REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants

More Information
  • Medicinal plants frequently encounter environmental challenges such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal pollution, all of which are aggravated by the ongoing global climate change. Plants can alleviate the negative effects of these stresses by interacting with microorganisms both in the rhizosphere and within the plant itself. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the responses of microbial communities to these challenges and their impact on plant resistance and quality. In this study, microbial community structures and assembly changes are explored in response to abiotic stresses and the functional mechanisms underlying beneficial microorganism’s enhancement of plant tolerance are elucidated. These include activation of the antioxidant system activation, osmotic regulation, hormone synthesis, nutrient utilization, and recruitment of other beneficial microbes. Furthermore, these microorganisms significantly improve the quality of medicinal plants under abiotic stresses by enhancing the synthesis and accumulation of key secondary metabolites. While these findings provide functional insights into the beneficial effects of microorganisms on medicinal plants under stressful conditions, further research is necessary to be able to routinely apply microbial resources as a means to enhance plant adaptability and quality.
  • The intestinal mucosal barrier is composed of epithelial cells and intercellular connections, which can effectively regulate the transportation of large molecules in the intestinal lumen, and prevent microorganisms, harmful solutes, toxins, and intraluminal antigens from entering bodies[1]. Mucosal barrier factors such as trefoil factor (TFF) family, diamine oxidase (DAO), and transform growth factor-ɑ (TGF-α) have protective and restorative effects on intestinal mucosal integrity, which are synthesized and secreted by intestinal mucosa[24]. The damage to intestinal barrier function can cause the invasion of antigens and bacteria in the lumen, and eventually lead to intestinal diseases, including diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and Crohn's disease[57].

    The Notch signaling pathway plays a crucial role in a series of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, development, migration, and apoptosis. Research suggests that the Notch signaling pathway is involved in intestinal development, and it can be connected to intestinal cell lineage specification[8]. Furthermore, the Notch signaling pathway can regulate intestinal stem cells, CD4+T cells, innate lymphoid cells, macrophages, and intestinal microbiota, and intervene in the intestinal mucosal barriers in cases of ulcerative colitis[9]. The activated Notch signaling pathway can suppress the goblet cells differentiation and mucus secretion, which would result in the disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier[10]. In addition, the absence of the Notch signaling pathway would cause the dysfunction of tight junctions and adherens junctions of intestinal mucosa, which could lead to increased permeability of epithelial cells and exposure of luminal contents to the immune system and inflammation[11]. Phytochemicals, such as cucurbitacin, honokiol and quercetin have been reported to have therapeutic effects on intestinal diseases by targeting the Notch signaling pathway[1214].

    Plant-based diets rich in phytochemicals, such as phenolics, anthocyanins, and vitamins, have been related to the prevention of human diseases[15]. Anthocyanins belong to a subclass of flavonoids, and are mainly in the form of different anthocyanin combined with glucose, galactose, and arabinose[16]. The physiological action of anthocyanins, such as antioxidant activity, anti-inflammation, and anti-obesity effects have been widely reported[17,18]. M3G is found naturally in plants and is reported to be the most common anthocyanin in different blueberry varieties[19,20]. Previous researchers reported that M3G from blueberry suppressed the growth and metastasis potential of hepatocellular carcinoma cells, modulated gut microbial dysbiosis, and protected TNF-α induced inflammatory response injury in vascular endothelial cells[2123]. Anthocyanins with diverse molecular structures and from different dietary sources are bioavailable at diet-relevant dosage rates, and anthocyanins from berry fruit are absorbed and excreted by both humans and rats[24]. Studies have shown that anthocyanins have a protective effect on intestinal barrier damage by regulating gut microbiota, tight junction (TJ) protein expression, and secretion of MUC2[2527]. In addition to physiological indicators related to the intestinal barrier, the regulation of the Notch signaling pathway was involved in this study. Therefore, it is speculated that M3G could improve the colonic mucosal barrier function via the Notch signaling pathway.

    To prove this hypothesis, the effects of M3G on the colonic mucosal barrier function were investigated in DSS-induced colitis mice. The pathological morphology of the colon tissue, markers of intestinal physical barrier function and immune barrier function and the Notch signaling pathway were evaluated to reveal the mechanism of M3G in improving colonic mucosal barrier function. The results are expected to lay the foundation for the utilization of anthocyanins as a promising natural product for improving intestinal diseases.

    M3G (CAS: 30113-37-2) used in this study was purchased from Xinyi Science and Technology Instrument Business Department, Baoji, Shanxi, China (HPLC ≥ 98%).

    Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice (Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd., Shenyang, Liaoning, China) weighing 16−18 g were housed and given AIN-93M diet (Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd., Shenyang, Liaoning, China) feeding. The animal experiment was carried out according to the guidelines of the Standards for Laboratory Animals of China (GB 14922-94, GB 14923-94, and GB/T 14925-94) and the Ethics Committee of Shenyang Agricultural University (IACUC Issue No.: 2023022401). All animal housing and experiments were conducted in strict accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

    After acclimating to the breeding environment for one week, the mice were randomly divided into two groups: control group (CG group, n = 6) and model group (n = 12). On days 1−7, the mice of the model group were given 2.5% DSS (CAS: 9011-18-1) dissolved in drinking water, while the mice of the CG group were given the same volume of drinking water as the model group. On days 8−14, mice of the model group were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 6): DSS group and M3G group. The mice of the CG and DSS groups were administered intragastrically via drinking water, and the mice of the M3G group were administered intragastrically by M3G (5 mg/kg body weight (BW)/d) dissolved in drinking water, and the liquid volume was controlled to be the same. For all groups of mice, the body weight, food consumption, stool consistency, and bloody stool were measured daily during the experiment. On day 15, mice were sacrificed after a 12 h fast, and the colon tissue samples of the mice were collected. The length of the colon tissue was measured and recorded.

    Colon tissue was embedded with paraffin and then cut into sections. After being dewaxed from paraffin, the tissue was placed in water, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin solution. The stained tissue was dehydrated and sealed for observation. A microscope (BX53, Olympus Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the stained tissue and photographed using 100× magnification. The damage in epithelial cells of colon tissue was evaluated.

    The colon tissue was dewaxed and placed in water after being embedded with paraffin, and then stained with schiff and hematoxylin solution. The stained tissue was dehydrated and sealed for observation. A microscope was used to observe the stained tissue and photographed using 100× magnification. The mucosal thickness and the population of goblet cells of the colon tissue were measured and recorded.

    The expression of MUC2 in colon tissue was detected by RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from colon tissue, and the concentration was determined using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The single-stranded cDNA of the extracted RNA (0.1 μL) was synthesized using a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Co., Ltd., Basel, Kanton Basel, Switzerland). ExicylerTM 96 (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, Korea) was used to analyze the fluorescence quantitative cDNA. The reaction conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, 94 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 30 s, then followed by 40 cycles of 72 °C for 2 min 30 s, 40 °C for 1 min 30 s, and then melting from 60 to 94 °C, and incubating at 25 °C for 1−2 min. The primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  The primer sequences used in the RT-PCR analysis.
    Gene Prime Sequence (5'-3') Size (bp)
    MUC2 Forward TGTGCCTGGCTCTAATA 17
    Reverse AGGTGGGTTCTTCTTCA 17
    β-actin Forward CTGTGCCCATCTACGAGGGCTAT 23
    Reverse TTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTCC 22
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The whole proteins from the colon tissue (200 mg) were extracted using a Whole Cell Lysis Assay kit (BioTeke Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, colon tissue was cut into pieces, and then mixed with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluorid (PMSF), followed by adding the protein extraction reagents A and B to prepare the tissue homogenate. Protein concentration was then determined using a Bradford Kit (BioTeke Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST buffer for 1 h, followed by incubating overnight at 4 °C with the appropriate monoclonal primary antibody (detailed information in Table 2). Then membranes were washed to remove non-bound antibodies, and then incubated with the secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit immunoglobin G-horseradish peroxidase (IgG-HRP), 1:5000; Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd., Shenyang, Liaoning, China) at 37 °C for 45 min. The enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) western blotting detection reagent (Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd., Shenyang, Liaoning, China) was used to detect the protein bands, and then the protein bands were visualized by a Gel Imaging System (Beijing Liuyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

    Table 2.  Details of the primary antibodies used in the experiment.
    Primary antibody Dilution ratio Manufacturer
    Claudin-1 1:500 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
    Occludin 1:500 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
    ZO-1 1:500 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
    iFABP 1:1000 ABclonal Technology Co., Ltd.
    DLL1 1:500 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
    DLL4 1:1000 ABclonal Technology Co., Ltd.
    Notch1 1:500 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
    NICD 1:1000 Affinity Biosciences Co., Ltd.
    Hes1 1:1000 ABclonal Technology Co., Ltd.
    TFF3 1:1000 Affinity Biosciences Co., Ltd.
    β-actin 1:1000 Wanlei Bio Co., Ltd.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The level of SIgA in colon tissue was detected by SIgA ELISA kit (Model number: EM1362, Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China). The experiment was carried out according to the ELISA kit instructions.

    CD4+T (CD3+CD4+) cells and CD8+T (CD3+CD8+) cells in colonic lamina propria monocytes (LPMC) were detected by FCM. The colonic epithelial cells were isolated by adding digestive solution to the colon tissue. After digestion, screening, re-suspension precipitation, and centrifugation, the precipitate was collected as colonic LPMC. Labeled antibodies were added to the flow tube and incubated according to the instructions. After washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), the cells were re-suspended in PBS solution. The CD4+T (CD3+CD4+) cells and CD8+T (CD3+CD8+) cells were detected by flow cytometric (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

    Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) based on six replicates. Differences between two groups were assessed using Student's t tests. The results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 8.0 (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

    The body weight of mice was monitored daily during the experimental period. As shown in Fig. 1a, after being fed with DSS for 7 d, the body weight of the mice in the DSS group was reduced significantly (p < 0.01) compared with that of the CG group. While the body weight of the mice in the M3G group was increased, and exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.01) body weight gain compared with the DSS group. The DAI score of the mice in the DSS group was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that of the CG group, but M3G supplementation significantly lowered (p < 0.01) the DAI score (Fig. 1b), which demonstrates that the DSS-induced mice colitis model was established successfully and M3G inhibited colon tissue damage in DSS-fed mice. Compared with the CG group, the food intake of the mice fed with DSS was significantly reduced (p < 0.01), and M3G supplementation significantly increased (p < 0.05) the food intake (Fig. 1c).

    Figure 1.  Effect of M3G on body weight gain, DAI score, and food intake in mice. (a) Body weight gain. (b) DAI score (Fecal consistency: 0 = normal, 1 = semi-formed, 2 = soft stool, 3 = diarrhea or watery stool; bloody stool: 0 = occult blood negative, 1 = occult blood positive, 2 = visible bloody stool, 3 = massive hemorrhage; weight loss: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%−5 %, 2 = 6%−10% ; 3 = 11%−15% reduction). (c) Food intake. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    Representative HE and PAS-stained sections of the colon are shown in Fig. 2a & b. The morphology of colon tissue in the CG group did not exhibit any damage, while damage in epithelial cells and goblet cells, inflammatory cells infiltration, and separation of the muscle layer and mucosal muscle layer were observed in the DSS group. The above damage to the tissue was changed for the better by M3G supplementation, with only small levels of damage in epithelial cells and goblet cells, inflammatory cell infiltration, and separation of the muscle layer and mucosal muscle layer compared to that in the CG group.

    Figure 2.  Effect of M3G on the pathological morphology of colon tissue. (a) HE staining of colon tissue. Original magnifications: 100×. (b) PAS staining of colon tissue. Original magnifications: 100×. (c) The damage score of colon tissue. (1) Epithelial cell damage: 0 = normal morphology; 1 = regional destruction of the epithelial surface; 2 = diffuse epithelial destruction and/or mucosal ulcers involving submucosa; 3 = severe epithelial damage. (2) Inflammatory cell infiltration: 0 = no infiltration or less than 5 cells; 1 = mild infiltration of the inherent layer; 2 = moderate infiltration of the muscular mucosa; 3 = high infiltration of the muscular mucosa; 4 = severe infiltration involving submucosa. (3) Separation of muscle layer and mucosal muscle layer: 0 = normal; 1 = moderate; 2 = severe. (4) Goblet cell depletion: 0 = no depletion; 1 = presence of disordered goblet cells; 2 = 1 to 3 regions without goblet cells; 3 = more than 3 regions without goblet cells; 4 = complete depletion of goblet cells. (d) The colon length. (e) The mucosal thickness of colon tissue. (f) Number of goblet cells in colon tissue. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    HE score was calculated to evaluate the degree of colon tissue damage. The HE score in the DSS group was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that in the CG group. Supplementation of M3G significantly reduced (p < 0.01) the score, which decreased by almost 50% of that in the DSS group (Fig. 2c). The colon length in the DSS group was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that in the CG group, which was significantly increased (p < 0.01) by M3G supplementation (Fig. 2d). The mucosal thickness and the number of goblet cells of the colon tissue were determined by PAS staining. Compared with the CG group, the mucosal thickness and the number of goblet cells of the colon tissue were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in the DSS group, but those were significantly increased (p < 0.01) in the M3G group (Fig. 2e & f). These results suggest that M3G supplementation can decrease the pathological damage in the colon tissue induced by DSS.

