Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica

More Information
  • Stigma development and successful pollination are essential for the continuous existence of flowering plants. However, the specific mechanisms regulating these important processes are not well understood. In this study, we investigated the development of the stigma in Fraxinus mandshurica, dividing it into three stages: S1, S2, and S3. Transcriptome data were used to analyze the gene expression patterns across these developmental stages, and 6,402 genes were observed to exhibit variable expression levels. Our analysis revealed a significant enrichment of pathways related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and flavonoids, as indicated by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes. Further examination by cluster analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed that 58 genes were associated with ROS synthesis and seven genes were linked to flavonoid synthesis during the S2 and S3 stages. ROS accumulated during stigma development, which decreased rapidly upon pollen germination and pollen tube elongation, as confirmed by H2DCFDA staining. Moreover, ROS levels in mature stigmas were reduced by treatment with ROS scavengers, such as copper (II) chloride, sodium salicylate, and diphenyleneiodonium, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, which enhanced pollen adhesion and germination. These findings suggest that the balance between ROS production and sequestration plays a critical role in regulating stigma development and pollen germination in Fraxinus mandshurica.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 Raw and clean reads of 9 RNA samples of Fraxinus mandshurica stigma.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 Transcriptome analysis of different developmental stages of stigma of Fraxinus mandshurica. (a) Transcriptome data quality statistics. (b) Transcription factor statistics. (c) GO enrichment analysis of S1 vs S2 (d) GO enrichment analysis of S2 vs S3. (e) GO enrichment analysis of S1 vs S3. (f) KEGG enrichment analysis of S1 vs S2. (g) KEGG enrichment analysis of S2 vs S3. (h) KEGG enrichment analysis of S1 vs S3.
  • [1]

    Fattorini R, Glover BJ. 2020. Molecular mechanisms of pollination biology. Annual Review of Plant Biology 71:487−515

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081519-040003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Broz AK, Bedinger PA. 2021. Pollen-pistil interactions as reproductive barriers. Annual Review of Plant Biology 72:615−39

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-080620-102159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2015. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytologist 207:968−84

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13424

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Heslop-Harrison Y, Shivanna KR. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Annals of Botany 41:1233−58

    doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085414

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Dumas C. 1977. Lipochemistry of the progamic stage of a self-incompatible species: neutral lipids and fatty acids of the secretory stigma during its glandular activity, and of the solid style, the ovary and the anther in Forsythia intermedia Zab. (Heterostylic species). Planta 137:177−84

    doi: 10.1007/BF00387556

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wolters-Arts M, Lush WM, Mariani C. 1998. Lipids are required for directional pollen-tube growth. Nature 392:818−21

    doi: 10.1038/33929

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Sanchez AM, Bosch M, Bots M, Nieuwland J, Feron R, et al. 2004. Pistil factors controlling pollination. The Plant Cell 16:S98−S106

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.017806

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wolters-Arts M, Van Der Weerd L, Van Aelst AC, Van Der Weerd J, Van As H, et al. 2002. Water-conducting properties of lipids during pollen hydration. Plant, Cell & Environment 25:513−19

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00827.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Heslop-Harrison Y. 2000. Control gates and micro-ecology: the pollen-stigma interaction in perspective. Annals of Botany 85:5−13

    doi: 10.1006/anbo.1999.1063

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Edlund AF, Swanson R, Preuss D. 2004. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. The Plant Cell 16:S84−S97

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.015800

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Liu C, Shen L, Xiao Y, Vyshedsky D, Peng C, et al. 2021. Pollen PCP-B peptides unlock a stigma peptide–receptor kinase gating mechanism for pollination. Science 372:171−75

    doi: 10.1126/science.abc6107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Doucet J, Lee HK, Goring DR. 2016. Pollen acceptance or rejection: a tale of two pathways. Trends in Plant Science 21:1058−67

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Iwano M, Igarashi M, Tarutani Y, Kaothien-Nakayama P, Nakayama H, et al. 2014. A pollen coat–inducible autoinhibited Ca2+-ATPase expressed in stigmatic papilla cells is required for compatible pollination in the Brassicaceae. The Plant Cell 26:636−49

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.121350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Iwano M, Ito K, Fujii S, Kakita M, Asano-Shimosato H, et al. 2015. Calcium signalling mediates self-incompatibility response in the Brassicaceae. Nature Plants 1:15128

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2015.128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sankaranarayanan S, Ju Y, Kessler SA. 2020. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of gametophyte development and double fertilization in flowering plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:1199

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Scandola S, Samuel MA. 2019. A flower-specific phospholipase D is a stigmatic compatibility factor targeted by the self-incompatibility response in Brassica napus. Current Biology 29:506−512.e4

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Samuel MA, Chong YT, Haasen KE, Aldea-Brydges MG, Stone SL, et al. 2009. Cellular pathways regulating responses to compatible and self-incompatible pollen in Brassica and Arabidopsis stigmas Intersect at Exo70A1, a putative component of the exocyst complex. The Plant Cell 21:2655−71

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.069740

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Sankaranarayanan S, Jamshed M, Kumar A, Skori L, Scandola S, et al. 2017. Glyoxalase goes green: the expanding roles of glyoxalase in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18:898

    doi: 10.3390/ijms18040898

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Rejón JD, Delalande F, Schaeffer-Reiss C, Carapito C, Zienkiewicz K, et al. 2013. Proteomics profiling reveals novel proteins and functions of the plant stigma exudate. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:5695−705

