Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple

More Information
  • Received: 09 May 2024
    Revised: 28 June 2024
    Accepted: 02 July 2024
    Published online: 02 September 2024
    Fruit Research  4 Article number: e030 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • The cytochrome P450 enzyme is one of the largest protein families identified in cuticle biosynthesis, plant growth, development, and stress response. In the present study, 28 members of the MdCYP86A family were identified in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Chromosomal localization analysis found that 28 genes were distributed on 13 chromosomes in apple. Phylogenetic and conserved motifs analysis showed that MdCYP86As in apple is evolutionarily most closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana. Each gene contains a cytochrome P450 domain, suggesting that MdCYP86As are highly conserved during the evolution of the species. Cis-acting element analysis of the promoter identified various elements associated with stress response. MdCYP86A21 was cloned in the apple genome to investigate the function of MdCYP86A family genes. MdCYP86A21 responded to abiotic stress, including PEG, NaCl, and ABA. The tissue-specific expression patterns revealed that the highest expression tissue was in flower by real-time quantitative reverse transcription (RT-qPCR). Subcellular localization showed that MdCYP86A21 was localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. Further, the function of MdCYP86A21 to enhance the resistance to PEG and NaCl stress in apple calli was verified. These results contribute to further study on the function of MdCYP86As and provide a molecular basis for the study of apple stress tolerance.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 Primer sequence.
    Supplemental Table S2 The MdCYP86As ID and gene name in apple.
    Supplemental Table S3 The location of MdCYP86As in apple chromosomes.
    Supplemental Table S4 The CYP86As ID and gene name in Arabidopsis thaliana, Rice and Tobacco.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 The logo of 10 motifs.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 3D protein structure of MdCYP86As.
    Supplemental Fig. S3 Transgenic apple calli identification.
  • [1]

    Zhang Y, Zhang C, Wang G, Wang Y, Qi C, et al. 2019. The R2R3 MYB transcription factor MdMYB30 modulates plant resistance against pathogens by regulating cuticular wax biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biology 19:362

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1918-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yeats TH, Rose JKC. 2013. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiology 163:5−20

    doi: 10.1104/pp.113.222737

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhang Y, Tian Y, Man Y, Zhang C, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Apple SUMO E3 ligase MdSIZ1 regulates cuticular wax biosynthesis by SUMOylating transcription factor MdMYB30. Plant Physiology 191:1771−88

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Wang H, Lu Z, Xu Y, Zhang J, Han L, et al. 2023. Roles of very long-chain fatty acids in compound leaf patterning in Medicago trunca tula. Plant Physiology 191:1751−70

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Huang H, Yang X, Zheng M, Chen Z, Yang Z, et al. 2023. An ancestral role for 3-KETOACYL-COA SYNTHASE3 as a negative regulator of plant cuticular wax synthesis. The Plant Cell 35:2251−70

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kong L, Liu Y, Zhi P, Wang X, Xu B, et al. 2020. Origins and evolution of cuticle biosynthetic machinery in land plants. Plant Physiology 184:1998−2010

    doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00913

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kunst L, Samuels L. 2009. Plant cuticles shine: advances in wax biosynthesis and export. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12:721−27

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.09.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Wu Y, Lv Y, Li X, Gao H, Zhou M, et al. 2024. The effect of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a main active ingredient in tea residues, on improving fruit quality and prolonging postharvest storage in apple. Scientia Horticulturae 326:112782

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112782

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lian X, Gao H, Jiang H, Liu C, Li Y. 2021. MdKCS2 increased plant drought resistance by regulating wax biosynthesis. Plant Cell Reports 40:2357−68

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02776-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Declercq M, Alkio M, Sprink T, Schreiber L, Knoche M. 2014. Effect of sweet cherry genes PaLACS2 and PaATT1 on cuticle deposition, composition and permeability in Arabidopsis. Tree Genetics & Genomes 10:1711−21

    doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0791-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Li J, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Gao H, Wang H, et al. 2022. An apple long-chain acyl-CoA synthase, MdLACS1, enhances biotic and abiotic stress resistance in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 189:115−25

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.08.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Man Y, Lv Y, Lv H, Jiang H, Wang T, et al. 2024. MdDEWAX decreases plant drought resistance by regulating wax biosynthesis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 206:108288

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kandel S, Sauveplane V, Olry A, Diss L, Benveniste I, et al. 2006. Cytochrome P450-dependent fatty acid hydroxylases in plants. Phytochemistry Reviews 5:359−72

    doi: 10.1007/s11101-006-9041-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Greer S, Wen M, Bird D, Wu X, Samuels L, et al. 2007. The cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP96A15 is the midchain alkane hydroxylase responsible for formation of secondary alcohols and ketones in stem cuticular wax of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 145:653−67

    doi: 10.1104/pp.107.107300

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhou M, Yu Z, Gao H, Li M, Wu Y, et al. 2023. Ectopic expression of an apple ABCG transporter gene MdABCG25 increases plant cuticle wax accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. Fruit Research 3:43

    doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2023-0043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Nelson D, Werck-Reichhart D. 2011. A P450-centric view of plant evolution. The Plant Journal 66:194−211

