Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production

More Information
  • Received: 05 April 2024
    Revised: 03 September 2024
    Accepted: 26 September 2024
    Published online: 09 January 2025
    Fruit Research  5 Article number: e004 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Nanotechnology has been widely applied in the field of agriculture to meet the requirements of green agricultural development. In agricultural production applications, nanomaterials have been applied as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and nano-sensors. This article provides a detailed review of recent agricultural applications of nanomaterials. It will also focus on specific agricultural applications, such as transgenics, product preservation, stress resistance, and growth and development. Finally, the challenges of applying nanomaterials for agricultural research are summarized, and solutions are proposed to promote the safe and efficient utilization of nanomaterials in agricultural production to achieve sustainable agricultural development.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Obuseng VC, Moshoeshoe MN, Nareetsile FM, Kwaambwa H, Maina I. 2022. Plant biomass as potential economic commodities for agricultural purposes. Frontiers in Chemistry 10:806772

    doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.806772

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li W, Xu W, Zhang S, Li J, Zhou J, et al. 2022. Supramolecular biopharmaceutical carriers based on host-guest interactions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14:12746−59

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04822

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang Y, Zafar N, Ali Q, Manghwar H, Wang G, et al. 2022. CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies for plant improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses: advances, limitations, and future perspectives. Cells 11:3928

    doi: 10.3390/cells11233928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Zhu Y, Xu F, Liu Q, Chen M, Liu X, et al. 2019. Nanomaterials and plants: positive effects, toxicity and the remediation of metal and metalloid pollution in soil. Science of The Total Environment 662:414−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Sharma S, Rana VS, Pawar R, Lakra J, Racchapannavar V. 2021. Nanofertilizers for sustainable fruit production: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 19:1693−714

    doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-01125-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Bhardwaj B, Singh P, Kumar A, Kumar S, Budhwar V. 2020. Eco-friendly greener synthesis of nanoparticles. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 10:566−76

    doi: 10.34172/apb.2020.067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Cheng J, Lin X, Wu X, Liu Q, Wan S, et al. 2021. Preparation of a multifunctional silver nanoparticles polylactic acid food packaging film using mango peel extract. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 188:678−88

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.161

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ramadan MA, Shawkey AE, Rabeh MA, Abdellatif AO. 2020. Promising antimicrobial activities of oil and silver nanoparticles obtained from Melaleuca alternifolia leaves against selected skin-infecting pathogens. Journal of Herbal Medicine 20:100289

    doi: 10.1016/j.hermed.2019.100289

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Dalir SJB, Djahaniani H, Nabati F, Hekmati M. 2020. Characterization and the evaluation of antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized from Carya illinoinensis leaf extract. Heliyon 6:e03624

    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03624

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Soni N, Dhiman RC. 2017. Phytochemical, anti-oxidant, larvicidal, and antimicrobial activities of castor (Ricinus communis) synthesized silver nanoparticles. Chinese Herbal Medicines 9:289−94

    doi: 10.1016/S1674-6384(17)60106-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Sengupta A, Sarkar A. 2022. Synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles from neem leaves and banana peels: a green prospect for dye degradation in wastewater. Ecotoxicology 31:537−48

    doi: 10.1007/s10646-021-02414-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Moale C, Ghiurea M, Sîrbu CE, Somoghi R, Cioroianu TM, et al. 2021. Effects of siliceous natural nanomaterials applied in combination with foliar fertilizers on physiology, yield and fruit quality of the apricot and peach trees. Plants 10:2395

    doi: 10.3390/plants10112395

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhang H, Li C, Wei K, Liu M, Shi Y, et al. 2023. The reduction of tea quality caused by irrational phosphate application is associated with anthocyanin metabolism. Beverage Plant Research 3:10

    doi: 10.48130/BPR-2023-0010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Abdelmigid HM, Morsi MM, Hussien NA, Alyamani AA, Alhuthal NA, et al. 2022. Green synthesis of phosphorous-containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHAP) as a novel nano-fertilizer: preliminary assessment on pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Nanomaterials 12:1527

    doi: 10.3390/nano12091527

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Montaño-Herrera A, Santiago-Saenz YO, López-Palestina CU, Cadenas-Pliego G, Pinedo-Guerrero ZH, et al. 2022. Effects of edaphic fertilization and foliar application of Se and Zn nanoparticles on yield and bioactive compounds in Malus domestica L. Horticulturae 8:542

    doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8060542

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Shi S, Wang W, Liu L, Wu S, Wei Y, et al. 2013. Effect of chitosan/nano-silica coating on the physicochemical characteristics of longan fruit under ambient temperature. Journal of Food Engineering 118:125−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.03.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hu Q, Fang Y, Yang Y, Ma N, Zhao L. 2011. Effect of nanocomposite-based packaging on postharvest quality of ethylene-treated kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) during cold storage. Food Research International 44:1589−96

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Shahbaz M, Fatima N, Mashwani ZUR, Akram A, Haq EU, et al. 2022. Effect of phytosynthesized selenium and cerium oxide nanoparticles on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against stripe rust disease. Molecules 27:8149

    doi: 10.3390/molecules27238149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Abdallah Y, Ogunyemi SO, Abdelazez A, Zhang M, Hong X, et al. 2019. The green synthesis of MgO nano-flowers using Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Rosemary) and the antibacterial activities against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Biomed Research International 51:5752−56

    doi: 10.1155/2019/5620989

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Shah T, Latif S, Saeed F, Ali I, Ullah S, et al. 2021. Seed priming with titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhances seed vigor, leaf water status, and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress. Journal of King Saud University - Science 33:101207

    doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.10.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Baz H, Creech M, Chen J, Gong H, Bradford K, et al. 2020. Water-soluble carbon nanoparticles improve seed germination and post-germination growth of lettuce under salinity stress. Agronomy 10:1192

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P. 2017. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Scientific Reports 7:8263

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Esser B, Schnorr JM, Swager TM. 2012. Selective detection of ethylene gas using carbon nanotube-based devices: utility in determination of fruit ripeness. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition) 51:5752−56

    doi: 10.1002/anie.201201042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Lew TTS, Park M, Cui J, Strano MS. 2021. Plant nanobionic sensors for arsenic detection. Advanced Materials 33:2005683

    doi: 10.1002/adma.202005683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Trang NLN, Nga DTN, Hoang VT, Ngo XD, Nhung PT, et al. 2022. Bio-AgNPs-based electrochemical nanosensors for the sensitive determination of 4-nitrophenol in tomato samples: the roles of natural plant extracts in physicochemical parameters and sensing performance. RSC Advances 12:6007−17

    doi: 10.1039/D1RA09202B

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Xing Y, Yang H, Guo X, Bi X, Liu X, et al. 2020. Effect of chitosan/nano-TiO2 composite coatings on the postharvest quality and physicochemical characteristics of mango fruits. Scientia Horticulturae 263:109135

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Tian F, Chen W, Wu C, Kou X, Fan G, et al. 2019. Preservation of Ginkgo biloba seeds by coating with chitosan/nano-TiO2 and chitosan/nano-SiO2 films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 126:917−25

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Eldib R. 2020. Application of nano-coating and chitosan combination films on cantaloupe preservation. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 23:1037−43

    doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2020.1037.1043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Xin Y, Chen F, Lai S, Yang H. 2017. Influence of chitosan-based coatings on the physicochemical properties and pectin nanostructure of Chinese cherry. Postharvest Biology and Technology 133:64−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.06.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Sun T, Hao W, Li J, Dong Z, Wu C. 2015. Preservation properties of in situ modified CaCO3-chitosan composite coatings. Food Chemistry 183:217−26

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xiao J, Gu C, Zhu D, Huang Y, Luo Y, et al. 2021. Development and characterization of an edible chitosan/zein-cinnamaldehyde nano-cellulose composite film and its effects on mango quality during storage. LWT 140:110809