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert345

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Nazemof N, Couroux P, Rampitsch C, Xing T, Robert LS. 2014. Proteomic profiling reveals insights into Triticeae stigma development and function. Journal of Experimental Botany 65:6069−80

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Qin H, Li H, Abhinandan K, Xun B, Yao K, et al. 2022. Fatty acid biosynthesis pathways are downregulated during stigma development and are critical during self-incompatible responses in ornamental kale. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:13102

    doi: 10.3390/ijms232113102

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Chen X, Su W, Zhang H, Zhan Y, Zeng F. 2020. Fraxinus mandshurica 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 2 enhances drought and osmotic stress tolerance of tobacco by increasing coniferyl alcohol content. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 155:697−708

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hu LJ, Uchiyama K, Shen HL, Saito Y, Tsuda Y, et al. 2008. Nuclear DNA microsatellites reveal genetic variation but a lack of phylogeographical structure in an endangered species, Fraxinus mandshurica, across North-east China. Annals of Botany 102:195−205

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li B, Dewey CN. 2011. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12:323

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X. 2010. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 26:136−38

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Quiapim AC, Brito MS, Bernardes LAS, daSilva I, Malavazi I, et al. 2009. Analysis of the Nicotiana tabacum stigma/style transcriptome reveals gene expression differences between wet and dry stigma species. Plant Physiology 149:1211−30

    doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131573

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Hu J, Liu Y, Tang X, Rao H, Ren C, et al. 2020. Transcriptome profiling of the flowering transition in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Scientific Reports 10:9680

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66675-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhu Z, Qi F, Yan C, Zhan Y. 2016. Sexually different morphological, physiological and molecular responses of Fraxinus mandshurica flowers to floral development and chilling stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 99:97−107

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.12.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    He Y, Song Q, Chen S, Wu Y, Zheng G, et al. 2020. Transcriptome analysis of self- and cross-pollinated pistils revealing candidate unigenes of self-incompatibility in Camellia oleifera. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 95:19−31

    doi: 10.1080/14620316.2019.1632749

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Li M, Xu W, Yang W, Kong Z, Xue Y. 2007. Genome-wide gene expression profiling reveals conserved and novel molecular functions of the stigma in rice. Plant Physiology 144:1797−812

    doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Waszczak C, Carmody M, Kangasjärvi J. 2018. Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69:209−36

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040322

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Mittler R. 2017. ROS are good. Trends in Plant Science 22:11−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Sies H, Jones DP. 2020. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 21:363−83

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kurusu T, Kuchitsu K, Tada Y. 2015. Plant signaling networks involving Ca2+ and Rboh/Nox-mediated ROS production under salinity stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:427

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00427

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Kobayashi M, Ohura I, Kawakita K, Yokota N, Fujiwara M, et al. 2007. Calcium-dependent protein kinases regulate the production of reactive oxygen species by potato NADPH oxidase. The Plant Cell 19:1065−80

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048884

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Yergaliyev TM, Nurbekova Z, Mukiyanova G, Akbassova A, Sutula M, et al. 2016. The involvement of ROS producing aldehyde oxidase in plant response to Tombusvirus infection. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 109:36−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.09.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zarepour M, Simon K, Wilch M, Nieländer U, Koshiba T, et al. 2012. Identification of superoxide production by Arabidopsis thaliana aldehyde oxidases AAO1 and AAO3. Plant Molecular Biology 80:659−71

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9975-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Benkő P, Gémes K, Fehér A. 2022. Polyamine oxidase-generated reactive oxygen species in plant development and adaptation: the polyamine oxidase-NADPH oxidase nexus. Antioxidants 11:2488

    doi: 10.3390/antiox11122488

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Gémes K, Kim YJ, Park KY, Moschou PN, Andronis E, et al. 2016. An NADPH-oxidase/polyamine oxidase feedback loop controls oxidative burst under salinity. Plant Physiology 172:1418−31

    doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01118

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Arent S, Pye VE, Henriksen A. 2008. Structure and function of plant acyl-CoA oxidases. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 46:292−301

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.12.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Corpas FJ, Gupta DK, Palma JM. 2015. Production sites of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in organelles from plant cells. In Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Damage in Plants Under Stress, eds Gupta D, Palma J, Corpas F. Cham: Springer. pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20421-5_1

    [42]

    Mittler R, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Van Breusegem F. 2022. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 23:663−79

    doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS. 2002. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:1331−41

    doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sudan J, Negi B, Arora S. 2015. Oxidative stress induced expression of monodehydroascorbate reductase gene in Eleusine coracana. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 21:551−58

    doi: 10.1007/s12298-015-0327-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Thompson EP, Wilkins C, Demidchik V, Davies JM, Glover BJ. 2010. An Arabidopsis flavonoid transporter is required for anther dehiscence and pollen development. Journal of Experimental Botany 61:439−51

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Koes RE, Van Blokland R, Quattrocchio F, Van Tunen AJ, Mol JNM. 1990. Chalcone synthase promoters in Petunia are active in pigmented and unpigmented cell types. The Plant Cell 2:379−92