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04529.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Bak S, Beisson F, Bishop G, Hamberger B, Höfer R, et al. 2011. Cytochromes P450. The Arabidopsis Book 9:e0144

    doi: 10.1199/tab.0144

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Sun C, Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Li M, et al. 2024. ZmCYP90D1 regulates maize internode development by modulating brassinosteroid-mediated cell division and growth. The Crop Journal 12:58−67

    doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2023.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li L, Chang Z, Pan Z, Fu Z, Wang X. 2008. Modes of heme binding and substrate access for cytochrome P450 CYP74A revealed by crystal structures of allene oxide synthase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:13883−88

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804099105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Tanaka Y, Brugliera F. 2013. Flower colour and cytochromes P450. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368:20120432

    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Nelson DR, Schuler MA. 2013. Cytochrome P450 genes from the sacred lotus genome. Tropical Plant Biology 6:138−51

    doi: 10.1007/s12042-013-9119-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Bozak KR, Christoffersen RE. 1992. Expression of a ripening-related avocado (Persea americana) cytochrome P450 in Yeast. Plant Physiology 100:1976−81

    doi: 10.1104/pp.100.4.1976

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Pinot F, Beisson F. 2010. Cytochrome P450 metabolizing fatty acids in plants: characterization and physiological roles. The FEBS Journal 278:195−205

    doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07948.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tully TLA, Kaushik P, O'Connor J, Bernards MA. 2020. Fatty acid ω-hydroxylases of soybean: CYP86A gene expression and aliphatic suberin deposition. Botany 98:317−26

    doi: 10.1139/cjb-2019-0198

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Natarajan P, Akinmoju TA, Nimmakayala P, Lopez-Ortiz C, Garcia-Lozano M, et al. 2020. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis to characterize cutin biosynthesis between low- and high-cutin genotypes of Capsicum chinense Jacq. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:1397

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21041397

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Xiao F, Mark Goodwin S, Xiao Y, Sun Z, Baker D, et al. 2004. Arabidopsis CYP86A2 represses Pseudomonas syringae type III genes and is required for cuticle development. The EMBO Journal 23:2903−13

    doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600290

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Xuenan Zhang, Yao Ge, Xue Yang, Yan Ma, Lingmin Dai, et al. 2021. Overexpression of Vvcyp86a1 Improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana during germination and seedling stages. Chemistry and Medical Engineering 2021:109−117

    doi: 10.25236/icbcme.2021.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Xu X, Chen M, Ji J, Xu Q, Qi X, et al. 2017. Comparative RNA-seq based transcriptome profiling of waterlogging response in cucumber hypocotyls reveals novel insights into the de novo adventitious root primordia initiation. BMC Plant Biology 17:129

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1081-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gao L, Cao J, Gong S, Hao N, Du Y, et al. 2023. The COPII subunit CsSEC23 mediates fruit glossiness in cucumber. The Plant Journal 116:524−40

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.16389

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zhang C, Hu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang G, et al. 2020. An apple long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 2 gene enhances plant resistance to abiotic stress by regulating the accumulation of cuticular wax. Tree Physiology 40:1450−65

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa079

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Wang X, Yang F, Zhang J, Ren Y, An J, et al. 2023. Ectopic expression of MmCYP1A1, a mouse cytochrome P450 gene, positively regulates stress tolerance in apple calli and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports 42:433−48

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02969-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Werck-Reichhart D, Feyereisen R. 2000. Cytochromes P450: a success story. Genome Biology 1:reviews3003.1

    doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-reviews3003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hansen CC, Nelson DR, Møller BL, Werck-Reichhart D. 2021. Plant cytochrome P450 plasticity and evolution. Molecular Plant 14:1244−65

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.06.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang J, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Li X, et al. 2023. PpyMYB144 transcriptionally regulates pear fruit skin russeting by activating the cytochrome P450 gene PpyCYP86B1. Planta 257:69

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04102-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang G, Xu J, Li L, Guo Z, Si Q, et al. 2020. GbCYP86A1-1 from Gossypium barbadense positively regulates defence against Verticillium dahliae by cell wall modification and activation of immune pathways. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:222−38

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13190

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Höfer R, Briesen I, Beck M, Pinot F, Schreiber L, et al. 2008. The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP86A1 encodes a fatty acid ω-hydroxylase involved in suberin monomer biosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:2347−60

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    He Y. 2012. Structural polymers and molecular pathways that influence tomato fruit integrity and surface quality traits. Thesis. Cornell University, NY.

    [38]

    Flagel LE, Wendel JF. 2009. Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants. New Phytologist 183:557−64

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Richardson SR, Doucet AJ, Kopera HC, Moldovan JB, Garcia-Perez JL, et al. 2015. The influence of LINE-1 and SINE retrotransposons on mammalian genomes. Microbiology Spectrum 3:MDNA3-0061-2014

    doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0061-2014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Nelson DR. 2011. Progress in tracing the evolutionary paths of cytochrome P450. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 1814:14−18

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhang C, Wang Y, Hu X, Zhang Y, Wang G, et al. 2020. An apple AP2/EREBP-type transcription factor, MdWRI4, enhances plant resistance to abiotic stress by increasing cuticular wax load. Environmental and Experimental Botany 180:104206

    doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104206

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Sun K, Fang H, Chen Y, Zhuang Z, Chen Q, et al. 2021. Genome-wide analysis of the cytochrome P450 gene family involved in salt tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:685054

