-
The experiment was conducted on four apple varieties: 'Golden Delicious'(GD), 'Granny Smith'(GS), 'Braeburn'(BR), and 'Royal Gala'(GA). They were harvested at commercial maturity from La Pugère experimental orchard (Mallemort, Bouches du Rhône, France) in 2019, and stored at 4 °C and around 90% relative humidity for up to 2 months to ensure starch regression. A multi-functional processing system (Roboqbo, Qb8-3, Bentivoglio, Italy) was used to process apple purees following a Hot Break recipe: cooked at 95 °C for 5 min at a 1,500 rpm grinding speed, then cooled down to 65 °C while maintaining the grinding speed. During three successive weeks, around 2 kg of each apple cultivar was processed into single-cultivar purees, then conditioned in two hermetically sealed cans: one was cooled in a cold room (4 °C) before formulation, while the other was stored at –20 °C for biochemical measurement of individual sugars (fructose, sucrose, and glucose) and malic acid.
Puree formulation
-
After puree processing, the four single cultivar purees were formulated by two of each of them, into six different experimental groups named 'A' (GS × GS), 'B' (GD × BR), 'C' (GD × GA), 'D' (GS × BR), 'E' (GS × GA) and 'F' (BR × GA), respectively (Fig. 1). Each experimental group (A−F) included nine samples with different formulated proportions of weight, which were divided into two subsets: the first included six proportions (10%:90%, 25%:75%, 50%:50%, 75%:25%, 90%:10%, 95%:5%) for the modeling set, while the second included three proportions (80%:20%, 33%:67%, 14%:86%) for the external prediction set. Finally, all the single and formulated purees were prepared for both the Vis-NIR spectral measurements and quality characterizations.
Figure 1.
Experimental scheme of puree reformation, quality characterizations, and spectral acquisition.
Determination of puree quality traits
Physical characterizations
-
The puree color was determined three times using a CR-400 chromameter (Minolta, Osaka, Japan) and expressed in the CIE 1976 L*a*b* color space (illuminant D65, 0° view angle, illumination area diameter 8 mm). Puree rheological measurements were carried out using a Physica MCR-301 controlled stress rheometer (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) and a 6-vane geometry (FL100/6W) with a gap of 3.46 mm, at 22.5 °C. The flow curves were performed after a pre-shearing period of 1 min at a shear rate of 50 s−1, followed by 5 min at rest. The viscosity was then measured at a controlled shear rate range of [10; 250] s−1 on a logarithmic ramp. The values of viscosity at 50 and 100 s−1 (η50 and η100 respectively) were kept as final indicators of the puree viscosity linked to sensory characteristics during consumption[18].
Biochemical characterizations
-
The dry matter content (DMC) was estimated from the weight of freeze-dried samples upon reaching a constant weight (freeze-drier, 5 d). Titratable acidity (TA) was determined by titration up to pH 8.1 with 0.1 mol/L NaOH and expressed in mmol H+ kg−1 of fresh weight (FW) using an autotitrator (Methrom, Herisau, Switzerland). Individual sugars and malic acid were quantified using colorimetric enzymatic kits (R-biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany), respectively. The contents of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and malic acid were expressed in g kg−1 FW. The total sugar content (TSC) of each puree sample was presented as the sum of characterized glucose, sucrose and fructose. The individual sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose) and malic acid contents of formulated puree samples were calculated based on the measured values of processed single cultivar purees.
Spectrum acquisition
-
A multi-purpose analyzer spectrometer (Bruker Optics®, Wissembourg, France) with OPUS software Version 5.0 (Bruker Optics®) was used to acquire the Vis-NIR spectral data of purees at 23 °C, which can provide diffuse reflectance measurements with a spectral resolution of 8 cm-1 from 500 to 2,500 nm. Totally 32 scans were recorded and averaged for each spectrum of purees. Purees were transferred into 10 mL glass vials (5 cm height × 18 mm diameter) which were placed on the automated sample wheel of the spectrophotometer. A reference background measurement was automatically activated before each data set acquisition using an internal Spectral on reference. Each puree sample was measured three times on different aliquots. Totally, 36 spectra of single-cultivar purees (4 cultivars × 3 testing weeks × 3 replicates) and 486 spectra of their formulated purees (6 experimental groups × 9 formulated proportions × 3 testing weeks × 3 replicates) (Fig. 1).
