-
Phylogeographic methods provide valuable insights into how genetic patterns among populations relate to geographic environments. These studies highlight how the historical context of geographic adaptive radiation shapes genetic distribution patterns. Genetic variations across vast geographic regions serve as essential indicators for assessing the adaptability of various genotypes[1,2]. By studying the genetic variations and distributions across large geographic scales, scientists can gain a deeper understanding of how evolutionary processes influence population genetic patterns over time. Additionally, phylogeographic studies provide valuable approaches for understanding and interpreting genetic variations in adaptive phenotypic traits, shedding light on the evolutionary mechanisms behind functional adaptations to diverse environments. Viewing this through a phylogeographic lens, it becomes clear that genetic divergence plays a crucial role in regulating phenotypic traits to facilitate adaptation across various geographic sites and environmental conditions[3].
To comprehensively understand the dynamics of phenotypic traits, it is imperative to gather genotypic information from large and diverse geographic locations. This involves conducting population genetics and phylogeographic analyses using gene sequences, genetic markers, and genome sequences, as exemplified in studies by Wiens et al.[4] & Wang et al.[5]. With the rapid advancements in genomic sequencing technology, various innovative analytical methods leveraging genomics have emerged. These include genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic selection (GS). These methods aim to correlate DNA polymorphism data with phenotypic traits, enabling the identification of the genetic basis underlying important phenotypic traits[6].
Spectral variability in optical remote sensing data may reveal genetic diversity at distinct geographical sites characterized by environmental heterogeneity[7−9]. The optical properties of plants, influenced by phenotypic traits such as biochemical content, leaf and canopy structure, and physiological functions, contribute to measurable spectral variability. Spectral information proves to be instrumental in accurately estimating genotype-specific phenotypic features. Consequently, spectral variation has the potential to capture genetic variations, particularly related to plant biochemical, physiological, and structural divergence. Using a combination of tools, including visual inspection, DNA molecular markers, and spectrometry[10,11], it is possible to improve the efficiency for identifying genetic variation in plant materials. As demonstrated by Bush et al.[12], phylogeographic affinities, genetic loci of functional traits, and spectral properties can be leveraged to parameterize process-based neutral and adaptive landscape genetics for biodiversity research.
Manually collecting phenotypic information across large areas is time-consuming and susceptible to data quality issues due to various factors during the data collection stages. Remote sensing offers an efficient alternative for gathering phenotypic data on plant diversity across different genetic groups in a short time frame. This approach helps to reduce both the cost and time required for phenotyping while maintaining a high level of data accuracy and consistency[13].
By using remote sensing, researchers can swiftly collect data and identify key phenotypic traits associated with physiology and biochemistry. This enhances our understanding of plant characteristics and their genetic variations. Studies have demonstrated a notable correlation between phenotypic traits measured using remote sensing data obtained from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and the data obtained in situ[14]. The correlation underscores the reliability and potential of remote sensing in phenotypic data collection and analysis, marking a significant advancement in the study of plant genetics and phenotypes. High-throughput phenotyping technology, including 3D modeling, has played a pivotal role in large-scale quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis. This technology has been instrumental in uncovering the genetic architecture governing dynamic plant growth in maize[15], the genetic control of leaf elongation in barley (Hordeum vulgare)[16], and the genomic prediction for canopy height in wheat[17]. The integration of genomic information under specific environmental conditions with plant ontogenetical, physiological, and biochemical properties, assessed through image-analysis-based phenotypic information, has enabled the targeted selection of more suitable cultivars for breeding purposes[18].
Remote sensing technology has the potential to bridge the gaps between genotype and phenotype study, by alleviating the challenges in large amounts of data collection across extensive geographic extent. By supplying consistent and reliable spectral and phenotypic measurements, remote sensing proves invaluable in the field of phylogeography, offering insights into the natural dynamics of essential agronomic or ecological traits across evolutionary history. In the review, we described applications of remote sensing technology on phylogeographic studies from two aspects. The initial aspect revolves around assessing genetic variation through analyses of spectral variability, while the second centers on investigating phenotypic dynamics for phylogeographic patterns to identify genetic basis linked to potential phenotypic traits through remote sensing technology.
