Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity

More Information
  • This study mainly explores three types of fermented tea beverages: kombucha, known for its distinctive sweet and sour flavor; tea wine, valued for its rich taste and low alcohol content; and tea vinegar, notable for its unique vinegar aroma. These beverages are produced through fermentation using teas as a base, facilitated by yeast and acetic acid bacteria. The research investigates how these microbes utilize tea as a nitrogen source, enhancing the content of tea polyphenols, reducing caffeine, and generating a rich array of organic acids and volatile compounds. This process imparts fermented tea beverages with unique flavors and augmented health benefits. Moreover, the bacterial cellulose film created by the symbiotic relationship between yeast and acetic acid bacteria opens up innovative avenues for the deep processing and high-value utilization of tea leaves.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Tang GY, Meng X, Gan RY, Zhao CN, Liu Q, et al. 2019. Health functions and related molecular mechanisms of tea components: an update review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20(24):6196

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20246196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Cai M, Huang L, Dong S, Diao N, Ye W, et al. 2023. Enhancing the flavor profile of summer green tea via fermentation with Aspergillus niger RAF106. Foods 12(18):3420

    doi: 10.3390/foods12183420

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wen L, Sun L, Chen R, Li Q, Lai X, et al. 2023. Metabolome and microbiome analysis to study the flavor of summer black tea improved by stuck fermentation. Foods 12(18):3414

    doi: 10.3390/foods12183414

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wong M, Sirisena S, Ng K. 2022. Phytochemical profile of differently processed tea: A review. Journal of Food Science 87(5):1925−42

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kim J, Adhikari K. 2020. Current trends in Kombucha: marketing perspectives and the need for improved sensory research. Beverages 6:15

    doi: 10.3390/beverages6010015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Hu T, Shi S, Ma Q. 2022. Modulation effects of microorganisms on tea in fermentation. Frontiers in Nutrition 9:931790

    doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.931790

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Costa, MAdC, Vilela DLdS, Fraiz GM, Lopes IL, Coelho AIM, et al. 2023. Effect of kombucha intake on the gut microbiota and obesity-related comorbidities: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 63(19):3851−66

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1995321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Barakat N, Beaufort S, Rizk Z, Bouajila J, Taillandier P, et al. 2023. Kombucha analogues around the world: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 63(29):10105−29

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2069673

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Pradhan S, Prabhakar MR, Karthika Parvathy KR, Dey B, Jayaraman S, et al. 2023. Metagenomic and physicochemical analysis of Kombucha beverage produced from tea waste. Journal of Food Science and Technology 60(3):1088−96

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-022-05476-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Wang B, Rutherfurd-Markwick K, Zhang XX, Mutukumira AN. 2022. Isolation and characterisation of dominant acetic acid bacteria and yeast isolated from Kombucha samples at point of sale in New Zealand. Current Research in Food Science 5:835−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.04.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Brewer SS, Lowe CA, Beuchat LR, Ortega YR. 2021. Survival of Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and changes in indigenous microbiota during fermentation of kombucha made from home-brewing kits. Journal of Food Protection 84:1366−73

    doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-483

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Nurten A, Sezer SDF, Erdogan OI. 2022. Kombucha – An ancient fermented beverage with desired bioactivities: A narrowed review. Food Chemistry: X 14:100302

    doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100302

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Emiljanowicz KE, Malinowska-Pańczyk E. 2020. Kombucha from alternative raw materials – the review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 60:3185−94

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1679714

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Laureys D, Britton SJ, De Clippeleer J. 2020. Kombucha tea fermentation: a review. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 78:165−74

    doi: 10.1080/03610470.2020.1734150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chen L. 2017. The research and development of the tea deep processing products from the tea in summer and autumn. Thesis. Guizhou University, China.

    [16]

    Zhao H, Zhao L, Bai L. 2021. Development and research progress of tea vinegar . China Condiment 46(10):114−16

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2021.10.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Morales D. 2020. Biological activities of kombucha beverages: The need of clinical evidence. Trends in Food Science & Technology 105:323−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2020.09.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang B, Rutherfurd-Markwick K, Zhang XX, Mutukumira AN. 2022. Kombucha: production and microbiological research. Foods 11(21):3456

    doi: 10.3390/foods11213456

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wang R, Sun J, Lassabliere B, Yu B, Liu SQ. 2020. Biotransformation of green tea (Camellia sinensis) by wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Food Science 85(2):306−15

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kaashyap M, Cohen M, Mantri N. 2021. Microbial diversity and characteristics of Kombucha as revealed by metagenomic and physicochemical analysis. Nutrients 13(12):4446

    doi: 10.3390/nu13124446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kaur P, Kocher GS, Phutela RP. 2011. Production of tea vinegar by batch and semicontinuous fermentation. Journal of Food Science and Technology 48(6):755−58

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0143-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Chen C, Wu S, Li Y, Huang Y, Yang X. 2022. Effects of different acetic acid bacteria strains on the bioactive compounds, volatile compounds and antioxidant activity of black tea vinegar. LWT 171:114131

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114131

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Lynch KM, Zannini E, Wilkinson S, Daenen L, Arendt EK. 2019. Physiology of acetic acid bacteria and their role in vinegar and fermented beverages. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 18(3):587−25

    doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Neffe-Skocińska K, Karbowiak M, Kruk M, Kołożyn-Krajewska D, Zielińska D. 2023. Polyphenol and antioxidant properties of food obtained by the activity of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) – A systematic review. Journal of Functional Foods 107:105691

    doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2023.105691

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Fuller GG, Kim JK. 2021. Compartmentalization and metabolic regulation of glycolysis. Journal of Cell Science 134(20):258469

    doi: 10.1242/jcs.258469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Judge A, Dodd MS. 2020. Metabolism. Essays in Biochemistry 64:607−47

    doi: 10.1042/EBC20190041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Khoi Nguyen N, Thuy Nguyen H, Le PH. 2015. Effects of Lactobacillus casei and alterations in fermentation conditions on biosynthesis of glucuronic acid by a Dekkera bruxellensis-gluco nacetobacter intermedius kombucha symbiosis model system. Food Biotechnology 29:356−70

    doi: 10.1080/08905436.2015.1092446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Jakubczyk K, Kupnicka P, Melkis K, Mielczarek O, Walczyńska J, et al. 2022. Effects of fermentation time and type of tea on the content of micronutrients in kombucha fermented tea. Nutrients 14(22):4828

    doi: 10.3390/nu14224828

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Jakubczyk K, Kałduńska J, Kochman J, Janda K. 2020. Chemical profile and antioxidant activity of the kombucha beverage derived from white, green, black and red tea. Antioxidants 9(5):447

    doi: 10.3390/antiox9050447

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Cardoso RR, Neto RO, Dos Santos D’Almeida CT, do Nascimento TP, Pressete CG, et al. 2020. Kombuchas from green and black teas have different phenolic profile, which impacts their antioxidant capacities, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Food Research International 128:108782

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108782

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Zou C, Chen DQ, He HF, Huang YB, Feng ZH, et a. 2023. Impact of tea leaves categories on physicochemical, antioxidant, and sensorial profiles of tea wine. Frontiers in Nutrition 10:1110803

    doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1110803

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Zou C, Xu Y, Chen J, Li R, Wang F, et al. 2021. Fermentation process optimization and chemical composition analysis on black tea wine. E3S Web of Conferences 233:02052

    doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202123302052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Gaggìa F, Baffoni L, Galiano M, Nielsen DS, Jakobsen RR, et al. 2018. Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. Nutrients 11(1):1

    doi: 10.3390/nu11010001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ivanišová E, Meňhartová K, Terentjeva M, Harangozo Ľ, Kántor A, et al. 2020. The evaluation of chemical, antioxidant, antimicrobial and sensory properties of kombucha tea beverage. Journal of Food Science and Technology 57(5):1840−46

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04217-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Kaewkod T, Bovonsombut S, Tragoolpua Y. 2019. Efficacy of kombucha obtained from green, oolong, and black teas on inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, antioxidation, and toxicity on colorectal cancer cell line. Microorganisms 7(12):700

