ARTICLE   Open Access    

Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress

More Information
  • Plant domestication via various agricultural practices, e.g., variety selection and fertilizer application, has resulted in a narrowed plant genetic diversity in modern cultivars and also altered soil ancestral microbiota. The effect of the changes in plant genetic background and/or soil fertility on the plant root-associated microbial community assembly is largely unknown. Here, the differences of bacterial community compositions in root-associated compartments of cultivated and wild tomato accessions were investigated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing under phosphorus (P) limitation. Results showed that wild tomato Solanum pimpinellifolium 'LA1589' presented a less sensitive stress response and possessed a less diverse microbiome under low phosphorus (LP) condition than cultivar Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme 'ZheYingFen No.1'. The impact of plant domestication on microbial diversity increased from rhizosphere to endosphere and from P-replete to P-depleted conditions. Further investigation indicated that wild LA1589 may cope with P deficiency by recruiting more LP-enriched microbes and more phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Comparison analysis with two additional modern tomato cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum cv. MoneyMaker and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Alisa Craig) showed that components of the microbial community were conserved in all these three cultivars. Collectively, our results clarified that domestication shifted the root-associated microbiome composition and exploring beneficial microbes in wild species may contribute to efficient use of soil nutrients and reduction in the use of fertilizers in agriculture.
  • In a recent report on Latin America's next petroleum boom, The Economist refers to the current and future situation in oil producing countries in the region. In the case of Argentina, the increase in oil and gas output 'have led to an increase in production in Vaca Muerta, a mammoth field in Argentina's far west. It holds the world's second-largest shale gas deposits and its fourth-largest shale oil reserves… Rystad Energy expects shell-oil production in Argentina will more than double by the end of the decade, to over a million barrels per day'[1].

    Oil production in Argentina is currently dominated by three Patagonian areas: Neuquén, San Jorge, and Austral. Based on 2021 information, 49% of oil reserves of Argentina are located in Neuquén, whereas San Jorge has 46%. Neuquén is also the largest source of oil (57%) and gas (37%) in the country. According to 2018 data, conventional oil produced in Argentina amounts to 87%, whereas non-conventional, shale production represents 13%; however, non-conventional oil is increasing due to Vaca Muerta shale oil exploitation.

    This increase of production in the Patagonian fields requires the use of a large fluid storage capacity by means of vertical oil storage tanks having different sizes and configurations. Tanks are required to store not just oil but also water. The exploitation of nonconventional reservoirs, such as Vaca Muerta, involves massive water storage to carry out hydraulic stimulation in low-permeability fields, and for managing the return fluid and production water at different stages of the process (storage, treatment, and final disposal).

    Storage tanks in the oil industry are large steel structures; they may have different sizes, and also different shell configurations, such as vertical cylinders with a fixed roof or with a floating roof and opened at the top[2]. It is now clear that such oil infrastructure is vulnerable to accidents caused by extreme weather events[35].

    Data from emergencies occurring in oil fields shows that accidents due to regional winds, with wind speed between 150 and 240 km/h, may cause severe tank damage. Seismic activity in the region, on the other hand, is of less concern to tank designers in Patagonia.

    Damage and failure mechanisms of these tanks largely depend on tank size and configuration, and their structural response should be considered from the perspective of shell mechanics and their consequences. In a report on damage observed in tanks following hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005[6,7], several types of damage were identified. The most common damage initiation process is due to shell buckling[811], which may progress into plasticity at higher wind speeds. In open-top tanks, a floating roof does not properly slide on a buckled cylindrical shell, and this situation may lead to different failure mechanisms. Further, damage and loss of integrity have the potential to induce oil spills, with direct consequences of soil contamination and also of fire initiation.

    Concern about an emergency caused by such wind-induced hazards involves several stakeholders, because the consequences may affect the operation of oil plants, the local and regional economies, the safety of the population living in the area of a refinery or storage farm, and the environment[6]. In view of the importance of preserving the shell integrity and avoiding tank damage, there is a need to evaluate risk of existing tanks at a regional level, such as in the Neuquén and San Jorge areas. This information may help decision makers in adopting strategies (such as structural reinforcement of tanks to withstand expected wind loads) or post-event actions (like damaged infrastructure repair or replacement).

    The studies leading to the evaluation of risk in the oil infrastructure are known as vulnerability studies, and the most common techniques currently used are fragility curves[12]. These curves evaluate the probability of reaching or exceeding a given damage level as a function of a load parameter (such as wind speed in this case).

    Early studies in the field of fragility of tanks were published[13] from post-event earthquake damage observations. Studies based on computational simulation of tank behavior under seismic loads were reported[14]. The Federal Emergency Management Administration in the US developed fragility curves for tanks under seismic loads for regions in the United States, and more recently, this has been extended to hurricane and flood events in coastal areas[15]. Seismic fragility in Europe has been reviewed by Pitilakis et al.[16], in which general concepts of fragility are discussed. Bernier & Padgett[17] evaluated the failure of tanks due to hurricane Harvey using data from aerial images and government databases. Fragility curves were developed based on finite element analyses and damage of the tank population was identified in the Houston Ship Channel. Flood and wind due to hurricane Harvey were also considered[18] to develop fragility curves.

    Because fragility curves for tanks under wind depend on the wind source (either hurricane or regional winds), and the type and size of tanks identified in a region, fragility curves developed for one area are not possible to be directly used in other areas under very different inventory and wind conditions.

    This paper addresses problems of shell buckling and loss of integrity of open top tanks, with wind-girders and floating roof and it focuses on the development of fragility curves as a way to estimate damage states under a given wind pressure. The region of interest in this work covers the oil producing areas in Patagonia, Argentina. Damage of tanks under several wind pressures are evaluated by finite element analyses together with methodologies to evaluate the structural stability.

    The construction of fragility curves requires information from the following areas: First, an inventory of tanks to be included in the analysis; second, data about the loads in the region considered; third, data about structural damage, either observed or computed via modeling; and fourth, a statistical model that links damage and load/structure data. This section describes the main features of the tank population considered in the study.

    The construction of an inventory at a regional level is a very complex task, which is largely due to a lack of cooperation from oil companies to share information about their infrastructure. Thus, to understand the type of tanks in an oil producing region, one is left collecting a limited number of structural drawings and aerial photography. A detailed inventory of the Houston Ship Channel was carried out by Bernier et al.[19], who identified 390 floating roof tanks. An inventory for Puerto Rico[20] identified 82 floating roof tanks. Although both inventories used different methodologies and addressed very different tank populations, some common features were found in both cases.

    An alternative strategy to carry out fragility studies is to develop a database using a small number of tanks, for which a detailed structural behavior is investigated using finite element analysis. This is a time-consuming task, but it allows identification of buckling pressures, buckling modes, and shell plasticity. This information serves to build approximate fragility curves, and it can also be used to develop what are known as meta-models, which predict structural damage based on tank/load characteristics. Such meta-models take the form of equations that include the tank geometry and wind speed to estimate damage. Meta-models were used, for example, in the work of Kameshwar & Padgett[18].

    This work employs a simplified strategy, and addresses the first part of the procedure described above. The use of a limited number of tanks in a database, for which a finite element structural analysis is carried out. This leads to fragility curves based on a simplified tank population (reported in this work) and the development of a meta-model together with enhanced fragility results will be reported and compared in a future work.

    Partial information of tanks in the Patagonian region was obtained from government sources, and this was supplemented by aerial photography showing details of tank farms in the region. As a result of that, it was possible to establish ranges of tank dimensions from which an artificial database was constructed.

    The present study is restricted to open-top tanks with a wind girder at the top. They are assumed to have floating roofs, which are designed and fabricated to allow the normal operation of the roof without the need of human intervention. The main characteristics of tanks investigated in this paper, are illustrated in Fig. 1.

    Figure 1.  Geometric characteristics of open-topped oil storage considered in this paper.

    The range of interest in terms of tank diameter D was established between 35 m < D < 60 m. Based on observation of tanks in the region, the ratios D/H were found to be in the range 0.20 < D/H < 0.60, leading to cylinder height H in the range 12 m < H < 20 m. These tanks were next designed using API 650[21] regulations to compute their shell thickness and wind girder dimensions. A variable thickness was adopted in elevation, assuming 3 m height shell courses. The geometries considered are listed in Table 1, with a total of 30 tanks having combinations of five values of H and six values of D. The volume of these tanks range between 55,640 and 272,520 m3.

    Table 1.  Geometry and course thickness of 30 tanks considered in this work.
    H
    (m)
    CoursesThickness t (m)
    D = 35 mD = 40 mD = 45 mD = 50 mD = 55 mD = 60 m
    12V10.0140.0160.0180.0180.0200.022
    V20.0120.0120.0140.0160.0160.018
    V30.0080.0100.0100.0100.0120.012
    V40.0060.0080.0080.0080.0080.008
    14V10.0160.0180.0200.0220.0250.025
    V20.0140.0140.0160.0180.0200.020
    V30.0100.0120.0120.0140.0140.016
    V40.0080.0080.0080.0100.0100.010
    V50.0060.0080.0080.0080.0080.008
    16V10.0180.0200.0220.0250.0280.028
    V20.0160.0180.0180.0200.0220.025
    V30.0120.0140.0160.0160.0180.020
    V40.0100.0100.0120.0120.0140.014
    V50.0060.0080.0080.0080.0080.010
    V60.0060.0080.0080.0080.0080.010
    18V10.0200.0220.0250.0280.0300.032
    V20.0180.0200.0220.0250.0250.028
    V30.0140.0160.0180.0200.0200.022
    V40.0120.0120.0140.0160.0160.018
    V50.0080.0100.0100.0100.0120.012
    V60.0080.0100.0100.0100.0120.012
    20V10.0220.0250.0280.0300.0320.035
    V20.0200.0220.0250.0280.0280.032
    V30.0160.0180.0200.0220.0250.028
    V40.0140.0140.0160.0180.0200.020
    V50.0100.0120.0120.0140.0140.016
    V60.0100.0120.0120.0140.0140.016
    V70.0100.0120.0120.0140.0140.016
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The material assumed in the computations was A36 steel, with modulus of elasticity E = 201 GPa and Poisson's ratio ν = 0.3.

    For each tank, a ring stiffener was designed as established by API 650[21], in order to prevent buckling modes at the top of the tank. The minimum modulus Z to avoid ovalization at the top of the tank is given by

    Z=D2H17(V190)2 (1)

    where V is the wind speed, in this case taken as V = 172.8 km/h for the Patagonian region. Intermediate ring stiffeners were not observed in oil tanks in Patagonia, so they were not included in the present inventory.