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110809

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wang Y, Zhang J, Wang D, Wang X, Zhang F, et al. 2023. Effects of cellulose nanofibrils treatment on antioxidant properties and aroma of fresh-cut apples. Food Chemistry 415:135797

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135797

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Oprea I, Fărcaș AC, Leopold LF, Diaconeasa Z, Coman C, et al. 2022. Nano-encapsulation of citrus essential oils: methods and applications of interest for the food sector. Polymers 14:4505

    doi: 10.3390/polym14214505

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wei H, Seidi F, Zhang T, Jin Y, Xiao H. 2021. Ethylene scavengers for the preservation of fruits and vegetables: a review. Food Chemistry 337:127750

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127750

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhai R, Chen G, Liu G, Huang X, Xu X, et al. 2022. Enzyme inhibition methods based on Au nanomaterials for rapid detection of organophosphorus pesticides in agricultural and environmental samples: a review. Journal of Advanced Research 37:61−74

    doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Zhang J, Wu C, Yuan R, Huang J, Yang X. 2022. Gap controlled self-assembly Au@Ag@Au NPs for SERS assay of thiram. Food Chemistry 390:133164

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Su D, Li H, Yan X, Lin Y, Lu G. 2021. Biosensors based on fluorescence carbon nanomaterials for detection of pesticides. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 134:116126

    doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116126

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Zhou JW, Zou XM, Song SH, Chen GH. 2018. Quantum dots applied to methodology on detection of pesticide and veterinary drug residues. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:1307−19

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang J, Wang X, Wang M, Bian Q, Zhong J. 2022. Novel Ce-based coordination polymer nanoparticles with excellent oxidase mimic activity applied for colorimetric assay to organophosphorus pesticides. Food Chemistry 397:133810

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133810

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Xu Y, Wang H, Li X, Zeng X, Du Z, et al. 2021. Metal-organic framework for the extraction and detection of pesticides from food commodities. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 20:1009−35

    doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12675

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Danish M, Shahid M, Ahamad L, Raees K, Hatamleh AA, et al. 2022. Nano-pesticidal potential of Cassia fistula (L.) leaf synthesized silver nanoparticles (Ag@CfL-NPs): deciphering the phytopathogenic inhibition and growth augmentation in Solanum lycopersicum (L.). Frontiers in Microbiology 13:985852

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.985852

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Pascoli M, Jacques MT, Agarrayua DA, Avila DS, Lima R, et al. 2019. Neem oil based nanopesticide as an environmentally-friendly formulation for applications in sustainable agriculture: an ecotoxicological perspective. Science of The Total Environment 677:57−67

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.345

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Muda MS, Kamari A, Abu Bakar S, Yusoff SNM, Fatimah I, et al. 2020. Chitosan-graphene oxide nanocomposites as water-solubilising agents for rotenone pesticide. Journal of Molecular Liquids 318:114066

    doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Yusoff SNM, Kamari A. 2018. N-deoxycholic acid-O-glycol chitosan as a potential carrier agent for botanical pesticide rotenone. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 135:46855

    doi: 10.1002/app.46855

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Sun X, Chen J, Fan W, Liu S, Kamruzzaman M. 2022. Production of reactive oxygen species via nanobubble water improves radish seed water absorption and the expression of aquaporin genes. Langmuir 38:11724−31

    doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01860

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Zaka M, Abbasi BH, Rahman LU, Shah A, Zia M. 2016. Synthesis and characterisation of metal nanoparticles and their effects on seed germination and seedling growth in commercially important Eruca sativa. IET Nanobiotechnology 10:134−40

    doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Ngo QB, Dao TH, Nguyen HC, Tran XT, Van Nguyen T, et al. 2014. Effects of nanocrystalline powders (Fe, Co and Cu) on the germination, growth, crop yield and product quality of soybean (Vietnamese species DT-51). Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 5:015016

    doi: 10.1088/2043-6262/5/1/015016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Iram F, Iqbal MS, Athar MM, Saeed MZ, Yasmeen A, et al. 2014. Glucoxylan-mediated green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles and their phyto-toxicity study. Carbohydrate Polymers 104:29−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Xu X, Shen R, Mo L, Yang X, Chen X, et al. 2022. Improving plant photosynthesis through light-harvesting upconversion nanoparticles. ACS Nano 16:18027−37

    doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c02162

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Priyanka N, Geetha N, Manish T, Sahi SV, Venkatachalam P. 2021. Zinc oxide nanocatalyst mediates cadmium and lead toxicity tolerance mechanism by differential regulation of photosynthetic machinery and antioxidant enzymes level in cotton seedlings. Toxicology Reports 8:295−302

    doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.01.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Skiba E, Pietrzak M, Glińska S, Wolf WM. 2021. The combined effect of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on Pisum sativum L.: a photosynthesis and nutrients uptake study. Cells 10:3105

    doi: 10.3390/cells10113105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Jing X, Liu Y, Liu X, Zhang Y, Wang G, et al. 2024. Enhanced photosynthetic efficiency by nitrogen-doped carbon dots via plastoquinone-involved electron transfer in apple. Horticulture Research 11:uhae016

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Jiménez-Rosado M, Perez-Puyana V, Guerrero A, Romero A. 2022. Micronutrient-controlled-release protein-based systems for horticulture: micro vs. nanoparticles. Industrial Crops and Products 185:115128

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    El-Badri AMA, Batool M, Mohamed IAA, Khatab A, Sherif A, et al. 2021. Modulation of salinity impact on early seedling stage via nano-priming application of zinc oxide on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 166:376−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Davarpanah S, Tehranifar A, Abadía J, Val J, Davarynejad G, et al. 2018. Foliar calcium fertilization reduces fruit cracking in pomegranate (Punica granatum cv. Ardestani). Scientia Horticulturae 230:86−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.11.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Chen L, Huang J, Chen J, Shi Q, Chen T, et al. 2022. Halloysite nanotube-based pesticide formulations with enhanced rain erosion resistance, foliar adhesion, and insecticidal effect. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14:41605−17

    doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c11234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Yang CY, Powell CA, Duan YP, Zhang MQ. 2016. Characterization and antibacterial activity of oil-in-water nano-emulsion formulation against Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Plant Disease 100:2448−54

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0600-RE

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Yadav J, Jasrotia P, Kashyap PL, Bhardwaj AK, Kumar S, et al. 2022. Nanopesticides: current status and scope for their application in agriculture. Plant Protection Science 58:1−17

    doi: 10.17221/102/2020-PPS

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Wang D, Saleh NB, Byro A, Zepp R, Sahle-Demessie E, et al. 2022. Nano-enabled pesticides for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Nature Nanotechnology 17:347−60

    doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01082-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Azmat A, Tanveer Y, Yasmin H, Hasan MN, Shahzad A, et al. 2022. Coactive role of zinc oxide nanoparticles and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for mitigation of synchronized effects of heat and drought stress in wheat plants. Chemosphere 297:133982

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Alabdallah NM, Hasan MM, Hammami I, Alghamdi AI, Alshehri D, et al. 2021. Green synthesized metal oxide nanoparticles mediate growth regulation and physiology of crop plants under drought stress. Plants 10:1730

    doi: 10.3390/plants10081730

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Rezaei Cherati S, Shanmugam S, Pandey K, Khodakovskaya MV. 2021. Whole-transcriptome responses to environmental stresses in agricultural crops treated with carbon-based nanomaterials. ACS Applied Bio Materials 4:4292−301

    doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Kolenčík M, Ernst D, Komár M, Urík M, Šebesta M, et al. 2022. Effects of foliar application of ZnO nanoparticles on lentil production, stress level and nutritional seed quality under field conditions. Nanomaterials 12:310

    doi: 10.3390/nano12030310

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Li D, Li L, Luo Z, Lu H, Yue Y. 2017. Effect of nano-ZnO-packaging on chilling tolerance and pectin metabolism of peaches during cold storage. Scientia Horticulturae 225:128−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Maryan KE, Lahiji HS, Farrokhi N, Haynes PA, Hamzelou S, et al. 2021. Comparative leaf proteomics of Brassica napus genotypes with distinctive levels of early cold acclimation. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 39:317−34

