Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies

More Information
  • Monosodium glutamate is a non-essential amino acid in the human body that has been widely used as a food additive since 1909 due to its unique umami taste. Typical food containing monosodium glutamate include tomatoes, yeast extracts, fermented soy products, and cheese. After entering the human body, it is mainly absorbed in the small intestine by passive diffusion. Subsequent binding to TAS1R1-TAS1R3 promotes the release of intracellular calcium that ultimately activates the brain’s taste center, recognized as an umami taste of monosodium glutamate. However, more and more preclinical and clinical data indicates that monosodium glutamate exerts adverse effects on humans, including metabolic syndrome, neurotoxicity, renal toxicity, cardiovascular disease, infertility and fetal underdevelopment, cancer, immune malfunction and so on. In addition, it has been found that medicinal plants and nutraceuticals could mitigate or treat the adverse effects of monosodium glutamate adverse. Taken together, we hope to raise the correct awareness of monosodium glutamate and improve the understanding of monosodium glutamate quality approaches to maximize their use.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Ault A. 2004. The monosodium glutamate story: The commercial production of MSG and other amino acids. Journal of Chemical Education 81:347−55

    doi: 10.1021/ed081p347

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kurihara K. 2015. Umami the fifth basic taste: History of studies on receptor mechanisms and role as a food flavor. BioMed Research International 2015:189402

    doi: 10.1155/2015/189402

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Backes M, Obst K, Bojahr J, Thorhauer A, Roudnitzky N, et al. 2015. Rubemamine and Rubescenamine, two naturally occurring N-cinnamoyl phenethylamines with umami-taste-modulating properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 63:8694−704

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04402

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kwok RH. 1968. Chinese-restaurant syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 278:796

    doi: 10.1056/nejm196804042781419

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yousof SM, Awad YM, Mostafa EMA, Hosny MM, Anwar MM, et al. 2021. The potential neuroprotective role of Amphora coffeaeformis algae against monosodium glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in adult albino rats. Food & Function 12:706−16

    doi: 10.1039/D0FO01957G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Al Hargan A, Daghestani MH, Harrath AH. 2021. Alterations in APC, BECN1, and TP53 gene expression levels in colon cancer cells caused by monosodium glutamate. Brazilian Journal of Biology 83:e246970

    doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.246970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Hermanussen M, Garcia AP, Sunder M, Voigt M, Salazar V, Tresguerres JA. 2006. Obesity, voracity, and short stature:the impact of glutamate on the regulation of appetite. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 60:25−31

    doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602263

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Depoortere I. 2014. Taste receptors of the gut: emerging roles in health and disease. Gut 63:179−90

    doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Maragakis NJ, Rothstein JD. 2004. Glutamate transporters: animal models to neurologic disease. Neurobiology of Disease 15:461−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mott CR, Siegel PB, Webb KE Jr, Wong EA. 2008. Gene expression of nutrient transporters in the small intestine of chickens from lines divergently selected for high or low juvenile body weight. Poultry Science 87:2215−24

    doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Burrin DG, Stoll B. 2009. Metabolic fate and function of dietary glutamate in the gut. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 90:850S−856S

    doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462Y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Windmueller HG, Spaeth AE. 1975. Intestinal metabolism of glutamine and glutamate from the lumen as compared to glutamine from blood. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 171:662−72

    doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(75)90078-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Windmueller HG, Spaeth AE. 1976. Metabolism of absorbed aspartate, asparagine, and arginine by rat small intestine in vivo. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 175:670−76

    doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(76)90558-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Stegink LD, Filer LJ Jr, Baker GL. 1983. Plasma amino acid concentrations in normal adults fed meals with added monosodium L-glutamate and aspartame. The Journal of Nutrition 113:1851−60

    doi: 10.1093/jn/113.9.1851

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sarabhai T, Roden M. 2019. Hungry for your alanine: when liver depends on muscle proteolysis. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 129:4563−66

    doi: 10.1172/JCI131931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Cynober L. 2018. Metabolism of dietary glutamate in adults. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism 73:5−14

    doi: 10.1159/000494776

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hernández-Bautista RJ, Alarcón-Aguilar FJ, del C Escobar-Villanueva M, Almanza-Pérez JC, Merino-Aguilar H, et al. 2014. Biochemical alterations during the obese-aging process in female and male monosodium glutamate (MSG)-treated mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15:11473−94

    doi: 10.3390/ijms150711473

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Nakanishi Y, Tsuneyama K, Fujimoto M, Salunga TL, Nomoto K, et al. 2008. Monosodium glutamate (MSG): a villain and promoter of liver inflammation and dysplasia. Journal of Autoimmunity 30:42−50

    doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2007.11.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li PP, Shan S, Chen YT, Ning ZQ, Sun SJ, et al. 2006. The PPARalpha/gamma dual agonist chiglitazar improves insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in MSG obese rats. British Journal of Pharmacology 148:610−18

    doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706745

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Jin L, Lin L, Li GY, Liu S, Luo DJ, et al. 2018. Monosodium glutamate exposure during the neonatal period leads to cognitive deficits in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Neuroscience Letters 682:39−44

    doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Collison KS, Zaidi MZ, Saleh SM, Makhoul NJ, Inglis A, et al. 2012. Nutrigenomics of hepatic steatosis in a feline model: effect of monosodium glutamate, fructose, and Trans-fat feeding. Genes & Nutrition 7:265−80

    doi: 10.1007/s12263-011-0261-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Miranda RA, da Silva Franco CC, de Oliveira JC, Barella LF, Tófolo LP, et al. 2017. Cross-fostering reduces obesity induced by early exposure to monosodium glutamate in male rats. Endocrine 55:101−12

    doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0965-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Shi Z, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Wittert GA, Yuan B, Dai Y, et al. 2010. Monosodium glutamate is not associated with obesity or a greater prevalence of weight gain over 5 years: findings from the Jiangsu Nutrition Study of Chinese adults. The British Journal of Nutrition 104:457−63

    doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000760

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Torrezan R, Malta A, de Souza Rodrigues WDN, Dos Santos AAA, Miranda RA, et al. 2019. Monosodium L-glutamate-obesity onset is associated with disruption of central control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 31:e12717

    doi: 10.1111/jne.12717

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    He K, Du S, Xun P, Sharma S, Wang H, et al. 2011. Consumption of monosodium glutamate in relation to incidence of overweight in Chinese adults: China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 93:1328−36

    doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.008870

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Insawang T, Selmi C, Cha'on U, Pethlert S, Yongvanit P, et al. 2012. Monosodium glutamate (MSG) intake is associated with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a rural Thai population. Nutrition & Metabolism 9:50

    doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-50

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Myers J, London L, Lucchini RG. 2014. Neurotoxicology and development: human, environmental and social impacts. Neurotoxicology 45:217−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.08.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    López-Pérez SJ, Ureña-Guerrero ME, Morales-Villagrán A. 2010. Monosodium glutamate neonatal treatment as a seizure and excitotoxic model. Brain Research 1317:246−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Olney JW, Sharpe LG. 1969. Brain Lesions in an Infant Rhesus Monkey Treated with Monosodium Glutamate. Science 166:386−88

    doi: 10.1126/science.166.3903.386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Burde RM, Schainker B, Kayes J. 1971. Acute effect of oral and subcutaneous administration of monosodium glutamate on the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice and rats. Nature 233:58−60

    doi: 10.1038/233058a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ali MM, Bawari M, Misra UK, Babu GN. 2000. Locomotor and learning deficits in adult rats exposed to monosodium-L-glutamate during early life. Neuroscience Letters 284:57−60

    doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)00958-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Ramalho JB, Izaguirry AP, Soares MB, Spiazzi CC, Pavin NF, et al. 2018. Selenofuranoside improves long-term memory deficits in rats after exposure to monosodium glutamate: Involvement of Na+, K+-ATPase activity. Physiology & Behavior 184:27−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.10.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hussein UK, Hassan NEY, Elhalwagy MEA, Zaki AR, Abubakr HO, et al. 2017. Ginger and Propolis Exert Neuroprotective Effects against Monosodium Glutamate-Induced Neurotoxicity in Rats. Molecules 22:1928

    doi: 10.3390/molecules22111928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Madhavadas S, Subramanian S, Kutty BM. 2017. Environmental enrichment improved cognitive deficits more in peri-adolescent than in adult rats after postnatal monosodium glutamate treatment. Physiology International 104:271−90

    doi: 10.1556/2060.104.2017.4.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Altaher W, Alhelo H, Chosky D, Kulesza RJ, Jr. 2021. Neonatal exposure to monosodium glutamate results in impaired auditory brainstem structure and function. Hearing Research 405:108243

    doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Sharma A, Prasongwattana V, Cha'on U, Selmi C, Hipkaeo W, et al. 2013. Monosodium glutamate (MSG) consumption is associated with urolithiasis and urinary tract obstruction in rats. PLoS One 8:e75546