Statistical analyses and chemometrics
Statistical analyses of reference data
-
After checking the normal distribution with a Shapiro-Wilk test (α = 0.05), the reference data of processed purees were presented as mean values and standard deviation values (SD) in Tables 1 & 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation analysis were carried out to determine the significant differences and internal correlations of puree quality traits of the different single apple cultivars and formulated puree groups using XLSTAT (version 2018.5.52037, Addinsoft SARL, Paris, France) data analysis toolbox, which was described in our previous work[13]. The physical (a* and b* values), rheological (viscosity η50), and biochemical (SSC, TA, and fructose) parameters of formulated purees were displayed in the boxplots using R software (version 2.6.2)[19] (Fig. 2).
Table 1. PLS prediction of physical, chemical and rheological parameters of all formulated purees using Vis-NIR (500–2,500 nm) spectra or their selected spectral variables based on SPA, CARS and UVE methods.
Parameters Range SD Methods Variables PLSR $\rm R_c^2 $ RMSEC $\rm R_p^2 $ RMSEP RPD L* 41.6−48.9 1.5 FULL 2,722 0.87 0.6 0.73 0.7 1.76 SPA 6 0.83 0.6 0.81 0.6 2.13 CARS 51 0.87 0.6 0.81 0.6 2.14 UVE 1,259 0.88 0.5 0.80 0.6 2.06 a* (−4.8)−2.4 2.0 FULL 2,722 0.98 0.3 0.96 0.4 5.17 SPA 6 0.98 0.3 0.96 0.4 5.24 CARS 33 0.98 0.3 0.97 0.3 5.56 UVE 1,596 0.98 0.3 0.97 0.4 5.38 b* 9.6−18.4 1.7 FULL 2,722 0.71 0.9 0.54 1.2 1.48 SPA 7 0.73 0.9 0.58 1.2 1.54 CARS 143 0.75 0.8 0.57 1.2 1.53 UVE 997 0.75 0.8 0.59 1.2 1.55 Viscosity η100 834−1,721 210 FULL 2,722 0.83 84.6 0.79 98.2 2.17 SPA 9 0.79 95.5 0.82 92.4 2.30 CARS 44 0.84 83.3 0.82 91.2 2.33 UVE 1,193 0.87 76.0 0.85 85.4 2.49 Viscosity η50 526−1,029 119 FULL 2,722 0.88 40.2 0.83 50.8 2.38 SPA 11 0.82 49.0 0.82 51.5 2.35 CARS 166 0.86 43.6 0.85 47.1 2.57 UVE 1,133 0.88 40.9 0.87 44.5 2.73 DMC (g/g FW) 0.14−0.17 0.01 FULL 2,722 0.74 0.004 0.49 0.006 1.39 SPA 9 0.56 0.006 0.50 0.006 1.42 CARS 92 0.75 0.004 0.58 0.005 1.56 UVE 1,497 0.80 0.004 0.63 0.005 1.66 TSC (g/kg FW) 93.2−145.4 12.6 FULL 2,722 0.96 2.7 0.90 3.6 3.57 SPA 9 0.96 2.8 0.92 3.6 3.53 CARS 101 0.97 2.7 0.92 3.5 3.66 UVE 1,531 0.96 2.7 0.92 3.6 3.63 TA (meq/kg FW) 28.0−94.8 16.2 FULL 2,722 0.96 0.3 0.91 0.5 3.31 SPA 10 0.94 0.4 0.90 0.5 3.12 CARS 92 0.96 0.3 0.91 0.5 3.37 UVE 1061 0.96 0.3 0.91 0.5 3.34 pH 3.39−4.47 0.23 FULL 2722 0.90 0.07 0.86 0.09 2.57 SPA 8 0.69 0.13 0.69 0.14 1.76 CARS 51 0.88 0.08 0.88 0.09 2.69 UVE 1,385 0.88 0.08 0.87 0.09 2.73 Glucose (g/kg FW) 13.2−28.3 3.7 FULL 2,722 0.86 1.2 0.85 1.3 2.42 SPA 5 0.85 1.3 0.84 1.4 2.51 CARS 38 0.87 1.1 0.86 1.3 2.58 UVE 1,181 0.86 1.2 0.85 1.3 2.54 Fructose (g/kg FW) 40.2−80.3 9.1 FULL 2,722 0.71 4.9 0.54 6.0 1.46 SPA 12 0.59 5.8 0.57 6.2 1.42 CARS 92 0.64 5.5 0.61 5.5 1.61 UVE 1,235 0.63 5.6 0.61 5.5 1.61 Sucrose (g/kg FW) 33.2−57.3 5.5 FULL 2,722 0.74 2.8 0.66 3.1 1.72 SPA 16 0.67 3.2 0.64 3.2 1.65 CARS 92 0.73 2.9 0.63 3.3 1.61 UVE 1,279 0.67 3.2 0.64 3.4 1.60 Malic acid (g/kg FW) 3.0−8.8 1.3 FULL 2,722 0.93 0.3 0.91 0.4 3.33 SPA 20 0.91 0.4 0.90 0.4 3.16 CARS 92 0.92 0.4 0.91 0.4 3.34 UVE 952 0.92 0.4 0.92 0.4 3.36 $\rm R_c^2 $: determination coefficient of the calibration test; $\rm R_p^2 $: determination coefficient of the external prediction test; RMSEP: root mean square error of prediction test; RPD: the residual predictive deviation of the prediction test. Table 2. Prediction results of chemical and rheological parameters of all formulated purees from the reconstructed spectra computed by the concentration of MCR-ALS and the selected spectral variables of single-cultivar purees.