    The mRNA expression level of MUC2 in the colonic mucosa tissue was determined. Compared with the CG group, DSS significantly decreased (p < 0.01) the mRNA level of MUC2, but this effect was significantly suppressed (p < 0.01) by M3G supplementation (Fig. 3a). The protein levels of claudin-1, occludin, ZO-1, iFABP, and TFF3 in the colon tissue were subsequently assessed. The protein expression levels of claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 in the DSS group were significantly lower than those in the CG group (p < 0.01). M3G supplementation significantly inhibited (p < 0.01) the reduction in the expression of these proteins (Fig. 3bd). Regarding the protein expression level of iFABP, it was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the DSS group than that in the CG group. M3G supplementation significantly decreased (p < 0.01) iFABP expression level compared with the DSS group (Fig. 3e). The protein expression level of TFF3 was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the DSS group than that in the CG group. However, M3G supplementation significantly intensified (p < 0.01) the increase of TFF3 expression compared with the DSS group (Fig. 3f). These results indicate that M3G can regulate colonic epithelial barrier function.

    Figure 3.  Effects of M3G on the colonic epithelial barrier disruption. (a) The mRNA expression level of MUC2. (b) The protein expression level of claudin-1. (c) The protein expression level of occludin. (d) The protein expression level of ZO-1. (e) The protein expression level of iFABP. (f) The protein expression level of TFF3. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    The content of CD4+T (CD3+CD4+) and CD8+T (CD3+CD8+) cells in colonic LPMC of mice in each group were detected by FCM as shown in Fig. 4 and Supplemental Fig. S1. Compared with the CG group, the percentages of CD4+T (CD3+CD4+) and CD8+T (CD3+CD8+) cells in the DSS group were significantly increased (p < 0.01), and those were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) after M3G supplementation (Fig. 4a & b). SIgA was measured as an indicator of immune barrier function in the colon tissue. The level of SIgA in the DSS group was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that in the CG group. Supplementation of M3G significantly raised (p < 0.01) the level of SIgA (Fig. 4c). These results indicate that M3G can improve the colonic immune dysfunction induced by DSS.

    Figure 4.  Effect of M3G on the colonic immune barrier function. (a) The percentage of CD4+T (CD3+CD4+) cells in the colon tissue. (b) The percentage of CD8+T (CD3+CD8+) cells in the colon tissue. (c) The level of SIgA in the colonic mucosal tissue. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    Subsequently, the protein expression levels of Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1, and Hes1 in the colon tissue were measured (Fig. 5). DSS significantly up-regulated (p < 0.01) these protein expression levels compared with the CG group. M3G supplementation significantly (p < 0.01) down-regulated the protein expression levels of Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1, and Hes1 in comparison with the DSS group. The results indicate that M3G can inhibit the over-activation of the Notch signaling pathway.

    Figure 5.  Effects of M3G on the protein expression levels of Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1, and Hes1 in the colon tissue. (a) The protein expression level of Notch1. (b) The protein expression level of NICD. (c) The protein expression level of DLL4. (d) The protein expression level of DLL1. (e) The protein expression level of Hes1. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    To explain the relationships between them, the Spearman r correlations between biomarkers and the Notch signaling pathway were analyzed, and represented using a heatmap. As shown in Fig. 6, colon length, food intake, ZO-1, number of goblet, MUC2, SIgA, claudin-1, occludin, body weight gain, and mucosal thickness were significantly (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05) positively correlated with Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1, and Hes1. Conversely, HE score, iFABP, DAI score, CD4+T, and CD8+T were significantly (p < 0.01) negatively correlated with Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1 and Hes1. In particular, TFF3 was only significantly (p < 0.05) positively correlated with DLL1, and Hes1. The results indicate that M3G may ameliorate the colonic mucosal barrier dysfunction via modulation of the Notch signaling pathway.

    Figure 6.  Heatmap of the Spearman r correlations between biomarkers and the Notch signaling pathway. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 indicate significant differences between two groups.

    Within the last five years, special attention is being paid to the therapeutic effects of anthocyanins. The recent studies could give evidence to prove the therapeutic potential of anthocyanins from different sources against various diseases via in vitro, in vivo, and epidemiological experiments[28]. The anthocyanin supplementation has been demonstrated to have positive effects on intestinal health[29]. The intestinal barrier is one of the crucial factors which can affect intestinal health and normal intestinal barrier function not only maintains intestinal health but also protects overall health by protecting the body from intestine injury, pathogen infection, and disease occurrence[30]. The disruption of intestinal barrier integrity is regarded as an important factor leading to IBD, obesity, and metabolic disorders[3133]. In this study, the effects of M3G on regulating the colonic physical barrier function and colonic immune barrier function in DSS-induced colitis mice were explored.

    M3G supplementation reduced the DAI score and the HE score of colon tissue, and restored colon length, mucosal thickness, and the number of goblet cells in the colon tissue, indicating that M3G can alleviate DSS-induced colon tissue damage and colitis symptoms in mice. The DAI score was developed as a simplified clinical colitis activity index to assess the severity of colitis[34]. Zhao et al. have found that black rice anthocyanin-rich extract can significantly decrease the DAI and HE scores of colon tissue in DSS-induced colitis mice[35]. Intestinal goblet cells are mainly differentiated from multipotential stem cells. Intestinal stem cells were located at the base of the crypt and distributed in intestinal mucosal epithelial cells, composing around 50% of colon epithelial cells[36]. The mucus layer is formed by goblet cell secretion, it separates the intestinal epithelium from the intestinal lumen, thereby preventing the invasion of pathogenic microorganisms and the translocation of intestinal microbiota[37]. The results suggested that M3G might repair the colonic mucosa by increasing the number of goblet cells.

    MUC2 is the most abundant mucin secreted by goblet cells of the colon, goblet cells, and MUC2 play important roles in maintaining and protecting the intestinal mucosal barrier[38]. M3G supplementation restored the level of MUC2 by nearly double that of the DSS group. Claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 are TJ proteins, which is an important component of the intestinal physical barrier[39]. M3G supplementation mitigated the down-regulation of claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1 in DSS-induced colitis mice. Wang et al. have found that Lonicera caerulea polyphenols can increase the expression levels of occludin in HFD rats[40]. Chen et al. have found that purple-red rice anthocyanins alleviated intestinal barrier dysfunction in cyclophosphamide-induced mice by up-regulating the expression of tight junction proteins[41]. iFABP can serve as a biomarker of small bowel damage in coeliac disease and Crohn's disease, and supplementation of M3G down-regulated the expression level of iFABP in colon tissue[42]. It has been reported that TFF3 alleviated the intestinal barrier function by reducing the expression of TLR4 in rats with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and supplementation of M3G increased the expression level of TFF3 in this research[43]. Although the effect of M3G on epithelial TJ proteins and other related proteins were limited, the beneficial effect of M3G on the colonic mucosal barrier function was supported by histological evaluation.

    The intestinal immune barrier is composed of intestinal mucosal lymphoid tissue and intestinal plasma cell secreted antibodies. Inflammatory damage in acute colitis influences the gut microbiota, epithelial barrier, and immune function in subsequent colitis[44]. Fructose can influence colon barrier function by regulating some main physical, immune, and biological factors in rats[45]. SIgA, CD4+T cells, and CD8+T cells play important roles in the functioning of the human immune system. The results indicated that M3G supplementation can maintain the colonic immune barrier function by modulating the level of SIgA, and the percentages of CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells of colon tissue.

    Notch signaling pathways are important for the maintenance of intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, and its abnormal activation is related to IBD and colon cancer[46]. Among the four Notch receptors in mammals, the most scattered in the intestine is Notch1[47]. NICD is the active form of the Notch receptor, NICD enters the nucleus, binds to the recruitment co-activator transcription complex, and then combines with the Hes gene to regulate the fate of cells[48,49]. DLL1 and DLL4 can serve as ligands for Notch signaling receptors[50]. Lin et al. found that qingbai decoction had beneficial effects on the mucus layer and mechanical barrier of DSS-induced colitis by inhibiting Notch signaling[51]. Supplementation with M3G significantly down-regulated Notch1, NICD, DLL4, DLL1, and Hes1 expression levels in the colon tissue, and there is a significant correlation between biomarkers and Notch signaling pathway-related proteins, suggesting that M3G might sustain the colonic barrier function via inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway.

    The present results showed that M3G exerted an improvement effect on the colonic mucosal barrier (physical barrier and immune barrier) function in DSS-induced colitis mice. The positive impact of M3G on the colonic mucosal barrier function may be ascribed to the modulation of permeability, stability, and integrity of the colonic mucosa by down-regulating the Notch signaling pathway. The results provide theoretical support for anthocyanins as the raw materials of functional products related to intestinal health. However, this study also has limitations, such as lacking intensive research on the effect mechanisms through cell experiments. Therefore, intensive research and clinical tests are the future direction.

    The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Zhang C, Jiao X; data collection: Zhang L; analysis and interpretation of results: Zhang C, Zhang L, Zhang B, Zhang Y; draft manuscript preparation: Zhang C, Wang Y, Tan H, Li L, Jiao X. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    We would like to thank the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Project - General Project (LJKMZ20221060).

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • [1]

    Sen T, Samanta SK. 2015. Medicinal plants, human health and biodiversity: a broad review. In Biotechnological Applications of Biodiversity. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, ed. Mukherjee J. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 59−110. doi: 10.1007/10_2014_273

    [2]

    Benarba B, Pandiella A. 2020. Medicinal plants as sources of active molecules against COVID-19. Frontiers in Pharmacology 11:1189

    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01189

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sun Y, Fernie AR. 2024. Plant secondary metabolism in a fluctuating world: climate change perspectives. Trends in Plant Science 29:560−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Leisner CP, Potnis N, Sanz-Saez A. 2023. Crosstalk and trade-offs: Plant responses to climate change-associated abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant, Cell & Environment 46:2946−63

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Maurel C, Nacry P. 2020. Root architecture and hydraulics converge for acclimation to changing water availability. Nature Plants 6:744−49

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0684-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mi P, Yuan F, Guo J, Han G, Wang B. 2021. Salt glands play a pivotal role in the salt resistance of four recretohalophyte Limonium Mill. species. Plant Biology 23:1063−73

    doi: 10.1111/plb.13284

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Venkataraman G, Shabala S, Véry AA, Hariharan GN, Somasundaram S, et al. 2021. To exclude or to accumulate? Revealing the role of the sodium HKT1;5 transporter in plant adaptive responses to varying soil salinity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 169:333−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.11.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ghosh S, Adhikari S, Adhikari A, Hossain Z. 2022. Contribution of plant miRNAome studies towards understanding heavy metal stress responses: Current status and future perspectives. Environmental and Experimental Botany 194:104705

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104705

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yu Y, Alseekh S, Zhu Z, Zhou K, Fernie AR. 2024. Multiomics and biotechnologies for understanding and influencing cadmium accumulation and stress response in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:2641−59

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14379

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Li H, La S, Zhang X, Gao L, Tian Y. 2021. Salt-induced recruitment of specific root-associated bacterial consortium capable of enhancing plant adaptability to salt stress. ISME Journal 15:2865−82

    doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00974-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Jia M, Chen L, Xin HL, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, et al. 2016. A friendly relationship between endophytic fungi and medicinal plants: a systematic review. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:906

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu W, Chen W, Liu S, Wu J, Zhu Y, et al. 2021. Beneficial relationships between endophytic bacteria and medicinal plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:646146

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.646146

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bai B, Liu W, Qiu X, Zhang J, Zhang J, et al. 2022. The root microbiome: Community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:230−43

