Search
2023 Volume 8
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea

More Information
  • Due to its edibility and therapeutic qualities, Auricularia Bull. (ear mushroom) is very significant and has a global distribution. A better technique in mushroom cultivation is needed due to the high demand for mushroom consumption and possibly maintaining enough supply throughout the year. In this study, three different Auricularia cornea isolates were subjected to four different tests to find the most suitable medium, temperatures, pH and substrates for spawning. The fruiting test and nutritional value analysis were also conducted. The results showed that A. cornea grew well on Rice Bran Sucrose Agar (RSA) followed by Malt Extract Agar (MEA) [0.1008 ± 0.0010 to 0.1722 ± 0.0143 g of dried mycelial weight]. The growth of three isolates performed best at a temperature of 25 °C at pH 5–7. Furthermore, the most favorable substrates for A. cornea growth were sorghum and paddy grain. However, sawdust (without any supplements) was the least effective. Moreover, the first primordia were observed on 20 ± 3.04, 15 ± 3.13, and 26 ± 1.15 d, respectively. Therefore, these conditions can be considered for Auricularia culture from tissue culture and spawning production. The nutritional value analysis showed that the crude protein was 11.22% and 13.14%, fat (0.77% and 1.27%), crude fiber (19.71% and 22.43%) and carbohydrate (72.27% and 70.66%), respectively. Surprisingly, the carbohydrate found in this study was higher than other Auricularia spp. (14%–17%) and 2–3 times higher than other edible mushrooms.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Liu E, Ji Y, Zhang F, Liu B, Meng X. 2021. Review on Auricularia auricula-judae as a functional food: Growth, chemical composition, and biological activities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 69:1739−50

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Chen Y, Sossah FL, Lv Z, Lv Y, Tian L, et al. 2021. Effect of wheat bran and maize straw substrates on the agronomic traits and nutritional content of Auricularia cornea cv. Yu Muer. Scientia Horticulturae 286:110200

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Krupodorova TA, Barshteyn VYu, Sekan AS. 2021. Review of the basic cultivation conditions influence on the growth of basidiomycetes. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 11:494−531

    doi: 10.5943/cream/11/1/34

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Sun X, Yang C, Ma Y, Zhang J, Wang L. 2022. Research progress of Auricularia heimuer on cultivation physiology and molecular biology. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:1048249

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1048249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Galić M, Stajić M, Vukojević J, Ćilerdžić J. 2020. Capacity of Auricularia auricula-judae to degrade agro-forestry residues. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 54:179−84

    doi: 10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2020.54.20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kumla J, Suwannarach N, Sujarit K, Penkhrue W, Kakumyan P, et al. 2020. Cultivation of mushrooms and their lignocellulolytic enzyme production through the utilization of agro-industrial waste. Molecules 25:2811

    doi: 10.3390/molecules25122811

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Thongklang N, Luangharn T. 2016. Testing agricultural wastes for the production of Pleurotus ostreatus. Mycosphere 7:766−72

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/6/6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Díaz R, Díaz-Godínez G. 2022. Substrates for mushroom, enzyme and metabolites production: A review. Journal of Environmental Biology 43:350−59

    doi: 10.22438/jeb/43/3/mrn-3017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gopal J, Sivanesan I, Muthu M, Oh JW. 2022. Scrutinizing the nutritional aspects of Asian mushrooms, its commercialization and scope for value-added products. Nutrients 14:3700

    doi: 10.3390/nu14183700

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hao Z, Zhang W, Tian F, Wei R, Pan X. 2022. Enhancing the Nutritional and Functional Properties of Auricularia auricula through the Exploitation of Walnut Branch Waste. Foods 11:3242

    doi: 10.3390/foods11203242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Zhao Y, Kakumyan P. 2022. Impact of cultivation substrate and microbial community on improving mushroom productivity: A review. Biology 11:569

    doi: 10.3390/biology11040569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Raghoonundon B, Gonkhom D, Phonemany M, Luangharn T, Thongklang N. 2021. Nutritional content, nutraceutical properties, cultivation methods and economical importance of Lentinula: a review. Fungal Biotec 1:88−100

    doi: 10.5943/funbiotec/1/2/6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Lesa KN, Khandaker MU, Mohammad Rashed Iqbal F, Sharma R, Islam F, et al. 2022. Nutritional value, medicinal importance, and health-promoting effects of dietary mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Journal of Food Quality 2022:2454180

    doi: 10.1155/2022/2454180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Assemie A, Abaya G. 2022. The effect of edible mushroom on health and their biochemistry. International Journal of Microbiology 2022:8744788

    doi: 10.1155/2022/8744788

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Dimopoulou M, Kolonas A, Mourtakos S, Androutsos O, Gortzi O. 2022. Nutritional composition and biological properties of sixteen edible mushroom species. Applied Sciences 12:8074

    doi: 10.3390/app12168074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Phonemany M, Thongklang N. 2023. Nutritional analysis of cultivated Pleurotus giganteus in agricultural waste as possible alternative substrates. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 13:92−103

    doi: 10.5943/cream/13/1/7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wu F, Yuan Y, Rivoire B, Dai YC. 2015. Phylogeny and diversity of the Auricularia mesenterica (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota) complex. Mycological Progress 14:42

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1065-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Bandara AR, Chen J, Karunarathna S, Hyde KD, Kakumyan P. 2015. Auricularia thailandica sp. nov. (Auriculariaceae, Auriculariales) a widely distributed species from Southeastern Asia. Phytotaxa 208:147−56

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.208.2.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Lowy B. 1952. The Genus Auricularia. Mycologia 44:656−92

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1952.12024226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Bandara AR, Karunarathna SC, Phillips AJL, Mortimer PE, Xu J, et al. 2017. Diversity of Auricularia (Auriculariaceae, Auriculariales) in Thailand. Phytotaxa 292:19−34

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.292.1.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Du P, Cui BK, Dai YC. 2011. Genetic diversity of wild Auricularia polytricha in Yunnan Province of South-western China revealed by sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) analysis. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 5:1374−81

    Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wu F, Yuan Y, Liu HG, Dai YC. 2014. Auricularia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota): a review of recent research progress. Mycosystema 33(2):198−207

    doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.130282

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Wu F, Yuan Y, Malysheva VF, Du P, Dai YC. 2014. Species clarification of the most important and cultivated Auricularia mushroom "heimuer": Evidence from morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa 186:241−53

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.5.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    De Silva DD, Rapior S, Hyde KD, Bahkali AH. 2012. Medicinal mushrooms in prevention and control of diabetes mellitus. Fungal Diversity 56:1−29