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.379

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Sharma B. 2019. An analyses of flavonoids present in the inflorescence of sunflower. Brazilian Journal of Botany 42:421−29

    doi: 10.1007/s40415-019-00552-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Koes RE, Quattrocchio F, Mol JNM. 1994. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in plants: function and evolution. BioEssays 16:123−32

    doi: 10.1002/bies.950160209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Lan X, Yang J, Abhinandan K, Nie Y, Li X, et al. 2017. Flavonoids and ROS play opposing roles in mediating pollination in ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala). Molecular Plant 10:1361−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Sharma B, Kalra G, Verma H. 2022. Evaluation of stigma receptivity and its properties in Helianthus annuus L. (Asteraceae). Vegetos 36:474−83

    doi: 10.1007/s42535-022-00419-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Nishihara M, Nakatsuka T. 2011. Genetic engineering of flavonoid pigments to modify flower color in floricultural plants. Biotechnology Letters 33:433−41

    doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0461-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Nakamura N, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Miyazaki K, Suzuki K, Tanaka Y. 2006. RNAi suppression of the anthocyanidin synthase gene in Torenia hybrida yields white flowers with higher frequency and better stability than antisense and sense suppression. Plant Biotechnology 23:13−17

    doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Muhlemann JK, Younts TLB, Muday GK. 2018. Flavonols control pollen tube growth and integrity by regulating ROS homeostasis during high-temperature stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115:E11188−E11197

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.181149211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Pollak PE, Vogt T, Mo Y, Taylor LP. 1993. Chalcone synthase and flavonol accumulation in stigmas and anthers of Petunia hybrida. Plant Physiology 102:925−32

    doi: 10.1104/pp.102.3.925

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Falcone Ferreyra ML, Rius SP, Casati P. 2012. Flavonoids: biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Frontiers in Plant Science 3:222

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00222

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Xie H, Wan Z, Li S, Zhang Y. 2014. Spatiotemporal production of reactive oxygen species by NADPH oxidase is critical for tapetal programmed cell death and pollen development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26:2007−23

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.125427

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Duan Q, Kita D, Johnson EA, Aggarwal M, Gates L, et al. 2014. Reactive oxygen species mediate pollen tube rupture to release sperm for fertilization in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 5:3129

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms4129

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Franklin-Tong N, Bosch M. 2021. Plant biology: stigmatic ROS decide whether pollen is accepted or rejected. Current Biology 31:R904−R906

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Huang J, Yang L, Yang L, Wu X, Cui X, et al. 2023. Stigma receptors control intraspecies and interspecies barriers in Brassicaceae. Nature 614:303−08

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05640-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Zhang L, Huang J, Su S, Wei X, Yang L, et al. 2021. FERONIA receptor kinase-regulated reactive oxygen species mediate self-incompatibility in Brassica rapa. Current Biology 31:3004−3016.e4

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Zafra A, Rejón JD, Hiscock SJ, de Dios Alché J. 2016. Patterns of ROS accumulation in the stigmas of angiosperms and visions into their multi-functionality in plant reproduction. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1112

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Breygina M, Schekaleva O, Klimenko E, Luneva O. 2022. The balance between different ROS on tobacco stigma during flowering and its role in pollen germination. Plants 11:993

    doi: 10.3390/plants11070993

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Zhou L, Qu L, Dresselhaus T. 2021. Stigmatic ROS: regulator of compatible pollen tube perception? Trends in Plant Science 26:993−95

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.06.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Kiyono H, Katano K, Suzuki N. 2021. Links between regulatory systems of ROS and carbohydrates in reproductive development. Plants 10:1652

    doi: 10.3390/plants10081652

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    McInnis SM, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ. 2006. Production of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species by angiosperm stigmas and pollen: potential signalling crosstalk? New Phytologist 172:221−28

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01875.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang M, Zhang X, Gao X. 2020. ROS in the male–female interactions during pollination: function and regulation. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:177

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Zafra A, Rodríguez-García MI, de Dios Alché J. 2010. Cellular localization of ROS and NO in olive reproductive tissues during flower development. BMC Plant Biology 10:36

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-36

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Šírová J, Sedlářová M, Piterková J, Luhová L, Petřivalský M. 2011. The role of nitric oxide in the germination of plant seeds and pollen. Plant Science 181:560−72

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.03.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Cárdenas L, McKenna ST, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK. 2006. NAD(P)H oscillates in pollen tubes and is correlated with tip growth. Plant Physiology 142:1460−68

    doi: 10.1104/pp.106.087882

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wang S, Yang S, Jakada BH, Qin H, Zhan Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0011
    Wang S, Yang S, Jakada BH, Qin H, Zhan Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0011

Figures(6)

Article Metrics

Article views(935) PDF downloads(153)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica

Forestry Research  4 Article number: e014  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Stigma development and successful pollination are essential for the continuous existence of flowering plants. However, the specific mechanisms regulating these important processes are not well understood. In this study, we investigated the development of the stigma in Fraxinus mandshurica, dividing it into three stages: S1, S2, and S3. Transcriptome data were used to analyze the gene expression patterns across these developmental stages, and 6,402 genes were observed to exhibit variable expression levels. Our analysis revealed a significant enrichment of pathways related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and flavonoids, as indicated by the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes. Further examination by cluster analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed that 58 genes were associated with ROS synthesis and seven genes were linked to flavonoid synthesis during the S2 and S3 stages. ROS accumulated during stigma development, which decreased rapidly upon pollen germination and pollen tube elongation, as confirmed by H2DCFDA staining. Moreover, ROS levels in mature stigmas were reduced by treatment with ROS scavengers, such as copper (II) chloride, sodium salicylate, and diphenyleneiodonium, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, which enhanced pollen adhesion and germination. These findings suggest that the balance between ROS production and sequestration plays a critical role in regulating stigma development and pollen germination in Fraxinus mandshurica.