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Xun W, Shao J, Shen Q, Zhang R. 2021. Rhizosphere microbiome: Functional compensatory assembly for plant fitness. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19:5487−93

    doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.09.035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Hartman K, Tringe SG. 2019. Interactions between plants and soil shaping the root microbiome under abiotic stress. Biochemical Journal 476:2705−24

    doi: 10.1042/BCJ20180615

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yan N, Marschner P, Cao W, Zuo C, Qin W. 2015. Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 3:316−23

    doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.11.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Khan N, Ali S, Shahid MA, Mustafa A, Sayyed RZ, et al. 2021. Insights into the interactions among roots, rhizosphere, and rhizobacteria for improving plant growth and tolerance to abiotic stresses: a review. Cells 10:1551

    doi: 10.3390/cells10061551

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Quiroga G, Castagneyrol B, Abdala-Roberts L, Moreira X. 2024. A meta‐analysis of the effects of climate change‐related abiotic factors on aboveground and belowground plant‐associated microbes. Oikos 2024:e10411

    doi: 10.1111/oik.10411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Signorini M, Midolo G, Cesco S, Mimmo T, Borruso L. 2023. A matter of metals: copper but not cadmium affects the microbial alpha-diversity of soils and sediments − a meta-analysis. Microbial Ecology 86:1071−81

    doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02115-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    He C, Wang W, Hou J. 2019. Plant growth and soil microbial impacts of enhancing Licorice with inoculating dark septate endophytes under drought stress. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:2277

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02277

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wang H, Wang Y, Kang C, Wang S, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Drought stress modifies the community structure of root-associated microbes that improve Atractylodes lancea growth and medicinal compound accumulation. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1032480

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1032480

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Qian F, Huang X, Su X, Bao Y. 2022. Responses of microbial communities and metabolic profiles to the rhizosphere of Tamarix ramosissima in soils contaminated by multiple heavy metals. Journal of Hazardous Materials 438:129469

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yang H, Hu J, Long X, Liu Z, Rengel Z. 2016. Salinity altered root distribution and increased diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil of Jerusalem artichoke. Scientific Reports 6:20687

    doi: 10.1038/srep20687

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Xia F, Hao H, Qi Y, Bai H, Li H, et al. 2023. Effect of salt stress on microbiome structure and diversity in chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L. ) rhizosphere soil. Agronomy 13:1444

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy13061444

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Yuan Y, Brunel C, van Kleunen M, Li J, Jin Z. 2019. Salinity-induced changes in the rhizosphere microbiome improve salt tolerance of Hibiscus hamabo. Plant and Soil 443:525−37

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04258-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Su J, Wang Y, Bai M, Peng T, Li H, et al. 2023. Soil conditions and the plant microbiome boost the accumulation of monoterpenes in the fruit of Citrus reticulata 'Chachi'. Microbiome 11:61

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01504-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Liu S, Gao J, Wang S, Li W, Wang A. 2023. Community differentiation of rhizosphere microorganisms and their responses to environmental factors at different development stages of medicinal plant Glehnia littoralis. PeerJ 11:e14988

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.14988

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Li Y, Zou N, Liang X, Zhou X, Guo S, et al. 2023. Effects of nitrogen input on soil bacterial community structure and soil nitrogen cycling in the rhizosphere soil of Lycium barbarum L. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:1070817

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070817

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Sun R, Zhang W, Liu Y, Yun W, Luo B, et al. 2022. Changes in phosphorus mobilization and community assembly of bacterial and fungal communities in rice rhizosphere under phosphate deficiency. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:953340

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.953340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Liu Y, Li Y, Luo W, Liu S, Chen W, et al. 2020. Soil potassium is correlated with root secondary metabolites and root-associated core bacteria in licorice of different ages. Plant and Soil 456:61−79

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04692-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Sun Y, Guo J, Ruan Y, Zhang T, Fernie AR, et al. 2022. The recruitment of specific rhizospheric bacteria facilitates Stevia rebaudiana salvation under nitrogen and/or water deficit stresses. Industrial Crops and Products 187:115434

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115434

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Obata T, Fernie AR. 2012. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 69:3225−43

    doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1091-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Nakabayashi R, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Urano K, Suzuki M, Yamada Y, et al. 2014. Enhancement of oxidative and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by overaccumulation of antioxidant flavonoids. The Plant Journal 77:367−79

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12388

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang W, Xia K, Feng Z, Qin Y, Zhou Y, et al. 2024. Tomato plant growth promotion and drought tolerance conferred by three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is mediated by lipid metabolism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 208:108478

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Sun X, Zhang L, Pei J, Huang LF. 2020. Regulatory relationship between quality variation and environment of Cistanche deserticola in three ecotypes based on soil microbiome analysis. Scientific Reports 10:6662

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63607-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Parasar BJ, Sharma I, Agarwala N. 2024. Root exudation drives abiotic stress tolerance in plants by recruiting beneficial microbes. Applied Soil Ecology 198:105351

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Chai YN, Schachtman DP. 2022. Root exudates impact plant performance under abiotic stress. Trends in Plant Science 27:80−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.08.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Pan Y, Kang P, Tan M, Hu J, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Root exudates and rhizosphere soil bacterial relationships of Nitraria tangutorum are linked to k-strategists bacterial community under salt stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:997292

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.997292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Xiong YW, Li XW, Wang TT, Gong Y, Zhang CM, et al. 2020. Root exudates-driven rhizosphere recruitment of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus flexus KLBMP 4941 and its growth-promoting effect on the coastal halophyte Limonium sinense under salt stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 194:110374

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110374

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Jiang M, et al. 2024. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are key to promoting the growth and furanocoumarin synthesis of Angelica dahurica var. formosana under low-nitrogen conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72:6964−78

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c09655

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Xie H, Chen Z, Feng X, Wang M, Luo Y, et al. 2022. L-theanine exuded from Camellia sinensis roots regulates element cycling in soil by shaping the rhizosphere microbiome assembly. Science of the Total Environment 837:155801

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155801

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Sun Y, Guo J, Alejandro Jose Mur L, Xu X, Chen H, et al. 2024. Nitrogen starvation modulates the sensitivity of rhizobacterial community to drought stress in Stevia rebaudiana. Journal of Environmental Management 354:120486

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zhang X, Zhang G, Yan Q, Ahmad B, Pei J, et al. 2024. Quality variation and salt-alkali-tolerance mechanism of Cynomorium songaricum: Interacting from microbiome-transcriptome-metabolome. Science of the Total Environment 919:170801

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170801

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Liang Y, Wei G, Ning K, Li M, Zhang G, et al. 2021. Increase in carbohydrate content and variation in microbiome are related to the drought tolerance of Codonopsis pilosula. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 165:19−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Liang Y, Wei G, Ning K, Zhang G, Liu Y, et al. 2021. Contents of lobetyolin, syringin, and atractylolide III in Codonopsis pilosula are related to dynamic changes of endophytes under drought stress. Chinese Medicine 16:122

    doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00533-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Yue H, Zhao L, Yang D, Zhang M, Wu J, et al. 2022. Comparative analysis of the endophytic bacterial diversity of Populus euphratica oliv. in environments of different salinity intensities. Microbiology Spectrum 10:e00500-22

    doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00500-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Ma J, Chen D, Xu Y, Liu Y, Liu L, et al. 2024. Effects of different heavy metal stressors on the endophytic community composition and diversity of Symphytum officinale. Microorganisms 12:477

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12030477

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wu Y, Ma L, Zhang X, Topalović O, Liu Q, et al. 2020. A hyperaccumulator plant Sedum alfredii recruits Cd/Zn-tolerant but not Pb-tolerant endospheric bacterial communities from its rhizospheric soil. Plant and Soil 455:257−70

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04684-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zhang S, Jiang Q, Liu X, Liu L, Ding W. 2020. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviate aluminum toxicity and ginger bacterial wilt in acidic continuous cropping soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:569512

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.569512

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Luo J, Tao Q, Wu K, Li J, Qian J, et al. 2017. Structural and functional variability in root-associated bacterial microbiomes of Cd/Zn hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 101:7961−76

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8469-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Liu H, Brettell LE, Qiu Z, Singh BK. 2020. Microbiome-mediated stress resistance in plants. Trends in Plant Science 25:733−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.03.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Lata R, Chowdhury S, Gond SK, White Jr JF. 2018. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Letters in Applied Microbiology 66:268−76

    doi: 10.1111/lam.12855

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Munir N, Hanif M, Abideen Z, Sohail M, El-Keblawy A, et al. 2022. Mechanisms and strategies of plant microbiome interactions to mitigate abiotic stresses. Agronomy 12:2069

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy12092069

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Xie W, Hao Z, Zhou J, Fu W, Guo L, et al. 2023. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal specific phenolic and flavonoid accumulation in licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. ) induced by arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 205:108173

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Amiri R, Nikbakht A, Etemadi N. 2015. Alleviation of drought stress on rose geranium [ Pelargonium graveolens (L.) Herit.] in terms of antioxidant activity and secondary metabolites by mycorrhizal inoculation. Scientia Horticulturae 197:373−80

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.062

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Wang Y, Gao X, Wu Q, Ji D, Cai F, et al. 2020. Influences of arbuscular myrorrhizal fungi on plant growth and tea quality of fuding dabaicha seedlings under different water conditions. Journal of Tea Science 40:588−96

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2020.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Wu HH, Zou YN, Rahman MM, Ni QD, Wu QS. 2017. Mycorrhizas alter sucrose and proline metabolism in trifoliate orange exposed to drought stress. Scientific Reports 7:42389

    doi: 10.1038/srep42389

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Begum N, Akhtar K, Ahanger MA, Iqbal M, Wang P, et al. 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve growth, essential oil, secondary metabolism, and yield of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) under drought stress conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:45276−95

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13755-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Yan Q, Li X, Xiao X, Chen J, Liu J, et al. 2022. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and drought tolerance of Cinnamomum migao by enhancing physio-biochemical responses. Ecology and Evolution 12:e9091

    doi: 10.1002/ece3.9091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Al-Arjani ABF, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF. 2020. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulates dynamics tolerance expression to mitigate drought stress in Ephedra foliata Boiss. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27:380−94

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.10.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Liu CY, Zhang F, Zhang DJ, Srivastava A, Wu QS, et al. 2018. Mycorrhiza stimulates root-hair growth and IAA synthesis and transport in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Scientific Reports 8:1978

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20456-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Zhang F, Wang P, Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuča K. 2019. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on root-hair growth and hormone levels of taproot and lateral roots in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65:1316−30

    doi: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1563780

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Xie W, Hao Z, Zhou X, Jiang X, Xu L, et al. 2018. Arbuscular mycorrhiza facilitates the accumulation of glycyrrhizin and liquiritin in Glycyrrhiza uralensis under drought stress. Mycorrhiza 28:285−300

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-018-0827-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    He C, Han T, Tan L, Li X. 2022. Effects of dark septate endophytes on the performance and soil microbia of Lycium ruthenicum under drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:898378

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.898378

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    He C, Zeng Q, Chen Y, Chen C, Wang W, et al. 2021. Colonization by dark septate endophytes improves the growth and rhizosphere soil microbiome of licorice plants under different water treatments. Applied Soil Ecology 166:103993

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103993

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Ahmed B, Shahid M, Syed A, Rajput VD, Elgorban AM, et al. 2021. Drought tolerant Enterobacter sp./Leclercia adecarboxylata secretes indole-3-acetic acid and other biomolecules and enhances the biological attributes of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek in water deficit conditions. Biology 10:1149

    doi: 10.3390/biology10111149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    He C, Liu C, Liu H, Wang W, Hou J, et al. 2022. Dual inoculation of dark septate endophytes and Trichoderma viride drives plant performance and rhizosphere microbiome adaptations of Astragalus mongholicus to drought. Environmental Microbiology 24:324−40

    doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15878

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Xie Z, Chu Y, Zhang W, Lang D, Zhang X. 2019. Bacillus pumilus alleviates drought stress and increases metabolite accumulation in Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. Environmental and Experimental Botany 158:99−106

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.11.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Barnawal D, Maji D, Bharti N, Chanotiya CS, Kalra A. 2013. ACC Deaminase-containing Bacillus subtilis reduces stress ethylene-induced damage and improves Mycorrhizal colonization and Rhizobial nodulation in Trigonella foenum-graecum under drought stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 32:809−22

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9347-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Lin Y, Zhang H, Li P, Jin J, Li Z. 2022. The bacterial consortia promote plant growth and secondary metabolite accumulation in Astragalus mongholicus under drought stress. BMC Plant Biology 22:475

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03859-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Chiappero J, del Rosario Cappellari L, Sosa Alderete LG, Palermo TB, Banchio E. 2019. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve the antioxidant status in Mentha piperita grown under drought stress leading to an enhancement of plant growth and total phenolic content. Industrial Crops and Products 139:111553

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111553

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ghorbanpour M, Hatami M, Khavazi K. 2013. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on antioxidant enzyme activities and tropane alkaloids production of Hyoscyamus niger under water deficit stress. Turkish Journal of Biology 37:350−60

    doi: 10.3906/biy-1209-12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Asghari B, Khademian R, Sedaghati B. 2020. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) confer drought resistance and stimulate biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L. ) under water shortage condition. Scientia Horticulturae 263:109132

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Heidari M, Mousavinik SM, Golpayegani A. 2011. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) effect on physiological parameters and mineral uptake in basil (Ociumum basilicm L. ) under water stress. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6:6−11

    Google Scholar

    [75]

