-
In this study, V. adenoclada and 'Shine Muscat' were clearly differentiated through phylogeny, admixture, and PCA analysis. Seven 'Muscat' individuals exhibited a single ancestral component in admixture analysis, while V. adenoclada manifested two main ancestries, which suggested the different sources of the V. adenoclada distributed in different regions. Three ADE individuals collected from Guangdong Province showed a mix of two ancestries, indicating that there might be gene flow of V. adenoclada in Guangxi and Guangdong Province, China. Besides, relative to the wild ADE_B population in Guangxi Province, the higher IBD score within the ADE_A group reflected the lower genetic diversity and closer kinship of these individuals. Combining genetic structure and kinship analysis, the HYB1 individual can be confirmed to be a progeny from the hybridization of V. adenoclada and 'Shine Muscat'.
Divergence of selection signal within V. adenoclada and Shine Muscat
-
The present analysis showed that there were many more loci under selection in 'Shine Muscat' compared with V. adenoclada individuals. At the same time, a lower number of SNPs was detected in 'Shine Muscat' (Table 1), which echoed such a result and suggested that many SNPs within the selected regions might be swept. This substantial difference in the number of selected loci between the two groups suggested the artificial selection and the breeding efforts applied to the cultivated 'Shine Muscat' and its parents[41].
Table 1. Quality and SNPs statistics of all 28 resequenced accessions.
Sample Total base (bp) Depth Mapping rate SNP number ADE1 17,520,817,445 35.40 97.32% 5,626,462 ADE2 24,257,947,082 49.02 88.66% 5,679,994 ADE3 18,328,442,529 37.04 80.59% 5,676,095 ADE4 21,011,413,063 42.46 94.82% 5,689,913 ADE5 22,031,567,287 44.52 97.23% 5,691,839 ADE6 24,068,277,235 48.64 96.30% 5,695,943 ADE7 23,436,537,148 47.36 96.31% 5,696,589 ADE8 21,950,203,360 44.36 96.11% 5,669,703 ADE9 22,002,259,768 44.46 96.97% 5,703,161 ADE10 22,309,202,148 45.08 96.37% 5,700,374 ADE11 22,049,567,098 44.56 96.66% 5,680,656 ADE12 27,580,752,978 55.73 97.70% 5,651,025 ADE13 22,064,551,844 44.59 97.65% 5,643,197 ADE14 24,850,211,192 50.22 97.83% 5,581,868 ADE15 22,814,344,130 46.10 97.74% 5,451,046 ADE16 23,240,185,342 46.96 97.54% 5,448,929 ADE17 19,291,800,581 38.98 98.07% 5,479,083 ADE18 19,298,624,750 39.00 97.67% 5,463,166 ADE19 20,634,991,493 41.70 97.95% 5,451,605 ADE20 20,619,496,304 41.67 98.06% 5,476,361 HYB1 19,995,439,567 40.41 94.71% 6,140,779 MUS1 20,104,866,097 40.63 97.08% 4,059,284 MUS2 31,473,565,455 63.60 98.29% 3,919,498 MUS3 32,273,677,414 65.22 98.88% 3,832,869 MUS4 35,479,482,412 71.69 98.91% 3,771,105 MUS5 35,076,902,316 70.88 97.71% 3,973,151 MUS6 36,508,316,389 73.77 98.92% 3,749,505 MUS7 7,963,746,000 16.09 98.68% 3,956,697 Corresponding to the selected situation around the whole genome, more selected genes related to disease resistance in 'Shine Muscat' were detected than in V. adenoclada. There are several specific resistance genes with distinct functions respectively in these two groups, which suggests their disparity with regard to the defense response. Besides, several genes associated with the pathway, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, were specifically enriched in V. adenoclada. In light of the divergence exhibited in V. adenoclada and Shine Muscat, it is possible for the hybrid offspring to inherit the premium elements of each parent and become a new cultivar integrating the high resistance and good quality.