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075546

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Mahieu S, Klug M, Millen N, Fabro A, Benmelej A, et al. 2016. Monosodium glutamate intake affect the function of the kidney through NMDA receptor. Life Sciences 149:114−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Sharma A, Wongkham C, Prasongwattana V, Boonnate P, Thanan R, et al. 2014. Proteomic analysis of kidney in rats chronically exposed to monosodium glutamate. PLoS One 9:e116233

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116233

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Elbassuoni EA, Ragy MM, Ahmed SM. 2018. Evidence of the protective effect of L-arginine and vitamin D against monosodium glutamate-induced liver and kidney dysfunction in rats. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 108:799−808

    doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Abo Zeid AA, Rowida Raafat I, Ahmed AG. 2022. Berberine alleviates monosodium glutamate induced postnatal metabolic disorders associated vascular endothelial dysfunction in newborn rats: possible role of matrix metalloproteinase-1. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry 128:818−29

    doi: 10.1080/13813455.2020.1729815

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Kumar P, Bhandari U. 2013. Protective effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn. on monosodium glutamate-induced dyslipidemia and oxidative stress in rats. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 45:136−40

    doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.108288

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Liu Y, Zhou L, Xu HF, Yan L, Ding F, et al. 2013. A preliminary experimental study on the cardiac toxicity of glutamate and the role of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor in rats. Chinese Medical Journal 126:1323−32

    Google Scholar

    [43]

    Jubaidi FF, Mathialagan RD, Noor MM, Taib IS, Budin SB. 2019. Monosodium glutamate daily oral supplementation: study of its effects on male reproductive system on rat model. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine 65:194−204

    doi: 10.1080/19396368.2019.1573274

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Meesala KM, Khandayataray P. 2018. Monosodium Glutamate Toxicity and the Possible Protective Role of L–Carnitine. Science & Technology Journal 6:45−56

    Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hamza RZ, Al-Harbi MS. 2014. Monosodium glutamate induced testicular toxicity and the possible ameliorative role of vitamin E or selenium in male rats. Toxicology Reports 1:1037−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.10.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Quines CB, Jardim NS, Araujo PCO, Cechella JL, Prado VC, et al. 2019. Resistance training restores metabolic alterations induced by monosodium glutamate in a sex-dependent manner in male and female rats. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 120:13426−40

    doi: 10.1002/jcb.28617

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Mondal M, Sarkar K, Nath PP, Paul G. 2018. Monosodium glutamate suppresses the female reproductive function by impairing the functions of ovary and uterus in rat. Environmental Toxicology 33:198−208

    doi: 10.1002/tox.22508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Gaspar RS, Benevides ROA, Fontelles JLdL, Vale CC, França LM, et al. 2016. Reproductive alterations in hyperinsulinemic but normoandrogenic MSG obese female rats. The Journal of Endocrinology 229:61−72

    doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0453

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Rani J, Savalagimath MP. 2017. Effect of Dooshivishari Agada over MSG-induced reproductive toxicity w. s. r. ovary and follicle count. AYU 38:88−92

    doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_166_17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Guo W, Li K, Sun B, Xu D, Tong L, et al. 2021. Dysregulated glutamate transporter SLC1A1 propels cystine uptake via Xc for glutathione synthesis in lung cancer. Cancer Research 81:552−66

    doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0617

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    de Queiroz EAIF, Akamine EH, de Carvalho MHC, Sampaio SC, Fortes ZB. 2015. Metformin reduces the Walker-256 tumor development in obese-MSG rats via AMPK and FOXO3a. Life Sciences 121:78−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2014.11.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Hata K, Kubota M, Shimizu M, Moriwaki H, Kuno T, et al. 2012. Monosodium glutamate-induced diabetic mice are susceptible to azoxymethane-induced colon tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis 33:702−7

    doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr323

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Scalise M, Pochini L, Galluccio M, Console L, Indiveri C. 2017. Glutamine Transport and Mitochondrial Metabolism in Cancer Cell Growth. Frontiers in Oncology 7:306

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00306

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Ataseven N, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Keskin AÇ, Ünal F. 2016. Genotoxicity of monosodium glutamate. Food and Chemical Toxicology 91:8−18

    doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.02.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Jovic Z, Veselinovic M, Vasic K, Stankovic-Djordjevic D, Cekic S, et al. 2009. Monosodium glutamate induces apoptosis in naive and memory human B cells. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 110:636−40

    Google Scholar

    [56]

    Castrogiovanni D, Gaillard RC, Giovambattista A, Spinedi E. 2008. Neuroendocrine, metabolic, and immune functions during the acute phase response of inflammatory stress in monosodium L-glutamate-damaged, hyperadipose male rat. Neuroendocrinology 88:227−34

    doi: 10.1159/000124131

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Nakadate K, Motojima K, Hirakawa T, Tanaka-Nakadate S. 2016. Progressive depletion of rough endoplasmic reticulum in epithelial cells of the small intestine in monosodium glutamate mice model of obesity. BioMed Research International 2016:5251738

    doi: 10.1155/2016/5251738

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Pavlovic V, Cekic S, Sokolovic D, Djindjic B. 2006. Modulatory effect of monosodium glutamate on rat thymocyte proliferation and apoptosis. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 107:185−91

    Google Scholar

    [59]

    Farombi EO, Onyema OO. 2006. Monosodium glutamate-induced oxidative damage and genotoxicity in the rat: modulatory role of vitamin C, vitamin E and quercetin. Human & Experimental Toxicology 25:251−59

    doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht621oa

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Belluardo N, Mudò G, Bindoni M. 1990. Effects of early destruction of the mouse arcuate nucleus by monosodium glutamate on age-dependent natural killer activity. Brain Research 534:225−33

    doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90132-U

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Woessner KM, Simon RA, Stevenson DD. 1999. Monosodium glutamate sensitivity in asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 104:305−10

    doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70371-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Zanfirescu A, Cristea AN, Nitulescu GM, Velescu BS, Gradinaru D. 2017. Chronic Monosodium Glutamate Administration Induced Hyperalgesia in Mice. Nutrients 10:1

    doi: 10.3390/nu10010001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Miskowiak B, Partyka M. 1999. Effect of neonatal treatment with MSG (monosodium glutamate) on thyroid of the adult male rats. Histology and Histopathology 14:63−67

    doi: 10.14670/HH-14.63

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Sasaki-Hamada S, Hojyo Y, Mizumoto R, Koyama H, Yanagisawa S, et al. 2021. Cognitive and hippocampal synaptic profiles in monosodium glutamate-induced obese mice. Neuroscience Research 170:201−7

    doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2020.08.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Romagnano MA, Chafel TL, Pilcher WH, Joseph SA. 1982. The distribution of enkephalin in the mediobasal hypothalamus of the mouse brain: effects of neonatal administration of MSG. Brain Research 236:497−504

    doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90734-X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Lima CB, Soares GdSF, Vitor SM, Castellano B, Andrade da Costa BL, Guedes RC. 2013. Neonatal treatment with monosodium glutamate lastingly facilitates spreading depression in the rat cortex. Life Sciences 93:388−92

    doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.07.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Frieder B, Grimm VE. 1984. Prenatal monosodium glutamate (MSG) treatment given through the mother's diet causes behavioral deficits in rat offspring. International Journal of Neuroscience 23:117−26

    doi: 10.3109/00207458408985353

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Pavlovic V, Pavlovic D, Kocic G, Sokolovic D, Jevtovic-Stoimenov T, et al. 2007. Effect of monosodium glutamate on oxidative stress and apoptosis in rat thymus. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 303:161−66

    doi: 10.1007/s11010-007-9469-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Fuchsberger T, Yuste R, Martinez-Bellver S, Blanco-Gandia MC, Torres-Cuevas I, et al. 2019. Oral Monosodium glutamate administration causes early onset of Alzheimer's disease-like pathophysiology in APP/PS1 mice. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 72:957−75

    doi: 10.3233/JAD-190274

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Hlinák Z, Gandalovicová D, Krejcí I. 2005. Behavioral deficits in adult rats treated neonatally with glutamate. Neurotoxicol Teratol 27:465−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2005.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Demirkapu MJ, Yananlı HR, Akşahin E, Karabiber C, Günay P, et al. 2020. The effect of oral administration of monosodium glutamate on epileptogenesis in infant rats. Epileptic Disorders 22:195−201

    doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1156

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Prastiwi D, Djunaidi A, Partadiredja G. 2015. High dosage of monosodium glutamate causes deficits of the motor coordination and the number of cerebellar Purkinje cells of rats. Human & Experimental Toxicology 34:1171−79

    doi: 10.1177/0960327115572706

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Lee KT, Sheen PC. 1994. Study of lysosomal changes in rat pancreas after ingesting monosodium L-glutamate. Pancreas 9:304−8

    doi: 10.1097/00006676-199405000-00004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Türküner MS, Özcan F. 2020. Monosodium glutamate restricts the adipogenic potential of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes through mitotic clonal expansion. Cell Biology International 44:744−54

    doi: 10.1002/cbin.11269

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Allen DH, Baker GJ. 1981. Chinese-restaurant asthma. New England Journal of Medicine 305:1154−55

    doi: 10.1056/nejm198111053051915

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Allen DH, Delohery J, Baker G. 1987. Monosodium L-glutamate-induced asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 80:530−37

    doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(87)90003-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Baad-Hansen L, Cairns B, Ernberg M, Svensson P. 2010. Effect of systemic monosodium glutamate (MSG) on headache and pericranial muscle sensitivity. Cephalalgia 30:68−76

    doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01881.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Kraal AZ, Arvanitis NR, Jaeger AP, Ellingrod VL. 2020. Could dietary glutamate play a role in psychiatric distress? Neuropsychobiology 79:13−19

    doi: 10.1159/000496294

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Shi Z, Wittert GA, Yuan B, Dai Y, Gill TK, et al. 2013. Association between monosodium glutamate intake and sleep-disordered breathing among Chinese adults with normal body weight. Nutrition 29:508−13

    doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.08.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Shi Z, Yuan B, Taylor AW, Dai Y, Pan X, et al. 2011. Monosodium glutamate is related to a higher increase in blood pressure over 5 years: findings from the Jiangsu Nutrition Study of Chinese adults. Journal of Hypertension 29:846−53

    doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328344da8e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Nandan P, Nayanatara AK, Poojary R, Bhagyalakshmi K, Nirupama M, et al. 2018. Protective role of Co-administration of vitamin D in monosodium glutamate induced obesity in female rats. Journal of the National Medical Association 110:98−102

    doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Savcheniuk OA, Virchenko OV, Falalyeyeva TM, Beregova TV, Babenko LP, et al. 2014. The efficacy of probiotics for monosodium glutamate-induced obesity: dietology concerns and opportunities for prevention. The EPMA Journal 5:2

    doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-5-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Du J, He W, Zhang C, Wu J, Li Z, et al. 2020. Pentamethylquercetin Attenuates Cardiac Remodeling via Activation of the Sestrins/Keap1/Nrf2 Pathway in MSG-Induced Obese Mice. The EPMA Journal 2020:3243906

    doi: 10.1155/2020/3243906

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Zhao L, Zhu X, Xia M, Li J, Guo AY, et al. 2021. Quercetin Ameliorates Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis That Drives Hypothalamic Damage and Hepatic Lipogenesis in Monosodium Glutamate-Induced Abdominal Obesity. Frontiers in Nutrition 8:671353

    doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.671353

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Hocayen PdAS, Grassiolli S, Leite NC, Pochapski MT, Pereira RA, et al. 2016. Baccharis dracunculifolia methanol extract enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in pancreatic islets of monosodium glutamate induced-obesity model rats. Pharmaceutical Biology 54:1263−71

    doi: 10.3109/13880209.2015.1067232

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Patil S, Prakash T, Kotresha D, Rao NR, Pandy N. 2011. Antihyperlipidemic potential of Cedrus deodara extracts in monosodium glutamate induced obesity in neonatal rats. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 43:644−47

    Google Scholar

    [87]

    Quines CB, Chagas PM, Hartmann D, Carvalho NR, Soares FA, Nogueira CW. 2017. (p-ClPhSe)2 Reduces Hepatotoxicity Induced by Monosodium Glutamate by Improving Mitochondrial Function in Rats. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 118:2877−86

    doi: 10.1002/jcb.25938

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Sasaki Y, Shimada T, Iizuka S, Suzuki W, Makihara H, et al. 2011. Effects of bezafibrate in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis model mice with monosodium glutamate-induced metabolic syndrome. European Journal of Pharmacology 662:1−8

    doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.04.051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Sanches JR, França LM, Chagas VT, Gaspar RS, Dos Santos KA, et al. 2016. Polyphenol-rich extract of Syzygium cumini leaf dually improves peripheral insulin sensitivity and pancreatic islet function in monosodium L-glutamate-induced obese rats. Frontiers in Pharmacology 7:48

    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Hazzaa SM, Abdelaziz SAM, Abd Eldaim MA, Abdel-Daim MM, Elgarawany GE. 2020. Neuroprotective potential of Allium sativum against monosodium glutamate-induced excitotoxicity: Impact on short-term memory, gliosis, and oxidative stress. Nutrients 12:1028

    doi: 10.3390/nu12041028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Waggas AM. 2009. Neuroprotective evaluation of extract of ginger (Zingiber officinale) root in monosodium glutamate-induced toxicity in different brain areas male albino rats. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 12:201−12

    doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2009.201.212

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Firgany AEDL, Sarhan NR. 2020. Quercetin mitigates monosodium glutamate-induced excitotoxicity of the spinal cord motoneurons in aged rats via p38 MAPK inhibition. Acta Histochemica 122:151554

    doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151554

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Dief AE, Kamha ES, Baraka AM, Elshorbagy AK. 2014. Monosodium glutamate neurotoxicity increases beta amyloid in the rat hippocampus: a potential role for cyclic AMP protein kinase. Neurotoxicology 42:76−82

    doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.04.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Zanuzo K, Guareschi ZM, Detogni AC, Huning LP, Rodrigues PF, et al. 2020. Physical exercise associated with vitamin D chronic supplementation reduces kidney injury induced by monosodium glutamate. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias 92:e20201097

    doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202020201097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Abd-Elkareem M, Abd El-Rahman MAM, Khalil NSA, Amer AS. 2021. Antioxidant and cytoprotective effects of Nigella sativa L. seeds on the testis of monosodium glutamate challenged rats. Scientific Reports 11:13519