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0187-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    De Silva DD, Rapior S, Fons F, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD. 2012. Medicinal mushrooms in supportive cancer therapies: An approach to anti-cancer effects and putative mechanisms of action. Fungal Diversity 55:1−35

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0151-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    De Silva DD, Rapior S, Sudarman E, Stadler M, Xu J, et al. 2013. Bioactive metabolites from macrofungi: Ethnopharmacology, biological activities and chemistry. Fungal Diversity 62:1−40

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0265-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Fu Y, Zhang L, Cong M, Wan K, Jiang G, et al. 2021. Application of Auricularia cornea as a pork fat replacement in cooked sausage. Coatings 11:1432

    doi: 10.3390/coatings11111432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ukai S, Kiho T, Hara C, Morita M, Goto A, et al. 1983. Polysaccharides in fungi: XIII. Antitumor activity of various polysaccharides isolated from Dictyophora indusiata, Ganoderma japonicum, Cordyceps cicadae, Auricularia auricula-judae and Auricularia species. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 31:741−44

    doi: 10.1248/cpb.31.741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yuan Z, He P, Cui J, Takeuchi H. 1998. Hypoglycemic effect of water-soluble polysaccharide from Auricularia auricula-judae Quel. on genetically diabetic KK-Ay mice. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 62:1898−903

    doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.1898

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Fan L, Zhang S, Yu L, Ma L. 2007. Evaluation of antioxidant property and quality of breads containing Auricularia auricula polysaccharide flour. Food Chemistry 101(3):1158−63

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Kho YS, Vikineswary S, Abdullah N, Kuppusamy UR, Oh HI. 2009. Antioxidant capacity of fresh and processed fruit bodies and mycelium of Auricularia auricula-judae (Fr.) Quél. Journal of Medicinal Food 12:167−74

    doi: 10.1089/jmf.2007.0568

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Cai M, Lin Y, Luo YL, Liang HH, Sun PL. 2015. Extraction, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities of crude polysaccharides from the wood ear medicinal mushroom Auricularia auricula-judae (higher basidiomycetes). In International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 17(6):591−600

    doi: 10.1615/intjmedmushrooms.v17.i6.90

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Choi YJ, Park IS, Kim MH, Kwon B, Choo YM, et al. 2019. The medicinal mushroom Auricularia auricula-judae (Bull.) extract has antioxidant activity and promotes procollagen biosynthesis in HaCaT cells. Natural Product Research 33:3283−86

    doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1468332

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Sun YX, Liu JC, Kennedy JF. 2010. Purification, composition analysis and antioxidant activity of different polysaccharide conjugates (APPs) from the fruiting bodies of Auricularia polytricha. Carbohydrate Polymers 82:299−304

    doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.056

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhao S, Rong C, Liu Y, Xu F, Wang S, et al. 2015. Extraction of a soluble polysaccharide from Auricularia polytricha and evaluation of its anti-hypercholesterolemic effect in rats. Carbohydrate Polymers 122:39−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Avci E, Cagatay G, Avci GA, Suicmez M, Cevher SC, et al. 2016. An Edible Mushroom with Medicinal Significance; Auricularia polytricha. Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering 3:111−16

    doi: 10.17350/hjse19030000040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ng TB. 2004. Peptides and proteins from fungi. Peptides 25:1055−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.03.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Kalač P. 2009. Chemical composition and nutritional value of European species of wild growing mushrooms: A review. Food Chemistry 113:9−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Hyde KD, Bahkali AH, Moslem MA. 2010. Fungi - An unusual source for cosmetics. Fungal Diversity 43:1−9

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-010-0043-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Thongklang N, Keokanngeun L, Taliam M, Hyde KD. 2020. Cultivation of a wild strain of Auricularia cornea from Thailand. Current Research in Environmental and Applied Mycology 10:120−30

    doi: 10.5943/cream/10/1/13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhang X, Zhang B, Miao R, Zhou J, Ye L, et al. 2018. Influence of temperature on the bacterial community in substrate and extracellular enzyme activity of Auricularia cornea. Mycobiology 46:224−35

    doi: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1497795

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wu F, Tohtirjap A, Fan LF, Zhou LW, Alvarenga RLM, et al. 2021. Global diversity and updated phylogeny of Auricularia (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi 7:933

    doi: 10.3390/jof7110933

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Kozarski M, Klaus A, Jakovljevic D, Todorovic N, Vunduk J, et al. 2015. Antioxidants of edible mushrooms. Molecules 20:19489−525

    doi: 10.3390/molecules201019489

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Wang X, Lan Y, Zhu Y, Li S, Liu M, et al. 2018. Hepatoprotective effects of Auricularia cornea var. Li. polysaccharides against the alcoholic liver diseases through different metabolic pathways. Scientific Reports 8:7574

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25830-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Rahman Sajon S, Rana S, Sadiur Rahman Sajon C, Sana S, Mushiur Rahman S, et al. 2018. Mushrooms: Natural factory of anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic and nutrition. Phytochem 7:464−75

    Google Scholar

    [46]

    Bandara AR, Rapior S, Mortimer PE, Kakumyan P, Hyde KD, et al. 2019. A review of the polysaccharide, protein and selected nutrient content of Auricularia, and their potential pharmacological value. Mycosphere 10:579−607

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. 1978. Methuen Handbook of Colour. London: Eyre Methuen.

    [48]

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. In Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, eds. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 315–22.

    [49]

    Matheny PB. 2005. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35:1−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit_a_user_friendly_biological_seque. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95−98

    Google Scholar

    [51]

    Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. RaxmlGUI: A graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12:335−37

    doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Rambaut A. 2012. FigTree v1. 4.0. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.

    [53]

    Zurbano LY. 2018. Mycelial Growth and Fructification of Earwood Mushroom (Auricularia polytricha) on Different Substrates. KnE. Social Sciences 4:799

    doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i6.2421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Ainsworth GC, Bisby GR. 1971. Dictionary of the Fungi. Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 663 p.

    [55]

    Maya Rizal L, David Hyde K, Chukeatirote E, Karunarathna SC, Mai Sci CJ, et al. 2016. First successful cultivation of the edible mushroom Macrolepiota dolichaula in Thailand. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 43:959−71

    Google Scholar

    [56]

    Philippoussis A, Zervakis G, Diamantopoulou P. 2001. Bioconversion of agricultural lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17:191−200

    doi: 10.1023/A:1016685530312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Sullivan DM, Carpenter DE. 1993. Methods of Analysis of Nutritional Labeling. eds. Sullivan DM, Carpenter DE. Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) International.