    Because a large number of tanks need to be investigated in fragility studies, it is customary to accept some simplifications in modeling the structure to reduce the computational effort. The geometry of a typical ring stiffener at the top is shown in Fig. 2a, as designed by API 650. A simplified version was included in this research in the finite element model, in which the ring stiffener is replaced by an equivalent thickness at the top, as suggested in API Standard 650[21]. This approach has been followed by most researchers in the field. The equivalent model is shown in Fig. 2b.

    Figure 2.  Ring stiffener, (a) design according to API 650, (b) equivalent section[22].

    The pressure distribution due to wind around a short cylindrical shell has been investigated in the past using wind tunnels and computational fluid dynamics, and a summary of results has been included in design regulations.

    There is a vast number of investigations on the pressures in storage tanks due to wind, even if one is limited to isolated tanks, as in the present paper. For a summary of results, see, for example, Godoy[11], and only a couple of studies are mentioned here to illustrate the type of research carried out in various countries. Wind tunnel tests were performed in Australia[23], which have been the basis of most subsequent studies. Recent tests in Japan on small scale open top tanks were reported[24,25]. In China, Lin & Zhao[26] reported tests on fixed roof tanks. CFD models, on the other hand, were computed[27] for open top tanks with an internal floating roof under wind flow. Although there are differences between pressures obtained in different wind tunnels, the results show an overall agreement.

    The largest positive pressures occur in the windward meridian covering an angle between 30° and 45° from windward. Negative pressures (suction), on the other hand, reach a maximum at meridians located between 80° and 90° from windward. An evaluation of US and European design recommendations has been reported[28,29], who also considered the influence of fuel stored in the tank.

    The circumferential variation of pressures is usually written in terms of a cosine Fourier series. The present authors adopted the series coefficients proposed by ASCE regulations[30], following the analytical expression:

    q=λinCicos(iφ) (2)

    in which λ is the amplification factor; the angle φ is measured from the windward meridian; and coefficients Ci represent the contribution of each term in the series. The following coefficients were adopted in this work (ASCE): C0 = −0.2765, C1 = 0.3419, C2 = 0.5418, C3 = 0.3872, C4 = 0.0525, C5 = 0.0771, C6 = −0.0039 and C7 = 0.0341. For short tanks, such as those considered in this paper, previous research reported[31] that for D/H = 0.5 the variation of the pressure coefficients in elevation is small and may be neglected to simplify computations. Thus, the present work assumes a uniform pressure distribution in elevation at each shell meridian.

    In fragility studies, wind speed, rather than wind pressures, are considered, so that the following relation from ASCE is adopted in this work:

    qz=0.613KztKdV2IV=qz0.613KztKdI (3)

    in which I is the importance factor; Kd is the directionality factor; and Kzt is the topographic factor. Values of I = 1.15, Kd = 0.95 and Kzt = 1, were adopted for the computations reported in this paper.

    Because shell buckling was primarily investigated in this work using a bifurcation analysis, the scalar λ was increased in the analysis until the finite element analysis detected a singularity.

    Fragility curves are functions that describe the probability of failure of a structural system (oil tanks in the present case) for a range of loads (wind pressures) to which the system could be exposed. In cases with low uncertainty in the structural capacity and acting loads, fragility curves take the form of a step-function showing a sudden jump (see Fig. 3a). Zero probability occurs before the jump and probability equals to one is assumed after the jump. But in most cases, in which there is uncertainty about the structural capacity to withstand the load, fragility curves form an 'S' shape, as shown in Fig. 3a and b probabilistic study is required to evaluate fragility.

    Figure 3.  Examples of fragility curves, (a) step-function, (b) 'S' shape function.

    The construction of fragility curves is often achieved by use of a log-normal distribution. In this case, the probability of reaching a certain damage level is obtained by use of an exponential function applied to a variable having a normal distribution with mean value μ and standard deviation σ. If a variable x follows a log-normal distribution, then the variable log(x) has a normal distribution, with the following properties:

    • For x < 0, a probability equal to 0 is assigned. Thus, the probability of failure for this range is zero.

    • It can be used for variables that are computed by means of a number of random variables.

    • The expected value in a log-normal distribution is higher than its mean value, thus assigning more importance to large values of failure rates than would be obtained in a normal distribution.

    The probability density function for a log-normal distribution may be written in the form[32]:

    f(xi)=12πσ21xexp[(lnxµ)2/(2σ2)] (4)

    in which f(xi) depends on the load level considered, and is evaluated for a range of interest of variable x; and μ* is the mean value of the logarithm of variable x associated with each damage level. Damage levels xi are given by Eqn (5).

    µ(xi)=1NNn=1ln(xin) (5)

    where the mean value is computed for a damage level xi, corresponding to I = DSi; summation in n extends to the number of tanks considered in the computation of the mean value. Damage levels in this work are evaluated using computational modeling and are defined in the next section. Variance is the discrete variable xi 2), computed from:

    σ2(xi,µ)=1NNn=1(ln(xin)µ)2=1NNn=1ln(xin)2µ2 (6)

    The probability of reaching or exceeding a damage level DSi is computed by the integral of the density function using Eqn (7), for a load level considered (the wind speed in this case):

    P[DS/x]=x=V0x=0f(x)dx (7)

    where V0 is the wind speed at which computations are carried out, and x is represented by wind speed V.

    Various forms of structural damage may occur as a consequence of wind loads, including elastic or plastic deflections, causing deviations from the initial perfect geometry; crack initiation or crack extension; localized or extended plastic material behavior; and structural collapse under extreme conditions. For the tanks considered in this work, there are also operational consequences of structural damage, such as blocking of a floating roof due to buckling under wind loads that are much lower than the collapse load. For this reason, a damage study is interested in several structural consequences but also in questions of normal operation of the infrastructure. Several authors pointed out that there is no direct relation between structural damage and economic losses caused by an interruption of normal operation of the infrastructure.

    Types of damage are usually identified through reconnaissance post-event missions, for example following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita[6,7]. Damage states reported in Godoy[7] include shell buckling, roof buckling, loss of thermal insulation, tank displacement as a rigid body, and failure of tank/pipe connections. These are qualitative studies, in which damage states previously reported in other events are identified and new damage mechanisms are of great interest in order to understand damage and failure modes not taken into account by current design codes.

    In this work, in which interest is restricted to open top tanks having a wind girder at the top, four damage states were explored, as shown in Table 2. Regarding the loss of functionality of a tank, several conditions may occur: (1) No consequences for the normal operation of a tank; (2) Partial loss of operation capacity; (3) Complete loss of operation.

    Table 2.  Damage states under wind for open-top tanks with a wind girder.
    Damage states (DS)Description
    DS0No damage
    DS1Large deflections on the cylindrical shell
    DS2Buckling of the cylindrical shell
    DS3Large deflections on the stiffening ring
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    DS1 involves displacements in some area of the cylindrical body of the tank, and this may block the free vertical displacement of the floating roof. Notice that this part of the tank operation is vital to prevent the accumulation of inflammable gases on top of the fluid stored. Blocking of the floating roof may cause a separation between the fuel and the floating roof, which in turn may be the initial cause of fire or explosion.

    DS2 is associated with large shell deflections, which may cause failure of pipe/tank connections. High local stresses may also arise in the support of helicoidal ladders or inspection doors, with the possibility of having oil spills.

    DS3 is identified for a loss of circularity of the wind girder. The consequences include new deflections being transferred to the cylindrical shell in the form of geometrical imperfections.

    In summary, DS1 and DS3 may affect the normal operation of a floating roof due to large shell or wind-girder deflections caused by buckling.

    Tank modeling was carried out in this work using a finite element discretization within the ABAQUS environment[33] using rectangular elements with quadratic interpolation functions and reduced integration (S8R5 in the ABAQUS nomenclature). Two types of shell analysis were performed: Linear Bifurcation Analysis (LBA), and Geometrically Nonlinear Analysis with Imperfections (GNIA). The tank perimeter was divided into equal 0.35 m segments, leading to between 315 and 550 elements around the circumference, depending on tank size. Convergence studies were performed and errors in LBA eigenvalues were found to be lower than 0.1%.

    The aim of an LBA study is to identify a first critical buckling state and buckling mode by means of an eigenvalue problem. The following expression is employed:

    (K0+λCKG)ΦC=0 (8)

    where K0 is the linear stiffness matrix of the system; KG is the load-geometry matrix, which includes the non-linear terms of the kinematic relations; λC is the eigenvalue (buckling load); and ΦC is the critical mode (eigenvector). For a reference wind state, λ is a scalar parameter. One of the consequences of shell buckling is that geometric deviations from a perfect geometry are introduced in the shell, so that, due to imperfection sensitivity, there is a reduced shell capacity for any future events.

    The aim of the GNIA study is to follow a static (non-linear) equilibrium path for increasing load levels. The GNIA study is implemented in this work using the Riks method[34,35], which can follow paths in which the load or the displacement decrease. The geometric imperfection was assumed with the shape of the first eigenvector at the critical state in the LBA study, and the amplitude of the imperfection was defined by means of a scalar ξ [10]. To illustrate this amplitude, for a tank with D = 45 m and H = 12 m, the amplitude of imperfection is equal to half the minimum shell thickness (ξ = 4 mm in this case).

    It was assumed that a damage level DS1 is reached when the displacement amplitudes do not allow the free vertical displacement of the floating roof. Based on information from tanks in the Patagonian region, the limit displacement was taken as 10 mm. This state was detected by GNIA, and the associated load level is identified as λ = λDS1.

    The load at which damage state DS2 occurs was obtained by LBA, leading to a critical load factor λC and a buckling mode. An example of damage levels is shown in Fig. 4.

    Figure 4.  Damage computed for a tank with D = 45 m and H = 12 m. (a) Deflected shape for damage DS1; (b) Equilibrium path for node A (DS1); (c) Deflected shape for damage DS2 (critical mode).

    An LBA study does not account for geometric imperfections. It is well known that the elastic buckling of shells is sensitive to imperfections, so that a reduction in the order of 20% should be expected for cylindrical shells under lateral pressure. This consideration allows to estimate DS0 (a state without damage) as a lower bound of the LBA study. An approach to establish lower bounds for steel storage tanks is the Reduced Stiffness Method (RSM)[3640]. Results for tanks using the RSM to estimate safe loads show that λDS0 = 0.5λDS2 provides a conservative estimate for present purposes.

    DS3 was computed using a linear elastic analysis to evaluate the wind pressure at which a 10 mm displacement of the wind girder is obtained.