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92977-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Gad FAM, Farouk SM, Emam MA. 2021. Antiapoptotic and antioxidant capacity of phytochemicals from Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) and their potential effects on monosodium glutamate-induced testicular damage in rat. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 28:2379−90

    doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10674-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Park E, Yu KH, Kim DK, Kim S, Sapkota K, et al. 2014. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine against monosodium glutamate-induced astrocytic cell death. Food and Chemical Toxicology 67:1−9

    doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.02.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Vitor-de-Lima SM, Medeiros LB, Benevides RDL, Dos Santos CN, Lima da Silva NO, Guedes RCA. 2019. Monosodium glutamate and treadmill exercise: Anxiety-like behavior and spreading depression features in young adult rats. Nutritional Neuroscience 22:435−43

    doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1398301

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Araujo PCO, Quines CB, Jardim NS, Leite MR, Nogueira CW. 2017. Resistance exercise reduces memory impairment induced by monosodium glutamate in male and female rats. Experimental Physiology 102:845−53

    doi: 10.1113/EP086198

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Quines CB, Rosa SG, Chagas PM, da Rocha JT, Dobrachinski F, et al. 2016. Homeostatic effect of p-chloro-diphenyl diselenide on glucose metabolism and mitochondrial function alterations induced by monosodium glutamate administration to rats. Amino Acids 48:137−48

    doi: 10.1007/s00726-015-2073-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yang L, Gao Y, Gong J, Peng L, El-Seedi HR, et al. 2023. A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies. Food Materials Research 3:16 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2023-0016
    Yang L, Gao Y, Gong J, Peng L, El-Seedi HR, et al. 2023. A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies. Food Materials Research 3:16 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2023-0016

Figures(4)  /  Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(5011) PDF downloads(768)

REVIEW   Open Access    

A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies

Food Materials Research  3 Article number: 16  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Monosodium glutamate is a non-essential amino acid in the human body that has been widely used as a food additive since 1909 due to its unique umami taste. Typical food containing monosodium glutamate include tomatoes, yeast extracts, fermented soy products, and cheese. After entering the human body, it is mainly absorbed in the small intestine by passive diffusion. Subsequent binding to TAS1R1-TAS1R3 promotes the release of intracellular calcium that ultimately activates the brain’s taste center, recognized as an umami taste of monosodium glutamate. However, more and more preclinical and clinical data indicates that monosodium glutamate exerts adverse effects on humans, including metabolic syndrome, neurotoxicity, renal toxicity, cardiovascular disease, infertility and fetal underdevelopment, cancer, immune malfunction and so on. In addition, it has been found that medicinal plants and nutraceuticals could mitigate or treat the adverse effects of monosodium glutamate adverse. Taken together, we hope to raise the correct awareness of monosodium glutamate and improve the understanding of monosodium glutamate quality approaches to maximize their use.

    • Glutamate is an amino acid and one of the basic components of protein. Upon protein intake, a large amount of glutamic acid is produced in the body after digestion and absorption. Its sodium salt is widely used to improve the umami taste of food, thereby increasing appetite and food intake. A Japanese professor stumbled upon the fact that Japanese wood fish and kelp dashi both have a special taste that is different from sweet, salty, sour, and bitter[1]. Using water extraction and crystallization, monosodium glutamate (MSG) was isolated from kelp, presenting a new type of seasoning that has expanded in the food industry. In China, the production of MSG started in 1921 by Wu, further to emerge into a stage of rapid development since the 1980s, as a major producer of MSG in the world. Food condiments such as soy sauces and chicken essences also contain certain levels of MSG via protein fermentation or chemical addition[2].

      As an umami taste modulator, it mainly binds to taste receptor heterodimers (TAS1R1-TAS1R3), activates a series of metabolic actions, increasing the release of intracellular calcium, thus activating the taste afferents by depolarization followed by generation of action potentials acting on purinergic receptors[3].

      At present, the usage regulations on MSG in different countries around the world are somewhat different. In some countries, especially in Asia, people like to add MSG to enhance the taste upon cooking. However, MSG is prohibited from being used in some European and American countries, such as USA and Mexico. The use of MSG remains a controversial topic owing to its side effects. MSG side effects were first reported in 1968 which manifested as palpitations, numbness, and weakness in the back of the neck and arms, later known as MSG syndrome[4]. In addition, numerous studies showed that MSG intake may increase the potential risk of nerve[5] and gastrointestinal diseases[6]. Meanwhile, it was forbidden to add MSG to baby food dating back to the late 1970s. Pregnant women are also advised not to consume MSG-containing foods during pregnancy or breastfeeding[7]. This article reviews the absorption and metabolism of MSG inside the body, and its safety to the human body, and provides updated information on the application of MSG as a food additive in human health.

    • MSG has been identified and recognized for over 100 years. In 1861, a German professor extracted glutamic acid from wheat gluten for the first time. Subsequently, a Japanese professor identified the glutamic acid from the juice of kelp in 1908. Japan began to produce and sell the first commercial MSG under the trademark 'Ajinomoto' in 1909. Since then, MSG has been used as a food additive to enhance the flavor of food and has been widely used all over the world, especially in Asian countries. So far, there have been a variety of methods proven effective to produce MSG including separation and extraction, chemical synthesis, and fermentation. The advantages or disadvantages of various methods of producing MSG are summarized in Table 1.

      Table 1.  The advantages or disadvantages of various methods for producing MSG.

      Separation
      and extraction
      Chemical synthesisFermentation
      MaterialsWheat
      gluten
      AcrylonitrileSelected
      microorganism,
      carbohydrates
      and ammonia
      Yield ↑×
      Time ↓×
      Purity ↑×
      Cost ↓×
      Environmentally friendly ↑××

      MSG was also found in many natural foods, such as tomatoes, fermented soy products, asparagus, mushrooms, walnuts, and milk to impart a special flavor (called umami) that exists in addition to the four classic flavors (sour, sweet, bitter, and salty)[2]. Currently, it is added to various processed foods, such as snacks, fast food, soups and various canned foods. As an umami taste regulator, it will bind to the TAS1R1-TAS1R3 to activate the taste G protein (α-gustducin), leading to the activation of phospholipase Cβ2 and inositol triphosphate, thereby increasing intracellular calcium release. Calcium activates the transient receptor potential cation channel M5, which then depolarizes and releases adenosine triphosphate to generate an action potential. Adenosine triphosphate acts on purinergic receptors, and triggers the taste afferents. Finally, the taste center of the brain is stimulated, in a way that the umami taste brought by MSG is recognized[8].

    • MSG is mainly absorbed by active transport inside the small intestine. The glutamate in the intestinal lumen is transported across the apical membrane to the intestinal epithelial cells by glutamate transporter. This transport mainly relies on the high-affinity XAG system, which is mainly composed of solute carrier family 1 member 1 (SLC1A1), SLC1A2, SLC1A3, SLC1A6 and SLC1A7[9]. The absorption and transport of glutamate in the intestinal tract mainly depends on SLC1A1[10]. Consequently, the regulation of its expression level and transport activity directly affects the absorption, and function of glutamate.

      After MSG is ingested inside the human body, MSG reacts with gastric acid to produce glutamic acid and sodium chloride, which are quickly digested and absorbed, and participate in various metabolic reactions. Studies have proved that 13C-labeled glutamate directly fed into piglets stomachs, was oxidized to CO2 as the main metabolic product[11]. Specifically, glutamic acid could be metabolized in the stomach. In addition, the intestine is also considered to be one of the main sites of glutamate absorption[12]. The metabolic pathway of glutamic acid in the small intestine is described as glutamic acid that yields α-ketoglutarate and aspartic acid through transamination between epithelial cells and oxaloacetate. In the presence of pyruvate, glutamic acid can produce alanine and α-ketoglutarate through transamination. The α-ketoglutarate produced by transamination could enter the mitochondria, to produce a reducing coenzyme for the synthesis of mitochondrial ATP through the tricarboxylic cycle. The aspartic acid produced by transamination of glutamate could likewise enter the mitochondria and can be oxidized through the tricarboxylic acid cycle[13]. The above observations indicated that glutamate is not only an important energy substrate in the intestine, but also a prerequisite for some other amino acids and active substances, and it can play an important role in the activities of the digestive tract.