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120700

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Wang R, Jiang X, Chen L, Zhu J. 2019. Fermentation Kinetics of Tea Wine. Food Research And Development 40(15):91−96

    doi: 10.12161/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.15.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Yu J, Lyu Y. 2021. Process of low-caffeine tea liquor and determination of its volatile components. Food Science and Technology 46(4):75−81

    Google Scholar

    [38]

    Chen J, Lin B, Zheng FJ, Fang XC, Ren EF, et al. 2023. Characterization of the pure black tea wine fermentation process by electronic nose and tongue-based techniques with nutritional characteristics. ACS Omega 8:12538−47

    doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00862

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Li Y, Zhang S, Sun Y. 2020. Measurement of catechin and gallic acid in tea wine with HPLC. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27:214−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.08.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Chen Y, Bai Y, Li D, Wang C, Xu N, et al. 2016. Correlation between ethanol resistance and characteristics of PQQ-dependent ADH in acetic acid bacteria. European Food Research and Technology 242:837−47

    doi: 10.1007/s00217-015-2589-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Tran T, Grandvalet C, Verdier F, Martin A, Alexandre H, et al. 2020. Microbial dynamics between yeasts and acetic acid bacteria in kombucha: impacts on the chemical composition of the beverage. Foods 9:963

    doi: 10.3390/foods9070963

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Chan M, Sy H, Finley J, Robertson J, Brown PN. 2021. Determination of ethanol content in kombucha using headspace gas chromatography with mass spectrometry detection: single-laboratory validation. Journal of AOAC International 104:122−28

    doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Mekoue Nguela J, Teuf O, Assuncao Bicca S, Vernhet A. 2023. Impact of mannoprotein N-glycosyl phosphorylation and branching on the sorption of wine polyphenols by yeasts and yeast cell walls. Food Chemistry 403:134326

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134326

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Cheng L, Zhang X, Zheng X, Wu Z, Weng P. 2019. RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis of green tea polyphenols regulation of differently expressed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 35:59

    doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2639-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Xiao T, Khan A, Shen Y, Chen L, Rabinowitz JD. 2022. Glucose feeds the tricarboxylic acid cycle via excreted ethanol in fermenting yeast. Nature Chemical Biology 18:1380−87

    doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01091-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Xia Y, Wang X, Sun H, Huang X. 2021. Proton-coupled electron transfer of catechin in tea wine: the enhanced mechanism of anti-oxidative capacity. RSC Advances 11:39985−93

    doi: 10.1039/D1RA07769D

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Değirmencioğlu N, Yıldız E, Sahan Y, Güldas M, Gürbüz O. 2021. Impact of tea leaves types on antioxidant properties and bioaccessibility of kombucha. Journal of Food Science and Technology 58:2304−12

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04741-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Ivanišová E, Meňhartová K, Terentjeva M, Godočíková L, Árvay J, et al. 2019. Kombucha tea beverage: Microbiological characteristic, antioxidant activity, and phytochemical composition. Acta Alimentaria 48:324−31

    doi: 10.1556/066.2019.48.3.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    de Noronha MC, Cardoso RR, Dos Santos D’Almeida CT, Vieira do Carmo MA, Azevedo L, et al. 2022. Black tea kombucha: Physicochemical, microbiological and comprehensive phenolic profile changes during fermentation, and antimalarial activity. Food Chemistry 384:132515

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132515

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Villarreal-Soto SA, Beaufort S, Bouajila J, Souchard JP, Renard T, et al. 2019. Impact of fermentation conditions on the production of bioactive compounds with anticancer, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in kombucha tea extracts. Process Biochemistry 83:44−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tran T, Romanet R, Roullier-Gall C, Verdier F, Martin A, et al. 2022. Non-Targeted Metabolomic Analysis of the Kombucha Production Process. Metabolites 12:160

    doi: 10.3390/metabo12020160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Zhao ZJ, Sui YC, Wu HW, Zhou CB, Hu XC, et al. 2018. Flavour chemical dynamics during fermentation of kombucha tea. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 30(9):732−41

    doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i9.1794

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Xu W, Wang X, Jia W, Wen B, Liao S, et al. 2023. Dynamic changes in the major chemical and volatile components during the "Ziyan" tea wine processing. LWT 186:115273

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115273

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Zhu YF, Chen JJ, Ji XM, Hu X, Ling TJ, et al. 2015. Changes of major tea polyphenols and production of four new B-ring fission metabolites of catechins from post-fermented Jing-Wei Fu brick tea. Food Chemistry 170:110−17

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.08.075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Quan X. 2013. Study on the technology of tea vinegar beverage fermented by summer and autumn tea leaves Thesis. Huazhong Agricultural University, China.

    [56]

    Shi S, Wei Y, Lin X, Liang H, Zhang S, et al. 2023. Microbial metabolic transformation and antioxidant activity evaluation of polyphenols in kombucha. Food Bioscience 51:102287

    doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Villarreal-Soto SA, Bouajila J, Pace M, Leech J, Cotter PD, et al. 2020. Metabolome-microbiome signatures in the fermented beverage, Kombucha. International Journal of Food Microbiology 333:108778

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108778

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Leonard W, Zhang P, Ying D, Adhikari B, Fang Z. 2021. Fermentation transforms the phenolic profiles and bioactivities of plant-based foods. Biotechnology Advances 49:107763

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107763

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Chen R, Gao J, Yu W, Chen X, Zhai X, et al. 2022. Engineering cofactor supply and recycling to drive phenolic acid biosynthesis in yeast. Nature Chemical Biology 18:520−29

    doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01014-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Macedo Dantas Coelho R, de Almeida AL, do Amaral RQG, da Mota RN, de Sousa PHM. 2020. Kombucha: Review. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 22:100272

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100272

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Aleksandra V, Dragoljub C, Sinisa M. 2013. Characteristics of Kombucha fermentation on medicinal herbs from Lamiaceae family. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 18:8034−42

    Google Scholar

    [62]

    Lin Z, Wei J, Hu Y, Pi D, Jiang M, et al. 2023. Caffeine Synthesis and Its Mechanism and Application by Microbial Degradation, A Review. Foods 12:2721

    doi: 10.3390/foods12142721

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Gummadi SN, Bhavya B, Ashok N. 2012. Physiology, biochemistry and possible applications of microbial caffeine degradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 93:545−54

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3737-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Parvin R, Bhattacharya S, Chaudhury SS, Roy U, Mukherjee J, et al. 2023. Production, purification and characterization of a novel thermostable caffeine dehydrogenase from Pichia manshurica strain CD1 isolated from kombucha tea. Microbiology 92:230−41

    doi: 10.1134/S0026261722601476

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Chakravorty S, Bhattacharya S, Chatzinotas A, Chakraborty W, Bhattacharya D, et al. 2016. Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. International Journal of Food Microbiology 220:63−72

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Pérez-López AJ, Saura D, Lorente J, Carbonell-Barrachina ÁA. 2006. Limonene, linalool, α-terpineol, and terpinen-4-ol as quality control parameters in mandarin juice processing. European Food Research and Technology 222:281−85

    doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0055-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Wang Z, Ahmad W, Zhu A, Geng W, Kang W, et al. 2023. Identification of volatile compounds and metabolic pathway during ultrasound-assisted kombucha fermentation by HS-SPME-GC/MS combined with metabolomic analysis. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 94:106339

    doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106339

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Meng Y, Wang X, Li Y, Chen J, Chen X. 2024. Microbial interactions and dynamic changes of volatile flavor compounds during the fermentation of traditional kombucha. Food Chemistry 430:137060

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137060

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Dartora B, Hickert LR, Fabricio MF, Ayub MAZ, Furlan JM, et al. 2023. Understanding the effect of fermentation time on physicochemical characteristics, sensory attributes, and volatile compounds in green tea kombucha. Food Research International 174:113569