    In a similar study for tanks with a fixed conical roof, Muñoz et al.[41] estimated a collapse load based on plastic behavior. However, in the present case the top ring has a significant stiffness, and this leads to extremely high wind speeds before reaching collapse (higher than 500 km/h). For this reason, the most severe damage level considered here was that of excessive out-of-plane displacements of the wind girder, and not shell collapse.

    The methodology to construct fragility curves has been presented by several authors[42,43]. The following procedure was adapted here[44]: (1) Establish qualitative damage categories (Table 2). (2) Compute a data base for different tanks, using LBA and GNIA. In each case, the damage category based on step (1) was identified (Table 3). (3) Approximate data obtained from step (2) using a log-normal distribution. (4) Plot the probabilities computed in step (3) with respect to wind speed x.

    Table 3.  Wind speed for each tank considered reaching a damage level.
    HDIDDS0DS1DS2DS3
    H12D351137.76162.06194.82336.02
    D402160.62181.31227.16360.73
    D453153.32174.19216.82374.04
    D504145.23165.27205.39373.76
    D555152.76180.83216.03374.75
    D606145.11170.75205.22370.98
    H14D357145.57162.05205.87295.03
    D408148.55166.20210.08311.24
    D459136.42153.72192.92334.54
    D5010155.36177.51219.71339.86
    D5511145.24165.34205.39343,17
    D6012141.89167.26200.67338.77
    H16D3513131.32161.94185.71262.20
    D4014146.95163.99207.82277.08
    D4515150.58170.90212.95293.37
    D5016138.97161.05196.54303.62
    D5517138.51174.17195.88313.97
    D6018156.34182.78221.10326.83
    H18D3519146.80160.79207.60223.18
    D4020159.01177.71224.87243.63
    D4521157.10179.51222.17265.32
    D5022152.54172.17215.72293.32
    D5523164.93188.10233.25305.94
    D6024163.69180.32231.49315.63
    H20D3525163.64199.59231.42195.03
    D4026171.24195.14242.18216.47
    D4527171.58203.68242.64293.32
    D5028182.46209.43258.03259.41
    D5529178.95208.23253.07272.48
    D6030174.47196.11246.74290.86
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Wind speeds for each tank, obtained via Eqn (3), are shown in Table 3 for the pressure level associated with each damage level DSi. A scalar ID was included in the table to identify each tank of the population in the random selection process. Wind speed was also taken as a random variable, so that wind speed in the range between 130 and 350 km/h have been considered at 5 km/h increase, with intervals of −2.5 and +2.5 km/h.

    Out of the 30-tank population considered, a sample of 15 tanks were chosen at random and were subjected to random wind forces. The random algorithm allowed for the same tank geometry to be chosen more than once as part of the sample.

    The type of damage obtained in each case for wind speed lower or equal to the upper bound of the interval were identified. Table 4 shows a random selection of tanks, together with the wind speed required to reach each damage level. For example, for a wind speed of 165 km/h, the wind interval is [162.5 km/h, 167.5 km/h]. This allows computation of a damage matrix (shown in Table 5). A value 1 indicates that a damage level was reached, whereas a value 0 shows that a damage level was not reached. In this example, 13 tanks reached DS0; six tanks reached DS1; and there were no tanks reaching DS2 or DS3. The ratio between the number of tanks with a given damage DSi and the total number of tanks selected is h, the relative accumulated frequency. The process was repeated for each wind speed and tank selection considered.

    Table 4.  Random tank selection for V = 165 km/h, assuming wind interval [162.5 km/h, 167.5 km/h].
    IDDS0DS1DS2DS3
    11145.2165.3205.4343.2
    6145.1170.7205.2371.0
    3153.3174.2216.8374.0
    9136.4153.7192.9334.5
    28182.5209.4258.0259.4
    22152.5172.2215.7293.3
    13131.3161.9185.7262.2
    19146.8160.8207.6223.2
    3153.3174.2216.8374.0
    12141.9167.3200.7338.8
    30174.5196.1246.7290.9
    23164.9188.1233.2305.9
    2160.6181.3227.2360.7
    17138.5174.2195.9314.0
    11145.2165.3205.4343.2
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 5.  Damage matrix for random tank selection (V = 165 km/h), assuming wind interval [162.5 km/h, 167.5 km/h].
    DS0DS1DS2DS3
    1100
    1000
    1000
    1100
    0000
    1000
    1100
    1100
    1000
    1100
    0000
    1000
    1000
    1000
    1100
    Total13600
    hi0.870.400
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 6 shows the evaluation of the fragility curve for damage level DS0. This requires obtaining the number of tanks for each wind speed (fi), the cumulative number as wind speed is increased (Fi), and the frequency with respect to the total number of the sample of 15 tanks is written on the right-hand side of Table 6, for relative frequency (hi) and accumulated frequency (Hi).

    Table 6.  Damage DS0: Wind speed intervals [km/h] shown on the left; logarithm of wind speed; and relative and absolute frequencies (shown on the right).
    V inf
    (km/h)
    V m
    (km/h)
    V sup
    (km/h)
    Ln
    (Vm)
    fiFihiHi
    127.5130132.54.87000.0000
    132.5135137.54.91220.1330.133
    137.5140142.54.94130.0670.200
    142.5145147.54.98360.2000.400
    147.5150152.55.01170.0670.467
    152.5155157.55.044110.2670.733
    157.5160162.55.080110.0000.733
    162.5165167.55.112130.1330.867
    167.5170172.55.140130.0000.867
    172.5175177.55.160130.0000.867
    177.5180182.55.192150.1331.000
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    With the values of mean and deviation computed with Eqns (5) & (6), it is possible to establish the log normal distribution of variable V for damage level DS0, usually denoted as P[DS0/V]. Values obtained in discrete form and the log-normal distribution are shown in Fig. 5a for DS0. For the selection shown in Table 6, the media is μ* = 5.03 and the deviation is σ = 0.09.

    Figure 5.  Probability of reaching a damage level P[DSi/V], (a) DS0, (b) DS0, DS1, DS2 and DS3.

    The process is repeated for each damage level to obtain fragility curves for DS1, DS2, and DS3 (Fig. 5b). Notice that the wind speeds required to reach DS3 are much higher than those obtained for the other damage levels. Such values should be compared with the regional wind speeds in Patagonia, and this is done in the next section.

    The oil producing regions in Argentina having the largest oil reserves are the Neuquén and the San Jorge regions, both located in Patagonia. This needs to be placed side by side with wind loads to understand the risk associated with such oil production.

    Figure 6 shows the geographical location of these regions. The Neuquén region includes large areas of four provinces in Argentina (Neuquén, south of Mendoza, west of La Pampa, and Río Negro). The San Jorge region is in the central Patagonia area, including two provinces (south of Chubut, north of Santa Cruz). Another area is the Austral region covering part of a Patagonian province (Santa Cruz).

    Figure 6.  Oil producing regions in Argentina. (Adapted from IAPG[47]).

    A map of basic wind speed for Argentina is available in the Argentinian code CIRSOC 102[45], which is shown in Fig. 7. Notice that the highest wind speeds are found in Patagonia, and affect the oil-producing regions mentioned in this work. For the Neuquén region, wind speeds range from 42 to 48 m/s (151.2 to 172.8 km/h), whereas for San Jorge Gulf region they range between 52 and 66 m/s (187.2 and 237.6 km/h).

    Figure 7.  Wind speed map of Argentina. (Adapted from CIRSOC 102[45]).

    The wind values provided by CIRSOC 102[45] were next used to estimate potential shell damage due to wind. Considering the fragility curves presented in Fig. 4, for damage levels DS0, DS1, DS2 and DS3 based on a log-normal distribution, it may be seen that it would be possible to have some form of damage in tanks located in almost any region of Argentina because CIRSOC specifies wind speeds higher than 36 m/s (129.6 km/h). The fragility curve DS0 represents the onset of damage for wind speeds higher than 130 km/h, so that only winds lower than that would not cause tank damage.

    Based on the fragility curves shown in Fig. 8, it is possible to estimate probable damage levels for the wind speed defined by CIRSOC. Because design winds in Patagonia are higher than 165.6 km/h (46 m/s), it is possible to conclude that there is 81% probability to reach DS0 and 25% to reach DS1.

    Figure 8.  Probability P[DSi/V] to reach damage levels DS1, DS2 and DS3 in tanks located in the Patagonia region of Argentina.

    For the geographical area of the Neuquén region in Fig. 6, together with the wind map of Fig. 7, the expected winds range from 150 to 172.8 km/h (42 to 48 m/s). Such wind range is associated with a DS0 probability between 41% and 92%, whereas the DS1 probability is in the order of 48%.

    A similar analysis was carried out for the San Jorge region, in which winds between 187.2 and 237 km/h (52 and 66 m/s). The probability of reaching DS1 is 87%, and the probability of DS2 is 88%. Wind girder damage DS3 could only occur in this region, with a lower probability of 18%.

    This work focuses on open top tanks having a floating roof, and explores the probability of reaching damage levels for wind loads, using the methodology of fragility curves. A population of 30 tanks was defined with H/D ratios between 0.2 and 0.6; such aspect ratios were found to be the most common in the oil producing regions of Patagonia. The data employed assumed diameters D between 35 and 60 m, together with height between 12 and 20 m. The tanks were designed using current API 650 regulations which are used in the region, in order to define the shell thickness and wind girder. All tanks were assumed to be empty, which is the worst condition for shell stability because a fluid stored in a tank has a stabilizing effect and causes the buckling load to be higher.

    Both structural damage (shell buckling) and operational damage (blocking of the floating roof due to deflections of the cylindrical shell) were considered in the analysis. The qualitative definition of damage levels in this work was as follows: The condition of no damage was obtained from a lower bound of buckling loads. This accounts for geometric imperfections and mode coupling of the shell. Shell buckling was evaluated using linear bifurcation analysis to identify damage level DS2. A geometrically non-linear analysis with imperfections was used to identify deflection levels that would block a floating roof, a damage level identified as DS1. Finally, deflections in the wind girder were investigated using a linear elastic analysis to define damage DS3.

    The present results were compared with the wind conditions of Patagonia, to show that several damage levels may occur as a consequence of wind speeds higher than 130 km/h, which is the expected base value identified for the region. The most frequent expected damage is due to the loss of vertical displacements of the floating roof due to large displacements in the cylindrical shell of the tank, and this may occur for wind speed up to 200 km/h. Damage caused by shell buckling may occur for wind speeds higher than 190 km/h, and for that wind speed, further damage due to displacements in the wind girder may also occur, but with a lower probability. This latter damage form requires much higher wind speed to reach a probability of 20%, and would be more representative of regions subjected to hurricanes.