    [58]

    Patouillard N, Olivier H. 1907. Champignons et lichens Chinois. Monde Pl 9:22−23

    Google Scholar

    [59]

    Li LJ. 1987. A study of the Auricularia from Hainan Island. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 5:43−48

    Google Scholar

    [60]

    Looney BP, Birkebak JM, Brandon Matheny P. 2013. Systematics of the genus Auricularia with an emphasis on species from the southeastern United States. North American Fungi 8:1−25

    doi: 10.2509/naf2013.008.00

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Bandara AR, Karunarathna SC, Mortimer PE, Hyde KD, Khan S, et al. 2017. First successful domestication and determination of nutritional and antioxidant properties of the red ear mushroom Auricularia thailandica (Auriculariales, Basidiomycota). Mycological Progress 16:11−12

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1344-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Srikram A, Supapvanich S. 2016. Proximate compositions and bioactive compounds of edible wild and cultivated mushrooms from Northeast Thailand. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50:432−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Pasakawee K, Banjongsinsiri P, Donrung N, Satiankomsorakrai J. 2018. Nutritional and antioxidant properties of selected-commercial mushroom in Thailand. Journal of Food Science and Agricultural Technology 4:36

    Google Scholar

    [64]

    Gunasekara NW, Nanayakkara CM, Karunarathna SC, Wijesundera RLC. 2021. Nutritional aspects of three Termitomyces and four other wild edible mushroom species from Sri Lanka. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 48:1236−46

    Google Scholar

    [65]

    Yao FJ, Lu LX, Wang P, Fang M, Zhang YM, et al. 2018. Development of a molecular marker for fruiting body pattern in Auricularia auricula-judae. Mycobiology 46:72−78

    doi: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1454004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Chang YS, Lee SS. 2004. Utilisation of macrofungi species in Malaysia. Fungal Diversity 15:15−22

    Google Scholar

    [67]

    Tapingkae T. 2005. Mushroom growing in Lao PDR. In Mushroom Growers' Handbook 2 – Shiitake Cultivation. Seoul, Republic of Korea: MushWorld. pp. 244–59. www.goba.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Mushroom_Growers_Handbook_2_-_Shiitake_Cultivation.pdf

    [68]

    Duc PH. 2005. Mushrooms and cultivation of mushrooms in Vietnam. In Mushroom Growers’ Handbook 2 – Shiitake Cultivation. Seoul, Republic of Korea: MushWorld. pp. 260–66. www.goba.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Mushroom_Growers_Handbook_2_-_Shiitake_Cultivation.pdf

    [69]

    Peng JT. 2008. Agro-waste for cultivation of edible mushrooms in Taiwan. International Workshop on Sustainable Utilization of Biomass and other Organic Wastes as Renewable Energy Sources and for Agricultural and Industrial Uses, Tagaytay City, Philippines, 2008. www.researchgate.net/publication/283117256

    [70]

    Abd Razak DL, Abdullah N, Khir Johari NM, Sabaratnam V. 2013. Comparative study of mycelia growth and sporophore yield of Auricularia polytricha (Mont.) Sacc on selected palm oil wastes as fruiting substrate. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 97:3207−13

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4135-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Yu T, Wu Q, Liang B, Wang J, Wu D, Shang X. 2023. The current state and future prospects of Auricularia auricula's polysaccharide processing technology portfolio. Molecules 28:582

    doi: 10.3390/molecules28020582

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Jo WS, Kim DG, Seok SJ, Jung HY, Park SC. 2014. The culture conditions for the mycelial growth of Auricularia auricula-judae. Journal of Mushroom 12:88−95

    doi: 10.14480/JM.2014.12.2.88

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Zhang J, Li X, Yin Y. 2018. Method for measuring the degree of fermentation of the edible mushroom cultivation substrate. Natural Resources 9:355−60

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Verma RK, Verma P. 2017. Diversity of macro fungi in central India-IV: Auricularia auricula-judae, a neutraceutical jelly mushroom. Van Sangyan 4(2):23–31 www.researchgate.net/publication/318283696

    [75]

    Bandara AR, Mortimer PE, Vadthanarat S, Xingrong P, Karunarathna SC, et al. 2020. First successful domestication of a white strain of Auricularia cornea from Thailand. Studies in Fungi 5:420−434

    doi: 10.5943/sif/5/1/23

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Carrasco J, Zied DC, Pardo JE, Preston GM, Pardo-Giménez A. 2018. Supplementation in mushroom crops and its impact on yield and quality. AMB Express 8:146

    doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0678-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Wu CY, Liang CH, Wu KJ, Shih HD, Liang ZC. 2017. Effect of different proportions of agrowaste on cultivation yield and nutritional composition of the culinary-medicinal jelly mushroom Auricularia polytricha (higher basidiomycetes). International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 19:377−85

    doi: 10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.v19.i4.80

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Onyango BO, Palapala VA, Axama PF, Wagai SO, Gichimu BM. 2011. Suitability of selected supplemented substrates for cultivation of Kenyan native wood ear mushrooms (Auricularia auricula). American Journal of Food and Technology 6:395−403

    doi: 10.3923/ajft.2011.395.403

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Hassan FRH, Medany GM. 2012. Studies on submerged culture conditions for mycelial biomass production of wood ears mushroom (Auricularia polytricha). Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research 1:33−39

    Google Scholar

    [80]

    Liang CH, Wu CY, Lu PL, Kuo YC, Liang ZC. 2019. Biological efficiency and nutritional value of the culinary-medicinal mushroom Auricularia cultivated on a sawdust basal substrate supplement with different proportions of grass plants. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 26:263−69

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Xing-Hong W, Chaobin Z, Pedro F, Changhe Z. 2016. Screening and characterization of Auricularia delicata strain for mushroom production under tropical temperature conditions to make use of rubberwood sawdust. Research Journal of Biotechnology 11:26−37

    Google Scholar

    [82]

    Chen N, Zhang H, Zong X, Li S, Wang J, et al. 2020. Polysaccharides from Auricularia auricula: Preparation, structural features and biological activities. Carbohydrate Polymers 247:116750

    doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116750

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Miao J, Regenstein JM, Qiu J, Zhang J, Zhang X, et al. 2020. Isolation, structural characterization and bioactivities of polysaccharides and its derivatives from Auricularia-A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 150:102−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Walker A, Wannasawang N, Taliam W, Keokanngeun L, Luangharn T, et al. 2023. Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea. Studies in Fungi 8:19 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0019
    Walker A, Wannasawang N, Taliam W, Keokanngeun L, Luangharn T, et al. 2023. Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea. Studies in Fungi 8:19 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0019

Figures(3)  /  Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(2177) PDF downloads(642)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea