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Suffys S, Richard G, Burgeon C, Werrie PY, Haubruge E, et al. 2023. Characterization of aroma active compound production during kombucha fermentation: towards the control of sensory profiles. Foods 12:1657

    doi: 10.3390/foods12081657

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Phung LT, Kitwetcharoen H, Chamnipa N, Boonchot N, Thanonkeo S, et al. 2023. Changes in the chemical compositions and biological properties of kombucha beverages made from black teas and pineapple peels and cores. Scientific Reports 13:7859

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34954-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Meng Y, Chen L, Lu H, An J, Zhang Z. 2020. Analysis of amino acid components and volatile components of tea vinegar made from meitan summer and autumn tea in Guizhou Province. China Condiment 45:176−81

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2020.05.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Kumar V, Joshi VK, Thakur NS, Kumar S, Gupta RK, et al. 2022. Bioprocess optimization for production of apple tea wine: influence of different variables on the quality attributes. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 16:1528−39

    doi: 10.1007/s11694-021-01262-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Hirst MB, Richter CL. 2016. Review of Aroma Formation through Metabolic Pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Beverage Fermentations. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 67:4

    doi: 10.5344/ajev.2016.15098

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Li SY, Ng IS, Chen PT, Chiang CJ, Chao YP. 2018. Biorefining of protein waste for production of sustainable fuels and chemicals. Biotechnology for Biofuels 11:256

    doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1234-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    van Wyk N, Binder J, Ludszuweit M, Köhler S, Brezina S, et a. 2023. The influence of Pichia kluyveri addition on the aroma profile of a kombucha tea fermentation. Foods 12:1938

    doi: 10.3390/foods12101938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Sumby KM, Grbin PR, Jiranek V. 2010. Microbial modulation of aromatic esters in wine: Current knowledge and future prospects. Food Chemistry 121:1−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Huang X, Xin Y, Lu T. 2022. A systematic, complexity-reduction approach to dissect the kombucha tea microbiome. eLife 11:76401

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.76401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Cubas ALV, Provin AP, Dutra ARA, Mouro C, Gouveia IC. 2023. Advances in the production of biomaterials through kombucha using food waste: concepts, challenges, and potential. Polymers 15:1701

    doi: 10.3390/polym15071701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Avcioglu NH, Birben M, Seyis Bilkay I. 2021. Optimization and physicochemical characterization of enhanced microbial cellulose production with a new Kombucha consortium. Process Biochemistry 108:60−68

    doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.06.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Aung T, Kim MJ. 2024. A comprehensive review on kombucha biofilms: A promising candidate for sustainable food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology 144:104325

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2024.104325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    El-Shall FN, Al-Shemy MT, Dawwam GE. 2023. Multifunction smart nanocomposite film for food packaging based on carboxymethyl cellulose/Kombucha SCOBY/pomegranate anthocyanin pigment. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 242:125101

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Brugnoli M, Robotti F, La China S, Anguluri K, Haghighi H, et al. 2021. Assessing effectiveness of Komagataeibacter strains for producing surface-microstructured cellulose via guided assembly-based biolithography. Scientific Reports 11:19311

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98705-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Landis EA, Fogarty E, Edwards JC, Popa O, Eren AM, et al. 2022. Microbial Diversity and Interaction Specificity in Kombucha Tea Fermentations. mSystems 7:00157−2

    doi: 10.1128/msystems.00157-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Gilbert C, Tang TC, Ott W, Dorr BA, Shaw WM, et al. 2021. Living materials with programmable functionalities grown from engineered microbial co-cultures. Nature Materials 20:691−700

    doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00857-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Valera MJ, Torija MJ, Mas A, Mateo E. 2015. Cellulose production and cellulose synthase gene detection in acetic acid bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 99:1349−61

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6198-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Villarreal-Soto SA, Beaufort S, Bouajila J, Souchard JP, Taillandier P. 2018. Understanding kombucha tea fermentation: a review. Journal of Food Science 83:580−88

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Yim SM, Song JE, Kim HR. 2017. Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose fabrics by nitrogen sources of tea and carbon sources of sugar. Process Biochemistry 59:26−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Ramírez Tapias YA, Di Monte MV, Peltzer MA, Salvay AG. 2022. Bacterial cellulose films production by Kombucha symbiotic community cultured on different herbal infusions. Food Chemistry 372:131346−46

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Ramírez Tapias YA, Peltzer MA, Delgado JF, Salvay AG. 2020. Kombucha tea by-product as source of novel materials: formulation and characterization of films. Food and Bioprocess Technology 13:1166−80

    doi: 10.1007/s11947-020-02471-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Stefanowska K, Woźniak M, Majka J, Sip A, Mrówczyńska L, et al. 2023. A new approach to obtain chitosan films – Characteristics of films prepared with tea and coffee kombucha as natural chitosan solvents. Industrial Crops and Products 197:116634

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116634

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Atkinson FS, Cohen M, Lau K, Brand-Miller JC. 2023. Glycemic index and insulin index after a standard carbohydrate meal consumed with live kombucha: A randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Frontiers in Nutrition 10:1036717

    doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1036717

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Costa MAdC, Dias Moreira LdP, Duarte VdS, Cardoso RR, São José VPBd, et al. 2022. Kombuchas from green and black tea modulate the gut microbiota and improve the intestinal health of wistar rats fed a high-fat high-fructose diet. Nutrients 14:5234

    doi: 10.3390/nu14245234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Cardoso RR, Moreira LPD, de Campos Costa MA, Toledo RCL, Grancieri M, et all. 2021. Kombuchas from green and black teas reduce oxidative stress, liver steatosis and inflammation, and improve glucose metabolism in Wistar rats fed a high-fat high-fructose diet. Food & Function 12:10813−27

    doi: 10.1039/d1fo02106k

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Wang P, Feng Z, Sang X, Chen W, Zhang X, et al. 2021. Kombucha ameliorates LPS-induced sepsis in a mouse model. Food & function 12:10263−80

    doi: 10.1039/d1fo01839f

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Xu S, Wang Y, Wang J, Geng W. 2022. Kombucha reduces hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes of mice by regulating gut microbiota and its metabolites. Foods 11:754

    doi: 10.3390/foods11050754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Jung Y, Kim I, Mannaa M, Kim J, Wang S, et al. 2019. Effect of Kombucha on gut-microbiota in mouse having non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Food Science and Biotechnology 28:261−67

    doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0433-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Moreira GV, Araujo LCC, Murata GM, Matos SL, Carvalho CRO. 2022. Kombucha tea improves glucose tolerance and reduces hepatic steatosis in obese mice. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 155:113660

    doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113660

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Pakravan N, Kermanian F, Mahmoudi E. 2019. Filtered Kombucha tea ameliorates the leaky gut syndrome in young and old mice model of colitis. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 22:1158−65

    doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.36189.8622

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Teixeira Oliveira J, Machado da Costa F, Gonçalvez da Silva T, Dotto Simões G, Dos Santos Pereira E, et al. 2023. Green tea and kombucha characterization: Phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and enzymatic inhibition potential. Food Chemistry 408:135206

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135206

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    An J. 2019. Study on the fermentation technology and function of tea vinegar. Thesis. Guizhou University, China.

    [102]

    Bhattacharya D, Bhattacharya S, Patra MM, Chakravorty S, Sarkar S, et al. 2016. Antibacterial activity of polyphenolic fraction of kombucha against enteric bacterial pathogens. Current Microbiology 73:885−96

    doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1136-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Guo Q, Yuan J, Ding S, Nie Q, Xu Q, et al. 2024. Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity. Beverage Plant Research 4: e029 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0026
    Guo Q, Yuan J, Ding S, Nie Q, Xu Q, et al. 2024. Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity. Beverage Plant Research 4: e029 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0026

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(475) PDF downloads(170)

MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity

Beverage Plant Research  4 Article number: e029  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: This study mainly explores three types of fermented tea beverages: kombucha, known for its distinctive sweet and sour flavor; tea wine, valued for its rich taste and low alcohol content; and tea vinegar, notable for its unique vinegar aroma. These beverages are produced through fermentation using teas as a base, facilitated by yeast and acetic acid bacteria. The research investigates how these microbes utilize tea as a nitrogen source, enhancing the content of tea polyphenols, reducing caffeine, and generating a rich array of organic acids and volatile compounds. This process imparts fermented tea beverages with unique flavors and augmented health benefits. Moreover, the bacterial cellulose film created by the symbiotic relationship between yeast and acetic acid bacteria opens up innovative avenues for the deep processing and high-value utilization of tea leaves.