    The number of tanks considered in the present analysis was relatively low, mainly because the aim of this work was to collect data to build a meta-model, i.e. a simple model that may estimate damage based on shell and load characteristics[46]. In future work, the authors expect to develop and apply such meta-models to a larger number of tank/wind configurations, in order to obtain more reliable fragility curves.

    Fragility studies for an oil producing region, like those reported in this work, may be important to several stakeholders in this problem. The fragility information links wind speed levels to expected infrastructure damage, and may be of great use to government agencies, engineering companies, and society at large, regarding the risk associated with regional oil facilities. At a government level, this helps decision makers in allocating funding to address potential oil-related emergencies cause by wind. This can also serve as a guide to develop further modifications of design codes relevant to the oil infrastructure. The engineering consequences may emphasize the need to strengthen the present regional infrastructure to reduce risk of structural damage and its consequences. The impact of damage in the oil infrastructure on society was illustrated in the case of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, in which a large number of residents had to be relocated due to the conditions created by the consequences of infrastructure failure.

    The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Jaca RC, Godoy LA; data collection: Grill J, Pareti N; analysis and interpretation of results: Jaca RC, Bramardi S, Godoy LA; draft manuscript preparation: Jaca RC, Godoy LA. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

    The authors are thankful for the support of a grant received from the National Agency for the Promotion of Research, Technological Development and Innovation of Argentina and the YPF Foundation. Luis A. Godoy thanks Prof. Ali Saffar (University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez) for introducing him to the field of fragility studies.

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • Supplemental Table S1 Summary statistics of the samples.
    Supplemental Table S2 PERMANOVA analysis of the effects of the niche, P treatment and plant species identity on bacterial community structure.
    Supplemental Table S3 PERMANOVA analysis of the effects of the P treatment and plant species identity on rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial community structure.
    Supplemental Table S4 list of indicator genera associated with ZYF and LA as determined by indicator species analysis and correlation network analysis.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 Coverage index and rarefaction curves for Chao index on OTU level of all the samples showed a good coverage and sequenced deep enough.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 β-diversity represented by n_pca analysis depicts the similarity and differences of bacterial community in ZYF and LA samples. Circles, triangles and error bar refer to the means and SE on PC1 and PC2, respectively. RMP/RLP, rhizospheric samples; EMP/ELP, endophytic samples.
    Supplemental Fig. S3 FAPROTAX analysis showed differences in functional endophytic microbial groups within the tomato cultivar ZYF and the wild relatives LA under LP (a) and MP (b) conditions.
    Supplemental Fig. S4 Comparison analysis of COG functional categories of the specific enrichment bacteria in the correlation network (Fig.4b) between the tomato cultivar ZYF and the wild relatives LA. RMP/RLP, rhizospheric samples; EMP/ELP, endophytic samples.
    Supplemental Fig. S5 Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) coupled with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) characterized endophytic microbiomes among the varieties under MP and LP soil. Only taxa with LDA scores greater than 3.5 are presented. Prefix p_phyla, c_class, o_order, f_family, and g_genus.
    Supplemental Fig. S6 The Olsen-P concentration in mock soils and soils grown tomato varieties under different P treatments. MP, Moderate P; LP, Low P.
  • Abdelfattah A, Tack AJM, Wasserman B, Liu J, Berg G, et al. 2022. Evidence for host–microbiome co-evolution in apple. New Phytologist 234:2088−100

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17820

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Abdullaeva Y, Ambika Manirajan B, Honermeier B, Schnell S, Cardinale M. 2021. Domestication affects the composition, diversity, and co-occurrence of the cereal seed microbiota. Journal of Advanced Research 31:75−86

    doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.12.008

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Ahemad M, Kibret M. 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King Saud University - Science 26:1−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. 2008. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research 163:173−81

    doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Bargaz A, Elhaissoufi W, Khourchi S, Benmrid B, Borden KA, et al. 2021. Benefits of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on belowground crop performance for improved crop acquisition of phosphorus. Microbiological Research 252:126842

    doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126842

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Battisti M, Moretti B, Sacco D, Grignani C, Zavattaro L. 2022. Soil Olsen P response to different phosphorus fertilization strategies in long-term experiments in NW Italy. Soil Use and Management 38:549−563

    doi: 10.1111/sum.12701

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. 2012. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science 17:478−86

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Bi QF, Zheng BX, Lin XY, Li KJ, Liu XP, et al. 2018. The microbial cycling of phosphorus on long-term fertilized soil: Insights from phosphate oxygen isotope ratios. Chemical Geology 483:56−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.02.013

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Billah M, Khan M, Bano A, Hassan TU, Munir A, et al. 2019. Phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria: Keys for sustainable agriculture. Geomicrobiology Journal 36:904−16

    doi: 10.1080/01490451.2019.1654043

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Bulgarelli D, Garrido-Oter R, Münch PC, Weiman A, Dröge J, et al. 2015. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host & Microbe 17:392−403

    doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.011

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Bünemann EK, Oberson A, Liebisch F, Keller F, Annaheim KE, et al. 2012. Rapid microbial phosphorus immobilization dominates gross phosphorus fluxes in a grassland soil with low inorganic phosphorus availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 51:84−95

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.012

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Carrillo J, Ingwell LL, Li X, Kaplan I. 2019. Domesticated tomatoes are more vulnerable to negative plant–soil feedbacks than their wild relatives. Journal of Ecology 107:1753−66

    doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13157

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Castagno LN, Sannazzaro AI, Gonzalez ME, Pieckenstain FL, Estrella MJ. 2021. Phosphobacteria as key actors to overcome phosphorus deficiency in plants. Annals of Applied Biology 178:256−67

    doi: 10.1111/aab.12673

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Castrillo G, Teixeira PJPL, Paredes SH, Law TF, de Lorenzo L, et al. 2017. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 543:513−18

    doi: 10.1038/nature21417

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884−i890

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Clausing S, Polle A. 2020. Mycorrhizal phosphorus efficiencies and microbial competition drive root P uptake. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3:54

    doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00054

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Demirer GS, Gibson DJ, Yue X, Pan K, Elishav E, et al. 2023. Phosphate deprivation-induced changes in tomato are mediated by an interaction between brassinosteroid signaling and zinc. New Phytologist 239:1368−83

    doi: 10.1111/nph.19007

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Dey G, Banerjee P, Sharma RK, Maity JP, Etesami H, et al. 2021. Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria — A Review. Agronomy 11:1552

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081552

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. 2006. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10:996−98

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Finkel OM, Salas-González I, Castrillo G, Spaepen S, Law TF, et al. 2019. The effects of soil phosphorus content on plant microbiota are driven by the plant phosphate starvation response. PLoS Biology 17:e3000534

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000534

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    de la Fuente Cantó C, Simonin M, King E, Moulin L, Bennett MJ, et al. 2020. An extended root phenotype: the rhizosphere, its formation and impacts on plant fitness. The Plant Journal 103:951−64

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14781

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Hassani MA, Durán P, Hacquard S. 2018. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6:58

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Hiruma K, Gerlach N, Sacristán S, Nakano RT, Hacquard S, et al. 2016. Root endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent. Cell 165:464−74

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.028

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Isidra-Arellano MC, Delaux PM, Valdés-López O. 2021. The Phosphate Starvation Response System: Its Role in the Regulation of Plant–Microbe Interactions. Plant and Cell Physiology 62:392−400

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab016

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Jia X, Wang L, Zeng H, Yi K. 2021. Insights of intracellular/intercellular phosphate transport and signaling in unicellular green algae and multicellular land plants. New Phytologist 232:1566−71

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17716

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Kalayu G. 2019. Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms: Promising Approach as Biofertilizers. International Journal of Agronomy 2019:e4917256

    doi: 10.1155/2019/4917256

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Lang M, Bei S, Li X, Kuyper TW, Zhang J. 2019. Rhizoplane Bacteria and Plant Species Co-determine Phosphorus-Mediated Microbial Legacy Effect. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:2856

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02856

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Li H, He K, Zhang Z, Hu Y. 2023. Molecular mechanism of phosphorous signaling inducing anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 196:121−29

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.029

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Liang JL, Liu J, Jia P, Yang TT, Zeng QL, et al. 2020. Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining. The ISME Journal 14:1600−13

    doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0632-4

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Liu J, Abdelfattah A, Norelli J, Burchard E, Schena L, et al. 2018. Apple endophytic microbiota of different rootstock/scion combinations suggests a genotype-specific influence. Microbiome 6:18

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0403-x

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Liu F, Hewezi T, Lebeis SL, Pantalone V, Grewal PS, et al. 2019. Soil indigenous microbiome and plant genotypes cooperatively modify soybean rhizosphere microbiome assembly. BMC Microbiology 19:201

    doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1572-x

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    López-Arredondo D, Leyva-González M, González-Morales S, López-Bucio J, Herrera-Estrella L. 2014. Phosphate Nutrition: Improving Low-Phosphate Tolerance in Crops. Annual review of plant biology 65:95−123

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Lu JL, Jia P, Feng SW, Wang YT, Zheng J, et al. 2022. Remarkable effects of microbial factors on soil phosphorus bioavailability: A country-scale study. Global Change Biology 28:4459−71

    doi: 10.1111/gcb.16213

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Lu YT, Li MY, Cheng KY, Tan CM, Su LW, et al. 2014. Transgenic plants that express the phytoplasma effector SAP11 show altered phosphate starvation and defense responses. Plant Physiology 164:1456−69

    doi: 10.1104/pp.113.229740

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957−63

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Martínez-Romero E, Aguirre-Noyola JL, Taco-Taype N, Martínez-Romero J, Zuñiga-Dávila D. 2020. Plant microbiota modified by plant domestication. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 43:126106

    doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126106

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Oberson A, Friesen DK, Rao IM, Bühler S, Frossard E. 2001. Phosphorus Transformations in an Oxisol under contrasting land-use systems: The role of the soil microbial biomass. Plant and Soil 237:197−210

    doi: 10.1023/A:1013301716913

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Olsen S r. , Sommers L e. 1983. Phosphorus. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 403–430.