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.685054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Wen H, Wang Y, Wu B, Feng Y, Dang Y, et al. 2021. Analysis of wheat wax regulation mechanism by liposome and transcriptome. Frontiers in Genetics 12:757920

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.757920

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Zhao Y, Peng T, Sun H, Teotia S, Wen H, et al. 2019. miR1432-OsACOT (Acyl-CoA thioesterase) module determines grain yield via enhancing grain filling rate in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17:712−23

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Yang X, Wu D, Shi J, He Y, Pinot F, et al. 2014. Rice CYP703A3, a cytochrome P450 hydroxylase, is essential for development of anther cuticle and pollen exine. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 56:979−94

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Zhong M, Jiang H, Cao Y, Wang Y, You C, et al. 2020. MdCER2 conferred to wax accumulation and increased drought tolerance in plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 149:277−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Jiang Z, Ding Y, Liu J, Yin W, Qi Y, et al. 2022. The MdFAD27 and MdFAD28 play critical roles in the development of greasiness disorder in postharvest apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology 191:111990

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Lv HM, Qi RH, Yu ZH, Man YY, Lv YH, et al. 2024. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple. Fruit Research 4: e030 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0024
    Lv HM, Qi RH, Yu ZH, Man YY, Lv YH, et al. 2024. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple. Fruit Research 4: e030 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0024

Figures(8)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(976) PDF downloads(133)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple

Fruit Research  4 Article number: e030  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: The cytochrome P450 enzyme is one of the largest protein families identified in cuticle biosynthesis, plant growth, development, and stress response. In the present study, 28 members of the MdCYP86A family were identified in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Chromosomal localization analysis found that 28 genes were distributed on 13 chromosomes in apple. Phylogenetic and conserved motifs analysis showed that MdCYP86As in apple is evolutionarily most closely related to Arabidopsis thaliana. Each gene contains a cytochrome P450 domain, suggesting that MdCYP86As are highly conserved during the evolution of the species. Cis-acting element analysis of the promoter identified various elements associated with stress response. MdCYP86A21 was cloned in the apple genome to investigate the function of MdCYP86A family genes. MdCYP86A21 responded to abiotic stress, including PEG, NaCl, and ABA. The tissue-specific expression patterns revealed that the highest expression tissue was in flower by real-time quantitative reverse transcription (RT-qPCR). Subcellular localization showed that MdCYP86A21 was localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. Further, the function of MdCYP86A21 to enhance the resistance to PEG and NaCl stress in apple calli was verified. These results contribute to further study on the function of MdCYP86As and provide a molecular basis for the study of apple stress tolerance.

    • The plant cuticle is a natural barrier in plants to adapt to the external environment, and the role of the cuticle is to effectively improve drought stress, reduce ultraviolet radiation, prevent the attack of pests and diseases, reduce non-stomatal water loss, and block organ fusion[14]. The cuticle consists of cutin and cuticular wax. The main components of cutin were C16 and C18 fatty acid and cuticular wax were very-long-chain fatty acids and their derivatives consist of alkane, alcohol, aldehyde, ester, and so on[5,6]. Wax is soluble in organic solvents and its crystal structure is observed using modern microscopic techniques[7]. The crystal structure of cuticular wax varies in different species, mainly in spherical, lamellar, rod-like, and so on[2,79].

      In the process of wax biosynthesis, C16, and C18 fatty acids are synthesized in plastids, followed by the extension of short-chain fatty acids into C26−C34 very-long-chain fatty acids and their derivatives by the action of long-chain acyl CoA synthase (LACS)[1012]. The generated very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) are extended into acyl-coenzyme A, which in turn forms primary alcohols and wax esters via the acyl reduction pathway. In the alkane formation pathway, aldehyde is formed first, followed by decarbonization to produce alkane, and finally the transition from alkane to secondary alcohol and ketone is achieved by a two-step redox reaction[13,14]. In the process of wax biosynthesis, we identified the involvement of MdCYP86A21 in the successive two-step oxidation reaction to achieve the transformation from alkane to alcohol in apple[14]. The wax monomers formed are transported to the plasma membrane via ABC and LTP transporter proteins, which in turn, form wax to cover the plant surface[7,15].

      Cytochrome P450 is one of the largest enzyme families in plants, named because of the special absorption peak at 450 nm and this family of proteins plays an important role in plant metabolism and development and adaptation to the environment[1619]. The gene functions of the CYPs family are involved in signal transduction, biological stress, polymerization of substances (lignin, cuticle, corky veins, etc.), and the complex structure formation of the anther cuticle[16,20]. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase is a specific heme protein, an enzyme ubiquitous in various mammalian tissues, insects, plants, yeasts, and other species. It is mostly located in the endoplasmic reticulum of cells[21,22].

