-
Dried Lycium barbarum L. with 20% water content was provided by Zaokang Wolfberry Incorporated Company (Ningxia Province, China). Dried Lycium barbarum L. was placed in a constant temperature and humidity chamber, then treated for 48 h at 60 °C and 50% humidity to obtain black Lycium barbarum L. (BLB). Pepsin (10,000 U/g) was purchased from Hefei Qiansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. ( Anhui Province, China). Trypsin (250 U/mg) and α-amylase (10,000 U/g) were purchased from Jiangsu Ruiyang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Province, China).
Preparation of melanoidins
-
Melanoidins were extracted according to the method described by Liu et al.[16] with some modifications, as described in the Supplemental File 1. BLB powder (20 g) was extracted with 200 mL of 30% ethanol solution (v/v) in a water bath at 45 °C for 90 min and then filtered to collect the supernatant. The collected supernatant was added to an anhydrous alcohol solution to achieve an ethanol concentration of 70% and then allowed to stand for 12 h at 4 °C to precipitate. Then the supernatant was filtered with filter paper. The filtrate was dialyzed for 48 h to remove compounds with a molecular weight (MW) below 1 kDa and then freeze-dried. Finally, the crude melanoidins were extracted and packed in vacuum-sealed bags for further use.
Isolation and evaluation of melanoidin fractions
-
The isolation of crude melanoidins was conducted using a method previously reported by Tores de la Cruz et al.[17] with some modifications. The prepared crude melanoidin solution was sequentially ultrafiltered three times using ultrafiltration membranes with molecular weight cut-off (MWC) of 50, 10, and 3 kDa to separate the fractions UF1 (ultrafiltration fraction 1, MWC > 50 kDa),UF2 (10 kDa < MWC < 50 kDa),UF3 (3 kDa < MWC < 10 kDa) and UF4 (< 3 kDa) respectively. The ultrafiltration procedure was repeated three times to collect the four melanoidin fractions. The fractions were freeze-dried, weighed and then stored at −20 °C. The chemical composition and antioxidant activity were analyzed to preliminarily evaluate the properties of the four fractions.
Orthogonal experimental design of resin purification
-
According to the preliminary analysis of four fractions, the target fraction was confirmed. The target fraction was further purified according to the method proposed by Zhang et al.[18] with some modifications. Briefly, dynamic adsorption and desorption tests were performed with the pretreated AB-8 resin. Twenty grams of the pretreated AB-8 resin was loaded into the glass column and a sample of the target fraction solution was loaded, and then eluted with 40% ethanol. First, three variables (loading concentration, elution volume, and elution flow rate) that could influence the yield of melanoidin purification were evaluated in single factor experiment. The conditions for the single factor experiment were set as follows: Loading concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg·mL−1), elution volume (4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 BV) and elution flow rate (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mL·min−1). Based on the results of the single factor experiments, an orthogonal L9 (33) test (as shown in Table 1) was performed. The purified melanoidin obtained under the optimal conditions was then analyzed for structure, stability, and antioxidant activity.
Table 1. Analysis and results of orthogonal L9 (33) experimental design.
Number Factors Results a: Loading concentration (mg·mL−1) b: Elution volume (BV) c: Elution flow rate (mL·min−1) Yield (%) 1 6 6 1 0.487 2 6 7 2 0.332 3 6 8 3 0.243 4 8 6 2 0.398 5 8 7 3 0.265 6 8 8 1 0.255 7 10 6 3 0.253 8 10 7 1 0.348 9 10 8 2 0.273 k1 0.351 0.376 0.360 k2 0.306 0.315 0.334 k3 0.291 0.257 0.253 R 0.0594 0.119 0.107 Order of importance b > c > a Optimal level a1b1c1 Determination of the chemical constituents of melanoidin fractions
-
The contents of reducing sugar and total sugar were determined by the DNS method and phenol sulfate colorimetry method, respectively. The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method[19]. The protein content was carried out using the Bradford method using bovine serum albumen as standard[20]. Using rutin as the standard sample, the total flavonoid content was determined. A 0.5 mL sample was mixed with 0.4 mL of 5% NaNO2 and then incubated for 6 min. Afterward, 0.4 mL of 10% Al(NO3)3 was added and reacted for 6 min. Finally, 4 mL of 4% NaOH and 4.7 mL of 70% ethanol were added to the reacted solution. Then the sample solution was incubated for 10 min and the absorbance was determined at 505 nm.
Antioxidant activity determination
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity
-
The hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was determined using the method described by Wu et al.[21] with some modifcations. Briefly, 1 mL of FeSO4 solution (5 mmol·L−1), 4 mL of salicylic acid solution (5 mol·L−1) and 3 mL of distilled water were mixed with 1 mL sample. Then, 1 mL of H2O2 (5 mmol·L−1) was added and reacted at 37 °C for 10 min. The absorbance of the reacted solution was measured at 510 nm, and the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following equation:
$ Hydroxyl\;radical\;scavenging\;ability\;\left({\text{%}}\right)=\dfrac{{A}_{0}-({A}_{1}-{A}_{2})}{{A}_{0}}\times 100{\text{%}} $ (1) where, A0: the absorbance of the blank; A1: the absorbance of the control; A2: the absorbance of the sample.