    • Tea is celebrated for its diverse array of active components, such as tea polyphenols, amino acids, tea polysaccharides, and caffeine, all contributing to its varied health benefits[1]. The majority of tea leaves, over 60% of the annual yield, are harvested during the summer and fall[2]. These leaves typically have higher levels of tea polyphenols, anthocyanins, and purine alkaloids, but lower amino acid content compared to those harvested in the spring[3]. Tea can be classified into six distinct types based on processing techniques: green tea (unfermented), white tea (slight-fermented), yellow tea (slight-fermented), oolong tea (semi-fermented), black tea (fully fermented), dark tea (post-fermented by microorganisms), each with its unique flavor profile[4]. Enhancing the value-added utilization of tea resources is a key research priority in the tea industry.

      The growing consumer interest in functional foods and beverages made from natural ingredients has fueled innovation in tea-based products[5]. The bioactive compounds and the flavor profiles of tea can be modified and enhanced through microbial fermentation[6]. Kombucha, a fermented tea beverage originating from the Bohai Sea region in China, later spread to the Soviet Union and Germany, and has since gained global popularity[79]. It is distinguished by its sweet and sour taste and unique flavor. The bacterial cellulose (BC) produced and floating on the surface of the brew is considered a valuable renewable resource[1013].

      The fermentation process involves complex interactions and uncertainties among the microorganisms present. This review utilizes sources from the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and other databases from the past five years. The production of kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar typically begins with sugar tea soup, where sugars serve as a carbon source and tea soup as a nitrogen source. A symbiotic culture of acetic acid bacteria and yeast (sometimes including a small amount of lactic acid bacteria) inoculated to kombucha fermentation, tea wine primarily fermented by yeasts, while tea vinegar requires initial alcoholic fermentation by yeast followed by inoculation with acetic acid bacteria[1416]. This review delves into how microbial fermentation transforms tea components, creating distinctive flavor profiles in fermented tea beverages and altering organic acids, polyphenols, caffeine, and volatile components.

      The analysis using VOSviewer — a software tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks — identifies several key research areas in studies on kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar, including evaluation of functional food, bioactive compounds, microbial metabolism, and bacterial cellulose research (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Co-occurrence analysis of data from Web of Science on 'Kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar' records.

    • In the world of kombucha, yeast, and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are the primary microorganisms found[8]. Common yeast species include Candida, Debaryomyces, Dekkera, Pichia, Saccharomyces, Saccharomycopsis, Schizosaccharomyces, Sporopachydermia, Zygosaccharomyces, and Zygotorulaspora[8,17,18]. For tea wine fermentation, yeasts such as Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Jiuqu are employed[15,19], with the latter being exclusive to tea wine. In kombucha, the principal AAB species involved are Acetobacter, Gluconobacter, Gluconacetobacter, and Komagataeibacter[8,17,18,20]. Tea vinegar fermentation primarily utilizes Acetobacter aceti, Acetobacter pasteurianus, and other Acetobacter species[21,22]. Yeast fermentation is noted for producing ethanol and carbon dioxide, as well as smaller amounts of glycerol, higher alcohols, and esters[14]. The metabolic processes of Acetobacter species are known for their 'oxidative' fermentation, involving the incomplete oxidation of substrates by primary dehydrogenases in the respiratory chain. This process oxidizes ethanol, carbohydrates, and sugar alcohols (also known as polyols or polyhydric alcohols) into their corresponding organic acids, aldehydes, or ketones, aiding in energy production[23,24].

    • During the fermentation of tea beverages, yeast initiates the process by breaking down glucose and fructose[25]. These sugars are then converted into pyruvate through glycolysis, ultimately entering the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle to produce various metabolites, including organic acids[26]. AAB play a crucial role by oxidizing glucose into gluconic and glucuronic acids and converting ethanol into acetic acid[27,28]. As fermentation advances, the sugar concentration decreases, while the accumulation of organic acids leads to a reduction in pH, typically stabilizing around 3.0[2931].

      In the specific context of tea wine fermentation, the predominant organic acids are malic and succinic acids, with traces of acetic, lactic, and gluconic acids also present[31,32]. Tea vinegar, in contrast, contains not only the organic acids found in tea wine but also oxalic, citric, tartaric, and ascorbic acids, among others[22], demonstrating a volatile acidity of about 4%[21]. These organic acids, common to tea wine and tea vinegar, are also found in kombucha. However, kombucha is distinguished by its primary organic acids: acetic, gluconic, glucuronic, D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone (DSL), ascorbic, succinic, malic, lactic, tartaric, and citric acids[29,30,3335].

      The alcohol content in these fermented tea beverages varies with the microorganisms involved. Yeasts are capable of converting glucose and fructose into ethanol[14]. During tea wine fermentation, ethanol levels increase[36], with alcohol content ranging from 8% to 16% vol, depending on specific fermentation conditions[32,3739]. For tea vinegar, the alcohol concentration declines as ethanol is first oxidized to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) on the acetic acid bacteria's plasma membrane surface, then further oxidized to acetic acid by aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)[40]. This process culminates in the complete oxidation of ethanol, where acetate is converted into CO2 and water[24]. In kombucha fermentation, ethanol levels initially rise before decreasing[29]. The acetic acid produced by AAB can enhance yeast's ethanol production, stimulating its invertase and fermentation activity[41]. As kombucha is classified as a non-alcoholic beverage, its alcohol concentration is kept below 0.5% (v/v)[42].

    • Research involving Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) highlights the crucial role of mannoprotein N-glycosyl phosphorylation in the adsorption of polyphenols by yeast and its cell walls, with a particular affinity for adsorbing polymeric and oligomeric tannins and derived pigments[43]. Studies on green tea polyphenols (GTP) have shown their protective effects on S. cerevisiae cells against ethanol-induced damage, enhancing cell wall permeability through up-regulation of the active gene for the guanosine diphosphate mannose transporter and promoting mannose protein formation. Additionally, GTP significantly enhances genes related to proline metabolism and biosynthesis, thereby increasing S. cerevisiae's tolerance to ethanol. As powerful antioxidants, GTPs reduce the accumulation of ROS, with associated genes for ROS production or mitochondrial electron transport being down-regulated[44]. Yeast cultures actively uptake ethanol, which is then oxidized to acetaldehyde and acetyl-CoA, providing a primary source of high-energy electrons for NADH and NADPH[45]. Research on tea wine has shown that catechins interact with ethanol to form hydrogen bonds, creating molecular clusters that transition the direct electron-transfer process of catechin to proton-coupled electron transfer, lowering the energy barrier of the redox reaction and enhancing antioxidative capacity[46].

      Fermentation generally increases the total polyphenol content in kombucha compared to unfermented tea soup, and enhances the bioavailability of these polyphenols[29,47,48]. A wide range of phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, other polyphenols, lignans, and stilbenes, have been identified in kombucha[30,49]. These complex phenolic compounds may degrade in kombucha's low pH environment and through enzymes (e.g., β-glucosidase, esterase) produced by bacteria and yeasts[49]. The increase of epigallocatechin and gallic acid in kombucha indicates the hydrolysis of gallate groups attached to polyphenols via ester bonds, such as epigallocatechin gallate[50,51]. The concentration of ester catechins decreases in kombucha fermented from green tea, black tea, and Pu'er raw tea, while the total catechins content increases in green tea kombucha[33,52].