      More than 670 CYPs have been named in plants and these genes play an important role in different stages of plant growth and development, especially the role of CYP86As is mainly related to fatty acid synthesis[13,23]. GmCYP86As in soybean has been localized to fatty acid hydroxylase, which is involved in the biosynthesis of suberin monomer[24]. The expression of CcCYP86As in capsicum were up-regulated in fruits with high cutin content[25]. Organ fusion occurs in rosette leaves and inflorescences of the AtCYP86A8 mutant in Arabidopsis[23]. AtCYP86A2 represses bacterial type III secretion system related gene expression through the synthesis of cutin-associated fatty acids, thereby inhibiting pathogen infection[26]. Ectopic expression of VvCYP86A1 in Arabidopsis showed a salt-tolerant phenotype[27]. CsCYP86As in cucumber disrupt the cell membrane structure by increasing the level of free fatty acids to acclimatize the cucumber hypocotyl to water-soaked conditions[28]. However, how the CYP86As regulate cuticular wax accumulation has been less studied in apple.

      Apple is one of the most important economic fruit trees in the world, and its quality affects the commodity value. Wax forms a film-like structure on the surface of apple fruit, which affects fruit gloss, reduces water loss to prolong shelf-time, reduces pest infection, and plays an important role in protecting the surface moisture and gloss of the fruit[3,29,30]. In this study, 28 genes of MdCYP86A in the apple genome were identified. MdCYP86As were analyzed by bioinformatics technology for physicochemical properties, phylogeny, gene structure, interspecies covariance, cis-acting elements, conserved motif, and domain. MdCYP86A21 was identified in apple, which was highly expressed in flower. Subcellular localization showed that MdCYP86A21 was localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, and improved drought and salt tolerance in apple calli. This provides a molecular basis for subsequent studies on the MdCYP86As involvement in wax accumulation in apple.

    • The family proteins were queried on the Pfam website (www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro). The HMM model of the family was obtained from HMMER software using the obtained ID number. The HMM model was compared to the apple genome using TBtools software to determine the final protein sequence. The members of this family were subsequently identified in TBtools software. The gene sequences of Arabidopsis, Rice, and Tobacco were downloaded from NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for subsequent analysis of CYP86As.

    • The physicochemical properties of this family protein were predicted through the EXPASY online website (www.expasy.org), such as MW (KDa), isoelectric point (PI), number of amino acids, instability coefficient, and a series of other indicators.

    • Based on the previously obtained protein sequences of the family, the gene evolution tree of the family was drawn in MEGA11 software using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method. The protein sequences were uploaded to the MEME website (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme) to obtain the conserved motifs of this family during the evolutionary process. The predicted motifs were defaulted to 10, and the motif plots were further embellished through the Chiplot online website (www.chiplot.online/#Scatter-plot). The conserved structural domains of this family were queried using the CD-Search function in NCBI, and the graphs were subsequently embellished in the Chiplot website (www.chiplot.online/#Scatter-plot).

    • The protein sequences were uploaded to the GSDS online website (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/), the gene structure of the family was mapped out, and the relevant values adjusted in the website to beautify the pictures. The homologous genes of the family in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Rice (Oryza sativa L.), and Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) were blasted out using NCBI, and a multi-species phylogenetic tree was drawn in MEGA11 software.

    • Sequences of 2000 bp before the start codon of the family gene ATG were extracted from the Apple GDR online website (www.rosaceae.org). The sequence of the first 2,000 bp of ATG was uploaded to the PlantCARE website (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) to screen the cis-acting elements contained in the promoter sequences. It counts the number of elements using Excel, cis-acting elements visualization in TBtools, and the visualized images beautification by Adobe Illustrator 2022.

    • Screening the chromosome location of family genes and the length of the chromosome where they are located in the apple genome annotation file, using the MG2C website (http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.1/index.html) for visualization, and adjusting the relevant parameters for beautification, a standard chromosome distribution map can be obtained. The apple genome files and annotation files were downloaded in NCBI, uploaded to TBtools, visualized in OneStepMCScanX plug-in, and the relevant parameters adjusted to beautify the covariance map.

    • Protein sequences were uploaded to the Phyre2 website (www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) to predict the tertiary structure of proteins. Interacting protein network maps were drawn using the STRING website (https://cn.string-db.org/cgi/input?sessionId=b5yciQWPS93E&input_page_show_search=on).

    • RNA was extracted from GL3 wild-type apple seedlings using RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Bio, Beijing, China). GL3 wild-type apple seedlings needed to be treated under four conditions: normal growth, PEG, NaCl, and ABA. The samples were taken at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. The cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using the reverse transcription reagent (HiScript II Q Select RT SuperMix for qPCR, Vazyme). These were then analyzed by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (QuantStudio 7 Flex, Thermo Fisher, USA), using 18S as an internal reference gene.

    • Design amplification primers were used to clone the full-length sequence of MdCYP86A21 into PRI-101 vector to obtain overexpression plasmids. The sequence around 30 bp length in the full-length sequence was selected for reverse complementation, amplified, and cloned into the PRI-101 vector to obtain the suppression plasmid. The overexpression and suppression plasmid were transferred into Agrobacterium LBA4404. The primer sequences are shown in Supplemental Table S1.

    • The 35S::MdCYP86A21-RFP vector was constructed and transferred into Agrobacterium LBA4404, then transiently injected into tobacco leaves. These were put under dark conditions for 1 d and put into the light. Subcellular localization pictures were taken on a laser confocal microscope LSM880 (Zeiss LSM 510 META, Jena, Germany) after 60 h.