      Although glutamate is mainly metabolized in the stomach and small intestine, it was also metabolized in tissues such as liver and muscle. Inside the liver, glutamate is converted to glucose, glutamine (Gln) or other amino acids[14]. Whereas in the muscle tissue, on the one hand, glutamate generated alanine through transamination reaction, then, it produces glucose through the Cahill cycle. On the other hand, glutamate was converted to Gln by the enzyme Gln synthetase[15] (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Metabolic reactions for the biotransformation of monosodium glutamate (MSG) in different body organs.

    • In recent years, the safety of MSG has attracted widespread attention. As the precursor of Gln, proline and arginine, glutamic acid is a coded amino acid in the process of protein synthesis and likewise a non-essential amino acid in mammals[16]. Although the use of MSG has shown no clear harmful effects on the human body since its discovery, MSG has caused much controversy in recent years. In 1968, the New England Journal of Medicine first reported the adverse effects of general weakness, heart palpitations, and transient numbness of limbs after eating MSG and called it the 'Chinese Restaurant Syndrome'[4]. In addition, the results of animal experiments also showed that MSG could induce obesity, non-alcohol fatty liver diseases (NAFLD), neurotoxicity, etc. Therefore, the safety of MSG is still a controversial topic warranting critical analysis of its health effects targeting different organs as highlighted in this review (Fig 2).

      Figure 2. 

      MSG toxic effects on human functions.

    • Metabolic syndrome refers to the pathological condition, in which the body’s protein, fat, carbohydrates and other substances are metabolically disordered. It is a complex of metabolic disorders (such as obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, atherogenic dyslipidemia, NAFLD, etc.) that is considered to be one of the risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The incidence of metabolic syndrome is increasing year on year worldwide. Studies have shown that metabolic syndrome is not only related to excessive calorie intake, but also some specific diets can often induce metabolic syndrome. Some in vivo studies reported that MSG could lead to metabolic syndrome (Fig 3). Numerous animal experiments have shown that gavage or subcutaneous injection of MSG could induce central obesity in mice or rats[17], as well as NAFLD, Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)[18], insulin resistance[19], type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)[20]. The specific effects of MSG on metabolic syndrome are summarized in Table 2.

      Figure 3. 

      MSG could lead to metabolic syndrome.

      Table 2.  List of the effect of MSG on metabolic syndrome.

      DiseasesDosage/daySpeciesEffectsReferences
      ObesityInject MSG (4 mg/g)MiceInduced obesity[18]
      Mixed with 3, 6 and 9 g of MSGWistar ratsIncreased in body weight gain[88]
      S.c. 4 mg/gAdult Wistar ratsInduced obesity[23]
      2.2 ± 1.6 g/dHealthy Chinese adultsInduced overweight[26]
      250 g of MSG for food preparation
      for 10 d
      Families from rural area of ThailandOverweight[27]
      NAFLDS.c. 2 mg/gICR miceInduced obesity and diabetes with steatosis and steatohepatitis resembling human NAFLD and NASH with pre-neoplastic lesions[33]
      Drinking water containing
      0.64 g/L MSG
      Female C57BL/6J miceInduced dyslipidemia and markers of insulin resistance[19]
      Insulin resistantS.c. 4 g/kgNewborn Wistar ratsDeveloped glucose intolerance[20]
      T2DMS.c. 4 mg/gMale DIAR miceObesity, diabetes and macrovesicular steatohepatitis[21]

      In addition, it has also been found that the maternal intake of high-dose MSG during pregnancy is also related to neonatal metabolic syndrome. Some animal studies in cats revealed that when mothers consumed a diet supplemented with 1.125% MSG during pregnancy, liver degeneration of the kittens occurred, as well as an increase in serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Insulin resistance also occurred in the kittens[21]. Similarly, high-dose MSG intake during rodents’ pregnancy could lead to obesity of offspring, which is mainly manifested as dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and impaired leptin signaling[22]. Whether such effects could also be reflected in humans has yet to be concluded. MSG is reported to induce metabolic syndrome attributed to its use as a common flavor enhancer causing increase in the palatability of food, thereby greatly increasing food intake. On the other hand, MSG could interfere with the function of leptin, which is a hormone that responsible for shutting down the appetite via signaling to the brain when full[23]. Impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) pathway can lead to an imbalance of autonomic nervous system activity in MSG-treated rats, contributing to the development of obesity[24]. In terms of clinical research, it is found that, regardless of the total calorie intake and the amount of exercise, the intake of MSG will increase the risk of obesity in healthy Chinese subjects[25]. Insawang et al. studied the relationship between MSG intake and metabolic syndrome in rural Thailand populations revealing that every 1 g increase in MSG daily intake, accelerates the risk of metabolic syndrome by 1.14 times, whereas the risk of obesity was increased by 1.16 times[26].

    • Neurotoxicity refers to damage to the structure or function of the nervous system caused by foreign chemicals[27]. As an excitatory amino acid with high content in human and mammalian brains, glutamate is involved in the transmission of information in the central nervous system. Glutamate receptors such as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are widely distributed in the central nervous system including the amygdala, hippocampus and hypothalamus, and are involved in the regulation of energy metabolism and autonomous functions. If an excessive amount of MSG (4 mg/g) is ingested, glutamate will enter the brain in large quantities, and the concentration will rise sharply, which could ultimately lead to nerve excitotoxicity, neuronal damage or death, with symptoms such as dizziness, panic attacks, and asthma[28].

      The neurotoxicity of MSG was first reported by Olney in 1969 where the injection of MSG into newborn mice caused an acute neuronal necrosis[29]. Burde et al. also confirmed in 1971 that oral and subcutaneous injection of MSG (2 mg/g or 4 mg/g) in rats could cause acute necrotizing damage to hypothalamic neurons[30]. Meanwhile, many studies have revealed that the use of different doses of MSG produced different neurological phenotypes[31]. Continuous intragastric administration of 2 g/kg of MSG in Wistar rats could cause memory impairment and inhibit Na+-K+-ATPase in the hippocampus and cortex[32]. Newborn SD rats subcutaneously injected with MSG (4 mg/kg) on day 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 9, respectively showed Alzheimer-like disabilities and memory impairment, as well as hippocampal synapse-related proteins misfunction, while the phosphorylated tau protein level showed an increase[20]. Rats administered MSG (100 mg/kg/d) for two consecutive months, also have elevated levels of amyloid β in the brain tissue, concurrent with an increase in Na+, Ca2+, K+ levels. The results of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain showed that severe neuronal degeneration, perivascular edema, hyperemia, and nuclear condensation occurred in the brain tissue[33]. In adult mice and rats, subcutaneous injections of MSG caused rapid degeneration of neurons. Acute necrosis of acetylcholinesterase-positive neurons in the final zone was observed in both the mother rats administered with MSG during pregnancy and their offspring, with offspring’s neurons found more sensitive to MSG[34].

      Because the blood-brain barrier is immature in neonates, once a large dose of MSG is taken, it will seriously affect the learning ability, concurrent with a dysregulation of the rhythm of the hippocampus and the frontal cortex[35]. The specific changes in the central nervous system are summarized in Table 3.

      Table 3.  The effect of MSG on nervous system and kidneys.

