Search
2025 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture

More Information
  • Received: 22 July 2024
    Revised: 15 December 2024
    Accepted: 09 January 2025
    Published online: 20 February 2025
    Seed Biology  4 Article number: e001 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Addressing the global challenges of food security, environmental sustainability, and ecosystem preservation necessitates novel integrative approaches that harmonize agricultural productivity with ecological stewardship. Conventional synthetic nanoparticles, though promising for enhancing crop yields and mitigating environmental stressors, pose risks of phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity manifested through stunted plant growth, impaired germination, and root defects. This highlights the necessity of strategic nanoparticle concentration management and mitigation strategy development. Green nanopriming has emerged as an eco-conscious panacea, harnessing the intrinsic reducing capabilities of plant extracts to synthesize nanoparticles through green chemistry principles aligned with biocompatibility. Green nanopriming epitomizes the synergistic integration of cutting-edge nanotechnology with nature's wisdom, transcending applications in crop enhancement to encompass green nanopesticides, nutrient solubilization, and quality optimization. This holistic approach catalyzes sustainable agricultural transformation to address food security while preserving ecological integrity. Continuous interdisciplinary research amalgamating nanotechnology, plant biology, and environmental sciences is crucial for elucidating mechanisms, assessing risks and ensuring responsible deployment of this innovative technology. The advent of green nanopriming heralds an environmentally-conscious paradigm shift where advanced technology coexists symbiotically with nature, paving the path towards resilient, sustainable agricultural landscapes that meet growing global food demands while safeguarding planetary resources.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Shukla P, Chaurasia P, Younis K, Qadri OS, Ahmad Faridi S, et al. 2019. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: studies from seed priming to post-harvest management. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering 4:11

    doi: 10.1007/s41204-019-0058-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Pagano A, Pagano P, Dueñas C, Griffo A, Gaonkar SS, et al. 2023. Seed quality assessment and improvement between advancing agriculture and changing environments. In Global Climate Change and Plant Stress Management, eds Ansari MW, Singh AK, Tuteja N. US: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. pp. 317−34. doi: 10.1002/9781119858553.ch22

    [3]

    De Vitis M, Hay FR, Dickie JB, Trivedi C, Choi J, et al. 2020. Seed storage: maintaining seed viability and vigor for restoration use. Restoration Ecology 28:S249−S255

    doi: 10.1111/rec.13174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kalwani M, Chakdar H, Srivastava A, Pabbi S, Shukla P. 2022. Effects of nanofertilizers on soil and plant-associated microbial communities: emerging trends and perspectives. Chemosphere 287:132107

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shelar A, Nile SH, Singh AV, Rothenstein D, Bill J, et al. 2023. Recent advances in nano-enabled seed treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture: challenges, risk assessment, and future perspectives. Nano-Micro Letters 15:54

    doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01025-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P. 2017. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Scientific Reports 7:8263

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Basu S, Banik BK. 2024. Nanoparticles as catalysts: exploring potential applications. Current Organocatalysis 11(4):265−72

    doi: 10.2174/0122133372285610231227094959

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Nair SA. 2022. Seed priming-a traditional technique to enhance crop establishment and to improve livelihood of farmers. Advances in Crop Science and Technology 10:11

    doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000539

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    May LH, Milthorpe EJ, Milthorpe FL. 1962. Pre-sowing hardening of plants to drought: an appraisal of the contributions by PA Genkel. Field Crop Abstract 15(2):93−98

    Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ellis JE. 1963. The influence of treating tomato seed with nutrient solutions on emergence rate and seedling growth. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 83:684−87

    Google Scholar

    [11]

    Heydecker W, Higgins J, Gulliver RL. 1973. Accelerated germination by osmotic seed treatment. Nature 246:42−44

    doi: 10.1038/246042a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kaur S, Gupta AK, Kaur N. 2002. Effect of osmo- and hydropriming of chickpea seeds on seedling growth and carbohydrate metabolism under water deficit stress. Plant Growth Regulation 37:17−22

    doi: 10.1023/A:1020310008830

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Giri GS, Schillinger WF. 2003. Seed priming winter wheat for germination, emergence, and yield. Crop Science 43(6):2135−41

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2003.2135

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hill H, Bradford KJ, Cunningham J, Taylor AG. 2008. Primed lettuce seeds exhibit increased sensitivity to moisture during aging. Acta Horticulturae 782:135−42

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2008.782.14

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Khan A, Numan M, Khan AL, Lee IJ, Imran M, et al. 2020. Melatonin: awakening the defense mechanisms during plant oxidative stress. Plants 9(4):407

    doi: 10.3390/plants9040407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Galland M, Huguet R, Arc E, Cueff G, Job D, et al. 2014. Dynamic proteomics emphasizes the importance of selective mRNA translation and protein turnover during Arabidopsis seed germination. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 13:252−68

    doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.032227

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Varier A, Vari AK, Dadlani M. 2010. The subcellular basis of seed priming. Current Science 99:450−56

    Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhang CF, Hu J, Lou J, Zhang Y, Hu WM. 2007. Sand priming in relation to physiological changes in seed germination and seedling growth of waxy maize under high-salt stress. Seed Science & Technology 35:733−38

    doi: 10.15258/sst.2007.35.3.19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Basra SMA, Farooq M, Tabassam R, Ahmad N. 2005. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing seed treatments in fine rice (Oryza sativa L.). Seed Science and Technology 33:623−28

    doi: 10.15258/sst.2005.33.3.09

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Ella ES, Dionisio-Sese ML, Ismail AM. 2011. Seed pre-treatment in rice reduces damage, enhances carbohydrate mobilization and improves emergence and seedling establishment under flooded conditions. AoB PLANTS 2011:plr007

    doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plr007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Sathish S. 2009. Effect of seed priming on physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in maize hybrid (COH(M)5) and its parents. Thesis. TNAU, Coimbatore

    [22]

    Lutts S, Benincasa P, Wojtyla L, Kubala S, Pace R, et al. 2016. Seed priming: new comprehensive approaches for an old empirical technique. In New Challenges in Seed Biology - Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology, eds AraújoS, Balestrazzi A. London: InTech. doi:10.5772/64420

    [23]

    Vashisth A, Nagarajan S. 2010. Effect on germination and early growth characteristics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seeds exposed to static magnetic field. Journal of Plant Physiology 167:149−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Pandita VK, Anand A, Nagarajan S. 2007. Enhancement of seed germination in hot pepper following presowing treatments. Seed Science and Technology 35:282−90

    doi: 10.15258/sst.2007.35.2.04

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Bewley JD, Bradford KJ, Hilhorst HWM, Nonogaki H. 2013. Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4

    [26]

    Rasool Mir H, Kumar Yadav S, Ercisli S, Al-Huqail AA, Soliman DA, et al. 2021. Association of DNA biosynthesis with planting value enhancement in hydroprimed maize seeds. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 28:2634−40

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Dadlani M, Yadava DK. 2023. Seed science and technology: biology, production, quality. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5888-5

    [28]

    Apel K, Hirt H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55:373−99

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Toorop PE, van Aelst AC, Hilhorst HWM. 1998. Endosperm cap weakening and endo-β-mannanase activity during priming of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Moneymaker) seeds are initiated upon crossing a threshold water potential. Seed Science Research 8:483−92

    doi: 10.1017/s0960258500004451

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen K, Fessehaie A, Arora R. 2012. Dehydrin metabolism is altered during seed osmopriming and subsequent germination under chilling and desiccation in Spinacia oleracea L. cv. Bloomsdale: possible role in stress tolerance. Plant Science 183:27−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Soeda Y, Konings MCJM, Vorst O, van Houwelingen AMML, Stoopen GM, et al. 2005. Gene expression programs during Brassica oleracea seed maturation, osmopriming, and germination are indicators of progression of the germination process and the stress tolerance level. Plant Physiology 137:354−68

    doi: 10.1104/pp.104.051664

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Mondal S, Yadav KN, Vikram N, Panda D. 2024. Physiological and molecular basis of seed priming with nanomaterials. In Nanofertilizer Synthesis, ed. Abd-Elsalam KA. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 345−58. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-443-13535-4.00028-6