    Google Scholar

    Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O, Jin Z, Tringe SG, et al. 2013. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110:6548−53

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302837110

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S. 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect. Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 84:1−186

    Google Scholar

    Pérez-Jaramillo JE, de Hollander M, Ramírez CA, Mendes R, Raaijmakers JM, et al. 2019. Deciphering rhizosphere microbiome assembly of wild and modern common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in native and agricultural soils from Colombia. Microbiome 7:114

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0727-1

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Pérez-Jaramillo JE, Mendes R, Raaijmakers JM. 2016. Impact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions. Plant Molecular Biology 90:635−44

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Raaijmakers JM, Kiers ET. 2022. Rewilding plant microbiomes. Science 378:599−600

    doi: 10.1126/science.abn6350

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Ren Y, Yu G, Shi C, Liu L, Guo Q, et al. 2022. Majorbio Cloud: A one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. iMeta 1:e12

    doi: 10.1002/imt2.12

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75:7537−41

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Seeling B, Zasoski RJ. 1993. Microbial effects in maintaining organic and inorganic solution phosphorus concentrations in a grassland topsoil. Plant and Soil 148:277−84

    doi: 10.1007/BF00012865

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, et al. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology 12:R60

    doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Shi J, Zhao B, Zheng S, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. 2021. A phosphate starvation response-centered network regulates mycorrhizal symbiosis. Cell 184:5527−5540.E18

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.030

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Smulders L, Benítez E, Moreno B, López-García Á, Pozo MJ, et al. 2021. Tomato Domestication Affects Potential Functional Molecular Pathways of Root-Associated Soil Bacteria. Plants 10:1942

    doi: 10.3390/plants10091942

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. 1994. Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 44:846−49

    doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Sugito T, Yoshida K, Takebe M, Shinano T, Toyota K. 2010. Soil microbial biomass phosphorus as an indicator of phosphorus availability in a Gleyic Andosol. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 56:390−98

    doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00483.x

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Suleman M, Yasmin S, Rasul M, Yahya M, Atta BM, et al. 2018. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat. PLoS ONE 13:e0204408

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204408

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Sun X, Song B, Xu R, Zhang M, Gao P, et al. 2021. Root-associated (rhizosphere and endosphere) microbiomes of the Miscanthus sinensis and their response to the heavy metal contamination. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China) 104:387−98

    doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.12.019

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A. 2015. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytologist 206:1196−206

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13312

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Wang X, Gao L, Jiao C, Stravoravdis S, Hosmani PS, et al. 2020. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nature Communications 11:5817

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19682-0

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73:5261−67

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Wang JL, Liu KL, Zhao XQ, Gao GF, Wu YH, et al. 2022. Microbial keystone taxa drive crop productivity through shifting aboveground-belowground mineral element flows. The Science of the Total Environment 811:152342

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152342

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Xu H, Zhang J, Guo X, Qu B, Liu Y, et al. 2021. Planting, Sample Collection and Library Preparation of 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing for Rice Root Microbiomes. Microbiome Protocols eBook Bio-101:e2003697(in Chinese)

    doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2003697

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Xu L, Zhao H, Wan R, Liu Y, Xu Z, et al. 2019. Identification of vacuolar phosphate efflux transporters in land plants. Nature Plants 5:84−94

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0334-3

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Zhang Y, Wang L, Guo Z, Xu L, Zhao H, et al. 2022. Revealing the underlying molecular basis of phosphorus recycling in the green manure crop Astragalus sinicus. Journal of Cleaner Production 341:130924

    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130924

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

    Zhou H, Ma A, Zhou X, Chen X, Zhang J, et al. 2022. Phosphorus Shapes Soil Microbial Community Composition and Network Properties During Grassland Expansion Into Shrubs in Tibetan Dry Valleys. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:848691

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.848691

    CrossRef    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Yu J, Wang L, Jia X, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. 2023. Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress. Soil Science and Environment 2:10 doi: 10.48130/SSE-2023-0010
    Yu J, Wang L, Jia X, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. 2023. Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress. Soil Science and Environment 2:10 doi: 10.48130/SSE-2023-0010

Figures(7)

Article Metrics

Article views(5534) PDF downloads(576)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress

Soil Science and Environment  2 Article number: 10  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Plant domestication via various agricultural practices, e.g., variety selection and fertilizer application, has resulted in a narrowed plant genetic diversity in modern cultivars and also altered soil ancestral microbiota. The effect of the changes in plant genetic background and/or soil fertility on the plant root-associated microbial community assembly is largely unknown. Here, the differences of bacterial community compositions in root-associated compartments of cultivated and wild tomato accessions were investigated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing under phosphorus (P) limitation. Results showed that wild tomato Solanum pimpinellifolium 'LA1589' presented a less sensitive stress response and possessed a less diverse microbiome under low phosphorus (LP) condition than cultivar Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme 'ZheYingFen No.1'. The impact of plant domestication on microbial diversity increased from rhizosphere to endosphere and from P-replete to P-depleted conditions. Further investigation indicated that wild LA1589 may cope with P deficiency by recruiting more LP-enriched microbes and more phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Comparison analysis with two additional modern tomato cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum cv. MoneyMaker and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Alisa Craig) showed that components of the microbial community were conserved in all these three cultivars. Collectively, our results clarified that domestication shifted the root-associated microbiome composition and exploring beneficial microbes in wild species may contribute to efficient use of soil nutrients and reduction in the use of fertilizers in agriculture.

    • Plant domestication brought wild ancestors into cultivated crops with a series of new traits according to human interest in a reliable food supply, but the domestication process also narrowed genetic diversity of crop plants (Doebley et al., 2006). Meanwhile, domestication was accompanied by habitat expansion and agricultural inputs (water, fertilizer, pesticides) -dependent management practice (Raaijmakers & Kiers, 2022). These agricultural managements strongly changed soil environment, especially the soil fertility and the plant root-associated microbiome in soil. Yet, it's unclear what the variation of rhizosphere microbiome is during domestication in response to the increased availability of nutrients in soil, supposing that the wild plants live in poor soil while modern cultivars live in fertile soil.

      Plant genetics itself can shape the rhizosphere microbiome, which was reported in maize (Peiffer et al., 2013) , barley (Bulgarelli et al., 2015) and apple trees (Liu et al., 2018). It's generally hypothesized that wild species possess a stronger ability to establish beneficial contact with the microbiome as compared to modern cultivars (Liu et al., 2019; Pérez-Jaramillo et al., 2016). Carrillo et al. (2019) found that domesticated tomatoes were more vulnerable to negative plant-soil feedback than their wild relatives. In this way, the rhizosphere microbiome of wild species may serve as a valuable reservoir of microbial genera that disappeared in modern cultivars. Since more and more microbiota are detected and proven as the environmently-friendly alternative to chemical fertilizers (Castagno et al., 2021), correctly interpreting the root-associated microbial assembly shaped by domestication will help to explore plant microbiota for crop growth and production in sustainable development of modern agriculture.

      Phosphorus (P) is a vital macronutrient required for most fundamental developmental and metabolism processes in plants (Jia et al., 2021). However, inorganic phosphate (Pi) easily forms insoluble complexes or precipitates with organic matter or mineral cations in soil, which are unavailable to plant roots. Plants have developed numerous morphological, physiological, and molecular strategies to mobilize and acquire soil Pi, as well as to interact with soil microorganisms (Isidra-Arellano et al., 2021). Plants adjust their growth and metabolic activity by activating the Pi starvation response systems which are also crucial for plants to recruit beneficial microbes to provide them with Pi (Finkel et al., 2019; Isidra-Arellano et al., 2021). Microbial genes encoding P-mineralizing enzymes, including acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and phytase, were considered as predictors of soil P bioavailability and confirmed as the effects of microbial factors on soil P mobilization (Lu et al., 2022). In addition, some microbes were found to release metabolic compounds that can protect plants from P starvation or other abiotic stresses and stimulate their growth (Hassani et al., 2018).

      Plant root-associated microbiomes, including both the rhizosphere and the endosphere microbial community, are referred to as the second or the extension of the plant genome (Berendsen et al., 2012; Vandenkoornhuyse et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2021). Beneficial characteristics presented by root-associated microbes may be crucial in soils with low available P (Bargaz et al., 2021). Bacteria that can solubilize and mineralize inorganic and organic P, that is, phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB), can mediate P dynamics on the soil-root-microbe continuum, enhance the capacity of plants to acquire P, and benefit crop growth performance (Bargaz et al., 2021). Several taxa (in Hypocreales, Bryobacter, Solirubrobacterales, Thermomicrobiales, Roseiflexaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Methylobacteriaceae, and Gemmatimonadaceae) exhibited the capability of solubilizing P in maize rhizoplane (Lang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022). Apart from the notable bacterial genera, including Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Actinomycetes, symbiotic nitrogenous rhizobia and nematofungus Arthrobotrys oligospora were also reported to have P-solubilizing activity (Kalayu, 2019). A novel P-solubilizing microbial taxa harboring glucose dehydrogenase gene showed a strong correlation with bioavailable P in soil (Liang et al., 2020). Furthermore, PSB inoculation not only modulates plant root development but also enhances plant nutrient acquisition by up-regulating the expression of Pi transporters and stimulating the production of organic acids, phytohormones, and enzymes (Suleman et al., 2018; Billah et al., 2019). Thus, investigating the microbiome composition and finding out the vigor microbes that thrive in P-deficiency soil is crucial in agriculture.

      Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is a high-value vegetable crop worldwide (FAO, http://www.fao.org/faostat) (Peralta et al., 2008). S. pimpinellifolium (SP), the closest wild progenitor of the cultivated tomato, was domesticated to give rise to S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme (SLC) in South America and the latter was then improved into big fruited tomato S. lycopersicum var. lycopersicum (SLL) in Mesoamerica (Wang et al., 2020). Previous studies on the effects of P starvation on plant microbiomes have been mainly focused on responses to various genotypes (Finkel et al., 2019; Isidra-Arellano et al., 2021; Shi et al., 2021). However, little is known about the combined effects of the plant genetic background and soil P availability on the tomato rhizosphere and endophytic microbiota.

      Here, we attempted to examine: (i) the effect of soil P availability on microbial composition of wild tomato and modern relatives, (ii) the interplay between the soil P and varieties in shaping the plant microbial composition, (iii) the composition and functional differences of microbiome between the domesticated and wild tomato. Therefore, we performed a pot experiment with four representative tomato accessions (one wild SP, one modern SLC with another two modern SLL accessions) to check their morphological and physiological characteristics in response to P-replete and P-deplete soil conditions. Furthermore, using an amplicon sequencing survey of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes, we investigated the diversity, composition and function prediction of the root-associated microbes between the domesticated and the wild tomatoes under different soil P availability conditions. Our study will provide cues for searching beneficial microbial resources for efficient use of soil P in agriculture.

