (Tables 1 & 2). Among these DEGs, several key genes for lignin biosynthesis were all downregulated in Cj + LL_root, including CCR1 (orange1.1t02755) and 4CL (Cs8g15880), which were also verified in Cj_root and Pt_root by qRT‒PCR (Table 1 & Fig. 5d). Other DEGs displayed a mixed expression pattern (contained both upregulated and downregulated genes) and showed distinct expression patterns between Cj_root and Pt_root. (Tables 1, 2 & Fig. 5d). To further investigate the different changes in lignin in the cell wall between Cj + LL and Pt + LL, we determined the content of lignin in the root and leaf of Cj + LL and Pt + LL. As shown in Fig. 6b, the content of lignin in Cj + LL was significantly lower than that in Pt + LL in both the root and leaf tissues, which was in accordance with the results of gene expression analysis.
Table 2. List of some of the important differentially expressed genes in the stem and leaf tissues between Cj + LL and Pt + LL.
Gene ID Stem (FPKM) Leaf (FPKM) Gene
namePt + LL
_stemCj + LL
_stemlog2 Ratio
(Cj + LL_stem /
Pt + LL_stem)Probability Pt + LL
_leafCj + LL
_ leaflog2 Ratio
(Cj + LL_leaf /
Pt + LL_leaf)Probability Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis Cs1g11780 24.56 56.53 1.20 0.87 22.36 74.58 1.74 0.90 HCT Cs4g01930 − − − − 7.52 16.54 1.14 0.80 HCT Cs1g12660 − − − − 20.34 62.34 1.62 0.89 CCoAOMT Cs6g11940 − − − − 72.42 157.96 1.13 0.87 PAL Cs6g20950 8.00 0.12 −6.06 0.90 14.82 0.08 −7.53 0.96 OMT1 orange1.1t05218 6.39 24.56 1.94 0.88 − − − − OMT1 orange1.1t05354 28.11 8.83 −1.67 0.88 − − − − OMT1 Cs8g04970 27.45 9.07 −1.60 0.87 − − − − CAD orange1.1t02036 2.87 10.97 1.94 0.83 − − − − Peroxidase15 orange1.1t02041 − − − − 2.61 14.31 2.45 0.87 Peroxidase15 orange1.1t02044 − − − − 16.26 43.46 1.42 0.87 Peroxidase15 alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism Cs1g17380 15.07 45.38 1.59 0.89 − − − − LOX3 Cs2g21000 − − − − 29.49 95.15 1.69 0.90 HPL1 orange1.1t04376 26.92 11.80 −1.19 0.84 15.35 35.87 1.22 0.85 LOX2 ABA biosynthesis Cs5g14370 13.58 35.27 1.38 0.87 − − − − NCED1 Cs8g18780 − − − − 18.07 47.40 1.39 0.87 ABA 8'-hydroxylase Cs8g05940 − − − − 1.80 9.71 2.43 0.84 ABA 8'-hydroxylase Cs6g19380 − − − − 43.57 4.88 −3.16 0.93 ABA 8'-hydroxylase Plant hormone signal transduction Cs1g15830 − − − − 32.49 14.61 −1.15 0.84 IAA26 Cs1g13960 − − − − 37.59 97.30 1.37 0.88 IAA15 Cs2g17860 − − − − 6.21 16.41 1.40 0.83 CRE1 Cs3g23120 − − − − 16.03 34.30 1.10 0.84 Cyclin D3 orange1.1t01850 − − − − 13.81 46.12 1.74 0.89 ARR-A Cs5g04810 − − − − 8.04 32.93 2.03 0.89 ARR5 Cs4g15360 − − − − 6.98 17.24 1.31 0.82 PP2C Other metabolic pathways and genes involved in the response to alkalinity stress
-
The formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can disturb normal metabolism when they are produced in excess. Glutathione (GSH) is an important ROS scavenger. In this study, several DEGs of Cj + LL_root and Pt + LL_root were enriched in the glutathione metabolism pathway (Table 1 & Fig. 5e). In addition, we measured the contents of GSH, MDA and H2O2 in Cj + LL and Pt + LL. As shown in Fig. 6c, d & e, the contents of MDA and H2O2 in the root and leaf tissues of Pt + LL were significantly higher than those in the root and leaf tissues of Cj + LL, and the GSH content in the root tissue of Cj + LL was higher than that in the root tissue of Pt + LL. In addition, as shown in Table 1, for H+-transporting ATPase genes, the expression levels of most of these genes were downregulated in Cj + LL_root, and 7/10 of H+-transporting ATPase genes were downregulated in Cj_root compared with Pt_root under alkaline conditions (Fig. 5f).