    [33]

    Lukose R. 2013. Toxic effect of nanoparticles of metals (Pb, Cd, Ag, Mn, Fe and Zn) and metal oxides (ZnO, CuO, TiO2 and CeO2) in human body. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry 6(12):1179−82

    Google Scholar

    [34]

    Mahakham W, Theerakulpisut P, Maensiri S, Phumying S, Sarmah AK. 2016. Environmentally benign synthesis of phytochemicals-capped gold nanoparticles as nanopriming agent for promoting maize seed germination. Science of The Total Environment 573:1089−102

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    An J, Hu P, Li F, Wu H, Shen Y, et al. 2020. Emerging investigator series: molecular mechanisms of plant salinity stress tolerance improvement by seed priming with cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environmental Science: Nano 7(8):2214−28

    doi: 10.1039/D0EN00387E

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Ye Y, Cota-Ruiz K, Hernández-Viezcas JA, Valdés C, Medina-Velo IA, et al. 2020. Manganese nanoparticles control salinity-modulated molecular responses in Capsicum annuum L. through priming: a sustainable approach for agriculture. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 8:1427−36

    doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05615

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Malik A, Mor VS, Tokas J, Punia H, Malik S, et al. 2021. Biostimulant-treated seedlings under sustainable agriculture: a global perspective facing climate change. Agronomy 11:14

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy11010014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Siddiqui H, Ahmed KBM, Sami F, Hayat S. 2020. Silicon nanoparticles and plants: current knowledge and future perspectives. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 41, eds Hayat S, Pichtel J, Faizan M, Fariduddin Q. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 129−42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33996-8_7

    [39]

    Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Semper J, Patil BS. 2020. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry-based metabolomics reveal enhancement of growth-promoting metabolites in onion seedlings treated with green-synthesized nanomaterials. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:13206−20

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00817

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Joshi A, Kaur S, Dharamvir K, Nayyar H, Verma G. 2018. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes applied through seed-priming influence early germination, root hair, growth and yield of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98:3148−60

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8818

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Sundaria N, Singh M, Upreti P, Chauhan RP, Jaiswal JP, et al. 2019. Seed priming with iron oxide nanoparticles triggers iron acquisition and biofortification in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 38:122−31

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-018-9818-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Hussain A, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Ali S. 2019. Seed priming with silicon nanoparticles improved the biomass and yield while reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat grains. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 26:7579−88

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04210-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Abou-Zeid HM, Ismail GSM, Abdel-Latif SA. 2021. Influence of seed priming with ZnO nanoparticles on the salt-induced damages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44:629−43

    doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1849288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Duran NM, Savassa SM, de Lima RG, de Almeida E, Linhares FS, et al. 2017. X-ray spectroscopy uncovering the effects of Cu based nanoparticle concentration and structure on Phaseolus vulgaris germination and seedling development. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65:7874−84

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Kannaujia R, Srivastava CM, Prasad V, Singh BN, Pandey V. 2019. Phyllanthus Emblica fruit extract stabilized biogenic silver nanoparticles as a growth promoter of wheat varieties by reducing ROS toxicity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 142:460−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Ahuja R, Sidhu A, Bala A. 2019. Synthesis and evaluation of iron(ii) sulfide aqua nanoparticles (FeS-NPs) against Fusarium verticillioides causing sheath rot and seed discoloration of rice. European Journal of Plant Pathology 155:163−71

    doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01758-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhang H, Wang R, Chen Z, Cui P, Lu H, et al. 2021. The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles for enhancing rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and quality. Agriculture 11(12):1247

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture11121247

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Das CK, Jangir H, Kumar J, Verma S, Mahapatra SS, et al. 2018. Nano-pyrite seed dressing: a sustainable design for NPK equivalent rice production. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering 3:14

    doi: 10.1007/s41204-018-0043-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Guha T, Ravikumar KVG, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee A, Kundu R. 2018. Nanopriming with zero valent iron (nZVI) enhances germination and growth in aromatic rice cultivar (Oryza sativa cv. Gobindabhog L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127:403−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Choudhary RC, Kumaraswamy RV, Kumari S, Sharma SS, Pal A, et al. 2019. Zinc encapsulated chitosan nanoparticle to promote maize crop yield. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 127:126−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.274

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Saharan V, Kumaraswamy RV, Choudhary RC, Kumari S, Pal A, et al. 2016. Cu-chitosan nanoparticle mediated sustainable approach to enhance seedling growth in maize by mobilizing reserved food. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64(31):6148−55

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02239

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Alhammad BA, Ahmad A, Seleiman MF, Tola E. 2023. Seed priming with nanoparticles and 24-epibrassinolide improved seed germination and enzymatic performance of Zea mays L. in salt-stressed soil. Plants 12(4):690

    doi: 10.3390/plants12040690

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Savassa SM, Duran NM, Rodrigues ES, de Almeida E, van Gestel CAM, et al. 2018. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on Phaseolus vulgaris germination and seedling development determined by X-ray spectroscopy. ACS Applied Nano Materials 1:6414−26

    doi: 10.1021/acsanm.8b01619

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Chau NH, Doan QH, Chu TH, Nguyen TT, Dao Trong H, et al. 2019. Effects of different nanoscale microelement-containing formulations for presowing seed treatment on growth of soybean seedlings. Journal of Chemistry 2019:8060316

    doi: 10.1155/2019/8060316

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Spagnoletti FN, Spedalieri C, Kronberg F, Giacometti R. 2019. Extracellular biosynthesis of bactericidal Ag/AgCl nanoparticles for crop protection using the fungus Macrophomina Phaseolina. Journal of Environmental Management 231:457−66

    doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.081

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Pereira ADES, Oliveira HC, Fraceto LF. 2019. Polymeric nanoparticles as an alternative for application of gibberellic acid in sustainable agriculture: a field study. Scientific Reports 9:7135

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43494-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Falsini S, Clemente I, Papini A, Tani C, Schiff S, et al. 2019. When sustainable nanochemistry meets agriculture: lignin nanocapsules for bioactive compound delivery to plantlets. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7(24):19935−42

    doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05462

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    García-Locascio E, Valenzuela EI, Cervantes-Avilés P. 2024. Impact of seed priming with Selenium nanoparticles on germination and seedlings growth of tomato. Scientific Reports 14:6726

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57049-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Crosby KM, Jifon JL, Patil BS. 2020. Nanoparticle-mediated seed priming improves germination, growth, yield, and quality of watermelons (Citrullus lanatus) at multi-locations in Texas. Scientific Reports 10:5037

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61696-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Waqas Mazhar M, Ishtiaq M, Maqbool M, Akram R, Shahid A, et al. 2022. Seed priming with iron oxide nanoparticles raises biomass production and agronomic profile of water-stressed flax plants. Agronomy 12:982

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy12050982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Kasote DM, Lee JHJ, Jayaprakasha GK, Patil BS. 2019. Seed priming with iron oxide nanoparticles modulate antioxidant potential and defense-linked hormones in watermelon seedlings. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7(5):5142−51

    doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Dileep Kumar G, Raja K, Natarajan N, Govindaraju K, Subramanian KS. 2020. Invigouration treatment of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles for improving the seed quality of aged chilli seeds (Capsicum annum L.). Materials Chemistry and Physics 242:122492

    doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122492

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Farhana, Munis MFH, Alamer KH, Althobaiti AT, Kamal A, et al. 2022. ZnO nanoparticle-mediated seed priming induces biochemical and antioxidant changes in chickpea to alleviate Fusarium wilt. Journal of Fungi 8(7):753

    doi: 10.3390/jof8070753

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Shcherbakova EN, Shcherbakov AV, Andronov EE, Gonchar LN, Kalenskaya SM, et al. 2017. Combined pre-seed treatment with microbial inoculants and Mo nanoparticles changes composition of root exudates and rhizosphere microbiome structure of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants. Symbiosis 73:57−69