      In contrast, the polyphenol content decreases in black tea wine compared to unfermented tea[36,37]. The content of various catechins, including (−)epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), (+)-catechin (C), (−)catechin gallate (CG), (−)-epicatechin gallate (ECG), (−)gallocatechin gallate (GCG) increases in Keemun black tea wine, with no significant change in gallic acid content[32]. The contents of (−)-epigallocatechin (EGC), EGCG, and gallic acid also decrease in Dancong tea wine[39]. Total catechin contents are significantly reduced in green tea wine[53]. The ester bonds of catechins like EGCG and ECG are reactive and prone to hydrolysis, releasing gallic acid, EGC, and EC. This hydrolysis can lead to further decomposition under yeast dioxygenase catalysis, producing simple phenols and B-ring fission metabolites of catechins[54].

      In tea vinegar fermentation, the contents of tea polyphenols and flavonoids initially decrease and then stabilize[16,55]. When AAB strains are inoculated into a black tea infusion with ethanol to produce black tea vinegar, the contents of tea polyphenols and thearubigins decrease, while theabrownins increase[22]. The content of C and EC decreases, while the EGCG content increases, generally raising the total catechin content in tea vinegar[55].

      Microbial strains exhibit distinct polyphenol transformation capabilities during the fermentation of tea soup to kombucha. Acetobacter pasteurianus, Zygosaccharomyces bailii, and Debaryomyce hansenii can increase the content of EGCG, a major component of tea polyphenols. Z. bailii and Acetobacter xylinum enhance the concentration of low molecular weight tea polyphenols. Synthetic microbial communities constructed with Z. bailii, L. plantarum, and D. hansenii significantly increase the EGCG content in tea broth, along with total phenols and flavonoid contents[56]. Microbiomes containing the enzyme shikimate dehydrogenase are responsible for gallic acid production. Compared to kombucha produced with Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which produces higher ethanol, kombucha without Brettanomyces bruxellensis shows lower ethanol and increased production of theobromine, rutin, and chlorogenic acid. The concentration of gallic acid and caffeic acid increases, while catechin and epicatechin decrease after kombucha fermentation[57].

      The mid-fermentation stage, spanning days 5 to 10, plays a pivotal role in the biotransformation of phenolic compounds during the fermentation of black tea kombucha. During this period, flavonoids experience the most significant degradation, whereas the concentration of phenolic acids increased substantially[49]. Compared to non-fermented tea, the levels of gallic, chlorogenic, protocatechuic, p-coumaric, and ellagic acids, along with rutin, vitexin, and resveratrol, are significantly elevated in black tea kombucha, while ferulic acid and syringic acid exhibit a slight decrease[48].

      The biotransformation of hydroxycinnamic acids, such as caffeic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acids, is facilitated by the decarboxylases or reductases of yeast[58]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the presence of three cofactors — FADH2, S-adenosyl-l-methionine, and NADPH — promotes the conversion of p-coumaric acid into high levels of caffeic and ferulic acids[59]. Additionally, the ester bonds of chlorogenic acid can be hydrolyzed by the ester hydrolases of S. cerevisiae, leading to the formation of caffeic acid and quinic acid. Furthermore, p-coumaric acid can undergo decarboxylation by S. cerevisiae to form 4-vinyl phenol[19].

    • Caffeine, a member of the methylxanthine class, is a crucial component of tea and provides essential nitrogen for microbial metabolism[48,60,61]. Both bacteria and fungi have developed pathways for caffeine degradation, mainly through N-demethylation and C-8 oxidation processes[62]. The degradation sequence starts with the conversion of caffeine into theobromine and theophylline, which are then transformed into xanthine and eventually broken down into carbon dioxide and ammonia by yeast via the purine catabolic pathway[63]. The Pichia manshurica strain, a caffeine-degrading yeast isolated from kombucha, exhibits maximum caffeine dehydrogenase activity when utilizing glucose as a carbon source, with fructose being the second most effective[64].

      In fermented tea beverages, such as kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar, the caffeine content undergoes a notable reduction during fermentation compared to their unfermented counterparts[48,50,65]. Kombucha, in particular, shows an increase in theobromine content as the caffeine content decreases[56,57]. The consumption of caffeine stabilizes to lower rates in the mid to late stages of tea wine fermentation[37]. In tea vinegar, the caffeine content is reduced by approximated 40%[55]. This general decrease in caffeine content across all fermented tea beverages underscores the significant impact of microbial activity on this stimulant during the fermentation process.

    • During the fermentation of kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar, the original volatile components found in tea broth — such as alcohols like linalool and geraniol, terpenes like squalene and limonene, as well as aldehydes and ketones — are significantly reduced or eliminated. Microorganisms transform terpenoids, including limonene and linalool into 4-pinacol type terpenoids[66]. In kombucha, the microbial reduction of dihydrolinalool and α-terpineol results in fluctuations in β-limonene content, which initially increases and then decreases[67]. The fermentation process in these three types of tea beverages alters the main volatile substances present in the tea broth and produces new volatile compounds, including alcohols, esters, and acids. These new compounds play a crucial role in developing distinct flavor profiles. The specific volatile compounds produced are influenced by the fermentation substrate, the microorganisms involved, and the fermentation conditions.

      In tea wine, the primary volatile components are alcohols, esters, and aromatic compounds[19,31,32,37,53]. The volatile profile of kombucha is primarily composed of alcohols, acids, and esters[52,6771]. Tea vinegar is characterized mainly by its content of acids and alcohols[72]. The transformation of aroma compounds during fermentation is affected by metabolic pathways related to amino acid metabolism, fatty acid synthesis, and terpene synthesis[53]. This complex interplay of biochemical reactions gives each beverage its unique and characteristic aroma.

    • Research has identified 2-phenylethanol, isoamyl alcohol, and isobutanol as the primary alcohols in fermented tea beverages like kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar[19,32,70,72]. Additional alcohols such as nerolidol, nerol, citronellol, n-pentanol, and 2-methyl-1-butanol are also present, with unique substances like citronellol, 1-nonyl alcohol, and benzyl alcohol found in summer and autumn tea vinegar, and Jinjunmei black tea wine[37,70,72]. A noted increase in tea concentration during the fermentation of apple tea wine significantly boosts the production of fusel alcohols[73]. The fermentation of tea wine by S. cerevisiae results in the depletion of amino acids such as isoleucine, leucine, and phenylalanine, correlating with the formation of their respective alcohols: isoamyl alcohol, and 2-phenylethanol[19]. These amino acids are derived not only from the tea broth but can also be synthesized from carbohydrates by yeast, where glucose undergoes glycolysis to form pyruvate, subsequently entering the amino acid biosynthesis pathway[74]. The Ehrlich pathway typically leads to the production of higher alcohols from the catabolism of some amino acids during fermentation[75].

    • During the fermentation of tea wine with various teas, esters such as ethyl caprylate, ethyl caproate, and ethyl decanoate have been identified[19,31,32,37]. Other distinctive esters detected include isoamyl caprylate, isoamyl acetate, diethyl succinate, 3-methylbutyl decanoate, ethyl sorbate, monoethyl succinate, lactic acid ethyl ester, and ethyl acetate[31,32,37]. In tea vinegar, notable esters include ethyl acetate and lactic acid ethyl ester[72]. Studies on kombucha fermentation have revealed compounds like 2-(1H-indol-3-yl) ethyl acetate, ethyl 2-phenylacetate, ethyl hexanoate, and methyl hexanoate[70]. Introducing Pichia kluyveri as a starter culture in kombucha fermentation enhances the rapid buildup of acetic acid and the production of acetate esters, particularly isoamyl acetate and 2-phenethyl acetate[76]. Ethyl esters, featuring an ethanol (alcohol group) and a medium-chain fatty acid (acid group), include compounds like ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, and ethyl decanoate. Acetate esters, formed from acetate (acid group) and an alcohol group (either ethanol or a complex alcohol from amino acid metabolism), include esters such as ethyl acetate and isoamyl acetate[77].

    • Acids such as octanoic acid and decanoic acid have been identified in tea wine, tea vinegar, and kombucha[19,70,72]. The fermentation of kombucha leads to the formation of a bacterial cellulose film on the solution's surface, which restricts the available oxygen and thus influences the presence of fatty acids, either by depleting or converting them[51,78]. During the fermentation period from the 7th to the 10th day, especially when using raw Pu-erh tea as the base, a notable reduction in alcohols and aldehydes are observed, while the concentration of acids increase. By the end of the fermentation process, around day 14, the volatile composition is predominantly characterized by acids and esters, indicating a significant transformation in the chemical profile of the tea over the fermentation period[52].