    • The wild apple calli and transgenic calli were transferred to different medium treatments to observe the growth conditions. The wild apple calli, MdCYP86A21-OE and antiMdCYP86A21-PRI were five duplicate treatments. 4% PEG were used to simulate drought stress, 100 mM NaCl to simulate a salt environment. These were placed in resistance plates for 10−15 d in dark treatment to see the phenotypic changes and determine the relevant resistance index.

    • Apple calli fresh weight using a 10,000 parts per million balance, and recording of data for follow-up statistics. MDA was determined using the Thiobarbituric acid method, referring to the methods of Wang et al.[31] 1 g of sample was ground on ice, 2 mL phosphate buffer and 5 mL thiobarbituric acid were then added. The solution was mixed well and put in boiling water for 10 min. After cooling, the absorbance values were measured at 450, 532, 600 nm using a UV spectrophotometer. The MDA content was calculated using the formula: MDA (mmol·g−1·FW) = [6.542 × (OD532 − OD600) − 0.559 × OD450] × [Vt/(Vs × FW)]. Vt: total volume of extract. Vs: measured volume.

    • All data have more than three biological replicates. The error line indicates the standard deviation between samples. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences in samples at p < 0.05. Significance analyses were performed in SPSS.25, and plotting was performed in GraphPad Prism 8.0.

    • Twenty-eight putative MdCYP86As, ranged from MdCYP86A1 to MdCYP86A28 were identified through analyzing and screening by HMMER software (Supplemental Table S2). The physicochemical properties of the MdCYP86As gene family were revealed. The physicochemical properties of the MdCYP86As family proteins were predicted using Expasy software. These result showed that the number of amino acids ranged from 423−753, the molecular weights ranged from 48.12−87.4 KDa, and the theoretical isoelectric points (PIs) ranged from 5.86−9.16. They were acidic proteins and their theoretical isoelectric points were less than 7, 23 proteins were alkaline proteins and their theoretical isoelectric points were greater than 7. Among all the proteins, the instability index of 12 proteins were less than 40 and 16 proteins were more than 40. It means that most of the MdCYP86As proteins are stable. The aliphatic index of all proteins were less than 100, and the total average hydrophobicity index was less than 0, which suggests that MdCYP86As proteins are hydrophilic proteins. The above analyses showed that most of the MdCYP86A family proteins were unstable hydrophilic alkaline protein (Table 1).

      Table 1.  The physicochemical properties of the MdCYP86As family proteins.

      Sequence ID Number of amino acids Molecular weight Theoretical pI Instability index Aliphatic index Grand average of hydropathicity
      MdCYP86A1 553 62,140.98 5.86 51.14 96.47 −0.029
      MdCYP86A2 594 68,147.91 9.05 33.81 94.6 −0.183
      MdCYP86A3 508 58,180.4 8.77 30.04 95.63 −0.131
      MdCYP86A4 503 58,126.88 8.86 33.51 85.31 −0.213
      MdCYP86A5 585 67,211.62 8.19 36.64 89.85 −0.221
      MdCYP86A6 753 87,408.56 6.3 41.04 87.78 −0.232
      MdCYP86A7 512 59,231.46 8.31 38.68 89.28 −0.138
      MdCYP86A8 522 58,977.08 9.16 41.38 90.65 −0.161
      MdCYP86A9 524 59,217.2 8.85 39.72 90.5 −0.124
      MdCYP86A10 508 57,785.03 8.2 40.48 84.45 −0.306
      MdCYP86A11 535 60,662.44 8.15 43.34 94.64 −0.081
      MdCYP86A12 513 58,460.27 8.84 40.19 94.56 −0.066
      MdCYP86A13 516 59,081.04 7.97 42.69 89.59 −0.178
      MdCYP86A14 525 59,381.74 6.17 50.18 97.89 −0.042
      MdCYP86A15 423 48,120.41 6.35 35.13 92.25 −0.194
      MdCYP86A16 514 58,923.46 7.95 44.63 89.32 −0.131
      MdCYP86A17 506 57,795.41 8.9 41.48 86.5 −0.234
      MdCYP86A18 506 57,541.1 9.03 41.64 85.18 −0.236
      MdCYP86A19 522 59,333.65 8.59 30.91 94.16 −0.104
      MdCYP86A20 544 62,600.47 8.45 37.62 88.88 −0.176
      MdCYP86A21 574 65,958.23 8.81 39.96 89.51 −0.229
      MdCYP86A22 521 59,981.17 8.65 38.03 94.45 0.034
      MdCYP86A23 534 60,600.33 8.68 40.6 95.51 −0.098
      MdCYP86A24 512 58,494.1 9.02 41.24 92.48 −0.088
      MdCYP86A25 520 59,435.27 8.3 41.37 88.71 −0.192
      MdCYP86A26 523 60,084.98 6.38 46.06 92.1 −0.152
      MdCYP86A27 507 58,722.86 8.55 35.93 91.68 −0.113
      MdCYP86A28 506 57,839.15 7.55 47.57 89.98 −0.092
    • Twenty-eight MdCYP86A genes chromosomes were found to be unevenly distributed on the 13 chromosomes of apple with some distributional preferences. Chromosome 2 contained the largest quantities of MdCYP86A family members. MdCYP86A4, MdCYP86A5, MdCYP86A6, and MdCYP86A7 were closely arranged on the chromosomes, which suggests that they may have undergone tandem duplication events during the long period of gene amplification and evolution (Fig. 1a & Supplemental Table S3). The gene amplification enhanced their expression level, improved the function of genes, and facilitated the evolution and adaptation of organisms. These results suggested that gene duplication event displays function in the amplification and evolution of the MdCYP86A family.