To consolidate this information, we conducted a thorough review of relevant publications, encompassing diverse platforms, sensors, wavelength ranges, spatial resolutions, model optimization techniques, and analysis methods (Table 1)[19,20]. We also summarized the advantages and disadvantages of remote sensing technologies in phenotypic measurements (Table 2). Finally, the review provides the deficiency and opportunities for future improvements in the cross-cutting research using remote sensing in phylogeography. Existing literatures demonstrate a noteworthy surge in interest regarding the evaluation of genetic variation by leveraging spectral features and identification of the genetic basis of remotely sensed phenotypic data (Figs 1 & 2). These studies play crucial roles in developing an integrated approach to identify, define, and conserve genotypic divergence, thereby enhancing our understanding of adaptive evolution and biodiversity. It aims to identify the genetic foundations of these adaptive traits, thereby contributing to advancements in genetic breeding and germplasm conservation.
Table 1. Approaches adopted to integrating remote sensing and phylogeography.
Spectral data Applications related to phylogeographic relationship Platforms Sensors Spatial resolution Bands Extracted features Methods Accuracy and references Spectral variation related to genetic variation Assessing genetic variation using variation in spectral patterns Satellite Landsat 5 TM USGS/ESPA 30 m Blue
(0.45−0.52 mm);
Green
(0.52−0.60 mm);
Red
(0.63−0.69 mm);
Near Infrared
(NIR)
(0.76−0.90 mm); Shortwave Infrared
(SWIR1)
(1.55−1.75 mm); Thermal (10.40−12.50 mm); Shortwave Infrared (SWIR2)
(2.08−2.3 mm)Normalized difference vegetation index
(NDVI); Normalized difference moisture index (NDMI)Linear mixed effects model with the maximum-likelihood population effects (MLPE) parameterization [21] ER-2 platform NASA airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) 8 m 414−2,447 nm NDVI; Water band
index (WBI)Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA); Canonical correlation analyses (CCAs); Discriminant analyses; Linear-mixed models (GLMMs) Kappa = 0.85−0.89[22] Automated tram Portable field spectrometer (SVC HR-1024i; Spectra Vista); Imaging spectrometer
(E Series; Headwall Photonics)30 cm 340−2,500 nm Leaf spectral
reflectancePartial least squares regression (PLSR); Mantel tests; D(TM) calculates; Linear regression models [11] Airborne Airborne imaging spectrometer (AIS); Field spectroradiometer (ASD FieldSpec 4, Boulder, CO, USA) 2 m 372−2,540 nm Spectral reflectance Partial least squares (PLS) regression; PRESS statistic RMSE = 0.2897[23] Ground USB4000 portable equipment; Bruker FT-NIR MPA II (12,489−3,996 cm−1); Portable thermo fisher MicroPHAZIR 0.2 nm;
16 cm−1;
16 cm−1400−1,037 nm; 12,489−3,996 cm−1;
1,595−2,396 nmSpectral reflectance Principal component analysis and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) Classification accuracy of 88%−91%[24] hyperspectral imaging
system (HIS)30 cm 400−1,000 nm Leaf spectral
reflectanceParSketch-PLSDA method Ranging from 81% to 96% for precision[25] ASD 350−2,500 nm Leaf spectral
reflectancePartial least squares-discriminant analysis
(PLS-DA); PCAKappa = 0.34 and 0.61[10] Classifying genotypic differentiation using spectrally derived traits UAV RGB or near-infrared, green and blue (NIR-GB) camera 40 m Near-infrared, green and blue PHUAV for each plot
from the DSM dataGenomic prediction modeling r = 0.448 − 0.634[26] Ground ASD 350−2,500 nm Foliar traits PLSR RMSE = 9.1%
− 19.4%[27]LiDAR Canopy height/
structureFine-scale digital
elevation models (DEMs)Predicted phenotypes
related to genetic
patternEstimating the phenotypic
dynamics under
genetic patternUAV 12-megapixel DJI FC300X camera;24-megapixel Sony a6000 RGB camera Altitude of 25 and 120 m Red-green-blue (RGB) bands Canopy height metrics from the DSM data Mixed linear models utilizing residual maximum likelihood (REML); Three-parameter Weibull sigmoid growth model R2 > 99%; RMSE < 4 cm[28] The compact LIFT instrument Blue light-emitting diode (LED); STS-VIS spectrometer (Ocean Optics, Florida, USA); RGB cameras 0.46 nm 445 nm;
400−800 nmFluorescence Data; NDVI; Alternative NDVI (NDVI_II); Green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI); MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index (MTCI); Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression; Linear modeling r = 0.7 − 0.92[29] Identifying the
genetic base of
adaptive phenotypic
traitsUAV high-throughput phenotypic platforms (UAV-HTPPs) RGB or near-infrared, green, and blue (NIR-GB) camera 40−60 m Plant height; Canopy reflectance; Biomass Crop surface model; Ortho mosaics model Accuracy for DSM was 2.31 cm/pixel[30] UAV and tractor Multi-spectral camera; GreenSeeker spectral sensors 40−42 m for UAV; 1.32 m for tractor Green; Red; Red Edge; NIR; Blue NDVI GWAS; QTL R2 = 0.02 − 0.11[31] UAV RGB 18 m RGB bands Canopy cover; Canopy volume; and Excess greenness index. Plant Growth Models; Variance inflation factor (VIF); GWAS R2 = 0.87 − 0.94[32] Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of remote sensing technologies in measuring plant traits.