Studies in Fungi  8 Article number: 19  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Due to its edibility and therapeutic qualities, Auricularia Bull. (ear mushroom) is very significant and has a global distribution. A better technique in mushroom cultivation is needed due to the high demand for mushroom consumption and possibly maintaining enough supply throughout the year. In this study, three different Auricularia cornea isolates were subjected to four different tests to find the most suitable medium, temperatures, pH and substrates for spawning. The fruiting test and nutritional value analysis were also conducted. The results showed that A. cornea grew well on Rice Bran Sucrose Agar (RSA) followed by Malt Extract Agar (MEA) [0.1008 ± 0.0010 to 0.1722 ± 0.0143 g of dried mycelial weight]. The growth of three isolates performed best at a temperature of 25 °C at pH 5–7. Furthermore, the most favorable substrates for A. cornea growth were sorghum and paddy grain. However, sawdust (without any supplements) was the least effective. Moreover, the first primordia were observed on 20 ± 3.04, 15 ± 3.13, and 26 ± 1.15 d, respectively. Therefore, these conditions can be considered for Auricularia culture from tissue culture and spawning production. The nutritional value analysis showed that the crude protein was 11.22% and 13.14%, fat (0.77% and 1.27%), crude fiber (19.71% and 22.43%) and carbohydrate (72.27% and 70.66%), respectively. Surprisingly, the carbohydrate found in this study was higher than other Auricularia spp. (14%–17%) and 2–3 times higher than other edible mushrooms.

    • Edible mushrooms are often produced industrially and there is a need to provide the best media for preserving and growing cultures and spawn production[14], and best temperatures, substrates, conditions and processes for growing the mushrooms[511]. The nutritional values of the fruiting bodies of mushrooms of various species have also often been studied[1216].

      Auricularia Bull. is one of the members of the family Auriculariaceae of Basidiomycota. Currently, there are 138 species of Auricularia listed in Mycobank (www.MycoBank.org) and it has A. mesenterica (Dicks.: Fr.) Pers as a type species[17]. Common names for this genus include jelly fungi, ear mushrooms, and Hed-hoo-noo in Thai[18]. These mushrooms are abundant in tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates[1820]. Commercially grown Auricularia mushrooms include, for example, A. heimuer F. Wu, B.K. Cui & Y.C. Dai, and A. polytricha (Mont.) Sacc[2123] which have been reported in China. Auricularia spp. also offer nutritional and therapeutic benefits[2426], for example, Auricularia cornea as a pork fat replacement in cooked sausage[27], A. auricula-judae (Bull.: Fr.) Queìl. has antioxidant activity[2833], A. polytricha is said to have antibacterial, antihypercholesterolemic, and antioxidant properties[3436]. Additionally, Trehalose, a substance that may be utilized as a moisturizer in cosmetics, has been found in Auricularia auricula-judae[3739].

      Auricularia cornea Ehrenb is widely used for consumption and medicinal purposes[40,41]. The distribution areas of A. cornea include Africa, North and South America, Asia, and Europe[42]. The distinguishing characteristics of the species are basidiocarp adhering to the substrate from the corner or center, short stalks, light brown to dark brown and undulate edge, present ridges, and veins, and shorter abhymenial hairs than A. nigricans[20,40,42]. This mushroom showed antioxidant activity, reduced alcoholic liver disease (ALD), reduced blood fat, exhibited anticancer activities, and improved immune system[26,41, 4345]. Interestingly, in Thailand, only two species of Auricularia mushrooms (A. auricula-judae and A. polytricha) have been used in commercial cultivation[40]. However, A. cornea were shown to have potential in commercial cultivation[20,40].

      To date, there have been several reports on optimal conditions for different species of Auricularia mushroom[46], but none of them was A. cornea. In this study the most suitable medium, temperatures, pH and substrates for spawning of Auricularia cornea were studied. Fruiting tests and nutritional value analysis were also conducted.

    • Three different strains of Auricularia cornea were used. The first strain MFLUCC18-0346 was previously described[40]. The other two strains, MFLUCC18-0347, were collected from dead wood in the Mae Suay subdistrict, Chiang Rai, Thailand, while MFLUCC23-0084 was collected from the rubber trunk in the Thasud subdistrict, Chiang Rai, Thailand. The fresh specimens were dried in hot air (40–50 °C) and sealed in Ziplock plastic bags. The strain was isolated by spore isolation and subcultured in PDA medium and incubated at 25 °C for 14 d. The strain collection and dry specimen are deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC18-0347 and MFLUCC23-0084) and the Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU18-0199 and MFLU23-0259).

    • Morphological characters of three wild strains of Thai A. cornea were recorded. Macromorphological characters were described from fresh specimens. The photographs were taken in situ and laboratory. Color notation[47] was used. Micromorphological characters were obtained from free-hand sections of dried specimens. The tissues were mounted in H2O and a 5% aqueous KOH solution and Congo red were used to highlight all structures.

    • Dried basidiocarps of A. cornea strains MFLUCC18-0347 and MFLUCC23-0084 were used for molecular analysis. The samples were then dried in desiccated at 45 °C and DNA from each sample was extracted with the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA amplification was performed using primers for ribosomal DNA regions (ITS1/ ITS4)[48]. The brpb2-6F and brpb2-7.1R[49] were used to amplify the region of rpb2 following the PCR conditions described[17]. Sequencing was performed by SolGent Co., Ltd, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea.

      The sequence data was assembled using BioEdit v. 7.0.9.0[50] and subjected to a BLAST search (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to find the closest matches. The sequences of the wild Thai A. cornea that were newly obtained for this study were deposited in GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/submit). Other sequences of this genus (Table 1) were downloaded from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/submit). Maximum likelihood analyzes were performed in raxmlGUIv.0.9b2[51] using the GTR + G model of evolution. Phylograms were visualized with the FigTree v1.4.0 program[52] and in Adobe Illustrator CS5 (Version 15.0.0, Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA).

      Table 1.  List of species, specimens, and GenBank accession number of sequences used in this study.