Ferric-reducing antioxidant power
-
The antioxidant power was measured according to the method described by Oracz & Nebesny[22]. One mL of sample (0.5 mg·mL−1) was mixed with 2.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 6.6, 0.2 mol·L−1) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide (1%, v/v). The mixed solution was incubated in a water bath at 50 °C for 20 min. 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added when the solution was cooled to room temperature. One mL of ferric chloride (1%, v/v) and 2.5 mL of distilled water were added into 2.5 mL of this mixture. Finally, the absorbance of the mixture was determined at 700 nm after incubation for 10 min.
DPPH radical scavenging activity
-
The DPPH radical scavenging activity of melanoidin was evaluated following previous reports by Kim[23] with slight modifications. Four mL of 95% ethanol solution and DPPH-ethanol mixed solution (2 mL, 0.05 mg·mL−1) were added to 1 mL of sample solution and then allowed to react for 30 min under light protection. The absorbance value of the solution was determined at 517 nm. The DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) was calculated as follows:
$ DPPH\;radical\;scavenging\;activity\;\left({\text{%}}\right)=\dfrac{{A}_{0}-({A}_{1}-{A}_{2})}{{A}_{0}}\times 100 {\text{%}} $ (2) where, A0: the absorbance of the blank; A1: the absorbance of the control; A2: the absorbance of the sample.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
-
The sample obtained above (1 mg) was mixed with dried KBr (100 mg) and pressed into a thin sheet with a tablet press after being ground. Then the sample was analyzed using a spectrometer in the 400−4,000 cm−1 range.
Stability assay
-
The stability of the purified melanoidins was examined according to a previous study[24]. Briefly, the stability was estimated by exposing the samples to different heating temperatures (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C) and different light conditions (sunlight, incandescent light, darkness). The absorbance of the samples exposed to different heating temperatures was determined every 1 h at 420 nm. And the absorbance of the samples exposed to different light conditions were determined every 1 d. The retention rate (R) was calculated using the following equation:
$ R=\dfrac{{A}_{1}-{A}_{0}}{{A}_{0}}\times 100{\text{%}} $ (3) where, R: Retention rate; A0: The absorbance value of the initial sample; A1: The absorbance value of the sample after treatment under different conditions.
Antioxidant activity in vitro simulated digestion
-
The purified melanoidins were digested according to the method described by Peña-Correa et al.[25]. Briefly, in the oral digestion phase, 1.0 g of sample and 20 mL of simulated salivary fluid (pH adjusted to 7.0) were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 2 min. In the gastric digestion phase, the sample after oral digestion was mixed with 10 mL of simulated gastric fluid (pH adjusted to 1.2) and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. In the intestinal digestion phase, 10 mL of simulated intestinal fluid (pH adjusted to 7.0) was added to the above gastric digestion mixture and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The samples before and after each digestion step were collected and freeze-dried for further analysis of antioxidant activity. Antioxidant activity was analyzed according to the method described above.
Statistic analysis
-
All experimental results were determined in triplicate and the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD). ANOVA accompanied and Duncan’s multiple range tests were performed to examine statistical differences across groups using SPSS software (version 19.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
-
Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Chen J, Wang J, Liu Y, Li H, Wang W, et al. 2024. Study on physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of melanoidins extracted from low thermal induced black Lycium barbarum L. Food Innovation and Advances 3(3): 288−294 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0027
Study on physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of melanoidins extracted from low thermal induced black Lycium barbarum L.
- Received: 30 March 2024
- Revised: 11 August 2024
- Accepted: 12 August 2024
- Published online: 30 August 2024
Abstract: In this study, static and dynamic desorption methods, infrared spectroscopy and, in vitro antioxidant modeling were used to isolate, purify, and investigate the bioactivity of melanoidins extracted from hypoheat-induced Lycium barbarum L. The results showed that melanoidin fractions with molecular weight in the range of 3−10 kDa were the dominant and most valuable fractions. In the purification phase, the optimal purification conditions were: a loading concentration of 4 mg·mL−1, elution volume of 6 BV, and an elution flow rate of 1 mL·min−1. Purified dominant melanoidin fractions (UF3) exhibited typical Maillard reaction (MR) characteristics in FTIR. The storage stability showed that sunlight and heat treatment exacerbated the instability of the purified UF3. At the same time it was relatively stable under dark conditions and incandescent light, with a retention rate of about 90%. After in vitro digestion, the purified UF3 still exhibited good antioxidant activity, and the DPPH scavenging activity and hydroxyl free radical scavenging ability reached more than 60%.
-
Key words:
- Melanoidins /
- Low thermal induced /
- Purification /
- Antioxidant activity /
- In vitro digestion