    Armada E, Probanza A, Roldán A, Azcón R. 2016. Native plant growth promoting bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis and mixed or individual mycorrhizal species improved drought tolerance and oxidative metabolism in Lavandula dentata plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 192:1−12

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.11.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Yue L, Uwaremwe C, Tian Y, Liu Y, Zhao X, et al. 2022. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens rescues glycyrrhizic acid loss under drought stress in Glycyrrhiza uralensis by activating the jasmonic acid pathway. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:798525

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.798525

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Attarzadeh M, Balouchi H, Rajaie M, Movahhedi Dehnavi M, Salehi A. 2019. Growth and nutrient content of Echinacea purpurea as affected by the combination of phosphorus with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and Pseudomonas florescent bacterium under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Environmental Management 231:182−88

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Hao Z, Xie W, Jiang X, Wu Z, Zhang X, et al. 2019. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus improves Rhizobium–Glycyrrhiza seedling symbiosis under drought stress. Agronomy 9:572

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy9100572

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Azizi S, Tabari Kouchaksaraei M, Hadian J, Fallah Nosrat Abad AR, Modarres Sanavi SAM, et al. 2021. Dual inoculations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria boost drought resistance and essential oil yield of common myrtle. Forest Ecology and Management 497:119478

    doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Wang Y, Wang M, Li Y, Wu A, Huang J. 2018. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and nitrogen uptake of Chrysanthemum morifolium under salt stress. PLoS One 13:e0196408

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196408

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Abd-Allah EF, Egamberdieva D. 2016. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance basil tolerance to salt stress through improved physiological and nutritional status. Pakistan Journal of Botany 48:37−45

    Google Scholar

    [82]

    Cheng XF, Wu HH, Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuča K. 2021. Mycorrhizal response strategies of trifoliate orange under well-watered, salt stress, and waterlogging stress by regulating leaf aquaporin expression. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 162:27−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Yilmaz A, Yildirim E, Yilmaz H, Soydemir HE, Güler E, et al. 2023. Use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi for boosting antioxidant enzyme metabolism and mitigating saline stress in Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L. ). Sustainability 15:5982

    doi: 10.3390/su15075982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Hou L, Li X, He X, Zuo Y, Zhang D, et al. 2021. Effect of dark septate endophytes on plant performance of Artemisia ordosica and associated soil microbial functional group abundance under salt stress. Applied Soil Ecology 165:103998

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103998

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Yan K, Zhu M, Su H, Liu X, Li S, et al. 2024. Trichoderma asperellum boosts nitrogen accumulation and photosynthetic capacity of wolfberry (Lycium chinense) under saline soil stress. Tree Physiology 44:tpad148

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Sharma K, Sharma S, Vaishnav A, Jain R, Singh D, et al. 2022. Salt-tolerant PGPR strain Priestia endophytica SK1 promotes fenugreek growth under salt stress by inducing nitrogen assimilation and secondary metabolites. Journal of Applied Microbiology 133:2802−13

    doi: 10.1111/jam.15735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Li X, Lang D, Wang J, Zhang W, Zhang X. 2023. Plant-beneficial Streptomyces dioscori SF1 potential biocontrol and plant growth promotion in saline soil within the arid and semi-arid areas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:70194−212

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27362-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Qin S, Feng WW, Zhang YJ, Wang TT, Xiong YW, et al. 2018. Diversity of bacterial microbiota of coastal halophyte Limonium sinense and amelioration of salinity stress damage by symbiotic plant growth-promoting actinobacterium Glutamicibacter halophytocola KLBMP 5180. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 84:e01533−18

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01533-18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Qin S, Feng WW, Wang TT, Ding P, Xing K, et al. 2017. Plant growth-promoting effect and genomic analysis of the beneficial endophyte Streptomyces sp. KLBMP 5084 isolated from halophyte Limonium sinense. Plant and Soil 416:117−32

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3192-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Mousavi SS, Karami A, Saharkhiz MJ, Etemadi M, Ravanbakhsh M. 2022. Microbial amelioration of salinity stress in endangered accessions of Iranian licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.). BMC Plant Biology 22:322

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03703-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Mousavi SS, Karami A, Saharkhiz MJ, Etemadi M, Zarshenas MM. 2022. Evaluation of metabolites in Iranian Licorice accessions under salinity stress and Azotobacter sp. inoculation. Scientific Reports 12:15837

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20366-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Sukweenadhi J, Balusamy SR, Kim YJ, Lee CH, Kim YJ, et al. 2018. A growth-promoting bacteria, Paenibacillus yonginensis DCY84T enhanced salt stress tolerance by activating defense-related systems in Panax ginseng. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:813

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00813

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Barnawal D, Bharti N, Maji D, Chanotiya CS, Kalra A. 2012. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase-containing rhizobacteria protect Ocimum sanctum plants during waterlogging stress via reduced ethylene generation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 58:227−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Barnawal D, Bharti N, Tripathi A, Pandey SS, Chanotiya CS, et al. 2016. ACC-Deaminase-producing endophyte Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum Strain SMR20 ameliorates Chlorophytum salinity stress via altering phytohormone generation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 35:553−64

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9560-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Pankaj U, Singh DN, Mishra P, Gaur P, Vivek Babu CS, et al. 2020. Autochthonous halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote bacoside A yield of Bacopa monnieri (L.) Nash and phytoextraction of salt-affected soil. Pedosphere 30:671−83

    doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60029-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Egamberdieva D, Berg G, Lindström K, Räsänen LA. 2013. Alleviation of salt stress of symbiotic Galega officinalis L. (goat's rue) by co-inoculation of Rhizobium with root-colonizing Pseudomonas. Plant and Soil 369:453−65

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1586-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Joe MM, Devaraj S, Benson A, Sa T. 2016. Isolation of phosphate solubilizing endophytic bacteria from Phyllanthus amarus Schum & Thonn: Evaluation of plant growth promotion and antioxidant activity under salt stress. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 3:71−77

    Google Scholar

    [98]

    Al-Garni SMS, Khan MMA, Bahieldin A. 2019. Plant growth-promoting bacteria and silicon fertilizer enhance plant growth and salinity tolerance in Coriandrum sativum. Journal of Plant Interactions 14:386−96

    doi: 10.1080/17429145.2019.1641635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Bharti N, Yadav D, Barnawal D, Maji D, Kalra A. 2013. Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, a halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, improves yield and content of secondary metabolites in Bacopa monnieri (L. ) Pennell under primary and secondary salt stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29:379−87

    doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1192-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Razzaghi Komaresofla B, Ali Alikhani H, Etesami H, Khoshkholgh-Sima NA. 2019. Improved growth and salinity tolerance of the halophyte Salicornia sp. by co–inoculation with endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria. Applied Soil Ecology 138:160−70

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Sziderics AH, Rasche F, Trognitz F, Sessitsch A, Wilhelm E. 2007. Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L. ). Canadian Journal of Microbiology 53:1195−202

    doi: 10.1139/W07-082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Rabiei Z, Hosseini SJ, Pirdashti H, Hazrati S. 2020. Physiological and biochemical traits in coriander affected by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under salt stress. Heliyon 6:e05321

    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Li L, Abd-Allah EF, Lindström K. 2017. Microbial cooperation in the rhizosphere improves liquorice growth under salt stress. Bioengineered 8:433−38

    doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1250983

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Bharti N, Barnawal D, Awasthi A, Yadav A, Kalra A. 2014. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviate salinity induced negative effects on growth, oil content and physiological status in Mentha arvensis. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36:45−60

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1385-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Saidi S, Cherif-Silini H, Chenari Bouket A, Silini A, Eshelli M, et al. 2021. Improvement of Medicago sativa crops productivity by the co-inoculation of Sinorhizobium meliloti−Actinobacteria under salt stress. Current Microbiology 78:1344−57

    doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02394-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Khalilpour M, Mozafari V, Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P. 2021. Tolerance to salinity and drought stresses in pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seedlings inoculated with indigenous stress-tolerant PGPR isolates. Scientia Horticulturae 289:110440

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Singh S, Chanotiya CS, Singh A, Vajpayee P, Kalra A. 2023. Role of ACC-deaminase synthesizing Trichoderma harzianum and plant growth-promoting bacteria in reducing salt-stress in Ocimum sanctum. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 29:815−28

    doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01328-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Hashem A, Abd Allah EF, Alqarawi AA, Al-Huqail AA, Wirth S, et al. 2016. The interaction between Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances plant growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:1089

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Arora M, Saxena P, Abdin MZ, Varma A. 2020. Interaction between Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum diminish the effect of salt stress in Artemisia annua L. by enhancing enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. Symbiosis 80:61−73

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-019-00656-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Khademian R, Asghari B, Sedaghati B, Yaghoubian Y. 2019. Plant beneficial rhizospheric microorganisms (PBRMs) mitigate deleterious effects of salinity in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): Physio-biochemical properties, fatty acids composition and secondary metabolites content. Industrial Crops and Products 136:129−39

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Li J, Han Q, Zeng Q, Wang C, Wang Q, et al. 2024. Pollutant-resistant bacteria facilitate the assembly of rhizosphere microbiota to mitigate pollutant threat on Ligusticum Chuanxiong Hort. In cadmium-phoxim co-contaminated soil. SSRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4551090

    [112]

    Rahman SU, Khalid M, Hui N, Rehman A, Kayani SI, et al. 2023. Piriformospora indica alter root-associated microbiome structure to enhance Artemisia annua L. tolerance to arsenic. Journal of Hazardous Materials 457:131752

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131752

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Fan M, Xiao X, Guo Y, Zhang J, Wang E, et al. 2018. Enhanced phytoremdiation of Robinia pseudoacacia in heavy metal-contaminated soils with rhizobia and the associated bacterial community structure and function. Chemosphere 197:729−40

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Pan F, Meng Q, Wang Q, Luo S, Chen B, et al. 2016. Endophytic bacterium Sphingomonas SaMR12 promotes cadmium accumulation by increasing glutathione biosynthesis in Sedum alfredii Hance. Chemosphere 154:358−66

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Chen B, Zhang Y, Rafiq MT, Khan KY, Pan F, et al. 2014. Improvement of cadmium uptake and accumulation in Sedum alfredii by endophytic bacteria Sphingomonas SaMR12: effects on plant growth and root exudates. Chemosphere 117:367−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.078

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Jiang X, Li WW, Han M, Chen G, Wu J, et al. 2022. Aluminum-tolerant, growth-promoting endophytic bacteria as contributors in promoting tea plant growth and alleviating aluminum stress. Tree Physiology 42:1043−58

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Chi Y, Ma X, Wu J, Wang R, Zhang X, et al. 2023. Plant growth promoting endophyte promotes cadmium accumulation in Solanum nigrum L. by regulating plant homeostasis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 457:131866

    doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131866

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Cao P, Wei X, Wang G, Chen X, Han J, et al. 2022. Microbial inoculants and garbage fermentation liquid reduced root-knot nematode disease and As uptake in Panax quinquefolium cultivation by modulating rhizosphere microbiota community. Chinese Herbal Medicines 14:58−69

    doi: 10.1016/j.chmed.2021.11.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Wei X, Cao P, Wang G, Han J. 2020. Microbial inoculant and garbage enzyme reduced cadmium (Cd) uptake in Salvia miltiorrhiza (Bge. ) under Cd stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 192:110311

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110311

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Chen M, Yang G, Sheng Y, Li P, Qiu H, et al. 2017. Glomus mosseae inoculation improves the root system architecture, photosynthetic efficiency and flavonoids accumulation of liquorice under nutrient stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:931

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Prakash J, Arora NK. 2019. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp. enhances growth, phosphorus uptake and oil yield of Mentha arvensis L. 3 Biotech 9:126

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1660-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Pramanik P, Goswami AJ, Ghosh S, Kalita C. 2019. An indigenous strain of potassium-solubilizing bacteria Bacillus pseudomycoides enhanced potassium uptake in tea plants by increasing potassium availability in the mica waste-treated soil of North-east India. Journal of Applied Microbiology 126:215−22

    doi: 10.1111/jam.14130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Devi KA, Pandey P, Sharma GD. 2016. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Serratia marcescens AL2-16 enhances the growth of Achyranthes aspera L., a medicinal plant. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences 23:173−80

    doi: 10.1016/j.hjb.2016.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Shi Z, Guo X, Lei Z, Wang Y, Yang Z, et al. 2023. Screening of high-efficiency nitrogen-fixing bacteria from the traditional Chinese medicine plant Astragalus mongolicus and its effect on plant growth promotion and bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. BMC Microbiology 23:292

    doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03026-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    Xin W, Zhang J, Yu Y, Tian Y, Li H, et al. 2024. Root microbiota of tea plants regulate nitrogen homeostasis and theanine synthesis to influence tea quality. Current Biology 34:868−880.E6