      Taxon nameHerbarium codeGenBank accession number (ITS)GenBank accession number (RPB2)Country
      A. americanaDai 13636KM396765KP729307China
      A. americanaCui 11657KT152095KT152128China
      A. africanaKM133591, typeNR177476Uganda
      A. africanaRyvarden 44929MH213349MZ740061Uganda
      A. angiospermarumCui 12360KT152097KT152130USA
      A. angiospermarumBJFC 017274, typeNR151847USA
      A. asiaticaBBH895, typeNR169914Thailand
      A. asiaticaDai 16224KX022011MZ740045China
      A. auricula-judaeDai 13210KM396769KP729312France
      A. auricula-judaeMT 7KM396771KP729314Czech Republic
      A. australianaMEL 2385783 typeNR176760Australia
      A. australianaHT 190MZ647503Australia
      A. brasilianaURM 85567 typeNR151845Brazil
      A. brasilianaBDNA 1641KP729277Brazil
      A. camposiiURM 83464MH213352MH213428Brazil
      A. camposiiURM 76905, holotypeMH213351MH213427Brazil
      A. confertaBJFC 027293, typeNR174873Australia
      A. confertaDai 18825MZ647500MZ740048Australia
      A. corneaYG-Dr1MH213353MH213429Germany
      A. corneaDai 12587KX022012South Africa
      A. corneaDai 15336KX022014KX022074China
      A. corneaWu 07MH213354MH213430China
      A. corneaDai 17352MH213355MH213431Ghana
      A. corneaLira 663MH213359MH213433Brazil
      A. corneaMFLU13-0403KX621145KX661337Thailand
      A. corneaMFLU16-2104KX621144KX661340Thailand
      A. corneaMFLU 19-0797MK696312Thailand
      A. corneaMFLU23-0259OR105042OR119735Thailand
      A. corneaMFLU18-0199OR105024OR119734Thailand
      A. delicataP 14, epitypeMH213364Cameroon
      A. fibrilliferaDai 13598AKP765615KX022084China
      A. fibrilliferaF 234519, typeKP765610Papua New Guinea
      A. fuscosuccineaFP102573SPKX022027KX022088USA
      A. fuscosuccineaDai 17406MH213366MH213436Brazil
      A. heimuerDai 13503KM396789KP729316China
      A. heimuerDai 13765, holotypeKM396793KP729317China
      A. lateralisDai 15670, holotypeKX022022China
      A. mesentericaHaikonen 11208KP729287KP729323United Kingdom
      A. mesentericaMiettinen 12680KP729286KP729322Switzerland
      A. minutissimaDai 14881, holotypeKT152104KT152137China
      A. minutissimaDai 14880KT152103KT152136China
      A. nigricansAhti 55718MH213372Costa Rica
      A. nigricansTJY 93242KM396803USA
      A. novozealandicaPDD 88998KX022035New Zealand
      A. novozealandicaPDD 83897, holotypeKX022034New Zealand
      A. orientalisDai 14875, typeKP729270KP729310China
      A. orientalisDai 1831KP729271KP729311China
      A. pilosaLWZ 20190421-7, holotypeMZ647506Ethiopia
      A. pusioAK 547MH213374MH213443Australia
      A. pusioSmith 18MH213375Zambia
      A. scissaTFB 11193, holotypeJX065160Dominican Republic
      A. scissaAhti 49388KM396805KP729324Dominican Republic
      A. sinodelicataCui 8596MH213376MH213444China
      A. sinodelicataDai 13926, holotypeMH213379China
      A. subglabraDai 17403MH213382MH213448Brazil
      A. srilankensisDai 19522, holotypeMZ647501Sri Lanka
      A. srilankensisDai 19575MZ647502MZ740058Sri Lanka
      A. submesentericaDai 15450, holotypeMH213386MH213449China
      A. submesentericaDai 15451MZ618942MZ740059China
      A. thailandicaMFLU 130396, typeKR336690Thailand
      A. thailandicaDai 15080KP765622MH213452China
      A. tibeticaCui 12267, holotypeKT152106KT152139China
      A. tibeticaCui 12337KT152108KT152141China
      A. tremellosaDai 17415MH213390MH213455Brazil
      A. tremellosaAJS 1304JX065158Mexico
      A. villosulaLE 296422, holotypeNR137873KJ698441Russia
      A. villosulaHei 1973MZ618944MZ740062China
      Exidia qinghaiensisHMAS 156328, typeNR172805MW358924China
      Newly generated sequences for this study are indicated in bold.
    • In this study, nine different agar-based media were tested. They included Carrot Agar (CA), Corn Meal Agar (CMA), Coconut Water Agar (CW), Malt Extract Agar (MEA), Oat Meal Agar (OMA), Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Potato Sucrose Agar (PSA), Rice Bran Sucrose Agar (RSA), and Sweet Potato Agar (SA). The preparations of PSA, CW, and RSA were followed[53]. For PDA, OMA and MEA were followed as described by the manufacturers. The preparation methods for CA were followed as described[54] with an additional 10 g/l sucrose. All media were sterilized at 15 psi for 15 min at 121 °C and then poured into petri dishes (20 ml/plate). A 0.5 cm diameter mycelial plug was cut from the edge of 12-d old colonies grown on PDA and transferred aseptically to the center of each medium plate. For each medium, there were three replicate cultures. The inoculated plates were incubated at 28 °C in dark. The diameters of the colonies were measured and recorded every three days during incubation until the fungal colonies reached the edge. Subsequently, plates with growing mycelium were melted to remove agar with approximately 100 °C water, to extract mushroom mycelia. Each one was dried at 45 °C for 24 h and then weighed[55].

    • The two-best media were MEA and RSA. They were chosen in subsequent experiments. To evaluate the effect of temperature on mycelial. A 0.5 cm diameter mycelial plug of the A. cornea strain MFLUCC18-0346, MFLUCC18-0347, and MFLUCC23-0084 was cut from the edge of 12-day old colonies grown in PDA and aseptically transferred to the center of each medium plate (MEA and RSA) at 20, 25, 30, 40 and 45 °C in three replicates. Mycelial growth was assessed by measuring the colony diameter of the mycelium. The dry mass of the mycelium was recorded by weighing the dried mycelium as previously described[55].

    • The two mediums (MEA and RSA) were adjusted to pH values of 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 with 1N HCl or 1N NaOH, then sterilized at 15 psi for 15 min at 121 °C and then poured into petri dishes (20 ml/plate). A 0.5 cm diameter mycelial plug of A. cornea strain MFLUCC18-0346, MFLUCC18-0347, and MFLUCC23-0084 was cut from the edge of 12 d old colonies grown on PDA and aseptically transferred to the center of each medium plate in three replicates of each treatment and then incubated at 25 °C. Mycelial growth was assessed by measuring the colony diameter of the mycelium. The dry mass of the mycelium was recorded by weighing the dried mycelium as previously described[55].