    • The soil was collected from the field without P fertilization at Yucheng Comprehensive Experimental Station of the Chinese Academy of Science in Yucheng County of Shandong Province, China (N 36°49′, E 116°34′). The soil type is light fluvo-aquic soil. Basic physicochemical characteristics were as follows: Olsen-P 3.7 mg/kg, total nitrogen 1.07 g/kg, available K 206.7 mg/kg, organic matter 8.93 g/kg, pH 7.6. Four tomato accessions named S. pimpinellifolium 'LA1589' (SP), S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme 'ZheYingFen No.1' (SLC), S. lycopersicum cv. 'MoneyMaker' (SLL), and S. lycopersicum cv. 'Alisa Craig' (SLL) were tested (hereafter termed LA, ZYF, MM, and Alisa, respectively). LA is a wild tomato accession and others are all cultivated tomato varieties. The seeds were kindly provided by Dr. Hongjian Wan from the Vegetable Research Institute of Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

    • The experiment included two variables: soil P availability (Moderate P and Low P supply, hereafter MP and LP) and tomato accessions (ZYF, MM, Alisa and LA) with four replicates. In addition, two mock soils (MP and LP) without plants were included as blank. All pots were filled with 2 kg mixture substrate of low P soils, perlite, and vermiculite in a 2:1:1 ratio (v/v/v). Every pot added 800 ml nutrient solution containing 0.2 g CO(NH2)2, 0.4 g K2SO4, and 2 g Ca(H2PO4)2 (MP) or 0 g Ca(H2PO4)2 (LP) as base fertilizer before the transplanting. Seeds were surface-sterilized by soaking in 70% ethanol for 2 min and immersed in 5% NaClO for 15 min, then rinsed three times with sterile water. Seeds were propagated on filter paper with sterile water and kept in a dark culture chamber until germination. Five germinating seeds were transferred to the pots and then thinned to three plants per pot. Pots were randomly arranged in the greenhouse with an average temperature of 28 °C, 13 h daylight, and watered up to 70% of the maximum water holding capacity.

    • After four-week growth in the greenhouse, pots and the second leaf from the top down were photographed. The height and shoot biomass of tomato plants were measured. Shoots were collected directly into liquid nitrogen for further measurements of Pi and anthocyanin concentrations. The molybdenum-antimony resistance colorimetric method was used to determine the Pi concentration in the shoots of plants (Xu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2022). Anthocyanin concentration was measured by a modified method (Lu et al., 2014). Briefly, 100 mg frozen homogenized leaves were weighed and extracted overnight at 4 °C with the extracting solution of methanol : HCl : water [18:1:81]. Mix and vortex properly after adding the chloroform followed by centrifugation, and the absorbance value of supernatant was measured at A535 and A657 using Infinite M200 Pro NanoQuant (Tecan, Austria). The Anthocyanin concentration was calculated as A535-657/g FW. Soil available phosphorus (Olsen-P) was estimated by extraction with NaHCO3, and determined by the molybdenum blue method using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at A700 (Olsen & Sommers, 1983).

    • The rhizospheric soil and root samples were harvested following a previous protocol (Xu et al., 2021). Briefly, the remaining underground parts with soil were carefully removed from pots and peripheral soil was gently stripped from the root system. Soil loosely adhered to the roots was slapped until no more soil dropped and collected for measuring soil available P. For the rhizospheric soil, approximately 1 mm surface soil adhered to the root was submerged in 50 ml tubes with 30 ml PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline) at pH 7.0 containing 130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4, and 3 mM NaH2PO4. Soil suspensions were centrifuged and the supernatants were sucked off. Subsequently, soil samples were merged in 2 ml tubes. For the root samples, roots were washed three times with PBS and shaken on the flat shaking table (180 rpm, 15 min) to remove the attached soil. Then washed roots were drained on filter paper and collected in 2 ml tubes. Soil and root samples were stored at −80 °C until processing. All the reagents, consumables, and implements used above were sterilized beforehand.

    • Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from rhizospheric soil and root samples using an E.Z.N.A.® soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was checked on 1% agarose gel, and DNA concentration and purity were quantified with NanoDrop 2000 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA). The hypervariable region V5-V7 of the 16S rRNA gene was first amplified using the primers 799F (5'-AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG-3') and 1392R (5'-ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC-3') by an ABI GeneAmp® 9700 PCR thermocycler (ABI, CA, USA). Then the 593 bp amplified fragment was used as the template for the second-round amplification (799F and 1193R: 5'-ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC-3'). The PCR amplification of 16S rRNA gene was performed as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 27/13 (first/second round) cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, and single extension at 72 °C for 10 min, and end at 4 °C. The PCR mixtures contain 5× TransStart FastPfu buffer 4 μL, 2.5 mM dNTPs 2 μL, forward primer (5 μM) 0.8 μL, reverse primer (5 μM) 0.8 μL, TransStart FastPfu DNA Polymerase 0.4 μL, template DNA 10 ng, and ddH2O up to 20 μL. The reactions were run in triplicate. The products were extracted from 2% agarose gels and purified using an AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and quantified using Quantus™ Fluorometer (Promega, USA).

      The purified amplicons were pooled in an equimolar concentration and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) according to the standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: PRJNA831021).

    • The raw 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing reads were demultiplexed, quality-filtered using fastp version 0.20.0 (Chen et al., 2018), and merged by FLASH version 1.2.7 (Magoč & Salzberg, 2011) with the following criteria: (i) The 300 bp reads were truncated at any site receiving an average quality score of less than 20 over a 50 bp sliding window. The truncated reads that were shorter than 50 bp and reads containing ambiguous characters were discarded; (ii) Only overlapping sequences longer than 10 bp were assembled according to their overlapped sequence. The maximum mismatch ratio of the overlap region was 0.2. Reads that could not be assembled were discarded; (iii) Samples were distinguished according to the barcode and primers and the sequence direction was adjusted. Exact barcode matching was required, a two nucleotide mismatch in primer matching was allowed.

      Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with a 97% similarity cutoff using UPARSE version 7.1, and chimeric sequences were identified and removed (Edgar, 2013; Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994). The taxonomy of each OTU representative sequence was assigned using the RDP Classifier version 2.2 (Wang et al., 2007) against the 16S rRNA database Silva v138 with a confidence threshold of 70%.

    • The data for the physiological parameters were visualized in GraphPad Prism v7.04 and the statistical test was analyzed in SPSS Statistics (version 25). Statistical analysis of microbiome data was mainly performed using the online platform Majorbio Cloud Platform (www.majorbio.com) (Ren et al., 2022). All samples were normalized to the same sequence depth. Rarefaction curves were generated to estimate the sequencing depth. OTUs were used to calculate α-diversity indices (Chao1 estimator) using mothur (v1.30.2 https://mothur.org/wiki/download_mothur/) (Schloss et al., 2009). Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities metrics was performed and visualized in R (version 3.3.1) to understand the bacterial community structure. Permutational Multivariate Analysis Of Variance (PERMANOVA, 999 permutations) was used to analyze the microbial community composition structure. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the relation between soil Olsen-P concentration and the microbial diversity of samples. Linear discriminant analysis coupled with an effect size measurements (LEfSe) analysis was conducted to search for enriched taxa in different samples, with an LDA score of at least 3.5 (Segata et al., 2011). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed with FDR corrections to compare the bacterial abundance between two groups on the phylum and family levels.

    • To examine the effects of soil P nutrient variation on different tomato genotypes, a greenhouse pot experiment was performed by using a cultivated tomato Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme 'ZheYingFen No.1' and its closest wild relatives Solanum pimpinellifolium 'LA1589' (hereafter termed ZYF and LA). The plant growth was significantly suppressed by LP treament, irrespective of the genotypes (Fig. 1a). However, wild LA presented less loss of plant height (indicated by ratio of height between LP:MP, 28.3%) and shoot biomass (10.8%) in comparison to ZYF (22.5% and 8.5%) (Fig.1b). It's worth noting that LA showed a significantly less reduction in shoot Pi concentration than that of ZYF, and the ratio was 20.4% and 7.7%, respectively. In contrast to ZYF, LA accumulated much less anthocyanin under LP condition, accounting for two and 18 times accumulation in LA and ZYF, respectively. These results suggested that the wild tomato LA was less sensitive to P-deficiency compared with the domesticated tomato ZYF.

      Figure 1. 

      Plant growth, Pi concentration and anthocyanin content of domesticated tomato ZYF and its wild relatives LA under MP and LP treatments. (a) Plant growth and leaf morphology of the two accessions. Left and right panels on a black background for each accession are the front and top view of the pots, respectively. Scale bar = 10 cm. Left and right panels on a white background for each accession are the obverse and reverse of leaves, respectively. Scale bar = 3 cm. (b) LP: MP ratio values of the physiological responses (represented by height, shoot biomass, shoot Pi and anthocyanin) between the two tomato accessions. Data and error bars were means ± SD and significance testing was analyzed between the two accessions using t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). MP, Moderate P; LP, Low P.

    • To investigate the effect of soil P contents on the tomato root-associated microbiome assembly, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to determine the bacterial community profiles under MP and LP treatment. A total of 5,388,497 optimized sequences with 2,033,379,389 bp were obtained by sequence filtration for 82 samples, and the average sequence length was 377 bp (Supplemental Table S1). All the samples were subsampled to the same depth, resulting in 20,445 sequences retained in each sample and 4,379 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% sequence similarity. The coverage index for observed OTUs was 97.66 ± 0.004, and rarefaction curves were slightly flattened, which together indicated that enough reads were sequenced and could be used for further analysis (Supplemental Fig. S1).

      To better understand the microbiome variation along the domestication path, we made comparisons of microbial community composition between ZYF and LA. The microbial α-diversity, represented by the Chao index, decreased from MP to LP conditions irrespective of plant genotype or ecological niche (Fig. 2a). Specifically, a significant decline of microbial α-diversity was observed under LP condition when compared with MP, except for that of the rhizospheric microbes for ZYF with a slight decrease. For the endophyte, the α-diversity was significantly lower in the microbial community of the wild tomato LA compared with that of the cultivar ZYF. For the rhizosphere, a similar trend was observed under LP condition, while there were no significant differences under MP condition. These results demonstrated that the wild tomato LA has a less abundant and diverse microbiome under low P condition compared with the domesticated tomato.

      Figure 2. 

      The α-diversity and β-diversity of bacterial community and their correlation with soil P contents. (a) The α-diversity calculated by using Chao index of 16S rRNA sequences in rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial community of ZYF and LA samples under MP and LP treatments. Statistically significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc test (p < 0.05). (b) The β-diversity represented by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PcoA) analysis based on bray_curtis dissimilarities (left panel) depicts the similarity and differences of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial community in ZYF and LA samples. The boxplots (right panel) showed discrete distribution of different groups of samples along the PC1 axis. (c) Linear regression reveals the correlation between rhizosphere/endophytic microbial diversity (Chao and PC1) and Olsen-P. R2 represented the percentage of variability explained by the regression line.