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-016-0472-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Maswada HF, Djanaguiraman M, Prasad PVV. 2018. Seed treatment with nano-iron (III) oxide enhances germination, seeding growth and salinity tolerance of Sorghum. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 204(6):577−87

    doi: 10.1111/jac.12280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Nandhini M, Rajini SB, Udayashankar AC, Niranjana SR, Lund OS, et al. 2019. Biofabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles as an eco-friendly alternative for growth promotion and management of downy mildew of pearl millet. Crop Protection 121:103−12

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.03.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Crosby KM, Jifon JL, Patil BS. 2019. Green-synthesized nanoparticles enhanced seedling growth, yield, and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.). ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7(17):14580−90

    doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Guo H, White JC, Wang Z, Xing B. 2018. Nano-enabled fertilizers to control the release and use efficiency of nutrients. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 6:77−83

    doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.07.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Metch JW, Burrows ND, Murphy CJ, Pruden A, Vikesland PJ. 2018. Metagenomic analysis of microbial communities yields insight into impacts of nanoparticle design. Nature Nanotechnology 13(3):253−59

    doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0029-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Zafar S, Perveen S, Kamran Khan M, Shaheen MR, Hussain R, et al. 2022. Effect of zinc nanoparticles seed priming and foliar application on the growth and physio-biochemical indices of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) under salt stress. PLoS One 17:e0263194

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263194

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Khan MN, Li Y, Fu C, Hu J, Chen L, et al. 2022. CeO2 nanoparticles seed priming increases salicylic acid level and ROS scavenging ability to improve rapeseed salt tolerance. Global Challenges 6:2200025

    doi: 10.1002/gch2.202200025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Mahdy AM, Sherif FK, Elkhatib EA, Fathi NO, Ahmed MH. 2020. Seed priming in nanoparticles of water treatment residual can increase the germination and growth of cucumber seedling under salinity stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 43:1862−74

    doi: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1750647

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Gautam A, Rusli LS, Yaacob JS, Kumar V, Guleria P. 2024. Nanopriming with magnesium oxide nanoparticles enhanced antioxidant potential and nutritional richness of radish leaves grown in field. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 10:1−17

    doi: 10.1007/s10098-023-02697-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Bano N, Khan S, Hamid Y, Bano F, Khan AG, et al. 2024. Seed nano-priming with multiple nanoparticles enhanced the growth parameters of lettuce and mitigated cadmium (Cd) bio-toxicity: an advanced technique for remediation of Cd contaminated environments. Environmental Pollution 344:123300

    doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123300

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Joudeh N, Linke D. 2022. Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: a comprehensive review for biologists. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 20:262

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01477-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Panpatte DG, Jhala YK, Shelat HN, Vyas RV. 2016. Nanoparticles: the next generation technology for sustainable agriculture. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity, eds Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R. New Delhi: Springer India. pp. 289−300. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4_18

    [77]

    Arya V. 2019. Nano-approach towards sustainable agriculture and precision farming. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science 5:639−47

    doi: 10.22161/ijaems.512.5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Gohari G, Jiang M, Manganaris GA, Zhou J, Fotopoulos V. 2024. Next generation chemical priming: with a little help from our nanocarrier friends. Trends in Plant Science 29:150−66

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.11.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Hussain M, Zahra N, Lang T, Zain M, Raza M, et al. 2023. Integrating nanotechnology with plant microbiome for next-generation crop health. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 196:703−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.02.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Rajput VD, Kumari A, Upadhyay SK, Minkina T, Mandzhieva S, et al. 2023. Can nanomaterials improve the soil microbiome and crop productivity? Agriculture 13(2):231

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020231

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Singh A, Sengar RS, Sharma R, Rajput P, Singh AK. 2021. Nano-priming technology for sustainable agriculture. Systematics and Biogeography Technology 8:79−92

    doi: 10.13187/bgt.2021.2.79

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Guerra FD, Attia MF, Whitehead DC, Alexis F. 2018. Nanotechnology for environmental remediation: materials and applications. Molecules 23(7):1760

    doi: 10.3390/molecules23071760

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Sathiyabama M, Muthukumar S. 2020. Chitosan guar nanoparticle preparation and its in vitro antimicrobial activity towards phytopathogens of rice. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 153:297−304

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Guha T, Gopal G, Das H, Mukherjee A, Kundu R. 2021. Nanopriming with zero-valent iron synthesized using pomegranate peel waste: a "green" approach for yield enhancement in Oryza sativa L. cv. Gonindobhog. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 163:261−75

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.04.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Singh A, Agrawal S, Rajput VD, Ghazaryan K, Movsesyan HS, et al. 2023. Seed nanopriming: an innovative approach for upregulating seed germination and plant growth under salinity stress. Nanopriming Approach to Sustainable Agriculture. US: IGI Global. pp. 290−313. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7232-3.ch013

    [86]

    Pandya P, Kumar S, Sakure AA, Rafaliya R, Patil GB. 2023. Zinc oxide nanopriming elevates wheat drought tolerance by inducing stress-responsive genes and physio-biochemical changes. Current Plant Biology 35:100292

    doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2023.100292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Kumar B, Indu, Singhal RK, Chand S, Chauhan J, et al. 2022. Nanopriming in sustainable agriculture: recent advances, emerging challenges and future prospective. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, eds Singh HB, Vaishnav A. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 339−65. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85581-5.00011-2

    [88]

    Ragab G, Saad-Allah K. 2021. Seed priming with greenly synthesized sulfur nanoparticles enhances antioxidative defense machinery and restricts oxidative injury under manganese stress in Helianthus annuus (L.) seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 40(5):1894−902

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10240-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Lee JHJ, Kasote DM. 2024. Nano-priming for inducing salinity tolerance, disease resistance, yield attributes, and alleviating heavy metal toxicity in plants. Plants 13(3):446

    doi: 10.3390/plants13030446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Saranya S, Aswani R, Remakanthan A, Radhakrishnan EK. 2019. Nanotechnology in agriculture. Nanotechnology for Agriculture, eds Panpatte D, Jhala Y. Singapore: Springer. pp. 1−17. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9370-0_1

    [91]

    Khan MN, Mobin M, Abbas ZK, AlMutairi KA, Siddiqui ZH. 2017. Role of nanomaterials in plants under challenging environments. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 110:194−209

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Chandrasekaran U, Luo X, Wang Q, Shu K. 2020. Are there unidentified factors involved in the germination of nanoprimed seeds? Frontiers in Plant Science 11:832

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00832

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Jiang Y, Peng B, Wan Z, Kim C, Li W, et al. 2019. Nanotechnology as a key enabler for effective environmental remediation technologies. A New Paradigm for Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, eds Jiang G, Li X. Singapore: Springer. pp. 197−207. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9447-8_12

    [94]

    Malik A, Punia H, Singh N, Singh P. 2022. Bionanomaterials-mediated seed priming for sustainable agricultural production. Bionanotechnology: Emerging Applications of Bionanomaterials, eds Barhoum A, Jeevanandam J, Danquah MK. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 77−99. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823915-5.00008-3

    [95]

    Khalil M, Kadja GTM, Ilmi MM. 2021. Advanced nanomaterials for catalysis: current progress in fine chemical synthesis, hydrocarbon processing, and renewable energy. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 93:78−100

    doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.09.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Khan MN, Li Y, Khan Z, Chen L, Liu J, et al. 2021. Nanoceria seed priming enhanced salt tolerance in rapeseed through modulating ROS homeostasis and α-amylase activities. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 19:276

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01026-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Rizwan M, Ali S, Ali B, Adrees M, Arshad M, et al. 2019. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere 214:269−77