Exogenous JA enhanced the tolerance of Cj to alkalinity stress
-
In our previous study[4], JA plus auxin analog treatment enhanced the tolerance of Pt seedlings to alkalinity stress, while the application of JA had little effect on improving the tolerance of Pt seedlings to alkalinity stress. In this study, we demonstrated that exogenous JA application to Cj seedlings cultured at pH 8.0 significantly reduced the contents of MDA and H2O2 in the root tissue and increased the number of LRs (Fig. 7). Notably, the content of H2O2 was significantly reduced in stem and leaf tissues, and a higher concentration of exogenous JA resulted in a lower content of H2O2 and more generation of LRs (Fig. 7a, c & d). However, the application of JA had little effect on MDA in stem and leaf tissue (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, we designed another treatment experiment using MeJA, SHAM and NAA to treat Cj seedlings at pH 8.5 (Fig. 8). After 10 weeks of culture, the growth status of the MeJA treatment group was the best, generating the largest number of LRs and had the highest photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II (Fig. 8a, b, d & e). The status of the SHAM and SHAM+NAA treatment groups were not good, and leaf yellowing and root necrosis were serious (Fig. 8a). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 8, NAA had little effect on improving the tolerance of Cj seedlings to alkalinity stress.
Figure 7.
Exogenous JA treatment of Cj seedlings with different concentrations under alkalinity stress. (a) Phenotypes of Cj seedlings; (b)−(c) contents of MDA and H2O2 in the root, stem and leaf tissues; (d) number of LRs of Cj seedlings. In this figure, the treatment groups are named 'C=concentration'. C = 0.5 indicates that the JA treatment concentration was 0.5 μM. Lowercase and capital letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) and highly statistically significant differences (p < 0.01), respectively. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.
Figure 8.
Exogenous MeJA, SHAM and NAA treatment of Cj seedlings under alkalinity stress. (a) Phenotypes of Cj seedlings; (b) Number of LRs of Cj seedlings; (c) In situ accumulation of H2O2 and anti-O2·– examined by histochemical staining with DAB and NBT in leaf tissue and the contents of MDA, H2O2 and anti-O2·– in the root, stem and leaf tissues; (d) chlorophyll fluorescence imaging; (e) Fv/Fm ratios. Lowercase and capital letters represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) and highly statistically significant differences (p < 0.01), respectively. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.
-
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Xu C, Cao J, Su M, Yan X, Yi H, et al. 2024. Comprehensive analysis provides insights into Ziyang xiangcheng (Citrus junos Sieb.) tolerance of alkalinity stress. Fruit Research 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/frures-0023-0037
Comprehensive analysis provides insights into Ziyang xiangcheng (Citrus junos Sieb.) tolerance of alkalinity stress
- Received: 03 August 2023
- Accepted: 11 October 2023
- Published online: 02 January 2024
Abstract: Alkaline soil is one of the major problems affecting the development of the citrus industry. Ziyang xiangcheng (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) (Cj) is an alkalinity stress-tolerant citrus rootstock. In this study, two citrus rootstocks (Cj and Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.) (Pt)) and one navel orange scion ('Lane Late' navel orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.) (LL)) were used. The root, stem and leaf tissues of grafted materials Cj + LL and Pt + LL grown in calcareous soil were used to identify genes and pathways that are responsive to alkalinity stress using comparative transcriptomics. Seedlings of Cj and Pt cultured in nutrient solutions at three pH grades were used to perform a supplemental experiment. A comprehensive analysis of the RNA-seq data, physiology, biochemistry, agronomic traits and mineral elements of the Cj + LL, Pt + LL, Cj and Pt materials revealed several candidate pathways and genes that were highly regulated under alkalinity stress. The data suggest that the jasmonate pathway may play crucial roles in tolerance to alkalinity stress in Cj by interacting with other plant hormones, lignin biosynthesis and the ROS scavenging system. These results provide new clues for future investigations of the mechanisms underlying the tolerance of citrus to alkalinity stress.
-
Key words:
- Citrus rootstock /
- Alkalinity stress /
- Jasmonic acid /
- Transcriptome /
- Lignin