-
There are many applications of nanomaterials in plants, such as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and biosensors, which have addressed many issues related to transgenics, fruit preservation, stress resistance, and growth and development, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Applications of different nanoproducts in agricultural production.
Nanoproduct Nanoparticles Synthesis method Target Function Ref. Nano-fertilizer Siliceous natural nanomaterials (SNNMs) Traditional method Peach and apricot Improve nutrient utilization efficiency, enhance light and efficiency, protect plants from high temperatures, drought, and biological stress, and improve fruit quality. [12] Nano-fertilizer Ca-encapsulated carbon dots (Ca-CDs) Traditional method Apple Supplement calcium and mitigate calcium-deficiency stress, boost calcium levels in apple fruits and improve quality attributes such as weight, firmness, and pectin content. [13] Nano-fertilizer Phosphorous-Containing Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAP) Green synthesis (pomegranate peel and coffee ground extracts) Pomegranate Provide phosphorus nutrient elements, increase total carbohydrate content, and enhance plant resistance to stress. [14] Nano-fertilizer Se NPs, ZnO NPs Purchased Apple Increase the antioxidant activity of fruits, supplement N, P, and K content, and improve apple fruit yield and nutritional quality. [15] Nano-coating/
packagingChitosan/nano-silica Purchased longan The coating enhances fruit cold resistance, inhibits the decrease of total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and ascorbic acid, increases defense enzyme activity, and provides a longer storage period. [16] Nano-coating/
packagingPolyethylene with nano-Ag, nano-TiO2, and montmorillonite blend Traditional method Kiwifruit Delay kiwifruit ripening, reduce kiwifruit fruit decay, and maintain post-harvest storage quality of kiwifruit. [17] Nano-pesticide SeNPs, CeONPs Green synthesis (Melia azedarach leaves and Acorus calamusas rhizomes extract) Wheat Reduce the incidence of wheat stripe rust or yellow rust, SeNPs and CeONPs at a concentration of 30 mg/L significantly improved wheat morphology and physiological parameters. [18] Nano-pesticide MgONFs Green synthesis (rosemary extract) Rice Inhibited bacterial diseases in rice. [19] Nanopriming TiO2 nanoparticles Purchased Corn Promote the germination and growth of corn seedlings under salt stress. [20] Nanopriming Carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) Purchased Lettuce Alleviate the harmful effects of salt stress on germination. [21] Nanopriming AgNPs Green synthesis (lime leaf extract) Rice Enhance germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds. [22] Nano-sensor Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWNTs) Traditional method Ethylene Detect ethylene gas and determine fruit ripeness. [23] Nano-sensor DNA-SWNT Purchased + traditional method Arsenic Real-time detection of arsenite in underground environments. [24] Nano-sensor Bio-AgNPs-based electrochemical nanosensors Green synthesis (green tea leaves, mangosteen peel, grapefruit peel) 4-nitrophenol Sensitive monitoring of 4-nitrophenol
(4-NP) in tomato samples.[25] -
Abiotic stresses are major threats to plant growth and development and are caused by various factors including drought, temperature, salinity, heavy metal contamination, and excessive pesticide use. These abiotic stresses can reduce crop yields, hinder plant growth, and even kill plants. Due to their unique physical and chemical properties, nanomaterials have become potential tools for alleviating the negative effects of abiotic stress on plants.
Drought stress
-
Drought stress is a common abiotic stress that plants face. Nanomaterials can help alleviate plant drought stress by improving their water absorption or regulating symbiotic interactions with beneficial microbes. Studies have shown that ZnO NPs, in conjunction with rhizobacteria PGPR, can alleviate drought and heat stress in wheat[60]. Additionally, the foliar application of metal oxide nanoparticles (MoNPs) such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), and iron oxide (Fe3O4) can enhance a plant's physiological and metabolic activities, thereby helping them resist drought stress[61]. Furthermore, nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene oxide (GO) can enhance plant drought tolerance by influencing the expression of relevant response genes[62]. These nano-enabled strategies not only bolster a plant's inherent drought tolerance but also pave the way for innovative agricultural solutions that can support crop productivity in arid environments.