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-020-01249-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Hossain MA, Ahammed GJ, Kolbert Z, El-Ramady H, Islam T, et al. 2022. Selenium and nano-selenium in environmental stress management and crop quality improvement. Cham: Springer. xiii, 458 pp. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-07063-1

    [67]

    Mohammadi R, Maali-Amiri R, Abbasi A. 2013. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on chickpea response to cold stress. Biological Trace Element Research 152:403−10

    doi: 10.1007/s12011-013-9631-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Chen Z, Wang Q. 2021. Graphene ameliorates saline-alkaline stress-induced damage and improves growth and tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 163:128−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.03.039

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    An J, Hu P, Li F, Wu H, Shen Y, et al. 2020. Emerging investigator series: molecular mechanisms of plant salinity stress tolerance improvement by seed priming with cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environmental Science: Nano 7:2214−28

    doi: 10.1039/D0EN00387E

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Ding L, Li J, Liu W, Zuo Q, Liang S. 2017. Influence of nano-hydroxyapatite on the metal bioavailability, plant metal accumulation and root exudates of ryegrass for phytoremediation in lead-polluted soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14:532

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Wang H, Zhang M, Li H. 2019. Synthesis of nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) supported on biochar for chromium remediation from aqueous solution and soil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16:4430

    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224430

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Song P, Ma W, Gao X, Ai S, Wang J, et al. 2022. Remediation mechanism of Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb contaminated soil by biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron and its impact on soil enzyme activity. Journal of Cleaner Production 378:134510

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    da Silva Carneiro JS, da Costa Leite DA, de Castro GM, Franca JR, Botelho L, et al. 2022. Biochar-graphene oxide composite is efficient to adsorb and deliver copper and zinc in tropical soil. Journal of Cleaner Production 360:132170

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132170

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. 2007. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nature Nanotechnology 2:577−83

    doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.260

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Liu J, Gu J, Hu J, Ma H, Tao Y, et al. 2023. Use of Mn3O4 nanozyme to improve cotton salt tolerance. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1935−37

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14145

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Khan MN, Li Y, Khan Z, Chen L, Liu J, et al. 2021. Nanoceria seed priming enhanced salt tolerance in rapeseed through modulating ROS homeostasis and α-amylase activities. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 19:276

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01026-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Gong J, Liu Q, Cai L, Yang Q, Tong Y, et al. 2023. Multimechanism collaborative superior antioxidant CDzymes To alleviate salt stress-induced oxidative damage in plant growth. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 11:4237−47

    doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07371

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Yan X, Chen S, Pan Z, Zhao W, Rui Y, et al. 2023. AgNPs-triggered seed metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming enhanced rice salt tolerance and blast resistance. ACS Nano 17:492−504

    doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c09181

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Sun G, Dong Z, Li G, Yuan H, Liu J, et al. 2023. Mn3O4 nanoparticles alleviate ROS-inhibited root apex mitosis activities to improve maize drought tolerance. Advanced Biology 7:2200317

    doi: 10.1002/adbi.202200317

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Zhao D, Fang Z, Tang Y, Tao J. 2020. Graphene oxide as an effective soil water retention agent can confer drought stress tolerance to Paeonia ostii without toxicity. Environmental Science & Technology 54:8269−79

    doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Martin Palmqvist NG, Seisenbaeva GA, Svedlindh P, Kessler VG. 2017. Maghemite nanoparticles acts as nanozymes, improving growth and abiotic stress tolerance in Brassica napus. Nanoscale Research Letters 12:631

    doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2404-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Gong X, Huang D, Liu Y, Zeng G, Wang R, et al. 2019. Roles of multiwall carbon nanotubes in phytoremediation: cadmium uptake and oxidative burst in Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaudich. Environmental Science: Nano 6:851−62

    doi: 10.1039/C8EN00723C

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Tai F, Wang S, Liang B, Li Y, Wu J, et al. 2022. Quaternary ammonium iminofullerenes improve root growth of oxidative-stress maize through ASA-GSH cycle modulating redox homeostasis of roots and ROS-mediated root-hair elongation. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 20:15

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01222-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Roger LM, Russo JA, Jinkerson RE, Giraldo JP, Lewinski NA. 2022. Engineered nanoceria alleviates thermally induced oxidative stress in free-living Breviolum minutum (Symbiodiniaceae, formerly Clade B). Frontiers in Marine Science 9:960173

    doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.960173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Liu J, Wang F, Wang L, Xiao S, Tong C, et al. 2008. Preparation of fluorescence starch-nanoparticle and its application as plant transgenic vehicle. Journal of Central South University of Technology 15:768−73

    doi: 10.1007/s11771-008-0142-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Zhao X, Meng Z, Wang Y, Chen W, Sun C, et al. 2017. Pollen magnetofection for genetic modification with magnetic nanoparticles as gene carriers. Nature Plants 3:956−64

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0063-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Martin-Ortigosa S, Valenstein JS, Lin VSY, Trewyn BG, Wang K. 2012. Gold functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticle mediated protein and DNA codelivery to plant cells via the biolistic method. Advanced Functional Materials 22:3576−82

    doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Demirer GS, Zhang H, Goh NS, González-Grandío E, Landry MP. 2019. Carbon nanotube–mediated DNA delivery without transgene integration in intact plants. Nature Protocols 14:2954−71

    doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0208-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Zhang H, Cao Y, Xu D, Goh NS, Demirer GS, et al. 2021. Gold-nanocluster-mediated delivery of siRNA to intact plant cells for efficient gene knockdown. Nano Letters 21:5859−66

    doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01792

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Liu Y, Yang F, Jing X, Liu X, Wang G, et al. 2023. A biomimetic nanoparticle for pDNA delivery and expression in plant cells in a pH-dependent manner. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology 3:631−41

    doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Li S, Li J, Du M, Deng G, Song Z, Han H. 2022. Efficient gene silencing in intact plant cells using siRNA delivered by functional graphene oxide nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition) 61:e202210014

    doi: 10.1002/anie.202210014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zhang H, Zhang H, Demirer GS, González-Grandío E, Fan C, et al. 2020. Engineering DNA nanostructures for siRNA delivery in plants. Nature Protocols 15:3064−87

    doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0370-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Chang FP, Kuang LY, Huang CA, Jane WN, Hung Y, et al. 2013. A simple plant gene delivery system using mesoporous silica nanoparticles as carriers. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 1:5279−87

    doi: 10.1039/c3tb20529k

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Vijayakumar PS, Abhilash OU, Khan BM, Prasad BLV. 2010. Nanogold-loaded sharp-edged carbon bullets as plant-gene carriers. Advanced Functional Materials 20:2416−23

    doi: 10.1002/adfm.200901883

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY, Wang K. 2007. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nature Nanotechnology 2:295−300

    doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Hao Y, Yang X, Shi Y, Song S, Xing J, et al. 2013. Magnetic gold nanoparticles as a vehicle for fluorescein isothiocyanate and DNA delivery into plant cells. Botany 91:457−66

    doi: 10.1139/cjb-2012-0281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zheng D, Zhang T, Li X, et al. 2022. Efficient and genotype independent maize transformation using pollen transfected by DNA-coated magnetic. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:1145−56

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13263

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang Y, Lv S, Wang H, Tu M, Xi Z, et al. 2025. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production. Fruit Research 5: e004 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0037
    Zhang Y, Lv S, Wang H, Tu M, Xi Z, et al. 2025. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production. Fruit Research 5: e004 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0037

Figures(1)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(30) PDF downloads(7)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production

Fruit Research  5 Article number: e004  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Nanotechnology has been widely applied in the field of agriculture to meet the requirements of green agricultural development. In agricultural production applications, nanomaterials have been applied as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and nano-sensors. This article provides a detailed review of recent agricultural applications of nanomaterials. It will also focus on specific agricultural applications, such as transgenics, product preservation, stress resistance, and growth and development. Finally, the challenges of applying nanomaterials for agricultural research are summarized, and solutions are proposed to promote the safe and efficient utilization of nanomaterials in agricultural production to achieve sustainable agricultural development.