      Figure 1. 

      Localization distribution and the inter-species covariance of MdCYP86A family genes. (a) Distribution of MdCYP86A family genes on 13 apple chromosomes. (b) Analysis of covariance in Apple, Arabidopsis, Tobacco, Rice.

      An interspecies covariance analysis between the CYP86A family genes in Apple and the homologous genes in Arabidopsis, Rice, and Tobacco, respectively. We found that the gene duplication frequency between Apple and Arabidopsis was the highest, with 31 covariances. This was followed by Rice with nine covariates. These indicated that the CYP86A family genes in Apple and Arabidopsis have the highest homology and the two species are most closely related to each other (Fig. 1b).

    • To realize the evolutionary relationship of CYP86As in multispecies, CYP86As from Apple, Arabidopsis thaliana, Rice, and Tobacco were jointly constructed into a phylogenetic evolutionary tree. They were divided into three branches I, II, and III (Supplemental Table S4). Among which 18 MdCYP86As proteins belonged to the I branch and 10 MdCYP86As proteins belonged to the II branch. The similar gene structure between gene family members suggests that they may have similar transcriptional regulatory and splicing machines, which in turn led to the understanding of gene family regulation and expression patterns (Fig. 2a). In the gene structure analysis of 28 MdCYP86A proteins showed that each protein sequence contained exons, numbering from 1−9. Among them, MdCYP86A2 has the maximum number of exons. These exons were longer than the introns and distributed at both ends of the sequence. MdCYP86As exons and introns have similar distribution patterns, which shows members are closely evolutionarily related and have similar expression patterns (Fig. 2b).

      Figure 2. 

      Phylogenetic and gene structure of MdCYP86As. (a) Phylogenetic tree construction in MEGA software for CYP86A family genes in four species: Arabidopsis thaliana, Rice, Tobacco, and Apple. (b) Gene structure analysis of MdCYP86A subfamily genes in apple, including both CDS and UTR regions.

    • To study the evolutionary relationships of MdCYP86A genes, the evolutionary tree of the family was drawn using MEGA11, and found that 28 family genes were closely related to each other. In addition, most of the evolutionary distances greater than 80, which indicated that the family was highly conserved (Fig. 3a). Based on the family evolutionary tree, the MEME website was used to analyze the conserved motifs, and more than 10 motifs were screened (Fig. 3b). Although the number of motifs in each sequence varied, each gene possessed more than eight motifs, and the distribution of motifs in the sequences was generally consistent, indicating that these 10 motifs were highly conserved in this family (Supplemental Fig. S1). The conserved structural domains of MdCYP86As were also batch screend in NCBI, and found that all 28 protein sequences contained CYP86A structural domains, which all contained specific binding sites (Fig. 3c). However, MdCYP86A6 contains not only the CYP86A structural domain but also the cytochrome P450 subfamily structural domain, which contains a non-specific binding site. It was speculated that this gene is likely to bind some specific endogenous and exogenous redox compounds of the substrate, thus catalyzing the redox reaction of the substrate (Fig 3c). Because MdCYP86A21 has the greatest variety of stress-related response elements, including ARE, STRE, LTR, MRE and so on. The protein 3D structure of MdCYP86A21 was predicted. It showed that the MdCYP86As family proteins have high similarity in 3D structure (Fig. 3d & Supplemental Fig. S2).

      Figure 3. 

      Evolutionary and conserved motif analysis of MdCYP86As gene in apple. (a) Construction of MdCYP86A subfamily evolutionary tree in MEGA11 software, the numbers next to the branches represent the evolutionary proximity between genes. (b) MdCYP86A subfamily motif analysis, on the left side is the gene ID of the family, and different colored boxes represent different motifs, with sequence length scale bar underneath. (c) The MdCYP86A subfamily conserved structural domains are analyzed, with gene ID on the left, structural domain on the right, and sequence length scale bar below. (d) Protein 3D structure image of MdCYP86A21.