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Li L, Mohamad OAA, Ma J, Friel AD, Su Y, et al. 2018. Synergistic plant-microbe interactions between endophytic bacterial communities and the medicinal plant Glycyrrhiza uralensis F. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 111:1735−48

    doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1062-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Wang H, Wang Y, Jiang D, Xiang Z, Wang S, et al. 2022. Soil microbe inoculation alters the bacterial communities and promotes root growth of Atractylodes lancea under heat stress. Plant and Soil 478:371−89

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05369-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128]

    Singh S, Tripathi A, Chanotiya CS, Barnawal D, Singh P, et al. 2020. Cold stress alleviation using individual and combined inoculation of ACC deaminase producing microbes in Ocimum sanctum. Environmental Sustainability 3:289−301

    doi: 10.1007/s42398-020-00118-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129]

    Orujei Y, Shabani L, Sharifi-Tehrani M. 2013. Induction of glycyrrhizin and total phenolic compound production in licorice by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 60:855−60

    doi: 10.1134/S1021443713050129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130]

    Li J, Meng B, Chai H, Yang X, Song W, et al. 2019. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in C(3) (Leymus chinensis) and C(4) (Hemarthria altissima) grasses via altering antioxidant enzyme activities and photosynthesis. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:499

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131]

    Irankhah S, Ganjeali A, Mashreghi M, Lari Z. 2021. Mixed inoculum of rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus enhance diosgenin contain and phosphorus uptake in fenugreek under drought stress. Rhizosphere 18:100338

    doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100338

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132]

    Mukhopadhyay R, Sarkar B, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Bolan NS. 2021. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. Journal of Environmental Management 280:111736

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133]

    Angon PB, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Samin SI, Habiba U, Hossain MA, et al. 2022. How do plants respond to combined drought and salinity stress?-A systematic review. Plants 11:2884

    doi: 10.3390/plants11212884

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [134]

    Dastogeer KMG, Zahan MI, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Akter MA, Okazaki S. 2020. Plant salinity tolerance conferred by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated mechanisms: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:588550

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.588550

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135]

    Chandrasekaran M, Boughattas S, Hu S, Oh SH, Sa T. 2014. A meta-analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal effects on plants grown under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 24:611−25

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0582-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136]

    Si T, Lu J, Cao Y, Tang Z, Ci D, et al. 2024. Physiological, transcriptional and metabolomic evidence for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Lactobacillus plantarum in peanut resistance to salinity stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 210:e12672

    doi: 10.1111/jac.12672

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [137]

    Tan JY, Yue ZC, Li ST, Pan YY, Chu ZY, et al. 2024. Alleviation of salt stress and changes in glycyrrhizic acid accumulation by dark septate endophytes in Glycyrrhiza glabra grown under salt stress. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 72:14557−14569

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00700

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138]

    Farh MEA, Kim YJ, Sukweenadhi J, Singh P, Yang DC. 2017. Aluminium resistant, plant growth promoting bacteria induce overexpression of Aluminium stress related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and increase the ginseng tolerance against Aluminium stress. Microbiological Research 200:45−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [139]

    Płociniczak T, Chodór M, Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. 2019. Metal-tolerant endophytic bacteria associated with Silene vulgaris support the Cd and Zn phytoextraction in non-host plants. Chemosphere 219:250−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140]

    Chamkhi I, Zwanzig J, Ibnyasser A, Cheto S, Geistlinger J, et al. 2023. Siccibacter colletis as a member of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria consortium to improve faba-bean growth and alleviate phosphorus deficiency stress. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7:1134809

    doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1134809

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141]

    Deng C, Sun RT, Ma Q, Yang QH, Zhou N, et al. 2022. Mycorrhizal effects on active components and associated gene expressions in leaves of Polygonum cuspidatum under P stress. Agronomy 12:2970

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy12122970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142]

    Morán-Diez E, Rubio B, Domínguez S, Hermosa R, Monte E, et al. 2012. Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24h incubation with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Journal of Plant Physiology 169:614−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143]

    Tiwari S, Prasad V, Chauhan PS, Lata C. 2017. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens confers tolerance to various abiotic stresses and modulates plant response to phytohormones through osmoprotection and gene expression regulation in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1510

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [144]

    Chiocchio I, Mandrone M, Tomasi P, Marincich L, Poli F. 2021. Plant secondary metabolites: an opportunity for circular economy. Molecules 26:495

    doi: 10.3390/molecules26020495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145]

    Sun Y, Alseekh S, Fernie AR. 2023. Plant secondary metabolic responses to global climate change: A meta-analysis in medicinal and aromatic plants. Global Change Biology 29:477−504

    doi: 10.1111/gcb.16484

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146]

    Yu JB, Bai M, Wang C, Wu H, Liang X. 2024. Regulation of secondary metabolites accumulation in medicinal plants by rhizospheric and endophytic microorganisms. Medicinal Plant Biology 3:e011

    doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147]

    He C, Wang W, Hou J, Li X. 2021. Dark septate endophytes isolated from wild licorice roots grown in the desert regions of northwest china enhance the growth of host plants under water deficit stress. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:522449

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.522449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148]

    Amanifar S, Khodabandeloo M, Mohseni Fard E, Askari MS, Ashrafi M. 2019. Alleviation of salt stress and changes in glycyrrhizin accumulation by arbuscular mycorrhiza in liquorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) grown under salinity stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 160:25−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149]

    Mishra BK, Meena KK, Dubey PN, Aishwath OP, Kant K, et al. 2016. Influence on yield and quality of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. ) grown under semi-arid saline soil, due to application of native phosphate solubilizing rhizobacterial isolates. Ecological Engineering 97:327−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150]

    Bharti N, Barnawal D, Shukla S, Tewari SK, Katiyar RS, et al. 2016. Integrated application of Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, Glomus fasciculatum, and vermicompost improves growth, yield and quality of Mentha arvensis in salt-stressed soils. Industrial Crops and Products 83:717−28

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151]

    Lazzara S, Militello M, Carrubba A, Napoli E, Saia S. 2017. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi altered the hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin content in flowers of Hypericum perforatum grown under contrasting P availability in a highly organic substrate. Mycorrhiza 27:345−54

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0756-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152]

    Ran Z, Ding W, Cao S, Fang L, Zhou J, et al. 2022. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Effects on secondary metabolite accumulation of traditional Chinese medicines. Plant Biology 24:932−38

    doi: 10.1111/plb.13449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Sun Y, Yuan H, Fernie AR. 2024. Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants. Medicinal Plant Biology 3: e024 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0023
    Sun Y, Yuan H, Fernie AR. 2024. Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants. Medicinal Plant Biology 3: e024 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0023

Figures(1)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(1643) PDF downloads(407)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants

Medicinal Plant Biology  3 Article number: e024  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Medicinal plants frequently encounter environmental challenges such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal pollution, all of which are aggravated by the ongoing global climate change. Plants can alleviate the negative effects of these stresses by interacting with microorganisms both in the rhizosphere and within the plant itself. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the responses of microbial communities to these challenges and their impact on plant resistance and quality. In this study, microbial community structures and assembly changes are explored in response to abiotic stresses and the functional mechanisms underlying beneficial microorganism’s enhancement of plant tolerance are elucidated. These include activation of the antioxidant system activation, osmotic regulation, hormone synthesis, nutrient utilization, and recruitment of other beneficial microbes. Furthermore, these microorganisms significantly improve the quality of medicinal plants under abiotic stresses by enhancing the synthesis and accumulation of key secondary metabolites. While these findings provide functional insights into the beneficial effects of microorganisms on medicinal plants under stressful conditions, further research is necessary to be able to routinely apply microbial resources as a means to enhance plant adaptability and quality.

    • Medicinal plants serve as the primary reservoirs of numerous essential natural compounds, playing a crucial role in human health through disease prevention and treatment. Prominent examples, such as artemisinin from Artemisia annua, tanshinone from Salvia miltiorrhiza, and ginsenosides from Panax ginseng, contribute significantly to human well-being[1]. The importance of these botanical resources has been further accentuated in the aftermath of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the increasing reliance of humanity on these botanical resources[2]. However, like all plant species, medicinal plants encounter diverse environmental stresses during their growth. Particularly, extreme environmental stresses such as drought, flooding and heat stress, resulting from the global climate changes, pose huge challenges to plant growth[3,4]. These abiotic stresses increase the uncertainty in the yield and quality of medicinal plants, profoundly impacting downstream industrial production and human health. Thus, it is imperative to enhance the resilience of medicinal plant to environmental fluctuations.

      Plants have evolved multiple strategies to cope with these challenges, which have been widely documented at the physiological and molecular levels. For instance, plants adapt to drought conditions by elongating roots, developing lateral roots, and enhancing the expression of aquaporins in order to facilitate water resource utilization[5]. Under salt-induced osmotic stress, plants employ physiological mechanisms such as actively secreting salt through salt glands[6] or passively excluding Na+ from entering cells through the plasma membrane[7] to enhance adaptability. To counter heavy-metal stresses, plants can activate reactive oxygen species-mediated antioxidant systems or regulate the expression of stress-related transcription factors, such as bZIPs, MYBs, AP2, and DREN2B, through miRNA modulation[8,9]. Beyond these intrinsic strategies, plant-associated microorganisms, acting as the second genome of plants (if the organellar genomes of plants are not considered as separate entities), also play a crucial role in plant growth, development, and adaptation to environmental stresses. For instance, Li et al.[10] showed that the salt-recruited beneficial soil bacteria could effectively enhance plant adaptability to salt stress. This theory also applies to the endophytic microorganisms, as endophytic bacterial incubation has been demonstrated to not only enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, but also increase the accumulation of secondary metabolites[11,12]. Moreover, the link between microbial communities and plant nutrient uptake, yield formation, and stress adaptation is well-established[13,14]. However, to date, the significance and functional mechanisms of these microorganisms in modulating adverse environmental fluctuations within medicinal plants remain to be fully elucidated.

      Here, we systematically survey the responses of plant-associated microorganisms, encompassing both rhizospheric and endophytic communities, to common abiotic stresses experienced by plants, and review the crucial role of these organisms in facilitating plant adaptation and promoting the synthesis of medicinal compounds. The present study aims to provide essential insights for future cultivation of medicinal plants in the face of climate change scenarios.

    • Abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and heavy metals have been demonstrated to affect both plant growth and development, as well as the associated rhizospheric or endophytic microbial communities, owing to their intricate interplay[15]. Such influence arises partly from the direct environmental effects, such as alterations in soil moisture and salinity, which subsequently affect the diversity and composition of soil microorganisms[16]. Equally importantly, plant physiological and metabolic responses to stresses indirectly shape the assembly of these microbial communities, particularly via the secretion of key compounds into the rhizosphere zone by root system[17]. Indeed, numerous studies have reported the microbial responses to abiotic stresses, with most studies revealing predominantly negative or insignificant impacts. For instance, via meta-analysis, Quiroga et al.[18] demonstrated that drought stress significantly decreased the abundance of rhizosphere microorganisms, particularly fungi, without significantly affecting phyllosphere microorganisms. Similarly, Signorini et al.[19] showed that copper (Cu), instead of cadmium (Cd), negatively affects the α-diversity of rhizosphere bacteria in a dose-dependent manner. These adverse effects underscore the sensitivity of microbial communities to environmental perturbations. In the context of medicinal plants, understanding these interactions is particularly crucial given their unique natural habitats and the specific metabolic compounds which they produce.

      The diversity and patterns of assembly of microbial communities are key indicators of ecosystem function and biotic interactions, which are intimately connected to the fluctuations within the environment. In the case of the rhizosphere microbiome, limited research indicates a potentially pronounced negative effect of drought stress on the rhizobacterial diversity of medicinal plant rhizospheres, but a potential benefit to fungal communities[20,21]. Comparable results have been observed under heavy-metal stress, with a study on Tamarix ramosissima revealing that bacterial diversity was more negatively affected by heavy metal stress than fungal diversity[22]. Such an influence of salt stress is more complex, as both positive[23], negative[24], and negligible effects[25] have been documented. This variability is likely attributable to differences in the salt tolerance among plant species and the specific conditions of stress exposure, such as duration and intensity. Additionally, soil nutrients are speculated to be a key factor in shaping rhizosphere microbiome assembly. For example, Su et al. found that variations in nutrients such as potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), and iron in the core planting area of citrus determine rhizosphere microorganism compositions, which in turn influence the synthesis of citrus terpenes[26]. Similarly, research on Glehnia littoralis demonstrates that varied soil nutrients act as key influencers at various developmental stages, with pH and available phosphorus (P) positively impacting bacterial and fungal communities during early development stages, while nitrate enhances these communities in the middle and late growth stages[27]. Interestingly, N deficiency may enhance the bacterial diversity, as seen in Lycium barbarum[28]. While studies on the relationship between other soil nutrients and the assembly of rhizosphere or endophytic microbial communities in medicinal plants are limited, it is hypothesized that P deficiency might reduce bacterial diversity but increase fungal diversity. This could strengthen the role of deterministic processes in shaping bacterial community assembly, as suggested by research in rice plants[29]. Additionally, a study on ginseng has identified soil total K as a key driver of the temporal dynamics of core-enriched bacterial communities in bulk and rhizosphere soils[30]. Thus, further research is needed to fully understand the impact of P or K deficiency on rhizosphere microbial communities in medicinal plants.