    • Rice straw, wheat grain, saw dust, rye grain, paddy grain, and sorghum were tested to determine their suitability for spawn production. Rice straw was cut into 2−3 cm pieces, soaked overnight in water, and boiled for 10 min. For other substrates, they were not chopped, but they still need to be soaked overnight in water and boiled for 10 min. The excess water will be removed by drying the substrate, until the moisture content reaches around 60%. Each substrate was transferred to a glass tube (200 × 25 mm), in which each substrate will be uniformly filled to a volume of 88 ml before autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min[56]. A mycelial plug, approximately 0.5 cm in diameter, was placed aseptically on the surface of each cool substrate in three replicates and incubated at 25 °C. PDA without fungal mycelium was used as a control. The linear growth and colonization rate in glass tubes was measured by the visible progression of mycelia to the substrate every 3 d until it reached the bottom of the glass tube[55].

    • For spawn production, Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) grains were used[7]. After being cleaned and soaked for the entire night, the grains were boiled for 15 min. Bottles containing 100 g of grains were autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min before being allowed to cool. One-fourth of a PDA plate containing mushroom mycelium was used to inoculate the bottles. For 30 d, the inoculated bottles were incubated at 25 °C in the dark.

    • A fruiting test of A. cornea was carried out with five replicates. Rubber sawdust was used as the main substrate and mixed (w/w) with 5% of rice bran, 1% of spent brewery grain, 1% of glutinous rice flour, 1% of pumice sulfate and 1% of calcium carbonate. All substrate supplements were mixed manually with 70% moisture. The mixture (800 g) was packed into polypropylene bags and then capped with a plastic ring and lid. Sawdust bags were sterilized at 121 °C for 45 min. After the temperature cooled to 25 °C, 50 g of spawn were inoculated into sawdust bags under aseptic conditions. The bags were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C in the dark, for 60 d. For the fruiting phase, the same temperature and 75%−85% humidity were used. The mushroom yield of each strain and the first primordia was recorded.

    • Dry A. cornea strain MFLUCC18-0346 and MFLUCC18-0347 were subject to analysis as described, crude protein (AOAC 991.20), crude fat (AOAC 948.15), ash (923.03 and 920.153), moisture content (925.10 and 950.46), crude fiber (internal method TE-CH-122 based on AOAC 978.10), and carbohydrate using method of analysis for nutrition labeling[57]. All analyzes were performed by Central Laboratory (Thailand), Co, Ltd, Chiang Mai Branch.

    • The dry weight of mycelium and the linear growth of mycelium were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and significant differences (p < 0.05) and Duncan’s multiple range test.

    • Auricularia cornea Ehrenb. (Fig. 1.)

      Figure 1. 

      (a) Basidiocarps of A. cornea MFLU23-0259, TW8. (b) Basidiocarps of A. cornea MFLU18-0199, LK14. (c) Cross section of the fruit body. (d) Abhymenial hairs. (e) Close-up of a hymenial layer. (f)−(i) Basidiospores. Scale bars: (c) = 500 μm, (d) = 50 μm, (e) = 25 μm, (f)−(i) = 5 μm.

      Basidiocarp: 0.3–4 cm, attached to the substrate at the corner or center, slimy and thick, dark crenate margin; abhymenial surface dark brown, 7F4 to dark magenta, 13F4; hymenial surface dark ruby, 12F4, there are thick ridges present., dense hair on the upper surface.

      Internal features: thickness 1,400–1,470 μm; medulla present; abhymenial hairs, gregarious, hyaline, acute tip, thick-walled, 2–4 μm, hair bases 8–14 μm wide; hair bases, light brown; zona pilosa 165–180 μm; zona compacta 40–70 μm; zona subcompacta superioris 100–130 μm; zona laxa superioris 210–260 μm; medulla 115–200 μm; zona inferioris 235–265 μm; zona subcompacta inferioris 150–160 μm; hymenium 75–95 μm; basidia 70–80 × 3–5 μm, cylindrical, tapered or blunt ends; basidiospores smooth-walled, allantoid, hyaline, (11.4)12.4–14.8(15.9) × (4.9)5.4–6.4(6.8) μm, $\bar x $ ± SD = 13.6 ± 1.2 × 5.9 ± 0.4 μm, Q = 1.8–2.7, Ǭ = 2.3

      Collections examined: THAILAND, Chiang Rai: Mae Suay, on dead wood, 28 September 2017, Lattana LK14 (MFLU18-0199) and Chiang Rai: Thasud, on rubber dead trunk, 2 September 2021 Arttapon TW8 (MFLU23-0259)

      Notes: In general, the key criteria used to distinguish A. cornea were, Basidiomata usually reddish brown, sometimes white, densely pilose (hairy), crystal present, hyphae with simple septa, basidia 60–75 × 4–6 µm, basidiospores 13.8–16.5 × 4.5–6 µm. We discovered that the internal features of our A. cornea differ slightly from the A. cornea described[42]. The basidia in our A. cornea were larger (70–80 × 3–5 µm) and the basidiospores were smaller (12.4–14.8 × 5.4–6.4 µm). One previous study mentioned that samples with similar macro-morphology are distantly related, while those with slightly different morphology are closely related, but all share micro-morphology and A. cornea characteristics[19,42, 5860], so they are treated as A. cornea. Similar result was observed in this study, our strains were not hugely different and they also share some characteristics of A. cornea (densely pilose and present of crystal). These variations in macro-morphology may be due to a wide distribution in Africa, North and South America, Asia, and Europe[42].

    • Based on phylogenetic analysis comprising 68 fungal accessions including the outgroups. The analysis of maximum likelihood showed that MFLU18-0199 and MFLU23-0259 clustered with the strains of A. cornea (Fig. 2). The isolates used in this study are in blue and type species are in bold. Similarly to the findings in a report[42], the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2) revealed that both samples (MFLU18-0199 and MFLU23-0259) and other fungal accessions of A. cornea constitute a lineage.

      Figure 2. 

      Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree illustrating the phylogeny of Auriclaria based on ITS + RPB2 dataset. The tree is rooted with Exidia qinghaiensis.

    • Based on the results in Table 2, the three isolates grew the best rice bran sucrose agar (RSA). In addition, the best synthetic medium was malt extract agar (MEA) for the two isolates (MFLUCC18-0346 and MFLUCC18-0347), but not for MFLUCC23-0084. The optimal temperature of three strains of A. cornea (MFLUCC18-0346, MFLUCC18-0347 and MFLUCC23-0084) was 25 °C. The statistical analysis indicated that the mycelial dried weight was significantly different, and the highest dried weight was obtained at 25 °C. Furthermore, none of the three isolates was grown at 40 and 45 °C. The most favorable pH range for the mycelial growth of A. cornea (MFLUCC18-0346, MFLUCC18-0347, and MFLUCC23-0084) in RSA was pH 5–7, while MEA was pH 5–6. Moreover, the mycelium was fully colonized 27 d after inoculation and the results showed that sorghum and paddy grain were the most favorable for the three isolates of A. cornea. On the other hand, sawdust (without any supplements) was the least effective.