    • Upstream cis-acting elements of promoters are important for the selection of gene transcription start sites and transcription rates. By analyzing the types and numbers of cis-acting elements upstream in promoters, the regulatory mechanisms of gene family members can be revealed, which leads to a deeper understanding of the functions and roles of the family members. To identify 28 conserved cis-acting elements within the promoter region of the MdCYP86As, the 2,000 bp sequences upstream of the ATG start codon were submitted to the PlantCARE database for promoter prediction analysis. These cis-acting elements were classified into four categories, including growth-associated, light-associated, stress-associated and hormone-associated. Among the growth and development-related cis-acting elements, the main elements are involved in endosperm expression (AAGAA-motif), shoot expression (As-1), correlation with meristematic tissue expression (CAT-box), endosperm-specific expression element (GCN4-motif), and senescence expression (W-box), which are contained in the first 2,000 bp upstream of most the MdCYP86A gene promoter cis-acting elements with bud expression (As-1) and had the highest proportion (34%) with the number of 41. In the light response element category, TCCC-motif had the largest proportion. In the stress response-related category, they were associated with anaerobic induction (ARE, GC-motif) and resist stress (STRE, TC-rich repeats), trauma (WRE3, WUN-motif), metal-response (MRE), cold-response (LTR) and drought-response (MBS), with the highest number of defense stress (STRE). And in the hormone response element category included abscisic acid (ABRE, ABRE3a, ABRE4), growth hormone (TGA-element), gibberellin (P-box, TATC-box), jasmone acid (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif, MYB, MYC), salicylic acid (TCA), and ethylene-responsive (ERE) response elements, with the largest proportion of cis-acting elements responding to jasmone acid (MeJA). Since hormone-signaling substances have more important roles in plants with biotic and abiotic stresses, the elements involved in the stress response and hormone response may be involved in the regulation of expression in apple interaction with adversity. Because hormonal signaling closely related with responding to stress, hormone-related elements in MdCYP86As promoter suggests that this family of genes may be involved in the regulation of expression in apple and adversity interactions (Fig. 4). These showed that the promoters of the MdCYP86As contain a variety of response elements that can be recognized and bound by different transcription factors involved in plant growth, development, and stress response.

      Figure 4. 

      Cis-acting elements analysis of the MdCYP86A subfamily. The classification of the different types of elements on the left, the gene ID below, and the name of the element on the right. The number representing the number of elements, and a larger number representing higher numbers of that element.

    • Previous analyses of cis-acting elements showed that the MdCYP86A family genes all contain different numbers of promoter elements under abiotic stress, we examined whether MdCYP86A21 is differentially expressed under PEG, NaCl, and ABA abiotic stresses. Compared to the control, NaCl treatment resulted in the highest expression at 3 h, followed by a decrease reaching a minimum at 12 h, and then increasing again at 24 h. The expression of PEG treatment was lower than the control in the early stage. Until 24 h, the expression reached about eight times the control, then decreased. The expression was elevated at 3 h, and then peaked at 12 h, which was about 27 times of the control, and then decreased to about six times of the control in ABA treatment. The above results suggest that MdCYP86A21 has a relative function in the response to abiotic stresses (Fig. 5a).

      Figure 5. 

      Expression patterns of MdCYP86A21 in different tissues and abiotic stress. (a) Expression pattern of MdCYP86A21 in response to three abiotic stresses, including PEG, NaCl and ABA. There are three biological replicates of the data, p < 0.05. (b) Expression levels of MdCYP86A21 in root, stem, leave, flower and fruit, there are three biological replicates of the data, p < 0.05.

      Tissue-specific expression patterns revealed that MdCYP86A21 was mainly expressed in flowers, followed in by root and fruit, with the lowest expression in leaves, MdCYP86A21 function primarily in flowers (Fig. 5b). 35S::MdCYP86A21-RFP was constructed using the full sequence of MdCYP86A21. RFP empty vector was also injected into tobacco. The empty vector was observed to fluoresce in both the nucleus and the cell membrane under laser confocal microscopy. 35S::MdCYP86A21-RFP appeared net structure and overlapped with the endoplasmic reticulum marker (PAL2259). From the results, it could be determined that MdCYP86A21 is a membrane protein which localizes endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 6).

      Figure 6. 

      Subcellular localization of MdCYP86A21, scale bar = 20 μm.

    • To further investigate the role of MdCYP86A21 to abiotic stresses in apple, overexpressed (MdCYP86A21-OE) was obtained and suppressed (antiMdCYP86A21-PRI) transgenic calli were obtained to detect the resistance of abiotic stresses (Supplemental Fig. S3). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the fresh weight of WT, MdCYP86A21-OE, and antiMdCYP86A21-PRI in MS. But in MS with 4% PEG and 100 mM NaCl, the fresh weight of MdCYP86A21-OE was significantly increased and antiMdCYP86A21-PRI was significantly decreased compared to the wild type (Fig. 7a & b). The content of MDA was significantly decreased in MdCYP86A21-OE than wild type. MdCYP86A21 improves apple calli resistance to PEG and NaCl (Fig. 7c). These results suggested that MdCYP86A21 responded to PEG and NaCl stresses, and improved drought and salt resistance.

      Figure 7. 

      MdCYP86A21 improves the tolerance to PEG and NaCl. (a) MdCYP86A21 apple calli treated on MS, PEG, NaCl medium for 15 d, the first row is wild type, the second is overexpression, and the third is suppression, five replicates per treatment. (b) Fresh weight of wild-type, overexpressed, and suppression calli were determined under different treatments. (c) Determination of MDA content in wild-type, overexpressed, and suppression calli under different treatments.

    • In order to further investigate the molecular mechanism of MdCYP86A21 involved in wax biosynthesis, MdCYP86A21 interacting proteins were predicted. In the predicted network, almost all proteins are related to fatty acid biosynthesis. Among them, ACOT is an acyl-coA thiesterase, which is involved in the hydrolysis of fatty acyl CoA. FAD is a fatty acid dehydrogenase involved in the synthesis of wax esters to promote oleaginous greasiness. CER2 and CYP86A7 are directly involved in wax biosynthesis (Fig. 8).

      Figure 8. 

      Protein interactions network analysis of MdCYP86A21.