Temperature stress
-
Spraying low concentrations of ZnO NPs on the leaves of mung beans in the field can change their stomatal conductance, affect plant transpiration, and subsequently influence plant temperature changes[63]. Additionally, nano-ZnO-based low-density polyethylene (NZLDPE) packaging exhibits excellent cold resistance during the cold storage of peaches[64]. Cold stress can damage a plant's photosystem, reduce its chlorophyll content, CO2 absorption, and transpiration rate, and degrade the enzyme RuBisCO. Studies have found that under cold stress, some proteins in rapeseed show differential expression, with nearly half related to chloroplast physiology. This indicates that rapeseed's cold stress response is partially achieved by regulating its chloroplast function[65]. The application of nano-selenium can mitigate the detrimental effects of cold stress on a plant's photosynthetic parameters, invigorate its antioxidant enzyme activity, and elevate antioxidant compound levels. It stimulates the metabolism of proteins associated with photosynthesis, thereby markedly bolstering the plant's cold stress tolerance[66]. Treatment of chickpeas with TiO2 NPs in sensitive and tolerant genotypes reduced membrane damage indicators, suggesting that TiO2 NPs increased the crop's cold resistance[67]. Further transcriptome analysis revealed that under cold stress, chickpeas treated with TiO2 NPs exhibited varying degrees of differential gene expression compared with a control group in terms of metabolic pathways, cell defense, cell connection and signaling, transcriptional regulation, and chromatin structure. TiO2 NPs may inhibit low-temperature oxidative stress. These research results demonstrate the potential applications of nanomaterials for alleviating plant cold stress, providing new possibilities for improving crop cold resistance and their adaptability to various growth environments.
Salt-alkaline stress
-
Excessive salt and alkali contents in the soil can harm plant growth and development, but nanomaterials can interact with plant cells to enhance their plant resistance under salt and alkali stress. For instance, graphene has been shown to mitigate the damage inflicted by salt and alkali stress, thereby promoting the growth and stress tolerance of plants like alfalfa[68]. In addition to acting on leaves and roots, nanomaterials can also act on seeds to enhance their crop salt tolerance. When applied to cotton seeds, they can regulate ROS homeostasis and Ca2+ signal transduction, thereby improving salt tolerance in cotton seedlings[69]. In a study on improving cucumber salt tolerance, nano-cerium dioxide validated CsAKT1 as a key gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, marking the first use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to validate key genes for nano-enhanced plant salt tolerance. These findings suggest that genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 could serve as a powerful adjunct to traditional mutagenesis for identifying genes that are critical for enhancing plant stress resistance through nanotechnology. The research underscores the potential of nanomaterials to not only improve plant salt tolerance but also to innovate approaches for enhancing crops' adaptability to adverse environmental conditions, offering novel strategies for agricultural sustainability in harsh ecosystems.
Metal pollution
-
Metal pollution is a serious environmental issue, as metal pollutants can accumulate in soil, sediments, and water bodies. They can enter the food chain through plants and animals, thereby causing harmful effects on human health and the ecosystem. Nanomaterials can effectively address this problem. For example, The application of nano-hydroxyapatite (NHAP) has been shown to decrease the mobility and bioavailability of lead (Pb) in soil, thus ameliorating conditions for plant growth[70]. Carbon-based materials have received significant attention as carriers for metal pollution treatment due to their large surface area, high functional group contents, low costs, and environmental friendliness. Biochar (ZBC) possesses strong electronegativity and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups and can regulate soil's physicochemical properties and alter soil's microbial structure. Thus, it provides an inexpensive method to facilitate the immobilization of heavy metals in the environment. Studies have shown that the addition of zero-valent iron to maize straw biochar composite material (MSB-nZVI) significantly reduced the chromium content in soil[71]. Furthermore, a rice straw-derived biochar-loaded nano zero-valent iron composite (nZVI@BC) exhibited superior remediation performance in copper, zinc, arsenic, cadmium, and lead-contaminated soil compared with biochar[72]. Graphene (G), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and their derivatives are commonly used for soil remediation and facilitate the transfer and enrichment of pollutants or their adsorption sites to the surface of nanomaterials. Combining these materials with biochar can achieve a higher adsorption efficiency. Adding a small amount (≤ 0.5%) of graphene oxide (GO) to poultry litter biochar enhanced the adsorption of copper and zinc while retaining trace nutrient elements, thereby improving the fertilizer utilization efficiency in highly weathered soils[73]. These methods offer new possibilities for mitigating the harm caused by metal pollution to the environment and human health.