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Younis ME, Abdel-Aziz HMM, Heikal YM. 2019. Nanopriming technology enhances vigor and mitotic index of aged Vicia faba seeds using chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles. South African Journal of Botany 125:393−401

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.08.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Wu Q, Jiang X, Wu H, Zou L, Wang L, et al. 2022. Effects and mechanisms of copper oxide nanoparticles with regard to arsenic availability in soil-rice systems: adsorption behavior and microbial response. Environmental Science & Technology 56(12):8142−54

    doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01393

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Mgadi K, Ndaba B, Roopnarain A, Rama H, Adeleke R. 2024. Nanoparticle applications in agriculture: overview and response of plant-associated microorganisms. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1354440

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1354440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Fouad AS, Hafez RM. 2018. The effects of silver ions and silver nanoparticles on cell division and expression of cdc2 gene in Allium cepa root tips. Biologia Plantarum 62:166−72

    doi: 10.1007/s10535-017-0751-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Tripathi GD, Javed Z, Dashora K. 2024. Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles on agriculturally important soil rhizobacteria Bacillus megaterium. Emerging Contaminants 10:100280

    doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Lv Z, Sun H, Du W, Li R, Mao H, et al. 2021. Interaction of different-sized ZnO nanoparticles with maize (Zea mays): accumulation, biotransformation and phytotoxicity. Science of The Total Environment 796:148927

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148927

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Ebbs SD, Bradfield SJ, Kumar P, White JC, Musante C, et al. 2016. Accumulation of zinc, copper, or cerium in carrot (Daucus carota) exposed to metal oxide nanoparticles and metal ions. Environmental Science: Nano 3:114−26

    doi: 10.1039/C5EN00161G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Asgari-Targhi G, Iranbakhsh A, Ardebili ZO. 2018. Potential benefits and phytotoxicity of bulk and nano-chitosan on the growth, morphogenesis, physiology, and micropropagation of Capsicum annuum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127:393−402

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Maity S, Pramanick K. 2020. Perspectives and challenges of micro/nanoplastics-induced toxicity with special reference to phytotoxicity. Global Change Biology 26(6):3241−50

    doi: 10.1111/gcb.15074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Wang J, Zhao S, Li Z, Chai J, Feng J, et al. 2023. Phytotoxicity and the molecular response in yttrium oxide nanoparticle-treated Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Protoplasma 260(3):955−66

    doi: 10.1007/s00709-022-01826-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Mosquera J, García I, Liz-Marzán LM. 2018. Cellular uptake of nanoparticles versus small molecules: a matter of size. Accounts of Chemical Research 51(9):2305−13

    doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00292

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Kibbey TCG, Strevett KA. 2019. The effect of nanoparticles on soil and rhizosphere bacteria and plant growth in lettuce seedlings. Chemosphere 221:703−7

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.091

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Sułowicz S, Markowicz A, Dulski M, Nowak A, Środek D, et al. 2023. Assessment of the ecotoxicological impact of captan@ZnO35–45nm and captan@SiO2 20–30nm nanopesticide on non-target soil microorganisms – a 100-day case study. Applied Soil Ecology 184:104789

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104789

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Song K, He X. 2021. How to improve seed germination with green nanopriming. Seed Science and Technology 49(2):81−92

    doi: 10.15258/sst.2021.49.2.01

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Sarkar N, Sharma RS, Kaushik M. 2021. Innovative application of facile single pot green synthesized CuO and CuO@APTES nanoparticles in nanopriming of Vigna radiata seeds. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 28(11):13221−28

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11493-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Ganesan VS, Paramathevar N. 2024. Utilising calcined eggshell waste as a multifunctional sustainable agent as a nano-adsorbent, photocatalyst and priming elicitor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 31:12112−30

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31777-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Nayak H, Mangaraj S, Pradhan SR, Paikaray RK, Hossain A. 2024. Nanopriming: a comprehensive perspective for regulating seed germination of crops under stress conditions. In The Nanotechnology Driven Agriculture, eds Roy S, Hossain A. UK: CRC Press. pp. 106−16. doi: 10.1201/9781003376446-6

    [115]

    Ahmed F, AlOmar SY, Albalawi F, Arshi N, Dwivedi S, et al. 2021. Microwave mediated fast synthesis of silver nanoparticles and investigation of their antibacterial activities for gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. Crystals 11:666

    doi: 10.3390/cryst11060666

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Velusamy P, Su CH, Venkat Kumar G, Adhikary S, Pandian K, et al. 2016. Biopolymers regulate silver nanoparticle under microwave irradiation for effective antibacterial and antibiofilm activities. PLoS One 11:e0157612

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157612

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Song K, Zhao D, Sun H, Gao J, Li S, et al. 2022. Green nanopriming: responses of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings to alfalfa extracts capped and light-induced silver nanoparticles. BMC Plant Biology 22:323

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03692-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Santhoshkumar R, Hima Parvathy A, Soniya EV. 2024. Biocompatible silver nanoparticles as nanopriming mediators for improved rice germination and root growth: a transcriptomic perspective. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 210:108645

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108645

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Dutta Gupta S, Pattanayak AK. 2017. Intelligent image analysis (IIA) using artificial neural network (ANN) for non-invasive estimation of chlorophyll content in micropropagated plants of potato. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 53:520−26

    doi: 10.1007/s11627-017-9825-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Rashid MU, Shah SJ, Attacha S, Khan L, Saeed J, et al. 2024. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles using Citrus limetta peels extract and their antibacterial activity against brown and soft rot pathogens and antioxidant potential. Waste and Biomass Valorization 15:3351−66

    doi: 10.1007/s12649-023-02389-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Elizabeth MK, Uma Devi R, Parameshwar M, Ratnamala A. 2024. Magnesium sulfide nanoparticles of Hordeum vulgare: green synthesis and their nano-nutrient impact on seed priming effect, germination, root and shoot length of Brassica nigra and Trigonella foenum-graecum. Asian Journal of Chemistry 36:1308−14

    doi: 10.14233/ajchem.2024.31421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Ibrahim SS, Elbehery HH, Samy A. 2024. The efficacy of green silica nanoparticles synthesized from rice straw in the management of Callosobruchus maculatus (Col., Bruchidae). Scientific Reports 14:8834

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58856-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Salem AA. 2020. Comparative insecticidal activity of three forms of silica nanoparticles on some main stored product insects. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology 11(4):225−30

    doi: 10.21608/jppp.2020.96009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Madusanka HKS, Aruggoda AGB, Chathurika JAS, Weerakoon SR. 2023. Effect of seed priming of green synthesized iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles using Salvinia molesta plant extract on seed germination and seedlings growth of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education 9(6):2669−86

    Google Scholar

    [125]

    do Espirito Santo Pereira A, Caixeta Oliveira H, Fernandes Fraceto L, Santaella C. 2021. Nanotechnology potential in seed priming for sustainable agriculture. Nanomaterials 11:267

    doi: 10.3390/nano11020267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Wang W, He A, Peng S, Huang J, Cui K, et al. 2018. The effect of storage condition and duration on the deterioration of primed rice seeds. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:172

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00172

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Aggarwal S, Mor VS, Paul D, Tanwar H, Malik A. 2025. Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture. Seed Biology 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0025-0001
    Aggarwal S, Mor VS, Paul D, Tanwar H, Malik A. 2025. Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture. Seed Biology 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0025-0001

Figures(4)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(74) PDF downloads(21)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture

Seed Biology  4 Article number: e001  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Addressing the global challenges of food security, environmental sustainability, and ecosystem preservation necessitates novel integrative approaches that harmonize agricultural productivity with ecological stewardship. Conventional synthetic nanoparticles, though promising for enhancing crop yields and mitigating environmental stressors, pose risks of phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity manifested through stunted plant growth, impaired germination, and root defects. This highlights the necessity of strategic nanoparticle concentration management and mitigation strategy development. Green nanopriming has emerged as an eco-conscious panacea, harnessing the intrinsic reducing capabilities of plant extracts to synthesize nanoparticles through green chemistry principles aligned with biocompatibility. Green nanopriming epitomizes the synergistic integration of cutting-edge nanotechnology with nature's wisdom, transcending applications in crop enhancement to encompass green nanopesticides, nutrient solubilization, and quality optimization. This holistic approach catalyzes sustainable agricultural transformation to address food security while preserving ecological integrity. Continuous interdisciplinary research amalgamating nanotechnology, plant biology, and environmental sciences is crucial for elucidating mechanisms, assessing risks and ensuring responsible deployment of this innovative technology. The advent of green nanopriming heralds an environmentally-conscious paradigm shift where advanced technology coexists symbiotically with nature, paving the path towards resilient, sustainable agricultural landscapes that meet growing global food demands while safeguarding planetary resources.