      Table 2.  Optimal conditions to grow three different isolates of A. cornea.

      Name of experimentsTreatmentsFungal isolates
      MFLUCC18-0346MFLUCC18-0347MFLUCC23-0084
      Effect of different media (g)PDA0.0844 ± 0.0088bc0.0551 ± 0.0165bcd0.0389 ± 0.0075c
      PSA0.0028 ± 0.0015d0.0394 ± 0.0298cd0.0256 ± 0.0077cd
      CW0.0846 ± 0.0037bc0.0861 ± 0.0170bcd0.0605 ± 0.0028b
      OMA0.0378 ± 0.0116cd0.0634 ± 0.0126bcd0.0422 ± 0.0068bc
      CMA0.0196 ± 0.0143d0.0114 ± 0.0068d0.0031 ± 0.0009d
      SA0.0595 ± 0.0113bcd0.1329 ± 0.0059ab0.0414 ± 0.0121bc
      RSA0.1568 ± 0.0310a0.1722 ± 0.0143a0.1008 ± 0.0010a
      CA0.0029 ± 0.0034d0.0095 ± 0.0053d0.0073 ± 0.0040de
      MEA0.1129 ± 0.0495ab0.1112 ± 0.0722abc0.0348 ± 0.0144c
      Effect of temperature in RSA (g)
      20 degrees0.1341 ± 0.0222a0. 1220 ± 0.0090b0.0776 ± 0.0148a
      25 degrees0.1583 ± 0.0237a0.1881 ± 0.0153a0.1141 ± 0.0346a
      30 degrees0.1232 ± 0.0521a0.1334 ± 0.0140b0.0103 ± 0.0051b
      Effect of temperature in MEA (g)
      20 degrees0.0602 ± 0.0135b0.0467 ± 0.0080b0.0578 ± 0.0055b
      25 degrees.0.1202 ± 0.0168a0.1242 ± 0.0092a0.0934 ± 0.0239a
      30 degrees0.0746 ± 0.0044b0.0523 ± 0.0056b0.0219 ± 0.0029c
      Effect of different pH in RSA (g)40.0755 ± 0.0079c0.0753 ± 0.0056b0.0297 ± 0.0074b
      50.0968 ± 0.0103bc0.1440 ± 0.0123a0.0373 ± 0.0015b
      60.1125 ± 0.0104ab0.0817 ± 0.0050b0.0733 ± 0.0067a
      70.1344 ± 0.0166a0.0953 ± 0.0206b0.0703 ± 0.0016a
      80.0403 ± 0.0062d0.0375 ± 0.0041c0.0302 ± 0.0013b
      Effect of different pH in MEA (g)40.0712 ± 0.0026b0.0357 ± 0.0050b0.0285 ± 0.0061d
      50.1071 ± 0.0127a0.0488 ± 0.0152b0.0611 ± 0.0087ab
      60.0706 ± 0.0115b0.102 ± 0.0237a0.0742 ± 0.0131a
      70.0474 ± 0.0049c0.0357 ± 0.0049b0.0419 ± 0.0024cd
      80.0460 ± 0.0044c0.0433 ± 0.0031b0.0491± 0.0050bc
      Effect of different substrates of spawn (cm)Rice straw15.00 ± 0.00bc12.00 ± 0.00ab0.00c
      Wheat grain11.50 ± 0.00d9.00 ± 0.00b3.67 ± 0.62b
      Rye grain13.67 ± 1.25c11.67 ± 0.94ab4.00 ± 0.00b
      Sawdust6.33 ± 0.94e5.00 ± 3.56c0.00 ± 0.00c
      Paddy grain15.50 ± 0.71ab15.00 ± 0.82a5.50 ± 1.78ab
      Sorghum17.00 ± 0.00a14.50 ± 0.41a6.50 ± 1.78a
      Values are the means ± SD of the dry weight/ growth in length of mycelial (g/cm). The values of the same letter differ significantly according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
    • Cultivation of three different strains of Auricularia cornea MFLUCC18-0346, MFLUCC18-0347, and MFLUCC23-0084 were carried out with five replicates (Fig. 3). The primordia appeared on 20 ± 3.04, 15 ± 3.13, and 26 ± 1.15 d after fruiting phase, respectively. The average yield of the first flush were 19.40 ± 6.73, 31.00 ± 4.06, and 23.67 ± 8.33 g, respectively (Table 3).

      Figure 3. 

      (a) Cultivated basidiocarps of A. cornea (MFLUCC18-0346) day 35 after fruiting phase. (b) Cultivated basidiocarps of A. cornea (MFLUCC18-0347) on day 28 after the fruiting phase and (c) Cultivated basidiocarps of A. cornea (MFLUCC23-0084) day 35 after the fruiting phase.

      Table 3.  Comparison of mushroom yield in the first flush.

      ContentMFLUCC
      18-0346
      MFLUCC
      18-0347
      MFLUCC
      23-0084
      First primordia after fruiting phase (d)20 ± 3.04b15 ± 3.13a26 ± 1.15c
      Average yield of the
      first flush (g)
      19.40 ± 6.73a31.00 ± 4.06b23.67 ± 8.33ab
      Values are the means ± SD of the first primordia/average yield. The values of the same letter differ significantly according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
    • The crude protein that was analysed from the dry fruiting bodies of A. cornea (MFLUCC18-0346 and MFLUCC18-0347) were 11.22% and 13.14%, fat (0.77% and 1.27%), crude fiber (19.71% and 22.43%), carbohydrate (72.27% and 70.66%), and ash (2.90% and 3.37%), respectively (Table 4).

      Table 4.  Nutritional values of Auricularia cornea (MFLUCC18-0346 and MFLUCC18-0347) compared with other mushrooms.

      MushroomsAsh (%)Carbohydrate
      (%)
      Crude Fiber
      (%)
      Fat (%)Protein
      (%)
      CountriesReferences
      Auricularia cornea MFLUCC18-03462.9072.2719.710.7711.22ThailandThis study
      A. cornea MFLUCC18-03473.3770.6622.431.2713.14ThailandThis study
      A. thailandica4.3no data4.622.9312.99Thailand[61]
      A. auricula9.2159.737.7212.1811.16Thailand[62]
      A. auricula-judae2.8260.2321.070.139.06Thailand[63]
      Auricularia sp.6.36no data28.552.718.54Sri Lanka[64]
      Lentinula edodes6.5123.6326.780.9839.48Thailand[63]
      Pleurotus sajor-caju7.7330.2628.401.5028.74Thailand[63]
      Volvariella volvacea10.3824.3522.840.5239.20Thailand[63]
    • China has been cultivating A. auricula-judae, often known as black fungus or wood ear mushroom, for around 2,100 years[65]. A. cornea and A. heimuer are being grown for sale in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam[22,6670]. More than 90% of the world's A. auricula production is currently produced in China, making it the leading producer in the world. A. auricula (dry goods) produced 674,000 tons in 2018, valued at 37.46 billion Chinese Yuan, and generated 6.15 billion Chinese Yuan in foreign exchange[71].