When subjected to abiotic stress, plants produce excessive ROS, which can inflict damage on cellular components and potentially culminate in cell death. Many studies have shown that introducing nanomaterials that can scavenge ROS alleviates the impact of abiotic stress. Among these, nano enzymes stand out due to their heightened enzymatic activity and their dual nature, harnessing the distinctive attributes of nanomaterials along with the catalytic capabilities of enzymes. Nanoenzymes are characterized by their high activity, stability, cost-effectiveness, adjustable catalytic activity, and multifunctionality, which position them to surpass the limitations of natural enzymes, such as their limited stability, singular catalytic functions, and high production costs. Since 2007, when Gao et al.[74] first discovered that iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) showed peroxidase-like activity, a series of nanomaterials have been found to possess antioxidant enzyme-like activity and have been applied to resist non-biological stress in plants, as shown in Table 2. Overall, the application of nanoenzymes for abiotic stress management in plants shows great potential for improving a plant's resilience to environmental challenges. Further research and development efforts in this area are needed to optimize the use of nanoenzymes and explore their full range of benefits for enhancing a plant's stress tolerance.
Table 2. Applications of nanoenzymes for plant abiotic stress.
Crop Nanomaterial Application method Stress type Mechanism Ref. Cotton Polyacrylic acid-modified Mn3O4 nanoparticles (PAA@Mn3O4-NPs, PMO) Foliar application Salt stress Adjustment of endogenous antioxidant system expression, maintenance of cytoplasmic Na/K balance. [75] Rapeseed Polyacrylic acid-coated nanoceria (PNC) Seed soaking Salt stress Regulation of ROS homeostasis and α-amylase activity, maintenance of cytoplasmic Na/K balance. [76] Pisum sativum Linn and Eucommia carbon dot nanozymes (CDzymes) Foliar application Salt stress Actively clearing ROS as an exogenous enzyme. [77] Rice (Oryza sativa L.) AgNPs Seed soaking Salt stress and rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme, induce immune response rather than the antibacterial activity of AgNPs themselves. [78] Maize Poly (acrylic) acid-coated Mn3O4 nanoparticles (PAA@Mn3O4 nanoparticles) Root application Drought stress Enhances the mitotic ability of root tip cells by maintaining ROS homeostasis, thus improving maize drought resistance. [79] Paeonia ostii Graphene oxide (GO) Root application Drought stress Rich pore structure strongly binds water molecules, acts as a water-holding agent, and adjusts endogenous antioxidant system expression. [80] Brassica napus γ-Fe2O3 NPs Root application Drought stress Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme. [81] Boehmeria nivea Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) Root application Cadmium (Cd) pollution MWCNTs enhance Cd uptake and transport in ramie seedlings, mitigate
Cd-induced toxicity, promote plant growth, reduce oxidative stress, activate antioxidant enzymes, and elevate
specific antioxidant levels.[82] Maize seeds (Zea mays L. Zhengdan 958) Quaternary ammonium iminofullerenes (IFQA) Seed soaking treatment Oxygen (H2O2) stress Actively remove ROS as an exogenous enzyme and promote maize root hair growth. [83] Breviolum minutum Engineered poly(acrylic acid)-coated cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeO2, nanoceria) Symbiotic cultivation High-temperature stress Alleviate heat-induced oxidative stress and enhance the heat resistance of algae. [84] -
Nanomaterials are widely used as gene delivery vectors in animal transgenic technologies, but they cannot yet overcome the cell wall barrier to integrate exogenous genes into the cell genome. Therefore, their applications in plant gene transformation are in their infancy. Nevertheless, compared with traditional transgenic methods, nanomaterial-mediated plant transgenic technologies have shown unique advantages. Traditional gene transformation methods include vector-mediated methods and direct injection methods. Vector-mediated methods are widely used and have shown a high transformation efficiency, but they have limitations and safety issues regarding the host. Direct injection methods, while less invasive and simpler in execution, are often hampered by limitations such as low transformation rates, the need for costly equipment, and the potential for cellular damage. When used as plant transgenic vectors, nanomaterials can overcome some of the drawbacks of traditional methods, providing new possibilities for plant gene transformation s shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Applications of nanomaterials in gene editing.