    • Gametophyte development and pollination are critical in the life cycle of flowering plants, as well as fruit production[1,2]. Many genes, proteins, and pathways regulate pollination in plants. However, in certain plant species, these genes, proteins, and pathways undergo distinct changes in both the stigma and pollen, establishing a barrier to reproduction[3]. The stigma receives pollen in the process of pollination, and based on the secretory substances on the stigma, the stigma can be divided into wet and dry. Dry stigmas, found in Brassicaceae and Poaceae families, are characterized by a waxy proteinaceous cuticle covering their surface[4]. Conversely, wet stigmas, found in Liliaceae, Solanaceae, and Rosaceae families, are saturated with water droplets and lipids, which facilitate pollen adhesion and hydration[57]. Lipids are also important for pistil fertility, with cis-unsaturated triacylglycerides playing a critical role[8].

      While the adhesion and hydration of pollen is less regulated in wet stigmas, dry stigmas show selective pollen acceptance due to the existence of surface barriers that promote pollen tube penetration[9]. During pollination, pollen comes in contact with the mature stigma, triggering changes in signaling molecules and critical metabolites[10]. In dry stigma, pollen capture mainly relies on the physical and chemical properties of the pollen surface, and upon the capture of compatible pollen, POLLEN COAT PROTEIN B-CLASS PEPTIDE (PCP-bs) binds to FERONIA (FER) and ANJEA (ANJ), leading to a reduction in ROS levels[11]. Subsequently, an increase in the second messenger Ca2+ promotes pollen germination[1214]. In flowering plants, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in the development of male and female gametophytes and the interaction between pollen and stigma[15].

      After the stigma recognizes the pollen, the downstream signal in the stigma responds quickly. The downstream protein of the S-LOCUS RECEPTOR KINASE (SRK), ARM-REPEAT CONTAINING 1 (ARC1), is not phosphorylated, allowing EXOCYST70A1 (EXO70A1), GLYOXALASE1 (GLO1), and PHOSPHOLIPASE D1 (PLD1) to function normally[16]. EXO70A1 promotes vesicle fusion and secretion, which are crucial for pollen hydration[17], while the lyase GLO1 regulates methylglyoxal levels in the cytoplasm, thereby reducing its content due to glucose metabolism during pollination[18]. PLD1 produces phosphatidic acid, promoting vesicle fusion in-stigma mastoid cells and facilitating exocytosis for pollen germination[16].

      In recent years, the rapid development of omics technologies, such as RNA sequencing and proteomics, has enabled researchers to explore the mechanisms underlying gametophyte development and pollination. An analysis of stigmatic exudates from Lilium longiflorum and Olea europaea identified 51 and 57 proteins, respectively, the majority of which were newly discovered, and many of which were implicated in regulating pollen growth[19]. In another study, mass spectroscopy coupled with 3D gel-based techniques identified more than 2,100 triticale stigma proteins involved in stigma development, pollen–stigma interactions, and environmental stress response[20]. Integration of PacBio SMRT-seq and Illumina RNA-seq technologies in ornamental kale resulted in the construction of a transcriptome database covering the various stages of stigma development and leading to the discovery of novel genes, transcripts, non-redundant transcripts, alternatively spliced variants, complete open reading frame sequences, simple sequence repeats, and long non-coding RNAs, all of which are important for the biology of the stigma[21]. Thus, the development of omics technologies can provide new ideas in Fraxinus mandshurica research.

      Fraxinus mandshurica (F. mandshurica) is a large deciduous tree belonging to the Oleaceae family, valued for its monetary worth and medical properties[22]. Propagated by seed, this plant has a low seed-setting rate due to various physiological factors that influence gametophyte development, pollination, and fertilization[23]. Understanding how F. mandshurica regulates and optimizes gene expression during stigma development could be instrumental in preserving its reproductive capability to ensure successful cross-pollination and seed formation for its conservation. Despite its importance, there is a lack of transcriptional profiling studies exploring stigma development in F. mandshurica. To address this gap, we use RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) to compare the transcriptomic profiles of F. mandshurica stigma at various stages of development, and this study serves as an avenue for improvement of F. mandshurica cultivation and conservation.

    • F. mandshurica from the Northeast Forestry University (Harbin, China) experimental forest was used as the experimental material. The stigmas of F. mandshurica were collected at different stages of development. In the initial stage (S1), approximately 3,000 stigmas were collected per sample. These stigmas were characterized as small and ellipsoidal, without bifurcation, and measuring less than or equal to 1 mm in length. In the subsequent stage (S2), approximately 2,000 stigmas were collected as they reached a size of 1.5–2.0 mm and started to show signs of bifurcation. In the final stage (S3), approximately 1,500 stigmas were collected per sample. At this stage, the stigmas had become bifid, with branches exceeding 2.5 mm in length, resembling sheep horns in shape, and displaying white coloration along the edges. Three biological replicates were collected for each stage and labeled as S1, S2, and S3. The samples were flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C for RNA extraction.

    • The stigmas of F. mandshurica were processed for RNA isolation using TRNzol Universal Reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quantity and quality of the RNA were assessed using spectroscopy (NanoDrop2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. The Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to sequence the 9 RNA samples (three replicates for each stage). RNA-seq by expectation-maximization and fragment per kb of transcript per million fragments mapped were used to calculate the gene transcript levels in different stages of stigma development[24]. DESeq2 (https://rdrr.io/bioc/DESeq2/src/R/core.R) was employed to extract differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with criteria set to |log2Fold Change| ≥1 and false discovery rate <0.05[25].