    • The Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast (SCOBY) in kombucha produces a floating layer of bacterial cellulose (BC), a sustainable and renewable biomaterial that is garnering significant research interest[79,80]. BC is particularly valued for its potential applications in food packaging, where its antioxidant properties are highly beneficial[81,82]. Genera such as Komagataeibacter and Gluconacetobacter within the AAB group are recognized for their ability to produce large quantities of extracellular cellulose[83]. This production can also be achieved through the combined fermentation of strains such as Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Komagataeibacter spp., or through co-culture methods involving Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Komagataeibacter rhaeticus[84,85]. Moreover, AAB can synthesize water-soluble cellulose polysaccharides from substrates including glucose, fructose, ethanol, and glycerol. This process involves the formation of uridine diphosphate glucose (UDPGlc), which then polymerizes into the β-1,4-glucan chain characteristic of bacterial cellulose[86,87]. Tea, particularly green tea serves as a nitrogen source in this process and is noted for producing a higher yield of BC with enhanced hydrogen-donating capabilities[88]. Plant xanthines in black tea, such as theaflavins, thearubigins, and caffeine have also been shown to boost cellulose production[89]. Furthermore, incorporating phytochemicals such as carotenoids, alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids and anthocyanins into the BC matrix can endow the material with specific properties, notably enhancing its antioxidant and antimicrobial activities[89,90].

    • Different types of tea, including black, green, white, oolong, dark, and summer teas, serve as the primary raw materials in the production of fermented beverages such as kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar[15,21,22,3033,3539,55,72] (Table 1). Generally, fermentation enhances the phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of these drinks[58]. In the case of kombucha, the fermentation process notably affects polyphenols when using black tea, leading to a greater variety of phenolic compounds[51]. Specifically, phenolic compounds newly formed in black tea kombucha represent 42.72% of the total phenolics, compared to a mere 0.97% in green tea kombucha[30]. Moreover, green tea kombucha features elevated levels of epicatechin, catechin, and kaempferol relative to its black tea kombucha[91]. The abundant amino acids in green tea promote sugar consumption, boosting alcohol production and enhancing yeast fermentation. Consequently, wines derived from green tea display higher concentrations of total and specific catechins (EC, EGC, ECG, and EGCG) than those produced from black, oolong, and dark teas[31].

      Table 1.  Kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar prepared from different types of tea.

      Beverage Fermentation conditions Substrate Results Ref.
      Kombucha 3% (w/v) SCOBY,
      100 mL/L kombucha,
      fermented at 25 °C for 10 d.
      Green tea pH = 3.2, total acid: 0.36% (w/v acetic acid), alcohol: 7.29 g/L,
      total phenols: 0.70 mg GAE/mL, theaflavin: 0.028 (% w/v),
      theobromine: 1.330 (% w/v).
      [30]
      Black tea pH = 3.5, total acid: 0.32% (w/v acetic acid), alcohol: 4.90 g/L,
      total phenol: 1.09 mg GAE/mL, theaflavin: 0.151 (% w/v), theobromine: 1.998 (% w/v).
      Kombucha 30 g SCOBY, 100 mL kombucha, fermented at 27 °C for 14 d. Black tea Days 7 and 14 of fermentation: acetic acid: 3.18, 9.18 (mg/mL),
      Alcohol: 4.69, 5.83(mg/mL).
      Days 0, 7 and 14 of fermentation:
      polyphenolics: 79.38, 64.81, 67.20 (mg/g DW),
      flavonoids: 17.97, 14.46, 13.87 (mg/g DW), and
      total catechins: 2.184 ,0.99, 0.464 (mg/g DW).
      [33]
      Green tea Days 7 and 14 of fermentation: acetic acid: 4.22, 7.65 (mg/mL),
      alcohol: 2.81, 4.18 (mg/mL).
      Days 0, 7 and 14 of fermentation:
      polyphenolic compounds: 74.40, 100.33, 67.40 (mg/g DW),
      flavonoids: 16.57, 18.49, 15.11 (mg/g DW),
      total catechins: 18.253, 9.770, 11.844 (mg/g DW).
      Kombucha 10% SCOBY and kombucha,
      28 ° C fermented for 1, 7, 14 d.
      Green tea Tea soup: pH = 5.54, alcohol: 0, acidity: 20.12 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 254.1 (mg/L), TPC: 269.0 (mg/L).
      At 1, 7, 14 d fermentation:
      pH = 3.50, 2.61, 2.49, alcohol: 0.2%, 3.0%, 2.75%,
      acidity: 610.34, 7,039.21, 9,147.4 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 196.2, 146.8, 181.3 (mg/L), TPC: 277.6, 299.6, 320.1 (mg/L).
      [29]
      Black tea Tea soup: pH = 5.34, Alcohol: 0, acidity: 23.5 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 231.7 (mg/L), TPC:183.1 (mg/L),
      At 1, 7, 14 d fermentation: pH = 3.54, 2.62, 2.53,
      Saccharose: 10.88, 9.5, 7.5 (Brix-g/100 mL),
      alcohol: 0.3%, 3.25%, 2.0%,
      acidity: 501.02, 7,039.08, 9,083.03 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 149.1, 90.5, 126.7 (mg/L), TPC: 201.0, 219.5, 206.0 (mg/L).
      White tea Tea soup: pH = 6.53, alcohol: 0, acidity: 21.09 (mg acetic acid/L)
      TFC: 209.3 (mg/L), TPC: 184.6 (mg/L);
      At 1, 7, 14 d fermentation: pH = 3.56, 2.53, 2.37,
      saccharose: 10.13, 10.13, 9.5 (°Brix-g/100 mL),
      alcohol: 0.4%, 3.5%, 3.0%,
      acidity: 620.13, 7,048.06, 9,132.20 (mg acetic acid/L)
      TFC: 132.6 (mg/L), 83.8 (mg/L),111.6 (mg/L),
      TPC: 200.8 (mg/L), 205.6 (mg/L), 228.1 (mg/L).
      Pu'er tea Tea soup: pH = 5.58, alcohol: 0, acidity: 20.42 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 359.9 (mg/L), TPC: 229.5 (mg/L),
      At 1, 7, 14 d fermentation: pH = 3.62, 2.38, and 2.32,
      alcohol: 0.4%, 3.5%, 3.0%,
      acidity: 600.09, 7,059.47, 9,071.02 (mg acetic acid/L),
      TFC: 292.5, 198.1, 242.5 (mg/L), TPC: 219.8, 270.5, 271.9 (mg/L).
      Kombucha 10% (v/v) kombucha, fermented at room temperature for 15 d. Green tea pH = 2.94, total acid: 11.72 g/L,
      alcohol free, glucuronic acid: 1.37 g/L, gluconic acid: 41.42 g/L, DSL: 3.44 g/L, ascorbic acid: 0.61 g/L, acetic acid: 10.42 g/L, succinic acid: none.
      [35]
      Black tea pH = 2.70, total acid: 16.75 g/L,
      alcohol free, glucuronic acid: 1.58 g/L, gluconic acid: 70.11 g/L, DSL: 5.23 g/L, ascorbic acid: 0.70 g/L, acetic acid: 11.15 g/L, succinic acid: 3.05 g/L.
      Oolong tea pH = 2.89, Total acid: 12.24 g/L, no alcohol,
      glucuronic acid: 0.07 g/L, gluconic acid: 48.75 g/L, DSL: 4.02 g/L, ascorbic acid: 0.60 g/L, acetic acid: 10.48 g/L, succinic acid: none.
      Tea wine 25°Brix, 0.5% yeast,
      fermentation at 25 °C.
      Black tea Alcohol 14.0% vol, theanine content: 0.241 mg/mL. [38]
      Tea wine The sugar level was 17 °Bx, 0.3 % yeast, fermentation at 24 °C for 13 d. Green tea The alcohol content was 8.5 %vol, the concentration of tea polyphenols was 2,902.35 mg/L. [36]
      Tea vinegar 4% alcohol by total volume, 5% acetic acid strain, 30 °C for 9 d. Black tea Theaflavins were significantly decreased, thearubigins were decreased, and theabrownines were increased. [22]
      Tea vinegar 0.9% yeast, initial sugar 15%. The initial alcohol content was 6% vol,
      9% acetic acid bacteria, fermentation at 28 °C for 12 d.
      Summer and
      fall green
      tea fragments
      The acidity content was 59.10 g/L, tea polyphenol content was 2.95 g/L, alcohol content was 0.08% vol, amino acid nitrogen content was 0.14 g/dL, and caffeine content was 0.80%. [72]
      GAE: Gallic acid equivalent, DW: Dry Weight, TPC: total polyphenols content, TFC: total flavonoids content.