      DiseasesDosage/dSpeciesEffectsReferences
      Nervous systemS.c 4 mg/gMale Wistar ratsIncreased brain extracellular Glu level and produced hyperexcitability and motor behavior alterations[30]
      3,200 mg/kg/dInduced neurodevelopmental toxicity[9]
      2 mg/g or 4 mg/gMice and ratsCaused acute neuronal necrosis[31]
      I.p.500 mg/kgAdult male Fischer-344 ratsAltered the dopamine content in adult rats[32]
      I. p. 2 g/kgMale Wistar ratsLead to long-term memory impairment[34]
      Mice and ratsExhibited peripheral insulin resistance, cognitive deficits, and a reduction in the total hippocampal volume with decreased neuron count in the DG, CA3, and CA1 subfields.[35]
      Kidneys4 mg/gAdult albino Wistar ratsThe cortex of the kidneys developed variable pathological changes[37]
      3 g/kgMale Wistar ratsProduced hyperfiltration with increased tubular reabsorption of Na, K and water[38]
      2 mg/gWistar male ratsThe renal handling and toxicity mainly related to oxidative stress and metabolism[39]
      3 g/kgMale Wistar ratsOccurred the renal pathologic changes, intrarenal oxidative stress and reduction of nitric oxide excretion[40]
    • As one of the important organs of the human body, the main function of the kidneys is to produce urine, eliminate metabolites, waste and poisons in the body, as well as retain water and other useful substances through reabsorption to regulate water, electrolyte and pH balance. Consequently, kidneys are one of the organs most affected by toxic substances such as MSG.

      Preclinical studies have shown that excessive intake of MSG (2 mg/g−4 g/kg) in rats can lead to urinary alkalization and calcium phosphate crystalluria, which will lead to the formation of kidney stones, followed by hydronephrosis and renal interstitial fibrosis[36]. Meanwhile, sodium reabsorption, glomerular filtration rate and renal cortex plasma flow increased after giving free food (3 g/kg/d) and water (1% MSG) to 5-week-old Wistar rats for 16 weeks. H&E stain examination further showed that NMDA receptors were significantly up-regulated[37]. Therefore, MSG could cause changes in the structure of renal cells, an increase in the number of glomerular cells, inflammatory cells infiltration of the renal cortex and renal tubular cell edema, and ultimately leading to renal tubular degeneration.

      The formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the kidney is believed to be the main reason for MSG-induced kidney damage. Studies have shown that with MSG intake, the activity of some antioxidant enzymes (catalase, glutathione-S-transferase, superoxide dismutase, etc.) in the kidney is significantly reduced. In Wistar rats, after 9 months of free drinking water (2 mg/g/d), the expression of the oxidative stress marker protein heat shock protein homolog Hsc70 was up-regulated and glutathione-S-transferase P was down-regulated[38]. For instance, MSG may cause excessive production of free radicals, as well as reduce the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes to induce liver damage[39], and whether such pro-oxidant effect exists in the other organs should be examined in the future. Table 3 lists renal toxicities induced by MSG intake based on animal studies.

    • Studies have shown that MSG can increase the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Newborn rats receiving MSG (4 mg/g) have an obvious aortic vascular disease[40]. In Kumar & Bhandari's study, MSG administration (4 g/kg) was found to increase the oxidative stress of the heart as manifested by several heart disease markers such as lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase[41]. Meanwhile, intake of MSG (0.5−1.5 g/kg) caused myocardial infarction and fatal tachyarrhythmia in rats[42]. Extrapolation of the toxic doses in these studies and safe levels provided in dietary sources should be compared to provide conclusive evidence on potential toxicity of MSG.

      Preclinical studies have shown that MSG also exerts a negative impact on fertility and embryonic development. As an excitatory neurotransmitter, glutamate can disrupt the HPA pathway, thereby reducing the level of sex hormones (including testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone), which ultimately leads to abnormal sperm formation[43]. It has been found that there are a large number of glutamate receptors in the reproductive organs and sperm, posing the reproductive system to be very susceptible to excitatory damage caused by excessive glutamate ingestion. In Wistar rats, it was found that MSG (60 and 120 mg/kg) significantly reduced sperm motility in a dose-dependent manner, and increased sperm with abnormal morphology. Meanwhile, a certain toxic effect on the testis was also found, ultimately leading to male infertility[44]. In addition, high-dose intake of MSG can reduce sperm motility, stagnation of spermatogenesis, and edema. These changes may be related to the inhibition of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase activity in rodents after MSG ingestion[45].

      MSG not only affects the male reproductive system, but also affects the female reproductive system. Current research showed that MSG affects the female reproductive system mainly through excitotoxicity and oxidative stress. MSG could cause arcuate lesions of the hypothalamus, resulting in a decrease in the release of catecholamine concurrent with a decrease in the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone. Therefore, MSG could cause hormone imbalance by disrupting the function of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis[46]. Mondal et al. found that the levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol were significantly increased after oral administration of MSG (0.8, 1.6 and 2.4 mg/kg) to mating female rats for 30−40 d. Therefore, MSG may impair ovarian function by increasing the release of LH, FSH and estradiol and inhibiting follicular maturation[47]. In addition, in neonatal rats given MSG (subcutaneous injection of 4 g/kg every two days until the 10th day after birth), it was found that oocytes doubled, ovarian follicular cysts increased six times, and the number of primitive and atretic follicles also showed an increase[48]. In another study, it was found that when Wistar rats consumed MSG for 14 consecutive days, a decrease in the number of follicles versus an increase in atretic follicles is observed. Thus, it indicated that MSG is toxic to follicles and suppresses ovulation[49].

    • The occurrence of tumors is the result of a comprehensive influence of multiple factors, not only the impact of the internal factors of the organism, but also the result of external environmental factors such as dietary factors. In a study of colorectal cancer (CRC), researchers found that the viability of cancer cells increased after 24 h of incubation with different concentrations of MSG, as well as an increase in the expression levels of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and beclin 1, which are involved in the development and progression of CRC. Therefore, it can be inferred that MSG may exert a promoting effect on the proliferation of CRC cells[6]. In a study of lung cancer, it was found that the glutamate receptor SLC1A1 was significantly up-regulated in tissue samples from patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer cells actively uptake glutamate through SLC1A1 to promote the uptake of cystine through XC-, thereby promoting the biosynthesis of reduced glutathione (GSH) and alleviating the oxidative stress generated during the growth of cancer cells[50]. Newborn Wistar rats were injected subcutaneously with 400 mg/kg MSG before subcutaneous implantation of Walker-256 cells. The results showed that compared with the control group, the tumor volume in the MSG group was larger[51]. Moreover, newborn mice were given MSG (2 mg/kg) and azoxymethane (AOM), and the mRNA expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor in the MSG-AOM group was increased compared with mice given AOM only. These results suggested that MSG-treated mice are more sensitive to colon cancer induced by AOM[52]. This promotion of cancer may be related to the conversion of Gln to glutamate by glutaminase and further conversion to α-ketoglutarate through the tricarboxylic acid cycle. This reprogramming pathway plays a major role in ATP synthesis, maintaining redox balance, and regulating the energy expenditure of cancer cells[53].

    • Studies have shown that MSG exerts a certain effect on the immune system. In vitro cell experiments showed that MSG significantly increased the frequency of chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchange in human lymphocytes, and this change was dose-dependent. Therefore, MSG may have genotoxic effects on human peripheral blood lymphocytes[54]. It was also found that MSG has a dose-dependent effect on the cell viability of B cells, further to mediate apoptosis of memory cells and initial B cells by affecting the metabotropic glutamate receptor[55]. Likewise, primitive and memory lymphocytes express different glutamate receptors, which induce immune cell apoptosis[55]. In MSG-exposed rats (4 mg/g), it was found that the neuroendocrine-immune functions were altered[56]. Administration of MSG to mice (day 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 after birth) was found to ameliorate the defense mechanism of the mice against pathogenic microorganisms[57]. In another animal experiments, MSG (4 mg/g, i.p. for 6 d) appeared to inhibit the proliferation of thymocytes, which may be related to the promotion of cell apoptosis[58], or it may be associated with the increase of oxidative stress[59]. The natural killer cell cytotoxicity depression was correlated to the decreased numbers of large granular lymphocytes in MSG-treated mice[60].