    • In recent decades, commensurate with the growing world population and the mounting threat of climate change, food and nutrition security challenges have, by instinct become much more transparent. The size of arable land areas harvested on a permanent basis decreases because of reasons including urbanization, land erosion, and climate change. This significantly affects the sustainability of agricultural systems[1]. In a similar vein, the decreasing amount of arable land in conjunction with the increasing demand for food has created a dire situation where increasing productivity is the only course of action that takes an integrated and environmentally sustainable approach.

      Seed quality is now a key area where farmers take steps to improve their yields and there is also a need to support them in dealing with stress caused by climate change[2]. Both pre- as well as post-harvest environmental conditions affect seed quality. The production of high-quality seeds is an expensive process, more so than the production of high-quality seeded crops. Also, the ideal maintenance of these seeds is a continuous and expensive process. The viability, vigor, and germination ability of quality seeds are reduced under various stressed conditions, leading to poor seedling establishment. These factors are crucial indicators of seed quality, directly impacting yield potential. High germination rates paired with strong seedling vigor are the foundation for quality seeds that ensure robust crop stands and contribute to good yield. Therefore effective strategies to manage and mitigate such damage are crucial to preserve seed quality and ensure optimal germination and vigor[3]. Seed deterioration, initiated by adverse environmental conditions in the field, continues through storage, also impacting seed quality. This deterioration, accelerated by long-term air-dry storage, leads to carryover or marginal seeds with reduced quality.

      Consequently, initiatives should be devised that will make it possible to improve the seed quality and enhance the tolerance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. One of the promising methods that have emerged recently is using priming techniques, as these produce positive results by improving seed health, germination, and stress tolerance of crops over conventional technology[4]. While multiple primary methods are available in seed quality enhancement techniques, the nanopriming technique stands out as the most advanced and efficient, as opposed to the conventional primary methods. The application of nanomaterials to augment priming responses known as nanopriming, has recently drawn a lot of interest by researchers because of the special qualities and capacity of nanomaterials. Every stage of agriculture, including germination, fertigation, priming, crop protection, seed storage, and post-harvest could benefit from increased agricultural output and quality due to nanotechnology[5]. Higher reproducibility and reliability can result from this enhanced stability in priming applications. While using seed treatment technology, it was found that nanopriming has improved germination rate, seedling vigor, plant tolerance to stress factors, as well as productivity[6].

      Two distinct approaches have emerged in the nanopriming technique: chemical-based nanopriming and plant-based nanopriming. To boost priming efficiency, the small size and high surface area to volume ratio (A/V) of nanoparticles can promote improved penetration, cellular absorption, and interaction with the targeted sites[7]. While the chemically-synthesized nanoparticles, in particular, have shown great promise in nanopriming applications. The small size and high surface area-to-volume ratio of nanoparticles can facilitate enhanced penetration, cellular uptake, and interaction with target systems, leading to improved priming efficacy[7]. Chemically synthesized nanoparticles have been thoroughly studied for their potential in nanopriming, and plant-derived nanomaterials and present a strong and environmentally friendly substitute. A cutting-edge agricultural practice called 'green nanopriming' uses nanoparticles which make it an eco-friendly manner by which to improve seed germination and seedling health. Because of its ability to increase crop output sustainably, this strategy is becoming more and more popular. These plant-based nanoparticles often referred to as phyto-nanoparticles, possess inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and natural functionalities that can be leveraged for priming applications. While the potential of chemically synthesized nanoparticles in nanopriming has been extensively investigated, plant-derived nanomaterials offer a potent and sustainable alternative.

      This review paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the nanopriming technique and its potential to address the challenges faced by modern agriculture. We will explore the distinct characteristics, mechanisms, and applications of these two nanopriming paradigms, highlighting the unique advantages and trade-offs of each approach. Furthermore, we will delve into the environmental impact, biodegradability, and life cycle considerations of the respective nanomaterials, as well as the potential for circular economy and green chemistry principles to be integrated into nanopriming technologies.

    • Seed priming, a method credited to the Greeks has attracted attention from researchers over the years[8]. A study by May et al.,[9] demonstrated that seeds treated and dried under controlled circumstances exhibited germination rates when encountering challenges. The application of solutions containing salts like NaCl, K3PO4 and KNO3 was found to stimulate the growth of tomato seedlings[10]. The term 'priming' was coined by Heydecker et al.[11] in 1973 to describe the practice of soaking and drying seeds before planting. The team further delved into seed priming as a technique to improve germination under conditions involving treating seeds before planting in an environment to trigger germination without root emergence, as noted by Kaur et al.[12] in 2002, and Giri & Schilinger[13] in 2003 (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Representation of periodical evolution of priming techniques.

    • Priming is a water-based technology that enables controlled rehydration of seeds to initiate the metabolic processes typically activated during the early stages of germination (referred to as 'pre-germinative metabolism'), while preventing the complete transition of the seed into germination. Consequently, the priming treatment must be terminated before the loss of desiccation tolerance[14]. The rehydration process triggers various crucial cellular mechanisms, including the de novo synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins, ATP production, accumulation of sterols and phospholipids, and the activation of DNA repair and antioxidant mechanisms[15,16] (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Sub-cellular changes during seed priming.

    • During the process of priming, different sub cellular changes occur such as biochemical, molecular, and physiological during germination. This is due to the slow imbibition of water by seeds but ceases the water uptake before radicle protrusion. Varier et al.[17] noted that several proteins like globulin, and cruciferin are only detected during priming. Furthermore, the enzymatic activities like catalase, peroxidase, esterase, phosphatase, superoxide dismutase activities, and α- amylase were higher in primed seeds as compared to unprimed seeds[18,19]. On the contrary, the lipid peroxidation activity reduced due to priming. After the imbibition process (Phase-I), DNA repair, cell division, starch break down, and repairing of cellular damage that may occur during maturation, dehydration, and storage[20]. Sathish[21] found no significant difference in DNA content up to 6 h of germination as a result of priming. However, at 12 h of germination, there was a twofold increase in DNA content in maize genotypes that were primed with 1% KH2PO4 for 6 h. Subsequently, the rate of increase in DNA content at 24 and 48 h of germination was lower compared to the rate at 12 h of germination. The pattern of water uptake during germination and priming is similar and the only difference is the rate of water uptake which is slower and controlled to prevent radicle emergence during priming (Fig. 3).

      Figure 3. 

      Schematic representation of seed priming inducing metabolic reprogramming in seeds, leading to enhanced germination and early seedling growth.

      Seed priming enhances germination and vigor by triggering various molecular, physiological, and biochemical changes. These include improved reserve mobilization, faster RNA and protein synthesis, increased nutrient content, better membrane integrity, reduced oxidative stress, and enhanced enzyme activity. These factors collectively contribute to the improved performance of primed seeds[2224].