      Overall, while kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar can be produced from six predominant tea types, an assessment of factors such as taste, fermentation duration, and polyphenol content highlights specific advantages of black tea. Nevertheless, green tea is distinguished by its higher catechin levels and superior antioxidant properties, making its transition from tea soup to fermented tea beverages during microbial fermentation (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Fermentation processes in tea beverages: from raw materials to finished products. (1) In the production of kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar, commonly used tea leaf raw materials include various types of tea such as green, black, oolong, dark, and white teas, processed differently, as well as seasonally surplus summer tea leaves. (2) These teas provide the substrate for fermentation. For kombucha, sugar tea soup, yeast, and a mix of acetic acid bacteria are added to initiate fermentation. In contrast, the addition of yeast alone ferments into tea wine while combining the ethanol from yeast fermentation with acetic acid bacteria further produces tea vinegar[16]. (3) During fermentation, glucose and fructose are converted into ethanol by yeast and transformed into gluconic and glucuronic acid by acetic acid bacteria. Additionally, ethanol is oxidized to acetic acid[14,27]. Throughout the microbial metabolism process, various compounds such as alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, acids, amino acids, caffeine, and polyphenols in the tea undergo transformations, being preserved, increased, or decreased. Caffeine is converted into theobromine and theophylline, serving as nitrogen sources for the microbes. Amino acids provide nitrogen and are transformed into alcohols, while aldehydes convert into alcohols and acids. Reactions between alcohols and acids with ethanol and acetic acid result in the formation of new ethyl esters and acetate compounds[15,30,31,33,35,55,72]. Tea polyphenols, predominantly flavonoids, and phenolic acids[67], undergo significant changes: catechin ester bonds break, (–)epigallocatechin gallate hydrolyzes into epigallocatechin and gallic acid, and chlorogenic acid converts into caffeic acid and quinic acid[19]. This intricate fermentation process not only alters the chemical composition of the raw materials but also enhances the flavor and nutritional value of the final products, underscoring the uniqueness and complexity of tea beverage fermentation.

    • Fermented tea beverages, including kombucha, tea wine, and tea vinegar, owe their health benefits to bioactive compounds that are produced during the fermentation process. These health benefits encompass antioxidant properties, antibacterial activity, anti-inflammatory effects, and blood sugar regulation. Additionally, these beverages contribute to gut health by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria (Table 2). Fermented tea beverages may also aid in detoxification and support liver health, attributed to the increased levels of polyphenols, organic acids, and other metabolites produced by microbial fermentation.

      Table 2.  Healthy benefits of fermented tea beverage kombucha in vivo.

      Model Intervention and dosage Significant results and biological activity Ref.
      Glycemic index and insulin index after a standard carbohydrate meal Sample: 11 healthy adults (four males and seven females),
      Period: 120 min after test meals
      Group 1: 330 ml of soda water;
      Group 2: diet lemonade soft drink;
      Group 3: organic kombucha.
      Additional capillary blood samples were collected at regular intervals
      (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min) after commencement of the reference solution or test meal.
      Soda water (GI: 86 and II: 85)
      soft drink (GI: 84 and II: 81)
      kombucha (GI: 68, and II: 70)
      ↓GI (Glycemic index)
      ↓II (insulin index).
      [92]
      HFHF Sample: 40 wistar rats,
      Period: 10 weeks,
      n = 10 for all groups, ad libitum consume,
      Group 1: standard diet (AIN-93M);
      Group 2: high-fat and high-fructose diet (HFHF);
      Group 3: HFHF + GTK diluted in water (30% v/v);
      Group 4: HFHF + BTK diluted in water (30% v/v).
      GTK, BTK: ↑propionic acid
      Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes,
      Erysipelotrichaceae,
      Bacteroidaceae ,
      S24-7, Desulfovibrionaceae.
      GTK: ↓Proteobacteria.
      BTK: ↑Euryarchaeota, Lachnospiraceae.
      [93]
      HFHF Sample: 32 wistar rats,
      Period: 10 weeks, ad libitum consume,
      Group 1: AIN-93M: standard diet (n = 8);
      Group 2: HFHF (n = 24);
      then regroup as follows: HFHF; HFHF + GTK diluted in water (30% v/v);
      HFHF + BTK diluted in water (30% v/v).
      GTK, BTK: improving the insulin sensitivity, reduced the percentage of lipid vesicles in the liver, reverting the liver steatosis from grade 2 to 1, active CPT1 express,
      ↑glucose tolerance, TAC in plasma and liver, SOD and CAT in liver,
      ↓ALT, NO, NLR,
      GTK: ↑ADIPO-R2, BTK: ↑SREBP1c.
      [94]
      LPS-induced sepsis Sample: Specific pathogen-free C57BL/6 adult mice,
      Period: 60 d,
      n = 10 per group, with equal numbers of male and female.
      Group 1: free-drinking water, the sham;
      Group 2: free-drinking kombucha (FD), (replaced every 2 d);
      Group 3: intragastric administration (IA) of kombucha (100 μL/100 g daily);
      Group 4: free-drinking water, LPS-induced sepsis (LPS);
      Group 5: FD + LPS;
      Group 6: IA + LPS.
      At day 60, Group 1−3 injected phosphate-buffered saline, Group 4−6 injected LPS (20 mg/kg).
      Kombucha was added to drinking water at a volume ratio of 1:20.
      ↑CD4+ T cells, B cell, macrophages,
      ↓CD8+ T cells,
      ↓IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL-2, IL-10, and CXCL10 in the lung tissues, alleviated the symptoms of lung histopathological damage
      ↓pIκBα, p-NF-κB expression.
      inhibits LPS-induced NF-κB activation.
      ↓Bacteroidetes,
      ↑Cyanobacteria and Alistipes,
      Prevotellaceae enrich in IA and FD group.
      [95]
      High fat high sugar diet injected with Streptozotocin to Type 2 Diabetes Sample: 60 Kunming mice,
      Period: day 40 to 68 (4 weeks), randomly divided into five groups ( n = 12). The mice feed with HFHSD was intraperitoneally injected with STZ (50 mg/kg·bw) 4 times (day 28, day 31, day 34 and day 37) to induce T2DM.
      Group 1: the normal control (NC), normal diet and gavage administration with 11.1 mL/kg·bw saline;
      Group 2: DC, HFHSD and gavage administration with 11.1 mL/kg·bw saline;
      Group 3: MET, HFHSD and gavage administration with 0.13 g/kg·bw metformin;
      Group 4: KT, HFHSD and gavage administration with 11.1 mL/kg·bw kombucha;
      Group 5: tea soup (TS), HFHSD and gavage administration with 11.1 mL/kg·bw tea soup.
      ↓HOMA-IR, ↑HOMA- β, ↓AST, ALT.
      ↑liver glycogen content,
      ↓pancreatic index,
      ↑GPR41/GPR43 mRNA express,
      ↑GLP-1, PYY,
      ↑ZO-1, Claudin-1, Occludin,Muc2,
      ↓IL-1β, IL-6, TFN-α mRNA in intestinal inflammation,
      ↓LPS, TNF-α and IL-6 in serum.
      ↑Firmicutes, Lactobacillus, Butyricicoccus, Bifidobacterium,
      ↓Proteobacteria.
      ↑acetic acid and butyric acid in SCFAs.
      [96]
      NAFLD Sample: 12 male C57BLKS db/db mice,
      Group 1: Control, the control diet (n = 4); MCD, the methionine/choline-deficient (MCD) diet (n = 8) for 4 weeks;
      Group 2: MCD + water (n = 4);
      Group 3: MCD + KT, Kombucha powder 2 g/kg by oral administration,
      every 24 h for 3 weeks (n = 4).
      ↓Fat accumulation in the livers.
      Firmicutes,
      Erysipelotrichia,
      Allobaculum,
      Turicibacter and Clostridium, ↑Bacteroidetes,Lactobacillus, ↑Mucispirillum.
      [97]
      High-fat diet NAFLD Sample: 20 male C57BL/6 mice,
      Period: 12 weeks (At the end of the 10th week, for nine consecutive days),
      n = 5 for all groups.
      Group 1: RC, the control group + tap water;
      Group 2: RC + K, control group + kombucha (0.2 mL containing 107–108 microorganisms/mL);
      Group 3: HFD, HFD + tap water;
      Group 4: HFD + kombucha (HFD + K).
      Reduced the presence of intra hepatocyte lipid droplets, collagen deposition in the liver's perivascular spaces, and hepatic FXR gene expression. [98]
      DSS induced the leaky gut syndrome Sample:16 male NMR mice,
      Period: day 7 to 21 (14 d);
      Old mice: normal group (n = 8); DSS colitis induction group (n = 8): DSS no treatment group and DSS + fKT.
      Young mice: normal group (n = 8); DSS colitis induction group (n = 8): DSS no treatment group and DSS + fKT.
      Ameliorates tissue changes associated with PMNs infiltration, crypt loss, epithelial defects, mucosal destruction, apoptosis, edema, and increased mucosal thinness due to DSS.
      ↑ZO-1 and ZO-2 express.
      [99]
    • Fermentation generally increases phenolic content and antioxidant activity[58]. Kombucha, for example, demonstrates strong antioxidant properties[35]. Green tea kombucha, after seven days of fermentation, exhibits less DPPH radical inhibition than unfermented green tea, while black tea kombucha has higher antioxidant activity compared to its unfermented counterpart[34,48,100]. This may be due to the higher phenolic content in black tea kombucha[93]. Green tea kombucha is found to have the highest antioxidant capability among kombuchas made from different tea types[29,47]. Similarly, with green tea wine having significantly higher ABTS values compared to other tea wines[31]. Tea vinegar's antioxidant and antibacterial functions surpass those of tea soup and conventional food vinegar[101], likely due to its rich phenolic and organic acid content[22].