    • As the global population is projected to surge to 9 billion by 2050, the demand for food will escalate alongside rising living standards[1]. This impending milestone necessitates a significant boost in the productivity of staple crops. However, the quest for enhanced crop yield and quality is beset by challenges such as biotic and abiotic stresses. These include the intensification of insect activity due to climate change, water scarcity, diminishing arable land, and soil contamination, all of which impede agricultural productivity. While conventional fertilizers and pesticides have addressed certain agricultural issues, their efficacy is often hindered by limited penetration, solubility, and utilization rates. Moreover, their use can lead to detrimental effects on human health, environmental integrity, and the balance of agricultural ecosystems[2]. Hence, the innovation of efficient, stable, and eco-friendly agrochemicals is imperative to enhance the efficacy and safety of active ingredients in pesticides. The cultivation of superior crop varieties is increasingly vital to fundamentally enhance agricultural output and quality. Traditional breeding methods such as hybridization, mutation breeding, and transgenic breeding are time-consuming and often fall short of desired outcomes[3]. There is an urgent need for innovative technologies that can expedite the breeding process and improve the efficiency of genetic modifications. These advancements are essential for bolstering plant growth, fortifying resistance to environmental stresses, and safeguarding global food security. Citrus fruits, peaches, strawberries, bananas, and other cash crops tend to spoil quickly during the distribution process from farms to households. This is a major cause of global food waste and results in significant economic losses. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop more sustainable and eco-friendly packaging materials and methods to extend the shelf life of perishable food products.

      Nanotechnology, with its ability to transcend the limitations of conventional materials, offers a novel paradigm in materials science. Nano-agriculture represents a cutting-edge research area within modern agriculture. Despite being in its nascent stages, it has already shown remarkable potential. Nanomaterials can stimulate plant growth, enhance nutrient uptake, invigorate metabolic processes, and bolster plants' resilience to various stresses, all while preserving their inherent agronomic characteristics[4]. Nanomaterials can adsorb harmful substances and microorganisms on the surface of fruits, thereby extending their shelf life. In addition, nanomaterials can also act as carriers to effectively deliver preservatives into the interior of fruits, maintaining their nutritional content and quality. Moreover, they can mitigate the adverse environmental and health impacts of traditional agrochemicals[5], serving as eco-friendly soil amendments, agricultural product packaging, and biosensors. Their potential to increase crop yield and quality is substantial. Nanomaterials also support plant transgenic technologies, tackling issues related to stress resistance, growth, and development, and playing a pivotal role in food security and sustainable agricultural practices. They contribute significantly to alleviating the global energy crisis (Fig. 1). Consequently, nanotechnology holds the key to fostering green agricultural development, driving technological advancements in agricultural inputs, enhancing the quality and efficiency of agricultural product processing, optimizing the utilization of biomass resources, and achieving sustainable agricultural growth.

      Figure 1. 

      Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production.

    • The synthesis of nanomaterials can be achieved through a variety of approaches, broadly categorized into physical, chemical, and green synthesis methods. Among these, green synthesis methods have garnered significant attention due to their simplicity, efficiency, and the absence of toxic by-products, making them particularly appealing in sectors such as medicine, environmental remediation, and agriculture[6]. These innovative methods surpass the constraints of traditional synthesis techniques, facilitating the production of a diverse array of complex nanomaterials that are more readily accessible. Nanomaterials can be engineered to form a spectrum of functional structures through chemical and physical interactions, primarily leveraging microbial and plant systems.

      The use of plant extracts for nanomaterial synthesis is particularly eco-friendly and cost-effective, making it a favored method for agricultural applications. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), for instance, are typically synthesized through laser ablation, chemical reduction, photochemistry, and sonochemistry, yet many conventional methods are not only costly but also ecologically harmful. Plant extracts offer a green and economical alternative, serving as reducing and stabilizing agents in the preparation of AgNPs. A case in point is the work by Cheng et al.[7] , who utilized mango peel extract to synthesize AgNPs and subsequently developed a multifunctional nanosilver polylactic acid membrane. The incorporation of AgNPs enhanced the membrane's mechanical properties and its barrier capabilities against water vapor and oxygen. This innovative preservation film demonstrated exceptional antibacterial activity, with inhibition rates surpassing 95% against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Moreover, in terms of safety, the silver migration and cytotoxicity levels comply with established standards, effectively extending the shelf life of strawberries. The scientific and high-value applications of agricultural waste are further exemplified by the use of Melaleuca alternifolia leaves[8], Carya illinoinensis leaf[9], castor[10], and banana peel[11], showcasing the potential of these materials in advancing sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices.

    • There are many applications of nanomaterials in plants, such as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and biosensors, which have addressed many issues related to transgenics, fruit preservation, stress resistance, and growth and development, as shown in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Applications of different nanoproducts in agricultural production.

      Nanoproduct Nanoparticles Synthesis method Target Function Ref.
      Nano-fertilizer Siliceous natural nanomaterials (SNNMs) Traditional method Peach and apricot Improve nutrient utilization efficiency, enhance light and efficiency, protect plants from high temperatures, drought, and biological stress, and improve fruit quality. [12]
      Nano-fertilizer Ca-encapsulated carbon dots (Ca-CDs) Traditional method Apple Supplement calcium and mitigate calcium-deficiency stress, boost calcium levels in apple fruits and improve quality attributes such as weight, firmness, and pectin content. [13]
      Nano-fertilizer Phosphorous-Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAP) Green synthesis (pomegranate peel and coffee ground extracts) Pomegranate Provide phosphorus nutrient elements, increase total carbohydrate content, and enhance plant resistance to stress. [14]
      Nano-fertilizer Se NPs, ZnO NPs Purchased Apple Increase the antioxidant activity of fruits, supplement N, P, and K content, and improve apple fruit yield and nutritional quality. [15]
      Nano-coating/
      packaging
      Chitosan/nano-silica Purchased longan The coating enhances fruit cold resistance, inhibits the decrease of total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid, increases defense enzyme activity, and provides a longer storage period. [16]
      Nano-coating/
      packaging
      Polyethylene with nano-Ag, nano-TiO2, and montmorillonite blend Traditional method Kiwifruit Delay kiwifruit ripening, reduce kiwifruit fruit decay, and maintain post-harvest storage quality of kiwifruit. [17]
      Nano-pesticide SeNPs, CeONPs Green synthesis (Melia azedarach leaves and Acorus calamusas rhizomes extract) Wheat Reduce the incidence of wheat stripe rust or yellow rust, SeNPs and CeONPs at a concentration of 30 mg/L significantly improved wheat morphology and physiological parameters. [18]
      Nano-pesticide MgONFs Green synthesis (rosemary extract) Rice Inhibited bacterial diseases in rice. [19]
      Nanopriming TiO2 nanoparticles Purchased Corn Promote the germination and growth of corn seedlings under salt stress. [20]
      Nanopriming Carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) Purchased Lettuce Alleviate the harmful effects of salt stress on germination. [21]
      Nanopriming AgNPs Green synthesis (lime leaf extract) Rice Enhance germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds. [22]
      Nano-sensor Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) Traditional method Ethylene Detect ethylene gas and determine fruit ripeness. [23]
      Nano-sensor DNA-SWNT Purchased + traditional method Arsenic Real-time detection of arsenite in underground environments. [24]
      Nano-sensor Bio-AgNPs-based electrochemical nanosensors Green synthesis (green tea leaves, mangosteen peel, grapefruit peel) 4-nitrophenol Sensitive monitoring of 4-nitrophenol
      (4-NP) in tomato samples.
      [25]
    • Traditional preservation techniques for agricultural produce, such as waxing, refrigeration, and modified atmosphere packaging, often come with drawbacks like high costs, time-consuming processes, and the potential to alter the appearance and taste of the fruits. In stark contrast, nanotechnology offers a suite of preservation methods that are non-toxic, environmentally friendly, biodegradable, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and widely accessible. As a result, these innovative approaches are gaining traction in research and application, gradually supplanting conventional packaging methods. This technology primarily manifests in two forms: nanocoating liquids and nanopackaging materials. Nanocoating liquids involve directly applying a mixture of nanomaterials and other substances onto the surface of agricultural products, while nano packaging materials disperse nanomaterials within other agricultural packaging materials to enhance their performance. By leveraging the unique properties of nanomaterials, these advanced preservation methods not only safeguard the integrity of agricultural products but also contribute to a more sustainable and efficient agricultural industry.