    • In addition to the above-mentioned adverse effects, MSG could also result in asthma[61], allergic reactions and genetic toxicity. Zanfirescu et al. found that after 21 d of administration of MSG (300 mg/kg) in mice, the thermal nociception threshold was significantly reduced, which may be related to the increase in brain nitrate concentration[62]. After the neonatal rats were injected with MSG (4 mg/g), it was found that MSG had a certain effect on the regulation of rats hypothalamic center in the pituitary-thyroid axis[63]. It was also reported that MSG exhibits a certain effect on the cognition and hippocampal synapse of obese mice[64]. MSG could also cause endocrine dysfunction in mice, which may be related to the lack of Enk cells and fibers in the hypothalamus[65]. Studies have shown that neonatal MSG treatment (2 or 4 g/kg) could lastingly promote the spread of cortical depression in rats. Therefore, consumption of MSG in developing organisms requires careful monitoring and or whether such effects could occur from mothers feeding on MSG should be determined[66]. In addition, it reported that administration of MSG in the second or third trimester not only makes the offspring obese, but it has also been found to cause behavior defects in the offspring[67]. MSG could also induce apoptosis of thymocytes, which may be related to the oxidative stress induced by MSG in appetite[68]. Meanwhile, it has been found that gavage of MSG could accelerate the occurrence of Alzheimer’s disease in APP/PS1 mice[69]. Further, adult rats treated with MSG, showed behavioral deficits[70]. Demirkapu et al. reported that long-term administration of MSG (1.0 g/L) during the developmental period of rats could cause excessive excitement of the central nervous system (CNS) and lead to epilepsy[71]. Rats administered with high doses of MSG (3.0 and 3.5 mg/g) also affects motor coordination, and the number of Purkinje cells in the cerebellum is also significantly reduced[72]. Studies have shown that when rats consume MSG, pancreatic lysosomes have also undergone corresponding changes. The main manifestations include swelling of mitochondria, changes in zymogen particles, with the ultrastructure of pancreatic acinar cells revealing an increase in the number and size of autophagic vacuoles[73]. Ataseven et al. co-incubated different concentrations of MSG (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 and 8,000 μg/mL) and human lymphocytes in vitro, and found that MSG can cause DNA damage to human lymphocytes, chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, and cell division after 1 h in vitro incubation. The frequency of aberrations that block micronuclei increases, suggesting that MSG is genetically toxic to human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro[54]. In addition, it was found that MSG can limit the adipogenicity potential of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, and this may be related to the clonal expansion of mitosis[74]. In 1981, Allen & Baker reported for the first time that asthma occurred 12 h after eating in a Chinese restaurant[75] Subsequently, they reported that 14 of 32 patients had asthma attacks after ingesting MSG in 1987[76]. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study revealed that after 14 healthy men drank sugar-free soda containing MSG for 2 h, human subjects had a significant increase in headache and pericrania muscle tenderness[77]. In addition, it is closely related to the occurrence and progression of psychiatric symptoms[78]. A clinical study showed that in Chinese adults of normal weight, the intake of MSG may increase the risk of sleep disordered breathing[79]. Meanwhile, after analyzing the data of 1,227 subjects participating in the Jiangsu Nutrition Study, it was found that the intake of MSG may independently increase blood pressure[80]. MSG induced miscellaneous injuries are summarized in Table 4.

      Table 4.  MSG-induced miscellanious injuries.

      DiseasesDosage/daySpeciesEffectsReferences
      Cardiovascular diseases4 mg/gNewborn ratsResulted in typical adult life MetS and oxidative stress with significant increase in ET-1 and MMP-1 with aortic vasculopathy[41]
      4 g/kgNeonatal Wistar ratsInduced dyslipidemia and oxidative stress[42]
      I.v 1.5 g/kgWistar ratsInduced bradycardia[43]
      Fertility and fetal development60 and 120 mg/kgAdult male ratsSignificant damage to the reproductive system[45]
      6, 17.5 and 60 mg/kgMature male Wistar ratsInduced testicular toxicity and reduce the oxidative stress on testis tissues[46]
      S.c. 4 g/kgMale and female Wistar ratsMale rats were more susceptible to induce metabolic alterations[47]
      0.8, 1.6 and 2.4 mg/kg BW/dayFemale virgin albino ratsSuppressed the female reproductive function by impairing the functions of ovary and uterus[48]
      S.c 4 g/kgPregnant Wistar ratsDecrease in oocyte count and increase the total primordial and atretic follicles[49]
      0.2 g/kgFemale Wistar ratsDecrease in primary follicle count and increased in atretic follicle count[50]
      CancerS.c 400 mg/kgNewborn male Wistar ratsIncreased tumor growth[51]
      S.c 2 mg/gThe pregnant ICR miceHighly susceptible to AOM-induced colorectal carcinogenesis[52]
      Immune systemHuman lymphocytes250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 and 8,000 μg/mLShowed genotoxic to the human peripheral blood lymphocytes[55]
      1−100 mMB cellsInduced apoptosis in naïve and memory human B cells[56]
      I.p. 4 mg/gAdult male and female Sprague-Dawley ratsInduced immune derangements[57]
      2 mg/gC57BL/6J male miceImpaired the defense mechanism against invasion of pathogenic microbes[58]
      I.p.4 mg/gMale Wistar ratsTriggered the thymocyte apoptosis[59]
      4 mg/gInduced thymocyte apoptosis[60]
      Newborn miceDestructed the mouse arcuate nucleus[61]
      Miscellaneous ellaneous effects300 mg/kgMale NMRI miceInduced hyperalgesia[63]
      4 mg/gNewborn ratsAffected the thyroid function[64]
      2 mg/gNewborn miceInduced obesity and recognition memory deficits[65]
      MiceExhibited endocrine dysfunctions[66]
      2 or 4 g/kgMale Wistar ratInfluenced cortical excitability[67]
      RatsCaused behavioral deficits[69]
      4 mg/gAdult male Wistar ratsInduced oxidative stress and apoptosis in thymocyte[60]
      0.5% MSG and 1% MSGAPPswe, PSEN1dE9-85Dbo/J transgenic mice and WT miceAccelerated AD-like pathophysiology in a
      mouse model of AD
      [70]
      S.c 3 mg/gPregnant Hannover-Wistar female ratsReduced locomotion[71]
      1.0 g/LWistar Albino ratsIncreased CNS excitability[72]
      3.0 and 3.5 mg/gWistar ratsDecreased motor coordination and the estimated total number of Purkinje cell of rats[73]
      0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%
      and 0.5%
      Male Wistar ratsInduced pancreatic acinar cells injury[74]
      250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000 and 8,000 μg/mLHuman lymphocytesInduced genotoxicity[55]
      100 μM, 250 μM, 2.5 mM and 25 mM3T3-L1 preadipocytes cellsChanges in cell proliferation and lipid accumulation[75]
      2.5 gTwo young womenInduced asthma[76]
      SubjectsInduced asthma and make recognition difficult[77]
      75 or 150 mg/kg14 healthy menInduced headache and craniofacial pain[78]
      Induced chronic pain[79]
      1,227 Chinese subjectsIncreased the risk of SDB in Chinese adults[80]
      1,227 Chinese men and womenIndependent BP-increasing effects[81]
    • This review highlights that MSG ingestion can be associated with obesity, NAFLD, neurotoxicity, renal toxicity, cardiovascular diseases and cancer in different models (including cell, animal, and clinical studies). Therefore, it is of value to identify approaches that can aid or prevent against the negative effects of MSG. Current research shows that some medicinal plants and nutraceuticals have a good protective effect on the diseases induced by MSG (Fig 4). Table 5 lists the main plants, natural products and specific mechanisms that exert protective effects as also discussed subsequently.

      Figure 4. 

      Nutraceuticals and natural products protective effect against MSG toxic actions in human functions.

      Table 5.  Protective effects of some plants or natural products against various MSG negative health effects.