The accumulation of the deleterious mutation
-
Deleterious mutations could cause changes or loss of genetic functions, thereby potentially affecting the adaptation of the organism[19]. Genes have been detected with potentially deleterious mutations in both the ADE and the MUS groups, many of which were enriched in the same biological processes or molecular functions. This suggests a common impact of these mutations on the fitness of all grapes. The wild species V. adenoclada was found to consist of more deleterious mutations, both in the form of heterozygous alleles and homozygous alleles, than the 'Shine Muscat'. Some studies indicated that during the constant breeding period, many deleterious mutations with large effects would be purged by negative selection due to the exposure of recessive deleterious mutations when inbreeding[42]. In this case, cultivated 'Shine Muscat' individuals might have undergone the same process, though the wild ancestors of this cultivar need further consideration in future studies. The present study also investigated the accumulation of deleterious mutations in the hybrid offspring HYB1 and discovered that most of the deleterious variations were embedded in the heterozygous alleles. This phenomenon was consistent with a study about walnut cultivar improvement, which pointed out that during breeding, the deleterious mutations were converted from homozygous format to heterozygous format[43]. Some studies revealed an accumulation of moderately deleterious burden in the context of modern crop breeding, and showed that slightly deleterious mutations were more likely to continue to exist in the form of heterozygosity[18,42]. Combined with the current context of high heterozygosity in the hybrid offspring, it suggests that in the future, it will be necessary to figure out a way to target such deleterious mutations that are hidden within the heterozygous alleles and are detrimental to fitness, and eliminate them using modern molecular methods.
-
The raw data that support the findings of this study are available in the NCBI repository. Raw data of accessions ADE1−ADE20, MUS1, and HYB1 that are newly sequenced in this study are stored under the BioProject of PRJNA1082482; Raw data of the accessions MUS2-MUS6 downloaded from the NCBI were in the number of DRR186531, DRR186532, DRR186533, DRR186535, DRR385775, respectively; and raw data of the MUS7 accession are not yet publicly available due to its source from the project under study. All necessary figures and tables generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information file.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Peng W, Liang F, Chen Z, Gong Z, Zhang M, et al. 2024. Genomic signals of divergence and hybridization between a wild grape (Vitis adenoclada) and domesticated grape ('Shine Muscat'). Fruit Research 4: e028 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0022
Genomic signals of divergence and hybridization between a wild grape (Vitis adenoclada) and domesticated grape ('Shine Muscat')
- Received: 04 March 2024
- Revised: 15 April 2024
- Accepted: 27 May 2024
- Published online: 05 August 2024
Abstract: Interspecific hybridization in Vitis holds immense potential for combining valuable adaptive traits and breeding superior cultivar development. To evaluate the feasibility of hybrid breeding using the resilient wild species Vitis adenoclada and the commercially successful cultivar V. vinifera 'Shine Muscat', their signatures of hybridization, genetic divergence, and divergent selection were investigated. Analyses of 28 resequencing genomes revealed pronounced genetic differentiation between these two lineages and corroborated the hybridization event within a derived progeny. Notably, 'Shine Muscat' exhibited stronger genome-wide selection signals, reflecting its intensive breeding history. While divergent selection signatures associated with disease resistance were evident in both species, V. adenoclada displayed enrichment in pathways linked to abiotic stress resistance. Furthermore, while 'Shine Muscat' displayed potentially mitigated deleterious mutations compared to V. adenoclada, their hybrid offspring exhibited an accumulation of heterozygous deleterious alleles, emphasizing the crucial need for monitoring such mutations in future breeding endeavors. Collectively, the findings unveil the significant genetic divergence and contrasting adaptations between V. adenoclada and 'Shine Muscat', highlighting their immense potential for breeding next-generation cultivars with enhanced resilience and superior quality.
-
Key words:
- Vitis adenoclada /
- 'Shine Muscat' /
- Hybridization /
- Genetic divergence /
- Genetic load