      Gene expression studies in osmoprimed seeds of Brassica oleracea on a cDNA microarray depicted that in primed seeds, genes for serine carboxypeptidase (involved in reserve protein mobilization and transacylation) and cytochrome B (involved in the mitochondrial electron transport) are expressed[17]. Seed priming is also shown to enhance seedling performance by increasing the proportion of cells in the G2 phase relative to the G1 phase. Seed priming resulted in the activation of DNA repair mechanisms, synchronization of the cell cycle in G2, and preparation for cell division[25]. The process of cell division in a germinating seed begins shortly after the radicle (embryonic root) emerges. Seed priming, a technique that extends the duration of Phase II of seed germination, is completed just before the radicle protrudes. Therefore, while seed priming does not directly influence cell division itself, it prepares the seed for the subsequent phase of cell division. Rasool Mir et al.[26] reported the beneficial effect of priming on seedling performance due to the action of replicative DNA synthesis processes before seed germination in hydroprimed maize seeds.

      Reactive oxygen species (ROS) also play a crucial role in plant growth and development by acting as signaling molecules. They regulate various processes, including programmed cell death and hormone signaling. ROS, such as superoxide radicals (O2·−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH·), are produced through redox reactions in seeds[27]. Seed priming treatment enhances the ROS mechanism within the seeds, leading to improved seed performance[28].

      Priming enhances the activities of cell wall hydrolases as endo-β-mannanase that helps in lowering mechanical constraints during the initial period of germination and radical protrusion[29]. During priming under abiotic stresses, the cellular structures and proteins accumulated during water uptake are known to be protected by specific proteins such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein and dehydrins[30]. The expression of LEA proteins undergoes sequential changes with a decline during the imbibition phase, upregulation in the dehydration phase followed by degradation during the germination phase[31].

    • Nanopriming, which is a new seed technology, substitutes nanoparticles (NPs) with seed functions and crop productivity. Here the seeds are covered with extremely thin nanoparticles such as metal oxides and polymers and they can use the nanoparticles as delivery tools of beneficial compounds directly to the seed or the emerging seedling. As part of the nanopriming process, nanoparticles quickly permeate the seed coat, increasing the efficiency of the intake of nutrients and water and promoting seed germination[32]. The fundamental material of nanoparticles (organic or inorganic) distinguishes them from one another. The categories of inorganic NPs are further divided as metal (Al, Au, Fe, Cu, In, Mo, Ti, W, Ni, Bi, Co, Si, Ag, Sn, Zn), metal oxide (CeO2, CuO, MgO, SnO2, ZnO, NiO, Cu2O, Al2O3, La2O3, SiO2, In2O3, TiO2, ZrO2) out of which CuO, ZnO, FeO, TiO2, and Ag are often practiced[33,34]. Several genes, particularly those connected to plant stress tolerance, are active during the germination of nano-primed seeds, according to recent publications[6,35,36]. By protecting seeds during storage, enhancing germination, synchronizing germination, and promoting plant growth, nano-priming can also help crops become more resilient to biotic and abiotic stressors, thereby lowering the need for pesticides and fertilizers[37]. Nano-particles have a dual purpose; in addition to being carriers, they are also distributors; they can carry nutrients, growth regulators, or maybe pesticides and allow access to plant cells with these molecules. Such practice may alter the way organic substances are utilized by plants and pests' populations so that fewer resources are being used and a lesser impact on the environment is caused. The nanopriming concept also provides a way in which the efficiency and effectiveness of fertilizers can be enhanced. Nanoparticles can serve as carriers or binders to fertilizers and they will determine when and which nutrients are needed by plants, thus releasing more slowly. This would help to decrease the fertilizer runoff, reduce nutrient losses, and produce higher nutrient use efficiency to bring more sustainable agronomical practices. It offers benefits in the form of selective delivery, enhanced seed performance. and stress tolerance (Fig. 4).

      Figure 4. 

      Various applications of nanopriming in agriculture, showing the nanoparticles can be used for crop improvement, protection, precision farming, and enhancing stress tolerance.

    • The development of electron exchange and improved surface reaction capabilities linked to diverse plant cell and tissue components are the key characteristics of nanoparticles in seed priming. Nano-priming causes the creation of nano-pores in the shoot, aids the intake of water, activates antioxidant and reactive oxygen species (ROS) mechanisms in seeds, and creates hydroxyl radicals, which weaken cell walls and accelerate the hydrolysis of starch[38]. It also triggers the expression of genes called aquaporins, which are involved in the uptake of water and in the mediation of ROS or H2O2 distributed across biological membranes. By stimulating amylase, nanopriming causes starch breakdown and thus accelerates seed germination. The generation of secondary metabolites and stress tolerance are aided by the mild ROS that is induced by nanopriming, which serves as the main signaling cue for a variety of signaling cascade events[6]. In essence, it initiates biological activities intrinsic to the early stages of germination which results in accelerated water absorption, expedited breakdown of starches, softening of cell walls, and weakening of endosperm all leading towards swift development of the embryo along with root-shoot progress. Recently, nanomaterials have been employed as a seed priming agent to enhance plant development and seed germination. They have also been shown to upregulate the defense system by modulating enzymatic activities and preventing stress[39]. Table 1 lists several nanoparticles that have been successfully used in field crops.

      Table 1.  Effect of various nanoparticles in different field crops.

      Sr. no Crops Types of nanoparticles Effect of nanoparticles Ref.
      1WheatMulti-walled carbon nanotubesImproved seed vigor, plant morphology, and harvest[40]
      2WheatIron nanoparticlesImproved seed vigor and plant morphology, and increased harvest yield[41]
      3WheatSilicon nanoparticlesIncreased biomass and biochemical activity, and reduced cadmium uptake[42]
      4WheatZinc oxide nanoparticlesReduced cadmium uptake[36]
      5WheatZinc oxide nanoparticlesImproved growth biomarkers under salt stress[43]
      6WheatCopper nanoparticlesAbiotic stress resistance development[44]
      7WheatSilver nanoparticlesIncreased seed and seedlings vigor[45]
      8RiceIron (II) sulfide aqua nanoparticlesImproved seed vigor and disease resistance[46]
      9RiceSilver nanoparticlesUpregulation of aquaporin gene expression, improved seed and seedlings vigor[6]
      10RiceZinc oxideImproved biofortification[47]
      11RiceIron nanoparticlesImproved enzymatic activity[48]
      12RiceSilver nanoparticlesIncreased aquaporin gene expression[49]
      13MaizeChitosan nanoparticles containing zincImproved seed and seedling vigor, and biotic resistance[50]
      14MaizeChitosan nanoparticles containing copperImproved seed and seedling vigor[51]
      15MaizeGold nanoparticlesImproved seed and seedling vigor[34]
      16MaizeZinc oxideIncrease grain weight, K+ content, and α-amylase activity under salt stress[52]
      17Common beanZinc nanoparticlesIncreased biomass[53]
      18Common beanCopper nanoparticlesIncreased seed vigor, and biomass[44]
      19Common beanCopper nanoparticlesHigh concentrations showed toxic effects on seed germination[44]
      20SoybeanCobalt and molybdenum oxide nanoparticlesImproved seed vigor, and plant morphology with increased biomass[54]
      21SoybeanSilver nanoparticlesPotential antimicrobial activity[55]
      22TomatoChitosan loaded with gibberellic acidImproved seed vigor and plant morphology with increased biomass[56]
      23TomatoLignin nanoparticles loaded with
      gibberellic acid
      Improved seed and seedling vigor[57]
      24TomatoSelenium nanoparticlesIncreased total antioxidant capacity, and chlorophyll content[58]
      25WatermelonSilver nanoparticlesImproved seed vigor, and plant morphology[59]
      26WatermelonIron nanoparticlesIncreased the activity of plant growth regulator[60]
      27WatermelonIron oxide nanoparticlesImproved plant morphology, reduced phytotoxicity[61]
      28Chilititanium and silverImproved seed vigor, increased disease resistance[62]
      29ChiliZinc oxide nanoparticlesHigh antimicrobial activity[62]
      30ChiliManganese (III) oxide nanoparticlesIncreased salinity resistance, and antioxidant enzymes[36]
      31ChickpeaLignin nanoparticles loaded with
      gibberellic acid
      Improved seed and seedling vigor[57]
      32ChickpeaZinc oxide nanoparticlesSignificantly mycelial growth inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum, and increase biochemical activity[63]
      33ChickpeaMolybdenumIncreased antioxidant enzymes, and harvest[64]
      34SorghumIron oxide nanoparticlesIncreased biochemical activity and biomass, and improved water content in leaves[65]
      35Pearl milletZinc oxide nanoparticlesAntimicrobial resistance[66]
      36OnionSilver nanoparticlesPotentially increased bio-chemical activity[67]
      37OnionGold nanoparticlesImproved seed and seedling vigor[68]
      38PeaPlatinum nanoparticlesDecreased microorganism colonization[69]
      39SpinachZinc nanoparticlesAlleviation of salt stress[70]
      40RapeseedCerium oxide nanoparticlesUpregulates the expression of salicylic acid biosynthesis under salt stress[71]
      41CucumberNanoparticles of water treatment residualsIncrease salinity stress tolerance, and biomass[72]
      42RadishManganese oxide nanoparticlesEnhanced nutritional richness[73]
      43LettuceZinc, silicon, iron, copper, cerium, and titanium oxide nanoparticlesReducedthe accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and malondialdehyde content under cadmium toxicity[74]
    • The fundamental difference between nanopriming and traditional priming is the size and scale of the particles involved. Nanopriming involves particles that are within the nanometer range and for the most part, are less than 100 nm. The nanoscale properties are beneficial and advantageous compared to particles that are in the micrometer scale more commonly in the form of microspheres, micelles, or micro-particles used in traditional priming methods[75]. The reasons are that the nanoparticles are within the size of the target cells and tissues. Consequently, they can efficiently penetrate the target and they also possess enhanced bioavailability and target delivery of the nanoparticles' active agents. Further, the mechanism of action between the two sizes differs vastly. Nanopriming uses the physio-chemical properties of the nanomaterials to achieve target-specific actions and related mechanisms. Nanoparticles' surface characteristics and functions can be engineered to selectively engage with and transport payloads to particular molecular or cellular targets. On the other hand, conventional priming is based on passive distribution and absorption of larger particles, leading to less efficient and less targeted chemical receptivity. Also, improved stability and extended shelf life of nanopriming formulations are a clear advantage over conventional priming techniques. Nanoparticles have small sizes and distinguished surface properties that resist environmental degradation, thus allowing for longer storage and steady performance. Nanopriming, a key application of nanotechnology in agriculture, has shown promising results in enhancing crop productivity, improving nutrient utilization, and mitigating environmental challenges[7678] (Table 2).