Need external force Nanoparticles Nanoparticle characteristics Functional modification Transgenic plants (tissues or cells) Transgenic plant expression characteristics Ref. No GONs Layered structure with excellent stability, high biocompatibility, and effective protection of siRNA. PEI and PEG Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana) Efficient gene silencing at the mRNA level of around 97% was achieved within 24 h, with mRNA and protein expression of the target gene fully restored to normal levels by 120 h. [91] No AuNCs High biocompatibility and protection of siRNA from RNase degradation. PEI N. benthamiana PEI-AuNCs delivered siRNA into mature mGFP5-expressing Nb leaves, resulting in efficient gene knockdown at both mRNA and protein levels. [89] No SWNT A high aspect ratio, exceptional tensile strength, and high biocompatibility ensure the optimal activity of biomolecules. PEI N. benthamiana,
E. sativa, wheat, cotton13.6 μg of GFP was obtained per gram of fresh leaf. [88] No DNA nanostructures Specific and transient gene targeting through sequence design, controllable attachment, and protection of siRNA cargo without toxicity or damage. No N. benthamiana, arugula, and watercress DNA nanostructures can be efficiently internalized into plant cells, with the relative internalization efficiency ranked from high to low as DHT, tetrahedron, and nanowires. All show protein-level silencing. [92] No MSNs Larger surface area, larger pore volume, adjustable mesoporous pore size. TMAPS, APTMS Nicotiana tabacum
BY-2, ArabidopsisGene delivery to Nicotiana tabacum protoplasts and Arabidopsis root for transient expression. [93] Gene gun method carbon-supported gold nanoparticles Good dispersibility, minimal damage to plants, capable of piercing tough plant cell walls and nuclear membranes, and inserting genes into chromosomal loci. No Nicotiana tabacum, Oryza sativa, Leucaena leucocephala. Carbon-supported gold nanoparticles produced by the heat treatment of biogenic nanoparticles were a more effective plant-transformation carrier than commercially available gold microparticles. [94] Gene gun method MSNs Larger surface area, larger pore volume, and adjustable mesoporous pore size. TEG modification, gold nanoparticles coverage N. benthamiana GFP-expressing callus sectors were observed ten days after the bombardment of a proliferating callus culture grown on a non-selective medium. This transfer system produced both transient and stable transgenic plant materials. [95] Magnetic field Magnetic gold nanoparticles (mGNPs) Superparamagnetic with strong targeting under an applied magnetic field condition. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), PEG Canola Stable expression and the delivery efficiency of nanoparticles to canola protoplasts was approximately 95%. [96] Magnetic field Fe3O4 Superparamagnetic with strong targeting under an applied magnetic field condition. PEI Maize Transient expression of exogenous genes in maize pollen, followed by normal expression in its offspring, demonstrating genetic stability. [97] The transfection of plant cells with nanocarrier-gene complexes is governed by two main strategies. The first involves the application of external forces, such as ultrasound, electroporation, and magnetic fields, to facilitate the penetration of the cell wall and the seamless integration of foreign genes into the plant cell genome. This method bypasses the complex intermediate steps associated with traditional Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, offering a more direct and efficient route. Nanomaterials provide a protective shield for exogenous genes, safeguarding them from environmental stress and enzymatic degradation. For example, Liu et al.[85] and others combined starch nanoparticles with fluorescent materials on the surface and then bound them with plasmid DNA to form complexes. After ultrasound and DNase I treatment, they co-cultured plasmid DNA-nanoparticle complexes with plant suspension cells, which efficiently entered the cell wall, cell membrane, and nuclear membrane of plant suspension cells. Zhao and colleagues[86] found that in the presence of a magnetic field, exogenous DNA loaded onto Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles was transported to pollen. This approach produced transgenic cotton through hybrid pollination, indicating that the magnetic effect may open up new pathways for transgenic species. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs), with their adjustable particle size, high pore volume, and expansive surface area, have become valuable tools in the development of plant transgenic systems. Many studies have used functionalized MSNPs to develop MSNP-mediated plant transgenic systems, where gold-coated MSNP carriers increased the density and performance of biologically mediated delivery. Past research on the nanoparticle-mediated delivery of biomolecules to plant cells has mainly focused on nucleic acids, including double-stranded/single-stranded DNA and siRNA, with fewer methods for protein delivery. However, in recent years, microinjection and cell-penetrating peptide methods have also been applied to introduce model proteins into plant cells. Martin-Ortigosa and colleagues[87] used plasmid DNA coated with protein-loaded Au-MSNPs. Through particle bombardment, they transformed it into plant tissues that subsequently released proteins and plasmid DNA. This study represented a breakthrough in the biological delivery of proteins and plasmid DNA to plant cells through Au-MSNPs. The co-delivery of protein-nanomaterial complexes has improved plant transformation efficiency, with nanomaterials playing a protective role in this process and providing powerful tools for basic and applied research in plant science. These studies offer new insights and methods to develop more efficient plant transgenic systems and improve plant transformation efficiency.