    • Nanocomposite coatings are gaining prominence in the realm of food preservation, with chitosan-based nanomaterial composite films emerging as a particularly promising option. Chitosan known for its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and antimicrobial and antioxidant properties often fall short in terms of thermal stability and mechanical strength. To address these limitations, the development of composite nanomaterials has become essential to bolster chitosan's performance. For example, when combined with nano-SiO2, chitosan forms a chitosan/nano silicon composite nanocoating that has been applied to preserve longan fruit, it significantly extended the shelf life, reduced browning index, delayed weight loss, and prevented an increase in the MDA content and PPO activity[16]. Additionally, chitosan was combined with nano-TiO2 to form a chitosan/nano-TiO2 composite nano-coating used to preserve mangoes[26]. Studies comparing the preservation effects of chitosan, chitosan/nano-silicon, and chitosan/nano-TiO2 on ginkgo seeds[27], and cantaloupes[28] have shown that the preservation and antimicrobial effects of composite materials are superior to those of chitosan alone. Furthermore, composite coatings such as chitosan/nano-SiOx[29], chitosan/CaCO3[30], chitosan/zein-cinnamaldehyde nanocellulose[31], and cellulose nanofibrils[32] are also widely used to preserve agricultural products.

    • Incorporating nanomaterials like nano silver, nano-SiO2, and nano-TiO2 into preservation films is a game-changer for enhancing packaging performance. These nano-enhancements fine-tune the moisture and oxygen permeability of films, bolster their antimicrobial properties, and extend the shelf life of food products. Hu et al.[17] blended polyethylene (PE) with nano-Ag, nano-TiO2, and montmorillonite to prepare a novel nanocomposite packaging that delayed the ripening process of kiwifruit. The innovation lies in the inclusion of ethylene inhibitors that facilitate the local oxidation of ethylene, a ripening hormone, thus preventing spoilage without adding to environmental pollution. Looking ahead, the future of fruit packaging preservation is poised to integrate ethylene scavengers and in-situ ethylene oxidants directly into food packaging materials or films. These advancements promise to revolutionize the way we preserve and extend the freshness of fruits, offering a more sustainable and effective approach to food preservation.

      Essential oils are secondary metabolites of plants that have many health-promoting benefits and are widely used in nano-preservation. However, due to their instability, essential oils are difficult to use on a large scale. To address this, Oprea et al. developed a nanoencapsulation method for citrus essential oils, including lipid-based methods (including liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, and nanoemulsions) and polymer nanostructures[33]. This nanoencapsulation technology overcame the instability of essential oils to provide protection, enhance their bioavailability, and improve their biocompatibility[34]. By encapsulating these potent plant extracts, the nano-preservation field can unlock the full potential of essential oils, ensuring their efficacy and safety in food preservation and other applications.

    • The extensive use of pesticides, while helpful in increasing crop yields has negative impacts on crop growth, soil ecosystems, biodiversity, farmer health, and planting costs due to overuse. Technological innovation through the combination of pesticides with nanomaterials can enhance the efficiency of pesticide utilization, which is an important way to achieve sustainable agricultural development.

      To reduce excessive pesticide use, nanomaterials can be used for pesticide detection and degradation or as plant-based nano-pesticides. Widely used pesticide residue analysis methods include chromatography and enzyme inhibition methods. Chromatography has a high accuracy but is costly and requires a high level of technical expertise. Enzyme inhibition methods offer the allure of simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for rapid on-site testing, yet they sometimes fall short in terms of high detection precision. Meanwhile, conventional approaches to the degradation of pesticide residues are often hindered by low efficiency, the risk of secondary pollution, and substantial economic costs. The development of sophisticated pesticide residue analysis methods is essential not only for the protection of human health but also for fostering a more sustainable and eco-friendly society. These methods are crucial for ensuring the safety of our food supply and the preservation of our natural environment. Nanomaterials show strong fluorescence and large surface areas potentially allowing them to be combined with chromatography and enzyme inhibition methods. Zhai et al.[35] combined enzyme inhibition methods with gold nanomaterials to establish an enzyme inhibition method for the rapid detection of organophosphorus pesticides in agricultural products. Gold/silver nanomaterials[36], carbon nanomaterials[37], quantum dots[38], polymer nanoparticles[39], and nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (nMOFs)[40] have also been used to construct various nano-sensors by integrating their various optical, electrochemical, and biological technologies. These materials have enabled the trace detection and degradation of pesticides and have shown a high sensitivity, good stability, low false negative rates, and ease of operation.

      Plant-based pesticides, which are naturally derived and primarily composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, are known for their eco-friendly nature. The integration of nanomaterials with these botanical formulations can enhance the penetration of active ingredients into target organisms, bolster the stability of pesticides, and introduce innovative controlled-release mechanisms. This synergy has been a focal point for agricultural research. For example, Danish et al.[41] synthesized Ag@CfL-NPs using Cassia fistula (L.) leaf extract and demonstrated its inhibitory effect on tomato pathogens and controlled insects. Moreover, this nanomaterial application was found to promote tomato growth, increase biomass, enhance photosynthetic efficiency, boost lycopene levels, and improve overall antioxidant properties. Azadirachta indica tree extract is widely used as a botanical insecticide and can be combined with nanomaterials to reduce its toxicity[42]. Rotenone is a natural insecticide, but it is limited by its poor stability, susceptibility to degradation, and limited solubility. Chitosan-based nanocomposite particles such as chitosan-graphene oxide[43], and N-deoxycholic acid-O-glycol chitosan (DAGC)[44]. These nanocomposites have been effective in enhancing the water solubility, stability, and safety profile of rotenone.

      Nanotechnology can address the low stability, high volatility, and thermal decomposition of plant-based pesticides. The development and promotion of new technologies will further limit the adverse effects of chemical pesticides on the environment and human health. Combining nanomaterials with plant-based pesticides can enhance agricultural production efficiency and sustainability.

    • Treating seeds with nanomaterials can enhance their vitality, increase the activity of various enzymes in plants, promote root growth, enhance photosynthesis, improve plant water and nutrient absorption, enhance nutrient uptake, promote metabolism, and ultimately increase yields and improve plant quality.

    • The germination stage of seeds is crucial for the growth and development of plants because it directly impacts the subsequent growth of the plants. When provided with adequate moisture and a suitable temperature, seeds will germinate, and the respiratory activity of embryo cells is enhanced. In traditional germination processes, the unique properties of nano-bubbles can promote seed germination and growth rate. The externally generated hydroxyl radicals (·OH) from nanobubble-containing water enhanced the permeability of the seed coat, loosened the cell walls and increased the expression of water channel protein genes in seeds[45]. However, an excess of these radicals, surpassing a toxic threshold, could potentially hinder the hypocotyl elongation and chlorophyll synthesis in plants. The impact of nanomaterials on crop seed germination may promote, inhibit, or have no significant effect. For example, Au NPs have inhibitory effects on arugula seed germination (Eruca sativa)[46] and promote soybean[47] seed germination, but they have no significant effect on radish or Mimusops laurifolia seed germination[48]. The main factors influencing the effect of nanoparticles on plants include the characteristics of the nanoparticles themselves (concentration, size, type, stability), seed characteristics (size, species), plant growth medium, plant growth stage, and coating materials of the nanoparticles. Given this complexity, further research into the toxicity and efficacy of various nanomaterials on different plant seeds is essential. Such studies will provide invaluable insights to optimize the germination process, ensuring the safe and effective application of nanotechnology in agriculture.