    • Primer-Blast (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi) was used to design primers for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). cDNA synthesis was performed using TransScript One-Step cDNA Synthesis and gDNA Removal SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing, China), while the LightCycler480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was employed for qPCR using SYBR qPCR Mix (TransGen, Beijing, China). Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method[21], with FmTUB serving as the housekeeping gene for normalization. The experiment was carried out with three biological and three technical replicates.

    • The ROS levels in the stigmas of F. mandshurica were measured using 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA). The stigmas were immersed in 10 mM MES, 5 mM KCl, 50 mM CaCl2, pH 6.15, containing 50 μM H2DCFDA, and then rinsed at least three times before observation, each group includes 13 stigmas. The average signal intensity in regions of interest was quantified using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For comparison, the S1 group is defined as the control group, ROS levels in control stigmas were set to 1.

    • The excised stigmas were immersed into 5 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, 0.01% H3BO3, 1 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 10% sucrose, 0.8% agarose, pH 7.5 for 1 h. Initially, mature stigmas were treated with copper (II) chloride (CuCl2), sodium salicylate (Na-SA), or an inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI). The mock-treated group of CuCl2 and Na-SA was treated with ddH2O. The mock-treated group of DPI was treated with 0.1% DMSO. The stigmas were placed in a chamber at a temperature of 22.5 °C and a humidity of 45% for 60 min. Subsequently, the stigmas were manually pollinated once and then placed in a chamber under identical temperature and humidity for 30, 60, and 120 min. Following this, an aniline blue stain was applied, and pollen adhesion and germination were observed using a Leica DM4 B microscope (Wetzlar, Germany).

    • Data on ROS, pollen number, and pollen tube number are presented as bar graphs generated in GraphPad Prismv 8.0.1. The dots in bar graphs denote individual data points ± SEM for all stigmatic ROS data and all the pollen tube growth data. Student's t-test was used to determine the statistical significance, asterisks or ns directly above the data bars indicate a significant difference (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p< 0.001).

    • Three distinct developmental stages were observed in F. mandshurica stigmas by stereomicroscopy. During the S1 stage, the stigma was characterized as small and ellipsoidal, with no observable bifid structure. The stigma appeared light yellow and measured 1 mm or less in length. In the S2 stage, the stigma elongated and began to show signs of bifurcation. Its length increased to 1.5–2.0 mm, and the yellow color along the edges of the stigma began to fade to white. By the S3 stage, the stigma displayed a bifid structure, with branches exceeding 2.5 mm in length, resembling sheep horns in shape, and displaying white coloration along the edges (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Morphological stages of stigma development in F. mandshurica. From left to right: S1, S2, and S3 stages, as observed by stereomicroscopy. The orange bar corresponds to the stigma, the green bar to the style, and the blue bar to the ovary. Scale bar = 500 µm.

    • Raw reads of 74.23–90.44 million basepairs were generated from nine RNA samples using the Illumina HiSeq platform (Supplemental Table S1), resulting in 70.94–86.85 million clean reads per library, accounting for 95.72% of total reads (Supplemental Fig. S1a). In total, 41,286 unigenes were successfully annotated in at least one database. The quantity and quality of the sequencing data satisfied the requirements for further downstream analysis.

      Subsequent analysis was conducted based on |log2Fold Change| ≥1 and FDR <0.05 as significance cut-offs. The principal component analysis (PCA) of gene expression levels revealed minimal differences among the three biological replicates compared to between the samples (Fig. 2a). Differential expression analysis during stigma development identified 5,053 (2,171 upregulated and 2,882 downregulated), 4,584 (2,023 upregulated and 2,561 downregulated), and 1,401 (702 upregulated and 699 downregulated) DEGs between S1 vs S2, S1 vs S3, and S2 vs S3 libraries, respectively (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, 450 DEGs were common to all libraries (Fig. 2c), potentially functioning in all stages of stigma development. Similarly, 3,460 transcription factors (TFs) were identified and categorized into 94 TF families, with AP2/ERF-ERF (228 genes), bHLH (209 genes), MYB (200 genes), and C2H2 (175 genes) families being the largest (Supplemental Fig. S1b).

      Figure 2. 

      Statistical analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to stigma development in F. mandshurica. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) of transcriptome data during stigma development. (b) Summary of DEG results. Red and blue indicate upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. In each comparison, orange indicates the total. (c) Venn diagram of DEGs in three comparison groups. (d) KEGG enrichment analysis of all DEGs.

      Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were predominantly associated with the biological process category (cellular and metabolic processe), cellular component category (cellular and anatomical entity), and molecular function category (binding and catalytic activity) (Supplemental Fig. S1ce).

      In each comparison group (S1 vs S2, S2 vs S3, S1 vs S3), the top 15 pathways with the smallest q-values in the KEGG analysis were considered significant (Supplemental Fig. S1fh). To investigate the biological and metabolic processes involved in stigma development, we used the KEGG database to annotate all DEGs. Among the 15 pathways showing enrichment, a strong presence of plant–fungal interactions were observed, followed by secondary metabolite biosynthesis, carotenoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, metabolic processes, plant–hormone signaling, and MAPK signaling (Fig. 2d).

    • In plants, ROS are mainly produced within subcellular compartments, thus requiring efficient mechanisms to regulate their levels. Our analysis of RNA-seq data focused on genes associated with ROS production and sequestration. A total of 58 genes were differentially expressed, including six enzymes related to ROS production and seven enzymes related to ROS elimination.