Remote sensing platforms Advantages Disadvantages Sensors Measured traits Ground-based platforms High resolution; Not influenced by background for leaf measurement Require long measurement time; Restricted by field conditions and challenging environment Multispectral, hyperspectral sensors Pigment concentrations; Quality traits (eg., oil, amylose, protein content, moisture); Total plant/canopy biomass; Yield Thermal infrared cameras Leaf and canopy temperature UAVs Large spatial scales for canopy measurement Low data resolution VIS imaging systems Morphological traits (eg., shape, structure, color properties); Geometric traits (eg., length, area, canopy cover, canopy volume); Photosynthetic behaviors; Pigment concentrations Near infrared (NIR), short-wave
infrared (SWIR) cameraLeaf water content; Plant/canopy structure; Biomass Hyperspectral sensors Pigment concentrations; Quality traits (eg., oil, amylose, protein content, moisture); Total plant/canopy biomass; Yield LiDAR Plant structure (eg., crown density, structural complexity) Thermal infrared cameras Leaf and canopy temperature Satellites Large spatial scales across
landscapes and regionsCoarser spectral resolution; Lower spatial resolution; Susceptible to
cloud interferenceMultispectral, hyperspectral sensors Vegetation structural properties (eg., species richness) Figure 1.
Annual number of publications related to the use of vegetation spectral data in phylogeography, from 2016 to 2023. These publications were searched using keywords 'vegetation spectral' and 'phylogeography', from the Web of Science.
Figure 2.
The number of publications on different types of research relevant to integration of vegetation spectral data and phylogeography, from 2016 to 2023.
In this study, we introduced a flowchart designed to facilitate the application of remote sensing technology on phylogeographic patterns (Fig. 3). The flowchart elucidates the connections between various facets of the dataset, fostering a comprehensive understanding of their relationships.
-
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang J, He Y, Liu J, Fan J, Shang J, et al. 2024. Integrating spectral data and phylogeographic patterns to study plant genetic variation: a review. Grass Research 4: e011 doi: 10.48130/grares-0024-0009
Integrating spectral data and phylogeographic patterns to study plant genetic variation: a review
- Received: 02 February 2024
- Accepted: 03 April 2024
- Published online: 06 May 2024
Abstract: The study of genetic variation is pivotal for understanding plant diversity and evolution. In recent years, remote sensing has played a significant role in phylogeography, facilitating the exploration of intricate relationships among genetics, spectral behavior, and evolution. This review article aims to present a comprehensive compilation of literature in two main areas: 1) investigating the potential of spectral data collected using remote sensing to study genetic diversity, and 2) using spectral characteristics to investigate functional dynamics associated with various phylogeographic patterns and identify genetic bases of important agronomic traits. Remote sensing has proven effective in detecting genetic variations across different geographical regions. Additionally, this review examines the limitations, challenges, and prospects associated with integrating remote sensing and phylogeography. In essence, phylogeographic studies offer theoretical insights into understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying functional variability observed in remotely sensed spectral data. Leveraging rapid technological advancements in remote sensing and data fusion approaches will lead to new understanding of plant genetic diversity and the functional significance of plant traits. This knowledge is invaluable for informing strategies for the management and conservation of natural resources.