    • Photosynthesis is a crucial process in plant activities and a key pathway for maintaining metabolic balance, and its disruption can disturb the accumulation of energy and metabolism in crops. Nanotechnology can potentially improve plant light utilization efficiency, as nanoparticles can broaden the spectral range and potentially enhance a plant's ability to remove oxygen-free radicals that disrupt photosynthesis. Previous studies have mainly used down-conversion nanomaterials to absorb ultraviolet light to promote electron transfer or convert ultraviolet light into visible light to enhance chloroplast light absorption efficiency. Xu et al.[49] found that spraying up-conversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) on the surface of lettuce to collect near-infrared light from sunlight-promoted electron transfer during photosynthesis and extend the spectral range to near-infrared light. Further analysis showed that over 90% of photosynthesis-related genes were upregulated. However, metal nanoparticles can both promote and inhibit plant photosynthesis. Under stress from Cd and Pb, ZnO NPs loaded onto cotton leaves significantly increased the content of chlorophyll and carotenoids[50]. Conversely, the application of ZnO NPs to Pisum sativum L.[51] led to a decrease in chlorophyll levels and impeded photosynthetic efficiency. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots, as a new type of carbon-based nanomaterial, have been proven to improve the photosynthetic efficiency of apple trees[52]. While research on their application in woody plants is limited, it sheds new light on the mechanisms by which nanomaterials can enhance photosynthesis. This knowledge provides a theoretical foundation for the strategic development of efficient nanomaterials for broad agricultural use, potentially revolutionizing the industry.

    • Nanomaterials have demonstrated the capacity to significantly enhance nutrient absorption and transportation within plants, which in turn can stimulate growth, development, and yield. Traditional fertilizers are often poorly assimilated by plants, leading to nutrient excess, while nano-fertilizers can achieve controlled release, display a higher water absorption capacity, and longer soil residence times. For example, Jiménez-Rosado et al.[53] developed a controlled micronutrient release system using soy protein as the raw material. Trace elements (zinc, copper, iron, and manganese) were incorporated in the form of micro and nanoparticles into the soy protein system. This method combined trace elements and nanotechnology to help crops better absorb micronutrients. Studies have shown that using ZnO nanoparticles in Brassica napus L. enhanced the absorption of micronutrients and promoted the biosynthesis of soluble sugars and soluble proteins, thereby promoting seedling development in saline-alkali soil[54]. Moreover, the foliar application of nano-fertilizers has been found to reduce the incidence of fruit cracking in pomegranates, increase the concentration of mineral elements in leaves, and improve both the quantity and quality of fruit production[55].

      Research has shown that nanomaterials can exert both positive and negative effects on plant growth and development, but there are still many issues that require further research. To better apply them in agricultural production, it is necessary to determine the nanoparticle size and concentration that are most suitable for specific plant growth stages. It is also necessary to study the mechanisms and connections between photosynthetic and other metabolic pathways after nanomaterial treatment.

    • Plants are often subjected to abiotic stresses (physical stress, chemical stress) and biotic stresses. The disruption of the redox balance in plant cells can lead to the accumulation of free radicals, cause changes in cell signaling mechanisms, and produce oxidative damage to biomolecules. Nanomaterials can regulate plant metabolic pathways to reduce the effects of stress and increase crop yield.

    • Biotic stresses include damage to plants caused by organisms such as fungi, bacteria, insects, and weeds. Although traditional pesticides such as insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides can increase crop yields, they have many drawbacks. The combination of nanomaterials with pesticides can enhance the adhesion, retention, and coverage of pesticides, reduce losses, improve efficiency, and increase biological utilization. Depending on the preparation method of nanopesticides, they can be divided into two categories. One involves directly processing the active ingredients of pesticides into nanoparticles, such as microemulsions, nanoemulsions, and nanodispersions. The field of nanoemulsions is currently experiencing a surge in research and practical applications, offering innovative solutions in agricultural chemistry. Chen et al.[56] used HNTs as an adjuvant to produce an HNTs-CAP emulsion system that showed good stability, leaf adhesion, rain resistance, and an insecticidal effect. In another significant advancement, Yang et al.[57] developed and optimized an oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsion to combat the citrus Huanglongbing pathogen Liberibacter asiaticus. This delivery system enhanced the therapeutic effect of antimicrobial drugs against Liberibacter asiaticus while reducing or eliminating the potential negative effects of chemicals on humans and non-target bacteria. Another method is to construct a nano-drug delivery system, which can be divided into organic polymer formulations, liposome nano-formulations, clay material nano-formulations, and silica nano-formulations, depending on the carrier. Nano-formulations such as nano-capsules, nano-microspheres, nano-micelles, and nano-gels can be constructed to reduce pesticide application and increase efficiency. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs) have an adjustable particle/pore structure and surface functionalization and make valuable drug carriers that are widely used in pesticides[58], such as loading pesticides like acetamiprid, imidacloprid, fipronil, and pyrimethanil. Nano-drug delivery systems show enhanced adhesion to rough surfaces, increased absorption of loaded pesticides by fungi and plants, controlled release of active molecules, and the prevention of off-target effects.

      According to research by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)[59], compared with traditional pesticides, nano-pesticides have shown improved overall efficacy against target organisms, especially in terms of field efficacy. They can also reduce toxicity to non-target organisms, thereby minimizing environmental collateral damage. Nano-pesticides reduce the loss of active ingredients before reaching target organisms, thus reducing their soil-leaching potential. Despite these advantages, there is a legitimate concern that certain nanoparticles could enter the environment or the food chain, potentially endangering human health and disrupting ecological systems. Current assessment methods are inadequate for the application of nano-pesticides, so safety and risk assessments of nano-pesticides should be conducted based on nanotoxicology and nanomedicine to avoid potential risks.

    • Abiotic stresses are major threats to plant growth and development and are caused by various factors including drought, temperature, salinity, heavy metal contamination, and excessive pesticide use. These abiotic stresses can reduce crop yields, hinder plant growth, and even kill plants. Due to their unique physical and chemical properties, nanomaterials have become potential tools for alleviating the negative effects of abiotic stress on plants.

    • Drought stress is a common abiotic stress that plants face. Nanomaterials can help alleviate plant drought stress by improving their water absorption or regulating symbiotic interactions with beneficial microbes. Studies have shown that ZnO NPs, in conjunction with rhizobacteria PGPR, can alleviate drought and heat stress in wheat[60]. Additionally, the foliar application of metal oxide nanoparticles (MoNPs) such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and iron oxide (Fe3O4) can enhance a plant's physiological and metabolic activities, thereby helping them resist drought stress[61]. Furthermore, nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene oxide (GO) can enhance plant drought tolerance by influencing the expression of relevant response genes[62]. These nano-enabled strategies not only bolster a plant's inherent drought tolerance but also pave the way for innovative agricultural solutions that can support crop productivity in arid environments.

    • Spraying low concentrations of ZnO NPs on the leaves of mung beans in the field can change their stomatal conductance, affect plant transpiration, and subsequently influence plant temperature changes[63]. Additionally, nano-ZnO-based low-density polyethylene (NZLDPE) packaging exhibits excellent cold resistance during the cold storage of peaches[64]. Cold stress can damage a plant's photosystem, reduce its chlorophyll content, CO2 absorption, and transpiration rate, and degrade the enzyme RuBisCO. Studies have found that under cold stress, some proteins in rapeseed show differential expression, with nearly half related to chloroplast physiology. This indicates that rapeseed's cold stress response is partially achieved by regulating its chloroplast function[65]. The application of nano-selenium can mitigate the detrimental effects of cold stress on a plant's photosynthetic parameters, invigorate its antioxidant enzyme activity, and elevate antioxidant compound levels. It stimulates the metabolism of proteins associated with photosynthesis, thereby markedly bolstering the plant's cold stress tolerance[66]. Treatment of chickpeas with TiO2 NPs in sensitive and tolerant genotypes reduced membrane damage indicators, suggesting that TiO2 NPs increased the crop's cold resistance[67]. Further transcriptome analysis revealed that under cold stress, chickpeas treated with TiO2 NPs exhibited varying degrees of differential gene expression compared with a control group in terms of metabolic pathways, cell defense, cell connection and signaling, transcriptional regulation, and chromatin structure. TiO2 NPs may inhibit low-temperature oxidative stress. These research results demonstrate the potential applications of nanomaterials for alleviating plant cold stress, providing new possibilities for improving crop cold resistance and their adaptability to various growth environments.

