-
Uniform seedlings that were approximately 10 cm high of both P. aizoon and K. blossfeldiana were purchased from a horticultural company located in Yunnan Province, China. The seedlings were neatly transplanted into uniform flowerpots according to the method of Yang et al.[19]. The Cd-free soils and contaminated soils were obtained according to the methods of Li et al.[20], with three replicates of each group. The flower pots were placed in a greenhouse with appropriate watering (500 ml each time, about once every 2 d, tap water without Cd) to avoid soil surface dryness.
Measurement of plant growth
-
After 3 months of growth, the plant size was measured before the plants were harvested. The diameter of the maximum amplitude and the diameter in the vertical direction were used to represent the plant size. After the roots were washed three times with deionized water, the root length was measured. The samples of leaves, stems, and roots were treated as described previously by Li et al.[21].
Chlorophyll content measurement
-
Fresh leaves (top first to third) were harvested to measure the chlorophyll content. Fresh leaves (0.1 g) were soaked in 10 ml 80% acetone for 24 h under darkness. After centrifugation at 12,000 ×g for 10 min, the absorbance of the resulting supernatant was precisely measured at wavelengths of 645 and 663 nm via a spectrophotometer (Youke, Shanghai, China). The concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) were calculated via formulas described in a previous report by Liao et al.[22].
Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
-
The concentrations of superoxide anions (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were detected using their corresponding kits (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the instructions.
Antioxidant enzyme activity assay
-
The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (CAT) were detected using their corresponding kits (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the instructions.
Cd concentration detection
-
The Cd concentrations in dry samples were measured via a previously described method by Li et al.[23].
Index calculation
-
$ \rm{B}ioconcentration\; factor\; (BCF)=\dfrac{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{C}\mathrm{d}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}}{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{C}\mathrm{d}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}} $ $ \rm{T}ranslocation\; factor\; (TF)=\dfrac{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{f}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{ }\; \mathrm{s}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{m}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{C}\mathrm{d}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}}{\mathrm{R}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{C}\mathrm{d}\; \mathrm{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}} $ $ { \rm TPR = \dfrac{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{d}\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\;\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\;\mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\;\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\;\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\;\times \;\mathrm{O}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\;\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\;\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}}{\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\;\times \;(\mathrm{R}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\;\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\;\times \;\mathrm{U}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\;\times \;\mathrm{S}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{l}\;\mathrm{d}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y})}} \times\; \mathrm{100}{\text{%}} $ $ \begin{split} & \rm{O}ptimum\; planting\; density=\dfrac{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\; \mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{P}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\; \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{z}\mathrm{e}}= \\ &\quad\dfrac{\mathrm{U}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\; \mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}}{\mathrm{D}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\; \mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\; \mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}.\; \mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{u}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\; \times \; \mathrm{D}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\; \mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\; \mathrm{v}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}\; \mathrm{d}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}} \end{split} $ Statistical analysis
-
Bar charts were drawn using SigmaPlot 10.0 software (Systat, San Jose, CA, USA). Significant difference was analysed by SPSS 18.0 software (IBM, New York, NY, USA).
-
Both P. aizoon and K. blossfeldiana genotypes used in this study tolerated 50 mg·kg−1 soil Cd stress and the antioxidant system might be involved in Cd detoxification. The results of the Cd concentration, BCF, and TF analyses revealed that P. aizoon is a potential Cd hyperaccumulator, whereas K. blossfeldiana is a high-Cd-accumulating species. Considering that the ultimate phytoextraction efficiency is affected by Cd accumulation ability of plants, plant biomass, and plant shape and size, the integrated index TPR was introduced to compare the potential phytoextraction rates between P. aizoon and K. blossfeldiana. Interestingly, the TPR value of K. blossfeldiana was approximately two times greater than that of P. aizoon, although Cd accumulation in the aboveground part of individual P. aizoon plant were significantly higher than that of individual K. blossfeldiana plant. This study offers new resources for phytoextraction of Cd-contaminated soils and a novel theoretical method to evaluate phytoextraction efficiency.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Huang X, Li Y, Karel NNJ, Tang H, Hu N, et al. 2024. Theoretical phytoextraction rates evaluating the application potential of two Cd accumulators from Crassulaceae for cleaning Cd-contaminated farmland. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e018 doi: 10.48130/cas-0024-0018
Theoretical phytoextraction rates evaluating the application potential of two Cd accumulators from Crassulaceae for cleaning Cd-contaminated farmland
- Received: 01 August 2024
- Revised: 09 December 2024
- Accepted: 16 December 2024
- Published online: 30 December 2024
Abstract: Phytoextraction based on heavy metal accumulators is a promising strategy for cleaning heavy metal-contaminated arable soils for food safety. In this study, the cadmium (Cd) tolerance and accumulation capacities of two Crassulaceae species were explored via pot experiments. The morphological and physiological results revealed that both Phedimus aizoon and Kalanchoe blossfeldiana could cope with heavy soil Cd contamination (50 mg·kg−1) at least by triggering an antioxidant system for Cd detoxification. After 3 months of growth, the Cd concentrations in the dry leaves, stems, and roots of P. aizoon were 212.0, 104.0, and 83.5 mg·kg−1, and of K. blossfeldiana were 101.5, 53.7, and 125.0 mg·kg−1, respectively. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) in P. aizoon leaves and stems were greater than the threshold of Cd hyperaccumulators, whereas the TFs in K. blossfeldiana leaves and stems was lower than this threshold. These results revealed that P. aizoon is a potential Cd hyperaccumulator and K. blossfeldiana is a high-Cd-accumulating species. To evaluate the Cd phytoextraction potentials of P. aizoon and K. blossfeldiana in the field, a new index, the theoretical phytoextraction rate (TPR), was introduced through the integration of the Cd accumulation level, plant biomass, and plant shape and size. Interestingly, it was found that K. blossfeldiana rather than P. aizoon had a higher TPR value. These findings demonstrate the decisive effect of plant shape on planting density is of importance for screening ideal phytoextraction resources in addition to plant biomass and heavy metal accumulation levels. This study offers new resources for phytoextraction of Cd-contaminated soils and a novel theoretical method to evaluate phytoextraction efficiency.
-
Key words:
- Cadmium /
- Phytoremediation /
- Hyperaccumulator /
- Crassulaceae /
- Theoretical phytoextraction rate