      Target MSG-induced diseasesCompoundDose or concentrationExperimental modelEffectsReferences
      Metabolic syndromeVitamin D0.2 mcg/kgFemale ratsSuppressed body weight[82]
      Probiotics109 CFU/kgNewborn ratsRecovery of lipid metabolism and prevention of the obesity development[83]
      Pentamethylquercetin5, 10 and 20 mg/kgObese miceAmeliorated obesity phenotypes and improved metabolic disorders[84]
      Quercetin5 mg/kgC57BL/6J miceReduced the hypothalamus damage and the expression of liver RetSat[85]
      n-6/n-3 PUFAsn-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio of 1.2: 1.0Female micePrevented metabolic dysfunction[86]
      Quercetin75 mg/kgMale Wistar ratsNormalized serum lipid and glucose profile[87]
      (p-CIPhSe)210 mg/kgNewborn Wistar ratsReduced hepatotoxicity[89]
      Berberine150 mg/kgNewborn ratsAlleviated postnatal metabolic disorders associated vascular endothelial dysfunction[41]
      Polyphenol-rich extract of Syzygium cumini leaf500 mg/kgObese ratsImproved peripheral insulin sensitivity[90]
      Nervous systemAllium sativum powder200 mg/kgMale Wistar albino ratsAnti-oxidative stress and apoptosis[91]
      Calendula officinalis L. flowers100 and 200 mg/kgAdult female Wistar ratsAntioxidant and anti-inflammatory[92]
      Rosemary extract and/
      or fluoxetine
      50 mg/kgMale Sprague-Dawley ratsAntioxidant and anti-inflammatory[93]
      KidneyZinc oxide nanoparticlesReduced the level of intracellular peroxidation by enhancing antioxidant capacity[95]
      Nigella sativa seeds30 g/kgMale adult albino ratsRebalanced LPO and TAC, antioxidant and cytoprotective activities[96]
      OthersHibiscus sabdariffa extract180 mg/kgAdult ratsReduced oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis[97]
      N-Acetylcysteine500 μMC6 cellsProtected C6 stellate cells[98]
    • Studies have shown that vitamin D can effectively alleviate MSG-induced obesity[81]. Regular administration of probiotics to newborn rats could restore the lipid metabolism disorder and obesity caused by MSG[82]. Identification of exact microbial strain mediating these beneficial effects should be examined to be conclusive. Du et al. reported that pentamethylquercetin could improve cardiac remodeling in MSG-induced obesity of mice through the Sestrins/Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway[83]. In the study by Zhao et al., dietary quercetin was found to reduce the hypothalamus damage and reduce the expression of liver RetSat by regulating intestinal flora imbalance induced by MSG, thereby combating MSG-induced abdominal obesity[84]. Moreover, Baccharis dracunculifolia methanol extract[85], Cedrus deodara extract[86] and (p-CIPhSe)2[87] showed good resistance to MSG-induced obesity. Identification of the active agent in these dietary sources or functional foods such as Cedrus deodara should be thoroughly investigated and the underlying action mechanisms understood.

      In addition, Abo et al. showed that berberine alkaloid alleviated MSG-induced postnatal metabolic disorders associated vascular endothelial dysfunction in newborn rats[40]. Bezafibrate, a fibrate drug used as a lipid-lowering agent to treat hyperlipidemia was found to effectively improve the metabolic syndrome induced by MSG in a mouse model of NASH[88]. Polyphenol-rich extract of Syzygium cumini leaf was reported to likewise improve peripheral insulin sensitivity by regulating β-cell insulin release, in obese MSG-induced metabolic syndrome rats[89].

    • A study suggested that Amphora coffeaeformis algae has a potential neuroprotective effect on the neurotoxicity induced by MSG in adult rats[5]. Ginger and propolis exerted similar protective effects, though with no evidence of the underlying chemical profile[33]. In addition, Allium sativum powder could improve MSG-induced neurotoxicity by alleviating the proliferation and apoptosis of glial cells in rat brain tissues induced by oxidative stress[90]. Other reported nutraceuticals to exert similar effect include the extracts of ginger (Zingiber officinale) root[91], quercetin[92] and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator Pioglitazone[93].

    • Zanuzo et al. reported that the proper physical exercise and vitamin D supplementation could increase the thickness of the renal cortex and reduce the degeneration of the renal tubules, thereby preventing kidney damage[94]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles reduced the level of intracellular peroxidation by enhancing cellular antioxidant capacity, thereby reducing the kidney damage caused by MSG in rats. In addition, Nigella sativa L. seeds have also been found to reduce MSG-induced testicular damage through antioxidant and cytoprotective activities[95]. Whether such effects can be attributed to the major phytochemical thymoquinone in nigella seed has yet to be confirmed.

    • It was reported that Hibiscus sabdariffa or roselle extract could reverse MSG-induced testicular toxicity by reducing oxidative stress and cellular apoptosis in adult rats[96]. Park et al. found that N-acetylcysteine exerts a protective effect on the toxicity of C6 astrocytes induced by MSG, and this may be related to the protection of C6 stellate cells from MSG-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress[97]. Studies showed that exercise could help both developing and adult brains against the harmful effects of MSG[98], this notion was supported by Araujo et al.[99]. Studies have found that (p-CIPhSe)2 can reverse MSG high glucose metabolism and inhibit mitochondrial malfunction in rats[100].

    • Being an essential amino acid for the human body, MSG participates in various metabolic reactions. Currently, there are no strict regulations on the daily intake of MSG. The FDA stipulates that MSG should be labeled on the outer packaging of a product, but in fact, MSG is also found in natural ingredients such as soy and yeast extracts. Therefore, this makes it difficult to define the extract amount of consumers’ daily ingestion. Research showed that China is the country with the highest consumption of MSG worldwide. Asia has become the region with the highest consumption of MSG due to the increasing demand for MSG in Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. However, MSG is banned in America, Canada and Mexico due to rising obesity rates.

      Generally, relevant regulations in the food field consider additives to be safe and harmless to the human body. However, an increasing number of preclinical and clinical studies have raised doubts about MSG safety. Normal doses of MSG have important functions in the human body, but long-term high concentrations of MSG may have adverse effects on the human body, with multiple effects on organs and systems. We speculated that the main reason for the contradiction lies in the misuse or overuse of MSG. Another reason is that with the continuous development of society, humans have stricter requirements on the taste of food, so more condiments are added to encompass the requirements, which leads to people ingesting more MSG, increasing the risk of side-effects. The third possibility is that, due to the limitation of technical means or the short observation time, it was mistakenly hypothesized that MSG is not harmful to the human body, with no evident restriction on the use of MSG. Together, more scientifically rigorous, larger-scale preclinical and clinical studies need to be carried out. In addition, investigating another umami enhancer may also be a safe alternative for human health.

    • In conclusion, MSG, as a food additive, produces a special umami taste by activating TAS1R1-TAS1R3 on the tongue. It is favored by people worldwide, and as the use of MSG has increased, its safety has been controversial. Research results in recent years have shown that excessive intake of MSG will produce a series of adverse effects on the human body, including obesity, metabolic syndrome, kidney, immune, reproductive, nervous, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular system damage. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen publicity and education on the harmful effects of MSG overdose on the human body and raise people’s awareness. On the other hand, more rigorous human clinical experimental studies on MSG also need to be carried out. In cell and animal models, MSG overconsumption related health effects have been sufficiently confirmed; however, a lack of clinical studies significantly limits the reliability of the obtained information. With the advances in metabolomics and other omics, better monitoring of MSG metabolism can be also achieved. With the development of multi-omics and bioinformatics, intestinal flora has been confirmed to be closely related to human digestion, absorption, metabolism, immunity and other functions. Such in depth studies of the biological and functional activities of the metabolites derived following ingestion will consolidate the understanding of the link between the health effects and the intake of MSG.

      • This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072212).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Nanjing Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (5) References (100)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yang L, Gao Y, Gong J, Peng L, El-Seedi HR, et al. 2023. A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies. Food Materials Research 3:16 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2023-0016
    Yang L, Gao Y, Gong J, Peng L, El-Seedi HR, et al. 2023. A multifaceted review of monosodium glutamate effects on human health and its natural remedies. Food Materials Research 3:16 doi: 10.48130/FMR-2023-0016

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return