Direct transformation methods such as spraying and injection use zero-dimensional and one-dimensional nanomaterials, which are small enough to cross plant cell walls. Carbon-based materials such as single-walled carbon nanotubes, multi-walled carbon nanotubes and carbon nanodots have become popular nanocarriers for achieving complete plant genetic transformation. Demirer and colleagues[88] prepared polyethyleneimine-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT-PEI), which instantly transformed complete Nicotiana tabacum through direct leaf infiltration. The SWNT-based delivery platform achieved DNA plasmid transformation in model and crop plants without transgenic integration. It showed a high efficiency, non-toxicity, and no tissue damage. The process from functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes to transgenic expression only required 5 d, which was significantly shorter than Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Zhang and colleagues[89] synthesized polyethyleneimine-functionalized gold nanoclusters (PEI-AuNCs) as carriers for siRNA and delivered siRNA into complete plants via injection into leaf tissues. PEI-AuNCs protected siRNA from RNase degradation and achieved effective gene knockout without toxicity. Liu et al.[90] synthesized amine-functionalized carbon dots (A-CDs), a pH-responsive nanomaterial with the unique ability to switch surface charge and facilitate gene import into the nucleus. These versatile vectors enable transient transfection in mature, whole plants, thereby contributing to the advancement of efficient gene delivery systems.
-
To meet the rapidly growing global food demand in the mid-century as well as the requirements for the freshness of fruits, interdisciplinary integration of plant science, agricultural science, and other fields is essential. Nano-agriculture offers an innovative solution that helps to ensure food supply and security. With the development of nanotechnology, it is expected that more innovative nano-agricultural products and technologies will emerge in the future. For instance, nanotechnology may be integrated with the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, and other technologies to develop smarter agricultural equipment and systems, achieving automated and intelligent agricultural production. The application of nanotechnology will promote the development of precision agriculture by precisely controlling the nutrients and water required for crop growth, thereby improving agricultural production efficiency. This helps to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, decrease chemical pesticide residues, enhance the natural defense mechanisms of crops, improve food safety and nutritional value, reduce environmental pollution, and promote the development of ecological and sustainable agriculture. Nanotechnology can serve as a vector for gene-editing technology, facilitating the genetic improvement of crops and the cultivation of varieties more adaptable to climate change and pests and diseases. However, it also faces challenges in terms of technological maturity, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, and regulatory aspects. We should also pay attention to the migration issue, where nanomaterials may migrate from the coating into the interior of the fruit, and then enter the human body through consumption, the potential impact on human health needs further research. It also requires policy support and public education to realize its potential in sustainable agriculture.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang Y, Lv S, Wang H, Tu M, Xi Z, et al. 2025. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production. Fruit Research 5: e004 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0037
Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production
- Received: 05 April 2024
- Revised: 03 September 2024
- Accepted: 26 September 2024
- Published online: 09 January 2025
Abstract: Nanotechnology has been widely applied in the field of agriculture to meet the requirements of green agricultural development. In agricultural production applications, nanomaterials have been applied as nano-fertilizers, nano-pesticides, and nano-sensors. This article provides a detailed review of recent agricultural applications of nanomaterials. It will also focus on specific agricultural applications, such as transgenics, product preservation, stress resistance, and growth and development. Finally, the challenges of applying nanomaterials for agricultural research are summarized, and solutions are proposed to promote the safe and efficient utilization of nanomaterials in agricultural production to achieve sustainable agricultural development.
-
Key words:
- Agriculture /
- Nanomaterials /
- Green synthesis /
- Application