      Between the apoplast and the cytosol, two RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGS (RBOH: NADPH oxidase) were highly expressed in the S2 stage, with one additionally showing increased expression in the S2 and S3 stages. Three POLYAMINE OXIDASES (PAO) were also differentially expressed, with two showing high expression in the S3 stage and one in the S1 stage. ALDEHYDE OXIDASE (AO) demonstrated elevated expression in the S2 stage, while YUCCA exhibited increased expression in S2 and S3 stages. Notably, most genes encoding ROS scavenging enzymes, such as GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE (GPX), GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE (GST), THIOREDOXIN (TRX), and PEROXIDASE (PRX), were highly expressed in the S2 and S3 stages (Fig. 3a).

      Figure 3. 

      Pathway cluster analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) validation of selected genes related to ROS production and sequestration. (a) ROS production and sequestration in the apoplast and cytosol. (b) ROS production and sequestration in the chloroplast. (c) ROS production and sequestration in the peroxisome. (d) qRCR analysis of selected genes. ACOX, Acyl-CoA oxidase; AO, Aldehyde oxidase; AsA, Ascorbic acid; CDPK, Calcium-dependent protein kinase; CNGC, Cyclic nucleotide-gated channel; GPX, Glutathione peroxidase; GRX, Glutaredoxin; GST, Glutathione S-transferase; MDAR, Monodehydroascorbate reductase; MDA, Malondialdehyde; PAO, Polyamine oxidase; PRX, Peroxidase; RBOH, Respiratory burst oxidase homolog; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; SOX, Sarcosine oxidase; TRX, Thioredoxin.

      In the chloroplast, one SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD) gene was highly expressed in S2 and S3 stages, while two GLUTAREDOXINS (GRX) were highly expressed in S2 and S3 stages (Fig. 3b), all of which are known to scavenge ROS. Similarly, in the peroxisome, the expression of ACYL-COA OXIDASE (ACOX) and SARCOSINE OXIDASE (SOX) increased across the three developmental stages, and MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE (MDAR) was highly expressed in S2 and S3 stages (Fig. 3c). Ten genes were selected for qPCR, and the findings aligned with those of RNA-seq (Fig. 3d).

    • The KEGG analysis revealed a significant enrichment of flavonoid synthesis pathways across the three developmental stages. Our analysis of the RNA-seq data identified seven genes involved in flavonoid synthesis, and the levels of these genes were increased in S2 and S3 stages. To confirm the reliability of our transcriptome data, we conducted qPCR on four flavonoid synthesis genes. The results revealed high expression levels of PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE (PLA), FLAVANONE 3P-HYDROXYLASE (F3H), CHALCONE SYNTHASE (CHS), and FLAVONOL SYNTHASE (FLS) in S2 and S3 stages (Fig. 4a, b). Taken together, these findings indicate that genes involved in flavonoid synthesis are specific to the S2 and S3 stages of stigma development and may play a role in pollen–stigma interactions.

      Figure 4. 

      Validation of potential genes associated with flavonoid synthesis by cluster analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). (a) Pathway and heatmap of candidate genes showing fold changes. (b) qPCR validation of flavonoid synthesis-related genes. PAL, Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; CHS, Chalcone synthase; F3H, Flavanone 3P-hydroxylase; FLS, Flavonol synthase.

    • To evaluate the ROS levels across the three developmental stages, we stained the stigmas with 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA). The results revealed a gradual accumulation of ROS in the stigma from S1 to S2 stage, followed by an increase of approximately 7-fold in the S3 stage (Fig. 5a). Additionally, aniline blue staining was used to explore the role of ROS in pollination. Pollen attachment was observed in the mature stigma at pollination, with fewer pollen grains sticking to the stigma and failing to germinate at 30 min after pollination (30 MAP). Pollen attachment increased significantly at 60 min after pollination (60 MAP), with partial germination of pollen. At 120 min after pollination (120 MAP), all the pollen tubes germinated and grew toward the style (Fig. 5b).

      Figure 5. 

      Accumulation of ROS in the stigma, followed by a reduction in ROS levels after pollination. (a) Detection of ROS during stigma development. (b) Observation of pollen grains under blue light after staining with aniline blue. From left to right: pollen grain number and pollen tube germination. (c) H2DCFDA staining of ROS levels at different time points after pollination. ROS signals were measured using ImageJ (the average signal in S1 stigmas is set at 1 for comparison). Data are expressed as ± SEM. Each data point is indicated by a dot, and (n) denotes stigma number. Asterisks or not significant (ns) above the error bars indicate significance level compared with the data bar on the left (Student's t-test; ***p < 0.001).

      H2DCFDA staining was employed to detect ROS levels in the stigma after pollination (0, 30, 60, and 120 MAP). Compared to the ROS level at 0 MAP, a significant reduction in the ROS level was observed at 30 and 120 MAP (Fig. 5c). These results indicate that ROS levels increase during stigma development, but decrease after pollination and pollen tube growth, suggesting ROS impact stigma development, pollination, and pollen tube growth.

    • To investigate whether reduced ROS levels in the mature stigma could increase pollen number and pollen tube germination, mature stigmas were treated with ROS scavengers, copper (II) chloride (CuCl2) and sodium salicylate (Na-SA) (Fig. 6a). Additionally, an inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI), was used to suppress ROS levels in mature stigmas (Fig. 6c). The findings revealed that 30 min after pollination, there was a significant increase in both the number of pollen and pollen tubes on the stigma compared to the mock-treated group (Fig. 6b, d). The results indicate that ROS scavengers and NADPH oxidase inhibitors can effectively reduce ROS levels in the mature stigma. Furthermore, the results demonstrate an enhancement in pollen tube germination on the stigma, suggesting a potential association between the reduction in ROS levels and the induction of pollen–stigma interactions.