      To date, it can be summarized that Auricularia is grown in a variety of culture medium, including Czapek-dox, glucose peptone, malt extract agar (MEA), mesangial cell medium (MCM), potato Dextrose agar (PDA), yeast extract agar (YEA), yeast mannitol agar (YMA) and Leonian medium, all of which have different nutritional profiles and ideal temperature and pH ranges[46,72]. Under ideal temperature (30 °C) and pH 8 conditions, A. villosula mycelium can be grown in a mixture of potato juice, sucrose, soybean powder and 0.5% ${\text{PO}^{-3}_4} $ to produce fruit bodies that are extremely comparable to those found in nature[73]. In our study, we found that the three A. cornea isolates grew best in RSA (non-commercial media) followed by MEA (commercial). The best pH values range from 5–7 at 25 °C.

      Compost and agro-waste products are used in many Southeast Asian nations for the low-cost cultivation of Auricularia species. For example, A. auricula-judae was successfully cultivated in India using compost that was predominantly made of corncobs, rice straw, broadleaf tree sawdust, and cottonseed bran with plaster stone, wheat bran, rice bran, and quick lime as supplemental components[74]. This study found that A. cornea grew well on both sorghum and paddy grain. In general, sorghum is widely used to produce spawns. In previous studies, there have been reports on A. cornea cultivation using rye grain[61,75] and sorghum[40]. The prices of paddy grain are 0.36–0.42 US${\$} $ per kilogram, while the prices of sorghum are 0.61–0.76 US${\$} $ per kilogram in Thailand. Interestingly, the addition of agricultural waste was better than simply using sorghum alone[7]. The comparison of paddy grain and sorghum is also summarized (Table 5). The content of lignin found in paddy grain was higher than that of sorghum, while the starch found in paddy grain was 12.64% lower than that of sorghum. Surprisingly, there is only a slightly different in total sugar (1.2% and 1.3%, respectively). Therefore, paddy grain can be considered for A. cornea cultivation, not only because of its effectiveness, but also because of its price.

      Table 5.  Comparison of the nutritional content of paddy grain and sorghum.

      ParametersPaddy grainSorghum
      Crude protein (%)8.510.6
      Crude fiber (%)112.8
      Crude fat (%)2.53.3
      Starch (%)64.373.6
      Lignin (%)5.51.1
      Total sugar (%)1.21.3
      These data are retrieved from www.feedtables.com.

      To increase edible mushroom production and commercial grade, ideal growth conditions (temperature, pH), along with nutrient-rich supplementation, are required[76]. The nutritional value of Auricularia is known to be affected by the addition of a substrate. For example, compared to other substrates for agro-waste such as rice straw and rice husk, the use of 60% sugarcane bagasse produced the highest nutrient production (carbohydrates, protein, ash, and fat) from A. polytricha[77]. However, in contrast to its Kenyan counterparts raised on sawdust and rice bran, A. auricula cultivated on maize cobs and wheat bran showed increased nutritional content (cellulose, proteins, and moisture)[78]. In a previous study demonstrated that the type of medium used for culturing affects the dry biomass weight, moisture content, crude proteins, ash and carbohydrates. For example, yeast extract, rather than the lowering effects of tryptone, beef extract, and peptone, was the nitrogen source that was most beneficial to the growth of A. polytricha and dry biomass production[79].

      Sawdust is typically used as the primary substrate while growing Auricularia[61,70,80]. Our results showed that rubber sawdust is beneficial for three different strains of A. cornea, which has similar results as observed in A. delicata and A. cornea[40,81]. Auricularia species can be grown on a variety of substrates, including agricultural waste. The fact that several of them produced higher yields than sawdust alone makes this a significant discovery as a substitute method of mushroom cultivation. For instance, the B.E. of A. polytricha grow in sawdust + oil palm frond + spent grain and sawdust + empty fruit bunch + spent grain were 288.9% and 260.7%, respectively[70], whereas in sawdust alone was 105.9%. Moreover, A. polytricha cultivated in sawdust + panicum repens stalk produced higher yields than sawdust alone, with B.E. values of 148.12% and 99.49%, respectively[79]. Additionally, maize cobs and wheat bran were suggested as acceptable substrate for growing the A. auricular brown and black strains of mushrooms in Kenya[77]. The productivity (B.E.) of Thai A. cornea fruiting trials in sawdust substrate was poor (72.46% ± 11.23%) in the previous study[40]. As a result, more research will be done to create the ideal environment for the cultivation of the Thai A. cornea utilizing local agricultural waste in the laboratory and in the industry.

      Asian cuisine frequently uses Auricularia spp. (Hed Hoo Noo) as one of the components. The nutritional values of two strains of Auricularia (A. cornea MFLUCC18-0346 and A. cornea MFLUCC18-0347) were analyzed and compared to those of other Auricularia and other known edible mushrooms. However, similar results were obtained with crude protein, fat, and fiber, except for carbohydrate. Surprisingly, the carbohydrate found in this study was higher than those from other Auricularia spp. (14%–17%) and 2–3 times higher than other edible mushrooms. It should be noted that in the fruiting body of A. auricula-judae, polysaccharides are one of the most vital active ingredients, promoting antioxidant, immunomodulatory, anticancer, anticoagulant, antifatigue, and other properties[82,83]. Therefore, potential medical applications of these two strains of mushrooms must be carried out.

    • The author confirms contribution to the paper as follows: study concept and design: Thongklang N; data collection: Walker A, Wannasawang N, Taliam W; samples collection: Keokanngeun L, Walker A; analysis and interpretation of results: Walker A, Luangharn T, Thongklang N; draft manuscript preparation: Walker A, Thongklang N. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This research on 'Value-added products from wild Auricularia to use as a new nutraceutical' by Mae Fah Lung University has received funding support from the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (5) References (83)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Walker A, Wannasawang N, Taliam W, Keokanngeun L, Luangharn T, et al. 2023. Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea. Studies in Fungi 8:19 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0019
    Walker A, Wannasawang N, Taliam W, Keokanngeun L, Luangharn T, et al. 2023. Optimal conditions for mycelial growth and nutritional values of the Auricularia cornea. Studies in Fungi 8:19 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0019

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return