      Table 2.  Comparative analysis of nanotechnolgy and conventional agriculture technology.

      Factors Conventional
      technology
      Nanotechnology
      mediated agriculture
      Ref.
      Yield and quality Low High [67]
      Crop productivity Low High [79]
      Nutrient use efficiency Low High [46]
      Effect on soil health and quality Negative Positive [80]
      Sustainable crop production Low High [81]
      Environment remediation Low High [82]
      Biotic stress and disease tolerance Low High [83]
      Usage of natural and waste resources for yield attributes Limited Exclusively high [84]
      salinity stress tolerance Low High [85]
      Drought stress tolerance Low High [86]
      Ecofriendly approach No Yes [87]
      Biomass production Low High [62]
      Reduction in Mn toxicity Low High [88]
      Reduction in Cd toxicity Low High [89]
    • Natural resources or artificial fabrication are two sources of nanomaterials. Engineered nanomaterials are defined as those that are created artificially or vary from naturally occurring nanoparticles. Engineered nanoparticles (ENs) fall into three broad categories based on their composition: organic nanomaterials, inorganic nanomaterials, and hybrid nanomaterials combining organic and inorganic components. A specific example of a hybrid EN is surface-modified clay, where the surface properties of clay nanoparticles are altered through chemical treatment[90]. Nanopriming based on chemicals is a method in agriculture that utilizes nanoscale materials like nanoparticles of metals or their oxides to precondition seeds before sowing. Abiotic stressors can be detrimental to crops, but they can be effectively mitigated by using metal and metalloid nanoparticles[91]. These minuscule particles can beneficially interact with both the seed and its immediate surroundings, fostering enhancement in plant evolution and vigor across its entire lifecycle. The tiny size and distinctive physicochemical characteristics of nanoparticles render them perfectly suited for their uses. By treating seeds with these particles, enhancements in sprouting, seedling's emergence, as well as augmented growth and productivity of the plant are facilitated[92]. This improvement stems from the nanoparticle's capacity to influence metabolic pathways and signaling within the seed. In the realm of environmental remediation, nanopriming techniques have shown promising results in addressing various forms of pollution. Nanoparticles can be engineered to selectively adsorb and remove contaminants, such as heavy metals, organic pollutants, or radioactive materials, from contaminated soil or water sources[82,89,93]. Nanopriming, a technique that involves the utilization of nanoparticles to augment the catalytic activity of materials, has garnered applications across diverse domains, encompassing chemical synthesis, energy production, and environmental catalysis. Nano-catalysts, in particular, have demonstrated the capability to enhance reaction selectivity, diminish activation energy barriers, and accelerate chemical reactions[94]. These advantages are attributed to the elevated specific surface area and surface energy inherent to nanoscale catalysts, which contribute to their heightened catalytic activity. The controlled synthesis of nanocrystals exhibiting high-energy surfaces, coupled with a comprehensive understanding of the synthesis-structure-performance relationships, constitute pivotal challenges in realizing the widespread industrial and environmental deployment of nano-catalysts[95]. More work is needed to understand the underlying mechanics of seed nanopriming, despite its encouraging results and significant potential for application in agriculture. It has been demonstrated that nanoceria seed priming increases salt tolerance in a variety of plants, such as cotton and rapeseed, via modifying plant signaling pathways related to ROS and ion homeostasis[35,96]. This priming method has been found to improve seedling morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits, as well as root vitality, under salt stress[35]. It also increases the activities of α-amylase, an enzyme involved in starch degradation, and reduces oxidative damage in plant tissues[96]. Furthermore, nanoceria seed priming has been associated with an improved maintenance of the cytosolic potassium/sodium (K+/Na+) ratio, which is crucial for salt tolerance. Several known or proposed mechanisms of seed nanopriming have been identified. Firstly, the application of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles has been shown to reduce electrolyte leakage and increase the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) enzymes[97]. These effects contribute to enhanced oxidative stress tolerance and membrane integrity. Secondly, iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles have been associated with decreased lipid peroxidation, increased plant-relative water content, and improved photosynthetic performance[65]. These mechanisms aid in maintaining cellular homeostasis and enhancing the plant's overall physiological state. Additionally, the use of silver nanoparticles has been linked to lower percentages of micronuclei and chromosomal abnormalities[98], suggesting a potential role in mitigating genotoxic effects and promoting genomic stability. Moreover, silver nanoparticles have been found to increase α-amylase activity, leading to higher soluble sugar, which supports seedling growth and upregulates aquaporin genes, potentially facilitating greater water uptake[6]. These processes contribute to improved seedling establishment and water management. Furthermore, iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles have been implicated in reducing the level of 12-oxophytodienoic acid, which aids in breaking seed dormancy[61]. This mechanism promotes germination and early growth stages. These proposed mechanisms highlight the multifaceted effects of nanoparticles in seed priming, encompassing physiological, biochemical and molecular processes that collectively enhance plant performance under various stress conditions.