      Figure 6. 

      Effect of ROS sequestration on pollination. (a) Detection of ROS after treatment of mature stigmas with copper (II) chloride (CuCl2) and sodium salicylate (Na-SA). (b) Detection of pollen number and pollen tube number after stigmas were treated with CuCl2 and Na-SA. From left to right: bright field and ultraviolet light views. (c) Detection of ROS after treatment of mature stigmas with diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI). (d) Detection of pollen tube number after mature stigmas were treated with DPI. From left to right: bright field and ultraviolet light views. Data are expressed ± SEM. Each data point is indicated by a dot, and (n) denotes the number of stigmas. Asterisks or not significant (ns) directly above the data bars indicate significance level compared with the data bar on the far left (Student's t-test; ***p < 0.001).

    • Stigma development and pollination are important factors for successful reproduction in flowering plants. Studies in various plant species have revealed the usefulness of transcriptome data in deciphering the mechanisms underlying stigma development and pollination[26,27]. Despite the widespread distribution of F. mandshurica across northeast China, Russia, and Europe, few studies investigate the biology of its floral organs[28]. In our study, the RNA-seq data revealed 6,402 DEGs and 3,460 transcription factors (TFs) across the developmental stages (S1 vs S2, S2 vs S3, and S1 vs S3 libraries), which included ROS synthesis genes, antioxidant enzymes, and flavonoid synthesis genes. In general, F. mandshurica female plants are more sensitive to stress[28], leading to increased ROS production and enhanced metabolic activity. Functional annotation of these DEGs highlighted their involvement in diverse biological pathways, including plant–pathogen interactions, as well as flavonoid and carotenoid synthesis. Moreover, the evolutionary perspective proposes that pollination has emerged from interactions between plants and pathogens[29,30], which leads to the accumulation of ROS and the activation of scavenging systems, including antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic small molecules such as glutathione, flavonoids, and carotenoids[31]. Therefore, global transcriptional profiles enable researchers to study the mechanisms underlying stigma development, and this information can greatly advance our understanding of plant reproductive biology.

      Reactive oxygen species exist in many forms within cellular environments, with the major forms including H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide),1O2 (singlet oxygen), O2·− (superoxide), HO (hydroxyl radical), and other organic and inorganic peroxides[3133]. Our analysis of the RNA-seq data revealed changes in the expression of genes related to ROS production during stigma development. Specifically, three differentially expressed unigenes encoding RBOH proteins (RBOHA-1, RBOHA-2, and RBOHC) were identified. RBOH proteins regulate the activity of ROS-producing NADPH oxidase (NOX), whose activation is triggered by Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation and Ca2+ binding to EF-hand motifs[34]. For example, StCDPK proteins have been reported to stimulate NADPH oxidase via phosphoric acid, which increases the production of ROS[35]. In our study, both CNGCs and CDPKs were highly expressed during S2 and S3 stages, aligning with the expression trends of ROBH genes, suggesting Ca2+ can modulate RBOH activity during stigma development. Furthermore, other enzymes can contribute to ROS production. For example, AO not only regulates aldehyde oxidation but also influences NADPH oxidase activity, leading to the generation of superoxide anions[36,37]. Additionally, NADPH oxidase and PAO synergistically regulate the accumulation of H2O2 and superoxide (O2·−) in tobacco[38,39]. To sum up, these genes regulate ROS production during stigma development. The activation of CDPK and other genes may lead to the activation of downstream gene RBOH. In the β-oxidation pathway, ACOX converts acyl-CoA into trans-2-enyl-CoA while producing H2O2 as a by-product[40]. Similarly, SOX covalently binds FAD molecules, facilitating the decomposition and metabolism of lysine, thereby producing H2O2 as a by-product[41]. Apart from the elevated expression of RBOH genes during the S2 and S3 stages, we also observed the activation of several transcripts encoding AO, SOX, PAO, and ACOX in the S2 stage and their increased expression across the three stages of stigma development. Taken together, these findings suggest that these genes act synergistically to promote the accumulation of ROS during stigma development.

      Low levels of ROS are critical in plants, protecting cells from damage. When ROS levels increase, antioxidant mechanisms are activated to sequester ROS[32]. Our study identified several enzymes, including SOD and PRX, which play important roles in defending plants from the damaging effects of ROS. These enzymes catalyze the dismutation of O2·− to H2O2 and O2 in mitochondria, chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and apoplasts[31,4143]. Monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), another antioxidant enzyme, can also scavenge ROS[44]. The current study revealed consistent expression trends among genes encoding SOD, PRX, MDAR, TRX, GPX, GST, and GRX, indicating ROS production activates antioxidant enzyme expression. During the S2 stage, the levels of RBOH, AO, and PAO were upregulated in both the apoplast and cytoplasm, suggesting that ROS content in the stigma changed during the S2 stage, which activated the ROS scavenging system in the stigma.

      Flavonoid synthesis directly impacts various physiological processes that are crucial for floral organ growth and development[45,46]. Elevated levels of flavonoids have been reported in both the stigma and pollen[47], with the key components of the flavonoid synthesis pathway (PAL, CHS, F3H, and FLS) regulating flavonoid accumulation in plants[48]. In ornamental kale, flavonoids act as antioxidants and alleviate self-incompatibility, with four flavonoid-producing genes (CHS1, CHS2, F3H, and FLS) consistently expressed in the stigma[49]. Flavonoids also facilitate reproduction in plants under harsh environmental conditions[50] and regulate stigma development by interacting with components of the ROS synthesis pathway[5153]. They are also involved in pollination, with studies suggesting opposing roles for flavonoids and ROS[49]. Flavonoids and ROS are also abundant during gametophyte development[47,50].