    • Excessive salt and alkali contents in the soil can harm plant growth and development, but nanomaterials can interact with plant cells to enhance their plant resistance under salt and alkali stress. For instance, graphene has been shown to mitigate the damage inflicted by salt and alkali stress, thereby promoting the growth and stress tolerance of plants like alfalfa[68]. In addition to acting on leaves and roots, nanomaterials can also act on seeds to enhance their crop salt tolerance. When applied to cotton seeds, they can regulate ROS homeostasis and Ca2+ signal transduction, thereby improving salt tolerance in cotton seedlings[69]. In a study on improving cucumber salt tolerance, nano-cerium dioxide validated CsAKT1 as a key gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, marking the first use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to validate key genes for nano-enhanced plant salt tolerance. These findings suggest that genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 could serve as a powerful adjunct to traditional mutagenesis for identifying genes that are critical for enhancing plant stress resistance through nanotechnology. The research underscores the potential of nanomaterials to not only improve plant salt tolerance but also to innovate approaches for enhancing crops' adaptability to adverse environmental conditions, offering novel strategies for agricultural sustainability in harsh ecosystems.

    • Metal pollution is a serious environmental issue, as metal pollutants can accumulate in soil, sediments, and water bodies. They can enter the food chain through plants and animals, thereby causing harmful effects on human health and the ecosystem. Nanomaterials can effectively address this problem. For example, The application of nano-hydroxyapatite (NHAP) has been shown to decrease the mobility and bioavailability of lead (Pb) in soil, thus ameliorating conditions for plant growth[70]. Carbon-based materials have received significant attention as carriers for metal pollution treatment due to their large surface area, high functional group contents, low costs, and environmental friendliness. Biochar (ZBC) possesses strong electronegativity and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups and can regulate soil's physicochemical properties and alter soil's microbial structure. Thus, it provides an inexpensive method to facilitate the immobilization of heavy metals in the environment. Studies have shown that the addition of zero-valent iron to maize straw biochar composite material (MSB-nZVI) significantly reduced the chromium content in soil[71]. Furthermore, a rice straw-derived biochar-loaded nano zero-valent iron composite (nZVI@BC) exhibited superior remediation performance in copper, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, and lead-contaminated soil compared with biochar[72]. Graphene (G), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and their derivatives are commonly used for soil remediation and facilitate the transfer and enrichment of pollutants or their adsorption sites to the surface of nanomaterials. Combining these materials with biochar can achieve a higher adsorption efficiency. Adding a small amount (≤ 0.5%) of graphene oxide (GO) to poultry litter biochar enhanced the adsorption of copper and zinc while retaining trace nutrient elements, thereby improving the fertilizer utilization efficiency in highly weathered soils[73]. These methods offer new possibilities for mitigating the harm caused by metal pollution to the environment and human health.

      When subjected to abiotic stress, plants produce excessive ROS, which can inflict damage on cellular components and potentially culminate in cell death. Many studies have shown that introducing nanomaterials that can scavenge ROS alleviates the impact of abiotic stress. Among these, nano enzymes stand out due to their heightened enzymatic activity and their dual nature, harnessing the distinctive attributes of nanomaterials along with the catalytic capabilities of enzymes. Nanoenzymes are characterized by their high activity, stability, cost-effectiveness, adjustable catalytic activity, and multifunctionality, which position them to surpass the limitations of natural enzymes, such as their limited stability, singular catalytic functions, and high production costs. Since 2007, when Gao et al.[74] first discovered that iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) showed peroxidase-like activity, a series of nanomaterials have been found to possess antioxidant enzyme-like activity and have been applied to resist non-biological stress in plants, as shown in Table 2. Overall, the application of nanoenzymes for abiotic stress management in plants shows great potential for improving a plant's resilience to environmental challenges. Further research and development efforts in this area are needed to optimize the use of nanoenzymes and explore their full range of benefits for enhancing a plant's stress tolerance.

      Table 2.  Applications of nanoenzymes for plant abiotic stress.

      Crop Nanomaterial Application method Stress type Mechanism Ref.
      Cotton Polyacrylic acid-modified Mn3O4 nanoparticles (PAA@Mn3O4-NPs, PMO) Foliar application Salt stress Adjustment of endogenous antioxidant system expression, maintenance of cytoplasmic Na/K balance. [75]
      Rapeseed Polyacrylic acid-coated nanoceria (PNC) Seed soaking Salt stress Regulation of ROS homeostasis and α-amylase activity, maintenance of cytoplasmic Na/K balance. [76]
      Pisum sativum Linn and Eucommia carbon dot nanozymes (CDzymes) Foliar application Salt stress Actively clearing ROS as an exogenous enzyme. [77]
      Rice (Oryza sativa L.) AgNPs Seed soaking Salt stress and rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme, induce immune response rather than the antibacterial activity of AgNPs themselves. [78]
      Maize Poly (acrylic) acid-coated Mn3O4 nanoparticles (PAA@Mn3O4 nanoparticles) Root application Drought stress Enhances the mitotic ability of root tip cells by maintaining ROS homeostasis, thus improving maize drought resistance. [79]
      Paeonia ostii Graphene oxide (GO) Root application Drought stress Rich pore structure strongly binds water molecules, acts as a water-holding agent, and adjusts endogenous antioxidant system expression. [80]
      Brassica napus γ-Fe2O3 NPs Root application Drought stress Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme. [81]
      Boehmeria nivea Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) Root application Cadmium (Cd) pollution MWCNTs enhance Cd uptake and transport in ramie seedlings, mitigate
      Cd-induced toxicity, promote plant growth, reduce oxidative stress, activate antioxidant enzymes, and elevate
      specific antioxidant levels.
      [82]
      Maize seeds (Zea mays L. Zhengdan 958) Quaternary ammonium iminofullerenes (IFQA) Seed soaking treatment Oxygen (H2O2) stress Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme and promote maize root hair growth. [83]
      Breviolum minutum Engineered poly(acrylic acid)-coated cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2, nanoceria) Symbiotic cultivation High-temperature stress Alleviate heat-induced oxidative stress and enhance the heat resistance of algae. [84]
    • Nanomaterials are widely used as gene delivery vectors in animal transgenic technologies, but they cannot yet overcome the cell wall barrier to integrate exogenous genes into the cell genome. Therefore, their applications in plant gene transformation are in their infancy. Nevertheless, compared with traditional transgenic methods, nanomaterial-mediated plant transgenic technologies have shown unique advantages. Traditional gene transformation methods include vector-mediated methods and direct injection methods. Vector-mediated methods are widely used and have shown a high transformation efficiency, but they have limitations and safety issues regarding the host. Direct injection methods, while less invasive and simpler in execution, are often hampered by limitations such as low transformation rates, the need for costly equipment, and the potential for cellular damage. When used as plant transgenic vectors, nanomaterials can overcome some of the drawbacks of traditional methods, providing new possibilities for plant gene transformation s shown in Table 3.

      Table 3.  Applications of nanomaterials in gene editing.