Parameters Range SD LVs PLSR $\rm R_c^2 $ RMSEC $\rm R_p^2 $ RMSEP RPD L* 41.6−48.9 1.5 10 0.77 0.7 0.62 0.8 1.57 a* (−4.8)−2.4 2.0 8 0.91 0.6 0.92 0.6 3.30 b* 9.6−18.4 1.7 9 0.58 1.0 0.42 1.4 1.31 Viscosity η100 834−1721 210 10 0.81 87 0.81 96 2.22 Viscosity η50 526−1029 119 10 0.82 48 0.82 54 2.26 DMC (g/g FW) 0.14−0.17 0.01 10 0.57 0.005 0.43 0.006 1.38 TSC (g/kg FW) 93.2−145.4 12.6 10 0.91 3.6 0.86 4.8 2.64 TA (meq/kg FW) 28.0−94.8 16.2 8 0.92 0.4 0.85 0.6 2.55 pH 3.39−4.47 0.23 10 0.84 0.09 0.85 0.10 2.47 Glucose (g/kg FW) 13.2−28.3 3.7 10 0.85 1.3 0.82 1.5 2.25 Fructose (g/kg FW) 40.2−80.3 9.1 10 0.68 5.0 0.60 5.6 1.58 Sucrose (g/kg FW) 33.2−57.3 5.5 13 0.82 2.3 0.77 2.6 2.08 Malic acid (g/kg FW) 3.0−8.8 1.3 8 0.93 0.3 0.86 0.5 2.67 $\rm R_c^2 $: determination coefficient of the calibration test; $\rm R_p^2 $: determination coefficient of the external prediction test; RMSEP: root mean square error of prediction test; RPD: the residual predictive deviation of prediction. Figure 2.
Boxplot of colors (a* and b*), rheological parameters (η50), total sugars (TSC), titratable acidity (TA) and fructose of different formulated puree groups.
Spectral analyses
-
Spectral discrimination and multivariate analyses were performed with MATLAB 7.5 (Mathworks Inc. Natick, MA, USA) software using the SAISIR package[20]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out on the single-cultivar puree spectra to evaluate their variability and point out the contributed wavelengths. ANOVA was performed on the Vis-NIR spectra of all formulated purees to analyze their variations during puree formulation.
Spectra variable selection
-
Three spectral variable selection methods, including competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), successive projections algorithm (SPA) and uninformative variable elimination (UVE) have been applied respectively on the formulated puree spectra matrix D (n × λ), which was made up with the number of samples (n) and the intensity at each wavelength (λ with 2722 spectral variables from 400 to 2,500 nm) (Fig. 3), to extract the most informative wavelengths for prediction models of each puree quality traits. After comparison, the specific spectral variables related to all puree quality traits were extracted by CARS and composed as the matrix D' (n × λ′) of all formulated purees, consisting of the same number of samples (n) and the intensity at selected variables (λ′ with 671 spectral variables from 400 to 2,500 nm).
Figure 3.
Process of Vis-NIR spectral data by multivariate resolution alternative least square (MCR-ALS) and spectral reconstruction of formulated purees.
Spectra reconstruction
-
Multivariate curve resolution-alternative least square (MCR-ALS) is an effective multivariate self-modeling curve resolution method, which can simultaneously elucidate the pure spectra of different species present in processed products and their concentration profiles[21]. As displayed in Fig. 3, the Vis-NIR spectra of formulated purees were reconstructed from their composed single-cultivar purees based on our previously developed method[13]. The ST matrix (s × λ′) is the spectroscopic matrix describing the selected spectral variables (λ′) of all single-cultivar purees (s). The matrix D′ can be mathematically decomposed into the individual contributions related to the spectral information of matrix ST according to Eqn (1) and is interactively transformed using an alternative least square (ALS) procedure as Eqn (2).