      Notably, these stresses would also reshape the composition and structure of rhizosphere microbial communities, while the responses may vary according to plant type and stress intensity. For instance, an examination of Atractylodes lancea has demonstrated that severe drought stress decreases the relative abundance of Proteobacteria phylum, whereas moderate stress leads to an increase of species of this phylum[21]. In the case of Stevia rebaudiana experiencing moderate drought stress, bacteria belonging to the phyla of Actinobacteria, δ-Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Chloroflexi were mainly enriched[31]. The enrichment of these microbes are partly associated with functions related to carbohydrate metabolism, lipid and secondary metabolite metabolism, which may be helpful in osmotic stress regulation since all of these compounds have been documented to play such a function[3234]. Under salt stress, specific microbes like those from the orders Micrococcales and Bacillales have been observed to be enriched in some studies while others suggest no significant shifts in the dominant bacterial phyla[23,35]. These examples suggest that the selective enrichment of microbes under stresses is substantially influenced by the host, which can attract and recruit beneficial bacteria via releasing specific root exudates. Notably, root exudates, comprising a diverse array of compounds such as carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids, and secondary metabolites, are well-documented to be capable of enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stress by attracting specific beneficial microorganisms within the rhizosphere acting as chemical signals[36,37]. As evidence in support of this, Pan et al.[38] demonstrated that the assembly of rhizosphere bacteria under drought and salt stress is accompanied by the accumulation of rhizosphere compounds such as organic acids, growth hormones, and sugars. Additionally, a study on Limonium sinense indicated that plants can attract and recruit beneficial bacteria through organic acids secreted from roots, promoting plant growth under salt stress[39]. This selective enrichment is further exemplified under low-N stress, where the secretion of C-containing compounds from roots may alter the C-N ratio in rhizosphere soil, thus recruiting specific rhizosphere bacteria to improve N use efficiency. This can lead to an increase in the relative abundance of Acidobacteriota and Myxococcota phyla, as well as ammonia-oxidizing bacteria such as Nitrosospira[28,40]. In addition, theanine secreted by tea plants has been shown to significantly changed the structure of the rhizosphere microbiota, selectively shaping rhizosphere microbial assembly[41].

      Alterations in the network structure of rhizosphere microorganisms when subjected to stress conditions are equally importance, reflecting the complex interactions among microbial species and the ecological stability of the community. For example, studies on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities in Stevia rebaudiana under drought stress have revealed simplified and unstable networks, yet also highlighted an increase in positive interactions and a strengthened deterministic assembly process[42]. Similar findings have been documented in salt-stressed Cynomorium songaricum[43], which further suggests that plants may be employing adaptive strategies to enhance their resilience to stresses. Additionally, N stress could reduce the number of edges in microbial occurrence networks, thereby altering network complexity and potentially increasing the contribution of deterministic processes to community assembly[40,42]. These changes in network complexity provide insights into microbial community adaptation and response to environmental pressures.

      While the number of case studies remains limited, we can discern certain general trends that characterize how these internal microbial communities react and adapt to various environmental stimuli. For example, studies in Codonopsis pilosula indicated increased Shannon and Chao indices of root endophytes[44,45]. Notably, the bacterial community showed a significant increase in Rhizobiales, while the fungal community was enriched with Hypocreales[44]. Similar to those rhizosphere microbes, these microbes were implicated in the modulation of key sugar components that function in drought resistance. Similarly, based on research in model plants, it is reasonable to hypothesize that salt stress could lead to a significant reduction in endophyte diversity. There may, concurrently be a recruitment of microorganisms which function in energy and carbohydrate metabolism, which are essential for the plant adaptation to saline conditions[10,46]. These cases again highlight the beneficial roles of specific microbial taxa enriched under stress conditions, can provide enhanced support for plant acclimation. Moreover, different from the response of rhizosphere microorganisms, Ma et al.[47] revealed a decrease in endophytic fungal diversity specifically in heavy metal-treated Symphytum officinale, with bacterial diversity being less affected. Additionally, the occurrence-network of these endophytes were also altered by heavy-metal stress, with the modular interactions of bacteria strengthened but those of fungi weakened, respectively. Heavy metal pollution also selectively affects microbial compositions by favoring microorganisms with specific functions, such as heavy metal transport and detoxification[47]. This is exemplified in studies on Sedum alfredii, a metal hyperaccumulating plant, which specifically recruits Cd/Zinc-resistant bacteria to enhance its own tolerance to heavy metals[48]. Moreover, under heavy metal stresses, both endophyte and rhizosphere microbiomes were dominated by members of the phylum Proteobacteria, including genera such as Pseudomonas and Serratia[49,50], further supporting the aforementioned findings. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the complex dynamics of plant-microbe interactions under stress and highlight the potential for manipulating these relationships to improve plant resilience and stress tolerance.

      Collectively, these findings highlight an evolutionary strategy where plants and their associated microbiomes co-evolve to mitigate the negative effects of abiotic stresses and such interaction shapes the assembly features of microbial communities. Future research should delve into the mechanisms by which medicinal plants and their microbiomes co-evolve under stress, which could potentially inform strategies for enhancing their resilience and optimizing their cultivation.

    • In the face of hostile and unpredictable environments, plants must develop robust adaptive capabilities to ensure their survival and reproductive success. The plant-associated microbiome, often referred to as the plant's second genome, plays a pivotal role in facilitating these adaptive responses. Through a long history of co-evolution with their host, these microorganisms have formed symbiotic relationships that significantly contribute to the plant ability to withstand diverse environmental stresses[51]. This relationship extends to medicinal plants as well, where mounting evidence suggests that inoculating rhizospheric or endophytic microbes can enhance their growth and development, even under stressful conditions[17,52], as listed in Table 1. Crucially, such microbial interventions have been observed to mitigate oxidative damage caused by various abiotic stress, triggering a cascade of physiological and molecular responses that enhance the plant resilience. The modulation of reactive oxygen species, enhancement of antioxidant systems, and regulation of stress-responsive genes are among the molecular events influenced by these beneficial microbes[53]. Understanding the intricate mechanisms by which these microorganisms confer medicinal plants with abiotic stress resistance is essential for advancing our knowledge of plant-microbe interactions and optimizing cultivation practices in the face of environmental adversity.

      Table 1.  Role of beneficial microorganisms in aiding host plant resisting abiotic stresses.

      Stress type Strain/microbes Medicinal plant Mechanistic function Ref.
      Drought AMF Pelargonium graveolens, Glycyrrhiza uralensis; Camellia sinensis Activation of antioxidant systems Xie et al.[54]; Amiri et al.[55]; Wang et al.[56]
      Poncirus trifoliate; Osmotic regulation Wu et al.[57]
      Nicotiana tabacum;
      Cinnamomum migao
      Activation of antioxidant systems;
      osmotic regulation
      Begum et al.[58];
      Yan et al.[59]
      Ephedra foliata Boiss Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulating IAA, GA and ABA levels Al-Arjani et al.[60]
      Poncirus trifoliate; Regulating root development;
      regulating IAA and ABA levels
      Liu et al.[61];
      Zhang et al.[62]
      Glycyrrhiza uralensis Regulating aquaporin expression; regulating ABA level Xie et al.[63]
      DES
      Lycium ruthenicum, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Regulating root development, nutrient uptake and regulating soil microbiome assembly He et al.[20]; He et al.[64]; He et al.[65]
      Glycyrrhiza uralensis Regulating IAA production and ACCD activity Ahmed et al.[66]
      DSE+ Trichoderma viride Astragalus mongholicus Regulating soil microbial assembly He et al.[67]
      Bacillus sp. Glycyrrhiza uralensis; Activation of antioxidant systems Xie et al.[68]
      Bacillus sp. Trigonella foenum-graecum Enhancing ACCD activity;
      beneficial microbial colonization
      Barnawal et al.[69]
      Bacterial combination/
      syncoms
      Astragalus mongholicus Activation of antioxidant systems Lin et al.[70]
      Mentha piperita; Hyoscyamus niger Activation of antioxidant systems Chiappero et al.[71]; Ghorbanpour et al.[72]
      Mentha pulegium Activation of antioxidant systems;
      regulation of ABA and flavonoid levels
      Asghari et al.[73]
      Ociumum basilicm Osmotic regulation Heidari et al.[74]
      AM fungi and PGPB Lavandula dentata Regulation of IAA levels and ACCD activity Armada et al.[75]
      Trigonella foenum-graecum Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulation of JA levels Yue et al.[76]
      Echinacea purpurea Regulation of nutrient uptake Attarzadeh et al.[77]
      Glycyrrhiza Regulation of nutrient uptake; beneficial microbial colonization Hao et al.[78]
      Myrtus communis Regulation of nutrient uptake; antioxidant system activation Azizi et al.[79]
      Salt stress AMF Chrysanthemum morifolium Regulation of nitrogen uptake Wang et al.[80]
      Ocimum basilicum Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio Abd-Allah and Egamberdieva[81]
      Trifoliate orange Enhanced aquaporin expression Cheng et al.[82]
      Ocimum basilicum Activation of antioxidant systems Yilmaz et al.[83]
      DES Artemisia ordosica Activation of antioxidant systems; IAA production; regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio Hou et al.[84]
      Trichoderma asperellum; Priestia endophytica Lycium chinense;
      Trigonella foenum-graecum
      Regulating nitrogen uptake and assimilation Yan et al.[85];
      Sharma et al.[86]
      Streptomyces sp. Glycyrrhiza uralensis Activation of antioxidant systems Li et al.[87]
      Glutamicibacter sp. Limonium sinense Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio; promotion of flavonoid synthesis Qin et al.[88]
      Bacillus sp.;
      Streptomyces sp.; Azotobacter sp.
      Limonium sinense; Glycyrrhiza glabra; Iranian Licorice Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio Xiong et al.[39];
      Qin et al.[89];
      Mousavi et al.[90];
      Mousavi et al.[91]
      Paenibacillus sp. Panax ginseng Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation; regulation of ABA level Sukweenadhi et al.[92]
      Achromobacter sp. Catharanthus roseus Activation of antioxidant systems;
      enhanced ACCD activity
      Barnawal et al.[93]
      Brachybacterium sp. Chlorophytum borivilianum Regulation of IAA level, ABA level and ACCD activity Barnawal et al.[94]
      Bacterial combination/ Syncoms Bacopa monnieri; Galega officinalis Regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio Pankaj et al.[95]; Egamberdieva et al.[96]
      Phyllanthus amarus;
      Coriandrum sativum
      Activation of antioxidant system Joe et al.[97];
      Al-Garni et al.[98]
      Bacopa monnieri; Salicornia sp.; Capsicum annuum Osmotic regulation Bharti et al.[99]; Razzaghi Komaresofla et al.[100];
      Sziderics et al.[101]
      Coriandrum sativum Regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio;
      activation of antioxidant systems
      Rabiei et al.[102]
      Glycyrrhiza uralensis Activation of antioxidant systems;
      regulation of nutrient uptake
      Egamberdieva et al.[103]
      Mentha arvensis Activation of antioxidant systems; regulation of nutrient uptake; regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio; regulation of ACCD activity and siderophore production Bharti et al.[104]
      Medicago sativa Regulation of the IAA level Saidi et al.[105]
      Pistacia vera Regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio; regulating IAA level, ACCD activity and siderophore production Khalilpour et al.[106]
      Fungi and PGPB Ocimum sanctum Activation of antioxidant systems;
      regulation of the ACCD activity
      Singh et al.[107]
      Acacia gerrardii Regulation of the nutrient uptake;
      regulation of the K+/ Na+ ratio
      Hashem et al.[108]
      Artemisia annuaitalic;
      Sesamum indicum
      Activation of antioxidant systems; osmotic regulation Arora et al.[109]; Khademian et al.[110]
      Heavy metal stress Halomonas sp Ligusticum chuanxiong Reduction of the heavy-metal uptake and regulating rhizosphere microbial assembly Li et al.[111]
      Piriformospora sp. Piriformospora indica Improving tolerance; regulation of rhizosphere microbial assembly Rahman et al.[112]
      Rhizobia Robinia pseudoacacia Improving tolerance;
      regulation of rhizosphere microbial assembly
      Fan et al.[113]
      Sphingomonas sp. Sedum alfredii Activation of antioxidant systems Pan et al.[114]
      Burkholderia sp. Sedum alfredii Regulating translocation ability Chen et al.[115]
      Leifsonia sp. Camellia sinensis Regulation of rhizosphere microbial assembly Jiang et al.[116]
      Pseudomonas sp. Solanum nigrum Regulation of nutrient uptake; recruiting beneficial bacteria Chi et al.[117]
      Microbial inoculant Panax quinquefolium;
      Salvia miltiorrhiza
      Reduction of heavy-metal uptake;
      regulation of rhizosphere microbial assembly
      Cao et al.[118];
      Wei et al.[119]
      Nutrient deficiency AMF Glycyrrhiza uralensis Regulation of P and K uptake; improving nutrient utilization Chen et al.[120]
      Bacillus sp. Mentha arvensis Improving P solubilization Prakash and Arora[121]
      Bacillus sp. Camellia sinensis Regulation of K utilization Pramanik et al.[122]
      Serratia sp. Achyranthes aspera Improving P solubilization, IAA level and siderophore production Devi et al.[123]
      Bacterial combination/syncoms Angelica dahurica Regulation of nutrient uptake Jiang et al.[40]
      Astragalus mongolicus Regulation of nutrient uptake; regulation of rhizosphere microbial assembly Shi et al.[124]
      Camellia sinensis Regulating root development;
      Regulation of the N uptake
      Xin et al.[125]
      Glycyrrhiza uralensis Regulation of nutrient uptake, IAA level and siderophore production Li et al.[126]
      Heat stress Soil suspension Atractylodes lancea Recruiting specific endophytic bacterial Wang et al.[127]
      Chilling stress Fungi and PGPB Ocimum sanctum Regulation of nutrient uptake and the ACCD activity; osmotic regulation Singh et al.[128]
      Flooding stress Bacterial
      combination/syncoms
      Ocimum sanctum Regulation of the ACCD activity Barnawal et al.[93]
    • Diverse microorganisms can form symbiotic relationships with plants and provide benefits under drought stress conditions. Among these, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are particularly acknowledged for their critical role in enhancing plant drought tolerance. For instance, extensive studies have demonstrated the positive role of AM fungi in enhancing stress tolerance in plants such as Glycyrrhiza uralensis[63,129], Ephedra foliata[60], and Poncirus Trifoliate[57] under drought stress. This benefits mainly evident in the increased growth rate, photosynthesis rate as well as the higher water content. Mechanistically, AM fungi enhance plant drought resistance by activating antioxidant defense systems[59,60,130] and facilitating the synthesis of osmotic substances such as sucrose and proline[57]. AM fungal incubation can also improve water absorption of G. uralensis through the upregulation of expression of PIP gene that related to aquaporin[63]. Interestingly, studies on Poncirus trifoliate have demonstrated that AM fungi incubation increases root endogenous hormone (e.g. abscisic acid, indole-3-acetic acid and brassinosteroids) levels, and thus promotes root hair density and diameter[61,62]. Such an effect is partly associated with the down-regulation of root auxin efflux carriers (PtPIN1 and PtPIN3) and up-regulation of root auxin influx carriers (PtABCB19 and PtLAX2) under drought stress. Moreover, via combined transcriptome and metabolome analysis, Xie et al.[54] demonstrated that AM-induced plant drought tolerance was primarily linked to the accumulation of root phenolic compounds and flavonoids. In addition to AM fungi, dark septate endophytes (DSE) have also been demonstrated to enhance biomass formation and root development in medicinal plants under drought stress, as seen in G. uralensis[20,65], and Lycium ruthenicum[64]. DSE appear to regulate plant drought tolerance by direct plant interactions and by enriching specific composition of soil microbial communities, including AM fungi, gram-negative bacteria, and actinomycetes. Bacterial inoculants also exhibit positive effects on plant drought tolerance via varying mechanisms. For instance, inoculation with Bacillus sp.[68,76] or Pseudomonas sp.[72] can mitigate lipid oxidation by enhancing the antioxidant enzyme activity or the oxidant content in the host plant. These beneficial bacteria also contribute to osmotic adjustment by increasing proline or soluble carbohydrates levels[72,74]. Furthermore, certain ACC deaminase-containing bacteria can enhance plant resistance to drought by lowing ethylene levels[69], while the activation of hormone-mediated defense pathways, such as those involving jasmonic acid (JA), is equally important[76].