    • Cytochrome P450 is one of the largest protein families in plants[32]. CYP86As participated in the synthetic processes of fatty acids and alkanes[33]. Current research on CYP86As is mainly in the biosynthesis of suberin monomers, disease resistance, and response to abiotic stresses. PpyCYP86B1 in pear is transcriptionally activated by PpyMYB114 to regulate suberin monomer accumulation in the pericarp[34]. GhCYP86A1-1 in cotton functions in resisting Xanthomonas campestris[35]. AtCYP86A1 in Arabidopsis is involved in suberin monomer biosynthesis[36]. SlCYP86As in tomato is involved in the synthesis of cork lipids and improves drought tolerance in tomato seedlings[37]. In this study, MdCYP86As were studied with regard to the abiotic stress in apple. The 28 members of MdCYP86A were identified in the apple genome, MdCYP86A21 was cloned to validate its resistant function in drought and salt, laying a foundation for future research on the impact of abiotic stress through wax synthesis.

      Gene duplication events are crucial in the process of gene evolution, since species can genetically expand family genes and acquire new genes and the new genes' emergence enhances the adaptation of species to the environment and promotes the evolution of species[38]. Tandem duplication events occur in both the chromosomal localization and cis-acting element results for MdCYP86As (Figs 1a & 4). A large number of duplications of sequences such as SINE and L1 in mammals lead to changes in the timing and level of expression of developmental genes, and duplications of the L1 element led to the specific activation or silencing of genes with different functions at a specific time[39]. Following the results of covariance suggests that the tandem duplication events promote gene family hybridization and species evolution. However, the covariance in Tobacco and Rice was significantly less than Arabidopsis (Fig. 1b). This suggests that the functional expression of CYP86As in Rice and Tobacco declined with evolution. The gene structure, motif, and domain of MdCYP86As were highly similar, suggesting that CYP86As evolved in a relatively conserved evolutionary manner in apple (Figs 2b & 3). However, two conserved structural domains are present in MdCYP86A6 and it is speculated that this gene has a stronger ability to select response substrates (Fig. 3c).

      The P450 family is a monooxygenase, the site where it binds substrates and functions is mainly the endoplasmic reticulum[13,26]. Consistent with the results of previous studies, MdCYP86A21 was mainly expressed in flower (Fig. 5b). This is consistent with the results of the MdCYP86A21 subcellular localization (Fig. 6). In the wax biosynthesis pathway, C16 and C18 fatty acids were intended to very long chain fatty acid (VLCFA). They were further extended into C20−C34 fatty acids in endoplasmic reticulum. Afterward, the alkane, alcohol, aldehyde, ketone, and ester are produced by various enzymes in the endoplasmic reticulum. Wax biosynthesis was almost exclusively carried out in subcellular organelles, after which wax monomers were transported to the plasma membrane and cuticle via transporter proteins[14,40,41]. MdCYP86A21 was located in the endoplasmic reticulum. It was speculated that MdCYP86A21 may be involved in the wax biosynthesis process.

      Previous studies have shown that members of the CYP86A family involved in plant response and regulation to adversity. For example, under salt stress, the expression of the CYP86A2 gene is significantly up-regulated, which promotes the synthesis of hydroxy fatty acids, improves the stability and tolerance of cell membranes, and enhances the ability to adapt to salt stress[42]. MdCYP86A21 contains components of the corresponding stresses (Fig. 4). qRT-PCR showed that MdCYP86A21 was corresponded to PEG and NaCl (Fig. 5a). Meanwhile, MdCYP86A21 showed tolerance in drought and salt in apple calli (Fig. 7). These results suggested that MdCYP86As are involved in responding to abiotic stresses. The predicted proteins are almost all related to fatty acid synthesis, such as ACOT, CER2, FAD, CYP86A7[4347]. This provides a molecular basis for the subsequent validation of the MdCYP86A21 function (Fig. 8).

      Finally, there are a variety of enzymes involved in wax biosynthesis, and research on wax synthesis pathways will continue. In this study, MdCYP86As were identified from the apple genome and carried out bioinformatics analysis. MdCYP86As is the closest relationship with Arabidopsis. This family is highly conservative in apple evolution. The gene structure, conserved motif, and domain are extremely similar in MdCYP86As protein sequences. MdCYP86A21 was cloned and its function preliminarily verified in apple abiotic stress. MdCYP86A21 showed tolerance in drought and salt in apple calli. This provides a basis for the subsequent validation of MdCYP86A21 in apple fruits. This will provide a candidate gene for the subsequent development of stress tolerance in apple and improvement of fruit quality.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Li YY, Zhang YL; performing the experiments, data analysis, interpretation of results, and draft manuscript preparation: Lv HM; assisting in experiments: Qi RH, Yu ZH, Man YY, Jiang H, Lv YH, Wang T. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • This work was supported by the National Key R&D Plan Project (2023YFD2301000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072539), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022JQ14), and Taishan Scholar Project.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (8)  Table (1) References (47)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Lv HM, Qi RH, Yu ZH, Man YY, Lv YH, et al. 2024. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple. Fruit Research 4: e030 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0024
    Lv HM, Qi RH, Yu ZH, Man YY, Lv YH, et al. 2024. Genome-wide identification and characterization of MdCYP86A family in apple. Fruit Research 4: e030 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0024

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return