$ {D'=CS}^{T}+E $ (1) $ C={D'\left({S}^{T}\right)}^+ $ (2) Matrix C (n× q) is the concentration matrix describing the contribution of every single-cultivar puree (q) in reconstructed purees (n). E is the error matrix that provides the data variation not explained by their contributions. The matrix (ST)+ is the pseudo-inverse matrix of ST. A general constraint used in the curve resolution method is the non-negativity on the concentration profiles.
Once the concentration profiles (matrix C) for each single-cultivar spectrum of Golden Delicious (CGD), Granny Smith (CGS), Braeburn (CBR), and Royal Gala (CGA), were obtained, they were used to reconstruct a new spectroscopic matrix R (n × k) for monitoring all formulated purees. Each row Ri (i = 1,…n) was made up of a reconstructed spectrum. And each column Rj (j = 1,…λ′) gave the reconstructed spectral intensity at each selected Vis-NIR wavelength based on the corresponding pure puree spectra of Golden Delicious (λ′GD), Granny Smith (λ′GS), Braeburn (λ′BR) and Royal Gala (λ′GA), following Eqn (3).
$ R={C}_{GD}{\lambda '}_{GD}+{C}_{GS}{\lambda '}_{GS}+{C}_{BR}{\lambda '}_{BR}+{C}_{GA}{\lambda '}_{GA} $ (3) Spectral multivariate regression
-
Spectral pre-processing and multivariate regression were performed with MATLAB 7.5 (Mathworks Inc. Natick, MA, USA) software with the 'PLS' toolbox and displayed in Fig. 4. For all spectral datasets, standard normal variate (SNV) and derivative transform calculation (Savitzky–Golay method, window size = 11, 21, 31, 41) of the first or second order were compared before multivariate regression. SNV pre-processing applied on the Vis-NIR spectral data showed the best performances to predict puree quality and was then systematically used.
Figure 4.
Overview of the applied methodology of Vis-NIR spectra pre-processing, spectral variable selection, spectral reconstruction and multivariate regression.
The partial least square (PLS) regression models were developed to predict the quality characteristics of formulated purees based on: i) their full spectral variables (FULL) and the selected spectral matrices from CARS, UVE, and SPA, respectively (Table 1); and ii) the reconstructed Vis-NIR spectral matrix (Table 2). All aforementioned spectral matrices correspond to the same reference dataset. The 324 spectra of the formulated purees (6 groups × 6 proportions × 3 weeks × 3 replicates) were used for modeling calibration. Then, the calibrated models were further validated with the external prediction set of 162 puree spectra (6 groups × 3 proportions × 3 weeks × 3 replicates) (see Fig. 1). The optimal numbers of latent variables (LVs) for PLSR models were selected by the Venetian blinds cross-validation method. The prediction ability of developed models was described by the determination coefficients of calibration (
) and external prediction ($\rm R_c^2 $ ), root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and prediction (RMSEP), residual predictive deviation (RPD) value as described by Nicolai et al.[22]. And the most contributed spectral variables (VIP) for each puree characteristic during the modeling training were obtained and analyzed.$\rm R_p^2 $ -
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Wang Z, Bureau S, Jaillais B, Renard CMGC, Chen X, et al. 2024. Infrared guided smart food formulation: an innovative spectral reconstruction strategy to develop anticipated and constant apple puree products. Food Innovation and Advances 3(1): 20−30 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0003
Infrared guided smart food formulation: an innovative spectral reconstruction strategy to develop anticipated and constant apple puree products
- Received: 04 January 2024
- Accepted: 23 February 2024
- Published online: 08 March 2024
Abstract: An innovative chemometric method was developed to exploit visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy to guide food formulation to reach the anticipated and constant quality of final products. First, a total of 671 spectral variables related to the puree quality characteristics were identified by spectral variable selection methods. Second, the concentration profiles from multivariate curve resolution-alternative least squares (MCR-ALS) made it possible to reconstruct the identified spectral variables of formulated purees. Partial least square based on the reconstructed Vis-NIR spectral variables was evidenced to predict the final puree quality, such as a* values (RPD = 3.30), total sugars (RPD = 2.64), titratable acidity (RPD = 2.55) and malic acid (RPD = 2.67), based only on the spectral data of composed puree cultivars. These results open the possibility of controlling puree formulation: a multiparameter optimization of the color and taste of final puree products can be obtained using only the Vis-NIR spectral data of single-cultivar purees.