    • Kombucha intervention significantly reduces serum levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α cytokines, and markedly decreases the expression levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α mRNA in the colon[95,96]. It significantly restores T cell levels and macrophage counts, elevates CD4+ T cell and B cell levels, significantly lowers CD8+ T cell levels, markedly suppresses the upregulation of CCL-2, IL-10, and CXCL10, decreases phosphorylated-IκBα (pIκBα)expression levels and inhibits nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)signal transduction[95].

    • In human clinical trials, consuming unpasteurized kombucha significantly reduces Glycemic Index (GI ) and Insulin Index (II) after a standard high-GI diet for 2 h[92]. In animal models induced by a high-fat diet, kombucha can reduce weight, significantly decrease fasting blood glucose (FBG) and food intake, reduce HOMA-IR, increase HOMA-β, raise glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) levels in the intestine, significantly repair pancreatic damage, and protect the pancreas[95,96]. It improves insulin sensitivity, lowers insulin resistance, and enhances glucose tolerance[94,98].

    • Kombucha intervention can reduce total fat tissue in high-fat, high-sugar diet mice, decrease serum triglyceride levels, significantly reduce AST levels, enhance glycogen synthesis, and effectively improve liver function[96]. It restores liver fat degeneration from grade 2 to grade 1, increases plasma and liver total antioxidant capacity (TAC), reduces the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and inflammatory marker levels. Black tea kombucha reduces SREBP1c expression, while green tea kombucha increases ADIPO-R2 expression[94]. Kombucha decreases citrate synthase and phosphofructokinase-1 enzyme activity, downregulates G protein-coupled bile acid receptor (Gpbar1, also known as TGR5) and farnesol X receptor (FXR) gene expression, reduces liver collagen fiber deposition, and liver fat accumulation[97,98].

    • Both green tea and black tea kombucha can regulate the intestinal microbiota, improving intestinal health in Wistar rats fed a high-fat, high-fructose (HFHF) diet[93]. Kombucha can restore colon damage in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) mice, significantly increase the relative expression levels of tight junction proteins (ZO-1, Claudin-1, Occludin), and mucin proteins (Muc2), improving intestinal barrier damage[96]. Kombucha can improve tissue changes associated with "leaky gut syndrome" induced by dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), such as polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) infiltration, crypt loss, epithelial defects, upregulating ZO-1 and ZO-2 expression[99].

      In HFHF and T2DM animal models, kombucha can increase the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, decrease Proteobacteria, significantly increase intestinal microbial richness, such as Lactobacillus, Butyricicoccus, Lachnospiraceae, Bifidobacterium, and others[93,96,97]. It can significantly increase the content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetate, butyrate, and propionate, and promote the growth of bacteria producing propionate, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects[93,95,96].

    • The antibacterial activity of kombucha is similar to that of acetic acid, exhibiting inhibitory effects on intestinal pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella Typhi, and Vibrio cholerae)[35,102]. Black tea kombucha shows strong inhibitory effects on Candida krusei, C. glabrata, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and Hemophilus influenzae[34]. The main antibacterial compounds present in the polyphenolic fraction of kombucha were catechin and isorhamnetin[102]. These findings suggest that acetic acid and polyphenols in kombucha offer significant potential health benefits in inhibiting intestinal pathogenic bacteria.

    • As consumer health awareness increases, kombucha's popularity has surged in the global beverage market. Simultaneously, low-alcohol beverages have gained traction among younger and female consumers, enhancing their market value. Additionally, vinegar — rich in amino acids and various organic acids — has become a popular pre-meal choice. In response to the growing demand for health-focused and natural products, tea wine and tea vinegar are carving out niches as innovative trends.

      The advanced utilization of summer and autumn teas through microbial fermentation is another notable development. This process not only reduces the bitterness and astringency by lowering catechin levels but also encourages the transformation of organic acids, alcohols, amino acids, and other substances, thus creating uniquely flavored tea beverages. Moreover, fermentation decreases the caffeine content in these drinks, categorizing them distinctly as fermented products. The flavor profile of these beverages is greatly enhanced by volatile compounds, which are key contributors.

      However, the fermentation conditions and the type of tea used can significantly affect the formation and balance of these compounds. Research into how bioactive components in tea are transformed by yeasts and acetic acid bacteria is highly promising. Moreover, using metabolic engineering to amplify the biotransformation of phenolic compounds, especially to increase phenolic acid content, is an area ripe for further exploration.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: data curation and writing the original draft: Guo Q; investigation & visualization: Yuan J, Ding S, Nie Q, Xu Q, Pang Y, Liao X, Liu Z; resources, supervision: Liu Z; funding acquisition, supervision, writing–review: Cai S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

      • The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Guangxi Innovation Driven Development Special Fund Project (No. AA20302018), the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1604405), National Natural Science Foundation Project of China (31471590, 31100501), and Self-Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2019jj50237).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (102)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Guo Q, Yuan J, Ding S, Nie Q, Xu Q, et al. 2024. Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity. Beverage Plant Research 4: e029 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0026
    Guo Q, Yuan J, Ding S, Nie Q, Xu Q, et al. 2024. Microbial fermentation in fermented tea beverages: transforming flavor and enhancing bioactivity. Beverage Plant Research 4: e029 doi: 10.48130/bpr-0024-0026

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return