    • Regarding the β-diversity, multi-way Principal Coordinates Analysis (n_PCA) presented a differential microbial community between the two tomato accessions, especially for the root endogenous bacteria (Supplemental Fig. S2). Despite the rhizosphere and endosphere microbiome being tightly linked, PERMANOVA analysis revealed that niche differentiation explained most (64.9%) of the variance in the bacterial community structure (p < 0.001), and P treatment explained 5.9% of the total variability (p < 0.05, Supplemental Table S2). A further separate investigation in the rhizosphere microbiome community displayed a distinct separation by P treatment, while no significant separation was shown between genotypes (Fig. 2b, Supplemental Table S3). For the endosphere, both P treatment and tomato genotype had a significant impact on differentiated endophytic microbial composition (Fig. 2b, Supplemental Table S3). This suggested that the genetic factor effects on microbial community increased from rhizosphere to endosphere. Moreover, the separation extent of the microbial community between LA and ZYF under the LP condition was larger than that under MP, indicating that genetic factor effects on microbial community increased from P-rich to P-deprivation conditions. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that microbial composition was strongly correlated with Olsen-P concentration in the soil, which was also consistent with the results observed with α- and β-diversity dissimilarity between the two Pi concentrations (Fig. 2c).

    • Given the effects of domestication on the root-associated microbial diversity, we further investigated the differences in the relative abundance of bacterial taxa under normal conditions. The concrete composition under MP condition at different taxonomic levels were compared. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota were the most dominant bacteria either in ZYF or LA (Fig. 3a). In the rhizosphere, they were more abundant in ZYF than in LA, while the opposite distribution was found in the endosphere. Proteobacteria were far more abundant in the endosphere than in the rhizosphere, accounting for about 70% of the whole endophytic microbiome, and Firmicutes were more abundant in the rhizosphere. The proportion of Acidobacteriota was higher in the rhizosphere microbiome of cultivated tomatoes than in that of the wild, which was consistent with a previous study (Smulders et al., 2021). At the family level, Nocardioidaceae, Geodermatophilaceae and Nitrospiraceae were more abundant in the rhizosphere of cultivated tomato ZYF, and the abundance of Hyphomicrobiaceae was higher in wild tomato LA (Fig. 3b). For the endophyte, the family Xanthomonadaceae was significantly more abundant in ZYF, while LA was significantly enriched with Rhizobiaceae and Devosiaceae. At the genus level, Bacillus, Allorhizobium, Devosia, Sphingobium, Lechevalieria and Streptomyces were enriched in LA, and Nocardioides were enriched in ZYF (Fig. 3c). Among them, Bacillus, Streptomyces and Nocardioides were reported to have P-solubilizing capacity(de la Fuente Cantó et al., 2020). According to FAPROTAX analysis, ZYF tended to recruit microbes that were associated with plant pathogens, while LA tended to be enriched with nitrogen utilization bacteria (Supplemental Fig. S3). These results showed that cultivated and wild tomatoes could recruit different types and functions of microbes under regular P supply, indicating that they may have different environmental interaction and adaptation strategies.

      Figure 3. 

      Differential abundance of rhizosphere/endophytic bacterial community between ZYF and LA under MP treatment at (a) phylum, (b) family, and (c) genus levels. (a) Bacterial community barplot analysis depicting the relative abundance of the rhizosphere/endophytic microbial communities of ZYF and LA at the phylum level. (b) Wilcoxon rank-sum tests followed by fdr corrections were performed between rhizosphere (top) and endophytic (bottom) bacterial communities of ZYF and LA under MP conditions at the family level. (c) Bubble plot showing the abundance (depicted by size) and the higher taxon (depicted by color) at the phylum level of the top 30 abundant microbial genera present in the rhizosphere/endophytic microbial communities of ZYF and LA.

    • The observed differences in microbiome composition between the two tomato accessions led us to explore more in the differential recruitment of bacterial taxa with particular attention to the LP condition. The bacteria genera that positively and negatively correlated with soil P concentration were identified through correlation network analysis, which showed that LA recruited more LP-enriched bacteria genera than ZYF irrespective of the niches (Fig. 4a). The indicator species of ZYF and LA under LP condition were obtained by integrating the results from the correlation network and the indicator species analysis (Supplemental Table S4). It was found that Solirubrobacter was the common indicator genus in the rhizosphere of ZYF and LA. Nocardioides and Phenylobacterium are common indicator bacteria in the endosphere. Among them, the genera Nocardioides, Sphingomonas, and Bradyrhizobium were reported to have P solubilization capacity, while the adaptation mechanism of the rest of the bacteria in withstanding low P environments needs further study.

      Figure 4. 

      Enriched microbial genera and PSB proportions in ZYF and LA. (a) Two-way correlation networks based on Spearman correlation coefficients showed interaction between environmental factor (soil Olsen-P) and top 50 bacterial composition of total abundance on genus level (absolute value of correlation coefficient ≥ 0.5, p-value < 0.05). The size and color of the node represented bacterial species abundance and the corresponding family it belongs to, respectively. The color and the width of the connecting lines were the nature and the strength of correlation. Red and green lines correspond to positive and negative correlation. (b) The relative abundance of several phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) genera in the rhizosphere/endophytic microbial communities of ZYF and LA. ANP-Rhizobium, Allorhizobium- Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium.

      To further investigate whether the wild species LA can recruit more PSB, we searched for 10 bacterial genera that were reported to have PSB and compared the relative abundance of them between ZYF and LA (Fig. 4b). In the endosphere, LA harbors far more PSB than that in ZYF, with the genus Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium accounting for most. The proportion of PSB in ZYF decreased from rhizosphere to endosphere either under MP or under LP conditions, while that in LA increased in the endosphere, suggesting that the wild tomato may have a more intimate relationship with the PSB.

    • The enrichment of LP condition associated microbes in LA raised the question of whether these microbes played roles in helping the wild species LA to respond LP. We performed functional prediction analysis to identify the functional diversity of the LP-enriched microbiome. Significant differences were observed between ZYF and LA endophytes. KEGG pathway analysis showed that those LP-enriched endophytes were primarily associated with environmental, genetic information processing, cellular processes and diseases in ZYF, with more genes related to energy, cofactors and vitamin metabolism, xenobiotic biodegradation and metabolism (Fig. 5a, b). More functional groups related to metabolism and organismal systems were observed in LA, including energy sources and biosynthetic precursors' metabolism and membrane transport. Notably, COG function annotation analysis demonstrated that the enriched functional groups included inorganic ion transport and metabolism (Fig. 5c). Though enriched with similar functional composition, the microbiome of ZYF and LA under MP condition presented no significant differences (Supplemental Fig. S4).

      Figure 5. 

      Function differentiation of LP-enriched endophytic microbes between ZYF and LA. (a), (b) KEGG pathway and (c) COG function annotation analysis of the endophytic LP-enriched genera in the correlation network (Fig. 4b) of ZYF and LA. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests followed by fdr corrections were performed between ZYF and LA. ELP, endophytic samples under LP condition.

    • Compared to the wild tomato LA, the cultivar ZYF showed an increased endophyte diversity and presented a separate microbial composition. To assess whether the differences in microbiome assembly were prevalent in tomato cultivars, two large-fruited tomato cultivars Solanum lycopersicum cv. MoneyMaker and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Alisa Craig (hereafter termed MM and Alisa) were added in the same experimental conditions. It was found that shoot Pi concentration and anthocyanin concentration of ZYF under MP condition were between those of the two large fruit varieties, and there was no significant difference among the three varieties under LP condition (Fig. 6a, b). The comparative analysis of microbial α-diversity between domesticated and wild tomatoes showed that the endosphere microbes of domesticated tomatoes presented a higher diversity than that of wild tomatoes, and the same was true in the rhizosphere microbes under LP condition, which were consistent with the previously mentioned results (Fig. 6c). PCoA analysis showed that the microbial community of the wild tomato was significantly different from that of domesticated tomatoes, irrespective of the niche (Fig. 6d).

      Figure 6. 

      Comparative analysis of (a) plant and leaf morphology, (b) physiology traits, and (c), (d) rhizosphere/endophytic microbiome diversity among the three cultivated varieties (ZYF, MM and Alisa) and the wild tomato LA under MP and LP treatments. (a) Plant growth of MM and Alisa. Scale bar = 10 cm. Leaf morphology of MM and Alisa. Scale bar = 3 cm. (b) Shoot Pi concentration and anthocyanin content of three cultivars under MP and LP treatments. Data and error bars were means ± SD and significance testing was analyzed between varieties using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc test, varieties with the same letter are not significantly different. (c) The α-diversity calculated by using Chao index in the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial community of four tomato accessions under MP and LP treatments. (d) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) analysis based on bray_curtis dissimilarities of 16S rRNA sequences of microbiome across all the treated samples under MP and LP conditions. Significance was determined using the nonparametric Adonis test with 999 permutations.

    • To further elaborate on the characteristics of the microbial composition of domesticated tomatoes, Venn diagrams were used to count the shared and specific distribution of bacterial abundance among the three cultivars at the phylum level (Fig. 7a, b). A total of 3,738 and 3,157 OTUs were detected in the rhizosphere and endosphere samples, respectively. Of these, the shared microbiome under both MP and LP represented a large part of the whole community, accounting for 79% and 67.1% in the rhizosphere and endosphere, respectively. Interestingly, shared microbiome distribution of either rhizosphere or endosphere represented a highly similar proportion of microbial abundance, among them Proteobacteria (~55%) accounting for the most abundant phylum, followed by Actinobacteria (26%), Firmicutes (7%) and Chloroflexi (2%). The specific bacterial composition in MP and LP conditions was quite different between the rhizosphere and endosphere. In the rhizosphere, there were more OTUs exclusively found in samples with LP treatment than that with MP treatment (Fig. 7a). The rhizospheric samples under MP were primarily enriched with members of the phyla Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, and Verrucomicrobiota compared with that under LP, while the LP-enriched bacteria mainly belonged to the phyla Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Planctomycetota. For root endogenous bacteria, more specific OTUs were identified in samples under MP than that under LP, accounting for 22.7% and 16.4% of their total bacterial abundance, respectively (Fig. 7b). While MP-enriched bacteria mostly derived from the phyla Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Myxococcota, and Actinobacteriota, the LP-enriched bacteria were mainly from the phyla Firmicutes and Bdellovibrionota.

      Figure 7. 

      Specific differences in microbial composition among three tomato cultivars. Venn diagrams in the middle counted the number of OTUs of (a) rhizosphere and (b) endophytic microbiome under MP, LP&MP and LP conditions. The top and bottom pie diagrams showed shared and specific microbial composition abundance under MP, LP&MP and LP conditions at the phylum level.