      The co-inoculation of diverse microorganisms, moreover, more effectively enhances plant tolerance due to their mutualistic interaction. For instance, the combined inoculation of DSE and Trichoderma viride has been shown to markedly enhance the growth and drought tolerance of Astragalus mongholicus[67]. Further evidence of the benefits of microbial co-inoculation comes from studies on Astragalus mongholicus[70], Mentha piperita[71], and M. pulegium[73], where various bacterial combinations have been documented to exert positive effects. These synergistic interactions are particularly prominent in bacterial-fungal combinations, which mitigate oxidative damage induced by drought stress by enhancing nutrient uptake and accumulation, while also reducing ethylene levels[78,131]. These findings suggest the importance of microbial diversity and the potential for mutualistic relationships between different microorganisms in improving plant resilience. The importance of microbial diversity is further demonstrated by a previous study showing significantly improved growth and drought resistance in Atractylodes lancea when incubated with an entire soil microbial community[21]. The enhanced growth and drought tolerance observed in plants inoculated with these microbial combinations highlight the potential of harnessing microbial diversity and synergies for boosting plant stress tolerance.

    • Salt stress is a widespread abiotic stressor that significantly influences plant growth and quality worldwide[132]. While it induces osmotic stress in plants similar to drought stress, the primary damage derives from ion imbalance and toxicity, which can severely impair plant productivity[133]. In the context of plant-microorganism interactions, various strategies are employed to mitigate this complex osmotic stress. Similar to their role in addressing drought stress, AM fungi represent a key strategy for mitigating salt stress in medicinal plants. Via meta-analysis, previous studies have shown that plants inoculated with AM fungi, either alone or in combination with other bacteria, exhibit better performance under salt stress compared to non-mycorrhizal plants[134,135]. This beneficial effect has been observed in medicinal plants such as Artemisia annua[109], Acacia gerrardii[108], and Ocimum basilicum[81]. The improved resilience of these medicinal plants is largely attributed to several factors. Crucially, AM fungi enhances nutrient uptake, leading to increased levels of essential elements such as N, P, and microelements while reducing the concentrations of harmful ions such as Na+ and Cl[80,110]. This also results in a more favorable potassium/sodium (K+/Na+) ratio. Equally important is the activation of antioxidant enzyme activities contributes to the enhanced stress tolerance. Additionally, a study on peanut demonstrated that combined inoculation of AM and Lactobacillus plantarum under salt stress modulated signal transduction pathways, including those involving phytohormone synthesis and mitogen-activated protein kinases[136]. This finding highlights the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in microorganism-regulated plant salt tolerance, similar to that observed in the salt tolerance promoted by DES in G. glabra[137]. Moreover, Trichoderma has also been shown to positively impact medicinal plant health, primarily through enhanced nutrient, especially N, absorption. This is accompanied by increased activities of N assimilation enzymes, including nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, and glutamine synthetase[85].

      Notably, N-fixing rhizobia and actinomycetes have garnered considerable interest for their roles in producing antioxidants and osmoregulatory substances[87,91]. Rhizobia enhance plant salt tolerance by improving N absorption and assimilation, while actinomycetes exhibit significant resilience to water shortage and osmotic stress. Similarly, other plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) also exhibit great potential in enhancing plant salt tolerance. For instance, bacteria such as Bacteroidetes, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas can activate the entire defence system of medicinal plants under salt stress by facilitating ion transport, boosting antioxidant production, and aiding in osmotic regulation[39,96,138]. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of co-inoculating these beneficial bacteria warrant significant consideration. For instance, co-inoculation of rhizobia and Pseudomonas or Bacillus species can effectively mitigate hydrogen peroxide production under salt stress by enhancing N content, antioxidant capacity, and free radical scavenging ability[97,103]. Incorporating multiple beneficial bacteria or a combination of growth-promoting bacteria and fungi may further strengthen plant capacity to tolerant salt stress through diverse regulatory mechanisms. Specifically, these beneficial microbes primarily elevate the K+/Na+ ratio by promoting K+ absorption and thus inhibiting Na+ uptake, which is also accompanied by the activation of antioxidant systems and the absorption of other nutrients to synergistically improve plant resistance[100]. Additionally, these bacteria can support plant growth under saline conditions through the production of extracellular polysaccharide, ACC deaminase or siderophores (iron carriers)[99,106].

    • When addressing heavy metal pollution, plant-microorganism systems primarily adopt two strategies: inhibiting the absorption of heavy metals by plants and improving plant tolerance to these metals, aiming to mitigate the associated negative effects. For example, Li et al.[111] demonstrated that Halomonas sp. could reduce the bioavailability of cadmium and phoxim in soil and plants, thereby improving rhizome biomass and reducing oxidative damage. Similarly, microbial inoculant have been found to reduce the accumulation of heavy metals in the roots of medicinal plants such as Panax quinquefolium[118] and Salvia miltiorrhiza[119], thus enhancing their survival efficiency. These findings highlight the potential of microbial inoculation as a sustainable and eco-friendly strategy for mitigating heavy metal pollution in agricultural ecosystems. Furthermore, microbial inoculation not only facilitates metal sequestration but also enhances plant tolerance to heavy metals by modulating plant physiology and biochemistry through various mechanisms. For instance, Chen et al.[115] demonstrated that Sphingomonas inoculation confers Sedum alfredii tolerance to cadmium stress and reduces oxidative damage in vivo through organic acids secretion. Additionally, the inoculation with multiple bacterial species has been shown to promote plant tolerance to aluminum stress by upregulating stress-related gene expression, such as AtAIP, AtALS3, and AtALMT1, and by recruiting aluminum-resistant and growth-promoting bacteria[116,138]. Comparable effects have been observed under arsenic stress, where beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus sp., Nitrospira sp., and Microbacterium sp., contributing to plant growth and tolerance under heavy metal stress[118]. Conversely, some beneficial bacteria enhance the transport efficiency of heavy metals in plants, promoting their accumulation in aboveground parts while simultaneously improving plant tolerance[112,139]. This is largely attributed to the reassembly of the rhizosphere microbiome, particularly the enrichment of beneficial microorganisms such like Mesorhizobium and Streptomyces genera[112,113]. These findings suggest that microbial inoculants aid in managing and mitigating the negative effects of heavy metals by cultivating a more robust and diverse microbial community. Thus, harnessing the beneficial interactions between plants and microorganisms can enhance plant resilience to heavy metal stress and promote ecosystem health.

    • Beneficial rhizobacteria are well-established for their critical role in enhancing nutrient uptake and utilization efficiency in plants. Investigations on Astragalus mongolicus[124] and G. uralensis[126] have elucidated that inoculating plants with rhizobacteria combinations can increase the mineral nutrients uptake, thus enhancing biomass production under low-nutrient conditions. Similar findings have been recorded in Angelica dahurica and Camellia sinensis, where the application of synthetic microbial communities (Syncoms) markedly improved N uptake and assimilation, concomitant with the theanine synthesis, under low-N conditions[40,125]. Moreover, bacteria possessing P-solubilizing properties may act as pivotal regulator of plant growth under low-P conditions. These bacteria facilitate root development and aboveground biomass formation by elevating rhizosphere soil P content through rhizosphere acidification and phosphatase excretion into the rhizosphere[121,140]. Notably, AM fungi has exhibited significant efficacy in enhancing P nutrient absorption, which typically resulting in reduced soil P levels and enhanced plant P uptake, consequently promoting plant growth under low-P conditions[120,141]. Furthermore, studies on Achyranthes aspera have highlighted the plant growth-promoting capabilities of Serratia sp., which produce siderophores under iron-deficient conditions[123]. Additionally, their roles in P solubilization and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production further contribute to plant growth. Given the significant contributions of beneficial rhizobacteria to plant nutrient uptake and growth enhancement, it is evident that harnessing these microbial interactions can develop innovative strategies to address global nutrient heterogeneity and to establish more resilient agricultural systems.

      Additionally, microbial inoculation has been reported to enhance the resilience of medicinal plants under other stress conditions, including chilling[127], heat[128], and waterlogging[93] stresses. The beneficial effects are primarily attributed to processes such as decreased ethylene production, improved nutrient absorption, and the recruitment of specific bacteria. Together with the above instances, it is evident that these beneficial microorganisms can significantly impact plant physiology and biochemistry processes via soil nutrient remobilization, hormone level regulation and reshaping of microbial community (Fig. 1). Furthermore, while research on medicinal plants is limited, studies in model crops such as Arabidopsis[142] and Oryza sativa[143] suggest that beneficial microorganisms can enhance plant tolerance by triggering induced systemic resistance (ISR), which stimulates the plant defense system, leading to the upregulation of genes involved in hormone regulation and stress responses, such as dehydrin (DHN), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and responsive to desiccation 29B (RD29B). These events comprehensively highlighted the pivotal role of employing beneficial microorganisms in advancing sustainable agricultural development under the challenging global climate changes. Thus, it is imperative to further investigate the efficacy of different types of microorganisms or their synthetic in mitigating diverse abiotic stresses as well as the underlying mechanisms. This will enable the development of corresponding microbial solutions for agricultural production under specific stress.