      Need external force Nanoparticles Nanoparticle characteristics Functional modification Transgenic plants (tissues or cells) Transgenic plant expression characteristics Ref.
      No GONs Layered structure with excellent stability, high biocompatibility, and effective protection of siRNA. PEI and PEG Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana) Efficient gene silencing at the mRNA level of around 97% was achieved within 24 h, with mRNA and protein expression of the target gene fully restored to normal levels by 120 h. [91]
      No AuNCs High biocompatibility and protection of siRNA from RNase degradation. PEI N. benthamiana PEI-AuNCs delivered siRNA into mature mGFP5-expressing Nb leaves, resulting in efficient gene knockdown at both mRNA and protein levels. [89]
      No SWNT A high aspect ratio, exceptional tensile strength, and high biocompatibility ensure the optimal activity of biomolecules. PEI N. benthamiana,
      E. sativa, wheat, cotton
      13.6 μg of GFP was obtained per gram of fresh leaf. [88]
      No DNA nanostructures Specific and transient gene targeting through sequence design, controllable attachment, and protection of siRNA cargo without toxicity or damage. No N. benthamiana, arugula, and watercress DNA nanostructures can be efficiently internalized into plant cells, with the relative internalization efficiency ranked from high to low as DHT, tetrahedron, and nanowires. All show protein-level silencing. [92]
      No MSNs Larger surface area, larger pore volume, adjustable mesoporous pore size. TMAPS, APTMS Nicotiana tabacum
      BY-2, Arabidopsis
      Gene delivery to Nicotiana tabacum protoplasts and Arabidopsis root for transient expression. [93]
      Gene gun method carbon-supported gold nanoparticles Good dispersibility, minimal damage to plants, capable of piercing tough plant cell walls and nuclear membranes, and inserting genes into chromosomal loci. No Nicotiana tabacum, Oryza sativa, Leucaena leucocephala. Carbon-supported gold nanoparticles produced by the heat treatment of biogenic nanoparticles were a more effective plant-transformation carrier than commercially available gold microparticles. [94]
      Gene gun method MSNs Larger surface area, larger pore volume, and adjustable mesoporous pore size. TEG modification, gold nanoparticles coverage N. benthamiana GFP-expressing callus sectors were observed ten days after the bombardment of a proliferating callus culture grown on a non-selective medium. This transfer system produced both transient and stable transgenic plant materials. [95]
      Magnetic field Magnetic gold nanoparticles (mGNPs) Superparamagnetic with strong targeting under an applied magnetic field condition. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), PEG Canola Stable expression and the delivery efficiency of nanoparticles to canola protoplasts was approximately 95%. [96]
      Magnetic field Fe3O4 Superparamagnetic with strong targeting under an applied magnetic field condition. PEI Maize Transient expression of exogenous genes in maize pollen, followed by normal expression in its offspring, demonstrating genetic stability. [97]

      The transfection of plant cells with nanocarrier-gene complexes is governed by two main strategies. The first involves the application of external forces, such as ultrasound, electroporation, and magnetic fields, to facilitate the penetration of the cell wall and the seamless integration of foreign genes into the plant cell genome. This method bypasses the complex intermediate steps associated with traditional Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, offering a more direct and efficient route. Nanomaterials provide a protective shield for exogenous genes, safeguarding them from environmental stress and enzymatic degradation. For example, Liu et al.[85] and others combined starch nanoparticles with fluorescent materials on the surface and then bound them with plasmid DNA to form complexes. After ultrasound and DNase I treatment, they co-cultured plasmid DNA-nanoparticle complexes with plant suspension cells, which efficiently entered the cell wall, cell membrane, and nuclear membrane of plant suspension cells. Zhao and colleagues[86] found that in the presence of a magnetic field, exogenous DNA loaded onto Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles was transported to pollen. This approach produced transgenic cotton through hybrid pollination, indicating that the magnetic effect may open up new pathways for transgenic species. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs), with their adjustable particle size, high pore volume, and expansive surface area, have become valuable tools in the development of plant transgenic systems. Many studies have used functionalized MSNPs to develop MSNP-mediated plant transgenic systems, where gold-coated MSNP carriers increased the density and performance of biologically mediated delivery. Past research on the nanoparticle-mediated delivery of biomolecules to plant cells has mainly focused on nucleic acids, including double-stranded/single-stranded DNA and siRNA, with fewer methods for protein delivery. However, in recent years, microinjection and cell-penetrating peptide methods have also been applied to introduce model proteins into plant cells. Martin-Ortigosa and colleagues[87] used plasmid DNA coated with protein-loaded Au-MSNPs. Through particle bombardment, they transformed it into plant tissues that subsequently released proteins and plasmid DNA. This study represented a breakthrough in the biological delivery of proteins and plasmid DNA to plant cells through Au-MSNPs. The co-delivery of protein-nanomaterial complexes has improved plant transformation efficiency, with nanomaterials playing a protective role in this process and providing powerful tools for basic and applied research in plant science. These studies offer new insights and methods to develop more efficient plant transgenic systems and improve plant transformation efficiency.

      Direct transformation methods such as spraying and injection use zero-dimensional and one-dimensional nanomaterials, which are small enough to cross plant cell walls. Carbon-based materials such as single-walled carbon nanotubes, multi-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon nanodots have become popular nanocarriers for achieving complete plant genetic transformation. Demirer and colleagues[88] prepared polyethyleneimine-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT-PEI), which instantly transformed complete Nicotiana tabacum through direct leaf infiltration. The SWNT-based delivery platform achieved DNA plasmid transformation in model and crop plants without transgenic integration. It showed a high efficiency, non-toxicity, and no tissue damage. The process from functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes to transgenic expression only required 5 d, which was significantly shorter than Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Zhang and colleagues[89] synthesized polyethyleneimine-functionalized gold nanoclusters (PEI-AuNCs) as carriers for siRNA and delivered siRNA into complete plants via injection into leaf tissues. PEI-AuNCs protected siRNA from RNase degradation and achieved effective gene knockout without toxicity. Liu et al.[90] synthesized amine-functionalized carbon dots (A-CDs), a pH-responsive nanomaterial with the unique ability to switch surface charge and facilitate gene import into the nucleus. These versatile vectors enable transient transfection in mature, whole plants, thereby contributing to the advancement of efficient gene delivery systems.

    • To meet the rapidly growing global food demand in the mid-century as well as the requirements for the freshness of fruits, interdisciplinary integration of plant science, agricultural science, and other fields is essential. Nano-agriculture offers an innovative solution that helps to ensure food supply and security. With the development of nanotechnology, it is expected that more innovative nano-agricultural products and technologies will emerge in the future. For instance, nanotechnology may be integrated with the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, and other technologies to develop smarter agricultural equipment and systems, achieving automated and intelligent agricultural production. The application of nanotechnology will promote the development of precision agriculture by precisely controlling the nutrients and water required for crop growth, thereby improving agricultural production efficiency. This helps to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, decrease chemical pesticide residues, enhance the natural defense mechanisms of crops, improve food safety and nutritional value, reduce environmental pollution, and promote the development of ecological and sustainable agriculture. Nanotechnology can serve as a vector for gene-editing technology, facilitating the genetic improvement of crops and the cultivation of varieties more adaptable to climate change and pests and diseases. However, it also faces challenges in terms of technological maturity, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, and regulatory aspects. We should also pay attention to the migration issue, where nanomaterials may migrate from the coating into the interior of the fruit, and then enter the human body through consumption, the potential impact on human health needs further research. It also requires policy support and public education to realize its potential in sustainable agriculture.

      • This work was supported by the Development Program of Shaanxi (Program No. 2023-YBNY-075) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002000, 32202423). Thank you to EditorBar (www.editorbar.com) for language polishing the article.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: writing - original draft: Zhang Y, Wang X, Lv S; writing - review & editing: Tu M, Xi Z, Wang X; format organization: Wang H. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (3) References (97)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang Y, Lv S, Wang H, Tu M, Xi Z, et al. 2025. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production. Fruit Research 5: e004 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0037
    Zhang Y, Lv S, Wang H, Tu M, Xi Z, et al. 2025. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production. Fruit Research 5: e004 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0037

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return