    • Deciphering how the changes of the plant genetic background and soil fertility during plant domestication affect the plant root-associated microbial community is of great importance to identify the ancestral and modern microbiota for rewilding and thriving plant microbiomes. In this study, greenhouse growth experiments and high-throughput amplicon sequencing were performed in different tomato accessions to investigate the effect of P-deplete condition on plant growth and the rhizosphere microbial community. As one of the essential nutrients to all living organisms including plants and microorganisms, P was a widely reported driver of the variation in plant growth and soil microbial communities (Zhou et al., 2022). As expected, the tomato plants stunted remarkably when they suffered from P-limitation (Fig. 1a, 6a). The decrease of soil P content also significantly reduced the microbial α-diversity of both rhizosphere and endosphere (Fig. 2a, 6c). Similarly, the microbial β-diversity was more influenced by P limitation rather than by genotypes (Fig. 2b, Supplemental Table S3). Exposing plants to specific stresses such as nutrient deprivation can help search for specific ancestral beneficial microbiota, since the effects of plant genotype on microbiome may be small (Raaijmakers & Kiers, 2022). Our results showed that the separation extent of microbial community under LP condition was higher than that under MP condition, suggesting P-deprivation may amplify the diffential recruitment of microbiota. Subsequent results found a strong correlation between microbial diversity and soil Olsen-P concentration (Fig. 2c). These results indicated that P would be a key driver of the shift observed in plant growth and microbial community diversity.

      Through the comparison between a small fruited tomato cultivar and its closest wild relative, we found that the wild tomato LA was insusceptible to soil P variation, as the fluctuation of plant height, shoot biomass, and shoot Pi in LA was smaller than that in cultivar ZYF (Fig. 1b). Anthocyanin is a natural pigment commonly found in plants and considered as a metabolic markers of nutrient deficiency, such as P deficiency (Li et al., 2023). Comparing the extremely significant induction of anthocyanin in ZYF, LA only harbors a small amount of anthocyanin accumulation, implying distinct strategies for adaptation to low P condition between the domesticated and wild tomatoes. This is similar to reports in another tomato cultivar M82 and the wild S. pennellii that the wild is largely P deprivation insensitive (Demirer et al., 2023). The increased phosphate sensitivity along domestication path may contribute to the reduced adaptability of modern tomatoes to low P soils.

      The domestication and improvement of crops not only changed the way plants respond to P-limitation condition, but also influenced the plant microbiome with the transition from native habitats to agricultural soils (Pérez-Jaramillo et al., 2019). Here, we observed significantly higher endophytic bacterial diversity in domesticated tomatoes compared to their wild relatives (Fig.6c), which implied that domestication contributed to gain more microbial species than to loss them. This is in line with other findings that plant domestication for desirable traits has promoted the microbial population size indirectly (Abdelfattah et al., 2022; Abdullaeva et al., 2021). Plants interact and benefit from the numerous profitable bacteria that live in the proximity of the root or inside the root (de la Fuente Cantó et al., 2020). Analysis of β-diversity revealed a strong niche-based differentiation, where rhizospheric and endophytic samples formed distinct clusters (Supplemental Fig. S2). Respective PERMANOVA analysis showed that the bacterial community composition was more influenced by plant genetic background in the endosphere compared with that in the rhizosphere, conferring endophyte a more intimate relationship with the plant host (Supplemental Table S2). The plant genotype had a smaller effect on microbial community composition than the soil P treatment. According to a suggestion by the Rural Development Programme that fertilization is withdrawn when the Olsen-P exceeds 25 mg/kg (Battisti et al., 2022), the initial Olsen-P concentration of the soil in this study is relatively low (Supplemental Fig. S6). A proposed mechanism underlying this minor influence of varieties might be associated with the harsh P condition in the soil, which has severely impeded root activity and microbial colonization.

      Although a significantly higher α-diversity was observed in the endophytic microbiome of the tomato cultivars, they were also sensitive to the P-deplete stress (Fig. 1b, 6b). The adverse performance of plants and bacteria diversity indicated that the responses of plants to P-deficiency and microbial colonization were not synchronous under hostile trophic conditions. The soil microbes would compete with plant roots for P, particularly in low P soils (Clausing & Polle, 2020). Studies found that microbial biomass can preserve a large amount of available P and slowly release it back into the soil during their turnover process (Seeling & Zasoski, 1993). The finding of Sugito et al. (2010) revealed that the shoot P content of kidney beans was positively related to microbial P, which indicated that the microbial biomass P could be set as a feasible index to estimate soil P content available for plant nutrition. Plant- and microbial-based strategies have the potential to improve the P-use efficiency in the P-depletion zone (López‐Arredondo et al., 2014). Rhizosphere- and root-associated microbes that exhibit the capacity of solubilizing and mobilizing the insoluble P have proved to be a vital part of the P cycle in the low available P agricultural soils (Bargaz et al., 2021). Research showed that immobilized P released from microbial cells might have been transferred to the various P pools, such as water-extractable P, resin-extractable P, and microbial P (Bünemann et al., 2012; Bi et al., 2018). To some extent, those microbes may act as a P sink, since immobilization of Pi by them and the gradual release via microbial turnover of organic P may help to overcome the P limitation (Oberson et al., 2001). The correlation network analysis showed that there were more bacteria colonized in LA under LP condition than in ZYF. LA recruited more PSB in the endosphere, which may be pivotal to helping LA confront with the P-limitation condition.

      Domestication also led to habitat expansion which caused plants to be exposed to diverse microbes. Those microbes that had a common interest with hosts may become novel colonizers in plants (Martínez-Romero et al., 2020). We further examined specific differences in the rhizosphere and endophytic microbiome among various tomato varieties. The common bacteria that consisted in both P sufficient (MP) and P deficient (LP) soil covered over two-thirds of the abundance and exhibited a very similar composition of the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities, suggesting a conserved characteristic of the dominant microbial community across tomato varieties. The exclusive OTUs existed in samples with LP stress might be involved in the potential regulatory mechanism of phosphate starvation. The correlation network showed several families that negatively related to soil P availability, which means they were more abundant under LP than MP condition. These taxa also might be a resource library to seek elite bacterial strains that can maximally accelerate the soil P exploratory capacity of the plant. The differentiation of microbial composition among those varieties is supported by the LEfSe analysis, which showed that Devosiaceae, Burkholderiales, Actinobacteriota and Gammaproteobacteria, Xanthimonadales, Allorhizobium were the most abundant taxa in samples of three cultivars under LP and MP, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S5). Previous studies had identified massive bacterial strains with the capacity to solubilize inorganic P and mineralize organic P, and many of them were also characterized as plant growth-promoting microbes (Ahemad & Kibret, 2014). And results from Dey et al. demonstrated that salt-tolerant PSB such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas sp., Streptomyces sp., and Acinetobacter sp. also displayed P-solubilizing and -mineralizing capacity (Dey et al., 2021). Burkholderia from MM, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium sp. from Alisa were reported to own properties for promoting plant growth by production of hormones like IAA as well as solubilizing P (Ahmad et al., 2008), while this contrasts with the findings from Finkel et al. that Burkholderia was responsible for the reduction of shoot Pi in Arabidopsis under P-limiting condition (Finkel et al., 2019). This might be explained by the shifts of certain bacteria during stress responses, which can be either adaptive to the host plants or adopt opportunistic strategies by the bacteria (Hiruma et al., 2016; Castrillo et al., 2017).

    • This study demonstrated that the declining plant genetic diversity and enhanced soil fertility by domestication have impacts on root-associated microbiome assembly of tomato. The domestication effect increased from rhizosphere to endosphere and from P sufficient to deficient conditions. The tomato wild relative can recruit more LP-enriched microbes and more PSB than modern cultivars under P-limited condition. The cultivars shared a more similar and more conserved microbial composition. Our results suggested that microbes derived from tomato wild ancestors may offer a new way to improve the P use efficiency of modern cultivars.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conceptualization and supervision: Zhu Y, Yi K; pot experiment conducted: Yu J, Wang L, Jia X; sample collection: Wang Z, Yu X; data analysis: Ren S, Yang Y, Ye X, Wu X; draft manuscript preparation: Yu J, Wang L, Jia X; all authors commented on the previous version of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The raw sequencing data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: PRJNA831021).

      • We thank Dr. Hongjian Wan for providing tomato seeds. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFF1000404). Keke Yi was supported by the Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Supplemental Table S1 Summary statistics of the samples.
      • Supplemental Table S2 PERMANOVA analysis of the effects of the niche, P treatment and plant species identity on bacterial community structure.
      • Supplemental Table S3 PERMANOVA analysis of the effects of the P treatment and plant species identity on rhizospheric and endophytic bacterial community structure.
      • Supplemental Table S4 list of indicator genera associated with ZYF and LA as determined by indicator species analysis and correlation network analysis.
      • Supplemental Fig. S1 Coverage index and rarefaction curves for Chao index on OTU level of all the samples showed a good coverage and sequenced deep enough.
      • Supplemental Fig. S2 β-diversity represented by n_pca analysis depicts the similarity and differences of bacterial community in ZYF and LA samples. Circles, triangles and error bar refer to the means and SE on PC1 and PC2, respectively. RMP/RLP, rhizospheric samples; EMP/ELP, endophytic samples.
      • Supplemental Fig. S3 FAPROTAX analysis showed differences in functional endophytic microbial groups within the tomato cultivar ZYF and the wild relatives LA under LP (a) and MP (b) conditions.
      • Supplemental Fig. S4 Comparison analysis of COG functional categories of the specific enrichment bacteria in the correlation network (Fig.4b) between the tomato cultivar ZYF and the wild relatives LA. RMP/RLP, rhizospheric samples; EMP/ELP, endophytic samples.
      • Supplemental Fig. S5 Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) coupled with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) characterized endophytic microbiomes among the varieties under MP and LP soil. Only taxa with LDA scores greater than 3.5 are presented. Prefix p_phyla, c_class, o_order, f_family, and g_genus.
      • Supplemental Fig. S6 The Olsen-P concentration in mock soils and soils grown tomato varieties under different P treatments. MP, Moderate P; LP, Low P.
      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (7)  References (62)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Yu J, Wang L, Jia X, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. 2023. Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress. Soil Science and Environment 2:10 doi: 10.48130/SSE-2023-0010
    Yu J, Wang L, Jia X, Wang Z, Yu X, et al. 2023. Different microbial assembly between cultivated and wild tomatoes under P stress. Soil Science and Environment 2:10 doi: 10.48130/SSE-2023-0010

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return