      Chalcone synthase (CHS) is abundant in both the stigma and pollen of Petunia, and mutations in the CHS gene lead to defective stigma and sterility[54]. Flavonoids also regulate pollen and stigma interactions in Arabidopsis and Helianthus annuus[47,55]. Consistent with prior research, increased expression of PAL-1, CHS, F3H-1, and FLS in the S2 and S3 stages of stigma development were observed, and their expression patterns aligned with those of ROS-related genes, suggesting flavonoids participate in stigma development and pollination in F. mandshurica.

      High levels of ROS impact various aspects of plant biology, including stress response, stigma development, pollen development and release, and pollen tube growth[15,31,56]. Interestingly, ROS accumulation in flowers has been reported to be critical for plant reproduction[49,57]. During this process, ROS control pollination, with ROS functioning as key determinants of the plant's decision-making process for successful fertilization[58]. After pollination, ROS levels decrease in the stigma, while incompatible pollination brings about increases in ROS levels, thus leading to self-incompatibility[59,60]. For example, FERONIA (FER), an important determinant of self-incompatibility, is regulated by ROS to ensure pollen growth and germination[60].

      In the present study, ROS levels in the stigma were assessed by H2DCFDA staining. It was observed that ROS accumulated in all stages of stigma development, reaching peak levels during the S3 stage. The accumulation of ROS in the stigma not only promotes successful pollination but also mediates pollen germination and growth through a decrease in ROS levels[61], consistent with prior research reporting a reduction in ROS levels after pollination[49,60]. In tobacco plants, the reduction of H2O2 in the stigma accelerates pollen germination and guarantees successful reproduction[62]. Other ROS, including ·O2−, ·OH, and OH, also participate in the interactions between pollen and stigma during reproduction[63].

      This is the first study to investigate the role of ROS scavengers in pollen–stigma interactions in F. mandshurica. The presence of ROS production and sequestration mechanisms in the reproductive tissues of plants has been reported in various species[64], and the accumulation of ROS in the stigmas of angiosperms is well documented[65]. The interactions between pollen and stigma are important for pollen attachment, hydration, adhesion, and germination. Furthermore, the content of ROS in stigma increased significantly after incompatible pollination and decreased after compatible pollination, elevated ROS levels in stigma can inhibit the germination of compatible pollen, suppressing RBOH or FERONIA(FER) receptor kinase homolog or Rac/Rop guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) which can effectively reduce the content of ROS in stigma and cause incompatible pollen to germinate[60]. Proteins and lipids found on the surface of pollen are involved in this process. In Arabidopsis, KINβγ mediates ROS production in mitochondria, which is essential for pollen hydration and germination[66]. Common ROS scavengers, such as CuCl2, Na-SA, and DPI, along with NADPH oxidase inhibitors, have been used to sequester ROS, resulting in enhanced pollen attachment[59,60]. Other studies have demonstrated that ROS inhibit pollen adhesion and germination[61], and a reduction in ROS levels in the stigma before pollen attachment is critical for pollen–stigma interactions and pollen germination[67]. As for DPI and catalase, both scavengers enhance pollen germination in cucumber by inhibiting NADPH oxidase activity[68]. Similarly, DPI decreases ROS levels, thus promoting pollen adhesion and germination[69]. Taken together, these findings underscore the role of ROS accumulation in stigma development, highlighting the importance of reducing ROS for pollen attachment and germination.

    • This study utilized RNA-seq data to identify crucial genes involved in both the production and sequestration of ROS during stigma development in F. mandshurica. Our results underscore the pivotal role played by ROS in regulating stigma development, pollination, and pollen tube growth. Staining revealed ROS accumulation during stigma development, and when stigmas were treated with ROS scavengers and an NADPH oxidase inhibitor, there was a decrease in ROS levels and an increase in pollen adhesion and germination. Taken together, these findings greatly contribute to our comprehension of reproduction in F. mandshurica.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Lan X, Zhan Y. data collection: Wang S, Yang S. draft manuscript writing: Wang S, Jakada BH, Qin H. data analysis and manuscript revision: Wang S, Jakada BH, Qin H, Zhan Y, Lan X. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD220030301) and Heilongjiang Touyan Innovation Team Program (Tree Genetics and Breeding Innovation Team).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Supplemental Table S1 Raw and clean reads of 9 RNA samples of Fraxinus mandshurica stigma.
      • Supplemental Fig. S1 Transcriptome analysis of different developmental stages of stigma of Fraxinus mandshurica. (a) Transcriptome data quality statistics. (b) Transcription factor statistics. (c) GO enrichment analysis of S1 vs S2 (d) GO enrichment analysis of S2 vs S3. (e) GO enrichment analysis of S1 vs S3. (f) KEGG enrichment analysis of S1 vs S2. (g) KEGG enrichment analysis of S2 vs S3. (h) KEGG enrichment analysis of S1 vs S3.
      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  References (69)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wang S, Yang S, Jakada BH, Qin H, Zhan Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0011
    Wang S, Yang S, Jakada BH, Qin H, Zhan Y, et al. 2024. Transcriptomics reveal the involvement of reactive oxygen species production and sequestration during stigma development and pollination in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forestry Research 4: e014 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0011

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return