      Figure 1. 

      Mechanistic insights into how beneficial microbes enhance medicinal plant resilience to abiotic stress.

      Under abiotic stress conditions, diverse microorganisms in the rhizosphere or within endophytic compartments—such as fungi and bacteria—play a crucial role in enhancing the adaptability of medicinal plants. These microorganisms can improve nutrient absorption and metabolism by enhancing soil nutrient availability. Additionally, their ability to produce auxin or ACC deaminase enzymes influences plant hormone production, which subsequently affects downstream resistance events. Furthermore, microbial inoculations can trigger induced systemic resistance (ISR) and then enhance the overall resilience of medicinal plants by altering their antioxidant system, osmotic regulation, and hormone balance. Under specific stress conditions, such as heavy metal pollution, these beneficial microorganisms can re-assemble the microbial community further to amplify their positive effects on the host plant.

    • In addition to growth, development, and stress adaptability, the variation in specific secondary metabolites in medicinal plants is equally important, as these compounds dictate their medicinal quality and economic value[144]. Previous studies have shown that under abiotic stresses, the levels of these compounds can either increase or decrease. The decreases may result from metabolic disruptions under severe stress condition, while increases are primarily attributed to the concentration effect resulting from reduced plant biomass, especially under drought conditions[145]. This prevalent trade-off between plant growth and differentiation complicates the simultaneous enhancement of both plant stress adaptation and medicinal compound concentration. Hence, given plant-microbe interactions, it is imperative to further comprehend the effects of beneficial microbial inoculation on the content of valuable compounds in medicinal plants and their potential mechanisms.

      Notably, numerous previous studies have illustrated that the single or combined inoculation of these microorganisms effectively alters the accumulation of specific metabolites under abiotic stresses, while also promoting plant growth (Table 2). For example, under drought stress, favorable results have been observed with the inoculation of DES[20], AM fungi[63], and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens[76] on the contents of glycyrrhizic acid, glycyrrhizin and liquiritin in Glycyrrhiza uralensis, alongside enhanced activities of key enzymes involved in licorice synthesis pathway. Similarly, investigations on Nicotiana tabacum and Pelargonium graveolens have indicated that AMF treatment significantly enhanced both the content and yield of essential oil[55,58]. Furthermore, studies have documented the positive effects of co-inoculation of two or more bacteria on secondary metabolite production in various medicinal plants under drought stress. This includes increased astragaloside IV and calycosin-7-glucoside content in Astragalus mongholicus[70], essential oil contents in Mentha pulegium[73], and tropane alkaloids in Hyoscyamus niger[72]. Such beneficial effects have also been recorded when plants were subjected to salt stress. For example, an examination of Artemisia annua showed that combined treatment with AM fungi and beneficial bacteria enhances both artemisinin accumulation and host salt resistance[109]. Similar results have been reported for specific metabolites in other medicinal plants, such as saponin[99], flavonoid[88], and glycyrrhizic acid[91]. Mechanistically, these effects may be attributed to an increase in plant sugar content under osmotic stress[91,92,107], as sugars play a central role as precursors for secondary C metabolism. Additionally, microbial inoculation may modulate plant hormone balance through ISR, thereby influencing the synthesis of secondary metabolites biosynthesis[146]. This was also evidenced by Yue et al.[76], who highlighted the role of JA in Bacillus sp.-promoted flavonoid and terpenoid synthesis.

      Table 2.  Role of beneficial microorganisms in the contents of main medicinal compounds in medicinal plants subjecting to abiotic stresses.

      Stress type Strain/microbes Medicinal plant Contribution Ref.
      Drought AMF Glycyrrhiza uralensis
      Improving glycyrrhizin and liquiritin production;
      up-regulation of the expression of key genes (e.g. squalene synthase (SQS1), β-amyrin synthase (β-AS)
      and cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CYP88D6
      and CYP72A154)
      Orujei et al.[129];
      Xie et al.[63]
      Nicotiana tabacum/ Pelargonium graveolens Enhancement of oil content; up-regulation of the expression of key genes Begum et al.[58]; Amiri et al.[55]
      DSE Glycyrrhiza uralensis Elevation of glycyrrhizin and glycyrrhizic acid content; regulation of the N and P content He et al.[147]
      Bacillus sp. Glycyrrhiza uralensis Enhancement of the total flavonoids, total polysaccharide and glycyrrhizic acid content; up-regulation of the expression of key enzymes (e.g. lipoxygenase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase); simulation of JA-synthesis Xie et al.[68];
      Yue et al.[76]
      Bacterial combination/ Syncoms Astragalus mongholicus Enhancement of the astragaloside IV and calycosin-7-glucoside content Lin et al.[70]
      Mentha pulegium Improving phenolic, flavonoid and oxygenated monoterpenes production Asghari et al.[73]
      Hyoscyamus niger Improving tropane alkaloid production Ghorbanpour et al.[72]
      Salt AMF Glycyrrhiza glabra Elevation of the glycyrrhizin and terpenoid precursors production Amanifar et al.[148]
      Priestia endophytica Trigonella foenum-graecum Improving phenolic compounds and trigonelline synthesis and N fixation Sharma et al.[86]
      Azotobacter sp. Glycyrrhiza glabra Enhancement of the glycyrrhizic acid and glabridin production Mousavi et al.[91]
      Bacterial combination/ syncoms Artemisia annua Enhancement of the artemisinin production; improving N and P contents Arora et al.[109]
      Foeniculum vulgare Enhancement of the essential oil production Mishra et al.[149]
      Bacopa monnieri Enhancement of the bacoside A production Pankaj et al.[95]
      AM fungi and PGPB Sesamum indicum Improving phenolic, flavonoid, sesamin and sesamolin production Khademian et al.[110]
      Mentha arvensis Enhancement of essential oil content Bharti et al.[150]
      Heavy-metal stress Microbial inoculant Panax quinque folium Enhancement of the ginsenoside production; regulation of the rhizo-microbial structure and composition Cao et al.[118]
      Microbial inoculant Salvia miltiorrhiza Elevation of the total tanshinones content; recruiting beneficial microorganisms Wei et al.[119]
      N-deficiency Bacterial combination Angelica dahurica Enhancement of the furanocoumarin production Jiang et al.[40]
      Astragalus mongolicus Enhancement of the flavonoids, saponins, and polysaccharides contents Shi et al.[124]
      P-deficiency AMF Hypericum perforatum Enhancement of the glycyrrhizic acid, liquiritin, isoliquiritin, and isoliquiritigenin contents; regulation of the nutrient absorption Lazzara et al.[151]
      Polygonum cuspidatum Enhancement of the chrysophanol, emodin, polydatin, and resveratrol contents; regulation of the nutrient absorption Deng et al.[141]
      Nutrient-deficiency AMF Glycyrrhiza uralensis Elevation of the isoliquiritin and isoliquiritigenin content; enhancement of the P, K and microelements absorption Chen et al.[120]
      Heat stress Soil suspension Atractylodes lancea Enhancement of the hinesol, β-eudesmol, atractylon and atractylodin content, up-regulation of the expression of key genes (e.g. 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS), farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme (HMGR)); enrichment of specific beneficial bacteria Wang et al.[127]

      The promotion of nutrient absorption by microbial incubation is as also considerable with prior studies having identified correlations between N and P contents and the terpenoid synthesis in G. uralensis[147] and Artemisia annua[109]. Additionally, alkaloid levels can be actively regulated by exogenous bacterial inoculation under salt stress, attributed to the induction of N fixation mechanisms in plants, thereby enhancing trigonelline biosynthesis[86]. Therefore, given the nutrient uptake-promoting effects of these microorganisms and the critical roles of N and P in secondary metabolite synthesis, these microorganisms are anticipated to have a substantial impact on the metabolic regulation of plants under nutritional stresses. Indeed, researchers have found that Syncoms derived from bacteria isolated under N-deficient conditions significantly improve the N utilization efficiency of Angelica dahurica and enhance the synthesis of furanocoumarins[40]. This stimulatory function is linked to the capacity of functional bacteria to enhance nutrient utilization. Supportively, N-fixing bacteria such as Bacillus and Arthrobacter have been shown to enhance nutrient uptake and accumulation, as well as elevate the flavonoid, saponin, and polysaccharide contents in Astragalus mongolicus[124]. An investigation on tea plants demonstrated that synthetic communities lacking N-fixing bacteria could not effectively facilitate theanine synthesis[125], further demonstrating the critical role of N in microbial regulation of secondary metabolism. P absorption and utilization are equally important for the synthesis of C-based secondary metabolites, which serve as vital components for acetyl-CoA, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, as well as isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP)/dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), the common substrate for both the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) and mevalonate (MVA) pathways[152]. Such results have been extensively documented with AM inoculation, which enhances terpenoid production through enhaced P uptake. For instance, AM has been shown to effectively increase the levels of hypericin and pseudohypericin in Hypericum perforatum[151], as well as chrysophanol, emodin, polydatin, and resveratrol concentrations in Polygonum cuspidatum[141], under low phosphorus conditions. Moreover, a study on Mentha arvensis revealed that Bacillus can increase essential oil production by solubilizing P[121], indicating that combining nutrients with microbial agents can more effectively enhance both the yield and quality of medicinal plants.

      Furthermore, there is evidence from limited studies documenting the beneficial effects of microbial inoculation on the quality of medicinal plants under other stress conditions. For example, the application of microbial inoculants significantly increased the accumulation of total ginsenosides in Panax quinquefolium[118] and total tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza[119] under heavy metal stress, offering new approaches for cultivating medicinal plants in contaminated regions. Furthermore, a study on heat stress has demonstrated the remarkable resilience conferred by inoculation with soil microbial communities, along with the accumulation of volatile medicinal compounds in the roots of Atractylodes lancea[127]. This observed enhancement was accompanied by the upregulation of key genes such as farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), and 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS), shedding light on the molecular mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated stress response and secondary metabolite production. Importantly, these investigations have identified simultaneous changes in the structure and composition of rhizosphere and endophytic microbial communities. These changes would selectively recruit microbes with specialized functions, thereby enhancing secondary metabolic processes under stress conditions. These findings not only deepen our understanding of plant-microbe interactions, but also hold significant implications for the sustainable production of high-quality medicinal plants in the face of environmental challenges. Notably, these elevated secondary metabolites may also be helpful in enhancing host plant resistance to abiotic stresses. However, evidence linking microbes, secondary metabolites and medicinal plant resistance is largely lacking and warrants further investigations in the future.

    • As the second genome of plants, plant-associated microorganisms, including rhizospheric and endophytic ones, will respond to environmental stresses correspondingly with plants and thereby critically contribute to plant adaptability. Faced with these stresses, microorganisms respond by altering their community diversity and assembly processes in a manner that is mainly mediated by root exudates. As a result, the specific core microorganisms recruited under stresses will favour host coping with the environmental stresses, as well as the improved quality formation of medicinal plants. Such results provide novel insights for cultivating high-quality medicinal plants under stressful conditions. The underlying mechanisms are multifaceted, encompassing the modulation of plant nutrient utilization and hormone production associated with the microbial functions such as nitrogen fixation and ACCD enzyme activity. These microorganisms also play a role as inducers of ISR in plants, thus stimulating their defense against various stresses. Equally important is the re-assembly of the microbial community structure through interaction with other microorganisms, thus enhancing the overall resilience of the plant-microbiome system. In the future, it is imperative to strength the research into the specific microbial communities associated with medicinal plants, which includes the development of agent or bio-fertilizer products associated with these beneficial microorganisms or the Syncoms, thus ensuring the robust growth and quality of medicinal plants in the face of increasingly challenging environmental conditions.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32101842), the Open Fund of Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources (JSPKLB202303) and the Max Planck Society.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Sun Y, Fernie AR; literatures collection and analysis: Sun Y, Yuan H; draft manuscript preparation: Sun Y, Fernie AR. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (2) References (152)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Sun Y, Yuan H, Fernie AR. 2024. Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants. Medicinal Plant Biology 3: e024 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0023
    Sun Y, Yuan H, Fernie AR. 2024. Harnessing plant-associated microorganisms to alleviate the detrimental effects of environmental abiotic stresses on medicinal plants. Medicinal Plant Biology 3: e024 doi: 10.48130/mpb-0024-0023

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return