    • These synthetic nanoparticles have beneficial impacts on the agriculture sector as explained above, but the negative impact has also been observed by these nanoparticles on crop production higher than specific concentrations. Plants that are exposed to nanoparticles (NPs) experience cytotoxic, genotoxic, and phytotoxic abnormalities that result in slowed germination, reduced plant growth, and elongated roots[99,100]. In addition to making plants toxic, they also have an impact on aquatic life, humans, and soil bacteria through the food chain. It was discovered that in the root tips of onions (Allium cepa), silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) and silver ions (Ag+) reduced the mitotic index and severely chromosomal aberrations[101]. Similarly, exposure to ZnO and CuO nanoparticles caused significant morphological and molecular modifications[102]. Lv et al.,[103] found phytotoxicity due to ZnO nanoparticles size of 9 mm in maize roots, alteration in root tip morphology, cortical collapse and vacuolation, and destruction of the epidermis and root cap of ryegrass. Zn, Cu, Ce oxide nanoparticles leads to chronic toxicity due to dietary intake of metal components in carrot[104]. Asgari-Targhi et al.[105], and Maity & Pramanick,[106] observed inhibited plant growth, seed germination, and gene expression due to chitosan-based polymeric nanoparticles. Through the inhibition of lignin-specific gene expression, Yttrium NPs caused oxidative stress, reduced bud elongation, root elongation, root activity, protein, and phototoxicity[107]. According to Mosquera et al. and Kibbey & Strevett[108109], the introduction of nanoparticles in soil and plants may have a direct or indirect impact on the diversity and functions of microorganisms. Sułowicz et al.[110] reported that the ZnO and SiO2-based nano-fungicides changed many microbial properties, which in turn affected soil microorganisms.

    • The concept of 'green nanopriming' was introduced as a method to enhance seed germination using environmentally friendly synthesized nanoparticles. This approach emerged as a response to the need for non-toxic alternatives to traditional chemical methods in agriculture[111]. Using nanoparticles (NPs) produced via green chemistry—which uses plant extracts as reducing agents rather than hazardous chemicals—is known as 'green nanopriming'. As an eco-friendly and economical alternative to conventional chemical synthesis, this approach shows promise[111]. For example, extract from kaffir lime leaves was used to create silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), and extract from coriander herbs was used to create copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles[6,112]. It is then utilized to prime seedlings with these green-synthesized nanoparticles, increasing their germination, and growth potential. The process of creating nanoparticles (NPs) usually involves chemical reduction. However the majority of the lowering agents are extremely hazardous substances. Because plant alternatives are more environmentally friendly than such hazardous reductants, green synthesis of nanoparticles (NPs) has emerged as an emergent technique[113,114]. Green nanopriming works well because it can improve several physiological and biochemical functions in seeds. The creation of nano-pores by nanoparticles can improve the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), enable water uptake and increase the activity of hydrolytic enzymes such as α-amylase, which is essential for starch metabolism[6,84]. When taken as a whole, these procedures increase seed germination rates and seedling health. For instance, it has been demonstrated that priming maize seeds with gold nanoparticles (GNPs) greatly raises the emergence percentage and seedling vigour index[6]. The low cost and environmental friendliness of the green-synthesized approach, in comparison to the conventional synthetic method's high energy-intensive, multi-step processes or formulations of harmful chemicals, have drawn increasing attention[115,116]. It synthesizes NPs using plant extracts and among its benefits are low cost, environmental friendliness, and biocompatibility. The plant extracts are obtained by boiling various plant components (leaves, stems, roots, etc.) in distilled water after they have been cleaned with distilled water[67,117]. In a few environmentally friendly minutes, the extracts are simply combined with the metallic salt solution at a particular temperature to transform metal ions into NPs. Green nanopriming is the process of seed priming using green synthetic nanoparticles[117].

      Rhamnus triquetra and Lantana camara are used to produce green ZnO NPs, which have antibacterial qualities against microorganisms. Using leaf extract from Piper colubrinum, Santhoshkumar et al.[118] produced biocompatible silver nanoparticles and observed increased seed germination, seedling growth and chlorophyll content in rice. Similar findings were observed by Datta Gupta & Pattanayak in potato, and Acharya et al., in watermelons[59,119]. After encasing curcumin as a priming agent, chitosan nanoparticles effectively reduced the amount of ionic toxicity in wheat seedlings under salt stress by upregulating the machinery of antioxidants (CAT, POD, APX, and SOD), photosynthetic pigments (Chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, total Chl, and lycopene), tannins, flavonoids, and protein content. Zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized from Citrus limmeta peel extract against plant pathogenic bacteria showed complete elimination of soft and brown rot infections in comparison to non-primed potato tuber slices[120]. Magnesium sulphide nanoparticles (MgS NPs) using an extract from Hordeumvulgare leaves enhanced average root and shoot lengths, as well as accelerated germination in Brassica nigra and Trigonellafoenum graecum successfully[121]. Green nanopriming is successfully effective against insect pest attacks and can be used as nanopesticides. Ibrahim et al.,[122] assessed the entomotoxic properties of silica nanoparticles using rice straw against C. maculatus. Similarly, insecticidal activity was illustrated by Salem[123] using silica nanoparticle with rice husk against Callosobrochus maculatus, Rhythopertha dominica, and Tribolium confusum. The seed quality parameters like germination, seedling fresh weight, shoot length, root length, and vigor indices were enhanced using iron oxide nanoparticle formation with an aqueous plant extract of Salvinia molesta in tomato[124].

    • Despite impressive advancements, it is acknowledged that scientists still lack a thorough grasp of how these nanomaterials may impact the macro- and micro-environments of seeds. Given the current and anticipated levels of exposure, it is concerning that fundamental knowledge about the potential health and safety impacts of manmade nanomaterials on both human and non-human receptors is still lacking. There is no universal rule governing seed nanopriming and there is no discernible pattern in priming responses based on a species' taxonomic position. Certain nanopriming procedures may cause the medium to become contaminated with bacteria and fungi, which could seriously impair the germination of succeeding seeds. Mature seeds take longer to dehydrate than nano-primed seeds, yet a nano-primed seed dries back to its initial moisture content. Numerous scientists have postulated that harsh desiccation techniques modify the results of nanopriming[125]. Nano-primed seed material may therefore be less stable, which results in increased maintenance expenses for farmers and seed firms. Repeated nanopriming treatments can partially reduce seed viability losses in certain situations, but in others, the losses are irreversible. Because germination potential might not be entirely recovered, the need for a second treatment could be both an additional expense and a source of unpredictability[126].

    • Green nanopriming represents a groundbreaking approach to sustainable agriculture, offering a novel alternative to conventional synthetic nanoparticles. This innovative technique harnesses the natural reducing capacities of plant extracts to create eco-friendly nanoparticles, aligning seamlessly with green chemistry principles. Its applications extend beyond crop enhancement to include green nanopesticides, nutrient solubilization, and crop quality optimization. The future of green nanopriming hinges on ongoing research to elucidate its mechanisms and assess potential risks, necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration among experts in nanotechnology, plant biology, and environmental sciences. As this technology matures, it promises to revolutionize agricultural practices, striking a crucial balance between productivity, food security, and ecological preservation. The advent of green nanopriming marks a significant paradigm shift towards an environmentally conscious farming future, potentially transforming how we approach sustainable agriculture on a global scale.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception: Aggarwal S, Mor VS, Malik A; preparation of the first draft: Aggarwal S, Paul D, Tanwar H; preparation of tables and figures: Aggarwal S, Paul D; editing and proof reading of the manuscript: Aggarwal S, Paul D, Tanwar H, Mor VS, Malik A. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

      • The authors duly acknowledge the support received from the Department of Seed Science and Technology, CCS-Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Harynana, India.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (2) References (126)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Aggarwal S, Mor VS, Paul D, Tanwar H, Malik A. 2025. Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture. Seed Biology 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0025-0001
    Aggarwal S, Mor VS, Paul D, Tanwar H, Malik A. 2025. Green nanopriming: a comparative analysis of chemical and bioinspired approaches for sustainable agriculture. Seed Biology 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0025-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return